OCTOBER 27, 1992 MINUTES
"WORLD'S LARGEST RESORT CITY"
(:l I Y COUNC@IL
JR
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
OCTOBER 27,1992
1. CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING - Council Chamber - 4:30 PM
A. OPERATING BUDGET: Five Year Forecast
E. Dean Block, Director, Management and Budget
ii. INFORMAL SESSION - Council Chamber - 5:30 PM
A. CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
B. ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL
C. RECESS TO EXECUTIVE SESSION
Ill. FORMAL SESSION - Council Chamber - 6:00 PM
A. CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
B. INVOCATION: Warren Withrow
Chaplain (Major, USA)
Fort Story
C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
D. ELECTRONIC ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL
E. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
F. MINUTES
1 . PUBLIC HEARING - October 8, 1992
2. INFORMAL & FORMAL SESSIONS - October 13, 1992
G. PRESENTAIION
1. MAYOR'S TROPHY
NORFOLK BOWLING ASSOCIATION
Gene Luke, Past President and Life Member
H. CONFIRMATION OF APPOINTMENTS
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEYS
1. CONSENT AGENDA
All mafters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered in the ordinary course of business
by City Council and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed. If an item is removed from
the Consent Agenda, it will be discussed and voted upon separately.
1 . Resolution applauding the efforts of Tidewater Builders Association and the developers
of the Church Point Subdivision re organization and promotion of Homearama 1992.
2. Resolution establishing a Community Management and Policy Team re implementation
of the Virginia Comprehensive Services Act for At-Risk Youth and Families.
3. Ordinance to AMEND and REORDAIN Section 1-8 of the Code of the City of
Virginia Beach, Virginia, re distribution and sale of bound volumes of, and supplements
to, the City Code.
4. Ordinance to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE a $8,000 grant from the Virginia Institute of
Developmental Disabilities at Virginia Commonwealth University to the FY 1992-1993
Operating Budget of the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and
Substance Abuse re development of respite services to mentally
retarded/developmentally disabled children; and, this appropriation be offset by an
$8,000 increase in estimated revenue.
5. CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY:
ROYAL LIMOUSINE
6. Ordinance authorizing License Refunds in the amount of $3,668.50.
J. RESOLUTION/ORDINANCES
1 Resolution authorizing the City Manager to implement the reoommendations of the
Construction Contract Process Review Team for a period of one (1) year; and, directing
the City Manager report to Council prior to October 31, 1993, outlining the benefits derived
from implementation of the new review process and suggesting any changes or
modification.
2. Ordinances re loan to the Development Authority; and, directing City Staff prepare all
necessary loan documents and an appropriation Ordinance:
a. Alternative No. 1 $ 2.2 Million
b. Alternative No. 2 $ 3.7 Million
C. Alternative No. 3 $11.3 Million
d. Alternative No. 4 $ 6.0 Million
K. PUBUC HEARING
1. PLANNING
a. Petition of LAVIYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION for the
discontinuance, closure and abandonment of a portion of Jade Street beginning
at the Northern boundary of Page Avenue and running in a Northerly direction a
distance of 595 feet, being 60 feet in width and containing 35,700 square feet
(LYNNHAVEN BOROUGH).
Recommendation: WITHDRAWAL
b. Application of JUDEO-CHRISTIAN OUTREACH SHELTER, INC. for a Conditional
Use Permit for a aroup home on the South side of Virginia Beach Boulevard,
540 feet East of North Birdneck Road (1049 and 1053 Virginia Beach Boulevard),
containing 41,382 square feet (LYNNHAVEN BOROUGH).
Deferred: October 13, 1992
Recommendation: APPROVAL
C. Application of AGAPAE WORLD OUTREACH CENTER for a Conditional Use
Permit for a church and related activities in Units 102, 104, 105, 106, 107 and 108,
Princess Anne Shoppes (4402 Princess Anne Road), containing 1.9176 acres
(PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH).
Recommendation: APPROVAL
d. Application of MIRACLES AMUSEMENT CORPORATION for a Conditional Use
Permit for a recreational and amusement faciliiy of an outdoor nature
(children's rides) on the South side of 12th Street, 75 feet East of Pacific Avenue,
containing 19,375 square feet (VIRGINIA BEACH BOROUGH).
Recommendation: DENIAL
e. Application of SECOND CHANCE MINISTRY, INC. for a Conditional Use Permit
for a aroup home on the East side of Princess Anne Road, 518.6 feet South of
Morris Neck Road (584 Princess Anne Road), containing 39,680 square feet
(PUNGO BOROUGH).
Recommendation: DENIAL
f. Application of WILLIAMS HOLDING CORPORATION and JOSEPH E. and JACK
P. BURROUGHS for a Conditional Use @ for sinale family homea in the
AG-1 and AG-2 6aricultural Digtricts on the Southwest side of Seaboard Road,
3500 feet more or less Northwest of Princess Anne Road, containing 264.62 acres
(PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH).
Deferred: June 23, 1992, and September 22, 1992
Recommendation: DENIAL
9. AMEND the City's Comprehensive Plan to revise land use policies and
recommendations affecting those parcels adjacent to and in the general vicinity of
General Booth Boulevard from Oceana Boulevard to Princess Anne Road.
Deferred: July 14, 1992
Recommendation; APPROVAL
h. AMEND the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area Ordinance (Appendix F)
re Resource Management Area Designation, nontidal wetlands definition, erosion
and sediment control for nonconforming structures and uses, swimming pool
exemptions, definition of redevelopment, water dependent facilities, default load
for stormwater management, intensely developed areas and definition of public
roads.
Recommendation: APPROVAL
L. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
M. NEW BUSINESS
1. COUNCIL-SPONSORED ITEM:
a. Resolution directing the City Manager study the financial impact of providing
additional tax relief to elderly and disabled Individuals by increasing the
income and financial worth limitations under Section 35-64 of the Code of the City
of Virginia Beach, Virginia; and, imposing a lower personal property tax rate on
a motor vehicle owned by qualified elderly or disabled individuals as authorized
and allowed by State law.
(Sponsored by Councilman Paul J. Lanteigne)
N. ADJOURNMENT
- CITY COUNCIL PUBUC HEARING
NOVEMBER 24,1992 Formal Session 2:00 PM
(Capital Improvement Program)
If you are physically disabled, hearing or visually impaired
and need assistance at this meeting,
please call the CITY CLERK'S OFFICE at 427-4305 VOICE OR TDD by MONDAY 9:00 AM
10/22/92mim
AGENDA\10-27-92.PLN
RU@H HODGES SM TH CMCI@E 281 C TY HALL BUILDING
Cl@ CLERK MUNIC PAL CENTER
V RGIN A BEACH V RG NIA 23456 9005
27 Octobet 1992
HONORABLE MAVOR
MEMBERS OF CITV COUNCIL
Thi,6 i,6 to "c@n youa ptea,6u)Le 6ot Scheduting the
Decembe)L City Counca Smsion,6.
The Ptanning Com@.6ion witt meet ThuAzday, Novembet 12
zince the EZeventh '" a hoziday. Adv@ing 4o)L the Decembe)L
City Councit must be e-6tab@hed.
Pe)Lhap,s you woutd tike to schedute the meeting @,xom the
Foulith Tue6day to the Thitd Tu@day, Decembe)L 15. Thi6 woutd
,sti,Pt o44eA the t@ee meeting-6 and give att o6 Councit time to
cetebAate theiil hotiday,6.
Ptea6e advi-6e.
Re,6pectiutty,
R H dge, Smith, CMCIAAE
City CteAk
FVI:
Thi6 matte,% @ be on the Coun@ Agenda NovembeA 3, 1992.
M I N U T E S
VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Virginia Beach, Virginia
October 27, 1992
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf called to order the CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING to the YIRGINL4
BF,4CH CITY COUNCIL in the Council Chamber, City Hall Building, on Tuesday, October 27, 1992,
at 4.-30 P.M.
Council Members Present:
John A. Baum, Linwood 0. Branch, Ill, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert
W Clyburn, Robert K Dean, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, John D.
Moss, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf Nancy K Parker and Vice Mayor
William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Absent:
None
- 2 -
CITY MANAGE R'SBRIE FIN G
OPERATING BUDGET. Five Year Forecast
4:30 P.M.
ITEM # 36143
E. Dean Block, Director - Management and Budget, distributed a copy of the FY 1993 through EY 1998
Five Year Forecast entitled: "New Challenges, New Opportunities, New Directions." 7his is the fourth
year the City has provided the Council with a five-year forecast of revenues and expenditures. 7he first
section of the report attempts to demonstrate how the City has improved the efficiency of operations in
the past. 77ie indicators chosen to do this will be refined as the City continues to look at its operations.
However, these indicators display a substantial reduction in the level of resources being used to provide
each unit of service to the residents of this community over the past few years.
77te second section of the report deals with the actual forecast and what it means to the community. Local
economists are predicting a very slow improvement over the forecast period. Based upon revenue
forecasts, which include projected school costs as provided by the school system, an overall deficit in each
of the five-forecast budget years is projected. nis, of course, hinges on the cuts the military imposes on
the Hampton Roads area. In past military cut backs, the Hampton Roads area has been relatively
insulated. 7he Hampton Roads Planning District Coinmission recently released a report outlining their
thoughts on the impact of the military and potentid military reductions on the Hampton Roads region.
Discussions with them have indicated that predicted job growth in other sectors over the next five years
should offset military job reductions. 77ie HRPDC anticipates some realjob growth in the Hampton Roads
economy over the next five years.
Me final section of the report is completely new this year. A rather lengthy list of Potential options for
dealing with the anticipated deficit has been identified. 7-he list is comprised of options for revenue
enhancement, service reduction and cost reduction.
During the last four years the City has experienced for the first time in its history, a slow down in growth
of revenues. Because of actual declines in some revenue streams over the past two years, total growth
for the City has beenflat. Vzrginia Beach has traditionally provided a high level of both basic government
services (ie. police, fire, infrastructure, maititenance and trash collection) as well as a wide variety of
quafity specialized government services (recreation centers, Marine Science Museum libraries and beach
management). 77te demand for government services has generally risen at a rate greater than population
growth since the early 1980@, a trend which is expected to continue. In the past four years, the City, to
a large extent, has addressed the increase in demand for services through streamlining operations and
some painful belt-tightening. Trying to protect all services during this recession, while responding to a
growing demand for service, has inspired staff to be creative in utilizing all available resources. Agencies
have prevented the normal incremental growth in the cost of providing government services by 9% over
the last 4 years, while not significantly impacting the public in most cases. In some cases, demand for one
service dropped off and resources were shifted harder (overtime and less planning time). Moreover,
resources were subject to higher priorities and other services reduced. To illustrate the City's efforts to
meet the need for services while holding costs, a discussion of five different indicators which illustrate
the City's past success has been provided.
7here are five basic ways in which the Staff has identified the City's cost reductionlproductivity
improvement efforts over the past several years. A cost per unit of dentand for each of the City's services
included in the "Denwnd for Services Index" was computed.
7he second way to illustrate the City @ comprehensive effort to control costs and improve productivity, is
to compare the actual operating budgets of City programs to a hypothetical budget - the "normal
increment,al growth " budger To compute this "nornial iticreniental growth " budget, the Staff started with
a specific point in time, in this case FY 1990, and increased that year's approved City operation's budget
by the combined annual growth rate of inflation and population. 7his establishes the level of funding the
City would have experienced had appropriations increased at the combined rate of inflation and
population. 7hese two indicators, inflation plus population, are widely used as measures of "normal"
growth.
October 27, 1992
- 4 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
OPERATING BUDGET. Five Year Forecast
ITEM# 36143 (Continued)
7he fourth method to highlight productivitylcost and service impacts can be illustrated reviewing the
iinpad on the residents paying for government services. 7hese are services such as police, fire, soud
waste collection, park maintenance, road construction, education and libraries which are directly
supported by local taxes. "Comparison of Annual Tax Impact for Virginia Beach, Chesapeake, and
NorfoLk" are contained within the report.
infornwtion regarding the status of the City of Norfolk's school population will be provided.
7he final method that illustrates llirginia Beach's eff-iciency in delivering services while maintaining a low
impact on our residents, is the ratio of employees per 10,000 population. According to a 1990 Census
report, the City's employees to population ratio ranked as the second lowest of the nine compared
Virginia cities. In the same report, the School system ranked as the third highest.
77te five year forecast illustrates, based on best current information, the anticipated revenues from taxes,
fees, the state and the federal government. It is divided into a base scenario and an add on scenario for
employee salary adjustments. Both scenarios contain no tax or fee increases fiom the current approved
leveL
7he forecast for City operations provides for a level of resources which allows for inflation, no increase
in personnel and no recognition of population growth or service demand increases. For this year's
forecast, the City operations number has been separated into its component parts of personnel costs,
operating costs and capital outlay and the funding required to support the opening of facilities which
were not included in the FY 1992-93 Operating Budget. To compute the figures for City operations the
FY 1992-93 approved Operating Budget was utilized as the starting point. For the FY 1993-94
personnel costs, $3.4-MILLION was added (the annualized amount for the 2.5% general increase which
will be awarded January 1, 1993, and the annualized amount for the increase to health insurance ($30
per month with the change approved by City Council in October 1992). For each year thereafter, there
are no additional merit or general increases; however, the Staff has assumed that personnel costs would
increase at approximately three tenths of one percent due to promotions and reclassification. 7he other
two accounts, operating and capital outlay, would increase annually by the rate of inflation.
7his is the first year the School System has provided an official five year forecast of their operational
needs. 77tey have aysumed a growth in student population of approximately 2.5% and address this
increase by adding approximately 100 teaching positions each year. Consequently, projected annual
increases in operating costs range from a low of 5.4% to a high of 8.8%. The capital outlay cost
increases are projected by School staff using a range of 5.6% to 8.8cl..
Funding availability for the next several years is going to be constrained unless the economy significantly
turns around. 77ze City Staff has prepared a "shopping list" of options, some short ter@ some long term.
As suck it does not constitute a particular strategy, but certainly contains the seeds or components of
several potential overall approaches. Aese Options are delineated on pages 19 through 27 of the report.
7he City is in many ways already a "low cost producer" of municipal services.
October 27, 1992
- 5 -
FORMAL SESSION
117RGINL4 BF,4CH CITY COUNCIL
October 27, 1992
6:00 P.M.
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf called to order the FORMAL SESSION of the VIRGINL4 BF,4CH CITY
COUNCIL in the Council Chamber, City Hall Building, on Tuesday, October 27, 1992, at 6:00 P.M.
Council Members Present.-
John A. Baum, Linwood 0. Branch, III, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert W Clyburn,
Robert K Dean, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, John D. Moss, Mayor Meyera E.
Oberndorf, Nancy K Parker and Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Absent.-
None
INVOCATION.- Warren Withrow
Chaplain (Major, U&4)
Fort Story
THERE WAS A MOMENT OF SILENT RESPECT IN MEMORY OF J. A. DANIEL SMITH - CLERK
OF GENERAL DISTRICT COURT.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED S TATES OF AMERIC,4
October 27, 1992
- 6 -
item iii-E.1
CERTIFICATION OF
EXECUTIVE SESSION
ITEM # 36144
Certification was not necessary as no EXECUTIVE SESSION was held.
October 27, 1992
7 -
Item III-F.I.
MINUTES ITEM # 36145
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Sessoms, seconded by Council Lady Parker, City Council APPROVED the
Minutes of the PUBLIC HFARING of October 8, 1992.
Voting: 11-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, Linwood 0. Brancib III, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert W. Clyburn,
Robert K Dean, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, John D. Moss, Mayor Meyera E.
Oberndorf Nancy K Parker and Vice Mayor William D. Sessotm, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent.-
None
October 27, 1992
8
Item III-F.2
MINUTES ITEM # 36146
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Sessona, seconded by Councilman Clyburn, City Council APPROYED the
Minutes of the 17VFORAL4L AND FORMAL SESSIONS of October 13,1992.
Voting: 11-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, Linwood 0. Branc,% III, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert W. Clyburn,
Robert K Dean, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, John D. Moss, Mayor Meyera E.
Oberndorf, Nancy K Parker and Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
None
October 27, 1992
9
Item III-F.3.
ANNOUNCEMENT ITEM # 36147
Mayor Oberndorf recognized the following Scouts in attendance to earn thier Badge in Citizenship:
TROOP 902
David Roberson
TROOP 436
Don Mac Eachern
Scout Master
Anthony Salemi
Senior Patrol Leader
Chip Larkin
Mike Rae
Mike Salenzi
Jason Tice
Kevin Kroll
Jared Mac Eachern
Colin Humphreys
October 27, 1992
- 10 -
Item III-G.I.
PPESENTATION
M4YOR'S TROPHY ITEM # 36148
77ie following presentation was CANCELLED and RESCHEDULED to November 10, 1992:
NORFOLK BOWLING ASSOCL4TION
Gene Luke, Past President and Life Member
October 27, 1992
Item 111-G.2
PRESENTATION ITEM 36149
Pamela Lingle, Director of Public Information, invited all Members of City Council to attend the
STORMWATER KTCKOFF on October 28,1992, at 10:00 A.M. at the rirignia Marine Science Museum.
7'his will consist of a storm stenciling project to make citizens aware of their responsibilities. 7he EPA
estimates that 50% of the pollution in the water system comes from stormwater runoff. 77ie Clean
Community Commission will be overseeing the stenciling. Frances Flanagan, Executive Director of the
Alliance of the Chesapeake Bay, will be speaking at no cost to the City.
Under the Stormwater Management Regulations, the City has a public awareness, public information
campaign.
Miss Lingle presented all Members of City Council with T-Shirts bearing the emblem "WQ - FISH".
October 27, 1992
- 12 -
Item III-G.3.
PPESENTATION ITEM # 36150
Mayor Oberndorf referenced the last Virginia Municipal League Meeting (October 18, 1992 - October
20, 1992). 77ie Public Information Office under the capable leadership of Pamela Lingle developed a
video on Budgeting detailing the ramifications of the Federal and State cuts. 77ie City won an
achievement award for this video.
October 27, 1992
- 13 -
item iii-H.I.
CONFIRAL4TION OF APPOINTMENTS ITEM# 36151
BY CONSENSUS, City Council CONFIRMED APPOINTMENTS:
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEYS
John F. Newhart, Jr.
Administrative Law Section
Charles B. Miller
Litigation Section
October 27, 1992
- 14 -
item iii-L
CONSEA'T AGENDA
ITEM # 36152
Upon motion by Ytce Mayor Sessotw, seconded by Councilwoman Parker, City Council APPROVED in
ONE MOTION Items 1, 2(AS "ENDED), 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the CONSENT AGENDA
Voting: 11-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, Linwood 0. Brancl4 III, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert
W Clyburr4 Robert K Dean, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, John D.
Moss, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf Nancy K Parker and Vice Mayor
William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent.-
None
October 27, 1992
- 15 -
Item III-LL
CONSEAIT AGENDA
ITEM # 36153
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Sessom, seconded by Councilwoman Parker, City Council ADOPTED:
Resolution applauding the efforts of Tidewater Builders Association and
the developers of the Church Point Subdivision re organization and
promotion of Homearanm 1992.
Copies of this Resolution shall be forwarded to the Tidewater Builders Association and the developers of
the Church Point Subdivision.
Voting: 11-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, Linwood 0. Branch, III, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert
W Clyburn, Robert K Dean, Louis R. Jones, Paul J Lanteigne, John D.
Moss, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf Nancy K Parker and Vice Mayor
William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
None
October 27, 1992
Requested by: Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr.
1 A RESOLUTION APPLAUDING THE EFFORTS
2 OF THE TIDEWATER BUILDERS
3 ASSOCIATION AND THE DEVELOPERS OF
4 THE CHURCH POINT SUBDIVISION IN THE
5 ORGANIZATION AND PROMOTION OF
6 HOMEARAMA 1992
7 WHEREAS, the Tidewater Builders Association (TBA) has
8 organized and promoted Homearama for the past eleven (11) years;
9 WHEREAS, Homearama consistently provides an excellent
10 opportunity for contractors, subcontractors, interior decorators,
11 furniture stores, real estate agents, and the many other companies
12 and individuals involved in the construction, furnishing, and sale
13 of homes to showcase their talents, goods, and services;
14 WHEREAS, Homearama also provides an opportunity for
15 citizens in the Tidewater area to get ideas for the purchase of a
16 new home, for remodeling, decorating, landscaping, or otherwise
17 improving an existing home, or just to dream;
18 WHEREAS, Homearama 1992 was held in the new Church Point
19 subdivision of the City of Virginia Beach; and
20 WHEREAS, Homearama 1992 proved to be extremely
21 successful, due in large part to the efforts of the TBA.
22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
23 OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
24 That City Council hereby applauds the efforts of the
25 Tidewater Builders Association and the developers of the Church
26 Point subdivision in the organization and promotion of Homearama
27 1992, and also applauds the efforts of the many companies and
28 individuals whose participation in Homearama 1992 helped to make it
29 a successful event.
30 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
31 That City Council hereby invites and encourages the
32 Tidewater Builders Association to conduct future Homearamas in the
33 City of Virginia Beach.
34 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
35 Virginia, on the 27 day of October 1992.
36 CA-4881
37 ORDIN\NONCODE\HOMEARA.RES
38 R-2
- 16 -
Item III-L2
CONSENT AGENDA
ITEM # 36154
Upon motion by rice Mayor Sessoms, seconded by Councilwoman Parker, City Council ADOPTED, AS
AMENDED.
Resolution establishing a Community Managentent and Policy Team re
implementation of the Virginia Conzprehensive Services Actfor At-Risk
Youth and Families.
On Line 26, the words "or their designees" shall be remaved.
Lines 25 and 26 shall read as follows:
... "Such Team shall be comprised of the agency heads, o, @i? alesig,,ees,
Of ... "
Voting: 11-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, Linwood 0. Branch, III, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert
W. Clyburn, Robert K Dean, Louis P, Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, John D.
Moss, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf Nancy K Parker and Vice Mayor
William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent.-
None
October 27, 1992
1 A RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH A
2 COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT AND POLICY
3 TEAM TO IMPLEMENT THE VIRGINIA
4 COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES ACT FOR AT
5 RISK YOUTH AND FAMILIES
6 WHEREAS, the 1992 Virginia General Assembly enacted
7 legislation entitled "The Comprehensive Services Act for At-Risk
8 Youth and Families," Reenrolled House Bill 935, intended to create
9 a coordinated syst@m of services and funding to meet the needs of
10 troubled youth and their families and at-risk children;
11 WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach, in order to become
12 eligible to receive State funds from the State Pool and State Trust
13 Fund established by such legislation, is required to establish a
14 management and policy team to implement the mandates of said
15 Comprehensive Services Act; and
16 WHEREAS, the City is further required to designate and
17 approve a Fiscal Agent to administer such monies as may be
18 allocated to the City from the State Pool and State Trust Fund;
19 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
20 OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
21 That there is hereby established a City of Virginia Beach
22 Management and Policy Team for Implementation of the comprehensive
23 Services Act for At-Risk Youth and Families, which shall have the
24 powers and duties set forth in Virginia Code Section 2.1-752, and
25 shall report to the City Council through the City Manager. Such
26 Team shall be comprised of the agency heads of the Department of
27 Social Services, the Department of Mental Health, Mental
28 Retardation and Substance Abuse Services, the Virginia Beach Public
29 Schools, the Juvenile Court Services Unit, and the Department of
30 Public Health; two members to be appointed by the City Manager; and
31 two members, to be appointed by the City Council, who shall not be
32 employees of the City, one of whom shall be a parent, and one, a
33 representative of a private organization which provides children's
34 or family services. The two members appointed by City Council
35 shall serve for terms of two (2) years and shall serve no more than
36 two (2) consecutive terms.
37 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager or his
38 designee is hereby designated the Fiscal Agent to administer such
39 funds as may be received by the City and appropriated by the City
40 Council to the respective agencies.
41 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
27 October
42 Virginia, on the day of 1992.
43 CA-4776
44 ORDIN\NONCODE\POLICY.RES
45 R-7
2
- 17 -
Item III-L3
CONSEAIT AGENDA
ITEM # 36155
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Sessoms, seconded by Councilwoman Parker, City Council ADOPTED, AS
AMENDED:
Ordinance to "END and REORDAIN Section 1-8 of the Code of the
City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, re distribution and sale of bound
volumes of and supplements to, the City Code.
Voting: 11-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, Linwood 0. Branch, III, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert
W Clyburn, Robert K Dean, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, John D.
Moss, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy K Parker and Pi-ce Mayor
William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
Non e
Council Members Absent.-
None
October 27, 1992
1 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN
2 SECTION 1-8 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY
3 OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA,
4 PERTAINING TO DISTRIBUTION AND SALE
5 OF CODE.
6 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
7 BEACH, VIRGINIA:
8 That Section 1-8 of the Code of the City of Virginia Beach,
9 Virginia, is hereby amended and reordained to read as follows:
10 Section 1-8. Distribution and sale of Code.
11 (a) This GeEle raay be disti-ibuted te a]:! the eear-ts, eit-y
12 depai-tments and ageneies ef- the eity Ejavei-nment: by the pab@
13 inforiftatien offieer free ef eharge.
14 @ The city manager is authorized to sell to any person-
15 upon request, an initial bound volume of, or supplements to, the
16 Code, and to make such charges therefor as are reasonable and
17 necessary to reimburse the city for its costs incurred for
18 Publication and distribution of the Code or supplements. desiring
19 eepies ef this Gede at the felleifing
20 (i) initial beund velumes
21 (2) Stipple%
22 Quarterly, eaeh 4:5.99
23 Annually, eaeh SG.oo
24 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia
25 on the 27 day of October 1992.
26 CA-4874
27 \ORDIN\PROPOSED\01-008.PRO
28 R-2
- 18 -
Item III-L4
CONSENT AGENDA
ITEM # 36156
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Sessotm, seconded by Councilwoman Parker, City Council ADOPTED, AS
AMENDED:
Ordinance to ACCEPT and APPROPRL4TE a $8,000 grant from the
Pirginia Institute of Developmental Disabilities at Virginia
Commonwealth University to the FY 1992-1993 Operating Budget of the
Department of Mental Health, Mentat Retardation and Substance
Abuse re development of respite services to mentally
retardedldevelopmentally disabled children; and, this appropriation be
offset by an $8,000 increase in estimated revenue.
Voting: 11-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, Linwood 0. BrancA Ill, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert
W. Clyburn, Robert K Dean, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, John D.
Moss, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf Nancy K Parker and Vice Mayor
William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
None
October 27, 1992
1 AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE A
2 GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,000 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
3 MENTAL HEALTH, MENTAL RETARDATION, AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE
4 FROM THE VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES
5 AT VIRGINIA COMKONWEALTH UNIVERSITY TO DEVELOP RESPITE PROGRAMS
6 TO SERVE MENTALLY RETARDED/DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED CHILDREN
7 WHEREAS, the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation, and Substance
8 Abuse is responsible for providing respite services to families with mentally
9 retarded/developmentally disabled children;
10 WHEREAS, the Virginia Institute for Developmental Disabilities at Virginia
11 Commonwealth University originally awarded the City of Virginia Beach Community
12 Services Board a grant in the amount of $29,073 during FY 91-92 and committed an
13 additional $8,000 in FY 92-93 to provide continued respite services to 27
14 families who have been unable to avail respite because of medical involvements
15 of their son or daughter with developmental disabilities;
16 WHEREAS, the grant increases the FY 92-93 departmental position total by
17 .08 FTE's and requires no local match or continuation commitments.
18 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
19 BEACH, VIRGINIA that a grant in the amount of $8,000 be accepted and appropriated
20 and .08 FTE's be established for the duration of the grant in the Department of
21 Mental Health, Mental Retardation, and Substance Abuse FY 92-93 Operating Budget
22 to provide respite services to families with mentally retarded/developmentally
23 disabled children.
24 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that appropriations be offset by a $8,000 increase
25 in estimated revenue.
26 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, this
27 27 day of October 1 1992.
28 This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its adoption.
29 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
30
31
32 Walte C. K@ Jr.
- 19 -
Item III-I.5
CONSENT AGENDA
ITEM # 36157
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Sessoms, seconded by Councilwoman Parker, City Council ADOPTED.-
CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONTIENIENCE AND NECESSITY
ROYAL LIMOUSINE
Voting: 11-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, Linwood 0. Branch, III, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert
W. Clyburn, Robert K Dean, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, John D.
Moss, Mayor Meyera E. Obemdorf, Nancy K Parker and @ice Mayor
William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent.-
None
October 27, 1992
- 20 -
Item III-L6
CONSEA'T AGENDA
ITEM # 36158
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Sessoms, seconded by Councilwoman Parker, City Council ADOPTED.-
Ordinance authorizing License Refunds in the amount of $3,668.50 upon
application of certain persons and upon Certification of the
Commissioner of the Revenue.
Voting: 11-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, Linwood 0. Branch, III, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert
W. Clybury; Robert K Dean, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, John D.
Moss, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf Nancy K Parker and Vice Mayor
William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
Non e
Council Members Absent:
Non e
October 27, 1992
FORM t4O. CA 8 REV. SM
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING LICENSE REFUNDS
UPON APPLICATION OF CERTAIN PERSONS AND
UPON CERTIFICATION OF THE COMMISSIONER
OF THE REVENUE
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
That the following applications for license refunds, upon certification of the Commissioner of the
Revenue are hereby approved:
NAME License Date Base Penalty Int. Total
Year Paid
Schwegler, Walter F. 1991-92 Audit 590.35 590.35
T/A Atlantic Travelodqe
3322 Virginia Beach Blvd., S-105
Virginia Beach, VA 23452
Wilson, Dennis R. 1991-92 Audit 44.27 44.27
T/A Custom Trim & Cabinetry
3793 Canadian Arch
Virginia Beach, VA 23452
Certified as to Payment:
.be,t P Vagha@
Commissioner ofThe Revenue
Approved as to form:
LWlidt. LilIK c-
City Attorney
This ordinance shall be effective from date of
adoption.
The above abatement(s) totaling $ 634.62 were approved by the Council
of the City of Virginia Beach on the 27 day of October .19 92
Ruth Hodges Smith
City Clerk
FMM NO. CA 8 REV. 3M
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING LICENSE REFUNDS
UPON APPLICATION OF CERTAIN PERSONS AND
UPON CERTIFICATION OF THE COMMISSIONER
OF THE REVENUE
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
That the following applications for license refunds, upon certification of the Commissioner of the
Revenue are hereby approved:
NAME License Date Base Penalty lnt. Total
Year Paid
Harrell, Brenda 1991 Audit 91.30 91.30
T/A Brendas Hairstyling
5962 Edgelake Drive
Virginia Beach, VA 23464
Melton, Iver W. & Don P. Morris
T/A Aservice Plus 1990-92 Audit 106.26 106.26
4638 Haygood Road #B
Virginia Beach, VA 23455
Mobile Accounting Inc. 1991-92 Audit 101.55 101.55
T/A Mobile Accounting Systems of America
3228 Pineridge Drive
Chesapeake, VA 23321
Certified as to Payment:
rt P. Vau@
Commissioner of the Revenue
Approved as to form:
@e L. Li@ey
City Attorney
This ordinance shall be effective from date of
adoption.
The above abatement(s) totaling $ 299.11 were approved by the Council
of the City of Virginia Beach on the 27 day of October 92
19
Ruth Hodges Smith
City Clerk
@M NO. C.A. 8 REV. &W
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING LICENSE REFUNDS
UPON APPLICATION OF CERTAIN PERSONS AND
UPON CERTIFICATION OF THE COMMISSIONER
OF THE REVENUE
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
That the following applications for license refunds, upon certification of the Commissioner of the
Revenue are hereby approved:
NAME License Date Base Penalty lnt. Total
Year Paid
Corder, Michael E. 1991-92 Audit 47.29 47.29
T/A Corder Carpet Service
720 Millpike Court
Chesapeake, VA 23320
Crest Restaurant Consultants Inc.
T/A Crest Restaurant Consultants
3073 Brickhouse Court 1989 Audit 365.53 365.53
Virginia Beach, VA 23452
Gusler, Denard L. 1991 Audit 63.37 63.37
2738 Console Avenue
Norfolk, VA 23518
Certified as to Payment:
Commissioner of the Revenue
Approved as to form:
@stie L. Eil-ley
City Attorney
This ordinance shall be effective from date of
adoption.
The above abatement(s) totaling $ 476. 19 were approved by the Council
27 October 92
of the City of Virginia Beach on the - day of 19 -
Ruth Hodges Smith
City Clerk
@M NO. C.A. 8 REV@ &W
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING LICENSE REFUNDS
UPON APPLICATION OF CERTAIN PERSONS AND
UPON CERTIFICATION OF THE COMMISSIONER
OF THE REVENUE
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
That the following applications for license refunds, upon certification of the Commissioner of the
Revenue are hereby approved:
NAME License Date Base Penalty Int. Total
Year Paid
American Printing Co., Inc.
T/A Sir Speedy Printing 198B-91 Audit 2,135.72 2,135.72
3008 Virginia Beach Blvd.
Virginia Beach, VA 23452
Art Forms Inc. 1991-92 Audit 109.66 109.66
6110 Oceanfront
Virginia Beach, VA 23451
Carlson, Ann Marie 1990 Audit 13.20 13.20
5812 N. Cherokee Cluster
Virginia Beach, VA 23462
Certified as to Payment:
n
Commii ioner of the ue
Approved as to form:
Ce-slt6 L. Li@ey
City Attorney
This ordinance shall be effective from date of
adoption.
The above abatement(s) totaling $ 2, 258. 58 were approved by the Council
of the City of Virginia Beach on the 27 day of October 19 92
Ruth Hodges Smith
City Clerk
- 21 -
item iii-il.
P,ESOLUTIONIOPDINANCES
ITEM # 36159
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Sessoms, seconded by Councilman Baum, City Council ADOPTED:
Resolution authorling the City Manager to implement the
recommendations of the Construction Contract Process Review Team for
a period of one (1) year; and, directing the City Manager report to
Council prior to October 31, 1993, outlining the benefits derived fi-om
implementation of the new review process and suggesting any changes
or modification.
Voting: 11-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, Linwood 0. Branck III, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert
W. Clyburn, Robert K Dean, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, John D.
Moss, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf Nancy K Parker and 1-ice Mayor
William D. Sessotm, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
None
October 27, 1992
1 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY
2 MANAGER TO IMPLEMENT THE
3 RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION
4 CONTRACT PROCESS REVIEW TEAM
5 WHEREAS, as part of the City's commitment to quality
6 customer service, representatives of various City departments were
7 asked to serve on a Construction Contract Process Review Team (the
8 "Team");
9 WHEREAS, the Team undertook a comprehensive study of the
10 construction contract review process employing a systematic
11 problem-solving methodology;
12 WHEREAS, the Team's objective was "to decrease the time
13 required to review and execute City construction contracts";
14 WHEREAS, the Team determined that the current process,
15 from receipt of bids to notice to proceed, requires an average of
16 one hundred and seven (107) days;
17 WHEREAS, the Team was able to develop a new process that
is has the potential to reduce the process time to thirty (30) days
19 while maintaining all Code requirements and mandatory quality steps
20 and, at the same time, providing enhanced information to City
21 Council;
22 WHEREAS, one step of the current process which is time-
23 consuming from the standpoint of City staff preparation time, and
24 which the Team proposes to eliminate, is the requirement that City
25 Council formally approve the award of construction contracts;
26 WHEREAS, the Team has recommended that in lieu of formal
27 approval of contract awards, Council be provided a weekly
28 Construction Bid Status Report which will provide the Council a
29 complete status of all construction projects, including
30 advertisements outstanding, bid results, and contracts awarded; and
31 WHEREAS, this proposed Construction Bid Status Report
32 will actually provide more information to Council in a more timely
33 manner than is provided to Council under the current process.
3 4 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
35 OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
36 That City Council hereby applauds the efforts of the
37 Construction Contract Process Review Team in its development of a
38 review process that should prove to be more beneficial to the City,
39 its contractors, and the citizens of Virginia Beach than the
40 current process.
41 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
42 That City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to
43 implement the recommendations of the Construction Contract Process
44 Review Team for a period of one (1) year, and directs the City
45 Manager to return to the Council prior to October 31, 1993, with a
46 report outlining the benefits derived from implementation of the
47 new review process and suggesting any changes for modification of
48 the process.
49 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
50 Virginia, on the 27 day of October 1992.
51 CA-4871
52 ORDIN\NONCODE\TEAM.RES
53 R-1
2
- 22 -
Item III-J.2.
RESOLUTIONIORDINANCES
ITEM # 36160
77te following registered in OPPOSITION.-
Lou Pace, 1908 Hunts Neck Court, Phone: 468-0925
Rae H. LeSesne, 5325 Thornburg Lane, Phone: 497-8008 represented the CitLens Action Coalition
A MOTION was made by Trice Mayor Sessoms, seconded by Councilman Jones to ADOPT an Ordinance
re loan to the Development Authority; and directing City Staffprepare all necessary loan documents and
an appropriation Ordinance: Alternative No. 4 $ 60-MILLION.
A SUBSTITUTE MOTION was made by Councilman Moss, seconded by Council Lady Parker to ADOPT
an Ordinance re loan to the Development Authority; and, directing City Staff prepare all necessary loan
documents and an appropriation Ordinance: Alternative No. 2 $3.7-MILLION.
Voting: 4- 7 (MOTION LOST TO A NEGATIVE VOTE)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Robert K Dean, John D. Moss, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf and Nancy
K Parker
Council Members Voting Nay:
John A. Baum, Linwood 0. Branch, III, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert
W. Clyburn, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne and Vtce Mayor William
D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Absent.-
None
October 27, 1992
- 23 -
Item III-J.2.
PESOLUTIONIOP.DINANCES
ITEM # 36161
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Sessoms, seconded by Councilman Jones, City Council ADOPTED:
Ordinance Alternative No. 4 re loan to the Development Authority; and,
directed City Staff prepare all necessary loan documents and an
appropriation Ordinance for$ 60-MILLION.
Voting: 7-4
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, Linwood 0. Branch, III, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert
W Clybur@ Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne and rice Mayor William
D. Sessonal Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
Robert K Dean, John D. Moss, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf and Nancy
K Parker
Council Members Absent.-
None
October 27, 1992
Requested by Vice-Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. , and Councilman
Louis R. Jones
I AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING
2 A $6 MILLION LOAN TO THE
3 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
4 DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
5 WHEREAS, a recent review of the financial condition of
6 the Virginia Beach Development Authority (the "Authority") revealed
7 a projected cash flow shortage by January, 1993, due to scheduled
8 debt service payments;
9 WHEREAS, as a result of this projected cash f low
10 shortage, the Authority requested the assistance of the City of
11 Virginia Beach in meeting its f inancial obligations during the
12 current recession;
13 WHEREAS, based on this request for assistance, city
14 Council directed the City Manager to conduct an analysis of the
15 Authority's financial condition and to return to the Council with
16 recommendations for such assistance;
17 WHEREAS, City staff made a presentation to City Council
18 on October 6, 1992, at which the Council was provided several
19 alternatives determined by staff to be viable options for providing
20 assistance to the Authority with respect to its current dilemma;
21 WHEREAS, City Council recognizes the vital importance of
22 economic development to the City's future growth;
23 WHEREAS, City Council further recognizes the important
24 role that the Authority plays in fostering economic development in
25 the City, and the importance of assisting the Authority in
26 resolving its current financial difficulties thereby enabling the
27 Authority to continue to play this important role;
28 WHEREAS, the provision of assistance to the Authority
29 will be seen by credit rating agencies as a positive approach to
30 dealing with, and effectively managing, the Authority's
31 difficulties, both financially and from a debt management
32 standpoint;
3 3 WHEREAS, based on the presentation made by City staff,
34 and on additional information provided to the Council since the
35 October 6, 1992, meeting, Council has determined that a loan to the
36 Authority of $6 million would be in the best interests of the City
37 and the Authority subject to certain conditions.
38 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
39 OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
40 1. That City Council hereby authorizes a loan to the
41 Authority of $6 million in FY 1992-93.
42 2. That City Council hereby directs City staff to
43 prepare all necessary loan documents and to return to the Council
44 for adoption of an ordinance specifically appropriating the funds
45 necessary to provide the loan to the Authority.
46 3. That the loan documents shall, at a minimum, provide
47 the following terms and conditions:
48 a. The interest rate on the loan shall not be
49 less than the interest the City could earn on
50 the funds loaned to the Authority;
51 b. The loan shall be made payable on demand;
52 C. Ninety-five (95) percent of the net proceeds
53 of the sale of any parcel in Oceana West
54 Corporate Park (OWCP) shall be paid to the
55 City to buy down the outstanding balance of
56 principal and interest on the loan;
57 d. Loan proceeds shall be used to pay off the
58 outstanding principal and interest on the
59 "White," "Pickler," and 31st Street property
60 loans;
61 e. The remainder of the loan proceeds shall be
62 applied toward the outstanding balance on the
63 Corporate Landing loan;
64 f. The Authority shall give the City a first deed
65 of trust on OWCP and the 31st Street property;
66 9. Any proceeds from the sale of the 31st Street
67 property shall be applied toward the
2
68 outstanding balance on the City's loan to the
69 Authority;
70 h. During the term of the loan, and until the
71 loan is paid in full both as to principal and
72 interest, the Authority shall devote its full
73 efforts and energy to the marketing and sale
74 of property in Corporate Landing, OWCP, and at
75 31st Street; and
76 i. The Authority shall not purchase or otherwise
77 acquire additional property or expend funds
78 for infrastructure or other development costs,
79 without the prior approval of City Council.
so 4. That the loan to the Authority shall be further
81 subject to NationsBank's agreement to the following terms and
82 conditions:
83 a. NationsBank will release its deeds of trust on
84 OWCP and the 31st Street property;
85 b. NationsBank will defer payment of principal on
86 the Corporate Landing note for two (2) years;
87 and
88 C. NationsBank will defer the payment of
89 interest on the Corporate Landing note until
90 January 1, 1994.
91 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
92 Virginia, on this 27 day of October 1992.
93 CA-4866
94 ORDIN\NONCODE\LOAN.ORD
95 R-2
3
- 24 -
Item IV-K1.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM # 36162
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndo?f DECLARED a PUBLIC HEARING on:
PLANNING
1.
(a) LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPORATION STREET CLOSURE
(b) JUDEO-CHRISTLIN OUTREACH SHELTEP, INC CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(c) AGAPAE WORLD OUTREACH SHELTER, INC CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(d) MIR,4CLES AMUSEMENT CORPORATION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(e) SECOND CHANCE MINISTRY INC CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(f) RYLLL4MS HOLDING CORPORATION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(g) COMPREHENSIVE PL4N AMEND RE.-GENER,4L BOOTH
BOULEVARD
(h) CHE&4PEAKE B,4 Y PRESER VA TION ORDINANCE AMENDIAPPENDJX R
RE RESOURCE MANAG
AREA DESIGNATION
October 27, 1992
- 25 -
Item IV-K 1. a,
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM # 36163
PLANNING
Attorney Lawrence H. Bryan4 900 Sovran Bank Building, represented the applicant and requested
WTHDR,4WAL.
Upon motion by Councilman Brazier, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms, City Council ALLOWED
fffTHDRAWAL of the petition of L4WYERS TITLE INSURANCE CORPOk4TION for the
discontinuance, closure and abandonment of a portion of Jade Street.
Application of Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation for the
discontinuance, closure and abandonment of a portion of Jade Street
beginning at the northern boundary of Page Avenue and running in
northerly direction a distance of S95 feet. Said parcel is 60 feet in width
and contains 35,700 square feet. LYNNI-I,4VEN BOROUGH.
Voting: 11-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, Linwood 0. Branch, III, James W Brazier, Jr., Robert
W Clyburn, Robert K Dean, Louis P, Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, John D.
Moss, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf Nancy K Parker and Vice Mayor
William D. Sessoiw, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent.-
None
October 27, 1992
- 26 -
Item IV-Kl.b.
PUBLIC HFARING ITEM # 36164
PLANNING
Richard Powell, Executive Director - JUDEO-CHRISTLIN OUTRF,4CH SHELTEP, INC., 209 53rd
Street, Phone: 428-3475 (H), 491-2846 (P).
77te following spoke in OPPOSITION.,
Lieutenant Commander Dwight Lawrence, NAS OCEANA, Phone: 433-3131
Jeff Cantrell, represented Mother's, Inc., Phone: 491-2887
Susie D. K%itehurst, Phone: 425-1692, represented the SeatacklAtlantic Park Civic Leagues
Michael A. Martineue, Jr., 1152 Virignia Beach Boulevard, Phone: 428-3524
Tyrone Walker, 1076 Kenya Lane
Reverend Jerome C Ross, 310 South Birdneck Road, Phone: 422-5048
Upon motion by Councilman Brazier, seconded by Councilman Baum, City Council DENIED an
Ordinance upon application of the JUDEO-CHRISTL4N OUTRF,4CH SHELTER, INC. for a
Conditional Use Permit:
ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF JUDEO-CHRISTL4N
OUTREACH SHELTEP, INC FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR A GROUP HOME
Ordinance upon application of Judeo-Christian Outreach Shelter, Inc.
for a Conditional Use Permit for a group home on the south side of
Virginia Beach Boulevard, 540 feet east of North Birdneck Road. Said
parcel is located at 1049 and 1053 Virgirtia Beach Boulevard and
contains 41,382 square feet. LYNNHAVEN BOROUGH.
Voting: 9-2
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, Linwood 0. Branch, Ill, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert
K Dear4 Louis P, Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, John D. Moss, Mayor
Meyera E. Oberndorf and Nancy K Parker
Council Members Voting Nay:
Robert W. Clyburn and f'zce Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr
Council Members Absent.-
None
October 27, 1992
- 27 -
Item IV-KI.c.
PUBLIC HFARING ITEM # 36165
PL4NNING
Cheyney Cole, 210 50th Street, Phone: 428-2224, represented the applicant
Upon motion by Councilman Dean, seconded by Council Lady Parker, City Council ADOPTED an
Ordinance upon application of AGAPAE WORLD OUTREACH CENTER for a Conditional Use Permit.,
ORDINANCE UPONAPPLICATION OFAGAPAE WORLD OUTRF-4CH
CENTER FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A CHURCH AND
REL4TED ACTMTIES R010921781
BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF TIIE C17Y OF VIRGINL4 BEACH, 117RGINL4
Ordinance upon application of Agapae World Outreach Center for a
Conditional Use Permit for a church and related activities in Units IOZ
104, 105, 106, 107 and 108, Princess Anne Shoppes. Said parcel is
located at 4402 Princess Anne Road and contains 1.9176 acres.
PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH.
7'he following condition shall be required:
1. Approval is for a period of three (3) years.
7his Ordinance shall be effective in accordance with Section 107 (f) of the Zoning Ordinance.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the Twen(Y-seventh of October,
Nineteen Hundred and Nine(y-Two.
Voting: 11-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, Linwood 0. Branch, III, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert
W. Clyburn, Robert K Dean, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, John D.
Moss, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf Nancy K Parker and Vice Mayor
William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent.-
None
October 27, 1992
- 28 -
Item IV-Kl.d.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM # 36166
PLANNING
Lonnie 0. Clark, III, 1112 Pacific Avenue, Phone: 428-8900, registered in OPPOSITION.
Upon motion by Councilinan Branch, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms, City Council ALLOWED
WITHDR4WAL of an Ordinance upon application of MIRACLES AMUSEMENT CORPORATION
for a Conditional Use Permit:
ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF MIRACLES AMUSEMENT
CORPOI?ATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A
RECRE,4TIONAL AND AMUSEMENT FACILITY OF AN OUTDOOR
NATURE (CHILDREN'S RIDES) R01092
BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF VIRGINL4 BEACH, VIRGINL4
Ordinance upon application of Miracles Amusement Corporation for a
Conditional Use Permit for a recreational and amusement facility of an
outdoor nature (children's rides) on certain property located on the south
side of 12th Street, 75 feet est of Pacific Avenue. Said parcel contains
19,375 square feet. VIRGINL4 BEACH BOROUGH.
Voting: 11-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, Linwood 0. Branch, 111, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert
W Clyburt4 Robert K Deat4 Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, John D.
Moss, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf Nancy K- Parker and Vice Mayor
William D. Sessoiw, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
None
October 27, 1992
- 29 -
Ite,m TV- K I.e.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM # 36167
PL,4NNING
Upon motion by Councilman Lanteigne, seconded by Trice Mayor Sessona, City Council DENIED an
Ordinance upon application of SECOND CHANCE MINISTRY, INC. for a Conditional Use Permit.-
ORDINANCE UPONAPPLIC4 TION OF SECOND CHANCE MINISTRY
INC FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A GROUP HOME
Ordinance upon application of Second Chance Ministry, Inc. for a
Conditional Use Permit for a group home on the east side of Princess
Anne Road, 51& 6 feet south of Morris Neck Road Said parcel is located
at 584 Princess Anne Road and contains 39,680 square feet. PUNGO
BOROUGH.
Voting: 11-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, Linwood 0. Branch, III, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert
W. Clyburn, Robert K Dean, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, John D.
Moss, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf Nancy K Parker and Vice Mayor
William D. Sessotw, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
Non e
Council Members Absent.-
Non e
October 27, 1992
- 30 -
Item IV-K 1. f.
PUBLIC HFARING ITEM # 36168
PLANNING
Attorney R Edward Bourdo?4 Jr., Pembroke Office Parl; Pembroke One - 7le Fifth Floor, Phone:
499-8972, represented the applicant and requested DEFERRAL.
Charles Traub, III, 784 Glasgow Court, Phone: 340-9056, registered in OPPOSITION.
Upon motion by Councibnan Dean, seconded by Council Lady Parker, City Council DEFERRED ninety
days until the City Council Session of January 26, 1993.
ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF RYLLLIMS HOLDING
CORPOR4TION AND JOSEPfl E & JACK P BURROUGHS FOR A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES IN THE
AGRICUL7'URE DISTRICT
Ordinance upon application of Williams IIolding Corporation and Joseph
E. and Jack P. Burroughs for a Conditional Use Permit for single family
homes in the Agriculture District on certain property located on the
southwest side of Seaboard Road, 3500 feet more or less northwest of
Princess Anne Road. Said parcel coritains 264.62 acres. PRINCESS
ANNE BOROUGH.
Voting: 11-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, Linwood 0. Branch, III, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert
W. Clyburn, Robert K Dean, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, John D.
Moss, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf Nancy K Parker and Vice Mayor
William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent.-
None
October 27, 1992
Comprehensive Plan Amendments
fbr General Booth Bwlevard Corridor
(As Jointly Developed by Staff &
Neigliborhood Representafives)
October 15, 1992
(Note: Language to be removed is shown by strike-out language to be
added is shown by underline (language)) -
COMPRFHFNSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT # CPA 92-1:
Amend the Comprehensive Plan by revising the 'Objective' in the first colurrm on
Page III-CS-17, beginning with the phrase, "Endorse no ...... to read:
"Endorse no development proposal that contributcs to strip residential or
commercial development, sprawl, or any disorderly arrangement of uses. Of
particular importance is the need to avoid any additional development of
these We of commercial retail uses vathin this planning area along General
Booth Boulevard and Princess Anne Road east of the Municipal Center. In
addition, no additional connnercial or medium or high density resideritial
developinent of any kind should be allowed on Dain Neck Road east of
General Booth Boulevard beyond what is already zoned or approved by
conditional use. Alternative land uses along this roadway segment should
emphasize residential, residential retirement communities, and low-intensity
institutional uses to define and li@t the already considerable commercial
presence at intersections of this arterial. Commercial and office uses, and
multi-family uses bmnd those already developed or zoned for, should only
be endorsed in the General Bootb Boulevard roadway corridor if they are
located in the areas specified below on Mal2s Irl-3 to 111-6 and are consistent
v,itb the standards outlined in A1212endix IIT-2 of this Plan. In addition, a
Traffic Impact Study, as eqlained in A1212endix IIT-1 of this Plan, must be
conducted for the 12arcels specified on Mal2s 111-3 to 111-6 if one of those land
uses is apl2lied for. 'ne Design Advisory Committee and the Planniniz
Comn-dssion should utilize tbe site and building design standards as the
P-uiding policies regardin2 desiizn for this Corridor and not as a set of desilzn
repulations tbat must be met by a proposal in order for al2l2roval to be
granted. Under existiniz State enabling lelyislation, desilyn alone would not be
a sufficient basis for rejection of a proposal along this Corridor. All other
@ larld uses and site developments occuning within the arterial corridors
of Courthouse-Sandbridge (north) should adhere to hich quality design
i-,
C,,,@r.1 @ll, Bo.i@,@rd Pl@. An,@nd@,@nts p.ge 2
A@@..st 31i 1992
General Booth Boulevard Map lii-3
ale parcels shown on this map may be possible candidates
for a land use other than that sbown on the Comprehensive
Plan Map, if the policies noted in this chapter are
adhered to.
NORTH
n
com -
G.n..[ B@th U..I.-,d PI..
A.,@,.@t 31,1992 1'.g. 3
General Booth Boulevard Map 111-4
The parcels shown on this map may be possible candidates
for a land use other than that shown on the Comprehensive
Plan Map, if the policies noted in this chapter are
adhered to.
@ -,51 &l
@ - mv
NORTH
Booth Do.lc-,d Pi.@ Am,.d.ents 4
Octob.r 15, Im
standards that will make a positive contribution to the City's image. 'ne applicable
provisions of the Community Aesthetics
section of the Plan, erever such development is proposed along
these corridors."
HEN WE
Amend the Comprehensive Plan by adding the following language in the second
column on Page 111-CS-17, as a new paragraph after the @ords, "... proposed along
these corridors," to read:
Retail comme uitan
Boulevard CQ
als stri
endix .;tandard,,;
should be cific
suTin ing- of these uses
hborb g the existin r@a
as a meth d f r vidin ac QU]d be reviewed
HENSIVE
Amend the Comprehensive Plan by adding tbe following language in the second
column on Paae 111-CS-17, as a new paragraph after the words, proposed along
a
these corridors," to read:
Neiizh Iti-famil
@-family r i ential I
residential and asso
General oth u
below if tbe develoi is ent vath th ite
nd uildin e i n ix 111-2 of hi Plan.
Prol2osals which a
considerat
Gcncml @th Bo.1-rd Pl.@ Am@ndm@nts p.ge 5
Octobo, 15, 1992
Area Man II
re i en ial u e wi h hi I riate fDr
rcels a) Boi
r Multi-family
residenti si ly 10
densities.
tbe inte ration f r ' ts in
bor oods thr ti b he u e of
.d coordinated 12edestria and
rea adiacent to the south sidp-
exigtin residential n,-i hb rhood-
@he site desi n of ro'ects tO
roilte
uld be-. dqina.
all Drive
Area 'B' as indicated on Mal2 111-4 mgy be suitable for nei bb rhOOd
ice se . Ideall n
until all of the I?arcels have been c
Boulevard
Bootl
h uld be Ii-ited to a t
reak.
Area 'C' aq indicated on Map III-4 i gle-family
dential [prehensive
this a
Area 'D' as indicat
COT
Du,- to the rox ngle-family us
Bmth j3o.le-,d Pla. A...dm.@tS P.ge 6
Octob.r 15,1992
,,Ii aroa ',,o ol@ea 'D' lor an
I
t, b i@'. tibl'.
General Booth Boulevard Map 111-5
ne parcels sho- on this map may be possible candidates
for a land use other than that shown on the Comprehensive,
Plan Map, if the pohcies noted in this chapter are
adhered to.
NORTH
40
71
G@@,@l @th Bo.l.@@d Pi.@ AM..d...t@ P.g@ 7
A.g.@t 31,1992
General Booth Boulevard Map 111-6
Tbe parcels shown on tbis map may be possible candidates
for a land use other than that shown or, the Comprehensive
Plan Map, if the policies noted in this chapter are
adhered to.
0 ORiu, (@x@
NO
NORTH
G.n.mi @th Bo.le-,d Pl-- A...dm.nts p.go 8
October 1S. 1992
cop
Amend the Comprehensive Plan by adding the following langliage in the second
colunin on Page III-CS-17, as a new paragraph after the words . ..... proposed along
these corridors," to read:
office us
t e ar a f he GGee
al
Izo e nd th e
d vel ed for
devel -ent
ea,;ement arr,,
b ective shoL
C mmittee.
CO PLAN
Amend the Comprehensive Plan by adding the following ladguage in the second
column on Page Ill-CS-17, as a new parauraph after the words, "proposed along tbese
corridors," to read:
ei h orho d-o
suitabl f r the a
e d
ng
desi r e
Bth Do.le@ Pi.. Am.nd@i@nts p.g. 9
octob@r 15, 1992
Th ite.@
ener I
in e at,
(the -Ei
r
Alth u
o f th-
or this corner -a
e
al
e.
B tt
e@
h@ul
'G..@.1 @th Bo-l-ld Pi.. A...d...t- Pag. 10
October 15, IM
as to as a nd t
ulevar Ferell Pa
COMPREHF,NSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PA 2-6 M
Add Maps 111-3 to II[I-6 to the Courthouse-Sandbridge chapter of the Plan.
MP HEN IVE PLAN AMENDM NT PA 12-7,
Amend the Comprehe-ive Plan by adding the following language as Appendix III-2:
i e ard"
BackLyround
ince en ixtu- design
character an eff I Dn element that can act t
es
I gr parts
ogether. ee easilv
'ne Gener d.
identifiable nodes (see Ma A nd
u - an d,- i character'.
Da- Neck is_ I)rimari ature and e e
a standard CO n could
best by de a only kn
a influence an aT'e f the
Corridor
Gencol Booth B..i-@@ Pi.n Am-dm@nts Pag. 11
October 15, IM
rat L d of the
ulevar fr tQ u t u b f
devel d
The land c e e
itself, of rate
land use in thi no e' and
Nimm e.
betwe
@cu
@Xly
integr f th S.
Based he fi desipn fo-r
t
12ossess design
S Desi Guidelines
During the de ce ex
identified. Natural
a significan sand(
and siniilar natural featur 'n
de e a sens f t)lace
can be expand ess.
All significant views 12resent within tbe-stlid
nd enhanced.
Access and rculati n
'ne 12rovision of clear and convenient vehicular and non-ve icular c
all new devel r ori
I
GENERAL BOOTH BOULEVARD CORRIBOR STUDY
Gen.ml Booth Bo.le-ld PI.. A.@.d@@nts Pap 12
October 15, 1992
r ce Vehi l,'
1 Direct acc fro-
2'. a d ment
ne-
is
n s
31. Er,
ssiin e
A aterial to make he dr
1 enc ura ed.
4,' W
wi
a
em.
5,' P,
I andsc edi
6',
Prototype Commercial Site Design
DIAGRAM APPENDIX-111-1
Fir]
Gon.r.1 @th B..I-ld Pi.. A.@.d.enL.
OCtob., 15, 1M P.g. 13
This pathwu shc ri of eitber concrete, asphalt, or
some other sur ace ma erial that is Dermeable in nature_
'.'---',;ng Areas
The visual al?12ea lots is controlled in 12art by adol2ted
but tbere are additional location and
circulation cbaracteristics tbat can further iMDrove the al2l2earance and function of
lots,
1.1 The Coml2rehensive Plan recommebds locatiniz 12arking areas toward
the rear of the site while locating buildings toward the front. Furtber,
this parking area should.be broken ul2 into separate sub-areas to avoid
tbe 'sea of asl2halt' al2pearance. B@ siting buildings as described in the
Setbacks section, this can be accoml2lished.
2,' Landscal2ing for the 12arkin,2 area should be strateizically located tQ
@Vide visual relief, shadiniz of the lot. izreen areas, and screening
while -.nsuring that lines-of-sigbt are maintained, both at the time of
121anting and when tbe 121ants have matured (see Landscai?ing section
below@@
3,' @ccess between parkin2 areas on sel2arate lots sbould be accoml2lished
through use of 5hared-access easements which join the lots. Individual
curb @ts for each 12arking area onto the bighways of the study area is
discouraized. Internal circulation roads on a 12arcel should be designed
vAth stubs to adjoininp- undeveloi2ed 12arcels that vlill 12rovide this
future shared access,
4,' A special area for the 12arkin2 of bicvcles should be Drovided on site
with ready access to tbe 12edestrian/bi@cle 12athway system,
LandscQing
1.1 This Plan notes tbat. "Retail service uses or sbol2l2ing centers tbat
adjoin areas 121anned for Tesidential use should 12rovide effective
screening and locate loading docks and trash areas in a manner that
significantly minimizes related noise and odor." LandscUD-e
121ants should be 12rovided as an effective buffer between such uses in
accordance Y,,ith ordinance requirements.
G@.eml Booth Bo.lewrd Plan A.C.d.enB
Octob.r 15, 1992 P.g. 14
2.1 Screening mgy include fences, crows and massin2 of
121ant material, All be designed with durable
materials otbe from a selection of hardy native 12]ant materials. If
walls are iised, they should match the dominant material and colg_r
used inthe building@ L ould be maintained between
the building, trash enclosure area, and..-the wall 121ane used for
screening, Hei2ht anti nlacement of th es should
COM121Y with Zon uirements.
3. 'nis Plan notes that. "Safe lines-of ts that meet or
excecd develol2ment st@ wavs be considered when
selec and location of land,.;caoing at critical areas
sueb as intersections, parkiniz lot crosswgys and drivewus." (12.11-1-5).
'ne size of tbe olants @ ritv should be considered.
Additionally, an inspection and . maintenance sched@ule shotild be
developed and adhered to to insure that lines-of-siizht a de tiate at
all times,
4.1 Within the Dam Neck Node and the Corporate Landiiii! Node,
landscal2ing within the ,etback adiacent tQ.Cyencral Booth Boulevard,
Dam Neck road, and Ferrell Parkwgy must abide, witli tbe existing
ordinance requirements.
51. Within the Nimm clearing of velyetation should be
conducted witbin the setback from the roadway to the building line.
Existiniz trees and groundcover should remain as they are, Clearing in
this area should be confined to the absolute minimum re ired for tbe
drivewU access and utility lines to the site (12rovided these are
peEpendicular t@ Pedestrian and i cle athwa
can be constructed within the setback area if they are constructed so
that thgy do not substantially reduce the veizetation vathin the setbac .
Ligbtin2 fixtures, signs, and clearina for adeauate lin@-of-sii!ht can also
be conducted if clearing of vepetation is minimal. If no..vegetation in
the form of youniz or mature trees and groundcover is 12resent, 12]anting
of the area with a sufficient number of trees and izrou dc ver that will
arow to compalabl-e beights should be conducted as 12art of the
develol2ment process. The setback area should be 12rotected by use of
ement.
Genemi B@th B..I.-,d Plan Ani.@d.,@ts Pag. 15
Octob.r 15, 1992
e t ana e-ei
ne,
encour@ enities.
Grass s le h uld be u
I le-
Wh n,
3'@
her of
Liizhting
en d
provide ffici t il
2'@
and the pedestrian le f tbe
be low in bei ht o e ,in a
illuminati n. Fixture sh Id
i nificance f Ni-
31 ri]2ed section,
All sip-ns sh @uilding,
'ne overall surface area and h,-i ht st e in c e Zoniniz
inance
Genemi @th Bo.le@rd Plan A-.nd..nt. P.F,. 16
October 15,1992
erl
t
eti whi
21, ho a the
u ine e t Ii h- n
3 In . w r i 'c
iden@ti i
in@lec
@l
h t
in ifi
e a rily
fention.
4.1 Si nf@
nd theme tf the c mTn
natural site features.
5. All-fre
rvel M nt
6,' d the
ii tin- fixt r
v,,-r th i
r imilar mat
N de b uld e
S t a@k and B il in cation
ment
t)arc I in r I i n' roaci int
re id ntial d v 10
R dential
G.neml Bmth Bo.lo@ Plan Am--dm@nts P.g. 17
Octobcr 15, 1992
1 Residential evel ment, ed in the
21 y the setback
tha e of
ment. Parkinil areas in multi-
Id be situated so as - to be
directed
frQ
"k arance
i ed The arra k
be av ided.
31, Sinlzle-family resid tbe
1. n
Iv tonsist
any residential structures area
use of a 12rotective easement
o -Re idential
1 buili Lydnerallv
oriented toward tbe front of tbe lot within a well landsca]2ed @en
area while locating the 12arkinp and loadiniz areas to the rear of the
lot ... the heiizht- bulk, nd ar structurea b uld conve
urin su tantial
a sen e of ennes ensurir_
2'. mce p
uildin ne l t Re
Buildings should be at hi
er t ck'
:o the
street sbould be limited along the front to
'C,.n,.l @th Do.Ic-,d Plan Am@.d.@.ts
Octobcr 15, 1992 Pag. Is
v m ri nous
ri se th hi bwa
Buildinizs should be ori
lurage
4 uil above
5L 012en apace areas should be included as 12art of the deve]opment a-nd
be strategically located in coniunct@ !e area i-n an
d a@cen ay (fiiture
t StOI2)-
6,' lie uildi an ar he gite to
ement from bu,@ s ace t
1 another.
Building Design Guide l@nes
the d-
a tant, the actual d n of
the buildinia in relation u the surr
Good site desijzn can huilding
design co=ensate for ite de rrelated.
Tbis section D bt diniz
design that sbould b othier structu
Corridor. Due to the
tQ od.
in these guidelines to gn reconung-ndations specific to each node. The
out is design.
m ati ili
The relatio las-. b uilt. is
Ocn@mi @th Bo.1-rd Pian A.@nd.@nt.
Oclob.r 15, 1992 Page 19
gh the scal-e
mass, heip-ht. and 1
1,1 Scale is vital to acbi@niz gQml2atibiliiy, 'ne ratio of the parts of a
structure to the entire structure, the structure's size in r
its slirroundings, and the str-ucture's size in relationshil2 to an individual
are the three most important aSl2ects n even more
important in the NiTnmo Church Node than anv of the other nodes.
1'.
21, 'ne mass, or overall size, and --- ture should be
undinizs. ne cl-@er the buildine or structure
is to eight 5hould be. In the Dam
Neck Node. an e:
create a sense of place at this node, mass and height b uld increase
tbe closer the ion. 'ne eff@rt is to create an
easily recopniz ble nd
se in the qualiiy .f the I;ite de i n
including amenities and I d ca in -
Proportion is the relationship on one ther. If
proportion is correct, order seems to 12revail, Each coml?onent of a
building sbould have go6d 12rol2ortion (height to vadth of a door. for
examl2lc). the relationshil2 of each component to each other (wall to
window, for examl2le) the ratio of
buildiniz mass to the s r)rooortion.
Correct nrodortion is more important the closer the site is to the
Nimmo Church Node.
Overall Design Elements
T'bis section vall focus on various asl?ects of building design tbat should be,
addressed fOTany structure to be located aloniz the corridor.
V, 'ne side or rear
from a roadway should be desilned so as to possess as milch detail as
the 12rimaiy facade oriented toward General Booth B evard. Vi ual
interest ul e ri tails, varied
roof lines, consistent textures and color, etc, In the case of multi-
family buildin2s. staizgered 121acement of the buildinlys can create that
interest,
G..cml @th 130.lc-,d Pi.n A.,.d.,@ts p.g. 20
October 15, IM
2 teri e od
Quali in
sidinps m e, te;
3', eril
surroundin ar a
Briph e rade-arl
o@l n the, IS
not 0 tru ive. The a ro rae ceE
suf icient t att.ract the necesa
acc-ent.
41, de
)ed
reta
ret il center
51,
hat
do
6 "n hei ht ulk d achi
a"n .
- 32 -
Item III-K].h.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM # 36170
PLANNING
7he following registered to speak.-
Mike Kensler, Hampton Roads Co-ordinator for the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Phone: 622-1964
John Marshall, Phone: 428-6384
F. Andrew Heatwole, Phone: 473-8575
Barbara Henley, 3513 Charity Neck Road, Phone: 426- 7501 rcpresenting &4 VE
Sue Carlyle, 1425 Alanton Drive, Phone: 481 -2538
Rae H. LeSesne, 5325 77iornburg Lane, Phone: 497-8008
Maurice Jackson, 1125 Ditchley Road, Phone: 428-1470
Michael L &niley, ASL,4, Landscape Architect, Chesapeake Bay Local Assistant Department, 805 East
Broad Street, Suite 701, Richmond, kirginia 23219
A MOTION was made by Councilman Baum, seconded by rice Mayor Sessona, to ADOPT the Ordinance
to AMEND the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area Ordinance (Appendix F) re Resource Management
Area Designation, nontidal wetiandy definition, erosion and sediment controlfor nonconforming structures
and uses, swimming pool exemptions definition of redevelopment, water dependent facilities, default load
for stormwater management, intensely developed areas and definition of public roads.
Upon SUBSTITUTE MOTION by Councilman Moss, seconded by Councilman Dean, City Council
DEFERRED until the City Council Session of November 10, 1992:
Ordinance to AMEND the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area
Ordinance (Appendix F) re Resource Management Area Designation,
nontidal wetlands definition, erosion and sediment control for
nonconforming structures and uses, swimming pool exemptions, definition
of redevelopment, water dependent facilities, default load for stormwater
management, intensely developed areas and definition of public roads
Voting: 6-5
Council Members Voting Aye:
Linwood 0. BrancA III, Robert W. Clyburn, Robert K Dean, John D.
Moss, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf and Nancy K Parker
Council Members Voting Nay:
John A. Baum, James W. Brazier, Jr., Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne
and rice Mayor William D. Sessoms-, Jr.
Council Members Absent.-
None
October 27, 1992
- 33 -
item iii-M.I.
NEW BUSINESS
COUNCIL-SPONSORED ITEM ITEM # 36171
Upon motion by Councilman Lanteigne, seconded by Councilman Brazier, City Council ADOPTED.,
Resolution directing the City Manager study the financial impact of
praviding additional tax relief to elderly and disabled individuals by
increasing the income andfinancial worth limitations under Section 35-
64 of the Code of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia; and, imposing a
lower personal property tax rate on a motor vehicle owned by qualified
elderly or disabled individuals as authorized and allowed by State law.
Voting: 11-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, Linwood 0. BrancA 111, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert
W. Clyburn, Robert K Dean, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, John D.
Moss, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Naticy K Parker and Vice Mayor
WzUiam D. Sessoiw, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
None
October 27, 1992
Requested by Councilman Paul J. Lanteigne
I A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO
2 STUDY THE IMPACT OF PROVIDING ADDITIONAL TAX
3 RELIEF TO ELDERLY AND HANDICAPPED INDIVIDUALS
4 BY INCREASING THE FINANCIAL LIMITS FOR REAL
5 ESTATE TAX DEFERRAL OR EXEMPTION; AND BY
6 PROVIDING A LOWER PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX RATE
7 ON THAT INDIVIDUAL'S MOTOR VEHICLE
8 WHEREAS, the State Code authorizes the governing body of
9 any county, city, or town to adopt an ordinance which provides for
10 the exemption from, and/or deferral of, taxation for real estate
11 owned by an individual who is at least sixty-five (65) years of age
12 or is permanently and totally disabled;
13 WHEREAS, the State Code further provides that any such
14 local governing body may, by ordinance, levy a tax on one (1) motor
15 vehicle owned and used by or for any individual who is at least
16 sixty-five (65) years of age or is permanently or totally disabled
17 at a rate different from the tax levied on other tangible personal
18 property;
19 WHEREAS, both provisions of the State Code set forth the
20 maximum income and financial worth limitations that an elderly or
21 disabled individual may not exceed in order to be eligible for the
22 exemption or deferral of real estate taxes or the imposition of a
23 different personal property tax rate on his or her motor vehicle;
24 WHEREAS, the State Code authorizes the City of Virginia
25 Beach and other designated localities to raise the standard maximum
26 income and financial worth limitations;
27 WHEREAS, pursuant to State law, the City of Virginia
28 Beach has, by ordinance [S 35-64], provided for the exemption,
29 deferral, or freeze of real estate taxes for qualified individuals
30 who are at least sixty-five (65) years of age or are permanently or
31 totally disabled, but has not adopted the maximum income and
32 financial worth limitations allowable under State law;
33 WHEREAS, the City has not adopted an ordinance to provide
34 for a different personal property tax rate for a motor vehicle
35 owned and used by or for any individual who is at least sixty-five
36 (65) years of age or is permanently or totally disabled;
37 WHEREAS, many elderly and disabled individuals live on
38 fixed incomes;
39 WHEREAS, many more elderly and disabled individuals rely
40 on social security benefits as their sole or primary source of
41 income;
42 WHEREAS, low interest rates precipitated by the current
43 economic recession have substantially decreased the earning
44 potential of elderly and disabled individuals on their investments;
45 WHEREAS, the federal government recently announced that
46 the increase in Social Security benefits for 1992 will be the
47 smallest increase since 1987; and
48 WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City to assist its
49 elderly and disabled citizens to the extent of its ability in light
50 of its own financial difficulties.
51 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
52 OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
53 That the City Manager is hereby directed to study the
54 financial impact on the City that would result from (1) raising the
55 income and financial worth limitations under SS 35-64 of the City
56 Code, and (2) adopting, by ordinance, the imposition of a different
57 tax rate on a motor vehicle owned by a qualified elderly or
58 disabled individual as authorized and allowed by State law.
59 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
60 That the City Manager is hereby directed to return to the
61 Council with a report of his findings prior to the presentation of
62 the FY 1992-93 Operating Budget.
63 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
64 Virginia, on the 27 day of October 1992.
65 CA-4873
66 ORDIN\NONCODE\STUDY.RES
67 R-2
2
- 34 -
Item 111-Nl.
ADJOURNMENT
ITEM # 36172
Mayor Obemdorf DECLARED the City Council Meeting ADJOURNED at 10:50 P.M.
@- -@- - -0-@ -@ --------
Beverly 0 Hooks, CMC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
@u h Hodges Smith, CMCIAAE
City Clerk M y@r. E. b@,,,d.@
Mayor
City of Virginia Beach
Virginia
October 27, 1992
Prototype commercial Site Design
DIAGRAM APPENIDIX-111-1
I N
-.-- --ow i
I u
,l 0
E
i
0
@l p ! 0
-i 11
3 1 11 I 0
0
1 ExV
I
:N 0 0
@, n F]
'V .
General Booth Boulevard Plan Amendments page 17
October 15, 1992
Residential developments should abide by the concepts detailed in the
C~-~ommunity Aesthetics chapter Of this Plan on page I1-I-2..
Multi-family residential structures should abide by the setback
~rovisions of the City_ Zoning Ordinance. Structures should be sited
so as to create courtyards or open spaces that promote a "sense of
place" or a human scale for the development. Parking areas in multi
f~amily residential developments should be situated so as' to b~
u__nobtrusive, not visible from the arterial highway, and provid~
adequate access to the units. Particular attention should be directed_
at the appearance of the buildings from the arterial highway created
.~v the way in which the buildings are sited. The "barracks" appearance
s._hould be avoided.
Single-family residential neighborhoods should apply the
" 1 described on page II-!-
"n_xighborhood boundary concept as thorough y -
2 of this Plan. This Plan notes that, "These boundaries usually donsis_t
of well landscaped greenbelts...." Residential structures should never
~rront or back onto the arterial highways within the study area. A wide.
l~ndscaped buffer or a stormwater BMP pond adjacent to the highway.
right-of-way should be provided before any residential structures area
sited. This buffer should be protected from future alteration througl[
use of a protective easemenL.
~Non-Residential
This Plan notes that,"Commercial buildings should be general!$
oriented toward the front of the lot within a well landscaped green
area while locating the parking and loading areas to the rear of thc.
lot...the height, bulk, and architecture of these structures should conveg
a sense of openness, ensuring substantial sunlight access."(page II-I-6)
"Consolidation of buildings within office parks is preferable to the one
b~uilding one lot development." (page II-I-5)
~Buildings should be situated closely to the highway just beyond th~
buffer setback:
The length of the wall parallel to the
s~treet should be limited along the front to