DEC 15, 1958 November 10, 1958
PETITION FOR CLOSING AND ABANDONING ROAD
TO THE HONORABLE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF PRINCESS ANNE
COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
Your petitioners Cobo Corporation a corporation organized and
existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Harry C. Kregeir
and Bessie R. Kreger,. husband and wife,, and J; E. Bond and Hazel W.
Bond, husband and wife, who are the several owners of Lots 40 through
44, inclusive, in Block Z8, and Lots 19 through 22, inclusive, in Block
29, on the plat of Euclid Place, Kempsville Magisterial District, Princess
Anne County, Virginia, petition the Board of County Supervisors of Princess
Anne County pursuant to Section 33-76. 16 of the Code of Virginia (1950)
to close and abandon that portion of Virginia Avenue which lies between
the lots owned by your petitioners, and runs only for a distance of 105.95
feet on the western side of said street and runs only for a distance of
81.88 feet on the eastern side of said street, and which is more particulmrly
described as follows:
All that certain piece or parcel of land located in
Kempsville Magisterial District, Princess Anne County,
Virginia, beginning at a point on the southern line of Virginia
Beach Boulevard (U. $. Route 58) where the western line of
Virginia Avenue meets the southern line of Virginia Beach
Boulevard; thence extending south 59° 12' E. 55.49 feet to a
pin located at the point where the eastern line of Virginia
Avenue meets the southern line of Virginia Beach Boulevard;
thence extending in a southerly direction along the western
lines of Lots 19, Z0, Z1 and 22, a distance of 81.88 feet,
more or less, to the northern line of College Street; thence
extending along the northern line of College Street a distance
of 50 feet to a pin on the northern line of College Street in
the southeast corner of Lot 44; thence extending northwardly
along the eastern line of Lots 44, 43, 42, 41 and 40 a distance
of 105.95 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. A
plat of that portion or Euclid Place wher~ein the _.property in-
volved is located is attached to this Petition.
Your petitioners, in order to inform the Board of County SupervisOrs
present the following facts, to-wit:
1. The section of road shown on the plat has never been improve
or paved.
ii
Z.
The section of the road is not being used by the public as a
' road.
road.
3. No public necessity exists for this section to be used as a public
It is requested that the Board of Go unty Supervisors proceed to hawe
such section of this road abandoned as provided in Section 33-76· 15, et
seq. of the Code of Virginia (1950}.
Respectfully submitted,
By
GOBO CORPORATION
.:' / ,. ~ > ' /. / ,: ';
Pre sident J J
· ~k~eger
BJssi~'R. t~r e ge r
.... "'' ' J.E. Bond
Hazel' W. Bond
~S, ~. E. T~ e~d ~ Tca~e,~zd~ huebaad a~d wife, are
the ceaer~ cg ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ Se~z S~
C~at~,~ere'to.
~'o ~he Board of Supervisors of Princess Anne Counvy, Virginia:
Your pe~:;izionez~ R. E. r~Lownsend and Marian Townsend, husband and wife
respec~fully show un'~:o he Board of Supervisors of Princess Anne County,Virginia
(1) i'hav your petiVioners are residen s of and domiciled in 'she
County of Princess Anne, State of Virginia.
(2) That they are owners of all of -the lots fronting on Mozart
Avenue between Selden S ~,ree~ and ~-~aye'~.e S'~reet; Beechwood Avenue between
Belden Si~reet and Lafayette Street; Arlington Avenue be~oween Selden Streev and
Edison Street; Raleigh Avenue between Lafayette Street and stree~t designated
on the hereinafter play as Virginia Beach Boulevard, said plat being Map of
Easton Place which map is duly of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of Princess Anne County, Virginia, in ~p Book 5, at Page 249.
(3) That your petitioners desire the Board ~ Supervisors to
close and vacate the portions of the streets as above set forth, the same
ibeing Mozart Avenue between Selden Street and Lafayette Street; Beechwood
Avenue between Selden Street and !~fayette Street; Arlington Avenue between
Selden Street and Edison Street; Raleigh Avenue between '~fayevte Street and
street desi~ated as Virginia Beach Boulevard, said streets being only paper
streets and never having been opened or used by the public. Said streets
taken together being approxmma~ ly I64~ feet in length
(4) Your petitioners, R. E. Townsend and Marian ~ownsen are the
owners of all of the property fronting on the portions of streets to be
closed, the same are paper streets and have never been opened and do not
serve anyone's property save and except the property of these petitioners.
(5) Your petitioners state that the interest of no parties
concerned will be injured or damaged by the closing of the portions of the
streets and that their interest will be greatly promoted. These streets
are not needed for access by any other person nor do they serve any other
property and the streets are purely paper streets and the petitioners desire
to re-plat the property in a way that will be more beneficial to all parties
concerned.
to be closed.
Your petitioners attach a plat showing the portion of streets
Notice of proposed closing of a portion of said streets has
been posted according to law.
~H~LRA?ORE, your petitioners pray that in accordance with the
statutes made and provided that the Board of Supervisors will proceed with
the closing of the portions of the said streets or roadways as therein
provided.
Respectfully submitted,
Keltam & Kellam
Board of Trade Building
Norfolk~ Virginia
R. E. TOWNSET~D
MARIA/~ TOWNS ~
CouPe!
Your pezttione~ R. E. To~n~en~ ~ ~ Tc~naen~ huabemd a~d ~e,
(1) ~t y~ ~tl~i~ ~ ~a~n~,a ~ ~ ~il~ ~ the
(2) T~t ~ey ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ the l~m f~t~ ~ ~rt
A~n~ Beton Se~ S~,reet ~ ~ette $~et; ~ch~ A~n~ ~t~en
Se~n Steer ~ ~e'tte ~t~et; ~lingt~ Av~e ~et~en Sel~ 5t~ ~
~m 5t~t~ Eei~ A~n~ bergen ~ette Steer ~ st~
the he~~r p~t ~ Vi~ Beth Bo~~, ~ p~t ~e~ ~P ~
~t~ P~e ~ch ~ la ~Y ~ ~ ~ ~e Clerk~a ~ice ~ the C~t
el~ ~ ~te ~ ~ti~ ~ ~e at~e~ ~ ~ set fo~h, ~he ~
Sel~ Steer ~ ~ St~t; ~i~ A~n~ ~t~en ~e~ St~t ~
(~)
he~n~r re~err~ ~ pl~t wdxieh
~ ~ ~
~i~ ~ ~ Clerk
cl~/c~ c~ '
, a lk~aar~ ~a~c, ~n ~ for
I,
~i~tng ~' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r, 1958, ~ ~s
~ ~r ~ ~ ~z t~ ~ ~ ~~r, 1958.
Refunds as approved by the Board of Supervisors December 15, ].958
REAL ESTA~
Rufus E. Parker
1073 Davis St.
Norfolk, Va.
Bayside Bill #1842
$58.74
Levin L. Hopkins
7513 Martone Road
Norfol~, Va.
Kemps. Mosq. Bill #15460
$28.98
Constant Sakakini
2817 Thoroughgood Dr.
Bayside, Va.
Bayside Mosq. Bill #13176
$13.80
T. M. Bellamy, Inc.
Route # 2
Princess Anne, Va.
Kemps. Mosq. Bill #40399
$ 2.07
PERSONAL PROPERTY
James Do Spivey
408 Langston Road
Princess Anne, Va.
Kempsville Bill #17313
$ 5.94
Refund BUILDING PERMIT #2525 to:
W. C. Harris
5972 Military Highway
Norfolk, Va.
$96.00
Real Estate:
W. D. Hobbs, Jr.
6337 Sedgefield Dr.
Norfolk 13, Va.
Kemps. Mosq.
#11514
$165.60
/
!
J
1/
~ ?
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Edward R. Amburn and Mary Alice Amburn, husband and wife,
and Willet R. Brewer, Widower, have petitioned the Board of Supervisors for
the vacation of the Southeastern 200 feet of Laurel Drive, as shown on the
plat "Linlier" (Revised April 22, 1950) of record in Map Book 26, at page 1;
and
WHEREAS, it appears from +~he said petition and otherwise that the
petitioners are the owners of all the land bounded on each side of that
portion of the street desired to be closed; and
WHEREAS, the Board is of the opinion that there are no other
property owners within the area of the land shown on the said plat of
"Linlier" reasonably needing to use that portion of such street as a means of
ingress or egress to and from their property and that none of the rights nor
privileges of other property owners within the bounds of said plat will be
abridged or destroyed by the proposed vacation of the street; and
WHEREFORE, upon motion duly made and seconded and by the affirmative
vote of all persons, it is;
RESOLVED, that the County of Princess Anne does approve the
vacation of the Southeastern 200 feet of Laurel Drive, together with the
Southeastern 200 feet of the 10 foot strip adjacent thereto, shown on said
plat as being dedicated for a road, as shown on the plat entitled "L~lier'~_
(Revised April 22, 1950) of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of Princess Anne County, Virginia, in MaP Book 26~ at page 1~, and being
more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at a point in the Northeasterly line of Laurel Drive,
at its intersection with the Northwesterly line of Lot 20, as shown on the
aforesaid plat, and running thence South 44 degrees 29 minutes East along
the Northeasterly line of said Laurel Drive ~ ~istanCe of 200 feet more or
less to the Northwesterly side of a drainage ditch as shown on said plat;
thence turning and running in a Southwesterly direction along the Northwesterl
side of said drainage ditch a distance of 40 feet more or less to the
Southwesterly line of a l0 foot strip of land shown on said plat as dedicated
for a road; thence North 44 degrees 29 minutes West along the Southwesterly
line of the said l0 foot strip a distance of 200 feet; thence turning and
running in a Northeasterly direction across said strip and across said Laurel
Drive, as shown on said plat a distance of 40 feet more or less to the point
of beginning.
AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Chairman of this Board is
hereby authorized and directed to enter into an instrument with the aforesaid
owners of the land bounding the aforesaid portion of said Laurel Drive,
vacating such portion of said street and the Clerk is authorized and directed
to affix and attest the seal of the County to such instrument.
VIRGINIA:
BEFORE T~ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF PRINCESS ANNE COUNTY
PETITION OF:
EDWARD R. AMBURN and
MARY ALICE AMBURN,
husband and wife, and
WILLET R. BREWER, Widower
To the HONORABLE ~ OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS:
The undersigned petitioners, EDWARD R. A~ and MARY ALICE
AMBURN, husband and wife, and WILTRT R. B~JER, Widower, show unto the members
of the Board of Supervisors of Princess Anne County, the following facts:
1. A plat entitled "Linlier" Princess Anne County, Virginia,
dated September 1949 (Revised April 22, 1950), and recorded in the Clerk's
Office of the Circuit Court of Princess Anne County, shows thereon a street,
in Lynnhaven Magisterial District, as Laurel Drive which runs in a general
Northeasterly direction from Bay Drive, and then turns and runs in a general
Southeasterly direction in to a drainage ditch. The said plat describes the ,
road as being 30 feet wide, with an additional l0 feet dedicated on said plat
for road purpose. The said road reaches a dead end at the Southeastern
extremity thereof and there is no turning circle shown on said plat at the end
of said road.
2. The petitioners own the property on either side of the
extreme Southeastern 200 feet of said road, the said WILLET R. BREWER, Widower,
being the owner of Sites 20 and 20A, and the said EDWARD R. AMBURN and
MARY ALICE AMBURN, husband and wife, being the owners of Lot 21.
3. The said Laurel Drive, as it extends in a Southeasterly
direction has never been open or improved, specifically has not been opened
or improved as to its Southeastern 200 feet, as it divides the said Lot 21
from the said LOt 20.
4. There are no other property owners within the area of the land
shown on the aforesaid plat reasonably needing to use that portion of such
street, as a means of ingress or egress to and fr~n their properties, as
clearly appears fr~n such plat, and otherwise.
5. Your undersigned Petitioners have execute~ an instrument
pursuant to the Provisions of Section 15-766.1 of the Code of Virginia of
1950, as amended, providing for the vacation of the Southeastern 200 feet
of Laurel Drive and pray that the Board of Supervisors will join in such
instrument for the purpose of approving such vacation.
And your Petitioners will ever pray.
EDWARD R. ~ and.
hr'I~ R. ~
Counsel
JO~;EPII D. DEAL
ATTORNEY AND COUNSELLOR AT LAW
BOARD OF TRADE BUILDING
NORFOLK, VIRGINIA
December 9~ 1958.
COMMISSIONER IN CHANCERY
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK
COURT OF LAW AND CHANCERY
OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK
Mr. John V. Fentress, Clerk
Circuit Court of Princess Anne County
Princess Anne, Virginia
Dear Sir:
Mr. McClenny, Game Warden, called me this morning in reference to
a claim I made for the loss of so]~ chickens, and wanted to as-
certain if I had ever reported the same to his office. Please be
advised that I have never made any report to him up to and until
this morning, at which time he called me by telephone.
I have ex~mined the statutes rather carefully in connection with
this, and see nothing therein reauesting such report to be made.
I think my Affidavit fully covers all of the reGuiren~ents set
forth in the statutes for making the claim and re-im[~rsen~nt
therefor. In fact, I had the statute before me when I made the
Affidavit, and was under the impression that I had fully covered
every point required by law. As I interpret the statute, it is
mandstory in effect.
~. McClenny suggested that I appear before the Board of Super-
visors, but in view of the fact that I consider the Affidavit
full and ample, I do not see the necessity of the same.
Thanking you for your courtesies, I am
Yours very truly,
JOSEPI! D. DEAL
BOARD OF TRADE BUILDING
NORFOLK. VIRGINIA
December 5, 1958.
COMMISSIONER IN CHANCERy
CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK
COURT OF LAW AND CHANCERY
OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK
Mr. J. V. Fentress, Clerk
Princess Anne Court House
Princess Anne, Virginia
Dear Sir:
I believe it is part of your duties as Clerk of the Court to
also act as Clerk to the Board of Supervisors of Princess
Anne County.
I am at+aching hereto Petition for the loss of chickens, as
provided for under the Statutes of Virginia under the stray
dog act. I would greatly appreciate it if you would place
this in due course before the Board for action upon the same.
I first wrote to Mr. Webb~fin connection with this matter,
but received no response, so I presume you are the proper per-
son to file this with. If not, I would appreciate it if you
· would advise me to whom I should direct this communication.
Yours very truly,
JDD/T
Encls.
TO: THE CHAIR~N OF THE ~iF~2~ OF THE BOARD OF SD~PERVISOES
OF PRINCESS ANNE COUNTY, VIRGINIA
I hereby make application for reimbursement for t he loss of
thirty-one la~ng hens, nine months old, killed by stray dogs, which appli-
cation is made pursuant to the Statutes of the State of Virginia pertaining
thereto.
Attached hereto is the Affidavit setting forth the facts to
the best of my knowledge and belief.
Respectfully,
VIRGINIA,
IN TEE CfRPORATION OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK, to-wit:
This day personally appeared before me, Evelyn W. Tatem, a
Notary Public, in and for t he City of Norfolk, in the State of Virginia,
whose Commission expires on the 13th d ay of November, 1961, JOSEPH D. DEAL,
who being duly sworn deposes and says as follows:
1. That he is now and has been for the past ten years a
resident and taxpayer of the Lynnhaven P~gisterial District of
Princess Anne County, Virginia; and
2. That on or about the 5th day of November, 1958~ he was
the owner of a certain flock of chickens, approximately nine months
old, which he had raised for t he purpose of egg production and dis-
tribution; and
3. That the said flock of chickens were duly penned in a
one-half acre enclosure, with a six foot heavy duty wire fence for the
purpose of confining the chickens, and as a protection and precaution
for their safety; and
&. That on the 5th day of November, 1958, between the hours
of 9:00 A.M. and l:OO P.M., during the absence of the deponent, this
enclosure was entered by a dog, or dogs, the owner of which is unknown
to the deponent; the method of entering was by digging a hole under
the fence on the rear of t he enclosure; and
5. That the aforesaid dog, or dogs, killed thirty-one of a
flock of seventy-six chickens; and
6. That the deponent was not the owner of the dog, or dogs,
that committed the act, nor were the dog, or dogs, owned by any member
of the family or household of the deponent, or by any employee of the
deponent, or otherwise $ and
-1-
7. That it is impossible at this time of year to replace
the aforesaid nine months old chickens, which were held for the pro-
duction of eggs; and if it were possible, the cost would be $2.50
per head; and
8. That the deponent is deprived of t he use and benefit of
the production of eggs hy the aforesaid chickens; and that it will be
a period of at least nine months before he will be able to replace the
chickens to a point of production; and
9. That the deponent is~m~a~ingz c~la~.~lor the said thirty-
one chickens at a value of $2.00 pe ad~ as p~ov~ded by the Statutes
of Virginia, to he paid by the Board of Supervisors out of the dog
license fund.
Subscribed and sworn to this ~%~- day of December, 1958.
Evelyn W. Tatem, N.P.
My Commission expires on the 13th day of November, 1961.
-2-