090605 BRAC TASKFORCEBRAC
September 6, 2005
1
BRAC Requirements:
If Virginia Beach fails to meet the BRAC Commission’s conditions, NAS
1.
not
Oceana will be realigned closed; ie. The base will remain a naval
facility
Enact State legislation requiring Virginia Beach and Chesapeake to adopt
2.
zoning ordinances consistent with AICUZ/OPNAV instruction to prevent
incompatible development in the 70 dB or greater noise zones
To protect and clear the area defined by and within the Accident Potential
3.
Zone 1 (APZ1). State and local laws must be enacted to establisha plan and
spend at least $15 million per year to purchase the property within the area.
The plan must include provisions for eminent domain acquisition.
The provisions of the Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) must be enacted by the
4.
Virginia General Assembly and the Virginia Beach City Council
The State must legislate requirements for Virginia Beach and Chesapeake
5.
to evaluate all undeveloped properties in the 70 dB or greater noise zones
that are zoned for uses incompatible with the OPNAV instruction to
determine if they can be rezoned so as not to permit incompatible uses.
2
BRAC Requirements (continued):
State and Local governments must establish a program for the purchase of
6.
development rights in the flight path between NAS Oceana and NALF Fentress
defined as the “Inter-Facility Traffic Area”.
The State must enact legislation creating an Oceana/Fentress Advisory Council.
7.
The Deadline for enactment of BRAC Commission requirements is the end of
8.
March 2006.
If the conditions are not met, and the State of Florida meets certain conditions, all
9.
Master Jet Base units and functions at Oceana will relocate to Cecil Field:
Appropriate sufficient funds to relocate commercial tenants previously located
?
at Cecil Field
Appropriate sufficient funds to secure public-private ventures for all personnel
?
housing required by the Navy at Cecil Field for a relocation
Turn over fee simple title to Cecil Field and its improvements to the
?
Department of Defense on or before December 31, 2006
The BRAC Commission stated further that “it is the sense of the Commission that
10.
the future of Naval Aviation is not NAS Oceana.”The BRAC urged the Navy to
begin transitioning high intensity training evolutions to other bases that are less
However, this statement is inconsistent with sworn
encroached upon.
testimony of Naval officials and with representations of the Navy.
3
BRAC Timeline:
4
State Discussions:
Governor to appoint State level Task Force on BRAC
?
issues
Governor to lead statewide efforts
?
The issues associated with Oceana are regional in
?
scope and impact
All cities need to be involved
?
The Master Jet Base is important to maintaining larger
?
military presence
State to meet with Comptroller General to clarify
?
compliance criteria and process
Virginia Beach effort needs to mesh with State Task
?
Force
5
Local Work Group Purpose:
Coordinate and work with Governor’s Task
?
Force and Regional efforts
To collect/analyze data needed by City
?
Council related to compliance with the BRAC
requirements
To keep all decision paths open until City
?
Council makes a decision
6
Local Work Group Structure:
&LW\&RXQFLO
3XEOLF
5HYLHZ &RPPHQW,QIRUPDWLRQ
:RUN*URXS
6WHHULQJ&RPPLWWHH
0HPEHUVKLS
:
0D\RU,QIRUPDWLRQ
9LFH0D\RU
%
&LW\0DQDJHU
&LW\$WWRUQH\
/HDGIURP(DFK6XEJURXS
6XEJURXS6XEJURXS6XEJURXS
6XEJURXS
6XEJURXS
(FRQRPLF3XEOLF/HJDO$FTXLVLWLRQ
/DQG8VH,VVXHV
%
,PSDFW&RPPXQLFDWLRQV,VVXHV
'
7HFKQLFDO&RPPLWWHH
2XWVLGH([SHUWLVH
0HPEHUVKLS
(FRQRPLVW
:
&LW\0DQDJHU¶V2IILFH
/HJDO
&LW\$WWRUQH\¶V2IILFH
0HGLD
0DQDJHPHQW6HUYLFHV
$SSUDLVHUV
0HGLD &RPPXQLFDWLRQ
7
2WKHUVDVQHHGHG
3ODQQLQJ
3:5HDO(VWDWH2IILFH