Loading...
100907 City Noise OrdinanceCouncil Presentation Council Presentation Proposed Revision to City Noise Proposed Revision to City Noise Ordinance Ordinance October 9, 2007 October 9, 2007 Existing Ordinance Existing Ordinance Section 23-47 Section 23-47 ? ? Objective or “reasonable man”standard Objective or “reasonable man”standard ? ? Utilized extensively throughout Virginia, in Utilized extensively throughout Virginia, in ? ? mostly smaller and more rural jurisdictions mostly smaller and more rural jurisdictions Has been sustained against numerous Has been sustained against numerous ? ? court challenges but challenges continue court challenges but challenges continue Difficult to enforce because there are no Difficult to enforce because there are no ? ? specific factors defining violation specific factors defining violation Proposed Revisions Proposed Revisions Proposed ordinance based on a model Proposed ordinance based on a model ? ? ordinance prepared by the International ordinance prepared by the International Municipal Lawyers Association (“IMLA”) Municipal Lawyers Association (“IMLA”) with certain changes made to address with certain changes made to address unique characteristics of Virginia Beach unique characteristics of Virginia Beach Purpose of Changes Purpose of Changes Changes intended to retain “reasonable Changes intended to retain “reasonable ? ? man”standard while providing additional man”standard while providing additional information to citizens, law enforcement information to citizens, law enforcement and the courts to aid in compliance, and the courts to aid in compliance, enforcement and conviction decisions enforcement and conviction decisions Decibel Meters Decibel Meters Proposed ordinance does notinclude decibel limits as a Proposed ordinance does notinclude decibel limits as a ? ? standard for determining violations standard for determining violations Most citizens do not have decibel meters and would not Most citizens do not have decibel meters and would not ? ? know when their conduct violated the ordinance know when their conduct violated the ordinance Police department does not favor use of decibel meters Police department does not favor use of decibel meters ? ? Decibel meters cannot readily differentiate between Decibel meters cannot readily differentiate between ? ? sound sources, leading to enforcement difficulty sound sources, leading to enforcement difficulty Costs: purchase of decibel meters, ongoing calibration Costs: purchase of decibel meters, ongoing calibration ? ? for use in court, ongoing training and certification of for use in court, ongoing training and certification of officers officers Decibel limit ordinances also have been susceptible to Decibel limit ordinances also have been susceptible to ? ? attack in the courts attack in the courts Proposed Noise Control Standards Proposed Noise Control Standards Two separate provisions: Two separate provisions: ? ? General Prohibition utilizing reasonable man General Prohibition utilizing reasonable man ? ? standard (23-67) standard (23-67) § § Specific Prohibitions (23-68) Specific Prohibitions (23-68) § § ? ? Proposed Section 23-67 Proposed Section 23-67 (General Prohibition) (General Prohibition) (a)No person shall intentionally make, continue, or cause or allow (a)No person shall intentionally make, continue, or cause or allow to be made or continued any unreasonably loud or raucous noise or to be made or continued any unreasonably loud or raucous noise or any noise that unreasonably disturbs, injures or endangers the any noise that unreasonably disturbs, injures or endangers the comfort, repose, health, peace or safety of reasonable persons of comfort, repose, health, peace or safety of reasonable persons of ordinary sensitivity. ordinary sensitivity. (b) Factors for determining whether a person has violated (b) Factors for determining whether a person has violated subsection (a) include without limitation: subsection (a) include without limitation: (1) The proximity of the noise to sleeping facilities, whether (1) The proximity of the noise to sleeping facilities, whether residential or commercial; residential or commercial; (2) The predominate land use of the area from which the noise (2) The predominate land use of the area from which the noise emanates and of the area where it is audible; emanates and of the area where it is audible; (3) The time of day or night during which the noise occurs; (3) The time of day or night during which the noise occurs; (4) The duration of the noise; and (4) The duration of the noise; and (5) Whether the noise is recurrent, intermittent or constant. (5) Whether the noise is recurrent, intermittent or constant. Changes from Existing Ordinance Changes from Existing Ordinance Discontinues use of term “unnecessary noise,” Discontinues use of term “unnecessary noise,” ? ? which is difficult to objectively define and has which is difficult to objectively define and has been successfully challenged in other courts been successfully challenged in other courts Includes new subsection (b), which identifies Includes new subsection (b), which identifies ? ? specific factors for law enforcement and the specific factors for law enforcement and the courts to consider when evaluating potentially courts to consider when evaluating potentially unreasonable noise unreasonable noise Factors: proximity to sleeping areas, predominate Factors: proximity to sleeping areas, predominate ? ? land use where noise created and audible, time of land use where noise created and audible, time of day, duration and character of noise day, duration and character of noise Proposed 23-68 Specific Prohibitions Proposed 23-68 Specific Prohibitions § § Sound Source Limitation Time Specific Exceptions Vehicle Horns 10 consecutive seconds All Emergency Non-emergency signaling 10 consecutive seconds/hour All Religious uses, devices testing of publicly operated devices Emergency Signaling 10 minutes -- residential All Emergency Devices 15 minutes -- all other areas Boom boxes, car stereos, Unreasonably disturbs non-voluntary All City permitted other sound amplifying listeners or audible 50 or more feet from events devices source Bars, nightclubs, Unreasonably disturbs neighbors or 11 p.m. None restaurants, other passers by, or plainly audible 50 or - 7 a.m. commercial more feet from business premises establishments Noise Sensitive Areas Noise generated within 200 feet of All None school, place of worship, court or hospital and that interferes with workings of such institution Loud Speakers, Public Unreasonably disturbs peace and 11 p.m. City permitted Address Systems comfort of neighbors or passers by, or - 7 a.m. events audible 50 or more feet from source Construction Equipment Use of defined equipment prohibited 9 p.m. Emergency during stated times in residential areas - 7 a.m. How Citations Would Be Written How Citations Would Be Written Citations could be written under either Citations could be written under either ? ? 23-67 or 23-68, but we would expect 23-67 or 23-68, but we would expect §§ §§ that the general prohibition of 23-67 that the general prohibition of 23-67 § § would be used primarily in clear cases of would be used primarily in clear cases of loud and raucous noise resulting in citizen loud and raucous noise resulting in citizen complaints for which no specific category complaints for which no specific category of 23-68 applied of 23-68 applied § § Penalty Penalty A first offense under this ordinance would be A first offense under this ordinance would be ? ? class 3 misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up class 3 misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $500 to $500 A second or subsequent offense within one year A second or subsequent offense within one year ? ? would be a class 2 misdemeanor punishable by a would be a class 2 misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 and/or a jail term of up to fine of up to $1,000 and/or a jail term of up to six months six months In addition, the City may seek an injunction In addition, the City may seek an injunction ? ? against continuing violations of the ordinance against continuing violations of the ordinance