062408 5K Loop
City of Virginia Beach
Department of Parks and Recreation
Bikeways and Trails Committee
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
1
Introduction
· Recommendation of Bicycle and
Trails Committee
· Study funded from CIP 4-074 Bicycle
and Trails Projects
· SK Loop Concept to address Special
Events, Recreation and Fitness
· Accommodate a variety of users
and ages at various skill levels,
something families can do together
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
2
Context
LEGEND
ACADEMIC VILLAGE PRINCESS ANNE COMMONS LIMITS INTERIOR PARK AREA
(APPROX. 6 ACRES)
- ATHLETIC VILLAGE r-- EXISTING WETLANDS VELODROME/INTERIOR
ECONOMIC ATHLETIC BLDG. (885 LF)
- EXISTING PEDESTRIAN PATHS
DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL FUTURE
EXISTING CROSS COUNTRY TRAILS - BUSINESS PARK
ENTERTAINMENT DEVELOPMENT
PROPOSED PATH ALIGNMENT
GOLF COURSE ALT. 3 (2.5K INNER LOOP) - POTENTIAL SPORTSPLEX
- DEVELOPMENT
(PUBLIC & PRIVATE) 6' MULCH SHOULDER! SOFT
SURFACE PATH (ALT. 3) FUTURE ROAD ALIGNMENTS
MUNICIPAL CENTER
POTENTIAL PARKING (ALT. 2) FUTURE SE PARKWAY
- OPEN SPACE ROAD ALIGNMENT
PROPOSED PATH ALIGNMENT ALT. 2
BUILDINGS (5K INCLUDING EXTENSION) -, INTERFACILlTY
6' MULCH SHOULDER! SOFT TRAFFIC AREA
SPORT SURFACES SURFACE PATH (ALT. 2) EASEMENT LINES ~
HYDRO SURFACES EXISTING ROADS
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
rJ)
q
o
1) 6
c<l 6
Q) 0
i=Qu
:~ ~
,~ ~
f....". ~
......- rJ) '"
4-< rJ) ""
o ~ .~
c.B ~
O~~
June 23, 2008
AS SHOWN
L1
3
Process
· Public input, variety of user
groups (workshops & user
surveys) provided design
crite ri a
· 5 Preliminary alternatives
· $3.2 million proposed CIP
Project, not included in FY
08/09 CIP
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
4
User Preferences
· Cycling, running, walking and
skating
· Asphalt
· Event use mostly weekends,
both AM/PM
· SK length
· Used with visits to other
adjacent facilities
· Compared to other similar
facilities - Mt. Trashmore,
Boardwalk, First Landing
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
5
User Preferences
· Separate lanes for various
uses
· Wide start
· Shade & topography
· Cross country
· One-way traffic
· Grandstands
· Rest stops/restrooms
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
6
Bob Rodale Cycling & Fitness Park
· Accommodates multitude of
users
· .75 mile outer loop, .6 mile
cut through, total {{loop" 1.35
miles (2.32 K)
· Paved path, walking trails
· Velodrome, midway area for
vendors, 15 acre internal
park, grandstands, press box,
concessions, locker rooms,
and restrooms
· Hosts major events
· 100 acre total park complex
· Developed in county park
system, primarily privately
funded
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
7
Preliminary Alternatives
.0\
\^>,,\~~
n~r
I I ALTERNATIVE2
ALTERNATIVE 3
ALTERNATIVE 4
ALTERNATIVE 5
*
POTENTIAL SUPPORT
FACILITY LOCATIONS
POTENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT SITES
+
SCALE 1" _ 1000'
Princess Anne Commons
5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
February, 2008
Figure 4: Preliminary Alternatives
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
8
Princess Anne Athletic Complex (PAAC)
i;:'{ .~.r4
;:7;1 L/i"/' \ \.J.tl"
"'./~ 1 'I]
t:~'(y~r\ rl (I
,S?J \ jAMPHITHEATER
l \ l /
~b:' t//
r4D
I
It
I)~~
Llit:
! i
1//"
f: .'
,1//
...,: l
9(
!!ill
Qb~,s
=e
~,'"
;Q:
011
)>11
ell
\\
1,1
~\
I'
,I
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
9
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
10
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
11
PAAC
Pros
.
2.4 K (1.5 Mile) length
approximates the Rodale facility in
PA, a model for the project
Generally attractive setting
One of the least land intensive
alternatives
Adds diversity to the Athletic
Complex
Accommodates long path
alignments, some without driveway
cross I ngs
Daily use support facilities and
parking are in place
.
.
.
.
.
June 24, 2008
Cons
.
Other facilities are heavily booked
on weekends and could create
capacity conflicts
Two driveway crossings
Would limit or preclude
development of some master
planned sports fields
.
.
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
12
Sportsplex
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
~
13
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
14
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
15
Sportsplex
Pros
· 2.5 K length (similar to PAAC)
· Very attractive setting
· Large existing parking areas
· Sup port fa c i lit i e s fo r I a rge
crowds in place
Cons
· In conflict with future Indoor
Sports Facility Project
· In conflict with Economic
Development opportunities
such as a n office pa rk.
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
16
Probable Costs
· PAAC Alternative:
Essential Items -
$3.26 Million
· Sportsplex
Alternative: Essential
Items - $3.42 Million
June 24, 2008
~
~
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
17
Conclusions
· Princess Anne Athletic
Complex is the
recommended location
· Consider for future Capital
Improvement Project
· Consider grants and/or
pu blic private pa rtnership
opportunities for funding
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
18
Questions?
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
19
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
20
Context
ti
LEGEND
PRINCESS ANNE
COMMONS LIMITS
c:::::J EXISTING WETLANDS
PONDIBMP
SCALE I- - 1000'
Princess Anne Commons
5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
February, 2008
Figure 3: Overall Context Map
Amphitheater
//
Ju _ _ ,__
22
Golf Course Area
"
-~\~-~""~),;.
~.:;, ""
LlI ' '" ij\~" '
\ ,r ,
.ml~I', " ~",'iA"',
'"\'b '\'.
~,'if-.A. ,.,
".,"" ....<i2.. "'"
\\1\: ~".
-.,.--
--~-f
I
C"~"~''''''''"''~
C'-~\\ -',
,,~, \
~':;" """~, \
I "<':~"'" \~~ .' .
\, '~~ >~~, }
',~ '\.\~ ""
"" ,.;1" ~", "'.
.,", '- ~'"
~~\
C~~E \
\\. \
\" ) \
\ .\ \
\ \
\ '
\
\
)
JUII"C: L-r-, LUVU
\....1 I I \....\,J\..II 'I\...I L. UI\ILI 11'1'-1
LoJ
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
24
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
25
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
26
SportsplexjGolf Alternative
" ~
June 24, 2008
27
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
28
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
29
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
30
June 24, 2008
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
31
SportsplexjGolf Alternative
Pros
· 2.5 K (inner loop) 4 K length
( 0 ute r 100 p) 0 r 5.4 K (fi g u r e 8
layout) is versatile for many
events and skill levels and the
longest of the alternatives
· Very attractive setting with
variety of existing vegetation
and some very scenic areas
· Includes all the positives of
Alternates 3 and 4
· Can be aligned to leave large
development sites intact
June 24, 2008
Cons
· Additional support facilities
would be needed in remote
sectors
· Additional parking may need to
be provided on the south end
· Most land intensive alternative
· Most expensive initial phasing
due to length of trails
· The most difficult site to secure
· Ultimate impact of Southeastern
Parkway will require grade
separated crossings
· Potential use by equestrians,
mountain bikes and cross country
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
32
City C:>:l Virgi:r1ia Beach
VBgov.com
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
(757) 385-4242
FAX (757) 427-5626
MUNICIPAL CENTER
BUILDING 1. ROOM 234
2401 COURTHOUSE DRIVE
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA 23456-9001
June 18, 2008
The Honorable Meyera E. Oberndorf, Mayor
Members of the City Council
Subject: Princess Anne Commons 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Dear Honorable Mayor and Council Members:
Attached for your review and reference is the 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study. A
briefing is scheduled for Tuesday, June 24, 2008.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Barry Frankenfield
(757)385-1104 or Barbara Duke (757)385-4310.
With Pride in Our City,
Attachment
Princess Anne Commons
Sf ftfJJe3s fuci/ffg feus1bi/ffg SfJIr/g
Presented to:
City of Virginia Beach, Department of Parks and Recreation
Spring, 2008
RSITES
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
~
---.----
- --- -
== ==- -
-~
'00
YEARS ~
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Executive Summary
The Princess Anne Commons 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study is being undertaken by the City
of Virginia Beach Departments of Parks and Recreation and Public Works in order to evaluate the
potential of establishing a multipurpose looped course for daily use by walkers, runners, cyclists and
skaters, and for special events and races. The study focuses on the Princess Anne Commons area, a
large tract of publicly owned land "encompassing a wide array of interesting and diverse activities
that advance the City's objectives of enhancing its economic vitality and creating an economically
vibrant center for a community for a lifetime."
Of five preliminary locations and alternatives proposed, three were evaluated further with two
scenarios showing the most potential for ultimate development. These two alternatives are under
further consideration by the City. Either alternative could be developed to provide facilities that
meet key project criteria and have been determined to be feasible options for further consideration.
Each location has unique opportunities and constraints. However, at this point, the broader City
interest in developing the Sportsplex site for office use may preclude further consideration of the site
or call for a reevaluation of underlying project criteria. A summary of the two preferred alternatives
follows.
Alternative 2
Alternative 2 (Exhibit A) utilizes approximately 25 acres of undeveloped land at the west end of the
Athletic Complex and provides for a 2.4 K primary looped path through open fields for day to day
use. With temporary traffic control measures, and by utilizing existing roads and the 2.4K loop for
specific races, a closed 5K route can be provided for road racing. The city supports road closures at
portions of Dam Neck Road and Landstown Road on an event by event basis. This would achieve
the initial goal of a 5K closed loop, making it possible for the City of Virginia Beach to host US
Cycling Federation sanctioned road races. In order to complete a 5K length, connections between the
existing roads and the primary (2.4 K) multiuse loop would need to be tied in at two points in the
path. The first phase budget (including only the construction of the primary looped track) is
approximately $3,260,000. The preliminary budget for full development of Alternative 2 (including
phased construction of parking, utilities, landscaping and park amenities) is approximately
$12,000,000.
Alternative 3
Alternative 3 (Exhibit B) utilizes approximately 32 acres of undeveloped land next to the Sportsplex
and provides for a 2.5 K primary looped path through open fields and groves of existing trees for day
to day use. With temporary traffic control measures, and by utilizing existing roads and the 2.5 K
loop for specific races, a closed 6.5 K route can be provided for road racing. The city supports road
closures at portions of Dam Neck Road and Landstown Road on an event by event basis.
This would allow the City of Virginia Beach to host US Cycling Federation road races within a
closed loop at a maximum length of 6.5 K. In order to complete a 6.5 K length, connections
between the criterium course and the primary (2.5 K) multiuse loop would need to be tied in at two
points in the path. A related study indicates that this location could be viable for a private indoor
recreation facility, and it's also being considered for mixed use or commercial development. Either
use could be very complementary. The first phase budget (including only the construction of the
primary looped track) is approximately $3,430,000. The preliminary budget for full development of
Alternative 3 (including phased construction of parking, utilities, landscaping and parking amenities)
is approximately $8,554,000.
Page i
)Q
):
"'"
:'11
:>
~
:r:
=<
~
:.,
c:
'"
.."
),.
z
CJ1
^
"
-.
........
::.J -a
CD ....,
en -.
en ::.J
(")
" CD
ID en
en (") en
"0 -. )>
-
'""I -.
S' ........ ::.J
co '<
I\.) " ::.J
0 CD
0 CD
co ID ()
en 0
-. 3
0'"
-.
- 3
-.
........
'< 0
en ::.J
........ en
c:
c..
'<
I)
I ;'
/ m '2"
/r-ml
it>> i:'f'l')
! 0 !l:l~C/)
l::::tm 0.,/
,0 J
0,.
r-
m ~ );z 1:1
X <: ~ ,,1:1 I'IHIl I"" )> 1:1 1:1 om om 1:Im ~ 01:1 r-
::r 1:1-1 0 m o e: 0 Os:OI""::o o O~ OX )>x Oai!m
fr ... 1:Im ~ I"" !Je:~C5~ 2 e: 1'1.I e:ei) -l- ei)
::0::0 0 m 2~ 02-1 ::0-1 X 1'1.I 31': 2 G)
;:::;: 0- 2 0 o ::02 1'1.I 1""__ 2 0 ..... -1- 1'1.I- 1'1.I::1 -I 31':0
)> ~ xO -I ::0 o m:::! e:0 i:1'I.I Ol::02m2 2 Z om m
.::0 )> 0 e: 1:1)> ::oX mm i: -< en __ en en en ~~ :z
C'l1:l I"" i: ::0 X I"" ""1'1.I 20 1:1 -10 :-" 0 1:1 ~
)> )>)> : m 1'1.I )> m )>X -f1:l ~::o ....::0 m 1"")>0
:::+: 0::0 00 N)> o ,,- 0 -z
C;; m I'I.I?:S - 1'1.I .......-1 -I ~2
ro ::0" ::0 C'l (j; J'I1 m me: ::"-1 I"" 1'1.I m m ):
'""I m)> 2S U'I 1:11"" ;lI:;Z 1'1.I ai! 1'1.I -1m
:J 1'1.I::0 2 " .... 2 )>0 _ -I 2 1'1.I
I"" - to!! -fm z e: AI
1J1Il.) --m en .!! 0
1Il.)!::!: )> .co X~ 2 !: > 1'1.I
co< z m 2
ro ('I) ::0
=: I\.)
J>
Z
s;
()
~
,;;
:>-
llll
(1
:r:
;;;
"D
"
~
~
CJ1
^
"
--
I""'+-
::J -ro
CD -,
en :s-
en en
"cp
0) en
~ en en
S' =: )>
f:P ~ ::J
f\.) " ::J
g CD CD
0)
en
g3
;S:3
~a
(f)::J
I""'+-en
c
a.
~
t:'D
)>
;:;;:
('II)
....,
-o::J
Q)e;.
co -.
('II) (ij
=:w
)>
i:
'V
::t:
=i
::t:
m
)>
-f
m
AI
\
'\
\
\
\
\\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
g I 0
I
I
~ )>< ')>z - ~ CIl (1) zil==~ " O~ O~ ~~ ~ O"'t!
Z O' r'"
0 -1m "'t!-I 00 'Tll: Z-O 0 0_ 0_ -1_ O:xl
:!:r- "'t!m Z e: CIl e: CIl :!: CIl en I:z m
r-O r-m -Ie: mG')"'t! !2
-:. me ;:U:xl 50 CIlr- ;:UZo ~::! ~::! CIl::! -I 1:0 Q
o- w z
::!;:u )(0 -0 e:0 r-I:CIl ;:uZ mZ Z om m
00 .:xl Z ;:u:!: omm iii: -<G')......G') G') G') ZCIl
~ g wiii: (1)"'t! G') e: 'Tl CIl OZe "'t! -10 :-" 0 "'t! ~ CIlCll Z
r-I!! )>)> 0;:U >:!: .:!!~"'t! ~::tl....;:u m m r-> 0
0- o::tl :xl CIl 0 0 !'J> o;::r;;- e -I -z
_m me: -CIl--I m I:z
G')Z ;:u;::r;; :-1m "'t! r- <n-l r- CIl m CIl > -m
. -I m> ;::r;;:!: CIl i!!-I ~
liim CIl;:u 0(", >0 e: ::tl Z
(l1 (Xli!! -m o;::r;; -I m iii: > 0
8 <no > e: :!: ~ CIl
r-::tl ;:u Z
..:!! CIl
!!!
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Contents
Executive Summary..,............................................................................ i
Alternative 2.......................,.....................................,.............,............... i
Alternative 3........................................................................................... i
Exhibit A: Alternative 2 Plan................. ............................................... ii
Exhibit B: Alternative 3 Plan............................................................... iii
Contents...............................................................,............................... iv
List of Figures and Exhibits .................................................................. v
Appendices Contents........................................................................... vi
Raw Data Contents.............................................................................. vi
Photo Credits...........................................,........................................... vii
1.0 Introduction.........................................................,........................... 1
2.0 Purpose and Need........................................................................... 2
3.0 Study Area...................................................................................... 3
4.0 Public Involvement & Analysis ......................................................4
5.0 Kick Off W orkshop.............................,................................... ........ 5
6.0 Surveys............................................................................................ 7
6.1 Summary of Findings: User Surveys .............................................. 7
6.2 Summary of Findings - Events Surveys....................................... 12
7.0 Precedents' Interviews.................................................................. 14
8.0 Alternative Analysis...................................................................... 15
8.1 Analysis Criteria ........................................................................... 16
8.1.1 Alternative 1............................................................................... 18
8.1.2 Alternative 2............................................................................... 19
8.1.3 Alternative 3............................................................................... 22
8.1.4 Alternative 4............................................................................... 25
8.1.5 Alternative 5............................................................................... 26
8.2 Preferred Alternatives................................................................... 28
Figures 1 14.........,................................,................. ..29-42
Acknowledgements.............,........,................................... .43
Page
IV
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
List of Figures
Figure 1: Context Map................. ,..... .......... .......... ... .......29
Figure 2: Preliminary Alternatives ...................................... 30
Figure 3: Alternative 1.................................................... 31
Figure 4: Alternative 2.................................................... 32
Figure 5: Alternative 2 Photos............................................ 33
Figure 6: Alternative 2 Cost Analysis.................................. 34
Figure 7: Amenity Package Cost Analysis........................ .....35
Figure 8: Alternative 3 ....................................................36
Figure 9: Alternative 3 Photos............................................ 37
Figure 10: Alternative 3 Cost Analysis ........................,.........38
Figure 11: Alternative 4.. ................,...........,......... ........... .39
Figure 12: Alternative 5. . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . .40
Figure 13: Alternative 5 Photos.... ....... .. ..... ...... .. . ................ 41
Figure 14: Alternative 5 Cost Analysis....... .... . ... ..................42
Page v
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Appendices Contents
Appendix A: Meeting Minutes
Appendix B: Summary of Findings - Precedent's Script
Appendix C: Precedents Contact Information
Appendix D: User Survey Results
Appendix E: Events Survey Results
Appendix F: Local RunlWalkathon Events
Appendix G: Local Clubs Contact Information
Raw Data Contents
Raw Data 1: User Surveys
Raw Data 2: Miscellaneous Feedback
Raw Data 3: Event Surveys
Page
vi
Shamrock Marathon, Virginia Beach, Todd Spencer,
Virginian Pilot
Freedom Walk, www.defenselink.mil
Cyclist, Stock Photo
Sportsplex, Virginia Pilot
Cyclists at Virginia Beach Boardwalk,
www.portlandindvmedia.com
Children Running, Stock Photo
Cyclist Race, Stock Photo
Man Running, www.Torontowaterfrontmarathon.com
Mount Trashmore, www.citydata.com
Marathon Participants, Stock Photo
Women Walking, Nike Women's Marathon,
www.runningskirts.com
Marathon Event, Stock Photo
Bob Rodale Cycling and Fitness Park,
www.usboomers.comlrodale
Cross Country Runner, Stock Photo
Walkathon Event, Stock Photo
Local Cyclists Racing, (SportsPlex Criterium race),
Kevin Horvath
Resting Cyclists (SportsPlex Criterium race), Kevin
Horvath
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Photo Credits
Cover
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 17
Page 25
Page 28
Page
VII
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
1.0 Introduction
The Princess Anne Commons 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study is a
derivative of a broader planning effort to further distinguish and
develop the city owned property in Princess Anne Commons and
improve the network of pedestrian and cycling trails throughout the
area. With a high demand for distance themed special events in other
city parks and the oceanfront, the City and user groups are interested
in developing a new destination for events with a long distance, off-
road, and multiple-use track. Several areas within the Princess Anne
Commons could accommodate this type of facility. This study
presents an evaluation and comparison of five possible locations.
Page 1
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
2.0 Purpose and Need
Virginia Beach and the Hampton Roads region are home to a
very active population and with a relatively mild climate,
hosting a diverse range of recreational activities throughout
year. There are a number of organizations for running, hiking
and cycling enthusiasts and an ever increasing number of
special events such as fundraising and awareness-raising walk-
a-thons and races. The interest in bicycle racing is also
growing. Outside of organized groups, large numbers of
individuals make walking, running, skating and cycling a part
of their fitness regimen without the need for specialized
facilities. Where provided, multiple use trails in the City are
wen utilized by a diverse range of users, although they are
sometimes fragmented and do not always provide opportunities
for looped courses.
Interest in and demand for a multiple use trail facility come
from many sources including the Virginia Beach Bicycle and
Trails Advisory Committee (BTAC) whose members may also
represent related organizations. Interest also comes from City
departments and staffwho are impacted by the demand on and for City
fitness facilities. The desire for off-road facilities that can increase
user safety, provide training opportunities and that can accommodate
organized events without the need for closing streets and providing
high levels of costly support personnel and traffic control measures is
a common goal among the project supporters. It is in response to this
level of demand that the City of Virginia Beach, through the Parks and
Recreation and Public Works Departments has undertaken the Princess
Anne Commons 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study which addresses
the following points:
. To provide an alternative to the oceanfront, Mount Trashmore
and other popular city locations for special events such as
walkathons, fun runs and related activities
. To provide a venue for bicycle racing and race training on a
closed loop, off-road course
. To develop a fitness facility that can accommodate individuals
and large groups
. To support diversification of the range of activities and
facilities within Princess Anne Commons
. To create facilities that support the goal of increased economic
development of the region and complement a wide range of
proposed uses
Page 2
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
3.0 Study Area
There are many reasons why Princess Anne Commons was identified
as a possible location for an off-road fitness facility and the focus of
the study, including the following in no specific order:
· There is ample undeveloped land currently under City
ownership in the 12,000 acre district to support a course and
related facilities.
· With a mixture of academic, sports, recreation, entertainment
and health care destinations, there are already complementary
uses and facilities planned and in place.
.. The existing landscape varies throughout the commons,
including some very scenic areas that are unique within the
regIOn.
· The landscape setting could draw individual users and groups
looking for a distinctive venue as an alternative to the
oceanfront, and other popular area parks such as First Landing
State Park and Mount Trashmore.
Princess Anne Commons is also centrally located and relatively close
to much of the City's population. A recent market study (Brailsford &
Dunlavey, City o/Virginia Beach, Indoor Sports Venue Report Study,
Final Report, 2006) indicates that a private indoor fitness facility
could be viable near the Sportsplex. Many of the same factors
evaluated such as proximity to a population base also support the
potential for specialized outdoor facilities such as a fitness course.
There is interest within the City government in diversifying the range
of activities within Princess Anne Commons and in increased
economic development of the area. There are examples in the region
and throughout the country of mixed use developments (Hampton
Roads Center, Hampton, VA) that successfully incorporate multiple-
use trail facilities for public use. Figure 1 shows an overall context
map of the study area.
Page 3
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
4.0 Public Involvement & Analysis
One of the challenges of the study was to articulate a vision for an
innovative local fitness facility. While the City had some specific
goals in mind and knew of some facilities that had characteristics that
might be relevant, there were no set standards or clear precedents for
this type of facility identified at the outset of the project. Some of the
questions that needed to be addressed included: How would it operate?
How would it meet the needs of the community? What types of
amenities would it include? How should a facility like this be
marketed? Therefore, an extensive public outreach effort was initiated
to poll potential users and user groups about how they might use the
facility and the nature of events that they sponsor. City departments
and agencies were polled to learn the challenges they face and how
this facility could help them achieve their goals. Finally service
providers and managers of facilities that had related uses were polled
to provide insight into facility planning, development, funding, and
operation.
Page 4
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
5.0 Kick Off Workshop
A two part workshop was held on June 11, 2007 at the Parks and
Landscape Services Administration offices adjacent to Princess Anne
Commons. Fifteen individuals from the City's Parks and Recreation,
Public Works, Marketing and Information Systems, Economic
Development and Planning departments attended the first portion of
the workshop. Goals and priorities for the project were discussed and
ranked. Design/use considerations, economic development factors,
measures of success, potential support facilities and related projects
were also discussed. For full meeting minutes (prepared by InSites),
refer to Appendix A. The top priorities identified from a longer list
raised by participants are as follows.
· It should be a true multi-use facility to accommodate a wide
spectrum of users.
· It should be an attractive facility, offering scenic views to
assure it's a viable alternative to the oceanfront.
.. It should be an asset to further development.
· The width is of concern to accommodate different uses and
skill levels simultaneously and safely.
.. The plan should consider equestrian, mountain bike and cross
country users.
· There should be an optimum financial return on the investment.
The second portion of the workshop was held later the same afternoon
as part of a regular meeting of the Virginia Beach Bikeways and Trails
Advisory Committee. Twenty eight committee members and guests
participated and full minutes are included as part of Appendix A. The
discussion format and topics were the same as the first stage of the
workshop. The top priorities that the group identified from a long
initial list are as follows.
· It should be a true multi-use facility to accommodate a wide
spectrum of users.
.. There should be adequate parking.
· The path should not cross any major roadways or driveways.
· There should be an appropriate and long lasting surface
treatment.
· The path should interface paved 5K loops with non-paved
scenic trails to create longer distance courses.
· It should be a professional facility to accommodate national
events with up 2,000 users.
Page 5
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
· A distance of five kilometers will be adequate for bicycle road
racmg.
· The width is of concern to accommodate different uses and
skill levels simultaneously and safely. Eighteen feet is a
minimum and up to 30-40 feet may be required for a racing
starting area.
· The finish line area should be a 250 meter straightaway with a
50 meter run-out area.
· Fencing should be considered at the finish to protect racers and
spectators.
· There should be changes in topography.
· It should accommodate fitness and circuit training.
It Criterium racing and training should occur on a sole-use
facility.
· Corporate and other private sponsors should be involved.
· There should be lighting for evening use.
411 There should be equestrian trails.
Page 6
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
6.0 Surveys
Two surveys were developed, distributed and posted on the
City web site to solicit further information about who might
use the facility, how they will use it and what types of
events might be hosted there. Also, telephone interviews
were conducted with managers and promoters of venues
identified as being potential models for the Virginia Beach
fitness course.
6.1 Summary of Findings: User
Surveys
Of the users, the majority anticipate using the facility for bicycling. Of
the bicyclists, most anticipate also using the facility for either walking
or running. A handful of people anticipate using the facility for
therapy and skating.
All users anticipate visiting the facility as individuals or in groups.
Over two thirds anticipate using the facility for up to two hours while
the other third anticipate using it for two to four hours, and a few users
anticipate using the facility more than four hours (for event purposes).
The majority of users anticipate visiting the facility on the weekends,
while over half of the users anticipate using the facility on the
weekdays as well. Almost a quarter of the users anticipate visiting the
facility on a daily basis. Those who anticipate using the facility on a
daily basis anticipate using the facility for at least two activities.
In terms of time of day, over half of the users anticipate using the
facility in the morning with the rest of the users using the facility
during the evening.
Eighty percent of users would like the course to be at least five
kilometers long (5 K). Of those users, majority would like the course
to be longer than five kilometers. Eight percent of users would like the
course to be at least one kilometer long. And almost twenty percent of
the users would like the course to accommodate longer distances
between eight (8 K) to ten kilometers (10 K).
Width preferences varied among users. Almost all users agree that the
path needs to be at least 12' wide with a significant number of users
Page 7
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
prefer that the path should be between 15' and 36' wide. Refer to raw
data for original survey responses.
Almost all of the users would favor asphalt as the surface treatment.
Several would prefer there to also be a mulch path (100% of them
being part ofthe running groups). And a handful of users suggested
either concrete or gravel as a surface treatment in parts of the path.
The major amenities that the users would like to have at the facility
include:
. Sitting and standing areas for spectators
.. Power sources
. Audio/video support
.. Water rest stops, and restrooms
lit Lane separation
.. Non-plastic paint for lanes
.. One way traffic as an option
.. Shade
.. A wider start (30' wide)
. 200m straightaway
.. A closed circuit
.. Include a separate training facility loop for higher speeds
.. Sweeping turns
. Changes in topography (small and large hills)
.. Berms for added challenges and added scenery
.. Create an overall loop with cut-throughs
. Involve the local public schools
.. Reinforce the concept of wellness
41> Include a cross country track for runners.
~-
Organizations that users belong to include:
. BGRO Running Group
4) Running Etc. Group, Marine Corps League
.. Tidewater Striders
. Final Kick
. Tidewater Bicycling Association
. Bicycle Racing Committee
. Kale Running
.. Virginia Cycling Association
CD Roanoke Cycling
.. US Army
.. Fat Frogs
.. USA Cycling
. Chesapeake Cycling Club
Page 8
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
· United States Cycling Federation (USCF)
· Rush Soccer
· Bicycle Shop Owner
· Richmond Area Bicycling Association (RABA)
.. Tri Power Cycling Club
· Tidewater Appalachian Trail Club
.. Tidewater Bicycling and Racing Club
· Triathlon Cycling Club
· Virginia Beach Wheelmen Cycling Team
· SR Racing
.. All About Bikes
· Special Events and Film Office (SEAFO)
All organizations contact their members via newsletters, email,
website, web blog, list server, meetings, and/or word of mouth with
many of the users saying that they would be glad to provide
information about this project and facility on their organization's sites.
The majority of users currently use several local facilities with Mount
Trashmore and First Landing State Park being the most widely used.
Our users indicated that the Boardwalk at the beach is the second most
used facility with City View Park and Great Neck Park used to a lesser
extent by polled users. Other facilities and trails mentioned include:
Nolan Trails, Newport News Park, The Botanical Gardens, Dam Neck
and London Bridge Road paths, The Dismal Swamp Trail, False Cape
State Park, Back Bay, streets at the oceanfront, Pocahontas State Park,
Petersburg Battlefield, NAB Fitness Center, Bayside Recreation
Center, roads in Pungo and Backwater, Redwing Park, and off-road
trails in both Williamsburg and along the Yark River.
Elements that users like about these facilities include:
· Lack of traffic
· Scenic views
· Different surfaces to accommodate runners or cyclists
It Off road trails
.. Accessible parking
· Restrooms
It Changes in topography
It Other activities available to users
· Playgrounds for children
· Lack of noise
· Safety
· Challenging trails
· Proximity
Page 9
III Length
11II Flat surface
. Water sources
III Shade
III Rural feel
. Loop options
III Good facilities for races
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Elements that users dislike about these facilities include:
. Crowded
It Multiuse
III Rough paths
III Lack of maintenance
. Heavily booked
. Wide start not available
III Expensive parking
III Limited access
. Narrow paths
. Proximity
. Do not cater to road bikes
. Rules not enforced
. Distance not long enough
It Presence of dogs
It Difficult traffic control
. Impact usage has on residents
. No seating available
. Lack of audio/video equipment
11II Lack of shade
III Proximity to waste site
III Do not accommodate competitive cycling
11II Lack of parking
Users had a variety of ideas of ways to make this facility unique
including: create a facility that will fully support professional cycling
and running events, restrict certain users to certain times of day (i.e.
strollers and skateboards), making facility a velodrome, make wide
paths, make it a bike specific facility, have separation of uses, changes
to topography, sharp turns throughout the trail, lights for night riding,
staging area at finish/starting lines, include places for mountain biking,
hiking trails, multiple surfaces for multiple users, incorporate an
equestrian area, include a water feature, incorporate the local terrain,
plants and wildlife, make it scenic, and provide amenities such as
restrooms, drinking fountains, accessible parking,
Page
10
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Other local facilities utilized at Princess Anne Commons include:
Landstown High School, Red Wing Park, Sportsplex, cross country
trails, Princess Anne Park, the golf course, the Verizon Wireless
Amphitheatre, shopping centers.
In terms of transportation to the facility, majority of users will be
driving (either by themselves or with other users) or bicycling.
Because of their proximity to the facility, several users would either
walk or run to the facility. One user would ride his motorcycle.
Almost three quarters of the users stated that they would be more
likely to use the facility if it had water sources and restrooms. Over
half the users would be more likely to use the facility if it had showers
andJor a changing area with a third of the users stating they would be
more likely to use the facility if it contained power, picnic tables, open
air shelters, and fitness stations. Copies of the surveys can be found in
Attachment 2 titled "Princess Anne Commons, 5K Fitness Facility
Feasibility Study: Raw Data."
Page
11
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
6.2 Summary of Findings - Events Surveys
Events that the facility might be used for include: Girls on the Run 5K,
Volksmarch, Todi Music Festival, Virginia Sports Hall of Fame
Bicycle Race, The Turkey Trot, and various races, marathons and
festivals hosted by the City of Virginia Beach.
The number of participants can range from 75 to 1,400 and up. The
number of spectators present at an event at any time can include up to
400 people. Staff requirements can include up to 40 people plus
volunteers, depending on the event.
Duration of the events can last from 2-8 hours per day. Events are
held at various intervals all throughout the year, including major
holidays.
Preferred distances for the events include 5K, 8K, and WK. Various
distances are necessary as the events held at the facility will require
different lengths for various user groups, Depending on the event,
preferred track widths can range from 18' - 36'. Half ofthe events
would use a pack start and half would use staggered start methods.
One design preference would be to have a 250 meter straightaway.
Preferred surfaces for the events include asphalt and concrete. One
quarter of the events planners would prefer rest areas along the course
at each mile with half preferring lawn as the viewing area. Others
preferred bleachers/grandstands.
The majority of events planners stated that awards ceremonies will be
taking place in conjunction with the events. Other program elements
occurring during an event include picnics, entertainment, and
registration.
Almost all events would require direct medical and emergency vehicle
access. According to event planners, food service, equipment,
delivery, trailers, and audiolbroadcast equipment should all be loaded
and unloaded nearby.
Signage would be required for almost all events on banners and tents.
Other major signage locations include trees, fencing, and sandwich
boards. Other forms of signage that will also be needed include: signs
on stakes, portable signs, and mile markers.
Information about the events would be handled by event organizers
and is typically posted on their websites.
Page
12
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Power, water, and restrooms are among the highest priority amenities
for these events. Areas for tents, open air shelters, picnic tables/grills,
audio and broadcast equipment, and a stage are among the amenities
that would be helpful but not absolutely necessary. Showers, locker-
room, and changing areas would not be necessary according to events
planners. Copies of the surveys can be found in Attachment 2,
"Princess Anne Commons, 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study: Raw
Data. "
Page
13
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
7.0 Precedents' Interviews
Interviews were conducted with individuals
representing projects in Maryland,
Pennsylvania, Illinois, Arkansas and
Tennessee. The projects were either identified
through research or through responses posted
to surveys. Of the five projects, the Bob
Rodale Cycling and Fitness Park (Lehigh, PA)
is the best model for the Princess Anne
Commons project in that it utilizes a wide
track for many users and that it hosts a series
of regional, national and international racing
events. The Medical Mile segment of the
Arkansas River Trail North (Little Rock, AR)
is noteworthy for its approach to fundraising
and development, incorporation of public art and
wellness. Maryland's Tanglewood Trail is a fitness trail that is very
popular with seniors and people with disabilities and includes a circuit
training course that is over half a mile long. This type of program
element could be considered for this project. However, it shouldn't be
extended along the race course. Instead, it could be designed in a
condensed format using smaller clusters. The remaining projects were
more typical of greenway projects with mixed use trails, ten to twelve
feet wide. Visits to the precedents have not been performed as part of
the study. Full summaries of the interviews are included in
Attachment 1 (Appendix B).
As stated above, the Bob Rodale Cycling and Fitness Park is seen as
the closest model for the Virginia Beach facility. Throughout the
racing season, it is leased to various cycling organizations and in the
off season, it is available to the public. The parks environment
includes various changes in topography, diverse vistas, and the
vegetation creates a mixture of sunny and shady areas for users. The
facility comprises various major program elements such as a one mile
track (with one cut through), a bridge over the track for riders, a
velodrome, and a 15 acre park surrounding the track. Support
facilities at the track include: grandstands, press box, concessions,
locker rooms, and restrooms. The facility also includes a midway area
for exhibitors, vendors, entertainment areas for use during special
events. These elements create a unique and well-used destination.
Page
14
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
8.0 Alternative Analysis
Five preliminary locations were identified and preliminary layouts
were developed and evaluated within Princess Anne Commons. These
are illustrated in Figure 2. Of the five original alternatives,
Alternatives 2, 3 and a revised Alternative 5A were carried forward for
further design refinement and evaluation, including preliminary budget
forecasts. As part of this analysis, lnSites developed a list of pros and
cons for each alternative. A summary of each alternative and any
additional supporting data is included in the following section.
Because Alternatives 2, 3 and 5A were subjected to three levels of
analysis, there is more supporting data for them than for Alternatives 1
and 4.
Page
15
Page
16
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
8.1 Analysis Criteria
Based upon feedback from the planning workshop and surveys, the
consultant developed a list of evaluation criteria and at a working
meeting with the City steering committee on July 23,2007, prioritized
the evaluation criteria. The prioritized criteria were applied to the five
alternatives and conclusions about each confirmed with the working
group. A summary of each of the preliminary alternatives and the
final disposition of each follows the criteria listed below. Refer to
Attachment 1 (Appendix A) for full meeting minutes.
High
.. Multi-use to accommodate the widest variety of users,
including mountain biking, cross country running
.. Attractive to compete with Oceanfront, with scenic variety
.. Proximity to adequate parking
.. Minimize conflicts from adjacent uses
.. No current roadway crossings
.. Compatible with existing or planned development
.. Accommodates adequate width paths (18' minimum paved
with striped lane designation and 6' minimum soft surface
shoulder for cross country running and mountain biking)
1& 5 K minimum length
. Proximity to existing parking
.. Minimize or avoid potential environmental impacts, wetlands
.. Ability to secure facility
. Overall visibility of course and facility
.. Capitalize on existing vegetation
Medium
.. Minimize schedule conflicts with other facilities
.. Crossings at limited use driveways (access roads)
.. Option for inner loops and alternative routes, surfaces, longer
trails, 10K+
.. Potential changes in topography
. Ability to isolate track for training, races
.. Proximity to overflow parking
It Existing event facilities, restrooms, staging areas
. Connections to other facilities and trails
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Low
.. Proximity to significant users, schools, hospital
.. Utilizes existing pathways
.. Existing water
4& Existing day to day restrooms
. Existing lighting
Page
17
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
8.1.1 Alternative 1
Alternative 1 (Figure 3) is located to the west of the Verizon Virginia
Beach Amphitheater, east of the soccer complex, and north of Dam
Neck Road. Although there would potentially be support facilities in
place and it is in close proximity to potential regular users at the
schools and medical center, Alternative 1 was not studied beyond the
preliminary evaluations. At 2.1 miles (3.3K), one of the two shortest
tracks, it was not as scenic or distinctive and the potential for
scheduling and user conflicts with adjacent facilities was greater. A
preliminary budget was not formulated for this option.
Pros
41& Support facilities already in place for large events
.. Incorporates some existing paths along Dam Neck
. Some lighting already in place
. V isibility of facilities
· Proximity to hospital and schools, central recognized location
Page
18
Cons
. Limited potential for inner loops and alternative routes
· Potential alignment constrained by existing features
. May not accommodate wider paths in all areas
· Potential for scheduling and user conflicts on specific dates
.. Shortest overall track length
· Driveways and access roads with limited but occasionally
heavy traffic
· With the concentration of existing facilities, there are not as
many opportunities for separate soft surface paths as with
some other alternatives
. Wetlands, canal remnants and dense woods provide some
scenic diversity but parking fields predominate
,. Would require coordination with Amphitheater management
. Potential wetland impacts
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
8.1.2 Alternative 2
Alternative 2 (Figure 4) utilizes approximately 25 acres of
undeveloped land at the west end of the Athletic Complex and
provides for a 2.4 K primary looped path (including a six foot wide
mulch shoulder for soft surface uses such as running or mountain
biking) through open fields for day to day use. With temporary traffic
control measures, paths on the north side of the complex access road
could be utilized to provide up to 1.8 K of additional track for racing
or other structured events.
With temporary traffic control measures, and by utilizing existing
roads and the 2.4 K loop for specific races, a closed 5 K route can be
provided for road racing. The city supports road closures at portions
of Dam Neck Road and Landstown Road on an event by event basis.
This would achieve the initial goal of a 5 K closed loop, making it
possible for the City of Virginia Beach to host US Cycling Federation
sanctioned road races. In order to complete a 5K length, connections
between the existing roads and the primary (2.4 K) multiuse loop
would need to be tied in at two points in the path. Construction costs
for these connections are included in the budget. For a longer route,
the race course could also include the criterium course, at no additional
cost, for a total length of 6.4 K per lap.
The character of the landscape varies from natural meadow with a
forested backdrop on the west end to fallow fields and high
transmission lines with little visual character on the east. The area
north of the access road includes existing multiple use paths which
would need to be widened, a large storm water pond and is visible from
both Dam Neck Road and the Athletic Complex. This alignment is
close to Dam Neck Road with potential connections to the existing and
proposed multiple use paths along that corridor. The existing parking
for the complex is well utilized, is a moderate distance from proposed
facilities, and would not always be able to accommodate the demands
of additional large events during peak use periods. While this area had
originally been master planned for additional athletic fields, Parks and
Recreation has determined that further athletic expansion could be
scaled back and supports the proposed use. The first phase budget
(including only the construction of the primary looped track) is
approximately $3,260,000. The preliminary budget for full
development of Alternative 2 (including phased construction of
parking, utilities, landscaping and park amenities) is approximately
$12,000,000.
Page
19
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Because of its central location and existing support facilities already in
place, Alternative 2 was considered an appealing option. InSites
developed this option further to incorporate the bike loop into the
existing Athletic Complex. Although it does not have the highest
scenic appeal, it is a central location and there is a high visibility of the
entire site. However, further development will require the site to
accommodate additional parking making the installation of additional
ball fields a potential challenge.
Pros
1II 2.4 K (1.5 Mile) length approximates the Rodale facility in PA,
a model for the project
1II Generally attractive setting with a variety of existing
vegetation, some very scenic areas
41 Adjacent wooded wetland is very scenic and contains walking
paths (unofficial)
411 Existing treelines create a partial sense of containment and
separation similar to the other alternatives
· The smaller site size makes more of the course visible at once,
perhaps adding a sense of security
41 This is one of the least land intensive alternatives and utilizes a
site previously programmed for recreational uses
411 Adds diversity to the Athletic Complex and ties in to the
overall circulation system
· Accommodates long path alignments, some without driveway
crossmgs
III Daily use support facilities and parking are in place at the
athletic complex but would need to be expanded
41 Some lighting in place
411 The site can be secured
411 High visibility of most of site
41 Incorporates some existing paths along Dam Neck
· Central location and connectivity
III Temporary use of Southeastern Parkway ROW expands
possibilities
Cons
III This alternative requires more up-front support facility costs,
including parking
41 Longer distance events would require multiple laps
41 This alternative may seem isolated from other potential uses
.. Other facilities are heavily booked on weekends and could
create capacity conflicts
41 Two driveway crossings
Page
20
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
. With the concentration of existing facilities, there are not as
many opportunities for separate soft surface paths as with some
other alternatives
. Could limit development of additional sports fields (currently
not scheduled)
. Not the highest scenic appeal, despite pond and small wooded/
canal segment water feature
. Alignments constrained by existing features in certain locations
Alternative 2 is one of the two Preferred Alternatives for further
consideration, along with Alternative 3. Figures 4 and 5 display the
path alignment as well as views of the site. The final budget analysis
is displayed in Figure 6.
Page
21
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
8.1.3 Alternative 3
Alternative 3 (Figure 8) utilizes approximately 32 acres of
undeveloped land next to the Sportsplex and provides for a 2.5 K
primary looped path (including a six foot wide mulch shoulder for soft
surface uses such as running or mountain biking) through open fields
and groves of existing trees for day to day use. With temporary traffic
control measures, the access roads surrounding the Sportsplex parking
lot could be utilized to provide up to 1.1 K (. 7 mile) of additional
course for racing or other structured events.
With temporary traffic control measures, and by utilizing existing
roads and the 2.5 K loop for specific races, a closed 6.5 K route can be
provided for road racing. The city supports road closures at portions
of Dam Neck Road and Landstown Road on an event by event basis.
This would allow the City of Virginia Beach to host US Cycling
Federation road races within a closed loop at a maximum length of 6.5
K. In order to complete a 6.5 K length, connections between the
criterium course and the primary (2.5 K) multiuse loop would need to
be tied in at two points in the path. Construction costs for these
connections are included in the budget.
The surrounding landscape lends a natural scenic character and feeling
of being out of the city, while the Sportsplex serves as an orientation
feature as it appears from different vantage points around the track.
The large existing parking lot provides space for casual users and for
large groups. The stadium could also be used as a support facility for
very large events planned around the soccer schedule. This alignment
is close to Princess Anne Road and connections could be provided to
the proposed multiple use path along the improved roadway, providing
connectivity to the Municipal Center and surrounding neighborhoods,
mixed use and commercial areas. A related study indicates that this
location could be viable for a private indoor recreation facility, which
would be a complementary use to the 5K Fitness Facility. The first
phase budget (including only the construction of the primary looped
track) is approximately $3,430,000. The preliminary budget for full
development of Alternative 3 (including phased construction of
parking, utilities, landscaping and parking amenities) is approximately
$8,554,000.
Page
22
This option was further studied as a potential site for the bike loop. Its
central location, existing support facilities and scenic qualities all
make for a desirable location. The arrangement with the Field Hockey
facility may pose a challenge to joint use of that portion of the site.
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
The Astroturf practice field can be removed, however, the other game
fields need to remain. There is a potential for the Sportsplex area to be
developed further into a multifunction area (possibly including an
indoor athletic area). As part ofthe secondary analysis, InSites
developed a list of Pros and Cons for alternative 3 (listed below).
Pros
. 2.5 K length is versatile for many events and skill levels
.. Many opportunities for smaller inner loops
. Very attractive setting with variety of existing vegetation with
scenic quality of tree groves and open fields
. Large existing parking areas
. Some existing lighting
1& Good visibility of most the course
. Views of Sportsplex and development of central green space
supports way-finding and related activities
. Support facilities for large crowds in place
. Compatible with Sportsplex and proposed indoor sports facility
. Opportunity to utilize or expand Sportsplex berm for viewing
. Connection to Princess Anne Road and Neighborhoods
. Existing utilities
. Existing 1.1 K (.7 mile) criterium course (with limitations, see
further discussion)*
. Flexibility for multiple course lengths and surfaces on a portion
of the site
. Can be combined with Alternative 4
· Could create a rolling terrain
Cons
· Several ditches of various depths need to be crossed
. Support facilities at the Sportsplex are somewhat removed
because of time restricted use
. Would need to relocate Astroturf soccer field
.. Potential conflicts with other scheduled events
. Smaller site is partially constrained by existing facilities
.. Open parking fields dominate a portion of the site
· Portions of site potentially difficult to secure
Alternative 3 is currently one of the two Preferred Alternatives for
further consideration. Figures 8 and 9 display the path alignment as
well as views of the site. The final budget analysis is displayed in
Figure 10.
Page
23
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
* The existing criterium course is an asset that in its present
configuration it not fully realized. Because the course surrounds the
Sportsplex parking lot and Field Hockey training facility access road,
users must be aware of traffic crossing the course. Even though daily
traffic is generally light, it still presents a potential hazard. Many of
the parking aisle access ways could be secured on a regular basis,
limiting conflict areas. Providing access to the stadium and hockey
facility from a new access point further south on Landstown Road
could allow the entire criterium course to be utilized for training on a
daily basis (see graphic, this page). Similarly the northwest half of the
course can be secured for a training loop, allowing access through the
southeast parking lot and access road.
Page
24
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
8.1.4 Alternative 4
Alternative 4 (Figure 11) covers the property south of the proposed
alignment of the Southeastern Parkway and Greenbelt. It was not
studied beyond the preliminary evaluations. Though it includes unique
natural character, there are no existing support facilities and its current
and ultimate separation from related venues may be problematic from
a security and accessibility standpoint. There is also concern about the
amount of developable land it would utilize. A preliminary budget has
not been formulated for this option.
Pros
· High scenic quality on portions of the site
· Acreage allows most extensive and potentially diverse path
alignments, including some that could be secured or isolated
for training or races
.. Accommodates broadest range of potential users including
equestrians
.. Could create a rolling terrain
.. The least developed location, allowing for the most flexibility
in design of the facility and support features
.. Could be combined with Alternative 3
.. Potential access from golf course and ultimately West Neck
Parkway
· Direct access from planned Princess Anne Road multiuse paths
Cons
· Furthest from existing support facilities
· Many of the "pro" factors also make it desirable for other
development
· Less visibility for monitoring use and security
Page
25
Page
26
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
8.1.5 Alternative 5
Alternative 5 (Figure 12) includes the entire course set out in
Alternative 3 and extends the path into undeveloped land to the south,
almost to the northern boundary of the Virginia Beach National/First
Tee Golf Course facility. This is the most land intensive alternative,
covering over 90 acres. It provides for the longest uninterrupted
course run (approximately 4 K) of any of the alternatives studied.
Therefore, it could be used for longer races and events without the
need for traffic control on streets or access roads. In addition to the
area around the Sportsplex, it encompasses some of the most densely
forested and remote reaches of Princess Anne Commons including
some old tree nursery plots with mature live oaks. The southern
portion of the site, not included in Alternative 3 is also characterized
by a rectilinear pattern of deep ditches, virtually impenetrable thickets
of mixed re-growth and a large overhead power line easement which
has been cleared. Alternative 5 also straddles the proposed alignment
of the Southeastern Parkway and Greenbelt. Figure 13 shows
additional views of the site. When the roadway is constructed, the
southern loop of this course would need to be routed under the road at
a grade separated crossing. Originally, Alternative 5 encompassed
even more property, but was realigned to provide more large
contiguous parcels that could ultimately be developed. The first phase
budget (including only the construction of the primary looped track) is
approximately $4,950,000. The preliminary budget for full
development of Alternative 3 (including phased construction of
parking, utilities, landscaping and parking amenities) is approximately
$11,509,000.
Pros
. 2.5 K (inner loop) 4 K length (outer loop) or 5.4 K (figure eight
layout) is versatile for many events and skill levels and the
longest of the alternatives
. Very attractive setting with variety of existing vegetation and
some very scemc areas
. Includes all the positives of Alternates 3 and 4
1Il Can be aligned to leave large development sites intact
Cons
. Several ditches of various depths need to be crossed, including
the largest on site
.. Linear views along large ditches can get monotonous
.. At many points along the path, users are very far from any
support facilities and orientation views
1Il Additional support facilities would be needed in remote sectors
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
· Additional parking may need to be provided on the south end
. Most land intensive alternative
. Most expensive initial phasing due to length of trails
· Some existing wooded areas are extremely overgrown
. The most difficult site to secure
· Ultimate impact of Southeastern Parkway will require grade
separated crossings
· Potential use by equestrians, mountain bikes and cross country
Page
27
8.2 Preferred Alternatives
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
The ultimate Preferred Alternative will be determined by the City of
Virginia Beach and the selection could be influenced in part by related
efforts and initiatives, induding separate requests for proposals to
develop some of the parcels within Princess Anne Commons, such as
the property surrounding the Sportsplex. As of the date of this report,
the final recommendation for the development of the Princess Anne
Commons 5K Fitness Facility is pending a determination by the City
of Virginia Beach.
Page
28
,I I
c:
~
en
"0
...,
:i'
co
N
o
o
CO
-.
-
~.
en
.........
c:
c..
'<
"T'I
cO.
t:
CD
.....
. .
o
<
CD
m
o
o
r::J
-oar
0> ><
CO-
CDS::
NO>
<:0"0
01
"
o
z
c
ijj
i:
"
mn".
~o;:om
~i:Z(j)
_i:nm
~~rnZ
:e wen 0
m r-;I>
-I - Z
r- !!i; z
~ c;jm
c
en
(Jl
^
-n
;:::;:
::J
CD
en
en
-n
Q)
(")
-.
-
-n
CD
Q)
en
cf
'" + *
8
0'" ."", )> )> )> )> )> 0'" r'"
0 mO )>0 r- !:i r- !:i r- o AJ m
<-t O-t -t -t -t 31:ZQ
mm -m m m m m m
r-z C:z AJ AJ AJ AJ AJ 31:0m
O-t ~:j z z z z z Om Z
"'5> ~ )> ~ ~ ~ ZOO C
31:. .)> -t 0000
m O. <: <: <: <: <: .)>
z 000 m m m m m -z
-t )>c ~z
-ti'J U'I ,jlo. W N ...l>
~ 00 -", -tm
=i 00 00
m Z;:o
00 OO-t
)>
z
v
(h
<J
,..
"
::T1
)>
10
()
1:
:t
'"
('J
..,
c:
J"
~
(J)
"'0
::!.
::J
co
'"
o
o
C>>
CJ1
^
'T1
-.
.........
::J
CD
en
en
'T1
Q)
(')
-.
-
-.
-
-.
.........
'<
(J)
.........
C
0..
'<
."
cO'
e:::
ro
'"
lJ
.....
(j)
~.
::J
l>>
<<!
)>
;::;:
(j)
lJ.....
l>> ::J
(Q~
(j) ;';::'
w(j)
.-.. Ul
'T1
CD
Q)
en
-.
c:T
+
),
Z
J
:.;::
>
~
lJ>
Q
(fJ
""0
::!.
::!
(0
I\.)
o
o
CO
-.
-
-.
.........
'<
en
.........
c:
c..
'<
II
cO'
c:
.....
CD
c...:>
)>
;::;:'
CD
-03
!.'lJ !.'lJ
(O!:!:
(l) <
wCD
01
^
"
.........
:::J
CD
(f)
(f)
"
Q)
("')
-.
-
"
CD
Q)
(f)
-.
CT
"tl
...
sr
(')
lZ
!II
)-
III ::l
::l ::l
a.1Il
11I0
!: 0
173
';' 3
Slo
0;
(') 3!:
;:rill
11I1:1
::11:1
IC! -.
!llc5
CIl
Q
C
...
l")
!I!
o
~
o
....
<:
ca'
:i"
iii'
CD
1Il
III
(')
;:r
"tl
iii'
::l
::l
S'
IC!
o
I'D
1:1
III
:::I.
3
1Il
::l
!""
~
*
Yi
~ 0
""I"I"tI
)>0
n-l
-m
Cz
~:::!
r-)>
Or-
n(l)
)>c::
-I"tI
-"tI
00
Z;::o
(1)-1
~
& ~
8
~
1:1
a
g
III
a.
;t
!!l.
!:
i
!II
III
(il
IlI-Z
::l!O
a. IC! -I
-....m
~ ir ,.
o III "tl
S. ::l III
ilia.....
. ;:r
1:I(il1ll
!!l.iii'~
;:rl:!::::I
III 0 3
:::::::1 III
IC! III ::l
::l:r.....
31:111>
III III III
::l-::l
litO a.
:e = ~
-. -':::1
=!!l.1Il
17 3' III
III IC! III
Cil III ;:r
:::!l::lg
::l a. '"
III 1:1 ::I
a.... III
~.g Cil
:::1.01:1
ilCl
;'" ~ 3'
III -,
III ::I
-III
5;<<
III III
!II ::I
."a.
o III
- ...
-II)
~ S'
-, -
:::I III
IC! ::I
....a.
C III
:::I. a.
;:r-
III 0
... III
III ;:r
::l 0
!!!.:e
~ l")
-.0
III ::l
III (')
::I III
a. 1:1
....
III !:
III III
cr=
n III
g.~
::l c:
o ~
....0
1:1 ::l
Cil :::!l
;tIC!
... C
III iil
a.l:!:
N 0
o ::l
::I III
III .
III
r-"tl
o Cil
c5=
III :I
.... -.
5;
&1".:<
;;::-1
I~
:::I I""
OS~
CIIIIC!
!th1:r
I"":::I~
(17)>
o III ill
1:111I0
n ....
:rl>>
i' ~
" :::I
lIl'
Q.-I
170
"<&I"
a VI
:I iil
~ !l. "!;
_::I III
- S' 18
SIC!:::I
m: -. r+
.... :::I 0
-1::1:::1
~ !; e
!!!.ll>1:I
-::Ill)
II> a. III
o 0
C "
if'"
.... ....
-II>
<> III
o ()
1:1 :r
!I' l8
IC!
::l
II>
:::I
....
D
"tI
o
Z
c
ijj
3:
"tI
"tIm
)>)(
-1-
::r:(I)
(I):::!
z
G')
m
)(
Ui
:::!
z
G')
:e
m
-I
r-
)>
Z
C
(I)
n"tl
02!!
3:z
3:n
Om
z(l)
0000
r-)>
-z
3:z
=im
(I)
)>
r-
-I
m
;::0
z
)>
-I
<:
m
....
;J>
10
n
:!:
:;
q
c:
7J
~
01
^
."
..........
::J
CD
en
en
."
Q)
(j) (")
-c --
::::!, --
::::!
(0
f\j ."
0
0 CD
co
Q)
en
-.
rr
--
-.
..........
'<
en
..........
c:
0..
'<
."
cO'
e
.....
CD
.$:>.
)>
;::;:
CD
'"03
w w
(00':
CD <
W ~,
/l.'~")
/ m 12h~
/ r- ;
In 11t;~ "/
/0 ~<('t;
l:I:mo)/
';O~tJ
...~..... .r-..
r- 'm'~j/
~'I:!!/
g
.....
6
z
)>
r-
"]]LZ ~
.. ..0-1 0
-nom
t:too
'I ::0 0
-c
/ n1::o
II ::tI en
-m
, C
I 3i:
\ 0
. 0
\ C
\.::tI
., en
m
I./)!ii'Oloeo..
Oo::lO-oO
(1) ='< 3 ::::T (1)
2. ;::;: Ol"O 0 I./)
O'<(1)--Ol-
O(1)I./)~Oo..c
::rx5' -00..0..
Ol"O(1)O"O.....(1)
..., Ol ..... 0 _. 0
Ol ::l ('j' (1) ::l ..... Ol
$lUi (J)......::r
(1) Cr-g ::l ~ (1) ~
=-'::lOlS 0
0-=0----10
s.ffi"=llas!!l
OlfllQ;o!!!.
..... "0 (C
(C ;::;:' Ol (1) ::l
..., 0 ::l ::l -.
(1) 0'< ::!"l
OlCI./)::::h~
~O:iif~;a.
oo-o..::E'<"
0(1)(1)(1)'
!!l-0..0l1./)
""",,(t):J-
0<0..0
o..~o..;::::
(1)00::r
<"0 (1) (1)
(1) (1) I./)Ol
00"::l.....
"OOlO::::T
Oll./)-W
::l0l::::T:::!:
'< OlO
<
(1)
..... · (J)
::r )> _.
Ol ::::T ;::;: Ol (ii' 0.. (j)
(j)S~@~9:()
0.. 0 I./) (1) :::!: ::::T
::l 0.. -, ..., 0 Ol
(1)-oC::l::l::l""
Ol Q, 3' 5' ~ ~ ~
::::. ;a. (C (1) <'"0 (j)
::r ./:>."0 )> !1> Ol :::!.
('J) ....,.... ~(/')
Ol Qo ~r 2: z -, :::!:
-<.0 (1)O';!O
::r..cn=,..,..~(J)
(i) m :::!: 0 0 (ii' ()
:::!:x3()::l...,0
o (ii' (1) 0,<"(1) ~
::!"l :::!: (1) 3 _...0
~::l <"0 I./) 5.
0..(C(1)--""
1./)1./)::l(1)::r(1)
. c.....X(1)O"
o"OfIl"O"OOl
0"0 Olal./)
!ii' g, ~ ~..g
::::'!ii' &5 2.;:::!.
a o. 0-<: Q,
3 ~ Ui 5' -0
:fill ::E8iif
(1)0l O::ll./)
"0"" C<(1)
~ (1) 0: ~ .....
::::T g~' g'
.!""'"
()(/)CD. CIJ@u)"o O"SO. =rq. 0"'0::;:'. (flU.
gg~-o@oOl-o(1)_Q-oO(1)-o;::::(1)(1)-o3a
~5'(1)::r::la::l::r0l2:~::r3i1l::r::::T~"O::::T~1./)
m ~S~Ola:S"OI./)~S:foS(1)I./)OS=~S
!!lQ,~o<:::!:(1)oS"O...,o(1)Oo::Es.::lo...,.....o
_.....~-oI./)-Qm~(1)Oo~...,C~OlOlO"~!I./)~
O::::T" - v::l;:::!.O v _v-::l-v"Olv
.....(1)(1)~~0l~~_-::l~(1)0"~~ I./)~~ ~
::::T::E0::l1./)::l"O::l~g::l::lQI./)::l::l80l::l0l~::l
com:::' o..LUo;-oro~mQz;~::1(fJ~a"""::
o<:!:::::To o@ -o_n...'"":(1).....,::l~.. (1)..
"0 Ol (1).. =ll Qoiif.....~----Ia(1)----I~(1)O----l"O;a.----I
~ 5.. ~ -j ~ 0' co I./) as (C ::::T ::l :::l ::r - Sl &5 ::::T III iii' ::::T
0l::::T 1./)"""(1) _(1)Ol:fm 0" ml./)=m
::!l (ii' ;;;: m m"O -j N !!:, ::::T a ..., m (1) ::l"O <: <' 0 0
(1) _, I./) Ol::r - m (1) x 0 <: (1) 0 "0
0:0l::l::::T <l./)mo!1>Ol~Ol"O~ Ol(j)m Olm
1./)<:(C0l Oll./)"OO _ Ol_ :::l:::l!!l-a.....::l
. ;~o.. ~~0l::l-j2:0l ~~ o..:::!:(1)oO"
_ Ol '< !E. m I.f) ::l ::r (1)::E -'(C mOl""...,::l::!"l
0= '< .....m~:::!:_ ~ x-::l(1)_~
o~ on. 00.. - - mOlOo..
3 c Q, 03 -. 0 ::!l m Ol:::l (1) 0.. :::!: ...,
m!!l -goffio...,m ~ (COOl
Ol . C -"0 m 0 -. m::l
..., 0:0..1./)(1) Ol_ 0 0
SR :::l :::l....
I
I
I
D
):;z "
,,-1 0
"m -I
AlAl m
00 ~
?< Al ;;
0)" .
)>)> "
o;;tl )>
Al" Al
m)> "
CIl Al Z
-!: Q
"omom
00><0~
ZCCiiCCll
o;:::!r,!:::!
ijj~zmz
iIl:-(Q__Q
"-10;-"0
~~ B~
-CIl m
r;; CIl Al
2:
ill:
~ ~
. 0
o m
o 0
;;tl 0
o C
ill: Al
m CIl
co m
C>> Ui
~ li
.:!!
CIlCl.lO.)>"
o .Al
:!l~~Q~
CIl .- z 0
cO iIl:t/)
;;tl:1: mm
."t/) Zo
)>:1: -I
00 1:3;:
mc :"'-1
". ,,::I:
)>0 _
-1m z
:1:2!:! Z
m
Al
"m m
~ ~ ><
:1: CIl Cii
t/):::! -I
z Z
Q (j')
" =e
m m
o -I
gJ >
;1 Z
;; ~
Z
-"
"'0
c-I
-1m
Cz
Al-l
m;;
".
~m
CIl~
!"m
....z
m!!
"0
-z
0"
O;;tl
iIl:z
ill: 0
om
ZCll
CIlCll
.)>
-z
iIl:z
=im
CIl
r'
m
G)
m
z
c
C. o..(i)::l. (J)
1.f)-j(1)0l0-j;::;:
m::::T<<-::::T(1)
Ol (ii' ~ m 16 (1) ()
::::-..gl./)mo::::T
::::T1./)3:f::loOl
mOl (1)"OOl03
~:::l~oiii':::!:n.
::::T(1) "'5':::lg (1)
(i) ~ (1)::l 0 ::::1.
.....(1) ..., (1)_1.f)
C'i" ::l I.f) 0.. _ :::!:
- !!:. ;::;: 0"" ::::T 1./)0
Ol 0 m -,
o.:::! I.f)"" rJ> -0
;:;:0 oS~a
'<- "O::::T(j)1.f)
!!!, a ~ Q; 3
<il~ O'm ~
Olm ""m<
:::l_ I./)m
0.. a' Ol ::::T
o::l ::l0l
~~ 0..rJ>
'>
z
~
Zh
~
"""
;t'1
".
l!II
n
:r:
=i
:::2
'I
-;
c:
~
."
cO'
e
......
(l)
01
)>
:::+
(l)
-03
t\) t\)
coe:
(l) <
w(l)
(,\ !\.)
-0
:r
o
-
o
'1J
Q,
::::l
-
!\.)
-0
:r
o
-
o
-0
Q.
::::l
-
.......
-0
:r
o
-
o
'1J
Q.
::::l
-
......
'1J
:r
o
-
o
'1J
Q.
::::l
-
0)
Princess Anne Commons Fitness Loop Feasibility Study
Final Cost Analysis
Figure 6: Alternative 2 Final Cost Analvsis 2 I
Unit Unit Cost Quantity Cost
Distance (outer IOOD) IF 7750
Distance MI 1.5
Distance K 2.4
ESSENTIAL ITEMS
Path 0 Aaareaate/TvDe 21A, assume 24" deDth) TON $35 44,594.7 $1,560,815
Path - AsDhalt/SMo9.SA} TON $95 2,287.2 $217,284
Path - Excavation - 24" CY $30 13,259 $397,770
Swale - Excavation CY $30 8,152 $244,560
Fill Shoulder Area* CY $20 5,044 $100,880
Geotextile Under Trail SY $3 27,844 $83,532
is'' RCP IF $80 532 $42,560
15" ES1 or 2 EA $1 ,400 28 $39,200
Seedina lB $25 2,280 $57,000
Overseedina lB $25 1,425 $35,625
Lime TON $400 45.1 $18,040
Fertilizer TON $900 6.8 $6,120
Clearina & Grubbina AC $12,000 4.2 $50,400
Erosion & Sediment control lS varies 1.0 $127,032
Metal Edging IF $7.50 17,900.0 $134,250
Pavement Markinas IF $4 35,800.0 $143,200
Subtotal 0 Path Construction $3.258.268
ASSUME TOP OF TRAIL l' ABOVE EXISTING GROUND EXCEPT WHERE IT CROSSES OVER
PROPOSED DRAINAGE PIPES, THEN TRAIL IS APPROX. 2,5' ABOVE EXISTING GROUND
TOTAL FILL NEEDED = FILL FOR SHOULDERT-fEXCAVATION Dlus a 12% comDaction factor
A neaative number 1-470} means that there is a surplus fill material I
*Excess fill due to additional cut material (could be used to create topoara-phv)
POTENTIAL SUPPORT FACILITIES
Nearbv Parkina SDaces EA n/a 0 n/a
Additional Parkina EA $3,380 790 $2,670,200
Staff SUDDOrt Facilitv lS $68,200 1 $68,200
Water Line IF $165 1,315 $216,975
Fire Hvdrant EA $3,400 3 $10,200
Sanltarv Sewer Line IF $165 4,925 $812,625
SanitarY Manhole VF $1,400 104 $145,600
SMH Frame & Cover EA $750 13 $9,750
Electrical IF $50 or $150.... 500 $75,000
Restrooms/Concessions* lS $250,000 1 $250,000
Maintenance EA $12,000 1 $12,000
Subtotal. Support Facilities $4.270.550
Subtotal. Path and Support Facilities $7,528,818
POTENTIAL ADDITIONS
Liahtina 175' O.C.}** EA $4,000 120 $480,000
Fencina . IF $27 7,655 $206,685
Park Amenity Packaae**' lS $407,459 1 $407,459
Landscaoe Imnrovements 0 Alt 2 on Iv lS $790,144 1 $790,144
Subtotal. Miscellaneous $1,884,288
Subtotal. Path, SUDDOrt and Misc. $9.413,106
Subtotal. incl. Public Art @ 2% $9,601,368
Basic Desian Costs 110%) $960,137
Additional Desian Costs (5%) $480,068
Mobilization (5%\ $480,068
De-Mobilization /5%) $480,068
Continaencv /20%\ $1,920,274
Grand Total $13.921.983
. Porl-o-potties can be used during large events and if needed facilities at the SporlsPlex and Athletic Complex can be used I
"Segments of the path can be lit; this would save on lighting costs I I I
'''Each alternative indudes a 6 acre inner core that could include turf, tables, shelters, grills, and site furnishings. I
,u"'Price difference due to Dominion Power's involvement; power assumed to run above ground. I
Page 34
InSites 1 PB
02/25/08
Princess Anne Commons Fitness Loop Feasibility Study
Final Cost Analysis
InSites / PB
02/25/08
Figure 7: The Amenity Package below is included as part of each alternative.
Amenities Package Unit Unit Cost Quantitv Cost
Clearing LS $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00
Trees EA $400.00 60 $24,000,00
Sod SY $3.00 27,353 $82,059.00
Irrigation LS $150,000.00 1 $150,000.00
Picnic Tables EA $1,000.00 10 $10,000.00
Benches EA $500.00 20 $10,000.00
Bollards EA $250.00 10 $2,500.00
Grill EA $500.00 15 $7,500.00
Drinking Fountain EA $1,200.00 8 $9,600.00
Trash Receptacle EA $400.00 12 $4,800,00
Bike Racks EA $500.00 4 $2,000.00
Signage EA $200.00 6 $1,200.00
Shelter/maintenance shed EA $12,000.00 2 $24,000.00
Tot Lot LS $60,000.00 1 $60,000.00
Bleachers/Lawn/Berm EA $4,000.00 2 $8,000.00
Watering Station LS $600.00 3 $1,800.00
Total $407,459.00
The Landscape Package below is included only as part of Alternative 2.*
Landscape Package (Alt. C) Unit Unit Cost Quantity Cost
Pond Excavation and Contour Grading CY $18.00 17,805 $320,490.00
Fine Grading SY $1.25 56,727 $70,909,17
Trees EA $400.00 44 $17,600,00
Seeding LB $20.00 4,608 $92,160.00
Overseeding LB $12.00 2,880 $34,560.00
Lime TON $225.00 91.2 $20,520.00
Fertilizer TON $650.00 13.7 $8,905,00
Irrigation LS $200,000.00 1 $200,000.00
Water Feature EA $25,000.00 1 $25,000.00
Total $790,144.17
"To enhance the cleared fields within this alternative.
Page 35
.,.
Z
Q
o;n
~
;;
(j)
""0
::i.
::l
<.0
I'V
o
o
<Xl
(J'1
^
.."
-"
........
::J
CO
(J)
(J)
.."
Q)
(")
-"
-
-"
~
.."
CO
Q)
(J)
-"
C"
-"
-
~"
en
........
c
0...
'<
)>
3:
"tI
:I:
=i
:I:
m
~
m
;tl
\\
"\\
'"
g
'\\
,~
\ -r;.
..0\ ~
~~\ 0
~\~
-, <:)
7A\
f/\
\
\\
~
~
o
\
\
\
\
\
~
.
~. g
\
\
\
\
\
\
'"
g
'@
I
I
I
o
->"tl "tl om om "tlm m o"tl r-
-~ CIlO') O~ O~ ~~ x 022
"tl >< >z z O. Zl"';:o 0 (ij m
x ....m "tl.... 00 ~3:: %-0 Z e: (I) e: CIl X (I) 3::% Q
0 XI'" "tlm mm"tl 0 z.... ;:0.... CIl::! .... 3::0
a 1"'0 ;:022 Em ? ;:ozo iii ....- (1)- % Z om m
;:oZ m%
!!.I 0 ~o 00 (1)0 1"'3::(1) 3:: m_m m m ZCIl Z
-oe:x omm CIl(l)
"tl o~ .;:0 ~e: ~(I) 0%0 "tl ~o ....0 "tl :e 1"'> C
0 ....;:0 :"";:0 m
Z m3:: O')"tl 0;:0 > X .::g~"tl ~OlS=i 0 m -z
>> .... 3::z
I"'r!! ;:0 (I) 0 0 ~~ m );
.... g~ _m me: -CIl m (I) =im
o- f;; CIl 22
mZ :-Ie;; "tl 6 ~::.t: .... Z (I)
.-1 m> e: ;:0 0
_m (1);:0 oi.n ~m 3:: :;
e>>;:o CIl
CIO- -~ g" x~ %
tIIO
1"';:0 ;:0
.::!! (I)
.!!!
..... $ ....."0 $ 0"" 0 $ Ol "0
0l0""$:iE"O":::r :::r- (I)@ (l)0l
"O(I)-o;::;:@-o(l)-o(l)~-oi'Ol-o!!l.g;
o 5" :::r :::r (fJ :::r "0 :::r (I) (I) :::r (I) - g- :::r <'
mgo Q~g.(3g.~.O'&(I)mo~(I)
;a_oai";::::O"OO!::!:.... ::lOl-oO@
5j"~-o;a:::r-om -o::l2'-O~o.o < ()
- 0 Ol .... 0 - 0 <0 ..... 0 ..... (I) _' Ol ....
"0 Ol -. ..... 0 -' '< 5' -, c 5' (I) _::l C (I)
- o..::l o' C ;a 0 ..... ::l .... - 3 5' ..... (I) Ol
Ol ~. ..... .... <0 =ll ::!l (I) W ^' -. N !::!:
o Ol ~ ~:::reo (I) (j) (I) W" :::.~.. :iE 0
(I) ~ 0 0 0 ., .... It<> 0: "0 -I <' (I) -I :::r ::l
0' ::l '-1' ;::: s. < S!;. <0 =- 0 :::r ~ 0"" ;;( (')' Ol
.....- :::r-a5'~..<O;:l.(I)V' w:::r.....
~offi~ffi:iE ~mg~5'wg~ ~~
(I).....(I)-"o(fJ'<~::l-~It<>::l~o (fJ
offi~mOlOOl!!l.~~=~~!::!:c;::;:c
lii (fJ !!l.' g:;::: a. 5' "0 "i' .:<'~ 0: ~ "0
o - -' .:::r <0 Ol C ~ (fJ
..... Ol ,~ -I (I) (fJ,~ ..... 0 Ol =- Si[ 0
;:l.~ o~ 7"- ::l::lW
gs 5' 0"" :r..g> ~ (3 5' ~ 0.. (I) "0 55
Ol <0 (I) (fJ 0 -. < <0 (I) (fJ 0 @ (fJ
:::. :::;, .....3 -...... 0 (I) ^' -' (I) - (fJ
::l -. III - ..... Ul w Ul ..... -0 Ol
(lJ ::l - Ol Ul (I)..... (/l Ul _. (I) ::l
. (ii':iE ];! "i :::r Ul ~ c::l:2_.
:::r:::r :iE(I)(I)(3 :::r@ "0(1)(1)3
=- -. Ol X Ol COOl Ol "i 0..-0
::l & '< Ol fi)<o :iE 0. (fJ (I)' 0
(I) o.....:::r::l'< ()(I) ;:l.
-::a:: (I) 0 0"" -. ..... (/l Ol
~g 15 S. ,<::l 1& ;a
mo: -0 ::l
(fJ
OlUl.g:.!8.
1t5:t>(I)(J)m
3!::.&jg;~o
Olo..;::;:(I)(I):::r
~O""c5'::a::@~
(I) (I)::l =-Ol
, ()0l-3Sl
"g ;; -g ~. m
Q !{!,.a gs Q ~
0.. -0 0.. -'
3 (I) 0 Ol -. 1;\
~. @ ;:l. 0.. c; ,
g 0. tii' el. :::r 0
(I) Ol 0 ::l Q 0
<Ul=.OlO::l
~ -g ~ <g \3. Ul
fi);:l.Ul()::l
- 0 ~ :::r<O
......~roQ)(ji
_:::r""'(/l =-.
o (I) v _ (I)::l
..., -n ~ a ::l ......
~~Ulo<gffi
=,(1) 3 . ::l
0- ~N!l!. 0
Ul-() ;:I.
Ol Q 0 :::r
......:T g ~
g: _. (I) ::l
(l)Ulg; "0
-. Ol
o ;:l.
~ s.
S..~5g,.fQ
-,,-oO:(I)Z(I)
ffioOlUl30o
.....~. ~ ~~Ol :::r
:;;3 0'-1>0<'% ~
(l)3::l0(l);::;:0l
(I) (I) -. l?' o' Sl
lllo.::l -o::l(l)
- -' 0 Ul lll....
ar~......"'Oro-~
.....(I):::r~(fJ"o_.
::l c (I) (I) (I) Ol 0
lll(/l Ul::l....Ul
~(I)1B..zc.,
ms:!!l.-I--~ 4'
~-.m :r.ffi::a:: 0
;::;:Ul::lUl OUl
0.. (ii' 0" 0.. W c
og::-'"g-ga:
m(l) Ul;:l.O""
::l3 ::lUl(l)
00 oJl!@
..... -(I)
....!!l. ::fX.g
~ () ~ -0 ::::;'
cO clll(l)
~. !!l. g. ~ ::
III ~ 2'~ Q
(/i (t) ......_t"'"i"
(") co:::r
~ m ......(i)"
(I)
),.
z
~
(h
~
"
~
)>
iIO
n
~
:i
::rJ
()
-l
r
?3
':"t"l
01
^
-n
,.......
:::J -ro
CD """"'S
en --
en p
(")
-n <D
Q) (J)
(j) (") (J)
"0 --
::!. .-
:;::)
(Q
N -n
0
0 CD
ex>
Q)
en 0
-. 3
C"'
.- 3
;::+:
'< 0
en p
,....... en
c
0..
'<
."
cO'
c:
...,
(t)
<:0
-0
Q)
(Q
(t)
CJ:.! ,.,
-0
:::s-
o
0-
-0
2.
:;::)
-
N
-0
:::s-
o
-
o
-0
Q.
:;::)
-
--....I
-0
:::s-
g.
o
-0
o
:i"
-
.....
-0
:::s-
o
-
o
-0
Q.
:;::)
-
0')
Princess Anne Commons Fitness loop Feasibility Study
Final Cost Analysis
Figure 10: Alternative 3 Final Cost Analysis 3
Unit Unit Cost Quantitv Cost
Distance (outer 100D) LF 8146
Distance MI 1.5
Distance K 2.5
ESSENTIAL ITEMS
Path - Aggregate (TVDe 21A, assume 24" depth) TON $35 45,379.4 $1,588,279
Path - Asphalt (SM-9.5A) TON $95 2,324.5 $220,828
Path. Excavation. 24" CY $30 13,476 $404,280
Swale . Excavation CY $30 8,430 $252,900
Fill Shoulder Area. CY $20 7,490 $149,800
Geotextile Under Trail SY $3 28,299 $84,897
15" RCP LF $80 912 $72,960
15" ES1 or 2 EA $1 ,400 48 $67,200
Seeding LB $25 2,337 $58,425
Overseeding LB $25 1,461 $36,525
Lime TON $400 46.3 $18,520
Fertilizer TON $900 6.9 $6,210
Clearing & Grubbing AC $12,000 4.3 $51,600
Erosion & Sediment control LS varies 1.0 $133,995
Metal Edging LF $7.50 18,192.0 $136,440
Pavement Markings LF $4 36,384.0 $145,536
Subtotal. Path Construction $3,428,395
ASSUME TOP OF TRAIL l' ABOVE EXISTING GROUND EXCEPT WHERE IT CROSSES
OVER PROPOSED DRAINAGE PIPES, THEN TRAIL IS APPROX. 2,5' ABOVE EXISTING GROUND
TOTAL FILL NEEDED = FILL FOR SHOULDER (-) EXCAVATION Dlus a 12% comDaction factor
A negative number (-470) means that there is a surplus fill material I
'Excess fill due to additional cut material (could be used to create topographv)
POTENTIAL SUPPORT FACILITIES
Nearbv Parking Spaces EA n/a 1 ,400 n/a
Additional Parking EA $3,380 0 $0
Staff SuPPort Facilitv LS $68,200 1 $68,200
Water Line LF $165 2,340 $386,100
Fire Hydrant EA $3,400 4 $13,600
Sanitary Sewer Line LF $165 2,435 $401,775
Sanitary Manhole VF $1,400 56 $78,400
SMH Frame & Cover EA $750 7 $5,250
Electrical LF $50 or $150.... 800 $40,000
Restrooms/Concessions' LS $250,000 1 $250,000
Maintenance EA $12,000 1 $12,000
Subtotal - Support Facilities $1,255,325
Subtotal. Path and Support Facilities $4,683,720
POTENTIAL ADDITIONS
Lighting (75' O,C.)" EA $4,000 122 $488,000
Fencing LF $27 7,575 $204,525
Park Amenity Package'" LS $407,459 1 $407,459
Subtotal - Miscellaneous $1,099,984
Subtotal - Path, Support and Misc. $5,783,704
Subtotal - incl, Public Art (Ql 2% $5,899,378
Basic Design Costs (10%) $589,938
Additional Desian Costs (5%\ $294,969
Mobilization (5%) $294,969
De-Mobilization (5%) $294,969
Contingency (20%) $1,179,876
Grand Total $8,554,097
. Port-o-potties can be used during large events and if needed facilities at the SporlsPlex and Athletic Complex can be used
"Segments of the path can be lit; this would save on lightng costs I I
'''Each altemative includes a 6 acre inner core that could include turf, tables, shelters, grills, and site fumishings. The cost of each would be the same.
**uPrice difference due to Dominion Power's involvement; power assumed to run above ground.
Page 38
InSites 1 PB
02/25/08
)-
Z
'::J
w
>
'""
'"
);.-
'"
n
=<
en
'~
c:
'"
m
01
^
"
(j)
"0
:::::!.
::l
<0
I'V
o
o
ex>
-.
-
-.
........
'<
en
........
c
0..
'<
."
cO'
C
"""I
CD
......
......
):>
;:;:'
CD
lJ"""I
m ::l
<os.
CD :;;;:-
WCD
(O.,f::..
........
:::J
(1)
en
en
"
Q)
(")
-.
-
"
(1)
Q)
en
0-
g *
o
'TI"
)>0
0-4
-m
Cz
~::i
r)>
Or
OW
)>c:
-4"
-"
00
Z;;o
W-4
"m
)>X
-4-
::r:::W
w::i
z
Q
"
m
c
m
w
-4
;;0
:;
z
m
X
M
-4
Z
Q
:e
m
-4
r
)>
Z
C
W
0"
0;;0
3:z
3:0
Om
ZW
WW
r)>
-Z
3:z
=im
W
)>
r
-4
m
;;0
z
~
<:
m
.to.
"
o
z
c
W
3:
"
..,
g
8
"
...
:i"
l'l
~
III
:l>
:::I
:::I
Cl)
o
o
3
3
o
S';
i:
III
'tl
'tl
5'
lC
en
o
l:
...
l'l
!l!
o
~
o
...
<
:;'
lC
S'
iii'
m
l1l
III
l'l
::T
"
iii
:::I
::l
5'
lC
C
l1l
'tl
III
;:l.
:I
Cl)
::J
r"
Ill-Z
::l ! 0
l:l.lC -l
-"'m
~ i ..
o III "
l: ::l III
lil'CI....
. ::T
i !. ~
....llllC
::Tl:!:::l
III 0 3
=;l1l
'g=.a
:I 'tl III
Cl) III III
:::1-:::1
lil'OCl.
lE ~ ~
=!::l
l:T :i' III
(0 lC III
; III ::T
::!l::l5!
::l CI. '"
III 'tl ::l
CI....1Il
2'-8 ;
;:l.O'tl
::Till...
Cl) (0 (0
:"~3
(0 -.
III ::l
-Ill
5;-<
1Il III
!II :::I
."CI.
o III
- ...
-1Il
~ S'
-, -
:::s 1Il
lC :::I
...CI.
l: (0
;:l.CI.
is'
... III
III ::T
:::I 0
!!!.lE
';i l'l
-, 0
III :::I
III l'l
:::I l'I)
CI.'S!.
III l:
l'I) III
iii=
C'l III
g.~
:::s l:
...
a8
'tl :::I
; ::!l
crlC
... l:
l'I) iil
Q.:::r.
N 0
o :::s
:::l III
(0 .
III
*
~
'tl
...
o
'tl
o
III
1Il
CI.
cr
III
-
l:
ill
III
III
ill
)>
z
~
'"
~
~
)>
9
:i
~
~
r"
.;3
~
en
-0
::!.
:J
(Q
N
o
o
(Xl
-.
dI""""t-
'<
en
dI""""t-
C
c..
'<
"
<.0'
e
ro
-..l.
N
)>
;::+
Cl)
"'03
mm
(Q!::!:
(l) <
~(l)
o(J'l
01
^
"
-.
dI""""t-
::J
CO ::J
en (")
en CO
"en
Q)en
Q. )>
......... ::J
::J
"CO
coO
Q) 0
en. 3
CT3
o
::J
en
t-J @
g:
" 'TI )>< ):z )>" " om om "m m 0" I"""
~ X m -1m ,,-1 I""'AI 0 0>< o~ )>>< >< OAl m
~ 0 0 Z Xl"'" -0 Z cen cen -1- en
-I 0 1""'0 "m Q" c AI-I xen lS:z Q
~ 0 m me :;0:;0 Zo Z-I en=! -I 31:0 m
0- - -l- en- Z
" C =!:;o ><0 31: en m :;oZ m~ Z om Z
& 0 Z 00 . :;0 mm lS: -(Q Q Q zen C
~ Zc " - en en
z m mlS: 0')" -10 :""'0 " ::e
I""'m )>)> -I" ~~ ....:;0 m 1""')>
-I )>)> ,,- e m -z
c:::::: 0:;0 --I m -I lS:z
QZ ::::0" 1""'-1 -en m !;
8 . -I m)> :-Ix I""'en ::::0 en =im
_m en -I en
00:;0 en:;o (J'I 2 AI Z
00 - -m - lS: :; e
(J'IO )> ./:lo. en
1""':;0 .c Z
'TI
-
s:C 00 .. 000 S:I(j) (f)0> .. 0> 0 (fJ CD'(f)~" s:s:o.."O .. o..() Cl) 3(Q 0.." 0 o..()"O er
a-N~,:~<lJ-g!~a"Oo~~~-lJg~"0030~aff~QlJ@i~Q~~lJ~~i~g
< C v_' <: "" o~, t::: -. c ;:x::- (Jl - ::::r :i" WJ Cl) -' -- ::l ::::r ::::r Cl) """I ""' 0
()Cl)o::::r::::r-mmo;:4.(fJ"""I::l::::r--;:4._i -~oO>~"""IOCl)~omoo>mo..
Ooo"O=o>o..oo<:ooo"O-o>o>o..~OO::::r ~seo_(Q WS(fJ~- o..aao>
~_Cl)m~ercCl)3~m~e~er3~m:IE _iOOOmO>o::l()moo-mCl)~
0.. ;;:.0 CD Cl)"O:: (fJ m a (Q Ci3 m. Cl)"O 0 ~ _ 0 lJ _, () () 0 0> _ lJ m.,~ """I (fJ
erW _0> !'V()"O O?)x ~m. N())>X 0> Ul ::::r-o (fJ::::rm c O-.oCO""" ()' er
m 3 2:~, 0 Q """I 0 0 mO'O 0.."0 s: - 0> 0> s: -. (fJ 0>' (fJ 0' a5 -. ::::r 0 0 s: m
o (fJ 0 0 - 0.. 0 """I <: """I 0 0.. 0> _ () ~ - Cl) a ~ CD -1"0 m (fJ a ero 0 ~ m 2"
0.. (fJ '" (Q ~. - 0> () 00 m _ ~. ;::;: """I 0 0> 0> ~ ::::r 0> O'l <: 0.. <:
gl _ ~ '^ 0.. ~ '< Cl) () 0_ :!. 0.. -0' C. _ (fJ 0 """I (Q 00 0 m ;:4. 0> er """I <:: 0 Cl)
;;:; 0 Cl) oV' m ~ _ 00 0 '^ 00 Cl) ~ 0 ::::r m 0> m a 0' (Q '< m " :3"::::r er"O m
~"O """I 3 """I;::;: o~, So.W """I ~ (Q m 0.. <: 3 <: en m 0 :{ -I (Q a m Cl) 0
o mom ;:;::. 0.. 0 0.. ~ m ~ -. -. c.B' m - 0> - .....::::r 00 0> 0
"Ooam o..wo>o en o.."O(fJ a o>f5oo~ QiJiS: rom;::;:~o
~ 1.U <' 0 0> 00 '<!'l 55 mo>o>.W 0> ~ ::::r ::::r mOm 0 ~ (jj (ii'
. om- 00 c mUl OO;;l-w 0 S91~ "0 s: erOO
0.. s: "0 (fJ _ "0 -. ~ @ 0 ;;:; a..... c c
Cl) 0> Cl) ::::r O>,~ 0 W ::::r W = m
;:4.. Cl) ;:4....... -
0"0 () C::::r" 0> :IE(Q"o .. 0> 3 (fJ .. ero 0> lJ)() .. (fJ(Q 9:" ~O""SZ-d:::
~'ooo CD ~ m ::l m """10 0 ..a 0"0 lJ ;.!t ~ 3 ~ Q lJ 2" a (fJ W 0> ..J......
W 0>..... lJ -. 00 _ () lJ C """I 0> <: W 0 ..J WJ e lJ 0> " lJ 0> m
o~"""Im(Q::::r()-i;:x::-::::r-m()::::r<::"""IoO>~::::rO"<o::::rc ::::r(fJ3
or Q: <_, Ul a 0 m m 00 mom (fJ mom 0> (Q (fJ g. 0 '< m () 0 eCO 0 m ^'
- - S~30;.S~mooS~()oo:IE"""Iso>a=<.s~a-o..w
<:5"'< m 0 Ci3 W w '-' () er ..J _ _ -, _ """I.... _ < 0 0> e
o::::r:IE~oolJaCl)"O....lJ1.U-Cl)lJ_m_O"~lJmmmlJO>Cl)lJ;::;:Ci3
. % ~ :IE 0 Q. S' g. ~ Q Q, @ 6. :{ Q. i ~ i ~ c. Q. ~ (tl 0 Q, ~ (ii' Q. ~ W
~O(Qm 30 Cl)mO () oo~oomOm 00'
-o2:m- ,C --o..m-~o(Q"O(Q-oooo-_O>-Q)-
::::ro..()"""I~"O "Omroo ~~::l"""lm W::l 0..1'0...... ~_::::r
Cl) () ::::r 0 .. Q. -I Q) 0.. ,. :IE Q) ::l " 0 ::l ~ ::l"O ., co "0 0> .. 0 C " <' (ii'
CO()"O(f)a:!.~Q))>Q)~~(f)~mmO>~-I_a"""l-l=~-Im()
OOC"""ImO' (fJ::lOOc- om~()OO"""I::::r::::r::::r-(')::::r..J ::::r' 0
m~m03 ()CO-o;:X::-"O<<ooe:IEre(fJmm~Cl)mm~m C
: ~ m (tl-iES:(j)i~ g::::roo)> "Oe~ ~~c ~
<:: W 0 oo::::r c"""Io(fJ 0> - Q) O><w _W<
;::;: (fJ _ _m m mQ)- () 0 -Cl)"""I mOm er
::::r Cl) CO"""l ::::r o..::::r 0.. m
00 ~-m Q)
0> ..
~lJ)
"""I m
::l()
ao>
-.c
< 00
Cl)m
(ii'o
.....-
::::r;::;:
m 00-
3-
0m
00 0
.....<9-
::::r
(f)
;::;:
m
(')
::::r
0>
@
a
m
"""I
(ii'
.....
&r
(')
o
::l
00
-
::::r
(ii'
~ ~..
g: cl5 -I
oom2:
(fJ (fJ
0..-
7,:;'0 ~
v' __
or_Cl)
::l ::::r 3
()mo>
ms:e
"""I <
m Cl)
m 0
~
"""I
00
.....
::::r
m
(f)
;::;:
m
(')
::::r
Q)
@
a
Cl)
"""I
(ii-
......
c)'
00
lJ
...,
o
00
',.
z
o
i'l
)>
;;
,.
1IO
9
::i
T
h
-l
c:
7'
"'!'l
01
^
..."
-.
.......
::J
CO
(/)
(/)
..."
en ~
"'0 _ .
::!. ...-
:::l
to
I\.)
o
o
CO
::J
...,,$
coO
Q) 0
~.3
g;3
.......0
~:o
en(/)
.......
c
c..
~
."
cO.
c::
....,
(I)
-'"
w
)>
;::::;:
(I)
lJ3
Q) Q)
to!:t.
(I) <
.j:I:o..(f)
-",O'l
lJ
::::T
o
8"
lJ
Q.
:::l
..-+
I\.)
lJ
::::T
sa.
o
lJ
Q.
:::l
..-+
O'l
lJ
::::T
o
..-+
o
lJ
Q.
:::l
..-+
-'"
o
lJ
::::T
o
..-+
o
lJ
Q.
:::l
..-+
........
lJ
::::T
o
8"
lJ
o
:i'
..-+
.j:I:o..
I I I
Princess Anne Commons Fitness Loop Feasibility Study
Final Cost Analysis
InSites 1 PB
02/25/08
Figure 14: Alternative 5 Final Cost Analysis 5
Unit Unit Cost Quantitv Cost
Distance (outer 1000) LF 13070
Distance MI 2.5
Distance K 4.0
ESSENTIAL ITEMS
Path - Aggregate (Type 21A, assume 24" deoth) TON $35 65,226 $2,282,910
Path - Asphalt (SM.9.5A) TON $95 3,340.1 $317,310
Path - Excavation. 24" CY $30 19,363 $580,890
Swale - Excavation CY $30 11,815 $354,450
Fill Shoulder Area* CY $20 11,612 $232,240
Geotextile Under Trail SY $3 40,662 $121,986
15" RCP LF $80 1 ,444 $115,520
15" ES1 or 2 EA $1,400 76 $106,400
Seedina LB $25 3,318 $82,950
Overseeding LB $25 2,074 $51,850
Lime TON $400 65.7 $26,280
Fertilizer TON $900 9,8 $8,820
Clearina & Grubbina AC $12,000 6.0 $72,000
Erosion & Sediment control LS varies 1.0 $190,000
Metal Edaina LF $7.50 26,140,0 $196,050
Pavement Markinas LF $4 52,280.0 $209,120
Subtotal - Path Construction $4,948,776
ASSUME TOP OF TRAIL l' ABOVE EXISTING GROUND EXCEPT WHERE IT CROSSES OVER PROPOSED DRAINAGE PIPES,
THEN TRAIL IS APPROX. 2.5' ABOVE EXISTING GROUND I I
TOTAL FILL NEEDED = FILL FOR SHOULDER (-) EXCAVATION plus a 12% compaction factor
A neaative number (-470) means that there is a surplus fill material I
*Excess fill due to additional cut material (could be used to create topoaraohv)
POTENTIAL SUPPORT FACILITIES
Nearbv Parkina Soaces EA n/a 0 n/a
Additional Parking EA $3,380 0 $0
Staff Support Facility LS $68,200 1 $68,200
Water Line LF $165 2,615 $431,475
Fire Hydrant EA $3,400 5 $17,000
Sanitary Sewer Line LF $165 1,580 $260,700
Sanitary Manhole VF $1,400 32 $44,800
SMH Frame & Cover EA $750 4 $3,000
Electrical LF $50 or $150"" 800 $40,000
Restrooms/Concessions* LS $250,000 2 $500,000
Maintenance EA $12,000 1 $12,000
Subtotal - Support Facilities $1,377,175
Subtotal - Path and Support Facilities $6,325,951
POTENTIAL ADDITIONS
Lighting (75' O.C.)** EA $4,000 175 $700,000
Fencing LF $27 12,900 $348,300
Park Amenity Packaae*** LS $407,459 1 $407,459
Subtotal - Miscellaneous $1,455,759
Subtotal - Path, Support and Misc. $7,781,710
Subtotal - incl. Public Art @ 2% $7,937,344
Basic Design Costs (10%) $793,734
Additional Desian Costs (5%) $396,867
Mobilization (5%) $396,867
De-Mobilization (5%) $396,867
Contingency (20%) $1,587,469
Grand Total $11,509,148
.. Port-a-potties can be used during large events and if needed facilities at the SportsPlex and Athletic Complex can be used
"Segments of the path can be lit; this would save on lighting costs
*uEach alternative includes a 6 acre inner core that could include turf, tables, shelters, grills, and site furnishings. The cost of each would be the same.
....Price difference due to Dominion Power's involvement; power assumed to run above ground.
Page 42
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Acknowledgements
Written, Edited and Produced by:
InSites
Keith Oliver
Tonya Gifford
Under the direction of:
Department of Parks and Recreation
Cindy Curtis, Director
Barry Frankenfield
Barbara Duke
Chris Kennedy
Department of Public Works
Christopher Wojtowicz
Bikeway and Trail Advisory Committee Members
Christopher Felton, Chairman
Bruce Drees, Co-Chairman
Fred Adams
Michael Ashe
Janet Werndli
Eugene Hansen
Ned Kuhns
Richard Hildreth
City Council
Councilwoman Barbara Henley
Councilman Bill DeSteph
Planning Commission
Eugene Crabtree
Parks and Recreation Commission
Robert Barnaby
Parsons Brinckerhoff
Beth Arnold
Jeff Walker
We'd like to express our appreciation for the assistance, cooperation
and involvement of all participants who supported this study.
Page
43
fJrincess Anne Commons
Sf fitness fUCi/ifg !eusibi/ifg Smr!f!
AtfJIc!JJ/)enc 1: AppendiX A
Heuting HiDutes
~~..._~~__~_~.".I I
1 I
...."'-...-...."'"'
~;j2,9,
." 1.*..t"J....."
#i~)
'}./-)
*~~-~
:",.)
\> .t'~
. ~~..,,~l
lo.\..~:>,.~~::ti:~~::;..>'
..'..v...........
City of Virginia Beach
Department of Public Works
Municipal Center-Building 2
2405 Courthouse Drive
Virginia Beach, VA 23456-9031
Phone: (757)-385-4131
Fax: (757)-385-5668
Meeting Minutes
Project: 4.074.002
5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Subject: Kick-Off Meeting for the 5K Fitness
Facility Feasability Study
Meeting Date: May 23, 2007
Time: 10:00 am
Location: Parks & Recreation Conference
Room, Bldg. 21
Meeting Attendees
Barbara Duke, Parks and Recreation, City of Virginia Beach
Tonya Gifford, InSites Landscape Architecture
Christopher I Kennedy, Parks and Recreation, City of Virginia Beach
Keith Oliver, CLA, ASLA, Principle, InSites Landscape Architecture
Christopher J Wojtowicz, P.E., Project Manager, Public Works, City of Virginia Beach
Issues:
Action For
01. InSites recommended meeting at the proposed facility location after they receive the
electronic mapping files and have had time to work with the details. Meeting to occur
before the BATC meeting in June. We later clarified that the walk through doesn't
necessarily have to happen before the meeting and that we may actually benefit from
hearing the stakeholder input in advance.
02. The location of the 5K Fitness Facility should be in the area located north of the
Sportsplex and east of the Southern Parkway alignment (near the first tee of the Virginia
Beach National golf course-formerly known as TPC). Parks & Recreation does want
InSites to consider other location alternatives within PA commons for the facility,
although Parks & Rec has always favored the area between the Sportsplex and the Golf
Course. This is also the area that the Economic Development pressure is in. So, we
must consider other alternative locations as part of this feasibility study
03. Parks & Rec. will create a stakeholders list for this facility and invite them to the June
11, BA TC meeting. 10-20 people should be identified, Attendees to represent Tidewater
Striders, Bikeway and Trails Committee (BATC), Virginia Beach Special Events,
Senterra, VB Schools, and the PA Commons Task Force.
04. There is a potential to link the 5K Fitness Facility to the Municipal Center via the
proposed West Neck Parkway. Also, Nimmo Parkway and Princess Anne Road
projects have been funded and could be potential ties, Any ties to transportation
projects could in theory open grant funding sources such as TEA 21. Rosemont Road
will not be extended into the project area due to the construction of the Landstown
Shopping Center.
05. Adverstising of the Fitness Facility to potential users will be performed by the marketing
group of Parks & Recreation.
06. Parks & Recreation will be responsible for the Maintenance of the facility. Public Works
may be responsible for maintenance of the paved surfaces.
07. InSites needs a copy of the PA Commons Path Study prepared by RK&K for use in the
feasibility study.
08, InSites would like a map showing the proposed uses/work by Parks & Recreation for the
area around the proposed fitness facility. The Racing Criterion will be completed this
summer. The Indoor Sports Facility mentioned at a prior meeting is not moving forward.
Barbara Duke
Christopher J
Wojtowicz, P.E,
Barbara Duke
Project Planning and Tracking System (PPATS)
Page 1 of 2
5/25/2007
City of Virginia Beach
Department of Public Works
Municipal Center-Building 2
2405 Courthouse Drive
Virginia Beach, VA 23456-9031
Phone: (757)-385-4131
Fax: (757)-385-5668
Meeting Minutes
09. An Alignment of the proposed Southeastern Expressway will be useful for InSites. This
will show any conflicts with the proposed Fitness Facility and the proposed expressway.
10. One thing that should be taken away from the BATC meeting in June is a list of items
that the fitness facility should have that will make people want to come to this planned
facility. These will be the "marketable" traits,
11. The feasibility study shall not include any options for crossing "major" roads with the
fitness facility. Whether any minor crossings would be acceptable could be discussed
further with stakeholders.
12. The golf course is no longer called TPC. It is now known as Virginia Beach National
(VBN).
13. Environmental Studies performed by Kerr Environmental are available for the proposed
project area. InSites to get a copy.
14. InSites needs the most recent aerial photography for the study area. These files will be
provided on CD from the Virginia Beach GIS Dept.
15. After the Stakeholder meeting in June (the BATC meeting), periodic meetings with the
City Review Committee will be made to discuss the deliverables at certain milestones of
the project.
16. Parks & Recreation will determine who will be part of the City Review Committee for this
project. Between 5 and 8 people will be part of this committee and will be made up of
both City employees and individuals from the private sector.
17. Ultimately this feasibility study will be used to "sell" the idea that building this facility will
be good for both the Community and the City of Virginia Beach. This will be a key
document for obtaining construction funding of this project.
18. Parks & Recreation will forward existing information regarding other known facilities to
InSites. Parks & Rec and InSites will look into the availability of National Recreation and
Parks Association membership lists and those of related organizations so InSites can
query for information on related facilities.
19. We reviewed tasks that were taken out of the original scope but could be performed
under the Optional Services services portion of Work Order 6B: Criteria for Lighting,
staging areas, wayfinding, restroom and support facilities and construction document
standards.
Minutes Prepared By: Christopher J Wojtowicz, P.E.
Date: OS/23/2007
cc: Attendees
Christopher J
Wojtowicz, P.E,
Barbara Duke
Christopher J
Wojtowicz. P.E.
Barbara Duke
Barbara Duke
Project Planning and Tracking System (PPATS)
Page 2 of 2
5/25/2007
IYE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
MEETING NOTES
Project:
Meeting Place:
City of Virginia Beach
Landscape Services Administration Conference Room,
4141 Dam Neck Road
Meeting Date and Time:
Meeting Purpose:
Monday, June 11 th, 2007, 2-3:30pm
Feasibility Study Workshop, Part I
Attendees (name, organization):
Keith Oliver, InSites, PLC
Tonya Gifford, InSites, PLC
Barry Frankenfield, City of Virginia Beach, Parks and Recreation
Barbara Duke, City of Virginia Beach, Parks and Recreation
Chris Kennedy, City of Virginia Beach, Parks and Recreation
Rob MacPherson, City of Virginia Beach, Parks and Recreation
Chris Wojtowicz, City of Virginia Beach, Public Works Project Management
Fred Adams, Trails Committee
Caryl Thompson, City of Virginia Beach, Marketing & Information Systems
Pete Hangen, City of Virginia Beach, Marketing & Information Systems
Karen Prochilo, City of Virginia Beach Planning Department
Mike Eason, City of Virginia Beach Resort Management
Bill Kelly, City of Virginia Beach, Resort Management
Brian Solis, City of Virginia Beach, Parks and Recreation
Jeff L. Bass City of Virginia Beach, Parks and Recreation, Sportsplex
Mark Wawner, City of Virginia Beach, Economic Development
Frank Fentress, City of Virginia Beach, Parks and Landscape Services
Discussion Items:
Top Priorities (Number of Dots)
. Multiuse facility to accommodate wide spectrum of users (5)
. Attractive Facility - scenic view to compete with the oceanfront (4)
. Asset for development (3)
· Width (1)
. Other users to consider: equestrian, mountain biking, cross country running (1)
· Optimum financial return (1)
424 WEST 21ST STREET SUITE 201 NORFOLK, VIRGINIA 23517
T757.622.6446 F757.622.6466 E info@insites-studio.com
PAGE 2 OF 3
MEETING NOTES
Design Considerations
· 5K distance
· Wide start to accommodate all users
· Width of trail is an important factor (18' = half the size of the boardwalk)
· Grade separation
· Reduce maintenance and operations cost
· Lessen impact
· Designated lanes
· Accommodate speeds up to 35 - 40 mph (bikers)
· One way traffic as an option
· Accommodate 100 - 500 runners (smaller events)
· Doesn't necessarily need to have an open center in the middle of the loop
· View of the entire course for spectators/security
· SE parkway and its impact
· Storm water - water feature/pond
· Criterion course - conflicts with other users
· Sportsplex - relationship with schools
· Civic Leagues - VBCCO - conduit
Economic Development
· Alternative to low economic impact events
· Value of interior and support land
· Naming Rights - $30k break point, $20k Coke - vending rights
· Consistent policy - no/low fee
Measures of Success
· Optimum use by community (including current users)
· Advocates outweigh negatives
· Safe and secure
· Easily accessible
· Scheduling and management without conflicts
· Fill the parking facilities
· Create revenue
· Compatible with other uses - connections to other facilities
· Golf course without the golf
· National games - senior games
· Cover operational costs
1ffi.'1W
SITES
PAGE 3 OF 3
MEETING NOTES
Possible Day to Day Usage
· Local schools
· Residents
. Trainers vs. family (fast vs. slow)
· 4 wheelers
Support Facilities
. Parking at existing facilities
· Tents/registration
· Water
· Rest areas
· Security
· Access control
· Lighting
· Seating for spectators
. Vehicular access for maintenance and emergency vehicles
Other Similar Facilities
. Innsbrook - commercial use w/running loops
. Rob Rodale Cycling & Fitness Park, Pennsylvania
· Mo-Pac Trail- Lincoln, Nebraska
Other Projects Currently Being Considered & Their Status
· Sentara/yMCA - Masterplan
· P A Athletics II - not funded
· Indoor Sports - in limbo
· SE Parkway - in limbo
. Nimmo Parkway - 2011 completion date (Chris W. to check)
. West Neck Parkway - not funded
. Princess Anne Road - 2011 completion date
· First Tee -long term lease
SITES
IYE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
MEETING NOTES
Project:
Meeting Place:
City of Virginia Beach
Landscape Services Administration Conference Room,
4141 Dam Neck Road
Meeting Date and Time:
Meeting Purpose:
Monday, June 11th, 2007, 3:30 - 5pm
Feasibility Study Workshop, Part II
Attendees (name, organization):
Keith Oliver, InSites, PLC
Tonya Gifford, InSites, PLC
Barry Frankenfield, City of Virginia Beach, Parks and Recreation
Barbara Duke, City of Virginia Beach, Parks and Recreation
Chris Kennedy, City of Virginia Beach, Parks and Recreation
Rob MacPherson, City of Virginia Beach, Parks and Recreation
Chris Wojtowicz, City of Virginia Beach, Public Works Project Management
Fred Adams, Trails Committee
Reese Lukei, Committee Co-Chair
Russell Webb, Courthouse Estates
Tom Lilley, Brigadoon
Shawn Hopson, City of Virginia Beach, Parks and Recreation
Cyndi Kight, Virginia Beach Beacon
Theresa Boothe, Shadowlawn
Dan Edwards, Tidewater Striders
Bob Barnaby, Parks and Recreation Commission
John McKee, Tidewater Bicycle Association, Fat Frogs Racing
Bruce Drees, Tidewater Bicycle Association, Kings Grant
Ned Kuhns, Bikeways and Trails Advisory Committee
Janet Werndli, Virginia Horse Council
Jay Davis, Fat Frogs Racing
Mila Ashe, BATC Committee Member
Discussion Items:
Top Priorities (Number of Dots)
· Multiuse facility to accommodate all users (5)
· Adequate parking (4)
424 WEST 21ST STREET SUITE 201 NORFOLK, VIRGINIA 23517
T757.622.6446 F757.622.6466 E info@insites-studio.com
PAGE 2 OF 3
MEETING NOTES
. No major roadway intersections or driveway curb cuts (3)
. Appropriate and adequate surface Treatment (3)
. Interface paved (5K) loops w/non-paved (scenic) trails to create longer distances
(3)
. Professional facility to accommodate National events (up to 2,000 users of
multiple groups) (2)
. Distance - 5K will be sufficient for road racing (2)
· Overall width (2)
. Starting width (at least 18', 30-40' wide for road racing)
. Finish Line Design - 250m straightaway, 50m run-out (2)
. Fencing to protect users and spectators (1)
· Changes in topography (1)
. Fitness/Circuit training (1)
. Criterium racing used at training facility only (1)
· Sponsors (1)
. Lighting for evening access (safety) (1)
. Horseback riding trails (1)
Design Considerations
. Aesthetics - attractive features, change in scenery
. Support multiple events at one time
. Consider closing certain parts of the trail as needed - signage to advertise
closures
Multiple surfaces for different usages
Separation between elements - nothing too close to racing course
Segregation of users (-8 person width is ideal)
Training facility vs. special events facility
Signage/striping to delineate lane usage
Traffic control, signage, and signals for street crossings
Storm water runoff
No crowning in curves if possible (for bike racing)
Consider phasing the project with top priorities being met first
Days and time available for racing (nights, weekends, 3-4 hours for typical race)
IOK for longer distance activities
Easily accessible
Water sources
Cross country running (users prefer some change in topography)
Alternative facility for recreational users
Users to consider: 6 local race teams, Boys/Girls clubs, Volksmarchers (5K events,
up to 2,000 walkers)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
SITES
PAGE30F3
MEETING NOTES
Equestrian Usage and Considerations
· Natural trail base (mulch)
· Obstacles for training
· Wooded areas
· Trailer parking with accessibility to trails
· Horse shows (timed and non-timed events)
· Long distance trail (15+ miles)
Support Facilities
· Power, lighting
· Check in area
· Registration
· Medical
· Viewing areas for spectators (berms)
· Adequate parking (users, spectators, support)
· Information kiosks
· Restrooms, changing areas, lockers
· Bike racks
Measures of Success
· Daily usage
· Consumption
· Amount of use
· Volume
· Revenue generator
Other Similar Facilities
· Mount Vernon Trail
· Mount Trashmore - lanes too narrow for racing and controlled events
· Rodale Facility in Pennsylvania
· Hampton/Langley speedway criterium course
· School athletic fields
· Sentara
Economic Development
· Sponsors
SITES
Bikeways and Trails Advisory Committee
Date of Meeting: Monday, June 11, 2007 Location: Parks and Landscape Services
Minutes Prepared By: Jackie Stone, Parks and Recreation
PUrpt.l~~ of Meeti~.g
To meet monthly and serve in an advisory capacity to City Council with respect to the implementation and
coordination of the Bikeways and Trails Plan and to coordinate the timely construction of bicycle facilities and
trails in accordance with the priorities established by the Bikeways and Trail Plan, to promote a balanced
approach between and among various facilities and trail users' interests in the City, and to provide a forum for
continued citizen and governmental input in the planning and programming of future bicycle facilities and
trails.
AtteriaUR~~i.~!. Me~tirigi ~ <
<Ii
Name Profession or Association E-mail Attend
Fred Adams Committee Chair warbler2@cox.net X
Michael Itzic Ashe Committee Member ashe@lawyervirginia.com X
Eugene Hansen Committee Member ewhansen@hotmail.com
Ned Kuhns Committee Member nedkuhns@cox.net X
Reese Lukei Committee Co-Chair rlukei@aol.com X
Janet Werndli Committee Member jfwerndli@att.net X
Christopher Felton Committee Member cfelton@vbschools.com
Richard Hildreth Committee Member rhildreth@jamesvalleyequipment.com X
Committee Liaisons
Bob Barnaby Parks and Recreation Commission barnaby2@cox.net X
Eugene Crabtree Planning Commisstion eugene .crabtree .ctr@navy.mil
Bill DeSteph City Council bdesteph@vbgov.com
Barbara Henley City Council bhenley@vbgov.com
City Staff
Barbara Duke Parks and Recreation bduke@vbgov.com X
Barry Frankenfield Parks and Recreation bfranken@vbgov.com X
Charleen Cooper Parks and Recreation ccooper@vbgov.com
Chris Kennedy Parks and Recreation ckennedy@vbgov.com X
Rob MacPherson Parks and Recreation rMacPher@vbqov.com X
Shawn Hopson Parks and Recreation shopson@vbqov.com X
Clay Bernick Planning cbernick@vbgov.com
Chris Wojtowicz Public Works X
Guest(s)
Keith Oliver InSites PLC X
Lt. Col. Russell Webb Courthouse Estates X
Theresa Boothe Shadowlawn X
Tom Lilley Brigadoon X
Bikeways and Trails Advisory Committee
Guests(s) continued
Cindy Kight Virginia Beach Beacon X
Dan Edwards Tidewater Striders X
John McKee TBA, Fat Frogs Racing X
Bruce Drees TBA, Kings Grant X
Jay Davis Fat Frogs Racing X
I~genda
1. Welcome and Introductions and Approval of Minutes
2. Old Business
3. New Business
4. Discussion Items
5. General Comments
6. Next Meeting
I MeetiJlg~otes, Deci$!pns: Issues
1. Welcome and Introductions and Approval of Minutes
Fred Adams called the meeting to order at 3:34 pm and called for a motion to approve the minutes
from the May 14, 2007 meeting, Reese Lukei made the motion and Ned Kuhns seconded the motion.
All present were in favor of approval. Although this is Reese's last meeting, we'll probably invite him
back annually. Reese was presented with a token of our gratitude for all that he has done for the
environment and the City.
Chris Wojtowicz, project Manager with Public Works, made the introductions. We have retained
InSites to work with us on the 5K loop and Keith Oliver is in attendance representing this company.
2. Public Workshop for 5K Fitness Facilitv
Barry said we were asked five years ago to include a special events area when developing Princess
Anne Commons. It was determined that we need an 18 to 25 feet wide 5K loop and fitness/cycling
facility. We are using Pennsylvania's facility as the model. BTAC has made the loop a priority in the
last year. We need to determine where it will fit. We have the consultant under contract. Those in
attendance have been invited to provide input and suggestions. By October/November, we should
have a concept and cost estimate to take to Council to ask for at least design funding.
Task 1 - Scoping/Analysis/Brainstorming: Keith Oliver with InSites said he needs to know what this
facility should be. They truly want to hear what it is that will make this work. They've learned the city
perspectives and will talk to event planners as well. They plan to wrap up this stage in early July.
From there, they will look at potential courses (where this might work in the Commons). Finally, they
will determine the preferred alternative, develop a preliminary budget, and make their final report.
The facility should be a trail, 18-25 feet with striped areas for cycling and walking (5K). Other than
that, the sky's the limit.
Each attendee was given three dots to indicate their priorities-this list is based on the number of
dots received:
Top Priorities
Multiuse facility to accommodate all users - 5
Adequate parking - 4
No major roadway intersections or driveway curb cuts - 3
Appropriate and adequate surface treatment - 3
Interface paved (5K) loops with non-paved (scenic) trails to create longer distances - 3
Professional facility to accommodate National events (up to 2,000 users of multiple groups) - 2
Distance - 5K will be sufficient for road racing - 2
Overall width - 2
Finish line design - 250m straightaway, 50m run-out - 2
2
Bikeways and Trails Advisory Committee
Starting width (at least 18', 30-40' wide for road racing) - 2
Fencing to protect users and spectators - 1
Changes in topography - 1
Criterium racing used at training facility only - 1
Sponsors - 1
Lighting for evening access (safety) - 1
Design Considerations
Aesthetics - attractive features, change in scenery
Support multiple events at one time
Consider closing certain parts of the trail as needed - signage to advertise closures
Multiple surfaces for different usages
Separation between elements - nothing too close to racing course
Segregation of users (-8 person width is ideal)
Training facility versus special events facility
Signage/striping to delineate lane usage
Traffic control, signage, and signals for street crossings
Storm water runoff
No crowning in curves if possible (for bike racing)
Consider phasing the project with top priorities being met first
Days and time available for racing (nights, weekends, 3-4 hours for typical race)
1 OK for longer distance activities
Easily accessible
Water sources
Cross country running (users prefer some change in topography)
Alternative facility for recreational users
Users to consider: 6 local race teams, Boys/Girls Clubs, Volksmarchers (5K events, up to 2,000
walkers)
Equestrian Usage and Consideration
Natural trail base (mulch)
Obstacles for training
Wooded areas
Trailer parking with accessibility to trails
Horse shows (timed and non-timed events
Long distance trail - 15 miles or more
Support Facilities
Power, lighting
Check-in area
Registration
Medical
Viewing areas for spectators (berms)
Adequate parking (users, spectators, support)
Information kiosks
Restrooms, changing areas, lockers
Bike racks
Success Measures
Daily usage
Consumption
Amount of use
Volume
Revenue generator
Other Similar Facilities
Mount Vernon Trail
Mount Trashmore -lanes too narrow for racing and controlled events
Rodale Facility in Pennsylvania
Hampton/Langley Speedway criterium course
School athletic fields
3
Bikeways and Trails Advisory Committee
Other Similar Facilities (con't)
Sentara
Economic Development
Sponsors
6.<Meetifi Ad'OUrn/Next Meetin
Chair Fred Adams adjourned the meeting at 4:49 pm.
DATE TIME LOCATION
July 9, 2007 3:30 pm Parks and Landscape Services, 4141 Dam Neck Road
AGENDA
. Update on Racing Criterion
. Update on Princess Anne Road/Nimmo Parkway project
. Lake Gaston Pipeline trail
A~$ignmeot$ ...lj;:
Action Assigned To Notes
Di.s.ttibution
Mayor and City Council
City Manager
Parks and Recreation Commission
Bikeways and Trails Advisory Committee
Charlie Meyer, Chief Operating Officer
Cindy Curtis, Parks and Recreation Director
Phil Davenport, Public Works Interim Director
Mark Johnson, Public Works Engineering
Ty Lee, Public Works
David Jarman, Public Works
Jack Whitney, Agriculture Director/Planning Interim Director
Clay Bernick, Planning
Richard Clark, Planning
Officer Jeff Jensen, Police Department
Steve Lurus, Open Space Subcommittee Chair
Design and Development
4
City of Virginia Beach
Department of Public Works
Municipal Center-Building 2
2405 Courthouse Drive
Virginia Beach, VA 23456-9031
Phone: (757)-385-4131
Fax: (757)-385-5668
Meeting Minutes
Project: 4.074.002
5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Subject: Preliminary Review Meeting
Meeting Date: July 22, 2007
Time: 10:00 am
Location: Parks & Recreation Conference
Room
Meeting Attendees
Beth Arnold, P.E., Senior Supervising Civil Engineer, PB Americas, Inc.
Barbara Duke, Parks and Recreation, City of Virginia Beach
Barry Frankenfield, Parks and Recreation, City of Virginia Beach
Tonya Gifford, InSites Landscape Architecture
Christopher I Kennedy, Parks and Recreation, City of Virginia Beach
Keith Oliver, CLA, ASLA, Principle, InSites Landscape Architecture
Christopher J Wojtowicz, P.E., Project Manager, Public Works, City of Virginia Beach
Issues:
Action For
01. If circuit training (i.e. training stations) will be considered, it will only be a small piece of
the overall project.
02. The Preliminary Alternative Analysis was ranked High, Medium, and Low as to the
importance of each design criteria.
03. Alternative #4 can't be considered by itself. Alternative #5 (A hybrid of Alternatives #3
and #4) and Alternative #2 must be investigated further. Alternative #1 (located at the
Ampitheater) will no longer be considered.
04. A scope of work and cost estimate must be prepared for the additional work in further
studying the chosen alternatives as well as for way finding, lighting, parking, and
facilites evaluation. Payment for these services will be paid from the Optional Services
section of the Work Order.
05. Rick Rowe from the Parks & Rec. Operations dept. must be invited to the next
progress meeting
06. A summary of the Analysis Ranking must be prepared and emailed to the meeting
attendees.
Beth Arnold, P.E.
Barbara Duke
T onya Gifford
Minutes Prepared By: Christopher J Wojtowicz, P.E.
Date: 07/24/2007
CC: Attendees
File
Project Planning and Tracking System (PPATS)
Page 1 of 1
7/24/2007
MEETING NOTES
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
MEETING NOTES
Project:
Meeting Place:
5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Department of Parks & Recreation, Municipal Center
Building #19, Virginia Beach, VA 23456
10 AM, July 23,2007
Concept Review Meeting
Meeting Date and Time:
Meeting Purpose:
Attendees (name, organization):
Keith Oliver, InSites
Tonya Gifford, InSites
Barry Frankenfield, City of Virginia Beach, Parks and Recreation
Barbara Duke, City of Virginia Beach, Parks and Recreation
Chris Kennedy, City of Virginia Beach, Parks and Recreation
Chris Wojtowicz, City of Virginia Beach, Public Works Project Management
Beth Anderson-Arnold, Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas
Discussion Items:
1. Review of Raw Data
InSites summarized raw data based on surveys, precedent research, and events and
distributed CD's with mapping and related research.
Based on a previous meeting, the top named priority for evaluating this facility was a
multiuse path that could incorporate all users. Based on the respondent's surveys,
InSites found that majority of the respondents were cyclists. They voiced a growing
need for a bicycle training and racing course in this area. This is a very design specific
element that needs to be considered and incorporated into the design. Barry feels that
limited hours for a training course may not be acceptable.
A portion of respondents also expressed a need for cross country-trails for running,
walking, and perhaps mountain biking. Being that cross-country trails already exist on-
site and are currently being used by local cross-country teams, it is a requirement for the
PAGE 2 OF 4
MEETING NOTES
facility. Parks would prefer a stone dust surface over mulch. Subtle grade changes can
be incorporated into project to add challenges to the trails and add scenic value.
There was no need for equestrian use expressed in the survey responses and therefore
will not be considered as a design element.
Valuable information was gained based on research from various precedents. Terry
Eastin, who helped develop the Medical Mile (Little Rock, Arkansas), found that tapping
into the medical community can be a great resource in revenue building. This might be
something to consider being that Sentara Hospital is one of the neighboring facilities in
this project.
Tanglewood Trail (Maryland) is a fitness trail that is very popular with seniors and
people with disabilities and includes a circuit training course that is over half a mile
long. This type of program element could be considered for this project. However, it
shouldn't be extended along the race course. Instead, it could be designed in a
condensed format using smaller clusters.
The Bob Rodale Cycling and Fitness Park (Lehigh, P A) is still seen as the closest model
for the Virginia Beach facility. A velodrome at the same facility creates a unique and
well-used destination.
2. Preliminary Alternative Analysis/Evaluation Criteria Rankings (Low, Medium, High)
High
. Multi-use to accommodate the widest variety of users, including mountain
biking, cross country running
. Attractive to compete with Oceanfront, with scenic variety
. Proximity to adequate parking
. Minimize conflicts from adjacent uses
. No current roadway crossings
. Compatible with existing or planned development
. Accommodates adequate width paths
. 5 K minimum length
. Proximity to existing parking
. Minimize or avoid potential environmental impacts, wetlands
. Ability to secure facility
. Overall visibility of course and facility
. Capitalize on existing vegetation
PAGE 3 OF 4
MEETING NOTES
Medium
. Minimize schedule conflicts with other facilities
. Crossings at limited use driveways (access roads)
. Option for inner loops and alternative routes, surfaces, longer trails, 10K+
. Potential changes in topography
. Ability to isolate track for training, races
. Proximity to overflow parking
. Existing event facilities, restrooms, staging areas
. Connections to other facilities and trails
Low
. Proximity to significant users, schools, hospital
. Utilizes existing pathways
. Existing water
. Existing day to day restrooms
. Existing lighting
3. Storm water
Are there unmet regional water storage needs, which could justify development of a
water feature? The flat grade of the land and soil makeup could create a challenge for
moving and holding water. Beth will be looking into the possibility of this.
4. Evaluation of Alternatives
The analysis of five alternatives was reviewed and conclusions were confirmed. The
final alternative needs to take advantage of existing support facilities, have a high scenic
value, and be easily accessible. Barry would like this facility to connect to the other
existing facilities, creating a seamless experience,
Alternative #1
Although it has support facilities already in place and is in close proximity to the
hospital and schools, Alternative #1 (Amphitheatre Zone) is not a viable option and will
not be considered. There is a great potential for scheduling and user conflicts. Also, it
would require working with the management and administration, which has proven to
be a challenge so far.
Alternative #2
Because of its central location and existing support facilities already in place, Alternative
#2 will be further considered as an option. InSites will be developing this option further
to incorporate the bike loop into the existing Athletic Complex. Although it does not
have the highest scenic appeal, it is a central location and there is a high visibility of the
, I
PAGE 4 OF 4
MEETING NOTES
entire site. However, further development will require the site to accommodate
additional parking and additional ball fields will not be a possibility.
Alternative #3
This option will also be further developed as a potential site for the bike loop. Its central
location, existing support facilities and scenic qualities all make for a desired location.
The arrangement with the Field Hockey facility may pose a challenge to joint use of that
portion of the site. The Astroturf field can be removed however the other fields need to
remain. There is a potential for the Sportsplex area to become more developed into a
multifunction area (possibly including an indoor athletic area).
Alternative #4 and #5
Although it has the highest scenic appeal, alternative #4 will be not be considered as an
option on its own. It does not contain any existing support facilities and takes up too
much of the undeveloped tracts. However an alternative similar to #5, a hybrid option
of alternative #3 and #4, will be considered as a possible location for the bike loop. This
option incorporates all of alternative #3 with an extension into the undeveloped tracts,
including live oak groves but still allowing further development.
5. Alternatives to be further developed
- Alternative #2 (Athletic Complex)
- Alternative #3 (Sportsplex Zone)
- Alternative #5A (Hybrid)
6. Requests for additional servies need to be submitted to Beth by next Wednesday,
August 1, 2007.
City of Virginia Beach
Department of Public Works
Municipal Center-Building 2
2405 Courthouse Drive
Virginia Beach, VA 23456-9031
Phone: (757)-385-4131
Fax: (757)-385-5668
Meeting Minutes
Project: 4.074.002
5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Subject: Project Status Meeting
Meeting Date: October 10, 2007
Time: 9:00 am
Location: Parks & Rec. Building 21,
Conference Room
Meeting Attendees
Beth Arnold, P.E., Senior Supervising Civil Engineer, PB Americas, Inc.
Barbara Duke, Parks and Recreation, City of Virginia Beach
Barry Frankenfield, Parks and Recreation, City of Virginia Beach
Christopher I Kennedy, Parks and Recreation, City of Virginia Beach
Robert MacPherson, Parks and Recreation, City of Virginia Beach
Michelle L. Martin, PE, Project Engineer II, PB Americas, Inc.
Keith Oliver, CLA, ASLA, Principle, InSites Landscape Architecture
Roxanne J Stonecypher, ASLA, Landscape Associate, InSites Landscape Architecture
Jeff Walker, PE, Project Engineer, PB Americas, Inc.
Christopher J Wojtowicz, P.E., Project Manager, Public Works, City of Virginia Beach
Issues:
Action For
01. A Powerpoint presentation was conducted by InSites to show the details of the three
alternatives. A copy of the presentation was given to Parks & Rec.
02. Copies of the cost estimate for each of the three alternative was handed out. These
costs to be reviewed by Parks & Rec and Public Works and comments sent back to
PB.
03. Other handouts included the Priorities of the 5K Fitness Facility, Pros/Cons of each
Alternative (A, B, and C) presented, a typical section of the trail, and the Sportsplex
area map showing the area where Economic Development wants to build
commercial/office space.
04. Option "C" needs to be expanded to be 2.5K and match more with Alternative A.
Christopher J
Wojtowicz, P.E.
Keith Oliver, CLA,
AS LA
05. All proposed paths need to support a vehicular load.
06. The edges of the asphalt should be supported with steel curbing to protect the edges
from crumbling,
07. It was brought up that cross country runners prefer earth as their running surface
instead of paved surfaces. Surveys submitted to the cross country community have
not been returned. At this time there are no unpaved trails planned for the cross
country runners.
08. A stormwater retention pond will be added to Alternative C.
09. It was decided to bring Alternatives A and C further along in design for the next phase
of work. No further consideration will be given to Alternative B at this time.
10. The estimate should assume that 24" of material will be cut from the path and include
geotextile. The aggregate volume will have to be increased due to this change.
11. Costs for contingencies, design, mobilization, and demobilization must be included in
the estimate.
12. A Work Order needs to be prepared for the additional work. This Work Order will be
Keith Oliver, CLA,
ASLA
Beth Arnold, P.E.
Project Planning and Tracking System (PPATS)
Page 1 of 2
10/10/2007
, I
City of Virginia Beach
Department of Public Works
Municipal Center-Building 2
2405 Courthouse Drive
Virginia Beach, VA 23456-9031
Phone: (757)-385-4131
Fax: (757)-385-5668
Meeting Minutes
run through the Annual Services Contract for General Civil Engineering currently held
by RK&K. PB Americas will be a sub to RK&K, but PB will still do all the Civil work that
may be needed for this work.
Minutes Prepared By: Christopher J Wojtowicz, P.E.
Date: 10/10/2007
cc: Attendees
File
Project Planning and Tracking System (PPATS)
Page 2 of 2
10/10/2007
Bikeways and Trails Advisory Committee
Date of Meeting: December 10, 2007 Location: Parks and Landscape Services
Minutes Prepared By: Barbara Duke, Design and Development
Purpos~IofMe~!i~g .......
To meet monthly and serve in an advisory capacity to City Council with respect to the implementation and
coordination of the Bikeways and Trails Plan and to coordinate the timely construction of bicycle facilities and
trails in accordance with the priorities established by the Bikeways and Trail Plan, to promote a balanced
approach between and among various facilities and trail users' interests in the City, and to provide a forum for
continued citizen and governmental input in the planning and programming of future bicycle facilities and
trails.
Attendance at Meeting
Name
Profession or Association
E-mail
Attend
Christopher Felton Committee Chair cfelton@vbschools.com -V
Bruce Drees Committee Co-Chair bwd-vb@cox.net -V
Eugene Hansen Committee Member ewhansen@hotmail.com -V
Ned Kuhns Committee Member nedkuhns@cox.net -V
Michaelltzic Ashe Committee Member ashe@lawyervirginia.com -V
Janet Werndli Committee Member jfwerndli@att.net
Fred Adams Committee Member warbler2@cox.net -V
Richard Hildreth Committee Member rhildreth@jamesvalleyequipment.com -V
Committee Liaisons
Bob Barnaby Parks and Recreation Commission barnaby2@cox.net -V
Eugene Crabtree Planning Commisstion eugene .crabtree.ctr@navy.mil -V
Bill DeSteph City Council destephenterprises@verizon.net
Barbara Henley City Council bhenley@vbgov.com
City Staff
Barbara Duke Parks and Recreation bduke@vbgov.com -V
Barry Frankenfield Parks and Recreation bfranken@vbgov.com -V
Charleen Cooper Parks and Recreation ccooper@vbgov.com
Chris Kennedy Parks and Recreation ckennedy@vbgov.com -V
Clay Bernick Planning cbernick@vbgov.com -V
Guest(s)
(3) Citizens Present
I>~genda
1. Welcome and Introductions and Approval of Minutes
2. Subcommittee Reports
3. Old Business
4. New Business
5. Discussion Items
6. General Comments
7. Next Meeting
Bikeways and Trails Advisory Committee
lMeeting~Pt~s, [)eci$~pns,ls$"'~$ 1-
1. Welcome and Introductions and Approval of Minutes
Chris Felton called the meeting to order at 3:30 pm and called for a motion to approve the minutes
from the November 14, 12007 meeting. Eugene Hansen made the motion and Ned Kuhns second the
motion. All present in favor of approval.
2. Subcommittee Reports
East Coast Greenway - Bruce Drees gave an update on his work as the southeast Virginia
coordinator. He is working on the interim Portsmouth route now. He stated that he will give the
committee more information to review on the Virginia Beach route as well as surrounding city routes
when the process is a little further along.
Sidewalk Improvements - Chris Felton gave the committee an update on the sidewalk
subcommittee's work and Barbara Duke handed out a status report to the committee. To date, five
sidewalk projects have been completed, four are scheduled for construction and four projects are
under design. The subcommittee has allocated all of the available funding to projects. There is a
significant number of projects still needing funding and a request for a new CIP project in the 2008-
2010 Parks and Recreation budget submittal to fund the sidewalk improvement program at
$500,000.00 per year for the next six-year CIP cycle has been submitted.
Parks and Recreation Foundation - Chris Felton stated that we need to attend the foundation
meetings as often as possible and suggested a quarterly rotation. Fred Adams agreed to attend the
next meeting in January. Chris Felton advised the members to review their calendars and come to
the next meeting ready to develop a rotation schedule for the coming months.
3. Old Business
RFI for Sportsplex/5K Loop Update - Barbara Duke gave the committee an overview of the draft
study findings. Three alternative path alignments within Princess Anne Commons were presented to
the committee and discussed at length. None of the alternatives measure a total of 5K. The longest
alternative, Alternative B, is a total of 4K in length. The committee felt that without the 5K length, the
facility would not draw interest from national groups for use. The facility needs to be "all it can be" in
order to be successful at obtaining support for funding and providing benefits to the City. The
committee voted to endorse Alternative B as the desired alternative with flexibility to complete the
loop in two phases. The committee chose this alternative because of the length (but still want to get
5K if possible) and the fact that there were no street crossings. Barbara Duke also gave the
committee an overview of the RFI process that is taking place in the area around the Sportsplex.
There is a potential for this area to be leased to a private entity for construction and management of
an indoor recreational facility in addition to management of the Sportsplex and Field Hockey
Complex. There is also interest from the Economic Development Authority to develop the area
around the Sportsplex into an office park. These two issues, the RFI and Office use, conflict with
Alternative B location. Alternative C, which is located west of the existing ballfield complex in
Princess Anne Commons, was discussed as a potential alternative location for the fitness loop. The
consultant is working on expanding Alternative C and the revisions will be included in the final report,
that should be submitted to Parks and Recreation in January 2008.
Status of Council Resolution - Chris Felton will get with Rosemary Wilson on the status of the
resolution. Bruce Drees suggested that since there will be anew Public Works Director coming on
board in January, the committee should request an in-breifing with the new director and committee
members agreed.
4. New Business
Bike Race Sponsorship - Mike Ashe wants to hold a bike race in May (which is bike month) for
children, similar to races he has held in Chesapeake in previous years. He would like for Parks and
Recreation Department to co-sponsor the race with advertising mostly. Eugene Crabtree suggested
that Fred Adams take the concept to the Parks and Recreation Foundation meeting also, to see if that
group might be interested in sponsoring the race.
5. Discussion Items
Eugene Hansen discussed the idea for a forum between bikers and civic league members that was
brought to him from the Pungo/Back Bay civic league membership. He stated he thought it was a
great idea to hold the forum in March as this is right before the weather warms up and the number of
2
Bikeways and Trails Advisory Committee
bikers increase with the warm spring weather. Several members agreed to get in touch with their
colleagues and coordinate with Gene on attending the March meeting. The goal is to educate both
groups on the issues/problems related to sharing the road and to discuss possible solutions to
improve conditions for both groups. Gene also mentioned that the first annual Pungo Christmas Tree
Lighting celebration was a success, but that he was disappointed in the level of city support. Also,
the 2008 goals for the Pungo Landowners Association include development of the trail system around
Pungo Village as outlined in the ULI report.
6. General Comments
None
7JJilMeeti nQ..AdjoufiilNext<.M.e.etintj...
Chair Chris Felton adjourned the meeting at 5:40 pm.
DATE I TIME I LOCATION
January 14, 2008 1 3:30 pm I Parks and Landscape Services, 4141 Dam Neck Road
AGENDA
Continue 5K Loop Discussion
CIP Submission Update
Asslgnme.nts <<
Action Assianed To Notes
Attend January 16, 2008 Parks and Recreation Foundation Fred Adams
Meetinq
Develop talking points on need for sponsorship for bike Mike Ashe Notes to be used by Fred
race Adams and Barbara Duke
Provide forum for discussions between bikers/residents of Eugene Meeting scheduled for
Punqo/Back Bay Hansen March 2008
8. Distdbutio"
Mayor and City Council
City Manager
Parks and Recreation Commission
Bikeways and Trails Advisory Committee
Susan Walston, Chief of Staff
Cindy Curtis, Parks and Recreation Director
Phil Davenport, Public Works Interim Director
Mark Johnson, Public Works Engineering
Tabitha Crowder, Public Works
David Jarman, Public Works
Jack Whitney, Agriculture Director/Planning Interim Director
Clay Bernick, Planning
Officer Jeff Jensen, Police Department
Steve Lurus, Open Space Subcommittee Chair
Design and Development
3
Bikeways and Trails Advisory Committee
Date of Meeting: January 14, 2008 Location: Parks and Landscape Services
Minutes Prepared By: Chris Kennedy/Barbara Duke
ling
Purpose
To meet monthly and serve in an advisory capacity to City Council with respect to the implementation and
coordination of the Bikeways and Trails Plan and to coordinate the timely construction of bicycle facilities and
trails in accordance with the priorities established by the Bikeways and Trail Plan, to promote a balanced
approach between and among various facilities and trail users' interests in the City, and to provide a forum for
continued citizen and governmental input in the planning and programming of future bicycle facilities and
trails.
Attendanc
Name
Profession or Association
E-mail
Attend
Christopher Felton Committee Chair cfelton@vbschools.com -V
Bruce Drees Committee Co-Chair bwd-vb@cox.net
Eugene Hansen Committee Member ewhansen@hotmail.com -V
Ned Kuhns Committee Member nedkuhns@cox.net -V
Michael Itzic Ashe Committee Member ashe@lawyervirginia.com -V
Janet Werndli Committee Member jfwerndli@att.net
Richard Hildreth Committee Member rhildreth@jamesvalleyequipment.com -V
Committee Liaisons
Bob Barnaby Parks and Recreation Commission barnaby2@cox.net -V
Eugene Crabtree Planning Commisstion eugene.crabtree .ctr@navy.mil -V
Bill DeSteph City Council destephenterprises@verizon.net
Barbara Henley City Council bhenley@vbgov.com -V
City Staff
Barbara Duke Parks and Recreation bduke@vbgov.com -V
Barry Frankenfield Parks and Recreation bfranken@vbgov.com
Charleen Cooper Parks and Recreation ccooper@vbgov.com
Chris Kennedy Parks and Recreation ckennedy@vbgov.com -V
Clay Bernick/Chuck Planning cbernick@vbgov.com -V
McKenna-v
Guest(s)
Terry Booth Resident -V
Don Youngs Resident -V
IAgen~~
1. Welcome and Introductions and Approval of Minutes
2. Subcommittee Reports
3. Old Business
4. New Business
5, Discussion Items
6. General Comments
7. Next Meeting
Bikeways and Trails Advisory Committee
IM~~ting...Note$tP~~i~ions;ilssuQ$
1. Welcome and Introductions and Approval of Minutes
Chris Felton called the meeting to order at 3:30 pm and called for a motion to approve the minutes
from the December 10, 2007 meeting. Eugene Hanson made the motion and Ned Kuhns second the
motion. All present in favor of approval.
2. Subcommittee Reports
East Coast Greenway - no report
Sidewalk Improvements - no report
Parks and Recreation Foundation - Mike Ashe bicycle event of May 10th 2008 is in conflict with
another event and will have to be rescheduled to a summer date to be determined.
Fred Adams asks if Parks and Recreation will be cosponsor for the event. Barbara Duke stated
Parks and Recreation will be providing some advertising and promotional support. P&R will also try
to get the word out about the race through the school system. Fred Adams has agreed to still attend
the Parks and Recreation Foundation meetings until the bike race event has been held (May/June
2008).
3. Old Business
Chris Felton gives overview of the status of council resolution for interim accommodations for bikers
and pedestrians. The resolution will also be discussed at the Agriculture Advisory Commission
meeting tonight and Barbara Henley is the liaison to this group also. Barbara Duke will be attending
for the bike committee. Barbara Henley stated her concern about the letter submitted by BTAC in
support of the resolution in regard to rural roads. She gave a brief history of the rural road CIP which
began in 1984. The CIP was funded in 2007/2008 but for only $100,000,00. Barbara Henley
expresses her concern that the funds would not be enough to pay for any substantial project. She
also informs BTAC that the Agricultural Advisory Commission reviews all rural roadway plans and that
this function should not change.
Mike Ashe believes that if a well designed 5K is built that it will help with the conflict between
bicyclists and the citizens in the southern part of the city. Fred Adams states that the twelve local
shops are selling forty to sixty road bikes a month. The conflict in the south more then likely will get
worse if that trend continues unless something is done to help with conflict between the residence
and bicyclists. Gene Hansen states that priority is the reason why city not putting money into the
rural roads. Richard Hildreth also states his concern that there needs to be something done to help
all parties. Chris Felton reminds the committee that the resolution is not just for the southern part of
the city but the entire City of Virginia Beach. Barbara Henley stresses that the committee needs to
prioritize its wishes.
Barbara Duke states that the resolution reinforces what was adopted in the bike plan.
Ned Kuhns states council is putting dollars in other places besides bike and pedestrian friendly
projects. Eugene Crabtree states that the City Comp Plan and the Master Transportation Plan
support the bike/ped improvements being stated by the committee members. Barbara Henley says
citizens need to be better informed to what is in the Comp Plan. Citizens need to know how much
right of way of way could be taken. Need to add other rural roads shown in the bike plan (Le. Muddy
Creek Road) to the Master Transportation Plan not just Princess Anne Road. The committee should
plan to be involved in the upcoming workshops during the Comprehensive Plan update process in
2008 to mesh the bikeway plan improvements with the Master Transportation Plan elements.
4. New Business
Committee reviewed city code section regarding biking in the resort area at the request of Mike Ashe.
Chris Felton states City code and State codes do not match up with each other as it pertains to riding
bicycles on sidewalks. Committee is concerned that this code section is not "bicycle friendly". Mike
Ashe gives overview of a legal case that dealt with this code City and State issue. Eugene Crabtree
said he will pass code issue on to Jan Anderson, member of the resort advisory commission. More
information on background, why this code was written the way it was, will be provided at a future
meeting.
Barbara Duke gives overview of resource process for CIP. All projects requested by committee are
above target projects that have no funding. All above target projects will be rated by city leadership
and may be presented to council in the final budget as "requested but not funded". Barbara Henley
2
Bikeways and Trails Advisory Committee
explained to the committee that in order to fund a "requested but not funded project", money has to
be taken away from another project that has been recommended for funding. The public hearing
process on the budget is important because it lets council know what budget priorities are important
to the citizens.
5. Discussion Items
Chris Felton asks committee if changing the start time to three o'clock instead of three thirty was
acceptable. The committee has agreed to the new start time of three o'clock. The new time may
start with the April meeting, as long as public notice procedures can be amended. Barbara Duke will
be checking into this and will let the committee know.
6. General Comments
No general comments.
7. Meetin Ad'ourhlNextMeetin
Chair Chris Felton adjourned the meeting at 5:30 pm.
DATE TIME LOCATION
February 11, 2008 3:30 pm Parks and Landscape Services, 4141 Dam Neck Road
AGENDA
1. Bruce Drees presentation on bike accident data
Assi ned To
Barbara Duke
Gene Hansen
Fred Adams
Notes
Bruce Drees to attend
Fred will attend 2/13/08
8. Distribution
Mayor and City Council
City Manager
Parks and Recreation Commission
Bikeways and Trails Advisory Committee
Susie Walston, Chief of Staff
Cindy Curtis, Parks and Recreation Director
Jason Cosby, Public Works Director
Phil Davenport, Public Works
Mark Johnson, Public Works Engineering
Tabitha Crowder, Public Works
David Jarman, Public Works
Jack Whitney, Planning Director
Clay Bernick, Planning
Officer Jeff Jensen, Police Department
Steve Lurus, Open Space Subcommittee Chair
Design and Development
3
, I
Princess Anne Commons
Sl fitness fucjlifg feusjlJjlifg Jtur/fl
AttucDment f: Appendix g
S{fJl)murff of findings - fJrecerfents SCript
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Summary of Findings - Precedent's Script
Chris Colvin, Landscape Architect, Maryland National Planning Commission
Tanglewood Trail was developed primarily for seniors and people with disabilities. This trail is a little
over half a mile long with exercise equipment and circuit training throughout the trail. The trail is 10'
wide, with 10' grass strips on one side for equestrian use (slopes are generally below 5%)
Other trails and fitness areas in the area include: The Northeast Branch Stream Valley Park Fitness Trail
(1.25 miles), ChernikoffFitness Trail, and the Tucker Road Sports Complex (1 mile). Each facility offers
challenging fitness stations in a scenic, natural environment. Other amenities include a multiuse paved
loop trail, a picnic area, two lighted tennis courts, a lighted basketball court, and play equipment.
Necessary permits and permit agencies for trail development include: Wetland Permits, Army Corps of
Engineers, National Capital Planning Commission, P.G. County Building Permits, Soil and Erosion
Control, Stormwater Management, and Tree Conservation.
Funding for Prince Georges County trails comes from a variety ofIocations including: M-NCPPC, Project
Open Space (State ofMD), ISTEA (Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act), and local
jurisdictions.
The trails are used by the general public for a variety of activities including rollerblading, walking,
biking, resistance training, and horseback riding. The trails serve as a major connection linking many
stream valley parks, communities, and metro stations.
There is a police presence throughout the trail system including 2-10 officers on trails in Prince Georges
County at any given time, 17 officers trained for traditional horseback patrols, 12 officers currently
trained for new bicycle patrols (on mountain bikes), and 24 hour surveillance even though parks are
closed at dark.
The rangers monitor parks (linked to police via radio), perform routine maintenance, answer questions,
serve as guides, and organize programmed activities (bike rides, walks, etc.)
Costs
10' wide trail: $27-37/linear foot (cost affected by amount of clearing and grading and soil conditions)
Cor-ten steel bridge: $60,000 ea. (avg.)
Busse Woods Trail System, Joe Mollica, Engineering Assistant, Parks and
Recreation
As the third most used trail system in the United States, Busse Woods Trail System is a Class I bicycle
trail located in northwestern Cook County, Illinois. It is over 11 miles long and winds through the
meadows and forests around Busse Lake providing access to many of the preserves unique features.
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Maintenance
Two years ago the trail was repaved and seal coated (cost: $40,000. $500,000 to repave entire trail). Re-
striping occurs every 2 years.
The trail was developed for users of all types. Cook County was able to finance the project with funds via
grants from the federal government. One major challenge facing the project was the drainage issues and
low areas throughout the site. To overcome this challenge, bridges were built over the low areas
preserving wildlife and vegetation. A landscape architect was hired to determine a concept for the plans,
focal points, and the path layout. Administrators from Cook County worked with the landscape architect
to come up with a viable solution. A grant was awarded and construction began. The project took almost
two years to build.
Trail Rules
Trails are open from sunrise to sunset.
Motor vehicles prohibited.
RIDE/W ALK ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE TRAIL.
Give warning before passing other trail users.
Obey all stop signs.
Speed training or racing is NOT PERMITTED. Violators will be ticketed.
Keep dogs leashed and in control.
Please do not litter. Pack out more than you pack in.
Helmets are required for all bicycle riders 14 years and younger (effective Jan. 1,2005).
In case of an emergency - call 911.
Paved Trails:
Stay in your own lane.
WALK all bicycles down overpasses where designated.
Unpaved Trails:
Bicyclists and equestrians must stay on the designated trail.
No off-trail riding.
Bicyclists must yield to hikers and equestrians.
Hikers must yield to equestrians.
Do not use trails when muddy.
Statistics:
67,000 acres of land, 32 picnic areas, 6 fishing walls
10' wide asphalt trail, 12' wide base (comprised 1.5" binder, 1.5" surface, 3" CAl stone, and 6" CA6
grade 8 stone). Solid base is needed to accommodate 20 ton trucks during construction.
Striped down the middle (2 way traffic)
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
There are multiple loops for different distance trails. The trails are currently being used by walkers,
runners, bicyclists, and users with strollers. Cook County hosts events at least 2-3 times per month on the
trails. Speed limits are posted along trail. There is ample parking and easily accessible to all users.
One of the unanticipated costs included repairs to the low spots caused by the drainage issues. Being that
they are landlocked, no subsequent phases are to be added on at this point.
Bob Rodale Cycling and Fitness Park, Bob Stiffler Director of Parks and
Recreation
Dedicated to Bob Rodale, this park offers the combination of a walking trail and a paved trail for multi-
users (1.3 miles total - the inner flat loop is 0.6 miles, inner hill loop is 0.75 miles). A velodrome for bike
racing, training, and various events is located across the street.
Since its inception, the park is continually being used by a multitude of people. Amenities of the park
include: a sandbox area for children, flower gardens, memorial garden, picnic pavilion, hiking trails, and
wide open spaces for tents. Part of the walking path comprises a raised boardwalk with sitting areas for
resting and wildlife observation.
No speed limits are set throughout the multiuse trail. There are three lanes for various speeds. There are
quite a few events held at the facility throughout the year. There aren't any specified sitting areas for
spectators.
The facility is maintained by one Cook County employee. The cost of maintenance and operations is
between $55,000 - 60,000. Costs that weren't anticipated were some of the maintenance costs like grass
cutting. One component that Bob Stiffler (Director of Parks and Recreation) wishes was done differently
is some of the unfinished secondary walking paths.
Shelby Farms, Steven Satterfield, Park Administrator
Shelby Farms (4,500 acres) is located in Memphis, Tennessee, Shelby County. The park is made up of 4
components: Agricenter (1,000 acres), Park Land (3,200 acres), Pastoral park land and uplands, and a
government correction farm.
The county acquired the park in sometime in the 1930's but the park came to fruition and opened to the
public in the 70's. Over the past 10-15 years the county has been developing the park to include many of
its current amenities. At this point the park is owned by the county government. However, because of
increasing budget problems they are looking to privatize ownership of the park.
Open to all user activities including: cycling (on and off road), walking, running (on road and cross
country), rollerblading, picnicking, hiking, horseback riding, fishing, water sports, offleash dog park (150
acres). Runners are the major users of this facility.
Trails include: Patriot Lake Trail (1.67 miles), Chickasaw Trail (2.75 miles), and
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Tour De Wolf Trail (a mixed use cross country trail (paved/non-paved).
One of the major challenges of the park is the lack of funding for maintenance and operations. The park
is maintained year-round by a staff of nine people. Infrastructure development is another challenge.
Water, sewage, and power are 3 of the major elements that are lacking.
The park hosts a variety of events such as triathlons, duathlons, bike races, and walking and running
events. The park is maintained year-round from sunrise to sunset for $500,000/year.
Usage Costs
The park is free to the public. During events the cost is $2.50/person. Site rentals are charged for each
event to the hosting organization. Parking, security, and garbage removal are provided by the staff.
Also included are areas for equestrian use: 150 acres of public equestrian trails, fields, 400 acres for
private equestrian trails, fields, and stables.
Subsequent phases that are to be added to the project in the future include addition of restrooms, and
additional parking. There is a grant pending for a master planning design process with a private donation
of up to $50 million dollars.
Medical Mile, Terry Eastin Executive Director, Mississippi Trail Inc.
Arkansas River Trail was being built in 2003 in North Little Rock. Terry served as a consultant on the
project. Terry Eastin was asked how to get Little Rock side of trails completed. A cardiologist
approached her one day and said that he'd be willing to help her raise the money for the project. This
group of cardiologists gave them inroads to the medical community. A unique partnership was formed
between private, state, and county organizations which also included the medical community.
They were able to gain public support for the project through different groups. Headwaters Partnership
comprised organizations such as Health Department, the City, the County, Private organizations, and the
Nature Conservancy. Headwaters created a model called "Triple Bottom Line" which incorporated
economic development, a fit population, quality oflife, repair buffers and greenways. This concept
appealed to everyone and is what drove the project. And it helps that people generally do not argue with
their physicians.
The Headwaters group did not have an example or prototype model for their project. It was a stand-alone
and 'create-as-you-go' process.
Process
The process for the project was started by forming a group of people to get behind the project. They then
developed a saleable project that could be marketed to the public and put together a team to help others
buy into the concept. Terry supervised and worked with the artist and 1 designer. The artist led the
design phase and put together all of the concepts. The artist's goal was to get the messages across without
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
having to display many words - simple messages. He used metal and 3D art to convey the messages. An
architect and a landscape architect brought the project to fruition. The construction phase lasted 1 year.
All donations went to a non-profit organization so that they could choose their own contractors and
wouldn't have to put the project out to bid. They were able to get a much better price with better results
and in less time. The non-profit agency was loosely related to the city government.
The Medical Mile Trail is 12' wide with an asphalt and concrete bases. The overall river trail connects 11
parks and 24 key tourist destinations. The overall 14 mile loop does have cut-through's on either side but
you can only cross the Arkansas river at either end of the trail. The trails follow the spine of the river.
3 Key Components
500' Promenade with a covered pergola
Entry Plaza Court
Sea Wall
Trail is currently being used for all activities including: biking, walking/running, rollerblading, dog
walkers (including a dog park). There are diverted trails and areas for high speed bicyclists
No subsequent phases are to be added at this point.
American Trails chose the Medical Mile for its National Trail Symposium slated for November, 2008.
Keys to success for this project include open-mindedness on everyone's part, willingness to step outside
the box and look at alternative resources (medical community), and the ability to make it fashionable to
support the project.
Organizations that took part in the project:
State Organizations: Department of Heritage, Parks and Tourism Department, Fish/Game/Highway
Departments, Governor's Office.
Cities: Little Rock and North Little Rock
Other Organizations: Rails to Trails, Department of Conservation, medical Community
Federal: National Park Service
Development Process
Within two months, the medical Community raised $350, 000 for the project. By the end of two years,
they had raised $2.1 million dollars. County Legislators donated $1 million to the project.
In order to raise money, various entities were sold to contributors. The Promenade was sold for
$250,000, Entry Plaza was sold for $250,000, and the naming rights for the bridge were sold for
$250,000. Portions of the art wall were sold to display various health messages. Icons were developed
along the trail with different types of medals to display health activities. There was 1 overall theme
throughout the process - the donors were not allowed to dictate the concept or design, and were not
Princess Anne Commons - 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
allowed to use their space for advertisement purposes. Examples of the messages include The Arkansas
Children's Hospital, "Be Active, Get Fit," Cardiologist Task Force "It's About Time."
One of the major challenges of the project was raising funds and developing a program that was easy to
market. Finding and marketing a location that would be visited by many people was another challenge.
The idea was to convey the message that the pieces to the medical mile weren't advertisement spaces but
more like places to promote healthy messages. Another challenge was to make sure that the donors were
satisfied with the designs that artist and designer were coming up with.
~"'t' 1
Princess Anne Commons
Sf fitness fucj/it{; feusjDj/it{; Jturfg
A tEucDment 1: Appenr/ix C
fJrecerlent's ConflIct /nfo/Yllotion
"- '"
~ ill
(08)
0:
c
'"
~
0-
o
o
...J
'"
'"
w
E
u::
'"
c
o
E
E '"
o w
o ~
w ~
c 0
c '"
<( w
<r
::l w
w"O
~~
0:0
co
N
'"
N
r-:
(Y)
N
N
:0:
fJ
'"
U
'"
<.l
~
-~
" '"
:12
<:.0
o '"
U ;::
L!)
L!)
OJ
L!)
....
"
-0
~
g
'"
:;
.J!!
'"
:E!
::>
-0
'"
U
'"
<.l
<.l
I
~B
:::;.1:
<l:
0..
.9f
5~
;:; 0
rJ '=
.3~
<l:
0..
ui
8
E
'"
u
'"
~
co
.. g
Ql=
~8
.~ ~
L1.. C
~ E
~ ~
~U
~8
iii~
;; '"
<:.<=
Ql
o~
D.<l:
E
o
<.l
ui
-'"
~
C
~
'"
2
o:i
(Y)
0>
9
CD
(Y)
N
d>
I'-
....
C
.'"
..
'"
w
~
'"
f-
co
~ ~
~ ci
.0
0.<=
~~
:;:.....
C/)OOM
t:~-5~
&S~~
'0 8 ~ O!;
Bg~d
~-a5-:tO
.=~t5ci
0_ Q;~~
~~~~
iJ)~U5~
.o~E"'=
~e~~
.~
o
'm
t
'"
>
.C
=<:
~
B
1:
E
1:
,,;
m
u
e
<.l
'"
;;-
<.l
o
-0
".
E
'l3
u
E'
C
o
~
i':'
<.l
'"
0::
~
o
;>
C
~
<.l
.<=
:E
3!
I
~
E
0::
<l:
~
<.l
o
0::
'"
E
::J
c::
r::
;::
o
t:
'"
X
Q)
.=
3!
~
m
<.l
'6
Ql
:2:
Q)
E
o
-0
o
a;
>
~
'"
o
U
~
ro
0..
'"
'"
Q)
E
u::
u
C
'"
'm
.=
03
>
~
'"
'"
'"
C
'"
-'"
~
.0::
~
U
Ql
m
-0
o
n::
.0
o
III
E
~ 8
:::::: >
~~
~c
-, ~
ri~
I'- 0
L!) 0
~ <.l
.-'-<0
I'- C
: e
0'"
I'- 15
.0
co
CD
@
E
"
3!
~
co
<D
"
:Q
~
o
~
~
(Y)
03
'"
E
o
<.l
U
<.l
S
i
~
:I::
.<=
=:!
?;-
C
::>
o
U
-'"
o
o
U
E
Q)
~
en
.(;;
.=
'"
-0
o
o
:s:
Ql
'"
'"
'"
III
'"
(Y)
N
o
N
co
'7
o
I~
C
'E
-0
~ g
.~ ~
"0 C
- '"
0>=
'Em
Ql~
'lii.21.
~~
[),E
U5 .c
E
o
<.l
ui
J
l"
~
'"
.~
:0
5.~
0....
co"!
....0>
NO>
. CD
0> .
O>~
CDO
'(Y)
o C
('I).:;::
;:0
:I:U
~.!!!
ro..c
-1U
-'"
ro
&,
~
::>
o
.0
~
o
05
'-'
C
~
m
-'"
ro
't;
E
1:
ui
'"
Q)
C
it='
en
-'"
I~
en
Q)
<.l
~
E
o
<.l
ui
1
~
~
.&
:I::
.c
!
1::
Z
f-
'"
:E
o
:2:
ci
U
I~
o
Q)
Cl
Q)
<.l
C
'C
0..
E
Ql
:2:
'"
i':'
<l:
C
o
~
E'
<.l
Q)
n::
""
~
'"
0..
'"
E
ro
~
.0
a;
.c
en
'"
<:
.S!
~
o
-I
'"
'"
o
~
"<ooj.., I
fJrincess Anne CofJ}mons
Sf fitness fUCilitj; feusiDilitj; Jturfg
A ClucDmeni f: Appenrlix f)
{Jser SUPY8f/ Results
1 I
~.r
"f'
<S'
:'$
(0
'"
"':+"':""''''''''. :,.J
"'\:.:< ~'" l.~l,'*'",..)i
\.~~.:.,..;,~
lYE
.......--.-........,00
YE"',RS'$
LAN!)~CAl'E ARCHITECTURE
5l fJ'JJIE:SS fACJUJr fEAS1IJ/lJ'!Y SJJJJ}Y - JfJRYEY FOR fJOJEJI'J!Al (jSffRS
VIRGINIA BEACH PARKS AND RECREATION
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility.
Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax:
757.622.6466 OR email: info@insites-studio.com) by 7/6/07. We appreciate your time and look
forward to your response.
(Results in bold)
1. What would you typically use the facility for? (check all that apply)
37 Bicycling 29 Running 20 Walking 0 Equestrian 4 Skating 2 Therapy
As 36 Individual or 34 Group Typical Duration (hours) 0-2: 222-4: 11 4-8: 18+: 1
Specific days: Monday: 18 Tuesday: 20 Wednesday: 19 Thursday: 19 Friday: 19
Saturday: 32 Sunday: 38
Frequency (i.e. daily): 1-3x: 11 3-5x: 9 5-7x: 10 Daily: 10 Monthly: 1 Quarterly: 1
Usual Time of day: AM: 26
PM: 19
Preferred Length (i.e. 5K): 1K: 3
5K:31
8K: 2 10K+: 6
Preferred Width (i.e. 12 feet): 10': 2 12': 14 15': 7 18': 2 20': 2 22': 1 24': 0 25': 1 30': 436': 1
Any other course design preferences?
· separate lanes for different speeds
· no painted lines
· 30' w for 1/4 mile @ the start
· mile markers
. grandstands
. power
. one way traffic
· provide some shade
· Make it a x-country course
· Concrete - too hard to run on
· Sweeping turns, hills/berms
· Closed circuit
· make like a track (loop) w/cut throughs
. hills, dirt trails
. lanes marked
. connecting trails
. schools, city wellness
. no plastic painting
. 200m straight away
. electrical and video support
. oval shape (loop)
. trees for shade
. allow for multi-users (bike, skate, run)
. cut throughs (a way to change course)
. scenic views
. water/ rest stops, restrooms
. curves
. connection to adjust length, loops
. adj. area hosting events (training)
. provide protection from strong winds
. shady, mile markers, soft surface that drains well
. small rolling hills, one large hill
. a small hill (20-30' tall), 2-3% slope max
. Soft surfaces
. Wider start and finish. This course could easily be used for cross country meets as
well as the Beach District Country meets. This course could also allow us to bid on
the Regional and State Cross Country Tournaments. Many schools also plan charity
walks/runs for various organizations and this facility could be used for those
purposes. Currently the only "real" 8K sites for a school to hold a race is the Virginia
Wesleyan College Campus site, but that even isn't that accurate. VWC could even
utilize this course for their races and tournaments as well for their cross country
team.
Preferred surface for your use? (i.e. mulch, asphalt, etc.)
Asphalt: 38
Mulch: 6
Concrete: 4
Crushed stone: 1
Compacted Earth: 2
Other: multi-use, natural ground covering, (mulch, grass mixture)
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested in this
facility? Y / N
. BGRO Running Group, Running Etc. Group
. Tidewater Striders
. Final Kick Tri Club
. Bicycle Racing Committee
. Kale Running
. TBA
. Bicycle Club
. Virginia Cycling Association
. Roanoke Cycling
. US Army
. VA Cycling
. Fat Frogs
. USA Cycling
. Chesapeake Cycling Club
. Rush Soccer (board member)
. USCF
. Running Club
. Bicycle Shop Owner
. RABA.org
. Tri Power Cycling Club
. Tidewater Appalachian Trail Club
. Arlington near C&O trail
. Triathlon Cycling Club
. Virginia Beach Wheelmen Cycling Team
. SR Racing
. All About Bikes
. COVB Special Events Office
. VA Cycling Association
. Marine Corps League
. Tidewater Bicycling Association
How does the organization reach its members?
19 Newsletter
30 Website or Weblog
27 Listserver / Email
Other: meetings, bike shop, word of mouth, mail
Would you be willing to post information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletter/website/blog etc. Y / N
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should contact?
. Final Kick, Running Etc.
. TBA
. cycling org's, event promoters
. Jane Oakes 467.9633, Bob Hosang 431.9461
. TBA, local race teams
. VA Cycling Association, Vacycling.org
. Board Members
. Coaches
. Tidewater Striders
. Kale Running
. Bike/Running Shops
. Ches. Cycling Club
. www.mellowdrome.com
3. Are there similar facilities that you have seen or used? Y / N
. Columbus, OH
. Trexlertown, PA
. Fort Lauderdale, FL
. Mellowdrome.com
. Central Park
. Indianapolis, IN - Major Taylor Velodrome
. Seattle, W A
. Florida
. Allentown, PA
. Trexlertown, PA
. Colorado Springs, CO
. Tennessee
. Final Kick
. Contes
. Fat Frogs
. Colorado
. Moorehead City, NC
. Newport News
. GW Parkway Arlington VA
. Newport News Park
. Noland Trails
. Western Branch Park
What other off road -trails or fitness facilities do you use in this area?
28 Boardwalk 23 Mt Trashmore 29 First Landing SP 3 Great Neck Park 2 City View Park
Other
. Dam Neck/London Bridge Rd paths
. Dismal Swamp Trail
. False Cape SP
. Roads
. Back Bay
. Pocahontas State Park
. Norfolk Botanical Gardens
. Petersburg Battlefield
. NAB Fitness Ctr.
. Bayside Rec. Ctr
. Roads in Pungo/Blackwater
. Redwing
. York River
. Williamsburg: Off-road trails
. Noland Trail
. Newport News Park
. Atlantic Ave., various city streets
. Western Branch Park
. Sportsplex
What do you like about them?
. Lack of traffic
. Scenic
. Nice place to run
. off road
. atmosphere
. Parking/ restrooms
. Scenic, hills
. other activities
. can take my kids
. nice place to bike
. no asphalt
. trails
. they exist
I I
. quiet (at times)
. various trails, safe, challenging
. Proximity, length, surface
. close to home, safe, lots of
equipment/facilities
. flat surface, water source
. rural 'feel'
. playgrounds
. open
. views, long runs on soft surfaces
. loop, trees
. good for races
. views, hills, long trails
. shade, clean, trails, lots of
options
. long trails, soft surfaces
. Winding, hills, water features
What do you dislike about them?
. Multi-use
. rough paths
. Crowded w/tourists
. not maintained
. heavily booked, wide start not avail.
. expensive parking, limited access, narrow paths
. narrow lanes, surface
. distance from home
. mainly for off road bikes
. no asphalt trails
. rules not enforced @ boardwalk
. Track not long enough, not outdoors
. no seating, TV monitor on track (results display)
. lack of shade, proximity to waste site, playground equip.
. can't ride @ high speeds b/c of crowds
. not good for competitive cycling, too narrow, too many leisurely users
. boring, hard surfaces
. lack of water and shade
. not enough options for bicycles (many areas limited to foot traffic)
. hard surfaces, muddy at times
. concrete and asphalt trails, not enough parking
. Difficult traffic control, impact on residents
. not specifically designed for one use
What can we do to make this facility unique?
. Get feedback, visit other facilities
. Ensure it will fully support cycling/running events
. accommodate cycle racing/training
. no strollers, skateboards
. make it happen/build it
. Use First Landing as precedent
· wide paths, stands around the park
· track for cycling road racing
· make it bike specific
· incorporate local terrain, plants, and animals
· scenic, safe, ample parking, accessible, water, par course, restrooms
· asphalt trail w /trees, bridges, large hill, separation of uses
. staging @ finish line
. Marked bike lanes
· 1 running track, 1 skating track, 1 cycling track
· Control access so that it is safe for competitive cyclers
. multi-surface
. mountain biking, hiking trails
· build a legitimate paved circuit, not just an asphalt walkway
. more water stops
· water feature - a place where people could swim
· Shade trees, water, bathrooms, lights, SK lane with cut through, hills, sharp turns
· Have showers/restrooms/drinking fountain
· Consider making it a velodrome
Are there other activities/facilities at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this facility? i.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf Course, etc.
. HRSC
. Sportsplex
. X-country trails
. PA Park
. Schools
. Amphitheatre
. Should be part of total concept for training
. All should tie together
. shopping centers
. Golf course
. From PA recreation center, or secure bus stops
. Redwing Park
. Landstown High School
· Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools, Golf course, etc. I feel this could be a good
starting point to making this area a sports/fitness hub in the city as well as a
beautiful and usable natural area. I think if this project is put together in the right
way, many sports based businesses could be interested in getting involved and
utilize the natural amenities offered by this project.
Would you use this facility while other friends or family members participate in other activities
such as athletics? Y / N (28)
4. How would you travel to the facility?
29 Drive alone 33 Drive with others 29 Bicycle 9 Run 2 Walk 0 Skate 0 Trailer a horse
o Ride a horse 0 Other
5. Would you be more likely to use the facility more often if any of the following features were
accessible or close by?
16 Y N Power Sources
38 Y N Water Sources
38 Y N Restrooms
27 Y N Showers / Lockers / Changing Areas
18 Y N Picnic Tables and Grills
21 Y N Open Air Shelters
14 Y N Fitness Stations
Would you be willing to sit on a planning/review/fundraising committee? Y / N 23
Will you be available for further discussion? Y / N 39
Name
Organization/Company
Email
Phone No <_)
sksuttonmd@cox.net Sentara 757.388.1844
mwinters@bgrolawfirm.com BGRO 757.428.6021
kelly@bgrolawfirm.com BGRO 757.528.2545
Sam.Bethune@gmail.com USN 757.368.2663
bwd-vb@cox.net TBA 757.486.4489
mitziat@lawyervirginia.com 757.425.5307
lionrun@aol.com Tidewater Striders 757.717.0259
kevin@kalerunning.com Kale Running.Com 757.373.0612
charlesalt@cox.net
rssj@virginia.edu VA Cycling Assoc. 434.242.3144
racedirector@roanokecycling.org Roanoke Cycling 540.580.7284
daleroseren@usarmy.mil US Army 757.961.6582
stormyva@hotmail.com Fat Frogs 757.620.9003
osteen4jc@cox.net 757.427.1713
kim@ballanceelectric.com TBA 757.615.6106
acelesia@aol.com Rush Soccer ITS 757.288.7715
coastalcottages@msn.com Coastal Cottages 252.449.2843
barkerca@cox.net 757.312.0531
mikemcmahon@smithfieldfoods.com 757.332.4703
waltgonz@gmail.com
Rawl & McNelis,
emcnelis@rawlsmcnelis.com PC 804.344.0038
loanexpert@hotmail.com 804. YESLOAN
jllora@esf-injurylaw.com TriPower Cycling 757.627.8900
nedkuhns@cox.net TATC 757.552.0292
rbojo@harrisconnect.com 757.572.1826
msmigiel@vbgov.com 757.385.6284
ashe@lawyervirginia.com 757.422.1278
amdesignldo@aol.com 757.679.2650
bccono@verizon.net Tripower Cycling
rachel@strollerstriders.net Stroller Striders 757.430.0873
fcampionl@cox.net US Navy 757.289.8575
joshua@bikezoneva.com
rmhildreth@jrc.hrcoxmail.com
ckndocs@cox.net
glenngatdula@aol.com
robertfrank@cox.net
alistairborchem@hotmail.com
mmidland@gmail.com
ajmidl@wm.edu
mark@runningetc.com
wjkelly@vbgov.com
andrew.winch@vdot.virginia.gov
warbler2@cox.net
Christopher .Felton@vbschools.com
VA Beach
Wheel men
TS,BATC
757.515.5940
757.377.4130
757.714.4552
757.963.0377
757.627.1112
Transystems
TWS
757.471.3995
757.630.1366
757.615.1444
757.385.6635
Running Etc.
COVB/SeaCo
VA Cycling
Association 757.925.2374
BATC 757.467.2775
VA Public Schools 757.499.0360
i I
~_._~"i I
friDcess Anne Commons
Sf fitness fucjlifg feusjDjlifg Sf11r!f!
A tlucnmen{ 1: Appenrfix [
[rents SfffYe!l Results
SITE
L,;Nn\fAI'}. \Rt.,riITkC'j'l'Rl
---.-.....,00
Y.fAR$~
of fJ'lJlESS fACflll'Y fEASJ!J!l1'!Y Sf(Jpy
VIRGiNIA BEACH PARKS AND RECREATION
City of Virginia Beach: SK Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Concept Development - Survey Questionnaire for Events Planning
(Results in bold)
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility. You've
been contacted because you've been identified as an events planner or may have some
knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and
return to InSites (fax: 757.622.6466 OR email: info@insites-studio.com) by 7/6/07. We
appreciate your time and look forward to your response.
1. Is there a special event that you are involved with or would possibly use this facility for? Y / N
Name of events:
. Girls on the Run 5K
. Volksmarch
. Todi Music Festival, VA Sports Hall of Fame Bicycle Race
. Numerous runs, races, walks, permitted by SEACO
. Tidewater Striders, Turkey Trot
. AARP & Senior Citizens
. VA Public Schools (various events)
Avg. # of Participants: 25-1400 Avg. # of spectators: up to 400 Avg. # of Support staff: 40+
Typical duration (hours) 2-4 hours: 4 4-8 hours: 1 8+ hours: 1
Specific dates if known (i.e. Holidays): Mid-July, Thanksgiving
Event frequency (i.e. yearly) Weekly: 1 Monthly: 2 Quarterly: 1 Bi-Annually: 2 Annually: 4
2. What type of track or course is best for your activity or event?
Length (i.e. 5K): 5K: 6 8K: 1 10K+: 2
Width (i.e. 12 feet) 12': 1 15': 1 18': 1 20': 1 22': 1 24': 1 25': 2 30': 1 36': 1
Starting Method (check one): Pack start: 3
Staggered start: 3
Do you need different length courses for different length activities or age groups? Y / N
Please explain
. 5K and 10K routes
· Number of loops dictate event
· 8K, 10K, 5K, various races
· may require rest stops
Any other course design or layout preferences?
· 250m straightaway, power source
. curves and small hills
What is the ideal path surface treatment for your event? Asphalt: 2 Concerete: 1 Rubbery
Surface: 1
Do you require rest areas or other stopping points along the path? Y / N
How frequently? 1 mile
3. What kind of viewing areas would be required for your event?
Open Lawn: 4 Bleachers: 2
4. Would there be other types of events taking place in conjunction with your event? i.e. Picnics,
opening/award ceremonies, entertainment etc.
Picnics: 3 Awards: 3 Entertainment: 3 Registartion: 1
5. What type of specialized vehicles need direct access or parking at your events?
6 Medical and emergency
Direct Access
Load/Unload and Park Nearby
2 Equipment delivery / trailers Direct Access
Load/Unload and Park Nearby
3 Food Service
Direct Access Load/Unload and Park Nearby
3 Audio/Video/Broadcast
Direct Access Load/Unload and Park Nearby
Other
Direct Access Load/Unload and Park Nearby
6. Do you use any signage or markers at your event for participant and spectator orientation? Y / N
What type? Check all that apply
5 Banners on tents or structures
2 Signs on trees and fences
o Signs on vehicles
o Sandwich Boards
4 Other, specify: Signs on stakes, mile markers, portable signs, A-
frame sign at start/finish
How do you provide course information to participants, such as start/ finish, distance markers,
routing and decision points? Handled by event organizer, via registration form listed on
website
7. What sort of support facilities are required for the event? Please rank the relative importance of
each potential feature. 1= Most Important 2= Least Important
1: 6 2: 1 Power Sources
1: 6 2: 0 Water Sources
1: 7 2:0 Restrooms
1: 0 2: 4 Showers / Lockers / Changing Areas
1: 3 2:3 Picnic Tables and Grills
1: 3 2:3 Open Air Shelters
1: 3 2:3 Areas for Tents
1: 1 2:3 Audio / Video / Broadcast Equipment
1: 0 2: 4 Internet Access
1: 2 2: 3 Stage
Please specify any other preferences or size requirements for support facilities.
Would you be willing to sit on a planning/review/fundraising committee? 7 Y / N
Will you be available for further discussion? 6 Y / N
Name Organization/Company
Email Phone No <_)
satweed@sentara.com
Sentara Healthcare
Gator Volksmarch
Club
TBRC
COVBI SeaCO
Tidewater Striders
BATC
VA Public Schools
757.552.7297
iturlo@yahoo.com
ashe@lawvervirqinia.com
wikelly@vbqov.com
rmhildreth@jrc.hrcoxmail.com
warbler2@cox.net
Christopher. Felton@vbschools.com
757.855.9650
757.422.1278
757.385.6635
757.377.4130
757.467.2775
757.499.0360
I I
fJdncess Anne Commons
Sl fiiness fucjlif{f feusjlJjlif{f Stur!g
AttucbJl)ent 1: Appendix f'
locul R(JJ)/Nullutbon [yents
.~.~~.- .".1- I
2
'jjj
..Q
Ol
:!:
1
Ei
0'
'-'
0,
c
""
C
::J
Q;
COj
._@
'" E
'E '"
w2
!
~ ~I
"0 .....:
~ {;5!
N ""
~; [I
i~i ~:
(.), .......
.~i~.
r-~J--+~~
! Iii
i : 1 I
~'~I~I~i~l~ ~ 0 ~
~I~ ~I~I~ (J) co N
filch cblcb ~ cD ID ~
~!~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~
r- r- r-1t- r- ...q- r- ~
.~~fti~l~t~'~ ~
! I
r--
ei-:,
OlN
C"'"
o '
.<:tn
c...:r--
E
E
a:i
E
o
.<:
E
o
'-'
--'
co
.c
~
~
::::.:;
B-
E
E
~ ~
~ E c:
~ 8 2"E
~ .~.~ ~
c ~~@ ~
g? Q5:Ci; @)
@)~'cn <n,
:-5 @!'V; ~
,~~'g ~
i0 -E ~ E
:(/), E > .9..
U") U")
~N~
"'"
..--~~
~,~ ;!
Q,L(')LO
co r-- r--
!o! ! ! I I
,g !-",I ! I, E
:~:ml i~~ ~c:c: Q)
o ! .c ! a.. 1 ! 0 0: I 0 0 ' w.2
c: ~i.~:~1 IE'I~i~i~i:~r~ C co
o colI ~I ! ~ ~! 3=1Ci51U5!~: ~ en
;~ :~,~ ~i~l~ ~'~I~ ~ ~'-5 ~
:O~.~ co ~!I ~ ~ o~rn co a,m co
_;_-='-?_c(f.) <Il:0 I::;:: I::;::' <D ~ _2_ <D -t='- 2
: 1
...cl !....cl....c...c
','-'I'" 1'-'1'-' '-'
-~.:..:: ffi ~:ffi
U): :col~, iCD miCD
i ~ : :51.~ I g-i =5 i .~ I.~ >~ =5 I =6
:~, 't: !'rn! ~!'t: '"rnl-o,;"o, 't: ,'t:
ju:~15~OJ~i5!5!5 ~I~
, ,
III
C
Ql
>
W
C
o
"iij
:;
<0
";;::
C
g>, 5 if)
:;: ~ +-':~
ni a:: ~i~
~ Q) "0 ~ ~!:::
C') EI ~ L{) LOiQ
.~ ~;&: .~ -E176
~ "E:'~ O'::';:!5:
::s ~~ttl3,~!3
0::: W --.J:U)'WiO:::
'"
-0
en
:2
os:
'"
oS
.<:
'-'
'"
'"
<D
"'~
:~!.g
.=: 0
>2
<n
'"
c: ~ ~
&: 0:: ~
::::c:::; 1Q::J c: c:
LO'I"-- DE =s ~"" 0 0
<(:8 <.) LD.c ..c:
iulN Q), c: ~ 10
~ ,~ ~:"Q '* ro Q) -
:;;;!~ ~I]l E ::;:: & ~
g.i g- a ~ ~
<0 I:!: ro .s:;;
0...1'0 a5 ~r-
32!w<(Z:S
~:5_J>=6~'c
,.0 Q)'t: cTI
!~I~ ~ ~ & &
E
o
E '-'
o .,;
'-' Q;
C-o
o ";:::
'<:(;5
~ V
ro!-
~! ~
g:~
~j
~~
J~I
E
o
'-'
C
o
.c
ro
ro
E
-'"
'-'
e
E
'"
.c
<n
@)
.2
'"~
U")
"'"
"'"
r--
U")
,r--
r-co
N<O
00
~ur
Nro~
'''T N
"'Tr-~
~i~ ~
~~
<n
c
'"
"E
"'~
t.') '"
C>-
O),
C'
~
-0
'"
0::
~ '"
~;.E
-0 C
COiro
oioi
co;co
-'" -'"
00
't: 't:
o 0
22
.s:;;, .s:;;.s:;;
ui u u
m! m m
co 1 en co
ro i x ro "~i
"C:Oi.C C
~~~~-~ ~!
(;5
'* co .~
~'.2; v
0.' "00 ' E
~:.1:' .~
x ~!~ ~
1.0 ~i ffi w
.s:;; roi- Q) Q)
~~:c5S8
~ gi-~ ~;o
~ ~: ~ ~! ~
'~;c13:~ & ~
,
E E
o 0
() ()
~ ~
Ol Ol
:;: :;:
0)00
o .g-,.g-
gjEE
-0 ro ro
"~ Q) i Q)
i j:j
>
o
0)
-"'-
<5
't:
o
:~ @)'(j)
.~,~! ~
v:"8-: U
@c1~!
~ m:~:
c:JS2.
U w.:-=..~ _
o
o
o
'"
<D
('")
.-:.
U")
r--
:L.{') L.{') <D
!~ ~ ~
!C'? C'? v
'N ~ <D
N N,v
'v <D;<D
r:::--r:::--ir:::--
L.{') L.{')iL.{')
t:.-~~~t:.-~__
I
'0
!2
14:
~-~>
'"
<n
~~
wl:9
21-a
~:!f
.c
'-'
'"
'"
<D
.~ =5; =5
"c;,''t:''t:
.: 0 0
> 2.2
<n
0-
E
<n
2 5
:.::i "0..
'0 ~
c .c
.Q 0
~ E
.0 "~ ;:)
"* ~:~
u ro:L-
fI) .- U!<2
_ .s:;; en! 0
~:~~!"~;
>10 g.1(/)1
~EO'"
t:!~ :!:119
~ 4: .g!(/)
~'~ ~i:;
C>>j
o 1
g IE
:c E! $
:~ ~i~ il
'~ ~!~ ~
.~! 8. ffi !~
i: [Ii 1 ~
illil~!
, . '"r
E
c E
.0 0
0-'-' '-'
i-7e ~
~,lL :2
..0 i Q) 1 .C
@)@! @
13 I.::.::: 1 :;:
glgi g
1;11;i =5:
, t---r-
1
,
c)'<D (O!
g,~ g;
C'?'L.{') r--
<D:~ en
N ('")
~'~ ;:2.'
lL.{')ilO'lO!
!r--[t-it-i
1
I
0-5
<n.c
~'~
'" c
ID 2
-0 '"
rn'<:
iCE!
i~ 0'
i"E U
.geE
E"*
~~
~ ~
,'" c
~~
<n
'"
'-'
~
E
o
'-'
a; E
c 0
'" '-'
Cic
~~
vm
x "C
~~
:::.::: ' ro
.8-' a5
.:E-E
jj
0- 0-
~ ""
.c .c
E
o
~
Q)
~
Ell!!
o'Ol
UiQ)
g'~
E '"
@).~
~@
1?.2
'" c
-'" .-
E
o
~
c
o
:r:
ro
'C
ECil
8 c
...;..Q
Ol-
ffi ~
- Ol
0.'<::
~-
2""
>< '"
@1:>
.2' e
.~ ;-8
LO
N,
N'O
~ co
, 'co
LOa:;>
~U;
. r--
:[(; ~
if'- co
...:
~ w t5
w c ..c
C ~ c3E~-o
.Q .s L-o E iE I ffi
_.::.::: u::: Q) 0 ,~c:
5'ii5 ~ : E b'.g:~ ~,_~ ~
W ro "E,~:~ ~;6,&,~:~ C
~i~ ~,~i~ Q)i~,~'o 0 ~
u..'2~<D,>- :u..!5:j~~.?:-_ ill 0
.c
'-'
'"
'"
<D
.~ =5
"c;,,'t:
~,o
52
I
.<:'
,-,' 0)
m! :s C
~!~ m,gi~ ~ ~ g .8
.c : ~ ~ I E .g ~ 0 E
:~ E ~I~ e ~ :g -5
:>_CI)_~I-~' u.. 0 >- iY
u
o
c
E
<n
'"
~
~
c
o
J":
ro
::J
fI) :0 C
t: C -o5~c
.Q 0 ~ ::e'm 0 5
=::ec O:::mL-::e:::c
~'5m~c 55~t=mro
~ I € ~ co .K C ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~
UI ::; "~; ~ (f) S2. 6' E K bf"E ~
t:O~i~-o-E w(f)cCLO
~~ 'c"'- -N,:.E.- L- ~'~ ro :;: ~ ~
~ _"~_Q) ; "I-~ L- ...... .- 0 ......'
-0::::. 0..;::: .~,~ ~ Z
~ "~; ~! fij E c: bfi as "~ 0 2 ~
.= :> m,(f) (f) ~'("I');tt >'r >< r-
fJrincess Anne Commons
Sf fitness fucjlift! feusjlJjlift! StrJrfg
A{tucDJl)ent 1: Appendir (J
locm C1ulJs ConflIct fnfofl1lotion
i.....
, l/l
'-
~
<Il
<Il
OJ ..c:
'- , ~I
..... 0
.1 C
E ..c ,
.21 E ::J
0 , l/l
~ () ! 0 .....
OJ' ~ E
l/l ci
<Il I 0 0
~, ~' (jj ~
:.a i > l/l
l/l' U ..c: <Il
OJ' <Il U ~
Oi ~ ctl '(3
....1 ctl <Il 0
-,
i <Il ..c <Il
0.. .~ i,
ctl: .!:
l/l:
,~ <Ill OJ Q)
..c: .=i -
.Iii u' >: .Iii
~ B- I ~i ~l =::::1 ~
Q) 0..: Q)
.....,
I~ .:E ....., ~
..c:'
~ I ~i
, E ~i
~~ EO ~E
' L..I Q) ~! <tJ
1 q '1j , 8 ._ ~ 8 E
l3l/l E Ictlctl <Il~(5
1je ~"n' 8 oE iD,.so :gctl..c:E
- ~E c oou@o
"5 Cii,~ Xo c; .....<Il:~ ~ o:..c: '- l/l ...- U
o -, c U x: 8'.(3! c c N 1 <Il ~! >" .
g ~r:~!<g): 8:"51~' ~ E ~! ~ e @! ~!g
'ctl,::J' >: <Il!@ctll,r,::,\U,r,::,\g'-:ooWI::J@I,
I r,::,\ I@I-''- @ ~ r,::,\ ~I ~ :: r,::,\,....J i -E "I
! ~ 1:5 '- i 1: I Q) ......! '? ~, Q; i co ~ ~ Q) ,-"
c ctl ..c:: U : c l/l i"tJ ...- .-: ' ..c: (jj I ~ -,::2:'
1'(1 ~Ic n;-gJ' ~i~ ~ ~ ~ ~I ~ .~ -51~li.~::;C
JJ i1l! 8 -8.[15)~ ~ l .8 ! ~i~---~~ .Q. l/l + W ~ 1.0 i .~j~.
eo eo ! eo I (j) 1...- I'- eo eo (j) I 1.0 '<t I '<t i N
I'- eo I,', "'-N ' Oeo I, ~ 0 eo eo eo : N N I '<t (j)'
eo '<t ...", C') (j) (j) I'- ,0 , C') . eo ...-
~ q> u;> "1 '9 u;> "'t ~ "? ~q>q> "?
N I'- 1.0 I'- 1.0 C') I'- co eo 0 ...-, '<t
Q) eo N eo (j) N N co eo Q) ...- (j) i 0 i C')
~ ~'I~: i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. !~ ~ ~I~I~
: 0. I'- I'- I'- I'- J'- I'- I'- 1'-' : 0. eo 1'-: I'- I'- :
:-- r t I -~r---I-m" - ~
s::: I
o
:0:;
C'IJ
E
...
o
-
s:::
l/l
<Il
13
>,
.2
CD
001
t::!
,0
, 0..
.(/)
-'
(,)
C'IJ
-,
s:::
o
o
I/) III
.o,~
~ ::::J
00
01'
OJ
C
.(3
ctl
0:::
l/l
<Il
I~
,CD
c
.Q
..c I n;
.2 I U '(3
l/l (), ..!:l ~'
~OJ llil/l
o C .c <(,
0::: 13: .5> ~
C' >" ...., U
o ()' .- >,
..... >u
0.. <Il , OJ'.-
E~ 'cCD
l/l ctl g>,.- ....
OJ ctl <Il I ._ U <Il
....
.(ii
..c:
c..2
..c:
U
III ctl
~ <Il
::::J CD..c
-I ctl
01 .c.2
01' .- , () ..c
.!:' 2',..c: ::J
s:: 5ul/l()
~ U
5 l/lctl~~
.... <IlE~u
0::: "tJ ..c:~
~ .;::~.....~
.....,- <(
01 (/) 01_ C
s:: 1 '- > - .Q
:i!1 E ~ 0 ~ (5
iIi,l'(I,g n; ~ f
~Z(/)CDa...Z
C'IJ
(,) () <(.....
o >.11'(1 _ ctl
..JOiZ<(LL
Princess Anne ComDlons
Sf fitness fucjlii{j feusjDjlii{j Siur/g
A tfJIcDmoot g ROY{ f)utu 1
(Jser SUFYOf/S
e
e
e
87/62/2887 13:18
ENVIRONMENTAL
7579253688
PAGE 02/63
ee
~--_.-
==- ka E5
:g ~
tRll.
lISITES
't."NJ1Sl,;AI1E( ,I,1t<;111 rltr,;rURl:
Sf f!l1lErS flACI1llY flEM1D11lfY SiYJby - SolVEr fOR fJrJJENtJAt DSFJ!S
VlRGlNIA BEAGf': PARKS AND RECID.nON
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cydlng and fitness fadlity at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off~road fadlity that can accommodate large competItive events and charily walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new fadlity.
Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax;
7S7.622.6466 OR email: info@insites-studio.com) by 7/6/07. We appredate your time and look
forward to yOur response.
1. What would you typitally use the facJlIty for? (check all that app[y)
~ Bicyding _ Running _ WalkJng _ Equestrian _ Skating _Therapy
As _Individual or':&. Group Typical DuratIon (hours) g
Specific daysSo:+ I~ Frequency (Le, daily) (o~h.v~ Usual Time of day ~
Preferred length (i.e. 5J<): ~:r4 trJi1~ Preferred Width (Le. 12 feet) ~-t I-eo.,a- li.fu:t.
Any other course design preferences? ~ft,* hUt, ~~_ "0 -10 ..p.J.d't.ll J ~ ~J'I. J/~<lf'~.)
Preferred SlIrface for your use? (I.e. muldl, asphalt, etc.) ~\t
2. Are YOLl a member of a user/advocacy/professional organlwt1on that would be interested in this
facility? Y I N V~5
How does the organization reach its members?
- Newsletter -.X. Website or Weblog x..Ustsetver I Email
-AOther ~
Would you I:>e willing to post information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletter/webslte/b1og etc@ N
Are there other people/organizationS/busine;ses that we ShoUld contact?
07/02/2067 13:10
7579253600
ENVIRONMENTAL
PAGE 03/133
.
3. Are lt1ere similar fadlltles that you have seen or usecr:0/ N If so, where? Si?~1 htlU\oJ
What other off road .trails or fitness fadlltles do you use In thIs area?
_ Boardwalk _Mt Trasnmore _First Landing SP _ Great Neck Park
_otyVlew Park JLOttler ~ ~IJ~ "'~I-E jW~B~)C~tt~~
What do you like al:xmt them? ~'t4 ore. not s~) ~w.. hil~ ()~NR 'h> /cV11J/~
What do you dislike about them? Mt'1l'.M~t CrowMJ.+~ d ~n6l~
What om we do to make this facility uniCjue? PNl\Jl8t ~ nilYl! p~) ~.ri~ ~ /~~
Are there other activitieslfadlltles at PrIncess Anne COmmons that you or family members use I n~) OItq j
that should have a direct path connection to this fadlity? i.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf Course, etc. No
e
WOUld you use this facility whRe other friends or family members partldpate In other activities
sud'l as athletics? Y / ~
4. How would you travel to the fadllty?
J(Drive alone -X-orive with others _Blcyde _Run _Walk _Skate
_Trailer El horse _ Ride a horse _ Other
accessible or dose by?
,
.~ N Power Sources
N Water SOurces
N Restrooms
Y <ID Showers I Lockers I Changing Areas
Y f!) PicnIc Ta~es and Grills
Gl N Open Air Shelters
Y ~ Fitness Stations
'4&~~~ ~dr~.
.Ide4U~1 ~O\A CIJ.\~~ "'~.tr- SM 'O~ ~t
t.a,lJQ. ~ c..d- ~r'~h --to ~ht. ct sJwritr ~Oup (().7S-
'IO~Ik.s)I~ ~d.t ~ J Hav~ a hitl ~ ~
(~ LJ~A. "'ILI'It It ~! olAi-!!
1~ shtw!nrt- 'be.~, b.'\- qD' +vms, ~s 1f1J~
l.You.~ ~ o:c- /k. ('D&a,"'-\tri~~ (110 ~)I~
s. Would you be more likely to use the fadlity more often if any of the following features were
.
Would you be wifling to sit on a planning/review/fundraislng committee? Y t@
Will you be available for further discussion? fiJ/ N A bso\~~~
Name A~~ \oJ t N:.4 Organlzatlon/Company \J'I~in\o. ('(""'j ~M'lftW~
Email Phone No c.JS::lJ ~ - ~14 "4<1.~ ~
~.\J~~U1~~\J't~rk\.9bV 151- '8t-~~...eVt.s: ....
l
e
e
e
7- 2-07: 8:47AM;
: ,
5K Outdoor Fitness Feasibility Study NOTE: Optional Services in Green
Concept Development. Survey Questionnaire
Potential Users
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road track that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the dty as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility. You've
been contacted because you've been identified as someone who may ultimate1y use the fadlity,
as an events planner or may have some knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few
minutes to complete the following survey and retum to XXXXXX by XXXX. We appreciate your
time and look forward to your response.
1. What would you typically use the fadlity for? (check all that apply)
f( Blcydlng -tRunnlng.i" Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating _Therapy
As _ Individual or ~roup Typical Duratlon (hours)
Specific days Frequency (i.e. daily) Usual lime of day
Preferred Length (Le. 51<): S4/~~referred Width (Le. 12 feet) e::?lf""
Any other course design preferences?
Preferred surface for your use? (I.e, mulch, asphalt:, etc.) AS(;);/AL T
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be Interested In this
fuclllty?~ N C rrr (1? V,&Ir/tA G'e14c1l Sltalit. 61Gi./rS 0 r-.,L:'t€
How does the organization reach its members?
_ Newsletter _ Webslte or Web/og
_Other
_Usl:server / Emall
Would you be willing to post Information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletter/webslre/b1og etc. Y I N
Are there other people/organizationS/businesses that we should contact?
# 4/ S
~
!
I
t
e
e
e
7- 2-07: 8:47AM;
; 1
$: 5/ 5
3. Are there similar fadlities that you have seen or used? Y {!j) If so, where?
What other off road -trails or fitness fadlities do you use in this area?
K Boardwalk _Mt Trashmore _First landing SP _ Great Neck Park
_CityVleNPark +Otller A-rLAN!fd' ~ IIMfiDIU.1 City ~il!!Ct;:1S
What do you like about them?
What do you dislike about them? O/ftfCuc"( 7f(,~ft(; 4,,,,, r~t..., /J11f}1rr ON ~~'t:1r;Ni5
,
What can we do to make this facility unique?
Are there other activitles/faalities at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this facUlty? I.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, SChools,
Golf Course, etc.
Would you use this facility while other friends or family members partidpate In other activitieS
such as athletics? <!!t1 N
4. How would you travel to the facility?
I
_Drive alone _Drive with others _Bic:yde _Run _Walk_Skate
_Trailer a horse _ Ride a horse _ Other
5. Would you be more likely to use the fadllty more often If any of the following features were
accessible or close by?
(!j) N Power Sources
ti2. N Water Sources
ClJ N Restrooms
Y N Showers I Loc:kers I Changing Areas
Y N PI01lc Tables and Grills
Y N Open Air Shelters
Y N Fitness Stations
Would you be willing to sit on a plannin9lrevlew/fundralslng committee~ N
Will you be available for further dlsaJSSion? t!J1 N
Name 8./tL JC~tDI Organization/Company C"1 0 f fhkrrJllf GUtrtj/5Ci1I'O
Email \,J~-rJf.~tJ.yeJ~'l6vt Phone No aDJ ,~s-,ce;3 S-
r
e
e
3. Are there similar fadlities that you have seen or used? Y I N
If 50, where?
ND
What other off road -trails or fitness fadtltles do \IOU use In thls area?
~~"--.:,.,
N{~.": ;+.1'&
~i
~~-
IrSIYES
LANDSCArEARCH~.CTVRF
Blfl.l11lK'8lAf1I1l'l J1JJMnl111'[ _ - So1YBTJIOlfJr!JJ!ltJm Ds8IlJ
VtR600A BEACH PARKS AHD REGREAT!ON
The CIty of Virginia Beach Department of Par1<s and Reaeation is oonducting a fea$lbllity study
for an outdoor cydlng and fltness fadllty at Princess Anne Commons. The vision Is to develop
an off--road fadllty that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as dally usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this rreN facility.
Please take a few minutes to mmplete the following survey and rebJm to In5ltes (fax:
757.622.6%6 OR emall: Info@lnsltes-studio.c.om) by 7/6/07. We appredate your time and look
forward to your response.
1. What would you typically use the facility for? {dleck all that awtyl
_ ElIcydlng A Running k. Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating _1'1'1erapy
As ~ Individual or _ Group Typical Duration (hours) D~
Spedt1c days Frequency (I.e. dally) Ll- S1--! 'VIUJ< Usual "TIme of day }'\'\..OY V\ 'lV'\.jS I ~F;;!.rtltl'^
Prefen'ed Length (I.e. SK): 5'~ + Prefen'ed Wir:Ith (I.e. 12 feet) t L-.f-t-.
Any other rourse design pteferences? ~ ~ '5 ho.J" / ~ le. '(V\..c)..v ~ v~
Preferred surface for your use? (I.e. mulch, asphatt. etc.) ~~ CO\AV f....e.t- '-t--kT" d V"'-\..n..c, wt.lt
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that'M)llld be Interested in this
fadlity? Y IN ..../>t1ff '16.. (lid e V'/lLte.v *v~Je.v<:.t)
How does the organlzaUon reach Its members?
L Newsletter ~ Webs/Ie or Weblog
_Other
Would you be willing to post: InformaUon about this procESS and fadllty to your organtzatkln's
)( UsII;ef' 'eI" / EmaH
newsletter/website/blog etc. Y IN. N (A
Are there other peopIe/organtzaUons/buslnesses that we should C1Jl'ltitct? e.O ('JJ:.-~ I ~Ih.O& V,
r<e..e.. t~~ cI. -. vl!.c.T 6\'"., l"h V\4o.ll<-jckl ~J' ...Tc../ }c.cle
. )r-lA.,y\- Ift~)
e
t.ooo/tOOO ~
:J1<l SlITUUD.J
TtCZT6t LSL YVd 9S:9T LOOZI8Z/90
.
&B
E!ii!ii!" !!!!"9!!!l.
....- "'"
- -100
-.
R$ITES
l.A:NDSCAI'E AJI(~ji IttCru~E
lJI fl1fKfm ldf1Dlff JlJJM1BDl1r 9JrJpy - Oolm POll J1Ji'JJtJJAt _
VJRSOOA BEACH PARKS AND RECREATION
The CIty of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off.road fadlity that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the dty as well as dally usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility.
Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax:
757.622.6466 OR email: info@insltes-studio.oom) by 7/6/07. We appreciate your time and look
forward to your response.
e
1. What would you typically use' the facility for? (check all that apply)
J Bicyding JRunnlng Jwalklng _ Equestrian _ S1<.atlng _Therapy
As ~nd;vidual or J Group Typical Duratlon (hours) J - 3 AI";
Specific days Frequency (I.e. daily) -d Q." Iy Usual lime of day t:ttrl'j Mof4>rll ;~
Preferred Length (i.e. SK): 5 m;{ '-S Preferred Width (i.e. 12 feet)
Any other c:ourse deslgn preferences? fMo..[f ~.Ih~ ),;I(r)
Preferred surface for your use? (Le. muldl, asphalt, etc.) Jl'"!' t'
o~e, b;q hill
v
2. Are you a member of a user/advocaqr/professional organization that would be interested In this
fadllty? y I@
How does the organization reach Its members?
_ Newsletter
_ Website or Weblog
_Ustserver I Emall
_other
Would you be willing to post Information about this proc:sss and facility to your organization's
newsletter/websitejblog etc. Y I N
Are there other people/organizatIOns/businesses that we should contact?
.
1.000/9000 ~
:)la ~uTuun.l
IttZ16t 1.S1. XV3 l.S:91 LOOZ/RZ/90
e
e--
e...
3. AIt! ~It! slmllar """Illes that you have seen or -e N If so, where? /1(,"'1"17/1/ e..-l P u/"
What other off road -trails or fitness fadlltles do you use In this area?
J Boardwalk J Mt Trashmore J First Landing SP _ Great Neck Park
_CIty View Park JOther Nolet;) Tt-tt.,'ll
What do you like about them? III "t Q;
What do you dislike about them?
What can we do to make this fCldJity unique?
.e"
Are there other actlvitles/fadlltles at PrIncess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path amnectlon to this fadlity? i.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf COurse, etc. fftJ/'t1j/ex.: 5cA60 /
Would you use this fadUty white other friends or family members partJdpate In other actlvltles
sum as ath'et:ks{fl N
4. How would you travel tD the facility?
v'Drive alone JDr1ve with others J BICfCle _Run _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse _ Ride a horse _ Other
5. Would you be more likely to use the fatility more often If any of the following features were
aa:esslble or dose by?
~ N Power Sources
N Water Sources
N Restrooms
N Showers I Lockers I ChangIng Areas
Y N Picnic Tables and Grills
Y N Open Air Shelters
Y N Fitness Stations
Would you be willing to sit on a planning/review/fundralsing oommlttee? Y I@
Will you be available for further discussion? (j) N
Name Mc,{ "4.11.111' organization/Company .1"'Yflli'!1' 61'G.
Emall f.114r!u@rUIfI1:.IJIh:.. Phone No (7$7) 6/5 -14 If 'i
GIIM
L.OOOI LOOO lP.l
:>~a ~UTuunJ:
TtcZT6t L.SL. YVd loS: 91 L.OOVgz/90
.-.:....~..."\.."._"
. "... .-.
- ... . .
- ~~.
., ~
DR
- -100
-.
R:SITES
r.ftNDSCAPE ARCHlTECTUR1!
lflJl1iJUm JliCl/llf JlKABJBDiJr 9Jwy - SomrtJlOl!f1J!lJtJJjJ _
VIRGOOA BEAGH P.illS AND REtREAD
The Oty of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Reaeatfon is CX>nduc.ting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness fadlity at PrIncess Anne Commons. The visioo Is to develop
an off-road facility tilat can aa:ommodate large mmpetltiVe events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held tilroughout the dty as well as daily usage bv a variety of users.
W~d like to get your feedback as we dt;:velop the preliminary plans for this new fadllty.
Please take a few mInutEs to mmplete the following survey and retum to InSites (fax:
757.622.6466 OR email: info@insiWs-studo.CXlfll) by 7/6/07. We appreciate your time and look
forward to your response.
e
L What would you typcally use the fadllty for? (check all that appfy)
./ BIcycling V'" Running ~ Walkfng _ Equesb1an _ Skating _Therapy
As ./ IndMdual or_Group TyptcaJ Duration (hours) I hi IlL ~ll.......~
SpecifIC days Frequency (I.e. dally) '3 ')( w~ Usual Tlme of day E\JE'"oJt.>l()
Preferred Length (I.e. 51<): Sf.. -131(, Preferred Width (I.e~ Ii feet) I'Z. - I S'~r
Anyother~rsedeslgn preferences? CO",,,,,6<.TIO..u ~ AO~~T LGlJ(,,~ ~oopsJ
AW"'A c::~ H.IA ~ ~ .h~$f\~<<O 6.ti!4Tl7 <,1lA<..<<"S' I .";;.,, '''M~n<.2-)
Preferred surface ror your use? (Le. mulch, asphalt. etc.) A1. f ~ P. ~~ ~ f<..
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be Interested in this
facility?@" N ,-~o~"- S-r-..,o~
How does the organization reach its members?
V Newsletter" ~ Webstte or Weblog V Ustserver ,.@).
_Other
Would you be willing to post Information about this process and fadnty to ycu organization's
newsletter/webslte/b1og etc. y~
Are there other peopleJorganl7Ations/bUslnesses that we'shouId oontact? 1f,c.r~"'Jc.
.
~dD\.J,) (71A) . ~~&A4 €'TC-1 hlS"''- l'-.ctc.. ~f oOtik. h~tSk''n'Ier)
.
;)'f'6 ~..
e
LOOO/IOOO Ii!J
:>:1a ~UTUUnJ
TttZ16t LSL XVd 9S:91 LOOZ/SZ/90
e
3. Are there similar facIIltles that you have seen or use::I?(f)/ N
If so; where? ~ .c). ()~A'I AUUJ4'h>AJ.JA
What other off road -trails or fitness fadlltles do you tJSe in thls area?
"'" Boardwalk ./' Mt Tmshmore ./ Arst landing SP _ Great Nedc: Parte
_atyVlewPark LOther /Jlsrf{.dl..<< &r4A1IC4.l.. ~A~Q6NS _JJte.e-p!AI...,1j"A)I~ 1.4&t!J
What do you like about them?~U""AuL - o~t:.I\.l \.l~6J / 'UAJ"..-e - "10...4...S ~ / t:c..~I- Lo,J~ -ncA ...s
What do you dislike about them? eo-tllhJlh.....- CkIAO;:),. "1'!A I ~ - aPuer!Q ~ g~Ttf IMI., (/,.,/LFfW'4.
~t. ~,- ~1 n "-{!/'
What can we do to make ttlIs fadlJl.y lIlique? JoMIIS M.G.c.B' ~ t'il'lS t'4.M~ - ~l(Q ~ S'cr1='T
:s: ~ ItSO !jo>. ~ r S14.~ F'-d ~ J' J;:5lL 1tM.~ oj; I N to _
Are there other actMtlestfadlJtles at Princess Anne Commons that you or tamlly members use
that should have a direct path cx:mnedlOn to this fadnty? te. Amphitheatre, SportspIex, Schools,
Golf COurse, etc. rr W4........0 I{ '~""'r 'tb 1\i4~ 1'M Ie c..oN~~'J1ITO -0. A
O~. o;."'-rhO 6lotE f1~-c'#O 'HOole. 'tt.I"'~J" IJ-~ .eO.
Would you use this fadllty while other friends or family members partldpate In other acU\IIties
such as athleljc:s7 Y J N
e
4. How 'NOUId you Il'aveI to the facUlty?
./ DrIve alone v Drive wfth others 1/ Bicycle _Run _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse _ Ride a horse _ Other
s. Would you be more likely to use the faclllty more often If any of the following features were
accessIbte or dose by?
y @Power Sourres
~ N Watts Sources
N RestJooms
N Showers / L.odrers / Changing Areas
yeN> PIcnlc TatWls and Grills
Y ~ Open Air She/ters
Y @ FItness stations
Would you be willing to SIt on a p1annlng/revlew/fundralslng committee? Y IdD
Will you be avaDabte for further dlsaJsslon? (J) N
Name MM.1l. M lOt...'\""D Organtzat:lon/Company1i"e'~ (~~.r ~&1-
Emall~ PhoneNoCli2J 1{7/-~1~ 6t)
CUI) t3L.-7f'7" CIA)
.
LOOOIZOOO ~
J=la ~uluun.J
Ttt6T6t LSL XVd 9S:91 LOOZ/gZ/90
ei..
,.
e-
e.,
DII
==
- roo
.......
mSITES
LAND~i'E A.<'''HlrncruRE
8lfl1lKI!m JlJlJ1l111 fl1UJ1JJJJJJr 9Jwr - 9o1YRY JIOJ fJt!JJ!NJ!At aD
YIRGI}8A BEACH PARKS AND RECREATION
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation Is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cyding and fitness facility at Princess Anne COmmons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and chanty walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the dty as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedbad< as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility.
Please take a few minutes to mmplete the following survey and return to InSites (fax:
757.622.6466 OR emall: 1nfo@insites-studio.com) by 7/6/07. We appreciate your time and look
forward to your response.
1. What would you typically use the facility for? (check all tI1at apply)
-2f BicyclIng K Run~ing _ Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating _Therapy
\
As L Individual or )f Group Typical Duration (hours)
Specific days M- ~'" Frequency (I.e. daily) D"q : {, Usual Time of day 7- ~ A~
. Preferred Length (I.e. 5K): Jo K Preferred width (I.e. 12 feet) IOt~
Any other oourse design preferences? ;tJ6'f- t-b~ w ',,,;lv
,
Preferred surface for your use? (i.e. mulch, asphalt, etc.) -LhM-"
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be Interested In thIs
fadlity? Y @
How does the organlzatlon read1lts members?
Newsletter _ Website or Weblog
_UstservE;!r. I Emall
_Other
Would you be willing to post Information about this process and fadllty to your organl tion's
newsletter /websltelblog ere. Y / N
Are there other people/organlzatlons,lbuslnesses that we should contact?
LOOO/tOOO ~
:>:ta ~UTUUn.I
TttZT6t LSL XVA 9S:9T LOOZ/gZ/90
.
e
...
3. Are there similar fadllties that you have seen or Used~1 N
If so, where? {;'f'f;1 ~"..htJ
What other off road -trails or fitness fadUties do you use In this area?
_ Boardwalk .lLMt Trashmore -2LArst landing SP _ Great Neck Pari<
_City View Park L Other AJ,.I..J 71')1II..;( / ~pcvt )./""'" P"""Ic,~ ~ ~.{..~ ~
What do you like about them? <;f..u.Jl!-J (]e<<i'l 7"4:1$1 L,I c A"f Of-h'~
What do you dislike aboutthem7 &I\u-t.le ~ As ",4..1.1 l' ~i Is, AI,,! ~rf P~.::J
What can we do to make this fadllly unique? ;t1,~ W~d' <JhfX W~.,.(!. k...c. {.lCAf l'It 12..c.
Are there other activitiesjfadlities at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use S.....-~-
that should have a direct path connectlon to this fadlity? I.e. AmphItheatre, Sportsplex, SCOOOls,
Golf Course, ete. LI!A;J1~"" H 'OJ, $e'd>1I' /
Would you use this facility while other friends or family members partldpate In other activities
such as athletics? Y I N
4. . How would you travel to the fadllty?
LDrive alone LDrive with others -LBicyde LRun _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse _ Ride a horse _ Other
5. Would you be more likely to use the fadlity more often if any of the following features were
accessible or dose by?
Y QVPower Sources
~ N Water Sources
N Restrooms
N Showers I Lockers I O1anging Areas
Y <&'>Pimlc Tables and GriUs
Y dl?Open Air Shelters
Y @ Fitness Stat:1ons
Would you be willing 00 sit on a planning/revlew/fundraising committee'(Y I N
Will you be available for further dlsaJssion? @ N
Name A&J~;t1; JI ..,,) Organization/Company
Email t4 } n,,' J I e IN,., . e J..... Phone No L!.flJ ":to"If' ,
LOOO/SOOO ~
O:jiJ ~UTUOn.I
TttZT6t LSL XVd LS:91 LOOZ/SZ/90
06/26/2007 18:04
202651421314
BORCt-ERT
PAGE 61
--..-...- -- - ..-'- ,- -_.~-~- ---.- ~,
e
DD
:=: -
- er.
lISIYES
lANDSCAI'f. ARCHITf.CTURf;
Sf JIJJJIJm ~f1l1lfl flKMIIlJJlr 3mD1- SolYEl JIOl hJiJKJm (J$JJf}S
VtR6tNJA BMCH PARKS ,\ND RECREA'llON
The oty of Virginia Beam Department of ParkS and Recreation Is conducting a feaSibility studY
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Canmons. The vision is to ~op
an off-road fadtity that can acrommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the dty as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility.
Please take a few minutes to complete the follOWing survey and rebJm to In5n:es (fax:
757.622.6466 OR email: info@insites-studio.com) by 7/6/07. We appredate your time and look
forward to your response.
e
1. What would you typically use the fadllty to(? (d'Ieck all that applv)
X Bicycling ~nnjng _ WalkIng _ Equestrian _ Skating _Ttu~rapy
As ~ndMdua' or ~roup TypIcal Duration (hours)
SpecIfic days Frequency (i.e. daly-;1Fi:fi l-dJ, Usual Time of day
Preferred length (i.e. 5K)~ ~ Preferred Width (l.e. 12 feEt) \da1t fJiE gc1JP/. ~? ~:;.1)r1.
--"7 L-f'n "C" ./
Any other CDUrse design preferences? J-i J.tA.., . G LA'l. \,.11!J" - I'-(onf 1U5O' CiV .I/h..j}
P1efe1red surfaa: for your use? (I.e. mulch, asphalt. etc.) t>5frl/Jl.4"" - M BilftAV& fJ~~)f
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that YoK,)Uld be interested in this
fadhty@N ~ /d(>tNf ~#AC3
How does the organiz;mon reach Its members?
~ Newsletter ~ Website or We!jog
_Other
XU~~
Would you be willing to post Information about this process and fadbty to your organlZiltlon's
newsletter/wehsite/tiog etc. y (if) p'W( ,liE () if ~Ci f Io\-'C?l
Are there other ~organlzatlol'lS/buslnesses !:hat VIe should oontac.t?
e
OS/26/2067 18:64
202051421314
BORCHERT
PAGE El2
.
3. .Are there similar fadllties that you have seen or used? Y I N If so, where?
What other off road -trails or fit/'le$ facilities do you use in this area?
X Boardwalk ....&Mt Trashmore _ffrst Landing SP _ Great Nedc. Park
_Otv V1~ Park. _ Other
What do you IlIce al:xJut U1em? r~-o" W::.YJ htl IZ~c.c5
What do you dislike about them? '--n7t) ~<t LV'
What aln we do to mate this facility unique?
Are there other actiVItles/facilitles at PrIncess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path oonnectlon to this fadllty? i.e. Amphitheatre, Sportspl8c:, Schools.
Golf Course. en:.
Would you use this t.Jdlity while other friends or family members partidpate in other aCllVlt1es
sudl as athletiCS~
4. How would you t'13VeI to the facility?
.)(.OrIve alone LOrive with others 1Bicyde _Run _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a I"lcmie ~ RIde a hor.;e _ Other
S. Would you be more likely to use the facility more often If any of the following features were
accessible or dose bY?
Y N Power SOurces
N Water Sources
RestrOoms
N Showers I lockers I Clanging Areas
N Picnic Tables and Grills
N Open Air Shelters
Y N Atness Statiorn
'.
Would you be willing tD sit OIl a p1amln9lreview/fundraising oomrnfttee? Y -0;1
Will you be available for fiKther dlsaJsslon7'G)1
Name AUS~ bt-1Z~~zationjCNnpany
~.e
EmaR Phone No L->
If) L t 5/itV,I! G cJfL C/4c. ~I (2~ j,.j lJ'O /7/J;Ct - Ui"II
JUN-26-2007 12:07
TRRNSYSTEMS CORP,NORFOLK
757 625 0929 P.01/02
~~
~~
=.:=:=--
==
---.00
_.
IrSIYES
lANDSCAP! ARCHITECruRE
oX fl!JJtF1l JlJjfJJllfl fII1M7B1111J Olwr - So1Y11! 101 fJrtJJJKJIAl D3KlB
VlRGUilA BEACH PARKS AND RECREATION
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibiliLy study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness fadlity at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road fadlity that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility.
Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSltes (fax:
757.622.6466 OR email: info@insites-studio.com) by 7/6/07. We appredate your time and look
forward to your response.
1. What would you typically use the facility for? (check all that apply) .
~ Bicyding _ Running _ Walking _ EquestrIan _ Skating _Therapy
e
As ..!. IndivIdual or ~ Group Typical Duration (hours)
Tues, TbUI'l,
Specific days WRkencls Frequency (i.e. daily) 2x per week
1mi. min,
Preferred Length (Le. 5K): Smi. max.. Preferred Width (i.e. 12 feet) 12' min 15' max
Ikfvre lIr After work,
Usual Time of day lISuallyavanlnp
Any other course design preferences? options for 90 degree comers VB. all gradual turns
Preferred surface for your use? (i.e. muld'l, asphalt, etc.)
2. Are you a member of a user/advocac;y/profe~ional organization that would be interested in this
faCiliwB N SR Racing
How does the organization reach its members?
asphalt
_ Newsletter _ website or Weblog
~Ustserver / Emall
_Other
Would you be wirling to post infbrmation about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletter!website/blog etcEJ N
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should contact?
e
e
e
e
JUN-2Q-200? 12:137
TRANSYSTEMS CORP,NORFOLK
757 625 13929 P.B2/02
3. Are there similar facilities ttlat you have seen or used? Y I N
If so, where? We make due with
our favorite paved roadWays
What other off road -trans or fitness fadJ/tles do you use in this area?
Boardwalk _Mt Trashmore ~Rtst Landing SP _ Great Neck Park
_City View Pari< _ Other Paved: none. Off Road: Williamsburg 31'lla
What do you like about them? lack of motor vehicle interference
What do you dislike about them? Not enough options for bicycles (many areas/lmlted to foot traffic only)
What CCln we do to make this fadlity unique? Build a legitimate paved circuit, noOuat an asphalt walkway.
Are there other activities/futilities at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this faality? La Amphitheatre, Sportspfex, Schools,
Golf Course, etc.
Would you use this facility while other friends or family members participate in other activities
such as athletics? Y I N
Myself, No. My associates, deflnattly Yes.
4. How would you travel to the fudlity?
..LDrive alone _Drive with others -!...Bicyde _Run _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse _ RIde a horse _ Other
5. Would you be more likely to use the facility more often if any of the following features were
accessible or dose by?
Y N Power Sources
Y N Water Sources
Y N Restrooms
Y N Showers I Lockers I Changing Areas
Y N Picnic Tables and Grills
Y N Open Air Shelters
Y N Fitness Stations
Would you be willing to sit on a planning/review/fundraising oommitteeB N
Will you be available for further discussion? 0 N
Name Rob Frank Organization/Company Transyatellts
Email robertfrank@cOLnet
Phone NO~) 627-1112
TOTAL P. 132
e
e
e
JON 25,2007 12:45 COMBAT HEATING*COOLING
7574311360
page 1
'i[,,~.""'~~'
.T:f.,'''' ."~
::e~ ;S)
c-.~ ~.,.
,., .. "f"
. \ -.I,. ~,,':rt
~.:""".""".'...<#';
"~-:;':'-
ftft
~=-
=- ~..=:
,= ~
- -IS!.
. .
I....NOSi ~"I'r. ^Ri.lllnl.:Tl'Kt
Gl JllIJIlJfJlJifJJ1J'l JfKAlrmnm 9JYJDr - SolYlffJlOl Pt1Jr!Jf1JAt DsIiIs
Vr~~~lA BrAI:H P A~KS ~h'D RECREA'ITOH
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is CDfIducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cyclIng and fitness fadlity at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is In develop
an off-road fadlity that can accommodate large competitive events ancJ charily walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throoghout the dty as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new radlit'(.
Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSItes (fax:
757.622.6466 OR email: info@insites-studlo.com) by 7/6/07. We appreciate your time and look
forward to your response,
1. What would you typIcallv use the fatility for? (check all that apply)
/ Bicycling _ Running ~alklng _ EQ\JesIJ1an ~ Sl<<tting _Therapy
As v";ndMclual or ~rouP Typical Duration (hours) ~ t- ~
SpeQflc days M l-. Frequency (I.e. daily) ))1\1 \ LJ Usualllme of day Am
Preferred Length (f.e, 5K): ~ Preferred Width (i.e. 12 feet) J''L ft
Ally other wurse design prefel'et1ces? lA) \Qs ~ is ~ {J S I ll..c.S+1!. (}l.> M S
Preferred surfcK;e for your use? (I.e. mulch, asphalt:, etc.) 1\ 'S~ b~.ht-
2, Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional Of91)nization that would be Interested in this
fadlltyr!) N -n d.e I;) A- J..l-tL ~ -bt- j d -<>-It S
How does the organization r its members?
_ Newslettef ~ebslte or Weblog
_other
/
_Ustserver I Ernail
Would you be willing to post Information about this process and fcldlity to your organization's
newslettef/webslte/blog etc. Y €J
An! there other people/organizations/businegses that ve should mntu:t?
eOAl& M-e.m b@[~ ~ Tide....0~ <;t1-.id~t:~
.JUN 25,2007 12:45 COMBAT HEATING*COOLING
7574311360
page 2
e
3. Are there similar fadlitie5 that you have seen or used? Y I D If so, where? ..
WZ off tOad ~or fitness fadlltles? you use in this area?
_.. Boardwalk _Mt Trashmore ~Flrst landing SP _ Great Ned< Park
/Ot'l VIew Park _ other
What do you like about them? L6 0 f .
I
What do you dslJke aoout them? LltdL
((.es i-'eoo l"\'lS 1 J1(.'€..QS
D~ WA~ ~ ~
What can we do to make thls fadllty unique?
e
Are there other actlvltJeslfadllties at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path oonnedion to this fadllty? I.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex. Schools;
Golf Course, etc.
Would you use this fadllty While other friends or family members partldpate In other adivilies
sum as athJetics?@ N
4. How would you travel to the fadllty?
_~1Ie alone /' Drive with others _Bicyde ___Run _Walk_Skate
_Trailer a hoo;e -.,.-- RIde i.l horse _ other
5. Would you be more likely to use the fadllty more oftl:n if any of the following features WNe
accessible or dose by?
y ~er Sources
~ N Water SOUI"CES
N Restrooms
N Showen; /l.ocXers ~I~
Y JPlenlC Tables and Grills
Y Open AIr Shelters
y F1~ Stations
Would you be willlng to sit on a plannlng/revlew/fundralsing committee? y~
Will YOl! be available for further diSQJsslon? Y I N
NameC.Jf\Jb..j W') \ ,~~S Organlzatlon/Companv
Emau.cJs,,..ibol ~@ Phone No ~~
C-o><. . N-f t
e
.
e
e
Jun 25 07 07:19p
7579630377
p. 1
Glenn Gatdula
~~
,.r~~~
(!j~r.l~~.:~t-t),
:~f .. \~~
~~~~ . ~.~J
...~'-;.~ -~;;.
~..~",::r-.
..~
~~
- -=-='
===:.
~ =:==
~ ~
KX)
........
RSITES
LANDSCAPE ARCHITIi.CTUllE
lil JlJJJtJ1J1f JlACJJm JlJJAS1BIJ1if 9Jwr- SolYlff JIOK Prl.tBJIiIAl D3JJJl3
VIRGINIA BEACH PARKS AND RECREATION
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cyding and fitness fadlity at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is tD develop
an off-road facility that can acmmmodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the dty as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new futility.
Please take a few minutes lo complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax:
757.622.6466 OR ema~: info@insites--studio.com) by 7/6/07. We appreciate your time and look
forward to your response.
1. What would you typically use tf1e fadlity for? (check all that apply)
"
.-L Bicyding ~ Running --.tWalking _ Equestrian _ Skating ~Therapy
ASr'~ Individual or!- Group Typical Duration (hours) c...l ~ ~
Specific days ,(,. S! S Frequency (i .e. daily) Usual Time of day(J / utL,~ /# a
Preferred length (I.e. 5K): (ole... Preferred Width (i.e. 12 feet) de) f r
Any other course design preferences?
Preferred surface for your use? (i.e. mulch, ~hall:,. ett:..) !h? rt:} \. r
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested In this
fadlity? Y I N
How does the organization reach its members?
_ Newsletter _ Website or Weblog
/ Ust:server I Email
_other
Would you be willing to post information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletter/website/b1og etc0 N
Are there other people,lorganlzalions/bL15lnesses that we should contact?
Jun 25 07 07:lSp
Glenn Gatdula
7579630377
p.2
.
3. Are there similar facilities that you have S€eI1 or used?~ N
I
If so, where? rJe...,.; f..:.p.:/ ~ew.l
What other off road -trails or fitness facilities do you use in this area?
Boardwalk _Mt Trashmore ~Rrst landing SP _ Great Neck Park
_my View Park _Other 10 ,l-IL.. ~ 11t:v'L
What do you like alxlut them? .) A .t=-<::r J,vQ CP{LS
What do you dislike aoout them? \l) U :=- ACt- S i) -t- {V]; i e-J
What can we do to make thls fadlity unique? (Y) r ,g, . _ } < e ) HI r::.1 ~c\ 1011 W
"--'
Are there other activities,lfadlities at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this facil~ty? Le. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf Course. etc. ~.& -v" , ,rJ fJ f fTtlL 11I17 7Q/)J rJlP1..t:!':.e
Would you use this facility while other friends or family members participate in other activities
such as athletics? @ I N
4. How would you travel to the fadlity?
LDrive alone _Drive With others -.6iCYde ~~n _Walk _Skate
.
_Trailer a horse _ Ride a horse other
5, Would you be more likely to use the facility more often if any of the following features were
accessible or close by?
)Q N Power Sources
w.. N Water Sources
~ Restrooms
N Showers I Lodcers I Changing Areas
N Pi01ic Tables and Grills
~ N Open Air Shelters
\'!:)N Fitness Stations
Would you be wIlling to sit on a planning/review/fundralslng committeO I N
Will you be available for further discussionO I N
- . (:i\1jl1.\L~
NameG\..eI\.'_,v ~ Organization/COmpany
Email. _ Phone No QS:2.) 176 ?"j7 7
Uk('l\J\~J.....\.... ($) ProL I (.;;~ -
.
..
e
e
[~(~:~.
'~;"I:' ~~~
~{ .~:' ~ ~..~.~\!~
':, ~ . j"""!;~
',~ I., "i.l(t
"1.':'0":', ,,~{.
~... '," ~~.,.
~,:'~,;.J'~
Sf flf1!Hl!/B flAf11lfY J1KMiJJIJm 3mOY
Ylk~;m!J\ BEwr I'^~K~ ANI! REG~EA'fiON
I~SrfES
1.\.\I"......I.r: '.IU:1J:,.r~'I"I:"I'
City of Virginia Beach: SK Fitness Fadlity Feasibility Study
Concept Development - Survey Questionnaire for Potentia! Users
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons, The vision is to develop
an off-road facility that can ~ccommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughOllt the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility. You've
been contacted because you've been identified as someone who may ultimately use the fadllty,
as an events planner or may have some knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few
minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax: 757.622,6466 OR email:'
info@lnsites~studio.com) by 6/22/07. We appreciate your time and look forward to your
response. . .
1. What would you typically use the fadllty for? (cheel< all that apply)
~ Blcydlng ~Running ~.__ Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating .. ..__Therapy
As -k Individual or.K.. Group Typical Dur<ltion (hours) _ ) - "'L
Spedfic days S-...~..-~ Frequency (Le. dally) Usual Time of day "1-c:."'-
Preferred Length (i.e. 5K): ..l.~~_ Preferred Width (i.e, 12 feet) .If::::..u....!.
Any other course desIgn preferences? ~" ___:>c..e-W\ ",,- V, G 100-'.5 .." ~
Preferred surface for your use? (l.e, mulch; asphalt, etc.) Vc. ~ ...bl.c-/ > c~.~ y r-tJi'1t
2. Are you ~ member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that woul9 be interested In this
fadllty"C) N __ ..'t~ - (l $.-\iJc.~ ~"\"",....(c94.r.s
How does the orgilnizatlon reach Its members?
.29Newsletter_"~ebsite or Weblog
_other
_L1stserver I Emall
Would you be willing to post inform~tion about this process and fadJity to your orqanizatlon's
newsletteriwebsi~/b1og et{j) N
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should contact?
cd WtlLS:60 LOOc SC 'unf
S08S89(LSL: 'ON XCI.::!
OJ ld~3 A3~n S~f: WO~-'"
..'
e
3. Are tl1ere similar fadlities that you have seen or usee N If so, where? ~ t.>r~ ~ I, .
/'I..t.p~ _..\. c.~ ,f! <:.
Whilt other off rOlld -trails or fitness f;j(;JIjties do you use il1 this area?
)< Boarnwalk _ ..Mt Tr<lshll1ore -X-Rrst Landing 51" .x. Great Neck Park
_City View Pork __ Other ,. _ ---"
What do you like about them? (3?~ ~ \ ~ -. \II ~~" . Ft.- Sf.:- J:!,..." ('\J'_~J c,.... f ....fi S~"'tt
- .
What do you dIslike about them?, fi.s.f- b.:q~.- tt~~,.dyJ..!~:- ""..,J fu~~~
What can we do to make this fadllly unique? fvt,u It,'- 5'u"'~_
Are there other activities/futilitIes at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this fad/lty? i.e. AmphItheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf Course, ete, p.o
Would you use this fadlity while other friends or family members partldpate in other activities
such as athletiCS?&- N
e
4. How would you travel to the facility?
-A-Drive alone ~Drllle wIth others ~Blcyde _Run _.. .._Walk _,Skate
. _Trailer a horse __ Ride a horse _ Other
5. Would you be more likely to use the facility more often If any of the following features were
accessible or dose by?
Y @power Sources
~ N Water Sources .
N Restroorns
N Showers I Lockers I Oli!nglng Areas
~lcniC Tables and Grills'
pen AIr Shelters
N Fitness Stations
Would you be willing to sit on a plannlng/review/fundraislng comrnittee~ N
will you be available for flJrther discussion? ~ N
(j) "1r&.t. vo:.~"" >+'"c~..,-;s
Name fi-Iq(.- ""' ~ (..(>f\~ ~ Organization/Company _(1. ~ ,,-,c'J 1. _<"t V~.L~- \.~
, .
Emal1rM\o..a~QJV'&..!_ PhoneNo(1.i.!J..3'11l-I.{/j.;) (~~
l-\r C,;:)'l'-Io'lAC\C. c...a........ ";':j,,.,,-: ,: J ;.
e
Id ~LS:60 L00C Sc .unr
S08S89~LSL: "ON ~~
OJ ldffi A3T1ti() S3wt1f; WO~.:l
e
e
e
~~......"'-.... ..........-.-r...--.- --.... -. ""....
.J The City of Virginia Beach Depan;ment of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons, me vision is to develop
an off~road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charIty walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for thIs new facility. You've
been contacted because you've been identified as someone who may ultimately use the facility,
as an events planner or may have some knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few
minutes to complete the folloWing survey and return to InSltes (fax: 757.622.6466 OR email:
info@insites-studlo.com) by 6/22/07. We appreciate yo~r time and look forward to your
response.
1. What would you typically use the fadllty for? (checl<. aU that apply)
_.~ Bicycling ~Running __ Walking _ _ Equestrian _ . Skating _ _ ,herapy
As)Q. Individual or K Group Typ!col Duration (hourS) _.1..::.,'"1---
,rr d ") . usual 11 me of day _b~.
Specific days ~~~ frequency (I.e. at y .~.- ._~- ,
red th (' SK)" t J~ Preferred Width (i.e. 12 feet) l~L.f...:..
prefer Leng J,e, . -'--:- - .
. ~. ~""l"" VIG.~_.-----
An'! other course design preferences? --~_.~ ~-_.- -- . ',.. ~
hIt t } ~"",d~l4-' $, ~~~
Preferred surface for your use? (i.e. mulch, asp a , e c. - .-~-+--- .
b f a user/advoca<:Yjprofessional organll.ation that would be int.erested In this
2. Are you a mem er 0
facility-&" N _'~:L>L-=-.~"'W S~L~n - _.-~'- --- - --~
How does the organization reach its membe~s?
__ _Ustserver I Email
__ \rWebsite pr Web\og
-29Newsletter ..p- -
_~_other _.-~.- ~-- ----.--. d f II'h. to your organIZation'S
. t this process an aC:11cy
would you be wiHin9 to post informatlOn abOU . .
newsletter/webslte/blo9 etc(!) N . _ __
'nesses that we should contact? ----- -
Are there other peOPle/organlzatloOs/bUS1 . ___ _'~_- __-------
---...-
----
_..--------------- ---
------------
\
~
. .'. . ~ ','
. _....JII!'/ ~
I.o'.,...~....:.~
It. <".' .
...J j."
-t'" ~ '.' "1;
".
td wtfC:S:60 L00C: SC: 'unf
908S89[LSL: 'ON X~j
OJ Id03 A311~~ S3~r: WO~~
.
e
e
,J
of flflff&r flAfJlmr J1lfASJBf1llf 8Jy;J)Y
YJRmn^ BI~AGH P^~KS ^ND ~EGR~A'nnN
I~~SiTES
L'! U"~l ~ltf'l: ."I.::m trot ;'! ~ 11fT.
City of Virginia Beach: 51< Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
rnnr",nt npVplnnMPnt - Survey Questionnaire for Potential Users
JUN-22-2007 10:44
SENTARA CONSL T I NT MED
757 522 1725 P.01
~~
~
===- --~
- --
- --
- -
- -
- ~
- -
~D
u..~':<,'.: };;'~i r:~ ~;: '~$
lANL>SCAPf. AIlCHIT[!CrURF,
8l fl11N1!1B flAC//lJ!l JIiASJJJMY 9mb! - b.Y/J! JlOl Pf11EN1r)J;_
VrRGrNlA BF.ACH PARKS AND RF.GRF.A'J10N
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor c.yding and fitness fadlity at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the dty as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
.' _ We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new fadlity.
t::.,\ Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax:
~~;- '~57.622.6466 OR email: info@insites-studio.com) by 7/6/07. We appreciate your time and look
)(f forward to your response.
~.
e
1. WhajWOuld you typi~11y use the facility for? (cneck all that apply)
~ Bicyding _ Running _ Walking _ EQuestrian _ Skating _Therapy
As _\.1ndMd~1 or ~roup Typical Duration (hours) ;;t.
SpecifiC days (,..~- frequency (i.e. daily) ~~ual Time of day ~fi I(
Preferred Length (I.e. 6) Preferred WidIll (i.e. Gv
Any other course design preferences? ~
"'eferte<! surfaa! tor your ""'? (I.e. m~ ~etc.) _
2. Are you a member of a user/adJocacy!professional organization that would be interested in this
fadlirrG)N Tr..--L~~~i~ ~.-
How does the organization reach i1s members?
~etter ~W;bsite or Weblog t..-1f~rver / Email
_Other
Would you be willing to post information about this process and fadlity to your organization's
newsletter/website/b1og et{j) N
Ale there other people/organizatiOns/businesSes that we should rontact?
e
.
e
e
~ ....af ~\
3. Are there similar facilities that you have seen or . V N If so, wh, dl.1::!::::::.~
--. (1 T-_Lvt~
What ot~ off road -trails or fitness fadlitieS do yo~..use in this area? - ~ ~ j
t/~ardwalk ~Mt Trashmore ~ Landing SP ~ Great Nedc. ~ /
, I
.... " /
-LL6ty View Park _ Other '-......... .____--.,,/
What do you like about them? ~ -6 ~:tr~
What do you dislike about them? ~ - ~
What can we do to make this fadlity unique? ~ ,~ ,7' - ~ ~ r1,-
Are there other activitieS/fadrlties at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use '-' A)
Ve / D .-!q!':. ~
that should have a direct path connection tD this facility? i.e. Amphitheatre, Spoltsp!ex, SChoolS, ~;::;l:..t .~
Goff Course, etc. ;J d ~ ff P~r
-;1v---<-
tJ-u.
V cl-J'
f ;;:J
:LA
JUN-22-2007 10:44
SENTARA CONSL T I NT MED
757 622 1726
./
"
Would you ~_~~dlily while other friends or family members partiCipate in other activities
such as athletic:tJ N
4. How would you travel to the facility?
v6rive alone _Lerrive with others ~~e _Run _Wa~k_Skate
_Trailer a horse _ Ride a horse _ other
5. Would you be more likely to use the fadlity more often if any of the following features were
accessible or dose by?
~. N Power Sources
. N Water Sources
N Restrooms
N Showers I Lorkers / Changing Areas
~ N Picnic Tables and Grills
CY N Open Air Shelters
Y N FItnesS stations
WOUld you be willing to sit on a planning/revlew/fundraising comrT'lit:reeW/ N
Will you be avadable for further discussion? (J IN
Name 1)1' S. Vf'/f~ Jl1 #'ow' Organization/Company Sf> 11 f(JYr;?
Email Sit 5v..-1f ()(\/ r 7) P Phone No (~) s?l "" / ( Yj<-
C!. d-""f. ~ tV e ,J ~ ') 7
P.02
-......... "
~.......... '"
TOTAL P. 02
e
e
e
..016/22/2007 FRI
9:12 FAX 757 491 7634 Brydges Geroe Rosenblatt
~OOl/002
~~
iiiiittiiiiii1 iSiiiiiii.r
~~
=
- ---r..OS.
HSITES
LANDSCAPE ARCHITF.c;rURF.
or JfJJ!NF1J3 Jl)J1!Ul'l JlsMIBDJir Oiwl- bYlf! flOll fJfJJJJHJIAb {JdJJM
V!RGlNIA BEACH PAAKS AND RECREATION
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facnrty that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as dally usage by a variety of users.
We'd Hke to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility.
Please take a few mInutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax:
757.622.6466 OR emall: info@insltes-studlo.com) by 7/6/07. We appreciate your time and look
forward to your response.
1. What would you typically use the facility for? (check all that apply)
~ Bicyding L Running ~ Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating _Therapy
.......) i ."....1- I h/Jwv '2~3 )<.I~
As ~ Individual or V' Group Typical Duration (hours)~(fl v vU/UV - - . L
Specific days Vo..vi (ll.). ') Frequency (I.e. dally) 2 - i Usual TIme of day ~ ~ 'J
0.+ 1etiF.>t- 'O~
Preferred Length (I.e. SK):Vuf rlLwalwreferred Width (i.e. 12 feet)
o.f/fJ fi mcre,.0fl10l15
Any other course design preferences?
Preferred surface for your use? (i.e, mulch, asphalt, etc.)
2. Are you a member of a user/advocaCf/professlonal organizatIon that would be Interested In this
fadlity?Y IN I t1Y Jhr..Xe/'1. (().,:f' !J k- ard am (~~ fN, _ I
OtOf._(u'?JU1'j) UJ() '~ C./fJf1) {f: OPhtJYJ - rcf.(fJif)a..lI",J
How does &'Ie o~nlzat1on reach its members? ~ n(,., U r ps t-e a.g UL 51:.- -J
Newsletter _ Website or Weblog
_UstselVer I Email
_Other
Would you be willing to post Information about this process and fudlity to your organization's
newsletter/website/blog etx(j)1 N
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should contact? Ii ck wa. kJ Sh1 'cJ.e.f/S
k.a Ie Whni ng
06/22/2007 FRI 9: 13 FAX 757 491 7634 Brydges Geroe Rosenblatt
lll002/002
e
3. Ot.b'~es lI1at you have seen or used? Y I N II so. wnen,?~ ~
What other off road -trails or fitness facilities do you use In this area?
_~rdwalk ~ Mt Trashmore _First Landing SP _ Great Neck Park
_Dty View Park _ Other
What do you like about themJliYn1)u;,iJ ~.Jr1hJ f!J
What do you cI1sllke about them? IrNit dJu;tlLf1 ~
What can we do to make this fadllty unique?
Are there other ac.tlvltles/fadlities at Princess Anne Commons that you or famity members use
&a tvf
/tLU?Ntxy ~
that should have a direct path cnnnection to this facility? I.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf Course, etc.~ ./Af ~) fU)7...
Would you use this fadlity while other frJends or family members partidpate In other adivities
such as athletics? (!) N
4. How would you travel to the facility?
~rive alone vDrlve with others
_Bicyde _Run _Walk _Skate
tit
_Trailer a horse _ RIde i'I horse _ Other
5. Would you be more likely to use the fadlity more often if any of the followIng features were
accessible or dose by?
Y N Power Sources
Y N Water Sources
Y N Restrooms
Y N Showers I Lockers / Changing Areas
Y N Picnic Tables and Grills
Y N Open Air Shelters
Y N Fitness Stations
e
Would you be willing to sit on a plannlng/reVlew/fundralsing committee? Y 6l
Will you be available for further discussion? (j I N
Name !kJf1)1!kt W1~ Organization/Company .$6 to ,
Email ~PJwihk/S ~ Phone No L-) 17--1-(002.1
et1.(LO utw ArfVl.OJfYl
.
.
06/22/2007 FRI 10:07 FAX 757491 7634 Brydges Geroe Rosenblatt
~002/003
.
Ir .IYES
LAN})"SCA~E ARCH lfECTU RE
.D
==r- ~ -=
s --
IBR.
lfl fI1fIu!m flAC/IlIf JIJJMJJJJuJr dirJIJr - SolYlil JlOl fJo'fJImAh USlI/$
VIRGINIA BEACH PARKS AND RECREATION
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommodate large competttfve events and charfty walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility.
Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax:
757.622.6466 OR email: info@insltes~studio.com) by 7/6/07. We appreciate your time and look
forward to your response.
1. What would you typically use the facility for? (check all that apply)
X Blcyding ..:i.. Running ~ Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating _Therapy
As j( Individual or K Group Typical Duration (hours) .!;) hrS
Specific days ~Sun Frequency (I.e. dally) Usual Time of day
Preferred length (Le. SK): E9LJl"8i4referred Width (I.e. 12 feet)
Any other course design preferences?
Preferred surface for your use? (I.e. mulch, asphalt. etc:.) mu\ c.h.., 'f#- ~ t-
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested In thIs
fadllty?<D' N M wI ~~ ~rv:\v.,&;;}~.l(OUP~ 'Pun w!<?V(rll~ €to. E:.cQ.Jp
How does the organization reach Its members?
_ Newsletter ~ Webslte or Weblog
)d Ustserver / Emall
_Other
Would you be willing to post information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletter/webslte/blog et.c(j)/ N
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should oontact?
~o
.
e
e
06/22/2001 PRI 10:07 FAX 151 491 7634 Brydgee Geroe Rosenblatt
lZIoo3/o03
3. Are there similar fadl1t1es that you have seen or used? Y I~ If so, where?
What other off road .tralls or fitness fadlltles do you use in this area?
~ Boardwalk ~Mt Trashmore _First Landing SP _ Great Neck Park
_CIty View Park _ Other
What do you like about them? Nl G p()I..C.L '-\-0 c u ~
What do you dislike about them? ~A~ C.-OJ-\ ot' Cr~ v.J1-.\.ait~-\s
What can we do to make this Fadlity unique? 4-h.ve.. 91Q.,.Jer.&) ~-\-~ t ~..Q~~
Are there other actlvitJes/fadlltles at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this f"adllty? i.e. Amphitheatre, SportspJex, SChools,
Golf Course, etc. Nt)
Would you use this facility while other friends or family members participate in other activitfes
such as athletics? tV; N
4. How would you travel to the fadllty?
X Drive alone ye:. Drive with others _B/cyde _Run _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse _ RIde a horse _ Other
5. Would you be more nkely to use the facility more otten if any of the following features were
aa:essible or dose by?
~ N Power Sources
N Water Sources
N Restrooms
(V N Showers I Lockers I Changing Areas
Y N Picnic Tables and Gr1l1s
('j) N Open Air Shelters
Y N Fitness Stations
Would you be Willing to sit on a plannlng/revlew/fundraising committee? Y / ~
WlII you be available for further discussion? (j)/ N
Name +,b: OrganlzaUon/Company &~J ttr~ ~~ g 6'8r~1W.:
Email \ Ii ar. ,(c01Phone No os:b ~'l.-2~S"
.
e
e
" FROM .: CSCS DET _EAST
FAX NO. :757-444-6449
Jun. 22 2007 12:20PM P1
~.s;i~
:s...jJ,... .....~
~Cil::ifI;l. .."...:>.~
);:.;r:'.. ." >..~,.;.'l.'
(5f t"" ',1:
t,. !"M.~' wi. .
... ~,:\,~.,. ~ ~Ic~
....(f'~lt~l'a..:,...I."lJ
\."'\:....~t~~.r
DD
gr- --~=
r;;; ..;.;;=;.....
::=-"_:'::."00
.........A
lISIYES
1,^.m$~:AI'r: /lRCliITIKTt'RI,
BK fllnIF1B flACllllf JlBAS18JilJf 9toDr - 801YE! !O1 fJo'iJJJtI!Al fJsKRS
VIRHJNrA BEAGII PARKS AN]) RECRF.^TION
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as dally usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility.
Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax:
757.622.6466 OR amail: info@lnsites-studio.com) by 7/6/07. We appredate your time and look
fOlWard to your response.
1. What would you typically use the facility for? (check all that apply)
X. Bicycling X Running _ Walldng __ Equestrian _ Skating _Therapy
As ~ Individuat or _ Group Typical Duration (hours) ___"._
Specific days ~ Frequency (i.e. daily)~.. Usual Time of day ~. f ~V~ .
Preferred Length (i.e. SK); 5CJ')LOI{ Preferred Width (i.e. 12 f<.>et) ..hlt.'pe A-J 1eS~,nLe
Any other course design preferences? ~~ ~J ~ fll<.\J\Gc._4:. (2..uUVt}J~
Preferred sulface for your use? (I.e. mulch, asphalt, etc.).J!JP1)j o'vd-N' f.tIoVte (Jor ~~ ~ "ry
~~ a..Jf}Iv4./-I' I ~ .f!!"d,.. bl k"~
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/profession31 organization that would be interested In this
facility?@N -rf~ sr~r I fiNAc.. ~,c,f!- rgt Gwg
How does the organization reach its members?
., ,~ews1etter ~ Website or Weblog
_1Jsl5erver / Email
__other
Would you be willing to post Information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletter/web5ite/blog etc. Y I(j) o11f6fZ.. fOtJ!..1 ftllf!, Oc1t~"-IHS
Are there other people/organIzations/businesses that we should contact? 1/IVr; 1?IKt:! Jl,uAJ a.e4) S.
J S 1I~f5
. FROM';CSCS DET_EAST
FAX NO. ;757-444-6449
Jun. 22 2007 12;20PM P2
e
3. Are there simRar facilIties that you have seen or used'? Y @ )f so, where?
What other off robd -trails or fitness facilities do you use in this area?
~ Boardwalk ~Mt Trashmore AArst Landing SP __ Great Neck Park
_CityViewPark _other ~Nf!.c.~ ~l> / LfJft)f>o.,.} a(l.\~ i2-1) ~t
What do you like about them? Q~f"'- ~ 't)
What do you dislike abOut them? ~ ~\N1'\A\~ ($W5-P"> .s1\11> "f
What can we do to make this facility unique? Ge\ t...O'\) df_ .~'\ - 'I...\~' 'II a1"I-\"E'41-, {, GA
~\ I., .
Are there other activitieS/fadlities at Princess Anne Commons that: you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this fadlity? I.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf Course, etc.-l:Ut s c.. (' Sf 0 (t ''is f1:.l5;L x.. -Ch.)~ '7 'frAf L.<;
e
Would you use this fadlity while otl1er friends or family members participate in other activities
such as athleticsQ N
4, How would you travel to the facility?
~Drlve alone \:::.-Drlve with others ~_alcycle >{ Run _Walk _Skate
_Tra~er a horse _ Ride a horse _ Ottler
5. Would you be more likely to use the fad/lty more often if any of the following features were
accessible or dose by?
y ($V Power SOurces
<5P N Water SOurces
z:.:il N Restrooms
~ N Showers I Lockers I Changing Areas
N Picnic Tables and Grills
N Open Air Shelters
eD Fitness stations
e
Would yotl be willing to sit on a planninglrevlew/fundn1lsjng committl~G> N arK; f(2.D&Ai,t..'1 WILL-
Will you be available for further discussion? (j)t N -r;s.Pr~~~~
Name.s4n ~lt1ItJ6 '. Organization/Company tJ ~ . . .. "'_'_ /W'A-I
Email5:1V'ihWttUh-e... Phone No 00 '.S~"fr-lk>l.t, 5
@3~~ \ . CoW"'\.
\. FROM
,.
e
.
e
(FRI)~UN 22 2007 e:~O/ST_ a:~0/No_7~~ea7e677 p ~
1
4?i\~
@j;... .~..C~~
~='b:c~"';l,
{ff.f!-: !t4,,\~p"
~~.. ~":;': .., ~~~
\-\\ .....llf
ll"'~~:;::;::Y .
~.~~~~~
oxflIINFm flACIJlfY JliMJJJlmy 3Jwy
YIRGI/flA. BUCII PARKS ArW REGRF,A1l0U
RS~rfES
l"~l,"I:"I'1. ~.I.JlIl"{ .ll:~.
City of Virginia Beach: 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Concept Development - Survey Questionnaire.for Potential Users
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conductil'!g a feasibility study
for an outdoor cyding and fitness fadlity at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility. You've
been contacted beca use you've been identlfied as someone who' may ultimately use the fadlity,
as an events planner or may have some knowledge of similar courses. Please rnke a few
minutes to complete the following sUrvey and return to InSites (fax: 757.622.6466 OR email:
info@insites-studio.com) by 6122/07. We appreciate your time and look forward to your
response.
1. What would you typically use the fadlity for? (dleek an that apply)
~Cling _ Running _ Walking _ Equestrian _ S1<ating _Therapy
As .....-'1 ndlvldual or _ Group Typical Duratfon (hours) /- 1..--
Spedflc days ~'-f PUN Frequency (i.e. daily) Usual Time of day 7 ~
Preferred length (i.e. SK): 5 K Preferred Width (ioe, 12 feet)
Any other Q)urse design preferences?
Preferred surface for your use? (Le. mulch, asphalt, etc.) tLr.L>A/,L-.
(
2.. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested in this
faclllty@ N. -r:Jew ;:/b.:.7)~ ~J--'
How does the organization reach Its members?
_ ~wsletter ~ebsit~ or Weblog ~tserver { Email
_Other
Would you be willing to post information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletter/website/b1og etc{}Jt N
Are there other people/organizationS/businesses that we should contact?
\\1 F'f:lOM
11
.
e
.
(FRI)~UH 22 2007 a:~O/ST. e:~O/Ho.76.aa7e677 p 2
3. Are the,re similar facilities that you have seen or used? Y @ If so, where?
What other off road -trails or fitness facilities do you use in this area?
~ardwalk Mt Trashmore ~st Landing SP _ Great Neck Pari<
_Oty View Park _ Other -PI ..1,.... 1../ f"lJ7 C~v/-:Z;;~.J rA~ ~ -rf
What do you like about them? 00--1:", S" ~ ~ .
What do you dislike about them?
B.i/t"......~
What can we do to make this facility unique?
Me there other activities{fadlities at Princess Anne COmmons that you or family members use
that should have a dIrect path connection to this fadllty? I.e, Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf Course, etc, ,i3,. ,.J {'1 j.r Vl A/,...;e ~
Would you use this fadlity while other friends or familv members partldpate in other activities
such as athletics? (ilr N
4. How would you travel to the fadlity?
_Drive alone ~ve with others ~cyde _Run _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse _ Ride a horse _ Other
5. Would you be more likely to use the facility more often if any of the following features were
accessible or dose by?
~y N Power Sou~s
N Water Sources
N Restrooms
Y N Showers I lockers I Changing Areas
Y N PiOlic Tables and Grills
Y N Open Air Shelters
Y N Fitness Stations
Would you be willlCl9 to sit on a planning/review/fundraising commlttee& N
Will you be available for further discussion? 61 N .
Name pfZtA t:t:.. D'Ztd Organizatioo/Company /7 J~e.I.~ r-z!;t:.y d A.r)
Email bNJ-vbe Co><.~Phor.eNo(7)2J t/t>~- ~Y~f "
~un 22 2007 3:44PM
MICHAEL I. ASHE,P.C.
7574226311
p.2
iI'
~ e::a..
=..=o:!::==
=
100
.c.uno .
R$ITES
LANDSCAI'l'. ^R.CHITI~CTUlt"
SK flf17ll&f flAfJ1lfY fllAsJJJJuJr S1wY - SUiYEf FOR fJtm:H11a USERS
VI.~6JMA BEACH p} RKS AND RECREA nON
The City of Virginla Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fimess facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as dally usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility.
Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSltes (fax:
757.622.6466 OR emall: info@insites-sbJdio.oom) by 7/6/07. We appreciate your time and look
forward to your response.
~...-
L What would you typically use the ~lity for? (check all that apply) .
.('etCV;!i"g - Ru~.n:;.II<1ng _ Equestrian _ Skating _Therapy
As -0ndividual or Group Typical Duration (hours) J.. -,-3 I}>L \')\ ~
Specific days Frequenc.y (I.e. daily) ~ Usual lime of day Vo.h;~
Preferred Length (i.e. SK): ~ p:efprred ~th Q.e. 12 feet) ~
Any other course design preferences? N f) \"' (''It '.;;to ~ L, "11, e... ~
e
2.
Preferred surface for your use? (I.e. mulch, asphalt. etc.)
/professional organization that would be interested In thls
.
~--~. .
~s the organization reach its members?
_ Newsletter ~bsite or Weblog ~tserver f Emall
_Otherj>~ / l<:i~ (~~
Would you be willing to post Information about this process and faclllty to your organization's
newsletter/webslte/blog etc.GlJ N
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should oontact?
.
Jun 22
--
200~~HAt:;P~;&J7~ ~
3. Are there similar fadlltles that you have seen or USoo@N If so, where? 1-t. L ~ &
What other off road -trails or fitness fadUtles do you use in this area?
L Boardwalk _Mt Trashmore ~rst landing SP _ Great Neck Park
_OtyViewPark _Other K.o~
Ie
lP'-"" -,.
What do you like about them? _ _ . _ \
~WhatdOYOU disllkeaboutthem?~~t~ ~,,~
. What can we do to m:!ke this fadllty .lJnlque? ,f1~'()!~ ~~ \~ r G n Q ('J" . .:
.....h . r ~ r..~ . ~
Ar~ there o~ltjes at Princess Ann~mons that you or family members LISe
that should have a direct path oonnectlon to this fad~ty? i.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsple>c, Schools,
Golf Course, etc. i\J ~
e
Would you use this fadlity while other friends or family members partldpate In other. activities
such as athletics? Y @
4. How 'NOuld you travel to the facility?
_Drive alone _Drlve with others ~CYde Run _Walk Skate ,
_Tralfer a horse Ride a horse _ Other & n iv~ ~ ~ +151
5. Would you be more likely to use the facility more often If any of the following features were
~,"-- ...,..
accessible or dose by?
(i) N Power Sources
! N Water Sources
N Restrooms
N Showers / Lockers I Changing Areas
Y N PIcnIc Tables and Grills
Y N Open Air Shelters
Y N Fitness Stations
JI!fl-"' ~_
Would you be willing to sit on a planning!review/fundraising committee? Y I N
Will you be available for further dIscussion? ffi N
Name r\{ ~2.\ r4~~ Organilatlon/Company
Email ~.it:. ~ L~ Phone No ( lJ5 "')-1-~ 5 -.5.:s D 7
.\J~<t.~ .
e
4":'~~~
.. .
e
e
e
JUN-2S-2007 08:18
DAN D EDWARDS
757 495 9576 P.01/02
~~~,
f{r~' !~.. ..~~~~
\'. '::; .::,. i;:
~'t.'fo, ';:11
~~~,....
\-\....,~.Ij~...
. "~..."f/I
Sl JlmIFm flAClllff JlFJD/JJJJJr 3Jwy
VIP,f,iN1A HUCH P^R~)) ANt) RI.:CV.EA1'!IlN
TT ~S"t '(,!,r. ':.J;::;~
;; '. :~, ~ 1t."
.l.. ~!.....~... t". :-,. .f......
j ...."... A:'. "R: l~ 11 .':
City of Virginia Beach: SK fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Concept Development. Survey Questionnaire for Potential Users
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness fadlity at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity wall<s/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the City as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility. You've
been contacted because you've been identified as someone who may ultimately use the facility,
as an events planner or may have some knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few
minutes to comptete the following survey and return to InSites (fax: 757.622.6466 OR emaH:
info@insites-studio.com) by 6/22/07. We appreciate your time and look forward to your
response. -
1. What would you typically use the fadllty for? (check all that apply)
_ Bicyding~ Runnln~ ~g _ Equestrian _ Skating _Therapy
-
f>s -... IndiVidual ~ Group TypIcal Duration (hoUrs) Z...,3 ",.~ ..;0.,.. 4c1~'" "-
Specific days ___ Frequency (i.e. dally) Usual 'Time of day Ca..r(r ~
Preferred Length (i.e. 51<): ~ Preferred Width (i.e. 12 feet) ~' J. ~ ~.,......., .:f
~~
Any other CDUrse design preferena>.s7 h 6,,.. ,~,I..." ..~ 10 ' ~
Preferred surface for your use? (I.e. mulch, asphalt, etc.) q,,;~. f1L....-
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested in this
fadlitC; N 7', J <GA.AJJ~ S~ J,.., J
How does the organization teach Its members?
~ Newsletter """ Website or Weblog _..N__Ustserver I Email
_other
Would you be willing to post Information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletter/webslte/blog et0 N
Are there other people/organIzations/bUSinesses thot we should contact? ftJ a
..
e
e
e
JUN-25-2007 08:18
DAN D EDWARDS
757 495 9576 P.02/02
-..
J. Are there similar fadlities that you have seen or used? Y I N
If so} where? __.__.
What other off road -trails or fitnesS facilities do you use in this area?
~ Boardwalk~Mt Trashmore _Rm Landing SF' _ Great Neck Park
_City View Park _Other _, ,..
What do you like about them? f> A ~ J} / ~-+,~_ ~ MS
What do yoo dislike aboot them? ~~. 1.0> '.Il> :to{ -:I~'4fII! 10...
What can we do to make this fadllty unique? ~ (J,'1J~
Are there other activities/facilities at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that shou;d nave a direct path connection to this fadllty? Le. Amphitheatre, spo~ex, s~~
-
Golf Course, etc.
Would you use tnis fadlity while other friends or family members partidpate in other activities
such as athletics? Y I([)
4. How would you travel to the fadlity? "'V. - . CW V.I" 7
"'"' Olive alone ""'" Drive with others ~Bicyde _Run _. _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse _.. Ri~a horse
Other
5. Would you be more likely to use \:he fadlity more often If any of the following features were
~ible or dose by?
~ N Power Sources
N Water Sources .
lL.RestTooms
a~howers I Lockers I Changing Areas
N Picnic Tables and Grills
N Open Air Shelters
Y C!):itness StatIons
Would you be willing In sit on a plannln9lreview/fundraising commltteeQ)' N
Will you b~~e for further <liSCUsslon;(i) N
Name ~ """1"~A.~ OrganiZation,lCOmpany"71t1....~....q y ~ I'.,.Jf!!.{J
Emall J, .~r""r\ f>> ~t~ne No ("C"7t:ll.l..::_~~
TOTAL P. 02
e
e
e'
, e5/25/2087 06:53
4237111
PAGE Ell
Rft
--=-
~~
- --
- -
- -
- -
- Iio
-~
IISIYES
1.1\~1'>S('.AT'E AllOIITf.CTtlll.1:
8l JlmIF11f flAClllff J1EAS/JJJJ1ff StuDY - SoiYlfl!Of fJfJJFJoJAll/SsJM
VtRGIMA BEAm PARKS AND REcllinoN'
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is ronducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cyding and fitness fadlity at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off. road facility that can aa:ommOdate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility.
Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSltes (fax:
757.622.6466 OR email: info@insites.studio.com) by 7/6/07. We appreciate your time and look
forward to your response.
1. What would you typically use the facility for? (check aU that apply)
l BiCyCling -L Running 1 Walking _ Equestrian ~ Skating _!herapy
~ _ Individual or 1- Gruup Typical Duration (hours) Ltf
SpecifIC days S~'( IsJrJ frequency (i.e. daily) ~11""e..s Y4MI1- Usuall1me of day 1'10 r ~ I'\,'i
Preferred Length (i.e. 5K): S i:::: Preferred Width (Le. 12 feet) L S .f t
, f?'Co: ~ '""t- s".. r ~: ~
My other course design preferences?"'; I. ~Dlrke(S '5~lt.a,( (6...........t ir~'Sf~...d 5
Preferred surface for your use? (i.e. mulch, asphalt, etc.) ~l-f
2. Are you a member of a user/advorncy/professional organization that would be i.,terestec! in this
fadlity~/ N -.JWW. tc.\.t,{"vAr1;V)j I Ct> ~
How does the organization reach its members?
Newsletter + Website or Weblog
_Other
....:L.Ustserver I Email
Woukl you be willing to post information about this process and fadlity tn your organization's
newsletter/webslte/bIog etO / N
Are there other peopIe/organizations/busirlE5Sffi that we should oontad:? rJ i)
e.
~
. ~6/25/2ee7 66:53
4237111
.
3. Are there similar fadlities that you have seen or useolP, N
If 50, where? Mr T t"'" S t,...., H'(.
PAGE 82
What other off road -bails or fitne.$ facilities do you use in this area?
V Boardwalk / Mt Trnshmore .../ First landIng SP _ Great Neck Park
.!M1.aty VIeW Park _ Other
What do you like about them? tJo...\ J (~I ~.d!f'v\1 ~~~k" (I.Q 1~~; v:Lc. s ~I.JJtl ,,:~ XC
/ ~
. It ~ I' . r"skMtt'l
What do you dislike about them?-2'#J....'5/IIt.fl>",l ~j hbPl rJ.."" t :..... ~hp ~CG4lJ~,../\t
What can we do to make this facility unique? J 'V'., ~ fll ( e. J ~ c. ~ 'II.. . Go if, : /p; k 5" "'A r."., ..J ".. ~
1("~f4~(
ATe there other activities,tfad6ties at Princess Anne CDmmons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this facility? i.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf Course, etc. tJ 'J
Would you use this facility while other friends Or family members participate in other activities
such as athletics? V I ~
-4. How would you travel to the facility?
LOrive alone LOlive with others ~Biqrcte _Run _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse. _ Ride a horse _ other
5. Would you be more likely to use the ft,dlity mor'e often if any of the following features were
accessible or dose by?
N Power Sources
N Water Sources
N Restrooms
N Showers I Lockers I Olanging Areas
N PlO"liC Tables and Grins
N Open Air Sheltmi
N Fitness Smtiors
Woold you be wiRing tn sit on a p/anning/review/fundraising wmmlttee:tj I N
Will yOu be available for further discussion? (Y I N
Name ~ 11.~ f1, (,) ~ f ' Organization/Company 4Lz. ('I,) I'\,,} ~. Co.....,
L I . L'A o?'I
Email 1l.(II..J\~I(c.\f..(.I./t\il..~Phone No (751) 3 73 'O~/Z-
'. Jun 26 07 08:06a
.
.
e
Bullaka Productions
7572712748
p.1
..~~.
~~-.
{iC~' -..-~
(\.I . >:.
..: ~ "'1'
,'.~1
l.,\: ./.
~" ..100#
,"~..,...
BK Jl!M$ flAamr J1JJAJtBD1Jr 9mB!
YJRGll/Ul. BE:AGH PARKS .00 REGREA nON
RSITES
t.~NO~CAPH .~II1.:Hllu:n;u
City of Virginia Beach: SK Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Concept Development - Survey Questionnaire for Potential Users
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road fadlity that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility. You've
been contacted because you've been identified as someone who may ultimately use the facility,
as an events planner or may have some knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few
minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSltes (fax: 757.622.6466 OR email:
info@inSites-studio.com) by 6}22/07. We appreciate your time and look forward to your
response.
1. What would you typically use the fadlity for? (d1eck all that apply)
.L Bicycling 2.... Running _ Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating _Therapy
As L Individual or ~ Group Typical Duration (hours) /- 3
Specific days
Frequency (j.e, daily)
Usual Time of day
Preferred Length (Le. SK):
Preferred Width (i.e. 12 feet)
Any other course design preferences?
Preferred surface for your use? (I.e. mulch, asphalt, etc.)
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organiZation that WOldd be interested in this
facility~ N l1dt WI>-{.t.( O-ie.-j c..-lR Asso (..', 0....:\-> o~
How does the organiZati<ln reach Its members?
L Newsletter
_Other
-L Website or Weblo9
_Ustserver I Email
Would you be Willing to post information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletter/website/b1og fiC(j) N
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should contact?
(,h.,e~/l.- Ui'-/<~ C c l~..... C.{t--~ '-;dt"-"6j~~ h;Jas A:tf ID~J
O~.L~co"" s(,...ofS: 0;~, t'........} G.-h..... .
Jun 26 07 08:07a
Bullaka Productions
7572712748
p.2
.
3. Are there similar fadlities that you have seen or uS€(j? Y Q It so, where?
What other off road -trails or fitness fadlities do you use in this area?
L Boardwalk -.-LMt Trashmore ~Rrst Landing SP _ Great Neck Park
~atyView Pari< _ Other
Wnat do you like about them? M ~L....A- -:;; (!...A..I.,... ~ "'^7 /G'~
What do you dislike a'oout them?
What can we do to make this futility unique?
Are there other activitiesjfadlities at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this fad6ty? i,a Amphit~ SportsPJ~hOOIS,
Golf Course, etc.
Would you use this fadlity while other friends or famIly members participate in other activities
such as athletiCS?Q N
e
4. How would you travel to the fadlity?
_Drive alone ~ve with others /BICYCle ~un _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse _ Ride a horse _ Other
S. Would you be more likely to use the fadlity more often if any of the following features were
accessible or dose by?
-:-9:> N Power Sources
:5D N Water Sources
CVN Restrooms
C!.L N Showers / Lockers! Changing Areas
~ N Picnic Tal)es and Grills
l,.b!N Open Air Shelters
Y N Fitness Stations
Would you be willing to sit on a planning!review/fundraislng committee? Y (jj)
Will you be available for furtller dlSOJ5sion? Y I N
Name
Organi2ation/Company
Email
Phone No L-J
e
.0)
~r
~!im
==
F==-
100
~.
RSp~-rg~
l^NO$('.APE ^RC. _.kC:TURE
oX f1mI1rJB flAClIlJf JlJJASiBJJlJr 9mJJr - SOlYJJl FOil fJrJJJJKJIAlfm3
VIRGINIA BEACH PARKS AND RECREATION
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road fadlity that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility.
Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax:
757.622.6466 OR email: lnfo@insltes-studio.com) by 7/6/07. We appreciate your time and look
forward to your response.
e
1. What would you typically use the fadlity for? (check all that apply)
~ Bicyding ..K Running ..2S Walking _ Equestrian ~kating _Therapy
As ~ Individual or.3. Group Typical Duration (hours) ~
Specific days 0..\\ Frequency (i.e. daily) '3 -~ ("'f.,K Usual Time of day
Preferred Length (i.e. SK): "/ 51<. Preferred Width (i.e. 12 feet)
Any other course design preferences? \,/ .- It. e 'to o~ ~ Fc.,. 6 de (Ii ;'" ~ 0 f~
Preferred surface for your use? (i,e. mulch, asphalt, etc.) Ci s ~hG \ t
~ ~t:l"\
7 (, I'm
dirt d'i;JjIIj
"to f~ ~~
sd'c.I\{
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested in this
fadllty0 N R"C\fcl~ dvb
How does the organization reach its members?
Newsletter ~ Website or Weblog ~ Ustserver / Email
_Other
Would you be willing to post information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletter/website/blog e!(9 N
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should contact?
.
3. Are there similar facilities that you have seen or used0 N If so, where? C olvilt; v ~ 0 ~ I 0
What other off road -trails or fitness facilities do you use in this area?
~ Boardwalk _Mt Trashmore \ First Landing SP _ Great Neck Park
e.
_Oty View Park _ other
What do you like about them?
What do you dislike about them?
toO CnH./ J!iJ So...( '-; I" v.)
What can we do to make this facility unique? /lit' ~Sfr()lltd sA/tt~~ C/( I
. I I'
Are there other activities/facilities at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this facility? i.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf Course, etc.
Would you use this facility while other friends or family members partidpate in other activities
such as athletiCS?(j N
4. How would you travel to the facility?
iOrive alone +Drive with others --1Bi<:ycle ~Run ~Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse _ Ride a horse _ Other
e
S. Would you be more likely to use the fadlity more often if any of the following features were
accessible or dose by?
y (N) Power Sources
$'~ Water Sources
Y N Restrooms
IShowers / Lockers I Changing Areas
Y icnic Tables and Grills
Y Open Air Shelters
Y Fitness Stations
Would you be willing to sit on a planning/review/fundraising committee? Y /0
Win you be available for further diSCUSsion? @N
Name C. h~) e .s A L T Organization/Company
Email L~arlo Ctlf-@ CO\(. \'ct Phone No (_)
.
.
.
i'~l;i\~~~z~)
...... ~' .... '''L,}~
-:::' ~r.)
'. . .. ---- . " ~ }
\>.:.:~:.:-::~}~I
===-- """""'-
:-;;
. '., . .
..L~_ .~; ~ T' ~.~ :::.
I .\ ~11~~ :AI" \It 11:71 ;. l: it I
~ ~.
oljllfJl}'$ flACJJI!Y J1EAsJIJJJJJr SlOPY - Soi'lFf fOR PrIIEHr1At USERS
V!~m~A B~}.I}. PI\~:\~; l:ljl, R~~~;},'i'o;.j
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The viSion is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users,
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility.
Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax:
757.622.6466 OR email: info@insites-studio.com) by 7/5/07. We appreciate your time and look
forward to your response.
1. What would you typically use the facility for? (check all that apply)
~ Bicycling _ Running _ Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating ~Therapy
As _ Individual or ~ Group Typical Duration (hours) Q - 3
Q I\M - t e 1'\/\
Specific days W~H~~~ Frequency (Le. daily) Usual Time of day __.').. _ _
Preferred Length (Le. SK): 5K Preferred Width (i.e. 12 feet) 1- '2. k-r
Any other course design preferences?
Preferred surface for your use? (i.e, mulch, asphalt, etc,) .___..~\\v- \ -\--
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested in this
f.~ V " (.. \' L ~
facility(0tN \(""ji Vl~CA. ~c tL 1 ~~tC,
How does the organization reach its members?
Newsletter L Website Or Weblog J Ustserver I Email
_Other
Would you be willing to post information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletter/websitejblog etG N
Are there other people/organizationS/businesses that we should contact?
3. Are there similar facilities that you have seen or USed@N
If so, where? ~'l."It"_.... hl.L~\) pj\;
What other off road -trails or fitness facilities do you use in this area?
Boardwalk _Mt Trashmore ./ First Landing SP _ Great Neck Park
_City View Park _ Other
What do you Hke about them? S c..e..~Q.4j .
What do you dislike about them? lCLw ~u-\l4~
J .; iJ. frf!J.s......._.....
What can we do to make this f2cility unique?
Are there other activities/facilities at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this facility? i.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf Course, etc.
Would you use this facility while other friends or family members partiCipate in other activities
such as athletics? Y 1(0
4. How would you trowel to the facility?
_.Drive alone / Drive with others _Bicycle
Run ___Walk
Skate
_Trailer a horse
Ride a horse
Other
5. Would you be more likely to use the facility more often if any of the following features were
accessible or close by?
(0 N Power Sources
\1( N Water Sources
Qt~~.N Restrooms
\.5-" N", Showers / Lockers / Changing Areas
y~,p'l(niC Tables and Grills
y "Open Air Shelters
y ~~itness Stations
Would you be willing to sit on a planning/review/fundraising committeeu;/ N
Will yOiJ be available for further diSCUSSiOn?QI N
r.7 I.,., '
Name ~ v 1 VI ':)'fc) ( 1l~
~ <; \~~.C:_.
Email V' ~ "';J ~ J;" ~1/1 If)
Organization/company V J. 6., c I " 'Ie']
edJ.\Phone No (~lJ l L{.< - J.Ltj \f
.
.
Keith Oliver
= ,.
'- .
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Ruth L. Stornetta [rs3j@cms.mail.virginia.edu]
Thursday, June 21, 2007 11 :32 AM
info@insites-studio,com
5K fitness facility feasibility study
~..
~
bike,pdf (47 KB)
I have attached the survey. I would certainly support this facility as a
multi-use facility but be sure to include cycling and as such, the lane width needs to be
22 feet due to speeds (20-30 mph) that cyclists can go on flat terrain. With this width,
cyclists, runners, skaters, walkers should be able to co-exist by marking off spearate
parts of the pavement for the different users. The faster groups would need to keep to one
set of lanes, with slower groups using the others. A good example of this is in Central
Park, New York where cyclists use the "car lanes. while the park is closed to traffic with
runners using the "bike lanes.,
An example of a facility just for fitness use (i,e. never open to cars) is the Bob Rodale
Cycling and Fitness Park in Trexlertown, PA.
http://www.usboomers.com/rodale.htm or http://www.lehighcounty.org/Recreation/rec.cfm?
doc=rec_rodale.htm
Ruth Stornetta, Ph.D.
Department of Pharmacology
Jordan Hall 5228
University of Virginia Health System
.1300 Jefferson Park Ave
Charlottesville, VA 22908-0735
(434) 982-3977
e
e
e
e
~I.rn#fi-~~~ '~.'
5' ~. .;. ~\
~~ F
,"~ /J
Ir..~~ ~
~
oK J1JJJu!tS fl)JJJJlfY JlBASIBJJ1fY Srupy
VIRGINIA BEACH PARKS AND RECREATION
R~~1f~~
1.""'P~(;AI'I: J,1(.UlHI;lli\l:L
City of Virginia Beach: SK fitness Facility feasibility Study
Concept Development - Survey Questionnaire for Potential Users
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor <.ycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility, You've
been contacted because you've been identified as someone who may ultimately use the facility,
as an events planner or may have some knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few
minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax: 757.622.6466 OR email:
info@insites-studio.com) by 6/22/07. We appreciate your time and look forward to your
response.
1, What would you typically use the facility for? (check all that apply)
_x_ Bicycling ~ Running _ Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating _Therapy
As Individual or _X_ Group Typical Duration (hours) _1-2
Specific days
Frequency (Le. daily) _daily
Usual Time of day _6:00PM_
Preferred Length (Le, SK): _5 miles_ Preferred Width (Le. 12 feet) _at least 12 feet
Any other course design preferences? _one way traffic
Preferred surface for your use? (i.e. mulch, asphalt, etc.) ~asphaft
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested in this
facility? Y / N _www.roanokecycling.org
How does the organization reach its members?
Newsletter
_X_ Website or Weblog
_Listserver / Email
_Other
Would you be willing to post information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletter/websitejblog etc. Y / N
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should contact?
3. Are there similar facilities that you have seen or used? Y / N If so, where? www.mellowdrome.com
What other off road -trails or fitness facilities do you use in this area?
Boardwalk _Mt Trashmore _First Landing SP _ Great Neck Park
_City View Park _ Other
What do you like about them?
What do you dislike about them?
What can we do to make this facility unique? _Make it happen
Are there other activities/facilities at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this facility? i.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf Course, etc.
Would you use this facility while other friends or family members participate in other activities
such as athletics? Y / N
4. How would you travel to the facility?
_X_Drive alone _X_Drive with others _X_Bicycle _Run _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse
Ride a horse
Other
5. Would you be more likely to use the facility more often if any of the following features were
accessible or close by?
Y N Power Sources
Y N Water Sources
Y N Restrooms
Y N Showers / Lockers / Changing Areas
Y N Picnic Tables and Grills
Y N Open Air Shelters
Y N Fitness Stations
Would you be willing to sit on a planning/review/fundraisfng committee? Y / N
Will you be available for further discussion? Y / N
Name _Ron Glowczynski
Organization/Company _Roanoke Cycling
Email _racedirector@roanokecycling.org
Phone No ( 540 L580-7284
....
.
e
e
e
e
e
Fax sent .by : 7579&16593
CBHCO VA
86-21-81 15:31
Pg: 1
..
~., . ~.' ~
~ .~
DB
s=-- 5;;0"""'"
~ ~
- =.
llSI.tJ.$:::~' .
LANPSCAJ>E'ARCHIUC'TURR' '. " . .
. Gl_flAriutrfl1fA3IBlmr.r ~ fJoRYElRJi/{!JJjllJJA1JJsm .
VIRGOOABtACri:PARKS .Mlt:~A~N '. .
,.;' .
..-
: ..:." ,',
. :'. . .... ,'t'
,,'. ;' .,.;:, . ......:. '::;-1 ::;.:
: ': "-..
. .:. '. . h . ~. ..
'The Oty of'vlrginia Beach OeI:Icirbnent 01 Parks and Recreation Is conducti09 a reaslbilit~;:~. '.. .~. , .
for.an Outdoor.Cydlng al')d fi~ faCilitY at Princess Anne Commons.. The"vision is b) deVcloP .
. 'an off-:road fadfit}i that can 'accOmmodate large competitive events and charity waIks/~s/l'ldes:
now roUt:ineIY held throughout the dty as. well as daily ~ by a varietY Of users. .'
, '. . . ... '.
- ..... ..
. '-,' ,.:.
We'd 11k1:!:'toget.your :teciJbaCk as we develop' the preliminary plans for. this' new '~l!ty.
Please take a few minuteS.'lD COlripIete the fotloWtng survey and retum to InSIb::s (fax:. .":. ". >: .' :....
'757.622;~~en.aU: info@insi~;a>m) by 7(6/07. weapprectateyourt;meartd:~.: .
forwai'd to your response, . ..... . .... ".
,'.. ;
:. '; .j..:.... " .
, .' ".;.'. :~.
. .. .: : ~. . . ..
',' ", ",.
1. . What would you r"Y use the fad'ltyfor? (cht!ck all that apply).. .
- Biotdlng ~ Running ~ Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating' Therapy
'As -' IndMduar or ~ GrouP . TYPical Du'ation. (hours) . I r '. . . .:: ':'" _ :.' . ........1.
"L:.l_ ..... . .' ,', !'
Speclflc d.Ys' 1""'1 ,freqI.loncy (i.e, dally) UsuoI1'lmeol day ~';;'J";( ','';
~ l~(I;e. SK): . S"K Preferred Width (i.e. 12 feet) fo::"'/S PI-- ' .
. . . ','
. Any other coor:se desi9n preferences? .
~~fory"ur use?(I., ,"ulm,asphalT. etc.) M' at cnJ,/1. ,.GfI.t ,..' , ';,
2: ~ . Are you a member of a user/advOcacy/pfor6sionafofganlzaUon that ~'be intei~ ii~~'.:':":.::. ". :..:'. ::'. i.::~1:. .,;: :
fa~NdL4."7 ,', ,'", ' " ,." ,', ",;<~:"i I
Howdoe~nhe.orgaJlzatlon reach Its members? I.
_ Newsletter" ." ~ Webslt:e'or Weblog _Ustserver I Emall
.....
~other . . '. . '.. . .::~ :.'~\ ':>'.'i' /.:ji ;:~ :,::~;'/::~:;"';
. wouid.'(9U be wSRing to post'infOrmatioo abOut this process and faCilitY to' Your orga~lzati~~~.,: ..:" :':,;::. ..:'.;: . :-'"::.:".<:;
nev~ettet/~,tettlOgen@N :.. ". .......... ..,.... .::"". ..
Are there ~ peOple/o~nlzations/busjnesses that we should cootact? NO.
. '" . ~.: . ",
. ~ .
. '.....
. ~ . j ."
'.:.':.:.: . . '" \ ",
.,.:....1..
,'.. .;. '.
.:' ,':'"
: ,',,'3':.') ", "
:.' .;-::~,:l:::~~;.:!,"~~j.J;~:~.
. " '.'
.'::. : .~..:~. ::' j. .:,~'
. .
. . ,:;. ~::.;:.;;.:.:<;::;},L:(~:,:;;~:;: ,;:i;/ ::;;':.:.
. '':.u:~...~._~
Fax sent h~
757%16593
CBHCO VA
Bb-21-87 15:31
Pg: 2
.'
.
, . .
3. Are.there SImIlar ratlllties that you have.seen or used? Y { N
If so, where?
What oth,er off road -tr~,.orfi~ faaUttes i.. you use in this area? .
~. Boardwalk . ~Mt Troshmore. '. . Am Ulnding SP ~ Great Nedt Pa~ .
. . ." . B..'eTh1' . ".,
-,.9I;y. ~ l;>art< , ~ ()ther
. # .'
. .
. ...."
.:: < ....:. ':"
. . \ '.,
..!.::i.
What 00'')00 like about them?
What do you cI~1<e abOUt them?
J~ ~~.'
. . .',
" ..
. .''; '. .
.', .
., .
What ~ri ~ do to make ~faciJity Unl~? . _ . .' ,.., :"'... . l .
Ai-e there other activltJesiritctnues at ?rl~ Arioo Commons 1tlat yoU or. fariJiiy ~;~ :'::::;::, ,:;.,;' .' . ,.'
thatshoold haVea'dred Pathcon~ tothlSfadlity? Le, Am~tte, ~:~;(\""::".': ..::"~>(.: :....
'.' Golf Course,.etC. . _
Would you use this fad1jtv whUe other friends or family members partldpate in o1tler activities .' ,:'
Such'aS a1td~tics?{f) N . ....,. '. . " ....
:#.
4. How wou~ ~.traYel) the ~lity? .' . ... .:, ::':.'>:.: ';'.:'. ':,' ',;.,: .... .
_OrIve ~Ione ~ with other.> _Bicycle _Run ~Walk ~Skat~(., " ,'-: .l ~ : :,:,.,,'.. :'. . .'~'
.
~Traile;: a'tJorse. _ Rlde a horse -:- Other
, 5. Woold ,ycx.i ~ ~ likely to use ine fadlity more often- jf art{ 'of the foirowing features were' .
acce;sibfe. Or dQSe tr{? .
-: ~ N ~Wer SourCes .
I. .~ =...-,., Olan9!ri9Areils
N PkJlic Tables and Grills .
N. Open Air Shelters
N Fitness Stations
,', .
"
... '.
.' .~:. .~ "
, . .' . . .
.' .:' '.' ,.!..., . '. ~:',' : ;~" :'.' ..,. ::
......... ':;\,.,::,,;':\'t}{
\. '
.. . ." ',~: .' ":...... I '::-;". ';.
" , . ':'.. ',,~:::~'::: :.:::
. . · "';'3::.:'.:',;..;:.' ..
e
Would yoL\'be~~ng ~ sit on a p1annin9i~/fundraiSing,com~ttee? Y tf).
WIK ~u be~~bie fur ~ dOO$On~ 'y Q '. .
Na~' rut ~. ~rganl2ation/Company' US: ..4mt7
~ma;l: 1~h'~1~~ur.li~1.",,1 Phone'~ (-7$7). %16t?l" '
. i
a, ,.
.', .
'. ,:'"
~ : '"
. . !
i
.... .: ",..
. l::'_~''::--''...Q~
........ ';:. ".:, .~'. >. "'''~/ '\.~. ..-;~: :":"
" .....~:_._.:.>::;...~l _,'.~ T;,,~ .....';.;::~:r:.:.,.
", . :.:\ ::~: ,: :.: : ,;' ..::'::::.: ',;\~;':~:~::~;'~~:.;;:!;;,;;'iM:;:'~~~iL~t~~:~::~;:/
i i
e
e
.
. ,Jun, 21, 2007 2:27PM
Gioson Equipment Compa.ny, Inc,
No,7512 p, 1
. :!":cr~:!f!"'. 'i.~~
f:r;~ ~ .~...
;1/:'#:. ...~~{.i?-,
t"6:.i ,', "!.~}
tlJ.;~ ....'=.....r
~;~~...... . :".~:/l
l\~. ~*..J.t~; <r.
~~~~
~~
rrSITES
LAN DS(".APF. ARCHITECTURE
JDO
TUI'$.
oK J1!JNEsS f1ACJllff fIJA3IJJJllf! 3JJ;flf - SlJiYEf POi p(JJJJ(JJ)J _
Vt~6fN!J\ BEACH PARKS AND REG.REA'l'ro~
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility,
Please take a few mInutes to complete the following survey and return to InSJtes (fax:
757,622.6466 OR email: info@inSites-studio.com) by 7/6/07. We appreciate your time and look
forward to your response.
1. What would you typically use the !~dlity for? (check all that,PIY)
/" Bicycling bUnning ~alking _ Equestrian L Skating _Therapy
fJ.s ~ndiVidUi'lr or _ Group Typical Duration (hours). 2...-
Spedfic days ~ Frequency (i.e. daily) VAl L"( Usual Time of day eVE. N 1 t.ll::t
Preferred Length (i,e. 5K): S K. + Preferred Width (i.e, 12 feet) 1'2 + t-e~
Any other course design preferences? ~ f:<X2 ~~~Tm.. ~~~ "(eA1L.
Preferred surface for YOUf use? (i,e. mulch, asphalt, etc.) ~
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested in this
facilit61N VllYcllIMa CCfaJl'h, FAT ~~N", ~ 0'1'[.,t..I""(,.
How does the organization reach its members?
_ Newsletter /' Website or Weblog ~stselVer / Email
_Other
Would you be willing to post inrormation about this process and fadlity to your organization's
newsletterfwebsitefblog e(0N
Are there other peopleforgarli~tions/businesses that we should contact?
. ~ Jun.2i. 2007 2:27PM
G i oson Equ i pmert Company, Inc.
No.7512 p, 2
.
3. Are there similar fadlities that you have seen or used? Y / N
If so, where?
Wha~her off road -trails Or fitness facilities do you use in this area?
-L Boardwalk _Mt Trashmore ~irst Landing SP _ Great Neck Park
_City View Park _ Other
What do you like about them? ~
What do you dislike about them~ MU,,", ~~ ~rv
Wh(}t can we do to make this fadlity unique?
Are there other activities/facilities at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this facility? i.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, SChools,
Golf Course, etc.
e
Would you use this facility while other friends or family members participate in other activities
such as athletiCS@ N
4. How would you travel to the facility?
_Drive alone ~rive with others / Bicycle _Run _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse _ Ride a horse _ Other
5, Would yOu be more likely to use the facility more often if any of the following features were
accessible or close by?
y ~Power50urces
.Y....<ID Water Sources
("'l> N Restrooms
y <8>Showers/ Lockers / Changing Areas
CD N Picnic: Tables an<.l Grills
r:'!ti 1i Open Air Shelters
Y \WFitness Stations
e
Would you be willing to sit on a planning/review/fundraising committ@N
Will you be available for further discusslOUN
Name &2JQ~ balU'" Organization/Company t==Af fl2O~ ]2AL.I ~
Emall~VA~Ua1MtvL.~Phone No G2L) (,Zo~oo3
e
e
e
.) JLn,21. 2007 2:39PM
Gibson Equipment Company, Inc.
~Jo, 7515 p, 1
e:~.
~ .!:;., x . ~%.
~\~. · .1fJe
\~~~. I
,-\"i .. ~ .
'~. -.::;..y
~~
oK fffNf1lS fACJJ1fY fEASJfJjJJfy SloPY - SURVEY fOR fJo'tEJtJJAh USERS
VTR6!~1A BEACH PAm MID RECREATION
~~
i:=1 ~.=-~
--== ==:-
=- =
=: ~
- 100
rVIU.
JISITES
l.AJ\DSCAPE ,I,RCHlTECrVlU:
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-roi:ld fGlcility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new fadlity.
Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax:
757.622.6466 OR email: info@insites-studio.com) by 7/6/07. We appreciate your time and look
forward to your response.
Any other course design preferences?
Preferred surface for your use? (Le. mulch, asphalt etc.) "'~e ~Cl'\ \+
2. Are 'Iou a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested in this
fadlity? y 16)
How does the organization rearn'its members?
Newsletter _ Website or Weblog
_Ustserver / Email
_Other
Would you be willing to post information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletter/website/blog etc. Y / N
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should contact?
.
e
.
..J
JLn,21. 2007 2:40PM
No. 7515
p, 2
Gibson Equipment Company, Inc.
3. Are there similar fadlities that you have seen Ot used? Y If!) If so, where?
What other off road -trails or fitness fadlities do you use in thls area?
Boardwalk _Mt Trashmore _Rrst Landing SP _ Great Neck Park
_City Vie.v Park _ other
What do you like about tt\ero?
What do you dislike about them?
What can we do to make this faCility unique?
Are there other actJvities/facilities at Prinress Anne Commons ttlat you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this fadlity? i.e. Amphitheatre, SportspJeJ<, Schools,
Golf Cou~e, etc.
Would you use this facility while other friends or family membets participate in other activities
such as athletics? Y / N
4. How would you travel ~e facility?
_Drive alone LDrive with others _Bicycle _Run _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse _ Ride a horse _ other
5. Would you be more likely to use the facility more often If any of the following features were
ao::essible or dose by?
^ (;>power Sources
Cf) N Water Sources
Y t0Restrooms
Y @Showers Ilod<ers I Changing Areas
m N Picnic Tables and Grills
N Open Air Shelters
N Fitness Stations
. Would you be willing to sit on a planning/review/fundraising committeet!} N
Will YOIJ be availabl~r further discussion7GI N
Name f1/ c"t. .;J (S hl"\ O~rganization/Company
Email m b L.l j C ~ (j,,~ nd- Phone No ClSL)....:f .J,. 7 ~ t 1l ~
I I
,
e
.
~6/21/2007 14:28
L E BALLANCE
PAGE 01
7574369199
-
~~~
~
~"ia~
=.ar:r=
=
- 100
..-..
RSITES
LANOSCAPf:ARCHntCTIJRE
or JIIIJufJJ JlACJJllJ]1BMIIJ!!1l'f 3mJJy - 81JlYElflOl PrJJriJJtlrAL {J3Iff3
VtRG1NfA BEACH PARKS MID RECRENl1m~
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducfjng a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness fadJity at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an Off-road fatility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held Itlroughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we deverOp the preliminary plans for this new fadlity.
Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and return to lnSites (fax:
757.622.6466 OR ema;l: info@insites-studio.com) by 7/6/07. We appreciate your time and look
forward to your response,
1. What would you typically use the fac:lIJty for? (elled< all that apply)
~lcyc1lng ~nning ~;king _ Equestrian _ Skating _Therapy
As ~'ivIdual or VGroup Typjcal Duration (hours) I~ d-v ~. ~
Specific days M- f Frequency (Le. daily) ~me of day ~"'~
Preferred Length (I.e. 5K): 5 K rAJ.. \t>~ed Width (i.e. 12 feet) 1~--I4-q/~
My other course design preferences?
PrefeITed surface for your use? (Le, mulch, asphalt, etc.) !+sf ~M
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organl:c:atlon that would be interested in this
fadlity@N \~(~--/~;Clt'l~ ~~. q ~~L L'td.t...~
How does the organization reach its members? Clv-t-
-LNewsletter ~~bsite orWeblog \./"ustserver / Email
_Other
Would you be wHllng to post information about thIs process and fadlity to your organization's
newsletter/webslte/blog etrf!J N ~.t h.~.
Are there other peopletorganizations/businesses that we S:gUld contact?
(~k $.~S Ct~..J.~; ~~- tS
f ~r
{1.. ~ L . f-,.."
(X.c J.. t3......ow.r--:s
.
.
.
"06/21/2007 14:28
7574369199
L E BALLANCE
PAGE 02
3. Are there similar fadlities that you have seen or used? Y / N
If so, where?
What other off road -trails or fitness fadlities do you use in this area?
Boardwalk ~MtTrashmore ...1.L'Rrst Landing SP _ Great Ned< Park
_Oty View Park _ Other
Whatdo~ Ilko about lhem? ~
What do you dislike .bout them? - ~ - c\K "a;:. jl.-.....,l
What can we do to make this fadlity unique?
Are there other activities/facilities at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
kL1<u.
that should have a direct path connectlon tD this facifity? i.e. Amphitheatre, SportSplex, Schools,
Golf Course, etc.
Would you use this fadlity while other friends or family members participate in other activities
such as athletiCS@ N
4. How would you travel to the facility?
..,LDtive alone _Drive wIth others ~icyde _Run _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse _ Ride a horse _ other
5. Would you be more likely to use the facility mOre often if any of the following features were
ac:;ces.c;;lble or close by?
Y N Power Sources
~ N Water Sources
N Restrooms
Y N Showers / Lockers I Olanging Areas
N PlO'lic Tables and Grills
Y N Open Air Shelters
Y N Fitness Stations
Would you be willing to sit on a planning/review/fund raising committee? Y I N f'l\-~ k.L
Will you be available for further discussiOn?WN
Name ~ h'\ M~~ I Organization/Company :J 1r~.Id~-/ ~ ~ /}ssu: .
Emaill~; ~ Phone No ~ b 15-b I alP
( \Ct..cr\.~. sLtc~ \.~.
e
e
.
JUD 21 07 07:34a
757-481-9514
p,1
PAS/Celasia
~~:..,
~~~~
~r'l"~~
u ' \~)
~~~~#
~~
~~
-
- tOo
-.
IrSIYES
LANDSCArl:: ARCHITECTURE
8l JIJJJII!m JlAf1Jl1f JlEAtJBDol dJopy - doiYKY flOi!tJi'J!JlJIAL UBF1i
VtLKilNIA BEACH PARKS AAJj REC~An01t
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facility that can aC<Dmmodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility.
Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax:
757.622.6466 OR email: info@insites-stuclio.com) by 7/6/07. We appreciate your time and look
forward to your response.
1. What would you typically use the fadlity for? (c:heck all that apply)
_ Bicycling X Running _ WaftOng _ Equ6trlan ~ Skating _Therapy
As ~ndJvidual or X Gro\JP Typical Duration (hours)
Specific days 5 f $....t}\ Frequency (i.e. daily) Usual 11 me of day
Preferred Lengt2'1 (i.e. 51<): 5 K preferred Width (i.e. 12 feet} \ S Vi:::..
Any other murse design prefflrel1CeS? fY\ 'l:l ~a.::\.:.. ~ 'X C C:> L~
Preferred surface for your use? (I.e. mulch, asphalt, etc.) N 6-\::... F n --.1~
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested in tI1is.
facility0 N Eva~ \M.~CA. R.~ ~\ Sou.u... I Me..~L<.. l ~~~,,\..~
. <S-\.t,'.>--.:.J.€-0
How does the organization reach its members?
~ews!etter X Website or Weblog K Ustserver I EmailtYOther
Would you be willing IX> post Information about ttlis process and fadlity to your organization's
newslet1er/website/blog et(Y1 N
Are there other people/organizations/buslnesses that we should contact? FI (\.0'.\."
~~c-~ (\I~J ,AW\ ~) O'l2- ~'-"-~~-~~ -S~C-- C ~-\G2., ')
Jl1l1 21 07 07:34a
PASlCalesia
757~481-9514
p.2
.
3. Are there similar faalities that you have seen or used? Y I N
If so, where?
~
What other off road -trails or fltness fadlitles do you use in ttlis area?
X Boardwalk X Mt Trashmore X Rrst Landtrig SP _ Great Neck Park
Are there other activities/facilities at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
_Qty View Park _ other
WhatdOYOUlikeaboutthem~G.6\'b \.s-t lo.~ ~"J oN. &O\--..\<....r--.~~ Q \2.-
Su..-~"'1 ~""-f~~'-\ ~ - L(O ~D\-.o.~
What do you dislike about them? '- .~ T _
- 's-t . , . L 0t-
What can we do to make this facility unique? CS \:) \.() \ Lc:-. ...d """1 -.!-~. ,.....Do.\, 't "-
j;
e
that should have a direct path connection to this facility? i.e. Amphitt1eatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf Course, etc. S\-o.,.....\.~ \t,e. r~ <> \ \D'\.o.'- U-<".s:>-i'-- $.0 -\.cO\,..,..,S
c..", ~ ~Q.c.:r-.,. ~ c...o ~~ '\:::)0 ~ '"t
Would you use this fadltty ~ne other friends'or family members partldpate in other activities . I
such as athletiCS(:Q N Q eS 0 L...-~~l '8 trL '"""D t c...o :::.- ea.. f\:: ot' I d
-=- :=::::: - -
4. How would you travel to tI1e fatility?
Y. Drive alone X-onve with others XBiCYcle ~Run _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse _ Ride a horse ~ Other
e
5. Would you be more likely to use the fadlity more often if any of the following featlJres were
accessible or dose by?
Y N Power Soun::es
~ N Water Sources
N Restrooms
y N Shower-~ II..ockers I Changing Areas
N Plmic Tables and GrIlls
Y N Open Air Shetters
Y N FItnesS Stations .' v.\ 1
e.1 C'\ >J.. ~t2--\.. 0 \" M~' "'-.j ~
-::L ~o. -.l0 0.. \.\.2 ~ ~ -=:... '.J U\. ,~ _ \.?t- \ e.,. \:' (,) ~
e.. N ~ \.- fl...<>... " -"-,) lU\. '-'
~"^ {pcu-~ ~ (U.~t:...-- ~ ~u9-- '\.o~~~..s &b~'~ O\.-'t~\~ _~t......s
t_'~e. 0.. 'I-,C- ~ -)2... 0. ", '<;:. :"~.s c. \. 't'^ e...o~ ~ t;:..~8.;:\s "
~ ~ e.. 0\. ~V"-u ~ t:. 0. ;;.e.. \;- 0 '\::::J
C-OJ.. .
Would you be willing to sit on a ptanning/reviewjfundraising committee N
WiD you be available for further drswssionQ N ,
Name H~&?k c.~: R Organization/Company ~...,...H\ s.c~.~^ l LL J.~_"'\.l?A.-. f
. S-\ {"'~..G.e...w
Ernail C\c.~, S\ @ Phone No ill2J 'J.-88- L l. IS L M j
q 0 \ .. L.I:> ......
t,
.
e
e
Coastal Co
252.449.2843
p. 1
-"!'....~~
,s:~~9~'I.
..-0: ~......",li"
~~. f.~
l":~_ ~ f.
c.. _. . ......
{(..~~..... r/~~I
".;;'~.2~~~
I.ANDSCA"E ARCHITf.CrURE
of fl1JJum flAC!llI'f J1JJASJB!1Ifr &wr - &fRYEr flOll fJo'fJJItJJAt D$fRS
VIRGINIA BEACH PARKS iJID RECREATION
The Oty of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facjlity at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road fadljty that can acmmmoclate large oompetitive events and charity walks/nms/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
,
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new fadlity.
Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax:
757.622.6466 OR emall: info@insites-studio.com) by 7/6/07. We appreciate your time and look
forward to your response.
1. What would you typically use the facility for? (check all that apply)
~CYdlng ~Utlnjng _ Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating _Therapy
I>s ~ndividual or ~roup Typical Duration (hours) JrAa./I;;~ o~ "T"'~ '1j~,""t'\,q
Specific days ~ PA'fS Frequency (i.e. daily) Usual lime of day
Preferred Length (i.e. 5K): :5 ~ Preferred INidth (Le. 12 feet) ~O Ro€l t..-l ~ t\
12-- 0 l.-P t alE..\.
Arrf other course design preferences?
Preferred surface fOf your use? (Le. mulch, asphalt etc.) A..s jf.-\Ald' - ~o--\<::... ~ l-1Aa.O -r.;;, a...,~ ..~
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested In this
y
facility? Y I N
How does the organization reaCh its members?
/
I/" Ustserver I Emall
Newsletter _ Webslte or Weblog
.JS...other JC(J~l,Y l'-1€'eTi..,~S
Would you be willing to post information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletter/website/blog ett:.t5) N
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should contact? Gt E/2'f
'is 1 few.: f (~'" r ~ 6 <$I C4Z.fG".
Coastal Co
252.449.2843
p.2
.
3. Are there similar fadlilies that you have seen or used-@ N
If so, where? c.~Ntrl..l'1L- 0.\ t2..1L.
What other off road -trails or fitness facilities do you use in this area?
~ Boardwalk -i-Mt Trashmore _Rrst landing SP _ Great Neck Park
_City View Park _ Other
What do you like about them? ~"C> C t\ lZ.5
What do you dislike about them? 5'-z> C:::-k!.b""">OtLO
What can we do to make this fatility unique? WIOf& fl.DA P. s14NO $. ,AlUvN 0 A ~12.t:::..
.
Are there othef activities/fatilities at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this facility? La Amptlitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf Courser etc, EII'b"/ZY1#".J 6 9IotJU> &' '1I.:EO -Z;~HC"JL I t== f'o,SS\";!c.E
Would you use this facility while other friends or family members participate in other activities
such as alttleticsQI N
.
4. How would you travel to the fadlity?
~ve alone ~ve with others
( Trailer a horse -
5. Would you be more Iikefy to use
,-
~de _Run _Walk _Skate
accessible or close by?
@ N Power Sources
l'i' N Water Sources
t:j> N Restrooms
C5i> N Showers I Lockers I Changing Areas
CV N Picnic Tables and Grills
(;P N Open Air Shelters
CP N Fitness Stations
r ~I \2.loxG Jo.e~:> 1>.sT'
y1AAio\ "( (' ~LlG' r1'-\. ~~..e."'r vc..K- C..... o.I'f""(
~A.Jl:Z ~~N -o.,J INQ fbiL A
e I 14 (q ~'2- .c::.oIV\/~ N ~
Would you be willing to sit on a p1anningJreviewJfundralsing committee@ N
Will you be available for further disaJssion7 Y I N
Name f1A~It.5Y OrganizatlonjCDmpany C-=-4~'- ~€S
Email Phone No ('tS''Z.) &{ofq- ~ "3
?_~~L~d7"7441<:~ S,....S~ .C-e>.A.-
e
i I
e
e
e
~5/21/2ea7 139;12
SSN 779 NEW MEXICO
PAGE 131/82
7575341884
~
-==-=
~
:= -~
=wo
rr:J1pwt~
RSITES
I.M"I)SC:AP~ AIt(:HITECTURli
Sf Jl!lJiFlJf JlAf1D1!J JliA3JBJ1Bl9NDr .. 901YJff JIOJl/r!JJJJIJI)J D3I!i3
VtRGtMA BEACH PARKS AND REGRENrnlU
The Qty of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cyding and fitness fadlity at Princess Anne Commons. The visIon is to develop
an off~ad facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminalY plans for this new fadlity.
Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSiteS (fax:
757.622.6466 OR email~info@insites-studio.com) by 7/6/07. We appreciate your time and look
forward to your response.
1. What would you typically use the futility for? (check all that apply)
.-K Bicycling KRuMing _ Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating -11'lerapy
As..K IndMdual or K Group Typical Duration (hours) /3i.c..YG/J:.5 Lt.p 1';) J^ (:::J
Spedflc days .:St'A:t'f.....~ Frequency (i.e. dailY) '^,,<ar;!.l~y Usual Time of day ~~~~ ---II (t'[ ~
Preferred Leng1h (I.e. 51<): ~ T Preferred Width (i.e. 12 feet) ~ roJ fJI.~ &..t...l)
, uity
Any other course design preferences? r5'iJ<:.JLPi."S -It.rt'\, 6..J ~. 0. J.., [I G-~IS't'Y) (., '
I - - - uv'" '
Preferred surfaca for your use? (I.e. muldl, asphalt, etc.) c..:5--C/)t;... tt ltlftj
V
2. Are yOU a member of a user/advocacy/C'rofessional organization that would be interested in this
'facilityii)N tJ cF / /Jlf...c Clb./j' 4"1" f,,:) (IN
How does the organization reach its members?
Newsletter X Website or Weblog Austserver I Email
_Other
Would you ])e willing to post information about this process and facility to your organizal:lon's
newsletter/website/b!o9 etc@ N
Are there other people/organizatiorlS/businesses that we should oontact?
~~6/21/2Ba7 09:12
#f
7575341004
SSN 779 NEW MEXICO
PAGE 02/82
e
3. Are there similar facilities that \-tlu have seen or used? Y J~ If so, where?
What other off road -trails or fJtness facintles do you use in this area?
_ Boardwalk -rtMt Trashmore .LL.First Landing SP _ Great Neck Par1<
_atv VieN Park _ Other
What do you dislike about them?
~) /I!J
~O 4~p<tJt
What can we do to make this faa1lty unique? j rvJ' IL -'k:.
.
-tn-lli
t.(,Ki 4t:.l"J ()t) /.3~ /feJ
What do you like about them?
Are there other adMties/fadlities at princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct: path connection to this facility? i.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf Course, etc.
e
Would you use this fadlity while other friends or famIly members partitipate In other ac:tiviti~
such as athletics& N
4. How would you travel to the fatility?
~Drive alone ~e with others ~Bicyde _Run _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse _ Ride a horse _ Other
5. Would you be more,likely to use the fatility more otnn if any of the following features were
accessible or close by?
~ N Power Sources
, N Water Sources
I .tl Restrooms
Y @Showers I Lockers I Olanging Areas
<J. N PIOlic Tables and Grills
&:J N Open Air. Shelters
Y (!!Jrtness Stations
e
Would you be willing In sit on a plannlngJrevlew/fundraising committee? Y I@)
Will you be available for further disOJssloo? @N
Name C.~ ty. ,,/:Vl" Organization/Company
Email k.r/~<?r cp(eCn<:..A~PhOne No a:ilJ __\tJ--o~ :6/
JUN-21-2007 THU 10:04 AM
FAX NO.
P. 01
DR
--
- a.
]~SITES
AND SCArE AaCl-lIn:crVfl.E
!1l fl1M11Y ~CIllff JlKA9JBtIm 3JrJpy - 901YEY JIOl fJtJJEHI!)J (fSERJ
VIRGINrA BEACH PARKS AND REC~110N
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conduct ing a fe ssibility study
for an outdoor cyding and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. Th ~ vision is to develop
an off-road fadlity that can accommodate large competitive events and c ,arity Vol )1ks/l1Jns!rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as dally usage by a variety of user ..
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for tI" is new t fJdlity.
Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and return tc InSitee (fax:
757.622.6466 OR emall: info@insites-studio.com) by 7/6/07. We apprec ate YOL' time and look
forward to your response.
e
1. What would you typically use the fadJlty for? (check all that apply)
.l.- Bic.ycling _ Running _ Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating _ _ Theral 'Y
As-t-IndMdual or iGroup TyplcaIOuriltion{hours) 5-B~~ 1"EDlt:JNfl!~~~,.,,\
"if i\lNU,17 ~ ~\I P 'VI'" N "" fo'I:l )
Specific days .. Frequency (i.e. dally) '?J,q ~k)t. Usu !Ilime ( f day M{'j.~{"-
Preferred Length (i.e. 5K): 6~ PrefelTed Width (i.E!. 12 feet) . J5:r.B; :J
Any other course design preferences? eU':t::JJY Ca.con
Preferred surface for your use? (i.e. mulch, asphaltJ ate.) F\$r\N:L- _
2. Are you a member of a user/atfvocacy/professional organization that ....ould be ~terested in this
faCili~ N ~ye. CL~t>
How dOES the organization reach its members?
X~ewsletter ~ Website or Weblog ..,/ listserver I E nail
_Other
Would you be wining to post information about this process and facillt'1 to your organization's
newsletter/websJte,lbJog e(Y N
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should coma:t? ..:m ~
.
JUN-21-2007 THU 10:05 AM
FAX NO.
P. 02
.
3. Are there similar fadUties that you have seen or used? Y 0 If 50/ "here? _
What other off road -trails or fitness fadlities do you use In this area?
V Boardwalk t/ Mt Trashmore V First Landing SP _ Gre3t Neck 'ark
_City View Park _ Ottler
What do you like about them? -rHci 1:::1.151
What do you dIslike about them? fII(J....:/J -Q~
What can we do to make this facility unique? "b\ ~ sf'tU F=t t:..
Are there other activities/facilities at Princess Anne Commons that you <;r family nembers use
that should haVB a direct path connection to this facility? i.e. Amphithec tre, Spo tsplex, SchooIs,
Golf Course, etc. NO ~
e
Would you use this facility while other friends or family members partie pate in ether actiVities
such as athletic6 N
4. How would you travel to the facility?
~ri\le alone t./Orive with others V Blcyde t/Run _ _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse _ Ride a horse _ Other
5, Would you be more likely to use the facility more often If any of the (QlloWlng (I atures were
accessible or dose by?
~N Power Sources
.- N Water Sources
N Restrooms
N Showers Il..od<ers I Changing Areas
Y N Picnic Tables and Grills
Y N Open Air 5hel~
Y N Amass stations
e
Would you be willing to sit on a planning/review/fundraising committ~) N
Will you be available for further DISCussion? &/ N
Name (l'\\~E mCM~ Organization/Company
Email Phone No ClB..-) 33" ~t.(70 ~
('(\\~ ~CIY\Af\l>tJ CD SMm-\FctlJ)~. (!YY\
e
Sl Jf!JNI!JS flAt1JlJf JlKM/JJJJJJf Oiwr
VIRGlNJA BEACH PARKS AND RECREATION
lISITES
I.^NIl.'C:Al'f, ^~:Hln.crllRl'.
City of Virginia Beach: 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility study
Concept Development - Survey Questionnaire for potential Users
The Oty of Virginia Beach Deparbnent of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runS/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new fadlity. You've
been contacted because you've been identified as someone who may ultimately use the facility,
as an events planner or may have some knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few
minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax: 757.622.6466 OR emall:
info@insitesrstudio.com) by 6/22/07. We appreciate your time and look forward to your
response.
e
1. What would you typicallv use the facllity for? (check all that apply)
../ Bicyding '~nnlng _ Walking _ EquestJ1an _ SkatIng _Therapy
As ILtndividual or l.~roup Typical Ouration (hours) \ . '2-
Spedtlc days 1-m--l~ Frequenc.y (i.e. dailv) Z ""~{V:J ~ Usual lime of day ~~r-J..Jc;.
Preferred Length (i.e. 5K): S' ~ Preferred WIdth (I.e. 12 feet) \ ""1-- f'r
Any other O)ur&e design preferences?
Preferred surface for your use? (i.e. mulch, asphalt, etc.) ~f:""1~-r
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested in this
fadlity'0 N "'Blv{(:...L-t:;:" Sl.-fUf" V\N.-I'~
How does the organlzatlon reach its members?
_ Newsletter ~ Webslte or Weblog
/Other ~t.-l<>p
_Ustserver / Email
Would you be wiNing to post information about thls process and fadbty to your organization's
newsletter/website/blog etc@N
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should wntact?
.
TOO~
XVd OO:Zl LOOZ!lZ/90
.
.
.
3. Are there similar facilities that you have seen or 1Bed-m N
If here, 9gI..-n'-<'" ~ wA
SOl w .
What other off road ~trails or f1tne$ facUlties do you use In this area?
/Boardwalk _Mt Trashmore ~r5t landing SP _ Great Neck Park
_City VieN Park _ Other
What do you like about them? ~v~"'''r1-\iC. - ~-t $~~ / ,...~ ~I....J", .. 6:I...J\.:;;:r
I
What do you dlsflke about them? ~~ Nf1" ~~ t:r:r U~......A-t..K.
What can we do to make thIs facility unique?
Ne there other adivitieslfacllltfes at PrIncess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should halJe a direct path connection to this futility? I.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, SChools,
Golf COurse, etc.
~~~..--I'...
J
~.-4.or(>,.~ ~2'i2:.-.c;.
Would you use this facility while other friends or family members partidpate In other activities
sudl as athletic:s?Cf) N
4. How would you travel to the fadllty?
_DrIve alone ~ Drive wtth others ~ic.yde ~~n _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse _ Ride a horse _ Other
S. Would you be more likely to use the fadlity more often If any of the following features were
accessible or close by?
~N Power Sources
N Water Sources
. N RestrOOms
N Showers !lackers , Changing Areas
Y N Plmlc Tables and Gl1l1s
Y N Open Air Shelters
Y N Atness Stations
Would you be willing to sit on a plannlng!revlew/fundralsing commltteeXY! N
Will you be ovallable for further dlscusslon? fiJ, N
Name vJ~~ f27u.->~ Organlzatton/Company
EmaJI WA.~"'f"G"..:>-J?@. ~,vvn\...(0.41phone No L--->
~oo~
XVd 00:61 LOOZ/tZ/90
.' . F~OM RAWLS & t4CNEL IS
(THU)JUN 21 2007 12:19/ST.12:18/NQ. 6350030B33 P 2
_.'...'.,J!!
..' f., .
.. .~ -
Dft
--
~ :-.~
- e.
lISlrES
LANDSCAPE ARCHnEcrUR&
\,
BlJlJ1Jl!J1f liC//lJ!1' JIKAsIBJmr 9mPr - bm JIOl JlfJJJfJtmlIJSJJRs
V!R{,'IN!A BEACH PAm) AND RECREATION
The aty of Virginia Beadl Department of Parks and Recreation Is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cydlng and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road fadlity that can accommodate large rompetitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the dty as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for thiS new facility.
Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and retum to InSites (fax:
757.622.6466 OR emaU: info@insltes-studio.com) by 7/6/07. We appreciate your time and look
forward to your response.
e
1, What would you typically use the facility for? (check all that apply)
i Bicycling K Running ~ Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating _Therapy
~ _ Individual or X Group Typical Duration (hours) / ~ , fl1
51Yi/St/v' '7v::r/ I
Specific days Frequency (I.e. daily) .? I' I '-J<<..J( Usual Tlme of day
Preferred Length (I.e. 51<); ;- k Prererred Width (i.e. 12 feet)
(?fJt'I1)~$ ;;'U"""ff
Arrf other OOUf'Se design preferences?
Preferred surface for your use? (i.e. mulch, asphalt, etc.) a S PI} fJ If
2. Ne you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organj~tion that would be Interested In this
facilit&N f/l C Y~j
How does the organlzatjon ream its members?
_ Newsletter .K-. Website or WroJog _U5tserver I Email
_Other
Would you be willing to post Information about ttlis process and facility to your organi2atlon's
newsletter/Website/blog ~ N
Are there other people{organl2atlons/buslnesses that we should cootad:?
.
e
.
e
FROM RAWLS & MCNELIS
(THV) JUN 21 2007 12: 1 9/ST, 12: l8/NO. 6350030833 P 3
3. fJre there similar facllltles that you have seen or used?(j}/ N If so, where? 01 (J (/ A
What other off road -trails or- fItneSS facilities do you use in this area?
_ Boardwalk _Mt Trashmore _Rr.it Landing SP _ Great Neck Part<
_Crt:y View Park _ Other
\.
...
What do you like about them?
What do you dislike about them?
What can we do to make this facility unique?
Are there other actlvltles/fadlities at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path amnection to this facility? i.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf Course, etc.
WOiIld you use this facility while other friends or family members partldpate in other activities
such as athletics? Y I N
4. How would you travel to the facility?
_Drive alone X Drive with others LsiCYCle _Run _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse _ Ride a horse _ Other
5. Would you be more likely to use the fadllty more ofte\ if any of the following feabJres were
acce55ible Or close by?
4s N Power SOurces
N Water Sources
N Restrooms
Y N ShoWers I lockers 1 Changing Areas
Y N Picnic Tables and Grills
Y N Open Air Shelters
Y N RtneSS Statlons
WOUld you be willing to sit on a planningJreview/fundralsing committee? Y 10
Will you be available for further discussi~'? 0 N
Name #Ward J.t1c.J./t15~nlz;j;lon/Company .;l~w~ r /'Ic~;:5, ~ C.
i J",. /.'1 . clSJNI ~
Email ell1C/')@ J S ~tlw M fFIC Phone No ~ 3 r $1- 0 o~
e
e
e
DII
.;:; ~
~ - ';00
_4
lISITES
LANDSCAPE M"CHlTE(~RI!
Sl JlJJJJJm f1AClIllY J1iNJJ1JJJJJr 9JrJDr- SoiYBI JlfJi fJrJ1'!!KJJAl USsl3
VIRGINIA BEACH PARKS AND REGREA'l!ON
The City of Virginia Beadl Department of Parks and Recreation is conducijng a feasibility stUdy
for.an.outdoor cyding and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road fadllty that can acwmmodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users,
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility.
Please take a few minubs b:> complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax:
757.622.6466 OR email: jnfo@lnslt.es-studio.rom) by 7/6/W, We appredate your time and look
forward to your response.
1. What would you typfmlly use the fadllty for? {ched< al/ that apply}
X BIcycling & Running ~ Walking _ Equestrian _ Skat1ng _Therapy
As~ Individual or >< Group lVPical OtJic1ti{]n (hours) J - '-/ hatly,5
P\4inlLjy##?,.ds- q.- J7!tU"
Spedflt days i7 Frequency (I.e. daily) Usuallil11e of day
Preferred Len9.th (I.e. 51<): Preferred \MdIh (Le. 12 feet) J z kef>
tollj~r ,5 Jttlk-~ 5 11111e~ - ~/e5 . J - ,"'- '_ , /' L:b.. ~ .
AnYo~r ~PTeferencesi' ~C? -In!::J~' f II~ 4- ':? I~c/~(/-./ ....
f (!t,,:f- fiJJcJ/~I? rh? ~t-e a "/6:,7 /<<JJf'I:: {/ n L.P~ $
- for .,... J? (I... mulch. """"It. ole. J ~ -- -il"llf
2. Are you a member of a l$et/adVocacy/professIonal organlzacm Z WOUld be intereste:1 In this
fadllty?Y IN 'fr.s R,4 $A ,or(J
How does the organl2atfon reach Its members?
X Newstetter ...x- WelElte or Weblog Kustserver (Emal1
-t-Other W 0 rY'
Would you be willing to post infotmation about this process and fadllty to your organization's
newsletter/WebSitelblog err(!) N
Are there other peopIefotganlzatlonslbusinesses that we shoutd contact? ~M;.<t! ~ b /i~ )
J;.unni() ) Cllc/j 0-jt:l1/?4.h.w, eV'...fl'/iJ.;na/e~ <"'h:-
I /' /
.
3. Are there simUar fadllties that you have seen or used{j) N If so, where? .f}or-iJtt.
What other off road -trails or fltness fadllties do you use in this area?
_ Boardwalk _Mt Trashmore ~First Landing SP ~ Great Ned< Park ~ vi
_CityVlewPan< :bOtJler 'fa hot4, ~~} f~"k -- ekr~~ ~H-l ir
What do you like about them? V4Y" bUS t~; 15 t) C"'r~) $4; cIwJ/e,,;;;~/
What do you dislikeaoout them? ;VUt 'l/AfNriS}/L/-el
What can we do to make this facility unique? j n CP1~rak ~ ~Ctf< 1- k,..ttJfI) f14,,}; d-
r- ..104 .~~ 17
Are there other activltles/fuellties at Princess Anne Commons that you or famity members use I'lJ ·
that should have a c.1lrcct path connection to this facility? I.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf' CotJrSe, etc. )J ~ 'le..
Would you use tl1ls fadllty while other frlends or family members partldpate in other activities
such as athl~ N
4. How would you travel to the facility?
~Or1ve alone KDrive wtth others ~Blcyde ~RLln _Walk _Skate
e
~Trnl1er a horse _ Ride a horse _ other
S. Would you be more IlIcePy to use the facility more otten tf any of the following features were
i3ttesslble Of c.lose by?
N Power Sources
N Water Sources
N RestJ'OOms
N Showers I Lockers J Clanging Areas
Y N Pi(:J1ic Tables and Grms
N Open Air Shelte~
N Fitness Stal10ns
e
Would you be wiDing to sit on CI planningJrevlew/fundralslng rommlttee? Y I N - ~t P<.. - ~
WHI you be avadable for further discussion? (j) N
Name ~ .A . Cmne J Ut- Organization/Company AI } A
Emall Phooe No L-J 8 () 4 YES LOJr.AI
)O/Jney, ifJfrt@ ~.Jma.j II-Cbm
~ II tilJa
~!
-
e
e
I. . ~
! ',J Ned Kuhns . I ~
L ~ f f..., !II!'> qe La Fa~'clte COlin ~--I., . 1k ummtmV d'lOJJY
-------... Vlrgllll<l Ikh, VA 23455 FlJJ1J)Jf)JhlJl
t'(..~....c&J,..,~j;l ."vlrlln vtl\Gff f A~K.) ArW REGREA'110N
'__~~~ .~~~~~";J
..........-.........
.' . -) 'I, . ,
,,' 'i ' 1 .,'~ " :',
.. - -- - .,/
1 .\ '~th. AI'I~.Rr j1rTl !" J. 1{1
City of Virginia Beach: 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Concept Development - Survey Questionnaire for Potential Users
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plan~ fQr this new facility. You've
been contacted because you've been identified as someone who may ultimately use the facilityr
as an events planner or may have some knowledge of similar courses, Please take a few
minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax: 757.622.6466 OR email:
info@insites-studio.com) by 6/22/07. We appreciate your time and look forward to your
response. -
1. What would you typically use the facility for? (check all that apply)
L Bicycling _ Running L Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating _Therapy
As L Individual or A Group Typical Duration (hours)
z
Specific days 1t14N- we Frequency (Le. daily) Wlftrlf.l,.V Usual lime of day ltlt7iNIIlIrJ Z.
~ ~tJKll. /lJI1JE I!NIJotS'Ii "'t?A. anN WIfIJEIl.'S"
Preferred Length (i.e. SK): _ SK Preferred Width (Le, 12 feet) A-~l> i!.. CVct..~ 7lt U$/! "5'I1J€ 4Y
Any other course design preferences? ('ON,.JGcr/~c; ~ "Sf l>t!'. 8Litn/lflLl. AI2NAJ~
J.A.IJ~ IYJlJttK.Ab "II 'TflAIL"$ oIL PA'11b, AULlry'
Preferred surface for your use? (Le, mulch, asphalt, etc.) WilLI/ugH. - '5orrt"CI.. P"UE'mFNT
B {KDt:f - MP'H~L.T
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested in this
facility-@ N ft:PLWkra APPllt,AQUAAI 7;?A/4 (].()fJ c.rtm!; i 7(:PEaJA.'711l 13lki...t'
.AS;-$OCJ/4. 7lllH (nA)
How does the organization reach its members?
X Newsletter
1- Website or Weblog
_..~~_Listserver / Email
_Other /74'1(:- A1t?1rJ1"/oILY R1EET/~ i
-r=e A - (f)IJAIl..rFe.LY' ;n E:eT7".,us
Would you be willing to post information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletter/website/blog etc(j) N
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should contact?
fQrrllJtp4(, L/~I2'S:
'jA/>J€ () A /IJ!S (1Jl-rr)
.
J
8dB flt'S/WtP
43/ - <14bf
4' '7 - ." =3.:J
-
3. Are there similar facilities that you have seen or used? Y /@ If so, where?
What other off road -trails or fitness facilities do you use in this area?
i Boardwalk LMt Trashmore LFirst Landing SP _ Great Neck Park
_City View Park _ other AIM L(TT/.G' ~ FrfNSS CeNrEIZ-
B4Y:5ll1e ~EC.aEA"'>>1.J CeNTRo.
What do you like about them? C t.I)S~ 711 H,mF' -::SA-~! ~(jr$ "po El:Pv,P/t'IE"Kr/
'" ,/ ;::- At::IlJf#ZF
What do you dislike about them? 17uJc" I-I.:?r /.oNd; E~utPH, ~7 "O~,{6.
What can we do to make this facility unique? /11~ILf[ IT A~N.R :>"A~ AthP~ I'AAk'~
IE A4Y A"J!"~'5 W,4-rE/Z. "f!I""PtJ/2.C,EC,/ PAL/ C61J/l , ~~,,~
Are there other activities/facilities~t Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this facility? Le. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf Course, etc.
(;plf C#t1/2.~e
,/
-:S'POit. T>S'PI.EX
"
Would you use this facility while other friends or family members participate in other activities
such as athletics? aJ/ N
4. How would you travel to the facility?
~Drive alone _Drive with others _Bicyde _Run _Walk _Skate
.
_Trailer a horse
Ride a horse
other
5. Would you be more likely to use the facility more often if any of the following features were
accessible or close by?
€) Power Sources
N Water Sources
N Restrooms
N Showers I Lockers / Changing Areas
Y N Picnic Tables and Grills
N Open Air Shelters
Y N Fitness Stations
Would you be willing to sit on a planningjreview/fundraising committee?@ N
Will you be available for further discussion? @ N
Name Nt!]) KvHNS Organization/Company t-,4.~
Email neJ Kllht\s ra at. rlet"" Phone No (757) S-s 2 - If 21 Z
e
-
e
e
Jpn 15 _ 07 _()_~: 37p
John Flora
7573210423
p. 1
....
.:l~;~~,i~;\J',
.- J!." -"
1',-:. .~ - . ~:
,,~..:. ~ ~~'.;:.. ~.....
..' '". .- . ~
-;""\" :-.....".~...
Gl ~ flAfJJ1'fY flEAsDJDlJr S'lYJJJy
V~~~PU B9J.;~ J>i.~\,~ rH' R~I;~r.ri1(l1;
~ \:\. I'. '''1') :'.'.111\'.';" 'j:
City of Virginia Beach: SK Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Concept Development - Survey Questionnaire for Potential Users
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility. You've
been contacted because you've been identified as someone who may ultimately use the facility,
as an events planner or may have some knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few
minutes to complete the fotlowing survey and return to In Sites (fax: 757.622.6466 OR email:
info@insites-studio.c.om) by 6/22/07. We appreciate your time and look forward to your
response.
1. What would you typically use the facility for? (check aD that apply)
~Bic;yclin9 _ Running _ Walking _ Equestrian /" Skating V Therapy
As t/";ndividual or v' Group Typical Duration (hours) 5-")- k 1 ~
I
SpecIfic days Frequency (i.e. daily) S J S ,11t.~L Usual TIme of day /J I'r\-
(
Preferred length (i.e. 5K): 5 lL Preferred Width (i.e. 12 feet) l1-
Any other course design preferences?
Preferred surface for your use? (i.e. mulch, asphalt, etc..) 5 ~ ~.......J.;;/.
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested in this
facilityQ N
How does the organization reach its members?
--r;ewsletter .....-- Website or Weblog ~tserver I Email
_Other
Would you be witting to post information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletterfwebsitefblog er()! N
Are there other people/organizatiOns/businesses that we should contact?
.
e
e
J~n 15 07 04:37p
John Flor-a
7573210423
p.2
3. Are there similar facilities that you have seen or ~ IN
ft~ . fA
"
If so, where?
What other off road -trails or fitness facilities do you use in this area?
Boardwalk VMt Trashmore --First landing SP !../Great Neck Park
_City View Park _ Other
What do you like about them? --(}\...c>M
What do you dislike about them? .l7
L7J~; 5~~
~~(
What can we do to make this facility unique?
Are there other activities/fadlilies at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this facility? i.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf Course, etc. f/J
Would you use this facility while other friends or family members participate in other activities
such as athletics? Y I N
4. How would you travel to the fadlitt? ~
t~ve alone _Drive with others _Bicycle _Run _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse _ Ride a horse _ Other
5. Would you be more likely to use the fadlity more often if any of the following features were
accessible or close by?
Power Sources
Water Sources
Restrooms
Y N Showers I lockers I Changing Areas
~ N Picnic Tables and Grills
N Open Air Shelters
N Fitness Stations
Y N
d>~
Would you be willing to sit on a planning/review/fundraising committee/ N
Will you be avaiLable for further discussion? '& N
Name .:::rOtl,,) FL..'<l'::!<_ Organization/Company""'1 P1).I.J.;f;.e.. C Ie L,v &- Q \1 g
Email :::Jft..:D f-A- lZ:L. Phone No (~n..) ~2..~ - 8 <t 0 b
~ f' - I rJ.Jv t-V L Aa-J . Cc.1.........
i I
Page 1 of3
e
Keith Oliver
From: Bojo, Richard [rbojo@harrisconnect.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 20074:45 PM
To: info@insites-studio.com
Subject: Survey
5KFITNESS FACILITY FEASIBILITY STUDY - SURVEY
FOR POTENTIAL USERS
VIRGINIA BEACH PARKS AND RECREATION
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity
walks/runs/rides
e
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility.
Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax:
757.622.6466 OR email: info@insites-studio.com) by 7/6/07. We appreciate your time and
look
forward to your response.
1. What would you typically use the facility for? (check all that apply)
_x_ Bicycling _X_ Running _X_ Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating _Therapy
As _X_ Individual or _ Group Typical Duration (hours)
Specific days
Frequency (Le. daily) _OAIL Y
Usual Time of day _6:QOpm_
Preferred Length (i.e. SK): _5K
Preferred Width (i.e. 12 feet)
Any other course design preferences? _Hills, Dirt Trails
e Preferred surface for your use? (i.e. mulch, asphalt, etc.) _variety
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested in this
6/14/2007
facility? Y / N _N
. How does the organization reach its members?
e
.
- Newsletter _ Website or Weblog _Listserver / Email
_Other
Would you be willing to post information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletter/website/blog etc. Y / N
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should contact?
Richard R. Bojo
Computer Security Analyst
Harris Connect
1400 Crossways Boulevard, Suite 114
Chesapeake, VA 23320
T 757.965.8297
C 757.572.1826
F 757.965,8210
rbojo@harrisconnect.com
www.harrisconnect.com
.----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK.on.
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)
mOG iBDm3zMURBADlzBW2Ua 7xu8YCNZ+xGqpjElOSyKtyp91 cb22v8U7xv6UVGXio4
NI2t1 Y9WnhZwHfeP2rVi69xF6nYOm PM5arrcK8DRXMLPYGrTMT q9UltOw9a1ySig
PV 1 FnhospXt6HHFvTK2WcGhyOK9nbc9+U9xIF9'vnxXA2vwml UzhlowV4wCg/3Fd
851 MGfrRjAZ9peYtZx7PdOOEAKK8JOOb9bXoPx3EaS06aKFOGHgvvKhOSZTDa YHD
CkFWOuB7DYbcub YGCcp6Mc7aZnOTB6B/RWGOM70V 1 fpIV21zxnNcShL 7 420gp3w2
flleXpRtBiOLom 1 CnMfOvpZafH3Z38uofObXPlbcVPw7XKX6Vr4THvOq97zWzZpn
eNoGBACXNjsiTEP2zWA+ 790IOPwHP A5bG kleAJ27D+k 1 HKykikOEJayCvwWgmezB
YLc1SpUxONLFNmQwnpFijs 1 DgOAXdzHe/1/wP3psMTOK8eCvkYcPa8xOlR6fZ3pP
q4Rfu2h TZ9fgLtJl caALr24qUKbB3iC7 JR/xqOA9bSyP61BA VLOkUmljaGFyZCBC
b2pvlDxyYm9qbOBiY2hhcnJpc3B 1 YiSjb20+iQBOBBARAgAOBOISt8zFBAsDAgEC
GOEACgkO/Hs YiJUWkGiXwCfYL+ouZvdiqVtOVeK73SXDfuRKVOAni68io TbV090
3BOldMhOmUDSEeBmlCISaWNoYXJklFlulEJvam8gPHJib2pvOGhhcnJpc2NvbmSI
Y30uY29tPokASwOOEOIACwUCRAdNNAOLAwlBAAOJEPx7GliSSVpBltY AnOzyaoyc
SBNcqM uK 1 G307YLg2BMOAJ93SqODDLbunrnVJNHzG 1 Au+UlawrkCDOQSt8zFEAgA
9kJXtwhlCBdyorrWqULzBej5UxEST7bxbr1LOCDaAadWoxTpjOBV89AHxstDqZSt
9Oxkhkn4Dl09ZekX 1 KHTUPj 1 VW/cdIJPl'T2N266Z4VeSWc39uK50T8X8dryDxUcw
Y c58yWb/Ffm7/ZFexwGq01 uejaClcjrUGvC/RgBYK+XOiP 1 YTknbzSCOneSRBzZr
M2w4DUUdD3ylsxx8Wy209vPJI8BD8KVbG 120u 1 WMuF040z T9fBdX06MdGGzeMyEs
tSrlPOGxKUA YEY18hKcKclaGxAMZyAcpesqVDNmWn6vQCICbAkb TCD 1 mpF 1 BnSx8
vYILlhkmuquiXsNV6TILOwACAggAiAhWgcHqHfTluZkVUNF+SZJYT mnks Y + 78jjx
y 1 FdCNCM08R+1N1IbHr ZF6HwG49rbmeSz1 LuMsVUIJl TLbGbWESmCgVJdOsJaBPCw
OZUGseLSWG6nWJrS+fydJ6qB7Wx 7M9XtY ckAa T +hfeOGk8cBao09aa58BDZIJghn
gqnasnvd48jfyoBm YbJbWQoqOHMYiydXYdwJbYBgyPe 1Jk9NOSSOzwlUNiZrFPjV
G9K024Jlub/g+ TfnF/Stfa1 ea5gONlmEdWa 1 FkgyVrP3L TQI17U6K9iK90iydI3IA
25LmuAUtoHqknbHYNVTfC 1 WzYkLfd08nv19vTUK83S9p02eAZ4kARgQYEO IABgUC
ObfMxOAKCRD8exilkuVaQV9dAKD/bQYVKQzrVOM2TRN5RMX 1 BgNNtwCgsUk97C2r
Vb2oKShdXEwN2fCl hl M==
=WbBv
.....END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK.....
6/1412007
Page 2 of3
6-'4-07: ",04AM;
:4270"93
.. 2/
-
5K FITNESS FACILITY
FEASIBILITY STUDY
VIRGINIA BEACH PARKS AND ReCREATION
'IISITES
IAN!)5('.AI'E AIl:HlttcrUM:
City of Virginia Beach: 5K fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Concept Development - Survey Questionnaire for potential Users
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road fadlity that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runS/rides
now routinely held throughout the dty as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new fadlity. You've
been contacted because you've been identified as someone who may ultimately use the facility,
as an events planner or may have some knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few
minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax: 757.622.6466 OR email:
info@insites-studio.com) by 6/22/07. We appreciate your time and look forward to your
response.
e
1. What would you typically use the faclllty for? (check all that apply)
_ Bicycling / Running ~alking _ Equestrian _ Skating / Therapy
As I Individual or _ Group Typical Duration (hours) / Aour
.
Specific days IAJI'~ft"lY.b Frequency (i.e. dally) dJ: I oJ ~Ic Usual Time of day r.A'ntla"",Cf
/ a
Preferred length (i.e. 5K): s:- H. Preferred Width (i.e. 12 feet) / ~
Any other course design preferences? I'lA/,VE'$...; hdfs .1 f~GS ..J .J. /a:ytZ Jui/
Preferred surface for your use? (i.e. mulch, asphalt, etc.) a.s f) k/I-.
./
2. Me you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested in this
facility? Y (i)
How does the organization reach its members?
Newsletter _ Website or Web log
_Ustserver / Email
_Other
.
Would you be willing to post information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletter/website/blog etc. Y IN
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should contact? s~()olsl
f!t.J.y lI.)pJIf"lt!'>rI
--
e
.
6-'4-07; '1:04AM;
;4270493
.. 3/
3. Are there similar facilities that you have seen or usecl'(V N If so, where? A-r /;;J !un
0'VLc. CJO tr~
What other off road -trails or fitness facilities do you use in this area?
~ardwalk ~t Trashmore V Rrst Landing SP _ Great Ned< Park
_OtyView Park _ Other
What do you like about them? ffi f,....,j!hc CO^ C' ern$
What do you dislike about them? DUs.) ~s, Uttf.I' ..& 7)"5 :Po-qp .
What can we do to make this facility unique? A~ /.;. P-aL 'L w~ -f~es. brt ;/p..r..l / ~~
j,.(,U.,J s~.r--r"d(! ptk"C'tJ ~rvr", rlA.I'\t'I/!!'r.s.
Are there other activities/facilities at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this facility? i.e. Amphitheatret Sportsplex, Schoors,
Golf Course, etc. .porn piJ R ec eel'\. -Jt"r . or S.(ku.~ };tA.J dcp:S .
./
Would you use this facility while other friends or family members participate in other activities
such as athlet;cs?0 N
4. HOlOUId you travel to the facility?
_Drive alone ~Drive with others ~iCYcle _Run _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse
Ride a horse
Other
5. Would you be more likely to use the facUity more often if any of the following features were
accessible or dose by?
Y N Power Sources
<cr:> N Water Sources
a;; N Restrooms
<:::r:J N Showers I Lockers I Changing Areas
Y N PiOlic Tables and Grills
Y N Open Air Shelters
Y N Fitness Stations
Would you be wming to sit on ~eview/fundraiSing committee@N
Will you be available for further diSCUSSiOn?cJ) N
Name Md'tt ~~Ie(,(\t.'l Organization/COmpany Lb. \Seo..c.l.-... k~";"~-T
Email M-SM ~ I E?(@.vbJo\l'c~ Phone No QIl..) 3 t' ) - C"c .}. ft'-f
.
~'~Ai~~.~
t~'\~~~" ~h'C'~'
,.<;.!'o;.~I> ",.':;1.
(c.... . - ... Lt""
I~l ~ \7"
(0\_ : l~~
',\-. ~. J;/
~\~..... ~~''''::j.
~.....~. ~.>v~~...,;,..,
"._~:::..~
oK jl1fNJl1}J fACJJJfY jlEA3JIJlllfY STUDY
V1J..l{JIN!A BEACH PA~KS AIW RECREA'l10N
.', ' "\
1 \.,:TI\,. AI'J ~AI 11'(1. . I:
City of Virginia Beach: SK Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Concept Development - Survey Questionnaire for Potential Users
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility. You've
been contacted because you've been identified as someone who may ultimately use the facility,
as an events planner or may have some knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few
minutes to complete the following survey and return to In5ites (fax: 757.622.6466 OR email:
info@insites-studio.com) by 6/22/07. We appreciate your time and look forward to your
response. -
e'
1. What would you typically use the facility for? (check all that apply)
~icycling _ Running _ Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating _Therapy
As _ Individual or ~roup Typical Duration (hours) '1- I~
lpecific days1 fI-"A /'f'lr) ~1~..1e;'cy (i.e. daily) r Xlw(l. Usual TIme of day
{
Preferred Length (i.e. 5K): S k Preferred Width (j.e, 12 feet) ~+
Any otl1er course design preferences? 11/0 !J /4iC:,~. r S "It! tJ,.., ~
~ ero~;- )'tf''k'rJ.X ~ i ~~;J;.'a.! /Wf<. (" ~ ' ,. I
Preferred ~urface fof youf:Use?" (1,e, mulch, asphalt, etc.) ('~~ C)~ J1..,I..4.Lf-
2, Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested in this
facility? Y / N * S
How does the Organi~tiOn reach Its members?
~wsletter ~ebsite o~ Weblog ~~tserver f Email
_Other
.
Would you be willing to post information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletter/websitefblog et@
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should contact? T81J. IcoaI
~
-&\~cl rAc-- ~
.
3, Are there similar facilities that you have seen or use~N If so, where? T~K.kr~ I J 11,
What ot r off road -trails or fitness facilities do you use in this area? Co!~~ ~~:" C e;
Mt Trashmore ~st Landing SP _ Great Neck Park
~ iN P.'r /f3(~k
_ oa.. #0 !v~-CC\c ,
clDr;;S
Wh t d k th' f 'I'ty ? C'lMJ.'I9t...-I- r~ ~'~L ,~~
a can we 0 to ma e IS aClI unique, ~7-t -I O~!!.- ll.=:!><
Are there other activities/facilities at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
_City View Park Lather
What do you like about them?
What do you dislike about them?
that should have a direct path connection to this fadlity? i.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf Course, etc,
.
Would you use this facility while other friends or family members participate in other activities
such as athletic@ N
4. How would you travel to the facility?
_Drive alone Drive with others LBiCYcle _Run Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse _ Ride a horse ...,/' Other ~ ~ e;db
5. Would you be more likely to use the facil ity more often if. any of the following features were
accessible or close by?
Power Sources
Water Sources
Restrooms
Showers / Lockers / Changing Areas
Picnic Tables and Grills
Open Air Shelters
Fitness Stations
y
Would you be willing to sit on G~review/fundraiSing committee\{) N
Will you be available for further discussion? & N
Name M;t4~1 :Xl AJ.., Organization/Company T"<<kwJb. BtY't IlACt'1dvb
Email A sil" @.. l.~>>it....~~/;g:::; No ( 7 SIJ '/ 2.2., L.;;{ 70'
.
Jun 1,: 07 1~;14a
AM Design
(757) 428-2559
p.1
.
~~\
r'~
itt.S' ~
(~t-~. .~
"\"..-' ',;
4l\...-...; .....~
~.r
Gl flmu!1JJ flAC!!ll'l JI&1aJiJuJr 3mP!
VlSA BEACH PARKS ANI) RalENIlON
lISIYES
].....~nS(A.-,.; MCHJn:..c.;TVRr.
City of Virginia Beach: 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility SbJdy
concept Development - Survey Questionnaire for Potential Users
The City of Virginla B63Ch Department of Parks and Reaeation is oonducting a feasil:iJity study
for an outdoor cyc6ng and fitness facility at Prinress Anne Commons. The vision is to develOp
an off-road facility that can accommodam large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now rOlltinely held throughout the dty as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we deveJop the preliminary plans for this new facility. You've
been contacted because you've been identified as someone who may ultimately use the facility,
as an events planner or may have some knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few
minutes to complete the following survey and rebJrn to InSites (fax: 757.622.6466 OR emaU:
info@insites-studio.can) t:Jy 6/22/07. We appredate your time and look forward to your
response.
e
1. What would you typically use the fadlity for? (check all that apply)
JL Bicydlng L Running _ Walking _ EQuestrtan _ Skating _Therapy
As.Y Individual or ~ Group TypIcal Duration (hours) ,
Specific days Fl"eXluency (I.e. daily) 1!lN\O\Nfl". UsuaITtme of day e-V l.lA.I Il. J,
Preferred length (i.e. 5K}: i /2 "lit', J <.."" Preferred Width (i.e. 12 feet) .1 0 '+
Any other course design preferences? t(e(-Mccd J.. \11 cLt.-o rUt) PI; rr
,
Preferred surface ~ your use? (Le. mulch, asphalt. etc.) cu Ph. cuA: (), CD k.e. ~
I
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organIzation that woutd be Interested In tl1is
facillty(!) N Y T e-, P D vv l?"t-
How does the organization ream Its members?
Nevi9etter ~ Website or Wetlog
~Other VV ~ ;..:{ of \,'"A.v v+- h
_Ustserver I Emall
Would you be willing to post information about this process and facility to your organl2atlon's
newsletterjwebsfte/blog etc. Y @
Are there other people,'organizatlons/businesses that we should amtact? Ti cl.c v,Jr...-{-c.r
~f,~oUt~-
.
Jun 11 07 1 ~.14a
-. .
.
.
.
AM Design
(757) 428-2559
p.2
3. Are there similar fadlities that you have seal or used? Y feJ If so, where?
What other off road -trails or fitness fadlities do you use In this area?
~ Boardwalk _Mt Trashmore ~Fjrst Landing SP _ Great Neck Park
_Cit>! Vif!N Park _ Other Vi &d~t
What do you like about them? /-tat ~ jA,r ""u., ,\;C&"U ~ C' ~u.s t, r e5h'voy'1j . (\ 0 f(C. " L
What do you distike about them; b;kbr:. 1.. "~~d~h: ~":1'! ed dO~~1 J~\k4Cl.Qd {{,~~ trot\tl~
What can we do to make this fadlity unlCJJe? ~.;. .4 -rf -hI \01u1~d'DY ~'irl . 7P- I.~ )vv\) 5 rctd
(Sztt '(\t." . ~sk..d( tUsl)tc~vl I
Are there other adivitleslfacilities at Princess Anne comrhbns that you or fa mily membef5 use (
that sflouJd have a direct path connection to this facility? (,e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf C()LJtSe, etc,
Would you use this facility while ott1er friends or family members participate in other actlvities
sudl as athletics? 21 N
4. How would yoll travel to the facility?
~Drive alone _Drive with others LBicyde _Run _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a hor5e _ Ride a horse _ Other
5. Would you be more likely to use the fadity more oitetl if any of the followIng f~res were
accessible or dose by?
iN Power Sources
N Water Sources
Y N Restrooms
06 N Showers I Lockers I Changing Areas
~ N Picnic Tac.es and Grills
Y N open Air SheJters
N Fitness Stations
<",
Would you be willing to sit on a plannlng/review/fa1draising commrrtee?(~> N
Will you be available for further discussion? @I N
Name ~lAe.;'ft .0~V'~{~ Organization/Comparr - .
,.t-IM+:/-I( r\f l f". I~ {""Tl .:-'l {Co.?-
Email tuil~J\i,'~k~C:JV PhcmeNoL!..U .,t..'l ,-'.;-L.c-::-X..)
J C1G t ((; {'/\
It
e
.\
SK FITNESS FACILITY FEASIBILITY
STUDY
VIRGINIA BEACH PARKS AND RECREATION
MlI>SCA1'l ARCIIIH.CIl. RE
lff#t:r_~tol .~~~~~~ '
. t:. I. 'l1:
(~ -- fs;
~~ . ~//
~~~
City of virginia Beach: 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Concept Development. Survey Questionnaire for Potential users
The City of VIrginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility. You've
been contacted because you've been identified as someone who may ultimately use the facility,
as an events planner or may have some knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few
minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax: 757.622.6466 OR email:
info@insites-studio.com) by 6/22/07. We appreciate your time and look forward to your
response.
1, What would you typically use the facility for? (check all that apply)
..u.. Bicycling _ Running _ Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating _Therapy
As .l(X.lndividual or _ Group Typical Duration (hours)
Specific days Weekends Frequency (Le. daily) Usual T1me of day 0700
Preferred Length (Le. 5K): 1 mile Preferred Width (Le. 12 feet) 30 feet
Any other course design preferences? oval
Preferred surface for your use? (Le. mulch, asphalt, etc.) asohalt
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested in this
facility? (Y)/ N
How does the organization reach its members?
_ Newsletter _ Website or Weblog ~ listserver f Email
_Other
Would you be willing to post information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletterfwebsite/blog etc. (Y)/ N
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should contact?
3. Are there similar facilities that you have seen or used? Y / (N) If so, where?
What other off road -trails or fitness facilities do you use in this area?
..xx.. Boardwalk lQt Mt Trashmore ..u.. First Landing SP _ Great Neck Park
_City View Park _ Other
What do you like about them? nice rural feeL
What do you dislike about them? sometimes crowded
What can we do to make this facility unique?
Are there other activities/facilities at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this facility? i.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf Course, etc.
Would you use this facility while other friends or family members participate in other activities
. such as athletics? (Y)/ N
4. How would you travel to the facility?
lQt Drive alone _Drive with others ..xx. Bicycle _Run _Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse Ride a horse _ Other
.-
S. Would you be more likely to use the facility more often if any of the following features were
accessible or dose by?
Y N Power Sources
Y N Water Sources
Y N Restrooms
(Y) N Showers / Lockers / Changing Areas
Y N Picnic Tables and Grills
Y N Open Air Shelters
Y N Fitness Stations
e
Would you be willing to sit on a planning/review/fundraising committee? Y / (N)
Will you be available for further discussion? (Y)/ N
Name B. Conoscenti
Organization/Company Tri Power
Email bccono(B)verizon.net
Phone No (_)
.
.
e
.
SK FITNESS FACILITY FEASIBILITY STUDY
VIRGINIA BEACH PARKS AND RECREA liON
City of virginia Beach: 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility study
concept Development - survey Ouestionnaire for potential users
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility
study or an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is
to develop n ofHoad facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity
walks/runs/rides Nw routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a
variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility.
You've een contacted because you've been identified as someone who may ultimately
use the facility, as an events planner or may have some knowledge of similar courses.
Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax:
757.622.6466 OR email: info@insites-studio.com) by 6/22/07. We appreciate your time
and look forward to your response.
1. What would you typically use the facility for? (check all that apply)
_ Bicycling _x_ Running _x_ Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating _Therapy
As _x_ Individual or _x_ Group Typical Duration (hours) _1
Specific days _M-F _ Frequency (i.e. daily) _3/week_ Usual Time of day _9 or 10 am_
Preferred Length (Le. SK): _3-4miles_ Preferred Width (Le. 12 feet) _9-12ft_
Any other course design preferences? _trees along course for shade
Preferred surface for your use? (i.e. mulch, asphalt, etc.) _asphalt
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested in
this
facility? Y / N _yes
How does the organization reach its members?
_x_ Newsletter _ Website or Weblog _x_Listserver / Email
_Other
Would you be willing to post information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletter/website/blog etc. Y / N
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should contact?
3. Are there similar facilities that you have seen or used? Y / N If so, where? _ Tennessee_
What other off road -trails or fitness facilities do you use in this area?
_x_ Boardwalk _x_Mt Trashmore _First landing SP _x_ Great Neck Park
_x_City View Park _x_ Other _Redwing
What do you like about them? _distance at Trashmore and the boardwalk, shade at the others,
playgrounds near by, accessible bathrooms_
What do you dislike about them? Jack of shade at Trashmore , proximity to the waste site at
City View, Great Neck needs new playground equipment, but the trail, when used with the access
road, is great
What can we do to make this facility unique? _marked bike lanes?
Are there other activities/facilities at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this facility? i.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Golf Course, etc._Princess Anne Park
Would you use this facility while other friends or family members participate in other activities
such as athletics? Y I N
4. How would you travel to the facility?
_Drive alone _x_Drive with others _Bicycle _Run ~Walk _Skate
_Trailer a horse Ride a horse Other
S. Would you be more likely to use the facility more often if any of the following features were
accessible or close by?
Y N Power Sources
Y N Water Sources
Y N Restrooms
Y N Showers I Lockers I Changing Areas
Y N Picnic Tables and Grills
Y N Open Air Shelters
Y N Fitness Stations
Would you be willing to sit on a planning/review/fundraising committee? Y IN
Will you be available for further discussion? Y I N
Name _Rachel McHale_ Organization/Company _Stroller Strides_
Email_rachel@strollerstrides.net_ Phone No (J57 _)_ 430-0873
.'
e
.
, Jun 08 07 07:17p
Bath Campion
757-963-2966
p.1
.
~-B'i.~,-
~~t~~
.)f!~"1"'~'''~
'1i~ . ~~
~...- . .:.,
".-:;.....- ~i~
"\.-. ..".~
'(~:.~..~~~:..
'~r::.""r
5x~ JlJJflIlll JliMBIIlJr 9Jwy
VIRGINIA BEACH PARKS AhP RECREA11011
~~=~[:;::~~l~~
L\N~'))i(:.&.i.; AII:(.:J.rrn:"I1;A.E
City of Virginia Beach: SK Fitness Fadlity Feasibility Study
Concept Development - Survey Questionnaire for Potential Users
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conduding a feasibility study
for an outOOor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision Is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommOdate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility. You've
been contacted because you've been identified as someone who may ultimately use the fadlilyl
as an events planner or may have some knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few
minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax: 757,622.6466 OR email:
info@insites-studio.com) by 6/22/07. We appreciate your time and look forward to your
response.
1. Zld..: ~ the futility for? (check all th~
_ ~ _ Running _ Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating _Therapy
As _ Individual or _ Group Typical DlIration (hours) ;;
< 1 ,4- M .
Specific days ~ Frequency (Le. daily) Usual lime of day I. M
Preferred Length (J.e. 5K): 5'" K Preferred Wrdth (i.e. 12 feet) j () - tf 0 -f+ .
Any other o>urse design preferenres? /J- &--c. ~ ("Ai 5 S" r M r.I e... j" ,.d.v ~ t:; (,/ \ 8 I k &; 5 kA 7& ; jLc.J;.
/
Preferred surface for your use? (i.e. mulch, asphalt, etc.) ;d 'i r'fl/J,,~. , pt.rocrrtf c~fl...,[r~
- I
2. Are you a member of ~vocacy/Professjonal organization that would be Jnterested in this
facility? Y IN ? ti f , cfJv-! t-12. V (Il.-ifr,v fA 7~ 1;4 77TC<;~ ;;:<yC!-r-.AJc;:.
" cc..c/~
vJ~~~~5
"..J riJFeJ) A Y j
How does the organizatio~ its menbers?
_ Newsletter L Website or Weblog
_listserver I Email
_Other
Would you be willing to post information about this process cmd facility to your organization's
newsJette.r/website,lblog et(;J N
Are there other peopIe/organizations/businesses that we should contact?
I
;: r N.4 c.. ~ {Ck : C O.Nre S ; ..c-~ ,t-tf2-c::Jc;.. 5
. ./ /
.
, Jun oB 07 07:18p
Beth Campion
757-963-2966
p,2
.
3. Are there similar faci6lies that you have seen or used? Y f.F) If so, where?
Wh7ff road -~tness facilities L in this area?
_ Boardwalk _Mt Trashmore _first: landing SP _ Great Neck Park
_City View Park _ Other
What do you like about them? 0 fl J. tJ
What do YOUdiSlikeaooutthem?C_I2.eWO r ,: C ~ ~ 'f /2-.r!>~ ~A)F
What can we do to make this facility utliQue? ONe ~AJ/J(,oiCr r..e.;dck : o~t S~h-r;c,)
...,-,t.,Acfi:' u/U& Co/'tc.1-AJe" ~4cfi:
Are there other actlvitleslfadlities at Princess Anne cornrrw'ns that you or famlly rliembers use
that should have a direct path connec:tion to this fatility? i.e. Amphitheatre, Sportspfex, Schools,
;J()
Golf Course, etc.
e
Would you use thiS facility while other friends or family members partidpate In other activities
- "'
such as athl~ N
4. How ~Id you travel ~dlity?
~Df'i',.,e alone _Drive with others _Bicyde _Run _Walk. _Skate
_Trailer a horse _ Ride a horse _ Other
5. Would yotJ be more likely to use the fadlity more often if any of the following features were
accessible or dose by?
r./ N Power Sources
~. N Water Sources
~- N Restrooms
N Showers I lockers I O'langing Areas
N Picnic Tables and GriDs
~ Open Air Shelters
(5:/N Fitness Stations
Would you be wiUing to sit on a plannlng/review/fundraislng committee? Y ,()
WiD you be available for further diSOJSSion?a N
Name f,tpJk: ~""lfO,J. Organization/Ccmpany U S 1'lf7
EmailJx.~ ~ f 0 rl1-@ Phone No <Z.1JJ ;1.89-8)7
co'C.~t'f -
.
. Jun,DB 07 OB: 12p
.
.
.
Joshua & Jennifer Go~et
17574677SBB
p.l
r~"~~,
;~~~l)'-'~:-:fi'
:~i ~~
(~~-- ;. :~.=
'(-, ;:.. . .l~fj
"~;:'."..':~~"~-;~ J.JJ
"'. ..r:-.... .~.,
...."",....y...
lJIf1mIIIB flACIJll'f f1Kmu11r 910])[
VIRGINIA BEACH PARKS AND RECREATION
'~,' ~.-:-,'-.. ..~:~. '-:--i~.~
~ ~ : ';.: ....,
.._._-..to_,.". .. _#".7'.:'_"
i.\:\ll~t ":l~ -\IIt:'IJlnCn"kr
City of Virginia Beach: 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility SbJdy
Concept Development - Survey Questionnaire for Potential Users
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
fur an outdoor cycling and fitness fadlity at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road fadlity that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the dty as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new fadlity. You've
been contacted because you've been identified as someone who may ultimately use the fadlity,
as an events planner or may have some knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few
minutes to complete the following survey and return to InSites (fax: 757.622.6466 OR email:
info@insites-studio.com) by 6/22/07. We appreciate your time and look forward to your
response.
1. What would you typically use the fadlity for? (check all that apply)
../ Bicyding _ Running _ Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating _Therapy
As _ IndivIdual or v'" Group Typical Duration (hours) !2 - 3
Specific days IH t frequency (I.e. dally) Ja; I" Usual lime of day tf" f-w1
/
Preferred Length (i.e. 5K): {-? ,.-.,' k5 Preferred Width (Le. 12 feet) I). I
Any other course design preferences? 4- ~ fo c hlW<jL Co()r~ k~ [},'h. 0. &.ff- thtWd'" )
Preferred surface for your use? (I.e. mulch, asphalt, etc.) ,<:) 5(> he.. l.f-
2, Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested in this
fadlity?& N Vjr8i..,:~ 8eoth wh~ 11'1,(", (;d,''''.) 1ea1lV)
How does the organization reach its members?
_ Newsletter ~ Website Or Weblog ../" Ustserver / Email
_Other
Would you be willing to post informatJon about this process and fadlity to your organization's
newslettet/w~itetblog etc@- N
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should contact?
\ /. " I I' ,4. ., .
VI rSl'llCl\ ,/7~ 111~ S'SorlCf-#-loV\
v4o/c'I;~. Of'j
. Jun 'rOB 07 OB: 12p
Joshua L JenniFer Go~et
175746778B8
p.2
e
3. Are there similar facilities that you have ~n or used? y Kfj) If so, where?
What other off road -trails or fitness facilities do you use in this area?
../ Boardwalk ~ MtTrashmore _First landing SP _ Great Neck Park
_City View Park _ Other
What do you like aoout them? /Vof soot\. ~ ( CoAtfe f;i-itJf2.. Clc l..~
What do you dislike about them? T~ f1&4rr"w, 100 .I1a"'.1 "1/Cfl kt?K, -/co ~~ leis~_ b; k...s
What can we do to make this facility unique? (D,.,.f-r-d 1 aU'.2i;t:,. SO;1 ; fi s~ ~ (' CoMpef,'ft',;.e.
R"MS)
Are there other activities/facilities at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this fadlity? i.e. Amphitheatre, SportSp(ex, Schools,
Gc>>fCourse, etc. A 6of{>d. PQ-f-'" i..s l1(rf ~J..td
Would you use this facility while other friends or family members partidpate in other activities
such as athletics? G) N
4. How would you travel to the fadlity?
/ Drive alone /' Drive with others / Bicyde _Run _Walk _Skate
.
_Trailer a horse
Ride a horse _ Other
5. Would you be more likely to use the facility more often if any of the folrowing features were
aa::essible or dose by?
~ N Power Sources
N Water Sources
N Restrooms
@ N Showers /lockers I Changing Areas
r9 N Pialic Tables and Grills
~ N Open Air Shelters
(j) N Fitness Stations
Would you be willing to sit on a planning/review/fund raising committee&, N
Will you be available for further discussion? <:i} N
Name :)05 ~'1A Go-l.R..t Organization/Company Viti
./
Email jQ.S~...q@hiKe2t1r1.eIkr.clil-\Phone No ( /$ ") ) S I) - SCfL/ ('y
.
e
e
e
5K Outdoor Fitness Feasibility Study NOTE: Optional Services in Green
Concept Development - Survey Questionnaire
Potential Users
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road track that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility. You've
been contacted because you've been identified as someone who may ultimately use the facility,
as an events planner or may have some knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few
minutes to complete the following sUlVey and return to XXXXXX by XXXX. We appreciate your
time and look forward to your response.
1. What would you typically use the facility for? (check all that apply)
_ Bicycling _X_ Running _ Walking _ Equestrian _ Skating _Therapy
As _X_ Individual or _X_ Group Typical Duration (hours)
SpeCific days Frequency (i.e. daily) Usual Time of day
Preferred Length (i.e. SK): _5-BK Preferred Width (i.e. 12 feet) _Varied start and ending,
actual track width 12-15 feet
Any other course design preferences?
Preferred surface for your use? (i.e. mulch, asphalt, etc.) _multi-use, natural ground covering (mulch,
grass/mulch mixture
2. Are you a member of a user/advocacy/professional organization that would be interested in this
facility? Y / N _Virginia Beach Public Schools - Bayside High School. This course could easily be used
for Cross Country meets as well as the Beach District Country meets. This course could also allow us to
bid on the Regional and State Cross Country Tournaments. Many schools also plan charity walks/runs for
various organizations and this facility could be used for those purposes. Currently the only "real" 8K site
for a school to hold a race is the Virginia Wesleyan College Campus site, but that even isn't that accurate.
VWC could even utilize this course for their races and tournaments as well for their cross country
team.
How does the organization reach its members?
_X_ Newsletter _X_ Website or Weblog _X_Ustserver / Email
_Other
Would you be willing to post information about this process and facility to your organization's
newsletter/website/blog etc. Y / N
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should contact?
_Already have sent the surveys to the High School Student Activities Coordinators and Cross Country
Coaches as well as the Student Activities Office
downtown.
3. Are there similar facilities that you have seen or used? Y I N If so, where?
What other off road -trails or fitness facilities do you use in this area?
_X_ Boardwalk _X_Mt Trashmore _X_First Landing SP _ Great Neck Park
_City View Park _X_ Other _Sportsplex
What do you like about them?
What do you dislike about them? _Not specifically designed for this
purpose.
What can we do to make this facility unique? _Central Park type atmosphere. Seating areas in open
natural space as well as modern amenities for participants as well as spectators. Watering stations and
F/A stations would be nice to have for day long activities.
Are there other activities/facilities at Princess Anne Commons that you or family members use
that should have a direct path connection to this facility? i.e. Amphitheatre, Sportsplex, Schools,
Chri~~r~t""- ~Ut()
r-r~7. 111. tJDl,olJ
13w1jidl l'hB k ~&~~,{
~~tAu/
b~olf Course, etc._I feel this could be a good starting point to making this area a sports/fitness hub in the
ity as well as a beautiful and usable natural area. I think if this project is put together in the right way,
ny sports based businesses could be interested in getting involved and utilize the natural amenities
bffered by this project.
~OuJd you use this facility while other friends or family members participate in other activities
such as athletics? Y / N
I . How would you travel to the facility?
X_Drive alone _X_Drive with others _Bicycle _Run _Walk _Skate
Trailer a horse Ride a horse _ other
. Would you be mqre likely to use the facility more often if any of the following features were
ccessible or close by?
N Power Sources
N Water Sources
N Restrooms
N Showers / Lockers / Changing Areas
N Picnic Tables and Grills
N Open Air Shelters
N Fitness Stations
ould you be willing to sit on a planning/reviewjfundraising committee? Y / N
ill you be available for further discussion? Y IN
5K Outdoor Fitness Feasibility Study NOTE: Optional Services in Green
Concept Development - Survey Questionnaire
Speci I Events
he City irginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
or an outdoo cling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facUi at can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held th ghout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your ~ ck as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility. You've
been contacted because you been identified as someone who may ultimately use the facility,
as an events planner or may ha some knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few
minutes to complete the following s ey and return to XXXXXX by XXXX. We appreciate your
time and look forward to your response.
1. Is there a special event that you would use this
Name of event _SEE ABOVE
Avg. # of Participants Avg. # of spectators _ vg. # of Support staff
Typical duration (hours) Specific dates if know i.e. Holidays)
Event frequency (i.e. yearly)
2. What type of track or course is best for your activity or event?
Length (i.e. SK): Width (i.e. 12 feet) ~
Starting Method (check one): _ Pack start _ Staggered start times
Do you need different length courses for different length activities or age g ups? Y I N
Please explain
Any other course design or layout preferences?
What is the ideal path surface treatment for your event?
Do you require rest areas or other stopping points along the path? Y IN
How frequently?
3. What kind of viewing areas would be required for your event?
_ None _X_Open Lawn _X_Bleachers
4. Would there be other types of events taking place in conjunction with your event? Le, Picni
.,,1 i
frincess Anne Commons
Sf fitness fucjliig feusjlJjliig Sf11r!g
A tlucnment 2: RUJY /Jotu 2
HiscellUD80us feerflJucl
-+..-...-1 ".,._..~,-_._---_._.._-
Re: Fitness Feasibility Study
Page 1 of2
e
Tonya Gifford
From: Joshua Goyet tioshua@bikezoneva.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 8:04 AM
To: Tanya Gifford
Subject: Re: Fitness Feasibility Study
Tonya,
I have filled out this survey and faxed it to you, Can I forward this to my teammates as well. Also I work
part time at a bike shop in Virginia Beach. Can I take it to the shop and have customers fin it out? I just
didn't know if this was a targeted surveyor a general one. I also would love to on a committee if one was
formed. I have some pretty good ideas that would hopefully make this a success, Some of which were not
covered in the survey (or just hard to explain in the survey), Just let me know if I could pass this on, Thank
you. Also is this facility going to happen and your survey is just making the details, or is this survey seeing if
it will happen at all?
-- Joshua Goyet
Virginia Beach Wheel men, President
http://bikezoneva.com/page.cfm?PageID= 202
"Race like you are the best, train like you are racing the best,"
e On 6/8/07 2:26 PM, "Tanya Gifford" <tgiffard@insites-studio,com> wrote:
To Whom It May Concern:
We are currently working on a feasibility study for an outdoor cycling and fitness
facility at Princess Anne Commons in Virginia Beach, Virginia, We'd like to get your feedback as
we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility.
You've been contacted because you've been identified as someone who may
ultimately use the facility. Please take a few minutes to complete the following
survey and return to InSites (fax: 757.622.6466 OR email: info@insites-studio.com)
by 6/22/07. We appreciate your time and look forward to your response,
We look forward to hearing from you.
Thanks,
Tonya Gifford & Keith Oliver
][[~Durn~
l}.NDSC:AI'F. i\JICHJTECTURE.
424 West 21st Street Suit( 201 Norlolk, Virginia 23517
T757.622.6446 F757.622.6466
www.insites-studio.com
.
6/21/2007
;-/
Keith Oliver
....L ...
. From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Mark Connelly [Ioanexpert@hotmail.com]
Thursday, June 21, 2007 11 :46 AM
info@ insites-studio.com
ashe@lawyervirginia.com
FW: VAcycling: Fw: Biking SK [3.1 mile] race course
To Whom It May Concern:
I just downloaded the "survey questionaire" and faxed it to the number provided.
As someone who has been coming to Va Beach for over 40 years.....
this seems to be a great thing for the Va Beach area!!!!
With all the development and new expansions, it seems imperative that "we" plan and
implement such things for our children and children's children.
With the high cost(s) of transportation... .and this will get even higher in years to
come.. ....it seems that by using alternative transportation whether for business and/or
personal use... .is and will be "the" way to go!!!!
AS it stands right now... ..the bicycle is the most economical mode of transportation
known(and developed) by mankind.
So, when friends, relatives, unknowns.. ..chatter about the high cost of gas, etc....
my response is and always will be..... ...then pick up a bike and ride!......
In addition to the many other factors that come into play.... .no insurance costs, no
~gaSOline costs, no sticker costs, no licenses required, health benefits, no pollution,
~seldom do you hear of a head on collision and/or a DUI,..... ..the list is long.
I hope that the "powers to be".. .can have the foresight to..... ..as they say... .do the
right thing!
Sincerely,
Mark A. Connelly
pinnacle Mortgage Corporation
3226 Shallowford Landing Terrace
Midlothian, Virginia 23112
Office: (804) Yes-Loan
Fax: (804) 744-MNYY
E-Mail: loanexpert@hotmail.com
NO WARRANTIES EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED.
ANY &/OR ALL ITEMS SUBJECT TO
CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE.
EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY BROKER
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Michael Ashe" <ashe@lawyervirginia.com>
Reply-To; Ashe@LawyerVirginia.com
To: <vacycling@topica.com>, <vacycling@googlegroups.com>, <uscf-district42@topica.com>,
"VA Cycling Officials List" <vaco@topica.com>, <Cyclistdude@aol.com>,
<cycling@virginia.edu>, "Cycling Penn - David Mitchell" <David_Mitchell@gmacm.com>,
.<preSident@ncsccYClinassoc.com>, <mhagen@bu.edu>, "Koehn, Eric"
<sales_service@northendcylery.com>, "Fat Frogs" <EZJVZ@AOL.COM>, "TOP OF HILL"
<Ctarpon@aol.com>
Subject: VAcycling: Fw: Biking 5K [3.1 mile] race course
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:54:43 -0400
-- ...
.,1
As you know, the public roads are being slowly closed to any and all road racing for
bicyclists.
Sorry if you get multiples of this. After many years of begging, argueing and coaxing,
~~e have gottenthe city to get to the point of a comprehensive study of a 3.1 mile circuit
...,that eQuId be utilized to run Road Races in Va.
Beach on a closed course. Can't get much safer then that. Anyway this from a city that
has not been very supportive of biking or racing in the last 2 decades. SO need our few
minutes of time to help in supporting this
project. Go to this site and print off and fill out and mail in!!
Thanks! ! ! ! Mike
www.vbgov.com/parks
study>.
then click on
<5K fitness facility feasibility
Michael Itzic Ashe, Attorney
713 19th Street #101
Va. Beach, Va. 23451
757-422-1278
Ashe@Lawyervirginia.com
ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGED; DO NOT FORWARD WITHOUT CONSENT. This e-mail and any files
attached are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this
e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this
e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this in error, please immediately notify
the Law Offices of Michael I. Ashe, p.e., at 757-422-1278 and delete/shred this e-mail.
Thank You.
.-You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vacycling"
.group.
To post to this group, send email to vacycling@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this
group, send email tovacycling-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/vacycling?hl=en
Hotmail to go? Get your Hotmail, news, sports and much more!
http://mobile.msn,com
e
2
e
e
e
. "
Page 1 of2
Tonya Gifford
From: Barbara Duke [BDuke@vbgov.com]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 9:01 AM
To: Tanya Gifford
Subject: FW: Survey
FYI
From: Rogers, Shawn [mailto:PKSHAWN@cLportland.or.us]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 6:38 PM
To: Barbara Duke
SUbject: RE: Survey
After reading the survey I have very little to offer unfortunately. By Cycling facility I'm assume you mean a
Veladrome for bicycle racing? Is it flat like a track?
I guess constructing a facility devoted to walks and runs doesn't make a great deal of sense to me. We have
tracks all over the city but they serve as the primary location for track and field events. They also provide the
benefit of allowing us to pledge based runs and walks on them all the time.
If the track is designed for non-competitive cycling it could be flat. However, if you build it for competitive racing if
it has to be heavily raked. That precludes walks and runs because they simply can stand on the course.
They slide right off on the turns.
Constructing a facility strictly for these types of events may reduce other City costs, traffic management, police,
etc, But it it also removes what we consider to be one of the more vibrant offerings a city has when you can race
or walk through areas of the city that other wise can only accessed in a vehicle.
Perhaps I don't have the entire picture. I'd love to assist further if you saw value it my help.
Shawn Rogers, Administrative Supervisor II
Customer Service Center / Administrative Services / Payroll
PORTLAND PARKS & RECREATION
1120 SW 5th AVE Portland, OR 97204
wk: 503823-2517 FAX: 503823-2515 Cell: 503975-3586
www.portlandparks,org
Healthy Parks, Healthy Portland
-----Original Message-----
From: Barbara Duke [mailto:BDuke@vbgov.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 12:31 PM
To: Rogers, Shawn
Subject: RE: Survey
You can em ail the completed survey back to me when you are done. Thank you very much.
From: Rogers, Shawn [mailto:PKSHAWN@ci.portland.or.us]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 12:24 PM
To: Barbara Duke
7/1 0/2007
Page 2 of2
SUbject: Survey
_ I've been asked to complete your survey. Could you please reply and attach a copy for completion.
Shawn Rogers, Administrative Supervisor II
Customer Service Center / Administrative Services / Payroll
PORTLAND PARKS & RECREATION
1120 SW 5th AVE Portland, OR 97204
wk: 503823-2517 FAX: 503 823-2515 Cell: 503975-3586
www.portlandparks.org
Healthy Parks, Healthy Portland
e
.
7/1 0/2007
Li i
Princoss Anno Commons
Sf fitness fucjJifg FeUSjlJjJifg SWrf{;
A {tucDmenc 2: iffY{ f}ofJJ 8
[rents Surrolls
.
JUN-J1-2007 09:44 DB TEAM
I \OH II"UVI) \)1,)\:)1".1'4 "" I VVt;t;U - I:vent5 r-'lanmne.pcT
~ '." ". -. ." - -, , . .. ,
P.01
I"age" J
. -~-..-.- .--.--.-....-... .
e
&-
~~
~
5K FITNESS FACUI'f FEASELIlY STuoy
v~ BEf\OiP~At()ImfA1Dl
HSITES
IJII"I'~......~ar.NI.I;.'"T~I1l1
.
City of Virginia Beach: SK Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Concept Development - Survey Questionnaire for Events Planning
The City af Virginia Beadl Department of Parl<s and Recreation is conductll'lg a feaSibility study
for an outdoor C)'ding and fitness fad~ at Princess Anne commons. 'The W;iOn is to develop
an off of'Oad faoaty (/tat can ac:commo<late large COfflpIJtltlve e~Tlt$ and dliIrity W4'11c:5/runs/rides
now routinely held thlQUghout the dt.y as well as daily usage by a v.uiety or users.
We'd hke to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new faCility. You\le
been contacted because you\'e been identified as an events planner Or may ha...e some
knowledge of similar wwses. Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and
return to InSiles (fax: 757,622.6166 OR emai/: info@insltes-stud/o.com) by 6/22/07. We
appreCiate your time and look forward to ~ur response.
1. Is lt1eIt! a special event !hat you ilIe involved with or WClIJcl ~ ~ !his facili1y fOl96.); N
Name of evert 6 i" k 0" -th~ Q "'-h S K: e \I ~2:~~ ~ '1 e(\V'"
Avg, # of Participalrts ~ ~ 0 ^V9- # 01 ~ _ Avg, # of ~ staff __
iypiGll duratioo (twrs) 3 Spe6f1C do3tes If kl'lCWl (Ll!, Holidays)
Evel1t ~ (i.e. yearly) ~ i- r.
2. What type of tnlck or course is ~ for your ac1ivity or evEJlt?
V
Lengltl (i.e. SK): WicIh (i.e. 12 feet)
~ltng ~ (d1edc one): 0./ PadI start _ StaQ!ll!R!d !>tart times
00 yllU need different IengI!1 murses fir different 12flQIh aaivities or age g~ Y I N
~IlJl! explain
My ~ COI.lI'!ll! design or Iaotout preferences?
What is the ideal pam SUJfam lrealmert for VOU" event?
Do yw nlCJire rest areas or ~ 5loWi~ JXlintI; aImg tt'e path? 0 1 N
Howfn!quentIy? ~
3. What land of viewing al'l!<3!l would be I'llql.i~ tor YWl' event?
./ Norlll --Open I...ilwn _Elleachers
JUN-!1-2007 09:44 DE TEAM
t.\~=..'lI,'~UV~} OU~I'\'>,I ~_~}~~~: 5\1en_~~~gpo~_... ...._.__
.
4. WDuld tt1ere 00 other types of events taking pIacp in rnnjlll"1Ctlo~ with your event? i,Q. PlCrlcs.
GngtllWard ce~ enterlainllllll1t e(C. _
5. What type of specialized vehides need direct aCtlilss or parldng at your everts?
'~I and emcrgcrx.y Direct Ao:E5ll Load/~ and Park Nearbv
~lipment delivery t tr.liIeJS
Direct A=
I..oil4'lJnJoacl and Park Nearl:1}l
LoiIdfl.klload and Park Nearby
load/1.Woad and Pam NeartTf
--F<<x:I ServilE
~DfVIdmJB raadmst
Direct Aa:e;.:;
Direct AaESS
other Dm AaESS load! Unload and Parle Nearbv
6_ 00 you use any si!1lilge or markers at your event for partiCipant ard ~1Dr orier4<lror-{J N
What type? Ched: aU d\llt applv
V 6amers on tenlS or!:ruc1\.n!s _ Sl9"S on trees and teras _ Signs (In velldes
_sat'1l:Midl Boaros ~OIher. ~
How do yOu provide ax.rse irIoonation ID jWtioJl<lllt$. sud'l as stlrt,l finish, distlOm markel'St
e
ItIUling ard dedsioo pants?
7. What sort of s~ facilities are ~ired for the event? Rea!!! rank lhe relative [1IlpOItilnce of
each potential feature. 1= Most Impcrtant 2.. Least I~nt
~ &urei
t~Water $cufQlS
.LRestltxms
~5howe1S I Lockers I Changing fv5l&
~O'liC Ta!;jes and Grills
~Open Air SheItm
~ torTents
k.~iO I Vi'*' I BroaOCa:t Eqtj+meTt
L.J~ Acr25S
LStage
F4ease sper:ify "IT)' 0111"" ~ or size req.jremenls for suwort faOlltie$.
WcMd you be williIYJ to sit on :~ingf~fumj~ng COmmittet(9 N
Will you,.be available for fIr1:her tbui:;ian? Y I N 51 ....1 If (_ I il .,A
Name ~'" ~WEEl) Organi%aliOlll.c;om pany e.lTIiU' c:o.. .:tiea. ~atV.....
Email wEEb5ernf>.flf....PlmeNo(m....L~t";)-7..lq "1-
COll'h
.
p.e2
Page 2 f
..__..;.....".-.~.~~--
TOTAL P.02
e
e
",,:':~~"R::"~
I"'~'~~?~
"~~""\~~.' -..t..:~
,":>.:..~. r7:.~. "1-'
~e; ,~- ~:;~
~;~~? .: '~~;l
\'~~"".~"~.Ji
~~~~y
oX J11nIFts f1A(]JJfff J1EA3JIuI1fY Sf{Jf)Y
V1R(.;!N1A Bm;Jj P,~v.~s MJIJ RF.C~EATlON
..~...~ ~~ \tt~,.,r:~, ~j;.
~ ~ ~ ~~.'.' ~ ry.. -.~.
_~.~~. -b-{P ;f. a: ~",......
1.\ ....:f..\(:AI"l. ~fI(" lllr-C r u;:'
City of Vi~inia Beach: SK fitness Facitity Feasibility Study
Concept Development - Survey Questionnaire for Events Planning
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasjbility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness faciIJty at Princess Anne Commons, The vision is to develop
an off~road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for thfs new factlity. You've
been contacted because you've been identified as an events planner or may have some
knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and
return to InSites (fax: 757.622.6466 OR email: info@insites-studia.com) by 6/22/07. We
appreciate your time and look forward to your response,
1. .Is there a spedal event that you are involved with or would possibly use this fadllty for? Y f N
Name of event V OLJ<. $ 1'-1 A ~c... \'\
Avg. # of Partidpants ~ Avg. # of spectators _ Avg. # of S<Jpport staff 5
Typical duration (hours) 1 Specific dates if known (i,e, Holidays)
Event frequency (i.e. yearly) 'f (2.A.I-LY
2. What type Of track or course is best for your activity or event?
Length (f.e. SK): SI<!ta Ie.. Width (i.e. 12 feet)
,
Starting Method (check one): _ Pack start ~taggered start times
Do you need dJfferent rength courses for different length activities or age 9fOUPS?@ I'J
Please explain Sf< f'\ 0 0 ( 0 k. e. 0 urt.s
Any other course design or layout preferences?
What js the Ideal path surface treatment for your event?
Do you require rest areas or other stopping points along the path?
5K
0N
How freauently?
3. What kind of viewing areas would be required for your event?
~None _Open lawn _Bleachers
e
rd
0996"":159- LSL
opnl ear
dLS:90 LO 9~ unr
.
4. Would there be other types of events taking place in conjunction witI"' your event' i.e, Picnics,
opening/award ceremonies, ertertainment etc. rp ( LtiJ ( c..
5. What t)'pe of specialized vehldes need direct access or parking at your events?
_Medical and emergenC'{ Direct Access. load/Unload and Park Nearby
_Equipment deliver{ / trailers Oi red Access Load/Unload and Park Nearby
_Food Service Oi rect 1l.ccess Load/Unload and Park Nearby
_Audio/VideojBroadcast Direct Access Load/Unload and Park Nearby
_ Othe- Direct Access Load/Unload and Park Nearby
6. Do you use any signage Dr markers at your event for partidpant and spectator orientation? Y / N
What type? Ched< all that apply
J.L: Banners on tents or st1Xtures r/ Signs on trees and fences
_Sandwich Boards ~ther, spedfy 5 (f('liS, (3 ~
_ Signs on vehides
S'TAK~S {JJ G-ea;W
How do you provide course information to partidpants, such as start( finish, distance markers,
routing and decision points? 5/6-J.JS aN S~t;...s
7, What sort of support fadilties are requIred for the event? Please rank the relative im(Xlrtance of
e
eilch potential feature. 1= Most Important 2"" Least Important
...!-power Sources
-+.-Water Sources
-LRestrooms
~Shower5 f Lockers f Changb1g Areas
LPicnlc Tables and Grills
--Lopen Air Shelters
1- Areas'for Tents
"1- Audio I Video I Broadcast Equipment
~Intemet Access
~tage
Please specify any other preferences or size requirements for support fadfities.
Would you be wllHng to sit on a p'anningjreviewjfundralsing committee~
Will yo~ available for further dlscussion?fY)j N r L. \ L J.U 1\ (J S(JL CL ot
Name .Jo l Tu ~ (.. 6 Organlia{fon/Company l...:rl,T6 ~ '-U-t-5 n rrf' t'\
Email J -nJklo ~ 'f ft(kJt> 0( Phone NO L-J
~ GI1 (57 ~5S-1.'>56
e
Z'd
0996-9S9-LSL
01101 ear
dLS:90 La S ~ unr
e
e
e
,,.~F~(\.~:t( :'\
/t~l'~t., :!<fi'.
t~~ .~ 1 ~',
~~i' .. .' ;~.~
,....0:... . ~
po.. ~ ...i
\.~: '.i....'~~_.r.,
~...:..~.:.:......,~.
Sl fl1M1)s fIA(}JJJfY FJ:ASJJJJ/lfY 8w])y
n~r;''IlA. B~A(;H p r.~~S A~jjl RECREATlll:,
~;, . A.' .AI 1,:1.,
City of Virginia Beach: 5K Fitness Facility Feasibility Study
Concept Development - Survey Questionnaire for Events Planning
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users,
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility. You've
been contacted because you've been identified as an events planner or may have some
knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few minutes to complete the following survey and
return to InSites (fax: 757.622.6466 OR email: info@insites-studio,com) by 6/22/07, We
appreciate your time and look forward to your response.
1. Is there a spedal event that you are involved with or would possibly use this facility fO@ N
Name of event ~ j,: fV..;.r; c.. ~c..J fr"1 '" ~ tI>4/ ( D {' ~e.. J t~ k t.1-ce-
Avg, # of particiPan~O+ Avg. # of spectators!/!2 Avg, # of Support staff /.:;;-
Typical duration (hours) 8 Specific dates if known (Le. Holidays) ~ it t ~ 1ft IJ
Event frequency (i.e. yearly) /~
2, What type of track or course is best for your activity or event?
Length (Le, SK): S J( +-Width (Le. 12 feet) 02't-3~r
Starting Method (check one): ~ack start _ Staggered start times
Do you need different length courses for different length activities or age groups? Y /0
Please explain -# d-t: /0 C3'pS ~ ~ eWAJI-
Any other course design or layout preferences? ke..e..cl 0<60+ h\..~ ~~rl-t<J~
"Iv.!" fJo"-/ S,OVIU.e. I
What is the ideal path surface treatment for your event? ~ T ~
Do you require rest areas or other stopping points along the path? Y t@
How frequently?
3, What kind of viewing areas would be required for your event?
hone _Open Lawn ~eachers ( ~;7 ~
..
.
e
.
4. Would there be other types of events taking place in conjunction with your event? i.e. Picnics,
opening/award ceremonies, entertainment ete. r:At.fe.
5. What type of specialized vehicles need direct access or parking at your events?
LMedical and emergency ~ ACC~ Load/Unload and Park Nearby
_Equipment delivery / trailers Direct Access Load/Unload and Park Nearby
_Food Service
~diofVideo/Broadcast
Direct Access
Load/Unload and Park Nearby
Di rect Access
other Direct Access Load/Unload and Park Nearby
6, Do you use any signage or markers at your event for participant and spectator orientatJon?~
What type? Check all that apply
/ Banners on tents or structures ~ Signs on trees and fences ~ Signs on vehicles
_Sandwich Boards /Other, specify
p~~ J1M
How do you provide course information to partlclpants, such as start! finish, distance markers,
.0-..\ J I r~
routing and decision points? I (,..~ ~~
7. What sort of support facilities are required for the event? Please rank the relative importance of
each potential feature. 1= Most Important 2= Least Important
~power Sources
~Water Sources
~Restrooms
~ Showers / Lockers I Changing Areas
~Picnic Tables and Grills
~Open Air Shelters
~Areas for Tents
~Audio I Video / Broadcast Equipment
.J... ~ Internet Access
l.-Stage
Please specify any other preferences or size requirements for support facilities.
I
. ,
e
e
.
7- 2-07; 8:47AM;
; I
#. 2/ 5
SK Outdoor Fitness Feasibility Study NOTE: Optional services in Green
Concept Development - Survey Questionnaire
Special Events
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision Is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runsjrides
now routinely held throughout the oty as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility. You've
been contacted because you've been identitif:rl as someone who may ultimately use the facility,
as an events plamer or may have some knowledge of similar courses. Please take a ffm
minutes to complete the following survey and return to XXXXXX by >000<. We appreciate your
time and look forward to your response.
1. Is there a spedal event that you would use this fatility for?{i) I N
Name of event 1Vr.1~v-~ etAtV$, /(~~. v/l1t..ks !?tel'lflrreo 8'1 S~
Avg. # of Partldpants ~S Avg. # of spectators ~fAV9. # of Support staff
Typical duration (hours) '-I- Specific dates if known (i.e. Holidays) -rtff&,I4c./f ()l.Lf" ~4e
Event frequency (i.e. yearly)
2. What type of track. or course Is best for your activity or event?
Length (I.e. 51<): ~ k. w[d~e. 12 feet) ;;JOt...:;; (j ,
Starting Method (check one): j{ Pack start .6ggered start times
Do you need different length courses for different length acttvltres or age groups? (f) N
Please explain <?k./ I~u I s-tG / VAA."tJ' R#.tE~ e((ICI~... tV~t..I{S
Any other wurse design or layout preferences?
What Is the Ideal path surface treatment for your event? As IIVk r
Do you require rest areas or other stopping points along the paltl? y /@ ~
How frequently?
I
3. What kind of viewing areas would be required for your event?
_ None ~open Lawn _Bleachers-
4. Would ttlere be other types of events taking place In conjunction with your event? i.e. Picnics,
opening/award ceremonies, entertainment etc.
Gv1~lt.rt4I,.jIllt5l1/y l'~tJSIt2/4fI()Jt/
Mft.f)S C~~17 s "
l
..
e
e
.
7- 2-07; g:47AM;
; ,
# 3/ 5
5. What type of specialized vehicles need direct access or parking at your events?
-f(Medical and emergency ~ Access ~ Load/Unload and Park Nearby
,6.!:Quipment delivery I trailers Direct Acnss Load/Unload and Park Nearby
~Food Service Direct Arxess load/Unload and Park Nearby
AAUdiO/Video/Broadcast Direct Aa:.ess
Other Dlrect Acr:ess Load/Unload and Park Nearby
L
~
6. Do you use any signage or markers at your event for partiCipant and spectator orientation? Y IN
What type? Check all that apply
~ Banners on tents or structures _ Signs on trees and fences _ Signs on vehldes
_Sandwich Boards _Oltler, specifY.
How do you provide course information to participants, such as start! finish, distance markers,
routing and decision points? <~ dJ~ fJR/'.J"Irz6t2 #P!N(){ffs- f1/LS l"'!fr(:fMJ41~rJ
" "
7. What sort of support fadlltles are required for the event? Please rank the relative importance of
each potential feature. 1= Most Important 2= Least Important
-.LPower Sources
iWater Sources
1-Restrooms
.a...Showers I Lockers I Changing Areas
~Picnic Tables and Gnlls
2::.0pen Air Shelters
-LAreas for Tents
-LAudio I Video I Broadcast EquJpment
.a:.Internet Access
~StiJge
I
'--
Please specify any other preferences or size requirements for support facHities.
Would you be willing to sit on a plannlng/revlew/fundraising commltt~ N
WlU you be available for further discuSSion? (Jj)N
Name ~ t;;k. Organization/Company -C~ "~A &AaI/ ~pCo
Email It. 'flG.~ ("", Phone No {ztzJ .]r.>-" 3 ./
J
e
SK Outdoor Fitness Faasibility study NOTE: Optional Services in Green
Concept Development - survey Questionnaire
Special Events
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness fadlity at Princess Anne Commons. The vision Is to develop
an off-road fadlity tt1atcan aa:ommodate large competitive events and charity walks/n.ms/rides
now routinely held throughout the dt)' as well as dally usage by a variety of users.
W~'d 'like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new fadUty. You've
been contacted because you've been ~ntlfied as someone who may ult:lmarety use the facility,
as an evenn; planner or may have some knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few
minutes to complete the follpwing survey and return to XXXXXX by)OOO(. We appreciate your
tlme and look forward tD YOj,Jr response.
1. Is there a special elJeIlt that you would use this futility ror(!) I N
II ,~c - L~ < :-\--/' .J1t..,~ N" .;)
Name of event <Il....".~.-, ~jl,~,,1-
.
Avg. # of Partldpantsl, t..t 0'-> Avg. # of spectators 7.-<:D Avg. It of SUpport staff Lf ..::)
Typical duration (hours) '2..- \(z... Speclflc dates If known (I.e. HoIldays)(1,"...... k$f (VI '...J-
Event frequency (I.e. yearly)
'fft<A,
e
2. What type of track or wurse Is best for your actlvlty or event?
length (I.e. 5K): I...:) ~ Width (I.e. 12 feet) / g I
starting Method (dledc. one):...x. Pad< start ~ Staggered start times
Do you need different length courses for dlffenmt lerJ9tf'l activities or age groups? Y I €J
Please explain
AnV other course design or layout pr~7
What Is the ideal iJath surface treatment for YOl,Jr E!\'ent?
. f\1c:c-....~ .$l.~. ~"
00 you require rest areas or other stt>ppng points along the path? Y 1&
How frequently?
3. What kind of vlewlng areas would be required for your event?
_ None )( Open Lawn ~B1eadlers
4. Would there be other typp.s of events taking place In conjunction with your event? i.e, PI01lcs,
I I ref . h.ri-.: t 'y I - ... W Q ~:!_.,._. 1.(:~-.:.r-l...I ~ ,",,9.S
open ng awa ceremonies, enl." u:unmen etl::. ,E.... .... __
e
ld WdL0:S0 L00c 6c 'unr
S08~89(LSL: 'ON X~~
OJ -LdB3 8Tlt10 53Wtif: t.n~.:l
.
e
e
5. What type of specialized vehicles need direct access or P.lfldng at your events?
~ ,Medical and emergency Direct Access Load/Unload and Park Neilrby
.2S:Equlpment delivery I trailers Direct Acxess _Load/Unload ~~d P~~,~~~...Y.
>:t Food Service
._AudioNldeo/Broadcast
~.oadJUnload and Park Nearby.
Load/Unload and Park Nearby
Direct Access
Direct Aocess
Other _____........- Direct Ac:cess Load/Unload and Park Nearby
6. Do you use any sign age or markers at your event for participant and spect"C1tor orierltZltion-;(VN
What type? Check <lit that apply
_ Banners on tents or strlJcture~ _ Signs on trees ilnd fences _ Signs on vehides
,(S:_sandwich Boards Stller/51:ledfy ~\.~:....{\L.r~..r>
How do you provide course Information to partIcipants, such as start! finish, dlstanc:.e markers,
routing amI decision points? ~~ ~.\ L:f" rc: \ \ .', -- i~.;.!...... c. A;i. ~.:!.<:k).l*__._
7. What ~OIt of support fadlities ijn: required for the event? Please rank the relative importance of
~ch potential feature. 1 = Most Important 2'" Least fmport/lnt
'"2.. Power Sources
_Lwater Sourt;es
-'jestrooms
"'2.. SI10werS f LockerS 1 Changing NeilS
l...- Picnic Tables and GrillS
"~pen Air Sheltt!r5
'Z-Areas for Tents
~.AUC110 I Video I Broadcast Eqlllpment
~Jlltt:rn~ Access
),...stage
Please specify any other preferences or size requirements for support fadlitif'_<;,
__~'#O'.'~~ .~.._______a_ ,...,~.....'....~,,_.._._---_.-
Would you be willing to sit on a plannlngJrevlew/fundralslng commlttee@ N
Will you be available for further dlsalsslon? @ N
Name ~ 1 -{ I tClref1,. OrganIZatIon/Company' 11 c..<.L.,I.u(.W )'\\'v."OV'>
Emall Phone NO CffU "3:}:'1- -'4...( J 3'"0 C...-...)
}.. w. '" I ~,,~~t\.. &, J..r P'. \~ (.n )C v--(. , \ - ((J .......
Zd WdL0:S0 L00e 6Z 'unr
S08589[LSL: 'ON X~~
OJ lcID3 ^3Tl~(\ S3Wl:Jr: WO~~
J.UL-11-07 10:29 AM FRAN~FRED.ADAMS
'..
757 467 2775
P.101
e
5K Outdoor Fitness feasibility Study NOTE: optional Services in Green
~ Concept Development. Survey Questionnaire
Special Events
The City of Vlrglnla Beach Department 0' Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
far an outdoor' cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Cemmons. The vision Is to develop
an off-road fadlity that can accommodate large competitive events and charIty walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the City as well as ~IlV usage tN l!.I varletv of users.
We'd like to get your feedback 85 we develop tt1e preliminary plans for this new fadUl:y. YCAJ've
been contacted because you'Ve been Identified as someone who may ultimately use the facility,
as an events planner or may have some knowledge of similar courses. Plmse t2lke a few
minutes to complete the following survey and return to XXXXXX by XXXX. We appreciate your
time and look forward to your response.
1. Is tnere a special event tnat you ~urd use thIs fad~. @ N /7:' _ .
Nameofevent ~aiC!../~ ~ 0e?1' It/l.... L_~,', f ?~'>I' J
Avg. # of Partldpenls .? ~- Avg. II of spec;tatOl'S ~ Avg. # of SUpport staff :3
Typial duration (hOurS) Z-
Event frequency (I.e. yearly)
SpecIfIc dates If known (I.e. Holidays)
"2.. Co
e
"-"
2. What type of track or course is best for your ~ctI\1lty or event?
I
SL-- 2'1
Length (I.e. SK): Width (I,e. 12 feet)
starting Metf10d (c;hed( one); _ Pack start / Staggered start times
Do you need dIfferent length courses for dfferent length activities or age grouP5(W
Please e>cplaln I t/..fL;-' c;.~.ct..P~ /?'"C 0>-"1 /) p 1<"1 (..fl. c....!1 ~
/Z. e ~ ,:-' S ;;7)~.s / / ", t... J. ..... ~ ... /'
Any other course deslgn or 11IVout Preferences? . c.. ,.k.. E:..,. c.. uc.(.IC"~ '9 ~:",u'l'l'.,
h ' /7"
What Is the Ideal path surface treatment for )lour even~.~~. ,~.__
00 you require rest areas or other stopping points along the path1C'1f; N
How frequently? &-~.A.J-- i _ n'7 ;0/ c....
3. What kind of vtewl~OUld be reQuired for your event?
_ None -C~~ _~!!!,)_B1ead'1ers
... ....----"
4. Would there be other types of events taking place In conjunction with your eve~'ZJ..e. Picnics, "
openlng/aw"d ",,"monles,e~. . Fi. ~-'" ~.!- . ::;:==-~
..~.
~~UL-11-07 10:30 AM FRAH~FRED.ADAMS
757 467 2775
P.02
.
~
S. What type of spec;iali~ed vehicles need direct access or parking at your events?
./ Medical and emergency Direct Access LoadjUnload and Park Nearby
~Equlpment delivery I tra'le~ Direct Access Load/Unload and Park Nearby
/ Food Service Direct Aa:e>s LOadNnload and Park Nearby
._Audio/Video/Broadcast Direct Aa:ess LoadNnload and Pari< Nearby
Other Direct Ac.cess loadlUnload and Park Nearby
6. Do you use any signage Or markers at your event for participant and spectator orlentatlon? Y I N
What type? OleCk all that apply
_ Banners on tents or structures fences _ Signs on vehlc;les
_Sandwich 50ards _._Other, specify . ~ "/:S:I''7 ht.- /
~ ~ 12-'- ~ I ,,_Jr"'- ~f- q. 1?'71 t;::J;.tl.~'it..S
How do you provide course Information to partldpants, such as start} finish, distance markers,
routing and decision points? _
'-or
7. What sort of support facilities are reQUired for the event? Please ranI< the relatl'/e importance of
each potential feature. 1= Most Important 2'" least Important
I..._PoWef SOurces
Lwater Sources
LRestrooms
_Showers I Lockers I Changing Areas
LPlcnlc Tables and GrlITS
L_open ~helters
_Areas for Tents
_Audio I Video I Broadcast EQuipment ( ,.....;'-..'/ LA' ~ ~ 'I::- J
_Internet ACcess
_Stage
e
Please spec::ify any other preferences or size requIrements for support fadlltles.
...---...---.-......,--------
Would you be w1111~ to sit on a p1annlng/revlew/fundraISing oom~e N
WID you be ..aiIolll7for M1I1er di$OJSsI@' N / /27 '/
7;""',-I4,.t;,. .('ct'..t" 7K'(~,./l \.c<.t"" ;~I"r r?c~, ~
Name OrganlZatlon/COmpany
Emall Phone No (---..J 'I' '7 1...J7 7~ -
_'-.. L~.aJ,.L.- '2....€,~. -xcL,-
JUL-l1-07 10:30 AM FRAN+FRED.ADAMS
757 467 2775
P.03
.
SK Outdoor F'ltness feasibility Study NOTE: Optional Services In Green
'-'" Concept Development - SUrvey Questionnaire
Potential Users
The Cltv of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor CYding and fitness fadllty at Princess Anne Commoos. The VCSion Is to develop
an oft"road tred< that can acmmmoclare large c::ompetjt/ve events and charity wallcs/rtlnS/r1des
naw routinely held throughout the dty as well as dally usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your t'eedback as we develop the preliminary plans for thIs new fadlJty. You'Ve
been contacted because you've been Identified as someone who may ultimately use the facility,
as an events planner or may have sane knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few
mlnutes to complete the following survey and return to XXXXXX by XXXX. We appreciate your
time l!lnd look forward to your response.
....
1. What would you typically use h fadllty for? (d1etk all that apply)
~ B1cydlng _ RunnIng ~Walklng _ Equestrian _ SMting _Therapy
As ~lndMdual or / GlOup Typical Duration (hours) Z-
SpecIfic days Frequency (I.e. dally) "3t......~..._k- Usuai l1me of day
_lengtIl(I...5l(): ~ _W1~12 f"'~
Arr{ other course design preferences? S (.; :s ~ .
,
Preferred surface for your use? (I.E!. mulch, Lt$phalt, etc.)
.... -/ ~
",;']
.
2. Are vou a member of a user/adYocacy/professiona
.~ .~
f$~IIrt!J) N
, does the Orgar'lll' reach Its mem ?
_ Newsletter _ Webslte or Weblog
_Other
Would you be willing tn post Infom\lltJon about thIs p/'lXeSS and faCIlity to your organl:tatlon's
newsletter/webslte/b1og@ N
Are there other people/organizations/businesses that we should oontact'? ec_.---;rc-~
..:5;k~ ~
rganlzauon that would be Interested In this
.. :J
r
_Ustser'ver I Emall
L
JUL-11-07 10:30 AM FRAN+FRED.ADAMS
7:;7 467 2775
P.04
.
"'-
3. Are there Similar fadlltles that you have seen or used? Y Of so, where?
yt other off road -trails or fitness fadlltles do you use In this area?
_ Boardwalk _Mt Trashmore /Rrst landing SP _ Great Neck Park
_City Vle.v Park _ Other
What do yOu like about them?
What do you dislike about them?
What can we do to make this fadlity unique?
Are there other 3CtIvltleslfadUtles at PrIncess Anne Commons that you or famllv members use
that should have a direct path connection to this fadlity? I.e. Amphitheatre, SportspIex, Schools,
Golf Course, etc.
Would you use this fadllty while other friends or family members portld~te In other activities
such as ath'e~ N
.
4. How would you travel to the facility? .;:
__Drive alone _._Drive with others _Bicycle _Run _Wall< _Skate
'-
_Trailer a horse __ RIde a horse _ Other
5, Would you be more lIkely to use the facility more often if any of the followIng features were
accessibl@ or close by?
Y N Power Sources
(!j) N Water Sources
6J N Restrooms
Y N Showers I Lockers / Changing Areas
(!? N Picnic Tables and Gnlls
GJ N Open Air Shelters
y N FItr1ess Stations
Would you be willing to sit on 8 p1annlrYJIrevtew/fundralslng oomml~ N
Will you be available fo~rther dlSCussloO I N
Name h. @.c../4>tG..e(lf SO~8nlzatjon/Company
Emall
Phone No L-J
e.
-
Golf Course, c._I feel this could be a good starting point to making this area a sports/fitness hub in the
city as well as a autiful and usable natural area. I think if this project is put together in the right way,
many sports based 'nesses could be interested in getting involved and utilize the natural amenities
offered by this project.
Would you use this facility w '\ other friends or family members participate in other activities
such as athletics? Y / N
4. How would you travel to the facili .
_X_Drive alone _X_Drive with others Bicycle _Run _Walk _Skate
~ Trailer a horse Ride a horse _ ther
5. Would you be more likely to use the facility m
accessible or close by?
Y N Power Sources
Y N Water Sources
Y N Restrooms
Y N Showers / Lockers / Changing Areas
Y N Picnic Tables and Grills
Y N Open Air Shelters
Y N Fitness Stations
Would you be willing to sit on a planning/review/fundraising committee? Y / N
Will you be available for further discussion? Y / N
e
5K Outdoor Fitness Feasibility Study NOTE: Optional Services in Green
Concept Development - Survey Questionnaire
Special Events
The City of Virginia Beach Department of Parks and Recreation is conducting a feasibility study
for an outdoor cycling and fitness facility at Princess Anne Commons. The vision is to develop
an off-road facility that can accommodate large competitive events and charity walks/runs/rides
now routinely held throughout the city as well as daily usage by a variety of users.
We'd like to get your feedback as we develop the preliminary plans for this new facility. You've
been contacted because you've been identified as someone who may ultimately use the facility,
as an events planner or may have some knowledge of similar courses. Please take a few
minutes to complete the following survey and return to XXXXXX by XXXX. We appreciate your
time and look forward to your response.
e
1. Is there a special event that you would use this facility for? Y / N
Name of event _SEE ABOVE
Avg. # of Participants Avg. # of spectators _ Avg. # of Support staff
Typical duration (hours) Specific dates if known (i.e. Holidays)
Event frequency (i.e. yearly)
2. What type of track or course is best for your activity or event?
Length (i.e. 5K): Width (i.e. 12 feet)
Starting Method (check one): _ Pack start _ Staggered start times
Do you need different length courses for different length activities or age groups? Y / N
Please explain
Any other course design or layout preferences?
What is the ideal path surface treatment for your event?
Do you require rest areas or other stopping points along the path? Y / N
How frequently?
3. What kind of viewing areas would be required for your event?
_ None _X_Open Lawn _X_Bleachers
4, Would there be other types of events taking place in conjunction with your event? i.e. Picnics,
~
.
.
e
opening/award ceremonies, entertainment etc, _All mentioned could occur if the facility had the proper
amenities.
5. What type of specialized vehicles need direct access or parking at your events?
_X_Medical and emergency Direct Access Load/Unload and Park Nearby
_X_Equipment delivery / trailers Direct Access Load/Unload and Park Nearby
_Food Service Direct Access Load/Unload and Park Nearby
_Audio/Video/Broadcast Direct Access Load/Unload and Park Nearby
_ Other Direct Access Load/Unload and Park Nearby
6. Do you use any signage or markers at your event for participant and spectator orientation? Y / N
What type? Check all that apply
X_ Banners on tents or structures _X_ Signs on trees and fences _ Signs on vehicles
_Sandwich Boards _other, specify
How do you provide course information to participants, such as start/ finish, distance markers,
routing and decision points?_Yes
7. What sort of support facilities are required for the event? Please rank the relative importance of
each potential feature. 1= Most Important 2= Least Important
_X_Power Sources
_X_Water Sources
_X_Restrooms
_Showers / Lockers I Changing Areas
_Picnic Tables and Grills
_Open Air Shelters
_X_Areas for Tents
_Audio I Video / Broadcast Equipment
_Internet Access
_X_Stage
Please specify any other preferences or size requirements for support facilities.
Would you be willing to sit on a planning/review/fundraising committee? Y / N
Will you be available for further discussion? Y / N
Name _Christopher Felton_ Organization/Company _BTAC/Bayside High School
Email_ChristopherJelton@vbschools.com_ Phone No L757 _L 499-0360