Loading...
NOVEMBER 15, 2011 MINUTESCITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH "COMMUNITY FOR A LIFETIME" CITY COUNCIL MAYOR WILLIAM D. SESSOMS, JR., At -Large VICE MAYOR LOUIS R. JONES, Bayside - District 4 GLENN R. DAVIS, Rose Hall - District 3 WILLIAM R. DeSTEPH, At -Large HARRY L. DIF.ZEL, Kempsville - District 2 ROBERTM. DYER, Centerville - District I BARBARA M. HENLEY, Princess Anne - District 7 JOHN D. MOSS, At -Large JOHN E. UHRIN, Beach - District 6 ROSEMARY WILSON, At -Large JAMES L. WOOD, Lynnhaven -District 5 CITY COUNCIL APPOINTEES Cl7T MANAGER -JAMES K. SPORE CITY A7TORNEY - MARK D. STILES CITY ASSESSOR - JERALD D. BANAGAN CITY AUDITOR - LYNDON S. REMIAS CITY CLh,'RK - RUTH HODGES FRASER, MMC CITY HALL BUILDING 2401 COURTHOUSE DRIVE VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA 23456-8005 PHONE: (757) 385-4303 FAX (75 7) 385-5669 E-MAIL: ctycncl@vbgov.com CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP AGENDA 15 NOVEMBER 2011 I. CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING - Building 19 - 3:00 PM A. FIVE YEAR FORECAST Catheryn Whitesell, Director — City Management Services Farrell E. Hanzaker, Schools Chief Financial Officer II. CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING - Conference Room - 4:00 PM A. VOLUNTEER RESOURCES ANNUAL REPORT Mary Russo, Director III. CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS A. OCEANFRONT FORM -BASED CODE Ashby Moss, Planner — Planning Department B. RESORT PARKING Barry Frankenfield, Manager — Strategic Growth Area Office C. PLANNING ITEMS PENDING Jack Whitney, Director — Planning MINUTES VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Virginia Beach, Virginia November 15, 2011 Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., called to order the CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT WORKSHOP re the FIVE YEAR FORECAST in the Conference Room of Building 19, Tuesday, November IS, 2011, at 3: 00 P.M. Council Members Present: Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, John D. Moss, Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Absent: None School Board Members Present: Vice Chairman William J. Brunke, IV, Emma L. "EM" Davis, Chairman Daniel D. Edwards, Dorothy M. Holtz, Brent N. McKenzie, Ashley K. McLeod, Sam Reid and Patrick S. Salyer School Board Members Absent: Todd C. Davidson and Carolyn D. Weems November 15, 2011 -2 - CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST The City Manager introduced Catheryn Whitesell, Director — City Management Services. Catheryn referenced the Agenda for the Five Year Forecast FY 2013-2017 (a Projection of City and School System Finances). There will be discussion re the economy and discussion concerning shared revenues. Catheryn introduced Farrell E. Hanzaker, Chief Financial Officer — Virginia Beach Schools, to discuss their Forecast and then Catheryn will return to the City portion of the Forecast. At the conclusion, there will be a combined Forecast. A Deficit is projected. There are four main drivers of the combined City/School deficit: Loss of Real Estate Tax Revenue, Increasing VRS Rates, Increasing Health Insurance Costs and then some increasing Disposal Costs the City will be experiencing in the out years. If we could control or mitigate these drivers of our deficit, the deficit would actually be significantly reduced and eliminated in 2015. Agenda • Forecast Presentation • Economy • Current Formula Revenue • School Forecast • City Forecast • Conclusion and Threats • Ways to Modify the Forecast • Voting Software The local economy hinges on three (3) key factors: Consumer Confidence, Virginia Beach Defense Spending (high military presence in the area) and Housing Real Estate Assessments. Consumer Price Index November 15, 2011 -3 - CITY COUNCIL/ SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST Relative the Consumer Price Index, which is referenced within the Graphic "All items " and "Core CPI" Energy and Food Items are included in All Items but not within the Core CPI. The difference between the "red bar" and "blue bar" illustrates volatility cost, really by energy and food prices. For purposes of the Forecast, inflation is assumed primarily related to energy costs to be approximately 3%. Consumer Confidence for the last several years has been included in the index to be tracked by the Conference Board. The "green " line indicates the location of a relatively strong economy and customers feel good about the economy. The "red" line indicates a struggling economy. Last Summer, for the first time in several months, the graph dipped below the 50% line for the first time in several months. Some of the theories are the discussions on the European Debt crises, our National Debt debate occurring at that time, the downgrade of National Debt by Standards and Poors, all participated in "shaking Consumer Confidence" and causing it to drop. Consumer Confidence Unemployment Rates remain high. Nationally the rate did drop to 90%; however, this does not include individuals "who have given up looking for jobs ". The Source of the information is Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Congressional Budget Office who anticipate an increase in unemployment within the next five (5) years. On average, the duration of someone being unemployed is now over 40 weeks. The projection of national unemployment by the Congressional Budget Office anticipates a decrease in unemployment over the next five years. As noted on the graph, Virginia Beach's unemployment rate is 6.4% well below the national rate and slightly below the region and the state. November 15, 2011 CITY COUNCILI SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST Unemployment Rates 12.0% 1---- -------- - _ _... _:._ __.. Virginia Beach Defense Spending In Virginia Beach, Defense Spending was just under $14 -Billion in 2010. If reductions in the Federal Budget cause just a 10% reduction in spending, there would be nearly a $2 -Billion reduction in the Virginia Beach economy. If that loss continues for three years, Virginia Beach could see defense spending in the City drop to $10 -Billion. There is a lot of uncertainty in the economy going forward. November 15, 2011 -5 - CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST Real Estate would be the third major driver of our local economy. Real Estate .Assessments 25.0% Six straight years of declining real estate 20.0% _ _ . values, a d,_,roR of 23.6%from 2010 to 2015 15.0% — _....... _ — 10.0% " 5.0% — 0.0% -5.0% Economic Summary • Unemployment remains high • High business profits, but not hiring • Inflation is rising Consumer confidence is unpredictable Stock market volatile Housing still declining Borrowing is tight November 15, 2011 -6 - CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST �7awta& Rew,..� These revenues are currently shared 51.3 to School System and 48.7% to the City The next series of slides reflects the revenues shared by the City and School Systems under the current Revenue Sharing Formula Farrell E. Hanzaker, Schools Chief Financial Officer, detailed the projection of the School System's Five Year Forecast: Real Estate Revenue $550.0 ..r ...................... _...._......._ _:............_......._.._......_.........._...._111..1.. ----._..------ $500.0 .°._.. _ _....................................... ....... _............................ ...... ....... .. ..... .................. Projected $450.0 -- O $400.0 $350.0 _:__ __ _: __:._. _$300A �. nnna 7nnn 4nin >nvt onio im i OMA on4r oniA 7n47 November 15, 2011 -7 - CITY COUNCILI SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST Personal Property Business License Tax 0.- In ._ In total, this revenue is projected to increase by 2.6% in 2013 generating an additional $1.1 -Million in revenue. New Business exemptions approved by City Council with the last budget, will start taking affect this January. For FY 2012, we assumed a loss of $500, 000 in revenue and in 2013 we are assuming that that will double to $1 -Million. Until we get actual data from the Commissioner of Revenue's office, this is the best estimate we have. November 15, 2011 CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST 3 $44.0 Utility Taxes (includes VA Telecommunications but not Egli) $40.0 _...... _. _....._ _ ... - - _:._ _._..-- ..._.:...---- - $35.0 I Total Utility Taxes are projected to decline over the next five years, driven by revenue losses in Virginia telecommunications. The Virginia telecommunications portion is expected to lose `half a Million between FY 2012 and 13. This is partially offset by the other Utility Taxes on Electric, Gas and Water which will see a small gain in revenue ($200, 000). While the State promised revenue neutrality, localities have seen steady erosion in the telecommunications portion of this revenue, in part due to the economy, but also due to administrative issues at the State which have resulted in significant repayments by the State after audits. For FY 2013, this revenue is projected to decline 3.3%. November 15, 2011 -9 - CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST Cable Franchise Tax Cable Franchise Tax revenue is on an upward trend and has actually improved through the Recession. It appears that cable TV is no longer a luxury, but has become a staple of the American life style. Prices, not subscribers, explain the growth in this revenue. The ever -enhancing offerings for digital service and specialty packages increase costs, and therefore, taxes. SCHOOL FORECAST Local Support Current Formula November 15, 2011 -10 - CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST Revenue November 15, 2011 -11 - CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST Fees and Charges $40.0 • • • • �• • •.f • •.• • •.0 1 •. November 15, 2011 -12 - CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST School Salaries $550.0 $530.0 November 15, 2011 -13 - CITY COUNCIL/ SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST Health Insurance Costs and Percentage of Full -Time Salaries School Operating Expenditures November 15, 2011 -14 - CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST School Debt Service November 15, 2011 -15 - CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST School Forecast November 15, 2011 -16 - CITY CO UNCILI SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST CITY FORECAST Formula Revenues City Portion $460.0 Denotes the $9.2 million in RSF $410.0 retained b y and replaced with School fund balance. This graph represents the City's portion of the current School Formula revenue. The increase in FY 2012 is due to the decision to switch $9.2 -Million from the School's allocation of these revenues to the City's and to replace the funding for Schools with $9.2 -Million in School Fund balances. Beginning in 2013, the forecast assumes a continuation of the City retaining only 48.7% of these seven revenues. November 15, 2011 -17 - CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST Cigarette Tax $18:0. _. - _. .. $14.0 __.. $12.0 $10.0 ......... •�..._�. «�_� N C $6.0 $4.0"' $2.0 -_ . _......__ _ . ..:.:.:..... ._ w. $0.0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013. 2014 2015 2016 2017 Cigarette Tax revenue continues to decline. Factors, such as cigarette tax increases, restaurant smoking bans and increased awareness of smoking, health risks have fewer people smoking. Cigarette Tax revenue is anticipated to decrease by 8.1% in FY 2012-13 and decrease by an additional 3% the remaining years of the Forecast. This is a $700, 000 loss of revenue in FY 2013. November 15, 2011 -18 - CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST Hotel Tax revenue declined slightly during the Recession, but we are expecting it to rebound due to the strong performance of Tourism over the Summer. Hotel Tax remains relatively flat into FY 2013 and begins to increase in the out years of the Forecast by an average of 2% per year. Restaurant Meals Tax Restaurant tax revenue has remained steady throughout the entire recession. This could be that with the need for both parents to work, cooking at home is less of an option. It also could be a reflection of families choosing to continue to eat out, but at less expensive restaurants. November 15, 2011 -19 - CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST VA Telecommunications — Egli $8.0- -.�,. ...... ............. __r 0 •••. 000 0 • • •♦ November 15, 2011 -20 - CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST Fees and Charges $300.0 - $250.0 $200.0 �._..._. H U) C O _$150.0 $100.0 - - Projected Revenues in this category are program specific, such as water and sewer rates, the Solid Waste fee, Recreation Center fees, Library cards, Building Permits. They are showing increases as program use is increasing and as we have responded to the Blue Ribbon Committee's recommendation to increase these revenues as service delivery costs increase. The growth from FY2012 to FY2013 is $13.4 -Million driven predominately by the annualized Solid Waste fee and approved increases in water and storm water rates. Federal revenue (gold bar) to the City programs is predominately in Housing and in Human Services. FY 2013 represents a slight increase over FY 2012, however this is all subject to the ultimate outcome of the federal budget. November 15, 2011 -21 - CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST City Salaries Switching over to the expenditure side of the Forecast: The Forecast does not project any salary adjustments over the next five years; however this is subject to the annual budget decision by City Council. City VRS Rates Includes both Retirement and Life Insurance rates For the City, VRS rates are expected to increase by 3.65% in FY 2013. Then, every other year we would expect to see a 2% increase. November 15, 2011 -22 - CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST Health Insurance Costs and Percentage of Full -Time Salaries This represents the employer contribution towards Health Insurance. The last time this was increased was January of 2008 from $5,225 per full time employee to the current $5,400. Both the City and School system have used the fund balance of the Health Care Fund to offset the rising cost of Health Insurance for both the employer and employees. In addition, we have been taking the GASB -45 payment out of this balance as well. Risk Management $25.00 November 15, 2011 -23 - CITY 23 - CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST SPSA Cost $25.0 --- $20,0 I Estimated Solid Waste Tipping Fee - $125.00 �t•••� • • • •vim•• Estimated Solid Waste Tipping Fee - $65.35 The City of Virginia Beach currently receives the benefit of a reduced Waste Disposal fee through a contract with SPSA; however, in FY 2015-16 this contract will expire. Based on current Waste Disposal demands and the cost per ton Disposal fee, the future SPSA cost is anticipated to increase by $11 -Million beginning in year four of the Forecast. Debt Service All City debt excluding Schools Projected $120.0..._..___._-----__.___ t $100.0 __ $80.0 - — — �' IIlllillllll November 15, 2011 -24 - CITY COUNCILI SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST City Pay -go f5 2016 2017 The Pay -As -You -Go amount displayed in the graph represents all City and Enterprise fund Pay -As -You - Go net of Schools. City Pay -As -You -Go increases $8.4 -Million in year one and $8.8 -Million in year two before leveling off and decreasing in the out years of the Forecast based on the current CIP. Total City Expenditures November 15, 2011 -25 - CITY 25 - CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST Conclusion and Threats Combined Forecast •.P • $-98.1 m �••• November 15, 2011 -26 - CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST City and Schools Staff prepared Forecast Questions to Ascertain Preferences related to future Five years. November 15, 2011 -27 - CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST Health Care Fund $250 -- - __.---- _ $200 contribution in 5 years $150 ................ ._........ ......... _....._ t $100 $50 - - 2008 2009 2010 2011 '2012 013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Calendar Years Combined VRS Rate Increases w Schools - ® City November 15, 2011 -28 - CITY COUNCILI SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST Options to Address the Deficits • Real Estate Revenue — Increase the rate to maintain current tax bills — Reduce services to the community — Process Improvement Steering Committee • Health Care — Increase incentives to encourage healthy behavior thereby reducing costs — Cost shift to employees (coinsurance, copays, and premiums) 7Make substantial changes to the plan design {reduce Options to Address the Deficits • Retirement — Seek General Assembly options • Defined contribution • Current employees to pay 5% — Require all new employees to pay 5% November 15, 2011 -29 - CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD JOINT MEETING FIVE YEAR FORECAST Threats to the Forecast • Federal Budget "Super Committee's" decisions (or lack there of) could significantly impact both the City and Schools • Cuts to Defense Spending • Cuts to Medicaid and Medicare Ways to Modify the Forecast Voting Softwear November 15, 2011 11/15/2011 Instant Voting • This voting system is anonymous . • Wait until I say voting is open. • Press the number on your keypad that corresponds to your answer (the keypad will turn on when you push the button). • You can only select one answer. •"We will let you know when voting is closed. The results will display up here on the screen. • \A/a Uri II i Ica thin raci dtc'frnm thin wntina tn'modiN the. V, Revenue Question: 25% of all our revenue comes from the State. Do you think that over the forecast period the State will: 1. Increase its financial commitment to Schools and the City 2. Same commitment to Schools and the City as shown in forecast 3. Reduce its financial commitment to Schools and the City of 0% of Revenue Question: 9% of all our revenue is Federal. Do you think that over the forecast period the Federal government will: 11/15/2011 11111111111111EA Expenditure Question: City and Schools continuously improve efficiency. Do you believe that they can continue to do so? 1. Easily, both can save an additional 1% 2. We should set a goal of reducing costs by 2% 3. No, while both should strive to remain efficient both have reached a point where choices among services would have to be made to reduce the budeet not AV no/- Expenditure Question: Should the City and School system set aside funding to ensure compensation remains competitive? 1. No additional funding should be provided until the economy improves 2. Set aside 1% of total payroll each year of the forecast 3. Decrease funding for total compensation by 1% each year 4. Need to wait to see what service reductions may need to be made with the Budget 0 of 4 11/15/2011 r Expenditure Question: Over the forecast period, VRS rates are anticipated to increase. Year 1 is somewhat set based on rates from VRS, but do you believe the growth in the out years is too ... 1. Aggressive, VRS investments should help mitigate the increases. 2f Low given the unfunded status of pension liabilities. 3. Just about right. Expenditure Question: Maintaining the current 80% employer contribution to health care will require a 30% increase assuming the cost of health care increases by the projected 9%. Do you believe we should ... 11/15/2011 Expenditure Question: What single service is likely to experience the most increase in demand over the next 5 years and should be considered for increased funding? Expenditure Question: Overall, expenditures in the forecast are: 1. Too conservative to maintain quality of life and address critical issues. Expenditures need to increase more. 2. Just about right given where the economy is likely to be. 3. Too optimistic, we should be able to reduce expenditures by focusing on core services. 4. Unsure =o o/ ,. % % 11/15/2011 11/15/2011 Discussion Question: The most significant threat to the financial position of the City and Schools in the next 18 months is: 1. State budget reductions due to the slow economy and the loss of the stimulus funds 2. Reductions in Federal defense spending 3. State elimination of local funding streams (Business License(BPOL) 4. Health care costs 0 Conclusion • The economy is improving although very slowly. • Federal and State budget reductions will affect programs and revenues, they are beyond our control.__ -30 - MINUTES VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Virginia Beach, Virginia VOLUNTEER RESOURCES ANNUAL REPORT 4:30 P.M. Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., called to order the CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING re VOLUNTEER RESOURCES ANNUAL REPORT in the City Council Conference Room of the City Hall Building, Tuesday, November IS, 2011, at 4:30 P.M. Council Members Present: Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill " DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, John D. Moss, Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Absent. None November 15, 2011 -31 - CITY COUNCIL `S BRIEFING VOLUNTEER RESOURCES 4:30 P.M. Mary Russo, Director — Office of Volunteer Resources, presented the Annual Report: November 15, 2011 -32 - CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFING VOLUNTEER RESOURCES November 15, 2011 -33 - CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFING VOLUNTEER RESOURCES Lltu V 11611L1cL-LvJLul:L"LJLFdl i -.V- olunteer programs • y. -- 1. . M0; crlk hnrc Mary Russo distributed the Annual Statistics and Achievements of the Volunteer Resources, which is hereby made a part of the record. Mrs. Russo presented a symbolic check to the Mayor equating to the value of Volunteer Resources services in the amount of $19,162,199. November 15, 2011 -34 - CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING OCEANFRONT FORM BASED CODE 4:48 P.M. Jack Whitney, Director — Planning and Ashby Moss — Planner, presented the Oceanfront Form Based Code, as was presented to the Planning Commission last evening. This is a companion document to assist with information in the implementation of Strategic Growth Plans for the Oceanfront. Said information is hereby made apart of the record. This item will first go to the Planning Commission for their formal consideration next month and hopefully, in January, to the City Council for consideration. Ashby Moss - Planner will detail the main portion of the Briefing, with Barry Frankenfield, Manager — Strategic Growth Area office, discussing Resort Parking. Ashby Moss advised the background which began with the RASAP (Resort Area Strategic Action Plan), was approved in 2008. One of the recommendations was to develop a Form -Based Code for the Oceanfront Resort District. Work on the Form -Based Code began in 2009, with the draft Code introduced March 2011. Many comments were received from both Stakeholders and the Public. As this is a Code, the regulations do apply to the legal rights of the property. The Revised Form -Based Code was released this past October along with a Resort Parking Strategy developed by the Strategic Growth Area Office. November 15, 2011 -35 - CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING RESORT PARKING STRATEGY 5:10 P.M. Barry Frankenfield, Manager — Strategic Growth Area Office, detailed the Resort Parking Strategy, which is hereby made a part of the record. Everyone concurred a Resort Parking Strategy was necessary to go "hand-in-hand "with the Form -Based Code. November 15, 2011 8/16/2011 f_ �i No one owns parking; there are , limited spaces; and everyone ` �¢r wants to use them;" moreover users perceive parking as a free public good. "No great city is known for its abundant parking supply; yet, it is necessary, because having an r optimal parking supply is an integral part of a great city." r r UCLA's parking economist Donald Shoup, PhD. 31/15/2011 1 {N:i III �� MIr r�{ M I tie>r_ . J." 8/16/2011 8/16/2011 FJW Staff working with RAC, Visii Association, Citizen Groups 1. Analysis of Existing Party No new public parking Replace existing public development opportui 2. Project Future Parking t M +/-.1.2,00.0 spaces beet 8/16/2011 11/15/2011 9 va,'taate needs by sub -districts based on Fk developmen t BLOCKMAX BLCI�OESCRIPTION MAXFLOOR ,r TYPE UNITS AREA A Common hotel block east of Atlantic 233 50,000 Al2 Similarform to'A' buthaKthe size 116 25,000 B+ Common block between Atlantic and Pacific 122 18,900 B Similar to'B+'but height limited to 75' 104 22,960 r 812 Similar form to'B'buthalfthesize 52 11,480 - W Similar form to'B'but twice thesize 208 45,920 Y \� C Common block west of Pacific along 19"' 185 42,212 C/2 Similar form to'C'buthalfthe size 93 21,106 W Similar form to'C' but twice this size 370 84,424 Note: Future Parking Need D Similar form to'C'butheight limited to45' 102 42212 estimated based on reduced D/2 Similar form to'D'buthalfthesize 22 21,106 parking space requirements: E Similar form to'C'butheight increased to110' 240 89,000 E/2 Similar form to'E'bulhalf the size 120 44,500 • 2 — Duplex Lot F Similar form to'C' but height limited to 35' 160 42212 • 1 - Lodging or Residential F/2 Similarform to'F'but halfthe size 80 21,106 Unit • 1/300 sf all other approved I�/1`�Zm1 uses.._..: .o 8/16/2011 8/16/2011 Excluding employee parking in RPP areas would have a negative impact on many businesses; moreover employees need to have reasonable parking access: Alternatives discussed include: • Reduced Employee Rates for City Facilities: This alternative would provide a reduced City parking facility rate. Businesses have expressed concern about rates and space availability. • Reduced Rate HRT Transit Passes: Supplementary to other alternatives, reduced public transit employee rates could be considered. • Satellite Parking Facilities: With the exception of peak demand requirement periods, the analysis indicates ample employee parking supply. To meet the demand for the estimated 1,500 person workforce, satellite facility locations could be considered and identified. 11/15/2011 - 13 w a • Guidelines and Alternatives: RAC TPPC Meeting November 17, 2011 • Public Meeting Comments November 17, 2011. • Stakeholder Involvement/Resort Management Office: December 2011. • Recommendations RAC TPPC January 2012. 8/16/2011 8/16/2011 immediate Staff Actions • Establish a Parking Facility Annual Lease Program: Immediately develop a policyand gain authorization allowing 1-5 year City and/or private facility parking leases which meet land use/zoning requirements for use or . a. development. Collaboration and coordination will occur with the City Attorney's Office, Planning Department, Police, City Manager and City. Council. • Create Public Parking Bicycle Program: Develop recommendations for bicycle parking in city parking lots, facilities and on streets. • Research Parking Technological Management Programs: Research ingress/egress counting, wayfinding, metering, and occupation sensoring technologies for creating efficient performance parking opportunities. • Initiate Consultant Services: Source a parking consultant's services to specificallyaddress` parking phases; rate structures; financing and costs; forecasted demand; and fiscal impact. 11/15/2011 -17 *,Re 'dentia) Permit Parkin g' Program an k E. ployee Parking — complete by the endXofi- this -year. • Parking Management Plan including Parking Authority or other Management Structure Recommendation and Fiscal Impact Analysis - complete early 2012 1117`/'077. ]£ 8/16/2011 f(r Background TOP 8 PRIORITIES Develop Luning r<. i.. ns fol Rcso2 Area -RT De:61oo ti-, teased coke (Laskin. cemral ee-b_ Menna drielst - Rnrsc a=lonable u5^s - Consis�cnl scl backs - Aclu=t Fatkinq requi!tn�enL - [rforcc tlesign q vdci. - 7_oring bonuses in target lncalions for n.eeb ng coi "'nil, goals Isuch as view cunidoI mcent�res along Oeeanlionll Derclopefs roundtable on Zoning changes Ceo�d nal.on Hnh Nav, nn AICtJ/ related pnllcy •4£. 21 sfi &'22nd St - Changed Frontage`to allow for all building types (Gateway 3) • Consolidated frontage types with same rules (Shopping 3 now Gateway 1) } 4 !� Revisions October . • " • Changes to Regulating Plans � Hei "fit, Setback, Frontage) • 'Heights matched better with tits" current zoning limitations a� " • More equitable setbacks • More flexibility in tower design,„ parking setbacks • more protections for adjacent neighborhoods • Simplified parking requirements` OCEANFRONT RESORT DIST R 1 C T 11/75/2011 •4£. 21 sfi &'22nd St - Changed Frontage`to allow for all building types (Gateway 3) • Consolidated frontage types with same rules (Shopping 3 now Gateway 1) } 0' Setback along all °RAS of Atlantic Ave • Treat all parts of • Atlantic Ave equally • 2151 & 22nd reduced from 10' to 5' B1Qck b/w Atlantic t, �. o� ,r , & Pacific now 110' �i DRAFT (towers) • 21 It & 22nd Streets -�� Increased height from 35' to 75' «i+, • Areas abutting residential - = reduced to 35'-: 0' Setback along all °RAS of Atlantic Ave • Treat all parts of • Atlantic Ave equally • 2151 & 22nd reduced from 10' to 5' Stepbacks are now Setbacks above•• • "Stepback" requirement reduced from ten to five feet • Option to setback from ground up or stepback above five stories • This is in addition to setbacks designated on setback map 00 yam. f • 1 St fldbr min. height for mixed use buildings reduced from 16' to 14' • Building height minimum reduced from 35' to 25' ` 11 r=nain object of the ORD sign �,'regul�tions is to encourage creativity and good design and to recognize that the ORD will be an urban, pedestrian -oriented district. • More urban -type signs are allowed j including A -frame, banner, hanging and marquees. • Except on the Boardwalk, certain types of signs can project over public sidewalks if they meet Sign Design Guidelines. • `More protection/compatibility for residential neighborhoods adjacent to the Resort Oceanfront Lower building heights adjacent toteµ protected districts • Restrictions on bars/nightclubs, commercial parking lots (surface), and drive-thru's adjacent to protected districts '�-•� • Landscaping/buffering requirement�''�" (Cat. IV) between parking lots and protected districts ` 11 r=nain object of the ORD sign �,'regul�tions is to encourage creativity and good design and to recognize that the ORD will be an urban, pedestrian -oriented district. • More urban -type signs are allowed j including A -frame, banner, hanging and marquees. • Except on the Boardwalk, certain types of signs can project over public sidewalks if they meet Sign Design Guidelines. Sign Design Guidelines Design Guidelines are voluntary (except for encroaching signs and banners) • Bonus sign provisions: _ -If all signage meets Design Guidelines, then extra signage is allowed 25% greater total sign allowance IN -one extra sign for establishments otherwise allowed 3 or more signs • P ing setback reduced from • 'Somencroachment permitte setback for structured parking • Design and screening rules added per guidelines in Comprehensive Plan 30' to 20' d` in the parking ,` W • Vehicular access handled case' by case and determined by Public Works • Alley access encouraged where it works - Vehicular access to Shopping Streets discouraged (Atlantic, = Laskin, 17'") • Corner lots on Atlantic Ave. encouraged to access from Beach Street if currently accessible by vehicles Revisions in October Draft Simplified Parking Requirements rj -36 - PLANNING ITEMS PENDING 5:40 P.M. Jack Whitney, Director — Planning, detailed the Planning items to be heard by City Council on December 6, and December 13, 2012. Detailed items are hereby made a part of these proceedings: December 6, 2011 Village Church Randy Tillman CVB -Amend Section 201 CVB -Amend Section 501 CVB -Amend Section 503 CVB — Virginia Aquarium and Owls Creek Master Plan December 13, 2011 Ashville Park, LLC New Today Bus, Inc. Sentara Village — Virginia Beach Keith and Cheri Carl Atlantic Development November 15, 2011 C ' C C C C w 00 03 co CL v .N► (DD p<>>> = 0 G ai 3 B 3 s �n ^L^ C C z N TO a' lND tcnD o o o P a 0 LnAN W Cl O O PIL N � N 3 _ T O, CL 3 3 .l cn 0D���o�os O -0 fD ? <D CD < °o -a Z fD �M fD fD lD CD a O a a a ""Zn (D N OO a .� O C 3 CD "I - CD 'a ^ 0 `, N n N N a O in 0 .i*, O cD lD �a (D r'0 3 Q. a 0 CCD n to r► Qm N. O O a CD 0� .+ O O O 3 _ T O, CL 3 3 .l t I cn 0D���o�os O -0 fD ? <D CD < °o ,�� CD Z fD �M � 0,Qo m a-0 0to 0 � 0 0 o v0 C v—v c� v �- N' vim' fD `< CD l<r. �'= -. N CD (D ogPIL r. 0 N Q o N �� lD N CCD n r► — N. O O O .+ O O O t�/r to O w 0 CQ 3 N 0 : SD -� CD m 0 = O ops N O lD N t I �,, Ti i7TO 11 gjj � �� i•-�j2jl a . . . . N a -I --I --i 2) "Q pK CD i17 (D 0 3 N fl3 f�DSu CQ L4 o s Q. � o O cND -^ o ,� v 3 cr < =0 0 6 rt o r. '"' cD 3 5 n S fli = fD o -0 �. 1 — CD S?. f�'D l<D Uf = CD N Q N Q O CD 3 Q _ N v � 3 =sem 2) -a o � lD 0N' 3 3 'a '+ SZ v v r* n O n CCD D tQ cD CL S 0 ='•► N N (D ID 3 L 3 = fD N = Q. (D cD �(� �' Su 0�a0 S m c� rr 3 0 Mi _� 0� 3 M 0 < 0 2) to 0 MR,MEMI _ 0 OR 3 3 n n '0 tD s CD tD CD Cn Q CD N .y, O cD O CL W O N B. O cD O N o W N 0 Q Cn O ,.r o CD CD o= c np CD n ca o 0 a 0 �_ 3 v; 0 n O cn N O CL O CD O -S (D3. cQ cD O r. O N n N N= � Q N -n C ' CDO CDO Q N o t�� CD a� cD M O Q. (1) n < (D 0 < CD m N cD IDCD < CD CD CD CCD n Z) Q Q N m c� rr 3 0 Mi _� 0� 3 M 0 < 0 2) to 0 MR,MEMI _ 0 OR 3 '0 CD CD Cy v CD CD O :3 :3 cD z cQ CQ (D Osu Cn O = o ip 'a ... _. CCD CD O N 0. n O cn N O 0, O -, O 'a 0 O � Q o CD CD s CDO Q N 3 a� cD M O cD < CL < m c� rr 3 0 Mi _� 0� 3 M 0 < 0 2) to 0 MR,MEMI _ 0 OR 3 mm 00 '0 CD =r CD "0'D cD CD O a< i 5 Q 3 co (D n Cn 0 0 O 63 (D '0 — cD 'a O N n O = O a 'a n O Q o `D ND 3(D N 3 a� O Q CQ � O CL < mm 00 Qv -I N CL N n m -i O�- S w 33S� 0 0= 0 ay _S NXN' CD (D 'a a a O 0 M CL O 3 (D 2) < 3 2) NCD (D U' �n N tD 0 _ O 03 �; nr 0 (D 0 "DV — (D p rt (D -0 O (A N 0 O to LO N O 3 �, O a a n Q. O -a O a O 0 3 -*� Q oc3 ME o_m N - O=r Q 0' C 3 '3 n O � � N to � Q � � a O a 3 R. tD S ch Q, < s3 O Qv -I N CL N n m -i O�- S w 33S� 0 0= 0 ay _S NXN' fD cD O 0 M CL O 3 vi s= = c O I� NCD (D O �` 0 0 _ CL -' C N p 0 �� C to CD w N S c0 O a o -*� Q oc3 �. o_m N - O=r Q 0' C 3 '3 n � � N to w �. N O O O a 3 R. tD S ch s3 O (D n N CD '-► O N O fD (D n �' S N O N S O O F N Q S O N �+ O (D 9 m . . . . . D x c z N n 9 o v0<2) -D CD = = %< v CD `:2. cU w n fD N r 'D 2) Ir CD < C? 1� CD 3 m n m o� 3_ 3 o G� �'o v 0O s v cD ��r cD om CD N m n CD Q N o N, j� N o D �< a) 3 a = (D CD (D as �D = co = oN � �, ce CD CD (= , (:=3l<c3D � cD 3 in N O N < trtD Q CD < , (D 2) to N Q. (n0=7y Q O '• p er ::� CD r- x O O 0 m N Q tD OET .�. N CD O ? 0 N m � CD CD =� PF 30 7--s `G o � =r > 3 . `gym U) su o K < 3 o CD N N w 0 Q N Q m n m o� 3_ n1 CD CD O CD W (Q (Q CD n N 003 = " O CD —0 � cD � O N O N N o 3 O n O O- O 0 3 Q. N O ? Q � O �D Q, < m n m o� 3_ C. O< (D 3 CD cD r§R`� r- -0 ID '0a Q e► Q 3 p 03 0 � fY Ow ID ffi 3CD N 0) Q. \ C. cc _S lD N. M (D C) CCD N Q a �. <� .Q;:. @ C- Y ?� CX N ID Q N N IrIL �` a^ N n' r N C (Q fD .► air. UIw O N y c i= A s ,y a N ci Q-:3 O -fi A �. m 3 �/ rt < C N Vi O O =_ a N rt ZT O cD 0 _► al < E 'm CL C < (Q N IDCD n � ID 0 ID CD, rt CO. CSD- -n ID CD �, o ID �. \\ 0k�f?�f/ƒ� =Q ° cCA C °° CD M \§ CD M ƒa) Ul-0 D \/ CD ID ƒ§ ° ƒ g C c :3 cr = ° - 2) °��=CD ,0-- \E ° mCL07=\2) $0 (//3\2$qo Dw 30`?�$ƒ/ \n m� »m=_o o .0 -0 = o o - 5 r� k§°° Q� Q a w 2\ q J e k� ;�\3 _� �2E7 2)- _ � E:3 CD _ _ c � U 2© ¢a) o$ O 2) U) o -0,m 3 0 (D 7 � } } 2 2 2 . g < - Q �. � ■ @ 0 @ M CD\ O m @ . @ . _ 0 2 2 0 p § AUJIL _ J m= 2 C 3 $ z q § � a 3 \ ` 7 2 M � 2 CL/ t �u 1p =r CD =r CD f 3 CD CD O 5 CD � f ' N,��c�m l I t =r CD =r CD CD CD O CD � � N,��c�m -& O rt ci C OO -0 C .; Q CD N. CD '� C CD 0 OU) N NN = O O 0 0 (DDS 3 O :3 = O o = ai ON D to 3 (DD C O ;* CD C O t OC CD 0'p NAl--5-i s'pD -DQM°maD--'=- (D) X = < c cD 36 D)� M m n v m ( rCL fNO W = O =" N = S = O N < __ ❑ N. O a- _ O � mN fl1 7 N M -4•n -� =� <D a O 3 0-p C- O Q. : m p O Q 7 �n -�,0 N a O C o"� (DD O O 2) QO _.tU N N N•a O .0 .0. 7 C n) a� = 7 C rt ma N CA C N MN CD S 0 N a S O �0--i Q-4 @ O CD CD 0 X CC S �' S X19 O D < to O M (OO QO K aCD ID -0 = * m O � O,0 --a CD 0 C w— C = S A► .�•a• S CD 91 Ch S N K 3 �} cD CD C O �. N fD CD� N (D yr �2 O f4Q v n CD —:3 X 3 C1 y O Q -O — co w (n N iY . Z)O l a �, c Q O '^ S.y. Q.+o CD QSCn !� NCD Q Q O O CD O U) O CD N S N CD C 3 C')q .N► fD Q .Oi S O S C Ort y 3 a1 O Q O CD C O 'DQ C < 7 � CO .�' 3 S =ra-. � O N -moi p O O C a: n 3 v O ^* = O N 2)O 4' (Q C CD Q Q O S S� 3 CSD =r CD C O ("D 0� N fli 0 3 S N N "t± .•r. 3 to y 7 '. O O O w CD 0 3 3 O NCD (DD O � 0<, (a La N -10 N m 2) O O (� < �CD.0 03 p �o OIL O 3 p _ O O 3 = p CD -a CD 0-0 = C _ cn� o 0 p 3 r*: O Q.SEEN 0 '" N 3 p p. CD o �- CL < 0 -37 - ADJOURNMENT Mayor Sessoms DECLARED the City Council Workshop ADJOURNED at 5:57 P.M. 6an-4 4�', yVo'l� Beverly O. Hooks, CMC Chief Deputy City Clerk uth Hodges Fraser, MMC City Clerk November 15, 2011