APRIL 19, 2011 MINUTESCITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
"COMMUNITY FOR A LIFETIME"
CITY COUNCIL
MAYOR WILLIAM D. SESSOMS, JR., At-Large
VlC'E MAYOR LOUIS R. JONES, Baystde -District 4
!UlA SWEET 86'LL7770, At-Large
GL6'NN R. DAV/S, Rose Hall -District 3
WILL/AM R. DeST EPH, At-Large
HARRY E. DIEZEL, Kempsville -District 2
ROBERT M. DYER„ Centerville -District I
BARBARA M Hh.'NL EY, Princess Anne -District 7
JOHN E. UHRIN, Beach -District 6
ROSEMARY WILSON, At-Large
JA:tiIES L. WOOD, I.ynnhaven -District S
CITY COUNCIL APPOINTEES
CITY MANAGER - .LAMES K. SPORE
CITY ATTORNEY - MARK D. STILES
CITY ASSESSOR - .IERALD D. BANAGAN
CITY AUDITOR - LYNDON S. REMIAS
CITY CLERK - RUTH HODGF,S FRASER, MMC
I.
II.
III
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP AGENDA
19 APRIL 2011
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING -Conference Room -
A. 2011 REDISTRICTING OF CITY COUNCIL RESIDENCE DISTRICTS
Kimball Brace, President -Election Data Services, Inc.
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
A. PLANNING ITEMS PENDING
Jack Whitney, Director -Planning
FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN
3:30 PM
- Conference Room - 4:30 PM
A. FAMILY and YOUTH OPPORTUNITIES
1. Overview
2. Health
Dr. VenitaNetyby-Owens, Director
3. Human Services
Robert R. Morin, Jr., Director
CITYHALL BUILDING
2401 COURTHOUSE DRIVE
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRG/NIA 23456-8005
PHONE: (757) 385-4303
FAX (757J 385-5669
E- MAIL: ctycncl@vbgov. com
B. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP)
1. Overview
a. Buildings
b. Communications and Information Technology
c. Economic and Tourism/Strategic Growth Areas
d. Parks and Recreation
e. Coastal
£ Storm Water
g. Roadways
h. Water and Sewer
-1-
MINUTES
VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Virginia Beach, Virginia
April 19, 2011
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., called to order the CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP BRIEFING re the
2011 REDISTRICTING in the City Council Conference Room, Tuesday, April 19, 2011, at 3:30 P.M.
Council Members Present:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill " DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert
M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor
William D. Sessoms, Jr., Rosemary Wilson, and James L. Wood
Council Members Absent.•
Rita Sweet Bellitto [Family Vacation)
John E. Uhrin [Entered.• 3:58 P.M.J
April 19, 2011
-2-
CITY COUNCILBRIEFING
2011 REDISTRICTING OF CITY COUNCIL RESIDENCE DISTRICTS
3:30 P.M.
Mayor Sessoms recognized City Attorney Mark Stiles to introduce Kimball Brace, President -Election
Data Services, Inc. In the past, Mr. Brace has assisted City Council and the City Attorney's Office re
Redistricting issues. Election Data Services also "keeps track" of the type of voting equipment utilized in
every single County in the United States and has since 1980. Election Data Services is also involved with
Election Administration issues. Election Data Services, Inc. is located out of Washington, D. C.
irginia Beach,
~~~ Redistrictinag:
Nuts Oc B o~'1 ~' By Kimbal(Brace
Election Data Services, Inc.
Since 1986, we've been on your wall. ~'`5:"="",,W -~°"'-
~'' ' ~ _-~
~~-S'
- ~ ~ ~i ~-
y~ '~, ~.-
i t .;~ ~,~ t ib.,,
s hips ~ ~ ~ * ~ + .
Nov. NtF, l~ .A~. ~ti ~ Y~ ~ i
- - ~ L^ ~ A ? T: 4
~ ~t ivf,~` i $
*~ ~ ~
In 2010/11 yo'lL.rte~ed arger.,wall ~~:
t_ ~
April 19, 2011
~a
.~
Who is Election Data Services,
-3-
CITY COUNCILBRIEFING
2011 REDISTRICTING OF CITY COUNCIL RESIDENCE DISTRICTS
(Continued)
Since 1979, more than `half the Nation has been helped by Election Data Services in Redistricting.
Reapportionment and Redistricting are two (2) different terms. Reapportionment is the first and takes
place for the allocation of Districts to an area. This is, in many instances, similar to Congressional
Districts going to States. This process took place by December Thirty-first. In some states, the process of
Reapportionment is used to allocate local Districts to areas or Legislative Districts to Counties and the
Cities. Therefore, some states still call their Redistricting process, Reapportionment. Redistricting is
the determination: the crafting of those District configurations in that particular area (involves anything
from Congressional, State Legislative down to local Districts, similar to Virginia Beach's Residency
Districts.) Redistricting usually takes place once every decade and that is the reasoning behind
conducting the Census every ten years.
~~~~
Who is Election Data. Services, Inc:?
~.:_'"_-_r ~' Since 1979,
~. '~4.,
-~ more than half the nation
has been helped by
Election Data Services in
redistricting
~~~~_ ' 4 ---~ -,,;I
-- _' ~ ~'
~,. ~' ~ 1
f ,.
}
Who is Election Data Services,
Since 1980, kept track of what voting equi
is used in every county of the nation
Type of Voting Equipmei
by County - 1980
.e:
a~ !
~.;_ ,~
..._.~
~,
EkcU
~] .x<t.y-e<n~i
April 19, 2011
-4-
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
2011 REDISTRICTING OF CITY CO UNCIL RESIDENCE DISTRICTS
(Continued)
-~~
Who is Election Data Services; ~ ,
If it concerns elections,
` And it deals with data ...
.. ~~. W
We're probably involved
Reapportionment vs Redistrict
What's the difference
• Reapportionment -
Afloc'ation of districts to an area.
-~ 'k:
• US Congressional. Districts to states
• Some statesuseto allocate legislative
counties
• Redistricting
- Craffng of district configurations withl
• Congressional, state legislative, county
wards, etc...
• Usually happens once a decade
- Unless you're Tom Delay
April 19, 2011
-5-
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
2011 REDISTRICTING OF CITY COUNCIL RESIDENCE DISTRICTS
(Continued)
Mr. Brace referenced the Redistricting Factors (all must be considered). He believes these encompassed
a three tier approach. The first tier is the first and foremost according to the Court: equal population
(equal size Districts). Congressional Districts must be exactly equal and exactly the same in a
particular State. The Courts have advised that for State Legislative and Local Districts, there is a
"window" -ten percent (10%): S% of both the ideal population and S% below the ideal population.
All Districts must fall into this "window" in order to ass muster re "One Person, One Vote':
Redistricting Factors
• pne Person, One Vote -Equal size Dic
`" -Congressional -
- State legislative
-Local
• Voting: Rights. Act -
"Fairly reflect minority strength"
• Kitchen sink '~
-Jurisdiction geography -how to divide~_ _. ~-
- "Community of interest"
'Political factors & incumbancy
.Compactness
- Others
The second tier is the Voting Rights Act: "Fairly reflect minority strength': The third tier is the
"kitchen sink" (all added together as a third tier), which could be anything from Jurisdictions - how to
divide; "Community of Interest'; Political factors and incumbency; Compactness; and, Others (which
were spoken out in terms of kind of factors) This third tier must be subordinate in terms of the other
two (2) tiers.
~- ,
Federal Census Efforts 8~ Timef _
• 2011 ~`
-Jan -Special Citizenship tabulation r
-Feb. -Marche. -Redistricting data relea_
• Redistricting can start
• Data for every block
• Total & Voting Age Population, by Rac
- May -Group quarters file released
• Total Count of persons for group quart s,
college dorms, etc.
Summer-full SF1 data file released -
• Includes Hispanic subgroup data (Cuban, PR,
Mexican)
Fall - 2011 ACS data released
April 19, 2011
-6-
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
2011 REDISTRICTING OF CITY CO UNCIL RESIDENCE DISTRICTS
(Continued)
Within the next two (2) weeks, a special Group quarters file shall release data i. e. prisons, college dorms.
The American Community Survey data will be provided in the Fall. This use to be the long form Census
(age, income, education, other forms of demographic data)
.The Election Process -
from adata prospective
Total Population
Voting Age Population
Citizen Voting Age Populati
2010 Census Questions on Hispanic Origin
-i HOT(cd Pteasa ahsvmr BOTH 4uastfoh 6 a5out Htspankc origM and
OuestiohS ahotrt rase. For Utis census, Hispanic origins are hot racos.
5, ks thls parson of H[spantc, Latino, or Spantah origlM
Mo, not at Hispan~, latlno, ar Spanish origin
.. Yes. Mtezican. Rdexi;an Am„ Chicarus
Yes, Poe:".~ R+can
': Yea, Cutran
_ - ..- Yes. arsoth, His:uvdc. Laf~c. w S{raa4sh origin - F>r: ~ro r rreiur<rk,
~ ~,.. rears ~ ..._ f •. r ~lt~,~:s~, SB~Yautrffis, ~,?rffrs, mJ s^ v:.
$. What fE ihls person's raceY ~±,~rk X aha or mtxa boxc&. ',
WTrdc '.
Bn<k A^!can Am_ x Negro
Amc in If>u'icR Y A"sska NaU<<6 - ~.Sk'iY a exY.t;~ e C+ftK.N acs. ~'
Asian Indian Java~3ese Ke;we liar~atien
Cl,enesu Korvs=~ GUU~tIFUttatt p(Ctwitloe>o
Fo~lno veto»rnese &a moan
Ulhsr Asian - P:~+u rocs. 3ar ~:. Othsr Pacitic tsfander - tin<'
srrs!ps. PNrtcrtg, Lr.~iaa Fha++. race br axsrr;3!e. filar?. To^~:r.
Ftx<is ~.::; Cart¢'~u.^., etas; m. ~ ar!J sa rr~.
Soma other race - Pr!nt rats ~°
and Race
5:xxse: 2C19Le~ws
United States"
CenSUS
Not everyone in total population (indicated on chart) can vote as one must be of voting age. Not everyone
of voting age can vote as they must be citizens. Not every one of voting age and a citizen can vote
because they must be registered. A "stepping stone " of data results. The Census Bureau gives the City a
cross tabulation between these two sets.
April 19, 2011
-~-
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
2011 REDISTRICTING OF CITY COUNCIL RESIDENCE DISTRICTS
(Continued)
Race Data -- Decision on user..
x~:.
Amenean
~
White Black tnd~an & Asian Hawaiiwn & Somw Two or '
TOTAL Hispanic TOTAL
7at~POputatum.. Naskfl : Pac~nc CNhwr Ma'e PERCENT.
,.. '. Natrva ' Islander Racw Races '.
Race Akute 41 97% ~ 77% 038%. d 354n 00695 13.58x6 2.92% 100.00°5
~YOn HisVarric Race Abnw 31.32% 31i "s~4o 015% d304'o 0034ir 0.75% 1.84Yo 28.02%. 10000%.,
F NBCe Gwnbuied (Max} 44 2890 37.4x96. 0.7245 d.854'0 016°,'0 15.82°%0 00095 103.0790
Non HispanicRace Comtwned (Max) <S2.S796.
F 38.8846 0.4Q % 4.73°."0 0.09% t.059n 00090 2802°6. i0t 7445:
.
FRace CoirQurp,W (OMB) 41.97:0 37.0095 O.dT95 d.6090 0.0896 75.18%.. 0.0096. 99.28%.
-Nan Hispanic Race Cornninod (QMB} 31.32% 38.57% 023% d S:f% 005"6 O81% 0.00% 28.02% 99.53%
Voting Age F'opulwtion
r 2.9%
United States`
~~us
A "stepping stone " of data results, not only are these unique and distinct instances in terms of data, they
change by the geography.
Race Rknx; d6.22%. 34.09%.. 0.3395 4.79°'° 0.08°5 11.8895
Non Hispanic Race Abne 36 729Sr 33.7795 0.15% 4.75% 0.03%. O. ta~.0
Racs ComWnad (Maz} 48 32% :SA 82 % 088% 5 24% 0 78% 73.76`+0
Mott H~spanrc RwceComt»ned (Max) 37.43% 3A 79% Odt%.. 515% U0996 1.0906
Race (lombined (OMB} 46.22% 34 24%'.. O d4'% S Ota 0-0&0'0 t3.3fi°'u
Non H~spenic Rwce Corripined (OMB). 36.7296 33.68%! 0.2395' 4.9545 0 D`,9o 0 FS<i°;°
2.65% t00.W%.
7.8090 22.83% 100.0096
0 0046 702 7846
0.0046' 22.83%, 101,69%
0.00% 99.35°~
0.0090 22 E33°0 ~ 5z°~.
2010 Census Race Distribution
12.6%
(14.7m)
Native Hawaiian and
Other Pacific Islander ~ 0.2%
alone (0.5m) {
Some Other Race 6.2%
alone (19.1m) ~
White alone '
(223.6m)
Black alone
American Indian and
Alaska Native alone Q.9%
(2.9m)
Asian alone 4 $%
Two or More Races
(9.Om)
April 19, 2011
-8-
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
2011 REDISTRICTING OF CITY CO UNCIL RESIDENCE DISTRICTS
(Continued)
2010 Census Race Alone or !n Combination
N,jhite alone or
i
in combination (231.Om) {
i
x_ 63ack alone or ~ ~~ ~a~
in combination (A2.Om)
{
American Indfan and
Alaska Native alone or ~.7°/0
in combination {S ern}
Asian alone or ~ I
5
6°0
in combination(17.3m} .
~
Native Hawaiian and Other
Pacific islander alone or ~.4%
in combination (1.2m}
Sorns Other Race alone or ~
~ ~~
in combination (21.7m}
';~~o ,.^ar? Rvices
:` V';? r
~as~
Race In Combination '~
United States
Census
~~ sa,Ha
' Race Alone
Nationwide, the Race in Combination added slightly to each of the groups. As a beginning point, a set of
maps has been created utilizing the demographic and racial groups. "Yellow " indicates the white race,
"red " -African American, "blue " -Hispanic origin race, and a couple of "spots "depicting Asian and
American Indian. Relative terms of different racial groups, in a predominate sense; there are pockets
throughout the City.
April 19, 2011
-9-
C ITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
2011 REDISTRICTING OF CITY COUNCIL RESIDENCE DISTRICTS
(Continued)
l
April 19, 2011
X041 ~ ~ ..
~:.
~'~
~9 c
s Op Oua NA"n~C1
WILLIAM D. SESSOMS, JFt.
IJIAYOR
March 29, 2011
Virginia Beach General Assembly Delegation
Subject: Senate Redistricting Process
Dear Senators and Delegates,
V$gOV.CC1Tri
MUNICIPAL CENTER
BUILDING 1
2401 COURTHOUSE DRIVE
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23456-9000
(757) 385-1581
FAX (/57) 3855699
vrsessoms v~ vbgov.com
Tire City Council of Virginia Beach is very concerned about the redistricting process that will .
begin next week. We are particularly concerned about representation in the Senate of Virginia
for Virginia's largest city. The population of Virginia Beach, according to the 2010 Session; is
437,494 persons. We understand that a perfect sized Senate seat under the 2010 Census would, be
200,206 persons.
Virginia Beach is currently represented by two senators who represent only Virginia Beach, plus
three senators who represent smaller portions of the city. 'We are very concerned that one of the
plans that has been put forward at this tinne for Senate representation would have only one
senator solely represent the City of Virginia Beach.
We believe very strongly that the City should be repxesented by two senators who represent only
the City of Virginia Beach, plus other senators who represent smaller portions of the population.
'We respectfully request that any redistricting plan that goes forward would, to the extent
possible, address our request.
City of Vir~i~ia Baach
We certainly understand that regardless of how the redistricting process is completed, whomever
is elected to represent Virginia Beach will do an excellent job. We believe, however, that two
senators representing just the City of Virginia Beach is the most fair and representative outcome.
The Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council
Subject: Senate Redistricting Process
Mardi 29, 2011
Page 2
Thank you far addressing our concerns. Staff is available to help in any way possible.
Respectfully,
Louis R. Jon
Vice-Mayor
William R. DeSteph
Council Member
Rita Sweet-Bellitto
Council Member
airy E ~ iezel
Counci enib.
.~
William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Mayor
/k•
Glenxz R. Davis, Jr.
Council Member
Robert M. Dyer
Council 1Vlember
Rosemary i n
Council er
tai--i. C> > ' l
Barbara M. Henley J lirin
cii Membex uncil Member
J es ood
C it Member
cc: Members Senate Privileges & Election Committee
Members House Privileges & Election Committee
DATE: March 25, 2011
TO: Local Governing Bodies, Virginia Municipal League, and the Virginia Association of
Counties
FROM: State Board of Elections (SBE)
RE: Submission Date far Local Redistricting Plans
CC: General Registrars and Electoral Board Members; Mary Spain, Division of Legislative
Services; Joshua Lief, Office of the Attorney General
This memorandum provides official guidance and recommendations from the State Board of Elections for
your locality's redistricting preparation and preclearance submission to the Department. of Justice under
Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.
The SBE is highhly recommending an Anri129 2011 submission deadline for your locality's redistricting
Mans In addition, the SBE is recommending that your locality seek expedited tn'eclearance review from
the Department of Justice (DOJ) of your redistnctmg elan. The SBE believes an Apnl 29 subrmssion date
combined with the possibility of expedited precleazance review will ensure orderly, cost-effective, and
successful elections in 2011.
2011 Va Acts Ch 3 Schedule Supports Submission on or before April 29.2011 -
As you likely know, Governor McDonnell recently signed into law HB 1507 (now 2011 Acts of Assembly -
Chapter 3), a bill that .modifies the. 2011 election. calendar due to the effects of the decennial redistricting
process. Subject to preclearance, this legislation moves the primary date from June 14,:2011, to August
23, 2011, while also preserving a full 45=day window fvr the transmission, of overseas absentee ballots for
both the primary and general elections. Consequently, absentee ballots fvr primaries must be sent out.. by
July 8, 2011, and additional deadlines have been pushed into<May and June. While `elected offices
associated with your local redistricting plans may not have primaries, it is extremely important for many
reasons that you begin work on your plans immediately.. ln_particular, if local primaries are utilized,
timely distribution of those absentee ballots in compliance.with.-the. statutory deadline makes it imperative
that local redistricting plans be submitted without delay on or before April 29, 2011.. The Secretary of the
State Board of Elections would have difficulty exercising discretion to waive the 45-day deadline for an
emergency created by a failure to plan accordingly.
Historical Precedent Supports Submission on or before April 29, 2011
There is significant historical precedent for the Department of Justice to reject or amend plans causing a
delay in preclearance and affecting important ballot preparation and delivery deadlines under the
calendar. For example,. four localities were directed to delay their Board of Supervisor General Elections
in 1991 due to a lack of DOJ preclearance. State law (Va. Code § 24.2-313) makes only limited
provision for delaying local governing body and school board elections scheduled for the general election
date. Minimizing preclearance delay is essential to avoid unnecessary complication and cost. In sum, the
condensed calendar makes it especially important that you prepare and submit your local .redistricting
plans for preclearance at the earliest possible date. Please keep in mind that under the Voting Rights Act,
the locality has the burden to prove that the proposed redistricting plan or other changes meet Section 5
standards. There is no guarantee that this process will go smoothly.
Delay Can Adversely Impact Your Locality
Delayed action on your end could significantly impact your locality financially. There is no way to know
for certain whether a state legislative primary will take place in your locality until, at the earliest, May 27
(the earliest official date under Chapter 3 where SBE would know whether or not a particular primary will
be held). Tn the event of your locality's participation in a local, State Senate and/or House of Delegates
primary, new voter identification cards must be mailed out to voters affected by redistricting at least 1S
days before the primary election (i.e., by Monday, August 8, 2011). Please keep in mind that your
General Registrars are working closely with the State Board of Elections in printing voter identification
cards and we need the updated information contained in your plans in order to print these cards timely. If
your plans are not precleared by the Department of Justice in time for the printing of these voter cards, it
is quite likely that a new set of cards will need to be printed and mailed to reflect your local plan.
In addition, SBE is attempting to secure funds to help localities defray the costs of the voter cards;
however, the SBE will not pay for printing two. sets of voter cards in the event your redistricting plan has
not been precleared by the Department of Justice within enough time. Inaction could cost your locality
twice as much in printing these cards.
Please keep in mind that your general registrars and Electoral Board members are under considerable
stress leading up to an election in any year. The added duties caused by redistricting and the. condensed
elections calendar compound these pressures.. Thef Commonwealth is under increased scrutiny not only
because it is the only state under the Voting Rights Act to hold a General Election in a redistricting year,
but also because of heightened scrutiny of timely mailing of military and overseas absentee. ballots. There
are many challenges to overcome and Virginia will certainly be in the national spotlight this fall. Please
do everything you can to provide the time. and planning necessary to ensure your general registrars and
local electoral boards succeed.
Remember to Request ExQedited Review---SuQaested Lanauase
In addition to the April 29, 2011, deadline,. the SBE also recommends that your legal counsel ask for
expedited review when submitting your plan to the Department of Justice.. 28 CFR § 51.34 {a) provides
that a submitting authority. "may request that the ,submission be given expedited consideration" and
"[w]hen a submitting authority demonstrates good cause ...the Attorney General will attempt to make a
decision by the date requested. However, the Attomey General cannot guarantee that such consideration
can be given: '~ Submissions asking for expedited consideration "should explain why such consideration
is needed and provide the date by which a determination is required: '
Below, please find suggested or sample language that your. locality can use when seeking expedited
review when submitting your local redistricting plan to the Department of Justice:
Expedited consideration by [insert date 30 days after submission date], is requested to
assure absentee ballots can be sent to absent active duty military and overseas
applicants at least 4S days before primary elections scheduled for August 23, 2011 under
2011 Va. Acts Ch. 3. Va. Code § 24.2-612 implementing the MOVE Act, as well as
Virginia's consent decree in US v. Cunningham, Case No. 3:08CV709 (12.14.2010),
establish a 45-day standard for sending absentee ballots that cannot be achieved without
expedited review. Preclearance on the requested expedited review calendar of 30 days
~ Please see § 24.2-306 of the Code of Virginia. A new voter card must be sent to all registered voters whose
election district, town, precinct or polling place is changed.
~ Please see: htt~•//www iustice goy/crt/abouUvot/28cfr/S1/subpart e.phn.
2
instead of 60 days will greatly benefit voters, particularly absent military and overseas
citizens, as well as candidates and election officials .affected by the redistricting
transition.
C1osel~Monitor Your Submission
SBE recommends taking a proactive approach during the preclearance process. A DOJ redistricting
analyst should contact the local submitting official and this would be an opportune time to underscore the
need for expedition from DOJ. If you have not heard from DOJ by Day 10 after submission, you should
take the initiative to contact the Voting Section with a phone call and reiterate your desire for expedited
preclearance to facilitate the mailing of absentee ballots to overseas civilian and military voters. Further,
if you have not received a response on your request from the Department of Justice after 30 days, then
SBE recommends you again contact DOPs Voting Rights Section of the Civil Rights Division and
inquire as to status of submission.
Resources on Preclearance Process
These suggestions are consistent with Virginia Division of Legislative Services' (DLS) guidance, in
particular its suggested Redistricting Calendar recommending that preclearance submissions should
follow "as promptly as possible" adoption of local redistricting plans in March and April, 20113 DLS's
publications, along with Chapter 25 of the General Registrars and Electoral Board Members Handbook,"
provide important practical guidance for specifics on the redistricting. process, including information on
the preclearance process. SBE. staff is also available at your convenience to discuss the 2011 elections
calendar and other items contained in this memo.
cerely,
,.---
_~~ ~ ..
Donald Palmer
Secretary,
State Board of Elections
s wide to Redistricting for 2011, http I/redistricting dls virginia gov/2010/Data/Publications/GuideRedist2011.ydf
(suggested Calendar timeline on pdf page 45); Additional publications, including the March 2011 Part 2 Drawing
the Line are available here: http•//redistricting dls virginia Qov/2010/Publications.asnx .
° Available here: htta'//townhall virginia gov/L/ViewGDoc.cfm?adid--4333 The Handbook is being updated to
reflect more recent DLS guidance.
3
-10-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
PLANNING ITEMS PENDING
3:58 P.M.
Jack Whitney, Director of Planning, detailed the Planning Items to be heard by the City Council on May
10 and May 24, 2011.
May 1 D, 2011
Darshak Patel (Kaveri, L.L.C.)
Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Great Neck Baptist Church, Inc.
City of Virginia Beach -Commercial and Recreational Vehicles Amendments
City of Virginia Beach -Zoning Ordinance Amendments
City of Virginia Beach -Sign Posting Amendment
7-Eleven, Inc.
May 24, 2011
Agapae International Church
Charles Payne
Breathwaite Place, L.L.C.
Whitaker Place, L.L.C.
Virginia Beach City Public Schools
April 19, 2011
4/19/2011
~:_~~:~
-~
_-_ .._
~ _~~;~~
~ s
I _ _ L~.`
~. _ .~
4/ 19/2011
', ( L \ iI'
.fpgj{E~.CV."(ION- WGIL ~G LOlNW~FJCt VWf .1~1flN~~~
•~~ ~ wu,y +ww Hi.ir
i
...mygk+!E`
~ -
~-+~
4/19/2011
... ..<<.
•._._._ . f .. L_ .~.yyf~ra_"'-.~. __.___
4/19/2011
°= . ~.~~_
_ __., __~
~-
4/19/2011
4/19/2011
.~~. ~...
,,.~.,,,;.; ARapae Inlernatitmal C'hurth
sib*,. ~q~~l ~Q . ~ Acs
' ~.. nab ~ ~ •~/
~..AG. \ ., .L ~ ~' .
AGt
AG/ AGt ` i7 AGi nv /~ u
~. RG3' / Gt: '
\ \. '~/
~ ~ ~~ ..
ACt 91
/'
I
6r'
ii~~°' ~~,-9T 07
oz
4/ 19/2011
~~;\ ~ ~y~ - t , ~r
`~t , F 1 ~ .r _ N.X ~ l
.^~ f _ -- - -- -
- ~ .~
s~ wen C'harlcn Pm ne
E 5- ; Rsa ~ : ~:
} ~ .
~
X 0 F
M 1
~~~Y d13 list rus
.1
',
j
~1
`
9 `
'
-
1 1
i
v "Y p.
1 ~ ~
~ ~R55 ?. ' ` . ~
4/19/2011
.,; °i..
-~.~ ~~, I
.~.•,_ ~_ f. .mss y~. .
:~_ -
~~~:°
8
Y
~~~f
Q
4/ 19/2011
--- ._ „L~ w ~ W ~
~;~
treathwaite %att ~_ 1 ~ ;i+. t_
\ ~~~
~~
r f-- ~-.. ~ r- .-
,~ ''
r .J?~ = __- _._
4/19/2011
~~
:~~
3REATHV~AIT°_ ?LAG=
$;
,e >`.. -.
~af8' _ _ ~
'" pia. ---- --
;' -
~.. Nfii2akerl'Ixc L.4C.
aN .
~- l~;a
4/19!2011
-
_- ~.
I,,
-
_ ,~ .
`~ _ ~T
j 1 ~~ ~ r At.
i I `~ ~ _! I .i s
'~ ~_ ,
,~ o I____ r~ ~
~:
I ° _.l 1
ELEVATION TWO
-~.--- ~_
_ ~
v L ~ ~ .
._- _. ~ f'
', L V3
r-ever.-v,__ y
1 , '~ma[x7G! 1 F
•,Whltaker Place,~trA:.C`,
PRINCESS ANNE
aW,..-.: Vir~,;inia Beach Citc Public Schools
~ ~ £~
~
C ,
.,
Sufi.-area ?
°~" ~
~'
'
b.w,
.
~
~~ ,•s act
'
,.
~ .~-.{' T j- cll3 ! do
, ,\
k~
_~ q
~{ '~
~ A2;2
.
~
Rib' <<
'
f
AGt
Rte-. ~v~i+r ..
~~I.tlr ~~~ CUP Iof ~NVnfr Sewage ireabrwnt
4/19/2011
T-- ~ - -~ . - - -
LIVING
p I 'µ I,~MR CMINF
e/ ~ 9
~~~~-
I ~ ,~
~~~ ~ ~ ~~
~.I.,
~! Kd1 m Hlgh S h of Rcplacemenc h-_^r=
,~ ~'nr ress~~xr..fi ..H.'tie~.
M Vifg~n a Beach``Cky p11~1~C SCf1OO~5
-11-
C ITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP
FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN
and
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
4:18 P.M.
The City Manager introduced Catheryn Whitesell, Director -Management Services, to provide a brief
review of the City's FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN and CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM re FAMILY and YOUTH OPPORTUNITIES concerning the two (2)
departments of HEALTH and HUMAN SERVICES.
Family and Youth Opportunities
FY 2010 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12
Family and Youth Opportunities Actual Adjusted Proposed % Change
Budgeted Expenditures $ 111,119,307 $ 115,124,392 $ 112,828,787 -1.99%
FTEs 1,087.98 1,056.43 1,077.15 1.96%
Includes Health and Human Services
Departments
City Council Goals:
r Create a financially stable City providing
excellent services
Increased service demands for assistance
from FYO agencies given slow economic
recovery.
Continued reduction of State funding and
shifting costs to the City.
6.596 of
TnYal
Family and Youth Opportunities
Balance
0.9°'°
Local
(Transfers)
0.2°'°
Major Revenues
Fees and Charges
r Medicaid and Insurance
Payments
Charges for Services
Other Local (Transfers)
'r Services provided to user
Departments
State and Federal
v Health Grants
r Human Services Programs
Fund Balance
For local construction, capital
and start-up costs for the
Indian River Road
Intermediate Care Facility to
be constructed with the
State.
April 19, 2011
Revenue Sources
-12-
C ITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP
FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN
and
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
HEALTH
4:22 P.M.
Dr. Venita Newby-Owens, Director -Health, provided a summarization re the Health Department and
their accomplishments.
Health Department
.."~`s`..e.a Sv,~: "::7~,'931w ~~ x, c:.4 f ~ ~ t x i "" Y°' ')
fi i
'
Gty Public Health 3,040,204 10.75 2,858,445 10.75 (181,759)
State Public Health 2,554,329 108.0 2,554,329 108.0 0.00
Grants .:.2,496;387 0.00 TBD 0.00 TBD.
Total 8,090,920 118.75 5,412,774 118.75 (181,759)
CITY FUNDINCa ONLY
12.0%
/~
88.03'0
_,
^ Personnel O Operations ^ City Mandated Contribution ®CKher Local Revenue
^ State ^ Federal
Health Department
Received $150,000 in Federal funding to develop and implement a
pandemic plan; and to increase outreach/marketing to vulnerable and
underserved populations in Virginia Beach.
Received funding to provide general nutrition education classes and
individual breastfeeding education to WIC clients. During fiscal year 2012,
approximately 1,000 clients will receive nutrition education classes and
450 nursing moms will receive counseling support.
>= Began annual inspections of nail salons to enhance the safety of these
establishments. In fiscal year 2012 it is anticipated over 250
establishments will be inspected in Virginia Beach.
VBDPH has experienced an increase in demand for services from our
senior citizen population. An additional senior health education clinic
location will be added in fiscal year 2012 to address this need.
April 19, 2011
-13-
CITYCOUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP
FY2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN
and
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
HEALTH
(Continued)
Health Department
FY 2011-12 Trends & H'sghlights
3> VBDPH will partner with the Virginia Beach Family Health Center to
provide a permanent medical home for SO% of the uninsured /
underinsured children who will be seen in our clinic in 2012.
Approximately 48 child safety seat education classes will be held in
English and Spanish and 570 safety seats will be distributed to low-
income children during 2012.
:- VBDPH will continue actively working with the State task force and
local healthcare providers to increase testing and treatment for STDs.
April 19, 2011
-14-
C ITY COUNCIL B UDGET WORKSHOP
FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN
and
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
HUMAN SERVICES
4:38 P.M.
Robert Morin, Director -Human Services, distributed brochures re the Department of Human Services,
which are hereby made a part of the record. Mr. Morin recognized the staff in attendance. Randy
Thompson -Social Services, has been with the Department for many years and assists with specific
responses concerning the Budget.
Social Services 40,108,379 309.29 38,261,586 3D5.29 (1,846,793}
Mental Health 23,574,496 263.01 23,037,122 259.01 (537;374)
Developmental Services 21,384,045 289.70 21,863,316 319.42 479,271
Comprehensive Services 14,487,119 2.00 13,931,191 2.00 (555,928}
Central5ervices 4,663,331 65.87 4,712,867 66.87 49,536
Juvenile Detention Center 4,302,533 67.56 4,226,213 65.56 (76,320)
Grants 1,867,284 25.00 2,261,788 25.00 394,504
Pendleton Child Center 1,697,001 23.25 1,676,259 23.25 (20,742}
Total 112,084,188 1,045.68 iQ9,970,342 1,066.40 (2,113,846)
Mr. Morin advised the "bottom line" is the proposed cut of $2.1-MILLION received on the proposed
FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN (Human Services)
Human Services
FY 2011-12 Proposed Revenues
$6,733,482 $28,690,313
$19,019.410 6% , ~ ,
184
FY 2011-12 Proposed Expenditures
13%
$33,248,220 $22,278,917
30% 20%
^ General Fund ^ Federal ^ State
^ Medicaid O Fees
^Personnel ^Assistance Payments OOperations
April 19, 2011
Human Services
-15-
CITYCOUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP
FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN
and
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW
HUMANSERVICES (Continued)
Human Services
DFiS Service Changes
.- Juvenile Detention Center reduction of $107,401 (2 FTE) which reflects
the decline in admissions.
Y Mediation and Visitation Services reduction of $244,968 (3 FTE) will
affect services to 140 families.
:- Mental Health/Substance Abuse reduction of $121,596 will create a
waiting list for psychiatric evaluation and medication treatment to 450
consumers.
~~ Mental Health Residential Services reduction of $86,881 (1 FTE) will
affect service coordination for residential services and reduce service
to 42 consumers.
%- Substance Abuse Prevention Education services reduction of $70,042
(1 FTE) will serve 149 fewer students.
r- New Intermediate Care facilities (Two 5-bed facilities) with cost of
$1,027,299 (31.5 FTE).
Human Services
FY 2011-12 Trends Se. Highlights
r Since the FV 2009 Adopted Budget, the ae neral Fund portion of the
Human Services budget has been reduced by $5,252,597 (15.5%)
from 31.2% to 26.6%.
.~ Since FY 2008 SNAP (Food Stamps) cases have increased 94.7% with a
current recipient count of 31,516.
Human Services
FY 2011-12 Trends $c Highlights (continued
Y Since 2008, provided Crisis Intervention training and services
through collaborative efforts with the Police Department and
the Sheriff's office. CIT Assessment Center opened in 2010.
Despite budget reductions in other areas, we've continued to
fund nine staff to serve approximately 190 Jail inmates per
month.
In FY 2010, Federal and State assistance payments made to or
on behalf of Virginia Beach residents totaled $256,874,586
(Medicaid, SNAP, TANF, Energy Assistance).
April 19, 2011
-16-
C ITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP
FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN
and
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
HUMANSERVICES (Continued)
Human Services
FY 2011-12 Trends & Highlights {continued)
~- In FY 2010, CSB served 10,087 persons (an increase of 1345, or 15%)
with Mental Health, Substance Abuse and Developmental
Disabilities.
Although our numbers served increased, we still have a substantial
waiting list:
310 persons waiting for Mental Health Substance Abuse
services
>- 337 waiting for Developmental Services
Human Services
FY 2011-12 Treads & Highlights (continued}
;~ DHS is proposing 31.5 FTEs to staff two five bed Intermediate Care
Facilities serving individuals discharged from the Southeastern Virginia
Training Center. On-going operations funded by Medicaid; startup
operating and construction costs @ $1,027,299 are proposed to be
funded from the DHS fund balance.
Operating enhancements due to Social Services Computer Migration
Y Health Care Reform
April 19, 2011
-17-
C ITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW
FY2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN
S: 07 P.M.
David Bradley, Management Services Administrator, referenced prior presentations to City Council,
relative the Capital Improvement Program.
Prior Presentations to Council
Communication and Info Technology -February 1, 2011
Roadways -March 1, 2011 ~~~ i~~=,,,
Storm Water-March 8, 2011 ~~'
~_ ~~_
,`.~= Coastal -March 15, 2011 ~ -~_I=`~ ~i"~
-- ~,_~
Debt- March 15, 2011 -
Facilities and Fleet -March 22, 2011
;t
' z
FY 2012/FY 2017 Capital Improvement Program
_ ~~ s~
~:. ,'~~
Schools _ - - ~ ~ ~ $456,624,035
Roadways 745,157,586
_._...
Buildings/Equipment
~___m___ ___._.
135,870,125
,___. _.m_____~ ..~~_._....._._
Parks and Recreation 123,491,762
_.__~w____.__ _____ _.._
Water. and Sewer __... _.
328,796,774
Storm Water 226,022,610 j
Coastal 142,460,37.1
Economic and Tourism Development 239,287,405
Communications & Information Technology... 68,786,645;
Total Funding $2,466,497,313
Relative Roadways, the Lesner Bridge Replacement is $90-Million, which is one-eighth of the Total
funding of Roadways: $745,157,586. Kellam High School costs slightly over $100-Million, which is
just under one-fifth of the School section. Just these two (2) projects alone encompass one-twelfth of the
entire Capital Improvement Program.
April 19, 2011
-18-
CITYCOUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW
FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN
(Continued)
Capital Budget
Parks and Recreation 33.6 12.0 (21.6)'
~___ __
i Water and Sewer 25.0 40.0 15.0
Economic and Tourism 20.1
Development
Communications & ` 4.3
lnformationJechnology
Total Capital Budeet $ 201.7
The first year of the Capital Improvement Program, which is the only year actually appropriated by City
Council, is $108.5-Million more than the current Capital Budget due to the infusion of funds from the
Governor's Transportation Plan. This alone added $86-Million in the first year of the proposed CIP.
Buildings, Utilities, and Communication and Information Technology all are seeing increases in
funding as the City begins to address the backlogs in building maintenance, neighborhood drainage,
technology and the Sewer Consent Order. Buildings/Equipment are increasing approximately $5-Million
due to backlog issues. Parks and Recreation appears to be taking a "large cut ". The Williams Farm
Recreation Center project was in the FY 2011 CIP and the reason for a reduction. There was a 4 year
sewer increase, which City Council APPROVED last year. This was to address a Consent Order. This is
part of their program to increase the Capital Improvement Program from $25-Million to $40-Million a
year. There is a significant backlog in Storm Water with proposed rate increases in the upcoming Capital
Improvement Program. Economic and Tourism Development appears to be taking a slight "cut ". When
this program was being submitted the end of March 2011, the $7.5-Million from the State for the BRAG
program had not been received.
The City Manager's transmittal letter referenced areas desired to be addressed over several years: Risk
Management, Storm Water, Information and Technology infrastructure. Capital Funding comprises
the $310-Million. Pay-As-You-Go financing has been significantly decreased over the last several years.
Part has been to mitigate some of the issues on the Operating Budget to save some of the programs.
April 19, 2011
Storm Water 8.6 27.1 18.5
-19-
CITYCOUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW
FY2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN
(Continued)
Capital Funding
Pay-as-you-go $33.7 $ 41.0 $7.3
__ - _. _.
General Fund Balance
31.5
23.9
(7.6)
Other Fund Balances 22.7 13.7 (9.0)
State and Federal Funds 16.8 93.2 76.4
Bonds & Lease Purchases 87.5 133.3 45.8
Other Sources 9.5 5.1 (4.4)
_..
Total Capital Budget _.
$201.7
$ 310.2 ..
$ 108.5
Funding for the Capital Budget includes $41-Million of Pay As-You-Go financing, $32-Million
which comes from dedicated sources; $37.6-Million in fund balance usage, including the use of $20-
Million in School Risk Management Fund surplus; $93.2 Million in state and federal funds, comprised
mainly of the $86-Million in new state funding for roadways; and $133.3 Million in debt. The
remaining $S.1-Million comes from various other sources.
Mr. Bradley advised Staff only appropriates the first year of the Capital Budget (Year One). Years Two
through Six are just for planning purposes.
Why Raise Debt Per Capita to $2,800?
Not for Operating Budget
Y Proposed CIP exceeds $2,400 in FY 2013, FY 2014, and FY 2016
and helps to address infrastructure backlog
~ Capacity held to accommodate future City Council priorities:
r Headquarters Hotel
Development of Dome Site
;: Pleasure House Point
y Actual debt per capita ($2,235) is one of lowest of Hampton
Roads cities; most exceed $2,900
> Actual debt per capita is one of lowest of AAA cities nationally
with population 250,000 to 500,000 -below the mean of
$3,433 and median of $3,163
Y Financial Advisor supports increase to $2,800
April 19, 2011
-20-
CITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW
FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN
(Continued)
Roadway Projects
~= VDOT Six Year Urban Funding for Virginia Beach:
- FY09 - FY14 (original)
r FY09 - FY14 (revised)
- FY10 - FY15
= FY11- FY16
r FY12 - FY17
$ 62.8 M ~ ` ~'~ ~ ~-~-~~~"'t
~~
$ 10.2 M :{'~~~,
$ 0 ~ X=
%' Success in obtaining COF (Competitively Obtained Funds):
:= FY 07 - FY12 funding $ 92.8 M *includes ARRA
~~ FY12 $ 8.4 M
:= Annual Avg. with ARRA $ 15.5 M
Annual Avg. without ARRA $ 7.9 M
Roadway Projects
Major roadway projects continued to
move forward through increased City
funding and reallocated State and Federal
funds (with VDOT approval):
r Birdneck Road -Phase II ($49,374,000)
Lynnhaven Parkway-Phase IX
($44, 288,127 )
r' Witchduck Road - Phase I ($26,486,900)
r' Princess Anne Road -Phase IV
($61,450,270)
r Princess Anne Road/Kempsville Road
Intersection Improvements
($89,636,045)
Nimmo Parkway- Phase V-A
($64,288,216)
y Lynnhaven Parkway- Phase XI
($38,553,413)
~~~~~~~
. ~, _
....
t
~-
F
'_~
yY ~'
<~,~~'
~' ~
.~
..
April 19, 2011
-21-
CITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW
FY2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN
(Continued)
Roadway Projects
' $362 million from Governor's
~.
Transportation Plan includes:
Lesner Bridge Replacement ($90,215,600)
Lynnhaven Parkway -Phase XI ($38,553,413)
Witchduck Road -Phase II ($32,582,950)
r Elbow Road Extended -Phase II
($53,360,642)
Laskin Road - Phase I ($112,934,495)
Laskin Road -Phase II ($22,866,723)
Indian River Road -Phase VII ($77,514,600)
r Holland Road -Phase VI ($52,718,249)
;= Seven positions added because of
additional project funding-three
Engineers, one Contract Specialist, o
Construction Inspector, and two
Accountants (paid for by projects)
Building Projects
1 Replace Anu~ial l,ar~ &Adoptiun Center w is `-~
2 Replace Parks & Rec City-Wide Programs Office
3 Relocate Resort Maintenance Compound
4 Replace Fire/Large Vehicle Repair Shop
5 Replace Euclid Yard Buildings
6 Relocate Treasurer's Beach Branch
7 - Replace Town Center (Thalia) Fire Station.
8 Replace Police Special Ops/Evidence
Storage/Forensics Complex
9-- Replace Parks & Recreation Landscape
Services/Parks Construction Facilities
10 Replace Chesapeake Bch Fire & Rescue Station
11 Replace Police 4`h Precinct
12 Replace PW/Highways Modular Buildings
13 Replace Blackwater Fire & Rescue Station
$13,401,000 Contitruction
337,500 Design
b Not Funded
1,799,970 Construction
0 Not Funded:'
Recommend Closure of
0 Office
9,435,000 Construction
7,809,420 Construction
Included with Design
#2above
5,248,800 Construction
434,504 Design
0 Not Funded
306,091 Design
April 19, 2011
-22-
CITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW
FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN
(Continued)
Building/Equipment
= Backlogs being partially or fully addressed:
Fire Apparatus (#'s 3371 and 3134)
r Building Rehabilitation
Various Buildings HVAC Rehab and Renewal (#3136)
Various Buildings Rehab and Renewal (#3137)
:~ Fire Stations (#3506)
- Heritage Buildings (#3103)
Judicial Center Water Intrusion Abatement (#3507)
= Aquarium Building Systems and Infrastructure Rehab (#'s
3146 and 3152)
r Alarm System/MOSCAD (#3102)
_,~-
~,.
--. 3 ~- -`
P
~ ~ ~ I
5
r
/Wif~tkt~
Parks and Recreation Projects
Includes funding for:
y Williams Farm Recreation Center -Scheduled for opening
September 2012
:j Modernization of Bow Creek (1960) and Kempsville (1977)
Recreation Centers
r Financed through existing dedicated real estate tax
- Bow Creek staff will be temporarily assigned to Williams
Farm and other recreation centers
April 19, 2011
-23-
CITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW
FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN
(Continued)
Parks and Recreation Projects
Bikeways and Trails Plan (BTP) Implementation
~= Begins a funding strategy to implement the BTP that Council is to
consider as part of the Comprehensive Plan next Tuesday (4/26/11)
Top Priority Infrastructure Projects include:
;= Bike lanes on Shore Drive (Kendall Drive to Atlantic Avenue)
i Shared-use path along the former Norfolk-Southern Right of Way corridor
NimmoTrail (Lago Mar tosandbridge)
Thalia Creek Greenway
:= Bike-pedestrian connection over I-264 to connect Mt. Trashmore to Thalia
Creek Greenway/Town Center
r' Bike route signs on new "signed shared roadways"
A shared-use path along Buckner Boulevard
r Rosemont Road to near Independence Boulevard
Council's Bikeways and Trails Advisory Committee will help identify
and prioritize additional bikeways and trails projects
Water and Sewer Projects
The Sanitary Sewer Consent Order mandates overhauling the sewer system
Council approved afour-year stepped rate increase in FY 2010-11 to address
compliance
Funding is included for:
r Landstown Yard Improvements ($3,172,000)
.- Princess Anne Road Water Improvements ($2,416,145)
i Resort Area Neighborhood Revitalization ($3,746,636)
'r Water Transmission System Upgrade Program ($15,415,391)
:- Sewer Pump Stations Modifications ($67,066,885)
r Sanitary Sewer System Revitalization Program ($25,014,000)
Sanitary Sewer Regulatory Compliance Program ($28,593,476)
Annual funding includes $27 million in utility bonds, $8 million pay-as-you-
go, and $5 million retained earnings
April 19, 2011
-24-
CITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW
FY2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN
(Continued)
Storm Water Projects
Proposed fee increases for FY
2012 (7.5C), FY 2013 (5G), & FY
2014 (5C). FY 2012 will address:
= Flood Control Project Backlog
y Water Quality Project Backlog
r Maintenance Project Backlog
Two crews to address ditch
and pipe cave-in maintenance
and an Engineer and a
Construction Inspector to
meet project management
requirements
Unfunded Federal mandate to
address pollution limits is not
yet addressed
Storm Water Projects -Flood Control
7005 North Lake Holly Watershed $17,071,135
7010 Elizabeth River Shores 2,130,450
7016 South Lake Holly Watershed 12,738,000
7024 Southern Canal/Lead Ditch and Culvert 950,000
7033 Rosemont Forest Drainage Improvements 6,800,000
7035 Lawson Forest Drainage 1,080,000
7036 Baker Road Culvert & Ditch 450,000
7037 Bellamy Manor Outfall Ditch 450,000
7038 Thoroiaghgood Drainage -Interim 670,000
7039 Level Green -Interim 675,000
7040 Aragona Village -interim 650,000
7049 Beach Garden Park - Kilborne Court & Holly Road 900,000
Improvements
7063 Neighborhood Storm'Water Infrastructure 9,159,886
7145 Arctic Avenue -Baltic Avenue 7,345,181
7151 Cape Henry Beach Drainage 10,618,066
7409 Shore Drive Drainage Preliminary Design 428,152
7902 North Beach Drainage. 29,142,523
TOTAL $101,258,393
April 19, 2011
-25-
CITYCOUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW
FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN
(Continued)
Storm Water Projects -Water Quality
7027 SWM Master Planning, Analysis, and Inventory $1,895,906
7153 Lynnhaven Watershed Restoration 5,014,16$
7159 Water Quality Participation Projects 1,501,500
7183 Storm Water Quality Enhancements 21,138,063
7406 Elizabeth River TMDL Implementation Plan 1,200,000
7412 Southern River TMDL Implementation Plan 1,200,000
TOTAL $31,949,637
s
~_, .
'fir.' i
~.
,~`~.
Storm Water Projects -Maintenance
7004 Storm Water lofrastriacture Rehabilitation $40,456,052
7067 Primary System Infrastructure Improvements 14,510,393
709.1 Residential Drainage Cost Participation Program 550,000
7152 Lake Management 24,758,135
7404 Aragona Neighborhood Infrastructure Rehab 2,000,000
7405 Brigadoon Lakes Maintenance Dredging 2,250,000
7407 Green Run Lakes Maintenance Dredging 750,000
7408 Green Run Neighborhood Infrastructure Rehab 4,000,000
7411 Oceanfront Storm Water Facilities Maintenance 1,062,000
7412 Storm Water Pump Station Modifications 2,478,000
TOTAL $92,814,580
April 19, 2011
-26-
CITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW
FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN
(Continued)
Coastal Projects
r Neighborhood Dredging Program initiated
r Partnership between City and waterfront neighborhoods
$809,388 in reserve for City dredging and upfront costs
Will create SSD's for each neighborhood requesting dredging
Policy included in ordinance for adoption
r Financing of sand replenishment being studied over the next
year
<~
~ _~, --
* ~ ,-
~; ~'
r ~ ~~,~~' - '~~
Economic and Tourism Projects
~ Governor's Budget includes $7.5 million for Oceana project
y Includes three SGA projects: Burton Station Road Improvements
-Phases II and III and other funding for SGA initiatives
~= Maintenance funding provided for Oceanfront and Town Center
garages and Amphitheater
~;~ ..
~~~ r~
~~
~' ~ ~~~=~
. ;_ - -
.-
April 19, 2011
-27-
CITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW
FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN
(Continued)
Communications & Information
Technology Projects
r New projects include:
VBAIert Replacement
v' ALI Database Management & Selective
Routing
r Data Storage and Management for
Evidentiary Files
eGIS Master Address Repository
Library Automated Material Handling
r Two positions added to help meet
communication and technology needs
(paid for by projects)
Future Concerns
r Future concerns continue to address backlogs in each CIP
section
Restoring Pay-As-You-Go funding to the CIP
April 19, 2011
-28-
A SPECIAL SESSION shall be SCHEDULED for the purpose of conducting a PUBLIC
HEARING at Green Run High School, 1700 Dahlia Drive, on Thursday, April 21, 2011, at
6:00 P.M.
The purpose of this SPECIAL FORMAL SESSION will be to invite all citizens to share their
concerns re the Management Resource Plan (FY 2011-2012 Budget)
April 19, 2011
-29-
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Sessoms DECLARED the City Council Workshop ADJOURNED at S:SO P.M.
Beverly O. Hooks, CMC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
<~1--'~-!~~~ ---------------
Ruth Hodges Fraser, MMC
City Clerk
April 19, 2011