JANUARY 5, 2010 WORKSHOP MINUTESCITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
"COMMUNITY FOR A LIFETIME"
CITY COUNCIL
MAYOR WI/.CLAM D. SI:'SSOMS, JR., Ai-Large
VICE MAYOR LOUIS R. JONES, Bayside -District 9
GLENN R. DAMS, Rose Hall -District 3
WILLIAM R. DeST1iPH, At-Large
HARRY E. DIEZEL, Kempsvi[le -District 2
ROBERI'M. DYER„ Centerville -District I
BARBARA M HENl,H7, Princess Anne -District 7
JOHN E. UHRIN, Beach -District 6
ROSEMARY WILSON, At-Large
JAMES L. WOOD, I,ynnhaven -District S
CITY COUNCIL APPOINTEES
C/7Y MANAGER -JAMES K. SPORE
CIIYA770RNF,Y- MARK D. STILES
CITY ASSESSOR - JERA/,D BANAGAN
C/77 AUDITOR - LYNDON S. REMIAS
CITY CLERK - RUTH HODGES FRASF.R, MMC
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP AGENDA
5 JANUARY 2010
CITYHALL BUILDING
2401 COURTHOUSE DRIVE
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA 23456-8005
PHONE. (757) 385-4303
FAX (757) 385-5669
E- MAIL: ctycncl@vbgov.com
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING -Conference Room - 4:00 PM
A. ARTS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY
Randy Cohen, Vice President -Local Arts Advancement, Americans for the Arts
II. CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
A. INDICATOR COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL CITIES
David Bradley -Management Services
B. PLANNING ITEMS PENDING
Jack Whitney, Director -Planning
-1-
MINUTES
VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Virginia Beach, Virginia
January S, 2010
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. called to order the CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP re the City Manager's
Briefing - in the City Council Conference Room, City Hall, on Tuesday, January 5, 2010 at 4:00 P.M.
Council Members Present:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill " DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Barbara
M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones , Mayor William D. Sessoms,
Jr. and James L. Wood
Councilman Villanueva resigned effective December 31, 2009
Council Members Absent:
Robert M. Dyer [Mother Ill -Entered: 4:12 P.M.J
John E. Uhrin [Entered: 4:16 P.M.J
Rosemary Wilson [Out of the CiryJ
fm~uary 5, 2010
-2-
SANDLER CENTER FOUNDATION UPDATE
4:00 P.M.
Linwood Branch, President, and Dot Wood, Vice President -Sandler Center Foundation, provided
information re the Foundation formed in 2005. The Foundation was tasked with raising $12.5 MILLIONfor
the construction of the Sandler Center re a public private partnership with the City of Virginia Beach. This
goal was exceeded; and, as a result, three (3) glass sculptures were purchased and are located in the Lobby.
The Sandler Center has an attractive new addition to its facade: a sleek, contemporary styled digital kiosk that
will serve as a striking marquee for this beautiful Performing Arts Center. With a kinetic, engaging display,
the marquee offers Sandler Center visitors and passersby up-to-the-minute information on performances and
events. This vital complement to the Sandler Center's streetscape is sponsored by Dominion Virginia Power
and was christened at a "Powering Up "Ceremony and Reception on August 20, 2009.
The Foundation sponsors "Why Not Wednesday's? "The series proved to be a cure for the midweek "blahs "
all Summer offering free music and entertainment for people of all ages. Best of all, the series raised over
$4, 000 for the Sandler Center Foundation's Education Endowment through food and beverage sales. This free
concert series will again be hosted this coming Summer.
The next sponsored event will be Mardi-Gras Masquerade in connection with the Harry Connick, Jr.
Performance on February 19, 2010. These proceeds will benefit the Sandler endowment program. Ongoing
community campaigns and endowment funds help to underwrite educational programs and create discounted
tickets for performances. Aspiring young artists have been able to work directly with performers such as the
Boston Brass, who this year will actually go to the schools and work directly with the students. A dynamic
Board is dedicated to the success of the Sandler Center and the advancement of the arts in Virginia Beach as
well as the Region. Next week, the Foundation will conduct elections for leadership positions. Linwood
Branch and Dot Wood will be stepping down as President and Vice President. They are excited about the
future of the Foundation and the continuation of the wonderful relationship that exists between the
Foundation, the City Council and the City Administration. Mr. Branch recognized the SandlerFamilyfor their
dedication. The Sandler's had pledged three (3) accomplishments: contribute $S-MILLION to the naming
rights of the Performing Arts Center, assist in raising additional funds and assume an active role in the
Foundation.
The $5-MILLION pledge is complete and the Sandlers were instrumental in raising additional funds. Art
Sandler dedicated many hours to this effort? The Sandler's have contributed enormously to the success.
Dot Wood advised she first came in 2003 to lead the Citizens group. In the audience were Bobby Melatti„
Jean Rawls and Brian Kirwin who were in attendance to celebrate the success of the Sandler Center. Mrs.
Wood expressed appreciation for the opportunity from City Manager James Spore, former City Attorney,
Judge Leslie Lilley and Patricia Phillips, Director -Finance. Emily Spruill, Director - Cultural Affairs,
Michele Catalano, Development Specialists and Hazel Turner, Administrative Assistant. Mrs. Wood expressed
appreciation for being a part of this project. Linwood Branch has become a very dearfriend with high family
values and well deserved recognition as First Citizen.
Mr. Branch lauded the accomplishments of Dot Wood and was grateful for the experience to work alongside
her. She has been the "heart, soul and driving force behind the project ". He expressed appreciation to the
City Council. The Sandler Center is a wonderful facility with a tremendous working relationship which will
only get better with time.
Mayor Sessoms expressed appreciation to all for the dedicated and unselfish endeavors on behalf of the
Sandler Center.
,jm~u~y5, 2010
-3-
CI TY COUNCIL BRIEFING
ARTS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY
4:10 P.M.
Randy Cohen, Vice President -Local Arts Advancement, Americans for the Arts
AEP3 (Arts and Economic Prosperity III), is an economic impact study of the nation's nonprofit arts and
cultural organizations and their audiences. It sends a clear and welcome message. Leaders who care about
community and economic development can feel good about choosing to invest in the Arts. AEP3 is a myth
buster. It alters the perception that the Arts are luxuries worth supporting in prosperous times but hard to
juste when the economy is struggling. At a time when governments at all levels are making tough budget
choices, this study sends an important message: that support for the Arts does not come at the expense of
econom is development. Rather, it is an industry that supports jobs, generates government revenue and is the
cornerstone of tourism and economic development that drives acreativity-based economy.
Arts and Economic Prosperity III includes study regions in all 50 states plus the District of Columbia.
Arts and Economic Prosperity is the most comprehensive study of its kind ever conducted in both national
and local data, The diverse communities range in population (4 thousand to 3 million) and type (rural to
urban).
Conservative study... Only includes nonprofit arts and culture organizations.
Economic Impact measurement uses a sophisticated analysis called input/output. Input/output analysis is a
highly regarded type of Economic Analysis that has been the basis for two Nobel Prizes in economics. This
form of Economic Analysis is well suited for this study because it can be customized specifically to each
community.
Input/output analysis enables economists to track how many times a dollar is "respent" (or ripples) in the
community-and the economic impact generated by each round of spending. How can a dollar be respent?
Consider the following example:
A theater company purchases a gallon of paint from the local hardware store for $20, generating the direct
economic impact of the expenditure. The hardware store then uses a portion ofthe aforementioned $20 to pay
the sales clerk's salary; the sales clerk spends some of the money for groceries; the grocery store uses some of
the money to pay its cashier; the cashier then spends some for the utility bill; and so on. The subsequent
rounds of spending are the indirect economic impacts.
Tlzus, the initial expenditure by the theater company was followed by four additional rounds of spending (by
the hardware store, sales clerk, grocery store, and the cashier). The effect of the theater company's initial
expenditure is the direct economic impact. The subsequent rounds ofspending are all of the indirect impacts.
The total impact is the sum of the direct and indirect impacts.
Cool item: Each community requires more than 1-Million calculations to measure total economic impact.
Mr. Cohen cited their National Partners:
J~rluary 5, 2010
-4-
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING
ARTS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY
~ ~. .~~
~I
P -
'~"`~ ~ Our National Partners
fli~\
A f`IL iirr~i
~~:•,~. .., .,. wew,.a i...o.acvei..
N`~~~~:.~`'~ Grantmakers -
,,,...,...,,. ®iit the Arts
'~~ ~~ -.
`~~~ a~~
~~
Nonprofit Arts and Culture
Industry in Virginia Beach
$56.8-MILLIONAnnual Expenditures
Full-Time E uivalent Jobs 1, 411
Local Government Revenue $2.3-MILLION
State Government Revenue $3.6-MILLION
Mr•. Cohen advised the numbers "tell the story" The total annual spending by local nonprofit Arts
organizations ($13.5-MILLION) and their audiences (1.4-MILLION) attendees ($43.3-MILLION). These
amounts reflect the total economic impact (total of both direct and indirect impacts).
U Y. f, Yt_
~y,~ ~ ° u
Nonprofit Arts & Culture
Attendees in Virginia Beach
Spend X30.44 Per Person, Per Event
Gifts $2.06
Ground
` .Transportation
Meals $18.35 - $1.43
-Lodging $3.04
Other $3.64
~~;`~'
~......~ .. 3 „;~ tTI.i~F
Jar~u~ry 5, 2010
-5-
CITYCOUNCILBRIEFING
ARTS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY
Mr. Cohen advised the average spending by local attendees to a nonprofit arts and culture event.
The amount is per person, per event and does not include cost of admission. Nationally, data was collected
from 94, 478 Arts event attendees. Average spending is $27.79 per person per event, not including the price of
admission. Very few people list hotel spending, so it's a low average).
In addition to spending data, researchers asked those surveyed to provide their home zip codes. Analysis of
this data enabled a comparison ofevent-related spending by local and nonlocal attendees. Previous economic
and tourism research has shown that nonlocal attendees spend more than their local counterparts. This study
reflects those findings. While the ratio of local to nonlocal attendees is different in every community, the
national sample revealed that 39 percent of attendees traveled from outside of the county in which the event
took place (nonlocal) and 61 percent were local. Arts and culture is a product-a magnet that attracts visitors
to a region.
r
.~
~~-3 Nonprofit Arts & Culture
Local vs. Nonlocal Attendees in Virginia Beach
(Total =1.4 million in 2009)
Nonlocal
Attendees
465,179
(33%)
r
8 percent of nonlocal visitors to Virginia Beach had hotel expenses, averaging $193 per person (hotel cost:
$105).Nonlocal audiences, who live outside the county in which the event occurred spend more than their
local counterparts. As would be expected from a traveler, significantly higher spending can be found in the
categories of lodging, meals, retail and transportation. This data demonstrates that people will travel to
attend a cultural event. When a community attracts cultural tourists, it harnesses significant economic
retivards. As communities compete for the tourist's dollar, the Arts have proven to be a magnet for travelers
and their money. Local businesses are able to grow because travelers extend the length of their trips to attend
cultural events. Travel and tourism research shows cultural travelers spend more ($631 vs. $457), travel
longer (5.2 nights vs. 4.1 nights) and are more likely to spend at least $1, 000 (18% vs. 12%).
fanu~ry 5, 2010
-6-
CITYCOUNCILBRIEFING
ARTS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY
o,~i~ ~i.
Nonprofit Arts & Culture
3f~
Event Related Spending in Virginia Beach
Local vs. Nonlocal
uo
$35
~o
~5 $26.27
s~o
,t ;
$,~
:r
.; f
^~cical,~
w3f~,~
a4 ~~iA w~~,~~f
$39.04
Non-Local
0. ~xf~
"We came for the Art!"
Purpose of visit:
Arts event: 84%
Vacation: 5
Business: 3
Arts and Economic Prosperity III reveals a significant contribution to nonprofit arts and culture organizations
as a result of Volunteerism. While these Arts Volunteers may not have an economic impact as defined in this
study, they clearly have an enormous impact on their communities by helping arts and culture organizations
function as a viable industry. Independent Sector estimates the value of the average 2008 volunteer hour to be
$20.25
The Citizen Volunteers (2008)
3,407 volunteers
133,976 hours
Value: $2.7-MILLION ($20.25/hour)
In-Kind Contributions: $405,745
f~~uary 5, 2010
-~-
CITYCOUNCILBRIEFING
ARTS ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY
How Virginia Beach Stacks Up .. .
Spending by Audiences
(Per Person, Per Event, Excluding Admission)
Virginia Beach $ 30.44
National Community Average ~ 27.87
Nonprofit Arts and Culture
Industry in Virginia Beach
- A Local Industry
- Attracts Audiences
- Stimulates Business Development
- Supports Jobs
- Generates Government Revenue
Arts and culture organizations-businesses in their own right-leverage significant event-relatedspending by
their audiences thatpump vital revenue into restaurants, hotels, retail stores, parkinggarages and other local
businesses. This study lays to rest a common misconception: that communities support arts and culture at the
expense of local economic development
The Arts Means Business: www AmericansForTheArts.orb/Econonaicimpact
Visit this website to access free resources you can use to help make the economic case for arts funding and
arts friendly policies in your community
Creative Industries in Virginia Beach
954 Arts Businesses Employ 4,212 People
f~„u~,y ~; 2010
-8-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
INDICATOR COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL CITIES
4:30 P.M.
FY 2010-11 Budget Preparation
- November 17`" Five Year Forecast Presentation
- December 8`" Presentation Summarizing Citizen Inputfrom Town Hall Meetings
- January 5th Regional Comparison Briefing
- March 23rd City Manager's Presentation of Budget and Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) to City Council
- City Council Workshops April 6`", 13`", 20`" and 27th
- Public Hearings April 22nd and 27th
- May 4`" Budget Reconciliation Workshop
- May II th FY ZOIO Budget Adoption
Expenditures By Category
100.D96 .-
17 l
i 80.0% °'
55.3%
60.0%
1
a
'. 40.0% '
! 1
20.0%
0.0%
.r ice/
92.4yb
46.
su.sw re
521%
,~~ ''
~` ~ o~w if` moo dtt' ,~o~'
~'-~' a°~ mot` ~°J ,~C+F~ ,~+t~ `'o
;~o txo Qo dT_
P
Community Development
^ parks, Recroation, and Cuhural
Education
^ Health and Welfare
^ Public Works
^ Publlc Safety and Judicial Administration
^ Ganarol Government Administrotion
Source: 2008 Comparative Repoli of Local Government Revenues and Expenditures
Virginia Auditor of Public Accounts
Local Revenue By Type
100.0% '~ # ~ 'i w'U r8 stor Barvke I
]
11 1+C, 1 5`(j ~ 11 S><a 13 tit. :
CC
~ .
1 G 3
~.
~
~
^MI IlenwuaRwanw ~
80.0% ~ ~
~~ ... ........ -
~ - I
..
~ ~
~'-
4. Rwenuehom the Uad of MOnw end Propxty
60.0%
5
~ _
-
~~''~~ .. .
•COCaltafae and USa Tex
i
•Consumar Utllky Texae
90.0% !
r+Mwls Tex
t 20.0% 'i ~ ^BPOL
.
.....
~> •Othar l.o9el Texae
,
;
I
'
.:
~
~~ ~~ ~
Sl`
t
. ~~ ^P nal and BU Inata Pro Party Taxer
~
..
.~
na
??? ~
- ,
'.
~
S ~. ^ RMI r,e.te Texae
Source: 2008 Comparative Report of Local Government Revenues and Expenditures
Virginia Auditor of Public Accounts
Jal~uary 5, 2010
-9-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
INDICATOR COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL CITIES
Current Selected Local Tax Rates and Fees for FY 2009-10
Real Estate Tax Rate
Per $100 of Assessed Value
$1.60 _. _ -
$1.45
$1.40
$1.40 __ _ - _ _ _ --- _ - -
$1.28 1
24 $1.27 $1.27
$1.22 .
51.20
_... _-
. _- .__._ ........ 1.11 _..__ __-_. ._-_
-._ $1.08 - _ _ _
_.._. 1.10
1.05 1.04
$1.00
50.80 _. __
0.89
- ___ _-.._ - __ _ 0.~1 ___
$0.60 I --
~'. -- --- . ; - --- ----
~' ~ - -- -
$0.40. ---- -- ---- -- - -
^ FY 2004
50.20 -_ ____._ -. _....... _ ___.. ^ FY 2010 -..
50.00
~'~
~!~ ~. - _ ~ ,a
''
'
' .VlrQinla - Chesapeake ,~~Norfolk ,Partsmoutho, Suffolk
~P~;~ _ ~°
1t~ -
~; -
~ -._.-Newport"*
.Hampton
c'
~
- Beach ..; F
.tl'
~
.. i
,,
„ .. -News
Source: Management Services
Personal Property Tax Rate
.,..~.:..~........a Q....:...,«
,J~luaiy 5, 2010
source: management services
II
-10-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
INDICATOR COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL CITIES
Hotel Tax Rate
Meal Tax Rate
Source: Management Services
Automobile License Fee
Vehicles Under 4,000 Pounds
Source: Management Services
Jal~uary5, 2010
-11-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
INDICATOR COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL CITIES
Cigarette Tax Rate
Per Pack
Monthly Water and Sewer Bill
Assuming 5,000 Gallons Consumed
Source: Virginia Beach Public Utilities Department
Jasluary5, 2010
.,..~~.,`. ~..a.~oy..~.~.............,....
-12-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
INDICATOR COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL CITIES
Monthly Trash Collection Fee
Source: Management Services
•Hampton charges $18.42 for houses that recycle and $43.33 for those that do not
•Newport News charges $18.63 fora 60 gallon container and $23.31 fora 90 gallon
container
Comparison of Municipal Taxes
FY 2009-10
Virginia Beach Chesapeake NoAolk Portsmouth Suffolk Hampton Newport News
Real Estate Tax $2,201.86 $2,597.70 $2,746.14 $3,067.78 $2,251.34 $2,572.96 $2,721.40
Personal Property Tax 461.76 509.18 530.40 624.00 530.40 530.40 530.40
Electricity Utility Tax 36.00 45.00 45.00 40.80 36.00 36.00 36.96
Gas Utility Tax 36.00 22.56 18.00 36.00 36.00 28.80 18.12
Va Telecommunications Tax 70.68 70.68 70.68 70.68 70.68 70.68 70.68
Water Utility Tax 36.00 None 67.50 84.00 None None None
Restaurant Tax 251.48 251.48 275.43 275.43 275.43 275.43 275.43
Admissions Tax 25.69 25.69 25.69 25.69 25.69 25.69 19.27
Vehicle Ucense Decal 50.00 46.00 52.00 50.00 40.00 56.00 52.00
Stormwater Utility Fee 80.67 82.20 98.28 78.00 62.88 55.20 65.40
Residential Refuse Fee None 36.00 324.12 384.00 None 221.00 279.76
Total Tax Impact 53,250.14 $3,686.49 $4,267.24 $4,736.38 $3,328.42 $3,872.16 54,069.42
Source: Management Services
• This comparison assumes a home valued at $247, 400 which represents the
median sale price of a home in Virginia Beach for 2010. Virginia Beach has
the lowest tax rate when using this standard This compar-ison assumes a
home valued at <$'2~7, X00 which represents the median sale price ofa Home
In Vilguua Beach for 2010.
,Ja»uary5, 2010
-13-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
INDICATOR COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL CITIES
Economic Vitality
Change in Housing Price in Hampton
Roads and Competing Metro Areas
from 2006 to 2008
10.0%
s.o%
o.~%
-s.o%
_lU.U%
-15.0%
ao.o%
_25.0%
-30.0%
Metropolitan Statistical Area
Source: Hampton Roads Planning District Commission (National Association of Realtors)
$6,000
i
ii $3,000. err
SO' , - ,,-, - _
Pr-
1993'1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 200fi"2007 2008...
Ir
Source: Hampton Roads Planning District Commission (Consolidated Federal Funds Report)
Jalwary 5, 2010
-14-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
INDICATOR COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL CITIES
Median Household Income
$80,000
$60,000
~ao,ooo
.Virginia
Beach
-rl-Chesapea
ke
~~- Norfolk
Partsmau
th
~~-5uffolk
:-~ Hampton
$20,000
2005 2006. 2007 ..:..2008
Calendar Year
Median Household Income can be affected by both economic and demographic factors
Per Capita Income
$5,000 ~_ ___ ___
$az,szl
-~VirBinia Beach
$40,000 ~ _- _ _ _ __ __ -F[hesapeake
~~ -t-Norfolk
li, $30,110
$30,000 ~_____.----___..-~°'"`~-__ -Portsmouth
-__
k~,m.-'~F'""~ -+-Suffolk
-*-Hampton
$20,000 _ __....
-,-Newport News
$10,000 _ ~ .. ~, ~r _ I
2000 , '~'rro 2001 ~ ~~~ 2002 2003 2004 ` 2005 200b 2007 ~, ;
k
i
Source: US Department of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis
• Virginia Beach has a much higher per capita income
• Median household income reflects just income, while per capita income reflects income and benefits,
which may also be higher due to military communities
Jal~ua~y 5, 2010
-15-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
INDICATOR COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL CITIES
Percent of Commercial Real Property
2008
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
Virginia Beach Chesapeake Norfolk Portsmouth Suffolk
Hampton Newport
News
Source: Virginia Association of Assessing Officers
Percent of Exempt Real Property
2008
45.0%
40.0%
35.0%
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
Source: Virginia Department of Taxation
Ja~~u~y 5, 2010
Virginia Chesapeake Norfolk Portsmouth Suffolk Hampton Newport
Beach News
-16-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
INDICATOR COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL CITIES
Unemployment Rate
Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics -Local Area Unemployment Statistics Database
Taxable Sales
$6,000,000,000 T-- -- -- - - - - - --- __ _ _..
___-_
55,000,000,000 t -_ _-..
_.- -.-. ~VirgtnlaBeach
-lf-Chesapeake
$4,OOO,OOO,OOp -~ -_ _ _ i
!i -i-Norfolk
$3,000,000,000 ±- ~ -- ter-Portsmouth
' Y~ "'~ -+k-Suffolk '
'
$2,000,000,000 - ~_`~ W.. -.-..-...~~~.~._
.
-
tHampton
$1,000,000,000 -, _ -.-.. _ -+-Newport News
i
SO, ~ ~ -t
2003 2004
~ 2005 2006'' 2007 2008 ~ ~G
~
~
rYear
~'
Calenda
Source: Virginia Department of Taxation
• This is total sales on which the S% General Sales Tax applies
• There are 62 categories of retail classifications
• By 2008, you can begin to see the impacts of the recession
Jarluary5, 2010
-17-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
INDICATOR COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL CITIES
Quality Education and lifelong Learning
Library Expenditures
Per Capita
$as.oo
Sao.ao
$35.00
$30.00
$25.00
$20.00
$15.00
$10.00
$ 5.00
$0.00
2003 2004 2005 2006
Fiscal Year
Source: Virginia Auditor of Public Accounts
!2
~Vlrginia Beach
-FChesapeake
-i-Narfalk
~Portsmouth
~k-Suffolk
-il-Hampton
--Newport News
2008
2007
City Expenditures Per Pupil
56,000
$5,000
$4,000
$3,000
$2,000
$1,000
$0
~Vlrgin(a Beach
i-Cheupeake
-i-Norfolk
-k-Portsmouth
-aie-Suffolk
tHampton
-~-:NewportNews
Source: Virginia Department of Education Superintendent's Annual Report
j~,~~~y 5, 2010
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
School Year
-18-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
INDICATOR COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL CITIES
City Contribution as a Percent of Total
School Operating Expenditures
o.o~ ~ _ _ --- ~ ___ r - --- __ ~- - _~. _ _...
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
School Year
Source: Virginia Department of Education Superintendent's Annual Report
Safe Community
Expenditures Per Capita
Fire and Rescue
$300 _... ._ _ _.... _..
$250 __. ........
-- _... ~~~~~~~_
.--"'" ~~x _...__..
n
- ..-w.Qht. se+~
$200 J. ~.
.,r fCh~sap~~k~
$150 _....
'~- $119.17 -it-POrtsmouth
' -"'~
08.97
$103.00
$100 - _ _._ ..._. -,m-SUHoIk
$93.64
$77.57 $83.01 -~H~mpton
$SO
-~--N~wpor[ News
$ _. .= P~
_
-- 2003 2004 - 2007
~ ~ 200
6 t
:.
{005 Zoos
~
i4 ~ ~i
,
~
r . t ~
5
Source: Virginia Auditor of Public Accounts
Jatwary 5, 2010
-19-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
INDICATOR COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL CITIES
Expenditures Per Capita Law
Enforcement and Traffic Control
- - - -- - --
$400.00 I _ _ _ _ __ _.
__ _- ~Vlrglnla Beach
$300.00 ~
- - _ -- -
~ -i-Chesapeake
~ ~
~
02
_ .
.
206.^~
r, -~-Norfolk
,5200.00 ~ --.
~
~~ _
~ t8i.75~~~~92.99 ~ _ Portsmouth
$1 .41
$163.25 ~
.,_,._....-
~,~
-~-Suffolk
$100.00 - tHampton
--Nawport News'?
i
~' 2003 ~ 2004- 2005 ~ ~ ,, 2006 s ~- 2007, -- r 2008
$ ' iuL ''
Source: Virginia Auditor of Public Accounts
Violent Crime Rate
12.0
~o.o
'~Vlrgln(a Beach
i-Chesapeake
$ 0
--r Norfolk
6.0
-Portsmouth
-~-Suffolk j
4.0
r~-Hamp[on
2.0 _. 2.2 .._. ._ 2.2 __.. _- - _.. 2:4--
-rNe
- wport News .. ~
. i
00 r~
- ~
-
i7aP
~^` ~~ .
2000 2001 2002'
r r
` 2003 X2004 2005 ~ 2006 i~ 2007 ~ 2008
ei ~u" si-V't' r: l'~
y~$ve4,a-,if ~~~~`a ;
~'`
A ~. ~ a~'
-~" k t
~
~.'';n ,~ ~%
~
#Calendarl .»~i ~t
i
Source: Crime in Virginia
fanu~ry 5, 2010
-ao-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
INDICATOR COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL CITIES
Quality Physical Environment
$600
$500
$400
C
c°
c $300
c
0
~ $200
$100
30,000
25,000
v
20,000 A
0
c
15,000 ~>
d
0
0
10,000 c
x
5,000
$0 0
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Source: Hampton Roads Planning District Commission (Texas Transportation Institute)
Lane Miles of Road
3,500 r- _ -__
i I I
3,000 1-_ _. __.
i
tVtreinia Beach '',
2,500 ,-. _ ___. -_
fChesapeake
! 2,000 __ _ _ __ __ -a-Norfolk
i
i -:c-Portsmouth ~.
-- ';
;' 1.500 __..
-~-Suffolk I
i _ I
.1,000 - - _.... -- ___- --_
-~-Hampton ''
500 - .. - __- -.._ -^Newport News
0 ,__ _, ___ ~ _ _ - _T_ ,
,'' 2008
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007...'
Source: Virginia Department of Transportation
fa~lu~y5, 2010
Hampton Roads Congestion and
Congestion Costs
-21-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
INDICATOR COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL CITIES
Expenditures Per Lane Mile
_.
560.000 _ _ _... _... __.._.
i
$50,000
tVlrQinla Beach
$40,000 i~Chesapeake i
Norfolk '
$30,000 -«-Portsmouth
~, -+-Suffolk
II $20,000 -4-Hampton
-Newport News
~ $10,000
II $0 {
II 2003 2004 2005 2006.. 2007 2008
- Fiscal Year
Sources: Virginia Department of Transportation and Auditor of Public Accounts
$zoo.oo
$ieo.oo
$120.00
$80.00
$40.00
~VlrQlnla Beach
i-Chesapeake
-}.Norfolk
I
9
-x-Portsmouth
-~-Suffolk
$0.00 _,_ -- __ ,
~~ 2003 ...2004 2005. " ` 2006 ,: 2007 -. - 2008 ~ I'~ ~ .~ .
'Fiscal Year ~"
Source: Virginia Auditor of Public Accounts
Expenditures Per Capita
Solid Waste Collection
~I
f~~uary 5, 2010
-22-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
INDICATOR COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL CITIES
Family and Youth Opportunities
Poverty Rate -Individuals
Source: Census Bureau -American Community Survey
Expenditures Per Capita
Public Health
$~o.oo
$60.00
~VIrQlnia Beach
$50.00
•-Chesapeake.
$40.00 -ie-Norfolk I
-f-Portsmouth
$30.00
-fit-Suffolk
$20.00
-}-Hampton
$10.00 ---Newport News
$5.72 $5.39 $5.45 $ •76 $6.06 $6.35 i
$0.00 ;_ _- .,_ ,,, -~~ _~ , _ ~ __ ti
~ ~ ~ 2003 2004 2009 x_2006 2007
g k -""y
~
p~ 2008 ~ ,, ~
~
~h.'~ a
~I'~1 FlscalYear '
~ ~ n -
~~- '~ r ~ ``
~' ry ;w~~
>urce: Virginia Auditor of Public Accounts
,January 5, 2010
-23-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
INDICATOR COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL CITIES
Expenditures Per Capita
Social Services
$400.OU -1
~ _ - -_ _..._.
~ ~-
tVlrgln~a Beath
$300.00 - -- __ . _ .
~µ^~f ~.
~ ~-Chesapeake
'°°~
~
-~-Norfolk
~
$200.00
- ~:....---" '-r„r--
~„~....----"e`-- -~-Portsmouth
$165.74
`-.~«-Suffolk
$100.00 - ---_ _ _- _
$~ g4 -~-Hampton
-»-Newport News
z $000 _ ~' {~+^Ij
~~+ 2003 ~ 2004 ' ; ~e;2005 ~ ~~ 2006 ~i .:2007 ~,. 2008 - ~_., ~~Il ~u~ r~ ~~~
'~'.r ' ' sT~. _ ~. FistalYear ~~ ~~'~ ~ ~, ,'titi ~- ~'i
m.. .. _.
Source: Virginia Auditor of Public Accounts
Expenditures Per Capita
Mental Health and Mental Retardation
siso.oo
$200.00 __ _ _ - ~/"~ ~rt+V1rQInIa Beath
~.-~^",y~'"/' i-Chesapeake
$ _ ~ - -. ..--.-.w"'~ _.... ~..s _.._ -k-Norfolk
150.00: III ~
er'~ .._ _
N,e„r---~-~-°' """~ -FPOrtsmouth ,.
$100.00 ~ _..._
~ -Suffolk
$50.00 - _._ .__..... ...__. _... .__... ..__. ___._.._. tHampton
-»-Newport News
I
$0.00 ~ -_ -__ ~ - -_ - -
I i ar iyl ,
~~ ~ 2003 w x2004 2005 -.2006 i,v - 200 ,' '~ r2008 '~ ~;;
~ .,.
~,u,. i,~';'. ~ ~~ Fiscal Year .,. ~ - '+ :
Source: Virginia Auditor of Public Accounts
j~luary 5, 2010
-24-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
INDICATOR COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL CITIES
Cultural and Recreational Opportunities
$160.00 -
$1ao.oo
$120.00
$100.00
$80.00
$60.00
$40.00
$20.00
$0.00
..M~Virginia Beach ~',.
-i-Chesapeake
..-;.,Norfolk
-te-Portsmouth ''..
Suffolk
-Hampton ~,..........
'--Newport News
Source: Virginia Auditor of Public Accounts
Expenditures Per Capita
Parks and Recreation
Expenditures Per Capita
Cultural Enrichment
S8o.00 _ _ __ ___ _ _. _ _ _ __
.,,:
,..,,.
Virginia Beach
- .~~•~ - ~ -`
L. _..
$60.00 _ "`t
_
-f Chesapeake
'. .,.,,•~i::-,..Norfolk ',.....
$40.00 -I_. __ __ _ _ __._ _ -~i-Portsmouth
-~-Suffolk
~. $22 90 $2 .Sl
$20.00 -- tHamp[on
$16.49 $18.70 $19.65
$1 .OS-+-Newport News '',
$0.00 ;. ___ _ --,
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 ',
Fiscal Year
Source: Virginia Auditor of Public Accounts
f~wary 5, 2010
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Fiscal Year
-zs-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
INDICATOR COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL CITIES
Quality Organization
Total Expenditures Per Capita
Source: Virginia Auditor of Public Accounts
Per Capita Expenditures as a Percentage
of Personal Income
14.0%
~Z.~
Source: Virginia Auditor of Public Accounts antl US Department of
Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis
fa~luary 5, 2010
-26-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
INDICATOR COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL CITIES
Debt Per Capita
ss,ooo
$4.000
h
Vl
~a~
rQlnia Beac
-FChesapeake
$3,000
-Norfolk
-?FPortsmouth
$2,000
-;+FSuffolk
$1,418 #Hampton.
$1,000 _ ___ _ __ _- ,
Newport News
iY a~~i
i q
n 2003 2004 2005 2006
'ra `
~
"
2007 2008
~ ~'
'
. ~ .
"` th:' _i, - .. ~ `
FLSpI Year ~ t, y,~ a~.
~
Source: Each City's 2008 CAFR
Bond Rating
Standard & Poor's AAA
Virginia Beach
Moody's
Aa1
Standard & Poor's AA
Chesapeake
Moody's
Aa2
Standard & Poor's AA
Norfolk
Moody's
Al
Standard & Poor's AA-
Portsmouth
Moody's
Al
Standard & Poor's AA
Hampton
Moody's
Aa2
Standard & Poor's Aa
Newport News
Moody's
Aa2
Source: Each City's 2008 CAFR
f811 U~71Y J~ 2Ol O
-a~-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
INDICATOR COMPARISON TO OTHER REGIONAL CITIES
Citizen Survey November 2009
• 91.4% are satisfied with City services overall
• 94.0% are satisfied with the appearance of the
City
• 97.4% believe Virginia Beach is a good place to
I ive
• 94.2% believe Virginia Beach is a safe place to
I ive
Conclusions
• The Region is experiencing the impacts of the
Recession
• Lowest cost provider in the Region
• Low overall tax rates compared to the Region
• Using standardized values, a family of four has
a lower tax burden than the other cities
• Still lag behind other cities in fees and charges
for service as proportion of total revenues
• Citizens value the services the City provides
Ja»ua~y5, 2010
-28-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
PLANNING ITEMS PENDING
4: SS P.M.
,Jack Wliitrley, Director - Plaunmg, ga ve a brief synopsis oldie Plallnmg Items pelldmgfor die,Jarlualy 12, 2010
a~xl falluary 26, 2010 City Counci] Sessions:
falluary 12, 2010
Church ofHolyFamily
Modification of"Conditional Use Permit
Lyrulha ven District
The applicant requests a modification ofdieir existing Conditional Use Peimitfor die church
to allow die addition of~a columbarium adjacent to die bulldi~lg.
Location oldie columbal"ium is along die eastenl wall oldie cfiurcli widim all area drat will be
enclosed wide die niche walls alld a decorative gate.
The existing church roof will be extended to cover the columbarium area.
Evaluation alld Recommendation
PIaI117rIlgStafl'recommends approval
Planning Commission recommends approval (11-0)
There was no opposition.
COllsent agenda
Nantucket by the Bay, LLC
Modification ofa Conditional Rezoning
Bayslde DIStrICt
The apphcalltlegUeStS a m0(IIhC'atron Of die plOflelS Ofl"eGOllrllgl'egUeStS for d11S Sltegl"allted
Ill 20~J~ all d 208.
The pUlpOSe Of die modlhcatroll IS t0 ~1) aIIOW a Day Cale OpelatlOn Ill die eXlStnlg bUlldlllg
arld (2) modrflCatroll Of die ploflel" pet'tarlllllg t0 die futUl"e Srte alld bUlJdrng deslgll.
The applicalltproposes use oldie existing buildmgfora Day Cale operation until such time as
die demand forresidential dwelling units increases. At drat time, die applicant will develop die
site to construct die mixed use multi familyalld commercial project proposed wide this proffer
modification.
Evaluation alld Recommendation
PlalulingStall~recommends approval
Plarlnmg Commission recommends approval (I1-0)
There was llo opposition.
Consent Agenda
falwary 5, 2010
-29-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
PLANNING ITEMS PENDING
farruary 12, 2010
Club Diesel (Craig Dean)/Prosperity Beach, LLC
Modification of Conditional Rezoning
Beach Dis6ict
The applicant requests a modification oFtfie existing Profiler Agreement for fire purpose of
installmgarr outdoorpatio/deck and a motorcycle parkingar~ea for tfie patrons ofClub Diesel,
which occupies fire units located at tfie nortfieaster-n end oftfie commercial center:
The patio area will be enclosed with wrought-iron fencing supported by brick and block
columns. Tlie proposed modification does not affect fire required parking on the site.
Evaluation and Recommendation
Plarrnirrg Stafl'r-ecommends approval
Plarmmg Commission recommends approval (11-0)
There was no opposition.
Consent Agenda
NewBeeurnn~ Outreach Church
Conditional Use Permit
Rose Hall District
The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit to allow use of a writ within a shopping
center for a church.
The church fias approximately 120 attendees duiinglargergatfie~ings.
The Zoning Ordinance requires 2~1 parkingspaces for a cfiurcfi with 120 seats. T here ar-e over
1, 000 parking spaces in this commercial center, marry of which ar-e not utilized Even with the
addition of'a Bmgo Hall, which was recently approved for this Center-, stafl~firrds parking is
more than adequate for all of tfie uses in tfie Centel:
Evaluation acrd Recommendation
Plarrnmg.Stafl'recommends approval
Plarrnirlg Commission recommends approval (11-D)
There was no opposition.
Consent Agenda
farruary 5, 2010
-30-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
PLANNING ITEMS PENDING
,January 12, 2010
Hard Concrete Co., Inc.
Conditional Use Permit
Centerville District
Tlie applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit for a contractor's storage yard
The applicarrtmarrufacturers concr-etc fence panels, caps and posts as contracts demand
This property leas been zoned I-1 Liglit Industrial District for marry years, being used for a
variety of light industrial uses, acrd has coexisted well with the adjacent residential area;
however, several conditions are recommended to ensure compatibility with tfie adjacent
residential area and to improve tfre appcararrcc oftlie site.
Evaluation acrd Recommendation
Plarrning.Stafl~recommends approval
Planning Commission recommends approval (11-0)
There was no opposition.
Consent Agenda
Jarruary5, 2010
-31 -
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
PLANNING ITEMS PENDING
farruary 12, 201 D
Tidewater Korean Baptist Church
Modification of Conditional Use Permit
Kempsville District
The applicant requests a modification of~tfieir~ Conditional Use Permit for the purpose ol~
allowingarr expansion oftlie building.
The total exparrsiorr includes a building addition of~1.9,22.9 square feel for a total of32,742
square feet in the building.
The plan also provides adrive-dirougli carropyfor drop-ofl~arrd pick-up arrd an alteration of
some oftlie parkingspaces along with the addition ofl7newspaces.
Witlr dre alteration and addition to fire parking areas, fire site meets fire minimum parking
requirement of 104 spaces.
Evaluation acrd Recommendation
Planning Staff~recommends approval
Plarming Commission recommends approval (11-0)
Tfier-e was no opposition.
Consent Agenda
,January 5, 2010
-32-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
PLANNING ITEMS PENDING
,jalluary 12, 2010
KLB Builders, Inc.
Change ofZoning
Beach District
The applicant proposes to rezone the existing A-12 property to R-5.S to replace one single-
familydwelling.
While much of this area is zoned A-12 Apartment, die prevalent housing type consists of
detached single-family alld duplex dwellings.
TI1eA-12Apal'trne1lCZOllingDlstrrctClOeSnota110WSlllgle-famllydWe11111gS, tllUSa1'eZOn111gIS
necessary iftlie applicant is to be allowed to construct a new single family dwelling
Evaluation and Recommendation
PlallrlingStafl~recommerlds approval
Plallnillg Commission recommends approval (11-0)
There was opposition.
CorlsentAgenda
City of Ylr.~inia Beach
Ordinance to AMEND Section 1001 of the City Zonrrl~ Ordinance pertaining to
religious uses m the I-1 and I-2 Industrial Districts
,jarluaiy26, 2010
~lesia Cristiana
Conditional Use Permit
Centerville District
The applicarltrequests a Conditional Use Permit to operate a religious facility witllill a existing
shopping center:
The church membership ra~Iges from 50 to 90 members.
Tlie Zoning Ordinance requires I S parking spaces for a church witfl ,90 seats. Tlier-e are ~f87
parking spaces irI the shopping center- parking lot, which is sufficient for the cliurcfi arld tfie
other users in tfle complex.
Evaluation alld Recommendation
PlaI1r11r1g.Stafl~r-eCOmmelldS approval
Planning Commission recommends approval (11-0)
There was no opposition.
ConsentAgenda
farlualy 5, 2010
-33-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
PLANNING ITEMS PENDING
fanuary26, 2010
Seashell Properties, LLC
Conditional Use Permit
Beach District
The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit to allow development of the site for a
commercial parkinglot and oft=site parkingforguests of fiis motel, .Sea Sliell Motel, located at
23'' Street arrd Atlantic Avenue.
Tlie applicant intends for this to be a temporary use until economic conditions improve such
tliatfull redevelopment oftlie site Carr occur:
The applicant will abide by the requirements in tfie City Code for tlris type of parkinglot arrd
has developed a meiliod ofidentifyirrg tfre vehicles that belong to the motel guests.
Evaluation arld Recommendation
Plarinirrg.Stafl'r-ecommends approval
Planning Commission recommends approval (11-0)
There was no opposition.
Consent Agenda
Robert R. and DorothyA. Martinsen
Street Closure
Lyrlnhaven District
The applicant requests discontirluarrce, closure acrd abandonment of a portion of arr
unimproved right-of-way for tfie purlrose ofincorvoratirrgitmto tfie a~~acentproperty.
The applicants owrr property to the east oftlie unimproved street; acrd wishes to incorporate
tlic land with their existing condominium development, wliicli is krrowrr as "Kentucky
Commons, a Condominium. "
Tfie applicants do have conceptual plans to redevelop the site should the street closure be
gr-anted acrd tfie closed area be unencumbered by easements.
Evaluation and Recommendation
PlarinirrgStaff'recommends approval
Plarming Commission recommends approval (11-0)
There was no opposition.
Consent Agenda
,January 5, 2010
-34-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
PLANNING ITEMS PENDING
January 26, 2010
Home Associates of Vrr.~inia, Inc.
Modification ofPD-HLand Use Plan
Princess Anne District
Tfie applicarrtrecluests modification oftfre proffers and PD-H2L~v~d Use Plan for the purpose
of suhstitutirrg the cur-r-ently approved 60 units of age-restriicted fiousmglocated at the soutlier»
end oftlie development with 53 towrrfiome condominium units and one single family "Manor
Home" condominium unit.
None of the new units will be age-restricted
Evaluation and Recommendation
Planning Stafl~recommends denial
Plarmmg Commission recommends approval (10-1)
There was no opposition.
farruary5, 2010
-35-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
PLANNING ITEMS PENDING
Kempsville Presbyterian Church
Conditional Use Permit
Princess Anne District
The applicantrequests a Conditional Use Permit to allowdevelopment oftlie site fora worship
center arld church campus for its congregation.
Phase I is the construction ofa facility with a footprint of~approximately 100, 000 square feet
(.SF). This building will include a tivo-stoiycir-culation hub andgeneralgatheru~gspace served
by a cafe for members.
A temporary 2~1 foot wide entrance road will be provided form North L~vlding Road to the
proposed church.
Evaluation al~d Recommendation
PlannirlgStafl~recommends approval
Planning Commission recommends approval (11-0)
There was no opposition.
January 5, 2010
-36-
CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING
PLANNING ITEMS PENDING
Jarlrrary26, 2010
Two (2) Non-conformin,~ Use Applications
Hells Kitchen on the Bay
Bayside District
Tfie applicant requests exparlsiorl ofa nonconforming use by adding all outdoor dining area.
.Site is zoned R-5R Residential. Restaurants are not allowed in tfie R-5R; tfierefor-e, this use is
110nCOrlfol'Innlg:
Evaluation arld Recommendation
This item has not been heard by tfie Plarmmg Commissio~l; tlier-efor-e,
there is no recommendation at lllis time.
Two (2) Applications being expedited from the
anuary 13 Plannur.~ Commission Hearing
Gary C. Kimnach c% Beach Auto
Beach District
Tlie applicalltproposes to rezone tfie existingR-10 Residential arld Conditional B-1 Business
properties to Conditional I-2 Heavy Industrial for the purpose ofdeveloping arl automotive
repair facility.
The Slte rS Irl AP7r1
Tfie applicant, working with Economic Development and PlarlrlmgS[afls, leave proffered a site
development plan that will affoicl flee surrounding properties with assurances oflarldscape
buffering, qualityfencing, on-site parking, unobtrusive business Hours arld a buildillgsimilar-irl
height to residential homes.
Evaluation arld Recommendation
This item will be heard by flee Planning Commission on farluary 13; therefore,
dier-e is no recommendation at this time.
Jallnary ~; 2010
-37-
PLANNING ITEMS PENDING
Jarruary26, 2010
Two (2) Applications beur.,~ expedited from the
January 13 Planning Commission Hearin
Senior's Unlimited Lifestyles, Inc.
Bayside District
Tlie applicant requests a Conditional Use Permitfor llie purpose ofconstr~ucturga tlu-ee-story,
X10 unit, independent living senior housing laciliry at 25.5 units/acre.
Tfie proposed development is located in the Burton Station area and is in the area
recommended by the Plan for such a project.
T he proposed f~ciliry will include approximately 30 one-bedroom and IOttyo-bedroom units
of,9~10 acrd 1,1,90 square feet respectively. Rents for the one-bedroom units will start at ~'J'-35
and the two-bedroom units will start at $'680.
Evaluation and Recommendation
Tliis item will be heard by the Planning Commission on January 13; therefore,
there is no recommendation at this time.
January 5, 2010
~~~~~ ~
~..., ~ .
h0. -i.~ `4 ~ ~ ~+.~~, *~6 3 i".' .. •_<
f~v
'~, f ~4ti~ 1TEM5 TO
• z ` F#E,AR~;IhI
~~~: `. Chur.~n o~th~ Nn?~~ /~im~lc
pp ~ ~ -rs gt'.
,~ ~~
N ~ .. ~~
g~~ ~- ~.~.~ 4 ~
S
1~ y n ~ ti
t f „ ~1
: ;' , ~.
~.~ ~ ~ ~
II I
Y
.~ + :p .
~' ~~
~
I I I I
115/2014
z t ~_
~i ,i~yr rx S ,~ ,~~ ~ ~ ~, (ci
t ~ 7 ~'~P`~a~'"~~` ~~
,~
n~u k r f ~ th 1,{„S,:
! x:
~ T.
1 /5/2010
1 /5/2010
~,,~,~.# ~. k
f ~
. ,,}~ ~
,. ~ _. _._.._,a._s.aus,.., btu ..
~ .~ v
~~ .. ~~`.~. ~ ..,. ~o ~ia. ,.r_a~.
4
1 /5/2010
1 /5/2010
~- `
~ ~,
~:
• ~ ~,: ,_,
~;~
~~~° _
~ fi.
~~~ h.:rr.o-.` .
~a ~~.
t`
R
~"~1~ ~k f ~~~
~~ E ~ ~ ~~k' a _ ~~~
r s c
--.~. ' ~-: ..: r '~ ri, , ~ri
k
6
1 /5/2010
„R~ 2d _. r~
~, ~f„
~.1 A ~ ~A o 7
~}e.~rl i~~Al ~ , ahi Rr-3
~~~-~ ~ ~ ~~ ~Ji7q ~.
'° ~s~ ~
nva_' ~~'~u ~r - ' t~ ~2 s --'
B-2~~ooe ab~-2- p~~ Ri=3
~ry~ ~ ~ +~' ~ ~ ~ ~
7
1 /5/2010
1 /5/2010
-- --
s3 L- ~__. ________ ~j AVAllA6LE UNli1
s _
a.~ i,.»e
~ ~ ~ O
_ .. .___,_,.._..T.__-.._,~
Gastcr~.w~ ~ ~ _ MAiY~s.lEen.
Swrt
9
1 /5/2010
~~,~;
,, t
. ~.
~~
,
a ~
9.q
I
~ yn
.,
~~;~..
~
~
~ _. q
j
^
Ay _
4~
~~ :a
:' ,moo^~a«
:-°~~"
I .
~:~°
.
.~,~~.,
3 ~.~~.
~_~
w __
""°
,~ _
10
1 /5/2010
_. z ~ _
~s.,.~. ~ ~ ' ~ ~~ _ -_~. , ~.-.~
r,~
`~ ~ ~E _~ i
g --~
~.
.:._ . = =
__ -~_
--.,~ - a
11
1 /5/2010
23rd Street Public Parking Lot
fir.
i
Y .7 _ ..
_- - a + ~~"sx$
S
M ~ ~'~
i;
r ~.,
,.~<;
12
1 /5/2010
~.~
~~R~_z~ a __._ ..
L '_
S
.,=
_. ~,-
4E •_ -
- 1 _.. ~
~~
~
~~~:'
- ....
~ -~
... ~.~
13
1 /5/2010
Sh i~vi 1 ak<-5 ,
_..,. ~,
~~~. .+
I ' ~ ___
r°-~~~
~ r~ ~ ' ~;`
~~ ~ ~ n ~ ~~ /~~
~~ f ~ r
!/ ~~ LF
,__ .r.
~~~:I'-
Sh pal Laki•~ ,
.. .. ... ...
~,,
~ v ~
a a :., i r
a dd1~~ \ ~ ..mot
,... ~ ~.
14
i i I .r.
1 /5/2010
!-R.,,
S- "fi JRYIJn
. _ 1-
KPC City
of Hope
A~~~rilr. ~.i/t, Frr~h~~re~ri«n (h~~r.-tr
KPC City of Hope C~ ~ , ~ -
......,~.,.«.. ~ F ~ ... ~~~,~
i
;~-' ~. _
r ~` __ ...
. _~. .
~ _ _ ~' r-.~^' i i
_ __
r ~~
1 ---*R 4
_ - ~.~ ' -
~ ~ itl
°"'"
15
1 /5/2010
n~„~~~.~,r~
dR
,,,~;,,~,, .,:,,,,, ~, ~ ~h,,.~o ,,,.m A ~ ~, 3 n , ~~
16
1 /5/2010
._ -
... _
~ ~,
;.
a _
i
! `
~~ fem.
M _.
~.+f
~-0~ ~ .aa
17
1 /5/2010
18
-38-
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor- Wrllianl D. Sessoms DECLARED the City Council MeetingADJOURNED ~t 5.•~0 P.M.
Beverly O. Hooks, CMC
CfiiefDeputy City Clerk
utli Hodges I%r-aser, MMC
City Clerk
CllyOf Vrglrll~ Be~Cll, Vrgnll~
J~Ilu~ry,J, 201~~