The URL can be used to link to this page

MARCH 4, 2014 MINUTES CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH "COMMUNITY FOR A LIFETIME" ��Ntn sPgcy CITY COUNCIL o4 ; r MAYOR WILLIAM D.SESSOMS,JR.,At Large VICE MAYOR LOUIS R.JONES,Bayside-District 4 ROBERT M.DYER,Centerville-District I BARBARA M.HENLEY,Princess Anne--District 7 SHANNON DS KANE,Rose Hall—District 3 o BRAD MARTIN,P.L.,Al Large JOHN D.MOSS,At Large AMELIA ROSS-HAMMOND,Kempsville-District 2 JOHN E.UHRIN,Beach District 6 ROSEMARY WILSON,At Large JAMES I.. WOOD,Iynnhaven-District 5 CITY HALL BUILDING 2401 COURTHOUSE DRIVE CITY COUNCIL APPOINTEES VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA 23456-8005 PHONE.•(757)385-4303 CITY MANAGER-JAMES K.SPORE FAX(757)385-5669 CITY ATTORNEY- MARK D.STILES CITY ASSESSOR- JERALD D.BANAGAN E-MAIL:clycncl@vbgov.com CITY AUDITOR- LYNDON S.REMIAS CITY CLERK- RUTH HODGES FRASER,MMC CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP AGENDA 04 MARCH 2014 I. CITY COUNCIL and SCHOOL BOARD JOINT HEALTH CARE - Building 19 - 3:00 PM II. CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING - Conference Room - 4:00 PM A. GENERAL ASSEMBLY LEGISLATION John T. Atkinson, City Treasurer B. GREEN RIBBON COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT June Barrett McDaniels and Wayne McCoy, Co-Chairs III. CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS A. PROJECT LIFEGUART Mike Eason, Resort Management Administrator— SGA Office Bobby Levin, Owner— Strategic Art Solutions B. LITTLE NECK CREEK NEIGHBORHOOD NAVIGATION DREDGING SSD David L. Hansen, Deputy City Manager -1- L`► VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Virginia Beach, Virginia March 4, 2014 Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., called to order the JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD BRIEFING, in Building 19, Tuesday, March 4, 2014, at 4:00 P.M Council Members Present: Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Shannon DS Kane, John D. Moss, Amelia N. Ross-Hammond, Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Absent: Brad Martin School Board Members Present: Beverly M Anderson, Vice Chairman William J. Brunke, IV, Emma L. "EM" Davis Chairman Daniel D. Edwards, Dorothy M. Holtz, Joel A. McDonald, Bobby Melatti, Sam Reid, Elizabeth E. Taylor, Leonard C. Tengco and Carolyn D. Weems School Board Members Absent: None March 4, 2014 -2- JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD BRIEFING HEALTH CARE 3:00 P.M. Mayor Sessoms introduced and welcomed Ms. Cindy Curtis, Deputy City Manager. Ms. Curtis expressed her appreciation to the City Council and the School Board in providing this information. Ms. Curtis advised, as reported earlier this year in January, the 2015 Health Care Plan has significant increases to employee premiums and deductibles. The Plan also includes concurrent Plan design changes due to the unsustainability of cost increases associated with the prevision of health care to employees. It is, quite frankly, unsustainable to remain "status quo". Ms. Curtis welcomed Mr. Ken Jeffries with Mercer to provide today's Briefing: MERCER 2015 HEALTH CARE PRESENTATION JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD MEETING 4 M,4.RSnn MILEssas Mr. Jeffries also expressed his appreciation to the City Council and the School Board. Mr. Jeffries provided the Agenda for today's Briefing" r•.mc,ze na rN ,..c '"" ""e`:ti"i °Rat„'ry ' °ati d„+Ye' €ir°'a'�`�E g, 1 sem-^ n 3'W N"m"" a` Agenda S Trend Graph 4 Health Care Cost Differential 4 Cost Projections <.Assumptions b Recommendations o Plan Design o Contribution Percentage o Defined Contribution Strategy o °°WellnessforLife 4. o Health Savings Account Contribution Eligibility o Spouses o Retirees •:•Nest Steps March 4, 2014 -3- JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD BRIEFING HEALTH CARE (Continued) As Ms. Curtis advised earlier, looking ahead over the next ten (10) years, the status quo trend is unsustainable without Plan changes: 10-Year Status Quo Trend Graph Jr Fat t)io Caslir:cmanesail au,Plan la anaa= • The below chart illustrates the long-tens impact of 6%,7%,and 8%gross cost increases through 2024 - Illustrates potential cost of maintaining status quo plan design • With 8%annual increases,gross cost would double from 2015 to 2024 to over$300 million • Gross plan cost includes projected excise tax per health care reform Impact of 6%-8%Annual Gross Cost Increase to Status Quo Plan 5350 $300 ...._ ...... .. ..... $250 a.$200 —0-6 TA-frond 8 5150 0%Trend -no-8 PM Trend $100 SO 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2 There was a 10.3%increase in costs for 2010 compared to 2009 and 10.5%increase from 2011 to 2012: A Historical Claims Trend for City and Schools .(a SIGa S ctembn-;'C13 • The below chart illustrates monthly incurred claims for medical and pharmacy on a per employee basis • Historical Per Employee Trends: - 2010/2009:10.3% - 2011/2010:6.4% - 2012/2011:10.5% - YTD 2013/YTD 2012:6.4% City and Schools Med+Rx Incurred Claims Experience $ano _, srAo ' S, -_.ah 55. $400 $300 $200 $100 SO rt- yPEPM —a—School PEPM —W—Combined PEPM 3 March 4, 2014 -4— JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD BRIEFING HEALTH CARE (Continued) The chart below provides the Health Care Differential. The top line represents total contributions, the line directly below is the employer contributions, the flat line is employee contributions (has remained relatively flat until 2013)and the bottom line represents monies taken out of the Health fund: Health Care Contribution Differential shoo $1200 ..... ...._. 5800 soo -5200 FYOS FY06 FY01 fl08 FY09 fY30 FYI] � fl12 fl13 t hyre Cl0e(buaims $188 $191 $198 $196 $20.1 $206 $206 $210 $161 -a-E.pbyerto,0 butons $56.2 $636 $04.4 $816 $83.8 $869 $889 $860 $930 --04 Funtl 8458,.Dud $2.6 $0.0 500 500 500 $08 506 5120 $104 --total CO t b4l441 511.6 $833 $942 $1012 $103.9 $108.3 $110.1 $1190 $130.2 6 Below is the 2015 Status Quo Projection/Gross Cost Projection prior to Strategy Changes: WINIMIERIZEIMIM A 2015 Status Quo Projection L( s., st P( C .."Pr., „S =1E4, zztrE*penae Estimate I tal Annual 1ntt ft 4 Projected 2015 Incurred Claims Before Plan Changes $134.2 Required Plan and Eligibility Changes from Healthcare Reform $3.6 Estimated Limited Spousal Coverage Membership Reduction ($0.9) Administrative Services Fees and Stop Loss Premiums $7.6 Health Care Reform Fees $1.1 Additional Administrative Expenses $1.6 GASB 45 Annual Required Contribution $4.0 Projected Gross 2015 Status Quo Cost $151.2 5 March 4, 2014 -5- JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD BRIEFING HEALTH CARE (Continued) The slide below provides a side-by-side cost comparison. The first column is the 2014 Projected Costs, the next column is 2015 Status Quo Projection, third is the original recommendation and last is the revised recommendations. The revised recommendation projected costs shows an increase in employer costs to 77%of total costs: "W.i s'�r Ysr.iil!" r'rw 2015 Plan and Rate Considerations S;de-Sv-S;de Ccs..Coscs,ser Projected 2015 Status Onginat Revised 2014' -Quo Projection'Reaoovveedaliont Recommendation' ,projected Gross Cost ! $138.6 $151.2 $142_9 $145.4 Estimated Employee Contributions ($275) I ($3002 ($37.4) ($33.12__._ PProjected Net E�lyer Cost $111 1 $121.2 _ $105.5__ $112.3 Projected Employer Cost Share I 80/0 80% 74% 1, 77% Net Employer Change from 2014 ' N/A �I $101__ j$5.6) ...1 $1.2 '.. 'Jet Cost Avoidance from Status(Duo N/A N/A ($157) _I ($8.91___ 'Amounts shown in millions 6 Below is a list of assumptions used in recommending the 2015 Plan and Rate Considerations. The Plan uses enrollment thru January, does not cover infertility treatment or dependent obstetrics, assumes 5%in reduction for spousal membership and 100%participation in Wellness For Life: 4 2015 Plan and Rate Considerations • Enrollment o Constant enrollment by her from January 2014 o Approximately 10%of employees elect the PPO.45%elect the Plus PPO.and 45%elect the POS • Plan Design o Health care reform plan change that requires pharmacy copays apply to the medical out-of-pocket maximum o All plans will continue to cover:chiropractic,hearing aid,and routine eye care o All plans will no longer cover:infertility treatment,bariatric surgery,child dependent OB o Plus PPO option modified to a non-qualified HSA plan to allow embedded deductibles and to remove the deductible requirement for pharmacy copays Costs o Status quo 2015 projection based on December 2013 experience update with enrollment through January 2014 o Assumes 5%reduction in spousal membership due to limited spousal coverage o Assumes 200 part-time employees will elect coverage in 2015 due to HCR eligibility requirements o Projections assume 8.0%status quo claims trend for 2015 based on Mercer trend guidelines and historical Virginia Beach experience o Assumes 100%participation in vnWellnessforLife. Non-participants will pay an additional$500 o One-time Health Savings Account contribution of$500 to the PPO plan upon enrollment in 2015. Not included in rate setting,but rather paid as a separate cost from health fund. Cost dependent upon migration to PPO plan.Assume 10%enrollment or approximately$0.8M. o Rates will be updated with additional claims and enrollment experience,revised healthcare reform impact,GASB costs,and administrative expenses before final rate setting March 4, 2014 -6- JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD BRIEFING HEALTH CARE (Continued) Below is a comparison of original and revised recommendations. The left side is the original recommendation and the right side is the revised recommendations with changes highlighted: Comparison of Original and Revised Recommendation P'ar,Deslo 550051500 S1.500/53.000 33.00056000 $50061500 $1.00062,000 $1,50083.000 (43,44144$1 (nane4bedd 4) N/A 3500" NIA N/A.. $SN".... 0/ 3250085000 54.00068000 $0000510000 $2.50055.000 $300066.000 $3,50057000 820/100%' °/•Coinsurence 20%Coinsurance 520/100%' 15%Coinsurence 20%.Ccinsurarwe 100%•' 100%' 100%' 100. 100, 10%- !-.; ../.:-5� Sao/t 0%' 10%Con..ante 20°/°CD nsurance ..540100%' 15°ie.0 surance 204• onsurer:ce. ttiv - v4 Y 10/.Con nce t2%co nsurance 20/•..o rance.. t0•h urence t54.Co ncure ce • c5surance. Im ;:h;F' t0°/•Goin .nce..10%Go nsurance 20Y°Co nsurance 10°HC surence 15%C surenw 20°h Co nsurance 1==n .r>Ho.::'r: tOX Coin ce 104°Ca nsurance 20•/°Ca nsurarce 10% urerce 1550 urence 20% oinsurerice r;_ te�.1 Rc-.�. t0%Col. a t0%Con rance 204°Co rance t04nce t59e. nsurance..11.1.°:..einsureua ra ny.a-r S30C 10°h Coin ante 20°°/•Co nsurance 5350 Copay' t59:C' urence 20°h oinsurerice i:. rr.c.... gher Deaucrible: Alter Dedugible: After Deaunible: $30' $30 35 $00 $15' $30 $ $30' $30 530 330' 330' $30 1 0i 25°h(m 0545 25%150345 25%500545. 25%1 0545 25%151505, 26%/31,0340 ¢5560)' 0+360) 0x560) 0x560)' 54560)' ax 300) 0%/644S60_ 0%/3!s$00. 60%/501$0. 50%/546$50. 50%1 16$0. 50 (4300. { r,-.-las 4axb110)' 3/5x3110) ....54045110) ......54555110)' mar$110)'.... 540x51101.... "PP051i500 HSA mnoiibulicn ohared M1%Pion Year mlv erred network 8 This slide below shows the Revised Recommendation Plan with the Health Plan offered today: Comparison of 2014 Plans and Revised Recommendation a i..,;,sl.c)n C<, ,;1,04 tip •,J. Not, k u t.:.. $3205600 $1.2062.00 35oors1 soo $1 mom 000 $13206.000, 1445-30554454/ /504.54.4454).... ...iF;, N/A ssm/s5oo N/A N/A $1,50053,000 $6.250512,500 32.0055000 $3.00056.000 53.500/5"7.000 2'>'"..- 520/100%' 30 Coinsurance 320/100%' 15%Goinsu nce 2o•/•Coinsurence... :.s 4''a�• 100% 100% 1004'•' too%' 100°°/•' �.,,,ial....,..:. 840/10040 30/.Coinsurence 840/100% tSk Coinsurance 20 r°Ccimuranca �I>.n +�..rr Sao/t20y. Cormuralce /.Consurance. 5°C5lnzurence 20%Coinsurence R ..' St0/t00% 30%Comurence tO,.Co nsurance tsr°Cc nsur0nce 20/.Co nsurance .n=h.,.r.::. : $500/t004° 304°Co rvurance t0°/°Co nsure 5°h Coinsurance 20%Coincuranu r:.x3000 5250/t00% % oimurence /°Coinsurance 15%Coinsurence 20%Coinsurenw 540 06 +..it= CDMirm52000bbel 30%Coinsurence 330 Copey' 15r°Ca4curanu 204.Coincurenca gher D4ucribie: Aher D4ucoiNe: 515 315 Sts' Et5' 315 ..gin.a.:. 330 S30 5305 Sao' 530 25%14103/5. 25%(54060) 5%1516) 64.1411345. 26%1435540 f'"'r"'" 0x50) amino) BOT 04° 001360 06 , 0 31560. %1410380. 50,0311060. 50%4410 50. 0%4400$60 0) o"'""'- mem St lO) me55tt0) max 5110)' max 5110)' max$110) 'D4octidoes 6ompp to obis service 'PPO E00 NSA wnhihutub bn offered first pian 2546 only "Pfiarmagc0pays do rmt assu spa p nin rbc Orefen4 network B March 4, 2014 -7- JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD BRIEFING HEALTH CARE (Continued) Below is the Active Employee Cost Impact: c 2015 Scenario Comparison • The below chart illustrates the combined monthly employee contribution plus expected out-of-pocket costs based on cost and utilization assumptions • Active employees are roughly 40%low,45% moderate,15%high utilizers,based on 2012 Optima report • Utilization scenarios are illustrative;actual utilization varies greatly among individuals - Note:High utilizers illustrate the out-of-pocket maximum for all Original and Revised plans ndm Frapmregxnnw¢n1 _. bmpbree Dory emir E ,. evn.rp�e roz 9 I � aa...re roz ::a..reew rro 4 S4 aoo aa..e.erro wn•r...m.xv }`s ;sx$e � 1 I 111 tow MMerate x ow Madero NiP uttillation • Considerations: - Low utilizers benefit from reduced monthly contributions of lower cost plans - Employee Only high utilizers see large percentage cost increase 10 Comparison of Original and Revised Recommendation 201f,Act,ve PPOPPO PO P:(;,( le,tMo;`a ly Ra;es a to...,,t,iautlons TW Tett Cast 08852Wtbp 885815 ,eyee iig4 TetalCat GEwMWlbn Canbibr8958 Emp005.only $525.12 $390.22 $134.,: Employee O5y $51].84 $42551 $92.3 (542.5] Employe5BchilE $850.55 5509.66 $42454 Empcyeed Chiid 5838.]6 $64300 5195.]• ($95.13 ess Children 4122418 5854.34 $5126' EmpOyee55544.5 51.264.64 k4 s93182 5333.0 ($8133 Empbyea85pmca 51224.18 57011.54 5512.6; Empbyea88pouse 51.2070., $43131 (581.33 Eemll St]13.58 $1.01140 5202.11 Femil $1,689.=�., 55858 5115.24 naau9SProtnte8..t808" Plass PPO antro 0*92P l.aaaa �•. oe.s Tin Total Cat Empleysr EnrpbywPIEWAMMEMERII _ CeMdbu4lan Cenbibutbn yea Ony E4 t.t9 5380.225425.51 561.] (520.24 EmPbyaeB Ch'E 57064.82 5508.6 E _ -- C ;. $]0922 5843.00 $146.2. (520.94 Empbyege Chdren 51,153.170 5854.30 5296.0 Em :555'00 n $1.18995 5831.02 $350 3 (540.50 Bpouae $4100 B0 3892a Emp,ee85pmae $1.13582 ET/590 $380.01 (529.25 em 5 Et 59004 5110286 $48]0. ($42.34 '-111/11:1162Mbili7"ItttiliWRN Tin /TeW Cwt_e=ren xiCenvtyutbe $4305]' 56]13 $55 • ee8 Ch d - $5t 59•.l 5588.66! S6 E]to53( 5= 5 .1. ES.zr mBChiidrert $9e2.44 1 522e t•E $16701 al ,S Et405+ Empoym80pmse. 583]63 E]tt 54' E226.2z Empo 85 ase'. 5102286:', $]]590 5246.]' $2952 51.312.]6 $1611.40' 5301.2 St a3t.50- $1.102.98 Ea28.5. •Defined employer coMibusun gut al93%of employee PPO cost,80%of drill dependent PPO cmt,00d 80%04 opeuse f)PO mat • All presented rates are subject to change and were developed with data through September 2013 11 March 4, 2014 -8- JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD BRIEFING HEALTH CARE (Continued) Revised Recommendation _G Acts, ')s PFC.),P0 M.,,',' Em ploy,.Only $51].84 $425.51 $92.33 $49.06 88% $43.27 Em ploy.9 Child $83876 $643.00 $195.76 $125.8056% $99.96 Employee6 Children $1,264.64 $931.62 $33303 $336. ,, -1% ($3.71) Empoye,,spouse 51.20]22 $7]590 $43131 $30319 • 7 42% $1269 $1,689.85 51.10296 $1.91 6maeFr fi .r i 46'ee Ernpww0e dbe Chage Tia TeW Cbt ,C, L.:.Eonbibu6w %Siem PO$* Employe.Only $487 26 - x:$61.74 :99 $49.06 26% $1266 Employee,mild $789.22 *643.2;. ,46.22 $125.80 16% $20.42 Employee,Children 51,189.95316 8 $258.33 $336.]4 -23% ($141) Employee,Spouse $1.1.-;s2+ 590 $360.01 $30362 19% $56.39 1,4.590..1,. *yy. 0298 $48108 $581 B6 -16% +.2+94.90) iuuur, sfN%Wmae ...��St „� �Se4 e....ko6?tiuw�w.,m., `_ r .,wehtaa7fll�Ee• '" Employee.* $43867 $425.51 $13.16 $49.06 -73% ($35.90) Employee.,child $71053 $64300 $61.53 $12560 -46% ($58.2]) Employ.,Children *1.07131 $931.62 $13089 $336]4 -59% ($197 05) Employ.,Spouse $1.022.66 $]]5.90 $24675 $30362 -19% ($5681) Family $1,431.50 *1.10298 $328.52 $58196 -44% ($25344) 12 Below are the revised 2015 monthly rates and contributions: Comparison of Original and Revised Recommendation 2014 Non-MA, e F',g t;,P yIS 2P0(F'e? oi� Pao^�i R,.4+ - � 04.' TMM CaM 4f T Employ. agree T1er Tatd Cwt Employer ftegrw _ COnbbMlbe CeMrlb219 'CeMel6Nien 00.505 RNIre9Ony 572466 5505.19 $218 $10 4]Retiree Only $714.52 $550.89 5163. (555.]4 Rehr., 51.050.70 8]05.04 $34572 Retiree 6 Child 5103620 5756.82 5267 (578 34 Retiree6 Children 5148556 5871.52 551404 Retiree 6 Children 51.464.9] $405.5 (5108.4] Spwce 84(8120 5848.20 5]40.26 Rear. Spouse 51665.06 5 53 5631.7• (5 1091] Fm ey 6 52 51 250 20 E 52. $1 E 5143.32 3 Film O8I66W762$8tM2Mb RMYw000.1idd 0488 P4 *00 fWes 0 RwkM P4gecSMA1S _ gM4e --7... 13340,IS836a$Nw6bb5 .: i6flY TNr ToIeI C,M C,nm8MNb Rabwbn I rTE CeMrlbM R ee R me eyeB Cn dren 5051 63 Retiree6Child 5944 55 r" O.38lyi '�i0 '57685'.6 '520201 (5E3 80 E 2 Ret ChildrenMt 51. 5 51. B 5 .5 27 Sete.8Spouse E B 20 R 7 se 21.506 72 51,033 97 5532 7 5 4 51 961. E 52 023 08 51 aea 20 saw a 550 52 TW 0*53* dbMNn 1.15555 15• I'-:n 96 Retiree OnM • 5605.3] 5550.89'. 564.: 54.5. Retiree,Child 58040] 599.93 Retiree Child 58]]78 5768.82 5108.9 59.0' Retiree,Children 51.138.06 5871.52 $16655 5tn I 5124100 51,55 5,81 6• at5 os 46 51.293.50 5920 5345.30 R use 51. 3397 53]5 51. 8312• family 51 671 01 51.250.20 5420 80 F 51. 51.363.2.7 5458.8 538.0 Defined employer conlnbution eat a191%of retiree PPO cost.80%of Odd dependent PPO`cosl,972,60%05 spouse PP(i c0st • All presented rates are subject to change and were developed with data through September 2013 13 March 4, 2014 -9- JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD BRIEFING HEALTH CARE (Continued) Revised Recommendation 1015 .. €.k, Isr=l ,,.i PCWP..-> F=O-€ t� rsct • i. r^,.. .,...,;^-s a .� aL mar », �r smda,Guor,. • T Rniree Only $714 62 $560.89 3163 73 54806 234% $114.6] Retiree,Child $1,03620 $]6882 $267.38 $141.•. 89% 5125.58 acne&Children $1,4649] $1,059.39 $4055] 5395''' 3% $1015 Retiree Spouse $1,66506 $1,033.9] 5631.09 :06. $2243] Ai $215100 $136329 $]8]] 0 ,• 23% $14734 r,awaum 5 Rarw$0.01weurw9.PRORW.f$i.uwn;;: ' Z0,4rcawaw4$4000.a94au.I nor /came. Emplq.r A 14 Po$RMirw R.6rw0 801480 �rp.heln Lam.. ':C.rIM9u8.h 5 ftatirce Only 56]2.41 t -42153 $4906 148% 5]2.4] Retiree,Child $975.00 '�.888 't•.18 514180 45% $64.38 Retiree 8 Children $1,3 45'•• $%59.3' $31905 5396.32 49% ($16.27) screed Spwse '1,:.4 S,:'•3.9] $532.75 $400]1 31% $126.03 R y -y �5�• � ",36328 f8606] $8403] 3% $2030 foit1848114t,l'44.90°"4 Relirw Only 5.153] $55089 $5448 $4906 11% 3582 ehree8 CMId $8]]78 $766.82 5108.9] $141.80 -23% 1$32.83) Retiree,children $1,241.00 $1.059.39 $18161 $395.32 -54% ($213.]1) Retiree&Spouse $1410.51 $1,033.91 $3]6.54 $406.]2 -7% ($30.18) Family 51821 16 $1,383.29 $458.87 $640.31 -28% 4181.50) 14 Below are the Plan Design Changes since the meeting in December 2013: 2015 Plan Design Changes S•V8WellnessforLife—All scenarios assume 100%participation in 58WellnessforLife o Those who elect not to participate will pay an additional$500 for their health coverage as they are not engaging in activities which help reduce their health risks and control the cost of the health plan •:•Services Covered—All scenarios assume the following coverage: o All plans will continue to cover:chiropractic,hearing aid,routine eye care o All plans will no longer cover:infertility treatment,bariatric surgery,child dependent OB t•HSA Contribution—A$500 one-time employer payment into a Health Savings Account for employees/retirees that elect the PPO plan during open enrollment for the 2015 plan year. Will not be provided for new hires or open enrollment thereafter. March 4, 2014 -10- JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD BRIEFING HEALTH CARE (Continued) Below are the changes in spouse and retiree eligibility: Changes in Eligibility •:•Spouse Eligibility Effective January 1,2015,spouses would not be permitted enrollment on city health coverage if have access to other employer coverage. Estimates shown for 5%,10%and 15%reduction in covered spouses. 2,494 active employee spouses are enrolled as of January 2014. 5% 125 $ 530,000 10% 250 $1,050,000 15% 375 $ 1,580,000 S•Retiree Eligibility Effective July 1,2014,no new employees hired on or after July 1,2014 would be eligible for an employer contribution towards retiree health care. Employees hired on or after July 1,2014 who have at least 15 years of service with the City and/or Schools upon retirement may continue to stay on the City and Schools' health plan offering,but the retiree would be responsible for 100%of the premium cost. I@ Below are the next steps: Next Steps t•Decision Points City Council/School Board Direction o Plan Offerings o Contribution Percentage o Contribution Strategy o'43Wellness/orLife o Health Savings Account o Eligibility • Spouses • Future Retiree Coverage •t•Next Steps ➢March 2014-GASB Valuation 0'April 2014-Rate Setting(Benefits Executive Committee) o Set rates after obtaining GASB valuation and two months of 2014 claims experience o Employee premiums will be established by determining plan costs and applying contribution scenario selected ➢May-October 2014-Health Plan Education/Marketing(Consolidated Benefits Office) tt March 4, 2014 -11- JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD BRIEFING HEALTH CARE (Continued) Important Notice with Respect to Projections Contained in this Document All projections are based on the information and data available ata point in time and the projections are not a guarantee of results which might be achieved.The projections are subject to unforeseen and random events and so must be interpreted as having a potentially wide range of variability from the estimates. The information contained in this document and In any attachments is not intended by Mercer to be used,and it cannot be used,for the purpose of avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or imposed by any legislative body on the taxpayer or plan sponsor. 18 Mayor Sessoms expressed his appreciation to Deputy City Manager, Cindy Curtis, Mr. Jeffers and the entire Team for their work on this difficult issue. The Joint City Council/School Board Meeting Adjourned at 4:00 P.M. March 4, 2014 -12- f4 ` tL 7 ``Cr7 t ria '.., C .i ,, fir,,out k�Stl" �W`E VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Virginia Beach, Virginia March 4, 2014 Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., called to order the CITY COUNCIL'S WORKSHOP, in the City Council Conference Room, Tuesday, March 4, 2014, at 4:00 P.M. Council Members Present: Robert M Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Shannon DS Kane, John D. Moss, Amelia N. Ross-Hammond, Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Absent: Brad Martin March 4, 2014 -13- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFING GENERAL ASSEMBLY LEGISLATION 4:00 P.M. Mayor Sessoms introduced John Atkinson, Treasurer. Mr. Atkinson expressed his appreciation to City Council for their continued support. He advised that he, just recently, learned that Delegate Johnny Joannou of Portsmouth proposed an Amendment to the House Budget that will eliminate Treasurer's, throughout the Commonwealth, from collecting uncollected court costs and fines. Mr. Atkinson later learned Senator Vogel introduced "verbatim language" to the Senate's Budget As such, it just about eliminates the Senate and House Conferees from removing the language from the Budget to be voted and passed later in this Session; however, he understands the Governor can now amend the Budget. Mr. Atkinson advised last year he won a "competitive bid"to perform court collections, at the expense of two (2) local law firms. His bid was based upon receiving 2,500 accounts per month with an annual collection of$3.5-Million. Last November, he received approximately 100,000 accounts worth around $40,000, and most were considered "stale accounts". After reviewing the files, my office determined that a little less than 10,000 of the defendants were employed and responsible for 21,000 fines worth $7.5- Million. To date, 14,000 letters have been mailed requesting prompt response within thirty (30) days to prevent a lien being placed against their pay checks, with the goal to complete processing the accounts before June 30`x'. Based on this information, Mr. Atkinson feels the City could receive several million dollars more than currently in the Budget. He has been told that by his office taking over these collections, has freed up one-half days docket in Circuit Court. In short, the City, as well as any locality, has a great deal to benefit from the Treasurer collecting these debts, and as same, a great deal to lose if they do not collect these debts. Mr. Atkinson requested City Council Members enlist the help of other governing bodies to have this provision stricken from the State Budget. March 4, 2014 -14- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFING GREEN RIBBON COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT 4:40 P.M. Mayor Sessoms welcomed June Barrett McDaniels and Wayne McCoy, Co-Chairs — Green Ribbon Committee. Ms. McDaniels expressed her appreciation to City Council for their continued support and introduced the Committee Members in attendance: Green Ribbon Committee Pr nta t tax City Cauncil I larch 4,2014+4 Below is the Mission of the Committee: ;,r. 2012 Green Ribbon ��tiwr Committee Mission Improve Water Quality! • Monitor Implementation of the TMDL plans vers P li i volve ent.o, to r►mater 2u�al ty, Ordinances ttx llsh and et a Public Invol et nt o , �1 a Council on r preteen reat t r s To improv Water 7ualtty .2 March 4, 2014 -15- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFING GREEN RIBBON COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT (Continued) Below is the history of the Committee: y to � .. Brief History of the Green Ribbon Committee iiiiit"."':';;:AppOintecf in 2006 to improve water quality by: during I [pact o4 Devel Rrr ent '_ reserving and Entrancing our,Natural ReSo ices,. IntegratingStarm Tatar Maria ement Impro a ffecttveness e ommend tions trgm the CommitCee presented to Council. imiliwiNotiiiiitoeloologompzongtoommtnaigAggoggragimg,11 posiMpletilOinaltiOttirreAttftppgghtedggggemberasi2orgon022 ...: reen Ribbon Committee I e-Appointed in Fall,2012 in responseto r tarage rn the re latoryenvi:ronment The Committee was charged with developing a comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for each of the City's major watersheds: Cornerstones of the Original Green Ribbon Committee's Recommendations: Development of Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for each of the City's Major Watersheds: Oetermrne comp nce or nott cempliante with FMDLs and other'water qualitygoais, i:srabiish water quality Cies to retrofit the existing system to assure .:. ; coospliance. i Deterrt�n g what increases to storm water fee are•nece ry to a;cotriplis# those gflals.. If vie don't kno where eve are goingr r 1 e know l+ hen rive fret there? March 4, 2014 -16- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFING GREEN RIBBON COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT (Continued) The Committee continues to look at City Ordinances, Standards and Operations for stormwater: Continuous : Improvement • Conianue to reure nrand revise Crty standards and P*a ices to anprose water quality tatEgratedSi t)e�gnT in�ques sagoodeeariple Street wh ths,sidewalk requirements,etc,,carr still he repro ed s ] The City Leads the Way New ily pio ectsr a vuc�€!as re evell p lent and infhl pr rtect shauldtreat.100%ref the stor water1 of the tin e. % 7&eCitiYds' wap magpi�{n Rivxra'F'S'artxlc+3ak vz;id,Odmds to uR)'F, aaier;[sa t'YcnI FF.rF-I. I' Egx March 4, 2014 -17- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFING GREEN RIBBON COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT (Continued) Wayne McCoy, Co-Chair, advised this is about Clean Water and how to regulate water or create Ordinances to provide better water quality: What's it all about? s a its Clean Waters Regulatory Components f 31unidpalSepareteStormSewerS�stem(M 4 lISMi €egul .onsr-neve€opment,Re desett pment CMDSLt,.Specific Goals€n padutio redact on W£Mtt57 fl!€EE �. .Wntl ndS _ ed8 €.5td .Man€c a€ *. outlieFt1kV7temlted -i�lunfdpal FI4 tem-KE i endtviun cit Pllunropal ladles{1S) ii * oningQr r nces�fll' March 4, 2014 -18- CITY L'S BRFREEN RIBBONCOUNCICOMMITTEEIEING G ANNUAL REPORT (Continued) JURISDICTIONAL BOUNDARIES Local Bay Act Programs-.1 RPA 100' Butler F RPA Features y) 3 anle,t r AC.tan 1. Wetlands 4 Boards M1'MK IMO w w:� I n:•r shAeo..ak --WrNs NMt4Ms Tti.,.N'arnw, Army Corps of Engineers IIEQ(including isolated wetlands) The Committee recommends new incentives for Developers to introduce water quality improvements above and beyond: a Let's Get the Ball Rolling ` • • } + & e Inc ntiu (riot Just Tags}for Developers enc[f developers to 1r �lcewa,er a ttV In tro mems"above a h ind", 1ofIt Deinok7a�on Proect �Ca Hi}hLy Vj ibl R City Properties Detai Review of As to demonstra how our w rqusf ;€ e., regturemertts and greater gtlal rtkwe met Through t �telnpm ent 10 March 4, 2014 il -19- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFING GREEN RIBBON COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT (Continued) Below are examples of incentives the City could offer: Incentives 4-a` _ "FBF Lz • P Ovide cp d3� dPermitting Prot ar certa ttFdal Provide lax Cneentsvesr3urs rs Rtrf The living shorelines can offer a natural look and slow, or stop, erosion: Living Shorelines - r:-- . ...,,,,, zz March 4, 2014 -20— CITY CO UNCIL'S BRIEFIN GREENC RIBBON COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT (Continued) Another recommendation is an incentive for the use of Permeable Pavers. The sub-base is more expensive to prepare and, as such, the City will need to offer some type of incentive to get Developers to choose this type of paver: Permeable Pavers 13 Permeable Pavers - *"''''' ''''-•-7-73 77.-7'':f7".'''17"517"*--*I'li'z''''''';.1:''''";.7'"'-'*-.-.4 '. ato _ .>_ .,. d -;',1'..'%.",:;44=7,':''' 7 ra t?, cin u March 4, 2014 -21- Y COL'S BR GREENCITRIBBON COMMITTEE ANNUALUNCIREPORT (Continued) The Committee will continue working to improve coordination between City Departments and broaden the approach to achieving clean water: What's Next: The Year Ahead a it c►rk on Improving cord nation etween cit Gepartmrts Subcomrtlittees wnf11At k n Specific Issues _Broaden€rur_Approacla to Achievi g Clean Water (tt' bust pelts! Below is the Summary of this presentation: 2 \'`�. %?,�i€ '.a ., , _ �Ea `aw3;w5 :,:.: Summary a itl ii Provide.!;.7,.: #ucat:.,p.,,.,,: �on/'Craarrrng for.Contr ,ctors,!Cc �sultarnts and Provide Lea lers sl'p:by E mpl Swimmy sleJFi�l a/SustainaIleDevelopment a�Strong Economic'Fu ture March 4, 2014 -22- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFING GREEN RIBBON COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT (Continued) What`s the End Paint? a7m a ,N «+ 11 { ' Mayor Sessoms expressed his appreciation to Ms. McDaniels, Mr. McCoy and the entire Committee for their continued work on this very important issue. March 4, 2014 -23- CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING PROJECT LIFEGUART 4:26 P.M. Mayor Sessoms introduced and welcomed Mike Eason, Resort Management Administrator—SGA Office. Mr. Eason expressed his appreciation to City Council for their continued support and he is excited to bring this unique opportunity to Council for consideration: Strategic Art Solutions Transformative Art Integ'at on Below is today's Agenda: Agenda Preface II. Strategic Art Solutions presents Protect LifeguART III. About Strategic Art Solutions IV. Management Team "w TTS V. Discussion+Next Steps — '. • • March 4, 2014 -24- CITPROJECTYMANAGER'S BRIEFING LFEART (ContinueId) GU ,n , g6ta, Preface ` „ wwj From Boston to Bogota,from Miami to - fix• Melbourne,from Sao Paolo of San :.i..:','„:, * Francisco, the power of street art, in its * f ,`. ,.' .. various forms, is enriching the lives of • ' _ 0, citizens in cities and towns across the `_ , globe. :? " . 4,. x ttt,krt% 7c� In many locations, street art installations, _ commissioned by both public and private ` 4 7 entities, mitigate vandalism, improve citizens' ,,,_ quality of life, and enhance entire districts of ,, ' major metropolitan areas by maximizing their roles as vibrant centers for commerce ,., and entertainment. `;:• i i , Strategic Art Solutions Presents: Project LifeguART m ,-_,..,,,1;461:',,, 71 f March 4, 2014 II -25- MANAGER'S BRIEFING CITY PROJECT LIFEGUART (Continued) Below is the "WHERE"of this project: WHERE ° >oF,,sttandng so Mtif,,. State Park . n ' Virginia Beach Oceanfront and gig. ` Virginia Boardwalk - 1st St. to �5 n Beath 40th St. - a3 mile esplanade Included in "Top 10 'stsc- ��.: ,9tr t. Boardwalks" by: '� �,�d. m .a seacb a o• volt°. 4ch Forbes Traveler x Travel & Leisure 3 9- Norfolk Ave. ' Discovery Channel Southern Living Coastal Living ss; General Boo Blvd. Travel Channel raSandbridga National Geographic € Beach 1 Below is the "WHAT"of this project: WHAT EXCLUSIVE sponsorship of "Project LifeguART"... a unique brand integration opportunity that re-images an entire seaside resort by transforming 42 custom designed lifeguard stands and 37 beach chair and umbrella storage containers into works of art. Sponsor recognition on every storage container and lifeguard stand. Achieve "Top of Mind" awareness fast with high —., tirnw.,yAy.',„; .— +" •+:"Y!* '• , - r.vG sq,.....1,,t,-,:„.., ^r.." +.� w« . M, mow; ,...........2-1--,,,.--..-R. Y .frequency exposure. °` k-. wt " _ ! rt t r b,-- * � . fi— d,r b'Y, y "_..� 0. t a.� .�. ilk`C �br^ `` '� jai d2 March 4, 2014 -26- CITYMANAGER'S BRIEFING PROJECT LIFEGUART (Continued) Night Time Display At the end of each day. .lifeguard stands will be wheeled from their daytime poston to a position 20-25 feet from the boardwalk to create a walking art tour into the evening hours along the 3 mile esplanade. tip. f , IP; `".A iii ° .. Below is the "OPPORTUNITY"of this project. Opportunity To engage the community and elevate the reki••,l•.,r-I:,-t,.e.!l..i.l.....„,t,i:i.;,....t....'.-.....,.„,-..,e..,,.!;,.if..ri•i-,w . beach-going experience by transforming beach fixtures into functional works of art. " ..5.,,,:0,.„i„, bG �i t 1 (I = $CAP x$a'aY w3 ro 1�1 .- ;,11,0,w ,,- 5Z IIS sp. t { , s w T S .: a k'c�` iK "'., C'. �, `4; �H a - yam 2 '� March 4, 2014 11 -27- CITYMANAGER'S (ConBRIEFING PROJECT LIFEGUART tinued) Opportunity a......... _d. _. .: Pryor - _ / .T� Her r', ,,,,,, „, `7,------ -'": ------, 7-1-- -,, 4. -T.- ' . if'-- J r - ,..,--t4r-z.....-- - ....-- - -7.-7.- - /01 Sponsor Recognition 4111 1 F ..1....,... 'ipippl , 4- __ Illi'-"IFa Dimensions Storage Containers:8' Wide, 4'6" High, 5'7" Deep Lifeguard Stands:4' Wide, 4' Deep, 8' High March 4, 2014 il -28- R'S BRI CITYMANAGEBRIEFING PROJECT LIGUART (ContinueFEd) Sponsor Recognition tto ',. ...r,,,.nH 0 ' trio w pePam'y:Mronnw� ` _ '' '. �i -,,-,--,.,,,!2' ,W''i .w Lr - . .tl''th F ICA121:7; -1' '''''''',-:::.''. ,alt•, 1,, „,...,,„ .:4, . - Ikr,,le^,',;.,,i),::,,;'' ...pr 4.4:„V;;;,;*;'.'''''*I'...7.'..-','W.,..:, `'.e.,44,4,,E...4.-' 2%,6"4"--.4. .,- -,:::,, . Dimensions Storage Containers: 8' Lifeguard Stands:4' WidWide, 4'6" High, 5-:,.......,::.,D" 7" Deep e,4' Deep, 8' High Current Sponsor Recognition - £ ; h4.1'4d "$ £ .S; - t---,w'?: '11:-'31,',: h$ " No- i tofuiii,ale ,wiik t} ,,,,,SA. lit.:,,,1171''' 77::::::,:!;;;.:;, ..::- ... , , _,... , . �t �_ March 4, 2014 -29- CITYMANAGER'S BRIEFING PROJECT LIFEGUART (Continued) Prototypes `30- ,7,144..: !,; xa tn�,. (E "•i .err �' 1 ., .7:- ;11..... 1 A. r� 3 a ass ..w....«.,;..- Below is the "WHEN"of this project: WHEN Sponsorship opportunity available for 2014 and 2015 tourist seasons (May 1 to September 30) in Virginia Beach, Virginia... .recognized in the Guinness Book of World Records as the world's longest pleasure beach. . 6x 11:17":;''I';''-":1::;!:'1:'11,:::.' s VII .. . ,mar .� r� � 7w.m ::-,.4.,-„t",-- _ March 4, 2014 -30- AGER'S BRIEFING CITY MAN PROJECT LIFEGUART (Continued) Activation Timeline • March: Electronic digital submissions will be solicited from a database of local artists maintained by the City of Virginia Beach Arts & Humanities Commission. • 1st week of April: 42 newly designed lifeguard stands will be constructed. Construction crew already identified. Staging area secured. Sponsor will be presented with choice of up to 20 artists. • Last 3 weeks of April: selected artists will paint lifeguard stands and storage containers. • May 1 : All lifeguard stands and storage containers will be placed on the 3 mile resort strip. Visitor Profile Over 5 million durable impressions annually. t ,`_c.3 . s a� ern ' F, . w:a ^9 .,1: • 4 f�'. a` 1.4..:C.t"y�+"' • 4.yZ 'L ''� wry -,.. .-..--, [��a' .., ., §j r t. Y ,1a• Fi tae..-.."d e ... r t . 2it -4- -'fix. f 1 ` „*� `_ .. . any 1 4 d •flt `$ +fin •? 71 e_ akW.hw @Y itio e: :.4 d 1,-- # • Typical Summervisitor 35-54 years-fid, _r'"�g i -_ �'"' _�; Top states of visitor origin:VA,PA,OH MD,Ny "'� ror ^ m "; t � +—` Top DMA for total visitation:IN, DC •.8)G '- - a- �7�; R • More than 75%of visitors are repeat visitors � t� * �: • More than 90%of visitors said they would return „ wry .,_ ' sL� • • Visitor Average Length of Stay:4.8 nights -.......0,.....,„.„,„0 "' �' 55 :• Average Family Income of Visitors:$100,640 - x;. .Av vrovMed by Virginia B..,hcoeeentoe.,d Vlskors Bureau -`k March 4, 2014 -31- CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING PROJECT LIFEGUART (Continued) Additional Elements • Right to use all images of stands and storage containers in any and all media and for any and all promotional/marketing purposes. • "Project LifeguART" will be promoted on line by the City of Virginia Beach. (www.visitvirginiabeach.com Official web site of City of Virginia Beach.2013 Page Views= 8,192,781 Unique Users=2,168,292) • Cost of Investment — ($500,000 per season) Escif I Atlanta About Strategic Art Solutions �•,,�'''tt Founded in 2013, Strategic Art Solutionsmission is to elevate both spaces and places by integrating museum quality art experiences into public and private spaces to engage diverse audiences where they live,work and play. March 4, 2014 il -32- CITYMANAGER'S BRIEFING PROJECT LIFEGUART (Continued) i'1',`,-,,,,,,,', :"l''400e'It:'',*,''N,„'', .1,,.,f-NT '"'-- 5- -4- 11,W4*NN'ti„. Management Team s 1:,,,,,,,-- :4.,..L,Aer.v:!.,,,,,,,,s.:.:lUniquelyequippedwith expertise � across arts management, curation, law ° 'r 1 '4I V7 :400,00!,11 and media strategy. E eik Robert Levin Pounder Next Level Talent Management ted ,: aA ,.c ;1100r a `4 Director Business&Legal A'rairs,Neev Dominion Pictures , 40 'F ,,,,tr. r.,4 Former Member Nev,York Bar `- ` , ' -c '� .t .fie "° riv„ r Aric Kurzman General Counsel,Pnmary FI!ght � ✓' Agent,William Morris Agency Member Florida Bar + ��' j(' ,' ..� ,„ F6:11.:1+ 3U P Johnny Levin Managng Partner,Open Theater °�, - ji lila °`' Senior Vice President,Head,William Morris Consultin < pre', and Founder Roundtable Entertainment tk g ) 11, :,\204___1,00_,,:t.,-, � 40,:v41,...0,,,,,,, ,� .-t!, Discussion + Next Steps BarryMcceelNewlbrk nil '' ' Isle -' . till 04t;111 i r 2.6 a x usr n;p . tt e , !` .a "Rte ° �'p r,"rk� M1 i:7, "moi a 42-' ) ' /IId ��9{ � F } ; � � a w w March 4, 2014 -33- CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING PROJECT LIFEGUART (Continued) Contact Robert Levin bobby( strategica rtsolution s.com 757-478-7974 ahlk Strategic Art Solutions, LLC www.strategicartsolutions.com Mayor Sessoms expressed his appreciation to Mr. Eason for this unique opportunity. March 4, 2014 -34- CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING LITTLE NECK CREEK NEIGHBORHOOD NA VIA GA TION DREDGING SSD 5:04 P.M. Mayor Sessoms introduced and welcomed David Hansen, Deputy City Manager. Mr. Hansen expressed appreciation to City Council for their continued support of these projects: i or c:id Channel Dredging City Council Briefing on Creating a Neighborhood SSD For: Little Neck-CTeek ��, � ��dl1 air �' hFN r µaw,, �U��rI��flP y�Gd �7�i(� V au ar �'��P �i6' dt2 vi 'tS s 3 ed iiia � V1 �rt i a�vf. Below are the project parameters: ,�a s Neighborhood Canel Dred,,a.ing Project Parameters Neighborhood channel funded by SSD City cost share's by funding spur channel Individual funding of turn basins City management of project co,firti)n:—Ini,edesehoefdsculaele a�' ih Ln n i�di,{ _ tation March 4, 2014 -35- CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING LITTLE NECK CREEK NEIGHBORHOOD NA VIA GA TION DREDGING SSD (Continued) h or ane re - ging Project Format Mechanical Dredging Option for a Dredged Material Transfer Station within Little Neck Creek.Or onthe Eastern Branch of the Lynnha'en River • Deposition; t Disposalrea:Whitehurst DredgeMarerial Management. I term c wa Y The first five (5)listed have Ordinances adopted by City Council: Neighborhoods Pia Buchanan Geek 1(uidv Cove Dix Creek Hebden Cmc Lynnhacen Acres \%itchth,ck-8.,ySoccci, u Wiichduck Vcctchd ck Cove jody cov •e R •Print,ruke^Maios 7 � ,BCS ¢ 1 I z i March 4, 2014 -36- CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING LITTLE NECK CREEK NEIGHBORHOOD NAVIAGATION DREDGING SSD (Continued) Below is a map of the SSD Projects: Neighborhood SSD Program R Status(313/zoig) DD DREDGE TRANSFER SIAIN: -- 'BRO1BAT) 4 ii � ;Kn urnenEK BAY i"----).\ z ��Ct\REEK` OVE K� vs. get;24744 t „ +•e IHRiROPE YE} ePEMBROKE ED ARLWEI DRPPPUPOH EH'1ODYcove k as IL,,,,,,„,,,,, FS L/ STAHO0 WHREHURST Legend' DMMA IF--'a. THALU TRANSFER SSDO d' eEO bli5hcd fy STATION Perition Phae -Ing 0O Phase Bo%Interest No�Achie"ad Disposal Area([r�nsfec 5iaiion 5 This project has thirty-eight(38)potential properties: ti chann el e .gg :ire j Numberof Properties:3$ .v% -'%a 1,City Spur Channel Length:Gro ft //....> c ,,,, pity Spur Channel Width:3? �_ ,, '1 SS5/ D ChannelLengt :3, i %'Y�..\ �� "yam=� l<`V'` �'I -� ' «SSDChanel Wim 1_ ft i CD 51CCI i Ca EP;� ',' f Cg {' .ow re ,�,em o..a��u-r�.m my k� March 4, 2014 -37- CITYMANAGER'S BRIEFING LITTLE NECK CREEK NEIGHBORHOOD NAVIAGATION(Continued)inued) NG SSD CharIn Little Neck Creek Life Cycle Estimated City Costs Cycle velum Cost 1 1,977 CY $81,925 1,384 CY �, 2 3 X88 Y $'73 975.. 349 "502 and fix Ihxx �'��I ski ''his iu'v't cost!Sea Ludes 5— navic kine ' kxi z 9 s s " p '� .k i�i�a I� d w§ 6 Little Neck Creek Life Cycle Estimated-SSD Costs Cycle Volume- Cost 13,675 CY X545,729 9,573 $509J60 3 6,8 8 CY fl,7 .2 ring,and � � r � i z,i 4 5% C a5 t M1s xy x'I'�x 'I s dudes March 4, 2014 -38- CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING LITTLE NECK CREEK NEIGHBORHOOD NA VIA GA TION DREDGING SSD (Continued) Neighbor C arlr1el Dredging Little Neck Creek City Appropriations Schedule Cycle Year Design' Construction 1 1 t79,4oa 2 5448,200 2 8 si66,6oi 9 06,2oct 3 15St67,4no � $ 1 1.6 x i i G The project includes thirty—eight(38)properties and will result in a 30.4 Cent per$100 increase Neighborhood annel Dred,bging Little Neck Creek SSD Data Total SSD FY14 assessed value: $32,210.3oo 38 properties in the neighborhood district Each penny surcharge raises$3,221/year Total SSD neighborhood channel dredging cost is$1,566,631 SSD rate covers costs for,16 year life, o telsroo of the lYi4 assessed value a 9 maple:oa pproperty s $25-4 Per per month ---1‘eview rate at a Y ende Ser, e 4Year IMS Pi.t�lil� re� r 9Si ^�.;.ak lid sir. �� p 1_ ';h Waw March 4, 2014 -39- CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING LITTLE NECK CREEK NEIGHBORHOOD NA VIA GA TION DREDGING SSD (Continued) Below are the Staff recommendations: Neighborhood hang e1 Dredging Staff Recommendations y Approve staff to continue workingwith Little Neck Creek Refine dredging specifics:quantities,costs&participants' Determine extent of potential mitigation validate willingness to teach 8o% Execute 1a�1 documentation ii( '�� g�nidyeNss it Petitions tio ns a Public hearing . � r � a t:a raft Qty O lance � ; s, 1uP i Y a 7 alp m° �,- 1N! : .._.,� ��7b�.:,ili f"�' �w'� a S ai rtF � Mayor Sessoms expressed his appreciation to Mr. Hansen and the City Stafffor their work on this project. March 4, 2014 -40- ADJOURNMENT Mayor William D. Sessoms,Jr., DECLARED the City Council Meeting ADJOURNED at 5:15 P.M. I J Li AA nda Finley-Barn's, CMC ief Deputy City Clerk R Hodges Fraser, MMC City Clerk March 4, 2014