NOVEMBER 24, 2015 SPECIAL SESSION & WORKSHOP MINUTES -1-
4\7
04e�aM1 4.4
ks baa °,F
•
OUR Roo
VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Virginia Beach, Virginia
November 24, 2015
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. called to order the Virginia Beach City Council's SPECIAL FORMAL
SESSION in the City Council Conference Room, City Hall, on Tuesday, November 24, 2015, at 4:00
P.M., to discuss the prospective CANDIDATES FOR THE POSITION OF THE CITY MANAGER.
Council Members Present:
Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Amelia N. Ross-Hammond, Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., Rosemary
Wilson and James L. Wood
Council Members Absent:
M Benjamin Davenport arrived late
Shannon DS Kane arrived late
John D. Moss out of town
John E. Uhrin arrived late
November 24, 2015
-2-
ITEM#65438
MAYOR'S CALL FOR
FORMAL SESSION
Mayor Sessoms read the Mayor's Call for the SPECIAL FORMAL SESSION:
November 20, 2015
"HONORABLE MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL
In accordance with the Virginia Beach City Code Section 2-21, and by
the authority vested in me as Mayor of the City of Virginia Beach, I hereby call
for a SPECIAL MEETING of the VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL:
Tuesday,November 24,2015, at 2:30 P.M.
City Manager's Conference Room
2401 Courthouse Drive
The purpose of this SPECIAL MEETING is for City Council to
CONVENE A CLOSED MEETING pursuant to Virginia Code Section 2.2-
3711(A)(1) to discuss the prospective CANDIDATES FOR THE POSITION
OF CITY MANAGER. No votes will be held, other than the votes in open
session to convene and certify the closed meeting.
The Workshop Briefing will begin in the City Council Chamber at 4:00 P.M.
Sincerely,
s/
William D. Sessoms,Jr.
Mayor"
cc: City Manager
City Attorney
City Clerk
City Auditor
Deputy City Managers
MultiMedia Services
Media and Communications
November 24, 2015
G0A.BE4,
Jti4 -ix,p
>... ,..:, i=; �` fi� s City of Vir irzia Beach
o�994s e��
Up OUR NASIONS
VBgov.com
WILLIAM D.SESSOMS,JR. MUNICIPAL CENTER
MAYOR BUILDING 1
2401 COURTHOUSE IVE
20 November 2015 VIRGINIA BEACH,VA 23456-9000
(757)385-4581
FAX(757)385-5699
wsessoms@vbgov.com
HONORABLE MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL
In accordance with the Virginia Beach City Code, Section 2-21, and by the
authority vested in me as Mayor of the City of Virginia Beach, I hereby call for a
SPECIAL MEETING of the VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL:
Tuesday, November 24, 2015, at 2:30 P.M.
City Manager's Conference Room
2401 Courthouse Drive
The purpose of this SPECIAL MEETING is for City Council to CONVENE A
CLOSED MEETING pursuant to Virginia Code Section 2.2-3711(A)(1) to discuss
prospective CANDIDATES FOR THE POSITION OF CITY MANGER. No votes will
be held, other than the votes in open session.
The Workshop Briefing will begin in the City Council Chamber at 4:00 P.M.
Sincerely, I
Willianti
s s, Jr.
Cc: City Manager
City Attorney
City Clerk
City Auditor
Deputy City Managers
MultiMedia Services
Media and Communications
-3-
ITEM#65439
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., entertained a motion to permit City Council to conduct its CLOSED
SESSION,pursuant to Section 2.2-3711(A), Code of Virginia, as amended,for the following purpose:
PERSONNEL MATTERS:Discussion and consideration of prospective
candidates for employment or appointment pursuant to Section 2.2-
3711(A) (1)
Candidates for the Position of City Manager
November 24, 2015
-4-
ITEM#65439
(Continued)
Upon motion by Councilman Wood, seconded by Council Lady Ross-Hammond, City Council voted to
proceed into CLOSED SESSION at 2:31 P.M.
Voting: 6-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Robert M Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Amelia N. Ross-Hammond, Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., and James
L. Wood
Council Members Absent:
M. Benjamin Davenport arrived late
Shannon DS Kane arrived late
John D. Moss out of town
John E. Uhrin arrived late
Rosemary Wilson arrived late
(Closed Session 2:31 P.M. - 4:00 P.M.)
November 24, 2015
-5-
CERTIFICATION
ITEM#65440
Mayor Sessoms RECALLED the SPECIAL FORMAL/CLOSED SESSION to order at 4:00 P.M
Upon motion by Councilman Dyer, seconded by Council Lady Wilson, City Council CERTIFIED THE
CLOSED SESSION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOTION TO RECESS.
Only public business matters lawfully exempt from Open Meeting
requirements by Virginia law were discussed in Closed Session to which
this certification resolution applies.
AND,
Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion
convening the Closed Session were heard, discussed or considered by
Virginia Beach City Council.
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
M Benjamin Davenport, Robert M Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice
Mayor Louis R. Jones, Shannon DS Kane, Amelia N. Ross-Hammond,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson and
James L. Wood
Council Members Absent:
John D. Moss
November 24, 2015
-6-
ADD ON ITEM#65440-A
MAYOR'S VETERAN'S COMMITTEE and ARENA
Mayor Sessoms advised he, along with Deputy City Manager Doug Smith and the United States
Management (USM) Representatives, met with the Virginia Beach Mayor's Veterans Committee
yesterday and were able to reach an agreement regarding the Memorial and the Arena project. As a
result of that meeting, Mayor Sessoms sent a letter to Mr. Montgomery— Chairman of the Committee, a
copy of which is attached and made a part of this record.
November 24, 2015
cplIA.1343,41
� L
City of Virginia- $tach
z
't711/':4:****':F NA�tONS
VBgov.com
WILLIAM D.SESSOMS,JR. MUNICIPAL CENTER
MAYORBUILDING 1
2401 COURTHOUSE DRIVE
VIRGINIA BEACH,VA 23456-9000
(757)385-4581
FAX(757)385-5699
November 24, 2015 WSCSSOrt1SOVb9OVCom
Mr. Charles R. Montgomery Jr.
Chairman
The Virginia Beach Mayor's Veterans Committee
qumby173d(a�cox.net
Dear Mr. Montgomery:
On behalf of the City of Virginia Beach, I want to thank you, and your fellow citizens on
the Mayors Veterans Committee, for your dedicated service. By overseeing the
Tidewater Veterans Memorial and Memorial Park, and planning annual events there,
you have ensured the sanctity of that space and provided our residents with a constant
reminder of the sacrifices made by our men and women in uniform.
We also appreciate your involvement in the discussions regarding the future of the
Memorial and the Park and, particularly, how they might be impacted by construction of
a proposed Arena, also on the south side of 19th Street. Your group and others
provided valuable input at the community briefing on November 19 and again at a
meeting with Deputy City Manager Douglas Smith, the arena developer and United
States Management (USM), CEO Andrea Kilmer four days later. As a result of those
interactions, let me assure you of the following:
• The City of Virginia Beach affirms the language and spirit of a resolution passed
by City Council in 1988, guaranteeing that the Tidewater Veterans Memorial and
Park on 19th Street will remain intact and in their present location.
• The City, ESG Companies and your committee recognize that certain
enhancements may be necessary to preserve the structural integrity and
enhance the aesthetic appearance of the Memorial and the Park. Any proposed
changes, however, will be presented to and approved by your committee in
advance.
• The City will ensure that annual legacy events on Memorial and Veterans Days
at the Memorial will take place during Arena construction with, if necessary, only
minor amendments for staging and parking based on the status of that
construction.
Mr. Charles R. Montgomery, Jr.
November 24, 2015
Page 2
In your role as Chair, I ask that you share these assurances with the entire committee
and other other veterans' groups who also have a sincere interest in this issue. Moving
forward, both the City and USM will work with your committee exclusively on the
planning and approval process.
As Stuart Myers reminded me in her letter on November 9, her late husband Billy, for
whom the Park is dedicated, was determined that our veterans "not be forgotten."
could not agree more, and that is why I give you my word, and that of the City, that the
Memorial and the Park will never move from the place it so honorably occupies.
Sincerely,
William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Mayor
-7-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
4:02 P.M.
Mayor Sessoms welcomed everyone in attendance and advised this presentation is as a result of
Councilman Dyer referencing a Referendum on Light Rail a few months back and, at that time,
Councilman Dyer suggested the City Council ask the Secretary of Transportation, HRT and etc.,provide
Briefings regarding this project.
City Manager Spore stated he wanted to take a few minutes and set the context of this discussion and
Briefing from the Secretary today. This is one of the most important discussions City Council will have in
a long time and an important point being the whole issue of public transportation and Light Rail in
particular needs to be considered in a much larger context that is more comprehensive and, perhaps,
more thoughtful than just talking about a 3.2 mile extension of the Tide from downtown Norfolk, Newtown
Road to Town Center.
Building a Multimodal
Transportation System
For Our City, For Our Region
i.kA F
City Council Land Use
,t atigtINS •
. .ky..M o
= .+ ,fit 74
dal
r ,
f y
s 1 .a 4.4148k T. T(
5LA
92404,
<r :,.. uiluk \ •aFcrrn..
-
November 24, 2015
-8-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
City Manager Spore does not feel the City can separate the discussion of Light Rail or any transportation
project for that matter, in his opinion,from the larger land-use and comprehensive planning issues that
need to be considered that really shape these projects. If the City ignores that connection, it is done so at
the City's great peril. For example, in terms of the City's land use and transportation policy planning
done over the years, 2%of the land area within the Strategic Growth Areas (SGA) is projected to have
50%of the growth moving forward in the City; and, as such, the SGA concept is critically important. The
other area is the Special Economic Growth Areas, about 8%of the land, or 30%growth, moving forward
and the Transition Area having 2%of the land or 20%of the growth moving forward:
Fulfilling City Land Use =;
and Transportation
Planning Policy
Strategic Growth Areas C..
2%of Land Area=50%of growth 1, .
Military Installations "w
8%of Land Area=Stable
r 1
Suburban Area '�
30%off Landnd •
Area=Stable 1
Suburban Focas Areas•Special L 1
Economic Growth Argas
8%of Land Area=30-35%of strewth 1y
Transition Area 2%of Land Area 4
=15.20%of growth
—
50%
Rural Parks of Land Area=Stable
a ee,w+rree..ru rare
Below are some facts that explain why the SGAs are so important to the City:
Why are Strategic Growth Areas in
Virginia Beach's Future?
- 1997: Estimated area of undeveloped land north of Green Line was 13,000 acres
- 2007: Estimated to be less than 5.000 acres
Further reduced by Oceana Land Use Conformity Program,preventing residential
and hotel development in high noise areas
In the 2003 Comprehensive Plan the City Council realized need to identify areas
for future growth while,at the same time,protecting our stable residential
neighborhoods and preserving our rural heritage
What was missing in Virginia Beach is a choice that is responsive to changing
demographic and market trends-Mixed use urban lifestyle.This additional lifestyle
choice has emerged to ensure cities remain economically competitive and attract
growth.
November 24, 2015
-9-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
Below are the City's SGAs:
SGA Character - All Different
Each SGA has its own unique character,distinct identifies help prevent
competition between the oreas and provide various opportunities.
Burton Station:Jan 2009 Pembroke Nov 2009 Hilltop Aug 2012
Next Generation Manufacturing Virginia Beach's Central Regional Retail Destination
and Technology Zono Business District Health Services Cluster
- I }
Oceanfront Doc 20
r . Flagship Resort and
V 1'\ ) Recreational Dustin.'.
Newtown July Alt i• •
Keynote Employment
District '
Centorvillo/Rogont March 20t3 Rosemont Sop!2011 Lynnhavon April 2012
Educaliononenlod master Transit-Onented PDR Hub(Production,Distribie
planned community Residnntid Vda;o ani RcSenee Ce,trict(
The City has had 'hundreds of meetings over the past fourteen (14)years for the City's Land Use Policy
and Transportation Planning. The City Council, as such, has adopted policy documents representing the
Citizens'desire for the future of the City. Seven (7)of the eight(8)adopted SGAs,plus the Princess Anne
ITA, are proposed to be served by public transportation, including Light Rail. As such, Public Transit is
a key component of making the important areas of the City work:
Fulfilling City Land Use Policy, Transportation
Planning and Public Engagement
These policy documents were
developed after extensive public
and stakeholder Involvement
include^.a numerous formal "y "
Planning Commission and City
Council pubic hearings over the i•
past 12 years.which culminated .d'. J_-,- \.
In their adoption by City Council
7 01 the 8 adopted SGAs plus the \! \
Princess Anne/ItA Plan include )\
alternative multimodal ss,
transportationsuch as light rai.as
the key component to maximizing _
thei potential to benefit our City /
and region.
•
Envision V82040 and the CBy's - "
Sustainability Plan emphosce the Adopted Centerville SGA Master Plan
need for a Connected
Community we multimodal
solutions G
November 24, 2015
-10-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
In November 2012, a Referendum was on the ballot and almost 63%voted yes to support all reasonable
efforts to support the financing and development of Light Rail. City Council is following the direction
received from the Citizens from the Referendum:
Fulfilling City Land Use and
Transportation Planning Policy
City of Virginia Beach Actions Related to Virginia Beach Transit Extension Study(VBTES)
lovember 2.2012 light rail related relere^dum was.
Should the City Council adopt an ordinance approving the use of all reasonable efforts to support
the financing and development of The Tide light rail Into Virginia Beach?"
The results were:
Yes 116.056 62.7%
No 68.848 37.2%
184.904 Total Votes
► July 2012.City Council requested to odd Hilltop SCA Alignment Alternative to VBTES
► March 2014.Vigisia Beach requested that HRT study a fourth alignment alternative to the VBTES
to extend The Tide light rat system from the Newtown Station to Virginia Beach Town Center
I. On May 12.2015.Virginia Beach City Council voted 9-2 for the Localy Preferred Alternative to
extend The Tide light roil system to Town Center at Constitution Drive.
7
Three (3)key projects included in the FY 15/16 Adopted Budget surround Public Transit:
Fulfilling City Land Use and
Transportation Planning Policy
City of Virginia Beach Actions Related to Virginia Beach transit Extension Study(VBTES)
► Aho on May 12.2015.City Council voted to approve the City's FY 16 Resource Management
Plan which included three capital projects related to the Viginio Beach light rail extension
project.These votes were a culmination of 6 years of study Instances and events for stakeholder
and public Involvement over the years.Those three projects became effective July 1.2015 and
include:
J Virginia Beach Transit Extension Project(The Tide to Town Center)
J Light Rail Corridor Shored Use Pathway project and the Feeder Bus project for
J 12 new buses to support increase bus service in the City in the coming years
► May 28.2015,the Transportation District Commission of Hampton Roads adopted a resolution to
endorseadopt and advance the Locally Preferred Alternative for the Virginia Beach Transit
Extension Study
► June 18.2015 the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Board approved a
resolution to amend the region's 2034 Long Range Transportation Pion"to add the construction
of the Virginia Beach light Rail Extension to Virginia Beach Town Center in accordance with the
City of Virginia Beach and Transportation District Commission of Hampton Roads adopted
resolutions."
8
November 24, 2015
-11-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
Again, this is not just about a 3.2 mile extension of Light Rail; however, an entire transportation system
that will benefit the City and the entire Region. One of the goals in the Vision 2040 is to create a
connected community. City Manager Spore feels the City's future is at stake and the leaders should be
very thoughtful about the process. The City did ask the State for help as this is a City of Virginia Beach
project and not an HRT. Specifically, regarding assistance since the Federal Government has been
absent from the `playing field"for some time and the State has stepped up in a big way to offer financial
assistance in this project:
Connected Community:
Creating A More Comprehensive Ira,�'��
r•-•
s‘ imaiat_tx
ar
VABEACHBIOO BIO CORRIDOR ,.yam,
KEY •
: _
J •
.74=":::. �'
City Manager Spore, with a great deal of pleasure, introduced the Secretary of Transportation—Aubrey
Layne.
November 24, 2015
-12-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
Mayor Sessoms welcomed Secretary Layne. Secretary Layne expressed his appreciation to City Council
and the Stafffor their continued support. Secretary Layne acknowledged Jennifer Mitchell, Director of
Rail and Public Transit, and Grindly Johnson, Deputy Secretary:
The Secretary of Transportation's
November 24 Light Rail Briefing
to the Virginia Beach City Council
Below is the Agenda for today's presentation:
Agenda
• My Personal Involvement On This Issue
• The State's Role & Contributions To Date
• The Planning Process
• Cost Considerations
• Next Steps
November 24, 2015
-13-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
Below are Secretary Layne's Personal Qualifications and Disclosures:
Personal Qualifications and Disclosures
• Native of Hampton Roads,long-term resident of Virginia Beach
• Former President and principal broker of Great Atlantic Properties
• Former Towne Bank Advisory Board Member
• Former Commonwealth Transportation Board Member—Hampton
Roads
• Former Envision 2040 Member(Wife,Peggy,currently serves as
Chair of 2040)
• Former Lead Fundraiser for MoveOn.org—advocacy group
• Former President of Achievable Dream Academy
• Current Secretary of Transportation and Chairman of the
Commonwealth Transportation Board
Secretary Layne advised the State is involved at the request of the City:
The City of Virginia Beach Has
Repeatedly Sought Virginia's
Direct Assistance In Moving
The Light Rail Extension
Initiative Forward
November 24, 2015
-14-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
Secretary Layne advised the State has assisted the City along the way in this venture:
We Have Answered Your Calls
1. Virginia helped you purchase Norfolk
Southern right-of-way in 2009 - $20 Million
2. Virginia (DRPT) helped you organize and
now conduct the comprehensive planning
studies
3. Set aside $155 million to help you fund this
initiative—a plan to make this happen
without federal funds
Below is the time frame and are various steps the State considered in moving this project forward:
When The Tide Extension
Conversations First Started
Comprehensive Plan 2003
Resort SGA Plan 2008
Comprehensive Plan Update 2009
Purchased right-of-way 2009
Environmental Impact Statement 2009
Newtown SGA Plan 2010
Rosemont SGA Plan 2011
Lynnhaven and Hilltop SGA Plans 2012
Centerville SGA Plan 2012
November 24, 2015
-15-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
The State's decision to invest was very much predicated on a time-table:
Active Planning Schedule
Project Schedule of Key Milestones Key Date
Locally Preferred Alternative selected by City Council)LRT to May 12,2015
Town Center)
Commonwealth of Virginia approves Six Year Improvement June 17,2015
Program
Preliminary Engineering 30%160%Utilities)Design/NEPA July 2015-Oct.2016
Conclusion
RFQ Posted and Design-Build Team RFQ Response Dec.2015-Feb.2016
Development
RFQ Process-Prequalification of Design Build Teams March-April2016
RFP Issued to Prequalified Design-Build Teams/Proposal Dec.2016-Feb.2017
Development Phase
Design-Build Team Selection and Negotiations April 2017 to June 2017
City Council Approval of Comprehensive Agreement June 2017
Design-Build Contract Implementation Phase July 2017-July 2019
The Tide Light Rail System service to Virginia Beach Town Dec.2019
Center Open to Public
The State became involved with House Bill 2. Once the Bill became Law, it allowed the Commonwealth
Transportation Board to allocate money to projects. The projects must go thru an objective "scoring
process"to use in determining which projects were allocated:
The Light Rail Initiative Was Fully Funded
Before HB2 Became Law
H2 -*a= • \VDOT
November 24, 2015
-16-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
This project, along with three (3)others, was "grandfathered"from House Bill 2:
Four Projects Grandfathered from
HB2
1. Route 29 Solutions - Charlottesville
2. Arlington Street Car/Light Rail
3. 1-95 / Rt. 630 Interchange - Stafford
4. Virginia Beach Light Rail Extension
House Bill 2 requires six(6)factors should be looked at in the Urban Area and below is Template A used
here and in Northern Virginia. There are four (4) templates used across the Commonwealth. The
Transportation Board went through this analysis:
Light Rail Extension HB2 Factors
HB2 Factors Weight Project
Benefits
Congestion 45%
Safety 5%
Economic Development 5%
Accessibility 15%
Environment 10%
Land Use 20%
November 24, 2015
-17-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
Secretary Layne wanted to address a recent "quote"that was published in the Virginian Pilot. Secretary
Layne admitted he did say in the early stages, Light Rail is not going to reduce congestion; however, he
went on to say that there are other factors considered in the scoring when looked at:
Out of Context
"I'll be the first to admit
that light rail is not going to
reduce congestion."
Aubrey L. Layne, Jr.
Source:Virginian Pilot
The Commonwealth Transportation Board used the following factors in scoring this project. According
to the Commonwealth, the majority of population growth in the Commonwealth is within the "Golden
Crescent"from Northern Virginia to Hampton Roads. What the Commonwealth Transportation used in
scoring this project:
Virginia Population Growth
80%
of Virginia's future 4
population growth
will occur in the
"Golden Crescent" U"0"\1W,cc\\'c)Jun(:w,Iwi l'.lute.Ionua,v 2'.20)5
Source:WMfoa Coope,ante.for Pukkr servxe,Demographic,&Wo,Yyre*Group
I
November 24, 2015
-18-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
A part of the scoring and basic criteria in the project must be a "connected, multi-modal system":
We Must Continue To Think
About And Plan For The Future
— 10 and 25 Years Out.
The Light Rail Extension Is Part
of Evolving To A 21st Century
"Connected, Multi-modal
System."
The Tide is a part of a larger "connected"Hampton Roads Plan and been in Transportation Planning for
many years:
The Tide Extension Is Part of A Larger
"Connected" Hampton Roads Plan
via
y, • Wih ireaencr Gculaloi
2
• Perk andRlde
\ Trrdk Twofer FUNItT
Prbrky Ana ter 6kKte end Pedestrian
t kwpevenr t,
0 Rkeshere
t
November 24, 2015
-19-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
The Tide was also considered. If the Tide Extension pulls one(1) out of every twenty(20) cars off of 1-
264, the congestion would be reduced:
Tide Ridership
• Tide carries more than 4,900 riders a weekday
• More than 1.5M trips annually
• Virginia Beach extension is expected to carry 2,250 riders
• 1-264 between Witchduck and Independence carries'-50,000
vehicles during the morning and evening peak periods
• Taking close to 1 in 20 cars off 1-264 during rush hour would
have a real benefit to 1-264
Light Rail Extension HB2 Factors
HB2 Factors Weight Project
Benefits
Congestion 45%
Safety 5%
Economic Development 5%
Accessibility 15%
Environment 10%
Land Use 20%
November 24, 2015
-20-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
Light Rail, compared to all other modes of transportation, is extremely safe:
Light Rail, Relative To All Modes, Is Safe
Figure 2 Passenger fatality rates(per 100,0(X1,000 passenger miles)
1.60 1.42
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.41
0.40 - -
0.20
■0.20 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.06
N S = c d
a LLa r E o
E
v
Source:Federal Transit Administration
Light Rail Extension HB2 Factors
HB2 Factors Weight Project
Benefits
Congestion 45%
Safety 5%
Economic Development 5%
Accessibility 15%
Environment 10%
Land Use 20%
November 24, 2015
-21-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
Tourism is a great economic driver for the City. As the City considers the Arena project, multi-modal
transportation should be considered since many studies do not include ridership for this type offacility:
Virginia Beach Chamber
of Commerce
And The
Virginia Beach Tourism &
Convention Bureau
Support the Extension
The State considered anything that will help populate the hotel rooms is welcome and will assist in
making the City a year-round destination:
12,000
Hotel rooms
VIRI
BE cH 12,000 jobs
$1.3 billion
jj,t- :77:77,—, annual revenue
Source:Virginia Beach
Convention&Tourism Bureau
November 24, 2015
-22-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
Of importance, the Navy has supported Light Rail Extension for over ten (10)years:
•
The Navy has
supported light
rail extension for
10+ years
There are a host of local and regional businesses that support Light Rail.
•
219 American Bistro 3601T PARTNERS 456 Fish on Granby 757 Creative Space AECOM Ainslie Construction alatte
Cafe Alt Daily Andre Marquez Architects Ann Stokes Architects Armada Hoffler Basketball Products International
Barter's Sports Lounge Bean There Cafe Big Easy Oyster Bar Blocker Norfolk Family YMCA Bodega Bonney
Research Boyton Marketing Bruce Williams&Associates Byrd&Baldwin CB Richard Ellis Carla Howard Consulting
Chartreuse Bistro Chesapeake Albemarle Engineering Childrens Hospital of the King's Daughters Chrysler
•
Museum of Art• by Marriott
Crenshaw, •mpany
Decker,Car• •wntowner •
NewspaFoodbankr Local & Regional •ua Granby
•
Theater Gr nt Harbor
Park Har •mpany
Hummingbi
HKks Home Businesses &ber'm
Optics Kim I Design
MacArthur• Guire
Woods,LLD
Norfolk ib -nt Old
Dominion D Support Light Rail `huge`
Ltd. Prot.: k Henn
Consulting f lampton Roads Public Transportation Alliance opment
Group Rove s Seventh
Point Shera• •nu Tayloe
Associates The A•s. c ... . • roup The Philip
Shucet Company The Wright Company Thomas Nelson Community College Three Plus 1 Partners Tidewater
Community College Tidewater Moving Todd lurich's Bistro TowneBank Vintage Kitchen Virginia Arts Festival
Virginia Opera Virginia Ship Repair Virginia Stage Company Virginia Zoo Voila!Cuisine International Volunteer
Hampton Roads We Choose Widener Corp Wilbanks Smith&Thomas Wilcox&Savage,PC.Williams Mullen
Work Program Architects Work Release
November 24, 2015 •
-23-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
There are a large amount of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) that also support Light Rail:
Central Business District Association Central Business District Nextgen
Chesapeake Economic Development Authority Citizens Transportation Advisory
Committee Coliseum Central Business District Connect Hampton Roads
Currituck Chamber of Commerce Downtown Hampton Business District
Downtown Noer Hampton
Roads Greate
Roads Greate NGOs of Hampton
t Hampton
Roads Cent •mmerce
Hampton•• Company
Hampton Roa• Support Association
for Comme ,•wntown
Norfolk Coun. ptonRoads
Planning Di .hors and
Convention Light Rail .Light Rail
Now Mobi it Riders
Hampton Roads Public Transportation Alliance
Advisory Co Peninsula
Realtors As- p Center
Tidewater Bicycle• socia ion i.ewa er:ui.ers• oc a on Transit Riders
Action Committee Urban Land Institute—Hampton Roads Virginia Beach
Economic Development Virginia Beach Vision Virginians for High Speed Rail
Virginia Peninsula Chamber of Commerce Virginia Transit Association
Williamsburg Area Transit Agency Women In Transportation
The Commonwealth Transportation Board also considered the "age shift"when scoring this project:
•
'The Age Shift
Demographic Destiny
November 24, 2015
-24-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
Across the United States, life expectancy is growing:
U.S. - Life Expectancy
_lot 414.1, iiits. /
,_,r__Iiiiiii"---..-
47 _
.11
1900
So r'L b.4 hrtvl/wwv.. ..<nsih+ -•x<rgnt f
At the same time, birth rates continue to decline:
Shifting Birth Rates
Total Fertility Rate
Number of Children per woman
0.0 3.7
3.5
3.0 Baby
Boom
2.5 2.0
2.0 Great
Great
1.5 Depress= 1970s Energy Recession
1.0 2.2 GUS
0.5
0.0
1911 1921 1931 1941 1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2011'
Source:ronwono,arh.rr.r Bo.eo&Any//*ab 0.0/p.si«orons/aororrwnp012/...oopmnm doro-:hecrryb<r sneer us popv+orno.a.0.
4
November 24, 2015
-25-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
1960 vs. 2030
MALES
115. d
8044 A
'676 L
'074
6569 -
6044 ____ `
5559
O
6094
4549 :k
4044
3149
303'
257
207(
\\I\
1579 St_
lou `
5:
..
4% iN 7k 4k
En Bar,8003984(born 19461964)
nes.U.5 Census Bv'pou
4
This chart depicts Millennials and what they consider to be the basics for quality of life:
For Millennials-Expectations for Safety,Variety of Employment,
Quality and Affordability of Housing Top The List
...:.
N 4 safe 89% 67% 98% 92% 91% 90%
V Has variety o1 employment
N 90% 81% 89% 85% 82% 87%
•
EO Owlltyr�i afferdabc8ty of 92% 83% 97% 87% 89% 83%
N.H.(Options
Offen outdoor recreation options 71% 60% 71% 77% 71% 76%
Offers a gnat load sane 76% 75% 78% 85% 77% 75%
Embraces creat683 59% 55% 58% 69% 59% 64%
Embraces 1mwation 70% 58% 61% 69% 60% 64%
ls near the mountains 28% 24% 40% 17% 30% 64%
Has access to water 59% 54% 64% 65% 54% 63%
is bik.-ab%/walkab4 46% 50% 41% 43% 44% 61%
Has easy pubic transportation 42% 66% 40% 47% 46% 60%
Embraces small busvless/Han 94% 48% 60% 61% 54% 57%
ups/entrepreneunlvp
Higher education options 76% 60% 60% 73% 62% 57%
is dn.0. 60% 63% 55% 69% 55% 55%
Urban living environment 47% 59% 51% 60% 46% 53%
Offen an active r,o,o,o.M 51% 36% 46% 53% 49% 49%
Offen an active arts scene 42% 38% 44% 43% 42% 46%
Has rich 61810ry 41% 47% 39% 41% 42% 42%
::7 when you Oen,.1.41.3(y a•pt..vo,a.i%Want m M.N.mperunt en.acct el t3.I,so.va m vw7
Source:SIR Research
November 24, 2015
-26-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
In conducting long range planning, the young adult population is not expected to grow unless the City
attracts them to move:
Hampton Roads PDC
Population Growth and Composition
1,762,000 1,862,000
1,696,000
iii
Older AdultsmaI AIM
65.
C Young
Adults 521,000 506,000 499,000
15-34
2013 2020 2030
Sours:Weldon Cooar Center for Pubic 8ervke,Ormoprop60,8 s5br4Hrce Groep.
www.coopereenrer orydenwaropoa,Un49rpt7 of Vogo,o.
Connected, multi-modal transportation is something young adults look to when considering where to
pursue employment:
New Mobility Options Are Important Placemaking Assets
waNC I voc I er NC rte T% I (•(.6
is sale 89'.4 r 8>'C. 91% 81% 90%
aneiv of employment 90 82% 83, 85% 8296 87%
Opt Or.
Qwirty ani affoMabay of 92% 83% 87% 87% 83% 83%
nowne zona
5—
Offers outdoor rgnr o84 options 71% 10% 71% 77% 71% 76%
Offen a gnat food.,.no 76% 75% 76% 85% 77% 75%
tio fmbraos crestlr8y 39% 55% 58% 69% 59% 64%
C fmbnces lnnoettion 70% 58% 61% 69% 60% 4%
Is near the mountain, 29', 24% 40% .... so% 64%
Y Nes access[owner 59% 54% 64% 65% 54% 63%
CCO Is bike-able/walkable 46% 50% 41% 43% 44% 61%
C y Has easy public 42% 66% 40% alfa 46% 60%
Utransportation
CO Embcaces small basion/start- 54% mx 60% 61% 54% 57%
ups/emnpnrwunbp
Q.. Ni6Mr.4,0 00 option 76% 60% 60% 71% 62% 57%
Is diverse 60% 63% 55% 69% 55% 55%
Urban wing environment 47% 59% 51% 60% 46% 53%
Often an active mock sten. 31% 56% 46% 53% 49% 49%
Often en an8 arts scene 42% 38% 4% 43% 42% 46%
....4ne,o.t,rrano„ater.,apkeyoualtrearcp 6aiiesematfw,e„n.44.4,,..a,
November 24, 2015
-27-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
Light Rail Extension HB2 Factors
HB2 Factors Weight Project
Benefits
Congestion 45%
Safety 5%
Economic Development 5%
Accessibility 15%
Environment 10%
Land Use 20%
It is important that the current system is "tying-in"with other modes of transportation available:
• Bay
i tyre.
HAMPTON ROADS
Hampton VIRGINIA• Atlantic
Newport Ne P Mows
•ti Ora„
trine d
MaNvn Mr.,i SAM APO ilsry
r• • • ' • •
•
ortsrn,outh Virginia Be •h
•
ttolk Chcsapeak*
•
November 24, 2015
-28-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
Accessibility is going to be a factor and, in fact, one of the websites that does not support Light Rail, has
the two (2)slides listed below:
02 Have you ever used the light rail system in Norfolk?(Base:Total Respondents,N=401)
42 /0
Virginia Beach Residents Have Used
Norfolk's Light Rail System
Source:No Light Rail/Virginia Beach Light Rail Survey
Conducted by:Issues&Answers September 2015
Q2b.Was it a positive experience?(Base:Total Respondents,(N=169)
92 /0
Of Virginia Beach Residents
Who Have Have Ridden The Tide
Say It Was Positive Experience
Source:No Light Rail/Virginia Beach Light Rail Survey
Conducted by:Issues&Answers September 2015
November 24, 2015
-29-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
Light Rail Extension HB2 Factors
HB2 Factors Weight Project
Benefits
Congestion 45%
Safety 5%
Economic Development 5%
Accessibility 15% ✓
Environment 10%
Land Use 20%
In terms of Federal Regulations and Scoring, this project will improve air-quality, reduce green-house
emissions and saves energy:
Improves air quality
Reduces greenhouse
gas emissions
Saves energy
November 24, 2015
-30-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
The Tide Light Rail Train Capacity
Seated Passengers 68
Total Passenger Capacity: 160-180
tg ro ro 144 U% re ro ro U4 Ud U4
ro too tx ro tg tg ro 14 U4 ro
sz zs ro to ss tg ." ro the ax 0% I —
ro ro 4% ro tg tg tg ro tto re
ro tm tg ro U4 U4 ro ro re rt
ro ro tx ro am lig ro 14 Ogg *4 04
Source:The Tide/HRT:http://gohrt.com/services/the-tide/light-rail-vehicles/
Light Rail Extension HB2 Factors
Project
HB2 Factors Weight Benefits
Congestion 45%
Safety 5%
Economic Development 5%
Accessibility 15%
Environment 10%
Land Use 20%
November 24, 2015
-31-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
Land Use was the biggest factor for the Commonwealth Transportation Board as they reviewed the City's
Website:
1VBVirginia Beach,.,,,.,., _ .._ .. �.
w Residents Rumness Visitors G...rm.n..v! Services
tUewewe: r.....o........Awn.. •......caws..•Aare+•4•n.n.0 AN,:
IltneearOmaii.w. Envision Virginia Beach 2040 a,...
..ru Car....V.....4.Lw Cam..A,....u.n V w
.........W NO Mw.aaa.M W V.4. .....
I
,mssowl.t...rrl.=.alar W...n.r.a aWY/ems
'.."y •••••••••••••••••••••••• •...r......�r.
1YO....a....Yi1M..Ir....
...rola.arra•.. Ma...
wTww.w..... .A
Y.W.
was..aorp�..as...WWas.CW.•r � '
According to the City's Website, each and every one of the SGA's is dependent on Multi-Modal
connections:
City of Virginia Beach
Fort
Strategic Growth Areas slay
Loth Cowl. Cnesapseke
aapntmow ea. 8•Y
V ! '
~ Click on the SGA of your choice `It,
Burton`' to open a detailed map. Z
Station
s'�' C i
a
g
Pembroke Lynn-
Hilltop
Newtown IiiRosemont w Lynnhaven
Illh
, N A.S.
November 24, 2015
-32-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
Light Rail Extension HB2 Factors
HB2 Factors Weight Project
Benefits
Congestion 45% 1 —
Safety 5% ✓
Economic Development 5% ✓
Accessibility 15% ✓
Environment 10% ✓
Land Use 20% %}
The Commonwealth Transportation Board's conclusion and Scoring will be available in the Spring:
CTB Conclusion:
State's Investment In
The Light Rail
Extension Project
Is Justified.
November 24, 2015
-33-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
The City also submitted four (4) other projects to the Commonwealth Transportation Board for
consideration:
•
Other Virginia Beach
Transportation
Projects?
Two (2) of the projects have nothing to do with reducing congestion:
Virginia Beach
Transportation Projects
• Elbow Road extension phasf•
Congestion
II-B Safety
• Indian River Road phase VIEconomic
• Laskin Road Bridgedevelopment
Accessibility
replacement Environment
• Centerville Turnpike phase Land use
November 24, 2015
-34-
PRESENTATIONS CITY CO UNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
Cost
Considerations
The City already made these investments:
DRPT Review of HRT Cost Estimate
• Preliminary Budget = $310 million
— Does not include value of ROW already purchased;
NEPA;or feeder bus service
— Basis of Commonwealth commitment of$155 million
• Potential cost savings:
— Contingency
— ROW estimate
— Final design
— Utility relocation
November 24, 2015
-35-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
DRPT Review of HRT Cost Estimate
• Potential value engineering opportunities in
structures and systems
• Potential labor and materials cost savings by not
needing to apply Federal requirements
— VA Beach has estimated up to$20 million in potential
savings
• Cost is based on 5%design; HRT is currently
advancing to 30%design and will have revised cost
estimate in fall of 2016
These are the recent transportation projects in the Region:
Recent Transportation Projects
In Hampton Roads
Dominion Boulevard Bridge $411 Million
64/264 Interchange $340 Million
Old Route 460 Proposal $1.8 Billion
1-564 Intermodal Connector $175 Million
November 24, 2015
-36-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
In 2013, the Commonwealth increased transportation funding. The funding is not based on usage of
gasoline and no transit project pays for itself:
About Light Rail Funding
• Roads, education and public safety
do not directly pay for themselves.
• Transit and light rail do not directly
pay for themselves.
GUEST COLUMNIST
Next step: Getting the funding facts
O•^^ - n n® • O •
w
IIfRI.M3.a lot of opinnr ownns around ad,Lev rod Fenrralll and
the eatentv.n to Virgin.6eaiRY low'n Center tpenrr ally So tee Important
{ to look at the taro
I dol,the referenduio gteebd F b poeWe chat•Cttlun dn.en effort
MO come vp nim the required*umber of aldnatam.and n n po.vhle
that the City Counatl wyll add a quarton K-the 2016 ballot
In nu hr clear adwtlhly the people have an ant..red to be heard
Should this tow adv ante to the ballot.I hair no doubt that the boot d
will heed the will of the 1aerr mu like tl out In 2015
heaardh++n(the oratory on etrhet ude the 3011 election showed that 62'
partmt of thou valeµ..tame 116100 peoplegreed that the Coy Coaotd
boot-adopt an ordinance appruvtnx thr ore of all rea.nruble eon.,to
.oppnn the f r,00tng.nd development of the Mk het rad mm VnFnu
Reach•
November 24, 2015
-37-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
VB Transit Today:
5 Million
Transit Trips
$6.5 Million
Operating Budget
0.64%
(Less than 1%of the City of VB's
total annual operating budget) f
The City's Transit will still be under 1%of the State's total Operating Budget:
VB Transit Today: VB Transit in
3 Years: (with Light Rail
5 Million Extended To VB)
Transit Trips 78% Increase In Bus
$6.5 Million Service Hours*
Operating Budget $8.5 Million
Operating Budget
0.64%
(Less than 1%of the City of VB's 0.85%
total annual operating budget)
(Less than 1%of the City of VB s
'fora tanrruateye,etingtnrdge r
November 24, 2015
-38-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
Next
Steps
The State did not invest in any other City like this because of past performance:
Where Is the City of
Virginia Beach Headed?
Do You Still
Want Our Help?
November 24, 2015
-39-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
This City is leading this initiative:
The City of Virginia Beach
Is Leading This Initiative
• The City of Virginia Beach (not HRT, HRPDC or
DRPT) is leading and managing the
implementation of the light rail extension.
— You have the demonstrated project management skills
and experience.
— You have the public support to study this initiative—
62%referendum.
The State is anxious to get to real procurement:
You Are Driving This
Project Schedule of Key Milestones Datejs) Lead
Locally Preferred Alternative selected by City Council(LRT to Town Center) May 12,2015 my Cannel
Commonwealth of Virginia approves Six Year Improvement Program June 17,2015 CTB
Preliminary Engineering 30%(60%Utilities)Design/NEPA Conclusion July 2015-Oct.201 ART-City Staff
RFO Posted and Design-Build Team RFO Response Development Dec.2015-Feb. CITY Staff
2016
RFO Process-Prequali6cation of Design Build Teams March-April 2016 City Staff
RFP Issued to Prequahfled Design-Build Teams/Proposal Development Dec.2016-Feb. City Staff
Phase 2017
Design-Build Team Selection and Negotiations April 2017 to June CRy Staff
2017
City Council Approval of Comprehensive Agreement June 2017 City Council
Design-Build Contract Implementation Phase July 2017-July 2019 City Staff
The Tide Light Rail System service to Virginia Beach Town Center Open to Dec.2019 ART
Public
November 24, 2015
-40-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
Decisions must be made based on limited funds. The Commonwealth has $1-Billion to allocate with $7-
Billion in funding needs. The Commonwealth has a responsibility to invest when there are committed
partners:
We Are Here To Assist
• We have $7 billion in funding needs
identified and requests across the
Commonwealth. Yet, we only have $1 billion
to allocate.
• We are investing where we have committed
partners who want to help us reinvent and
grow Virginia's new economy.
Staying on schedule is what it will take to demonstrate to the Commonwealth the City is truly committed
to ensure the Commonwealth's continued support:
Staying On Schedule Demonstrates
You Want This Funding
Project Schedule of Key Milestones Dates) Agency lead
Loyally Preferred Alternative selected by City Council(LRT to Town Center) May 12,2015 City Council
Commonwealth of Virginia approves Six Year Improvement Program lune 17,2015 CTB
Preliminary Engineering 30%(60%Utilities)Design/NEPA Conclusion July 2015-Oct.2016 NRT-City Staff
REO Posted and Design-Build Team RFC/Response Development Dec.2015-Feb. City Staff
2016
REO Process-Pregualification of Design Build Teams March-April 2016 City Staff
REP Issued to Prequalified Design-Build Teams/Proposal Development Dec.2016-Feb. City Staff
Phase 2017
Design-Build Team Selection and Negotiations April 2017 to June City Staff
2017
City Council Approval of Comprehensive Agreement lune 2017 City Council
Design-Build Contract Implementation Phase July 2017-July 2019 City Staff
The Tide light Rail System service to Virginia Beach Town Center Open to Dec.2019 NR'
Public
November 24, 2015
-41-
PRESENTATIONS CITY COUNICL'S BRIEFING
LIGHT RIAL
ITEM#65441
(Continued)
Thank You
Mayor Sessoms expressed his appreciation to Secretary Layne and everyone working on this project.
November 24, 2015
-42-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
TOWN CENTER PHASE VI
ITEM#65442
5:05 P.M.
Mayor Sessoms welcomed Mark Wawner, Economic Development. Mr. Wawner expressed his
appreciation to City Council for their continued support. The Town Center project began in 2000, with
the City Council's Vision of having a Central Business District(CBD) in the City:
IrlillIFIl
Proposed Phase VI
l
Town Center
Block 9
City Council
November 24,2015
This is how Town Center looked in 1998:
Town Center 1998
-C::z::::"....f's. 1, r
--....-- :.•,,,-c..-- - . --...1;31.7.,- -;,,., - - .___ _
,„..T.„. ..,.e -Iiiir„,-20.'1-4'..• ...,...-7.,., . ,&:4'.,••ao.-- . ^-, -
`
. \ - 14,
4 n }•
November 24, 2015
-43-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
TOWN CENTER PHASE VI
ITEM#65442
(Continued)
To date, over$500-Million of private investment has taken place in Town Center:
Town Center 2015
,,rraaaw
•
11 it ,�.+
Ittltlliiu *
•
•awe-_ •
1
Town Center Update
, I
• To date: '
• Office:814,736 sf
• Restaurants:117,807 sf(19 9 •I
total) • I 11
• Retail:190,459 sf :
• Residential:804 units "44
• Hotel Rooms:412 rooms
•
rtif
November 24, 2015
-44-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
TOWN CENTER PHASE VI
ITEM#65442
(Continued)
Below is an overview of the Town Center TIF:
Town Center TIF Summary n
town center
,�.. �.. Phase I Phase II Phase Ill Total Phase V Total
Waves 4111
PUBLIC
INVESTMENT
Public Parking $22.5 $181 $16.9 $57.5 $20.1 $77.6
Garages
Meeting Space. $0.5 $9.9 $10.4 $10.4
Connector,and
Land'
Intrastructure- $6.3 07.7 $1.7 $15.7 $1.0 $16.7
CIP/EDIP Funded
TOTAL PUBLIC $29.3 $25.8 $28.5 S83.6 $21.1 $104.7
raev an.
lnumeuensre)
TOTAL PRIVATE $95 $97 $172 $365.0 $84.4 $4494
Publ,c Prrvafe 132 138 161 1.4.4 140 143
Ratio
Compkbon Dates Fall 2003 Winter Fall 2007 Fall 2014
2005 III cw.
Since 2006, the City has tracked the Taxes generated by the project. In 2015, over$7.5-Million in taxes
was generated. Since 2006, over$63-Million was generated for the City:
Town Center Business Taxes* n
town center
v.
Type of FY.2006 FY-2007 FY-200e FY-2009 FY-2010 FY-2011 FY-2012 FY-2013 FY-2014 FY-2015 Total
Tax
Blyirysl MOMS M>/M• M W.. Ismuu SLAM. sunemo aLL4s424 foam= Wm>, MAA./ sumayse
License
8,,,ymety
MM.1o> tsb M, $450.0)0$450.0)0MA
WOW% MW> SWIM M . N,>.W *MAO mom ss.0174
Property
Truslae M.wMI M.»t0M *mom. t rotes M4s>MI MM>Mo UMW,/ M4Mm MOW MM,Mo MINYN
Taxes
General Mss nx SM>m1 tmlvta M>CNs sass* MM. MMMT 111401, MIME MMM1 ar5asns
Sales
Tues
Total MJMM> 4004314 MMm.u> $40MMI Mammo 1005651 .man MMI4N Ms10171 smarm, •e1S
•60s nes,Taxes Generated Wth-n the Core keg of the CBO South TIF Datnct
November 24, 2015
-45-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
TOWN CENTER PHASE VI
ITEM#65442
(Continued)
Here is the Town Center Master Plan and today's presentation is regarding Block 9:
Town Center Master Plan
Pt ( r I ■
_ AOR] O{tl_ ■W
I
1. ,,...c'....7-... wrrr. i 1 ■.....h.,r.....rwY... h.PN..if;`,.' ,'""...
.y... ... r-....e.....
. n ti.. i-. - !i.SII.......:
t rw. H H
". Hf-1 11,4,1
•' ' ._ 17_4. .♦
•
wtew.x... ... 7! 4.16 MMM
•
v.... al:' -7". ' L.1111: '
_ It t:11•••
_ i M--= N, 4'�♦1
ON TI.. * MA M r . — 11♦� .
w.r.rda. Y Qaldt..y., _ 1••
W r Ili ft,. — 'C••
•
Phase VI:Block 9
•▪W..r.
.
J
Y
d
• e
_ -4 ,1
14ii i:' tS M 1 h R P q LLQ( '{I' 1 I I ,
lini
t:. bbl i 1 F:- 7 i! 1.. I
L 9 R 1
November 24, 2015
-46-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
TOWN CENTER PHASE VI
ITEM#65442
(Continued)
Here is an Aerial Perspective of Block 9:
Aerial Perspective
°to
MBUSSTR er
AQP
H
ti
coMMFRCFST �e
RFFr
•
Below is an overview of the proposed project for Block 9:
Proposed Project
Mixed-use Retail.Restaurant Theater Ito UT Z A U?
and Apartments
• Level One:33,000 sf retail 1 r
• Level Two 17,000 sf Zeiders Amencan
Dream Theater(300sealexpenmental
theater)and 5,000 at restaurant
• Level Three-Nine:N-120 studio/1- 1 f
bedroom luxury apartments r, r
• Streetscapes around entire block
• Public plaza
• Pedestrian bndge
r 0
33,000 sf retail `J► I
t�.
17,000 sf theater • i
55,000 sf restaurant
+/-120 apartments `"tom r '
November 24, 2015
-47-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
TOWN CENTER PHASE VI
ITEM#65442
(Continued)
Here is a rendering of the proposed project:
ill u
ga
gal
I M
L_ a "" 111
IS I `r,
.
COMMERCE STREET
Here is a rendering of the proposed Zeiders American Theater:
• L-
r a'
_Au s4
tie otl
November 24, 2015
-48-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
TOWN CENTER PHASE VI
ITEM#65442
(Continued)
Project Schematics
4161111111114 4 1. A
T; , -:.p�
,,,,,,,,,,„ of
Here is a rendering for the Second Level Plan:
Second Level Plan
PUBLIC PLAZA
�w
j r o
G rc:"141/7i II mi. '.= ,
1 IF-1-3 ; sm
jr
g 0
,..._ 1
November 24, 2015
-49-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
TOWN CENTER PHASE VI
ITEM#65442
(Continued)
The total project cost is estimated just over$41-Million:
Project Budget Estimates
Private $30,725489
Investment
(Armada Nobe,')
ZADT $7651.312
VBDA $2 933 374
Total Building $41,310,175
Cost
Mixed-use Retail.Restaurant Theater and
Apartments _
33,000 sf retail
17,000 sf theater ?
5,000 sf restaurant
+1-120 apartments •
Here is the VBDA Participation offending:
VBDA Participation L ,
Podium Cost $1.440.959
•'
(Foundations.etc)
VerpcalTransportation 5473470 i
(Monumental Public 0 N�
Stair,Stairs.Elevators) •'!! gyp;
Pudic Plaza $813,26011 NW
► �C
SottCosts $205,685
(Design and Legal) g
i�
Total VBDACost $2,933,374
r _
1`
November 24, 2015
-50-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
TOWN CENTER PHASE VI
ITEM#65442
(Continued)
As with every other projects in Town Center, the City supports the infrastructure:
Infrastructure Cost
Streetscapes $500,000
Pedestrian Bridge $500,000
(Connecting Cosmopolitan
Garage to Block 9)
Total InfiamuctureCost $1,000,000
Below is the funding source for the project:
Funding
Building Support and Plaza $2,933,374
(TIF Funded)
Streetscapesand Pedesnian $1,000,000
Bnelge
(ED/P Funded)
• mer:.-r
_ I �
_ - C- i-
r—
•'�!Y' r A
November 24, 2015
-51-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
TOWN CENTER PHASE VI
ITEM#65442
(Continued)
Here is more specific information regarding the proposed Zeiders American Dream Theater:
CONCEPT PROPOSED BY MICHAEL
ZEIDERS,FOUNDING DIRECTOR AMERICAN a .
DREAM
• Zeiders American Dream Theater Goal THEATER
To become an integral part of the
community-using the arts to 17,000 sf theater
encourage individuals to embrace 300 seats •
their dreams and to achieve their full
potential. •
• Highlights A B�T Z A D T
• Private investment of$7,598,411 �F� •
•
• ZADT*will be responsible of all -
operations.management and `V
programing
1
ZADT-Zeiders American Dream Theater LEVEL TWO
Below are just a few of the primary activities of the Theater:
WHER ,pTIgy 'QTYitlif S,OPPO UNITY
( . (
p _ ;
0‘ t
• Zeiders American Dream Theater Will
Include 17,000 sf theater
• Audio and video recording studio 300 seats
• Lobby and reception area
• Flexible rehearsal performance space
• Offices and support spaces
• Primary ActMtie5'
• Touring acts p(�P�`,
• Music festivals and vaaery shows `��V �`
• Original plays and operas PN`O�P�fR
• Community performing arts groups •`�
• Webcasts LEVEL TWO
• Audio and video recording
November 24, 2015
-52-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
TOWN CENTER PHASE VI
ITEM#65442
(Continued)
Here are the Benefits and Impacts of Town Center:
Project Benefits
Town Center Impacts
• Construction of Phase VI at high
quality level fl
• Maintains momentum of Town - [(
Center retail activities
I 4441111
• Brings unique uses to Town I /. ,,, 6�
Center ddd
• Increases values of existing
Town Center and Pembroke area
development
ist
• Benefits existing restaurants and I
retailers
I
The Theater "compliments"the Sandler Center and is not a competitor:
Project Benefits •
Cultural Impacts
• Helps establish Town Center as cultural
Center
• Complements Sandler Centel
• Attracts upcoming performing arts talent
to the Virginia Beach region \t
Enhances quality of lite for residents and
visitor
• Operations and maintenance costs of
theater provided by non-profit
• 24-theater-use dates to City at no cost 1• 300-seat performing arts venue
• Supports Special Service District(SSD:
$34,000 per year)
• Generates net surplus revenues to City .
November 24, 2015
-53-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
TOWN CENTER PHASE VI
ITEM#65442
(Continued)
The Net Fiscal Impact of Phase VI, over 20 years, is approximately$6.3-Million to the City. In addition,
the project will generate over $300-Million to the TIF and Real Estate Taxes, with a private to public
ratio of 13 to 1:
Project Benefits:Town Center Fiscal Impact 20 Years
REVENUES ADDITIONAL REVENUES
Personal Property $291,960 Real Estate Taxes(per $304,182
BPOL $379,599 year)
General Sales $3,148,990 SSD Taxes(per year) $172,695
PRIVATE/PUBLIC RATIO 13:1
Meal $3,352,969
Admissions $653,738
Utility $156,000
Indirect and Induced $166,423
Spending
Residential NonR E $5.140,916 „ilCc�
Revenues t:l rt
TOTAL $13,290,595
COSTS:
Municipal and School $6,951,119
I NET FISCAL IMPACT: $6,339,476
(Excluding Real Estate J
Taxes, ----_—._
111
11
C
I
11
_ G Questions?
- m CP- -
i:.
•
'! �' ...
ir-
•
Mayor Sessoms expressed his appreciation to Mr. Wawner and everyone working on this project.
November 24, 2015
-54-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
OLD BEACH VILLAGE 2
ITEM#65443
5:25 P.M.
Mayor Sessoms welcomed Douglas Smith, Deputy City Manager. Mr. Smith expressed his appreciation
to City Council for their continued support:
Old Beach Village 7
City Council Work Session Briefing
Douglas L. Smith, Deputy City Manager
November 24, 2015
Below is an Overview of today's presentation:
Presentation Overview
Review SGA Incentive Program
Review the project
Present proposal for SGA Incentive
Next steps
November 24, 2015
-55-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
OLD BEACH VILLAGE 2
ITEM#65443
(Continued)
Below are the SGA Incentive Guidelines adopted by the City Council:
SGA Incentive Guidelines
• Compliance with City Council goals
• Higher quality
• Increased jobs/tax base
• Comp plan-sense of place,etc
The project is located within a Strategic Growth Area or Special Economic Growth Area
The private sector investment is a minimum of approximately$30 million
• The project aligns with SGAISEGA design principles.
• Proximity to light rail stations(SGA only)
• Historical financial and construction development integrity of the Developer.
• Generates jobs and supports target industry development
• Projects support pedestrian and bicycle connectivity
• Offers housing stock variety
The analysis for consideration of any project is based on financial feasibility:
Financial Feasibility for
City and Developer
Fiscal,economic,and/or social benefits will be greater
because of a public investment partnership based on a due
diligence evaluation.
A fair and reasonable return is provided to the private and
public sector partners.
The project will not proceed,or will not proceed at a desired
quality level,"but/for"a public sector investment partnership.
Developer and the CityNBDA enter into a Development
Agreement that fairly delineates responsibility and risk.
a
November 24, 2015
-56-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
OLD BEACH VILLAGE 2
ITEM#65443
(Continued)
Below is the Review Process of the proposed project:
Review Process
Formal Request from developer
Assemble complete Information on proposal
3. Briefing to City Council&Appointment of Council Liaisons
4. Assign Project Manager and complete a study of economic,
fiscal and social impacts
5. A Term Sheet may be developed, in concert with the City
Attorney,and presented to City Council for concurrence.
6. The Project Manager will undertake stakeholder input that is
appropriate based upon the size and scope of the project.
7. A Development Agreement is prepared with the
developer/partner.
8. The Development Agreement is brought before the City
Council and/or Development Authority for formal approval.
Below is the proposed "Old Beach Village 2: Project Area":
Old Beach Village 2: Project Area
,
i ' .
a ,
-4' 'atM v.'4 ,,
6
November 24, 2015
-57-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
OLD BEACH VILLAGE 2
ITEM#65443
(Continued)
Preliminary Elevation Looking
Northeast on Baltic Avenue
®b -._ - -
sift'RN;
..gee ■ _,A611-
ate.:
The Ainslie Group and Hampton Roads Housing worked on the Old Beach Village Condominiums to help
define the Gateway along 30'1 Street and Baltic Avenue, as the southern portion of Laskin Gateway. The
Old Beach Village 2 would expand on that project:
Old Beach Village 2
The Ainslie Group and Hampton Roads Housing
Overview — Original OBV Condominium -
freestanding, self-sustaining community, a blend of
Loft and Traditional style condos for 120 residents,
helped define the gateway along 309' Street and Baltic
Avenue as the southern portion of Laskin Gateway.
OBV2 would expand on that project providing a
complimenting blend of residences that will be new,
cutting edge, clean energy efficient, safe and
affordable places to live that are convenient to where
residents will work, live, play and shop.
November 24, 2015
-58-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
OLD BEACH VILLAGE 2
ITEM#65443
(Continued)
An overview of the proposed project is provided below:
Old Beach Village 2
320 apartments,over 500 residents, 541 private
parking spaces
Amenities:
skywalk,sky pool,sky workout facilities,storage for kayaks,
paddleboards and bikes.
Fitness Studio-5,600 sf on the top deck of the Parking
Garage,providing exercise/yoga/palates services for Tenants
and General Public use.
Private investment would approach$60M
Developer seeking financial support for parking
garage structure
Here are the Benefits of the Project:
Old Beach Village 2 - Benefits
Creates a buffer zone for Old Beach Community
Designed for diverse clientele offering multiple sizes,
styles, floor plans and features for Millennials,
Boomers, Execs, Surfers, Retirees
500 people will engage with area businesses,
retailers, restaurateurs
20% of units will be available to persons earning less
than Area Mean Income
November 24, 2015
-59-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
OLD BEACH VILLAGE 2
ITEM#65443
(Continued)
Below is an overview of the SGA Incentive Guidelines Review:
SGA Incentive Guidelines Review
Compliance with City Council goals
• The project is located within a Strategic Growth Area or Special Economic Growth Area
• The private sector investment is a minimum of$30 million
• The project aligns with SGA/SEGA design principles
• Proximity to light rail stations(SGA only)
• Historical financial and construction development integrity of Iho Developer.
• Generates jobs and supports target industry development
• Projects support pedestrian and bicycle connectivity
• Offers housing stock variety
OLD Beach Village - Proposal
City Economics:
Project will have 20 year net fiscal impact of$12M
Project will generate$15M in real estate taxes over 20 years
50%of estimated real estate taxes would be$7.5M
Developer Pro forma reviewed by Dr. Larry Filer(ODU)
Without city incentive this project is not feasible
Proposal: SGA Incentive Grant
Share 50%of real estate taxes with Old Beach Village, LLC
Up to 20 years not to exceed$6M
u
November 24, 2015
-60-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
OLD BEACH VILLAGE 2
ITEM#65443
(Continued)
Below are the Next Steps:
Next Steps
With City Council concurrence
Finalize Term Sheet
City Council
December 1 -Public Comment
December 8 -Vote
Development Agreement
Mayor Sessoms expressed his appreciation to Mr. Smith and everyone working on this project.
November 24, 2015
-61-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP
EVALUATION GUIDELINES
ITEM#65444
5:38 P.M.
Mr. Smith continued with the next presentation regarding Investment Partnership Evaluation Guidelines:
Investment Partnership
Evaluation Guidelines
City Council Work Session Briefing
Douglas L. Smith, Deputy City Manager
November 24, 2015
Mr. Smith advised Staff is looking for guidance regarding how to handle information obtained from a
private developer in these types of projects:
Guidelines for Evaluation of Investment
Partnerships for Economic Development
Looking for City Council guidance
regarding the handling of
confidential financial information
provided by developers to city staff
November 24, 2015
-62-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP
EVALUATION GUIDELINES
ITEM#65444
(Continued)
Below is the Process of evaluation of possible partnerships:
Process of evaluation of possible partnerships
Staff is required to complete a study of the economic,fiscal and social
unpacts of the project,including
the number of jobs.
the type of jobs,
salaries to be paid,
as well as economic,community and other impacts.
A complete study requires the private partner provide confidential proprietary
records to determine:
whether the project assumptions(e.g.jobs.salaries,economic uplift)are
realistic;
whether the support of the City is needed:and
other documentation(e.g.private financing commitments,lease
commitments)indicating the likelihood or imminence of the project.
Staff requests proprietary records from the proposed developer and, as such, City Staff has promised
confidentiality of such records:
Confidentiality
To obtain these confidential proprietary records, City staff
has promised confidentiality of such records to the extent
the records are protected by the Virginia Freedom of
Information Act(the"VFOIA").
The VFOIA protects such records from disclosure when
the private body voluntarily provides such documents
pursuant to a promise of confidentiality by the public
body.
The SGA Policy is silent as to the treatment of the
records required to complete the required study of a
proposed project.
November 24, 2015
-63-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP
EVALUATION GUIDELINES
ITEM#65444
(Continued)
Below are the options related to such records and policy implications of those options:
Council Guidance
Options related to such records and policy implications of such
options.
These options include:
No policy as to the treatment of such records
No promise of confidentiality provided by the City
Limits upon disclosure of such records to the maximum extent
protected by the VFOIA:and
• City Council confirm its intention to
Maintain confidentiality of proprietary financial information consistent
with FOIA
Publicly release staff generated analysis upon which decision is made
Based on discussion by City Council, Mayor Sessoms advised the Policy should be Amended to reflect the
last option above. Mr. Smith advised the Amended Policy will be drafted and provided at an upcoming
Formal Session for City Council's consideration.
November 24, 2015
-64-
PRESENTATIONS
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
PENDING PLANNING ITEMS
ITEM#65445
5:45 P.M.
Mayor Sessoms welcomed Barry Frankenfield, Acting Director—Planning. Mr. Frankenfield expressed
his appreciation to City Council for their continued support and distributed a copy of today's
presentation which is attached hereto and made a part of this record.
Mr. Frankenfield advised these ten (10) items are scheduled to be heard on December J51
Christine Werne—Modification of Conditional Use Permit
Porpoise, LLC—Conditional Use Permit
Holly Road, LLC/Dr.Jack Siegel—Street Closure
Bayside Concrete, Inc. —Conditional Use Permit
Robert McNichols—Modification of Conditions
BJ's Wholesale Club—Modification of Conditions
YNOT, LLC—Conditional Change of Zoning
Shela Marie Bollenbacher—Conditional Use Permit
City of Virginia Beach
Mr. Frankenfield advised these nine(9) items are scheduled to be heard on December 8'h:
RNR of Virginia—Conditional Use Permit
Kevin Jamison—Conditional Use Permit
Lina Mercer—Subdivision Variance
Radman Radiological Corp. —Conditional Use Permit
Reed Enterprises—Modification of Conditional Change of Zoning and Conditional Use Permit
Donald L. Kessel—Subdivision Variance
MGP Retail Consulting, LLC—Conditional Change of Zoning
Princess Anne Meadows—Conditional Change of Zoning
Richard W. Boucher—Conditional Use Permit
Mayor Sessoms thanked Mr. Frankenfield and the entire Department for their hard work.
November 24, 2015
11/24/2015
VB( 'ilil r,/
Virginia Beach
PLANNING ITEMS
City Council Agendas
December 1 , 201 5
December 8, 201 5
1
11/24/2015
SUMMARY- DECEMBER 1ST
Ten Planning Item are proposed for City Council's
consideration on December 1St. All Ten items were
recommended for approval by the Planning Staff and
the Planning Commission.
CHRISTINE WERNE
Bayside District
A-18 I as 4 �
M3
I! '\\ <65 dB DNL AICUZ _ J
vot
sa CSC
— CBC
— a
11 Virginia Beach Boulevard
1
is r
c.c f _
1
11/24/2015
y!rP' O
,12
LROf 5TR<<T - - G
O � _ 3
VIRGINIA[3LACH[3OULEVARD -
`.
CHRISTINE WERNE
Relevant Information
Modification of Conditions to a Conditional Use
Permit for a Vocational School approved by City
Council on January 22, 2013.
• The applicant operates a vocational school for esthetician
and skin care.
• Conditions approved in 201 3 limit the applicant to one
class in the morning and one class in the afternoon, with
no more than 15 students at any one time.
• This modification is requested to allow the applicant to
lease an additional 2,000 square feet and to increase the
size and number of classes.
2
11/24/2015
•
;r 3
�.
r
CHRISTINE WERNE
Evaluation and Recommendation
• Planning Staff recommended approval.
• By Consent, the Planning Commission voted 11 -0
to recommend approval with conditions.
• There was no opposition.
3
11/24/2015
PORPOISE, LLC
Beach District
OR
OR
- OR
OR
Omer Mae u.Permit-OlMivOoete/.•Partly
Tr"! a
T
1
PORPOISE, LLC
4
11/24/2015
Relevant Information
Conditional Use Permit for an Outdoor Recreational
Facility for a Skate Park.
• The Site was granted a Conditional Use Permit for a Skate
Park in 1993. It has recently come to the attention of the
applicant that this approval has expired.
• The Skate Park will have the same hours as the retail store
across Cypress Avenue (Wave Riding Vehicles)
• The skaters will have access to the retail store's
bathrooms and water fountain.
nonAco,Qt,(Q,ut
♦ 'D 0C`4 (N O' (0 11WM[Qw Wv4M♦V v
PARCEL 2A
Cil
•
s a�
20
•12 P.
S rr r .
\
0TNi •
1C
PORPOISE, LLC
5
11/24/2015
Y tW al .'4
• "i a r.
of' ...10f." .0„..., .."........ y iiro
1v;a • ' - _ •
fig_
PORPOISE, LLC
v• /
'v„ - fir • •,..;;;,,atetbibir. -iiiImpr a � �� J- `
1 ill 1
356rbP.'
PORPOISE, LLC
6
11/24/2015
Evaluation and Recommendation
• Planning Staff recommended approval.
• By Consent, the Planning Commission voted 11 -0
to recommend approval with conditions.
• There was no opposition.
HOLLY ROAD, LLC / DR. JACK SIEGEL
Beach District
-MJ -
1
i I rsr+•..
R.1.5.. HJ 1 R.1.f -
R _ t -
.11 R to
11.74;11.74; - D
1114.11-1
f �✓ r
40., u.wwa'SAw —
63 10 MOM NINS
_
�.. `e l M).f
SW '14 , - ON
$....rw.w OW n.o-.
7
11/24/2015
a • ?
HOLLY ROAD, LLC
DR.JACK SIEGEL & LISA A. BERTINI
Relevant Information
Street Closure of an unimproved portion of Holly
Road south of 48th Street.
• Two requests to close a 50'x 125' portion of Holly Road
• If approved, each of the applicants will purchase a 25' section
of Holly Road.
• Property to the west of this portion of Holly Road (Holly
Road, LLC), is undeveloped.
• Property to the east of this portion of Holly Road (Dr.Jack
Siegel), is developed with a single-family home.
8
11/24/2015
I I @ e L— ......,:_--1-.
rKJ�tll P11• _(/ yy WZ AN__1.h
li 9 01.0.00. � MI 1rr atlas.
- — A 401 SMEET ZIA ��b • aeora w�ot or�..
�_ r iaj 0011.dAm'I),F
.... O.
,.....1.7".47.=
.sw I1a10 ' SAN • -.1 G�L•
Au or mom
�— -_ .n 1110.GAIN •
`.---
.,r---
/'�'O Pln r A am fn ♦ ♦ 45 1 140
/ ✓M t �-lel
1f.Y.a1 `..j•. f./If rtl :• W
4,..IF A. •
1n •',.•i•i0- lamer uanr ii.:;n OM.11
_Louie ti:��fay J �J 0,•ly.�•' ..• 1Dred..a 0TO
y A"'_' .410.00'$ 4o xt1'� lig ks*' J
fA*AV 'aaii•wf • t4ai r•at•1a1�4, >.... -...../rwr •0061
S AI II-Il-AW :::::*%-At eNwl. q i .•1,
•
M'wax nn-n- ''*""1,• no.a..•,an STiT-''"t ,!Ai* C.31 j at.a la t,i ile'4
� y(f
r—.—_ na'- --.3;z-4..^r,..—a' nv • .
NY amv
HOLLY ROAD, LLC
DR.JACK SIEGEL & LISA A. BERTINI
SIEGEL& BERTINI HOLLY ROAD LLC
•
. p
•
• • - — -
T4
HOLLY ROAD, LLC
DR.JACK SIEGEL& LISA A. BERTINI
9
11/24/2015
• •-.fix •;s .{_
x .11 ' ` f�
niu.n. L _HOLLY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY
•
HOLLY ROAD, LLC
DR.JACK SIEGEL& LISA A. BERTINI
Evaluation and Recommendation
• Planning Staff recommended approval.
• The Planning Commission voted 11 -0 to
recommend approval with conditions.
• There was opposition.
10
11/24/2015
BAYSIDE CONCRETE, INC.
Kempsville District
/
/1.
<65 d8 DNL4.
-
5-2
5-2 ,
r
., SITE
IA•r-;^ o":
Cor4uiawl Use Femur(Bulk Rawl'Yard)
•
. y
(�,, .'
'',4`VP st el ,
4 �'• BIIIK STORAGE •
•
••
t ,
BAYSIDE CONCRETE, INC.
11
11/24/2015
Relevant Information
Conditional Use Permit for a Bulk Storage Yard.
• Site has a nonconforming single-family residence
(constructed in 1959) and a bulk storage yard. This
request encompasses the rear portion of the site used for
bulk storage.
• The Bulk Storage Yard has been operating for many years.
The owner was recently informed of the requirement for a
Conditional Use Permit.
• Proposed improvements include: replacing the entry gate
with a gate using solid fencing materials, installing a row
of evergreen trees along the rear property line, and
removing the barb-wire from the fence along the rear
property line.
SITE PLAN FOR BAYSIDE CONCRETE
408 DAVIS STREET
MAU wKMwAY
*W SS TOSwR WNW.A5IA
10STOG GAT(SMALL IC I[OLACC
[ISSTSITOWIWKLrctc[
TOR[rA.
UMW, r.uuot tVl,N orW YNLUK ARRA/r :1
LLOIG 1,101 4 SULK 11011A01 ruse MMU It 11[YOr[0. :1
S ( 10Vww kY1
[M
. F ALL w O(RIsw LLU
[YfTM TO-_O 1R rlwt(
TO KIWI fM[U �I
i j it
-- - ----- t`L:••L•LL•'Y'WW`W'YWIVVLL•WW WW •WW`WWWY[YVWY`W41
LAMS 0,T IK AREA INC LIMO NI TK CW
I ON SULK S1011A4t
BAYSIDE CONCRETE, INC.
12
11/24/2015
1 i Y
. if
kNl�k '�Jll lU k;ULV
STORE i l
fir+ 04\15 -to
BAYSIDE CONCRETE, INC.
Evaluation and Recommendation
• Planning Staff recommended approval.
• By Consent, the Planning Commission voted 11 -0
to recommend approval with conditions.
• There was no opposition.
13
11/24/2015
ROBERT McNICHOLS
Kempsville District
04.1;
04
_ 14
c!o
4�
s„,„„
<65 d8 DNL AICUZ 1.1
Much,.Wan dconar.on>
•o a a
'
•
s ` i
•
ROBERT MCNICHOLS
14
11/24/2015
Relevant Information
Modification of Conditions of a Conditional Use
Permit for Senior Housing approved by City Council
on February 9, 1994.
• The Marian Manor Retirement Community was constructed
in 1990.
• Conditional Use Permits for Senior Housing were granted
on the subject site in 1985, 1986, 1990 & 1994.
• Applicant proposes to expand the existing facility by
constructing a 2,661 square foot addition to the rear of
the building.
• The addition will accommodate a chapel for use by the
residents and visitors to the facility.
• The addition will match the existing building in materials and
style.
• -S 3. 5 •
�yf i , � w• it . 09
�' -� , r, -. 4
9
•
.j,r 4 1
ROBERT MCNICHOLS
15
..-
11/24/2015
�.... N
N
hl MI ERN ilii _I
--FRONT ELEVATION --i „8".1.0-
^�
, _- -6 \I---� _ -_ ..__ -` 1
_.. ,
SBL Jt _ . 1 AIill.
REAR ELEVATION
l iir•r4-
1
ROBERT
r4-
ROBERT MCNICHOLS
c
:.,. ' -lo,---trif i r '
-1 •I I I
I " t71'
._ 1A 'I,. 11111. , : —
ROBERT MCNICHOLS
16
11/24/2015
Evaluation and Recommendation
• Planning Staff recommended approval.
• By Consent, the Planning Commission voted 11 -0
to recommend approval with conditions.
• There was no opposition.
BJ'S WHOLESALE CLUB
Lynnhaven District
R-7.5 R-7.5
A-24
Lamp:lane
6-2
•
8-2 SITE
8-2
A•24
8.2
8.2
PROPOSED
ELECTRONIC 6-2
DISPLAY
JK.N }i,SjS
Vlr`ina Beach Blvd
8-2
Conditional Use permit ifkctronic Display Sign
essociuted with o Service Station)
17
11/24/2015
� '• r� f
f
/tel
ilo
• V•� •`' r •.'y
INtremerenei
1 LI
,_ ?2 . , . 1!
•
•
1 5 IAS F
pompom, ,iL4C7RORIC �y .� •l
• oven,
OIt►Ur i1GM �, 1 o -"r
^ ;r _ s
NAI
M r 4
Bea."
o
virgin's Bea
BJ'S WHOLESALE CLUB
Relevant Information
Modification of Conditions of a Conditional Use
Permit for an Automobile Service Station approved by
City Council on June 26, 2001 .
■ The 2001 approval limits fuel sale signage to traffic
control signs and canopy signage.
• The applicant wishes to advertise the fuel prices on the
freestanding sign for BJ's Wholesale Club along Virginia
Beach Boulevard.
• The existing freestanding sign will be replaced.
• The new sign will meet all requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance.
• The new sign will have one, 5.25 square foot panel that will
display fuel prices electronically.
18
11/24/2015
n
---___,..__ -----:_ \\ ,t...-0-;jOikl W. s'y!)j410• :-
•
em. .... . .,,. ._ _ 4-,-.,.--:::,,,,,,,,,, --, \
.- - \ .
BJ'S WHOLESALE CLUB
r� 1
,u,101.1W.'MIS GAS rkc(CA TI
B�I J'a r- r,IA GAS MK1 ISO[env
BIsc45
11.2
Olt fnKarae.su MOON
MOW.MI.,l1N,MOM
BriGAS
y sari AYYY ass I.
•.Nr..lwws
'':T�.S7 Nei F i i
..r..q.0""!1.&3==illii
BJ'S WHOLESALE CLUB
19
11/24/2015
Evaluation and Recommendation
• Planning Staff recommended approval.
• By Consent, the Planning Commission voted 11 -0
to recommend approval with conditions.
• There was no opposition.
YNOT, LLC
Princess Anne District
1D 10 75 dB 41N7
42
MD
-717
12-2
Tiy .so
7010 75 dB DNI AlCU7
(/IA(
Y-2
A$2.1
Chonge of loni.B(A6 710 Condillonel B 2)
20
11/24/2015
- o 4,,
trw.� nrcbP�rY
pnrtcrtY ,� Ca'P --.
‘414 .
t IL6-**'%4" ---....„-. /-.0,
CON PIZO t V
.SO/""1111k.''
a.
"* • 11- ..
•., PDOPOMD YNOT P07A
• 2
�� .
Pc
y .
y
0�o
YNOT, LLC
Relevant Information
Conditional Change of Zoning from AG-2 to
Conditional B-2
• This request is to rezone a 1.7-acre portion of the City-owned parcel at
the corner of Princess Anne Road and Winterberry Lane.
• The applicant plans to purchase the land from the City to accommodate
additional parking for the YNOT Italian restaurant that will be
constructed on the adjacent parcel to the north.
• 32 additional parking spaces will be located on the subject parcel.
• Access will be from within the existing Lansdowne Commons
Shopping Center parking area. No access will be provided from the
proposed restaurant to Winterberry Lane.
21
11/24/2015
I.®O
I
•
l �
j
YNOT, LLC
VERIZON UTILITY
-• •t __-.. w~—' , .I _ JE
OT DEVELOPME ITE VERIZON INGRESS•EGRESSSUBEASECTMSITEENTT 1
..._s ... _ .. .3eiN Cry,
Prr
YNOT, LLC
22
11/24/2015
Evaluation and Recommendation
• Planning Staff recommended approval.
• By Consent, the Planning Commission voted 10-0
with an abstention to recommend approval as
proffered.
• There was no opposition.
SHELA MARIE BOLLENBACHER
Rose Hall District
itio
1141.
A+ g g.
4Vs' *CP Rii
c711Z/N
Conditional Use Permit(Home Occupobon.Day-Care)
23
11/24/2015
kii\.. . ,. * vif .
*'Ill.:1h, • '' ' lir d
,7:7 er , er,
' ' : I u. . ". fp,
y
r , f*4 1.
As, 4 tit
�• k
k
v
rfl r_ al.-,
SHELA MARIE BOLLENBACHER
Relevant Information
Conditional Use Permit for a Family Daycare Home
• The applicant desires the ability to care for up to 12
children from her single-family home.
• Hours of operation will be Monday through Friday, from
7:00 am to 6:00 pm.
• Arrival and pick-up times will be staggered.
• Rear yard is fenced and provides an outdoor play area for
the children.
• The existing driveway will accommodate parking.
24
11/24/2015
•
.1 e ■
SHELA MARIE BOLLENBACHER
� s
I
= 4-
II
I -_
iikrZ•
SHELA MARIE BOLLENBACHER
25
11/24/2015
Evaluation and Recommendation
.
• Planning Staff recommended approval.
• By Consent, the Planning Commission voted 11 -0
to recommend approval with conditions.
• There was no opposition.
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
An Ordinance to Amend Section 801 of the City Zoning
Ordinance Pertaining to the Requirements for Farm Stands.
26
11/24/2015
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
1. Section 801 limits the size of a farm stand to 1,000 square feet.
This amendment deletes this maximum and allows the size to be
determined with a conditional use permit.
2. The amendment clarifies that only agriculture and agriculturally-
related products,as defined in Section 401(e),can be sold at a farm
stand.
3. The amendment clarifies areas where crops will be grown and/or
farm animals kept must be identified.
4. The amendment requires one parking space for every 250 square
feet of covered farm stand sales area unless a modification is
warranted.
SUMMARY- DECEMBER 8TH
Nine Planning Item are proposed for City Council's
consideration on December 8th. All Nine of the items
were recommended for approval by the Planning Staff
and the Planning Commission.
27
11/24/2015
RNR OF VIRGINIA
Beach District
y —
1..--\----------
wu`_ r
01 1 se
-;....._......_...„.............„.....,...„.... .__i C
\1 V
<d .
-- Road ' boa
'!` COW"' CY- ",b .F«St C
•
•
1
�.� . '• tom- ,' ..• -.a* _ .
�- .'
1"' , rs'� !4 fr -..48.te, T.
RNR OF VIRGINIA
28
11/24/2015
Relevant Information
Conditional Use Permit for an Automobile Repair
Garage.
• Conditional Use permit is required to allow the applicant
install tires.
• Applicant will renovate and occupy the existing 6,200 sq.
ft. building.
• 1,500 sq. ft.will be a showroom in the front of the building
• Minimal changes to the exterior of the building
■ The First Colonial Road improvement project (CIP 2-030)
will impact the site.
• Applicant will replace the sign and install additional
landscaping when road widening is complete.
■ Access drive to the adjacent property will remain until road
widening is complete.
. 7--3_, .\
•
•
RNR OF VIRGINIA
29
11/24/2015
44
.. _ EXISTING BUILDING w I
`
I �: �10I TO REMAIN O
I LL I i
I 6,200 SQUARE FEET
12
I L _ X 50_- - I ..+e-..n,+.
lI • I Ir '
F 19 SV --- �_1 1 .. -I II! 1,,-\
•
RNR OF VIRGINIA
a
41,
RNR OF VIRGINIA
30
11/24/2015
• � ..a
rl
•
RNR OF VIRGINIA
a.
dam '011-1.
111
T �
RNR OF VIRGINIA
31
11/24/2015
Evaluation and Recommendation
• Planning Staff recommended approval.
• By Consent, the Planning Commission voted 10-0
with an abstention to recommend approval as
conditioned.
• There was no opposition.
KEVIN JAMISON
OR District
OR ,.. `� OR
r► VIROINV`50ON ."OR ..,
OR A•12
N
; • -f79 dB 1)1513_&12,--
,„STREET .'.. ....
i ... R•68
S
R•ds ...••��l
Conditional Use Permit(Eating and Drinking Establishment)
32
11/24/2015
Relevant Information
Conditional Use Permit for an Eating and Drinking
Establishment.
• Applicant recently opened a restaurant (Commune) on the
site and wishes to offer bottled beer and wine.
• In the OR zoning district, a restaurant that serves alcohol
requires a Conditional Use Permit if it is within 100' of a
residential or apartment district.
• Restaurant occupies 2,000 sq. ft. at northeast corner of
the building
• The building and site have recently been renovated, and in
November 2014 the building was approved by the Virginia
Beach Historical review Board to be listed on the Virginia
Beach Historical Register.
• No changes to the exterior are proposed
•
,
J '
. • - �.
KEVIN JAMISON
33
11/24/2015
•
•
t,VA(
KEVIN JAMISON
Evaluation and Recommendation
• Planning Staff recommended approval.
• By Consent, the Planning Commission voted 11 -0
to recommend approval as conditioned.
• There was no opposition.
34
11/24/2015
LINA MERCER
Lynnhaven District
IVO
IVO
S N-20
11-10
i
S. up
-m
---
6 ib "t 4 US 1140 . . `--`
• N-10
SW/Aka liodmint
Alb -14.-- - `'/--
.7 .. f t
ti. ,
} '`—
4 may !r.-
Mill pa Road i i ,., ordvic
LINA MERCER
35
11/24/2015
Relevant Information
Subdivision Variance to Section 4.4(b) of the
Subdivision Regulations.
• Applicant wishes to re-subdivide three lots, comprising of
1 .309 acres, into four lots.
■ Three of the proposed lots will meet all the dimensional
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. A variance is
required for the one lot that does not meet the required
80' of lot width in the R-10 zoning district.
• A portion of the site is wetlands. Per Section 200(b) of the
Zoning Ordinance, this area cannot be used in determining
minimal dimensional requirements, and therefore a
deficiency in lot width is created.
• The site was also impacted by the City improving Palmetto
Drive and installing a cul-de-sac in 1984.
r
LINA MERCER
36
11/24/2015
•
•
•IT :
-69'
•
•
waoroim
LINA MERCER
•
•
me.":ms=
_ 1ii
ilogr
" _ _
LINA MERCER
37
11/24/2015
•-'�
%. . kIN.,. .:^4. . ,.''.tz .... .1, - 7'
II
LINA MERCER
Evaluation and Recommendation
• Planning Staff recommended approval.
• By Consent, the Planning Commission voted 11 -0
to recommend approval as conditioned.
• There was opposition.
38
11/24/2015
RADMAN RADIOLOGICAL CORP.
Princess Anne District
i
R10
R-10
,.PD
-1u(R-7.S)
2201if
mt 1W
21, 1L: R40 3.41
rw
PD-Hi IR-7.I) 4 IX:2
1M
Mel 212.
1VIe111♦-Haw I Otnesiliwo
Y #. "4 .. 1
.,*, 's o.. -".e 0 li.
Yi t - ,, .r • '
O �`
, IV j100lis
r ,\ : ,/- if
�! `•' iv •y .�
•
RADMAN RADIOLOGICAL CORP.
39
11/24/2015
Relevant Information
Conditional Use Permit for a Home Occupation.
• Applicant owns a radiological (X-ray) supply and
equipment company.
• The administrative offices are operated from the applicant's
residence.
• This request is to allow one non-family member to work at
the residence.
• Hours are typically Monday through Friday, 8:00 am to 5:00 pm
\•\
illfs
11111
. 0 • l
RADMAN RADIOLOGICAL CORP.
40
11/24/2015
Evaluation and Recommendation
• Planning Staff recommended approval.
▪ By Consent, the Planning Commission voted 10-0
with an abstention to recommend approval as
conditioned.
• There was no opposition.
REED ENTERPRISES, INC.
Princess Anne District
a-:
411 14
AG-3
h4, yy
�wv
A6-2
0-2
AG-2
41
11/24/2015
r ?
Dur. ,,. ~"�::'
3
I, rt
,„4,,c...„ 'rte, .`.'we'., ' '. €11
ri'
►� • �,t1" � ' +rte� �� 6i1‘,,.'.��,L�y,..yx, �1.;
v
' °`.-4.• . "?' '' - .ti'''k. 'i/3:444/4;4'‘':44:: ./e. -1" . 4.;-°.:6'
>. -`1.re,,,-,i, .,',, 'i,t,40.1.,. ,..'l• , , -,,4, '').,_ , tt.,-- ,,..,
REED ENTERPRISES, INC.
Relevant Information
.
Modification of a Conditional Change of Zoning &
Conditional Use Permit approved by City Council on
October 8, 2013.
• In 2013 the property was rezoned from AG-2 to
Conditional B-2, and a Conditional Use Permit was
approved for an automobile repair facility.
• New regulations by Dominion Power limit what can be
located underneath power lines in order to make the space
available for future natural gas lines.
• The new layout relocates the BMP and moves the parking
within the Dominion Power easement.
42
11/24/2015
} I
1
1
UV Relocad
BMP
Relocated
Parking
i I Spaces
I
I
I I
1 1
1 I
SITE LAYOUT APPROVED IN 2013
NEW SITE LAYOUT
REED ENTERPRISES, INC.
Imo iiimia.k.
REED ENTERPRISES, INC.
43
11/24/2015
REED ENTERPRISES, INC.
Evaluation and Recommendation
• Planning Staff recommended approval.
■ By Consent, the Planning Commission voted 11 -0
to recommend approval as conditioned.
■ There was no opposition.
44
11/24/2015
DONALD L. KESSEL
Princess Anne District
t x
0
ACM
AL1
A04 <65 dB DNL AICUZ
AL1
Subdivision Varian,
� t3
\ 2\t. ‘1.1trti ,„
— J
•
DONALD L. KESSEL
45
11/24/2015
Relevant Information
Subdivision Variance to Section 4.4 (b) of the
Subdivision Ordinance.
• Lot was created by Deed 1959. Since 1954, all lots created
by subdivision require the recordation of a plat.
• Applicant wishes to put the subject lot to record by plat;
however, the lot is deficient in the necessary lot area.
• There are no changes proposed to the existing lot with
this request.
E PARCEL C
I 0823 ACR
a 35.860 SQUARE FEET
ES
I '
BLACKWATER ROAD
DONALD L. KESSEL
46
11/24/2015
x r ,:
s
DONALD L. KESSEL
Evaluation and Recommendation
• Planning Staff recommended approval.
• By Consent, the Planning Commission voted 11 -0
to recommend approval as conditioned.
• There was no opposition.
47
11/24/2015
MGP RETAIL CONSULTING, LLC
Princess Anne District
`/ —moi )/ , /
r
•
�DN1 62 B-2
f
AG-1
AG-2 R BO
>75 774-
____
•
d8 D 74A02/
/
A-12
B-2
/145D0-75 dB :. 14-1D1-1 �
\ .... ---- --""iy.
A-1• ` 8D /\ ` RSO
(oodn,orro!(honor of/an+np(A(:)to londrtimol H?1
7:
,<.,.,-'"4r''' lu.
.lit- 4. y
MGP RETAIL CONSULTING, LLC
48
11/24/2015
Relevant Information
Conditional Change of Zoning from AG-2 Agricultural
District to Conditional B-2 Community Business
District.
• Applicant wishes to consolidate and rezone six parcels,
totaling four acres, to B-2 for the purpose of developing
the site with a grocery store.
• Proposed grocery store is 36,1 70 sq. ft.
• Building is a modern design,with primary exterior materials
of brick and glass storefront windows.
• Right-of-Way dedications and site improvements include:
• Installation of a right-turn lane northbound on General Booth
Boulevard.
• Improve Edison Road and tie into the existing access road to
the commercial center to the north.
MAIM OR YYY•Y
€ 8
. '
49- e • 8
3
*
MGP RETAIL CONSULTING, LLC
49
11/24/2015
010
MGP RETAIL CONSULTING, LLC
•
MGP RETAIL CONSULTING, LLC
50
11/24/2015
• a i : . . :
-
14.;
4
J
MGP RETAIL CONSULTING, LLC
Evaluation and Recommendation
• Planning Staff recommended approval.
• By Consent, the Planning Commission voted 10-0
with an abstention to recommend approval as
proffered.
• There was no opposition.
51
11/24/2015
PRINCESS ANNE MEADOWS, LLC
Princess Anne District
ire—WI q , • R7.5. �`%J R10'
R10'
AG1�,�• AG1 AG��rr• R10
70— ,i B td r•
AG2 . • AG1 AG1• ,' .-7 R7/5;I.II 1.5. C
AG1 AG2 AGI
j.•'
• AG1 C
•
I:•
AG1 ITA
AG2 Rt. R!u
65-70 ILII Ldn AG2 • R10 t;.
R10 A• !c
A
•,.—.. .--•-- Condd.on•1 Zomnp Chu.p.from AG1•AG7 I,
..•.......n•.. Cond.hona/R t.,
- - . - .--.4„...„. .--..,,,t. ' • ir.
. _ ..
, ,.. , .
,... . ...
,,,,*. .-...•,,, .
- , ,...g......
, s.„ ,
....,.......,. . , 0 , .
,.., -,: .A.._,
-.4%;,, , .,..i.,,,.• J. ,.
.1,441k,„
i •
• 3--•-:"
N-
i "ate' --J
Princess Anne Meadows, LLC
52
11/24/2015
Relevant Information
Conditional Change of Zoning from AG-1 & AG-2 to
Conditional R-10.
• Applicant has assembled eleven parcels of undeveloped
land.
• Site is 42.45 acres of developable land
• 12.35 acres of Open Space (29%of total site area),
• Open Space includes: 3.43 acres of lakes, 5.15 acres of
forested area, and 2.61 acres of managed lawn area, and
1.16 acres dedicated to the City as a buffer between
Christopher Farms and the proposed London Bridge Road
expansion.
• Primary vehicular and pedestrian access will be directly
from Princess Anne Road at an existing median opening.
• Applicant proposed 80 single family lots (density: 1 .88
units per acre)
• Minimum lot size: 10,000 square feet
• Houses size: 2,400 sq. ft. (2-story), 2,150 sq. ft. (1-story)
-.;
—
peK IPR��gEDI .. __
_��_____1
d firee� _
�n Pa� • wiy_
eoult\oast° kw•Y 1 .w,xwl •�
110.10
N 'uw,n, n..w"
�'Ot'1R1 (SII 1s1 ,IiIrI
_____ � �\\\
JB'9� '
/4:7- •
) cl Yt wwRrol
er?41
\\\
Mrntilt
Princess Anne Meadows, LLC
53
11/24/2015
!
lY
� - '. PROJECT STATISTICS
• .vfl•10“001T
Anti,
O[ ``i i £• '
w •
MOPONDOCOMMON",Rp
DEVELOPMENT THE O fMOWN.
'\ • •W1Y .....NUNIEROOQMOUNTS 00
OM&LOT KJTYI�OO FT Af
`I .• •';',,,4F
,r,. 1 NMMlIIOT fJ)F 10(m AO tT
� Yf '• M:T �.T \ LAKES sa]KKi
>✓ Y,rfygSy�Lgc \\\�yqfOIOGTro 116 A
CSKt
OL20A
MO WI DICKATOS TO
CM
,1 le Well
t '1,10 , • ` ,Wit 1lgAVVr.
UIlA]Yell 10030410N0 l0401.
- ' .\ ARG,a NAPA INPI.1lRYN
luilastlKN wTWOR a N KASS
a VTAu ON.,a KRIS
a L Aa.
A.
l'4 s0 reap MllNNa.IroacREs
• 1 TO1K 0a ACMEl
0.0.VALYS 100 WC,
yi • I • iw MIR+.
W t 4.-
Princess Anne Meadows, LLC
• .'MWGWIM54R5 ,GAZEBO
-.STRUT LIGHTING ,-0ICNIc
PAVII ION
WITH
GRILL
.i:
t� • s ,
- � •'._i :N . q, • - 4J?'e'
k- cep o4/'I
^ ` .� /�
•
'`....~•�..`1 ‘} E"ear `
�� IA •v ��
I ` `! 1' � " °ndon Brie.,r�R+k �r I 1 . J
I
_ 'f'' - A-4 / it Ki-,an; /�..
.00
, . „,,,,,.. , . 7^-,%,____ • .t., 1 A. /
f / ' K
Iat
1 . ` • ` + (1)
1 i
A P
Q i , CIJF�
i - 1 Q)
0 fluda/ r."-10 `' {
x-I d _ 11 c"o i0 / 6
1I Q
... ..I.Ail or'IV- .
)0,\
VI
VI
G s..... .... ,,. ..... , ....c:544';0,0.../c-i. ^
�� " —r O� ahs` V
I t• �. .., _ .I OCA
I .0cy
I o rc., o
0
! h. I
a 1
! j
flopiri: c
O
��� G ; �rlj4, j��Jse, 'b a
0
oul
l. r_
sg 8
11/24/2015
,,i_Araillailitiat.
ELEVATION•PRINCESS ANNE ROAD FRONTAGE LANDSCAPING
- I vim. 2,,..,..... ?- .... T_row 5..._.-.... S ,....7.. -R 8- 9
SMALL ORNAMENTAL TREES SMALL ORNAMENTAL 6 NGT.ALUMINUM
6 NV BROWN MR.FENCE SHRUBS WROI�IC�NT MtON_SME
I ARGE EVERGREEN SHRUBS
LARGEECANOPY
E E'`E WfTM BRICK SI
x t
PLAN-PRINCESS ANNE ROAD FRONTAGE LANDSCAPING
4 PRINCESS ANNE
r MEADOWS
Princess Anne Meadows, LLC
4 PRINCESS ANNE Typical Exterior Details
r' MEADOWS w $eptember 28,2015
a........... o..... rowl.+...+.o,. O.w N.... s_ a ac
NPa LM. 4.... LF,..w✓a... Na, ew.riotQaF�L
�.. ♦ Y.
1 1,5,1 -
1'_7".)1 70/0 .,j r
1.4.............. fOmr Owwfi•... b.cuw:4f
Princess Anne Meadows, LLC
55
11/24/2015
r
;,:i 4: L-4,,,-- 5 ..±,,it_.._ -..fdr" ' . itioi'
•.ii;.. 4' LC'--.-P- nnii fs.,;ii, , ,
.., ,4
sir
caa ncn• I
1 . r; ETA; ❑c�aQ
1 =•r•�fa. aamo oaaa
A1k PRINCESS ANNE
r MEADOWS
1F 7+ Tl�+
. ..
Princess Anne Meadows, LLC
Evaluation and Recommendation
• Planning Staff recommended approval.
• The Planning Commission voted 7-3 with one
abstention to recommend approval as proffered.
• There was opposition.
56
11/24/2015
RICHARD W. BOUCHER
Rose Hall District
_ IMD i
Lstv. 14. a
►-i 73 211)•• •-rcuz
ct______77
I-1 /4
M
70 db OM arc - 0-30 Iw
Sub A•ea3
Nr
/-\
. � %/ Am 7'
R..
/
/J/
• QP
a
w
So co'`‘ QEF
• 0400, ,-•-•-,,..,„,-'-' _ -
RICHARD W. BOUCHER
57
11/24/2015
Relevant Information
•
Conditional Use Permit for an Automobile Repair
Garage.
• Automobile repair will be "high-end", specialty body and
paint work.
• No collision work or engine repair
• All repair will take place inside the building.
• tr: r
4,e/./ .4!deal •• -, , 4 I,t
—I 11111511 I •Ten,,MSW,
; KAPRIF*•-.. NEN tr •
- 4;,.•
si
IL.
1111111111- 11111151e .
mrag
0.
•
nrr
*4.1 El
--
RICHARD W. BOUCHER
58
11/24/2015
yr
� .
INNS arc.,
RICHARD W. BOUCHER
1116
RICHARD W. BOUCHER
59
11/24/2015
Evaluation and Recommendation
■ Planning Staff recommended approval.
• By Consent, the Planning Commission voted 10-0
with an abstention to recommend approval as
conditioned.
■ There was no opposition.
60
-65-
ADJOURNMENT ITEM#65446
Mayor William D. Sessoms,Jr., DECLARED the City Council SPECIAL MEETING ADJOURNED at
6:09 P.M.
II
A anda Fin.le W arnes, MC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
th Hodges raser, MMC William D. Sessoms,Jr.
City Clerk Mayor
City of Virginia Beach
Virginia
November 24, 2015