Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJUNE 11, 1996 MINUTESCity of Virginia Bcach "WORLD'8 LARQEST RESORT CITY" CITY COUNCIL MAYOR MEYERA E. OBERNDORF, At-L.~,ge VICE MAYOR ~LLIAM D. SE~8OM$, IR., JOHN A. BAUM, Bl~:b.~te~ ldN'A/OOD O. BRANCH Ill, Virginia ROBERT K, DEAN, Prim:eu Anne W, W. HAP, P-dSON, JR., Lynnhaven HAROLD HEI~CHOP~R, At. La','g,f BARBARA M. HENLEY, P~ngo LOUIS P~ JONES, t~y~ide l~'~ugh ~ K. PA~R, At.~rge ~UISA M. ST~YHO~, K~p~ ~gh ]AMES K. SPORE, City Manager LESLIE L ULLEY, City Attorney RUTH HODGES SMITH, CMC / AAE, City Ck, r& CITY COUNCIL AGENDA June 11, 1996 281 CITY HALL BUILDING MUNICIPAL CENTER VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA 234.56-9005 (8041 427.4303 I. CIT~ MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS - Conference Room - 10:00 JOINT BILLING PROJECT - PUBLIC UTILITIES/PUBLIC WORKS/HRSD Clarence Warnstaff, Director of Public Utilities SOCIAL SERVICES BUILDING FINANCING PROPOSAL Patricia A. Phillips, Director of Finance VENDING MACHINE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Andrew Friedman, Director, Housing & Neighborhood Preservation II. REVIEW OF AGENDA ITEMS III. CITY COUNCIL CONCERNS IV. INFORMAL SESSION - Conference Room - 12:30 P A. CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf B. ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL C. RECESS TO EXECUTIVE SESSION V. FORMAL SESSION - Councfl Chamber - 2:00 A. CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf B. INVOCATION: Reverend William S. Campbell Aragona Church of Christ C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMEF D. ELECTRONIC ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL E. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION F. MINUTES 1. INFORMAL & FORMAL SESSIONS - June 4, 1 G. ADOPT AGENDA FOR FORMAL SESSION CONSENT AGENDA The Consent Agenda will be determined during the Agenda Review Session and considered in the ordinary course of business by City Council to be enacted by one motion. PRESENTATIONS e o CAPTAIN WILLIAM H. SHURTLEFF, COMMANDING OFFICER, NAVAL AIR STATION OCEANA CAPE HENRY COLLEGIATE SCHOOL - "Odyssey of the Mind" World Finals COX HIGH SCHOOL - "Odyssey of the Mind" World-wide competition OCEAN LAKES HIGH SCHOOL - Rocket Launch at Wallops Island MISS VIRGINIA BEACH - Miss Courtney Criswell MISS TIDEWATER - ~Miss Tracy Blizzard J. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORT GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND SALE Patricia A. Phillips, Director of Finance K. PUBLIC HEARING REAPPORTIONMENT OF DISTRICT NO. 5 (Movement of the boundary line Wolfsnare Creek) from Inlynnview Road to ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS Ordinance to modify Residential Districts 5 and 6 by moving the boundary along Inlynnview Road, between the Lynnhaven River to the West and Great Neck Road to the East, southwardly to the centerline of Wolfsnare Creek (LYNNHAVEN BOROUGH). 0 Ordinances to the City Code: a. AMEND Chapter 30 re submission of a construction plan prior to the excavation of a Farm Pond or a Fish Pond. b. AMEND Chapter 30 by changing a provision re definition of a borrow pit, application information, permit and inspection fees. c. AMEND Chapter 33 by ADDING provisions re hauling of sand, gravel, topsoil, fill or other excavated material off an excavation site. Resolution referring to the Planning CommissionAmendments to the City Zoning Ordinance, Site Plan Ordinance and the Subdivision Regulations: a. Ordinance changing the definition of a borrow pit. Ordinance ADDING the requirement to provide hauling operation information on an application for a Conditional Use Permit for a borrow pit. Ce Ordinance &DDING provisions to the Site Plan Ordinance re plans and information on hauling operations asociated with the excavation of stormwater management facilities. de Ordinance &DDING provisions to the Subdivision Ordinance re plans and information on hauling operations associated with the excavation of Btormwater management facilities and consideration of the Public Health, Safety and Welfare in the approval of subdivisions. Ordinance to authorize the City Manager to execute a Lease Agreement with James M. and Denise M. Bordeau for a portion of City Pump Station Site #534 on Dryden Street re extension of their rear yard (KEMPSVILLE BOROUGH). Se Ordinance to authorize the City Manager to execute a Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) with the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District, for the Erosion Control and Hurricane Protection Project re construction and maintenance from Rudee Inlet to Eight Street, not to exceed $3,705,000 (VIRGINIA BEACH BOROUGH). 0 Ordinance to APPROPRIATE $138,000 from the Sheriff's Inmate Telephone Fund Revenue to the Department's FY 1995-1996 Operating Budget re increased medical and food service expenses; and estimated revenue be increased accordingly. Ordinances to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE additional federal prevention grant funding to Mental Health-Mental Retardation- Substance Abuse (MHMRSA); and, estimated federal revenue be increased accordingly: FY 1995-1996 Operating Budget re one time expenses - $41,600. FY 1996-1997 Operating Budget re one full time position be created to support substance abuse prevention programs - $41,600. 8. Ordinances to authorize temporary encroachments: Into a portion of the easement adjacent to 2537 Pamlico Loop to Anthony L. and Barbara L. Asaro re installation of an inground swimming pool and concrete deck (PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH). Deferred 6/4/96 Into a portion of the City's 15-foot maintenance easement and 150-foot drainage easement at the rear of, and, onto a portion of City owned property designated as a 100-foot drainage and public use easement adjacent to 801 Costa Grande Drive to Ronald L. and Andrea M. Kilmer re installation of an inground swimming pool and maintenance of an existing wooden bulkhead (PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH). e Applications for Annual Permit Renewal for private, municipal and non-profit organizations operating emergency medical service agencies or vehicles within the City, pursuant to Section 10.5-2 of the City Code: Advanced Wheelchair Transport, Inc. Chesapeake Emergency Medical Service Chesbay Medical Transport Children's Hospital of the Kings Daughters Eastern Medical Transport Mariners Associates/Ramada Plaza Resort Medical Transport, Inc. Mercy/Tidewater Ambulance Service Nightingale Air Ambulance Norfolk Fire and Paramedical Services Ocean Rentals LTD Virginia Beach Lifesaving Service 10. CERTIFICA?ES OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY: 11. 12. Beach Taxi, Inc. Yellow Cab Company Long Limousine Service Resolution re the Major Investment Study for the Route 44/ 1-264 Corridor (Light Rail) by the Tidewater Transportation District Commission; that the Planning Commission include Light Rail in an issue to be considered in the process of amending the City's Comprehensive Plan; and, that the City Manager.direct an analysis of the Light Rail alternative to meet the strategic needs of the City. Resolution to request the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) cancel the City's FY1996-1997/01-02 Six Year Improvement project for the improvement of Jeanne Street from Independence Boulevard to Constitution Drive, a distance of approximately 0.2 miles; and, the City agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) for the total funds expended for this project through the date the Department is notified of such cancellation. PUBLIC HEARING - PLANNING PLANNING BY CONSENT - To be determined during the Agenda Review Session. 3:00 PM Application of SANDFORD M. and LAUREL E. ROSENBERG for the discontinuance~ closure and abandonment of a portion of a 15 foot alley located adjacent to Lots 6 and 18, Block 20, Croatan Beach, containing 750 square feet (LYNNHAVEN BOROUGH). Recommendation: APPROVAL Application of BPP DEVELOPERS, INC., a Virginia Corporation for the discontinuance: closure and abandonment of Lynnhaven Drive beginning at a point 151.6 feet east of Vista Drive and running in an easterly direction a distance of 115 feet, containing 3239 square feet (LYNNHAVEN BOROUGH). Recommendation: APPROVAL Application of PANDELL BUILDERS, INC., for a ~ to Section 4.4(b) of the Subdivision Ordinance which requires that all lots created by subdivision meet all the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance at the Southeast intersection of Reedtown Road and Mason Street, containing 1.9 acre (BAYSIDE BOROUGH). Recommendation: APPROVAL Application of JANE R. DOWDY for a ~ to Section 4.4(b) of the Subdivision Ordinance which requires all newly created lots to meet all requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance on South Spigel Drive on Lot B of proposed Dowdy Acres, containing 5.16 acres (LYNNHAVEN BOROUGH). Recommendation: APPROVAL Application of VIRGINIA METRONET, INC., dba 360° Communications Company for a Conditional Use Permit for a 150- foot monopole tower on Lots 49, 50 and 51, Shelton Place (1707 Lawson Drive), containing 25,958 square feet (BAYSIDE BOROUGH)· Recommendation: APPROVAL e Application of EXXON CORPORATION for a Conditional Use Permit for a car wash in conjunction with a convenience store and gas ~ at the Southwest corner of London Bridge Road and General Booth Boulevard (2101 General Booth Boulevard), containing 39,988 square feet (PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH). Recommendation: APPROVAL Application of ANNIE B. and FLOYD E. KELLAM, JR., for a ~ of Zoning District Classification from B-1 Neighborhood ~ to Conditional B-2 Community Business District for a ~rive through window on the North side of Princess Anne Road beginning at a point 680 feet more or less West of the intersection with North Landing Road, containing 38,419.9 square feet (PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH). Staff Recommendation: Recommendation: DENIAL APPROVAL Application in behalf of the CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH for the discontinuance~ closure a~d ~bandonm~n~ of a portion of Atlantic Avenue beginning at the Southern boundary of Cavalier Drive and running in a southerly direction a distance of 450 feet more or less, containing 21,938 square feet (VIRGINIA BEACH BOROUGH). Deferred Indefinitely: Approved for Compliance by 4/9/96: Deferred for Sixty Days: August 22, 1995 October 3, 1995 April 9, 1996 Recommendation: FINAL APPROVAL N. APPOINTMENTS HAMPTON ROADS PLANING DISTRICT COMMISSION (HRPDC) SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD TIDEWATER TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT COMMISSION (TTDC) O. UNFINISHED BUSINESS P. NEW BUSINESS Q. ADJOURNMENT * * * * * * * * * If you are physically disabled or visually impaired and need assistance at this meeting, please call the CITY CLERK'S OFFICE at 427-4303 Hearing impaired, call: TDD only 427-4305 (TDD - Telephonic Device for the Deaf) * * * * * * * * * 06/06/96BAP AGENDA\06-11-96.PLN MINUTES VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Virginia Beach, Virginia June 11, 1996 Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf called to order the INFORMAL SESSION of the VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL in the Council Conference Room, City Hall Building, on Tuesday, June 11, 1996, at 10:00 A.M. Council Members Present: John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert K. Dean, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis P~ Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy K. Parker and Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. Council Members Absent: William W. Harrison, Jr. Louisa 34. Strayhorn [ENTERED: 10:15 A.M.] [ENTERED: 10:05 A.M.] -2- ITEM # 40861 Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf entertained a motion to permit City Council to conduct its EXECUTIVE SESSION, pursuant to Section 2.1-344, Code of Virginia, as amended, for the following purpose: PERSONNEL MATTERS: Discussion or consideration of or interviews of prospective candidates for employment, assignment, appointment, promotion, performance, demotion, salaries, disciplining, or resignation of specific public officers, appointees, or employees pursuant to Section 21-344 (A) (1). To Wit: Appointments - Boards and Commissions: Hampton Roads Planning District Commission Social Services Board Tidewater Transportation District Commission Performance of Appointed Officials LEGAL MATTERS: Consultation with legal counsel or briefings by staff members, consultants, or attorneys pertaining to actual or probable litigation, or other specific legal matters requesting the provision of legal advice by counsel pursuant to Section 2.1-344(A)(7). Lake Gaston Water Supply Project FLSA - Fire/Rescue Upon motion by Vice Mayor Sessoms, seconded by Council Lady Parker, City Council voted to proceed into EXECUTIVE SESSION. Voting: 9-0 Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert K. Dean, HaroM Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndoff, Nancy K. Parker and Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: William gE. Harrison, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn June 1I, 1996 -3- CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEM # 4O862 Upon motion by Councilman Jones, seconded by Council Lady Strayhorn, City Council CERTIFIED THE EXECUTIVE SESSION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOTION TO RECESS. Only public business matters lawfully exempted from Open Meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in Executive Session to which this certification resolution applies; Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the Executive Session were heard, discussed or considered by Virginia Beach City Council. Voting: 7- 0 Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baum, William W.. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Nancy K. Parker and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert K. Dean, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf and Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. Mayor Oberndoff, Vice Mayor Sessoms, Council Members Branch and Dean left to attend funeral of Judge Kellam. June 11, 1996 CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS: The Virginia Beach City Council convened into EXECUTIVE SESSION, pursuant to the affirmative vote recorded in ITEM # 40861 Page No. 2 and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and, WHEREAS: Section 2.1-344. of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the governing body that such Executive Session was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Virginia Beach City Council hereby c~rtifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge, (a) only public business matters lawfully exempted from Open Meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in Executive Session to which this certification resolution applies; and, Co) only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening this Executive Session were heard, discussed or considered by Virginia Beach City Council. R~h Hodges S~t~th, ~dC/AAE City Clerk June 11, 1996 -4- AGENDA R E VIE W 11:58 A.M. ITEM # 4086.t SESSION Councilman Harrison inquired relative: L2 Ordinances to the City Code: a. AMEND Chapter 30 re submission of a construction plan prior to the excavation of a Farm Pond or a Fish Pond. AMEND Chapter 30 by changing a provision re definition of a borrow pi~ application information, permit and inspection fees. Co AMEND Chapter 33 by ADDING provisions re hauling of sand, gravel, topsoil, fill or other excavated material off an excavation site. Resolution referring to the Planning Commission Amendments to the City Zoning Ordinance, Site Plan Ordinance and the Subdivision Regulations: a. Ordinance changing the definition of a borrow pit. Ordinance ADDING the requirement to provide hauling operation information on an application for a Conditional Use Permit for a borrow pit. Ordinance ADDING provisions to the Site Plan Ordinance re plans and information on hauling operations associated with the excavation of stormwater management facilities. Ordinance ADDING provisions to the Subdivision Ordinance re plans and information on hauling operations associated with the excavation of stormwater nmnagement facilities and consideration of the Public Health, Safety and Welfare in the approval of subdivisions. Councilman Harrison advised of telephone calls from individuals effected by the amendments. Inquiries arose concerning the retroactive application of amendments, which may put certain existing fish pond operations currently under construction out of business. In terms of public safety and protection or roads Councilman Harrison inquired relative the difference in regulating a load of topsoil or fill material being excavated from a fish pond, storm drainage pond or farm pond different from regulating a load of lumber, concrete, bricks (heavy construction material) being brought into a building site. Councilman Baum advised this issue has been complicated by the fact that the fish ponds are not technically fish ponds. These "fish ponds" are enlarged and, in effect, became borrow pit operations. The problems arises from borrow pits on the edge of suburban development. The City Attorney advised the Ordinance being referred to is Section 33-19: hauling of sand, gravel, topsoil, fill, or other excavated material off an excavation site. This is not a retroactive application, as it does not seek to address anything occurring in the past. From the date of the passage of said ordinance, anyone hauling will have to possess a hauling permit. The permit does not prohibit anyone from hauling from a site. Certain criteria must be met in order to obtain a hauling permit. There is also an appeal process to the City Manager. If not satisfied with the City Manager's response, the appeal may be made to the Circuit Court. This Orch'nance is applicable to all existing operations as it is a health, safety and welfare ordinance adopted under the police powers of the City. Councilman Harrison suggested this Ordinance become effective September First. June 11, 1996 -5- AGENDA REVIEW SESSION ITEM # 40863 (Continued) Charles Hassen, Administrator - Development Services Center, advised a borrow pit is regulated by the State from a mining standpoint and the City regulates same from a land use standpoint. When one is excavating for a stormwater management facility, these are short in duration. The State is not involved with these types of facilities, as they are not considered a mining activity. The City has a process established both for the borrow pit excavation and the haul on and off site: subdivision and site plan process. The three fish ponds that are "grandfathered" are heavy intense use. The road system needs to be protected and there were no ordinances to deal with the safety and roadway issue. Council Lady Henley expressed concerns relative the third criteria for not granting a hauling permit: The noise or dust generated by the hauling operation is of such character, intensity and duration as to be detrimental to the life or health of persons of reasonable sensitivity, or to disturb or annoy the quiet, comfort or repose of reasonable persons who reside in close proximity to the hauling operation. Mr. Hassen advised this section does not apply to excavation operations conducted pursuant to an excavation permit and a conditional use permit for a borrow pit or to stormwater management facilities constructed pursuant to approved subdivision construction plans or site plans. Mr. Hassen advised amended forms for the permit are now in the process of being printed. City Staff must be briefed and Public Works/Highways will prepare an estimate in the worst case scenario, re the cost to restore the roadway. This item will be discussed further during the Formal Session. June 11, 1996 -6- CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING JOINT BILLING PROJECT - PUBLIC UTILITIES/PUBLIC WORKS/HRSD ITEM # 40864 BY CONSENSUS, the JOINT BILLING PROJECT - PUBLIC UTILITIES/PUBLIC WORKS/HRSD was RESCHEDULED. June 11, 1996 CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING VENDING MACHINE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 12:28 P.M. ITEM # 40865 Andrew Friedman, Director of Housing and Neighborhood Preservation, advised the City currently has an Ordinance regulating vending machines in the Resort Tourist Zoning Districts. OPTIONS FOR VENDING MACHINE ORDINANCE REVISIONS Restrict Current Ordinance Option 1 Option 2 Number of Maclu'nes Limited to one per lot No limitation No limitation per lot of Parcel or parcel Relationship to Require that machines Same as current Strengthen: require Existing Business be accessory to a the machines be permitted use "incidental to and substantially for the benefit of already approved businesses and their customers". Enclosures Required on three Not required. Not required. sides. Which way enclosure Enclosure openings No restriction No restriction openings must face. must not face the (enclosures not (enclosures not boardwalk, any park, required), required). or any improved connector street plaza Set Back from Right- Three (3) feet Three (3) feet Five (5) feet in RT-2 of-Way and RT-3, Twenty (20) feet in RT-1. During the summer of 1995, members of the RAAC brought to the attention of the City Manager that Section 23-60 of the Code which governs vending machines on private property was not being enforced. The Code Enforcement Division of the Department of Housing was assigned the task of enforcing the ordinance. After issuing warning letters and then notices of violations to offenders of the ordinance, it became known that there were flaws in the ordinance which prevented anticipated enforcement results. Further action under the ordinance was deferred until it could be amended and ready for use prior to the 1996 resort season. Representatives of the Department of Housing discussed proposed amendments to the ordinance at several RAAC meetings. The current version has been provided to members of RAAC, but has not been formally approved by that body. Through the utilization of slides, Mr. Friedman displayed various vending machines on Atlantic Avenue and the Boardwalk. Assistant City Attorney l/'anessa Valldejuli advised, relative the relationship to existing businesses, this is basically the same legal requirement imposed on all accessory structures. June 11, 1996 -8- CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING SOCIAL SERVICES BUILDING FINANCING PROPOSAL 1:I0 P.M. ITEM # 40866 Patricia Phillips, Director of Finance, advised in December 1995, City Council adopted a resolution approving the construction of a 75,000 square foot Class B office space Social Services building, to be constructed on the site of the existing Social Services and Health Department facility. City Council authorized the staff to begin to design and prepare a financing plan for the new facility, with the caveat that the financing plan enables the City to either own the facility outright or be able to purchase the facility for a set or nominal fee at the end of any lease term. Finally, Council's resolution authorized City staff to work with the Virginia Beach Development Authority (VBDA) to determine the least costly and most expeditious manner to complete design, construction, and financing of the proposed facility. David Grochma~ Director of General Services, displayed the rendering of the new Social Services building designed by the firm of KLEMT + Associates, P.C. The existing building would be occupied until the completion of the new building. The majority of the parla'ng wouM be in the rear of the new building. This design phase and the preparation of bid specifications is to be completed on June 30, 1996. Assuming Council's approval of the financing technique in June 1996, the advertisement, bidding, and negotiation phase couM be completed by October 1, 1996. It is anticipated the construction phase would then start October L 1996, and be completed by Fall 1997. Mr. GrochmaI advised a fiat roof can work if correctly designed and installed. There are basically two types of roofs: (1) rubber membrane and (2) built-up roof with tar and gravel. Most of the buildings on Virginia Beach Boulevard have a "flat" roof. Mrs. Phillips advised there are unique reimbursement formulas for certain Social Services' costs, which will have a bearing on the manner in which the proposed facility would be financed. Basically, the City will receive a greater reimbursement for Social Services' building costs, if the City leases/rents rather than owns the facility. For example, if the City owns the Social Services facility, it is currently eligible for a 27.8% reimbursement of interest paid plus annual depreciation costs equal to 3% oft he building -- and not land--value only (i.e., the building must be depreciated over a 33-year period and no deprecation of land value is allowed.) If, on the other hand, the City does not own but leases the facility, the full annual lease amount wouM be subject to 27.8% reimbursement rate. Because the expected annual lease payment wouM be greater than the sum of the annual depreciation amount plus related interest financing cost, a leasing of the facility rather than outright ownership wouM result in a greater cost reimbursement. To date, City Council has appropriated $663,780 from the Fund Balance and the Operating Budget. The remainder is to be financed through some form of debt. Four basic options have been explored for the financing of this project: General Obligation bonds Lease-Revenue debt Lease from the Virginia Beach Development which obtains permanent financing Developer financing The issuance of debt by either the City or Virginia Beach Development Authority for this project wouM each have the same impact on the City's debt ratios. The project is expected to cost $7,097,137. OPTION City issues its G.O. bonds to buiM the facility. City owns the facility. In this option, the City would issue its twenty-year term general obligation bonds to fund the projected building cost. Because the City wouM own the facility, only a portion (currently 27.8%) of the annual depreciation costs plus interest expense would be eligible for reimbursement. Present Social Services regulations require that an owned facility be depreciated on a straight-line basis over a thirty-three (33) year period. June 11, 1996 -8- CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING SOCIAL SERVICES BUILDING FINANCING PROPOSAL 1:10 P.M. ITEM # 40866 Patricia Phillips, Director of Finance, advised in December 1995, City Council adopted a resolution approving the construction of a 75,000 square foot Class B office space Social Services building, to be constructed on the site of the existing Social Services and Health Department facility. City Council authorized the staff to begin to design and prepare a financing plan for the new facility, with the caveat that the financing plan enables the City to either own the facility outright or be able to purchase the facility for a set or nominal fee at the end of any lease term. Finally, Council's resolution authorized City staff to work with the Virginia Beach Development Authority (VBDA) to determine the least costly and most expeditious manner to complete design, construction, and financing of the proposed facility. David Grochma~ Director of General Services, displayed the rendering of the new Social Services building designed by the firm of KLEMT + Associates, P.C. The existing building wouM be occupied until the completion of the new building. The majority of the parking would be in the rear of the new building. This design phase and the preparation of bid specifications is to be completed on June 30, 1996. Assuming Council's approval of the financing technique in June 1996, the advertisement, bidding, and negotiation phase couM be completed by October 1, 1996. It is anticipated the construction phase wouM then start October 1, 1996, and be completed by Fall 1997. Mr. Grochmal advised a fiat roof can work if correctly designed and installed. There are basically two types of roofs: (1) rubber membrane and (2) built-up roof with tar and gravel. Most of the buildings on Virginia Beach Boulevard have a "fiat" roof. Mrs. Phillips advised there are unique reimbursement formulas for certain Social Services' costs, which will have a bearing on the manner in which the proposed facility wouM be financed. Basically, the City will receive a greater reimbursement for Social Services' building costs, if the City leases/rents rather than owns the facility. For example, if the City owns the Social Services facility, it is currently eligible for a 27.8% reimbursement of interest paM plus annual depreciation costs equal to 3% of the building -- and not land--value only (i.e., the building must be depreciated over a 33-year period and no deprecation of land value is allowed.) If, on the other hand, the City does not own but leases the facility, the full annual lease amount would be subject to 27.8% reimbursement rate. Because the expected annual lease payment would be greater than the sum of the annual depreciation amount plus related interest financing cost, a leasing of the facility rather than outright ownership would result in a greater cost reimbursement. To date, City Council has appropriated $663,780 from the Fund Balance and the Operating Budget. The remainder is to be financed through some form of debt. Four basic options have been explored for the financing of this project: General Obligation bonds Lease-Revenue debt Lease from the Virginia Beach Development which obtains permanent financing Developer financing The issuance of debt by either the City or Virginia Beach Development Authority for this project would each have the same impact on the City's debt ratios. The project is expected to cost $7,097,137. OPTION ,4 City issues its G.O. bonds to build the facility. City owns the facility. In this option, the City would issue its twenty-year term general obligation bonds to fund the projected building cost. Because the City wouM own the facility, only a portion (currently 27.8%) of the annual depreciation costs plus interest expense would be eligible for reimbursement. Present Social Services regulations require that an owned facility be depreciated on a straight-line basis over a thirty-three (33) year period. June 11, 1996 -9- CITY M,4N,4GER'S BRIEFING SOCL4L SERVICES BUILDING FINANCING PROPOSAL ITEM # 40866 (Continued) The discounted (@ 6%) present value of this option 'S net cost to the City is $5,377,303 at the end of the twenty year financing period and $5,212,204 at the end of the thirty-three year depreciation period. While this may not be the lowest discounted net cost option, it does have the advantage of the City having absolute ownership of the facility. OPTION B City issues a form of lease supported appropriation-based dept to build the facility. City owns the facility. In this option, rather than issue G.O. debt, the City would utilize a twenty year term appropriation-based financing to fund the building cost. ,4gain, because the City wouM own the facility, only a portion (currently 27.8%) of the annual depreciation cost plus interest expense would be eligible for reimbursement. As indicated in the discussion regarding Option .4, present Social Services regulations require that an owned facility be depreciated on a straight-line basis over a thirty-three (330 year period. The discounted (@ 6%) present value of this option 'S net cost to the City is $5,471,207 at the end of the twenty year financing period and $5,305107 at the end of the thirty-three year depreciation period. OPTION C City sells existing site to VBD,4 for $2,500,000 (current market value). VBD,4 obtains financing covering cost of land and $7,100,000 building construction cost. City leases, with an appropriation clause, new facility from F'BDA, with lease payments equal to current market lease rates. Creditors are secured by City's lease and a security interest in the property. While this option carriers the highest projected debt service, it has the lowest discounted present value of net cost to the City at $3,797,844 after the end of the twenty year financing term and $3,049,663 at the end of the thirty-three year period. This occurs because this option allows the City to receive the greatest federal formula reimbursement through the State. The City's reimbursement is enhanced by leasing the facility from VBD,4 at current market lease rates, which is the maximum amount allowable for inclusion in the formula reimbursement. The difference between the lease payment ($975,000) and the annual debt service (approximately $820,000) can be utilized to establish a fund for future renovation/refurbishment. While renovation/refurbishment expenses will be incurred regardless of the financing option selected, their treatment in this manner on this option will enable the City to immediately receive the full 27.8°/, reimbursement on these costs. This option would result in I/BD,4 rather than the City owning the facility. The precedent for this type of relationship between the City and VBDA has been established with the amphitheater project. At the end of the original twenty-year lease term, City Council can decide if it wishes to continue to lease the facility from VBD,4. Should City Council elect to continue the lease arrangement, both the City and VBDA could benefit. VBDA's benefit would be the continuation of lease revenues after debt service payments on the original construction have ended. At the same time, these continued lease payments could serve to supplant or offset whatever other funds the City Council at that time might be appropriating to VBDA for economic development purposes. June IL 1996 - 10 - CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING SOCIAL SERVICES BUILDING FINANCING PROPOSAL ITEM # 40866 (Continued) It is also important to note that, at closing, the City wouM receive $2.5- MILLION from the sale of land to VBDA, as well as the reintbursement of $663,780 the City has appropriated from general fund balance attd the operating budget for this project. These funds could then be restricted for use to offset the required lease payments under this option. OPTION D Once the design is complete, the City could bid the design out for a developer to both build and finance the facility. The land could be leased (or sold) to the private entity, with the City then leasing back the land and building. Under this option, the private entity would own the building and obtain its own financing to be secured by a long-term lease agreement with the City. The lease payments by the City would be eligible for the previously mentioned formula reimbursement. However, the disadvantages include: (I) underlying financing would be at taxable rates; (2) the private entity, rather than the City would own the facility at the end of the lease-term; and (3) the City's lease wouM likely include inflationary increases. Because t~xable interest rates for this option would be 250-300 basis points greater than the true interest cost under Option C and a private entity rather than the City would own the facility, staff does not recommend this option and no cost analysis has been prepared. Option C has the lowest discounted net cost to the City. While VBDA rather than the City would own the property, the property nevertheless remains within the Virginia Beach ".family" so to speak, and City Council should always have a say in its use and disposition. To that extent, City staff believes Option C comports with Council's goals as expressed in the aforementioned December 1995 resolution and, based on all factors considered, recommends this option as the preferred means of financing a new Social Services building. BY CONSENSUS, the necessary items will be SCttEDULED for the City Council Session of June 25, 1996. Resolution directing the City Manager to request VBDA to work with the City as necessary in all aspects to include (1) purchase of the site by VBDA; (2) negotiation of a lease agreement, between I/'BDA and the City; (3) action by VBDA to seek appropriate financing for this facility and (4) initiation of plans by VBDA for managing the project. June 11, 1996 - 11 - AGENDA REVIEW SESSION (Continued) 1:48 P.M. ITEM # 40867 Council Lady Henley expressed concern relative the New Election District Maps for City Council and School Board on file in the Public Libraries. The citizen must go to the library desk and request the maps. They are not postecL The City Attorney advised mailings were forwarded to each of the Civic Organizations advising of the location of the maps. Council Lady Parker inquired relative: ITEM # 40868 L.5 Ordinance to authorize the City Manager to execute a Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) with the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District, for the Erosion Control and Hurricane Protection Project re construction and maintenance from Rudee Inlet to Eight Street, not to exceed $3,705,000 (VIRGINIA BEACH BOROUGH). The City Manager advised the storm drainage system will be installed as a part of this project, but it will &'scharge onto the Beach until Phase H is completed. The City will not have to go back and tear out anything and install the pumping lines. At Eighth Street, there will be a temporary drain discharging onto the Beach, until Phase H is completed. ITEM # 40869 The following items will be discussed further during the Formal discussion to enable the City staff and the applicants to provide additional information: L. 8. Ordinances to authorize temporary encroachments: go Into a portion of the easement adjacent to 2537 Pamlico Loop to Anthony L. and Barbara L. Asaro re installation of an inground swimming pool and concrete deck (PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH). Deferred 6/4/96 Into a portion of the City's 15-foot maintenance and 150-foot drainage easement at the rear of, and, onto a portion of City owned property designated as a lO0-foot drainage and public use easement adjacent to 801 Costa Grande Drive to RonaM L. and Andrea M. Kilmer re installation of an inground swimming pool and maintenance of an existing wooden bulkhead (PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH). June 11, 1996 - 12 - AGENDA REVIEW SESSION ITEM # 40870 Councilman Harrison inquired in what year this project first received funding under the CIP. L12 Resolution to request the Virginia Department of Transportation (I~DOT) cancel the City's FY1996-1997/01-02 Six Year Improvement project for the improvement of Jeanne Street from Independence Boulevard to Constitution Drive, a distance of approximately 0.2 miles; and, the City agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation O/DOT) for the total funds expended for this project through the date the Department is notified of such cancellation. John Herzke, City Engineer, advised the funding becomes available this Fiscal Year for the intersection improvements at Jeanne Street and Constitution Drive. ITEM # 40871 BY CONSENSUS, the following items shall compose the CONSENT AGENDA: ORD INANCES/~S OL UTI ONS L. 1 Ordinance to modify Residential Districts 5 and 6 by moving the boundary along Inlynnview Road, between the Lynnhaven River to the West and Great Neck Road to the East, southwardly to the centerline of Wolfsnare Creek (LYNNHAVEN BOROUGH). L. 4 Ordinance to authorize the City Manager to execute a Lease Agreement with James M. and Denise M. Bordeau for a portion of City Pump Station Site #534 on Dryden Street re extension of their rear yard (KEMPSVILLE BOROUGH). L. 5 Ordinance to authorize the City Manager to execute a Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) with the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District, for the Erosion Control and Hurricane Protection Project re construction and maintenance from Rudee Inlet to Eighth Street, not to exceed $3,705,000 (VIRGINIA BEACH BOROUGH). L.6 Ordinance to APPROPRIATE $138,000 from the Sheriff's Inmate Telephone Fund Revenue to the Department's FY 1995- 1996 Operating Budget re increased medical and food service expenses; and estimated revenue be increased accordingly. L. 7 Orch'nances to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE additional federal prevention grant funding to Mental Health-Mental Retardation-Substance Abuse (MHMRSA); and, estimated federal revenue be increased accordingly: a. FY 1995-1996 Operating Budget re one time expenses - $41,600. FY 1996-1997 Operating Budget re one full time position be created to support substance abuse prevention programs - $41,600. - 13 - AGENDA RE VIEW SESSION ITEM # 40871 (Continued) L. 9 Applications for Annual Permit Renewal for private, municipal and non-profit organizations operating emergency medical service agencies or vehicles within the City, pursuant to Section 10.5-2 of the City Code: Advanced Wheelchair Transport, Inc. Chesapeake Emergency Medical Service Chesbay Medical Transport Children 'S Hospital of the Kings Daughters Eastern Medical Transport Mariners Associates/Ramada Plaza Resort Medical Transport, Inc. Mercy/Tidewater Ambulance Service Nightingale Air Ambulance Norfolk Fire and Paramedical Services Ocean Rentals LTD Virginia Beach Lifesaving Service LIO CERTIFICATES NECESSI'IY: OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND Beach Taxi, Inc. Yellow Cab Company Long Limousine Service L12 Resolution to request the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) cancel the City's FY1996-1997/01-02 Six Year Improvement project for the improvement of Jeanne Street from Independence Boulevard to Constitution Drive, a distance of approximately 0.2 miles; and, the City agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) for the total funds expended for this project through the date the Department is notified of such cancellation. June 11, 1996 - 14 - AGENDA REVIEW SESSION ITEM # 40872 Councilman Jones inquired relative: M. 5 Application of VIRGINIA METRONET, INC., dba 360° Communications Company for a Conditional Use Permit for a 150-foot monopole Wwer on Lots 49, 50 and 51, Shelton Place (1707Lawson Drive), containing 25,958 square feet (BAYSIDE BOROUGH). The City Manager advised of a City staff meeting relative suggestions to defer items relative towers until a regional standard could be devised. The City Manager advised Virginia Beach is further along than the other cities in this area and this system should be ready for implementation this Fall. Therefore, the City Manager suggested these Conditional Use Permits be approved rather than DEFERRED. ITEM # 40873 Councilman Dean requested this item be discussed during the Formal Session to advise the citizens re the landscaping. M. 6 Application of EXXON CORPORATION for a Conditional Use Permff for a car wash in conjunction with a convenience store and gas pumps at the Southwest corner of London Bridge Road and General Booth Boulevard (2101 General Booth Boulevard), containing 39,988 square feet (PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH). ITEM # 40874 Jim latwson, Real Estate, advised in an attempt to have this project on course and meet the schedule for this season, the actual fee owner of a portion of Atlantic Avenue was the Virginia Department of Transportation, and they had to be participants in the closure. There will be an exchange of deeds between the landowner and the State. M8 Application in behalf of the CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH for the discontinuance, closure and abandonment of a portion of Atlantic Avenue beginning at the Southern boundary of Cavalier Drive and running in a southerly direction a distance of 450 feet more or less, containing 21,938 square feet (VIRGINIA BEACH BOROUGH). ITEM # 40875 BY CONSENSUS, the following items shall compose the PLANNING BY CONSENT AGENDA: M. 1 Application of SANFORD M. and LAUREL E. ROSENBERG for the discontinuance, closure and abandonment of a portion of a 15-foot alley located adjacent to Lots 6 and 18, Block 20, Croatan Beach, containing 750 square feet (LYNNHAVEN BOROUGH). June IL 1996 - 15 - AGENDA REVIEW SESION ITEM # 40875 (Continued) M3 Application of PANDELL BUILDERS, INC., for a Variance to Section 4.4(b) of the Subdivision Ordinance which requires that all lots created by subdivision meet all the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance at the Southeast intersection of Reedtown Road and Mason Street, containing 1.9 acre (BAYSIDE BOROUGH). M4 Application of JANE R. DOWDY for a Variance to Section 4.4(b) of the Subdivision Ordinance which requires all newly created lots to meet all requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance on South Spigel Drive on Lot B of proposed Dowdy Acres, containing 5.16 acres (LYNNHAVEN BOROUGH). M5 Application of VIRGINIA METRONET, INC., dba 360° Communications Company for a Conditional Use Permit for a 150-foot monopole tower on Lots 49, 50 and 51, Shelton Place (1707 Lawson Drive), containing 25,958 square feet (BAYSIDE BOROUGH). M6 Application of EXXON CORPORATION.for a Conditional Use Permit for a car wash in con. Junction with a convenience store and gas pumps at the Southwest corner of London Bridge Road and General Booth Boulevard (2101 General Booth Boulevard), containing 39,988 square feet (PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH). M8 Application in behalf of the CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH for the discontinuance, closure and abandonment of a portion of Atlantic Avenue beginning at the Southern boundary of Cavalier Drive and running in a southerly direction a distance of 450 feet more or less, containing 21,938 square feet (VIRGINIA BEACH BOROUGH). - 16 - FORMAL SESION VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL June I1, 1996 2:00 P.M. Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf called to order the FORMAL SESSION of the VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL in the Council Chamber, City Hall Building, on Tuesday, June 11, 1996, at 2:00 P.M. Council Members Present: John A. Baurn, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert IC Dean, William W. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy IC Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Absent: None INVOCATION: Reverend William S. Campbell Aragona Church of Christ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - 17- Item V-E. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEM # 40876 The EXECUTIVE SESSION WAS CERTIFIED TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOTION TO RECESS, IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE EXECUTIVE SESSION IN THE CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM (11:55.4~1.) June 11, 1996 - 18 - Item V-F. 1. MINUTES ITEM # 40877 Upon motion by Vice Mayor Sessoms, seconded by Council Lady Strayhorn, City Council APPROVED the Minutes of the INFORMAL AND FORMAL SESSIONS of June 4, 1996. Voting: 9-0 Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert IC Dean, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R~ Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy IC Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Abstaining: William gE. Harrison, Jr. and Harold Heischober Council Members Absent: None June 11, 1996 - 19 - Item V-G. ADOPT AGENDA FOR FORM~IL SESSION ITEM # 40878 BY CONSENSUS, City Council ADOPTED: AGENDA FOR THE FORMAL SESSION June 11, 1996 - 20 - Item V-L1. PRESENTATION ITEM # 40879 Mayor Oberndorf PROCLAIMED: JUNE 11, 1996 CAPTAIN WILLIAM H. SHUR TLEFF DA Y Captain William H. Shurtleff, Commander, Naval Air Station, Oceana, will complete his tour of duty. Captain Shurtleff has made OCEANA, the largest corporate citizen in Virginia Beach, an integral part of what makes Virginia Beach great, including extensive work with Crime Stoppers, the successful effort to have Oceana become "home" to the majority of the East Coast F/A-18s and all of the Navy's F-14s. Mayor Oberndorf PRESENTED the street sign renaming the road into OCEANA in honor of the new airplane coming to Virginia Beach "HORNET DRIVE". Captain Shurtleff ACCEPTED the Proclamation and street sign with appreciation. June 11, 1996 NOW, THEREFORE, I, PROCLAIM: e~ ~ bye ote~ become t~ ~ b t~ ~on~ of the ~ co~ F/A-lBS ~ a~ of the th~ ~jor t~l ~; ~ ~d t~ c~ ~ly on n m~d of ~t~, mch ~ ~es of eom?ntlbtll~ ~th ~ m~on of o~ ~ ~ ~ br Pohg ~ Fire ~o~cflon; ad he ~a z. o~, ~ayor of ~e ci~ of vtrgt.~ seth, vtr~ma, ~ JUNE 11, 1996 CAPTAIN WILLIAM H. SHURTLEFF DAY la vlr~ s.t& m~ wish him ~tlnud ~cess In sm, let to the N~y tu~ to the Nation. vurthermort, cl~ to dmongratt their ~c~ for ~ tone.ns ~t by cny~n shurtlt~ ~ all ~mbm of the Armed Strvlces in our cll~. vir~l,~, ~ ~ ~ ~u E~th m7 ,f~, ~ ~r~ ~ ~-SU. /- Ma~or - 21 - PRESENTATION ITEM it 40880 Mayor Oberndorf RECOGNIZED: JUNE 11, 1996 CAPE HENR Y COLLEGIA TE DA Y The Cape Henry Collegiate Team is the Worm Champion in the Odyssey of the Mind Worm Finals. This competition featured more than 5,000 participants from the United States and twenty foreign countries. This RESOLUTION was ACCEPTED by CAPE HENRY COLLEGIATE'S ODYSSEY OF THE MIN TEAM: Lauren Fisher Lauren Schiff Mahdi Warren Brian Fry Elizabeth Siteman Rachel Wagner Anne Ruehrmand Coaches: Susan Fisher and Peg Warren. Cape Henry's Odyssey of the Mind Coordinator and Co- Director of Tidewater's Program: Bill Wagner. Odyssey of the Mind is the worM's largest creative problem-solving program for school-aged students. Students choose one of five complex problems to solve. Judges award points for the effectiveness of solutions, style shown in the presentation and response to a spontaneous problem given to teams at the competition. June 11, 1996 The Cape Hmr/, Coilegtale Team ~rom Virginia Beach is Ibc WorLd Champion in lire Odyssey 05 Ihe Mind World Finals; Thl~ competition ~ealurrd more Ihan $,000 parlldpanls j~om (he U.S. and Iwenly ~orelgn munlrles; The sludeab ~rom Cape HenrI, Collzglale wed(ed dlligmll!, all tear Io prepare for mmpelillon; This honor has made Virginia Beach proud and given our dly inlernalional rgmgnitlon. ~ NOW, TLIEREFORE, BE IT BI~OLVED BY TIlE COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH TIIAT: JUNE 11, 1996 IS CAPE HENRY COLLEGIATE DAY Given under our hands and seals lids Ele~nlh Day oS June, Nineteen Hundred and NinelF-Six. )ohn A. Baum Un~ood O. llr~h, !!i Handd flelsdwber l~rbam M. flmlel~ Nanc~ K. Parker Louisa M. Strarhom Will/am D. Sessoms, ~r. Vice Mayor - 22 - Item V-I. 3. PRESENTATION ITEM # 40881 Mayor Oberndorf RECOGNIZED: JUNE II, 1996 COX HIGH SCHOOL DA Y Cox High School was the first Virginia Beach Public School to attend the Odyssey of the Mind World Finals. Cox High School ranked Fourth in Spontaneous Problem Solving and Nineteenth in Long Term Problem Solving in this worldwide competition. This RESOLUTION was ACCEPTED by Members of COX HIGH SCHOOL'S ODYSSEY OF THE MIND TEAM: Adam Law Diane Peters Jackson Weller Jeff Bowles, Nathan Cummings, Steve Bull, Ed Carden and their Coach, Mrs. Chris Peters, were unable to attend. Councilman Harrison also advised COX HIGH SCHOOL WON THE STATE HIGII SCHOOL BASEBALL CHAMPIONSHIP on June 10, 1996. June 11, 1996 Beso u on H~iERF~$: Cox High School was lhe.first ¥i~glula Beach public Khooi lo go Io the Odl, ss~ of Ihe Mind World F/nab; Cox High School ranked ]ourlh in $ponlantous Problt, m Sob4ng and uineleenlh in Long Term Pmbit. m ~ohdflg in Ibis woddwid~ mmptflflon; This ¢ompeliflon ytalurrd more Ihan $,000 parfldpanls ~rom IIw U.S. and Iwmll~ foreign tounlries; The studmls./rom ~z High School workd dili§mlll~ lo smxeed al I/ds lt,~! and Io in'lng Ibis rewgniflon Io Ihe Clly o./¥trgini-, IlaU~lL NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH THAT: JUNE 11, ~996 IS COX HIGH SCHOOL DAY Gi,~m up~d~ our hands and seals lids Eltq, mth Day o~lun~ Ninelten Hundred and Ninell~iX. loire A. Barn lJnwood O. Branch, !ii Rolm~ lt. Dean Harold Heischober Bad,ara 81. Hmk.~ Louis K lon~s NamT it. Parker Ma~or ~ w'miam i). Sessoms, Ir. Vice Ma~or - 23 - Item V-L4. PRESENTATION ITEM # 40882 Mayor Oberndorf RECOGNIZED: JUNE 11, 1996 OCEAN LAKES HIGH SCHOOL DA Y Ann Lingraff-Newton, Mathematics Teacher, Ocean Lakes High School, advised 60 students and 15 teachers were involved in the Ocean Lakes High School Rocket Project. Mrs. Lingraff-Newton expressed appreciation: Lee Rich Ronnie Stephenson Elizabeth Lee-Rausch David Hahn Dr. Dianne DeTurris Dr. Knut Oxnevad Jerry Deviney Dr. Carol Cash Scott Brown Rob Stover Jeff Steckroth Pat Maturo Steven Carter Michelle Bailey-Hennessey Brian Alexander Jeff Goldstein Patti Dunkum Lisa Patterson Kerri Albertson Congressional Affairs Officer NASA Congressional Affairs Office NASA Chairperson, AL4A President - National Space Society, Langley Chapter National Space Society, Rocket Project Coordinator National Space Society, Past President Principal - Ocean Lakes High School Math & Science Magnet Coordinator Ocean Lakes High School Materials, Science, Small Engines Ocean Lakes High School Electronic, Applied Physics Ocean Lakes High School AP Calculus/Algebra 2, Trigonometry Ocean Lakes High School Physics/Applied Physics/Chemistry Ocean Lakes High School Oceanography/Environmental Issue¥/ Earth & Space Sciences Ocean Lakes High School Earth Science - Ocean Lakes High School Oceanography/Earth Science Ocean Lakes High School Math/Computer Program/Design/ Math Modeling/Optimization Ocean Lakes High School Work/Family Structures/Sewing Ocean Lakes High School Math - Ocean Lakes High School Virginia Beach Schools Public Information Mrs. Lingraff-Newton expressed appreciation to Councilman Robert Dean for his vision and confidence. Mrs. Lingraff-Newton presented Councilman Dean with a plaque signifying gratitude for his dedication to the project. Mrs. Lingraff-Newton expressed further appreciation to business sponsors: WVEC-TV and Texas Instruments. Jttne 11, 1996 Studt. nls from Ocr. au lakes High School look pad in a rockt! launch on Mat' 30 on Wallops Island; This' was a join! projcc! tsd!h NASA who assislzd !he sludenis In designing and building the roche! and ils pai'iood; Ocean lakes Hh3h School has btm desi§naled as the new science and mlh magnet schoolJ'or the Vir~luM Beach Public School !1 is hol~.d Ilml Ibis ~111 !~ IhejI~l oJ humr NAS~4kemt Ldtes l,rojeds. NOW, THEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLVED BY TIlE COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH THAT: JUNE 11, 1996 IS OCEAN LAKES HIGH SCHOOL DAY Gh'm under our hands and seals lids lle~nlh Da!' oSJufle, Nifleleen Hundrzd and Niflely-SIx. John A. Baum Ltuwood O. Bram~ I!! Robert lt. Dean W.W. Harrison, Barbara ~. HmleF Louis It)om NamT it Parker '- Lou/sa ~. Stral4wrn Merera ~. Ob~ William D. Sessoms, Jr. Vice JVia~or - 24 - Item V-I. 5/6 PRESENTATION ITEM # 40883 Mayor Oberndorf PRESENTED: MISS VIRGINIA BEACH Courtney Criswell MISS TIDEWATER Tracy Blizzard Courtney is a second Year student at ODU, on the Dean's List. She was a 1995 Honor Graduate of Cox High School. Her career ambitions are to become a speech language pathologist, to continue to use her vocal talents as a means of communication and to be a loving wife and mother. Tracy Blizzard is a Graduate of Bethel High School in Hampton and has a Double Major in Broadcast Journalism/Chinese at the University of Maryland. Her career ambitions are to dance professionally for a modern dance company and to open a studio that encompasses the spectrum of fine arts. Mayor Oberndorf PRESENTED Pewter Cups engraved with the City Seal to each Beauty Queen. June 11, 1996 Item V-J. 1. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORT ITEM # 40884 Patricia .4. Phillips, Director of Finance, advised on June 11, 1996, at ll:OO A.M., the City received six separate bids on its $58,000,000 General Obligation Public Improvement Bonds, Series of 1996. The true interest cost to the City of each of the bids is as follows: Syndicate Headed True Interest Cost Prudential Securities 5.622% First Union 5.634% Morgan Stanley 5.643% Paine Webber 5.657% Merrill Lynch 5.680% Craigie, Inc. 5.687% The true interest cost of the winning bid by Prudential Securities of 5.622% was 22 basis points below last week's II-Bond G.O. Index. The City's financial advisors, Government Finance .4ssociates, Inc. and the Government Finance Group, recommended the City accept the low bid of Prudential Securities. Therefore, based on the resolution adopted by City Council on June 4, 1996, the bonds have been awarded to Prudential Securities. June 11, 1996 - 26 - Item V-ICl. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM # 40885 Mayor Oberndorf DECLARED A PUBLIC HEARING: REAPPORTIONMENT OF DISTRICT NO. 5. (Movement of the boundary line front lnlynnview Road to Wolfsnare Creek) Bill Bueno - Chair - Great Neck Association of Civic Leagues, Phone: 481-1740, spoke itt SUPPORT There being no further speakers, Mayor Oberndorf CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. Jvne 11, 1996 - 27 - Item IV-L. ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 40886 Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms, City Council APPROI ED in ONE MOTION Items 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 and 12 of the CONSENT AGENDA (Ordinances/Resol~ttions). Voting: 11-0 Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert K. Dean, William W.. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndoff, Nancy K. Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None Jvne 11, 1996 - 28 - ORDINANCES/RESOL UTIONS ITEM # 40887 CONSENT AGENDA Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms, City Council ADOPTED: Ordinance to modify Residential Districts $ and 6 by moving the boundary along Inlynnview Road, between the Lynnhaven River to the West and Great Neck Road to the East, southwardly to the centerline of Wolfsnare Creek (LYNNHAVEN BOROUGH). Voting: 11-0 (By Consent) Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert 32 Dean, William W. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R~ Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy 32 Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessotns, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None Jztne 11, 1996 Requested by Councilmember W.W. Harrison 1 2 3 4 AN ORDINANCE MODIFYING THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN RESIDENCE DISTRICTS 5 AND 6, USED FOR ELECTION OF CITY COUNCIL AND SCHOOL BOARD MEMBERS 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 3O 31 32 33 34 WHEREAS, on February 6, 1996, by ordinance, Council established seven (7) approximately equally populated residence districts for election of city Council Members and School Board Members, as required by Chapter 697 of the Acts of Assembly of 1995, which districts are more particularly described on the map of Plan D-3 and other exhibits attached to Council's ordinance of February 6, 1996; AND, WHEREAS, on April 23, 1996, citizens of the Inlynnview neighborhood of the City and the Inlynnview Civic League appeared before City Council and requested that the boundary line between Districts 5 and 6 be modified so that their Civic League would not be split between Districts 5 and 6 and specifically requested the boundary between these Districts, which runs along Inlynnview Road between the Lynnhaven River, to the West, and Great Neck Road, to the East, be moved southwardly to the natural boundary of the centerline of Wolfsnare Creek, all of which area is more particularly shown on the eight and one-half (8 1/2) by eleven (11) inch map prepared by Election Data Services, dated May 23, 1996, attached hereto, marked Exhibit A; and WHEREAS the City Attorney and the expert employed by the City Attorney, Election Data Services, have concluded that this modification meets legal requirements; and, WHEREAS Council has held a Public Hearing to receive citizen comment on the proposed modification and the modification will not disrupt the balance of the plan adopted by Council on February 6, 1996. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: That the residence districts for election of City Council members and School Board members adopted by Council on February 6, 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 That the residence districts for election of City Council members and School Board members adopted by Council on February 6, 1996, are hereby modified so as to change the boundary between Districts 5 and 6 by moving the boundary along Inlynnview Road, between the Lynnhaven River to the West and Great Neck Road to the East, southwardly to the centerline of Wolfsnare Creek all as more particularly shown on the 8 1/2 x 11 inch map of the area, prepared by Election Data Services, dated May 23, 1996, attached hereto and made a part hereof, marked Exhibit A; and BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the City Attorney is directed to modify, label, and reproduce all documents necessary to reflect this modification, including but not limited to, the map of the residence districts which was attached to the ordinance of February 6, 1996, marked Exhibit A, the Metes and Bounds Report which was attached to the ordinance of February 6th and marked Exhibit B, and the list of census block assignments which was attached to the ordinance of February 6th and marked Exhibit C. 5O 51 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the 11 day of June , 1996. 52 53 54 55 CA-6351 ORDIN\NONCODE\DISTRICT.ORD R-1 PREPARED: June 5, 1996 APPROVED 4S TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY ¢nt ~f Law -~ 2 POPULAI'ION ANL) Vg) lING AGE i"'L)PULAI ION CHANGES MADE BY PLAN D-4 TO PLAN D-3 PLAN D-4 '1'/- TOTAL POPULATION District 5 56,627 + 1,456 District 6 55,460 1,456 55,171 56,916 TOTAL WHITE District 5 52,636 + 1,401 51,235 District 6 45,284 1,401 46,685 TOTAL BLACK District 5 District 6 2,630 + 20 8,523 - 20 TOTAL NATIVE District 5 District 6 123 + 1 274 - 1 TOTAL ASIAN District 5 District 6 983 + 33 815 - 33 TOTAL OTHER District 5 District 6 255 + 1 564 I 2,610 8,543 122 275 950 848 254 565 TOTAL OVER 18 District 5 43,181 + 1,146 42,035 District 6 41,451 1,146 42,597 TOTAL OVER 18 (WHITE) District 5 District 6 40,322 + 1,107 39,215 34,561 - 1,107 35,668 TOTAL OVER 18 (BLACK) District 5 District 6 TOTAL OVER 18 (NATIVE) District 5 District 6 1,883 + 14 5,711 - 14 TOTAL OVER 18 (ASIAN) District 5 District 6 88 + 1 202 - I DISTRICT.CHT 722 + 23 582 - 23 1,869 5,725 87 2O3 699 605 - 29 - ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM # 40888 The following spoke in SUPPORT of the Ordinance: Fred Gray, 3277 Colchester Road, Donald Denkce, 2004 Las Croces Court, Phone: 430-0104 The following spoke in OPPOSITION: Gale Levine, 2748 Atwoodtown Road, Phone: 496-7000 Steve Barnes, 1100 McClanan Lane Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Councilman Dean, City Council ADOPTED: Ordinances to the City Code: Ordinance to AMEND Chapter 30 re submission of a construction plan prior to the excavation of a Farm Pond or a Fish Pond. Ordinance to AMEND Chapter 30 by changing a provision re definition of a borrow pit, application information, permit and inspection fees. Voting: 10-1 Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert IC Dean, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy IC Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Yoting Nay: William W. Harrison, Jr. Council Members Absent: None Jzfne 11, 1996 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 30 OF THE CITY CODE BY CHANGING THE PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO THE DEFINITION OF A BORROW PIT, APPLICATION INFORMATION AND PERMIT AND INSPECTION FEES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: That Sections 30-16, 30-19, 30-20, 30-37 and 30-44 of the Code of the city of Virginia Beach, Virginia, are hereby amended and reordained to read as follows: 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 Sec. 30-~6. Definition. For the purpose of this article, the term ,'borrow pit'' means any operation involving the breaking or disturbing of the surface soil or rock, where the primary purpose of the operation is to facilitate or accomplish the extraction or removal of sand, soil, gravel, fill or other similar material. Specifically exempt from this definition are the following: (1) Any excavation for roads, drainage, stormwater management facilities as defined in the city stormwater management ordinance (Appendix D), or similar features necessarily incidental to, and in accordance with, the approved construction plans for a residential subdivision or other similar development activityT£ cvcn ~t~ '~i .... ~ ~ ~'~ ~itc .... ~ provided however, if the depth or surface area of the excavation exceeds that of the approved construction plans and the excavated material is hauled offsite, an excavation permit and conditional use permit for a borrow pit must be obtained. (2) Any excavation for the sole purpose of conducting a bona fide agricultural operation, including, but not limited to, excavations to improve drainage, provide watering facilities for livestock, create a holding lagoon for animal waste~ or farm ponds or fish ponds; provided that 39 40 42 43 44' 45 46 47 (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Accessibility for maintenance without adversely impacting adjacent properties. Density of population in the immediate area. Traffic volume and safety issues on adjacent roadways. Design and structural integrity of adjacent roadways. Protection of trees and other environmental considerations. A violation of this section shall constitute a Class 3 misdemeanor. 48 49 Adopted by the city Council of the city of Virginia Beach on this 11th day of June, 1996. 52 53 CA-6300 DATA/ORDIN/PROPOSED/30-1.ORD MAY 8, 1996 R2 APPROVED AS 'TO CONTENT APPROVED AS 'TO LEGAL SUF~C~NCY D¢i~rtmcnt ox ~.ew ~ 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 30 OF THE CITY CODE BY REQUIRING THE SUBMISSION OF A CONSTRUCTION PLAN PRIOR TO THE EXCAVATION OF A FARM POND OR A FISH POND BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: That Section of the Code of the city of Virginia Beach, Virginia, is hereby amended and reordained to read as follows: 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 .A~--~- ,A_ eExcavations for farm ponds or fish Sec. 30-1 ............. " ponds for bona fide agricultural operations. (a) This section shall only apply to farm ponds or fish Dond~ for bona fide agricultural operations, and not to borrow pits as defined in the city zoning ordinance (appendix A) or stormwater management facilities as defined in the stormwater management ordinance (appendix D). (b) Prior to the excavation for a farm pond or fish pond, th~ property owner shall submit to the director of the department of agriculture a construction plan showinq the location, dimension and depth of the proposed excavation and the intended use and location of the excavated material. '~' (c) The edge of any excavation for farm ponds or fish ponds. for bona fide agricultural operations shall be located at least twenty-five (25) feet from any exterior property line and at least one hundred (100) feet from all existing or proposed public streets and highways. (~' (d) The director of planning may grant an exception to the setback requirements imposed by this section when he finds that due to existing conditions and circumstances, the location of a farm pond or fish pond within the required setback area will not adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare. In reviewing requests for exceptions, the director of planning shall consider the following factors: (1) Existing and planned uses of adjacent properties. (2) Constructability without adversely impacting adjacent properties. 38 39 ~0 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 52 53 54 55 56 none of the excavated material may be hauled off site or sold. (3) Any excavation or excavatio s on an sin le ot or arce of land which ~e total less than e~ 9ne-quarte~ /~]_~ acre in area and less than fivc hundrcd ~vv, ~A., _~ - ~ ~ twelve 12 feet in excavated de th as measured from the ori inal round level to the lowest point of the excavatio~- (4) Any trench, ditch or hole for utility lines, drainage pipes or other similar public works facilities or projects where the excavation is in accordance with the approved construction plans. 57 58 59 60 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 Sec. 30-19· site inspections_and inspection fee~. The department of planning shall periodically inspect the sites of excavations for which permits are issued under this article to insure compliance with this article and other provisions, as required by the city council~ and a reasonable fe~ for such ins ections shall be aid. ~he director of planninq o~ ins ections for com liance, such fee shall be submitted to the of Virqinia Beach. .... Reserved Sec. 30-20. 73 74 ~5 76 77 78 79 8O 81 82 83 84 85 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 ~-- ~m~- cf plann-n~. d~r~ .... t Sec. 30-37. ~pplication generally. After approval by the city council of a conditional use permit for a borrow pit, the owner of record shall cause to be filed with and site pla~ for an the department of planning an application _ excavation permit. The application fee shall be fifty dollars ($50.00). The application shall include the following: (1) The name and address of the owner of the property affected. (2) The names and addresses of owners of all property abutting the property for which the excavation permit is (3) (4) (5) (6) sought. If the applicant or owner is a corporation, the names and addresses of its corporate officers and registered agent. An aerial photograph of the area to be excavated, with the boundaries of such area clearly delineated. A copy of the current recorded survey or plat, if available, prepared by an engineer or land surveyor, certified by the commonwealth, and drawn to a scale of not less than one (1) inch equals two hundred (200) feet, submitted in five (5) copies. The boundaries of the area to be excavated by courses and distances. The current field topography, including the location of all watercourses. (8) The means of vehicular access to the proposed excavation. (9) A cross-section of any banks or walls to be established through, the process of excavating. (10) The number of cubic yards to be excavated. (11) The areas proposed for the storage of overburden and other spoil during the process of excavating. 107 108 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 (12) The proposed date on which excavating will commence, the proposed date on which the excavation will be completed and the proposed date that all required restoration measures are to be completed. (13) The location of all haul roads leading to public streets and highways within the areal ~s well as the on-site haul road the oint at which the haul road intersects the ublic ri bt-of-wa the nearest street intersections in all directions leavin the excavation site and all existin and ro osed entrances on both sides of the ublic street within 500 feet of the ro osed entrance. /~ A detailed descri tion of the on-site haul road and the entrance to the ublic ri bt-of-wa includin width radii com osition of surface material and len th of improved surface~ ~ /~ A statement listing the public streets ~ ~-~a~-~ to be used as haul routes to access an arterial or ma'or street 116~ A traffic maintenance control lan includin but not limited to si n t e size color letterin size and location. /~ A descri tion or lan of all ro osed im rovements to o eration inciudin but not limited to turn lanes si nalization stri in and other traffic control measures. ~1~ /~ The location of all test wells and depth of borings, where required, which shall be within the setback requirements of this article. The location of test wells adjacent to residential areas shall be subject to approval of the department of planning. ~ ~ An erosion and sedimentation control plan. ~ ~0Y A statement of the methods to be used to maintain or repair any public street or highway to be used for hauling purposes. The department of planning shall 149- 143 ]&4 145 147 149 150 151' 152 153 154 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 166 167 168 169 170 determine the acceptability of the methods proposed by the applicant and, if deemed necessary, shall require the posting of a bond to insure against road damage due to the hauling. {-1~ /~ A copy of the mining permit issued by the Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy. Bec. 30-44. Expiration; extension. An excavation permit henceforth issued under this division shall expire one (1) year from the date of issuance. Excavation permits issued prior to the date of adoption of this ordinance shall expire one (1) year from the date of adoption of this ordinance· The holder of the permit may thereafter apply annually to the department of planning for a renewal of the permit upon a ent of a fift 50 dollar renewal fee and by providing the following information. (1) A copy of the current mining permit issued by the Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy. (2) Crcs=-uccticns s-b .... tt~d by an ~..~i..~ certified bz ~h- c ...... c ..... l~h, shc~ing th~ excavation ~-~n thc b ..... pit, ~ .... ~---~ cf ~l_..nin~. Verification of all by thc --~ information required under section 30-37 of this article.. fro o~ncr cf thc ~r~p Y ~ A written verification of the number of cubic yards o~ material removed from the excavation site durinq th~ previous year ._ 171 172 173 174 i,6 this 11th day of June, 1996. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach on APPROVED AS TO CONTENT CA-6283 DATA/ORDIN/PROPOSED/30-ETC-COM May 29, 1996 R4 Department of Pl~nnlng 5 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY Department of Law - 30 - ORDINANCES~RESOLUTIONS ITEM # 40889 Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Councilman Dean, City Council ADOPTED: Ordinance to AMEND Chapter 33 by ADDING provisions re hauling of sand, gravel, topsoil, fill or other excavated material off an excavation site. Voting: 9-2 Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert IC Dean, ltarold Heischober, Louis R. Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy IC Parker, V~ce Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members I,~oting Nay: William W.. Harrison, Jr. and Barbara M. Henley, Council Members Absent: None Jtene 11, 1996 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 33 OF THE CODE BY ADDING PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO THE HAULING OF SAND, GRAVEL, TOPSOIL, FILL, OR OTHER EXCAVATED MATERIAL OFF AN EXCAVATION SITE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: That Chapter 33 of the Code of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, is hereby amended by adding Section 33-19 to read as follows: Sec. 33-19. Hauling of sand, Gravel, topsoil, fill, or other excavated material off an excavation site. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to haul more than three hundred thirty-seven (337) in situ cubic yards of sand,. gravel topsoil, fill, or other excavated material from an excavation site by vehicle upon any street in the city of Virginia Beach without a hauling permit from the department of planning in accordance with the provisions of this section. (b) Application for a permit required by this section shall be filed with the department of planning on forms supplied by the city. The application fee shall be fifty dollars ($50.00). The application shall be signed by the property owner, hauler an~ operator and shall include the following information: (1). The names and addresses of all haulers; (2) If the hauler is a corporation, the name and address of its corporate offices and reqistered agent;. (3). The name and address of the excavator and/o~ operator; (4) The names and addresses of owners of all property from which the fill material is to be hauled; (5)... The proposed date on which the hauling operation will commence and the proposed date on which the operation will be completed; 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 5O 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 (7~ (6) The total number of cubic yards of material to be hauled; The number, tvDe, carryinq caDacity, and weight of vehicles to be used in the hauling operation on a daily basis; (8) The location of all haul roads leading to public streets and highways within the hauling area~ (9) A statement listing the public streets to be used as haul routes to access an arterial or maior street or highway; (10) A statement of the methods to be used to maintain or repair any public street or highway to be used for hauling purposes~_ ¢11) A site plan or survey of the excavation site, with a location map, showing the locations of the area to be excavated, the on-site haul road, the point at which the haul road intersects the public right- of-way, the nearest street intersections in all directions leaving the excavation site and all existing and proposed entrances on both sides of the public street within 500 feet of the proposed entrance; (12) A detailed description of the on-site haul road and the entrance to the public right-of-way, including width, radii, composition of surface material and length of improved surface; (13) Erosion and sediment control measures to be employed at the haul road entrance and all access points; (14) The method by which dirt and dust will be controlled on the public streets and in the air; (15~ A traffic maintenance/control plan, including, but not limited to, sign type, size, color, lettering size and locations; 2 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 (16) Location and description of public structures and improvements immediately adjacent to and under the haul road entrance; and (17) A description or plan of all proposed improvements to mitiqate the traffic imDacts associated with th~ hauling activity including, but not limited to, turn lanes, signalization, striding and other traffic control measures. In the event any changes in the above-required information are needed, the applicant shall submit such changes to the planning department for review and thereof. (c) The director of approval prior to the commencement designee shall determine the acceptability of the hauling methods and routes proposed by the applicant, and shall grant the hauling permit unless: (1) Under accepted engineering standards, it is determined that the public streets and highways tQ be used in the proposed hauling route cannot sustain the weiqht or frequency of the hauling vehicles without substantial damage thereto; o~ (2) The proposed hauling operation would render the streets and highways affected by the hauling unsafe for public travel; or (3) The noise or dust generated by the haulinq operation is of such character, intensity and duration as to be detrimental to the life or health of persons of reasonable sensitivity, or to disturb or annoy the quiet, comfort or repose of reasonable persons who reside in close proximity to the hauling operation. Any person aggrieved of the decision of the planninq director or his desiqnee may appeal such decision to the city manager or his designee within thirty (30) days of the date of such decision. Any person aqqrieved of the decision of the city manager or his the department of planning or his 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 designee may appeal such decision to the circuit court within thirty (30) days of the date of such decision. /~ In the event the planning director or his designee issues a hauling permit under this section, he may attach such conditions and safeguards as are deemed necessary to protect the public safety and to ensure against the creation of a public nuisance or substantial damage to the streets due to the hauling and may require the posting of a bond with surety, cash, escrow, letter of credit, any combination thereof, or such other legal arrangement acceptable to the city attorney, to assure compliance. (e) No permit issued under this section shall be transferre~ to another person without approval by the planning department~ Such approval shall be granted in the same manner as for original applications for permits. (f) A hauling permit issued under this section shall expir~ one (1) year from the date of issuance. The holder of the permit may thereafter apply annually to the department of planning for ~ renewal of the permit upon the payment of a fifty ($50~ dollar renewal fee and verification of all information required under subsection (b). (g) A violation of any of the provisions of this section o~ failure to comply with the terms and conditions of a hauling permit shall constitute a class 1 misdemeanor. In addition to the penalties imposed hereunder, the city may institute legal action to enjoin a continuing violation of any of the provisions of this section or of any of the terms and conditions of a hauling permit issued pursuant to this section. (h) In addition to, and not in lieu of, the remedies set forth in subsection (g) hereof, the director of planning or his designee may revoke a hauling permit issued pursuant to this section as a result of the violation of any of the terms or conditions of the permit. (i). This section shall not apply to excavation operations conducted pursuant to an excavation permit and a conditional use permit for a borrow pit or to stormwater management facilities ].40 14]. ].42 ].43 site plans~ Adopted by the City Council of the city of virginia this 11th day of June, 1996. Beach on 144 145 146 147 CA16282 DATA/ORDiN/PROPOSED/33-19-COM May 29, 1996 R4 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Del~u~ment of APPROVED AS 1'O LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: 5 - 31 - ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM # 40890 Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Council Lady Parker, City Council ADOPTED: Resolution referring to the Planning Commission Amendments to the City Zoning Ordinance, Site Plan Ordinance and the Subdivision Regulations: Ordinance changing the definition of a borrow pit. Ordinance ADDING the requirement to provide hauling operation information on an application for a Conditional Use Permit for a borrow pit. Ordinance ADDING provisions to the Site Plan Ordinance re plans and information on hauling operations associated with the excavation of stormwater management facilities. Ordinance ADDING provisions to the Subdivision Ordinance re plans and information on hauling operations associated with the excavation of stormwater management facilities and consideration of the Public Health, Safety and Welfare in the approval of subdivisions. Voting: 11-0 Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert K, Dean, William W. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy Ic2 Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None Jvne 11, 1996 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 A RESOLUTION REFERRING TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE WHICH CHANGE THE DEFINITION OF A BORROW PIT AND ADD THE REQUIREMENT OF PROVIDING HAULING OPERATION INFORMATION ON AN APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A BORROW PIT AND AMENDMENTS TO THE SITE PLAN ORDINANCE AND THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS WHICH ADD THE REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HAULING OPERATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXCAVATION OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES ON SITE PLANS AND SUBDIVISION PLATS. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: That the attached proposed amendments to Sections 111 and 227 of the City Zoning Ordinance, Section 4 of the Site Plan Ordinance, and Section 7.1 and 7.8 of the Subdivision Regulations of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, are hereby referred to the Planning Commission for its consideration and recommendation. The Planning Commission is hereby requested to make its recommendation to the City Council within thirty (30) days of the date of this resolution. 24 25 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the 11 day of June , 1996. 26 27 28 29 CA-6335 ORDIN\NONCODE\hauling.res R-1 PREPARED: May 24, 1996 Depa~mcnt of Plannh~g APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY Department of Law 1 2 3 4 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE DEFINITION OF A BORROW PIT 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 3O 31 32 33 34 35 36 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: That Section 111 of the city Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended and reordained to read as follows: Sec. 111. Definitions. For the purpose of this ordinance, words used in the present tense shall include the future; words used in the singular number include the plural and the plural the singular; the use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders; the word "shall" is mandatory; the word "may" is permissive; the word "land" includes only the area described as being above mean sea level; and the word "person" includes an individual, a partnership, association, or corporation. In addition, the following terms shall be defined as herein indicated: Borrow pit. Any operation involving the breaking or disturbing of the surface soil or rock where the primary purpose of the operation is to facilitate or accomplish the extraction or removal of sand, soil, gravel, fill, or other similar material . Specifically exempt from this definition are the following: (a) Any excavation for roads, drainage, stormwater management facilities as defined in the city stormwater management ordinance (Appendix D), or similar features necessarily incidental to, and in accordance with, the approved construction plans for a residential subdivision or other '~ .... ~ thc ..... t~d similar development activityl, cvcn ..... ~.. ~ .... v~ ~ ....~ ~ _~.. ~A ~..~^~ A~ff_=.t~ ~~.A~ ..... -~ ~ provided however, if the depth or surface area of the excavation exceeds that of the approved construction plans and the excavated material is hauled offsite, an excavation permit and conditional use permit for a borrow pit must 37 be obtained. 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 5O 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 6O 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 (b) Any excavation for the sole purpose of conducting a bona fide agricultural operation, including but not limited to excavations to improve drainage, provide watering facilities for livestock, or create a holding lagoon for animal waste~ or farm ponds or fish ponds; provided that none of the excavated material may be hauled off site or sold. (c) Any excavation or excavations on any single lot or parcel of land which~-~- total less than one ~=,'~' one-quarter (1/4] acre in area and less than ~"- ~.._~_A~ ,=,~ ~A_. twelve (12] feet in excavated depth as measured from the original ground ~eve~, to the lowest point of the excavation. (d) Any trench, ditch or hole for utility lines, drainage pipes or other similar public works facilities or projects where the excavation is in accordance with the approved construction plans. COMMENT The language allowing the hauling or selling of material excavated from a stormwater management facility has been eliminated from subsection (a). However, if a stormwater management facility is excavated within the parameters of an approved construction plan, the material may be hauled off site. The new language makes it clear that if a stormwater management facility is over excavated in violation of the approved construction plans and the excavated material is hauled offsite, a conditional use permit and an excavation permit for a borrow pit must be obtained. Accordingly, stormwater management facilities that are constructed in accordance with approved construction plans are exempt from the borrow pit regulations and the conditional use permit process. The terms "farm ponds" or "f'tzh ponds" were added to subsection Co) to clarify that the~e particular excavations would be exempt from the borrow pit regulations and the conditional use permit process so ion~ as no excavated material wns hauled offslte. The minor excavation exemption in subsection (c) was changed to allow legitimate agricultural, aquacultural or other excavations to be conducted without having to apply for an excavation permit or a conditional use permit for a borrow pit. However, notwithstanding the exemption under this section of the City Code, these minor excavations will be subject to the requirements of new section 33-19 concerning hauling permits for excavation materials hauled offslte. 70 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach on 71 this day of 1996. 72 73 CA-6284 DATA/ORDIN/PROPOSED/lll. COM MAY15,1996 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT Dcpamncnt of Planning APPROVED AS TO LEGAL Department of Law 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADDING THE REQUIREMENT TO PROVIDE HAULING OPERATION INFORMATION ON AN APPLICATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A BORROW PIT 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: That Section 227 of the Zoning Ordinance of the city of Virginia Beach, Virginia, is hereby amended and reordained to read as follows: Sec. 227. Borrow pits. (a) Application. Each application for a use permit for a borrow pit shall include the following information in addition to the general information required by this ordinance: (1) A boundary survey of the subject property, together with the proposed location of the limits of excavation; (2) The means of vehicular access to the proposed excavation; (3) The number of cubic yards to be excavated; (4) The areas proposed for the storage of overburden and other spoil during the process of excavating; (5) The proposed date on which excavating will commence, the proposed date on which the excavation will be completed and the proposed date that all required restoration measures are to be completed; (6)The location of all haul roads leading to public streets and highways within the area, and ~ of ~v ............... , as well as the on-site haul road, the point at which the haul road intersects the public riqht-of-way, the nearest street intersections in all directions leavinq the excavation site, and all existinq and proposed entrances on both sides of the public street within 500 feet of the proposed entrance; (7) A detailed description of the on-site haul road and the entrance to the public riqht-of-way, includinq width, radii, composition of surface material and lenqth of 39 improved surface; 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 5O 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 (8) A description or plan of all proposed improvements to mitiqate the traffic impacts associated with the haulinq operation includinq, but not limited to, turn lanes, siqnalization, stripinq and other traffic control measures; (7) (9) A statement listing the public streets~.~-~ ~.~,,~ to be used as haul routes to access an arterial or major street or hiqhway; ~v, (10) A plan showing the proposed use of the property once excavation has been completed, including the location of proposed lots, streets, structures, and other features; and ,~ if this is ~, (11) A plan for filling of the borrow pit, intended, once excavation has been completed. No filling of the borrow pit will be allowed unless plans for the filling have been approved by city council as a part of or as an amendment to the use permit application, and until the director of planning has issued a fill permit for such activity. CO~ENT The additional ~nguage in subdiv~ions (6), (~, (8) and (9) of subs~tion (a) con~rms to the requiremen~ of Chapter 30 per~in~g ~ borrow pit permit. The new r~uiremen~ will ensure that conditional use permit applications ~r ~rrow pi~ wH! be reviewed and evaluated in a more comprehensive manner by considering the ~aslbRity of the hauling operation as well as the excavation i~elf. (b) Special requirements. (1) Undrained pockets and stagnant pools resulting from surface drainage shall be sprayed in accordance with requirements of the state board of health to eliminate breeding places for mosquitoes and other insects. (2) Off-street parking areas adequate for all employees' vehicles and trucks shall be provided. (3) The edge of the area to be excavated shall be located at least one hundred (100) feet from all exterior property lines. The setback area shall not be used for any purpose during the period of excavation, including overburden and spoil storage, except the setback area may be used for access roads. Exterior limits of all work shall be 2 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 monumented with iron markers no less than five (5) feet above surface of the earth. (4) Access roads. Access roads to any excavation where hauling is being conducted shall be maintained in a dust- free manner. All access roads shall be constructed so as to intersect as nearly as possible at right angles with public streets and highways and no access road shall intersect any public road at any angle of less than sixty (60) degrees. (5) Operating hours. Operating hours of excavation shall be restricted to between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. or such lesser hours of operation as the city council may deem appropriate. No Sunday operations shall be permitted. (6) Construction of buildings. All buildings used for the production and processing of excavated material shall be constructed and maintained as required by the building code of the city. (7) Roadside landscape. Existing trees and ground cover along public street frontage shall be preserved and maintained, and replaced during the period of excavation if the appropriate city authorities deem it necessary. (8) Excavation permits. No excavation on the site shall commence until all permits required by chapter 30 of the City Code have been received from the Department of Planning, and all requirements of chapter 30 of the City Code have been met. (c) Factors relating to approval. Before issuing any use permit for the excavation or fill of a borrow pit, the city council shall give due consideration to the following factors: (1) Effect of the proposal upon groundwater supply and drainage in the area; (2) Effect of the proposal upon the city streets of the area, including but not limited to the factor of traffic safety; 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 (3) Impact from noise, dust, odor or other nuisance, upon surrounding properties; (4) Effect of the proposal as a potential health or safety hazard. (d) Bonding requirements. The city council may require a bond or letter of credit in an amount and with surety satisfactory to the department of planning, securing to the city compliance with the conditions and limitations set forth in the use permit. No excavation on the site shall commence until such bond, if required, has been filed and accepted by the director of planning. 121 122 Adopted by the City Council of the city of Virginia Beach on this day of 1996. 123 124 125 126 CA-6320 DATA/ORDIN/PROPOSED/45-227.ORD MAY 30, 1996 R5 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT Depa-~m'ent of Planning APPROVED AS TO LEGAL Department of Law 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE SITE PLAN ORDINANCE BY ADDING PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO PLANS AND INFORMATION ON HAULING OPERATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXCAVATION OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: That Section 4 of the city of Virginia Beach, Virginia Site Plan Ordinance is hereby amended and reordained to read as follows: Sec. 4. Information required on site development plan· C. Haulinq operations plans and information: In addition to the information required in subsections A. and B. of this section, where sand, qravel, topsoil, fill or other excavated material from the excavation of a stormwater manaqement facility will be hauled off site, the followinq information shall be submitted to the city aqent: (1) The names and addresses of all haulers; (2) If the hauler is a corporation, the name and address of its corporate offices and reqistere~ aqent; (3) The proposed date on which the haulinq operatio~ will commence and the proposed date on which the operation will be completed;. (4) The total number of cubic yards of material to be hauled; (5) The number, type, carrying capacity, and weiqht of vehicles to be used in the haulinq operation on a daily basis; (6). The location of all haul roads leadinq to public streets and hiqhways within the haulinq area; (7~ A statement listinq the public streets to be used as haul routes to access an arterial or major street or hiqhway; (8) A statement of the methods to be used to maintain or repair any public street or hiqhway to be used for haulinq purposes;. 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 (9) The location of the on-site haul road, the point at which the haul road intersects the public riqht-of- way, the nearest street intersections in all directions leavinq the excavation site and all existinq and proposed entrances on both sides of the public street within 500 feet of the proposed entrance; (10) A detailed description of the on-site haul road and the entrance to the public riqht-of-way, includinq width, radii, composition of surface material and lenqth of improved surface; (11) Erosion and sediment control measures to be employed at the haul road entrance and all access points; (12). The method by which dirt and dust will be controlled on the public streets and in the air; (13) A traffic maintenance/control plan, includinq, but not limited to, sign type, size, color, letterinq size and locations; (14) Location and description of public structures and improvements immediately adjacent to and under the haul road entrance; and (15) A description or plan of all proposed improvements to mitiqate the traffic impacts associated with the haulinq activity includinq, turn lanes, siqnalization, traffic control measures. but not limited to, stripinq and other The city aqent shall determine the acceptability of the haulinq methods and routes and may disapprove a site plan if: (1) Under accepted enqineerinq standards, it is determined that the public streets and hiqhways to be used in the proposed haulinq route cannot sustain the weiqht or frequency of the haulinq vehicles without substantial damaqe thereto; or 74 75 76 77 78 79 8O 81 82 83 84 85 (2) (3) (4) The Droposed haulinq operation would render the streets and hiqhways affected by the hauling unsafe for public travel; or The noise or dust generated by the haulinq operation is of such character, intensity and duration as to be detrimental to the life or health of persons of reasonable sensitivity, or to disturb or annoy the quiet, comfort or repose of reasonable persons who reside in close proximity to the haulinq operation; or Any of the information required under this subsection is incomplete, incorrect or false. 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 COMMENT This subsection has been added to ensure that proposed hauling operations associated with the excavation of a stormwater management facility do not pose a traffic safety or public health or safety hazard, llauling operations conducted from these facilities are generally short term in nature, frequency and duration, tlowever, this subsection will require that these operations be reviewed and evaluated. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach on this day of 1996. 93 94 95 96 CA-6315 DATA/ORDIN/PROPOSED/46-4.COM MAY 29, 1996 R3 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT pl~ n~g Department ' APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY of Law /~ Department 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS BY ADDING PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO PLANS AND INFORMATION ON HAULING OPERATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXCAVATION OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES AND CONSIDERATION OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE IN THE APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISIONS 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: That Sections 7.1 and 7.8 of the Code of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, is hereby amended and reordained to read as follows: Sec. 7.1. Plans and specifications for general improvements. A. Plans and specifications for general improvements in [a] subdivision shall be prepared and endorsed by a certified engineer. Manner of preparation and number of copies provided shall be as appropriate to the type of improvements and the requirements for local review, approval, inspection and recording, plus one copy for return to the subdivider or his agent, bearing certification of approval by the appropriate official or officials if approved, or if disapproved, indicating the reasons for such disapproval. Improvements for which such plans and specifications are required include all required improvements and any gas, water, sewer or electric light or power works, pipes, wires, fixtures or systems, or any telephone or community antenna television systems or the like, in, on or under any streets, alleys or easements within the subdivision, and all other general improvements to be provided by the subdivider or his agent, including preparation of land by grading, clearing, filling or drainage. To the extent that specifications have been established by the city or other public agency having jurisdiction concerning a particular type of improvement, they may be included by reference and need not be restated in relation to a particular plan. B. Plans and information on hauling operations associated with the excavation of stormwater management facilities 38 39 40 In addition to information required under the provisions of the subdivision regulations (appendix B), where sand, gravel, topsoil, fill or other excavated material from the excavation of a 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 stormwater management facility will be hauled offsite, th~ following information shall be submitted to the planning director: (1) The names and addresses of all haulers; (2) If the address agent; (3) 1'4) (5) (6) hauler is a corporation, the name and of its corporate offices and registered The proposed date on which the haulinq operatio~ will commence and the proposed date on which the operation will be completed; The total number of cubic yards of material to be hauled; The number, type, carrying capacity, and weight of vehicles to be used in the hauling operation on a daily basis;,, The location of all haul roads leading to public streets and highways within the haulinq area;, (7) A statement listing the public streets to be used as haul routes to access an arterial or major street or hi~hwav; . (8) A statement of the methods to be used to maintain (9) or repair any public street or hiqhway to be used for haulinq purposes;_ The location of the on-site haul road, the point at which the haul road intersects the public riqht-of- way, the nearest street intersections in all directions leaving the excavation site and all existing and proposed entrances on both sides of the public street within 500 feet of the proposed entrance; (10) A detailed description of the on-site haul road and the entrance to the public right-of-way, including width, radii, composition of surface material and lenqth of improved surface; 74 75 76 77 78 79 8O 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 (11) Erosion and sediment control measures to be employed at the haul road entrance and all access points; (12) The method by which dirt and dust will be controlled on the public streets and in the air; (13) A traffic maintenance/control plan, including, but not limited to, sign type, size, color, lettering size and locations;. (14) Location and description of public structures and improvements immediately adjacent to and under the haul road entrance; and (15) A description or plan of all proposed improvements to mitigate the traffic impacts associated with the hauling activity including, but not limited to, turn lanes, signalization, striping and other traffic control measures. The planning director or his desiqnee shall determine the acceptability of the hauling methods and routes and may disapprove a subdivision plat if: (1) Under accepted engineering standards, it is determined that the public streets and highways to be used in the proposed hauling route cannot sustain the weight or frequency of the hauling vehicles without substantial damage thereto; or (2) The proposed hauling operation would render the streets and highways affected by the hauling unsafe for public travel; (3) The noise or dust generated by the hauling operation is of such character, intensity and duration as to be detrimental to the life or health of persons of reasonable sensitivity, or to disturb or annoy the quiet, comfort or repose of reasonable persons who reside in close proximity to the haulinq operation; or 3 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 (4) Any of the information required under this subsection is incomplete, incorrect or false. COMMENT Subsection B has been added to ensure that proposed hauling operations assoclated with the excavation of a stormwater management facility do not pose a traffic safety or public health or safety hazard. Hauling operations conducted from these facilities are generally short term in nature, frequency and duration, tlowever, this subsection will require that these operations be reviewed and evaluated. 7.8 Consideration and action by the planninq director or his desiqnee. In considerinq and actinq upon subdivision plats, the planninq director or his desiqnee shall take into consideration the public health, safety and welfare, the comfort and convenience of the public in qeneral and of the immediate neiqhborhood in particular, and may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards as may be required in order that the result of the action may, to the maximum extent possible, further the expressed interest of the subdivision regulations and all city ordinances. COMMENT The addition of this subsection expressly provides that the public health, safety, and welfare must be taken into consideration in the review, evaluation, and approval of proposed subdivision. 129 Adopted by the City Council of the city of Virginia Beach on 130 this day of 1996. 131 132 CA-6314 DATA/ORDIN/NONCODE/47-7-1.COM MAY 29,1996 R4 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT De~rtment of Planning APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY Department of Law 4 - 32 - ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM # 40891 CONSENT AGENDA Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms, City Council ADOPTED: Ordinance to authorize the City Manager to execute a Lease Agreement with James M. and Denise M. Bordeau for a portion of City Pump Station Site #534 on Dryden Street re extension of their rear yard (KEMPSVILLE BOROUGH). Voting: 11-0 (By ConsenO Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert IC Dean, William W.. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy K. Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None J~tne 11, 1996 1 2 3 4 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH JAMES M. AND DENISE M. BORDEAU FOR A PORTION OF CITY PUMP STATION SITE #534 ON DRYDEN STREET 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach is the owner of Pump Station Site #534 on Dryden Street in the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia; WHEREAS, adjacent property owners James M. Bordeau and Denise M. Bordeau, husband and wife, wish to lease a portion of this pump station site from the City in order to landscape it as an extension of their rear yard to their residence; and WHEREAS, lease of such property to the Bordeaus will save the City the cost of maintaining that portion of Pump Station #534 for one year and possibly for up to an additional four more years; WHEREAS, the Department of Public Works, Real Estate Division recommends that the City lease approximately one thousand (1,000) square feet of this pump station site to James M. Bordeau and Denise M. Bordeau for the purposes referenced above in accordance with the terms stated in the attached proposed lease between the City and the Bordeaus. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute a lease agreement in a form substantially the same as the attached lease agreement between the City of Virginia Beach and James M. Bordeau and Denise M. Bordeau regarding property at Pump Station #534 on Dryden Avenue. Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the llday of June 1996 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 CA- ORDIN\NONCODE\Bordeau. ORD R-1 05/02/96 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: ~AL ESTATE DIVISION, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 38 39 40 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY ~Y ATTORNEY ' S OFFICE 148G-3; FlO4ff281(OfJ2~OffO~! ·HIS AGREEMENT, made this / 7 ~day of A/~/L , 1996, by and between the CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH (GRANTOR/LESSOR), a municipal corporation of the Commonwealth of Virginia, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" or "Lessor," party of the first part, and JAMES M. BORDEAU AND DENISE M. BORDEAU (GRANTEE/LESSEE), hereinafter referred to as "Lessee," party of the second part. W I TN E S S ~TH 1. LEASED PREMISES. That for and in consideration of the rents, covenants and agreements hereinafter reserved and contained on the part of the Lessee to be observed and performed, CITY leases to Lessee and Lessee rents from CITY the following property delineated in red upon the attached plat labelled "Exhibit A" entitled "LEASING EXHIBIT "A" APPROXIMATELY 1000 SQUARE FEET OF CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH PUMP STATION PROPERTY (P.S. #534)," and denoted as "HATCHED AREA DENOTES AREA OF LEASE APPROX. 1000 SQUARE FEET" (hereinafter the "Property"), reference being made to said survey for a more accurate description thereof. 2. RENT. That for and in consideration of the sum of $250.00 per year, payable on or before the first day of May of each year the Lease is in effect, the CITY does hereby lease and demise unto Lessee the Property. 3. TERM. The term of this Agreement shall be for one year from May 1, 1996, to April 30, 1997. This lease may be renewed for four (4) successive one-year terms at the City's sole discretion, based on the following conditions and stipulations: A. The Lessee must request, in writing, a renewal not later than January 31 before the lease shall expire; and B. Lessee must be in compliance with all terms and conditions of the original lease; and C. The rental amount is subject to negotiation for each year's renewal; and D. All other terms and conditions of the original lease shall remain in force for each renewal term, at the City's sole discretion. 4. USE OF PROPERTY - ADDITIONAL YARD SPACE. Lessee covenants that the Property shall be used solely for expanded rear yard space for their residence located at 3603 Dryden Court. No permanent structures (except fencing) of any nature may be constructed on the Property without first obtaining approval, in writing, from the CITY. Landscaping may be planted by the Lessee, but will thereupon become the property of the CITY. If the property is permitted to deteriorate, this lease may be terminated on thirty (30) days' notice by CITY. Lessee shall use the Property only for the purposes listed herein and any other use thereof unless necessarily incidental to such listed and allowed uses shall constitute a breach of the Agreement and cause its immediate termination. The Property is leased 'by CITY to Lessee "as is," and the sole responsibility for the maintenance and upkeep of the Property shall be with the Lessee. 5. ASSIGNMENT AND SUB-LEASE. This lease may not be assigned or transferred, and the Property shall not be sublet, either in whole or in part, by Lessee without the CITY's prior written consent. 6. TERMINATION AND RIGHT OF ENTRY BY CITY. A. Lessee shall not be entitled to renew this Agreement in the event Lessee is in default in the performance of any of the covenants, terms or conditions of this Agreement. B. The CITY reserves the right at any time without prior written notice to enter upon the Property. C. The parties acknowledge that the CITY has certain powers, purposes and responsibilities. To discharge its powers, purposes or responsibilities, the CITY shall have the right to require Lessee to immediately dismantle and remove any and all improvements from the Property, within four hours after notice is given to Lessee. Then the CITY shall have the exclusive right to use the Property , and Lessee shall surrender possession and control to the CITY. D. Further, the CITY reserves the right to terminate this lease by giving written notice to Lessee ninety (90) days in advance. Any rent paid in advance by Lessee shall be returned by the CITY in an amount prorated according to the actual period of occupancy. E. Should it become necessary for CITY to enter upon the Property in accordance with paragraph 6.C of this Agreement, and if such action causes damage to, or loss of, any of the Lessee's property, CITY agrees to pay to Lessee a mutually agreed upon sum to cover Lessee's loss provided that such sum shall not exceed the annual rental amount. Lessee must submit a written claim to the CITY within sixty (60) days of the date on which damage was sustained. 7. Lessee will keep all improvements placed upon the Property in a safe, clean, and orderly condition; be responsible for all activities on the Property; and will act immediately in response to any notices by the CITY with reference to the foregoing. It is further understood and agreed as part of the consideration hereof, that Lessee shall be responsible for the maintenance and/or repair of the Property arising out of Lessee's use of the Property. Should any maintenance and/or repair work be required during the term of this Agreement and any determination of Lessee's liability for said maintenance and/or repair work be deemed necessary, then the decision of the CITY as to the scope of the required work and the amount of such liability shall control and be binding on Lessee. Upon termination, Lessee shall promptly restore the property to approximately the same condition existing prior to its occupancy to include, but not limited to, removing any fence owned by the Lessee on City property. Any other landscaping improvements, at the option of the City, become the property of the City upon termination of this lease. 4 8. CITY'S RIGHT ~O GRA~T ~~S. CITY reserves the right to grant easements and rights of way across or upon the leased Property, for streets, alleys, public highways, drainage, utilities, telephone and telegraph transmissions lines, pipelines, irrigation canals, and similar purposes. 9. INDEMNIFICATION/INSURANCE BY I~SSEE. Lessee shall indemnify and save harmless the CITY and all its employees from and against all losses and expenses incurred because of claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, recoveries, and judgements of every nature and description brought or recovered against them by reason of any injuries to property or person, including death, occurring on the Property or arising out of Lessee's use of the Property. During the term of the lease, Lessee shall obtain and keep in force Ail Risk Property Insurance and General Liability Insurance or such insurance as is deemed necessary by the CITY, and all insurance policies shall name the CITY as additional named insured or loss payee, as applicable. Lessee agrees to carry Comprehensive General Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000.00, combined single limits of such insurance policy or policies. Lessee shall provide endorsements providing at least thirty (30) days' written notice to the CITY prior to the cancellation or termination of, or material change to, any of the insurance policies. It is the intent of this Agreement that Lessee shall assume all responsibilities and liabilities, vested or contingent, with relation to the Property. 5 10. APPLICABLE LAW. This Agreement shall be deemed to be a Virginia Agreement and shall be governed as to all matters whether of validity, interpretations, obligations, performance or otherwise exclusively by the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and all questions arising with respect thereto shall be determined in accordance with such laws. Regardless of where actually delivered and accepted, this Agreement shall be deemed to have been delivered and accepted by the parties in the Commonwealth of Virginia. ENVIRONMENTAL. Any costs associated with violations of the law including, but not limited to, remediations, clean up costs, fines, administrative or civil penalties or charges, and third party claims imposed on the City by any regulatory agency or by any third party as a result of the noncompliance with Federal, state or local environmental laws and regulations or nuisance statutes by the LESSEE or by their invitees or guests, or any persons, corporations or legal entities retained by the LESSEE for work on Lessee's property and/or the property which is the subject of this Lease, shall be paid by the LESSEE. COMPLIANCE WITH AT~.LAWS. Lessee shall comply with all laws, rules and regulations of CITY and all other governmental authorities respecting the use, operation and activities on the Property, and shall not make, suffer or permit any unlawful, improper or offensive use of such premises or permit any nuisance thereon. 6 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 City Manager is authorized to advance the federal portion of a reduced plan for initial construction of the Project from Rudee Inlet to 8th Street in an amount not to exceed $3,705,000 to avoid delay of the Project. Such amount is in addition to the City's share of the initial construction costs currently estimated and not to exceed $4,795,000. The city Manager is also directed, pursuant to the terms of the PCA, to seek reimbursement for any sum expended in excess of the City's share of construction funds. Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, 11 3une Virginia, on the day of , 1996. 49 5O 51 52 53 54 55 CA-6350 ORDIN\NONCODE\ARMYCORP.ORD R-2 06/05/96 BEACH MAN~MENT DIVISION/PW 56 57 58 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY C ~T~i~ ~%TTOR~-~ Y ' ~"'O~F~E ~ 2 ~ 1~:0~ F.t][ ~027610464 E~USACE CEC; A ~* CECW-.~R SECO~ DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ol~c~ OF 'n~ A~ ~ WoR~ .~aY .22, 1996 Pn~-~ORARDUM FOR TH~ CHZ~.F, POLICY REVI~.W ~ ~YSIS DZVZSION S~CT~ ProJec~ coopera~iou Agre~ent for Const~ctlon of the Bea~ Eros/oH Control ~d H~ric~e ~ro~eotion Project at Vi~gi~a Bea~, Virginia [x] The s~bJeot draft agr~meat is approved, ms modified on' the enclosure. Encl Subject ft~anciug plan is approved. ~xecution authority delegated t~ DiStrict Commander. .~ENI DY:~ENAO ; b-29-~§ ; 14:01 ;NO~tOLK D1~1~I0'I GOE~ 004 426 570~;~ ~ PKOJECT COOPERATION THE DEPARTMENT OF THE AND CITY OF VIROINIA BEACR~ 'VIRGINIA FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE BEACH EROSION CONTRO~ AND HURRICANE PROTECTION PRO~ECT AT VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA (As of 29 May 1996~ THIS AGREEMENT iS entered into =his ._ day of . . by and between the DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY (hereinafter'the , 199_, "Government.), represen=ed by the Distric~ Engineer, U. S. Army Engineer District, Norfolk, and the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia (hereinafter the 'Non-Federal Sponsor.), represented by the City Manager. WITNESSETH, THAT~ WHEREAS, construction of the Beach Erosion Control and Hurricane Protection Project'between Rudee Inle~ and!89th Street in Virginia Beach, Virginia, was au=horized by the Water'Resources Development Act of 1986, approved November 17, 1986, i Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress and subsequently modified by the Water Resources Development Ac= of 1992, approved october 31, 1992, Public Law 102-580, 102d Congress; WHEREAS, the Oovernment and the Non-Federal Spohsor desire to enter in~o a Project Cooperation Agreement for construction 'of the Beach Erosion Control and Hurricane Protection ProjeCt at Virginia Beach, Virginia (hereinafter, the 'Project" and defined in ArtiCle I.A. of this Agreement); WHEREAS, Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, as amended, specifies th~ cost-sharing requirements applicable to the Project; WHEREAS, Section 102 (cc) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, Public Law 102-580, contains specific wording regarding the Project; WHEREAS, Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611, as amended, and Section 103 of the WateriResources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, as amended, Dro~ide that the Secretary of the Army shall not commence construction of any water resources project, or separable element thereof, until each non-Federal sponsor has entered into a written agreement to furnish its required cooperation for the project or Separable element: new storm water drainage system, providing for underground pumped ocean discharge, will also be constructed. C. The term "periodic nourishment' shall mean the placement, after the end of the period of initial cons~ruction, of suitable beach fill material within the area of the initial construction. Periodic nourishment shall occur in distinct iterat~ions currently estimated at once every 3.years on the aver~gei and ~shall.be s'uP~lemented, as needed, ~n order to maintain the integrity of the project over its 50-year economiclife. ' D. The term "total project costs, shall mean a~l costs incurred by the Non-Federal Sponsor and the aowernme~t in accordance with the terms of this Agreement dtrectlylrelated to initial construction and periodic nourishment of the:Project. Subject to the provisions of this Agreement, the ter~ shall include, but is not necessarily limited to..= continuing planning and engineering costs incurred after October 1, 198.5; advanced engineering and design costs; preconstruction engine~ring and design costs; engineering and design costs during construction; the costs of lnyestigations to identify the existenc9 and extent of hazardous substances in accordance with Article XV.A. of this Agreement; costs of historic preservation activitiesiin accordance with Article XVIII.A, of this Agreement; actual construction costs, including the costs of alteration, lowering, raising, or'" replacement and attendant removal of existing.railro9d bridges and approaches thereto; supervision and administration c~sts; costs of participation in the Project Coordination Team in accordance with Article V of this Agreement; costs of contract dispute settlements or awards; the value of lands, easements, rights-of-~ay, relocations, and suitable borrow and dredged or excavated material disposal areas for which the Government affords credit in accordance with Article IV of this Agreement; and co, ts of audit in accordance with Article X of this Agreement. The~term does not include any costs for operation, maintenance, reDair~ replacement, or rehabilitation; any costs due to betterments; or ~ny costs of dispute resolution under Article VII of this Agreement. E. The term "total costs of initial constructiSn" shall mean that portion of total project costs allocated by the;Government to initial construction. F. The term "total costs of periodic nourishment, shall mean that portion of total project costs allocated by theiGovernment to periodic nourishment. G. The term 'financial obligation for initial ~onstruction" shall mean a financial obligation of the Government, ~other than an obligation pertaining to the provision of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and borrow and dredged or excavated material disposal areas, that results or would result in a cost that is or would be included in total costs of initial construction. H. The term 'financial obligation for ~eriodic: nourishment' shall mean a financial obligation of the Government, lother than an obligation pertaining to the provision of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and borrow and d~edged or excavated material disposal areas, that results or woul~iresult in a cost that is or would be included in total costs of periodic nourishment. I. The term 'non-Federal proportionate Share" With respe=~ to initial construction, shall mean the ratio of the~Non-Federal SPonsor's total cash contribution required in.accordance with Articles II.D.2. of this Agreement to total financial obligations for initial construction, as projected by the Goverr~ent. The term shall mean, with respect to periodic nourishmen~, the ratio of the Non-Federal Sponsor's total cash contributionirequired in accordance with Article II.G.2. of this Agreement to.total financial obligations for periodic nourishment, as projected by the Government. J. The term *period of initial construction. shall mean the time from the date the Government first notifies the~ ~Non-Federal Sponsor in writing, in accordance with Article VI.B.;of this Agreement, of the scheduled date for issuance of theisolicitation for the first contract for initial cons~ruction to t~e date that th? u.s. Army Engineer for the Norfolk District (her"inaft-~ "Dlstrict Engineer') notifies the Non-Federal Sponso~ 9f ~n~ ~0v~rnment,s determination that initial construction of the mro]ect is complete. K. The term "authorized periodic nourishment period" 'shall' mean the authorized duration for Federal participation in periodic nourishment for a period of 50 years from the commencement of period of initial construction of the beach berm feature of the Project. L. The term "highway' shall mean any public highway, roadway, street, or way, including any bridge thereof. e . M! Th? t~.~?. "r~lo~tion" she½1 mean. pr~viding ~ functionally qulvalen~ zac~zcy co cae ~.w~.er o! an exxst~n~ utilSty, ce~et?y, highway or other public fac~lxty, or railroad (exclu4ing ex~st~ng railroad bridges and approaches thereto) when such a~tion is authorize~ in accordance w~th app½icab%e lefal princ%ples of just compensation or as otherwise provided ~n the authori~ing legislation for the Project or any report referenceditherein. Providing a functionally equivalent facility may tak~ the form of alteration, lowerinf~ raising, or replacement and &t~endant removal of the affected facility or part thereof. N. The term "fiscal year. shall mean one fiscal year of the ~overnmenc. The C~vernment fiscal year begins on October i and ends on September 30. bl:Nl DY;Gt-NAU WHEREAS, Section 902 of Public Law 99-662 establishes the maximum amount of costs for the Beach Erosion'Control and Hurricane Protection Project at virginia Beach, Virginia and sets forth procedures for adjusting such maximum'amount; and WH~R:ff3~8, the Government and Non-Federal~ SDonso~have the full authority and capability to perform as hereinafter s~t forth and intend to cooperate in ~ost-sharing and fln?noing ofl the construction of the Pro]eot in accordance w~th the t~rms of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the Government and the Non-Federal Sponsor agree as follows: ARTICLE I - DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS For purposes of this Agreement~ " _ A. The ~rm "Pro]ect" shall mean initial const orion and periodic nourishment as generally described in the Phase I, General Design Memorandum, dated June 1984, the Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated 22 May 1985, and the Phase'II, General Design Memorandum, dated January 1989, and as generally described in and as modified by the General Reevaluation Report, dated June 1994, (hereafter, the "General Reevaluation Keport") and approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) on July 15 1994. ' B. The tez~ "initial construction" shall mean the provision of a seawall and bOardwalk, enhanced dune system, be$ch berm, storm water drainage, and beach access structures along the City of Virginia Beach oceanfront from Rudee Inlet to the;property line at 89th Street of the u. S. Military Reservation at Fort Story, as generally described in the General Reevaluation Report. The seawall, which will be constructed seaward of the existing bulkhead and extend from Rudee Inlet to 58th S~reet, lwill be of a vertical steel sheet-pile design with a top elevation of 13.5 feet, National Geodetic Vertical Datum (hereinafter,!"NGS, D"). The boardwalk will extend from Rudee Inlet ~o 40~h Stree~ and will '" generally be constructed over the ex~st~ng bulkhead and boardwalk. It will be wider than the existin~ boardwalk'and hay9 a top elevation coincident with the top of the seawall, thereby eliminating the need for closures. Dune enhancement:will be accomplished with the placement of suitable fill material as required in those areas between 58th. Street and 89th.Street to form, where it does not exist at the time of placement, a dune with a minimum crest width of 25 feet and a maximum ~rest elevation of 18.0 feet, N~VD. Both the seawall and ~nhanced dune will be fronted by a beach berm which will be constr~cted of suitable fill material and have a tod elevation of 9~0 feet, NG"FD, a minimum top width of 100 feet, and a lV~20H foreshpre slope. Beach access facilities and dune walkover structures will be constructed at appropriate locations along the entire length of the project to provide ingress to and egress from the beach. A It is expressly understood and agreed that all activities on the Property are solely that of the Lessee and Lessee, in no way, represents or acts on behalf of the CITY or any department thereof. VENUE. Any and all suits for any claims or for any and every breach or dispute arising out of this Agreement shall be maintained in the appropriate court of competent jurisdiction in the City of Virginia Beach. 11. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. With respect to the Property, Lessee shall comply with all federal, state and local statutes, ordinances and regulations now in effect or hereafter adopted. 12. If any section, paragraph, subparagraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Agreement shall be declared or judged invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the other sections, paragraphs, subparagraphs, sentences , clauses or phrases. 13. NOTICES. Any notice which may be or is required to be given pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement shall be delivered or sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, and addressed as follows: If to lessee, to: Mr. and Mrs. James M. Bordeau 3603 Dryden Court Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462 If to CITY, to: city Real Estate Agent Operations Building, Room 170 Municipal Complex Virginia Beach, Virginia 23456 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have each caused this Agreement to be executed by their proper representatives as of the day and year first above written. (SEAL) ATTEST: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH BY. City Manager/Authorized Designee of the City Manager Ruth Hodges Smith City Clerk M. Bordeau Denise M. Bordeau APPROVED AS TO CONTJ~NT ,,,, / $1GNAi'IJ~,J DEPARTMENT APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUF~F!CiENCY 8 STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, to-wit: I, , a notary public in and for the city and state aforesaid, do hereby certify that , CITY MANAGER/AUTHORIZED DESIGNEE OF THE CITY MANAGER, whose name as such is signed to the foregoing writing, bearing date the /?~ day of ~f~/~ , 1996, has acknowledged the same before me in my city and state aforesaid. Given under my hand this day of , 1996. My Commission Expires: Notary Public STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, to-wit: I, , a notary public in and for the city and state aforesaid, do hereby certify that RUTH HODGES SMITH, City Clerk, whose name as such is signed to the foregoing writing, bearing date the / ~t~ day of /~/u~j~_ , 1996, has acknowledged the same before me in my city and state aforesaid. Given under my hand this day of , 1996. My Commission Expires: Notary Public STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,to wit: I, /~/~/L ~. ~W~A-~ , a Notary Public in and for the City and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that JAMES M. BORDEAU AND DENISE M. BORDEAU, Lessee, whose names are signed to the foregoing writing, bearing date the / ~ day of , 1996, have acknowledged the same before me in my City and State aforesaid. Given under my hand this / ~ day of //;w~/L 1996. My Commission Expires: Notary Public 10 1' HILL. IBKW¥.~APPI~O~.,.lC)O' S. (Ilf' LEASING EXH~BIT APPROXI~TELY 1000 SQU~E FEET OF CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH PU~P STATION PROPERTY (P.S. ~534) ORDINANCES/RESOL UTIONS ITEM # 40892 CONSENT AGENDA Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms, City Council ADOPTED: Ordinance to authorize the City Manager to execute a Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) with the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District, for the Erosion Control and Hurricane Protection Project re construction and maintenance from Rudee Inlet to Eight Street, not to exceed $3,705,000 (PTRGINIA BEACH BOROUGH). Voting: 11-0 (By ConsenO Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert K. Dean, William W. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy I~ Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessorns, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None Jt~ne 11, 1996 1 2 3 4 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A PROJECT COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH THE UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND THE INCURRENCE OF RELATED OBLIGATIONS 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 3O 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach has previously authorized, by Resolution adopted on January 2, 1996, the negotiation of a Project Cooperation Agreement (the "PCA") with the United States Department of the Army in order to undertake the Beach Erosion Control and Hurricane Protection Project (the "Project") at Virginia Beach, Virginia, as developed by the U. S. Army Engineer District, Norfolk; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City has included funds in the FY 1996-97/2001-02 Capital Improvement Program for the Project, CIP 9-704; and WHEREAS, the form of the Project Cooperation Agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney and found to be legally sufficient; and WHEREAS, the Project Cooperation Agreement obligates the City to make certain contributions for construction of the Project, now estimated to be $36,541,703 for the fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998 and 1999 and further obligates the City to make future payments for beach nourishment services to be provided by the Corps in the future, now estimated to be $96,500,000 over the 50-year life of the Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to ensure that initial construction of the Project begin in October 1996, as scheduled. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: 1. The terms and conditions of the (PCA) between the Department of the Army and the City of Virginia Beach, dated as of 29 May 1996, are hereby approved; 2. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the PCA, with such completions, omissions, insertions and changes as may be necessary, and which are not inconsistent or substantively different from the PCA approved herein; and 3. In the event a full federal appropriation for this Project is not authorized for the federal fiscal year of 1997, the D. The Non-Federal Sponsor shall contribute 35 percent of the total costs of initial construction assigned by the Goverr~ent to hurricane and storm damage reduction plus 100 percent of the tots! costs of initial construction assigned by the oovernmen~ to privately owned shores where use of such shores is limited ko private interests {hereinafter the "non-Federal share of initial construction"), in accordance with the provisions of. this paragraph. 1. In accordance with Article III of Chis Agreement, the Non-Federal Sponsor shall provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable borrow and dredged or excavated material disposal areas thaC the Government determines the Non- Federal Sponsor must provide for the initial construction, operation, and maintenance of the Pro~ect, and shalliperform or ensure Performance of all relocations that the Oovernment determines to be necessary for the ini~iaI construction, operation, and maintenance of the Pro]etc. 2. If the Government ~roJecCs. that the Yalue of the NOn-Federal Sponsor's contributions under Paragraph D.1. of this Article and the Non-Federal Sponsor,s contributions attrib,.table Co initial construction under Articles V, X, and XV.A. of this Agreement will be less than che Non-Federal share of~ini~ial construction, the Non-Federal Sponsor shall ~rovide a cash contribution, in accordance with Article VI.B. of Chis Agreement, in the amount necessary ~o make the Non-Federal Spon~or,s total contribution equal to the non-Federal share of initial construction. ~ 3. If the OovernmenC determines thaC the value of ~he Non-Federal Sponsor's contributions provided under paragraphs D.1. and D.2. of this Article and the Non-Federal Sponsorle con~ributions attributable to initial construction u~der Articles V, X, and XV.A. of this Agreement has exceeded ~he Non-Federal share o~ initial construction, the Government, subject to the availability of funds, shall reimburse ~he Non-Federal Sponsor for any such value in excess of the non-Federal share of;initial construction. After such a determination,, the ~overm"ent, in its sole discretion may provide any remaining Project la~ds, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable borrow and dredged or excavated material disposal areas and perform an~v re~aining Pro~ect relocations on behalf of the Non-~ederal Sponsor. E. The Non-Federal Sponsor may request the Government to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, ~nd suitabl~ borrow and dredged or excavated material disposal areas or perform relocations on behalf of the Non-Federal Sponsor during the period of initial construction. Such requests shall be in writing and shall describe the services requested to be performe~. If in its sole discretion the Government elects to perform the'requested services or any portion thereof, it shall ~O notify ~e NO~- Federal Sponsor in a writing that sets forth any applicable terms and conditions, which must be consistent with this Agreement. In the event of conflict between such a writing and this Agreement, chis Agreement shall control. The Non-Federal Sponsor shall be solely responsible for al% costs of the requested services and shall pay all such costs an accordan~e.with Article VI.C. of this AgreementI Notwithstanding the provasaon of lands, 9asements, rights o~ way, and suitable borrow and dredged or ex, ava=ed oaterial disposal areas or performance of relOcationS by the vernment, the Non-Federal Sponsor shall be' responsible, as between the Government and the Non-Federal Sponsor, For the co,ts of cleanup and response in accordance w~th Article X"7.C. of th~s Agreement. F. The Government shall perform a final accoun$ing in accordance with Article VI.D. of this Agreement =o d~termine the contributions provided by the Non-Federal SPonsor in. accordance with paragraphs B., D., and E. of this Article and Articles. V, X, and KV.A. of this Agreement and to determine whether the Non- Federal Sponsor has met its obligations under paragraphs B., D. and E. of this Article. O. For each iteration of periodic nourishment!, the Non- Federal Sponsor shall contribute 35 percent of the total costs of periodic nourishment assigned by the Government to h~rricane and storm damage reduction plus 100 percent of the total'costs of periodic nourishment assigned by =he Government to privately owned shores where use of such shores is limited to private interests (hereinafter the "non-Federal share of periodic nourishment.) in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph. . 1. In accordance withArticle III of th~s Agreement, the Non-Federal Sponsor shall provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable borrow and dredged or excavated material disposal areas that the Oovernment determines the Non- Federal Sponsor must provide for the iteration of periodic nourishment, and shall perform or ensure performanceof all relocations that the ~overnment determines to be necessary for the iteration of periodic nourishment. 2. If the Government projects that the value of Non-Federal Sponsor's contrib~tions under paragraph G.1. of this Article and the Non-Federal Sponsor's contributions ~ttributable to periodic nourishment under Articles V, X, and XV.A. of this Agreement, will be less than the non-Federal shares Of periodic nourishment, the Non-Federal Sponsor shall provide an additional cash contribution, in accordance with Article VI.B2 Of this Agreement, in the amount necessary to make the Non F~deral Sponsor's total contribution equal to the non-Federa~ shares of periodicnourishment. 3. If the 8overnment determines that the: value of the Non-Federal Sponsor's contributions provided under p$ra. graphs O.1. and G.2. of this Article and the Non-Federal Sponsor!e contributions attributable to periodic nourishment under Articles v, X, and XV.A. of this Agreement, has exceeded the non-Federal shares of periodic nourishment, the Oovernment, subject to the availability of funds, shall reimburse the Non-Federal Sponsor for work is performed under contract or by (]ove~ru~ent shall be exclusively within the control of the Goverl 2. Throughout.the period of construction Engineer shall furnish the Non-Federal Sponsor.with ~overnment,s Written Notice of Acceptance of Complet each contract for the Project. 3. Notwithstanding paragraph A.1. of this: :sonnel), %ment. the District copy of the ~d Work for Article, if, upon the award of any contract cumulative financial Obligations for in~tial construction would exceed $102,82§,000, Or cumulative financial obligations for periodic nourishment would'exceed $277,175,000, the Government and the Non-Federal Sponsor agree to defer award of that contract and all subsequent contracts until such time as the aovernment and the Non-Federal SponSor agree to proceed with further contract awards for the Project} but in no event shall the award of contracts be deferred for more than three years. Notwithstanding this general provision for d~ferral of contract awards, the Government, after consultation With the Non- Federal Sponsor, may award a contract or contracts after the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) makes a written determination that the award of such contract or contracts must proceed in order to comply with law or to protect .llfe or property from imminent and substantial harm. B. The Non-Federal Sponsor may request the Government to accomplish betterments. Such requests shall be in w~iting and shall describe the betterments requested to be accomplished. If the Government in its sole discretion elects to acco~plish the requested betterments or any portion thereof, it shall so notify the Non- Federal Sponsor in a writing that sets forth any applicable terms and conditions, which must be consi~tent with this Agreement. In the event of conflict between such a writing and this Agreement, this Agreement shall con~rol. The Non-Federal Sponsor shall be solely responsible for all costs due to the requested betterments and shall pay all such costs i~ accordance with Article VI.C. of this Agreement. ' C. When the District Engineer determines that the entire Project is complete Or that a portion of the ProJectlhas become a functional portion of the Project, the District Engineer shall so notify the Non-Federal Sponsor in writing and furnis~ the Non- Federal Sponsor with an Operation, Maintenance, Repair, Replacement, and Rehabilitation Manual (hereinafter the 'OMRR&R Manual') and wi~h copies of all of the Government's Written Notices of Acceptance of Completed Work for all contracts for the Project or the functional portion of the Project ~hat have not been provided previously. Upon such notification, t~e Non-Federal Sponsor shall operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the entire Project, with the exception of periodic nourishment, or the functional portion of the Project in accordance With Article VIII of this Agreement. .51-NI DY:~I-NAO ; b-2~-B§ ; 14:04 ;NOF~POLK D!511~,I,~I~(~OE-* 004 ¢25 570~;~ { O. The term 'functional portion of the Project.' shall mean a portion of the Project that is suitable for tender tO the Non- F~deral Sponsor to operate and main=sin in advance o~ completion o~ the entire Project. Fo~ a portion of the Project,to be suitable for tender, the D~strict Engineer mu~ n°ti~y the Non- Federal Sponsor in writing of the ~overnment's determination that the portion of the Project is complete and can 'function independently and for a useful purpose, although theibalance of the Project is not complete. P. The term 'b~=terment' shall mean a change i~ ~he design and construction of an element of ~he ProJec~ resulting from the applica=ion of standards that the Governmen~ determi~es exceed those that the ~overnment would o=herwise apply for accomplishing the design and construction of that element, i ' ARTICLE II - OBLIGATIONS OF THE GOVERNMENT.AND TH~ NON-FEDERAL SPONSOR ' A. The Government, subject to receiving.funds ~pproprla~ed by ~he Congress of the United States (hereinafter, the 'Congress') and using those funds and funds provided by the Non-~ederal Sponsor, shall expeditiously construct the Project (~ncluding alteration, l?we~lng, raising, or replacemen~ and attendant removal of exzst~ng railroad bridges and approaches thereto and including periodic nourishment at such times during ~he authorized periodic nourishment period as the Government, afterl cormulta~ion with the Non-Federal Sponsor, determines such placement to be necessary and economically justified), applying those procedures usually applied to Federal projects, pursuant to Federal laws, regulations, and policies. 1. The Government shall afford the Non-F~deral Sponsor the opportunity ~o review and commen~ on the solicitations for all contracts, including relevant plans and speclficatio~s, prior to the Government's issuance of such solicitations. Th~ ~overnment shall not issue the solicitation for the first construction contrac~ until the Non-Federal Sponsor has confirmedi in writing" its willingness to proceed with the Project. To thelextent possible, the Government shall afford the Non-Federa~ Sponsor the opportunity to review and comment on all contract modifications, including change orders, prior to the issuance to th~ contractor a No ice to roceed. ,I9 instance where .on- Federal Sponsor with not~faca=~on of a contract modification or change order is not possible prior to issuance of :h~ Notice to Proceed, the Government shall provide such no:ificat~on in writing at the earliest da:e possible. To the extent possible, the Government also shall afford the Non-Federal Sponsor: the opportunity to review and comment on all contrac: claims prior to resolu:ion thereof. The Government shall consider in good faith the comments of the Non-Federal Sponsor, but the conten~s of solicitations, award of contracts, execution of contract modifications, issuance of change orders, resolution of contract claims, and performance of all work on the Project (whether the any such value in excess of the non-Federal shares o nourishment. After such a determination, the Govern sole discretion, may provide any remainin~ periodic lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable borrow or excavated material diseosal areas and per,form any periodic nourishment relocations on behalf of'the No Sponsor. periodic ent, in its nourishment and dredged remaining ~-Federal H. The Non-Federal Sponsor may request the Gcvernment to accom~lish betterments during the authorized periodic nourishment period. Such requests shall be in writing and shalll describe the betterments requested to be accomplished. If the GoVernment in its sole discretion elects to accomplish the requested betterments or any portion thereof, it shall es n~tify the Non-Federal Sponsor in a writing tha~ sets forth any applicable ~erms an~ conditions, which must be consistent with ~his Agreemenc. In the event of conflict between such a writing and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control. The Non-Federal Sponsor shall be solely responsible for all costs due to the requested betterments and shall pay all such costs in accordance with Article VI.c. of this Agreement. I. The Non-Federal Sponsor may request the Goyernment ~o provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable borrow and dredged or excavated material disposal areas or perform relocations on behalf of the Non-Federal Sponsor during the authorized periodic nourishment period. Such requests shall be in writing and shall describe the services requested t.olbe performed. If in its sole discre~ion the Government elects to perform the requested services or any port,on thereof, it shall So notify the Non-Federal Sponsor in a writing that sets forth anylapplicable terms and condi~ions, which mus~ be consistent with ~his Agreement. In the even~ of conflict between such a Writing and this Agreement, this Agreement shall control. The NOn-Federal Sponsor shall be solely responsible for all coats oflthe requested services and shall pay all such costs in accordance ~ithArticle VI.C. of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the provision of lands, easements, r~ghts-of-way, and suitable borrow and dredged or excavated material disposal areas or performance of ~elocations by the Government, the Non-Federal Sponsor shall be responsible, as between the Government and the Non-Federal Sponsor, for the costs of cleanup and response in accordance with Article xv.c. of this Agreement. J. For each iteration of periodic nourishmentI, the "' Government shall perform a final accounting in accordance with Article VI.F. of this Agreement to determine the contributions provlded by the Non-Federal Sponsor toward the total:costs of periodic nourishment and costs due to betterments in.accordance with paragraphs G., H., and I. of this Article and t~e Non-Federal Sponsor's contributions attributable to periodic nourishment under Articles V, X, and XV.A. of this Agreement, and to d~termine whether the Non-Federal Sponsor has met its obligations under paragraphs G., H, and I. of this Article. K. In the event that the initial construction, or any functional portion of the initial construction, is c~mplete and the dune and beach berm portion of initial construction is damaged or destroyed by a storm or other natural forces, the~ government, subject to the availability of funds and Article II'.A. of this Agreement, shall place suitable beach and dune fill ~aterial within the area of the completed initial constructioh, or the functional portion of the initial construction, as periodic nourishment. The costs of such placement'shall be included in the total Costs of periodic nourishment and cost shared in accordance with Article II.G. of this Agreement. In the event ~n uncompleted dune and beach berm portion of the initial construction is damaged or destroyed by a storm or other natural forces, thei Government, subject ~o =he availability of funds, shall place suitable beach and dune fill material within the area of the uncompleted initial construction as initial construction. In the event an uncompleted portion of the initial construction, exclusive of th~ dune and beach ber~ portion of initial construction, is damaged or destroyed by a storm or o~her natural forces, the ~o~ernment, sub~ect to ~he availability of funds, shall repair and restore the damaged or destroyed portion of initial construct~onl, exclusive of the dune and beach berm portion of initial construction, as initial construction. The costs of the placement of. suitable beach and ~une fill material and repair and restoration shall be included in ~he to,al costs of initial construction ~nd cost shared in accordance with Article II.D. of this Agreement. Nothing in this paragraph shall relieve the Non-Federal Sponsor of its obligations under Article VIII of this Agreement!. Nothing in this paragraph shall preclude the Government from using Public Law 8~-99 tO accomplish any emergency repair and r.estora~lon work of the completed initial construction, or a functional portion of =he initial construction, L. The Government shall assign all costs included, or to be included in total project costs, including all cont:r~but~ons provided by the Non-Federal Sponsor, to hurricane ar[d storm damage reduction or privately owned shores where'use of such shores is limited to private interests. M. The Congress has appropriated $1,100,000 in Fiscal Year 1996 for the initial construction of the Project. The Government's present ability to participate in this ~roJect is limited to this amount. This amount is less than th~ Federal share of the estimated total project cost, and the Government makes no commitment to budget for the balance of such funds. In the event that the Congress does not provide additional appropriations, the Government will terminate constr~ction in a manner necessary to provide for the safety of the public and the integrity of the Project. Such termination shall be: accomplished within the amount of presently available funds, currmntly estimated to be $1,100,000. To provide for such an eventuality., up to 5% of available project funds (65% Federal and 35% Non- Federal) may be reserved as a contingency to pay the' cost of termination. In the event the congress provides additional appropriations for construction of this Project, the Government BEN1 §Y:OENAO ; 5-2~-B6 ; 14:08 ;NORPOLK Di~IRiCl tOE~ ~04 426 will undertake additional construction of the Project using the subsequently appropriated funds and any funds required from the Non-Federal Sponsor in accordance with ArtiCle II.C. hereof. N. The Non-Federal Sponsor shall not ~.e Federal funds meet the Non-Federal Sponsor's share of total projec~ costs under this Agreement unless the Federal granting agenCy verifies in writing that the expenditure of such funds iS'expresSly authorized o. The NOn-Federal Sponsor agrees to Partic~ip te in and comply with applicable Federal floodplain management: and flood insurance progranm. P. Not less than once each year the Non-Federal Sponsor shall inform affected interests of the extent of pro2ection afforded by the Project. Q. The Non-Federal Sponsor shall publicize floodplain information in the area concerned and shall provide ghis information to zoning and other regulatory agencieslfor their use in preventing unwise future development in the floo~ plain and in adopting such regulations as may be necessary.to prevent unwise future development and to ensure compatibility with protection levels provided by the Project. R. The Non-Federal Sponsor shall assure'conti~ued condltions of public ownership and use of the shore upon which ~he amount of Federal participation is based during the economic l~fe of the Project. s. The Non-Federal sponsor shall to the exten~ of its powers, prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent, obstruction of or encroachment on the Project that would reduce ~he level of protection it affords or that would hinder operatio~ or maintenance of the Project. ARTICLE III - LANDS, RELOCATIONS, DISPOSAL AREAS, AND PUBLIC LAW 91-646 COMPhIANCE ' A. The Government, after consultation with the Non-Federal Sponsor, shall determine the lands, easements, and ~ights-of-way required for the initial construction, periodic nourishment, operation, and maintenance of the Project, includin~ those required for relocations, borrow materials, and dredged or excavated material disposal. The Government in a timely manner shall provide the Non-Federal Sponsor with general Written descriptions, including maps as appropriate, of the :lands, easement.s, and rights-of-way that the Government det~rmines the Non-Federal Sponsor must provide, in detail.suffici .eht to enable the Non-Federal Sponsor to fulfill its obligations t~nder this paragraph, and shall provide the Non-Federal Sponsor' with a written notice to proceed with acquisition of such l~nds, easements, and rights-of-way. During the period of initial ~ENI BY:~NAO ; b-2~-98 ; 14;10 ;NOHt-OLK U181HI~I OOb* 804 construction, the Non-Federal Sponsor shall acquire, at the appropriate time, all lands, easements, and r~ghts-of-way required for the initial construction, operation and maintenance, and periodic nourishment, as'set forth in such de~criptl°ns. Furthermore, prior to issuance of the solici~ation for each contract for the initial construction or periodic nourishment, the Non-Feperal Sponsor shall provide the Government wit~ . author~zation for entry to all lands, easements, andlr~ghts-of-way the Government determines the Non-Federal Spoasor must provide for that contract. For so long as the Project remains apthorlzed, the Non-Federal Sponsor shall ensure that lands, easements, and rights-of-way that the ~overnment determines to be rmquired for the operation and maintenance, and periodic nourishment of the Project and that were provided by the Non-Federal SPPnsor are retained in public ownership for uses compatible with the authorized purposes of the Project. B. The Government, after consultation with the} Non-Federal Sponsor, shall determine the improvements required on lands'., easements, and rights-of-way to enable the proper diSpoSal of dredged or excavated material associated with the in~tlal construction, periodic nourishment, operation, and maintenance of the Project. such improvements may include, but arei not necessarily limited to, retaining dikes, wasteweirs,lbulkheads, embankments, monitoring features, stilling basins, and de-watering pumps and pipes. The Government in a timely manner shall provide the Non-Federal Sponsor with general written descrip~ions of such improvements in de:ail sufficient to enable the Non-Federal Sponsor to fulfill its obligations under this' paragraph, and shall provide the Non-Federal Sponsor with a written notice to proceed with construction of such improvements. During the Period of initial construction, the Non-Federal Sponsor shall provide,'at the appropriate time, all improvements required for the initial construction, operation and maintenance, and periodic nourishment of the Project, as set forth in such descriptions. Furthermore, prior to issuance of the solicitation for each Government construction contract for initial construction or periodic nourishment, the Non-Federal Sponsor shall prepare p~ans and specifications for all improvements the Government determines to be required for the proper disposal of dredged or excavated' material under that contract, submit such plans and ~peciflcatlons ~o the Government for approval, and provide such improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. C. The Government, after consultation with the Non-Federal Sponsor, shall de~ermine the relocations necessary for the initial construction, periodic nourishment, operation, and maintenance of the Project, including those necessary to enable the' removal of borrow materials and the proper disposal of dredged or excavated material. The Oovernment in a timely manner shall p~ovide the Non- Federal Sponsor with general written descriptions, including made as appropriate, of such relocations in detail suffic:ient to enable the Non-Federal sponsor to fulfill its obligations under chis paragraph, and shall provide the Non-Federal Sponsor with a written notice to proceed with such relocations. During the 'SENT §Y:OENAO ; 5-29-96 ; 14:11 ;NORFOLK DISTRICT OOE* 804 426 5783;#1~ period of initial construction, the Non-Federal Sponsor shall perform or ensure the performance of all relocations, at the appropFiate time~ necessary for the initial c°nstruc~ion, . operatlSn and maintenance, and periodic nourishment ~f the. Project as set forth in such descriptions. Furthermore, pri~ ~o.lssuance of the solicitation for each Government contr&ct for!andrea1 - construction or periodic nourishment, the Non-Federal Sponsor shall prepare or ensure the preparation of plans and, specifications for, and perform or ensure the performance of, all relocations the ~overnment determines to be necessary for that contract. ~ D. The Non-Federal Sponsor in a timely, manner ,shall provide the Government with SuCh documents as are sufficientl to enable the Government to determine the value of any contributio~ provided pursuant to paragraphs A.0 B.0 or C. of this Articlei. Upon receipt of such documents the Government, in accordahce with Article IV of this Agreement and in a timely manner,: shall de~ermine the value of such contribution, include such value in coca1 project costs, and afford credit for such valu~ toward the non-Federal share of initial construction or ~he non. Federal share of periodic nourishment. E. The NOn-Federal Sponsor shall comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and ~eal Property ACquisitiOn Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, as amended by Title IV of the Surface Transportation and uniform R~loCation Assistance Act of 1987 (Public Law 100-17}, and the Uniform .. Regulations contained in 49 C.F.R. Part 2~, in acqui~ng lands, easements, and righ~s-of-wa¥ required for the initia~ construction, periodic nourishment,.operation, and ma~intenance of the Project, including those necessary for relocaCio~s, borrow materials, and dredge~ or excavated material .disposa~, and shall inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, ~olicies, and procedures in connection with said AcC. ARTICLE IV - CREDIT FOR VALUE OF LANDS~ RELOCATIONS, AND DISPOSAL AREAS A. The Non-Federal Sponsor shall receive credi:t toward its share of total project costs for the value of the lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable borrow and dr~dged or excavated material disposal areas that the Non-Federal Sponsor must provide pursuant to Article III of this Agreement, and for the value of the relocations ~hat uhe Non-Federal Sponsor must perform or for which i~ must ensure performance pursuant to Article III of this Agreement. However, the Non-Federal Sponsor shall no~ receive credit for the value of any lands,, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, or borrow and dredged or excavated material disposal areas that have been provided previously as an item of cooperation for another Federal project. The Non-Federal Sponsor also shall not receive credit for the value 9f lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, or borrow and dredged or ~xcavated material disposal areas to the extent that such items are provided using Federal funds unless the Federal granting agency verifies in writing that such credit is expressly .authorized by statute. B. For the sole purpose of affording credit inl accordance with this Agreement, the value of lands, easements, and rights-of- way, including those necessary for relocationSl, borrow materials, and dredged or excavated material disposal, shall be~the fair market value of the real property interests, plus certain incidental costs of acquiring those interests, as determined in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph. ~ 1. Date of Valuation. The fair market v~lue of lands, easements, or rights-of-way owned by the Non-Federali S~onsor on the effective date of this Agreement shall be the fair market value of such real property interests as of the da:teethe Non- Federal Sponsor provides the Government with authorization for entry thereto. The fair market value of lands, easements, or rights-of-way acquired by the Non-Federal Sponsor after the effective date of this Agreement shall be the fair market value of such real property interests at the time the interests are acquired. 2. ~eneral Valuation Procedure. Except Rs provided in paragraph B.3. of this Article, the fair market value of lands, easements, or rights-of-way shall be determined in a~cordance with paragraph B.2.a. of this Article, unless thereafter a different amount is determined to represent fair market value in accordance with paragraph B.2.b. of this Article. a. The Non-Federal Sponsor shall obtain, for each real property interest, an appraisal that is prepared by a qualified appraiser who is acceptable to the Non-Federal Sponsor and the aovernment. The appraisal must be prepared ~n accordance with the applicable rules of Just compensation, as specified by- the Government. The fair market value shall be the amount set forth in the Non-Federal Sponsor's appraisal, if such appraisal is approved by the Government. In the event the aovernment does not approve the Non-Federal Sponsor's appraisal, the Non-Federal Sponsor may obtain a second appraisal, and the fair~arket value shall be the amount set forth in the Non-Federal sponsor's second appraisal, if such appraisal is approved by the Government. In the event the Government does not approve the Non-Federal Sponsor's second appraisal, or the Non-Federal Sponsor chooses not to obtain a second appraisal, the Government shall obtain an appraisal, and the fair market value shall be the amount set forth in the Government's appraisal, if such appraisal is approved by the Non-Federal Sponsor. In the event the Non-Federal Sponsor does not approve the Government's appraisal, the ~o~ernment, after consultation with the Non-Federal Sponsor, shall consider the Government's and the Non-Federal Sponsor's appraisals and determine an amount based thereon, which shall be deemed to be the ~air market value. b. Where the amount paid or proposed to be paid by the Non-Federal Sponsor for the real proper~y interest exceeds the amount determined pursuant to paragraph B.2..a. of this Article, the Government, at the request of the Non-Federal Spgnsor, shall consider all factors relevant to determining fair market value and, in its sole discretion, after consultation withithe Non- Federal Sponsor, may approve in writing an amount greater than the amount determined pursuant to paragraph 8.2.a~ of th~s Article, but not to exceed the amount actually paid or proposed to be paid. If the GOvernment approves such an amount, the..fair market value s~all be the lesser of the approved amount or.the amount paid by the Non-Federal Sponsor, but no less than the amounti determined pursuant to paragraph B,2.a. of this Article.' 3. Eminent Domain Valuation Procedure. For lands, easements, or rights-of-way acquired by eminent domain proceedings instituted after the effective date of this Agreement, the Non- Federal Sponsor shall, prior to instituting such proceedings, submit to the ~overnment notification in writing of its intent to institute such proceedings and an appraisal .of the specific real property interests to be acquired in such proceeding9. The Government shall have 60 days after receipt of such ~ notice and appraisal within which to review the appraisal, if not previously approved by the ~overnment in writing. a. If the ~overnment previously has iapproved the appraisal in writing, or if the Government provides written approval of, or takes no action on, the appraisal wi~hln such 60- day period, the Non-Federal Sponsor shall use the amount set forth in such appraisal as the estimate of Just compensation for the purpose of instituting the eminent domain proceeding~ b. If the Oovernment provides written disapproval of the appraisal, inc~udin~ the reasons for disapproval, within such 60-day perxod, the ~overnment and the Non-Federal Sponsor shall consult in good faith to pronLDtly resolve the ~ssues or areas of disagreement that are identified in the ~overnment's written disapproval. If, after such good faith consultation, the Government and the Non-Federal Sponsor agree as to an appropriate amount, then the Non-Federal Sponsor shall use that $moun~ as the estimate of just compensation for the purpose of institutxn~ the eminent domain proceeding. If, after such ~ood faitH consultation, the ~overnment and the Non-Federal Sponsor cannot. agree as to an appropriate amount, then the Non-Federal SPOnsor may use the amount set forth in its appraisal as the!estimate of just compensation for the purpose of instituting the~eminent domain proceeding. c. For lands, easements, or rights-of-way acquired by eminent domain proceedings instituted in accordance with sub- paragraph B.3. of this Article, fair market value shall be either the amount of the court award for the real property Snterests taken, to the extent the Government determined such Snterests are required for the initial construction, periodic nourishment, operation, and maintenance of the Project, or the a~ount of any stipulated settlement or portion thereof that the Government approves in writing. 4. Inoidental.Co~n. For lands, easements, or rights- of-~a~ acquired by the Non-Federal Sponso~ within a ~ive-year perloa preceding the effective date of this Agreement, or at any time after the effective date of this Agreement,. theivalue of the interest shall include the documented incidental costs of acquiring the interest, as determined by the Government, subject to an audit in accordance with Article x.C. of this Agreement to determine reasonableness, allocability, and allowability of costs. Such incidental costs shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, closing and title costs, appraisal costs, survey costs, attorney's fees, plat maps, and mapping costal as well as the actual amounts expended for payment of any Public Law 91-646 relocation assistance benefits provided in accordanc~ with Article III.E. of this Agreement. .. C. After consultation with the Non-Federal Spohsor, the Government shall determine the value of relocations in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph. 1. For a relocation other than a highway,.the value shall be only that portion of relocation costs that the Government determines is necessary to provide a functionally eqgivalent facility, reduced by depreciation, as applicable, and by the salvage value of any removed items, 2. For a relocation of a highway, the value shall be only that portion of relocation costs that would be necessary to accomplish the relocation in accordance with the desSgn standard that the State of virginia would apply under similar'conditions of geography and traffic load, reduced by the salvage value of any removed items. ' 3. Relocation costs shall include, but no~ necessarily be limited to, actual costs of performing the reloca~ion; planning, engineering and design costs; supervision administration costs; and documented incidental costs associated with performance of the relocation, but shall not include any costs due to betterments, as determined by the Goverm~ent, nor any additional cost of using new material when suitable used material is available. Relocation costs shall be subject to an audit in' accordance with Article X.C. of this Agreement to de~ermine reasonableness, allocabllity0 and allowability of costs. D. The value of the improvements made to lands~ easements, and rights-of-way for the proper disposal of dredged~or excavated material shall be the costs of the improvements, as determined by the Government, subject to an audit in accordance wi~h Article X.C. of this Agreement to determine reasonableness, allocability, and allowability of costs. Such costs shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, actual costs of providing the improvements; planning, engineering and design costs; supervision and administration costs; and documented incidental costs associated with providing the improvements, but shali not include any costs due to betterments, as determined by the Government. ARTICLE V'- PROJECT COORDINATION TFJ~M A. To provide for consistent and effective communication, the Non-Federal Sponsor and the Government, not later than 30 days after the effective date of this A~reement, Shall appoint named senior representatives to a Project Coordination Team. Thereafter, the Project Coordination Team sba11 meetlre~larly until the end of =he period of initial construction 9nd during each authorized periodic nourishment period. The Government's Project Manager and a counterpart named by the Non-Federal Sponsor shall co-chair the Project coordination Team. B. The Government's Project Manager and the No~-Federal Sponsor's counterpart shall keep the Project Coordin~tion Team informed of the progress of construction and of sign~ficant pending issues and actions, and shall seek the views~of the Project Coordination Team on matters that the Project Coordination Team generally oversees. ~ C. until the end of the period of ~nitial cons~ruction and durin~ each authorized periodic nourishment period, ~he Pro~ect coordination Team'shall generally oversee the Pro]ec~, including issues related ~o design~ plans and sPec~fications~ ~chedulin-. real proper~y and relocatlon requirements~ real ~r~~ ~' the Government's cost projections~ final inspection Of the entire Project or functional portions of the ProJec~ Preparation of the proposed OMR~&R Manual~. antlci~ated requirements andlneeded capabilities for performance of operation, matntenange, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of the ProJectz and Other related matters. This oversight shall be consistent with a project management plan developed by the Government after consultation with the Non-Federal Sponsor. D. The Project Coordination Team may make recommendations that it deems warranted to the District Engineer on~atters that ~he Project Coordi~ation Team generally oversees, in~luding suggestions to avoad potential sources of dispute. The Government in good faith shall consider the recommendations of ~he Project Coordination Team. The Government, having the le~al!authority and responsibility for construction of the Project, has the discretion to accept, reject, or modify the Project Coordinatio~ Team's recommendations. E. The costs of participation in the Project COordination Team shall be included in total project costs and cost shared in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. .SENT DY:6ENAO ; 5-29-96 ; 14:16 ;NORFOLK DJSTRiGT 60E* ~04 426 ARTICLE VI - M~THOD OF PAYMENT A. The Government shall maintain currant records of contributions provided by. the parties and current projections of total project costs, total costs of initial ~construction, total costs of periodic nourishment, and costs due to betterments. By March 1st of each year and at least quarterly thereafter, the Government shall provide the Non-Federal Sponsor with a report setting forth all.contributions provided to date and,the current projections of total project costs, of total costs of initial construction, of total costs of periodic nourishment, of total costs due to betterments, of the components of total project costs, of the non-Federal share of initial cor~truct~on, of the non-Federal share of periodic nourishment, of the maximum amount of total project costs determined in accordance with~Article XIX of this Agreement, of the Non-Federal Sponsor's to~al cash contributions required in accordance with Articles Ii.B., II.D., ii.E, II.G, II.I, and II.J. of this Agreement, of =he non-Federal Proportionate shares, and of the funds the Oovernmen~ projects to be required from the Non-Federal Sponsor for the upcomin~ fiscal year. On the effective date of this A~reemen~, total project COSts are projected to be $380,000,000, with $102,82~,000 projected for initial construction and $277,17~,000 projected for periodic nourishment. The Non-Federal Sponsor s cash contribution required under Article II.D. and Article II.G. of thSs Agreement are projected to be $35,876,000 and $97,011,000, respectively. Such amounts are esuimates subject to adjustment by the ~overnment and are not to be construed as the total financial responsibilities of the Oovernment and the Non-Federal Sponsor. B. The Non-Federal Sponsor shall provide the c~sh contribution required under Article II.D.2 of this A~reement in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph. 1. NO~ less than 90 calendar days Drier tO the scheduled date fo~ l~s~&nce of the ~olieitation for the first contract for initial construction, the ~oYernment shall notify the Non-Federal Sponsor in writing of such scheduled date and the funds the Government determines to be required from ~he Non- Federal Sponsor to meet the non-Federal proportionate share of projected financial obligations for initial construction through the first fiscal year of initial construction, including the non- Federal proportionate share of financial obligationslfor initial construction incurred prior to the commencement of the period of initial construction. Not later than such scheduled!date, the Non-Federal Sponsor shall verify to the satisfaction.of the Government that the Non-Federal Sponsor has deposi=e~ the required funds in an escrow or other account acceptable to =he Government, with interest accruing to the Non-Federal Sponsor. 2. For the second and subsequent fiscal years of construction, the Government shall notify the NOS-Federal Sponsor in writing, no later than 60 calendar days pr/or to ~he beginning of that fiscal year, of the funds the GoverD_ment dete~mines to be required from the Non-Federal Sponsor to meet the no~-Federal proportionate share of projected financial obligations for initial construction for that fiscal year. No later than 30 calendar days prior to the beginning of the fiscal year, the Non-F,~deral Sponsor shall make the full amount of the required funds for that fiscal year available to the Government through the funding mechanism specified in Article VI.B.1. of this Agreement. 3. The Government shall draw from the funds provided the Non-Federal Sponsor such sums as the Government ieems necessary to cover= (a) the non-Federal proportionate share of financial obllgations for initial construution incurred prior to the commencement of the period of initial o°nstructi~n~ and the non-Federal proportionate share of finanlcial obligations for initial construction as they are incurred during the period of initial construction. 4. If at any time during the period of in/rial construction the Government determines that.addltlon~l funds will be needpd from the Non-Federal Sponsor to cover the~on-Fed~rpl proportionate share of pro~ected financial obl.igations for ~n~tial construction for the current fiscal year, the Government shall notify the Non-Federal Sponsor in writing of the additional funds required, and the Non-Federal Sponsor, no later thanl60 calendar days from receipt of such notice, shall make the additional required funds available through the payment mechanism specified in Article vz.~.l. Qf ~his Agreement. C. In advance of the Government incurring any financial obligation associated with additional work under Article II.B. or II.E. o~ this.A~reement, the Non-Federal Sponsor s.ha$1 verify to the satmsfactmon of the Government that the Non-Federal Sponsor has deposited the full amount of the funds required ~o pay for such additional work in an escrow or other account acceptable to the Government, with interest accruing to the Non-Federal Sponsor. The Government shall draw from the funds provided bylthe Non- Federal Sponsor such sums as the Government deems necessary to cover the Government's financial obligations for suc~ additional work as they are incurred. In the event the Government determines that the Non-Federal Sponsor must provide additional~funds to meet its cash contribution, the Government shall nOtify t%e Non-Federal Sponsor in writing of the additional funds required. Within 60 calendar days thereafter, the Non-Federal SpOaSOr shall provide the Government with a check for the full amount of t~e additional required funds. D. Upon the completion of the initial construction or termination of this Agreement during the period of initial construction, and upon resolution of all claims and appeals relevant to the initial construction, the Government shall conduct a final accounting and furnish the Non-Federal SponsOr with the results of the final accounting. The Government shall make every effort to conduct the final accounting within 180 days of the completion of the initial construction or the termination of this Agreement. The final accounting shall determine total costs of initial construction, each party's contribution provided thereto, -SENT DY:CENAO ; 5-29-96 ; 14:18 ;NORFOLK DISTRICT tOE* 604 426 and each party's required share thereof. The final accounting also shall determine costs due to betterments during the period of initial construction and the Non-Federal Sponsor's cash contribution provided pursuant to Article II.B. of this Agreement. 1. In the evenU the final accou~ting shows that the total contribution provided by the Non-~ederal Sponsor is less than the Non-Federal share of initial construction plus costs due to any betterments provided in accordance with Article II.B. of this Agreement, the Non-Federal Sponsor shall, no later than 90 calendar days after receipt of written notice, make a cash payment to the Government of whatever sum is required to meet the Non- Federal share of initial construction plus costs due~to any betterments provided in accordance wi~h Article II.B~ of this Agreement. 2. In the event the final accounting shows that the total contribution provided bM the Non-Federal SponsOr exceeds the Non-Federal share of initial construction plus costs'due to any Betterments provided in accordance with Article II.B~ of this A~reement, the ~overnment shall, subject to the availability of funds, refund the excess to the Non-Federal Sponsor no later than 90 calendar days after the final accounting is complete. In the event existin~ funds are. not available to refund the excess to the Non-Federal Sponsor, the ~overnment shall seek such appropriations as are necessary to make the refund. E. The Non-Federal Sponsor shall provide the cash contribution required under Article II.~.2. of this Agreement in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph. 1. Not less than ~0 calendar dams prior 2o the scheduled date for issuance of the solicitation for ~he first contract for periodic nourishment, the ~overnment shall notify the Non-Federal Sponsor in writing of such scheduled da=~ and ~he funds the ~overnment determines to be required from 2he Non- Federal Sponsor to meet the.non-Federal Proportionate share of projected financial obli~atxons for periodic nourishment through the first fiscal year of the authorized periodic nourishment '- period, including the non-Federal proportionate share of financial obligations.for periodic nourishment incurred prior to the commencement of the authorized periodic nourishment period. Not later than such scheduled date, the Non-Federal SponSor shall verify to the satisfaction of the Government that the Non-Federal Sponsor has deposited the required funds in an escro~ or other account acceptabl~ to the ~overnment, with interest accruing to the Non-Federal Sponsor. 2. For the second and subsequent fiscal years of periodic nourishment, the Government shall notify the Non-Federal Sponsor in writing, no later than 90 calendar days prior to the beginnin~ of that fiscal year, of the funds the Government determines to be required from the Non-Federal Sponsor to meet the non-Federal proportionate share of projected financial obligations for periodic nourishment for that fiscal year. No later than 30 calendar days prior to the beginning of the fiscal year, the Non- Federal sponsor shall make the full amount of the required funds for that fiscal year available to the Government through the funding mechanism specified in Article VI.E.1. of this Agreement. 3. The Government shall draw from. the funds provided by the Non-Federal Sponsor such sums as the Government deems necessary to coverl Ca) the non-Federal proportionate share of financial obligations for periodic nourishment, incurred prior to the commencement'of the authorized periodic nourishment period~ and (b) the non-Federal proportionate share of financial ligat~ons for periodic nourishment as they are incurred during ne authorized periodic nourishment period. 4. If at any time during the authorized Periodic nourishment period the aovernment determines that ad~itional funds will be needed from the Non-Federal Sponsor to cover.the non- Federal proportionate share of projected financial obligations for Periodic'nourishment for the current fiscal year, the Covernment shall notify the Non-Federal Sponsor in writin~ of the additional funds required, and the Non-Federal Sponsor, no later than 60 calendar days from receipt of such notice, shall mak~ the additional required funds available through the payment mechanism specified in Article VI.E.1. of this Agreement. F. Upon the completion of each iteration of periodic nourishment or termination of this Agreement during the authorized periodic nourishment period, and upon resolution of ~11 claims and appeals relevant to the periodic nourishment, the ~oVernment shall conduct a final accounting and furnish the NOn-Federal Sponsor with the results of the final accounting. The ~over~ment shall make every effort to Conduct the final accounting within 180 days of the completion of each iteration of periodic nourishment or termination of this Agreement. The final accounting.shall determine total costs of periodic nourishment, each ~arty's contribu~ion provided thereto, and each party's required share thereof. The final accounting also shall determine costs due to betterments during the authorized periodic nourishment period and the.Non-Federal Sponsor's cash contribution provided:pursuant to Artmcle II.H. of this Agreement. 1. In the event the final accounting shows that the total contribution provided by the Non-Federal Sponsgr is less than the Non-Federal share of periodic nourishment p~us costs due to any betterments provided in accordance with Article II.H. of this Agreement, the Non-Federal Sponsor shall, no la,er than 90 calendar days after receipt of written notice, make a cash payment to the Oovernment of whatever sum is required to mee~ the Non- Federal share of periodic nourishment plus costs due to any betterments provided in accordance with Article II.~. of this Agreement. ~. In the event the final accounting shows that the total contribution provided by the Non-Federal Sponsor exceeds the Non-Federal share of periodic nourishment plus costs 'due to any 21. betterments provided in accordance with Article II.H.. of this Agreement, the Government shall, subject to the availability of funds, refund the excess to ~he Non-Federal Sponsor no later than 90 calendar days. after the f~nal accounting is complete. In the event existing funds are-not available to refund the excess to the Non-Federal Sponsor, the aovernment shall seek: such appropriations as are necessary to make the refund. ARTICLE VII - DISPUTE RESOLUTION b As .a condition precedent to a party brino;in= reach o£ this Agreement, that party must fir~ ~v P .Y_i9 Wrzt~ng of the nature of the purportsd hrea~h and gooa,~smth to resolve the dispute through nego~iatio~. parties cannot resolve the dispute through neggti~ti0n, they .may agree to a mutually acceptable method of non-bmndmngialternatmve dispute resolution with a qualified third party acCeptable to bo~h parties. The parties shall each pay 50 percent of a~y costs for the services provided by such a third party as such costs are incurred. The existence of a dispute shall not excuse the parties from performance pursuant to this Agreement. ARTICLE VIII - OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, RE~AIR, REPLACEMENT,AND REHABILITATION (OHRR&R} A. Upon notification in accordance with Article II.C. of this Agreement and for so long as the Project remains authorized, the Non-Federal Sponsor shall operate, maintain, repgir, replace, and rehabilitate the entire Pro~ect, with the except$on of periodic nourishment, or the functional portion of the Project, at no cost to the ~overnment, in a manner compatible wish the BroJecb's authorized purposes and in accordance withi, applicable Federal and State laws as provided in Article XI of ~his Agreement and specific directions prescribed by the aovernment.in the OHRR&R Manual and any subsequent amendments thereto. b . . }. At 1.east annuall~ the Qovernment shal~ monitor the each aha ~u~e profile to de~ermzne losses of nouris~ment material from the Project desiQn sectmon and provide the results of such monitoring to the Non-Federal Sponsor. 2. rot purposes of routine maintenance, ~xclusive of damage or destruction by storm or other natural forces, the Non- Federal Sponsor shall grade and reshape ~he beach and dune profile, as needed, using material within the Projec~ area and maintain ve~etation, fencing, dune walk-over structures, and other Project features associa~ed with the beach and dune. B. The Non-Federal Sponsor hereby gives the QoVernment a right to enter, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon property that the Non-Federal Sponsor owns or controls for access to the Project for the purpose of inspection and, if necessary, for the purpose of completing, operating, ~maintaining, 22 SENT BY:¢ENAO ; 5-29-96 ; 14:20 ;NORFOLK DISTRICT OOE* 004 426 5783;~24 repairing, replacing, or rehabilitating the Project.. If an inspection shows that the Non-Federal Sponsor for anF reason is failing to perform its obligations under thz$ Agreement~ the Government shall send a written notice describing th~ non- performance to the Non-Federal Sponsor. If, after 30 calendar days from receipt of notice, the Non-Federal Sponsorlcontinues to fail to perform, then the Government shall have the ~ight to enter, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon property that the Non-Federal Sponsor owns or controls for access to the Project ~or the purpose of completing, operating, maintaining, repa~ring, replacing, or rehabilitating'the Project. No completion, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, or rehabilitation by the ~overnment shall operate to re!leve the Non- Federal Sponsor of responsibility to meet the Non-Federal Sponsor's obligations as set forth in this Agreemen~i or to preclude the Government from pursuing any other remedy at law or e~uity to ensure faithful performance pursuant to thSs Agreement. ARTICLE IX - INDEN~IFICATION The Non-Federal Sponsor shall hold and save the. Government free from all damages arising from the initial construction, periodic nourishment, operation, maintenance, repair~ replacement, ndrehabilitation of the Project an~ any Project-rela~ed etterments, excep9 for damages due to the fault or ~egligence of the Governmen~ or ~ts contractors. ARTICLE X - MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS AND AUDIT A. Not la=er than 60 calendar days after ~he effective date of this Agreement, the Government and the Non-Federal Sponsor shall develop procedures for keeping books, records,~documents, and other evidence pertaining to costs and expenses ~ncurred pursuant to this Agreement. These procedures shall ~ncorgorate, and apply as appro~riate, the standards for financta% management systems set forth ~n the Uniform Administrative Requ%rements for ~rants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local~Governments at 32 C.F.R. Section 33.20. The Government and the Non-Federal Sponsor shall maintain such books, records, documents, and other evidence in accordance with these procedures and for a minimum of three years after the period of initial construction~ authorized periodic nourishment period, and resolution of all relevant claims arising therefrom~ To the extent permitted under applicable Federal laws and regulations, the ~overnment and the~Non-Federal Sponsor shall each allow the o~her to inspect such books, doctunents, records, and other evidence. B. Pursuant ~o 32 C.F.R. Section 33.26, the Non-Federal Sponsor is responsible for complying with the single Audit Act of 1984, 31 U.S.C. Sections 7501-7507, as implemented by Office of Managemen~ and Budget (OMB) Circular NO. A-128 and Department of Defense Directive 7600.10. Upon request of the Non-Federal Sponsor and to the extent permitted under applicable Federal laws and regulations, the Gover~en~ ~hall ~rovide to ~he ~on-Fedaral Sponsor and independent auditors any info~tion necessa~ ~o enable an audit of the Non-Federal Sponsor's activities under this A~reement. The costs of any non-Federal audits DerfO~ed in accordance with this Paragraph shall be allooa~ed in~ accordance with the provisions of ~ Circulars A-87 .~d'A-128, :and such costs as are allocated ~o the Project shall ~ included in total ~ ' , D o3ect costs and cos= shared in accordance with ~he provisions of this Agreemen~. · C. In accordance with 31 U.S.'C. Section~7503, hhe Government may conduct audits in addition to any audit that the. Non-Federal Sponsor is required to conduct under the Single Audit Act. A~y such Government audits shall be conducted in'accordance with Government Auditing Standards and the cost principles in OMB Circular No. A-87 and other applicable cost principles and regulations. The costs of ~overnment audits'performed in accordance with this paragraph shall be incI~ded in total project costs and cost shared in accordance with the proviai~ns of this Agreement. ARTICLE XI - FED~3~L AND STATE LAWS In the exercise of their respective rights and Obligations under this Agreement, the Non-Federal Sponsor and the Government agree to comply with all applicable Federal and state laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, Section 601 of the Civil Rights Act Of 1964, Public Law 88-352 (412 U.S.C. 2000d), and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 izsued pursuant thereto, as well as Army Regulations 600-7, entitled "Nondisc:~imination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the Department of the Army.. ARTICLE XII - RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES. A. In the exercise of their respective rights .and obligations under this Agreement, the Oovernment and!the Non- ~ederal Sponsor each act in an indeoende t _n_ capacity, :and neither · s to be considered =he officer, agent, or employee Of the other. B, In the exercise of its rights and obligations under this Agreement, neither party shall provide, without the Consent of the other party, any contractor with a release that walv~s or purports to waive any rights such other party may have to see~ relief or redress against such contractor either pursuant to any cause of action tha~ such other party may have or for violati0n of any law. ARTICLE XIII - OFFICIALS NOT TO BENEFIT NO member of or delegate to ~he Congress, nor any resident commissioner, shall be admitted to any share or part .of this Agreement, or to any benefit that may arise therefrom. 2~ ARTICLE XIV - TERMINATION OR SUSPENSION A. If at any time the Non-Federal SPonsor fails to fulfill its obligations under ArtiCle II.B., II.D., Ii.E., II~., II.H, I!.I., VI, or XVIII.C. of this A~reement, the. Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) shall terminate this Agreement or suspend future performance under this Agreement unless he determines that continuation of work on the Project is in the interest of the United States or is necessary in order to satisfy agreements with any other non-Federal interests in connection with the Project. · B. If the. Government fails to receive a-~..-~ ....... ._L. ~n amounts sufficient to meet Project e~end~=ures f~r the t~en- current or upcoming fiscal year, the ~overnment shall so notafy the' Non-Federal Sponsor in writing, and within 60 calendar days thereafter either party may elect without penalty to'terminate this Agreement or to suspend future performance under this Agreement. In the event that either party elects tolsuspend future performance under this Agreement pursuant to ~his paragraph, such suspension shall remain in effect un~il such time as the ~overnment receives sufficient appropriations or until either the Government or the Non-Federal Sponsor elects to terminate this Agreement. C. In the event that either party elects to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Article or Article XV of =his Agreement, both parties shall conclude their actl¥1ties relatin~ to the Project and proceed to a final accounting ~n accordance with Article VI.D. or VI.F. of this Agreement. D. Any termination Of this Agreement or suspension of future performance under this Agreement in accordance with ~his Article or Article XV of this Agreement s~all no~ relieve the parties of liability for any obligation prevxously xnc~rred. Any delinquent payment shall be charged interest at a rate, ~o be determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, equal to 150 per cent~m of the average bond equivalent rate of the 13-week Treasury!bills auctioned immediately prior to the date on which such payment became delinquent, or auctioned immediately prior tolthe beginning of each additional 3-month period if the period of delinquency exceeds 3 months. ARTICLE XV - HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES A. After execution of this Agreement and upon ~irection by the District Engineer, the Non-Federal Sponsor shall perform, or cause to be performed, any investigations for hazardous substances that the Government or the Non-Federal Sponsor determines to be necessary to identify the existence and extent of any hazardous substances regulated under the Comprehensive E~vironmental ~esponse, Compensation, and Liability ACt (hereinafter 'CERCLA.), 42 U.S.C. Sections 9601-9675, that may exist in, on, or under lands, easements, and rights-of-way that the government determines, pursuant to Article III of this Agreement, to be required for the initial construction, periodic nourishment, operation,'and maintenance of the Project. However, for lands that the Government determines to be subject to the navi~ation servitude, only the aovernment shall perform such investi~ations unless the District Engineer provides the Non-Federa~ Sponsor With prior specific written direction, in which Case the Non-Federal Sponsor shall perform such investigations in accordance with such written direction. 1. All actual costs incurred by the Non-Federal Sponsor or the Government during the period of initial construction for such investigations for hazardous substances shall b? ~ncluded in t~tal costs of initial construction and cost shared ~n accordance w~th the provisions.of this Agreement, sub, eot to an~aud~t in accordance with Article X.C. of this Agreement to de~ermxne reasonableness, allocability, and allowability of costs. 2. All actual costs incurred by. the Non-Federal Spon~o? or the ~overnment du~in~ the authorized periodic nour~sfu~ent per~od for such znvesti~ations for hazardous . substances shall be included in the total c?sts of periodic nourishment and cos~ shared in accordance w~th the p~ovisions of this Agreement, sub3ect to an audit ~n accordance wi~h Article x.c. of this Agreement to determine reasonableness, allocabxlity, and allowability of costs. B. In the event ~t is discovered through any investigation for hazardous substances or other means that hazardous substances regulated under. CERC~A exist in, on, or under any la, ds, easements, or rights-of-way that the Government dete~mines, pursuant to Article III of this Agreement, Co be r~q~ired for the in}tial construction, ~eriodic nourishment, operation, and maintenance of the Pro]ect, the Non-Federal Sponsor and the Oovernment - t' _ shall provide prompt written notice ~o each ot~er, and ne Non-Federal Sp?nsor shall n?t proceed w~th the acquisxtion of the real property xnterests untxl both partxes agree'that the Non- ~ederal $~onsor should proceed. C. The Government and th~'~og-Federal Sponsor $hall de~ermlne whether to ~nitiate ~nmt~al construction o~ eriodic nourishment of the Pro eot, or ........... j . .., if already in initia~ construction or ~rlO~lC nourAsnment, wnet~er to continue with work on the Project, suspend future performance under this Agreement, or terminate this Agreement any _ . . fo? the convenience of the ~overnment, in case wn~re hazardous substances regulated under CERCLA are found to ex~st in, on. or under any lands, easements, or ri h of-way that the Government . determines, pursuant to A~ticle III Of this Agreement, to be required for the initial construction, periodic nourishment, operation, and maintenance of ~he Project, Should the Government and the Non-Federal Sponsor de~ermine to initiate or continue with initial construction or periodic nourishment after considering any liability that may arise under 26 CERCI~A, the Non-Federal Sponsor shall be responsible, as between the Government and the Non-Federal Sponsor, for the costs of ~lean?p and response, to include the costs of any sSudies and xnvestxgations necessary to de=ermine an appropriate:response to =he contamination. Such Costs shall not be consider~d a parc of total pro~ect costs. In the even= the Non-Fsderal S~onsor fails to provid· any funds necessary to pay for clean-up a~d response costs or to otherwise discharge the Non-Federal Sponsor's responsibilities under this paragraph upon directionlby Government, the Government may, in its sole discretion, esther terminate this Agreement for the convenience of the ~overnment, suspend future performance under this Agreement, or continue work on the Project. D. The Non-Federal Sponsor and the Government shall consult with each other in accordance with Article V of this'Agreement in an effort to ensure that responsible parties bear any necessary clean up and response costs as defined in CERCLA. Any decxsion made pursuant to paragraph C. of this Article shall Dot relieve any third party from any liability that may arise Under CEaC~A. E. As between the Oovernment and the Non-Federal Sponsor, =he.Non-Federal Sponsor shall be.considered ~he opera,or of ~he Prelect for purposes of CERCLA l~ab~lit¥. To the maximum exten~ practicable, =he Non-Federal Sponsor shall opera=e, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilltate the Pro~ec~ in a manner that will not cause liability to arise under CERCLA. ARTICLE XVI - NOTICES A. Any notice, request, demand, or other communication required or permitted to b? giv?n ~nder.t~is Agree~e,t sha~} be deemed to have been duly g~ven If ~n writing and e~ther delivered personally or by telegram or mailed by first-class, registered, or certified mail, as follows= If =o the Non-Federal Sponsor~ City Manager City Hall Building Municipal Center virginia Beach, virginia If tO the Government~ Distric~ Engineer U. S. Army Engineer District, Norfolk 8'03 Front Street Norfolk, Virginia 23510-1096 B. A party may change the address to which such communications are to be directed by giving written notice to the other party in tho manner provided in this Article. C. Any notice, request, demand, or other communication made pursuant to this .A?ticle.~hall_be deemed t° have been received by the addressee at one ear,let of such time as it is a~tually received or seven calendar days after it is ~ailed. ~ ARTICLE XVII - CONFIDENTIALITY I TO the extent permitted by the laws governing e~ch party, the parties agree to maintain the confidentiality'o~ exchanged information when requested to do so by the provzding!party. i ARTICLE XVIII - HISTORXC PKESF~RVATION~ A. The costs of identification, survey and eva~uatton of historic properties shall be included in total proJeot costs and cost shared in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. B. As specified in Section ?(a) of Public Law 93-291 (16 u.S.C. Section 469c(a)) . , the costs of mitigation and=data recovery activities associated with historic preserva~ion sha~} be borne entirely by the Government and shall not be included an total project costs, up to the statutory liner of one percent of the total amount authorized to be appropriated for the P~o~ect. d C. The Government shall not incur cos.ts for mitigation and aba recovery bhab exceed ~he s~a~u~ory one per~en~ ~imi~ spec~fied in paragraph B. of this .Article unless and. Until the Assistant Secretary of the Army {Civil Works) has waived that limit in accordance with Section ~08(3) of .l~.b~ic Law 96-515 116 U.S.C. Section 469c-2(3)). Any costs of m~t~ga=ion ~nd data recovery that exceed the one Percen~ limit shall be included an tota~ pro~ect co,ts and cos~ shared in accordance wi~h the provisions of this Agreement. A~TICLE iix - SECTION 902 PROJECT COST LIMITS The Non-Federal Sponsor has reviewed the provisions set forth ~? ~e~ttO9 90~_9~ .1~? ~aw 99-$62, as amended, and:understands ?~.s~ctlon.~o2 esca~llsles a maximum for the Cot~l cost of zniclai construction and for the total cost of periodic nourishment of the Beach Erosion ~ontrol and H~rricane Protection Project at Virginia Beach, Virginia. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Government shall nog make a new P~o]ect financial obli~acion, make a ' Project expenditure, or affor~ credit toward total project costs for the value of a contr~bution provided by the Non-Fed-r-- .... n~ . = a& ~pOllSOr, 1£ such obligation, expenditure, or credit would result in total ro ect 9oste exceeding this maximum amount ,.-~ ..... =---~-- -~ ~ - , ~~ u~n~rwlse aUthOriZes by law. On the effective date of ~- - .......... ~ · amount is estimated to be $153,790:000 for initial cOnstru and $309,476,000 for Periodic nouris~.-~ ..... ~. _ .trion accordance with ER 1~0§-2-100 using October 1, 1995 price levels and allowances for projected future inflation. The Government shall adjust this maximum amount in accordance~ with Section 902. · ARTICLE XX - NATURE OF NON-FEDERAL SPQNSOR'S CASH CONTRIBUTION WITHRESPECT TO PERIODIC'NOURISHMENT Under Articles II and VI, the Non-Federal, Sponsor ts obligated to make certain payments to be used ~xclusively for providing periodic nourishment for the Projectl. The Government agrees to use such funds exclusively to provide such periodic nourishment service, subject to the limitatio~s herein, and the Non-Federal Sponsor agrees to make the contributions required herein in payment for such service. The 0over~ment and the Non- F~al S~onsor. acknowledge that the 0overnmsn= is authorized to w~cnaraw =rom t~e escrow fund into which such cash contributions are made by the Non-Federal Sponsor pursuant to Article VI only in furtherance of periodic nourishment as provided in this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement, W~ich shall become effective upon 2he da~ it is signed by the Distr~cC Engineer, U. S. Army Engineer Distr~Ct, Norfolk. TH~ DEPARTMF~T OF THE ARMY BYe,, ROBERT H. REARDON, JR. Colonel, Corps of Engineers District Engineer CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRQINIA BY:. Ci=y Manager City of Virginia Beach, Virginia DATE:... 29 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY - , o hereby certify that I am the principal legal officer for the CAty of Virginia Beach, Vir~inia, that the ¢it¥ of virginia Beach, virginia is a legally constituted public body with full authority 4nd legal capability to perform the terms of the Agreement betgeen the Department of the Army and the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia° in connection with the Beach Erosion Control and HUrricane Protection Pro~ecc at Virginia Beach, Virginia, and to pay damages i~ accordance with the terms of this Agreement, if n~cessary, in =~e even~ of the failure to perform, as required by Section 221 Public ~aw 91-611 (~2 U.S.C. Sec=ion 1962d-$b), and. ~ha= the persons who have executed this agreement on behalf of the city of Virginia Beach, Virginia, have ac=ed within their authority. . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have made and executed this cer~ification ~his . , ~ day of ].99_. (SIC, NED) (TYPED (TITLE IN PULL) CEKTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING The undersigned certifies, ko the best of his cz her knowledge and belief that: (1) No Federal appropriated funds have been pale or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to.a.ny person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or ~employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer o9 emplOyee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in ~onnection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the makin~ of any Federal grant, the making of an~ Federal loan, the e~tering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal c~ntract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to arly person for influenc~ng' or at'tempting to influence an officer or ampi.oyes of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee' of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with ~his .Federal contract,-gran~, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, 'Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,' in accordance with its ~ns~ructiorm. (3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents foria11 subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, andlcont~a~ under grants, loans, and cooperative agreementsl and,that all subrecip~ents shall certify and dlsclose accordingly~ . This certification is · material representation,of fact u~on which reliance was placed when thas transaction was made or entered inco. Submission of th~s certification is alprerequ~si~e for making or entering into this transaction imposed iby Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to ~ile the required certification shall be subject to a c~vi! p~nalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than-S100,000 for each such failure. City Manager DATE~ ORDINANCES/RESOL UTIONS ITEM # 40893 CONSENT AGENDA Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms, City Council ADOPTED: Ordinance to APPROPRIATE $138,000 from the Sheriff's Inmate Telephone Fund Revenue to the Department's FY 1995-1996 Operating Budget re increased medical and food service expenses; and estimated revenue be increased accordingly. Voting: 11-0 (By ConsenO Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert ~ Dean, William W. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy I~ Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None Jtene 11, 1996 1 2 3 4 5 AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $138,000 FROM INMATE TELEPHONE FUND REVENUES TO THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT'S FY 1995-96 OPERATING BUDGET FOR INCREASED MEDICAL AND FOOD SERVICE EXPENSES 6 7 WHEREAS, the Sheriff's Department receives revenues from outgoing telephone calls made by inmates at the Virginia Beach Correctional Center; 8 9 WHEREAS, the inmate population is higher than original estimates, resulting in greater revenues from outgoing telephone calls; 10 11 WHEREAS, the revenues derived from inmate telephone calls is used by the Sheriff to provide funding for inmate-related expenses. 12 13 14 15 16 17 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA, that $138,000 be appropriated to the Sheriff's Department's FY 1995-96 Operating Budget in the Sheriff's Department Special Revenue Fund for the purpose of funding increases in medical and food service expenses, and that this appropriation be offset by an increase in estimated revenue in the Inmate Telephone Fund. 18 19 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the 11 June of ,1996. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Walter C. Resource and Management Services Administrator Department of Management Services APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY - 35 - Item IV-L. 7, ORDINANCES/RESOL UTIONS ITEM# 40894 CONSENT AGENDA Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by l/ice Mayor Sessoms, City Council ADOPTED: Ordinances to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE additional .federal prevention grant funding to Mental Health-Mental Retardation- Substance Abuse (MHMRSA); and, estimated federal revenue be increased accordingly: FY 1995-1996 Operating Budget re one time expenses - $41,600. FY 1996-1997 Operating Budget re one full time position be created to support substance abuse prevention programs - $41,600. Voting: 11-0 (By ConsenO Council Members Voting Aye: John ~L Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert IC Dean, William W. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy IC Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa 34. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None June 11, 1996 1 2 3 4 AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE $41,600 IN ADDITIONAL FEDERAL PREVENTION GRANT FUNDING AND TO INCREASE ESTIMATED FEDERAL REVENUE BY $41,600 IN THE FY 1995- 96 MENTAL HEALTH-MENTAL RETARDATION-SUBSTANCE ABUSE (MH-MR-SA) OPERATING BUDGET 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 WHEREAS, the Community Services Board and the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation, and Substance Abuse (MHMRSA) are responsible for the coordination and implementation of mental health, mental retardation, and substance abuse services; WHEREAS, the department has been awarded an additional $41,600 in additional Federal prevention grant funds for FY 1995-96; WHEREAS, the state Department of Mental Health Mental Retardation Substance Abuse Services has recommended that the additional funding for FY 1995-96 be used to cover one-time expenses and purchases; WHEREAS, MHMRSA has identified several important uses of the funds including: staff training for strategic planning, computer and publishing software, a youth forum for summer youth, office supplies and furniture for Substance Abuse Prevention, purchase of evaluation consultant services to develop measurement tools, and purchase of two TV/VCR units for programs' educational use; NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA, that $41,600 in additional Federal prevention grant funds be accepted and appropriated to the FY 1995-96 MHMRSA Operating Budget to be used for one time expenses; BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that estimated Federal revenue for FY 1995-96 be increased by $41,600. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the 11 , day of June , 1996. This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its adoption. Approved as to Content Department of Management Service APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY F :\u~rskmg~nt ~Xmtunrsa~appropr .ord 1 2 3 4 AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE $41,600 IN ADDITIONAL FEDERAL PREVENTION GRANT FUNDING AND TO INCREASE ESTIMATED FEDERAL REVENUE BY $41,600 IN THE FY 1996- 97 MENTAL HEALTH-MENTAL RETARDATION-SUBSTANCE ABUSE (MH-MR-SA) OPERATING BUDGET 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 WHEREAS, the Community Services Board and the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation, and Substance Abuse (MHMRSA) are responsible for the coordination and implementation of mental health, mental retardation, and substance abuse services; WHEREAS, $41,600 in additional Federal prevention grant funds are being added to the department's base funding for FY 1996-97; WHEREAS, the state Department of Mental Health Mental Retardation Substance Abuse Services states that Federal appropriations supporting the additional funding are appropriated by Congress; WHEREAS, MHMRSA requests that the additional funding be appropriated to support a full-time Educator II for Families Matter Program (Children of Incarcerated Parents) and other contractual services (child care, transportation, and housing) to assist LINK and Crisis Care program consumers; NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA, that $41,600 in additional Federal prevention grant funds be accepted and appropriated to the FY 1996-97 MHMRSA Operating Budget and that one full time position be created to support substance abuse prevention programs; BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that estimated Federal revenue for FY 1996-97 be increased by $41,600. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the I 1 , day of June ,1996. This ordinance shall be effective on July 1, 1996. 24 25 26 27 Approved as to Content Walter C. Kraemer, Jr. Department of Management Service APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY Item 1V-L. 8. a. ORDINANCES/RESOL UTIONS ITEM it 40895 CONSENT AGENDA Barbara L. Asaro, 2537 Pamlico Loop, Phone: 427-0289, the applicant, represented herself Charles F. Bowdoin, 3313 North Landing Road, Phone: 427-6178, spoke in OPPOSITION. A motion was made by Councilman Dean, seconded by Council Lady Henley to DENY an Ordinance to authorize a temporary encroachment into a portion of the easement adjacent to 2537 Pamlico Loop to Anthony L. and Barbara L. Asaro re installation of an inground swimming pool and concrete deck (PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH). A SUBSTITUTE MOTION was made Councilman Harrison, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms to ADOPT an Ordinance to authorize a temporary encroachment into a portion of the easement adjacent to 2537 Pamlico Loop to Anthony L. and Barbara L. Asaro re installation of an inground swimming pool and concrete deck (PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH). 4-7 (MOTION LOST TO A NEGATIVE VOTE) Council Members Voting Aye: Linwood O. Branch, III, William W. Harrison, Jr., Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: John A. Baum, Robert IC Dean, tlarold Ileischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis 1~ Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf and Nancy IC Parker Council Members Absent: None June 11, 1996 - 37 - ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM # 40895 (Continued) CONSENT AGENDA Upon motion by Councilman Dean, seconded by Council Lady Henley, City Council DENIED: Ordinance to authorize a temporary encroachment into a portion of the easement adjaccnt to 2537 Patnlico Loop to Anthony L. and Barbara L. Asaro re installation of an inground swimming pool and concrete deck (PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH). Voting: 7-4 Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baurn, Robert IC Dean, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R~ Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf and Nancy IC Parker Council Members Voting Nay: Linwood O. Branch, III, William W. Harrison, Jr., Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Absent: None June I1, 1996 ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM # 40896 CONSENT AGENDA Andrea M. Kilmer, 801 Costa Grande Drive, Phone: 721-2908 Upon motion by Councilman Dean, seconded by Councilman Branch, City Council ADOPTED: Orch'nance to authorize a temporary encroachment into a portion of the City's 15-foot maintenance and 150-foot drainage easement at the rear of, ana~ onto a portion of City owned property designated as a lO0-foot drainage and public use easement adjacent to 801 Costa Grande Drive to Ronald L. and Andrea M. Kilmer re installation of an inground swimming pool and maintenance of an existing wooden bulkhead (PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH) The following conditions shall be required: 1. The owner agrees to remove the encroachment when notified by the City, at no expense to the City. 2. The owner agrees to keep and hold the City free and harmless of any liability as a result of the encroachment. 3. The owner agrees to maintain said encroachment so as not to become unsightly or a hazard. 4. The owner must obtain a permit from the Development Services Center prior to commencing any construction. The owner must obtain and keep in force Ali Risk Property Insurance and Comprehensive General Liability in an amount not less than $500,000. 6. The owner agrees that all above ground encroachments shall conform to the minimum setbacks requirements, as established by the City Traffic Engineer's Office. 7. The owner shall submit for review and approval, a survey of the area being encroached upon, certified by a professional engineer, and/or "as built" plans of the encroachment, if required by either the City Engineer's Office or the Engineering Division of the Public Utilities Department. Voting: 11-0 Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert IC Dean, William W. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy K. Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None June 11, 1996 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 AN ORDINANCE TO AUTHORIZE A TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT INTO A PORTION OF THE CITY'S 15' MAINTENANCE EASEMENT, 150' DRAINAGE EASEMENT, AND 100' DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND PUBLIC USE EASEMENT (OWNED IN FEE SIMPLE BY THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH) TO RONALD L. KILMER AND ANDREA M. KILMER, THEIR HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESSORS IN TITLE 16 17 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 That pursuant to the authority and to the extent thereof contained in Section 15.1-893, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, RONALD L. KILMER and ANDREA M. KILMER, their heirs, assigns and successors in title are authorized to construct and maintain a temporary encroachment into the City's 15' maintenance easement, 150' drainage easement, and 100' drainage easement and public use easement (owned in fee simple by the City of Virginia Beach). That the temporary encroachment herein authorized is for the purpose of constructing and maintaining an inground swimming pool and maintaining an existing wooden bulkhead and that said encroachment shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the City of Virginia Beach Public Works Department's specifications as to size, alignment and location, and further that such temporary encroachment is more particularly described as follows: 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 An area of encroachment into a portion of the City's 15' maintenance easement, 150' drainage easement, and 100' drainage easement and public use easement (owned in fee simple by the City of Virginia Beach), as shown on that certain plat entitled: "PHYSICAL SURVEY OF: LOT 78, SUBDIVISION OF LAGOMAR, SECTION 6, PHASE 2, PART C, PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA. FOR: RON KILMER-ANDREA KILMER-HAROLD C. WARREN, JR. LAND SURVEYOR-SCALE: 1" = 30'-DATE: APRIL 12, 1996", a copy of which is on file in the Department of Public Works and to which reference is made for a more particular description. 50 51 52 PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the temporary encroachment herein authorized shall terminate upon notice by the City of Virginia Beach to RONALD L. KILMER and ANDREA M. KILMER, their heirs, 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 assigns and successors in title and that within thirty (30) days after such notice is given, said encroachment shall be removed from the City's 15' maintenance easement, 150' drainage easement, and 100' drainage easement and public use easement (owned in fee simple by the City of Virginia Beach) and that RONALD L. KILMER and ANDREA M. KILMER, their heirs, assigns and successors in title shall bear all costs and expenses of such removal. AND, PROVIDED FURTHER, that it is expressly understood and agreed that RONALD M. KILMER andANDREA M. KILMER, their heirs, assigns and successors in title shall indemnify and hold harmless the City of Virginia Beach, its agents and employees from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses including reasonable attorney's fees in case it shall be necessary to file or defend an action arising out of the location or existence of such encroachment. AND, PROVIDED FURTHER, that the party of the second part agrees to maintain said encroachment so as not to become unsightly or a hazard. AND, PROVIDED FURTHER, that this ordinance shall not be in effect until such time that RONALD M. KILMER and ANDREA M. KILMER execute an agreement with the City of Virginia Beach encompassing the aforementioned provisions. Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the 11 day of 3une · 19 96 . 77 78 79 8O 81 82 83 CBC May 9, 1996 GPIN 2424-02-7227 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT Department APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY 2 THIS AGREEMENT, made this %%~ day of ~ 0~. , 19~, by and between the CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIa, a municipal corporation, Grantor, party of the first part, and RONALD L. KILMER and ANDREA M. KILMER, husband and wife, THEIR HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESSORS IN TITLE, Grantee, party of the second part (even though more than one). WI TNESSETH: That, WHEREAS, it is proposed by the party of the second part to construct and maintain an inground swimming pool and wooden bulkhead in the City of Virginia Beach; and WHEREAS, in constructing and maintaining such inground swimming pool and wooden bulkhead, it is necessary that the said party of the second part encroach into a portion of an existing City 15' maintenance easement, 150' drainage easement, and 100' drainage easement and public use easement (owned in fee simple by the City of Virginia Beach); and said party of the second part has requested that the party of the first part grant a temporary encroachment to facilitate such inground swimming pool and wooden bulkhead within a portion of the City's 15' maintenance easement, 150' drainage easement, and 100' drainage easement and public use easement (owned in fee simple by the City of Virginia Beach). NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and of the benefits accruing or to accrue to the party of the second part and for the further consideration of One Dollar ($1.00), in hand paid, to the said party of the first GPIN 2424-02-7227 part, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the party of the first part doth grant to the party of the second part a temporary encroachment to use a portion of the City's 15' maintenance easement, 150' drainage easement, and 100' drainage easement and public use easement (owned in fee simple by the City of Virginia Beach) for the purpose of constructing and maintaining such inground swimming pool and wooden bulkhead. It is expressly understood and agreed that such temporary encroachment will be constructed and maintained in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia and the City of Virginia Beach, and in accordance with the City of Virginia Beach Public Works Department's specifications and approval as to size, alignment and location and is more particularly described as follows, to wit: An area of encroachment into a portion of the City's 15' maintenance easement, 150' drainage easement, and 100' drainage easement and public use easement (owned in fee simple by the City of Virginia Beach) as shown on that certain plat entitled: "PHYSICAL SURVEY OF: LOT 78, SUBDIVISION OF LAGOMAR, SECTION 6, PHASE 2, PART C, PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA. FOR: RON KILMER-ANDREA KILMER.HAROLD C. WARREN, JR. LAND SURVEYOR-SCALE: 1" = 30'- DATE: APRIL 12, 1996", a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and to which reference is made for a more particular description. It is further expressly understood and agreed that the temporary encroachment herein authorized shall terminate upon notice by the City of Virginia Beach to the party of the second part, and that within thirty (30) days after such notice is 2 given, such temporary encroacnment shall be removed from the City's 15' maintenance easement, 150' drainage easement, and 100' drainage easement and public use easement by the party of the second part; and that the party of the second part shall bear all costs and expenses of such removal. It is further expressly understood and agreed that the party of the second part shall indemnify and hold harmless the City of Virginia Beach, its agents and employees, from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses including reasonable attorney's fees in case it shall be necessary to file or defend an action arising out of the location or existence of such temporary encroachment. It is further expressly understood and agreed that nothing herein contained shall be construed to enlarge such permission and authority to permit the maintenance or construction of any encroachment other than that specified herein and to the limited extent specified herein, nor to permit the maintenance and construction of any encroachment by anyone other than the party of the second part. It is further expressly understood and agreed that the party of the second part agrees to maintain said encroachment so as not to become unsightly or a hazard. It is further expressly understood and agreed that the party of the second part must obtain a permit from the Development Services Center prior to co~..encing any construction. It is further expressly understood and agreed that the party of the second part shall obtain and keep in force All Risk Property Insurance and General Liability or such insurance as is deemed necessary by the party of the first part, and all insurance policies must name the party of the first part as additional named insured or loss payee, as applicable. The party of the second part also agrees to carry Comprehensive General Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $500,000.00, combined single limits of such insurance policy or policies. The party of the second part will provide endorsements providing at least thirty (30) days written notice to the party of the first part prior to the cancellation or termination of, or material change to, any of the insurance policies. The party of the second part assumes all responsibilities and liabilities, vested or contingent, with relation to the encroachment. It is further expressly understood and agreed that any above ground encroachments shall conform to the minimum setbacks requirements, as established by the City Traffic Engineer's Office. It is further expressly understood and agreed that the party of the second part shall submit for review and approval, a survey of the area being encroached upon, certified by a professional engineer, and/or "as built" plans of the encroachment, if required by either the City Engineer's Office or the Engineering Division of the Public Utilities Department. It is further expressly understood and agreed that the party of the first part, upon revocation of such authority and permission so granted, may remove any such encroachment and charge the cost thereof to the party of the second part, and collect the cost in any manner provided by law for the collection of local or state taxes; may require the party of the second part to remove such temporary encroachment; and pending such removal, the party of the first part may charge the party of the second part compensation for the use of such portion of the City's right-of-way encroached upon the equivalent of what would be the real property tax upon the land so occupied if it were owned by the party of the second part; and if such removal shall not be made within the time ordered hereinabove by this Agreement, the City shall impose a penalty in the sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) per day for each and every day that such encroachment is allowed to continue thereafter, and shall collect such compensation and penalties in any manner provided by law for the collection of local or state taxes. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, RONALD L. KILMER and ANDREA M. KILMER, the said party of the second part have caused this Agreement to be executed by their signatures and seals duly affixed. Further, that the City of Virginia Beach has caused this Agreement to be executed in its name and on its behalf by its City Manager and its seal be hereunto affixed and attested by its City Clerk. 5 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH (SEAL) ATTEST: By City Manager/Authorized Designee of the City Manager City Clerk zo CON'r :r, rr SIGNORE DEPARTMENT /~NALD L. KILMER ANDREA M. KILMER (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFi.u ~ E.~.,.,,y STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, to-wit: If · a Notary Public in and for the City and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that , CITY MANAGER/AUTHORIZED DESIGNEE OF THE CITY MANAGER, whose name is signed to the foregoing Agreement bearing date on the day of , 19 , has acknowledged the same before me in my City and State aforesaid. GIVEN under my hand this day of · 19 . My Commission Expires: Notary Public STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, to-wit: I, · a Notary Public in and for the City and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that RUTH HODGES SMITH, City Clerk for the CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, whose name is signed to the foregoing Agreement bearing date on the day of , 19 , has acknowledged the same before me in my City and State aforesaid. GIVEN under my hand this day of · 19 . My Commission Expires: Notary Public STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH· to-wit: I~ ...... (~¢~.i~_~_.~.,~¢~<.C' , a Notary Public in and for the~/ty and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that RONALD L. KILMER and ANDREA M. KILMER0 whose names are signed to the foregoing writing· bearing date the ~-~¥~' day of ~[t~.,~ , 19~1~, have acknowledged the same before me ~n my City and State aforesaid. Given under my hand this 1 · · My Commission Expires: day of Notary Pu~c F\_ 7 AS Tile BUI NO ENCROACHM TO CERTIFY THAT I. ON A/:),¢/L /2 ,lg~ ,SJRVEYED THE PROPERLY PRAT, AND IIIAT 1lIE TITLE LINES AND -rile WAI.LS OF TIlE BUILDINGS THIS PLAT. ) TFAND STRICTLY WITitlN THE TITLE LINES Al'ID TItER£ .'.~I~E'L ','- '" OTHER BUILDINGS ON THE PROPERTY. EXCEPT'.~,S'~"H~WNi SIGNED ~." '?' ~n. woOD 77 ~ L C o£?A TillS HOUSE IS IN ZONE C. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER 5~5531 0043C. MAP DATED 1/17/85 SCALE : 1" ==30' PI IYSICAL SURVEY OF: LOT 78~ SUBDTVTS[ON OF' LAGOMAR, SECTION 6, PItASE 2, PART C, PHINCESS ANNE BOROUGII, VIRGS[NIA BEACH, VA. FOR: RON KILMER AHDREA KILMER NO TITLE REPORT WAS FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR PRIOR TO THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS SURVEY. HAROLD C. WARREN.JR. L,~I~ D SURVEYOR 5935 INDIAN RIVER ROAD VIRGIHIA BEACH.VIRGINIA 23456 F,B. 2o~ ,P. 3~ FII E NO, PlAT hECORDED IN VA. c)u. 2555 p. - 39 - ORDINANCES~RES OL UTIONS ITEM # 40897 CONSENT AGENDA Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms, City Council APPROVED: Applications for Annual Permit Renewal for private, municipal and non-profit organizations operating emergency medical service agencies or vehicles within the City, pursuant to Section 10.5-2 of the City Code: Advanced Wheelchair Transport, Inc. Chesapeake Emergency Medical Service Chesbay Medical Transport ChiMren's Hospital of the Ka'ngs Daughters Eastern Medical Transport Mariners Associates/Ramada Plaza Resort Medical Transport, Inc. Mercy/Tidewater Ambulance Service Nightingale Air Ambulance Norfolk Fire and Paramedical Services Ocean Rentals LTD Virginia Beach Lifesaving Service Voting: 11-0 (By ConsenO Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baam, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert K. Dean, William W.. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy K. Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members l,~oting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None June 11, 1996 3 MORGI M~ WAY ',,~,,,, ~ Wt ","'- ,' ~ ,, , ,,~) ,,~ . 4..~ -,. ;.. · .'' / ~ ' .:?,. ~R ~ -,,.~. ,,.. I ~ -,5 ~',!_ ;.,. ,',,"...t, [~.-,,,,..-.,,,>,.-,. ,.., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' .~, '~.,.'..'[.~ ~'~ :,' ~, ~.",.,.', :., ~ ~ ,-T-.. ..~- :.' . .. ~ · ~-, ~ , '~'8 ~ ~ ~'~ ~""?~: '"" 'q'~'~' ~//x~.,,~:'~ Item 1V-L. IO. ORDINANCES~RESOLUTIONS ITEM # 40898 CONSENT AGENDA Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms, City Council APPROVED: CERTIFICATES OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY: Beach Taxi, Inc. Yellow Cab Company Long Limousine Service Voting: 11-0 (By ConsenO Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert K. Dean, William W. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy K. Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None June 11, 1996 ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM # 40899 June Barrett McDaniels, 2902 Erikesen Court, Phone: 496-2570, Member of the Board - Elizabeth River Project. Harry T. Lester, 2101 Parks Avenue, Phone: 428-7655, President, Virginia Beach Vision, Inc. Cyndy Bourguard, 3113 Lynn Acres, Phone: 463-8398, President - Hampton Roads Public Transportation Alliance. Sue W. Carlyle, 1425 Alanton Drive, Phone: 481-2538, represented the Southeastern Association for Virginia Environment Roger Newil~ 1277 East Bayshore Drive, Phone: 429-1624, represented the Resort Area Advisory Commission Steve Vinson, 2965 Lynnhaven Drive, Phone: 496-9065 The following spoke in OPPOSITION: W. Thomas Sawyer, Jr., 1461 Carolyn Drive, 23451, Phone: 428-7255 Richard Robertson, 5544 Parliament Drive, Phone: 497-4960 Upon motion by Council Lady Strayhorn, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms, City Council DEFERRED until the City Council Session of July 9, 1996: Resolution re the Major Investment Study for the Route 44/1-264 Corridor (Light Rail) by the Tidewater Transportation District Commission; that the Planning Commission include Light Rail in an issue to be considered in the process of amending the City's Comprehensive Plan; ana~ that the City Manager direct an analysis of the Light Rail alternative to meet the strategic needs of the City. This DEFERRAL will allow discussions and information to be provided relative Norfolk Southern's ownership of the rail. An estimated cost shall also be furnished concerning the spur to the Naval Base. Voting: 11-0 (By ConsenO Council Members Voting Aye: John ~ Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert K, Dean, William W. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis IL Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndo~ Nancy K. Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessorns, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None June 11, 1996 ORDINANCES/RESOL UTIONS ITEM # 40900 CONSENT AGENDA Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms, City Council APPROVED: Resolution to request the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) cancel the City's FY1996-1997/01-02 Six Year Improvement project for the improvement of Jeanne Street from Independence Boulevard to Constitution Drive, a distance of approximately 0.2 miles; and, the City agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) for the total funds expended for this project through the date the Department is notified of such cancellation. Voting: 11-0 (By ConsenO Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert I~ Dean, William W. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy IC Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None J~tne 11, 1996 PRO~ECT RESOLUTION WHEREAS, in accordance with Virginia Department of Transportation construction allocation procedures, it is necessary that a request by Council resolution be made in order that the Department cancel an urban highway project in the City of Virginia Beach from the current Six Year Improvement Program; now THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to cancel a project for Independence Boulevard approximately 0.2 miles. the improvement of Jeanne Street from to Constitution Drive, a distance of BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Virginia Beach hereby agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation for the'total amount of the costs expended by the Department through the date the Department is notified of such cancellation. Adopted this 11 day of June City of Virginia Beach, Virginia , 1996 ATTEST BY CITY CLERK CITY MANAGER/CITY MANAGER DESIGNEE APPROVED A5 TO !3GAL CITY ATTORNEY PROJECT PROGRAMMING RESOLUTION WHEREAS, in accordance with Virginia Department of' Transportation construction allocation procedures, it is necessary that a request by council resolution be made in order that the Department program an urban highway project in the City of Virginia Beach; no~ THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council' of Virginia Beach, Virginia requests the Virginia Department of Transportation to establish a project for the ~mprovement of Jeanne Street from Independence Boulevard to Constitution Drive, a distance of approximately 0.2 miles. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of Virginia Beach hereby agrees to pay its share of the total cost for preliminary engineering, right of way and construction of this project in accordance with Section 33.1-44 of the Code of Virginia, and that, if Virginia Beach subsequently elects to cancel this project, Virginia Beach hereby agrees to reimburse the Virginia Department of Transportation for the total amount of the costs expended by the Department through the date the Department is notified of such cancellation. Adopted this 28 day of September, 1993 city of Virginia Beach, Virginia ATTEST CLERK OF COUNCIL CERTIFIED TO BE A TRUE COPY OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL' OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA, ON SEPTEMBER 28, 1993. Ruth/Hodges Smith, CMC/AAE City Clerk APPROVED AS TO COl"i'l DEPARTMENT ~,PPROVED AS TO LEGAL .~'I)i::ICIEI,;ICY AND.[qRM/3 . CITY ATTORNEY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY STAFF TO MAKE A PRESENTATION TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REGARDING THE PROPOSED INDEPENDENCE BOULEVARD PHASE IV-B PROJECT, THE REALLOCATION OF URBAN FUNDS FROM CERTAIN PROGRAMMED PROJECTS TO PROMOTE THE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE SOUTHEASTERN PARKWAY AND GREENBELT, RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS TO 1-64AND ROUTE 44, AND OTHER INITIATIVES DESIGNED TO ENHANCE BOTH REGIONAL AND LOCAL ACCESS 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 3O 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 WHEREAS, City staff has recommended cancellation of the Jeanne Street Project and the reallocation of all programmed funds to a new project, designated as Independence Boulevard Phase IV-B, involving the construction of improvements at the intersection of Haygood Road and Independence Boulevard; WHEREAS, City staff has also recommended a redirection of urban allocations to fund the Southeastern Parkway and Greenbelt Project; WHEREAS, City staff has further recommended designated improvements to Interstate 64 and Route 44; WHEREAS, City staff made a presentation to City Council regarding these recommendations at Council's meeting on March 19, 1996; and WHEREAS, the City Manager has requested authorization from City Council for City staff to present these recommendations, and related initiatives, to the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Transportation at the Suffolk District Preallocation Hearing on March 27, 1996. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: 1. That City Council hereby authorizes City staff to make a presentation to the Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Transportation regarding the proposed Independence Boulevard Phase IV-B Project, the reallocation of urban funds from certain programmed projects to promote'the development and construction of the Southeastern Parkway and Greenbelt, recommended improvements to 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Interstate 64 and Route 44, and other initiatives designated to enhance both regional and local access. 2. That the presentation to be made by City staff shall be in substantial conformance with the proposed statement which is attached hereto as "Exhibit A," and is hereby incorporated by reference. Adopted by..the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the 26th day of M-~h , 1996. 46 47 48 49 CA-6257 ORDIN \NONCODE \ PHASEIV. RES R-1 PREPARED: 03 / 2 0 / 9 6 CERTIFIED TO BE A TRUE COPY OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA, ON March 26, 1996 ~th Hodg~ Smith, CMC/~E City Clerk BTATEHENT OF JOHN W, HERZKEv PE CITY ENGINEER~ DEPARTHENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH~ VIRGINIA AT THE COI~OI~EALTH OF VIRGINI~ DEPARTHENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUFFOLK DISTRICT PREALLOCATION HEARING MARCH 27~ 1996 COMMISSIONER AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD: Good Morning, I am John W. Herzke, representing the Public Works Department, of the City of Virginia Beach. On behalf of the City Council, the City executive staff and the Director of Public Works of the City of Virginia Beach, I am pleased to be here this morning to present this statement regarding the roadway network needs of Virginia Beach motorists. We believe these needs can be most effectively addressed by the continued proactive actions of the Commonwealth Transportation Board, through its Six-Year Improvement Program, and the continued diligent execution of the program by the personnel of the Virginia Department of Transportation at both the Richmond and Suffolk District levels. My remarks will be in three categories: Urban Construction, and its relationship to the Southeastern Parkway and Greenbelt, Interstate 64 Improvements, and Route 44 Improvements. URBAN CONBTRUOTXON/SOUTHF~STERN PARKWAY ~ GREENBELT First, I would like to thank the Department for the completion of two major projects in Virginia Beach since our last preallocation hearing. The construction of a new highway, South Plaza Trail, which provides a vital transportation link on new alignment from Independence Boulevard to Princess Anne Road, and the construction of a second crossing of Rudee Inlet in our resort area with aocompletion of the Rudee Inlet Bridge project. Both of these highway improvements have significantly improved travel time, and completed vital links in our north-south transportation corridors. There are three other VDOT funded projects currently under construction in Virginia Beach: 1) Military Highway provides the widening of Route 13 serving the transportation needs of the region including the adjoining cities of Norfolk and Chesapeake. 2) Interchange improvements are being completed at the Birdneck Road intersection with Route 44, and 3) Sound barrier walls are currently under construction along the Independence Boulevard interchange on Route 44. Twenty additional projects are included in the planning, design or right-of-way acquisition stages of the current six-year program. Several projects such as Kempsville Road, Salem Road, Lynnhaven Parkway, and London Bridge Road should begin construction within the next two to three years. The remaining projects for Virginia Beach included in the current VDOT Six-Year Urban Allocation program have planning and engineering efforts underway. Most of these projects are scheduled for construction completion near the end of this six-year program. These projects are vitally needed components of the City's Master Street and Highway Plan. The City understands that several projects were experiencing delays associated with air quality issues. With the completion of the congestion mitigation study for the region, we are confident that the Department can keep our program moving forward. Any and all efforts by VDOT to prevent slippage and to improve on current comple~ion schedules would be greatly appreciated by Virginia Beach. On the basis of our anticipated annual allocation, and the current estimate of funds available within prior allocations, we have identified the following modifications for your consideration in conjunction with this annual updating of the VDOT Six-Year Improvement Plan. First, we would like to request the cancellation of project U000-134-V38, Jeanne Street and a reappropriation of all programmed funds to a new VDOT project in the Independence Boulevard corridor which is a'hi~h priority for Virginia Beach. Specifically, we request the Department to program the acquisition of right-of-way and construction of improvements at the intersection of Haygood Road and Independence Boulevard, which we have designated as Independence Boulevard, Phase IV-B. This project will complete the work of the existing VDOT project which widens Independence Boulevard from Pembroke Boulevard north to Haygood Road. The City is administering the design and construction of the VDOT project which has already been programmed and we would plan on administering the acquisition and construction of this new project if included in the updated six-year program. The City has already undertaken the design work on this major intersection improvement and will have design completed by this spring. Our current estimate to complete acquisition and construction of the Independence Boulevard/Haygood Road intersection is approximately 4.6 million dollars. Our second request involves a redirection of Urban Allocations to fund the Southeastern Parkway and Greenbelt Project. This project has, for many years, been an integral part of the Master Street and Highway Plan of the City of Virginia Beach. Improvements to our roadway network have been planned and implemented on the assumption the roadway would, eventually, be constructed. We ask that you consider delaying Holland Road (Project U000-134-145) and all programmed improvements to the Laskin Road corridor (Project 0058-134-V02, V03 and V04) and reapp~opriate those funds towards the design and construction of the Southeastern Parkway and Greenbelt (Project U000-134-F23). These projects currently represent 60.4 million dollars of total urban allocations of which 47 million is already programmed in the current six-year plan. This reallocation of urban funds will provide a means to begin financing of this regional limited access facility and is consistent with the actions taken by the CTB on February 15, 1996 which approved the final corridor alignment and authorized completion of the final Environmental Impact Statement. Our City Council fully endorses this project and it is one of our highest pri~ri~les- Also, in support of the Southeastern Parkway and Greenbelt, we ask for a modification of the parallel facility improvements currently planned for Oceana Boulevard and reprogram any excess funds from that project to the Southeastern Parkway and Greenbelt. Specifically, we would request your consideration of a modified project for Oceana Boulevard/First Colonial Road Extension (Project U000-134-118) to construct a two-lane highway on new alignment at the north end of the project from existing First Colonial Road to existing Oceana Boulevard. The modified project would also include a realignment at the southern end of the project from Oceana Boulevard to General Booth Boulevard at its present intersection with Prosperity Road. This alignment would also provide a two-lane facility and an improved intersection at General Booth Boulevard to accommodate local traffic demand. Existing oceana Boulevard from Southern Boulevard to Harpers Road would not be widened as presently proposed by this project, since the Southeastern Parkway and Greenbelt will be constructed parallel to and just to the east of the First Colonial project. The Southeastern Parkway and Greenbelt project will provide major transportation benefits in this corridor with planned interchange improvements at Route 44, Virginia Beach Boulevard, the Oceana Naval Air Station main gate entrance, and Dam Neck Road. Clearly, our objective in working with the Department is to place a high priority on the progressive development, design and construction of the Southeastern Parkway and Greenbelt as our highest priority project. We encourage the Department to move towards construction as soon as possible on this project, and we will prQvide aa mu~h assistance as' we can towards achieving a viable financing and funding plan. 4 INTERSTATE 64 I would like to turn now to a brief discussion of VDOT's planned improvements to Interstate 64, addressing those areas of particular importance to Virginia Beach. First, we acknowledge and thank you for your ongoing efforts to widen 1-64 to a six-lane facility with HOV lanes between Route 44 and the Western City Line. Secondly, as previously requested, we would appreciate consideration being given to including HOV access at Northampton Boulevard in the six-year program. This HOV access is essential to preclude motorists, residing in the northern area of the City, from having to travel south to Route 44 to gain access to HOV lanes. It will also reduce traffic on the remaining lanes of 1-64 west of Northampton Boulevard. Finally, the Virginia Beach City Council has endorsed a VDOT proposal to construct an additional interchange between Indian River Road and Greenbrier Parkway at the planned junction of City Line Road and Interstate 64. The City has added City Line Road to its Master Street and Highway Plan and, we would like to thank the Department for their addition of this project to the VDOT program. The city supports the rapid progression of this project from the engineering phase to construction completion and again requests your support to move this project to timely completion. ROUTE 44 The following remarks pertain to Route 44, the Virginia Beach Expressway. We would like to thank the Department for all of your efforts to date for the construction of the Route 44/Birdneok Road interchange which has a construction'completion date of April 15, 1996. This project, taken together with the VDOT project for upgrading Birdneck Road, will complete the improvements of the Birdneck Road corridor. This will provide greatly improved access to the City's Pavilion area and create a beneficial by-pass of the resort area for southbound traffic. We are again asking that you examine the Route 44/Witchduck Road inte~cha~ge for improved operational considerations. 5 Increased capacity and smoother traffic flows through the area appear attainable through geometric modifications and other improvements. As part of the assessment, consideration will need to be given to the impacts of planned interchange improvements on the local street network in the area. On balance, we believe both the intersection and the potential of the roadway network in this area can be enhanced, and we seek your assistance to accomplish this. We also ask the Department to program additional improvements at the Rosemont Road interchange. We appreciate the modifications that were completed last October, but these are only interim measures and major modifications are warranted. Thank you for affording me the opportunity to appear before the Board today and present the requests of the City of Virginia Beach. BLG/nfe 3/14/96 6 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA FY 1996-97 / FY 2001-2002 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Project Category: Project Number and T~e: Priority ,: * Roadways 2-164 Jeanne Street UNAPPROPRIATED SUBSEQUENT YEARS Total Budget Estimated Appropriafior. s Year I Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Cost To Date FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98 FY 1998-99 FY 1999-00 FY 2000-01 FY 2001-02 624,160 374,160 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 Opera,rig Budget Impact 0 0 0 3,000 3,090 3,185 L_ OE-~CR!PT'.C~N AND SCOPE I · I'.'t~ [;l() CC: .~ 'C.' C"-rt.q'.riJ-'llOn of cefc'til[te.'-.: im-"}rove"t'..cfiT5 3l '.fie J~:;Jrt:te STreet and C~fISI.IIJ[.'on ;:)five inTeriec:lCiI. The ml=fcvemen[s will include raised medians, striping and dome markers designed to improve traffic flow through the intersection and to prevent non-local traffic on Constitution Orive. "TI"~ .~ ,')' =1!;:~;. ;'~111 prey 'J.~ ~! .'ree.fl,~'..~l'~3 traff.'= ;rom the Pembroke Manor subdivision. JLJSTIFICATiON AND IMPACT J,rB,:'la 5ed¢;rt E,~,tl.ev;zrn Io In.~el~eno:?nce BolJ.evara. aha i111nlm. ZO ;r;.ll'l" f,O;'.' mro..gn HISTGRY · ll~. :~'"l~,"t T.rS: acp,.',.=rr.~J '. Ir,e ~Y 1992-~3, CIP a~. a majc' :oa."-way ,m~,rovemefi: r;roject at an est~ma:e3 (:-"-5~ -'.f ~[,768,..7. W~m the FY 1993-94 CIP, VDOT accepted the project as a state road project. In the FY 1996-97 CIP, this project's scope has been greatly reduced, and the project is no longer a VDOT project. Funding ia programmed to close out the project with VDOT, and construct the intersection improvements. City owned. ACTIVITY FROM - TO AMOUNT Inspections and Support 7193 - 12198 41,000 Design 7193- 7/97 367,160 Site Acquisition 5/97 - 11/97 10,000 Private UtiltiyAdjustments 11197 - 4~98 10,000 Construction 4198- 9/98 140,000 Landscaping 9~98 - 12/98 5,000 Contingencies 7193 - 12/98 51,000 Total Budgetary Coat Estimate 824,16O 1995 Charter Bonda 118,000 Operating Budget 10,000 Pay-As-You-Go 250,000 Total 624,160 Pembroke Mall 30 Item V-M. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM ti 409O1 PLANNING Mayor Oberndorf DECLARED a PUBLIC HEARING on: PLANNING 1. SANFORD M. AND LAUREL E. ROSENBERG STREET CLOSURE 2. BPP DEVELOPERS, INC. STREET CLOSURE 3. PANDELL BUILDERS, INC. VARIANCE 4. JANE R. DOWDY VARIANCE $. VIRGINIA METRONET, INC.~ CONDITION~IL USE PERMIT 6. EXXON CORPORATION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 7. ANNIE B. AND FLOYD E. KELL&M, JR. CHANGE OF ZONING 8. CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH STREET CLOSURE June 11, 1996 Item V-M. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM # 40902 PLANNING BY CONSENT Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms, City Council APPROVED IN ONE MOTION Items 1, 3, 4, 5 and 8 of the PLANNING BY CONSENT AGENDA. Items 1 and 3 were approved subject to compliance of conditions by December 10, 1996. Voting: 11-0 Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert IC Dean, William W. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndo~ Nancy K. Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None Council Lady Parker ABSTAINED on Item 8 as she and her husband are owners of Parker Pools. June 11, 1996 Item V-M. 1. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM # 40903 PLANNING BY CONSENT Upon motion by Councilman Baton, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms, City Council APPROVED SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE BY DECEMBER 10, 1996 the Application of SANFORD M. and LAUREL E. ROSENBERG for the discontinuance, closure and abandonment of a portion of a 15-foot alley. Petition of Sanford M. and & Laurel E. Rosenberg for the discontinuance, closure and abandonment of a portion of a 15 foot alley located adjacent to Lots 6 and 18, Block 20, Croatan Beach. Said parcel contains 750 square feet. LYNNHAVEN BOROUGH. The following conditions shall be required: The City Attorney's Office shall make the final determination regarding ownership of the underlying fee. The purchase price to be paid to the City shall be determined according to the "Policy Regarding Purchase of City's Interest in Streets Pursuant to Street Closures," approved by City Council. Copies of the policy are available in the Planning Department. 2. All funds generated from this purchase shall be deposited in the Croatan Beach access account and utilized by the City to purchase additional access to the beach in the Croatan area at an appropriate location. The applicant is required to resubdivide the property and vacate internal lot lines to incorporate the closed area into adjoining parcels and ensure that all lots have access to a public street. The applicant is responsible for determining if any private utilities are located within the area proposed for closure and working with the private utility companies to provide any necessary easements. Preliminary comments from the private utility companies indicate that no private utilities will be impacted. Closure of this right-of-way is contingent upon compliance with the above stated conditions within 180 days of approval by City Council. Voting: 11-0 (By ConsenO Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III,, Robert IC Dean, William W. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy IC Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None June IL 1996 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM # 40904 PI. eINNING ~dttorney Robert Jones, represented the applicant Dr. Steve Vinson, 2965 Lynnhaven Drive, Phone: 496-9065, registered in OPPOSITION Upon motion by Councilman Harrison, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms, City Council APPROF'ED SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE B Y DECEMBER 10, 1996 the Application of BPP DEVELOPERS, INC., a Virginia Corporation for the discontinuance, closure and abandonmet~t of Lynnhaven Drive: Petition of BPP Developers, Inc., a Virginia Corporation for the discontinuance, closure and abandonment of Lynnhaven Drive beginning at a point 151.6 feet east of Vista Drive and running in an easterly direction a distance of 115 feet. Said parcel is variable in width and contains 3239 square feet. LYNNHAVEN BOROUGH. The following conditions shall be required: The City Attorney's Office shall make the final determination regarding ownership of the underlying fee. The purchase price to be paid to the City shall be determined according to the "Policy Regarding Purchase of City's interest in Streets Pursuant to Street Closures", approved by City Council. Copies of the policy are available in the Planning Department. The applicant is required to resubdivide the property and vacate internal lot lines to incorporate the closed area into the adjoining parcel. The applicant is responsible for determining if any private utilities are located within the area proposed for closure and worla'ng with the private utility companies to provide any necessary easements. Preliminary comments from the private utility companies indicate that no private utilities will be impacted. Closure of the right-of-way shall be contingent upon compliance with the above stated conditions within 180 days of the approval by City Council. Voting: 10-0 Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baurn, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert ~ Dean, William gE. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis iZ Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndo~ Nancy K. Parker and Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members ~lbsent: Louisa M. Strayhorn June 11, 1996 - 47 - Item V-M.$, PUBLIC HEARING ITEM # 40905 PLANNING BY CONSENT Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms, City Council APPROVED Application of PANDELL BUILDERS, INC., for a Variatw¢ to Section 4.4(b) of the Subdivision Ordinance which requires that all lots created by subdivision meet all the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance. Appeal from Decisions of Administrative Officers in regard to certain elements of the Subdivision Ordinance, subdivision for Pandell Builders, Inc. Property is located at the southeast intersection of Reedtown Road and Mason Street. BAYSIDE BOROUGH. 11-0 (By Consent) Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert K. Dean, William W. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R~ Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy IC Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessotns, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None June 11, 1996 - 48 - Item V-M, 4, PUBLIC HEARING ITEM # 40906 PLANNING BY CONSENT Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms, City Council APPROVED Apph'cation of JANE R. DOWDY for a Variance to Section 4.4(b) of the Subdivision Ordinance which requires all newly created lots to meet all requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance. Appeal from Decisions of Administrative Officers in regard to certain elements of the Subdivision Ordinance, Subdivision for Jane R. Dowdy. Property is located on South Spigel Drive on Lot B, Proposed Dowdy Acres. LYNNHAVEN BOROUGH. The following condition shall be required: 1. No development will be permitted within the limits of the Resource Protection Area. Voting: 11-0 (By Consent) Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert IC Dean, William W. Harrison, Jr., HaroM Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R~ Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy K. Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None June 11, 1996 - 49 - PUBLIC HEARING ITEM # 40907 PLANNING BY CONSENT Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms, City Council ADOPTED an Ordinance upon application of VIRGINIA METRONET, INC. dba 360° Communications Company for a Conditional Use Permit: ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF VIRGINId METRONET, INC. DBA 360* COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY FORA CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT R06962041 BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA Ordinance upon application of Virginia Metronet, Inc., dba 360* Communications Company for a Conditional Use Permit for a 150-foot monopole tower on Lots 49, 50 and 51, Shelton Place. Said parcel is located at 1707 Lawson Drive and con tains 25, 958 square feet. BA YSIDE BOROUGH. The following conditions shall be required: 1. The tower will be a monopole style tower and will not exceed 150 feet in height. 2. The tower will be developed as a multiple use tower, accommodating at a minimum each of the three providers identified in this staff report. The applicant must petition the Board of Zoning Appeals for a setback variance to the reduced setback proposed by this request. No greater reduction of setback will be permitted without further consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council. A letter from radio frequency engineer indicating the combined nonionizing electromagnetic radiation exposure emitted will not exceed the lowest applicable exposure standards adopted by the American National Standards Institute must be submitted prior to final site plan approval. A letter from a licensed structural engineer indicating the structural integrity of the proposed tower meets or exceeds standards established in the City Zoning Ordinance must be submitted prior to final site plan approval. This Ordinance shall be effective in accordance with Section 107 69 of the Zoning Ordinance. Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the Eleventh of June, Nineteen Hundred June 11, 1996 - 50 - Item V-M.,5. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM # 40907 (Continued) PLANNING BY CONSENT Voting: 11-0 (By ConsenO Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert IC Dean, William W. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy IC Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa 34. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None June 11, 1996 - 51 - Item V-M, 6. PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING ITEM # 40908 Upon motion by Councilman Dean, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms, City Council ADOPTED an Ordinance upon application of EXXON CORPORATION for a Conditional Use Permit: ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF E. EPfON CORPORATION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A CAR WASH R06962042 BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA Ordinance upon application of Exxon Corporation for a Conditional Use Permit for a car wash in conjunction with a convenience store and gas pumps at the southwest corner of London Bridge Road and General Booth Boulevard. Said parcel is located at 2101 General Booth Boulevard and contains 39,988 square feet. PRINCES ANNE BOROUGH The following conditions shall be required: Site development shall be substantially in accordance with the site plan/landscape plan submitted to the Planning Department on April 18, 1996. The car wash shall utilize water reclamation and recycling technology. Architectural design and materials for the car wash shall be substantially consistent with those of the Strawbridge Shopping Center and the existing convenience store, including the use of matching brick and roof materials. One large, one medium, or two small trees be installed in the remaining open space area between the convenience store and the car wash drive aisle. The tree(s) shall be a native species selected.from the recommended tree list contained in the User's Guide for the City of Virginia Beach Tree Planting, Preservation and Replacement Ordinance. Final site plan approval shall provide for the replacement of existing landscape material along the General Booth Boulevard and London Bridge Road street frontages, where determined by the City Arborist to have been damaged by improper pruning. Replacement plantings shall comply with the specifications set forth on the originally approved site plan for the service station and convenience store. This Or&'nance shall be effective in accordance with Section 107 (f) of the Zoning Ordinance. Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the Eleventh of June, Nineteen Hundred June 11, 1996 Item V-M. 6, PUBLIC HEARING ITEM # 40908 (Continued) PLANNING Voting: 10-0 Council Members Voting .dye: John A. Baum, Linwood '0. Branch, III, Robert K. Dean, William W. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy K. Parker and Iffce Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: Louisa M. Strayhorn June 11, 1996 Item V-M. 7. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM # 40909 PLANNING Attorney R. J. Nutter, 4425 Corporation Lane, Phone: 671-6000, represented the applicant Upon motion by Councilman Dean, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms, City Council ADOPTED an Ordinance upon application of ANNIE B. and FLOYD E. KELLAM, JR., for a Change of Zoning District Class(fication: ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF ANNIE B. KELLAM AND FLOYD E. KELLAM, JR., EXECUTORS AND TRUSTEES UNDER THE WILL OF FLOYD E. KELLAM, DECEASED Z06961493 BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA Ordinance upon application of Annie B. Kellam and Floyd E. Kellam, Jr., Executors and Trustees under the Will of Floyd E. Kellam, Deceased, for a Change of Zoning District Classification from B-1 Neighborhood District to Conditional B-2 Community Business District on the north side of Princess Anne Road beginning at a point 680 feet more or less west of the intersection with North Landing Road. The proposed zoning classification change to Conditional B-2 is to allow for a drive-through window for the use of this parcel for suburban low density residential at densities that are compatible with single family use in accordance with other Plan policies. Said parcel contains 38,419.9 square feet. PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH. The following condition shall be required: 1. An Agreement encompassing proffers shall be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court. Voting: 11-0 Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert K. Dean, William W. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndoff, Nancy lc2. Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None June 11, 1996 ;'ORM NO. P.$, lB City of Virginia In R~ly R~f~' To Our Fi]~ No. DATE: May 22, 1996 TO: FROM: RE: Leslie L. Lilley William M. Macali ~ Conditional Zoning Application Annie B. & Floyd Kell~m, Jr., TrusSes DEPT: City Attorney DEPT: City Attorney The above-referenced conditional zoning applicatiOn is scheduled to be heard by the City Council on June 11, 1996. I have reviewed the subject proffer agreement, dated April 22, 1996, and have determined it to be legally sufficient and in proper legal form. A copy of the agreement is attached. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further. WMM Enclosure THIS AGREEMENT, made this 22nd day of April, 1996, by and between ANNIE B. KELLAM and FLOYD E. KELLAM, JR., EXECUTORS AND TRUSTEES UNDER THE WILL OF FLOYD E. KELLAM, DECEASED, collective (hereinafter Grantor) and the CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, a municipal corporation of the Commonwealth of Virginia (hereinafter referred to as Grantee). W I T N E S S E T H : WHEREAS, the Grantors initiated an amendment to the Zoning Map of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, by Petition addressed to the Grantee, which Petition was granted by the Virginia Beach City Council on April 22, 1985 changing the classification of the Grantors property from AG-2 to B-1 on certain property containing a total of 0.882 acres, more or less, in the Princess Anne Borough of the City of Virginia Beach, more particularly described in the attached Exhibit A (hereinafter "the Property"); and WHEREAS, on April 22, 1985, Grantor and Grantee agreed upon certain conditions respecting the development of the Property which conditions are on file in the planning Department of the City of Virginia Beach and are set out below: 1. Installation of a six foot privacy fence along the rear property line; 2. Design of the building and the signage shall be approved by the Virginia Beach Historic Review Board; 3. Grantor shall use low level lighting directed inwardly toward the Property; 4. The proposed restaurant shall close at midnight; 5. Grantor shall dedicate right-of-way along Princess Anne Road pursuant to the Master Street and Highway Plan; and WHEREAS, during 1995, the Grantor caused to be constructed on the Property a restaurant, which restaurant was developed in accordance with all of the conditions imposed by City Council on April 22, 1985; and WHEREAS, the Grantor has now initiated an amendment to the Zoning Map of the City of Virginia Beach, by petition of the Grantor to the Grantee to change the classification of the Property from B-1 to B-2 (Conditional) and therein desires to amend, modify and supplement the conditions applicable to the Property; and WHEREAS, Grantor acknowledges the competing and sometimes incompatible uses conflict and that in order to permit differing uses on and in the area of the Property and at the same time to recognize the effects of the changes, and the need for various types of uses, including those listed herein, certain reasonable conditions governing the use of the Property for the protection of the community that are not generally applicable to the land similarly zoned B-2 are needed to cope with the situation which the Grantors rezoning application gives rise to; and -2- WHEREAS, the Proffers set forth herein shall continue in full force and effect until a subsequent amendment changes the zoning on the Property covered by such conditions; provided, however, that such conditions shall continue despite a subsequent amendment if the subsequent amendment is part of the comprehensive implementation of a new or substantially revised zoning ordinance, unless, notwithstanding the foregoing, these conditions are amended or varied by written instrument recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, and executed by the record owner of the subject property at the time of recordation of such instrument; provided, further, that said instrument is consented to by the Grantee in writing as evidenced by a certified copy of ordinance or resolution adopted by the governing body of the Grantee, after a public hearing before the Grantee advertised pursuant to the provisions of the Code of Virginia, Section 15.1-431, which said ordinance or resolution shall be recorded along with said instrument as conclusive evidence of such consent. NOW, THEREFORE, the Grantor, for themselves, their successors, assigns, grantees, and other successors in title or interest, voluntarily and without any requirements by or execution from the Grantee or its governing body and without any element of compulsion of quid ~ro ~ for zoning, -3- rezoning, site plan, building permit or subdivision approval, hereby makes the following declaration of conditions and restrictions as to the physical development and operation of the property and governing the use thereof and hereby tenders thm. following covenants running with the said property, which shall be binding following the approval of Grantor's rezoning Petition by Grantee upon the Property and upon all parties and persons claiming under.or through the Grantor, its heirs, personal representatives, assigns, grantees and other successors in interest or title, namely: 1. The Grantor shall develop the Property and install landscapng thereon substantially as shown on the Site Plan entitled "Princess Anne Rd. @ Muncipal Center, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Virginia Beach; Landscape Enhancements & Drive-Thru Addition,,, revised April 15, 1996, (hereinafter Site Plan) which Site Plan is presented to the City Council at its public hearing on this application and is on file in the Planning Department of the City of Virginia Beach. 2. The Grantor shall not use any loud speakers or external intercoms in conjunction with the drive-thru window facility on the building. 3. Any exterior lighting installed on the Property shall be directed toward the interior of the Property and light levels at the northern Property line, when measured, shall not exceed 0.5 foot candles. -4- 4. The Grantor shall close its business to the public between the hours of 12:00 midnight and 6:00 a.m. daily. 5. Grantor shall adhere to the following restrictions and construct the following improvements which collectively comprise an on-site traffic management plan for the Property: a. Install a speed control bump substantially as shown on the Site Plan; b. Reserve two parking spaces along the western boundary of the Property for drive-thru overflow substantially shown on the Site Plan; c. Install and maintain pedestrian accent stripping within the parking lot on the Property substantially as shown on the Site Plan; d. Install directional signage at the pedestrian cross walks and within the drive-thru stack lane substantially as shown on the Site Plan; e. Grantor shall prohibit vehicles from remaining in the drive-thru stack lane except where designated on the Site Plan. 6. Further conditions may be required by the Grantee during detailed site plan and/or subdivision review and the administration of applicable City codes by all applicable City agencies and departments to meet all applicable City Code requirements. -5- Ail references hereinabove to zoning districts and to regulations applicable thereto refer to the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, in force as of the date the conditional zoning amendment is approved by the Grantee. The Grantor covenants and agrees that (1) the Zoning Administrator of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia shall be vested with all necessary authority on behalf of the governing body of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia to administer and enforce the foregoing conditions, including (i) the ordering in writing of the remedying of any noncompliance with such conditions, and (ii) the bringing of legal action or suite to ensure compliance with such conditions, including mandatory or prohibitory injunction, abatement, damages or other appropriate aCtion, suit or proceedings; (2) the failure to meet all conditions shall constitute cause to deny the issuance of any of the required building or occupancy permits as may be appropriate; (3) if aggrieved by any decisions of the Zoning Administrator made pursuant to the provisions of the City Code, the CZO or this Agreement, the Grantor shall petition to the governing body for the review thereof prior to instituting proceedings in court; and (4) the Zoning Map shown by an appropriate symbol on the map the existence of conditions attaching to the zoning of the subject property on the map and that the -6- ordinance and the conditions may be made readily available and accessible for public inspection in the office of the zoning Administrator and in the Planning Department and that they shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia and indexed in the name of the Grantor and Grantee. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: TRUSTEE UNDER THE WILL OF FLOYD E. KELLAM, DECEASED FLO~ ~E. KELLAM, IJR.~ EXL~CUTOR AND TRUSTEE UNDER THE WILL OF FLOYD E. KELLAM~ DECEASED -7- STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, to-wit: Subscribed and sworn to before me this 22nd day of April, 1996 by Annie B. Kellam, Executor and Trustee under the Will of Floyd E. Kellam, Deceased. Notary ~ublic My Commission Expires: STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, to-wit: Subscribed and sworn to before me this 22nd day of April, 1996 by Floyd E. Kellam, Jr., Executor and Trustee under the Will of Floyd E. Kellam, Deceased. My Commission Expires: Notary P~fbl ic -8- - 53 - Item V-M. ?. PUBLIC H~4RING ITEM # 40909 PLANNING Attorney R. J. Nutter, 4425 Corporation Lane, Phone: 671-6000, represented the applicant Upon motion by Councilman Dean, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms, City Council ADOPTED an Ordinance upon application of ,4NNIE B. and FLOYD E. KELLAM, JR., for a Chanee o_f Zoning District Classification: -- ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF ANNIE B. KELLAM AND FLOYD E. ~ JR., EXECUTORS AND TRUSTEES UNDER THE WILL OF FLOYD E. KELI. AM, DECEASED Z06961493 BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BE~CIt, VIRGINL4 Ordinance upon application of ~lnnie B. Kellam and Floyd E. Kellam, Jr., F~ecutors and Trustees under the Will of Floyd E. Keilam, Deceased, for a Change of Zoning District Classification from B-I Neighborhood District to Conditional B-2 Community Business District on the north side of Princess ~nne Road beginning at a point 680 feet more or less west of the intersection with North Landing Road. The proposed zoning classification change to Conditional B-2 is to allow for a drive-through window for the use of this parcel for suburban low density residential at densities that are compatible with single family use in accordance with other Plan policies. Said parcel contains 38, 419.9 square feet. PRINCESS ~VNE BOROUGH. The following condition shall be required: 1. An Agreement encompassing proffers shall be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court. Voting: 11-0 Council Members Voting Aye: 'John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert K. Dean, William gE. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndoff,, Nancy K. Parker, Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None J, ne 11, 1996 - 54 - Item V-M. 8. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM # 40910 PLANNING B Y CONSENT Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Vice Mayor Sessoms, City Council AUTHORIZED FINAL APPROVAL BY CONSENT the Application in behalf of the CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH for the discontinuance, closure and abandonment of a portion of Atlantic Avenue. Application of the City of Virginia Beach for the discontinuance, closure and abandonment of a portion of Atlantic Avenue beginning at the southern boundary of Cavalier Drive and running in a southerly direction a distance of 450 feet more or less. Said parcel contains 21,938 square feet. VIRGINIA BEACH BOROUGH. lO-O(ByConsenO Council Members Voting Aye: John A. Baum, Linwood O. Branch, III, Robert 32 Dean, William W. Harrison, Jr., Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Vice Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. and Louisa M. Strayhorn Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Abstaining: Nancy IC Parker Council Members Absent: None Council Lady Parker ABSTAINED as she and her husband are owners of Parker Pools. June 11, 1996 ORDINANCE NO. IN THE MATTER OF CLOSING, VACATING AND DISCONTINUING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN STREET KNOWN AS ATLANTIC AVENUE AS SHOWN UPON THAT CERTAIN PLAT ENTITLED, "PLAT SHOWING PROPERTIES TO BE EXCHANGED BETWEEN CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH AND CAVALIER HOTEL CORPORATION VIRGINIA BEACH BOROUGH -- VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA" DATED JUNE 5, 1995, ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. WHEREAS, it appearing by affidavit that proper notice has been given by the City of Virginia Beach that it would make application to the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on August 22, 1995, to have the hereinafter described street discontinued, closed, and vacated; and WHEREAS, it is the judgment of the Council that said street be discontinued, closed, and vacated; NOW, THEREFORE, SECTION I BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, that the hereinafter described street be discontinued, closed, and vacated: ALL THAT certain lot, tract or parcel of land together with improvements thereon belonging, lying, situate and being in the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, and designated and described as the dotted area shown as "PARCEL C PORTION OF ATLANTIC AVENUE TO BE CLOSED AND VACATED" as shown on that certain plat entitled, "PLAT SHOWING PROPERTIES TO BE EXCHANGED BETWEEN CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH AND CAVALIER HOTEL CORPORATION VIRGINIA BEACH BOROUGH -- VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA" SCALE 1" = 30', DATED: JUNE 5, 1995, prepared by Rouse - Sirine Associates, Ltd. SECTION II The discontinuance, closure and vacation of the portion of street referenced above is conditioned upon the execution and recordation of deeds substantially in the form of the attached deeds between the Cavalier Hotel Corporation and the Commonwealth of Virginia which deeds are on file in the Office of the City Attorney of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia. GPIN: 2418-95-5764 .SECTION III A certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed simultaneously with the recordation of the above-referenced deeds in the Clerk,s Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, and said Ordinance shall be indexed in the name of the City of Virginia Beach as Grantor. Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on this 11 day of June 1996. FINAL APPROVAL APPROVED AS TO CONTENT ¢ of Real Estat~ - APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY Department of Law 2 EXEMPTED FROM RECORDATION TAXES UNDER SECTION 58.1-811 (c)(3) THIS DEED is made this day of ,199_, by and between the COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, (the 'Grantor') and the CAVALIER HOTEL CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation, (the 'Grantee'). WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) cash in hand paid, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Grantor does hereby quitclaim, release and convey to the Grantee, all right, title and interest of the Grantor in and to the following described property, to wit: pARCEL C All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land together with the improvements thereon, lying situate and bein in the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, designated an~ described as "PARCEL C' as shown on that certainplat entitled: "PLAT SHOWING PROPERTIES TO BE EXCHANGED BETWEEN COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA AND CAVALIER HOTEL CORPORATION VIRGINIA BEACH BOROUGH - VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1"=30' JUNE 5, 1995 REVISED: OCTOBER 5, 1995 ROUSE - SIRINE ASSOCIATES, LTD.", which plat is duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, in Map Book , at page _,__, to which reference is made for a more pam--i~fflar description. It being a part of the same property conveyed to the Grantor from Cavalier Hotel Corporation, a Virginia corporation, by Deed dated October 8, 1944, duly recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 224-A, at page 393. This conveyance is made subject to the covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements of. record, insofar as they may lawfully affect the aforesaid property. WITNESS the following signature and seal: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONER By: (SEAL) GPIN: 2418-96-?081 2418-95-5764 STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY OF The foregoing ,199__ by Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Virginia, on its behalf. , to-wit: i~trument was acknowledged before me this day of , Commonwealth Transportation My commission expires: Notary Public EXEMPTED FROM RECORDATION TAXES UNDER SECTIONS 58.1-S11(a) (3) AND 58.1-811(c) (4) REIMBURSEMENT AUTHORIZED UNDER SECTION 25-249 THIS DEED is made this day of of , 199. , by and between CAVALIER HOTEL CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation, (the "Grantor"), and the COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, (the "Grantee"). .W I T N E S S E T N: That for and in consideration of the sum of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) cash in hand paid, consideration, the receipt and acknowledged, the Grantor does GENERAL WARRANTY and ENGLISH COVENANTS OF TITLE, Grantee, the following described property, to wit: PARCELS A-I, A-2, & B and other good and valuable sufficiency of which are hereby hereby grant and convey, with unto the All those certain lots, tracts or parcels of land together with the improvements thereon, lying situate and being in the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, designated and described as "PARCEL A-l, PARC[~.L A-2, AND PARCEL B" as shown on that certainplat entitled: "PLAT SHOWING TO BE EXCHANGED BETWEEN VIRGINIA AND CAVAI~IER HOTEL CORPORATION VIRGINIA BEACH BOROUGH - VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1"--30' JUNE 5, 1995 REVISED: OCTOBER 5, 1995 ROUSE - SII~INE ~,S_SOCIATES, LTD. which plat is duly recorded in the Clerk s Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, in Map Book , at page , to which reference Is made for a more p mcular descnpuon. tr berg a part of the same property conveyed to the Grantor om ~avaher-Jefferson Corporation, a Virginia corporation, by Deed dated May 31, 1960, duly recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 636, at page 422. GPIN: 2418-95-5764 This conveyance is made subject to the covenants, conditions, restrictiom and easements of record, insofar as they may lawfully affect the aforesaid property. V~rlTNESS the following signatures and seals: CAVALIER HOTEL CORPORATION By: ,(SEAL) STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY OF' , to-wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1~.._ by of Cavalier Hotel Corporation, on its behalf. My commission expires: Notary Public 2 Item I~-N. APPOINTMENTS ITEM ti 40911 BY CONSENSU~ City Council RESCHEDULED the following APPOINTMENTS: HAMPTON ROADS PLANING DISTRICT COMMISSION (HRPDC) SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD TIDEWATER TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT COMMISSION (TTDC) June 11, 1996 - 56 - Item UNFINISHED BUSINESS ITEM # 40~12 Councilman Branch referenced concerns expressed re the Vending Machine Ordinance A~nendment. Councilman Branch believed Orch'nance amendments in the resort area should not be considered during the tourist season. The Resort Area Associations have not reviewed these proposed amendments. Councilman Branch has not had any complaints re vending machines. He did not understand the reasoning for eliminating the enclosure requirements and considering increased setbacks. Councilman Branch requested these revisions be DEFERRED until after the tourist season. June 11, 1996 - 57 - Item V-Q. ADJOURNMENT ITEM # 40913 Mayor Oberndorf DECLARED the City Council Meeting ADJOURNED at 5:40 P.M.. Beverly O. Hooks, CMC/~IE Chief Deputy City Clerk City Clerk Meyera E. Oberndorf Mayor City of Virginia Beach Virginia June 11, 1996