HomeMy WebLinkAboutOCTOBER 8, 2002 MINUTES City of Virginia Beach
"COMMUNITY FOR A LIFETIME"
CITY COUNCIL
MA YOR MEYERA E OBERNDORF, At-Large
VICE MA YOR ROBERT C MANDIGO, JR, Kempsvtlle -Dtstrtct 2
MARGARET L EURE, Centervdle -Dtstrtct 1
LOUIS R JONES, Baystde -Dtstrtct 4
REBA S McCLANAN, Rose Hall - Dt~trlct 3
RICHARD A MADDOX, Beach -Dtstrtct 6
JIM REEVE, Prtncess Anne -Dtstrtct 7
PETER W SCHMIDT, At-Large
RON,4 VILLANUEVA, At-Large
ROSEMARY WILSON, At-Large
JAMES L WOOD, Lynnhaven -Dtstrtct 5
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
dAMES K SPORE, Cay Manager
LESLIE L L1LLEY, Ctty Attorney
RUTH HODGES SMITH, MMC, Ctty Clerk
CITY HALL BUILDING I
2401 COURTHOUSE DRIVE
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA 23456-8005
PHONE (757) 427-4303
FAX (757) 426-5669
E MAIL Ctycncl~vbgov corn
October 8, 2002
I. CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
- Conference Room-
I:30PM
Ao
Bo
Co
AMENDMENT TO R-5S DISTRICT
Karen R. Lasley, Zoning Admlmstrator
COMMUNITY LEGISLATIVE AGENDA
Robert R. Matthlas, Assistant to the City Manager
SANDBRIDGE ROAD/NIMMO PARKWAY CORRIDOR
E. Dean Block, D~rector - Department of Pubhc Works
II. REVIEW OF AGENDA ITEMS
III CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
IV. INFORMAL SESSION
- Conference Room -
4:30PM
A. CALL TO ORDER- Mayor Meyera E Obemdorf
B. ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL
C. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
V FORMAL SESSION
- Council Chamber -
6:00 PM
A. CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Meyera E. Obemdorf
B. INVOCATION:
Reverend R~chard J. Keener
Bayside Presbyterian Church
C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
D. ELECTRONIC ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL
E. CERTIFICATION OF CLOSED SESSION
F. MINUTES
1. INFORMAL AND FORMAL SESSIONS
October 1, 2002
G. AGENDA FOR FORMAL SESSION
H. MAYOR'S PRESENTATIONS
1. PROCLAMATION
a. Captain Cary A. "Dollar" Silvers Day, October 8, 2002
2. RESOLUTION
a. Harold Heisehober Field
I. ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS
1. Ordinances re the City Code:
a. AMEND § 18-72 re business license taxes on coin-operated machines
bo
AMEND and REORDAIN § 21-321.2 re ad&ng certmn neighborhoods subject to
maximum speed limits ("Traffic Calming") and prow&ng penaltles ~n those
neighborhoods:
(1) Stratford Chase
(2) Bayvflle Park
.
Ordinances to AUTHORIZE temporary encroachments into portions of the City's rights-ot
way within Linkhom Shores: (DISTRICT 5 - LYNNHAVEN)
a,
WAYNE and KIMBERLY A. BEAGLE re mmntenance of an existing timber
retaining wall at 1200 Gloucester Lane.
b,
PAUL D. and MARIANNE WARREN re construction and maintenance of a split rai
fence, willow arbor and landscaping at 1517 Duke of Windsor Road.
,
Resolution refemng to the Planmng Commission proposed amendments to §502 of the C~ty
Zoning Ordinance (CZO) re dimensional requirements for nonconforming lots in the R-5S
residential &strict.
.
Resolutton to AUTHORIZE the issuance and sale of $28-Mfllion Water and Sewer Revenue
Bonds, Series of 2002, heretofore authorized, re reimbursement for previous capital
expenditures and funding for future water and sewer projects; and, AUTHORIZE the
dlstnbuhon of the preliminary Official Statement and other related actions.
J. PLANNING
le
Application of MOTHERS, INC. for the reconstruction and conversion of a nonconforming
garage apartment into a nonconformtng single family residence at 16th Street and Baltic Avenm
(417 V2 16th Street), containing 5,000 square feet
(DISTRICT 6 - BEACH)
Recommendation:
DENIAL
.
Apphcatlon of DAVID ELGIN for mod~catton of acreage allowed by the Con&ttonal Use
Permtt for a church at Providence Road and Waring Street (5724 Providence Road) (approved
June 26, 1965), contatnlng 2.02 acres
(DISTRICT 2 - KEMPSVILLE)
Recommendation:
APPROVAL
.
Apphcatxons of HARBOUR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, L.L.C. at North Landtng
and West Neck Roads, containing 65.1 acres:
(DISTRICT 7- PRINCESS ANNE)
ae
Change ofZomng Dtstrtct Clas. stficatton from AG-1 and AG-2 Agricultural to
Conditional R-30 Residential re single family lots no less than 30,000 sq. ft.
b. Con&ttonal Use Permtt re Open Space
C,
Vartance Appeal re certain elements of the Subdlwslon Ordinance, Section 4.4(b), that
requires all newly created lots meet the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance
(CZO) and reduce required street width
Deferred:
Recommendation:
July 9 and August 13, 2002
INDEFINITE DEFERRAL
Apphcation of TRINITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP for a Con&ttonal Use Permzt re a
church at Challedon and South Parliament Drives (5245 Challedon Drive), contalmng
16,247.88 square feet.
(DISTRICT 2 - KEMPSVILLE)
Recommendation:
APPROVAL
Ko
APPOINTMENT
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
L UNFINISHED BUSINESS
M. NEW BUSINESS
N. ADJOURNMENT
10/03/02
AGENDA 10/011102\gW
If you are physically disabled or visually impaired
and need assistance at this meeting,
please call the CITY CLERK'S OFFICE at 427-4303
Hearing impaired, call. TDD only 427-4305
(TDD - Telephonic Devine for the Deaf)
MINUTES
VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Virginia Beach, Virginia
8 October 2002
Mayor Meyera E Oberndorf called to order the CITY MANAGER'$ BRIEFING re AMENDMENT TO
R-5S DISTRICT tn the Ctty Council Conference Room, City Hall Butldtng, on Tuesday, October 8, 2002,
at 1 30PM
Counctl Members Present
Margaret L Eure, Louts R Jones, Reba S McClanan, Vtce Mayor Robert
C Mandtgo, Jr, Rtchard A Maddox, Mayor Meyera E Oberndorf, Jtm
Reeve, Peter W Schmtdt, Rosemary Wtlson and James L Wood
Counctl Members Absent
Ron A Vtllanueva [Entered 2 46 P MI
-2-
MAYOR'S COMMENTS
ITEM # 50242
Mayor Oberndorf attended the "Virginia Hospitality and Travel Association, a Taste of Virginia Gala",
October 7, 2002 The event was held at the Shirley Plantatton, just outstde of Rtchmond The Mayor
&splayed pocket mformatton comptled by the Vtrgmta Beach Conventton and Vtsttor Development Tourtsm
facts were stated t e over 3-MILLION overnight visitors, the annual visitor spending $647.9-MILLION
and the Virginia Beach Tourism had a $1.3-BILLION economic impact on the region These handt-facts
are readtly avatlable tn a very compact fashton
ITEM # 50243
Mayor Oberndorf referenced a very tmpresstve book entttled "Discover our Wild Side" - the Virginia
Birding and Wildlife Trail, recetved from Davtd Whttehurst, Dtrector of Wtldhfe Dtverstty- Dtvtston of
Vtrgtnta Department of Game and Inland Ftshertes They wtll be sendtng a book for each member of Ctty
Counctl Thtspubhcatton encompasses the Prtncess Anne Wtldhfe Management Areas, the Whttehurst Tract,
Munden Potnt Park, and Stumpy Lake (hsted as the number 3 spoO There ts no charge to the Ctty The State
ts assumtng the costs of pubhshtng
ITEM # 50244
Yesterday, October Seventh, the Mayor also attended a luncheon meettng of the Chrysler Museum of ~4rts
Advisory Committee The Chrysler Museum has ratsed $30-MILLION to be tnvested for a sptn off $1-
MILLIONper year to asstst tn paytng some of the operattng expense of the Museum They are now looktng
for another $23-MILLION Thetr ctttzenry has been generous The Mayor informed them Vtrgtnta Beach
could not pledge any money, but would be happy to have, as a gtft, The Thoroughgood House, so we could
repair and lovingly provtde tts care
October 8, 2002
-3-
CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFING
AMENDMENT TO R-SS DISTRICT
1:33 P.M.
ITEM # 50245
Karen Lasley, Zontng Admtntstrator, detaded tnformatton relattve the proposed amen&nent to the R-5S
Residential District The "Shadowlawn Neighborhood" ts composed of the old Shadow Lawn Hetghts plat
and the old Ptnewood Plat The area ts zoned R-SS altowmg only smgle famdy restdenttal dwelhngs R-5S
has a mtntmum lot width requirement of S feet and mtmmum lot area of S, 000 square feet The R-SS District
has umque regulattons pertatmng to nonconformtng lots
Shadow Lawn Heights Plat
Ortgtnally platted tn Map Book 7, page 14 tn I924
The majortty of blocks are platted wtth 30' x 100' lots Corner lots are
45'by I00
Several blocks have lots 25'by 100' with 30'by 100' corner lots
Stze vartes for lots on the water
Pinewood Plat
Platted tn Map Book 7, Page 132 tn 1926
Majority of lots are 25'by + 120'
Deed restrtcttons requtre two lots for a restdenttal butldtng stte
Relattve the development, most buyers bought two (2) to three (3) lots and budt small one-story brtck ranch
homes Ms Lasley dtsplayed photographtc examples of these homes
Infill and Redevelopment
Destrabthty and property values went up tn the 1980s
Infill and redevelopment on stngle lots
Homes constructed on 25' and 30' wtde lots were not tn keeping with
the character of the netghborhood
Denstty was an issue
Examples of these types of homes were deptcted
Wtth the adoptton of the 1988 City Zoning Ordinance, new regulattons were tncorporated tn the R5S
District:
Where one substandard lot ts owned separately = ok to budd on
stngle lot
Where adjacent, nonconformmg lots are owned by one enttty=
cannot sell off one lot separately for development Lots must
meet the mtntmum lot wtdth of 50' and mtntmum lot area of
5, 000 square feet
Some property owners were chssattsfied wtth the 1988 amendment and beheved thetr property rtghts had
been taken Some property owners had bought three (3) lots, budt home on two (2) lots and had tntended to
sell off the thtrd lot to finance thetr rettrement or chddren's college educatton
October 8, 2002
-4-
CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFING
AMENDMENT TO R-5S DISTRICT
ITEM # 50245 (Continued)
In 1994, a compromtse amendment was adopted Thts amendment allowed property owners to convey one
substandard lot, provided: (a) Lot must be a minimum of 35' wide and have a minimum of 3500 square
feet in area; and, (b) Remaining substandard lots must be resubdivided to conform.
35-foot Substandard Lots
&de yard setbacks reduced to 5' tn order to maxtmtze wtdth of home
Allowed a 25' wtde home
"Shadowlawn Infill Development gutdehnes" adopted as part of the
Comprehenstve Plan
Encouraged homes butlt on the 35' wtde lots to be
compattble wtth extsttng ranch homes
Proportton and destgn
2002 Proposed Amendment
Ctvtc League has met wtth Counctlman Maddox and requested that the
35' exemptton be deleted
Concerned that the 35' lots are resulting tn dwelhngs that are not
compattble wtth the character of the netghborhood
Concerned about tncreased denstty
Ms Lasley advtsed fifieen (15) of these 35-foot wtde lots have been created Onephotographtc example was
&splayed of a home under constructton on a corner lot Another example of a 35-foot lot home was deptcted
The Amendment has been drafted, deleting this 35-foot wide exception
The Resolutton has been scheduled for the Formal Sesston
Resolutton referrtng to the Planmng Commtsston proposed
amendments to ~502 of the City Zomng Or&nance (CZO) re
dimensional requirements for nonconforming lots tn the R-SS
Restdenttal Dtstrtct
Other photographs tn&cate the narrowness of the streets, wtth no curb or gutter, attracttve older small
cottage homes and a mtx of archttecture Ms Lasley advtsed there are approxtmately thtrty-one (31), 35-foot
wtde lots whtch could be developed
Counctlman Maddox advtsed the Shadowlawn Ctvtc League approached him approxtmately a month ago
wtth a petttton contatntng over three hundred (300) stgnatures, requesttng the 35' exceptton be deleted It
was the feehng of staff, as well as the Ctvtc League, the madortty of the proponents of the 35-foot rule,
through attrttton, have moved out of the netghborhood Counctlman Maddox does not wtsh to take anyone's
tnvestment and make tt an unbuddable lot on whtch they wtll be paytng real estate taxes forever However,
the CtvlC League beheves thts ts &mtntshtng the tntegrtty and character of the netghborhood by conttnutng
to butld these "shot gun" houses
Ms Lasley wtll provtde tnformatton relattve assessments on the larger tnfill developments
Robert Scott, Dtrector of Planmng, advtsed Shadowlawn has parttcular character Mr Scott &splayed a
house deptcttng the character that defines Shadowlawn (good/sohd/affordable housmg stock) Even tf the
property values are htgher, the newer, narrower, taller houses, whtch are &fferent tn character, are not
healthy for the netghborhood
Mayor Oberndorf advtsed the restdents of North Beach have advtsed smaller homes are bemg purchased,
torn down and replaced by these huge structures 3- and 4-stortes htgh The view of the ocean ts obstructed
and the character of the netghborhood has changed Counctl Lady Eure advtsed Sandbrtdge has also
expertenced these changes
October 8, 2002
CITY
_$_
COUNCIL 'S BRIEFING
AMENDMENT TO R-SS DISTRICT
ITEM # 50245 (Continued)
Counctlman Maddox referenced the posstbthty of creattng an Archttectural Revtew Committee to retatn the
flavor of the oM housing stock
The Mayor advtsed Norfolk and Wdhamsburg have Archttectural Review Committees Ms Lasley advtsed
these are present tn Htstortc Dtstrtcts
Council Lady McClanan beheves Loudon County also has a Revtew Commtttee
The City Attorney advtsed voluntary Architectural Revtew groups could be estabhshed to encourage the
development of homes tn a certain manner The Ctty Attorney's office shall provtde mformatton relattve the
Ctty of Norfolk and Loudoun County's Revtew Commtttee
Ms Lasley advtsed the State Code requtres all owners of property zoned R-5S be nottfied tn wrtttng of the
proposed amendment
The staff wtll provtde tnformatton relattve deahng wtth the nonconformmg lot issue tn other netghborhoods
October 8, 2002
-6-
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
COMMUNITY LEGISLATIVE AGENDA
1:56 P.M.
ITEM # 50246
Robert Matthtas, Asststant to the Ctty Manager, advtsed the 2003 General Assembly Sesston wtll hkely pose
harder budgetary chotces for the Commonwealth than have not been faced tn 40 years, including the last
recession tn 1991 Governor Warner on Tuesday, October 15, 2002, on prime ttme televtston wtll address
the announcements on suggested cuts for vartous state departments tn the budget The Governor, on hts own
accord, can cut each operattng department by 15%. The General Assembly has also mandated cuts from
the overall state budget Every state agency wtll probably have at least a five percent (5%) cut There wtll
be no "sacred cows" Mr Matthtas beheves educatton and enforcement will also face reducttons The Ctty
ts less dependent upon state revenue than many jurtsdtcttons Local revenue bases are growtng with
tncreases prtmartly tn the housing market Northern Vtrgtnta sales tax revenues are decreasing Fatrfax,
whtle having problems wtth this revenue, ts revtewtng layoffs There are also major problems tn the
commercial and real estate market Fatrfax County and Fatrfax Ctty encompassing approxtmately l-
MILLIONpopulatton, generates 28 73% of the State's tncome tax revenue Vtrgtnta Beach generates 4 5 7%
The Ctty's compostte index, which drtves the funds recetved back for education, ts less than 34 Fatrfax and
Fatrfax Ctty are above 7, whtch means for every $1 O0 expended on meetmg the standards of quahty, Fatrfax
must put up $70 O0 The State puts up $30 O0 Vtrgtma Beach puts up shghtly less than $34 O0 and the State
puts up $66 O0 The car tax, whtch was projected to cost approximately $400-MILLION, ts now entathng
approxtmately $825-MILLION Fully implemented, thts wtll tnvolve an expense of $I 2-BILLION The State
has at least a $1 5-BILLIONproblem tn thts btenmum This wtll probably grow to over $2-BILLION There
are uncontrollable costs tn medtcatd and the Comprehenstve Servtces Act There ts still awatttng hst of
1,900 tndtvtduals watttngfor placement tn emergency psychtatrtc care The State must try to address thts
problem Even with the bleak foundatton, the General Assemblypartnered with the Ctty and planned for the
future as Ctty Counctl Members, School Board Members and the General Assembly Delegatton pledged to
do when they met tn December 2001 to dtscuss the upcomtng sesston From that partnershtp came a
legtslatton that will allow voters of the Commonwealth to vote on a $900-MILLION htgher educatton
package tn November, whtch wtll brtng approxtmately $200-MILLION of tmprovements to tnstttuttons tn
Hampton Roads A $119-MILLIONpackage of tmprovements to Parks and Recreatton facthttes across the
Commonwealth, whtch tncludes approxtmately $3-MILLION for Vtrgtnta Beach and perhaps most
importantly, gives voters the opportumty to vote on a one percent sales tax increase to fund the six major
transportation projects that are the key to the regton's economtc vttahty The Ctty Counctl unanimously
supported these three referenda tn resoluttons
Mr Matthtas cited the Charter Amendments There are numerous reverences tn the Ctty :~ Charter where
the term borough ts utthzed Counctl members are no longer elected by boroughs, but by districts The
proposed changes to the charter are to change the word "borough' to the term "dtstrtct" as well as other
housekeeptng ttems
Amend the provtstons of Charter ~2 02 and 3~3 03, as well as the title of
Chapter 3, to replace outdated references to "boroughs" wtth the term
"dtstrtcts" The proposed changes are not substantive tn nature
Repeal the portion of City Charter 3 04 concermng the salartes of the Ctty
Council and Mayor, and amend the tttle of the section accordtngly The
subject of City Counctl salartes ts controlled by Vtrgtnta Code 3~15 2-1414 6
The proposed amendments are not substanttve tn nature The rematntng
portton of Ctty Charter 3~ 3 04 would rematn as wrttten
Amend Ctty Charter ~ 2 01, 3 09, and 16 06, to update references to certatn
sections of the Vtrgtma Code that have been re-codtfied The proposed
amendments are not substanttve tn nature
Delete Ctty Charter 3~ 16 02, and amend 3q 16 04, whtch refer to appotnted
School Boards and the transttton to an elected School Board The proposed
amendments are not substanttve tn nature
These Charter Amendments will be advertised for a Public Hearing on October 29, 2002
October 8, 2002
-7-
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
COMMUNITY LEGISLATIVE AGENDA
ITEM # 50246 (Continued)
Mr Matthtas cited the Non-Funding Issues
Telecommunication Fees
The General Assembly ts requested to make changes to the current formula to
provtde an equttable &strtbutton that ts more representattve of each locahO~ 's
contrtbutton wtth respect to the Wtreless 911 surcharge managed under Vtrgtnta
State Code
Personal Watercraft Regulations
The General Assembly ts requested to modtfy State Code 3~29 1- 744 1 Under the
current code, a locahty can enact a &stance of less than fiftyfeet from shore that
personal watercraft would have to operate at slower speeds Locahttes can enact
a &stance greater than fiftyfeet and tn Vtrgmta Beach we respectfully request
200feet The General Assembly ts requested to amend the Code of Vtrgtnta to
create a water destgnatton "Pass through Zones" wheretn boaters would be
allowed to transtt through designated waterways at crutstng speeds, but would
not be allowed to lotter or maneuver for recreatton Thts change ts necessary
because many of the waterways tn Vtrgtnta Beach are very constricted and carry
a large amount of traffic If persons lotter tn any ktnd of watercraft, they may
cause dangerous congestton and/or accidents
The General Assembly ts requested not to enact a law requtrtng the use of spdl-
proof fuehng devtces for personal watercraft
Prorating of License Taxes
The General Assembly ts requested to amend the State Code so that tnterest on
bustness hcense refunds requtred due to a bustness hcense clostng ts only
requtred to be pard from the date the tax ts pard to the date that the bustness
closes (3~58 1-3 710 Prorattng of hcense taxes that changed) Interest on any such
refund shall be payable from the date of the payment of the hcense tax to the date
upon whtch theperson, firm or corporatton permanently ceased to engage tn such
bustness, trade, profession, occupatton or calhng wtthtn the county, ctty or town
Prohibitions on Former Employees (requested by Council Lady McClanan)
Under the current code, the ctty ts not allowed to prohtbtt former officers and/or
employees from recetvtng compensation for services they provtde tn connection
wtth matters.[or which they participated personally and substantially as a ctty
employee Thts revolvtng door program allows officers and employees to leave
ctty employment and then provtde the same servtces to the city through a
contractor The General Assembly ts requested to amend State Code 3q15 2-1408
whtch would prohtbtt former City Council or City Offictals from parttctpattng tn
thts type of acttvttyfor two years after thetr term of office ends Thts amendment
would add the verbtage cities, population of more than 425,000, city council or
city officers and for two years
Destruction of Misdemeanor Arrest Warrants, Etc
Under the current code, the ctty must watt three years before destroytng
unexecuted mtsdemeanor arrest warrants, summonses and captases that u, ere
tssued tn error or are no longer vtable For example, processes tssued as a result
of mtstaken tdenttty, against a "homeowner" who no longer owns the subject
property, or for a person who ts deceased must be matntatned for three years
even tf the error's known Unttl the warrant ts destroyed, tt rematns tn the law
enforcement agency's computer system, posstbly subjecttng an tnnocent person
to unnecessary and tnconvement pohce encounters The request ts for the
General Assembly to amend State Code 3~19 2-76 1
October 8, 2002
-8-
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
COMMUNITY L E G IS L,4 TI VE ,4 G END ,4
ITEM # 50246 (Continued)
Inspection Warrants for Building Code Violations
Under current code, only a court may issue a warrant for determtntng whether
there ts a suspected violation of the Butldtng Code, which ts an tmmedtate and
imminent threat to the health and safety of the owner or tenant of a restdenttal
dwelhng unit or a nearby residential dwelhng umt, and where the owner or
tenant of the restdenttal dwelhng unit that ts the subject of the complatnt has
refused to allow the butMtng official or his agent to have access to the subject
dwelhng The Ctty ts requesting magtstrates be allowed to issue these warrants
whtch would expe&te the procedure and provtde better safety for the ctttzenry
The General Assembly ts requested to amend State Code ~36-105
Councdman Wood had a concern relative thts ttem as tt refers to entering one's prtvate home Andrew
Friedman, Dtrector of Housmg and Netghborhood Preservatton, shall confer with Counctlman Wood
Summons for Delinquent Parking Citations
Under the current code, the local admtmstrattve official, whtch tn Vtrgtnta
Beach's case ts the Treasurer, must request the Magtstrate to tssue summons for
dehnquent parktng cttattons Thts puts a tremendous admtntstrattve burden on the
Magistrate's office since hundreds of these summonses may be prepared at any
one time Furthermore, having the Magistrate prepare the summons duphcate
work that the Treasurer's office has done, and the Pohce Department must serve
the warrant The General Assembly ts requested to amend the code so that the
Treasurer could tssue the summons dtrectly and the Shertff's office could serve
the summons rather than the Pohce Department The General Assembly ts
requested to amend State Code 3~46 2-1225
Collection of Delinquent Parking Citations
Under the Department of Motor Vehtcles (DMV), the Treasurer may enter tnto
an agreement wtth the Commtsstoner where the Commtsstoner of DMV would
refuse to issue renewed vehtcle regtstrattons for any apphcant who owes to a
county, ctty, or town the local vehtcle hcense fees or dehnquent tangtblepersonal
property taxes In order to fully utthze the DMV Commtsstoner's power, we are
requesttng that thts abthty be extended to dehnquent parktng citations as well
The proposed amendment would permtt the Ctty Treasurer to use the DMV'S
vehicle regtstratton process as a means of collecttng dehnquentparktng cttattons
The request ts for the General Assembly to amend the State Code 3~ 46 2- 752
Removal of Trash, Cutting of Grass and Weeds Penalties
Under extsttng code ~15 2-901, the ctty may prescrtbe charges agatnst property
owners for the removal of trash, cuttmg of grass and weeds, and the proper
dtsposal of trash The Ctty desires to have the abthty to assess ctvd penalttes as
prescrtbed by law for vtolattons of ordmances prohtbitmg the overgrowth of
weeds, grass and other vegetation, accumulatton of trash and proper chsposal of
trash This would be tn addttton to the abthty locahttes now have to put hens on
properttes that have such vtolattons The request ts for the General Assembly to
amend the State Code 3~15 2-901 The ctvd penaltyfor any one vtolatton shall
be $100
Councd Lady Wdson expressed concern and beheves the ctvd penalty should be up to $100 Mr Matthtas
advtsed, unless there ts a patron for thts amendment, the fee wdl probably commence at $25 OO per day The
Ctty Manager advtsed for a contractor to perform thts servtce, the mtmmum charge ts $100, even for the
smallest lot k'tce Mayor Man&go advtsed the owner ts charged separately for the cutting of the grass Mr
Matthtas advtsed $100 ts a standard ctvd penalty
October 8, 2002
-9-
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
COMMUNITY LEGISLATIVE AGENDA
ITEM # 50246 (Continued)
Recovery of Attorney's Fees
In the last General Assembly the Ctty requested an amendment to the code to
permit the recovery of attorney's fees tn sttuattons where legal action ts taken to
requtre a property owner to phystcally connect to the City's utthty system
Extsttng language hmtts collection of attorney's fees to sttuattons tn whtch
connection fees are unpatd Wtthout thts legtslatton, utthty customers throughout
the ctty substdtze the expenses created by ctttzens who do not comply with the
mandatory connectton ordtnance until compelled to do so by legal actton The
request ts for the General Assembly to amend the State Code 3~15 2-2122 When
legal actton ts requtred to compel a property owner to comply wtth any
mandatory connectton ordtnance, then a locahty shall be entttled to recover its
reasonable attorney's fees tn any action to compel such connection
Weapons in Publicly Funded Mental Health/Mental Retardation/Substance
Abuse Services
Under the current code, the ctty cannot prohtbtts person from brtngtng weapons
of any type tnto places where pubhcly funded Mental Health/Mental
Retardation~Substance Abuse servtces are betngprovtded For tnstance, a chent
may be vtstttng a Vtrgtnta Beach Communtty Servtces Board facthty to recetve
drug counsehng or therapy and may brtng a weapon mto the facthty, placmg the
workers at rtsk. The General Assembly ts requested to amend the State Code to
allow pubhcly funded Mental Health/Mental Retardatton/Substance Abuse
facthttes to prohtbtt chents from brtngtng any type of weapon into a facthty
where servtces are betng provtded
Mr Matthtas advtsed the Ctty Counctl Chamber cannot be included tn the Btll A weapon can be carrted
into the General Assembly butldtng Concern was expressed as there are otherpubhc butldtngs such as the
schools, whtch should be included Mr Matthtas advtsed schools, and court butldtngs are separate cases
However, Parks and Recreatton facthttes, unless there was a pre-extsttng 1987 code sectton as the Ctty of
Norfolk has, or any other pubhc butldtng, there ts no prohtbttton and he does not beheve there will be a
prohtbttton The General Assembly ts very second amendment friendly Counctl Lady Wtlson beheves thts
should at least be requested of the General Assembly Mr Matthats advtsed tf the Ctty were to recetve
authortty to prohtbtt guns from all pubhc buddtngs, there are costs entatled Councilman Wood satd this ts
actually addressed tn the Pubhc Safety Addendum 3~18 2-283 1 Carrytng weapon into courthouse, etc
Post Labor Day Opening for Schools
The Vtrgtnta Beach tourtsm tndustry provtdes our ctty wtth $630-MILLION per
year tn tourtsm spendtng Hampton Roads recetves $1 3-BILLION from Vtrgmta
Beach's tourism Starting schools tn Vtrgtnta Beach and other locahttes tn the
Commonwealth prtor to Labor Day would have stgntficant financtal
consequences tn the long term Begtnntng schools prior to Labor Day would
ehmtnate two weeks tn August, whtch ts prtme famtly vacatton ttme that cannot
be replaced If the Vtrgtnta Beach school system begtns before Labor Day and
other locahttes follow our lead, tt wtll have a negattve effect on the economtc
tmpact of the tourtsm tndustry To a lesser extent thts wtll also have an tmpact on
thts tndustry by affecttng the labor pool available during this timeframe The
General Assembly ts requested to matntatn the extsttng legislation concerning
post Labor Day opentng of schools Thts allows all schools to open after Labor
Day, except those gtven exempttons by the State Board of Educatton
October 8, 2002
-lO-
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
COMMUNITY LE GISL,4 TIVE A GEND,4
ITEM # 50246 (Continued)
Support for Inclusion of"Sexual Orientation" in any proposed "Hate Crimes"
Legislation
Under the current code, there are enhanced penalttes for certatn crtmes ~f the
person who commzts the crtme selects his or her vtcttm because of the vtcttm'S
race, rehgtous convtcaon, color or national ortgtn These crtmes are generally
referred to collectively as "hate crimes" Dunng tts 1998 and 1999 Sessions, the
General Assembly constdered, but dtd not adopt, several bdls, whtch, ~f adopted
would have expanded extsttng "hate crtmes" legtslatton to mclude any vtcttm
selected because of hts or her sexual ortentatton The Ctty Councd supports the
tncluston of "sexual ortentaaon" tn any "hate crtmes"
Prescription Medications
A large segment of the elderly populatton cannot afford the prescrtptton
medtcations needed, whtch ts a growtng threat to their health and well betng The
Nurses and Nurse's Aid South Hampton Roads Coahtton on Agtng of[ers
proposals for change and solutton Develop and tmplement a "Prescrtptton
Drugs Only" component of Medtcatd for mtddle mcome elderly and dtsabled to
purchase Medtcattons avadable would be the same that are avadable to Medtcatd
rectptents The money to payfor the prescrtptton program be harvested from two
"voluntary" tax opttons the lottery and a state tncome tax check-off box.for
persons due to recetve a refund Relattve the issue of the state lottery, tt was
verbally understood, but never codified tnto law, that the proceeds from the
lottery would be dtvtded equally between educatton and the elderly, whtch has
never matertahzed
Nurse and Nurse's Atds Development of new plans to retatn and tmprove the
worktng condtttons and wages of regtstered nurses (RN), hcensed practtcal
nurses (LPN) and certtfied nurse atdes (CNA)
Medtcal care has reached a crtsts potnt Retentton must be emphastzed,
tmplemented and reahzed for RNs, LPNs and CNAs Improved worktng
condtttons and regular hours should become a prtonty wtthtn hospttals, long-
term care facthttes, and home heath agenctes Careerpaths for CNAs should be
estabhshed to encourage recruttment Pay for nurses, and espectally for the
CNAs, must be revtewed and tmproved Ratse Medtcatd reimbursement rates to
nurstng homes and communtty based watver/personal care, and dtrect the
tncrease to ratse the CNA wage Complete nattonal crtmtnals check ton all
candtdates for CNA Postttons Provtde tn-service tratmng that emphastzes the
"human element" of gentleness and ktndness Funds to payfor the state RN and
CNA programs be harvested from two "voluntary" tax opttons the lottery and
a state tncome tax check off box forpersons due to recetve a refund
Increase in Voter Participation
The General Assembly ts requested to amend the State Code of Vtrgtnta to
estabhsh pdot onhne vottngprograms tn Hampton Roads and Northern Vtrgtnta
These programs could be estabhshed wtthout any rtsk o f fraud and could lead to
wtdespread onhne vottng throughout the Commonwealth tf the General Assembly
ts not wdhng to estabhsh an onhne voang trad tn Hampton Roads and Northern
Vtrgtnta, then a Study Commtsston should be estabhshed to examtne other state
successes, costs, etc Onhne vottng can be made very safe and secure through
128-btt encryptton technology
October 8, 2002
-11-
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
COMMUNITY LEGISLATIVE AGENDA
ITEM # 50246 (Continued)
Same Day Voter Registration
The General Assembly ts requested to allow the Regtstrar's Office of local
governments to perform same day voter regtstratton servtces betng currently
provtded tn many other states
Counctl Lady Eure expressed concern and would not support the parttcular sectton due to the number of
voters
Mr Mathtas referenced Councilman Vtllanueva's request for draft legtslatton to allow the Development
Authority to be increased to either rune (9) or eleven (11) members
An Act to amend and reenact 3~ 3, as amended, of Chapter 643 of the Acts of
Assembly of 1964, relattng to development authortttes, by tncreastng the number
of commtsstoners tn the Ctty of Vtrgtnta Beach
Counctlman gtllanueva advtsed one of the top prtortttes for the Ctty Counctl ts economtc development In
conferrtng wtth bustness leaders, tt became apparent the Development Authortty reflects the same number
of members as Ctty Council There was dtscusston relattveposstble can&dates for membership Membershtp
could be expanded and asstst wtth solvtng tssues relattve a quorum Counctlman Vtllanueva also suggested
tying tn membershtp re how the Mtnortty Business Counctl tnteracts wtth the Development Authortty
Counctlman Vtllanueva requested thts concept be encouraged throughout the state Counctlman Vtllanueva
advtsed he ts pushtngfor a member of the Mtnortty Bustness Council to serve on the Development Authortty
Conferrtng with members of the Mmortty Bustness Counctl, many have spectfic talents t e Sylvta Strtckland-
Prtmm, the current Chatr, ts excellent re procurement tn mthtary contracts, Loutsa Strayhorn (former
Counctl Member) ts very networked tn the Afrtcan Amertcan commumty In hts mtervtew wtth Don Maxwell,
Dtrector of Economtc Development, he beheved there should be more emphasts on mtnortty bustness
development The two go "hand tn hand" Counctlman Vtllanueva advtsed former member Edward Hamm
ts now a Dtrector of the State Mtnortty Bustness Enterprtse and ts worktng to determtne tf some components
of state and ctty contracttng have tntttattves geared towards mtnortttes Vice Mayor Man&go understood
the Development Authority was not acttvely seektng business, but revtewtng proposals for issuing revenue
bonds Mayor Oberndorf beheves thts would be healthy to have the Mtnortty Bustness Council "at the
table" Counctl Lady Eure beheves the Ctty Counctl needs to be more dtverstfied and reach out to other
mtnortttes rather than appotnttng the same members Councilman Jones, Ltatson to the Development
Authortty, advtsed there have been several occasions where the Development AuthortO2 dtd not have a
quorum unttl late tn the meettng Counctlman Jones concurred wtth the appotntment of a mtnortty
representattve
Funding Issues
Virginia Marine Science Museum
Base Realignment and Closure Commission
Funding for Education
Funding for the Comprehensive Services Act (CSA)
Funding for Community Services Board (CSB)
Funding for the Pavilion Convention Center
Virginia Beach Public Libraries; Full Funding of State Aid
Funding for Contemporary Arts Center of Virginia
The Army Corps of Engineers 216 Study of Kerr Reservoir
Hydrilla Eradication and Management on Lake Gaston
Convention and Visitor Development Rock-N-Roll Half Marathon
Maintain and increase the availability of Public Guardianship
Virginia Caregivers Grant Program (Sponsored by Counctl Members Wtlson and Vtllanueva)
October 8, 2002
- 12-
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
COMMUNITY LEGISLATIVE AGENDA
ITEM # 50246 (Continued)
Relattve Counctl Lady Eure's concern, tnformatton relattve Phragmttes control shall be fitrmshed
Mr Matthtas advtsed the Public Safety Addendum are ttems requested by the I,'trgtma Beach Pohce
Department These tssues are statewtde tn thetr tmportance and are provtded for informational purposes
only for City Council. The Sheriff's Assoctatton or the Vtrgmta Pohce Chtefs 'Association or the Fraternal
Order of Pohce should pursue these tssues
Mr Matthtas referenced the addttton of an tssue
§2.2-4303.1 Multiphase professional services contract
In any ctty wtth a population greater than 400,000, multtphase professtonal
servtces contracts sattsfactory and advantageous to the Ctty for envtronmental,
locatton, study, design or mspectton work regardtng constructton or
mfrastructure proJects may be negottated and awarded based on a fatr and
reasonable prtce for the first phase only, when completton of the first phase ts
necessary to provtde tnformatton critical to the negottatton of a fatr and
reasonable prtce for succeedtng phases Prtor to the procurement of any such
contract, the ctty shall determtne tn wrtttng that the nature of the work ts such
that the best tnterests of the Ctty requtre awardtng the contract on thts basts
Counctl Lady Wtlson tnqutred relative the pursutt of a "rainy day fund"for the School Board Thts year,
the Schools have $18-MILLION left over The Mayor advised the funds the Schools have left over, whtch
the Ctty Counctl returns to them, has been htstortcally utthzed for those Capttal Projects that wouM not
cause a reoccurrtng cost There ts a fine hne between the "ratny day fund" that mtght be used for operattons
and those whtch would create an ongotng cost The Ctty Attorney, Mr Matthtas, Patrtcta Phtlhps -Dtrector
of Ftnance and Catheryn I~ghttesell- Dtrector of Resource Management, wtll research and advtse The Ctty
Manager advised tt has been the pohcy tn the past that there wouM be only one Undestgnated Fund Reserve,
whtch ts tted back to the debt structure The Ctty ts exclustvely responstble for repayment of that debt The
School Dtvtston ts not The pohcy of the Ctty has been to have one reserve fund that would essenttally be
managed by the Ctty Counctl rather than creattng multtple kinds of reserves Counctl Lady' I'Vtlson beheves
the best way to handle this concern ts tn dtscusstons on the revenue shartngformula Vtce Mayor Man&go
and Counctlman Jones were not tn favor of a "ratny day fund" IfS18-MILLION rematns thts year, the Ctty
Counctl should dectde how the schools expend these funds Mayor Oberndorf advtsed she spoke wtth
Chatrman Dan Edwards and he relayed by an 11-0 vote, the School Board wtll request the Ctty Counctl to
allow the Schools to expend these funds on capttal projects (one ttme expendttures)
Mr Matthtas advtsed the pre-fihng deadhne for the Legtslattve Package ts December 12, 2002
Mr Matthtas advtsed the Ctty Counctl wtll confer on December Second with the General Assembly
Delegatton and the School Board relattve the Legtslattve Package The meettng will be at the new offices
of Economic Development tn Town Center P F Chang's wtll be catertng the affatr
October 8, 2002
- 13-
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
SANDBRIDGE ROAD/NIMMO PARKWAY CORRIDOR
$:25 P.M.
ITEM # 50247
E Dean Block, Dtrector of Pubhc Works, advised on February 6, 2001, Ctty Counctl pursued the
development of the Sandbrtdge Road Corrtdor as the prtmary corrtdor to hnk the reset of the Ctty to
Sandbrtdge &ncc that ttme, the Ctty has been accomphshtng the necessary prehmtnary engtneertng to
determtne the cost of such projects and tdenttfy various posstble ahgnments, The CA C has been meeting on
a monthly basts stnce February 2002, developtng alternattves, concepts and absorbtng transportatton and
traffic issues The CAC recommended an ahgnment on September 3, 2002 Thts design must be to current
Ctty and Vtrgtnta Department of Transportatton (VDOT) standards
The Consultants, Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc, were employed to conduct the Study relattve the
Sandbridge Corridor improvements Mr Block recogmzed Bobby Hester, P E, ProJect Manager with
Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc (VHB) The Ctttzens Advtsory Board (CAC) advtsed fifiee, n (15) members
parttctpated on the Citizens Advisory Committee Mr Hester tntroduced those members tn attendance
Councilman Jim Reeve
Chairman
Molly Brown
Drew Lankford
Eric Anderson
The Sandbridge Corridor Improvements has a project webstte whtch contatns tnformatton and &splays
graphtc of the alternattve ahgnments There were over 800 htts to thts webstte
Group Meettngs were held at Tabernacle and Ntmmo Churches and Sandbrtdge, Lago Mar and Lotus
Garden Farms Ctvtc Leagues
Thts mformatton wtll be presented at a Citizens Information Meeting on Thursday, September 5, 2002
(4 30 P M to 7 30 P M) at Red Mtll Elementary School Thts meetmg was attended by over four hundred
(400) restdents
310 comments were received as of September 18, 2002
18 were form the web site
21 out of are comments received (Florida, West Virginia and Australia)
Only the Sandbridge Road Corridor was presented durtng thts meettng Mr Hester summartzed the
questtons and responses
Dtd you prefer alternative 1, 2, 3, or 4, or a combtnatton of these and why?
What are your safety concerns along the roadway? Do yo thtnk the proposed
tmprovements wtll decrease acctdent?
Please provtde any tnformatton that you feel wtll asstst tn developtng the destgn
of th ss project
SUMMARY OF COMMENTS (Questsons 1 -3)
150 comments requested Ntmmo Parkway as the primary corrtdor
56 ctttzens thought safety was a concern
31 ctttzens wanted no tmprovements
49 ctttzens requested mtnor safety tmprovements
Dedtcated btke lane was requested (safety)
Pedestrtan walkway requested
Faster tmprovement schedule noted
October 8, 2002
- 14-
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
SANDBRIDGE ROAD/NIMMO PARKWAY CORRIDOR
ITEM # 5024 7 (Continued)
71 Comments Received on Alignment Preference
Alternative 1: 44% minimization of impacts to environment
Alternative 2: 13%
Alternative 3: 15% improving Red Mill Elementary access/parking
Alternative 4: 28% minimization of impacts to Lotus Garden
Question 4: What recreational opportunities you want to see incorporated into
the project/Do you prefer one 8-footpath on both sides of the road or a single
12-footpath on one side with a sidewalk on the other side?
Mayortty agreed path was needed
45% wanted 12'path on one stde
5% wanted 8"path on both stdes
Request for off-corridor trail~horse tratl
3% tndtcated a need for recreational access
Question 5; Do you feel the information was clearly presented at the meeting
and do you understand the options for improvements?
Majortty felt tnformatton was presented well
Question 6: For each roadway section identified in parentheses on the
following chart, please indicate your preferred alignment (1,2,3 or 4) and
preferred typical section (90', 110 ', 143 9.
Majortty selected Ahgnment 1
90' r/w chose to mtntmtze tmpacts to environment
Hybrtd ahgnments presented to CA C tn September tncorporated comments
At the September Twenty-stxth Ctttzens Advtsory Commtttee meeting two (2) Hybrtd Ahgnments were
presented, based on all pubhc comment The Hybrtd Ahgnment basically follows the path of the extsttng
roadway In general, the ahgnment wtll tmprove the Upton, Sandbrtdge, Prtncess Anne and General Booth
intersections It wtll move away from Ntmmo Church and allow them to uttltze some of thetrproperty on the
southstde The ahgnment wtll stay rtght on the edge of the wetlands through that area As the ahgnment
progresses past the Cathohc Church and the parks, tt swings away allowtng Red Mill School more room to
tmprove thetr access and parktng situation In front of Lago Mar, Hybrtd Ahgnment 1 and 2 dtffer Hybrtd
1 runs south through the Htllproperty behtnd the homes of Lotus Garden and back onto extsttng Sandbrtdge
Road Hybrtd Ahgnment 2 uttltzes the extsttng Sandbrtdge Road and tmproves the curve at Flanagans Lane
After that the ahgnment proceeds by Tabernacle Church on the extsttng roadway and followtng extsttng
ahgnment through McClanan 's Curve and stratghten the curves at the Oceanfront The Oceanfront section
ts the one wtth the on-streetparktng and the me&an, whtch werepresentedprevtously Overwhelmtngly the
Ctttzens Advtsory Commtttee selected Hybrid Alignment 1.
Mr Block retterated the Sandbridge/Nimmo Corridor Comparison
Ltmtts of analysts
Addtttonal prehmtnary engineering and survey reqmred
Wetlands confirmatton reqmred
Conservattve analysts for both corrtdors
Transportation Need Summary
General Booth Boulevard to Upton Drive requtres 8 lanes Four lanes extst on
Ntmmo Parkway Two (2) addtttonal lanes on Princess Anne Road are needed
Upton Drtve to Atwoodtown Road requtres 6 lanes 4 Ntmmo/2 Sandbrtdge or 2
Ntmmo/4 Sandbrtdge
Atwoodtown Road to Sandbrtdge Beach reqmres 2 lanes that meet standards
October 8, 2002
- 15-
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
SANDBRIDGE ROAD/NIMMO PARKWAY CORRIDOR
ITEM # 50247 (Continued)
Sandbridge Road Corridor Improvements
Prtncess Anne Road and Sandbrtdge Road 4 lanes chvtded from General Booth
Boulevard to Las Brtsas Drtve
Sandbrtdge Road two (2) lane roadway from Atwoodtown Road to Sandfiddler
Road
Nimmo Parkway Corridor Improvements
Four (4) lane chvtded roadway from Upton Drtve to Atwoodtown Road, transttton
to 2 lanes after Atwoodtown Road
Two (2) lane roadway from Atwoodtown Road to Beach, usmg Ntmmo Parkway
as primary corrtdor
Other Improvements
If Sandbrtdge rematns the preferred corrtdor, then a 2-lane extenston of Ntmmo
Parkway from Upton to Atwoodtown ts needed to serve as a netghborhood
collector Ctty cost of $800,000 was tncluded tn the Sandbrtdge Capttal
Improvement Program
A replacement bridge over Hell's Point Creek will be reqmred tn the future
Mmtmum traffic safety tmprovements along Sandbrtdge Road from Atwoodtown
to McClanan's Curve, tf Ntmmo ts the preferred corrtdor ProJect cost ts - SI-
MILLION
BRIDGES OVER WETLANDS
Brtdge
Ashvtlle Brtdge Creek
Hell's Point Creek
Sandbrtdge Road Ahgnment
540feet 0 5 acres wetlands
$3 5-MILLION
400feet 0 3 acres wetlands
$2 7-MILLION
Ntmmo Parkway Ahgnment
l lOOfeet 1 3 acres wetlands
$ 7 I-MILLION
N/A
Lan dscaping/Recreation/A esthetics
Same level of treatment ts reflected for each ahgnment
$41 per hnear foot - 4 lane sectton, 17per hnear foot - 2 lane section
One (1) canoe launch per project - $ 75, 000
Current cost esttmates dtd not tnclude the Vdlage Concept, multtple
recreattonal amentttes, or Sandbrtdge Beach arrtval planntng opttons
October 8, 2002
-16-
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
SANDBRIDGE ROAD/NIMMO PARKWAY CORRIDOR
ITEM # 5024 7 (Continued)
PROJECT SUMMARY
Transportatton ProJect Descrtptton Sandbrtdge Road as the Ntmmo Parkway as the
Prtmary Corrtdor Prtmary Corrtdor
Necessary Prtncess Anne Road (4 lane) $ 8,350,000 - $ 8,600,000 $ 8,350,000 - $ 8,600,000
Prtmary Sandbrtdge Road (4 lane & 2 lane) $ 27,400,000 - $31,400,000 -
Segments Ntmmo Parkway (4 lane) - $13,050,000
Ntmmo Parkway (2 lane) - $11,600,000
TOTAL $ 35, 750,000 - $40,000,000 $33,000,000 - $33,250,000
Addtttonal Ntmmo Parkway (2lane) $ 3,500,000 -
Network Sandbrtdge Road Safety $1,000,000
GIL4ND TOTAL $ 39,250,000 - $43,500,000 $34,000,000 - $34,250,000
Next Steps
Consider authortztng complete "apples to apples" analysts Plus or mtnus $200,000 cost
Counctl approval to use extsttng project ts requtred
Involves meettng wtth regulatory agencies regardtng Ntmmo Parkway
120-180 days for study
Constder determtntng prtmary corrtdor based on avatlable tn formation
CA C recommendatton for Sandbrtdge Road
Ntmmo Parkway ahgnment tdenttfied or
Constder selecttve tmprovements or no actton
Relattve the permttttng process, Mr Block beheves Sandbrtdge would requtre an Envtronmental Analysts
and on Ntmmo Parkway a complete Envtronmental lmpact Statement The delay would tnvolve engtneertng
and analysts Mr Block beheves the receptton by the Envtronmental Agenctes would be more favorable for
Sandbrtdge than Ntmmo Parkway Mr Block referenced the Ashvtlle Creek Brtdge was at one ttmeprojected
to be 400feet, then tncreased to 800 and finally 1 l OO feet Counctl Lady Eure stated the studies on Ntmmo
Parkway of approxtmately four (4) years ago should sttll be able to be utthzed There would only be one
brtdge for the Ntmmo Parkway Ahgnment, but two for the Sandbrtdge Road Ahgnment
Mr Block advtsed addtttonal approprtattons would not be necessary, Mr Hester would be dtrected to
change hts focus The Ctty Attorney 's office has advtsed theproject would not have to be rebtd, the same firm
could be uttltzed to make the "apples to apples" comparison The wetland dehneattons have not been
developed for Ntmmo Parkway Thts could affect the length of the brtdge The staff has not attempted to
define hfe cycle costs of these facthttes Thts ts a hard and soft construction cost, land acqutsttton, destgn
and landscaptng conttngency Counctlman Schmtdt suggested the regulatory agenctes brtef Ctty Counctl at
a future sesston relattve these issues
Councdman Reeve DISCLOSEDpursuant to Sectton 2 2-3115(G), Code of Vtrgtnta re Sandbrtdge Corrtdor
Improvements project Hts primary residence ts located at 1476 Lotus Drtve One of the four opttons
tnvolved havtng Lotus Drive one-way Under that option none of his land would be under constderatton for
acqutsttton The Ctty Attorney has advtsed that thts tnterest does not meet the crtterta of a personal tnterest
and he ss able to parttctpate tn consideration of the Project fatrly, objecttvely and tn the. pubhc tnterest
Counctlman Reeve's correspondence of September 16, 2002, ts hereby made a part of the record
Counctlman Reeve beheves the Federal wtldhfe wetlands are extenstve on Sandbrtdge Road The Brtdge
lengths should be stmtlar, tf compartng "apples to apples" Thts process started tn 1971 and not one thtng
has been done to tmprove the safety of the restdents tn the Sandbrtdge Corrtdor area If SI-MILLION ts
allocated to safety tssues, tt should be expended Safety tssues relattve McClanan's and Flanagan 's curve
need to be fixed Transportatton capactty tn the future ss another issue and should be addressed The full
evaluatton of the wetlands re Ntmmo (on the east side of the Creek) should be performed
Mr Block advtsed, tf the Ntmmo Parkway Corridor ss chosen, the road would be placed tn the Vtrgtnta
Department of Transportatton (VDOT) Que and hopefully there would be a potenttal for fundtng The VDOT
program has been evtscerated by cuts Four (4) majorprojects are funded onlyforprehmtnary engtneertng
and rtght-of-way or prehmtnary engtneertng only Elbow Road, In&an Rtver Road, two Wttchduck Road
ProJects (from Prtncess Anne/Kempsvtlle and from the Interchange to Vtrgtnta Beach Boulevard)
October 8, 2002
-]7-
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
SANDBRIDGE ROAD/NIMMO PARKWAY CORRIDOR
ITEM # 50247 (Continued)
Relattve Ntmmo, Mr Block advtsed the cost to dehneate wetlands would be approximately $60,000, whtch
would tnclude an opportumty to meet wtth some of the regulatory agenctes Mr Block beheve, s the regulatory
agenctes would be reluctant to brtef Ctty Counctl However, the City Counctl Ltatsons would be tnvolved
tn the meettngs If the Ctty Counctl were to tndtcate its preference to move forward on Ntmmo, tn
approxtmately 60 to 90 days, the staff would report back to City Counctl with a cost and a Ctttzens Advisory
Counctl recommendatton
Mayor Oberndorf tnqmred whether there are multtple paths destgned for Ntmmo VII comparable to the ones
for Sandbrtdge Road east of Atwoodtown Road Mr Block advtsed the paths are comparable Mr Block
advtsed there ss posstbly one house whtch would have to be taken and dtsplayed the locatton Mayor
Oberndorf requested responses tn wrtttng to her questtons presented to the City Manager Do the
engtneertng costs tnclude the norse abatement walls and stop hghts as denoted tn the Wtley Wtlson study of
1998 Mr Block advtsed the costs would tnclude stop hghts, but not sure of norse abatement walls unttl
further tnto the destgn There ts a 1 lO-foot right-of-way through there Ulttmately the questton of sound walls
rests wtth the people affected by the sound walls Mr Hester advised Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc were
tn the process of gathertng sound data to vertfy on Sandbrtdge Road
Mayor Oberndorf tnqutred relattve accommodattons made for the commerctal development, the potenttal
for the three acres at the corner of Atwoodtown Road and Ntmmo Parkway and the slx acres at the corner
of Camtno Real and Ntmmo Parkway and what costs mtght these entail tn butldtng the Parkway? Mr Block
advtsed none of the land tssues have been addressed on esther corrtdor for zomng acttons or development
permtts In theprehmtnary cost studtes, $1-MILLIONwas recommended to be expended on Sandbrtdge Road
for safety However, tn the 1998 Wiley and Wtlson study, $4-MILLION was stated as necessary for short
term traffic safety management Mr Block advised the scope of the safety project whtch was at one ttme tn
the Capttal Improvement Program for Sandbrtdge Road and then removed by thts Ctty Counctl tn February
2001 and the fundtng reprogrammed The scope of that project was to avotd the taktng of right-of-way The
project basically tnvolved safety wtthtn the extsttng rtght-of-way Mr Block beheves the Wtley study was
more comprehenstve The Mayor referenced tn the wrttten summary, the type and quahty of wetlands by
regulatory defintttons ss constdered more ecology valuable along the Ntmmo Parkway ahgnment then ts
found along the extsttng Sandbrtdge Road Mr Block advtsed the $60,000 cost ss a detatled dehneatton of
the wetland area If tt ts Ctty Council 's pleasure to perform a safety project on Sandbrtdge Road, guidance
must be provtded to the Ctty Manager regardtng the Capital Improvement Program
Coptes of the wrttten responses to the Mayor's questtons shall be provtded to the Mayor and Ctty Counctl
BY CONSENSUS, Ctty Counctl chrected the staff to proceed wtth expendmg $60, O00 for delineation of
wetlands re the N#nmo Parkway Corridor.
October 8, 2002
- 18-
AGENDA RE VIEW SESSION
5:16 P.M.
ITEM # 50248
10rdtnance re the Ctty Code
a AMEND 3~18-72 re bustness hcense taxes on coin-operated machines
Counctl Lady Eure referenced the operators are exempted from thts Ordtnance if they own less than three
(3) machtnes Counctl Lady' Eure tnqutred what would prevent the same owner from placmg machmes tn
several locattons under different names to ctrcumvent the requtrement
Asststant Ctty Attorney Larry Spencer advtsed Vtce Mayor Man&go, there would be no financtal tmpacts
of the deferral
Thts ordtnance shall be DEFERRED unttl the Ctty Counctl Sesston of October 29, 2002
ITEM # 50249
12
Ordinance to AUTHORIZE temporary encroachments tnto portions
of the Ctty's rtght-of-way wtthm Lmkhorn Shores (DISTRICT 5 -
L rNNHA VEN)
PA UL D and MARIANNE WARREN re constructton and matntenance
of a spht ratl fence, wtllow arbor and landscapmg at 1517 Duke of
Wtndsor Road
As there mtght be opposttton, thts ttem shall be dtscussed tn Formal Sesston
ITEM # 50250
14 Resolution to AUTHORIZE the tssuance and sale of $28-Mtlhon
Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Sertes of 2002, heretofore
authortzed, re reimbursement for prevtous capttal expendttures and
funding for future water and sewer projects, and, AUTHORIZE the
dtstrtbutton of the prehmtnary Offictal Statement and other related
acttons.
Counctl Lady McClanan wtll vote NAY on thts ttem Counctl Lady McClanan expressed concern relattve
the repair of the roads tn the Wtndsor Woods and Wtndsor Oaks section The roads cannot be repatred unttl
the sewer work ts performed, whtch wtll not be accomphshed unttl FY 2004-2005
ITEM # 50251
B Y CONSENSUS, thefollowtng shall compose the CONSENT AGENDA:
ORDINANCES/RESOL UTIONS
10rdtnances re the Ctty Code
a AMEND 3~18-72 re bustness hcense taxes on coin-operated machines
b AMEND andREORDAIN3~ 21-321 2 re ad&ng certain neighborhoods
subject to maxtmum speed hmtts ("Traffic Calming ") and provtdtng
penalttes tn those netghborhoods
(1) Stratford Chase
(2) Bayvtlle Park
October 8, 2002
- 19-
GENDA RE VIEW SESSION
ITEM # 50251 (Continued)
12
13
14
Ordtnance to AUTHORIZE temporary encroachment tnto porttons
of the Ctty's rtghts-of-way wtthm Lmkhorn Shores (DISTRICT 5 -
L YNNHA VEN)
WAYNE and KIMBERLY A BEAGLE re maintenance of an extsttng
ttmber retatntng wall at 1200 Gloucester Lane
Resolutton referring to the Planntng Commtsston proposed
amendments to 3~502 of the Ctty Zonmg Ordmance (CZO) re
dimensional requirements for nonconforming lots tn the R-5S
restdenttal dtstrtct
Resolution to AUTHORIZE the tssuance and sale of $28-Mtlhon
Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Sertes of 2002, heretofore
authortzed, re reimbursement for prevtous capttal expendttures and
funding for future water and sewer projects, and, AUTHORIZE the
dtstrtbutton of the prehmtnary Offictal Statement and other related
actions
Item I 1 a wtll be DEFERRED, BY CONSENT, unttl the Ctty Counctl Sesston of October 29, 2002
Counctl Lady McClanan wtll vote NAY on Item 14
October 8, 2002
- 20-
/t GENDA RE VIE W SESSION
ITEM # 50252
K1 Apphcatton of MOTHERS, INC for the reconstruction and
conversion of a nonconforming garage apartment tnt, a
nonconformmg stngle famdy restdence at 16th Street and Balttc Avenue
(417 ~ ]6th StreeO, contammg 5,000 square feet
(DISTRICT 6- BEA CH)
Counctlman Maddox advtsed thts ttem wtll be dtscussed tn Formal Sesston
ITEM # 50253
K 2 Apphcatton of D.4 VIDELGINfor modtficatton of acreage allowed by
the Condtttonal Use Permtt for a church at Provtdence Road and
~Vai-iiig Warntng Street (5 724 Provtdence Road) (approved ,June 26,
1965), contatntng 2 02 acres
(DISTRICT 2 - KEMPSVILLE)
Stephen Whtte, Planmng, advised Vice Mayor Man&go the correct street name ts Warning, NOT Wartng
ITEM # 50254
K3
Apphcattons of HARBOUR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
L.L.C. at North Landtng and West Neck Roads, containing 65 1 acres
(DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE)
Change of Zomng Dtstrtct Classtficatton from ,4G-1 and,4G-2
,4gricultural to Conditional R-30 Residential re single faintly lots no
less than 30,000 sq fi
b Condtttonal Use Permit re Open Space Promotion
Vartance Appeal re certain elements oftheSubdtvtston
Ordtnance, Section 4 4(b), that requtres all newly created lots
meet the requtrements of the Ctty Zomng Ordtnance (CZO) and
reduce requtred street width
(DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE)
Counctlman Reeve advtsed Attorney Bourdon requested thts ttem be DEFERRED unttl danuary 14, 2003
ITEM # 50255
K 4 Apphcatton of TRINITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP for a
Condtttonal Use Permtt re a church at Challedon and South
Parhament Drtves (5245 Challedon Drtve), contatntng 16,247 88
square feet
(DISTRICT 2 - KEMPSVILLE)
Counctl Lady Eure requested Condttton No 2 be tncluded and amended
1 Theparktng lot shall be re-strtpedso as to clearly dehneate all parktng
spaces, tncludtng the requtred handtcap space
.
Foundation landscaping within planters shall be installed and
maintained along at least 50 percent of the front facade facing
Challedon Drive
3 A Certtficate of Occupancy shall be obtained from the Building Official
prtor to occupancy.
October 8, 2002
- 21 -
AGENDA RE VIEW SESSION
ITEM # 50256
BY CONSENSUS, the followtng shall compose the PLANNING BY CONSENT AGENDA:
K2
K3
Apphcatton of DA VID EL GIN for modtficatton of acreage allowed by
the Condtttonal Use Permtt for a church at Provtdence Road and
Wai-iiig Warnmg Street (5 724 Provtdence Road) (approved June 26,
1965), contatmng 2 02 acres
(DISTRICT 2 - KEMP S VIL L E)
Apphcattons of HARBOUR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
L.L.C. at North Landtng and West Neck Roads, contamtng 65 1 acres
(DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE)
Change of Zomng Dtstrtct Classtficatton from AG-1 and AG-2
Agricultural to Conditional R-30 Residential re stngle famtly lots no
less than 30, 000 sq fi
b Condtttonal Use Permtt re Open Space Promotion
Vartance Appeal re certatn elements of theSubdtvtston
Ordtnance, Section 4 4(b), that requtres all newly created lots
meet the requtrements of the Ctty Zonmg Ordtnance (CZO) and
reduce reqmred street width
(DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE
K 4 Apphcatton of TRINITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP for a
Condtttonal Use Permit re a church at Challedon and South
Parhament Drtves (5245 Challedon Drtve), contatntng 16,247 88
square feet
(DISTRICT 2 - KEMPSVILLE)
Item K 3 shall be DEFERRED, BY CONSENT, untd the Ctty Counctl Sesston of January 14, 2002
Item K 4 shall be APPROVED, BY CONSENT, with amended conditions
October 8, 2002
- 22 -
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
5:26 P.M.
ITEM # 50257
Mayor Oberndorf advtsed Ruth Hodges Smith, Ctty Clerk, ts absent as her husband, Leon, had to be rushed
to Chesapeake General Hospttal The Mayor extended thetr prayers to Ruth and Leon
ITEM # 50258
Counctlman Vtllanueva referenced conferrtng with members tn other locahttes The Counctl Members
beheve dtalogue should be renewed concerntng regionalism. Certatn Council Members tn Norfolk and
Chesapeake have tntttated &alogue re a regional summit Councilman Vtllanueva suggested a January ttme
frame to dtscuss tssues affecttng the regton t e santtatton, water, transportatton Counctlman Vtllanueva
understands the pohttcal ramtficattons
The Mayor advtsed some of these tssues are already betng constdered regtonally The Hampton Roads
Santtatton Dtstrtct ts a regtonal authortty The water tssue has been approached by the Mayor and
Counctlman Jones wtthtn the area The Hampton Roads Transportation Commtsston ts also regtonal Mayor
Oberndorf advtsed this was a great tdea, but would have to be announced to the press when thts summtt ts
formulated Mayor Oberndorf referenced attendance at an affatr honortng a lady leavtng Habttat for
Humantty A promtnent Norfolk tndtvtdual tn attendance, suggested the Norfolk Redevelopment and
Housing Authority ts regtonal
Counctl Lady Wilson and Counctlman Maddox concurred relative theposstbtltty of a regtonal summtt, even
tf only asoctal event, and requested ctty staff provtde suggesttons
Counctl Lady Eure referenced her trtp to dacksonvtlle, Flortda, wtth the Hampton Roads Chamber of
Commerce whtch was truly a regional representatton of the Hampton Roads area The tdea of a summtt
was expressed to Counctl Lady Eure from representattves of Chesapeake and Portsmouth Counctl Lady
Eure beheves thts would be an advantageous opportunity Council Lady Eure had dtnner with the pubhsher
of The Vtrgtntan-Ptlot
ITEM # 50259
Counctlman Jones referenced the newspaper articles relattve the Conventton Center The Ctty Attorney
advised the court proceedtngs have been delayed 45 days until November 22, 2002 Rtght-of-entry pettttons
had been filed on approxtmately twenty (20) properttes Whtle debate concerntng locatton mtght be
occurrtng, the Ctty Attorney beheves these condemnattons should not go forward
The Ctty Manager advtsed the Mayor the 19'h Street locatton requtred some land assemblage for parktng
Thts was authortzed by the Ctty Counctl tn January 2002 There were thtrty-ntne (39) parcels
Counctlman Jones wtshed the Ctty Counctl request E Dean Block, Dtrector of Pubhc Works, to provtde
tnformatton on the Dome Site as an optton tn order to compare the two sttes Counctlman Maddox
concurred
Mr Block advtsed the Ctty ts at apotnt where destgn development drawtngs have been completed The next
step tn the process ts to have the Archttect and Constructton Manager partners to tndependently perform
esttmates of the cost of the replacement of the extsttng Pavthon These esttmates wtll then be jotntly
reconctled Durtng that ttme, tnformatton and drawtngs wtll be prepared to be presented to the Ctty Counctl
An updated status report on the destgn, cost and all the aspects of the facthty wtll be presented Thts process
should entatl approximately forty-five (45) days
The Mayor tnqutred relattve the current cost of the Conventton Center replacement Mr Block advtsed
approxtmately $4-MILLION has been expended on destgn (whtch ts stte spectfic) Approxtmately $4-
MILLION to $5-MILLION has been spent on land acqutsttton The Mayor referenced $4-M[LLION was a
constderable sum tn a "tight economy" Mayor Oberndorf referenced she anddtm Rtcketts, Admtntstrator -
Conventton and Vtsttor Development, advtsed the Hampton Roads Partnershtp, Vtrgtnta Beach wtshed to
be the "home" of a major conference and conventton center The ctty was forced to move ahead as the
Partnershtp dtd not provtde any asststance
October 8, 2002
- 23 -
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
ITEM # 50259 (Continued)
Counctlman Maddox referenced correspondence from the Vtrgtnta Beach Hotel/Motel Assoctatton, whtch
endorses the opportunttyfor the Ctty to revtew the Dome stte Thetr members are the true stakeholders and
will bear the burden of the tax to pay for the Center Councdman Maddox has been a long time proponent
of butldtng the Conventton Center at the Oceanfront and closer to the hotels Counctlman Maddox advtsed
bond rates were 'half the rate of two years ago
Vtce Mayor Mandtgo ts comfortable with Ctty Counctl's dectston of two years ago, but dtd not have any
problem wtth a brtefing
October 8, 2002
- 24 -
FORMAL SESSION
VIRGINIA BEA CH CITY CO UNCIL
October 8, 2002
6:18 P.M.
Mayor Meyera E Oberndorf called to order the FORMAL SESSION of the VIRGINIA BEACH CITY
COUNCIL tn the Counctl Chamber, Ctty Hall Butldmg, on Tuesday, October 8, 2002, at 6 18 P M
Counctl Members Present
Margaret L Eure, Louts R Jones, Reba S McClanan, Rtchard A
Maddox, Vice Mayor Robert C Man&go, Jr, Mayor Meyera E
Oberndorf dtm Reeve, Peter W Schmtdt, Ron A Vtllanueva, Rosemary
Wtlson and James L Wood
Counctl Members Absent
None
INVOCATION
Reverend Rtchard J Keener
Baystde Presbytertan Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
October 8, 2002
Item V-E.
- 25 -
CER TIFICA TION OF
CLOSED SESSION
ITEM # 50260
THE CITY COUNCIL DID NOT HOLD A CLOSED SESSION
October 8, 2002
Item V-F. 1.
- 26-
MINUTES
ITEM # 50261
Upon motton by Vtce Mayor Man&go, seconded by Counctlman Schmtdt, Ctty Counctl APPROVED the
Mtnutes of the INFOR31AL AND FORMAL SESSIONS of October 1, 2002.
Vottng 11-0
Counctl Members Vottng Aye
Margaret L Eure, Louts R Jones, Reba S McClanan, RtchardA Maddox,
Vice Mayor Robert C Man&go, Jr, Mayor Meyera E Oberndorf, Jtm
Reeve, Peter W Schmtdt, Ron A Vtllanueva, Rosemary Wtlson and James
L Wood
Counctl Members Vottng Nay
None
Counctl Members Absent
None
October 8, 2002
Item V-G.
-27-
ADOPT AGENDA
FOR FORMAL SESSION
ITEM # 50262
BY CONSENSUS, City Counctl ADOPTED:
AGENDA FOR THE FORMAL SESSION
October 8, 2002
Item V-H. 1.
- 28 -
MA YOR 'S PRESENTATION
ITEM # 50263
Mayor Oberndorf PROCLAIMED:
October 8, 2002
Captain Cary A. "Dollar" Silvers Day
Captain Cary A "Dollar" &lvers, Comman&ng Officer, Umted States Navy, ts rehnqmshtng command of
Naval Atr Statton Oceana Captatn &lvers recetved a Bachelor of Bustness Admtmstratton Degree from the
Untverstty of Georgta tn 1977 and was commtsstoned through Avtatton Officer Can&date. School tn 1978
and became a Naval Avtator tn 19 79 He completed a deployment tn support of Operatton Desert Shteld ton
board the USS Dwtght D Etsenhower, and, served as the Executtve Officer fo VF- 1 O10 and of VF-3 2, where
be became the 46th Commandtng Officer of the Swordsmen tn 1994 Captatn &lvers served on the USS
Independence as Atr Boss and assumed the duttes of Executive officer of NAS Oceana tn February 2001 and
assumed Commandtng Officer later that same year Captam &lvers ts recogmzed fi~r hts masterful
leadershtp and management of the East Coast's Master .let Base, NAS Oceana, for hts tremendous
cooperatton tn worktng wtth the Ctty of Vtrgtnta Beach though the day-to-day operations of NAS Oceana,
the successful 2002 Neptune Festtval Atr Show, and the response to the terrortsm attacks on September
Eleventh
Captatn &lvers, hts wife, Karen, and daughter, Brtttany, ACCEPTED the PROCLAMATION.
October 8, 2002
c~}hereas!
Captain Cary ~. "~Do£far' Silvers, Commanding Officer, ~UnitedStates Havy,
is relinquishing commandof Hava£Air Station Oceana; and
Captazn Silvers receiveda $achelor of $usiness Adminutration degree from
the ~Oniversity of Georgia in 1977 andwas commissioned through Avzatzon
Officer Candidate Schoolin 1978, becoming a HavalAviator m 1979; and
Whereas:
Captain Silvers servedin q/T-24 as an instructorpilot, reportedto Vq;-l Olfor
trazning zn the q:-14A aircraft, andservedzn Vq:-143 as Line Dzvtsion, P~lot
Training, andAssistant Operations Officer as a TOPGffjHgraduate, mab3ng
two Mediterranean deployments aboardthe ~)SS Dwzght ~D. ;Eisenhower, and
Whereas:
Captain Silvers became an adversary instructorpilot flying the T-38, G-S~ A-4
and the q:-21 (Kq:IPG aircrafts, being the.first to trazn in the Kq~IRIsraeli
aircraft and being the first HavalAir Training and Operating Procedures
Standardization Officer for the same; and
r~/~}hereas:
He later completeda deployment in support of Operation Desert Shield on
board the DSS ~wight D. Bisenhower, and
Whereas:
He servedas the Executive Officerof Vq:-101 andof VG-3 2, where he became
the 46~ Commanding Officer of the Swordsmen ~n 1994; and
Whereas:
Captain Sdvers served on the ~OSS Independence as Air $oss and after
numerous deployments, reported to Commander Operatzonal Test and
Bvaluatzon q~orce as Assistant Chief of Staff for SpecialPrograms; and
Whereas:
Captazn Silvers assumed the duties of Bxecutive Officer of HAS Oceana in
q:ebruary 2001 andassumedCommanding Officer later that same year, and
Whereas:
Duffng his career, Captain Silvers has accumulated more than 4,000flight
hours and 688 carder arrested landings; and
His awards inclucle the Meritorious Service Medal,, ~r Meda[Stri~e q~fi'glit
~ward, 3;avy Commendation Meda~ ~ir q~orce Commendatwn Medal, Joint
Meritorious ~)nit ~ward, anclvarious unit service medals; ancl
Captain Si[vets' new ctssignment beginning ~pnl 2003 will 6e as Captain,
~)nitedStates Navy, Retired; ancl
¢Vhereas:
Captain Si[vets is recognizecl for his mastegCulleaclersliip anclmanagement of
tlie east coast's Master, et ~ase, HAS Oceana, for his tremenclous cooperation
in wor~ng witli the City of Virginia ~each tlirough the gay-to-clay operatwns
of HAS Oceana, tlie succesqTCu[2002 Heptune q~estival~ir Sliow, ancl tlie
response to the terrorism attacks on September 11a; ancl
Captain Silvers is a warrior, a patriot, a tremendously loyalAmerican citzzen,
anda tribute to the ~)nitedStates Havy:
How, Therefore, I, Meyera B. Obemdogc,, Mayor of the City of Virginia ~each, Virginia, do
hereby acknowledge andcelebrate the service of Captain CaryA. "Dollar"Silvers, vSH, to
America and Virgzma &each, anddo hereby Proclaim
october 8, 2002
Dollar Silver's Day
In Virginia $each, and I call on all citizens to join the Virgima $each Oty Councd zn
wzshing Captain Silvers andhis family the best of success in retirement, andwe thankhzm
for his commitment to hzs country as a Patriot, a Warrior, andan Officer anda Gentleman.
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my handandcausedthe OfficialSealof the Oty
of V~rginia $each, Virginia, to be aff~edth~s Bighth day of October, Two Thousand-Two.
Meyera B. Obemdorf
Mayor
- 29-
Item V-H.2.
MA YOR 'S PRESENTATION
ITEM # 50264
Mayor Oberndorf PROCLAIMED
October 8, 2002
John Wareing Day
John Waretng was born on November 14, 1923, and enhsted tn the Untted Sates Navy tn December 1940
Durtng hts 20years of servtce, he was decorated on numerous occastons for herotsm A beloved strongman,
wrestler, boxer, televtson personahty, tratner, coach and mentor, "Jungle" John Waretng founded and
operated Waretng's Gym tn Vtrgtnta Beach for two decades John graduated from the Vtrgtnta Beach Pohce
Academy tn 1985, served the ctttzens of Vtrgtnta Beach for etght years as a sworn pohce officer and accepted
spectal asstgnments wttH the Vtrgtnta Beach Pohce Department after hts rettrement The new gym at the
Vtrgtnta Beach Law Retnforcement Tratntng Academy was dedtcated on October 3, 2002, tn honor of ~lohn
Waretng, who passed away on July 16, 2000, and through thcs gym,John's influence will hve on
Mrs ~lohn Waretng and hts famtly ACCEPTED, with appreciation, THE PROCLAMATION
October 8, 2002
Whereas: John q4;areing was bom on November 14, 1923, and
Whereas: John Wareing enlisted~n the ~)nitedStates Havy in ~)ecember 1940, andduring
his 20 years of service, he was decoratedon numerous occasions for heroism; and
Whereas: A 6eloved strougman, wrestler, boxer, television personality, trainer, coach and
mentor, "Jungle "John Wareing founded and operated Wareing 's Gym in Virginia
$each for two decades, assisting citizens from all walks of life tn their quest to
achieve fitness; and
gVhereas: John qdjareing was an active citizen involved in many community organizations,
including the qeleet Reserves, the qvraternalOrder of Police, the flmericanSociety
of LawBnforcement Trainers, the Veterans of qvoreign Wars, the CaulidToxverAlley
Club, and the Dtstinguished B13nng Cross Society; and
'Whereas: John Wareing tlraduated from the Virginia $each Police Academy in 1985, served
the citizens of Virginia $each foreight years as a sworn police officer, andaccepted
special assignments with the Virginia $each Police q)epartment after his
retirement; and
Whereas: The new gym at the Virginia $each Law Enforcement Training Academy was
dedicatedon October3, 2002 in honorof John qVareing, who passedaway on July
16, 2000, and through this gym, John's influence willlive on:
How, Therefore, I, Meyera B,. Oberndo95, Mayorofthe City of Virginia $each, Virginia, do hereby
Proclaim:
October 8, 2002
Jo h n Wa reintl Day
In '~tness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the OfficialSealof the City of
Virginia $each, V~rtlinia, to be affixed this Seventh day of October, Txvo Thousand Two.
Meyera E. 06erndo~
Mayor
Item V-H.$.
- 30-
MA YOR 'S PRESENTATION
ITEM # 50265
Counctlman Louts Jones read the Resolutton tn recognttton of former Mayor and Counctlman Harold
Hetschober's unttrtng achtevements The playtng field at the Virginia Beach Sportsplex hereby ts named
and henceforth shall be know as the
HAROLD HEISCHOBER FIELD
"Today, we lard to rest Harold Hetschober, a wonderful and caring husband, father, grandfather and frtend
He was those thtngs foremost, but also, he was a great player on the team that ts the pohttcal hfe of Vtrgtnta
Beach Durtng two decades of de&cated servtce he had a steady hand and a cool head as Ctty Counctl dealt
wtth major growth However, he never lost stght of what ss the true fiber of a ctty, its services and amentttes
to benefit tts ctttzens He was most proud of spearhea&ng creatton of the 24'h Street Park and the Veterans
Memortal, amentttes that gtve pleasure and prtde to ctttzens everyday Many of us were tn thts chamber tn
1997 when he gave what has come to be known as his "Fteld of Dreams" speech He was extolhng the
vtrtues ofhavtng a Multt-Purpose sta&um here and the need for a professtonal sports team He told us how
he had been tnsptred, as a youngster, by the professtonal sports fields he had been fortunate enough to vtstt
and to play on, how they had fueled hts dreams of bemg tn the "btg" leagues He encouraged us to butld
a "Fteld of Dreams "for ouryoungpeople to fuel thetr tmagtnattons, to bmld strength tnto thetr bo&es and
tntegrtty tnto their mtnds and souls We &d that, and today the field ss used by young people from all over
the regton What a testament to Harold's dreams for hts ctty and the people he served That ss why, today,
I am pleased to offer a resolutton to name the Sports Complex Harold Hetschober Fteld tn honor of Harold 's
tenactty of sptrtt, "btg league" outlook on hfe, and de&cated pubhc servtce
Upon motton by Counctlman Jones, seconded by Vtce Mayor Man&go, Ctty Counctl ADOPTED:
Resolution renaming the playing field at the Virginia Beach Sportsplex:
Harold Heischober Field.
Vottng 11-0
Counctl Members Vottng Aye
Margaret L Eure, Loms R Jones, Reba S McClanan, Rtchard A Maddox,
Vtce Mayor Robert C Man&go, Jr, Mayor Meyera E Oberndorf, Jtm
Reeve, Peter W Schmtdt, Ron A Vtllanueva, Rosemary Wtlson and James
L Wood
Council Members Vottng Nay
None
Counctl Members Absent
None
October 8, 2002
WHEREAS: Harold Heischober was elected to membership on the l~rginia Beach
City Council in 1980;
WHEREAS: Councilman Heischober served two years and was elected by his peers
as the Vice Mayor, which he served 1980-1982;
WHEREAS: Vice Mayor Heischober was elected by the Virginia Beach City Council
to serve as Mayor 1984-1986. This represented the first time a member of City Council had been
elevated each two years to the higher o. ffice from Councilman to Mayor;
WHEREAS: Mayor Heischober, with many years of professional leadership
experience, exhibited his wisdom with vision to guide Virginia Beach, the largest city in the
Commonwealth of Virginia, in its growth as a major American municipality;
WHEREAS: Harold Heischober, formerly a professional baseball player, has
throughout his long career of service consistently given of his unlimited talents for the enhancement
of whatever community he was privileged to call "home";
WHEREAS: After his tenure as Mayor, Councilman Heischober continued to serve
as a member of the City Council with a particular vision for a world-class sports facility to serve as a
venue for a variety of participatory sports;
WHEREAS: Harold Heischober's tenacity saw that vision become a reality in the
form of the Virginia Beach Sportsptex; and,
WHEREAS: The City of Virginia Beach continues to benefit, on a daily basis, the
enhancement this Sportsplex has brought to local sports, school activities and economic benefia
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That, in recognition of these untiring
achievements, the playing field at the Virginia Beach Sportsplex hereby be named and henceforth be
known as the:
HAROLD HEISCHOBER FIELD
Given under our hands and seals this Eighth day of October Two Thousand and Two.
Margaret L. Eure
Richard A. Maddox
Ron A. Villanueva
Louis R. Jones
Jim Reeve
Rosemary W'dson
Reba S. McClanan
Peter W. Schmidt
James L Wood
Vice Mayor Mayor
Item V-H. 4.
- 31 -
MA YOR 'S PRESENTATION
ITEM # 50266
Mayor Oberndorf tntroduced the followtng Boy Scout tn attendance to earn hts mertt badge
Scout Troop 63
David Anderson
Sponsored by Francis Ashbury Church
October 8, 2002
Item V-I.
- 32 -
ORDINANCES/RESOL UTIONS
ITEM # 50267
Upon motton by Vtce Mayor Mandtgo, seconded by Counctlman Wood, Ctty Counctl APPROVED IN ONE
MOTIONitems Ia (DEFERRED) lb, 2 a, 3 a and 4 of the CONSENTAGENDA
Item Ia was DEFERRED BY CONSENT, unttl the Ctty Counctl Sesston of October 29, 2002.
Vottng 11-0 (By Consent)
Counctl Members Vottng Aye
Margaret L Eure, Louts R Jones, Reba S McClanan, RtchardA Maddox.
Vice Mayor Robert C Man&go, Jr, Mayor Meyera E Oberndorf, Jtm
Reeve, Peter W Schmtdt, Ron A Vtllanueva, Rosemary Wtlson and James
L Wood
Counctl Members Vottng Nay
None
Counctl Members Absent
None
Council Lady McClanan voted a VERBAL NAY on Item 1 a
October 8, 2002
Item V-I.l.a.
- 33 -
ORDINANCES/RESOL UTIONS
ITEM # 5026 7
Upon motton by Vtce Mayor Mandtgo, seconded by Counctlman Wood, Ctty Counctl DEFERRED unttl the
Ctty Counctl Sesston of October 29, 2002:
Ordtnance to AMEND 3g18-72 of the Ctty Code re busmess hcense taxes'
on coin-operated machines
Voting 11-0 (By ConsenO
Counctl Members Vottng Aye
Margaret L Eure, Louts R Jones, Reba S McClanan, Rtchard A Maddox,
Vtce Mayor Robert C Mandtgo, Jr, Mayor Meyera E Oberndorf, Jtm
Reeve, Peter W Schmtdt, Ron A Vtllanueva, Rosemary Wtlson and James'
L Wood
Counctl Members Vottng Nay
None
Counctl Members Absent
None
October 8, 2002
Item V-I.l.b.
- 34 -
ORDINANCES/RES OL UTIONS
ITEM # 50268
Upon motion by Vtce Mayor Mandtgo, seconded by Counctlman Wood, Ctty Council ADOPTED:
Ordtnance to AMEND and REORDAIN 3~ 21-321 2 re addtng certatn
netghborhoods subject to maxtmum speed hmtts ("Traffic Calming ") and
provtdtng penalttes tn those netghborhoods
1 Stratford Chase
2 Bayvtlle Park
Vottng 11-0 (By ConsenO
Counctl Members Vottng Aye
Margaret L Eure, Louts R Jones, Reba S McClanan, Rtchard A Maddox,
Vtce Mayor Robert C Mandtgo, Jr, Mayor Meyera E Oberndorf, Jtm
Reeve, Peter W Schmtdt, Ron A Vtllanueva, Rosemary Wtlson and James
L Wood
Counctl Members Vottng Nay
None
Counctl Members Absent
None
October 8, 2002
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
AN ORDINANCE TO ADD A NEW SECTION
TO THE CITY CODE PERTAINING TO
MAXIMUM SPEED LIMITS IN DESIGNATED
NEIGHBORHOODS
SECTION ADDED' 21-321.2
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
That the Code of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, is
hereby amended and reordained to read as follows:
Sec. 21-321.2. Traffic Calming via Maximum speed l~mits in
certain residential districts; penalty.
Pursuant to section 46.2-878.2 of the Code of Virginia,
any person who operates a motor vehicle in excess of the maximum
speed limit established for any portion of the following highways
located within the designated neighborhoods, on or after the
effective date, shall be guilty of a traffic infraction punishable
by a non-prepayable fine of not more than $200, in addition to
other penalties provided by law:
Effective as of February 12, 2001:
1. L & J Garden: Norwich Avenue; Tajo
Avenue; Fairlawn Avenue; Dulcie Avenue.
2. Acredale: Andover Road; Langston Road;
Bonneydale Road; Olive Road, Alton Road; Old
Kempsville Road.
3. Lake Shores: Jack Frost Road; Lake
Shores Road.
4. Little Neck: Harris Road.
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Effective as of August 14, 2001.
1. Lake Shores: Oak Leaf Lane, Tern Road; Lake Road S;
Regina Lane; Meredith Road, School Road, Mosby Road,
Frizzel Drive; Finn Road; Charla Lee Lane; Smith Farm
Road.
2. Brighton on the Bay: Templeton Lane; Wivenhoe Way;
Starr Way.
36
37
38
3. Baylake Pines/Baylake Beach' Ben Gunn Road; Indian
Hill Road; Baylake Road; Rampart Avenue; Bayvzlle Road;
Lookout Road; Sandy Bay Drive.
39
4. Country Haven' Stewart Dr~ve.
4O
41
Effective as of April 9, 2002'
42
1. Fairfmeld- Lord Dunmore Drive.
43
2. Bellamy Manor- Homestead Drive.
44
Effectlve as of May 28, 2002'
45
1. Church Point' Church Point Road; Church Point
46
Place; Timber Ridge Drive.
47
Effective as of October 8, 2002'
48
1. Stratford Chase- Stratford Chase Drive; M[nden
49
Road; Violet Bank; Kittery Drive.
5O
51
2. Bayville Park' Greenwell Road (From Shore Drive to
First Court Road).
52
53
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
Virginia, on the 8th day of October, 2002.
CA8524
F-kordin\noncode\21-321.2.ord.wpd
September 19, 2002
R3
- 35-
Item V-2. a.
ORDINANCES/RESOL UTIONS
ITEM # 50269
Upon motion by Vtce Mayor Mandtgo, seconded by Councilman Wood, City Counctl ADOPTED:
Ordinance to AUTHORIZE temporary encroachment tnto a portton of
the Ctty's rtghts-of-way within Ltnkhorn Shores (DISTRICT 5 -
L YNNHA VEN)
WAYNE and KIMBERLY A BEAGLE re maintenance of an
extsttng timber retatmng wall at 1200 Gloucester Lane
The followtng condtttons shall be requtred
The temporary encroachment shall be constructed and matntatned tn
accordance wtth the laws of the Commonwealth of Vtrgmta and the
Ctty of Vtrgtnta Beach and tn accordance with the City's
spectficattons and approval as to size, ahgnment and locatton
The temporary encroachment shall termtnate upon nottce by the
Ctty to the apphcant and, wtthm thtrty (30) days after such
nottce ts gtven, the temporary encroachment must be removed
from the encroachment area by the apphcant and the apphcant
wtll bear all costs and expenses of such removal
The apphcant shall tndemntfy and hold harmless the Ctty, tts
agents and employees from and agatnst all claims, damages,
losses and expenses, tncludtng reasonable attorney's fees tn case
tt shall be necessary to file or defend an actton artstng out of the
locatton or extstence of the temporary encroachment
Nothing herein contatned shall be construed to enlarge the
permtsston and authortty to permit the matntenance or
constructton of any encroachment other than that spectfied
heretn and to the hmtted extent spectfied heretn, nor to permtt
the matntenance and constructton of any encroachment by
anyone other than the apphcant
5 The apphcant agrees to matntatn the temporary encroachment so
as not to become unsightly or a hazard
The apphcant agrees to obtatn a permtt from the Development
Servtces Center/Planmng Department prtor to commenctng any
constructton wtthtn the encroachment area
Prior to tssuance of a rtght-of-way permit, the apphcant must
post surettes tn accordance wtth the project engineer's cost
esttmate, to the Office of Development Servtces Center of the
Planntng Department
8 The apphcant shall obtatn an approvedjotnt permtt apphcatton
from Waterfront Operations Dtvtston of the Planmng Department
The apphcant shall obtatn and keep tn force all rtsk property
tnsurance and general habthty tnsurance, or such tnsurance as
ts deemed necessary by the Ctty, and all tnsurance pohctes must
name the City as addtttonal named tnsured or loss payee, as
apphcable The apphcant must also carry comprehenstve
general habthty tnsurance tn an amount not less than Ftve
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), combtned smgle hmtts
of such tnsurance pohcy or pohctes The apphcant must provtde
endorsements provtdtng at least thtrty (30) days' written nottce
to the Cttyprtor to the cancellatton or termtnatton of or matertal
change to, any of the tnsurance pohctes The apphcant assumes
all responstbthttes and habthttes, vested or conttngent, wtth
relatton to the temporary encroachment
October 8, 2002
Item V-2. a.
ORDINANCES/RESOL UTIONS
- 36-
ITEM # 50269 (Continued)
10
11
12
The temporary encroachment must conform to the mtntmum
setback requtrements as estabhshed by the Ctty
The apphcant must submtt for revtew and approval, a survey for
the encroachment area, certtfied by a regtstered professtonal
engtneer or a hcensed land surveyor, and/or "as built "plans of
the Temporary Encroachment sealed by a regtsteredprofesstonal
engtneer, tf requtred by etther the Ctty Engtneer's Office or the
Engtneertng Dtvtston of the Pubhc Utthttes Department
The Ctty, upon revocatton of such authortty and permtsston so
granted, may remove the temporary encroachment and charge
the cost thereof to the apphcant and collect the cost tn any
mannerprovtded by law for the collectton of local or state taxes,
may reqmre the apphcant to remove such temporary
encroachment, and, pendtng such removal, the Ctty may charge
the apphcant for the use of such portton of the Ctty's rtght-of-way
encroached upon the equtvalent of what would be the real
property tax upon the land so occupted tf tt were owned by the
apphcant, and, tf such removal shall not be made wtthtn the ttme
ordered heremabove by thts Agreement, the Ctty shall impose a
penalty tn the sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100 O0) per day for
each and every day that such temporary encroachment ts allowed
to conttnue thereafter, and shall collect such compensatton and
penalttes tn any manner provtded by law for the collectton of
local or state taxes
Vottng 11-0 (By Consent)
Counctl Members Vottng Aye
Margaret L Eure, Loms R Jones, Reba S McClanan, Rtchard A Maddox,
Vtce Mayor Robert C Man&go, Jr, Mayor Meyera E Oberndorf, Jtm
Reeve, Peter W Schmtdt, Ron A Vtllanueva, Rosemary Wtlson and James'
L Wood
Counctl Members Vottng Nay
None
Counctl Members Absent
None
October 8, 2002
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Requested by Department of Public Works
AN ORDINANCE TO AUTHORIZE A
TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT INTO A
PORTION OF THE CITY'S RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF GLOUCESTER LANE BY WAYNE BEAGLE
AND KIMBERLY A. BEAGLE, THEIR HEIRS,
ASSIGNS AND SUCCESSORS IN TITLE
WHEREAS, WAYNE BEAGLE and KIMBERLY A. BEAGLE, desire to
construct and maintain a timber retaining wall into the City's
right-of-way known as Gloucester Lane.
WHEREAS, City Council is authorized pursuant to §§ 15.2-
2009 and 15.2-2107, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, to
authorize a temporary encroachment upon the City's right-of-way
subject to such terms and conditions as Council may prescribe.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
That pursuant to the authority and to the extent thereof
contained in §§ 15.2-2009 and 15.2-2107, Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended, WAYNE BEAGLE and KIMBERLY A. BEAGLE, their heirs, assigns
and successors in title, are authorized to construct and maintain
a temporary encroachment for a timber retaining wall in the city's
right-of-way of Gloucester Lane as shown on that certain plat
entitled: "SKETCH SHOWING RETAINING WALL ENCROACHMENT LOCATED ON
SITE 45B-1 FOR WAYNE BEAGLE RESUBDIVISION OF SITE 45A AND 45B
RESUBDIVISION OF SITE 45 LINKHORNSHORES VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA",
a copy of which is on file in the Department of Public Works to
which reference is made for a more particular description; and
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that the temporary encroachment
is expressly subject to those terms, conditions and criteria
contained in the Agreement between the City of Virginia Beach and
II II
WAYNE BEAGLE and KIMBERLY A. BEAGLE (the Agreement ), which is
attached hereto and incorporated by reference; and
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that the City Manager or his
authorized designee is hereby authorized to execute the Agreement.
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that this Ordinance shall not be
in effect until such time as WAYNE BEAGLE and KIMBERLY A. BEAGLE
37
38
39
40
and the City Manager or his authorized designee execute the
Agreement.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
Virginia, on the 8th day of October , 2002.
41
42
43
44
CA#-
TKENN\ENCROACH\BEAGLE.ORD
R-1
PREPARED: 8/26/02
APPRAV_ED AS TO CONTENTS
~/ SIGNATURE
DEPARTMENT
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY AND ~
CITY ATTO~RNEY
W00DHOUSE RD S \ \
SITE
FIRST COLONIAL RD.
LOCATION MAP
.....-
SCALE: 1" == 1,600'
SEW
LOCA
LOCATION MAP FOR
ENCROACHMENT FOR
WAYNE AND KIMBERLY BEAGLE
AT 12 00 GLOUCESTER LAN E
SCALE: 1' = 100'
PREPARED BY P/W ENG. DRAFT. 20-AU~2002
PREPARED BY VIRGINIA BEACH
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
EXEMPTED FROM RECORDATION TAXES UNDER
SECTIONS 58.1-811 (a)(3) AND 58.1-811 (c)(4)
REIMBURSEMENT AUTHORIZED UNDER SECTION 25-249
20 O~, by and between the CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, ~RGINIA, a
municipal corporation, Grantor, "City", and WAYNE BEAGLE and
KIMBERLY A. BEAGLE, his wife, THEIR HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESSORS
IN TITLE, "Grantee", even though more than one.
W I T N E S S E T H:
That, WHEREAS, the Grantee is the owner of that certain
lot, tract or parcel of land designated and described as "Site
45B-1, Subdivision of Linkhorn Shores" (Instrument No.
200207153001475), and being further designated and described as
1200 Gloucester Lane, Virginia Beach, VA 23454; and
That, WHEREAS, it is proposed by the Grantee to
construct and maintain a timber retaining wall, a "Temporary
Encroachment in the City of Virginia Beach; and
WHEREAS, in constructing and maintaining the Temporary
Encroachment, it is necessary that the Grantee encroach into a
portion of an existing City right-of-way known as Gloucester
Lane, "The Encroachment Area"; and the Grantee has requested that
the City permit a Temporary Encroachment within The Encroachment
Area.
GPIN: 2408-87-4323
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises
and of the benefits accruing or to accrue to the Grantee and for
the further consideration of One Dollar ($1.00), in hand paid to
the City, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the City doth
grant to the Grantee permission to use The Encroachment Area for
the purpose of constructing and maintaining the Temporary
Encroachment.
It is expressly understood and agreed that the Temporary
Encroachment will be constructed and maintained in accordance
with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia and the City of
Virginia Beach, and in accordance with the City's specifications
and approval and is more particularly described as follows, to-
wit:
A Temporary Encroachment into The Encroachment
Area as shown on that certain plat entitled:
"SKETCH SHOWING RETAINING WALL ENCROACHMENT
LOCATED ON SITE 45B-1 FOR WAYNE BEAGLE
RESUBDIVISION OF SITE 45A AND 45B
RESUBDIVISION OF SITE 45 LINKHORN SHORES
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA", Revised date:
August 6, 2002; a copy of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit "A" to which reference is
made for a more particular description.
It is further expressly understood and agreed that the
Temporary Encroachment herein authorized terminates upon notice
by the City to the Grantee, and that within thirty (30) days
after the notice is given the Temporary Encroachment must be
removed from The Encroachment Area by the Grantee, and that the
Grantee will bear all costs and expenses of such removal.
It is further expressly understood and agreed that the
Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its agents
and employees, from and against all claims, damages, losses and
expenses including reasonable attorney's fees in case it shall be
necessary to file or defend an action arising out of the location
or existence of the Temporary Encroachment.
It is further expressly understood and agreed that
nothing herein contained shall be construed to enlarge the
permission and authority to permit the maintenance or
construction of any encroachment other than that specified herein
and to the limited extent specified herein, nor to permit the
maintenance and construction of any encroachment by anyone other
than the Grantee.
It is further expressly understood and agreed that the
Grantee agrees to maintain the Temporary Encroachment so as not
to become unsightly or a hazard.
It is further expressly understood and agreed that the
Grantee must submit and have approved a traffic control plan
before commencing work in The Encroachment Area. Also, the
Grantee agrees that the Temporary Encroachment must stay at least
three feet (3') from the edge of the existing pavement for
Gloucester Lane.
It is further expressly understood and agreed that the
Grantee agrees that no open cut of the public roadway will be
allowed except under extreme circumstances. Requests for
exceptions must be submitted to the Highway Operations Division
of the Department of Public Works for final approval.
It is further expressly understood and agreed that the
Grantee must obtain a right-of-way permit from the Development
Services Center of the Planning Department prior to commencing
any construction within The Encroachment Area.
It is further expressly understood and agreed that prior
to the issuance of a right-of-way permit the Grantee must post
sureties, in accordance with their engineer's cost estimate, with
the Development Services Center of the Planning Department.
It is further expressly understood and agreed that the
Grantee must get an approved Joint Permit Application from the
Waterfront Operations Division of the Planning Department.
It is further expressly understood and agreed that the
Grantee must obtain and keep in force all-risk property insurance
and general liability insurance, or such insurance as is deemed
necessary by the City, and all insurance policies must name the
City as additional named insured or loss payee, as applicable.
The Grantee also agrees to carry comprehensive general liability
insurance in an amount not less than $500,000.00, combined single
limits of such insurance policy or policies. The Grantee will
provide endorsements providing at least thirty (30) days written
notice to the City prior to the cancellation or termination of,
or material change to, any of the insurance policies. The
Grantee assumes all responsibilities and liabilities, vested or
contingent, with relation to the Temporary Encroachment.
It is further expressly understood and agreed that the
Temporary Encroachment must conform to the minimum setback
requirements as established by the City.
It is further expressly understood and agreed that the
Grantee must submit, for review and approval, a survey of The
Encroachment Area certified by a registered professional engineer
or a licensed land surveyor, and/or "as built" plans of the
Temporary Encroachment sealed by a registered professional
engineer, if required by either the City Engineer's Office or the
Engineering Division of the Department of Public Utilities.
It is further expressly understood and agreed that the
City, upon revocation of such authority and permission so
granted, may remove the Temporary Encroachment and charge the
cost thereof to the Grantee, and collect the cost in any manner
provided by law for the collection of local or state taxes; may
require the Grantee to remove the Temporary Encroachment; and,
pending such removal, the City may charge the Grantee for the use
of The Encroachment Area the equivalent of what would be the real
property tax upon the land so occupied if it were owned by the
Grantee; and, if such removal shall not be made within the time
ordered hereinabove by this Agreement, the City may impose a
penalty in the sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) per day for
each and every day that the Temporary Encroachment is allowed to
continue thereafter, and may collect such compensation and
penalties in any manner provided by law for the collection of
local or state taxes.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WAYNE BEAGLE and KIMBERLY A. BEAGLE,
his wife, the said Grantee has caused this Agreement to be
executed by their signatures and seals duly affixed. Further,
that the City of Virginia Beach has caused this Agreement to be
executed in its name and on its behalf by its City Manager and
its seal be hereunto affixed and attested by its City Clerk.
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
City Manager/Authorized
Designee of the City Manager
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
City Clerk
(SEAL)
Wayne Beagle
STATE OF VIRGINIA
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, to-wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this day of , 20 , by
, CITY MANAGER/AUTHORIZED
DESIGNEE OF THE CITY MANAGER.
My Commission Expires:
Notary Public
STATE OF VIRGINIA
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, to-wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this day of , 20 , by
RUTH HODGES SMITH, City Clerk for the CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH.
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this /~ day of ~ ~ , 20 z~)~_~ , by
WAYNE BEAGLE and KIMBERLY A. BEAGLE, his wife.
ary Publ i~
My Commission Expires: ~gr~~ ~
APPROVED AS TO
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
CITY ~TTORNEY -
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
(~ITY REAL ESTATE AGENT
W
L~
W
lO. O0°
N 80'44"I0" E
I i i ii I
THIS SKETCH WAS PREPARED TO BE AFFACHED TO ENCROACHMENT
APPLICATION AND IS NOT INTENDED TO REPRESEN? A OOUNDARY SURVE)<
O UKE OF WINDSOR R OA O
S
VALVE0
W
(~-VACUUM SENDER POT
o
VALVE
45.5
WALL
ENCROACHMENT
N 80'44'!0' E
48. 12
50.7
SITE 45A- 1
GPIN 2408-87-6304
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL'--
('SEE DETAIL. SHEET 2 OF 2)
SKETCH SHOWING
RETAINING WALL ENCROACHMENT
LOCATED ON
SITE 45B- 1
FOR WAYNE BEAGLE
RESUBDIVlSlON OF SITE 45A AND 45B
RESUBDIVlSlON OF SITE 45
LEGEND
~ -- ENCROACHMENT
SHEET ! OF 2
REVISED DATE: AUG. 6, 2002
SCALE: 1 "--20'
JOB NO. L/NKENCR
REFERENCE PLAT RECORDED IN
MAP BOOK 47, PACE 2.7
IN$7'RUMENT ~ 200207 f 5.700 !475
SITE 45B- 1
GPIN 2408-87-4.323
1200 GLOUCESTER LANE
L INKHORN SHO RES
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA
PREPARED BY
TECHNICAL AND ENVIRBNNENTAL SERVICES
SURVEYING DIVISION
GRAPHIC S~SALE
1' = 20'
10 20
5625 PROVIDENCE ROAD
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA 23464
(757) 420-4462
FAX (757) 420-4463
I
30
Photo looking South showing retaining
wall encroachment and edge of pavement
for Gloucester Ln.; a distance of approx.
37'. Retaining wall encroaches into R/W of
Gloucester Ln. approx. 23' Wayne Beagle
Photo looking North showing retaining wall
encroachment and edge of pavement for
Gloucester Ln.; a distance approx. 37'. End
of retaining wall encroaches into R/W of
Gloucester Ln. approx. 23'
Item
-37-
ORDINANCES/RES OL UTIONS
ITEM # 502 70
Upon morton by Councdman Wood, seconded by Councd Lady Wdson, City Councd ADOPTED:
Or&nance to AUTHORIZE temporary encroachment tnto a portton of
the Ctty's rtghts-of-way wtthtn Ltnkhorn Shores (DISTRICT 5 -
L YNNHA VEN)
PAUL D. and MARIANNE WARREN re constructton and
matntenance of a spht ratl fence, wtllow arbor and landscaptng
at 1517 Duke of Wmdsor Road
The followtng condtttons shall be requtred
The temporary encroachment shall be constructed and
matntatned tn accordance wtth the laws of the Commonwealth of
Vtrgtnta and the Ctty of Vtrgtnta Beach and tn accordance wtth
the Ctty's spectficattons and approval as to stze, ahgnment and
locatton
The temporary encroachment shall termtnate upon nottce by the
Ctty to the apphcant and, wtthm thtrty (30) days after such
nottce ts gtven, the temporary encroachment must be removed
from the encroachment area by the apphcant and the apphcant
wtll bear all costs and expenses of such removal
The apphcant shall tndemmfy and hold harmless the Ctty, tts
agents and employees from and agamst all clatms, damages,
losses and expenses, tncludmg reasonable attorney's fees tn case
tt shall be necessary to file or defend an actton artstng out of the
locatton or extstence of the temporary encroachment
Nothtng heretn contatned shall be construed to enlarge the
permtsston and authortty to permtt the matntenance or
constructton of any encroachment other than that spectfied
heretn and to the hmtted extent spectfied herein, nor to permtt
the matntenance and constructton of any encroachment by
anyone other than the apphcant
5 The apphcant agrees to matntatn the temporary encroachment so
as not to become unsightly or a hazard
The apphcant agrees to obtatn a permtt from the Development
Servtces Center/Planntng Department prtor to commenctng any
constructton wtthtn the encroachment area
The apphcant shall obtatn and keep tn force all rtsk property
tnsurance and general habthty tnsurance, or such tnsurance as
ts deemed necessary by the Ctty, and all tnsurance pohctes must
name the Ctty as addtttonal named tnsured or loss payee, as
apphcable The apphcant must also carry comprehenstve
general habthty tnsurance tn an amount not less than Ftve
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500, 000), combmed stngle hmtts
of such tnsurance pohcy orpohctes The apphcant must provtde
endorsements provtdtng at least thtrty (30) days' wrttten nottce
to the Ctty prtor to the cancellatton or termtnatton of, or matertal
change to, any of the tnsurance pohctes The apphcant assumes
all responstbthttes and habthttes, vested or conttngent, wtth
relatton to the temporary encroachment
October 8, 2002
Item l/-I.2, b.
- 38-
ORDINANCES/RES OL UTIONS
ITEM # 502 70 (Continued)
The Ctty, upon revocatton of such authortty and permtsston so
granted, may remove the temporary encroachment and charge
the cost thereof to the apphcant and collect the cost tn any
mannerprovtded by law for the collectton of local or state taxes,
may requtre the apphcant to remove such temporary
encroachment, and, pendtng such removal, the Ctty may charge
the apphcant for the use of such portton of the Ctty's rtght-of-way
encroached upon the equtvalent of what would be the real
property tax upon the land so occupted tf tt were owned by the
apphcant, and, tf such removal shall not be made wtthtn the ttme
ordered heremabove by thts Agreement, the Ctty shall tmpose a
penalty tn the sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100 O0) per day for
each and every day that such temporary encroachment ts allowed
to conttnue thereafter, and shall collect such compensatton and
penalttes tn any manner provtded by law for the collectton of
local or state taxes
Vottng 11-0
Councd Members Vottng Aye
Margaret L Eure, Louts R Jones, Reba S McClanan, Rtchard A Maddox,
Vtce Mayor Robert C Man&go, Jr, Mayor Meyera E Oberndorf, Jtm
Reeve, Peter W Schmtdt, Ron A Vdlanueva, Rosemary Wtlson and James
L Wood
Councd Members Voting Nay
None
Councd Members Absent
None
October 8, 2002
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Requested by Department of Public Works
AN ORDINANCE TO AUTHORIZE TEMPORARY
ENCROACHMENTS INTO A PORTION OF THE
RIGHT-OF-WAY 1517 DUKE OF WINDSOR
ROAD BY PAUL D. WARREN AND MARIANNE
WARREN, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESSORS IN
TITLE
WHEREAS, Paul D. Warren and Marianne Warren, desire to
construct and malntamn a 4' X 188' split rail fence, 3" willow
arbor, and landscaping, mnto the City's rights-of-way located at
1517 Duke of Windsor Road.
WHEREAS, City Council ms authorized pursuant to §~ 15.2-
2009 and 15.2-2107, Code of Virgmnla, 1950, as amended, to
authorize a temporary encroachments upon the City's right-of-way
subject to such terms and conditions as Council may prescribe.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
That pursuant to the authority and to the extent thereof
contained in ~ 15.2-2009 and 15.2-2107, Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended Paul D. Warren and Marianne Warren, assigns and successors
in title are authormzed to construct and maintain a temporary
encroachment in the City's right-of-way as shown on the map
entitled: "ENCROACHMENT PLAT FOR 1517 DUKE OF WINDSOR ROAD," a copy
of which is on fmle in the Department of Public Works and to which
reference is made for a more particular description; and
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that the temporary encroachments
are expressly subject to those terms, cond~tmons and criteria
contained ~n the Agreement between the City of Virginia Beach and
Paul D. Warren and Marianne Warren, (the "Agreement") which ms
attached hereto and incorporated by reference; and
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that the City Manager or h~s
authorized designee ms hereby authormzed to execute the Agreement.
33 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that this Ordinance shall not be
34
35
36
37
effect until such time as Paul D. Warren and Marianne Warren and
the City Manager or hms authormzed designee execute the Agreement.
Adopted by the Council of the City of V~rg~nia Beach,
Vlrginma, on the 8th day of October , 2002.
38
39
4O
CA-%
gsalmons/warren/ord.
R-1
PREPARED: 09.02.02
SUFFICIENCX A~-~O~4
C'rTX A~TOm~X
LINKHORN BAY
LOCATION MAP
ITE
SCALE: 1" = 1,600'
~ /
.Y
/
/
?/
A. OSMANTHUS FORTUNES
B. ACUBA
C. CAMELIA
D. LEYLAND CYPRESS
E. HYDRANGEA
F. RIVER BIRCH
/
£408-98-5100 /
\ '-.
IN
//
/
12
POSED
I
12.~N D ~
.' NTo C TY
12
118
2408-97-5488
28
OF
EDGE
MAP
lNG
REQUES
RI~qNE
DUKE W R
E: 1" = 100'
DUKE OF WINSOR. DGN M.].S. PREPARED BY P/W ENG. CADD DEPT. 10-SEP-2002
PREPARED BY VIRGINIA BEACH
CITY ATIORNEY'S OFFICE
EXEMPTED FROM RECORDATION TAXES
UNDER SECTIONS 58.1-gl l(a)(3)
AND 58.1-Sl ~(¢X4) REIMBURSEMENT
AUTHORIZED UNDER SECT[ON 25-249
THIS AGREEMENT, made this ~ day o _fL~z~~ ~ , 2002, by and between
the CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA, a municipal corporation, Grantor, "City", and
PAUL D. WARREN AND MARIANNE WARREN, husband and wife, THEIR HEIRS, ASSIGNS
AND SUCCESSORS IN TITLE, "Grantee", even though more than one.
WITNESSETH:
That, WHEREAS, the Grantee is the owner of that certain lot, tract, or parcel of land
designated and described as "SITE 31 1.6 ACRES" as shown on "REVISED PLAT OF
LINKHORN SHORES PROPERTY OF LINKHORN SHORES, INC. LYNNHAVEN MAG.
DIST.-PRINCESS ANNE CO., VA. SCALE: 1" = 100' DECEMBER 16, 1953 SAMUEL W.
MILLER, JR. CERTIFIED LAND SURVEYOR VIRGINIA CERTIFICATE NO 405,"and being
further designated and described as 1517 Duke of Windsor Road, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23454;
WHEREAS, it is proposed by the Grantee to construct and maintain a 4' X 188' Split
Rail Fence, Arbor, and Landscaping, "Temporary Encroachment", in the City of Virginia Beach;
WHEREAS, in constructing and maintaining the Temporary Encroachment, it is
necessary that the Grantee encroach into a portion of an existing City right of way that is located on
the east portion of the property known as 1517 Duke of Windsor Road "The Temporary
Encroachmem Area"; and
GPIN 2408-97-4860-0000
WHEREAS, the Grantee has requested that the City permit a Temporary
Encroachment within The Encroachment Area.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and of the benefits
accruing or to accrue to the Grantee and for the further consideration o f One Dollar ($1.00), in hand
paid to the City, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the City doth grant to the Grantee
permission to use The Encroachment Area for the purpose of constructing and maintaining the
Temporary Encroachment.
It is expressly understood and agreed that the Temporary Encroachment will be
constructed and maintained in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia and the
City of Virginia Beach, and in accordance with the City's specifications and approval and is more
particularly described as follows, to wit:
A Temporary Encroachment into The Encroachment
Area as shown on that certain plat entitled:
"ENCROACHMENT PLAT FOR 1517 DUKE OF
WINDSOR ROAD," a copy of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit "A" and to which reference is made
for a more particular description.
It is further expressly understood and agreed that the Temporary Encroachment herein
authorized terminates upon notice by the City to the Grantee, and that within thirty (30) days after
the notice is given, the Temporary Encroachment must be removed from The Encroachment Area
by the Grantee; and that the Grantee will bear all costs and expenses of such removal.
It is further expressly understood and agreed that the Grantee shall indemnify and hold
harmless the City, its agents and employees, from and against all claims, damages, losses and
expenses including reasonable attorney's fees in case it shall be necessary to file or defend an action
arising out of the location or existence of the Temporary Encroachment.
It is further expressly understood and agreed that nothing herein contained shall be
construed to enlarge the permission and authority to permit the maintenance or construction of any
encroachment other than that specified herein and to the limited extent specified herein, nor to permit
the maintenance and construction of any encroachment by anyone other than the Grantee.
It is further expressly understood and agreed that the Grantee agrees to maintain the
Temporary Encroachment so as not to become unsightly or a hazard.
It is further expressly understood and agreed that the Grantee must obtain a permit
from the Office of Development Services Center/Planning Department prior to commencing any
construction within The Encroachment Area.
It is further expressly understood and agreed that the Grantee must obtain and keep
in force all-risk property insurance and general liability or such insurance as is deemed necessary by
the City, and all insurance policies must name the City as additional named insured or loss payee,
as applicable. The Grantee also agrees to carry comprehensive general liability insurance in an
amount not less than $500,000.00, combined single limits of such insurance policy or policies. The
Grantee will provide endorsements providing at least thirty (30) days written notice to the City prior
to the cancellation or termination of, or material change to, any of the insurance policies. The
Grantee assumes all responsibilities and liabilities, vested or contingent, with relation to the
Temporary Encroachment.
It is further expressly understood and agreed that the City, upon revocation of such
authority and permission so granted, may remove the Temporary Encroachment and charge the cost
thereofto the Grantee, and collect the cost in any manner provided by law for the collection of local
or state taxes; may require the Grantee to remove the Temporary Encroachment; and pending such
removal, the City may charge the Grantee for the use of The Encroachment Area, the equivalent of
what would be the real property tax upon the land so occupied if it were owned by the Grantee; and
if such removal shall not be made within the time ordered hereinabove by this Agreement, the City
may impose a penalty in the sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) per day for each and every day
that the Temporary Encroachment is allowed to continue thereafter, and may collect such
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Paul D. Warren and Marianne Warren, the said Grantee
has caused this Agreement to be executed by their signature and seal duly affixed. Further, that the
City of Virginia Beach has caused this Agreement to be executed in its name and on its behalf by its
City Manager and its seal be hereunto affmed and attested by its City Clerk.
Further, that the City of Virginia has caused this agreement to be executed in its name
and on its behalf by its City Manager and its seal be hereunto affixed and attested by its City Clerk.
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
By_
City Manager/Authorized
Designee of the City Manager
(SEA )
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Paul D. Warren
~¥l~n~e Warren~ '~
STATE OF VIRGINIA
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, to-wit:
The foregoing instrumem was acknowledged before me this
__day of
2002, by
., CITY MANAGER/AUTHORIZED DESIGNEE OF
THE CITY MANAGER.
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
STATE OF VIRGINIA
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, to-wit:
The foregoing instrumem was acknowledged before me this
day of
,2002, by RUTH HODGES SMITH, MMC, City Clerk for the CITY OF VIRGINIA
BEACH.
Notary Public
My Commission Expires:
CITWCOUI~Y~ Ur~.:~;~. ~ ¢o ~- , to-wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this .~
,2002, by Paul D. Warren and Marianne Warren.
My Commission Expires:
Notary Pu~t~c
KAmLEEN J GIRDLER ~"'/
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
~M~ION EXPIRES APRIL 30,
APPROVED AS TO
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
CITY ATTORNEY
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
C~TY REAL ESTATE AGENT
Rev 07-24-02
Exhibit "A"
,IN(~)
FAWCET
DOCK
SITE 30
FR SHED
o
ELEC OUTLET
PIN
GRAVEL
DRIVEWAY
4' WOO0
FENCE
PIN(~,f)
:z: I
O
WATER FAWCET
C~ A~M.
SPACE
ACCESS
EXISTING
1 STY BR & FR
RESD
#1517
(SEE DETAIL)
BRICK
WALK
PIN(f)
zz
20 O'
A/C ON
CONC
PAD
20 4'
LOCATION OF FLOOD ZONE LINE
AS SCALED FROM FIRM PANEL
SITE 32
R = 20.00'
L = 29.62'
PIN(f)
DUKE OF
113
S 16'06'30" E 132.00'
S 16'15'07"' E 131.48'(f)
PIN(f)
WINDSOR ROAD (50' R/W)
ENCROACHMENT PLAT
FOR
1517 DUKE OF WINDSOR ROAD
PAUL D. AND MARIANNE WARREN
1517 DUKE OF WINDSOR ROAD
Kent Lane looking towards the back of 1517 Duke of Windsor Road. Fencing
will go on the outside of the encroaching landscaping.
Three inch willow arbor will begin where the split rail fence ends and pick
back up with the matching fencing on the outside of encroaching
landscaping.
Kent Lane Looking towards Duke of Windsor Road
PAUL D. AND MARIANNE WARREN
1517 DUKE OF WINDSOR ROAD
Eastern portion of 1517 Duke of Windsor Road looking towards Kent Lane
showing encroaching landscaping.
Item V-3.
ORDINANCES/RES OL UTIONS
- 39-
ITEM # 502 71
Upon motton by Vtce Mayor Man&go, seconded by Councilman Wood, Ctty Counctl ADOPTED:
Resolutton referrtng to the Planntng Commtsston proposed amendments to
8'502 of the Ctty Zoning Ordtnance (CZO) re dimensional requirements for
nonconforming lots tn the R-5S restdenttal dtstrtct
Vottng 11-0 (By Consent)
Counctl Members Vottng Aye
Margaret L Eure, Louts R Jones, Reba S McClanan, RtchardA Maddox,
Vtce Mayor Robert C Man&go, Jr, Mayor Meyera E Oberndorf, Jtm
Reeve, Peter W Schmtdt, Ron A Vtllanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James
L Wood
Counctl Members Vottng Nay
None
Counctl Members Absent
None
October 8, 2002
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
A RESOLUTION REFERRING TO THE PLANNING
COMMISSION PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 502
OF THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE, PERTAINING TO
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR NONCONFORMING
LOTS IN THE R-5S RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the public necessity, convenience, general welfare
and good zoning practice so require;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,
VIRGINIA:
There is hereby referred to the Planning Commlssmon, for
consideration and recommendation, proposed amendments to Section
502 of the City Zoning Ordinance, pertaining to dimensional
requirements for nonconforming lots in the R-5S Residential
District. A true copy of such proposed amendments is hereto
attached.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
BEACH, VIRGINIA:
That the Planning Commission be, and hereby is, directed to
transmit to the City Council its recommendation concerning the
aforesaid amendments no later than sixty (60) days after the date
of adoption of this Resolution.
22
23
24
25
26
27
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
Virginia, on the 8th day of October, 2002.
CA-8631
noncode/CZO502(e) .res.wpd
R-1
September 26, 2002
1 Requested by Councilmember Richard Maddox
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY
ZONING ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENT FOR
NONCONFORMING LOTS IN THE R-SS
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
SECTION AMENDED' CZO ~502
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
WHEREAS, the public necessity, convenience, general welfare
and good zoning practice so require:
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
BEACH, VIRGINIA:
That Section 502 of the City Zoning Ordinance is hereby
amended and reordained to read as follows:
Sec. 502 Dimensional Requirements
(e) Nonconforming lots:
(1) Where a lot has less than the minimum requirements for the
R-5S Residential District and said lot has continuously been
a lot of record, in single and separate ownership from
adjacent property, prior to and since the passage of this
ordinance, said lot may be developed for any purpose permitted
within the R-5S Residential District.
(2) However, if the owner of a lot which does not meet the minimum
requirements of the R-5S Residential District, is the owner of
or becomes the owner of another substandard lot adjacent to it
and located in the same R-5S Residential District, he is not
entitled to the exception in (1) above. In this instance, the
owner of the two (2) or more adjacent substandard lots must
combine the two (2) or more lots to form one which will meet
or more closely approximate the frontage and area requirements
of the ordinance applicable within the R-5S Residential
District.
(3) The owner of contiguous substandard lots is prohibited from
conveying one (1) or more of the substandard lots with the
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
6O
61
62
63
64
65
66
result that both the grantors and the grantee possess lots
entitled to an exception from the minimum lot requirements.
(4) Status as a single and separate owner may not be acquired
after enactment of this ordinance by selling a parcel and
reducing the remainder below the minimum lot requirements nor
may an owner of several contiguous nonconforming parcels
combine them so as to leave a substandard lot, and assert the
right to exception in (1) above.
...... m... 3---- A.% I7% /'__% I'5% % 4 (~.k=7 %.,,;--1-- -- V
-= ~---- {2) ...... : ....... subs anda:d '-3-- ' .... 5
Res-'d--t'-I ~: .... ' .... =:-= ....... = .... -'--~ t -3- 'dth
~.~,~ o-~ as u- th= date of ~..= passage of thio ordznon~=,
..... I~1 % --._L --J-
,.~y convey ~,~= ~/ o~o=o,,dard lot to o oeparate owner and
su~,, lot may ut u=.=~u~=u for any purpose pe~.,~tted
width ~ t~%i:ty-five (35) feet and a:ea ~ thirty-five hundred
--=~-=~-= -- follows-
~, ~ ~~~o o~ustandard loto ~n cobb, on ownersh ohall
b- resubdivided .... ~ ..... ~' .......... ~-- '" '
substandard lot~=-= ~ ~ess than thirty-f~---~= ~35}
' --~ f~= hundred {3,500} square
area. The remaining contiguous substandard lots shall be
~ ' ...... ~2--2 -- *
~stz-~ct The ~=o~~ozon of -~' ....
· ~ ~,~guous substanda:d
lots in co~on ownership shall~=~- d=ocribed-- on one '"~,'
subdivision plat.
~ ~e~o who seek to develop on o~ot=~d~d lots
........... ~ = - dh ..... th- nfill
............. - :--- d bd in' ~,, ~ ..... =---~---
68
69
7O
71
72
73
74
75
76
lot in the R-SS R=sidential~'~stzzct
subsection shall be
.L~V~
For the purposes of this section, lots are not regarded as
adjacent where they form an "L", part of one being contiguous
to the other.
COMMENT
This amendment will delete the exception that allowed one substandard 35 foot lot when
other substandard lots were resubdivided in the R-5S Residential Zoning District.
77
78
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
Virginia, on the day of , 2002.
CA-8626
Proposed\czo 502(e)
R-3
September 25, 2002
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT'
'Planning' Oep%-r tme~t
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY'
Cit~ Attorney's Off~-c-e
Item V-4.
ORDINANCES/RES OL UTIONS
- 40-
ITEM # 502 72
Upon motton by Vtce Mayor Man&go, seconded by Counctlman Wood, Ctty Counctl ADOPTED:
Resolution to AUTHORIZE the tssuance and sale of $28-Mtlhon Water
and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Sertes of 2002, heretofore authortzed, re
reimbursement for prevtous capttal expen&tures and funding for future
water and sewer proJects, and, AUTHORIZE the &strtbutton of the
prehmtna~ Offictal Statement and other related acttons
Vottng 1 O- 1 (By Consent)
Counctl Members Vottng Aye
Margaret L Eure, Louts R Jones, Rtchard A Maddox, Vtce Mayor Robert
C Man&go, Jr, Mayor Meyera E Oberndorf Jtm Reeve, Peter W
Schmtdt, Ron A Vtllanueva, Rosemary Wtlson and James L Wood
Counctl Members Vottng Nay
Reba S McClanan
Council Members Absent
None
October 8, 2002
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE DISTRIBUTION OF A
PRELIMINAllRY OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND OTHER
ACTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE BY THE
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA, OF ITS WATER
AND SEWER SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS, SERIES OF 2002
WHEREAS, the City of Vlrg~ma Beach, Virginia (the "City"), proposes to issue its Water
and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series of 2002, ~n an amount not to exceed $28,000,000 (the
"Bonds"), and
WHEREAS, there have been presented to this meeting drafts of the following documents:
(a) Notice of Sale, draft dated September 30, 2002 (the "Notice of Sale"), of the City
relating to the advertisement of the pubhc offenng of the Bonds;
(b) Preliminary Official Statement, draft dated September 30, 2002 (the "Prehmlnary
Official Statement"), of the City relating to the public offering of the Bonds; and
(c) Continuing Disclosure Agreement, draft dated September 30, 2002, pursuant to which
the City agrees to undertake continuing disclosure obligations pursuant to Rule 15c2-12 (the "Rule")
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") for the benefit of the holders
of the Bonds;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA, AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Counml ofthe City (the "City Councd") approves the following terms ofthe sale
of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be sold by competitive bid, and the City Manager shall receive bids
for the Bonds and award the Bonds to the bidder providing the lowest "true" or "Canadian" interest
cost, subject to the following limitations The Bonds (a) shall have a "true" or "Canadian" interest
cost not to exceed 7.0%, taking into account any original issue discount or premium, (b) shall be sold
to the purchaser at a price not less than 99% of the pnnc~pal amount thereof and (c) shall mature no
later than the year 2027.
2. The C~ty Manager, in collaboration with Government Finance Associates, Inc, and
ARD/Govemment Finance Group, the City's financial advisors (the "Flnanmal Advisors"), is
authorized and directed to take all proper steps to advertise the Bonds for sale substantially ~n
accordance with the form of Notice of Sale attached hereto, which is approved, provided that the
City Manager, ~n collaboration with the Financial Advisors, may make such changes in the Notice
of Sale not inconsistent with this Resolution as he may consider to be in the best interest of the City.
3. The City authorizes the distribution of the Preliminary Official Statement in form
deemed "near final" as of its date, within the meaning of the Rule of the SEC, to prospective
purchasers of the Bonds, with such completions, omissions, insertions and changes as may be
approved by the City Manager Such distribution shall constitute conclusive evidence of the
approval of the City Manager as to any such completions, omissions, insertions and changes and that
the City has deemed the Preliminary Official Statement to be near final as of Its date.
4. The City Manager, in collaboration with the Financial Advisors, ~s hereby authorized
and directed to approve such completions, omissions, ~nsertlons and other changes to the Prehmlnary
Official Statement necessary to reflect the terms of the sale of the Bonds and the detmls thereof
appropriate to complete it as an official statement in final form (the "Official Statement") and to
execute and dehver the Official Statement to the purchasers of the Bonds. Execution of the Official
Statement by the C~ty Manager shall constitute conclusive evidence of his approval of any such
completions, omissions, ~nsertlons and changes and that the Official Statement has been deemed
final by the City as of its date within the meamng of the Rule.
5. The Mayor, the City Manager and such officer or officers of the City as either may
designate, any of whom may act, are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Continuing
Disclosure Agreement, the form of which is approved, with such completions, omissions, ~nsertions
and changes that are not inconsistent with th~s Resolution
6. The Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Bonds by manual or
facsimile signature, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to countersign the Bonds and
affix the seal of the City thereto or cause a facsimile thereof to be pnnted thereon, and the officers
of the City are hereby authorized and d~rected to deliver the Bonds to the registrar and paying agent
for authentication and dehvery to the purchasers of the Bonds.
7. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute, dehver and file
all certificates and documents and to take all such further action as they may consider necessary or
desirable ~n connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds, including without limitation (a)
execution and delivery of a certificate setting forth the expected use and Investment of the proceeds
of the Bonds to show that such expected use and ~nvestment wall not wolate the provisions of
Section 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and regulatmns
thereunder, applicable to "arbitrage bonds," (b) making any elections that such officers deem
desirable regarding any provision requinng rebate to the United States of"arbitrage profits" earned
on investment of proceeds of the Bonds, and (c) fihng Internal Revenue Service Form 8038-G. The
foregoing shall be subject to the adwce, approval and direction of bond counsel.
8. Any authorization herein to execute a document shall include authorization to deliver
it to the other parties thereto.
9. All other acts of the officers of the City that are in conformity with the purposes and
intent of this Resolution and in furtherance of the issuance and sale of the Bonds are hereby approved
and ratified.
10. This Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Vlrglma Beach, Virginia, on the 8 t:h day of October,
2002.
CA-8637
noncode/VAB 2002 W&S POS.res.wpd
October 1, 2002
R1
Approved as to Content:
Finance Depa~rtme~ '
Approved as to Legal Sufficiency'
City Attorney s Offici/
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA
SEVENTH SUPPLEMENTAL RESOLUTION SUPPLEMENTING AND
AMENDING RESOLUTION ADOPTED FEBRUARY 11, 1992, ENTITLED
"MASTER WATER AND SEWER REVENUE BOND RESOLUTION
PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE FROM TIME TO TIME OF ONE OR
MORE SERIES OF WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS
OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH," AS PREVIOUSLY
SUPPLEMENTED AND AMENDED, TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE
AND SALE OF UP TO $28,000,000 OF WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM
REVENUE BONDS, SERIES OF 2002, AND PROVIDING FOR THE
FORM, DETAILS AND PAYMENT THEREOF AND THE FINANCING
OF THE COST OF IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CITY'S WATER AND
SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES
ADOPTED ON OCTOBER __, 2002
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paee
ARTICLE I
SEVENTH SUPPLEMENTAL RESOLUTION
Section 7.101. Seventh Supplemental Resolution ........................................................................... 2
Section 7.102. Meaning of Terms; Definitions ................................................................................ 2
Section 7.103. Reference to Articles and Sections .......................................................................... 2
ARTICLE II
2002 PROJECT
Section 7.201. Authorization of 2002 Project .................................................................................. 3
ARTICLE III
ISSUANCE AND SALE OF SERIES OF 2002 BONDS
Section 7.301.
Section 7.302.
Section 7.303.
Section 7.304.
Section 7.305.
Section 7.306.
Section 7.307.
Issuance and Sale of Series of 2002 Bonds ............................................................. 3
Details of Series of 2002 Bonds ............................................................................... 3
Book Entry System .................................................................................................. 4
Registrar ................................................................................................................... 5
Form of Series of 2002 Bonds ................................................................................. 5
Security for Series of 2002 Bonds ........................................................................... 5
Application of Proceeds ........................................................................................... 5
ARTICLE IV
REDEMPTION OF SERIES OF 2002 BONDS
Section 7.401. Optional Redemption Provisions ............................................................................. 6
Section 7.402. Mandatory Redemption ........................................................................................... 6
Section 7.403. Manner of Redemption ............................................................................................ 6
Section 7.404. Notice of Redemption .............................................................................................. 6
ARTICLE V
FEDERAL TAX PROVISIONS
Section 7.501. Limitation of Use of Proceeds ................................................................................. 7
Section 7.502. Rebate Requirement ................................................................................................. 8
Section 7.503. Calculation and Payment of Rebate Amount ........................................................... 8
(i)
ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 7.601. Limitation of Rights ................................................................................................. 9
Section 7.602. SNAP Investment ..................................................................................................... 9
Section 7.603. Severability .............................................................................................................. 9
Section 7.604. Effective Date .......................................................................................................... 9
Appendix A - Description of the 2002 Project ........................................................................... A- 1
Appendix B - Form of the Series of 2002 Bonds ......................................................................... B-1
(ii)
SEVENTH SUPPLEMENTAL RESOLUTION SUPPLEMENTING AND
AMENDING RESOLUTION ADOPTED FEBRUARY 11, 1992, ENTITLED
"MASTER WATER AND SEWER REVENUE BOND RESOLUTION
PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE FROM TIME TO TIME OF ONE OR
MORE SERIES OF WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS
OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH," AS PREVIOUSLY
SUPPLEMENTED AND AMENDED, TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE
AND SALE OF UP TO $28,000,000 OF WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM
REVENUE BONDS, SERIES OF 2002, AND PROVIDING FOR THE
FORM, DETAILS AND PAYMENT THEREOF AND THE FINANCING
OF THE COST OF IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CITY'S WATER AND
SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES
WHEREAS, the Council (the "Council") of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia (the
"City"), adopted a resolution on February 11, 1992 (the "Master Resolution"), providing for the
issuance from time to time of water and sewer revenue bonds to finance the cost of
improvements and extensions to its water and sanitary sewer system; and
WHEREAS, the Council desires to issue pursuant to the Master Resolution up to
$481,001 of the $14,560,000 water and sewer system revenue bonds authorized by an ordinance
adopted by the Council on December 6, 1990, up to $1,880,179 of the $13,770,000 water and
sewer system revenue bonds authorized by an ordinance adopted by the Council on November
12, 1991, up to $228,208 of the $5,450,000 water and sewer system revenue bonds authorized by
an ordinance adopted by the Council on November 23, 1993, up to $5,773,442 of the
$14,080,000 water and sewer system revenue bonds authorized by an ordinance adopted by the
Council on May 10, 1994, up to $1,464,354 of the $6,593,000 water and sewer system revenue
bonds authorized by an ordinance adopted by the Council on May 9, 1995, up to $1,023,216 of
the $6,960,000 water and sewer system revenue bonds authorized by an ordinance adopted by
the Council on May 14, 1996, up to $1,580,331 of the $12,730,000 water and sewer system
revenue bonds authorized by an ordinance adopted by the Council on May 13, 1997, up to
$5,069,187 of the $11,600,000 water and sewer system revenue bonds authorized by an
ordinance adopted by the Council on May 12, 1998, up to $3,116,281 of the $9,513,000 water
and sewer system revenue bonds authorized by an ordinance adopted by the Council on May 1 I,
1999, up to $3,186,381 of the $7,890,000 water and sewer system revenue bonds authorized by
an ordinance adopted by the Council on May 9, 2000, up to $2,475,513 of the $11,000,000 water
and sewer system revenue bonds authorized by an ordinance adopted by the Council on May 15,
2001, and up to $1,721,907 of the $6,930,000 water and sewer system revenue bonds authorized
by an ordinance adopted by the Council on May 14, 2002, and to sell such bonds as a single
issue in a collective amount equal to $28,000,000; and
WHEREAS, the City is not in default under the Master Resolution or in payment of the
principal of or interest on the Outstanding Bonds (as defined in the Master Resolution);
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
ARTICLE I
SEVENTH SUPPLEMENTAL RESOLUTION
Section 7.101. Seventh Supplemental Resolution.
This Seventh Supplemental Resolution is adopted pursuant to and in accordance with
Section l l01(g) of the Master Resolution. All covenants, conditions and agreements of the
Master Resolution shall apply with equal force and effect to the Series of 2002 Bonds (as
hereinafter defined) and to the holders thereof, except as otherwise provided herein.
Section 7.102. Meaning of Terms; Definitions.
All capitalized terms used herein, and not defined either in this Section or elsewhere in
this Seventh Supplemental Resolution (including the recitals hereto), shall have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Master Resolution. The following terms shall have the following
meanings in this Seventh Supplemental Resolution.
"2002 Project" shall mean the acquisitions, improvements, extensions, additions and
replacements to the System as described in Article "II".
"DTC" shall mean The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, a securities
depository, as holder of the Series of 2002 Bonds, or its successors or assigns in such capacity.
"Rebate Amount" shall mean the excess of (a) the future value of all nonpurpose
receipts with respect to the Series of 2002 Bonds over (b) the future value of all nonpurpose
payments with respect to the Series of 2002 Bonds, in each case calculated under Section 7.503
pursuant to the requirements of Section 148 of the Code, or such other mount of arbitrage
required to be rebated to the United States of America under Section 148 of the Code.
"Rebate Amount Certificate" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 7.503.
"Registrar" shall mean The Bank of New York, New York, New York, as paying agent
and bond registrar for the Series of 2002 Bonds.
"Series of 2002 Bonds" shall mean the Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series
of 2002, in the amount up to $28,000,000 to be issued in accordance with the provisions of
Article III.
"Seventh Supplemental Resolution" shall mean this Seventh Supplemental Resolution
which supplements the Master Resolution.
Section 7.103. Reference to Articles and Sections
Unless otherwise indicated, all references herein to particular articles or sections are
references to articles or sections of this Seventh Supplemental Resolution.
ARTICLE II
2002 PROJECT
Section 7.201. Authorization of 2002 Project.
The Council has authorized the acquisitions, improvements, extensions, additions and
replacements to the System described on Appendix A, which are part of the approved capital
improvement program of the City.
ARTICLE III
ISSUANCE AND SALE OF SERIES OF 2002 BONDS
Section 7.301. Issuance and Sale of Series of 2002 Bonds.
The City hereby provides for the issuance of water and sewer system revenue bonds in a
principal amount up to $28,000,000, consisting of up to $481,001 of the $14,560,000 water and
sewer system revenue bonds authorized by an ordinance adopted by the Council on December 6,
1990, up to $1,880,179 of the $13,770,000 water and sewer system revenue bonds authorized by
an ordinance adopted by the Council on November 12, 1991, up to $228,208 of the $5,450,000
water and sewer system revenue bonds authorized by an ordinance adopted by the Council on
November 23, 1993, up to $5,773,442 of the $14,080,000 water and sewer system revenue bonds
authorized by an ordinance adopted by the Council on May 10, 1994, up to $1,464,354 of the
$6,593,000 water and sewer system revenue bonds authorized by an ordinance adopted by the
Council on May 9, 1995, up to $1,023,216 of the $6,960,000 water and sewer system revenue
bonds authorized by an ordinance adopted by the Council on May 14, 1996, up to $1,580,331 of
the $12,730,000 water and sewer system revenue bonds authorized by an ordinance adopted by
the Council on May 13, 1997, up to $5,069,187 of the $11,600,000 water and sewer system
revenue bonds authorized by an ordinance adopted by the Council on May 12, 1998, up to
$3,116 281 of the $9,513,000 water and sewer system revenue bonds authorized by an ordinance
adopted by the Council on May 11, 1999, up to $3,186,381 of the $7,890,000 water and sewer
system revenue bonds authorized by an ordinance adopted by the Council on May 9, 2000, up to
$2,475,513 of the $11,000,000 water and sewer system revenue bonds authorized by an
ordinance adopted by the Council on May 15, 2001, and up to $1,721,907 of the $6,930,000
water and sewer system revenue bonds authorized by an ordinance adopted by the Council on
May 14, 2002, which such bonds shall be issued and sold. The proceeds thereof shall be used to
pay the Cost of the 2002 Project. All such bonds shall constitute Bonds, as defined in the Master
Resolution.
Section 7.302. Details of Series of 2002 Bonds.
(a) The Series of 2002 Bonds shall be designated "Water and Sewer System Revenue
Bonds, Series of 2002," shall be numbered R-1 upward, shall be dated, shall be in an aggregate
principal amount not to exceed $28,000,000, shall bear interest at rates, payable semiannually on
such dates and shall mature in installments on such dates and in years and amounts, all as
determined by the City Manager to be in the best interest of the City.
(b) Principal of the Series of 2002 Bonds and the premium, if any, thereon shall be
payable to the holders upon the surrender of such Bonds at the principal corporate trust office of
the Registrar. Interest on the Series of 2002 Bonds shall be payable by cheek or draft mailed to
the holders as of the 15th day of the month prior to each interest payment date, at their addresses
as they appear on the registration books kept by the Registrar.
(c) Except as otherwise provided herein, the Series of 2002 Bonds shall be payable,
executed, authenticated, registrable, exchangeable and secured, all as set forth in the Master
Resolution.
Section 7.303. Book Entry System.
Initially, one Series of 2002 Bond certificate for each maturity will be issued to DTC,
which is designated as the securities depository for the Series of 2002 Bonds, or its nominee, and
immobilized in its custody. Beneficial owners of the Series of 2002 Bonds will not receive
physical delivery of the Series of 2002 Bonds. So long as DTC is acting as securities depository
for the Series of 2002 Bonds, a book entry system shall be employed, evidencing ownership of
the Series of 2002 Bonds in principal amounts of $5,000 or multiples thereof, with transfers of
beneficial ownership effected on the records of DTC and its participants pursuant to rules and
procedures established by DTC and its participants. Interest on the Series of 2002 Bonds shall
be payable in clearinghouse funds to DTC or its nominee as registered owner of the Series of
2002 Bonds. Principal, premium, if any, and interest shall be payable in lawful money of the
United States of America by the Registrar.
Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of DTC shall be thc
responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by
participants of DTC will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of
beneficial owners. The City and the Registrar shall not be responsible or liable for maintaining,
supervising or reviewing the records maintained by DTC, its participants or persons acting
through such participants.
In the event that (a) DTC determines not to continue to act as securities depository for the
Series of 2002 Bonds by giving notice to the City and the Registrar discharging its
responsibilities hereunder, (b) the Registrar or the City determines that DTC is incapable of
discharging its duties or that continuation with DTC as securities depository is not in the best
interest of the City, or (c) the Registrar or the City determines that continuation of the book entry
system of evidencing ownership and transfer of ownership of the Series of 2002 Bonds is not in
the best interest of the City or the beneficial owners of the Series of 2002 Bonds, the Registrar
and the City shall discontinue the book entry system with DTC. If the Registrar or the City fails
to identify another qualified securities depository to replace DTC, the Registrar shall authenticate
and deliver replacement bonds in the form of fully registered certificates to the beneficial owners
or to the DTC participants on behalf of beneficial owners, substantially in the form as set forth in
Appendix B with such variations, omissions or insertions as are necessary or desirable in the
delivery of replacement certificates in printed form. The Series of 2002 Bonds would then be
registrable and exchangeable as set forth in Section 204 of the Master Resolution.
So long as DTC is the securities depository for the Series of 2002 Bonds (a) it shall be the
registered owner of the Series of 2002 Bonds, (b) transfers of ownership and exchanges shall be
effected on the records of DTC and its participants pursuant to rules and procedures established
by DTC and its participants, and (c) references in this Seventh Supplemental Resolution to
holders of the Series of 2002 Bonds shall mean DTC or its nominee and shall not mean the
beneficial owners of the Series of 2002 Bonds.
Section 7.304. Registrar.
The selection of The Bank of New York as paying agent and bond registrar for the Series
of 2002 Bonds is approved.
Section 7.305. Form of Series of 2002 Bonds.
The Series of 2002 Bonds shall be in substantially the form set forth in Appendix B with
such variations, omissions and insertions as may be necessary to set forth the details thereof
pursuant to Article II of the Master Resolution and Article III hereof.
Section 7.306. Security for Series of 2002 Bonds.
The Series of 2002 Bonds shall be issued pursuant to the Master Resolution and this
Seventh Supplemental Resolution and shall be equally and ratably secured under and to the
extent provided in the Master Resolution with the Prior Parity Bonds, any Bonds that may be
issued under the Master Resolution, any Parity Double Barrel Bonds that may be issued and any
Parity Debt Service Components that may be incurred, without preference, priority or distinction
of any obligations over any other obligations; provided, however, the Debt Service Reserve Fund
will secure only the Bonds.
Section 7.307. Application of Proceeds.
The proceeds of the Series of 2002 Bonds shall be applied as follows:
(a) An mount representing accrued interest on the Series of 2002 Bonds fi.om their
dated date to their date of delivery shall be paid to the Fiscal Agent and deposited in the Interest
Account in the Revenue Bond Fund.
(b) The amount of Series of 2002 Bond proceeds necessary, together with amounts on
deposit in the Debt Service Reserve Fund, to equal the Debt Service Reserve Requirement after
the issuance of the Series of 2002 Bonds shall be paid to the Fiscal Agent and deposited into the
Debt Service Reserve Fund.
(c) The balance of the proceeds shall be retained by the City and deposited in a
General Account in the Construction Fund to be used to pay the Cost of the 2002 Project and to
pay expenses incident to issuing the Series of 2002 Bonds.
ARTICLE IV
REDEMPTION OF SERIES OF 2002 BONDS
Section 7.401. Optional Redemption Provisions.
(a) The Series of 2002 Bonds may be subject to redemption prior to maturity at the
option of the City on or at~er dates, if any, determined by the City Manager, in whole or in part at
any time at redemption prices equal to the principal amount of the Series of 2002 Bonds,
together with any accrued interest to the redemption date, plus redemption premiums not to
exceed 2% of the principal amount of the Series of 2002 Bonds, as such redemption premiums
may be determined by the City Manager.
Section 7.402. Mandatory Redemption.
The Series of 2002 Bonds may be subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption prior to
maturity in years and amounts, upon payment of 100% of the principal amount thereof to be
redeemed plus interest accrued to the redemption date, as may be determined by the City
Manager.
Section 7.403. Manner of Redemption.
If less than all the Series of 2002 Bonds are called for redemption, the maturities of the
Series of 2002 Bonds to be redeemed shall be selected in such manner as the City Manager or the
chief financial officer of the City may determine to be in the best interest of the City. If less than
all of the Series of 2002 Bonds of any maturity are called for redemption, the Series of 2002
Bonds to be redeemed shall be selected by DTC or any successor securities depository pursuant
to its rules and procedures or, if the book entry system is discontinued, shall be selected by the
Registrar by lot in such manner as the Registrar at its discretion may determine. In either case,
(a) the portion of any Series of 2002 Bond to be redeemed shall be in the principal amount of
$5,000 or some integral multiple thereof and Co) in selecting Series of 2002 Bonds for
redemption, each portion of $5,000 principal amount shall be counted as one bond for this
purpose.
Section 7.404. Notice of Redemption.
(a) Notice of redemption of the Series of 2002 Bonds shall be given in the manner set
forth in Section 402 of the Master Resolution.
(b) In the case of an optional redemption, the notice may state that (1) it is
conditioned upon the deposit of moneys, in an amount equal to the amount necessary to effect
the redemption, with an escrow agent no later than the redemption date or (2) the City retains the
right to rescind such notice on or prior to the scheduled redemption date (in either case, a
"Conditional Redemption"), and such notice and optional redemption shall be of no effect if such
moneys are not so deposited or if the notice is rescinded as described herein. Any Conditional
Redemption may be rescinded at any time prior to the redemption date, and the Registrar shall
give prompt notice of such rescission to the affected Series of 2002 Bondholders. Any Series of
2002 Bonds subject to Conditional Redemption where redemption has been rescinded shall
remain Outstanding, and the rescission shall not constitute an Event of Default. Further, in the
case of a Conditional Redemption, the failure of the City to make funds available on or before
the redemption date shall not constitute an Event of Default, and the Registrar shall give
immediate notice to all organizations registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as
securities depositories or the affected Series of 2002 Bondholders that the redemption did not
occur and that the Series of 2002 Bonds called for redemption and not so paid remain
outstanding.
ARTICLE V
FEDERAL TAX PROVISIONS
Section 7.501. Limitation of Use of Proceeds.
The City covenants with the holders of the Series of 2002 Bonds as follows:
(a) The City shall not take or omit to take any action or make any investment or use
of the proceeds of any Series of 2002 Bonds (including failure to spend the same with due
diligence) the taking or omission of which would cause the Series of 2002 Bonds to be "arbitrage
bonds" within the meaning of Section 148 of the Code, including without limitation participating
in any issue of obligations that would cause the Series of 2002 Bonds to be part of an "issue" of
obligations that are arbitrage bonds, within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.148-
10 or successor regulation, or otherwise cause interest on the Series of 2002 Bonds to be
includable in the gross income of the registered owners under existing law. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, the City shall comply with any provision of law that may require the
City at any time to rebate to the United States of America any part of the earnings derived from
the investment of gross proceeds of the Series of 2002 Bonds.
(b) The City shall not permit the proceeds of the Series of 2002 Bonds or the facilities
to be financed with such proceeds to be used in any manner that would result in either (1) 5% or
more of such proceeds or the facilities being financed with such proceeds being considered as
having been used in any trade or business carried on by any person other than a govemmental
unit as provided in Section 141(b) of the Code, (2) 5% or more of such proceeds or the facilities
being financed with such proceeds being used with respect to any "output facility" (other than a
facility for the furnishing of water) within the meaning of Section 141Co)(4) of the Code, or (3)
$% or more of such proceeds being considered as having been used directly or indirectly to make
or finance loans to any person other than a governmental unit, as provided in Section 141 (c) of
the Code; provided, however, that if the City receives an opinion of Bond Counsel that
compliance with any such covenant is not required to prevent the interest on the Series of 2002
Bonds from being includable in the gross income of the registered owners thereof under existing
law, the City need not comply with such restriction.
(c) The City shall not take any other action that would adversely affect, and shall take
all action within its power necessary to maintain, the exclusion of interest on all Series of 2002
Bonds from gross income for federal income taxation purposes.
Section 7.502. Rebate Requirement.
The City shall determine and pay, from any legally available source, the Rebate Amount,
if any, to the United States of America, as and when due, in accordance with the "rebate
requirement" described in Section 148(f) of the Code and retain records of all such
determinations until six years after payment of the Series of 2002 Bonds.
Section 7.503. Calculation and Payment of Rebate Amount.
(a) The City selects October 1 as the end of the bond year with respect to the Series
of 2002 Bonds pursuant to Treasury Regulation Section 1.148-1.
(b) Within 30 days after the initial installment computation date, the last day of the
fifth bond year (October 1, 2007), unless such date is changed by the City prior to the date that
any amount with respect to the Series of 2002 Bonds is paid or required to be paid to the United
States of America as required by Section 148 of the Code, and at least once every five years
thereafter, the City shall cause the Rebate Amount to be computed. Prior to any payment of the
Rebate Amount to the United States of America as required by Section 148 of the Code, such
computation (the "Rebate Amount Certificate") setting forth such Rebate Amount shall be
prepared or approved by (1) a person with experience in matters of governmental accounting for
Federal income tax purposes or (2) a bona fide arbitrage rebate calculation reporting service.
(c) Not later than 60 days after the initial installment computation date, the City shall
pay to the United States of America at least 90% of the Rebate Amount as set forth in the Rebate
Amount Certificate prepared with respect to such installment computation date. At least once on
or before 60 days after the installment computation date that is the fifth anniversary of the initial
installment computation date and on or before 60 days every fifth anniversary date thereafter
until final payment of the Series of 2002 Bonds, the City shall pay to the United States of
America not less than the amount, if any, by which 90% of the Rebate Amount set forth in the
most recent Rebate Amount Certificate exceeds the aggregate of all such payments theretofore
made to the United States of America pursuant to this Section. On or before 60 days after final
payment of the Series of 2002 Bonds, the City shall pay to the United States of America the
amount, if any, by which 100% of the Rebate Amount set forth in the Rebate Amount Certificate
with respect to the date of final payment of the Series of 2002 Bonds exceeds the aggregate of all
payments theretofore made pursuant to this Section. All such payments shall be made by the
City fi.om any legally available source.
(d) Notwithstanding any provision of this Article to the contrary, no such calculation
or payment shall be made if the City receives an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that (l)
such payment is not required under the Code in order to prevent the Series of 2002 Bonds from
becoming "arbitrage bonds" within the meaning of Section 148 of the Code or (2) such payment
should be calculated and paid on some alternative basis under the Code, and the City complies
with such alternative basis.
ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 7.601. Limitation of Rights.
With the exception of the rights herein expressly conferred, nothing expressed or
mentioned in or to be implied from this Seventh Supplemental Resolution is intended or shall be
construed to give any person other than the parties hereto and the holders of the Series of 2002
Bonds any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim under or in respect to this Seventh
Supplemental Resolution or any covenant, condition or agreement herein contained, this Seventh
Supplemental Resolution and all of the covenants, conditions and agreements hereof being
intended to be and being for the sole and exclusive benefit of the holders of the Series of 2002
Bonds as herein provided.
Section 7.602. SNAP Investment.
The Council has received and reviewed the Information Statement (the "Information
Statement") describing the State Non-Arbitrage Program of the Commonwealth of Virginia
("SNAP") and the Contract Creating the State Non-Arbitrage Program Pool I (the "Contract").
The Council acknowledges the Treasury Board of the Commonwealth of Virginia is not, and
shall not be, in any way liable to the City in connection with SNAP, except as otherwise
provided in the Contract.
Section 7.603. Severability.
If any provision of this Seventh Supplemental Resolution shall be held invalid by any
court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not invalidate any other provision hereof.
Section 7.604. Effective Date.
This Seventh Supplemental Resolution shall take effect immediately.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
Virginia, on this day of , 2002.
CA-8635
R-1
October 2,
2002
APPENDIX A
Description of the 2002 Project
City of Virginia Beach, Virginia
Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds
Series of 2002
The 2002 Project consists of extensions, improvements, enlargements, additions and
replacements to the plants, systems, facilities, equipment or property owned, in whole or in part,
acquired, operated or maintained by or on behalf of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, in
connection with the collection, treatment or disposal of sanitary sewer and the supply, treatment,
storage or distribution of water. The water system improvements include but are not limited to
replacement of existing water mains, construction of new water mains, modification of existing
pump stations and small line improvements. The sanitary sewer system improvements include
but are not limited to construction of new gravity sanitary sewers, construction of new force
mains, modification of existing pumping stations and construction of new pumping stations.
A-1
APPENDIX B
FORM OF SERIES OF 2002 BOND
Unless this certificate is presented by an authorized representative of The
Depository Trust Company, a New York corporation ("DTC"), to the issuer or its agent for
registration of transfer, exchange, or payment, and any certificate is registered in the name
of Cede & Co., or in such other name as is requested by an authorized representative of
DTC (and any payment is made to Cede & Co. or to such other entity as is requested by an
authorized representative of DTC), ANY TRANSFER, PLEDGE, OR OTHER USE
HEREOF FOR VALUE OR OTHERWISE BY OR TO ANY PERSON IS WRONGFUL
inasmuch as the registered owner hereof, Cede & Co., has an interest herein.
REGISTERED
REGISTERED
R- $
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
Water and Sewer System Revenue Bond, Series of 2002
INTEREST RATE
MATURITY DATE
DATED DATE
CUSIP
% October 1,__
October 15, 2002
REGISTERED OWNER: CEDE & CO.
PRINCIPAL AMOUNT:
DOLLARS
The City of Virginia Beach, Virginia (the "City"), for value received, hereby promises to
pay upon surrender hereof at the principal corporate trust office of The Bank of New York, New
York, New York (the "Registrar"), solely from the source and as hereinafter provided, to the
registered owner hereof, or registered assigns or legal representative, the principal sum stated
above on the maturity date stated above, subject to prior redemption as hereinafter provided, and
to pay, solely from such source, interest hereon semiannually on each April 1 and October 1,
beginning April 1, 2003, at the annual rate stated above, calculated on the basis of a 360-day year
of twelve 30-day months. Interest is payable (a) from October 1, 2002, if this Bond is
authenticated prior to April 1, 2003, or Co) otherwise from the April 1 or October 1 that is, or
immediately precedes, the date on which this Bond is authenticated (unless payment of interest
hereon is in default, in which case this Bond shall bear interest from the date to which interest
has been paid). Interest is payable by check or draft mailed to the registered owner hereof at his
address as it appears on the 15th day of the month preceding each interest payment date on
registration books kept by the Registrar. Principal, premium, if any, and interest are payable in
lawful money of the United States of America.
B-1
Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, this Bond is subject to a book entry system
maintained by The Depository Trust Company ("DTC") and the payment of principal and
interest, the providing of notices and other matters will be made as described in the City's
Blanket Letter of Representations to DTC.
This Bond is one of an issue of $28,000,000 Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds,
Series of 2002 (the "Bonds"), of like date and tenor, except as to number, denomination, rate of
interest, privilege of redemption and maturity, authorized and issued pursuant to ordinances and
resolutions adopted by the City Council including a resolution adopted on February 11, 1992, as
previously supplemented and as supplemented and amended by a resolution adopted on October
8, 2002 (collectively, the "Resolution"), and the Constitution and statutes of the Commonwealth
of Virginia, including the City Charter and the Public Finance Act of 1991, to provide funds,
together with other available funds, to pay the cost of the acquisition and construction of
improvements and extensions to the City's water and sanitary sewer system (the "System"), as
more fully described in the Resolution.
The Bonds and the premium, if any, and the interest thereon are limited obligations of the
City and are payable solely from the revenues to be derived from the ownership or operation of
the System, as the same may from time to time exist, except to the extent payable from the
proceeds of the Bonds, the income, if any, derived from the investment thereof, certain reserves,
income from investments pursuant to the Resolution or proceeds of insurance, which revenues
and other moneys have been pledged as described in the Resolution to secure payment thereof.
The Bonds, the premium, if any, and the interest thereon are payable solely from the revenues
pledged thereto in the Resolution, and nothing herein or in the Resolution shall be deemed to
create or constitute an indebtedness of or a pledge of the faith and credit of the Commonwealth
of Virginia or of any county, city, town or other political subdivision of the Commonwealth,
including the City.
The Bonds are issued under and are equally and ratably secured on a parity with the
unpaid balance of the City's $5,100,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Notes, 1977 (P.A. Corp.),
$2,000,000 Drought Relief Revenue Bond, 1978, $2,200,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Notes,
1982 (County Utilities), $1,800,000 Water and Sewer Revenue Notes, 1982 (Kempsville
Utilities), $46,440,000 Water and Sewer System Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series of 1993,
$1,405,031.36 Taxable Water and Sewer System Revenue Bond, Series of 1994, $7,500,000
Taxable Water and Sewer System Revenue Bond, Series of 1997, $6,200,000 Taxable Water and
Sewer System Revenue Bond, Series of 1998, and $40,000,000 Water and Sewer System
Revenue Bonds, Series of 2000 (collectively, the "Parity Bonds"), to the extent set forth in the
Resolution. Reference is hereby made to the Resolution and all amendments and supplements
thereto for a description of the provisions, among others, with respect to the nature and extent of
the security, the rights, duties and obligations of the City, the rights of the holders of the Bonds
and the terms upon which the Bonds are issued and secured. Additional bonds ranking equally
with the Bonds and the Parity Bonds may be issued on the terms provided in the Resolution.
The Bonds are subject to redemption beginning October 15, 2012, in whole or in part at
any time, at the option of the City, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount
of Bonds to be redeemed plus interest accrued and unpaid to the redemption date.
B-2
Bonds maturing on October 1, , are required to be redeemed prior to maturity, in
part, in accordance with the sinking fund requirements of Section 7.402 of the resolution adopted
on October 8, 2002, on October 1 in years and amounts upon payment of 100% of the principal
amount thereof plus interest accrued to the redemption date, as follows:
Year Amount Year Amount
The amount of the Bonds required to be redeemed pursuant to the preceding paragraph
may be reduced in accordance with provisions of the Resolution.
If less than all the Bonds are called for redemption, the maturities of the Bonds to be
redeemed shall be selected in such manner as the City Manager or the chief financial officer of
the City may determine to be in the best interest of the City. If less than all of the Bonds of any
maturity are called for redemption, the Bonds to be redeemed shall be selected by DTC or any
successor securities depository pursuant to its rules and procedures or, if the book entry system is
discontinued, shall be selected by the Registrar by lot in such manner as the Registrar in its
discretion may determine. In either case, (a) the portion of any Bond to be redeemed shall be in
the principal amount of $5,000 or some integral multiple thereof and (b) in selecting Bonds for
redemption, each portion of $5,000 principal amount shall be counted as one bond for this
purpose. If a portion of a Bond is called for redemption, a new Bond in principal amount equal
to the unredeemed portion thereof will be issued to the registered owner upon the surrender
hereof.
The Registrar will cause notice of the call for redemption identifying the Bonds or
portions thereof to be redeemed to be sent by registered or certified mail, not less than 30 nor
more than 60 days prior to the redemption date, to DTC or its nominee as the registered owner
thereof. The City will not be responsible for mailing notice of redemption to anyone other than
DTC or another qualified securities depository or its nominee unless no qualified securities
depository is the registered owner of the Bonds. If no qualified securities depository is the
registered owner of the Bonds, notice of redemption will be mailed to the registered owners of
the Bonds.
Provided funds for their redemption are on deposit at the place of payment on the
redemption date, all Bonds or portions thereof so called for redemption shall cease to bear
interest on such date, shall no longer be secured as set forth in the Resolution and shall not be
deemed to be outstanding under the provisions of the Resolution.
The registered owner of this Bond shall have no right to enforce the provisions of the
Resolution or to institute action to enforce the covenants therein or to take any action with
respect to any Event of Default under the Resolution or to institute, appear in or defend any suit
or other proceedings with respect thereto, except as provided in the Resolution. Modifications or
alterations of the Resolution, or of any supplement thereto, may be made only to the extent and
in the circumstances permitted by the Resolution.
B-3
The Registrar shall treat the registered owner as the person exclusively entitled to
payment of principal, premium, if any, and interest and the exercise of all other fights and
powers of the owner, except that interest payments shall be made to the person shown as owner
on the 15th day of the month preceding each interest payment date.
All acts, conditions and things required to happen, exist or be performed precedent to and
in the issuance of this Bond have happened, exist and have been performed.
This Bond shall not be valid or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution
until the Registrar shall have executed the Certificate of Authentication appearing hereon and
inserted the date of authentication hereon.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, has caused this Bond
to be signed by the manual signature of its Mayor, to be countersigned by the manual signature
of its Clerk, its seal to be impressed hereon, and this Bond to be dated October 15, 2002.
COUNTERSIGNED:
Clerk, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia
Mayor, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia
Date Authenticated:
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION
This Bond is one of the Bonds described in the within-mentioned Resolution.
THE BANK OF NEW YORK,
Registrar
By
Authorized Signature
B-4
ASSIGNMENT
FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby sell(s), assign(s) and transfer(s) unto
(please print or typewrite name and address including zip code of Transferee)
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF TRANSFEREE
the within-mentioned Bond and all fights thereunder, hereby irrevocably constituting and
appointing
Attorney, to transfer said Bond on the books kept for the registration thereof, with full power of
substitution in the premises.
Dated:
Signature Guaranteed
NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed
by an Eligible Guarantor Institution such
as a Commercial Bank, Trust Company,
Securities Broker/Dealer, Credit Union
or Savings Association who is a member
of a medallion program approved by The
Securities Transfer Association, Inc.
(Signature of Registered Owner)
NOTICE: The signature above must
correspond with the name of the
registered owner as it appears on the
front of this bond in every particular,
without alteration or enlargement or any
change whatsoever.
B-5
- 41 -
Item V-J.
PLANNING
ITEM # 502 73
1. MOTHER'S, INC.
NONCONFORMING USE
2. DA VID ELGIN
MODIFICATION OF A CREA GE
ALLOWED BY THE CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT
3. HARBOUR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, L.L.C.
CONDITIONAL CHANGE OF
ZONING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
VARIANCE
4. TRINITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
October 8, 2002
Item V-d.
- 42 -
PLANNING
ITEM # 502 74
Upon motton by Vtce Mayor Mandtgo, seconded by Counctlman Wood, Ctty Counctl APPROVED IN ONE
MOTION Items 2, 3 (DEFERRED) and 4 (AMENDED CONDITIONS) of the PLANNING BY
CONSENT
Item 3 was DEFERRED UNTIL THE CITY COUNCIL SESSION OF JANUARY 14, 2003, BY
CONSENT
Item 4 was APPROVED, BY CONSENT, WITH AMENDED CONDITIONS
Vottng 11-0 (By ConsenO
Counctl Members Vottng Aye
Margaret L Eure, Louts R Jones, Reba S McClanan, Rtchard A Maddox,
Vtce Mayor Robert C Mandtgo, Jr, Mayor Meyera E Oberndorf Jtm
Reeve, Peter W Schmtdt, Ron A Vtllanueva, Rosemary Wtlson and James
L Wood
Counctl Members Vottng Nay
None
Counctl Members Absent
None
October 8, 2002
Item V4.1.
- 43 -
PLANNING
ITEM # 502 75
The followtng spoke tn SUPPORT:
Attorney Glen Huff, 4705 Columbus Street, Phone 552-6012, represented the apphcant, and presented
supplemental tnformatton supporttng Mother's, Inc Said tnformatton ts hereby made a part of the record
Resource Bank had tmttally tssued a non-conformtng loan
Brenda McCormtck, 517 16th Street, Phone 491-2887
Pam Sterhng, 935 South Clubhouse Road, Phone 468-6822
The followtng spoke tn OPPOSITION
Dorts H Ftsher, 415 16th Street, Phone 428-5506
Barbara Clark, 411 16th Street, Phone 425-2139
Upon motton by Counctlman Maddox, seconded by Counctl Lady McClanan, Ctty Counctl DENIED
apphcatton of MOTHERS, INC for the reconstruction and conversion of a nonconformtng garage
apartment tnto a nonconformtng stngle famtly restdence
Apphcatton of Mothers, Inc for the demohtton and constructton of a
nonconformtng use on the north stde of]6th Street, 50feet east of Balttc
Avenue Parcel ts located at 417 ~ ]6th Street and contatns 5,000 square
feet (GPIN #2427-06-6534) DISTRICT 6 - BEACH
Vottng 10-0
Counctl Members Vottng Aye
Margaret L Eure, Reba S McClanan, Rtchard A Maddox, Vice Mayor
Robert C Man&go, Jr, Mayor Meyera E Oberndorf, Jtm Reeve, Peter W
Schmtdt, Ron A Vtllanueva, Rosemary Wtlson and James L Wood
Counctl Members Vottng Nay
None
Counctl Members Abstatntng
Louts R dones
Counctl Members Absent
None
Councdman Jones DISCLOSED and ABSTAINED as Resource Bank &d provtde a loan to Mother's Inc ,
and he ts a Dtrector who has ownershtp tnterest tn Resource Bank, whtch exceeds three percent of tts total
equtty
October 8, 2002
Item V-J. 2.
- 44-
PLANNING
ITEM # 502 76
Upon motton by Vtce Mayor Mandtgo, seconded by Councdman Wood, Ctty Counctl ADOPTED Ordinance
upon phcatton of DA VID ELGIN for modtficatton of acreage allowed by the Condtttonal Use Permit for
a church at Provtdence Road and Warning Street (5 724 Provtdence Road) (approved June 26, 1965)
Or&nance upon Apphcatton of Davtd Elgtn for a modification of
condmons placed on a condtttonal use permit for a church on June 26,
1965 Property ts located at 5724 Provtdence Road and contatns 2 02
acres (GPIN #1456-84-3691 AND #1456-84-3877) DISTRICT 2 -
KEMPSVILLE
The apphcant has requested a modification to the Condtttonal Use Permtt to reduce the area for church use
to 1 4 acres
Vottng 11-0 (By ConsenO
Council Members Vottng Aye
Margaret L Eure, Louts R Jones, Reba S McClanan, Rtchard A Maddox,
Vice Mayor Robert C Man&go, Jr, Mayor Meyera E Oberndorf, Jtm
Reeve, Peter W Schmtdt, Ron A Vtllanueva, Rosemary Wtlson and James
L Wood
Counctl Members Vottng Nay
None
Council Members Absent
None
October 8, 2002
- 45 -
Item V-J.3.
PLANNING
ITEM # 502 77
Upon motton by Vtce Mayor Man&go, seconded by Councdman Wood, City Council DEFERRED to the
City Council Session of January 14, 2003, Ordtnances upon apphcattons of HARBOUR DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION for a Condtttonal Change of Zontng, Condtttonal Use Permtt and Vartance Appeal to
dectston of Admtntstrattve Officers re certatn elements of the Subdtvtston Ordmance, Sectton 4 4(b), that
requires all newly created lots meet the requtrements of the City Zontng Ordinance (CZO)
ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF HARBOUR DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION, L L C, A VIRGINIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,
FOR A CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICA TION FROM A G- I
AND AG-2 TO CONDITIONAL R-30
Ordtnance upon Apphcatton ofHarbour Development Corporatton, L L C,
a Vtrgtnta hmtted habthty company, for a Change of Z. ontng Dtstrtct
Classtficatton from A G- 1 and A G-2 Agrtcultural Dtstrtcts to Condtttonal
R-30 Residential Dtstrtct on certain property located on the south stde of
N Landtng Road, west of West Neck Road (GPIN #1493-58-7581) The
proposed zoning to Conchttonal R-30 ts for stngle famtly land use on lots'
no less than 30, 000 square feet The Comprehenstve Plan recommends use
of thts parcel for appropriate growth opportumttes, conststent wtth the
economtc vttahty pohctes of Vtrgtma Beach Smd property contams 65 1
acres DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE
ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF HARBOUR DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION, L L C, A VIRGINIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,
FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN OPEN SPACE
PROMOTION
Ordtnance upon Apphcatton of Harbour Development Corporation, L L C,
a Virginia hmtted habthty company, for a Con&ttonal Use Permit for an
Open Space Promotion on certatn property located on the south stde of N
Landtng Road, west of West Neck Road (GPIN #1493-58-7581) Said
property contains 65 1 acres DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE
AND,
Appeal to Dectstons of Admtmstratlve Officers tn regard to certain
elements of the Subdtvtston Ordinance, Subchvtston for Harbour
Development Corporatton Property ts located on the south stde of N
Landtng Road, west of West Neck Road (GPIN #1493-58-7581) Satd
property contatns 65 1 acres DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE
Vottng 11-0 (By Consent)
Counctl Members Voting Aye
Margaret L Eure, Louts R Jones, Reba S McClanan, Richard A Maddox,
Vwe Mayor Robert C Man&go, Jr, Mayor Meyers E Oberndorf Jtm
Reeve, Peter W Schmidt, Ron A Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James'
L Wood
Counctl Members Voting Nay
None
Counctl Members Absent
None
October 8, 2002
- 46-
Item V-J. 4.
PLANNING
ITEM # 502 7~
Upon motton by Vice Mayor Man&go, seconded by Councilman Wood, Ctty Counctl ADOPTED
Or&nance upon apphcatton of TRINITY CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP for a Con&ttonal Use Permtt
ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF TRINITY CHRISTIAN
FELLOWSHIP FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A CHURCH
ROI 00231050
BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA
Or&nance upon Apphcatton of Trmtty Chrtsttan Fellowshtp for a
Con&ttonal Use Permit for a church on the south side of Challedon Drive,
642 54 feet east of S Parhament Drtve (GPIN #1466-58-2655) Satd
parcel ts located at 5245 Challedon Drive and contatns 16,247 88 square
feet DISTRICT 2 - KEMPSVILLE
The followtng con&ttons shall be required
2~
The parking lot shall be re-striped so as to clearly dehneate all
parking spaces, tnclu&ng the requtred han&cap space
Foundation landscaping within planters shall be installed and
maintained alone_ at least 50percent of the front facade f, acing
Challedon Drive
A Certtficate of Occupancy shall be obtained from the Butldtng
Offictal prtor to occupancy.
Thts Or&nance shall be effecttve tn accordance wtth Section 107 69 of the Zontng Or&nance
Adopted by the Counctl of the Ctty of Vtrgtnta Beach, Vtrgtnta. on the Etghth of October, Two Thousand
Two
Vottng 11-0 (By ConsenO
Counctl Members Vottng Aye
Margaret L Eure, Louts R Jones, Reba S McClanan, Rtchard A Maddox,
Vtce Mayor Robert C Man&go, Jr, Mayor Meyera E Oberndor~, Jtm
Reeve, Peter W Schmtdt, Ron A Vtllanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James
L Wood
Council Members Vottng Nay
None
Counctl Members Absent
None
October 8. 2002
-47-
Item V-L. 1.
APPOINTMENTS
ITEM # 502 79
BY CONSENSUS, Ctty Council RESCHEDULED the followtng APPOINTMENT:
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
October 8, 2002
- 48-
Item V-O.
ADJOURNMENT
ITEM # 50280
Mayor Meyera E Oberndorf DECLARED the City Counctl Meeting ADJOURNED at 7:28 P.M.
oks, CMC
Chtef Deputy Cay Clerk
Ctty Clerk
Meyera E Oberndorf
Mayor
City of Vtrgtnta Beach
Vtrgtnta
October 8, 2002