The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About051606 Shore Drive AdvisoryShore Drive Advisory Shore Drive Advisory Committee Annual Committee Annual Report to City Council Report to City Council and and Implementation Strategy Implementation Strategy Briefing Briefing May 16, 2006 May 16, 2006 OVERVIEW OVERVIEW Shore Drive Plan –The Blueprint Shore Drive Plan –The Blueprint ? ? What has been accomplished? What has been accomplished? ? ? What is underway? What is underway? ? ? What has not yet been completed? What has not yet been completed? ? ? Existing Conditions Existing Conditions ? ? What should be the Implementation What should be the Implementation ? ? Strategy to get the job done? Strategy to get the job done? Recommendations and Next Steps Recommendations and Next Steps ? ? Shore Drive Plan – Shore Drive Plan – The Blueprint & Vision The Blueprint & Vision –A well defined plan to improve and beautify –A well defined plan to improve and beautify the Shore Drive corridor or “Bayfront”area the Shore Drive corridor or “Bayfront”area –Part of our Comprehensive Plan –Part of our Comprehensive Plan –A Resort neighborhood; not a resort –A Resort neighborhood; not a resort destination destination –A strategy to unify the “Bayfront”area for –A strategy to unify the “Bayfront”area for residents and businesses through urban design residents and businesses through urban design improvements improvements –Much more than a highway project; needs to –Much more than a highway project; needs to be driven by multiple factors (neighborhood be driven by multiple factors (neighborhood preservation, aesthetics, multi-modal transit preservation, aesthetics, multi-modal transit and pedestrian circulation, etc.) and pedestrian circulation, etc.) What has been accomplished? What has been accomplished? ULI Bayfront Study –1997 ULI Bayfront Study –1997 ? ? Creation of Shore Drive Advisory Committee –1998 Creation of Shore Drive Advisory Committee –1998 ? ? Shore Drive Corridor Plan –2000 Shore Drive Corridor Plan –2000 ? ? Shore Drive Transportation Study -2001 Shore Drive Transportation Study -2001 ? ? Landscaping Design Guidelines -2002 Landscaping Design Guidelines -2002 ? ? Architectural Design Guidelines -2002 Architectural Design Guidelines -2002 ? ? Lynnhaven Boat & Beach Facility –2002 Lynnhaven Boat & Beach Facility –2002 ? ? Cape Henry Trail Extension Project –2004 Cape Henry Trail Extension Project –2004 ? ? Beach Accessways (Albemarle Avenue, Sandalwood, Beach Accessways (Albemarle Avenue, Sandalwood, ? ? Dinwiddie Road) –2004 & 2005 Dinwiddie Road) –2004 & 2005 Numerous Private Development Projects that Incorporate Numerous Private Development Projects that Incorporate ? ? Plan and Guidelines Criteria Plan and Guidelines Criteria What is underway? What is underway? Shore Drive Demonstration Project, Phase 1 – Shore Drive Demonstration Project, Phase 1 – ? ? Commence Construction Spring 2006 Commence Construction Spring 2006 Shore Drive Demonstration Projects, Phases 2 Shore Drive Demonstration Projects, Phases 2 ? ? and 3 –Commence Study Spring 2006 and 3 –Commence Study Spring 2006 Lesner Bridge Replacement –Commence Study Lesner Bridge Replacement –Commence Study ? ? Spring 2006 Spring 2006 Live Oak Tree Strategy –Commence Live Oak Tree Strategy –Commence ? ? Implementation Spring 2006 Implementation Spring 2006 Beach Accessway (Kendall Street) –Commence Beach Accessway (Kendall Street) –Commence ? ? Construction Spring 2006 Construction Spring 2006 First Landing Fire Station Site and Design – First Landing Fire Station Site and Design – ? ? Commence Construction Summer 2006 Commence Construction Summer 2006 What has not been completed? What has not been completed? Implementing Adopted Shore Drive Plan Implementing Adopted Shore Drive Plan ? ? Recommendations Recommendations Implementing Adopted Outdoors Plan Implementing Adopted Outdoors Plan ? ? Open Space Acquisition Recommendations Open Space Acquisition Recommendations Implementing Adopted Beach Implementing Adopted Beach ? ? Management Plan Recommendations Management Plan Recommendations Adopt and Implement Shore Drive Safety Adopt and Implement Shore Drive Safety ? ? Task Force Recommendations Task Force Recommendations Incorporating SDAC Recommendations Incorporating SDAC Recommendations Revisit Adopted Plans, Policies and Revisit Adopted Plans, Policies and ? ? Ordinances re: “Bayfront”area Ordinances re: “Bayfront”area Existing Conditions Existing Conditions Northampton Interchange Northampton Interchange Gateway to “Bayfront”Area Gateway to “Bayfront”Area Lack of Pedestrian Lack of Pedestrian Connectivity and Safety Connectivity and Safety Northampton Interchange Lack of Northampton Interchange Lack of Sidewalks and Landscaping Sidewalks and Landscaping Lack of Pedestrian or Vehicular Lack of Pedestrian or Vehicular Areas Definition Areas Definition Lack of Pedestrian Lack of Pedestrian Connectivity and Safety Connectivity and Safety Need to Reclaim and Improve Need to Reclaim and Improve the City R-O-W the City R-O-W Dependence on Private Sector to Dependence on Private Sector to Make Desired Improvements Make Desired Improvements Lack of Safe Pedestrian Crossing Lack of Safe Pedestrian Crossing at East Stratford Road at East Stratford Road Lack of Sidewalks and Lack of Sidewalks and Landscaping from West Lesner Landscaping from West Lesner Bridge Bridge Lack of Sidewalks and Lack of Sidewalks and Landscaping from East Lesner Landscaping from East Lesner Bridge Bridge Landscaping is Appropriate but Landscaping is Appropriate but Lack of Pedestrian Connectivity Lack of Pedestrian Connectivity Landscaping is Appropriate but but Landscaping is Appropriate but but Lack of Pedestrian Connectivity Lack of Pedestrian Connectivity West Great Neck Road – West Great Neck Road – Crosswalks to Nowhere Crosswalks to Nowhere Shore Drive East of West Great Shore Drive East of West Great Neck Road Neck Road Implementation Strategy Implementation Strategy Implementation Strategy Implementation Strategy Phased Approach Phased Approach ? ? Identification of Funding Mechanism and Identification of Funding Mechanism and ? ? Financing Strategy Financing Strategy Commitment to Follow Through for Long Term Commitment to Follow Through for Long Term ? ? Commitment to Interdepartmental Coordination Commitment to Interdepartmental Coordination ? ? and Ongoing Community Involvement and Ongoing Community Involvement Demands a new CIP Approach for Grouping Demands a new CIP Approach for Grouping ? ? Multiple Kinds of Projects (Roads, Open Space, Multiple Kinds of Projects (Roads, Open Space, etc.) for the “Bayfront”Area etc.) for the “Bayfront”Area Integrates with Shore Drive Safety Task Force Integrates with Shore Drive Safety Task Force ? ? and SDAC Recommendations and SDAC Recommendations Roads –A Phased Approach Roads –A Phased Approach Establishes Timetable for Ultimate Establishes Timetable for Ultimate ? ? Completion Completion Communicates Schedule to Citizens Communicates Schedule to Citizens ? ? Allows for Integration of Design Allows for Integration of Design ? ? Elements for Entire “Bayfront”Area Elements for Entire “Bayfront”Area Builds upon Successful Model Utilized Builds upon Successful Model Utilized ? ? for Resort Area Improvements for Resort Area Improvements Phases 2 and 3 Phases 2 and 3 Phase 2 -South Oliver Drive / Waters Point Place Phase 2 -South Oliver Drive / Waters Point Place ? ? to Treasure Island Drive to Treasure Island Drive Phase 2 -Includes Northampton Interchange Phase 2 -Includes Northampton Interchange ? ? Aesthetic and Pedestrian Improvements Only Aesthetic and Pedestrian Improvements Only Phase 3 -East Lesner Bridge to Croix Drive Phase 3 -East Lesner Bridge to Croix Drive ? ? Phase 3 -Includes Vista Circle / Page Avenue, Phase 3 -Includes Vista Circle / Page Avenue, ? ? West Great Neck Road and North Great Neck West Great Neck Road and North Great Neck Road Intersections Road Intersections Phase 3 -Links Cape Henry Trail from Jade Street Phase 3 -Links Cape Henry Trail from Jade Street ? ? to Lesner Bridge to Lesner Bridge Study Underway; $575,000 Cost Appropriated in Study Underway; $575,000 Cost Appropriated in ? ? CIP; $500,000 Proposed for FY 2007-2008 CIP; $500,000 Proposed for FY 2007-2008 Total Estimated Cost $11.0 million Total Estimated Cost $11.0 million ? ? Completion Scheduled Late 2012 Completion Scheduled Late 2012 ? ? Phase 6 Phase 6 Croix Street to First Landing State Croix Street to First Landing State ? ? Park Park Includes First Landing State Park Includes First Landing State Park ? ? Entrance Road Intersection Entrance Road Intersection Funds to Initiate Study not yet Funds to Initiate Study not yet ? ? Appropriated Appropriated Not Identified as Project in CIP Not Identified as Project in CIP ? ? Priority Road Project Priority Road Project Recommendations Recommendations Adopt and Implement Shore Drive Safety Adopt and Implement Shore Drive Safety ? ? Task Force and SDAC Recommendations Task Force and SDAC Recommendations (Including Full Funding to Complete (Including Full Funding to Complete Phases 1, 2 & 3 and Study & Design Funds Phases 1, 2 & 3 and Study & Design Funds for Phase 4) for Phase 4) Identify and Provide Necessary Funding of Identify and Provide Necessary Funding of ? ? $30.2 million Over the CIP 6 Year Funding $30.2 million Over the CIP 6 Year Funding Period by FY 2011-2012 Period by FY 2011-2012 Financing and Funding Strategy Financing and Funding Strategy Exploration of Alternatives (“TIF – Exploration of Alternatives (“TIF – ? ? Like”, CIP, Special Tax District); Pros Like”, CIP, Special Tax District); Pros and Cons and Cons Evaluation of Economics and Evaluation of Economics and ? ? Demographics and Anticipated Demographics and Anticipated Revenue Streams from “Bayfront” Revenue Streams from “Bayfront” Area Area Selection of Recommended Funding Selection of Recommended Funding ? ? and Implementation Strategy and Implementation Strategy Economics and Demographics Economics and Demographics Why has the impact of the “Bayfront”Area Why has the impact of the “Bayfront”Area ? ? been lost in the economic maze? been lost in the economic maze? –Bayside and Lynnhaven Voting Districts –Bayside and Lynnhaven Voting Districts both include portions of the “Bayfront” both include portions of the “Bayfront” Area Area –Real Estate Assessments have not –Real Estate Assessments have not routinely aggregated this data together routinely aggregated this data together –“Bayfront”Area has not been –“Bayfront”Area has not been considered as a destination for a considered as a destination for a funding strategy before funding strategy before Bayfront Population Compared to Bayfront Population Compared to Other Planning Areas Other Planning Areas % of Total Population TOTAL LESS PUNGO BLACKWATER TOTAL ALL DISTRICTS Pungo Blackwater Oceanfront Little Neck Kempsville Holland Great Neck South Courthouse Sandbridge North Courthouse Sandbridge Bayside Bayfront 0%20%40%60%80%100%120% Bayfront Development Compared Bayfront Development Compared to Other Planning Areas to Other Planning Areas % DEVELOPED WITHIN EACH PLANNING AREA TOTAL LESS PUNGO BLACKWATER TOTAL ALL DISTRICTS Pungo Blackwater Oceanfront Little Neck Kempsville Holland Great Neck South Courthouse Sandbridge North Courthouse Sandbridge Bayside Bayfront 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% Bayfront Student Population Density Bayfront Student Population Density Compared to Citywide Average Compared to Citywide Average (1 = Bayfront; 2 = Citywide) (1 = Bayfront; 2 = Citywide) STUDENTS PER DEVELOPED ACRE 2 1 0.850.900.951.001.051.101.15 STUDENTS PER POPULATION210.900.800.700.600.500.400.300.200.10- Schools Impact Schools Impact TOTAL LESS PUNGO SCHOOLSBayfrontBLACKWATERDifference No. Students 2003-2004 2,153 75,424 Percent Student Population2.9%100% STUDENT PER POPULATION 0.10 0.83 (0.733) STUDENT PER DEVELOPMENT AC 0.96 1.10 (0.139) STUDENT PER DWELLING UNIT 0.22 0.47 (0.246) Estimated School Impact Developed Acres 2,241 Difference Per Development Acre (0.139)* Reduced impact on Schools (311) Estimated Cost per Student for 2004$ 7,846 Estimated Savings$ (2,438,946) REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENT COMPARISON CITYWIDE COMPARED TO THE BAYAREA DISTRICT 1 2 Citywide Bayside Area TOTAL ASSESSMENT FY 2006 - 2007 45,582,234,063 3,558,195,055 ASSESSMENT PER POPULATION 109,713 159,004 ASSESSMENT PER ACRE 253,684 1,162,809 ASSESSMENT PER DEVELOPED ACRE 445,770 1,587,771 TAXES PER DEVELOPED ACRE 4,564 16,257 Assessment Per Acre and Assessment Per Developed Acre 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 - CitywideBayside Area Funding Strategy Funding Strategy SOURCES OF FUNDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IN THE BAYFRONT AREA SOURCES OF FUNDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IN THE BAYFRONT AREA Bayfront Citywide $ 3,558,195,055 TOTAL ASSESSMENT FY 2006 - 2007$ 45,582,234,063 9% Assumed Area Rate of increase in assessed value9% $ 320,237,555 Estimated Increase$ 4,102,401,066 $ 0.99 Tax Rate$ 0.99 $ 3,170,352 Increase Tax Revenue$ 40,613,771 "TIF - Like" Revenue $ 30,180,500 Capital Needs 5% Assumed Rate 20 Term of Bond $ 2,421,774 Required Annual Bond Payment 76% Percent of Increased Real Estate Taxes in the "TIF - Like" Area Questions Questions