Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPTEMBER 12, 2006 MINUTES CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH "COMMUNITY FOR A LIFETIME" CITY COUNCIL MA YOR MEYERA E. OBERNDORF, At-Large VICE MA YOR LOUIS R. JONES, Bayside - District 4 WILLIAM R. DeSTEPH, At-Large HARRY E. DlEZEL, Kempsville - District 2 ROBERT M. DYER" Centerville - District I BARBARA M. HENLEY, Princess Anne ~ District 7 REBA S. McCLANAN, Rose Hall - District 3 JOHN E. UHRIN, Beach - District 6 RON A. VILLANUEVA, At-Large ROSEMARY WILSON, At-Large JAMES L. WOOD, Lynnhaven -District 5 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY HALL BUILDING 2401 COURTHOUSE DRIVE VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA 23456-8005 PHONE:(757) 385-4303 FAX (757) 385-5669 E-MAIL: Ctycncl@vbgov.com CITY MANAGER - JAMES K. SPORE CITY ATTORNEY - LESLIE L. LILLEY CITY CLERK - RUTH HODGES SMITH, MMC 12 SEPTEMBER 2006 I. MAYOR'S BRIEFING - Conference Room - 2:00PM A. TEN YEAR PLAN TO ADDRESS HOMELESSNESS Mayor Meyera Obemdorf Andrew Friedman, Director of Housing and Neighborhood Preservation II. CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING A. COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER PLAN Dr. Glenn Snyders, Chairman, Health Services Advisory Board III. CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING A. HEALTH CARE AS A BUDGET DRIVER Susie Walston, Chief of Staff IV. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS V. REVIEW OF AGENDA ITEMS VI. INFORMAL SESSION - Conference Room - 4:00PM A. CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf B. ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL C. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION VII. FORMAL SESSION - Council Chamber - 6:00 PM A. CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf B. INVOCATION: Reverend Deborah R. Fair Pastor, Charity United Methodist Church C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA D. ELECTRONIC ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL E. CERTIFICATION OF CLOSED SESSION F. MINUTES 1. INFORMAL and FORMAL SESSIONS September 5, 2006 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. CHARTER AMENDMENTS a. Landscape Screening for abandoned retail and commercial property b. Removal of May election references c. Photo Red Light Enforcement Program H. AGENDA FOR FORMAL SESSION I. CONSENT AGENDA J. ORDINANCES/ RESOLUTIONS 1. Ordinance to AMEND the City Code ~2l-230 to add Oxford Drive in Kings Grant to the Traffic Calming Program effective September 12,2006. 2. Ordinance to AUTHORIZE the City Manager to execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) re Special Weapons and TacticslCrisis Negotiation (SW AT/CN) and the City's support to Fort Story. 3. Ordinance to AUTHORIZE the City Manager to execute a second Amendment to the Lease Agreement for Stumpy Lake Golf Course with an extension until December 31, 2007. 4. Ordinance to IMPLEMENT the Southside Hampton Roads Hazard Mitigation Plan in accordance with Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) programs. 5. Ordinances to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE: a. $631,452 to the Clerk of the Circuit Court's FY 2006-07 Technology Trust Fund re courtroom technology expenses b. $284,192 in additional income from the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) to the Department of Housing and Neighborhood Preservation's FY2006-07 Operating Budget re the creation of affordable rental housing for low- and moderate-income households c. $102,106 from the United States Department of Justice's Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant and $28,000 of Asset Forfeiture Funds re public safety support and criminal processing d. $101,067 from the United States Department of Homeland Security to the Fire Department's FY 2006-07 Operating Budget re Fire and EMS station alerting capabilities e. $78,949 in United States Department of Criminal Justice Services state grant funding to the Department of Human Services FY 2006-07 Operating Budget re growing caseloads 6. Resolution re the 2007 Community Legislative Agenda and REQUEST the local Delegation to the General Assembly sponsor and/or support legislation that will realize the goals and objectives set forth therein. 7. Resolution to ESTABLISH the Historic Sites Organizing Committee re the creation and formation of a Foundation to assist in the support of City-owned "historic sites." K. PLANNING 1. Application of MIKE'S PAINT & BODY, INC. for a Conditional Use Permit at Progress Lane and Central Drive re an automotive repair garage and bulk storage. (DISTRICT 6- BEACH) RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL 2. Application ofKAH PROPERTIES, L.L.c. for a Conditional Use Permit at 3222 Virginia Beach Boulevard re motor vehicle sales and service. (DISTRICT 5 - L YNNHA VEN) RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL 3. Application of DR. ALAN MAHANES for a Change of Zoning District Classification from AG-2 Agricultural District to Conditional 0-2 Office District at 2513 North Landing Road re a dental office and additional space for lease. (DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE) RECOMMENDATION: APPRO V AL 4. Application of KEMP ENTERPRISES, INC. for a Change of Zoning District Classification from R-5D Residential Duplex District to Conditional A-24 Apartment District at Bonney Road and Kenley Road re multi-family dwellings. (DISTRICT 2 - KEMPSVILLE) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: REFERRAL BACK TO PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL 5. Application of RHO MAN COMPANIES for a Change of Zoning District Classification from R-10 Residential District to Conditional I-1 Light Industrial District on a portion of 1032 Bells Road and 1041 01ds Lane re warehouses and office-warehouses. (DISTRICT 6- BEACH) RECOMMENDA nON: APPROVAL L. APPOINTMENTS BEACHES AND WATERWAYS COMMISSION BUILDING CODE OF APPEALS - New Construction COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD EASTERN VIRGINIA HEALTH SYSTEMS AGENCY HISTORIC SITE ORGANIZING COMMITTEE INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP ADVISORY COMMITTEE-PPEA M. UNFINISHED BUSINESS N. NEW BUSINESS O. ADJOURNMENT ********* If you are physically disabled or visually impaired and need assistance at this meeting, please call the CITY CLERK'S OFFICE at 385-4303 Hearing impaired, call: Virginia Relay Center at 1-800-828-1120 *********** Agenda 09/07/2006mb www.vbgov.com - 1 - MINUTES VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Virginia Beach, Virginia 12 September 2006 Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf called to order the Mayor's Briefing re the City's TEN YEAR PLAN TO ADDRESS HOMELESSNESS the City Council Conference Room, City Hall, on Tuesday, September 12,2006, at 2:00 P.M. Council Members Present: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Absent: None September 12, 2006 - 2 - MA YOR'S BRIEFING TEN-YEAR PLAN TO ADDRESS HOMELESSNESS 2:00 P.M. ITEM # 55569 Mayor Oberndorf advised the Federal Government has employed a very capable man to implement the dispersal of funds enabling different types of housing for those unable to purchase. The City of Norfolk is currently working on their Plan. Mayor Oberndorf introduced Andrew Freidman, Director of Housing and Neighborhood Preservation, to provide information re Regional Homeless Issues. Mr. Friedman introduced Sharon Prescott, Housing Development Administrator, and John Boylan, Homeless Policy and Resource Coordinator, who actually implemented the programs to be discussed. Approximately six hundred twenty-eight (628) persons were homeless in Virginia Beach based on the "point-in-time" count in 2005 (January 1). This means over the year, 'hundreds more went in and out of homelessness. Homelessness causes severe problems for those who experience it. Chronic homelessness costs our city and community millions of dollars in public safety and emergency services. People Seeking Shelter Exceeded Regional Bed Capacity in Jan. 2005 2000 1500 1000 500 o Beds Individuals . Permanent . Transitional 0 Emergency 0 Seasonal Mr. Friedman advised there were 1,800 homeless persons in Southside Hampton Roads in January 2005. Of those, nearly four hundred (400), or 22%, met the definition of "chronic" having been homeless for at least the past twelve (J 2) months or four or more times in the previous three (3) years. Nationally, the proportion of chronically homeless is between 10-15%. Neither their wages nor public support are enough to afford housing. Chronic homelessness is extremely costly to society. Chronic homelessness could be costing South Hampton Roads over $30-MILLION annually in health care, courts, Police, Sheriff, and other costs. Being homeless once is a key riskfactor in becoming homeless again. September 12, 2006 - 3 - MA YOR'S BRIEFING TEN-YEAR PLAN TO ADDRESS HOMELESSNESS ITEM # 55569 (Continued) Virginia Beach has funded homeless programs since 1984 using federal funds. Utilizing federal and city funds, the Lighthouse Center was established in 1995. The City receives over $1-MILLION annually in federal funding for homeless programs. To continue to receive HUD funding, all cities must develop a ten-year plan. In February 2005, the Southside Mayors and Chairs agreed to form a task force to address homelessness issues which they determined would be best addressed regionally. The participating localities are: Chesapeake, Isle of Wight, Norfolk, Portsmouth, Suffolk and Virginia Beach. The Planning Council participates and provides administrative services. Regional Accomplishments September 2005: Produced a Regional Report on Homelessness February 2006: Held conference with national speakers - attracted three hundred fifty (350) attendees August 2006: Established Affordable Housing Database with United Way funding December 2006: First ever regional apartments for the homeless (Gosnold Apartments) to open in Norfolk. * *Virginia Beach, with Portsmouth and Norfolk is participating in the funding of these regional apartments. Twelve (J 2) individuals currently homeless in Virginia Beach will be eligible to move into the Gosnold apartments. Thus, having permanent housing at a cost of 30% of their income. Mr. Friedman displayed the Internet Web Page: www.housinzconnect.org (The Affordable Housing Connection in South Hampton Roads). Regional Initiatives Establishment of the second project of efficiency apartments for the homeless - hopefully in Virginia Beach - approximately sixty (60) units. Four (4) cities would share the costs - Norfolk, Portsmouth, Chesapeake and Virginia Beach Would require a site and land use approval Virginia Supportive Housing, developer of Gosnold Apartments, has briefed many of the City Council Members. Establishment of a "Healing Place" for homeless substance abusers - a highly effective residential treatment model currently operating in Tennessee, North Carolina and Virginia (Richmond) Would be owned and operated by a non-profit Regional cities would fund a feasibility study and help initiate the project Would need public and private support for operating expense "Campus-style" setting needed September 12,2006 - 4- MA YOR'S BRIEFING TEN-YEAR PLAN TO ADDRESS HOMELESSNESS ITEM # 55569 (Continued) The Healing Place is a residential substance abuse program for homeless single adults. The Healing Place has a success rate nearly five (5) times the national average (65% versus 15%). The first Healing Place was started in Louisville in 1989 by physicians who were tired of the failure of homeless programs to address the root causes of homelessness. The core elements of the program are: Recovery Dynamics (based on the twelve (12) step program of Alcoholics Anonymous), the Community Model (therapeutic community) and Peer Mentoring. There are four (4) in the United States (two (2) in Kentucky, one (1) in North Carolina and one (1) in Richmond) Homeless adults enter the program by police escort, shelter referral, or self-referral. They first enter non-medical detox and then (over time) two thirds will voluntarily enter the program. The efficiency apartments and the Healing Place together would take meaningful and long-term steps toward addressing a serious, costly and long term problem in the most cost effective way - with our regional partners. The Virginia Beach's Homeless Advocacy and Resource Partnership (VBHARP) is a coalition of city agencies, non-profits and community stakeholders who work together to develop the annual plan for homelessness. The City must create and submit a ten-year plan for Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to continue to provide funding. TEN YEAR PLAN TO ADDRESS HOMELESSNESS Elements 0 the Ci 's Ten-Year Plan S eci IC Issues addressed b the Plan Understanding the causes of and the key barriers to Enhanced prevention programs including early overcoming homelessness intervention and financial assistance Identifying current services Improved/centralized intake and referral and better access to housing Develo ment 0 more housin resources Enhanced and expanded support services to help eo Ie overcome barriers Identi in the stakeholders who can hel Proposing actions at all levels Developing an Action Plan and schedule City Agencies (Housing, Human Services, Health, Police), non-profit agencies serving the homeless, health care providers as well as citizen and business groups, will be involved in developing the Ten-Year Plan. Mayor Oberndorf expressed appreciation to Mr. Friedman and inquired re the number of homeless children. John Boylan, Homeless Policy and Resource Coordinator, advised the number of children served last year through Project Hope totaledfive hundred thirty-three (533). Mr. Friedman advised the inability of the Mental Health system to provide housing and services for all those in need contributes to the number of homeless. There is a continuing discharge of patients from facilities without housing resulting in the mentally ill being chronically homeless. The federal government's definition of homelessness is "lacking in fixed and adequate nighttime shelter" i.e. an individual who is not in the same place each night, on the street or in a shelter. Council Lady McClanan is concerned re the substance abuse program. Lack of nightly supervision has allowed undesirable activities. Council Lady McClanan believes the goal noble but there should be closer supervision. Mr. Friedman advised the Department of Housing and Neighborhood Preservation is conducting continual communication with the representatives of the Interfaith Agencies and many participate in the monthly Virginia Beach Homeless, Advocacy and Resource Partnership, the community dialogue re homelessness. Statistics shall be furnished re the homeless concerning the individual's health, length of participation time in the program and their city of origin. September 12, 2006 - 5 - MA YOR'S BRIEFING TEN-YEAR PLAN TO ADDRESS HOMELESSNESS ITEM # 55570 Councilman Dyer referenced the example of the U$1-MILLION man from Las Vegas". After tracking all the items consumed by one homeless individual in Las Vegas Oail, court, emergency room utilization), the expenditure amounted to $1-MILLION. Councilman Uhrin referenced if the Efficiency Apartments is developed in Virginia Beach, Virginia Beach would receive a number of rooms in proportion to the City's contribution, thus the City would receive approximately two-thirds of the rooms. Mayor Oberndorfrequested Vice Mayor Jones to Chair the City Council Session, as she must leave for a personal appointment. Mayor Oberndorfreturned at 5:20 P.M. September 12, 2006 - 6 - C IT Y MANA G E R 'S B R IE FIN G COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER PLAN 2:40 P.M. ITEM # 55571 Vice Mayor Jones introduced Dr. Glen Snyders, Chairman - Health Services Advisory Board, Pediatrician in Virginia Beach. Dr. Snyders cited the objectives: Objectives · Review Virginia Beach Health Services Advisory Board Role · Define the problem of access · Describe current sources of primary care and a proposed Community Health Center Project · Update efforts and suggest next steps Virginia Beach Health Services Advisory Board "To actively participate with community representatives in the formulation of a comprehensive plan for the development, coordination, and evaluation of local health services systems, and to make formal recommendations to City Council and the Health Department. " Va Beach City Council EnactedFebruary 7, 1995 Members . Glenn Snyders, MD - Chair . Vicky Gray, MPH . Terry Jenkins, Ph.D. . Buddy King . Frank Lane . Suzanne Love, MD . Charles McCallum, III . Mary Redd Nelson . Susan Hellstrom . Linda Reinersten . June Robertson, RN . Christopher Sawides . Joyce Schmidt, RN . Helen Shropshire . Linda Lilley, PhO . Ronald Wyles, MD September 12, 2006 - 7 - CITY MANA GER 'S BRIEFING COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER PLAN ITEM # 55571 (Continued) Dr. Snyders advised Access Partnership was formally established in 2002 and is a nonprofit community collaboration of diverse stakeholders who share a common goal of improving access to health services to the uninsured and underinsured residents of Greater Hampton Roads. The Virginia Beach Health Services Advisory Board identified access to basic health services as top priority. The Board reviewed Virginia Beach resources for primary health care (Hampton Roads Community Health Assessment), and other community approaches to addressing access to care. The Board worked collaboratively with Access Partnership to connect with community stakeholders. Background of Problem of Access to Healthcare Hampton Roads Community Health Assessment 2004 conducted by Stephen Horan, PhD of Community Health Solutions, Inc. Estimated 1.3-MILLION people over 800 square miles Chesapeake, Hampton, Newport News, Norfolk, Poquoson, Portsmouth, Virginia Beach Utilized health data from state, city and regional sources e.g. Health Department, Vital Statistics et cetera. Used data from Sentara hospitals emergency department Survey of community health professionals Virginia Beach Excerpts from this Study 1. Access to Basic Health Services 54,075 Uninsured - 24,857 Under 200% Fed Poverty level ($38,500 for family of 4)- Highest # Uninsured in Hampton Roads 5,892 Seniors - Under 200% Fed Poverty level - Medicare Access Issue Emergency Departments seeing patients that should be seen in ambulatory settings 2. Access to Chronic Care Rates for Heart Disease and Chronic Respiratory Disease> than State Average 3. Access to Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services, Access to Oral Health Services - Issues Consistent with Region 4. Access to Maternal and Infant Services Good News - lower than State Average low Birth Weight September 12,2006 - 8 - CITY MANA GER 'S BRIEFING COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER PLAN ITEM # 55571 (Continued) (Continued) Current Sources of Primary Health Care in Virginia Beach Beach Health Clinic - Free care for qualified uninsured, 15,000 patient visits/year - Primary care, specialty care, coordinated diagnostics, - Multiple sources of operating funds - City of Virginia Beach, United Way, individual donors - L1MITATIONS:Do not serve Medicare, Medicaid or individuals >200% poverty Local Emergency Rooms - Care for anyone - May provide referral to community services for follow up care. - L1MITATIONS:Long waits for primary care with negative impact on emergenVtrauma patients & system Virginia Beach Public Health Department Services for targeted populations: Prenatal Ob care, gynecological services, childrens' preventative and dental care, immunizations - LIMITATIONS: acute care, primary care for non-targeted populations Private Primary Care Offices - Provide charity care for selected patient population - LIMITATIONS: majority not accepting new Medicaid or Medicare patients Future Sources of Primary Health Care in Virginia Beach Community Health Center Local, non-profit, community-run primary care Serve all population including low income and medically underserved, Medicare and Medicaid Affordable primary care at reduced rates Funded by federal grants, local grants and individual contributions Paid administrative staff and medical staff Located in areas where care is needed but scarce Costs of care rank among the lowest with best quality Currently, over 1,000 community, migrant and homeless health centers serve 3,600 urban and rural communities in every state and territory. Dr. Snyders advised the Virginia Beach Health Services Advisory Board voted on May 2005 to endorse a feasibility study and pursue a federally funded Community Health Center in Virginia Beach. The Goal is to improve access to primary care for all residents - uninsured, Medicare, Medicaid and privately insured. On July 12, 2005, they initially presented the Health Center Plan and received support to move forward with the feasibility study. A Steering Committee was formed, consisting of representatives from the Virginia Beach Health Advisory Board and Department of Public Health, Access Partnership, United Way of South Hampton Roads, Sentara Healthcare, Samaritan House, Sentara Medical Group, Virginia Primary Care Association and community residents. September 12, 2006 - 9 - C IT Y MANA G E R 'S B R IE FIN G COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER PLAN ITEM # ITEM # 55571 (Continued) Goals Community collaboration Secure funding for feasibility study and grant writing - Interview candidates to manage a feasibility study and project coordination - Interview and researched grant writers to facilitate the grant proposal process Prepare a complete grant for HRSA December 1 application Planning Committee Formed - Roundtable Discussion held July 2005 VB Central Library Over 100 community members invited. Nearly 50 people attended and offered their support Subcommittees formed to support process and participate in the project to develop plan for the grant Committee Members - Access Partnership, Beach Health Clinic, Bon Secours, CINCH, EVMS, Interfaith Advisory Board, JCOC, Minority Health Coalition, NSU, ODU, Operation Blessing, PICH, Portsmouth Community Health Center, Samaritan House, Senior Services, Sentara Healthcare, The Planning Council, TCe, United Way, Virginia Beach Department of Public Health, residents and other community leaders Planning Begins Federal Grant Requirements Reviewed Grant opportunity announced by HRSA (Health Resources and Services Administration). Grant application due December 1, 2005 Cost of Project - Project Coordination Grant Writer - Administrative cost - $12,000 $42,000 $10,000 Total $65,000 Funding Commitments City of Virginia Beach - Sentara Health Foundation United Way of SHR $10,000 $15,000 $40,000 Total $65,000 September 12, 2006 - 10- CITY MANA GER 'S BRIEFING COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER PLAN ITEM # ITEM # 55571 (Continued) Dr. Snyders referenced the Needs Assessment and Grant Development Services were provided by J. Sarkiss and Associates from Birmingham, Alabama, with project management. Federal funding changes due to greater demand for federal assistance related to Hurricane Katrina (November 2005). The application is as complete as possible. Expansion Option Selected Health Advisory Board, Steering Committee and Planning Committee agree: Expansion of a current CHC site is the most comprehensive and cost-effective option Brings all existing services and resources to Virginia Beach without a "learning curve" Most likely avenue for future federal funding Sentara Health Foundation Provides Grant $300,000 start-up funding grant announced in April 2006 Request for Proposals publicized (newspaper, letters of invitation) After review of the RFPs, the Steering Committee recommended: The Peninsula Institute for Community Health Established in 1978 JCAHO Accredited 24,000 unduplicated visits in 2005 3 primary care sites in Newport News and Suffolk Healthcare for the Homeless Dental Services Pharmacy Care of Hampton Roads (central-fill pharmacy) Community Access to Care (program for uninsured to access diagnostic and specialty services) A search for a site is underway. The site must be in or near a medically underserved area (Ocean a Gardens or Birdneck) and be a minimum of 2, 000 square feet with the ability to expand. A storefront operation in a street mall would be acceptable as long as the site is within these two (2) areas. Vice Mayor Jones inquired re the $300,000 from Sentara being a one time grant. Gina Pitrone, Executive Director - Sentara Health Foundation, advised, at the present, this is a one time grant for access to care. However, every year, grants are given to Access to Care projects; therefore, the Community Health Center could reapply for funding in two (2) years. Funding from a Community Health Center becomes available through Medicare and Medicaid eligible payments. Basically, for every two (2) Medicare or Medicaid patients, the Health Center can treat (1) uninsured patient. Enhanced reimbursement is received through Medicare and Medicaid; therefore, the Center assists in funding itself through this successful model. September 12, 2006 - 11 - CITY MANA GER 'S BRIEFING COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER PLAN ITEM # ITEM # 55571 (Continued) Dr. Syed Kalumuddin, Chief Executive Officer, Peninsula Institute for Community Health, advised a Community Health Center is not supported by local dollars, but a federally funded program. The cost for each patient is $150. Funds are being brought to the community. No funding is being taken from Virginia Beach. Dr. Kalumuddin advised Hurricane Katrina resulted in a 1 % cut in funding in their Budget. Community Health funding is provided through the Department of Health and Human Services. Once locked in as a Community Health Center, the program will continue as long as in existence. Information relative finances of the Community Health Centers shall be provided to the City Council. September 12, 2006 - 12 - CITY MANA GER 'S BRIEFING HEALTH CARE AS A BUDGET DRIVER ITEM # ITEM # 55572 3:05 P.M. Susie Walston, Chief of Staff, advised "Health Care as a Budget Drive" is a briefingfor awareness and information. Mrs. Walstron introduced: Linda Matkins Benefits Co-ordinator / Consolidated Benefits office Barb Bailey Ken Jeffries Mercer Human Resources Consultants (Richmond office) Benefits Executive Committee (City) Susan Walston Chief of Staff David Hansen Chief of Finance and Technology Fagan Stackhouse Director - Human Resources Patricia Phillips Director - Finance Catheryn Whitesell Director - Management Services Mrs. Walston reiterated the information presented by David Hansen during the August 22, 2006 City Council Session: EXPENDITURES FY07 - 08 Major Categories Reserves 8% Debt Service 11% .. Includes $45.8M = rollover compensation Personnel 45%J "Personnel . Operations o Capital CDebt Service . Reserves September 12, 2006 - 13 - C IT Y MANA G E R 'S B R IE FIN G HEALTH CARE AS A BUDGET DRIVER ITEM # 55572 (Continued) FY07-08 Personnel Costs Health Inlurance 7.53% Ufelnsurance 0.82% Miscell.neoua Fringe Benefits O.22'lt1 Retirement 11.48% .. Doee not include $45.8M rollover FJ,C.A 554% Other Per50nnel Costs 1.Q4% Owrtime 2.2(5% Part-Time 3.24% 11IIII Full-Time CJ Other P.-sonnet Costs . Life Insurance . P.n-Time .F.I.C.A mJ Health Insurance OOwrtime II Retirement . Miscellaneous Fringe a_fits Health Care is a benefit offered as part of the City's total compensation package. A competitive package is critical to the recruitment and retention of a quality worliforce. The challenge is to manage increasing costs to ensure affordability into the future. Background . Created City and Schools Consolidated Benefits Office in 1994 as a consolidated service administered by the VBCPS . Moved to self-funding from fully-insured by insurance provider in 2000 (Cost = actual health care service + administration + stop-loss premiums) . Formed Benefits Executive Committee in 2002* . Selected Mercer Human Resources Consulting in 2002 to assist with issues relating to health insurance and employee benefits . Moved to one managed care carrier in 2003 . Basic plan option added in 2004 . Point of Service Plan (POS) plan added for new retirees in 2005 *Virginia Beach City Schools is represented by Chief Financial Officer, Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources and Comptroller. September 12, 2006 - 14 - C IT Y MANA G E R 'S B R IE FIN G HEALTH CARE AS A BUDGET DRIVER ITEM # 55572 {Continued} Administration encompasses approximately 4.4% of the cost and involves a third party administrator, covers customer and member services, claims processing, negotiates the contracts through the service providers, the credentialing of providers, furnish reports, employee identification cards. The City creates the plan existing in Virginia Beach, not an outside insurance company. Barb Bailey, Health Care Consultant - Mercer Human Resources Consulting, cited the Trends - Cost Drivers . Higher utilization of services . New medical treatments . More intensive diagnostic testing . Defensive medicine . Aging workforce . Growing retiree population . Unhealthy lifestyles . Fixed dol/ar co-pays in plan design . Double-digit prescription drug trends High Prevalence Disease and Conditions . Cancer . Joint conditions and replacement . Heart disease . Diabetes . Maternity . Hypertension Barb Bailey itemized the Historical Health Plan Costs: Plan Year Total Health Plan Aggregate + Expensesfor City & Schools City Split 2001 $50,200,000 $18,474,000 2002 $56,400,000 $20,642,000 2003 $60,900,000 $22,655,000 2004 $68,000,000 $26,180,000 2005 $80,300,000 $32,200,000 2006 $87,700,000 $37,886,000 2007* $97,700,000 $42,206,000 *Projected September 12, 2006 - 15 - C IT Y MANA G E R ~S B R IE FIN G HEALTH CARE AS A BUDGET DRIVER ITEM # 55572 (Continued) National Averagefor Health Care Increases for Governmental Employers 2005 over 2004 = 12 % (18.2%) 2004 over 2003 = 14 % (18.6%) 2003 over 2002 = 13.5% (6.2%) Ms. Bailey advised the percentage of Government employers offering Retiree Medical Coverage (2005) Pre-Medicare 81% Medicare-eligible 60% Ms. Walston itemized the City/Schools contribution and percentage of increase: CITY YEAR Employer % Increase From Contribution Prior Year 2000 $2,280 2001 $2,400 5.26% 2002 $2,520 5.00% 2003 - January $3,155 25.20% 2003 - July $3,350 6.18% 2004 $3,689 10.12% 2005 $4,169 13.01% 2006 $4,585 9.98% SCHOOLS YEAR Employer % Increase From Contribution Prior Year 2000 $2,280 2001 $2,400 5.26% 2002 $2,520 5.00% 2003 $3,155 25.20% 2004 $3,350 6.18% 2005 $3,852 14.99% 2006 $4,430 15.01 % September 12, 2006 - 16 - CITY MANA GER 'S BRIEFING HEALTH CARE AS A BUDGET DRIVER ITEM # 55572 (Continued) Health Plan Review Plan Year 2006 Plan and Proiections · 9.1% revised trend, downfrom original projection of 10.3% due to greater than expected savings from pharmacy changes · Co-insurance introduced on 3rd and 4th tier pharmacy · Co-payment added for high cost diagnostic imaging Plan Year 2007 Plan and Proiections · City continues to fully cover the premium cost of the "employee only" tier (HMO) · City & Schools contributions are equal As of August 1,2006,5,359 city employees were eligible for health care with 5,116 enrolled. There are a number of employees not taking advantage of the health care option. As of September, there are 5,120 employees enrolled. Employee premium costs will increase on average: PPO 1.8% HMO 5.2% Basic PPO 9.0% City Retirees Current Enrollees: 567 Retirees on a plan 544 receiving City's contribution Projected cost increase (total for retiree and City premiums) is 20.3% For those retirees with 25 or more years of service, premium costs will increase an average: POS - 26.7%, HMO - 44.4%. Ms. Walston advised Open Enrollment for Plan Year 2007 is in October for employees and November for retirees. The Request for Proposal (RFP) for carrier(s) is for Plan Year 2008, including medical, pharmacy and dental Linda Matkins, Benefits Co-ordinator - Consolidated Benefits office, spoke re the Wellness and Disease Management expanded offerings: Data Analysis Sentara Disease Management Programs Cardi04Life Health Risk Assessment 24-Hour Nurse Line Fitness/Weight Management Website Wellness Programs September 12, 2006 - 17 - C IT Y MANA G E R 'S B R IE FIN G HEALTH CARE AS A BUDGET DRIVER ITEM # 55572 (Continued) Health lifestyles, as well as the quality of life of the employee, have an impact on health claims, which would ultimately affect their absenteeism and productivity. Council Lady McClanan requested costs of staffing and consultants be provided. Cost Comparisons of neighboring localities re health care for the past three (3) years shall be provided. Mrs. Walston advised the costs and comparisons would be provided, but she could not advise whether all the Health Plans equaled each other. September 12, 2006 - 18 - CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS 4:05 P.M. ITEM # 55573 Councilman Wood referenced correspondence from Sheriff Lanteigne concerning a moratorium on new jail construction and the cost to the City of Virginia Beach (approximately $1.5-MILLION). The General Assembly voted to take funding out of the state budget this year. Council Lady Henley requested information re local funding of jail construction. Robert Matthias, Assistant to the City Manager, advised there is a state wide moratorium on reimbursement to jails. An exemption from the moratorium must be received. The staff will attempt to have the Governor place this jail construction in his budget submission. September 12, 2006 - 19 - AGE N DA REV IE W S E S ION 4:10 P.M. ITEM # 55574 J. 6. Resolution re the 2007 Community Legislative Agenda and REQUEST the local Delegation to the General Assembly sponsor and/or support legislation that will realize the goals and objectives set forth therein. Council Lady Wilson distributed correspondence requesting DELETION of the Bifurcated Tax Rate from the 2007 Community Legislative Agenda. Council Ladies Henley and McClanan will verbally vote NAYon the Charter Amendment re City Council and School Board Elections (Charter Changes - Item 2) Concern was expressed relative the Community input portion of the Agenda. A Revised Resolution shall be submitted for consideration. Robert Matthias, Assistant to the City Manager, referenced correspondence received from the State advising funds ($10-MILLION) can be utilized for either the BRT, replacement for trolley vehicles or purchase of the Norfolk/Southern right-ol-way. A Matrix will be developed of the amount of local funding to supplement state services i.e. Constitutional offices. ITEM # 55575 J. 7.Resolution to ESTABLISH the Historic Sites Organizing Committee re the creation andformation ofa Foundation to assist in the support of City-owned "historic sites." Council Lady McClanan distributed an AMENDMENT. Discussion will continue after the Closed Session and during the Formal Session. Lynn Clements, Director - Department of Museums and Cultural Arts, advised it is anticipated in the future there would be other historic houses owned and operated by the City. At the present time, Mrs. Clements advised the City owns two (2) houses and operates three (3). The Lynnhaven House is not currently owned by the City. ITEM # 55576 BY CONSENSUS, thefollowingshall compose the CONSENT AGENDA: ORDINANCES/ RESOLUTIONS 1. Ordinance to AMEND the City Code ~21-230 to add Oxford Drive in Kings Grant to the Traffic Calming Program effective September 12, 2006. 2. Ordinance to AUTHORIZE the City Manager to execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) re Special Weapons and Tactics/Crisis Negotiation (SWAT/CN) and the City's support to Fort Story. September 12, 2006 - 20- AGENDA RE VIE W SESION ITEM # 55576 (Continued) 3. Ordinance to AUTHORIZE the City Manager to execute a second Amendment to the Lease Agreement for Stumpy Lake Golf Course with an extension until December 31,2007. 4. Ordinance to IMPLEMENT the Southside Hampton Roads Hazard Mitigation Plan in accordance with Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) programs. 5. Ordinances to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE: a. $631,452 to the Clerk of the Circuit Court's FY 2006-07 Technology Trust Fund re courtroom technology expenses b. $284,192 in additional income from the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) to the Department of Housing and Neighborhood Preservation's FY2006-07 Operating Budget re the creation of affordable rental housing for low- and moderate-income households c. $102,106 from the United States Department of Justice's Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant and $28,000 of Asset Forfeiture Funds re public safety support and criminal processing d. $101,067 from the United States Department of Homeland Security to the Fire Department's FY 2006-07 Operating Budget re Fire and EMS station alerting capabilities e. $78,949 in United States Department of Criminal Justice Services state grant funding to the Department of Human Services FY 2006-07 Operating Budget re growing caseloads September 12, 2006 - 21 - AGE N DA REV IE W S E S ION ITEM # 55577 BY CONSENSUS, the following items shall compose the PLANNING BY CONSENT Agenda: K. PLANNING 1. Application of MIKE'S PAINT & BODY, INC. for a Conditional Use Permit at Progress Lane and Central Drive re an automotive repair garage and bulk storage. (DISTRICT 6 - BEACH) 2. Application of KAH PROPERTIES, L.L.C. for a Conditional Use Permit at 3222 Virginia Beach Boulevard re motor vehicle sales and service. (DISTRICT 5 - LYNNHA VEN) 3. Application of DR. ALAN MAHANES for a Chanf!e of Zoninf! District Classification from AG-2 Agricultural District to Conditional 0-2 Office District at 2513 North Landing Road re a dental office and additional space for lease. (DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE) 4. Application of KEMP ENTERPRISES, INC. for a Chanf!e of Zoninf! District Classification from R-5D Residential Duplex District to Conditional A-24 Apartment District at Bonney Road and Kenley Road re multi-family dwellings. (DISTRICT 2 - KEMPSVILLE) 5. Application of RHO MAN COMPANIESfor a Chanf!e ofZoninf! District Classification from R-JO Residential District to Conditional I-I Light Industrial District on a portion of 1032 Bells Road and 1041 Olds Lane re warehouses and office- warehouses. (DISTRICT 6 - BEACH) Item K.3 will be DEFERRED, BY CONSENT, until the City Council Session of September 26,2006. Item K.4. will be REFERRED BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BY CONSENT. September 12, 2006 - 22- ITEM # 55578 Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones entertained a motion to permit City Council to conduct its CLOSED SESSION, pursuant to Section 2.1-3711 (A), Code of Virginia, as amended, for the following purpose: PERSONNEL MATTERS: Discussion, consideration or interviews of prospective candidates for employment, assignment, appointment, promotion, performance, demotion, salaries, disciplining or resignation of specific public officers, appointees or employees pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(1) Council Appointments: Boards, Commissions, Committees, Authorities and Agencies PUBLICLY-HELD PROPERTY: Discussion or consideration of the condition, acquisition, or use of real property for public purpose, or of the disposition of publicly-held property, or of plans for the future of an institution which could affect the value of property owned or desirable for ownership by such institution pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A)(3). Acquisition/Disposition of Property: ARP: Princess Anne District Upon motion by Councilman Dyer, seconded by Councilman Wood, City Council voted to proceed into CLOSED SESSION (4:38 P.M.). Voting: 10-0 Council Members Voting Aye: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan, John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James 1. Wood Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf [Leftfor Medical Appointment entered: 5:20 P.M.] (Closed Session: 4:38 P.M. - 5:07 P.M.) (Recess: 4:40 P.M. - 4: 50 P.M.) (Dinner: 5:30 P.M. -6:00 P.M.) September 12,2006 - 23 - ITEM # 55579 Vice Mayor Jones RECONVENED the INFORMAL SESSION in the City Council Conference Room, City Hall, on Tuesday, September 12,2006, at 5:07 P.M CERTIFICATION OF CLOSED SESSION Upon motion by Councilman Dyer seconded by Councilman Wood, City Council CERTIFIED THE CLOSED SESSION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOTION TO RECESS. Only public business matters lawfully exemptfrom Open Meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in Closed Session to which this certification resolution applies. AND, Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening the Closed Session were heard, discussed or considered by Virginia Beach City Council. Voting: 9-0 Council Members Voting Aye: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan, John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson and James 1. Wood Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf [Left for Medical Appointment entered: 5:20 P.M.} Ron A. Villanueva September 12, 2006 RESOLUTION CERTIFICATION OF CLOSED SESSION VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL WHEREAs.. The Virginia Beach City Council convened into CLOSED SESSION, pursuant to the affirmative vote recorded in ITEM # 55548, Page 22, and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia Freedom of Information A~ and, WHEREAs.. Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the governing body that such Closed Session was conducted in conformity with Virginia law. NOfY, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VED That the Virginia Beach City Council hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge, (a) only public business matters lawfully exempted from Open Meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in Closed Session to which this certification resolution applies; and, (b) only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening this Closed Session were heard, discussed or considered by Virginia Beach City Council. ~4 ~.- uth Hodges Smith, MMC City Clerk September 12, 2006 - 24- AGENDA RE VIE W SESION 5:10 P.M. ITEM # 55580 J. 7.Resolution to ESTABLISH the Historic Sites Organizing CommiUee re the creation andformation of a Foundation to assist in the support of City-owned "historic sites. " Further discussion continued re the Resolution to ESTABLISH the Historic Sites Organizing CommiUee. Council Lady Henley expressed concerns re intent: (1) Re Fund Raising (2) Historic Preservation (3) Mainly assisting the three (3) properties: Adam Thoroughgood House, Francis Land House and Lynnhaven House. Particular Friends Groups are also attempting to raise funds. There are other means of raising funds as the Preservation Partnership established many years ago (but does not have the funding necessary to commence its purposes). Hopefully the funds raised will be for historic preservation with a process for division of these funds Council Lady McClanan advised the City needs to maintain a certain amount of control. After the Foundation begins to carry out the recommendations of the Organizing Committee, hopefully this will provide guidance to the City and formulate policies. The historic houses should serve both educational as well as tourism purposes. Vice Mayor Jones believes the Resolution to organize the committee for the purpose of creating the Foundation is a good move. One of the problems with all of the historic houses has been the lack offunds. The City Council should be appointing the members of the Historic House Boards. Once the Foundation is formed, a process should be established for justifying the distribution of funds. Charles Meyer, Chief Operating Officer, advised this Resolution was originally drafted relative the three (3) properties operated by the Department of Museums. A governance function is anticipated. The Foundation could examine fund raising in support of a broader range of properties and would also examine the governance issues relative the three (3) properties. This Resolution shall be revised to encompass City Council's concerns. September 12, 2006 - 25 - FORMAL SESSION VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL September 12, 2006 6:10 P.M. Mayor Meyer E. Oberndorfcalled to order the FORMAL SESSION of the VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL in the Council Chamber, City Hall Building, on Tuesday, September 12, 2006, at 6:00 P.M. Council Members Present: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M Dyer, Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Absent: Ron A. Villanueva [Entered: 6: 15 P.M.] INVOCATION: Reverend Deborah R. Fair Pastor, Charity United Methodist Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Council Lady Rosemary Wilson DISCLOSED her husband is a principal in the accounting firm of Goodman and Company and is directly and indirectly involved in many of Goodman and Company's transactions. However, due to the size of Goodman and Company and the volume of transactions it handles in any given year, Goodman and Company has an interest in numerous matters in which her husband is not personally involved and of which she does not have personal knowledge. In order to ensure her compliance with both the letter and the spirit of the State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, it is her practice to thoroughly review the agenda for each meeting of City Council for the purpose of identifYing any matters in which she might have an actual or potential conflict. If, during her review she identifies any matters, she will prepare and file the appropriate disclosure letter to be recorded in the official records of City Council. Council Lady Wilson regularly makes this disclosure. Council Lady Wilson's letter of January 27, 2004, is hereby made a part of the record. Council Lady Rosemary Wilson DISCLOSED she is a real estate agent affiliated with Prudential Decker Realty. Because of the nature of Real Estate Agent affiliation, the size of Prudential, and the volume of transactions it handles in any given year, Prudential has an interest in numerous matters in which she is not personally involved and of which she does not have personal knowledge. In order to ensure her compliance with both the letter and the spirit of the State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, it is her practice to thoroughly review the agenda for each meeting of City Council for the purpose of identifYing any matters in which she might have an actual or potential conflict. If, during her review she identifies any matters, she will prepare and file the appropriate disclosure letter to be recorded in the official records of City Council. Council Lady Wilson regularly makes this disclosure. Council Lady Wilson's letter of January 27,2004, is hereby made a part of the record. September 12, 2006 - 26- Item V-F.J. MINUTES ITEM #55581 Upon motion by Councilman Dyer, seconded by Councilman Wood, City Council APPROVED Minutes of the INFORMAL and FORMAL SESSIONS of September 5, 2006. Voting: 10-0 Council Members Voting Aye: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M Dyer, Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf John E. Uhrin" Rosemary Wilson and James 1. Wood Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: Ron A. Villanueva September 12, 2006 - 27- Item V-G.J.aIb/c. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM #55582 Mayor Oberndorf DECLARED A PUBLIC HEARING: CHARTER AMENDMENTS Landscape Screening for abandoned retail and commercial property Removal of May election references Photo Red Light Enforcement Program There being no speakers, Mayor Oberndorf CLOSED the PUBLIC HEARING September 12, 2006 Item V-H. ADOPTAGENDA FOR FORMAL SESSION BY CONSENSUS, City Council ADOPTED: - 28 - ITEM #5558 AGENDA FOR THE FORMAL SESSION September 12, 2006 - 29- Item v'J. ORDINANCESIRESOLUTIONS ITEM #55584 Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Council Lady Wilson, City Council APPROVED IN ONE MOTION Ordinances 1, 2, 4 and 5 albic/die of the CONSENT AGENDA Voting: 11-0 (By Consent) Council Members Voting Aye: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None September 12, 2006 - 30 - Item v,J.1. ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM #55585 Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Council Lady Wilson, City Council ADOPTED: Ordinance to AMEND the City Code S21-230 to add Oxford Drive in Kings Grant to the Traffic Calming Program effective September 12, 2006. Voting: 11-0 (By Consent) Council Members Voting Aye: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None September 12, 2006 1 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CITY CODE 2 SECTION 21-230 PERTAINING TO TRAFFIC 3 CALMING VIA MAXIMUM SPEED LIMITS IN 4 CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS; 5 PENALTY 6 SECTION AMENDED: ~ 21-230 7 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA 8 BEACH, VIRGINIA: 9 That the Code of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, is 10 hereby amended and reordained to read as follows: 11 Sec. 21-230. Traffic calming via maximum speed limits in certain 12 residential districts; penalty. 13 14 Pursuant to ~ 46.2-878.2 of the Code of Virginia, any person 15 who operates a motor vehicle in excess of the maximum speed limit 16 established for any portion of the following highways located 17 wi thin the designated neighborhoods, on or after the effective 18 date, shall be guilty of a traffic infraction punishable by a 19 prepayable fine of two hundred dollars ($200.00), in addition to 20 other penalties provided by law. No portion of the fine shall be 21 suspended unless the court orders twenty (20) hours of community 22 service. 23 (1) L & J Garden: Norwich Avenue; Taj 0 Avenue; Fairlawn 24 Avenue; Dulcie Avenue. 25 (2) Acredale: Andover Road; Langston Road; Bonneydale Road; 26 Olive Road, Alton Road; Old Kempsville Road. 27 (3) Lake Shores: Jack Frost Road; Lake Shores Road. 28 (4) Little Neck: Harris Road. 1 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 (5) Lake Shores: Oak Leaf Lane, Tern Road; Lake Road S; Regina Lane; Meredith Road, School Road, Mosby Road, Frizzel Drive; Finn Road; Charla Lee Lane; Smith Farm Road. (6) Brighton on the Bay: Templeton Lane; Wivenhoe Way; Starr Way. (7) Baylake Pines/Baylake Beach: Ben Gunn Road; Indian Hill Road; Baylake Road; Rampart Avenue; Bayville Road; Lookout Road; Sandy Bay Drive. (8) Country Haven: Stewart Drive. (9) Fairfield: Lord Dunmore Drive. (10) Bellamy Manor: Homestead Drive. (11) Church Point: Church Point Road; Church Point Place; Timber Ridge Drive. (12) Stratford Chase: Stratford Chase Drive; Minden Road; Violet Bank; Kittery Drive. (13) Bayville Park: Greenwell Road (From Shore Drive to First Court Road) . (14) Milburn Manor: Davis Street. (15) Lake James: Lake James Drive. (16) Larkspur: Edwin Drive from Princess Anne Road to Independence Blvd. Effective as of April 6, 2004: (1) Croatan: Croatan Road. 2 53 (2) Birdneck Point: Cardinal Road. 54 Effective as of April 5, 2005: 55 (1) Thoroughgood: Thoroughgood Drive. 56 (2) Hermitage Road. 57 Effective as of September 12, 2006: 58 (1) Kings Grant: Oxford Drive. 59 60 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, 61 Virginia, on this 12th day of September, 2006. 3 NEIGHBORHOODS PARTICIPATING IN PHASE III OF THE TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM, ORDINANCE 2619 . CHURCH POINT * KINGS GRANT OXFORD DR. lAKE SHORES CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH AUGUST 3, 2006 PREPARED BY PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING CADD BUREAU I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~_______________________________~______________________________________________________J ~ ~ -\ '0 o n ~ FAIRFIELD COUNTt<Y HAVEN ACREDALE * NEW NEIGHBORHOODS PROPOSED WITH THIS AGENDA X1'ROJECTSMAPs.-\raffic calming.DGN M.J.S. Rev. B /3 /06 PREPARED BY PM' ENG. CADD DEPT. - 31 - Item v'J.2. ORDINANCES/RESOLUTONS ITEM #55586 Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Council Lady Wilson, City Council ADOPTED: Ordinance to AUTHORIZE the City Manager to execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) re Special Weapons and Tactics/Crisis Negotiation (SWAT/CN) and the City's support to Fort Story. Voting: 11-0 (By Consent) Council Members Voting Aye: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None September 12, 2006 1 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE CITY 2 MANAGER TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF 3 UNDERSTANDING PROVIDING FOR 4 SPECIAL WEAPONS AND TACTICS/CRISIS 5 NEGOTIATION TEAMS AID SUPPORT FROM 6 THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH TO FORT 7 STORY 8 9 WHEREAS, Code of Virginia Section 15.2-1728 authorizes 10 local governments to enter into memorandums of understanding for 11 emergency police services with federal authorities; 12 WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach maintains 13 equipment and personnel for emergency Special Weapons and 14 Tactics/Crisis Negotiations ("SWAT/CN") team responses within 15 its own jurisdiction and areas; 16 WHEREAS, it is recognized that the location of Fort 17 Story makes the Virginia Beach SWAT /CN teams the appropriate 18 primary responder in the event of a crisis that cannot be 19 contained by Fort Story Personnel; 20 WHEREAS, Code of Virginia ~ 15.2-1728 provldes that 21 City police officers shall have the same powers, rights, 22 bcnefi ts, privileges, and immunities as are lawfully conferred 23 upon them wit the City when they act, in the performance of 1 24 their duties, on property, SUCh as Fort Story, that is under 25 federal authority; 26 WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach and Fort Story are 27 cognizant of the benefits they will derive from an agreement 28 allowing Fort Story to request the aid of Virginia Beach; and 29 WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach and Fort Story 30 desire to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding setting forth 31 the procedures to be followed in the event of a crisis requiring 32 the assistance of the Virginia Beach SWAT/CN teams. 33 34 35 36 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: 1. That the attached Memorandum of Understanding 37 ("Agreement") for emergency SWAT /CN team responses to Fort Story 38 is hereby approved. 39 2 . That the City Manager is hereby authorized and 40 directed to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City of 41 Virginia Beach. 42 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, 43 Virginia on the 12th day of September, 2006. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: LEGAL ~ A. a~ Police Department ice 2 CAI0128 V:\citylaw\00019056.DOC R-2 September 5, 2006 3 SUMMARY OF MATERIAL TERMS 1. Events - A terrorist or non-terrorist incident, a hostagelbarricade situation, execution of high risk warrants or drug raid that occurs on Fort Story. 2. Memorandum of Understanding - An agreement between the City of Virginia Beach and Fort Story entered into in preparation for a response to any potential event listed above. Virginia Beach Police SWAT ICN personnel will respond, if available, at the request of Fort Story should such an event occur that cannot be contained by Fort Story personnel. 3. Command and Control - Virginia Beach personnel will remain under the command and control of the Virginia Beach Police Department's On-Scene Commander and/or the Virginia Beach SWAT/eN Team Commander. 3. Nature - Allows the City of Virginia Beach to provide police manpower and equipment, if available, in an effort to maintain public safety during any of the above described events. 4. Term - This agreement is effective upon execution and may be terminated by either party with 30 days written notice, or on the date control of Fort Story is transferred from the Army to the Navy. 5. Insurance - Insurance requirements are met through the City of Virginia Beach's self insurance program administered by Risk Management. 6. Liability - Neither party assumes liability for the negligent acts of the other party. Code of Virginia S 15.2-1728 provides that City police officers shall have the same immunities as are lawfully conferred upon them within the City when they act, in the performance of their duties, on federal property (such as Fort Story), pursuant to a mutual aid agreement. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA And GARRISON COMMANDER, FORT STORY, VIRIGINA Refs:(A) Army Regulation 525-13, Anti-terrorism; Security of Personnel, Information, and Critical Resources. (B) Army Regulation 190-58 Personnel Security. (C) Department of Defense Directive 2000.12 DOD Combating Terrorism Program. (D) FM 3 -19 .11, Special Reaction Teams (SR T). (E) Army Regulation 190-40, Special Incident Report. 1. PURPOSE: This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is negotiated by and between the Fort Story Garrison Commander (hereafter referred to as "the Army") and the City of Virginia Beach, VA. (hereafter referred to as "Va. Beach"). The purpose of this MOU is to establish a mutual understanding regarding the responsibilities, procedures, and conditions for utilization of Special Weapons and TacticslCrisis Negotiations (S W A T ICN) from the above agencieslorganizations in the intervention into a non- terrorist hostagelbarricade situations taking place on Fort Story, Army Base, located within the City of Va. Beach. This document is not intended as a replacement or to contradict existing Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) or other regulations or laws, but rather to supplement the agreements already established in accordance with existing guidelines. 2. MISSION: In the event of a terrorist and non-terrorist event, hostagelbarricade situation, high risk warrants, and drug raids that occurs at Fort Story under jurisdiction of the Provost Marshal Office, and the cognizant Regional Public Safety Program Manager determines it is necessary for the use of a special weapons or tactical unit to resolve the situation, Va. Beach Police Department will be contacted for assistance. The Va. Beach Police Department will provide, if available, a SWAT/eN Team to respond to the scene upon notification of a non-terrorist hostagelbarricade, high risk warrant, and/or drug raid. 3. PROCEDURES: A. Response: Once notified, the Va. Beach Police Department will depart for the crisis site, if available. Once the team arrives, the team leader will report to the Army On- Scene-Commander (OSC) for information and to provide advice as required. The Va. Beach CN Team will be in charge of negotiations. The Army will provide such plan, maps, etc. that is required by the team. In keeping with preferred practices, whoever has established a good rapport with the hostage takers will continue unless circumstances determine otherwise. B. Command/Control: Once it is determined that Va. Beach SWAT/eN assets are to be used operational control of the situation will be turned over to the Va. Beach On-scene Commander. Overall operations control will stay with the SW A TICN Team Commander. Up until the time of assault, there will be continued discussions between Army and local law enforcement officials to try and find a peaceful solution to the situation. Once committed, the Va. Beach SW A TICN will operate according to their established procedures until the situation is resolved. C. Assault: Any assault upon Fort Story Army Base will be conducted only after approval from the Army OSC or Provost Marshal Office and only after all other avenues of neutralizing or diffusing the crisis have been exhausted. Any decision to make an entry will be discussed with the SWAT/eN Commander, senior CID agent on scene, Army OSC and Provost Marshal Office before permission is granted. The only exception to receiving prior command approval would be exigent circumstances at the crisis site, which would endanger the lives of the hostages and/or SWAT personnel within the area. In this case, the decision to effect and emergency assault will be made by the on-scene Va. Beach SWAT/eN Commander. D. Explosives: Use of any explosive devises for breaching of doors, windows, walls, etc. will be conducted by the Virginia Beach Police Department's Bomb Squad, eN Team, and on- scene S W A T Commander. E. Termination of Mission: The VBPD Incident Commander may terminate support of the mission at any time at hislher discretion. However, this decision will be discussed with the OSC, Army CID, and Fort Eustis Provost Marshal Office before support is terminated. F: Post Incident Teams: Post incident crime scene teams will consist of Army CID, Va. Beach Police Department Personnel, and any other unit deemed necessary by the OSC. Army CID will coordinate any substantive criminal investigative matters. 4. RELEASE OF LIABILITY: Neither the Provost Marshal Office, nor the United States Army shall be liable for any personal injury, property damage, or death caused solely by any negligent actions or inaction by the Va. Beach SWAT/CN personnel. Neither the City of Virginia Beach or the Virginia Beach Police Department shall be liable for any personal injury, property damage, or death caused solely by any negligent action or inaction by the Provost Marshal Office or the United States Army. The City of Virginia Beach and its police officers and agents shall be entitled to immunity granted by Code of Virginia ~ 15.2-1728. 5. COST INCURRED: Any expense incurred by the City of Virginia Beach will be handled in accordance with references (A) through (E). 6. EFFECTIVE DATE: This agreement shall be effective upon signature of all parties involved. 7. MODIFICATION AND REVIEW: No changes shall be made to this memorandum without mutual review and consent of all parties. This agreement shall be reviewed annually or as determined by the affected parties. 8. TERMINATION: This memorandum may be terminated by either party, preferably with written notice of not less than thirty (30) days from date of proposed termination. This agreement shall terminate upon the effective date of transfer of control of Fort Story from Army to Navy installation management. Rev: 03/29/06- MPR MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA And GARRISON COMMANDER, FORT STORY, VIRGINIA SIGNATURE PAGE FOR THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH FOR THE GARRISON COMMANDER JAMES SPORE CITY MANAGER CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VA. JOEL J. CLARK LIEUTENANT COLONEL, U. S. ARMY GARRISON COMMANDER LEGAL REVIEW LESLIE L. LILLEY CITY ATrORNEY CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VA. A. M. JACOCKS, JR. CHIEF OF POLICE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, V A. BEVERLY F. CORNELIUS LIEUTENANT COLONEL, U.S. ARMY PROVOST MARSHAL A TrEST: CITY CLERK CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, V A. - 32 - Item v'J.3. ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM #55587 Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Council Lady Wilson, City Council ADOPTED: Ordinance to A UTHORIZE the City Manager to execute a second Amendment to the Lease Agreement for Stumpy Lake Golf Course with an extension until December 31,2007. Voting: 11-0 (By Consent) Council Members Voting Aye: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None September 12, 2006 1 2 3 4 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT TO EXTEND THE TERM OF THE LEASE FOR THE STUMPY LAKE GOLF COURSE UNTIL DECEMBER 31, 2007 5 WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia (City) is 6 the owner of approximately 300.25 acres of land generally known 7 as Stumpy Lake, which was acquired from the City of Norfolk (the 8 Property) ; 9 WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Agreement of Lease 10 (Lease) dated October 1, 2001, the City leased the Property to 11 Stumpy Lake Golf Course, Incorporated (Lessee) for the operation 12 and management of the Stumpy Lake Golf Course for a term which, 13 with extensions, ends September 30, 2006; 14 WHEREAS, the Lease was amended by a First Amendment to 15 Lease Agreement, dated September 13, 2005; 16 WHEREAS, the City has issued a Request For Proposal for the 17 renovation and management of the Stumpy Lake Golf Course, and 18 negotiations are currently being conducted with Lessee; 19 WHEREAS, the Lessee has agreed to holdover and remain In 20 possession of the Property until an agreement lS reached for the 21 renovation and management of the Golf Course but no longer than 22 December 31, 2007; and 23 WHEREAS, the City and the Lessee desire to amend the lease 24 to allow an extension until December 31, 2007, or to such 25 earlier time as a new agreement is reached for the lease of the 26 property. 27 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY 28 OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: 29 That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute a 30 Second Amendment to Lease Agreement between Stumpy Lake Golf 31 Course, Incorporated and the City, for the purpose of extending 32 the term of the lease until December 31, 2007. Provided -:,-:, "'''' hf"""ll'.rc"tTor .1 i '-" 11'\1 '-' V ............L , that all rom;:::a; 1'1; 1'1 rr nrn\T; co; r'\l'1 C' ...L.........I.LL'-A.....L..L.I.....L..1.L'::1 .t-'...L'-..../ \I ...J....o.....)...L...........L..LU of the Lease, ~ ~ a.:> 34 previously amended, shall remain in effect. 35 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, 36 Virginia, on the 12th day of September , 2006. CA-I0133 PA/GG/orders/stumpy lake ord (2) .doc September 6, 2006 R-2 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: ~~~I'-/ Par s and Recreation JrJt#: Attorney's Office SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT ("Second Amendment") is made as of the day of , 2006 between the CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA, a municipal corporation of the Commonwealth of Virginia (the "City") and STUMPY LAKE GOLF COURSE, INCORPORATED, a Virginia corporation ("Lessee"). RECITALS 1. Pursuant to that certain Lease dated October 1, 2001, between the City and Lessee (the "Lease"), City leased to Lessee certain premises described in the Lease and shown on the exhibit attached to the Lease as Exhibit A. 2. Pursuant to a First Amendment to Lease Agreement the parties agreed to a release of an approximately 4.2 acre parcd from the leased premises. 3. Pursuant to the lease, the term of the lease and any extensions shall not exceed a total duration of five (5) years. 4. The total duration of the original term and all extensions of the lease shall be five (5) years on September 30,2006. 5. The City and the Lessee desire to amend the Lease to permit an extension of the term of the lease until December 31, 2007. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Paragraph 2 of the lease is hereby amended to read as follows: 2. TERM The parties agree that the term of this Lease is October 1, 2001 through December 31, 2002. After the expiration of the term, upon written consent of both parties, this Lease shall be extended month to month, under the same terms of this Lease. The Lessee shall have sixty (60) days to vacate the property from the date the City notifies the Lessee it does not intend to extend the Lease. In such event, the Lessee may not continue to operate as a golf course past December 31, 2002. During any extension period, either party may terminate this Lease upon ninety (90) days advance written notice to the other party. The consent for the extension must be signed by the Lessee no later than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of this Lease. Under no circumstances shall the original term and the extensions exceed total duration of five (5) years. Provided 1 . however, effective October 1, 2006, this lease may be extended for an additional extension period until December 31, 2007. 2. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the Lease, as amended shall remain in full force and effect. In the event of a conflict between the terms, conditions, and provisions of the Lease, the First Amendment and this Amendment, the terms, conditions and provisions of this Amendment shall prevail. 2 WITNESS the following signatures and seals: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: c;~ Ctt~~ CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, a municipal corporation of the Commonwealth of Virginia By: City Managerl Authorized Designee ATTEST: By: City Clerk STUMPY LAKE GOLF COURSE, INCORPORATED a Virginia corporation By: (SEAL) Title: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: 3 - 33 - Item v'J.4. ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM #55588 Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Council Lady Wilson, City Council ADOPTED: Ordinance to IMPLEMENT the Southside Hampton Roads Hazard Mitigation Plan in accordance with Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) programs. Voting: 11-0 (By Consent) Council Members Voting Aye: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None September 12, 2006 1 2 3 4 5 AN ORDINANCE TO APPROVE AND ADOPT THE SOUTHSIDE HAMPTON ROADS HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN WHEREAS, in an effort to reduce the Nation's mounting 6 natural disaster losses, the U. S. Congress passed the Disaster 7 Mitigation Act of 2000 that requires, in part, that state and local 8 governments develop a hazard mitigation plan in order to remain 9 eligible for pre- and post-disaster mitigation funding; 10 WHEREAS, the federal and state governments provided grant 11 funds in the amount of $130,000 to the City of Virginia Beach for the 12 purpose of supporting the development of a Souths ide Hampton Roads 13 Hazard Mitigation Plan; 14 WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach sponsored the 15 development of a regional hazard mitigation plan including the cities 16 of Norfolk, Portsmouth, and Suffolk, Isle of Wight County, and the 17 towns of Smithfield and Windsor; 18 WHEREAS, the ultimate goal of the plan is to minimize or 19 eliminate the long-term risk to human life and property from natural 20 hazards by identifying and implementing cost-effective mitigation 21 actions; 22 WHEREAS, the plan outlines specific actions for 23 participating jurisdictions to undertake in reducing the impact of 24 natural hazards; 25 WHEREAS, the regional mitigation plan will meet all 26 applicable Federal regulations per the Disaster Mitigation Act of 27 2000 and local planning requirements established by the Federal 28 Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), as well as local planning 29 requirements for hazard mitigation required by the Virginia Department 30 of Emergency Management; 31 WHEREAS, a FEMA-approved mitigation plan is required for 32 local conununities to remain eligible for future grant funds made 33 available through FEMA's Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) program and 34 Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP); 35 WHEREAS, funds from these programs may be used by local 36 governments and non-profit organizations to implement mitigation 37 projects at the local conununity level; and 38 WHEREAS, in accordance with Federal planning requirements, 39 the local governing body of each participating jurisdiction is 40 required to review and approve that portion of the overall plan that 41 affects them. 42 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 43 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA, 44 That the Southside Hampton Roads Hazard Mitigation Plan 45 Final Draft, an abstract of which is attached hereto, is hereby 46 approved and adopted for the City of Virginia Beach. 47 Adopted this -1.2.:tb day of Spptpmhpr, 2006, by the Council of 48 the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: . ~ <[ -1-()' Planning Department APPROVED AS TO LEGAL S~CJ:ENS:Y : City Attorney's Office CA10144 V:\applications\citylawprod\cycom32\Wpdocs\D006\P001\OO019746.DOC R-2 September 6, 2006 City of Virginia Beach Hazard Mitigation Plan - Abstract INTRODUCTION The following is an abstract of the Southside Hampton Roads Hazard Mitigation Plan. Its intent is to provide a brief overview of the basic components of the plan, and to provide a list of Virginia Beach- specific strategies to mitigate the defined hazards. PURPOSE This plan has been developed to satisfy the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act (DMA) 2000, and is a collective effort between Isle of Wight County, Norfolk:, Portsmouth, Smithfield, Suffolk:, Virginia Beach and Windsor. Its purpose is to identify the region's risk of natural hazards (i.e. hurricanes, tornados, lightning storms, etc.), highlight each jurisdiction's capabilities and vulnerabilities, and detail strategies to remedy shortfalls and further prepare the community. This plan is also a requirement for future mitigation funding eligibility. It is important to understand the spirit of the DMA 2000 is not to impose a federal mandate on state and local governments. Instead, it is meant to encourage proactive steps toward protecting communities - not only through post-disaster mitigation activities, but more importantly, through pre-disaster mitigation planning in all areas of govemment. Mitigation is just one phase of four under comprehensive emergency management. The other three include Preparedness, Response, and Recovery. As stated in the EOP Basic Plan: "Hazard mitigation includes the responsibility for developing specific measures to reduce the effects of natural or man-made hazards. Also included is the identification and mitigation measures for other hazards that may develop. These measures include, but are not limited to, the development of zoning laws and land use ordinances, building codes, regulations, and licensing for the handling and storage of hazardous materials, and the inspection and enforcement of such ordinances, codes, and regulations (p. 37). Logic, and history, suggests more effort in the mitigation phase will result in a decreased need in the Response and Recovery phases. In Layman's terms, money put into mitigation projects can ultimately save money in Response and Recovery efforts in the future. For example, the one-time cost of elevating a structure in a flood zone will be less than the numerous losses and claims of repetitive damage through the years. Funding was provided by FEMA and VDEM through Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) funds. SITUATIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS Situations · The city is vulnerable to natural disasters that place the community at risk from various hazards and consequences. City of Virginia Beach Hazard Mitigation Plan Abstract July 18, 2006 . The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 was intended to facilitate cooperation between state and local authorities on risk reduction measures to expedite funding allocation. . DMA 2000 compliance requires local communities to develop hazard mitigation plans to remain eligible for pre-disaster and post-disaster funding through FEMA. . Plan focuses on natural hazards only, such as floods, hurricanes and tornados, and not manmade disasters such as technological accidents or acts of terrorism. . While the plan takes a regional approach, it details information specific to each participating jurisdiction. Assumptions . City is interested in a true assessment of the threats to the community, its capabilities, and also its vulnerabilities as a base to establish effective mitigation strategies. . Approved plan will be a comprehensive, useable document that will result in improved measures toward the safety of community. . City is interested in eligibility for future pre- and post-disaster mitigation funding. GENERAL In order to provide the most accurate information for the City of Virginia Beach, input was solicited from the Quality Physical Environment (QPE). The plan was also distributed to all appropriate departments for comment. Externally, other stakeholders invited to participate included the American Red Cross, Peninsula Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, National Weather Service, Virginia Department of Emergency Management, Navy Mid-Atlantic Command, USACE Norfolk Office, and most importantly, the citizens. Following the guidelines set forth by the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), the committee formulated the plan's capability assessment, risk assessment and mitigation strategies. Lastly, documentation was performed detailing the steps intended to maintain the plan. Capability Assessment Examination of each participating jurisdiction's local capabilities (i.e. regulatory, administrative, technical and fiscal) to implement mitigation activities. The assessment serves to highlight some of the positive mitigation measures already in place as well as identify any existing gaps, conflicts or weaknesses that may need to be addressed through future mitigation planning actions. Risk Assessment Includes a general hazard identification, analysis and vulnerability assessment for the natural hazards that can affect the region in order to prioritize hazard risks and develop appropriate mitigation strategies. Based on current and historical information, natural hazards that threaten the area were rated at a "High," "Medium" or "Low" consideration risk. The summary of the hazards threatening Virginia Beach are as follows: City of Virginia Beach Hazard Mitigation Plan Abstract July 18, 2006 Low Wildfire / Drou ht, Dam / Levee Failure Erosion Earth uakes Extreme Tern eratures Sinkholes Landslides Note: Some natural hazards overlap. For instance, the effects of a hurricane will include strong winds, storm surge, and possibly tornadoes. Part of the vulnerability assessment takes into account the asset inventory of the population. Flooding is the most frequent and costly of all natural hazards in the United States, particularly Virginia Beach. As such, the following statistics were compiled to better understand the potential economic impact on the community. (Similar statistical information is detailed for each hazard in the plan). Residential 135,766 Commercial 1,393 Number of Buildin s Industrial 115 Other 266 Total 137,540 Residential $18,256,280,000 Buildin and Contents Values Commercial Industrial $2,170,665,000 $27,859,000 Other $370,162.000 Total $21,068,966,000 Vulnerability maps specific to High-consideration hazards to Virginia Beach are attached to this Abstract. Mitigation Strategy General regional goals, as well as jurisdictionally-specific local mitigation actions (projects and policy alternatives). Each proposed mitigation action is tied to assigned implementation mechanisms, such as the department or person responsible for carrying the specific action out, a time line for its completion and potential funding sources, if applicable. Regional Goals: Goal #1: Develop plans and studies that will support the implementation of techniques that will aid in the mitigation of natural hazards in the region. City of Virginia Beach Hazard Mitigation Plan Abstract July 18, 2006 Goal #2: Conduct public education, outreach and awareness programs to help citizens better understand hazard mitigation and ways to protect lives and property from the impact of natural hazards. Goal #3: Undertake cost beneficial structural projects across the region that will be beneficial to reducing the impact of natural hazards when they occur. Goal #4: Implement sound hazard mitigation policies into the framework of local government operations across the region. Virginia Beach-Specific Action Strategies: 1. Comprehensive Planning process could be expanded to better integrate the existing mitigation related programs, as well as the mitigation philosophy to include links to the mitigation plan itself. 2. The Open Space Program could be reviewed in light of mitigation considerations and rationalized as part of a mitigation plan. 3. The Stormwater Management Program could be reviewed as part of the city's overall Hazard Mitigation Plan. Projects and programs should be reviewed to identify possible HMGP grant opportunities that might support stormwater management programs. 4. Relocation of the ComIT Data Center. 5. The city should review its Floodplain Management Program to ensure that stakeholders, as well as program activities, are current and appropriate for the city. 6. The city should evaluate its Site Plan Review Process to consider the vulnerabilities of natural, as well as man-made disasters. This analysis should be made part of the review process and include mitigation and preparedness issues, where appropriate. 7. The city should consider the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code's current status and determine iflobbying might be appropriate to increase the code's strength. 8. Encourage critical businesses and service agencies to consider mitigation planning and project development to include emergency quick connects and emergency generators. 9. The city should review its property maintenance and renovation programs to ensure mitigation programs and concepts are integrated into its operations. HMGP grants are ways to improve property protection and maintenance, such as elevating structures. 10. The city wishes to continue its program of providing emergency power quick connect capabilities to its sewer pump stations to support extended power outages. 11. The city might work with Dominion Virginia Power to explore strategies for putting utilities underground to decrease their vulnerability. 12. The city should identify and consider a program to continue the hardening and retrofitting of critical facilities. 13. Mitigation Capital Improvement Program: The city may consider, as part of the CIP process, initiatives to identify funds for projects and to harden critical facilities, as well as other mitigation projects under the HMGP program. 14. Subject to funding becoming available, the city will consider programming emergency power quick connect projects for the city's critical facilities. These facilities consist of critical city buildings, sewer and storm water pump stations where service disruption to these facilities would be minimized to ensure better services and community protection. 15. The city should expand its public education programs and activities to ensure that disaster preparedness information is made available to the public. 16. The city should continue with the CERT and Medical Reserve Corps (MRC) Programs for the integration into the overall emergency preparedness community. 17. The city might consider a flood insurance education program to ensure that the public is aware of and receives information to make an informed decision about flood insurance. 18. The city might consider business education programs to encourage businesses to plan for disasters and disaster recovery. Planning support for internal, as well as external organizations should be considered. City of Virginia Beach Hazard Mitigation Plan Abstract July 18, 2006 19. Purchase and install flashing beacon alert signs (14) to notify motorists when new or updated emergency messages are available via the city's low power AM Radio system. The city's VBAM 1680 was installed in the late summer of 2005 provides warnings and notifications. 20. Continue to build upon the communications systems to advance interoperability within the city and the region. 21. Public Information Operation Emergency Power: Install a generator for Building 22 to power equipment for the 24/7 non-emergency contact center. 22. The city should consider the identification of existing critical intersections for emergency power and quick connect for wiring 80 intersections out of 220. 23. Upgrade backup power plant for the Municipal Center PBX phone switching station to avoid loss of telephone service when commercial power fails. This switching station provides telephone service to the Municipal Center Campus including multiple remote sites, as well as the future E911 phone service. 24. The city will work with the COE and federal government to ensure the maintenance of the Hurricane Protection Project and other maintained beaches within the city. The Virginia Beach-specific mitigation strategies outlined in this plan are not concrete. This is a living document subject to change. The intent is to keep mitigation at the forefront of future city planning. Also, DMA 2000 does not require action within the prescribed timeframe; goals are contingent upon available funding. Plan Adoption / Maintenance To ensure the Plan remains a relevant local planning document that is implemented and routinely reviewed and updated, as necessary. At a minimum, the plan must be evaluated, updated and resubmitted to the State Hazard Mitigation Officer every five years. Documentation Thorough documentation on the planning process used to prepare the Plan is included, as required by the State and FEMA. Plan implementation involves the completion of proposed mitigation actions, including policies and projects. AUTHORITY Section 322, Mitigation Planning, of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as enabled by Section 104 of the Disaster Mitigation Act of2000 (P.L. l06-390) and by FEMA's Interim Final Rule published in the Federal Register on February 26, 2002, at 44 CFR Part 201. City of Virginia Beach Hazard Mitigation Plan Abstract July 18, 2006 - 34 - Item v'J.5a/b/c/d/e ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM #55589 Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Council Lady Wilson, City Council ADOPTED: Ordinances to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE: a. $631,452 to the Clerk of the Circuit Court's FY 2006-07 Technology Trust Fund re courtroom technology expenses b. $284,192 in additional income from the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) to the Department of Housing and Neighborhood Preservation's FY2006-07 Operating Budget re the creation of affordable rental housing for low- and moderate-income households c. $102,106 from the United States Department of Justice's Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant and $28,000 of Asset Forfeiture Funds re public safety support and criminal processing d. $101,067 from the United States Department of Homeland Security to the Fire Department's FY 2006-07 Operating Budget re Fire and EMS station alerting capabilities e. $78,949 in United States Department of Criminal Justice Services state grantfunding to the Department of Human Services FY 2006-07 Operating Budget re growing caseloads Voting: 11-0 (By Consent) Council Members Voting Aye: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M Dyer, Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None September 12,2006 1 2 3 4 5 AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE $631,452 TO THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT'S FY 2006-07 TECHNOLOGY TRUST FUND WHEREAS, the State of Virginia Compensation Board has 6 modified its reimbursement format for the Clerk of the Circuit 7 Court's Technology Trust Fund. 8 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY 9 OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: 10 That $631,452 in additional State revenue is hereby 11 accepted and appropriated to the Clerk of the Circuit Court's FY 12 2006-07 Technology Trust Fund to cover the cost of courtroom 13 technology, with State revenue increased accordingly. 14 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, 15 Virginia on the 12th day of September , 2006. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: ~~t q~r~ ,-J~ (' K- ~/.( ^ City Attorney's ffice CA10140 V:\applications\citylawprod\cycom32\Wpdocs\D030\P001\O0019550.DOC R-2 August 31, 2006 d-.<::,.q.-Ub; 11: :d/AIVl; ;456 56B6 # 2/ 2 MC7S COIN BUDGET REQUEST V.08012006 FY: 2007 LOC: 810 OFF: 321 VIRGINIA BEACH CITY $4 BUDGET REQUEST FOR SERVICES 2006-08-23 12:31 $4 AVAILABLE BALANCE: $ 631,452 SEL VENDOR NAME SERVICE DESCRIPTION PURPOSE CODE TOTAL COST AMC1ID INSTALL NEW CMS F 500000 AMC1ID INSTALL NEW CMS. F 500000 . . AHCAD MAINTENANCE BIV 123000 AMCAD MAINTENANCE BIV 12'3000 .' AMCAD EQUIP/SOFTWARE/CONV BIll 8452 AMCAD EQUIP/SOFTWARE/CONV BIll 8452 TOTAL $4 EQUIPMENT/ SERVICES REQUESTED: $ '631,452 $4 REMAINING BALANCE: $' 0 SELECT () A=ADD U=UPDATE D=DELETE . 0003 THERE IS-NO AVAILABLE TtmNOVER BALANCE LEFT, YOU C1\NNO'l' ADD REQUESTS Fl=HELP F2=AUTH BDG F3=MENU F4=TOTALS F7~PREV F8=NEXT F12=MAIN 1 2 3 4 5 6 AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $284,192 IN ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM INCOME TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION'S FY 2006-07 OPERATING BUDGET 7 WHEREAS, more program revenue will be realized ln the 8 Department of Housing and Neighborhood Preservation's Conununity 9 Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program due to the return of unspent 10 funding previously allocated to the Virginia Beach Conununity 11 Development Corporation for a home-ownership program for low- and 12 moderate-income households. 13 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 14 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: 15 That $284,192 from program income is hereby appropriated to 16 the Department of Housing and Neighborhood Preservation's FY 2006- 17 07 Operating Budget to provide additional funding to the Virginia 18 Beach Conununity Development Corporation's Acquisition and 19 Rehabilitation of Rental Housing Program to create additional 20 affordable rental housing for low- and moderate-income households, 21 with estimated revenue from program income increased accordingly. 22 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, 23 Virginia, on the 12th day of september, 2006. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: Management Services APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: 10~JO, / a ,Uyi , 1 f-.)( , --!L -' IA,~ CitY Attorney's Offgce ~ CAI0135 V:\applications\citylawprod\cycom32\Wpdocs\D030\P001\OO019533.DOC R-4 August 31, 2006 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE $102,106 FROM THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT AND APPROPRIATE $28,000 OF ASSET FORFEITURE FUNDS FOR THE PURPOSES OF SUPPORTING PUBLIC SAFETY AND IMPROVING CRIMINAL PROCESSING 9 WHEREAS, the United States Department of Justice has 10 authorized a 2006 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance grant 11 of $102,106 to the City of Virginia Beach. 12 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY 13 OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: 14 1. That $102,106 is hereby accepted from the U.S. 15 Department of Justice and appropriated to the following agencies 16 and departments in the amounts and for the purposes set forth 17 below: 18 a. $4,575 to the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court for 19 an information kiosk display. 20 b. $33,000 to the Police Department for new evidence 21 storage and presentation equipment. 22 c. $3,241 to the Magistrate for a new laptop to assist with 23 processing defendants. 24 d. $13,290 to the Sheriff's Department for new presentation 25 equipment at the Law Enforcement Training Academy. 26 e. $20,000 to the Community Corrections program for 27 contracted manpower clerical support. 28 f. $28,000 to the Commonwealth's Attorney to fund 50% of an 29 additional FTE for asset forfeiture. 30 2. That estimated revenue from the Federal Government in 31 the 2006-07 Operating Budget is hereby increased by $102,106. 32 3. That one additional FTE is added to the Commonwealth's 33 Attorney's FY 2006-07 Operating Budget. This position will 34 terminate one year from the date of hire. 35 4. That estimated revenue from asset forfeiture is 36 increased by $28,000 and $28,000 in estimate revenue from asset 37 forfeiture is hereby appropriated to the Commonwealth's 38 Attorney's FY 2006-07 Operating Budget to pay 50% of the costs 39 of the additional FTE for asset forfeiture. 40 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, 41 Virginia on the 12th day of September, 2006. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: J1a;JQ- ,~/wru f. K . .ivl U/l_ City Attorney's Of~ice CA10134 V:\applications\citylawprod\cycom32\WpdocS\D030\P001\OO019513.DOC R-3 August 31, 2006 DeparhnentofJustice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Assistance Office of Justice Programs Washington. D.C. 20531 August 25, 2006 Mr. James Spore City of Virginia Beach 2501 James Madison Blvd. Municipal Center Virginia Beach, VA 23456-9120 Dear Mr. Spore: On behalf of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, it is my pleasure to inform you that the Office of Justice Programs has approved your application for funding under the FY 2006 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program in the amount of $1 02, I 06 for City of Virginia Beach. Enclosed you will find the Grant Award and Special Conditions documents. This award is subject to all administrative and financial requirements, including the timely submission of all financial and programmatic reports, resolution of all interim audit findings, and the maintenance of a minimum level of cash-on-hand. Should you not adhere to these requirements, you will be in violation of the terms of this agreement and the award will be subject to termination for cause or other administrative action as appropriate. If you have questions regarding this award, please contact: - Program Questions, Tahitia M. Barringer, Program Manager at (202) 616-3294; and - Financial Questions, the Office of the Comptroller, Customer Service Center (CSC) at (800) 458-0786, or you may contact the CSC at ask.oc@usdoj.gov. Congratulations, and we look fOIWard to working with you. Sincerely, d),jl--o Domingo S. Herraiz Director, Bureau of Justice Assistance Enclosures 1 2 3 4 5 AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE $101,067 FROM THE U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT'S FY 2006-07 OPERATING BUDGET TO COMPLETE STATION ALERTING IN FIRE AND EMS STATIONS 6 WHEREAS, the City has been awarded pass-through funding 7 from the U. S. Department of Homeland Security to support the 8 response to and coordination of Weapons of Mass Destruction 9 events. 10 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY 11 OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: 12 1. That $101,067 is hereby accepted from the U.S. 13 Department of Homeland Security and appropriated to the Fire 14 Department's FY 2006-07 Operating Budget to finalize station 15 alerting in Fire and EMS stations, with revenue from the federal 16 government increased accordingly; and, 17 2. That James K. Spore, City Manager, or his designee, is 18 hereby authorized to execute for and in behalf of the City of 19 Virginia Beach, a public entity established under the laws of the 20 State of Virginia, this application and to file it in the 21 appropriate State Office for the purpose of obtaining certain 22 Federal financial assistance under the OJP, National Domestic 23 Preparedness Office Grant Program(s), administered by the 24 Commonwealth of Virginia; and 25 3 . That the Virginia Beach City Council, a public entity 26 established under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 27 hereby authorizes its agent to provide to the Commonwealth and 28 to the Office of Justice Programs (OJP) for all matters 29 pertaining to such Federal financial assistance any and all 30 information pertaining to these Grants as may be requested. 31 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, 32 Virginia, on the 12th day of September ,2006. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: 1j~Q. ~JJ~f jJ. t,~!v. / City Attorney's 0 ~ce CA10136 V:\applications\citylawprod\cycom32\Wpdocs\D030\P001\OO019535.DOC R-2 August 30, 2006 MICHAEL M CLINE Slate Coordmatof COMMONWEALTH oj' VIRGINIA Department of Emergency lvfanagement 10501 Trade Court Richmond, VirgJM.23236-3713 (804) 897-6500 {TOO) 674-2417 FAX {8(4) 897-6500 JANET L CLEMENTS Deputy COOrdinator JAf,JlES IN, KECI< Deputy Coordinator March 31, 2006 Mr. James K. Spore City Manager Virginia Beach City 2401 Courthouse Drive Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Dear Mr. Spore: The Virginia Department of Emergency Management (VDEM) is pleased to announce an additional allocation of the 2005 State Homeland Security Program (SHSP), CFDA # 97.067 from the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Office of Grants and Training. The 2005 Grant is designed to provide equipment, training, planning. and exercises for first responders to develop better preparedness to prevent, respond and recover from potential acts of terrorism. DHS intends to guide state and local security and preparedness efforts toward a project-oriented process to address common measurable objectives. VDEM strongly encourages each community to employ regional approaches to planning and preparedness and to adopt regional response structures whenever appropriate to meet the needs identified through the assessments and in the Commonwealth's Homeland Security Strategy. Each of the seven regions in the Commonwealth has been allocated $402,762; which has been divided between the jurisdictions within each region on a per capita basis. Your community has been allocated a total of $101.067.00. This funding must be used according to the requirements specified by DHS. A copy of the directions and guidance provided by the Department of Homeland Security may be found in attachment one (1). You will notice that the Approved Equipment List is in combination with other programs, the SHSP approved equipment is listed ONLY in the first (1~ column. Compliance with the rules and conditions set forth by DHS is mandatory. Under the preparedness enhancement portion of this 2005 grant award. subgrantees are allowed to spend funds in four (4) areas of need in First Responder Preparedness_ They are as follows: 1. Equipment Acquisition 2. Training 3. Planning 4. Exercise "fVorkil1g to Protect People, Propert)' and Our Communities" Mr. Spore March 31, 2006 Page 2 Completion of the Bi-Annual Strategic Report (BSIR) report will also be required until the end of the grant period. In addition to the BSIR, the regular grant application forms must be completed and returned to VDEM by June 1,2006. Funds will not be released until we have received forms from your locality. With the 2005 Grant, the Commonwealth will only send grant funds to a sub-grantee a maximum of 120 days prior to purchase of allowable expenditures. To accomplish this, VDEM will forward a "Request for Drawdown" form once you have completed your application process. You may request all of your funds at one time, or spread your request out over the grant period up to a maximum of 5 drawdowns. You must use this form for each request and, as you will see, the form is designed to result in your new balance after each drawdown request. You will need to attach a list of what you are planning to purchase to each request. Please note that the form is to be signed each time and mailed to us. Paid invoices for drawdown amounts are due no later than 140 days from the drawdown request date. As with other DHS grants, your locality is required to retain and submit to VDEM a copy of your paid invoices to complete your grant file and be compliant with the grant rules and audit requirements. As soon as a payment is made, please forward your paid invoice copies to VDEM. Taking action right away, we believe, will help minimize confusing one grant for another. You have until January 31. 2007, to obligate your funds under the DHS 2005 State Homeland Security Program. The original paid invoices and receiving reports will reside with your purchasing office with copies provided to VDEM. These reports should be held for at least three years after the end of the grant period and are subject to audit by DHS and/or the Commonwealth of Virginia. This award is subject to all administrative and financial requirements, including the timely submission of all financial and programmatic reports, resolution of all interim audit findings. Should you not adhere to these requirements, you will be in violation of the terms of this agreement and the award will be subject to termination for cause or other administrative action as appropriate. Attached you will find the Special Conditions document. Please initial the Special Condition oaae and submit it with your arant application packaae. I appreciate your prompt attention to this matter. You are encouraged to contact Julian Gilman, Cheryl Adkins, or Joann Maher at (804) 897-6500 for help with this grant or if you need any additional information_ Sincerely, ~~ffC~ Michael M_ Cline MMC/JDG/cj Cc: The Honorable Robert P. Crouch, Jr., Assistant to the Governorfor Commonwealth Preparedness The Honorable John W_ Marshall, Secretary of Public Safety Ms. Janet Clements, Chief Deputy State Coordinator Mr. James W. Keck, Administrative Deputy State Coordinator Mrs. Linda l. Coleman, Chief Financial Officer Attachments "Working to Protect People, Property ami Our Communities" 1 AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRITATE $78,949 IN 2 DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES STATE 3 GRANT FUNDING TO ADDRESS GROWING CASELOADS 5 WHEREAS, the Department of Criminal Justice Services awarded the 6 Department of Human Services an additional $78,949 in state grant 7 funding to address growing caseloads. 8 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 9 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: 10 (1) That $78,949 in state grant funds is hereby accepted from the 11 Department of Criminal Justice Services and appropriated to the FY 12 2006-07 Human Services Operating Budget to address growing caseloads, 13 with state revenue increased accordingly. 14 (2) That one FTE, a Pre-Trial probation Officer I, with fringe 15 benefits, is added to the Department of Human Services for the 16 duration of the grant. 17 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, 18 on the 12th day of September , 2006. Requires an affirmative vote by a majority of the members of the City Council. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: ~ ~ K. .~Lv- City Attorney's 0 ice Management Services CAI0139 V:\applications\citylawprod\cycom32\Wpdocs\D030\P001\OO019540.DOC R-3 September 6, 2006 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Leonard G. Cooke Director Department of Criminal Justice Services July 14, 2006 202 N. Ninth Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 (804) 786-4000 FAX (804) 371-8981 TDD (804) 386-8732 Mr. James K. Spore City Manager City of Virginia Beach 2401 Courthouse Drive Virginia Beach, VA 23456 q !' llll dUL 1 '-> 2006 Title: Community Corrections .', '~".i Dear Mr. Spore: The original grant award information, dated July 10, 2006, has been revised to reflect an increase in the total amount of awarded funds for fiscal year 2007. Enclosed you will find a "revised' Statement of Grant Award. To indicate your acceptance of the award and the special conditions (previously submitted), please sign the award acceptance and return it to Janice Waddy, Grants Administrator, at the Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS). Please review the conditions carefully; as some require action on your part before we will disburse grant funds. . !'.',', ~ We appreciate your interest in this grant program and will be happy to assist you in any way we can to assure your project's success. If you have any questions, please call Paula Harpster at (804) 786-1140. Yours very truly, ~~~},u~d~ Grants Administrator Enclosures cc: Ms. Sharon Jones, Supervisor Ms. Patricia K. Phillips, Finance Director Ms. Paula Harpster, DCJS Criminal Justice Service Board, Committee on Training' Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice Advisory Committee to Court Appointed Special Advocate and Children's Justice Act Ptograms Private Security Services Advisoty Board' Criminal Justice Information Systems Committee Department of Crimina I Justice Services 202 North 9th Street, 5th Floor, Richmond, V A 23219 Statement of Grant A~ard/Acceptance Subgrantee: Va Beach City Date: July 14, 2006 Grant Period: From: 07/01/2006 Through: 06)30/2007 Grant Number: 07-K6355CC07 Project Director Project Adminis trator Finance Officer Ms. Sharon Jones Mr. James K. Spore Ms. Patricia K. Phillips Supervisor City Manager Finance Director City of Virginia Beach City of Virginia Beach City of Virginia Beach 2425 Nimmo Parkway 2401 Courthouse Drive 2401 Courthouse Drive Virginia Beach, VA 23462 Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Phone: (757) 385-4689 Phone: (757) 385-4242 Phone: (757) 385-4681 Email: sjjones@vbgov.com Email: Jspore@vbgov.cOln Email: PPhillips@vbgov.com Grant Award Budget DCJS Funds Budget Categories Federal State Locality Match TOTALS Consultant $0 $0 $0 $0 . Equipment $0 $0 $0 $0 Indirect Cost $0 $0 $0 $0 Personnel $0 $0 $0 $0 Supplies/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 Travel $0 $0 $0 $0 Totals $0 $945,755 $0 $945,755 This grant is subject to all rules, regulations, and criteria included in the grant guidelines and the special conditions attached thereto. l. f'\ (J .~~<O. ~ Leonard G. Cooke, Director The undersigned, having received the Statement of Grant Award/Acceptance and the Conditions attached thereto, does hereby accept this grant and agree to the conditions pertaining thereto, this day of , 20 . /d;. '_') -' ) ~ j ..- '. ,- ,d ,I .....r/ -oJ 1._' r; r/'; . / ('lvClUett t.::;,. ZG{Lll:fJY} n j. ',r1 . (> -~. . _ {)O IrllfCt (}.,.... .....S+d-,H Signature: Title: - 35 - Item v'J.6. ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM #55590 Upon motion by Council Lady Wilson, seconded by Councilman Villanueva, City Council ADOPTED, Pages 1-32 of the 2007 Community Legislative Agenda*: Resolution re the 2007 Community Legislative Agenda and REQUEST the local Delegation to the General Assembly sponsor and/or support legislation that will realize the goals and objectives set forth therein. *DELETING Item 1 Bifurcated Tax Rate re City of Virginia Beach Non-Funding Items. Voting: 10-0 Council Members Voting Aye: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M Henley*, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan *, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: Harry E. Diezel Council Ladies Henley and McClanan verbally voted NAY on the Charter Amendment re City Council and School Board Elections (Charter Changes - Item 2) September 12, 2006 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CITY'S 2007 COMMUNITY LEGISLATIVE AGENDA, WHICH INCLUDES PROPOSED CITY CHARTER AMENDMENTS, AND REQUESTING THAT THE CITY'S LOCAL DELEGATION TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY SPONSOR AND/OR SUPPORT LEGISLATION THAT WOULD CARRY OUT THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES SET FORTH THEREIN WHEREAS, the City Council traditionally adopts a Community 12 Legislative Agenda and requests member of the City's local 13 Delegation to the General Assembly sponsor and/or support 14 legislation therein; and 15 WHEREAS, the City Council has considered a number of goals 16 and objectives for inclusion in the city's 2007 Community 17 Legislative Agenda; and 18 WHEREAS, the 2007 Community Legislative Agenda includes 19 proposed amendments to the City Charter, and such amendments 20 were the subject of a properly advertised public hearing; 21 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 22 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: 23 That the City Council hereby adopts the City's 2007 24 Community Legislative Agenda, which is attached hereto and is 25 hereby incorporated by reference. 26 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 27 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: 28 That the City's Delegation to the General Assembly is 29 hereby requested to sponsor and/or support legislation in the 30 2007 Session of the General Assembly that would carry out the 31 goals and obj ecti ves of the City as set forth in its Community 32 Legislative Agenda. 33 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 34 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: 35 That the City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a copy 36 of this resolution to each member of the City's local Delegation 37 to the General Assembly, along with a publisher's affidavit 38 showing that the public hearing for the proposed charter 39 amendments was advertised and a certified copy of the minutes 40 from today's meeting that reflects the action taken during the 41 advertised public hearing. 42 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, 43 Virginia, this 12th day of September , 2006. APPROVED TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: ~~ City Attorney's Office CA10142 V:\applications\citylawprod\cycom32\Wpdocs\D030\P001\00019557.DOC R-3 September 6, 2006 COMMUNITY LEGISLATIVE AGENDA GENERAL ASSEMBLY' SEsSION 2007 CITY OF fflR6/NIA BEACH BUILD/N6 '~ COMMUNrrYFOR A LIFETIME" MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING ONE 2401 COURTHOUSE DRIVE, SUITE 234 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA 23456 Adopted by City Council September 12, 2006 2007 COMMUNITY LEGISLATIVE AGENDA CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # TABLE OF CONTENTS - 1-2 PREFACE - 3-4 CHARTER CHANGES - 5-7 1. Abandoned Retail Establishments 5 2. City Council and School Board Elections 5-7 3. Photo Red Light Enforcement 7 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH NON-FUNDING ITEMS - 8-20 1. Confidentiality of Juvenile Justice Records - Gang Activity 8 2. Civil Penalties for Fire Code Violations 8-10 3. Child Endangerment from Illegal Fireworks 10 4. Transfer of Property for Laskin Road Improvement Project 11 5. Loss of Medicaid Eligibility for Teens in Foster Care with Earned Income 11 6. Medicaid Coverage for Out of State Residential Placements 12 Review of Applications for State or Federal Funds or Services Used in 7. Substance Abuse Programs 12-13 8. Workforce Housing - Amendment to Virginia Code Section 15.2-2304 13 9. Recommendation for JLARC to Do a Comprehensive Study ofVRS 14 Benefits 10. Better Reporting ofVRS Actuarial Data to Localities 14 11. Unclaimed Property Program 15 12. Patrol and Enforcement of Federal Safety and Restricted Zones 15 13. Carrying a Concealed Weapon 16 14. Background Investigations of Law Enforcement Applicants 16 15. Required Crash Reports 16-17 16. Pawn Shop, Records and Property 17 17. Definitions of "Criminal Street Gang" and "Predicate Criminal Act" 17 -18 18. Endorsement of Governor Kaine's Enhancing Opportunities for Small, 18 Women and Minority Owned Businesses 19. Downsizing of State Facilities for Mental Health and Mental Retardation 19 20. Tax Relief for Senior Citizens - Constitutional Amendment 19-20 21. Creation of State Insurance "Wind Pool" 20 Page 1 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH FUNDING ISSUES - 1. Group Home Beds in the Locality for Youth Needing Out of Home Placement 2. CSA Administrative Allocation 3. Support for Additional State General Fund Dollars for Mental Health Programs 4. Funding for the Virginia Beach Juvenile Detention Center 5. State Aid to Virginia Public Libraries 6. Info-Powering the Commonwealth 7. Virginia Beach and Tee Lifelong Learning Center 8. Sheriffs Work Release Facility 9. Transportation 10. Virginia Aquarium, Marine Science Center Marine Animal Research & Conservation Initiatives 11. Virginia Beach Convention Center Funding 12. Contemporary Art Center of Virginia Funding 13. The Sandler Center for the Performing Arts Funding Page 2 Page # 21-31 21 22 22-23 23 23 24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 29-30 30-31 2007 COMMUNITY LEGISLATIVE AGENDA CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH PREFACE The 2007 General Assembly Session will be a very important Session for local governments and the Commonwealth at large. Although the General Assembly was able, after much consternation, to adopt a budget for the biennium, there still remains much to be done on the budget and other issues during the 2007 Session. Recently, for instance, localities were made aware of the miscalculation in the amount money that would be available for school systems due to an error in accounting of sales tax revenue to local governments and the Commonwealth. Although the General Assembly has pledged to make localities "whole" for the first year of the biennium (including the $6 million loss that would have accrued to the school system in Virginia Beach) they have not been as forthcoming about making the school systems whole in the second year of the biennium where the City estimates it would cost the City $8 million. This should be priority number one for the Commonwealth when the 2007 Session begins. Although the sky rocketing real estate assessments in the past several years have certainly moderated, especially in Northern Virginia where according to newspaper accounts the next increases will be less than 3%, there will still likely be pressure on the General Assembly to limit local government taxation powers. The City of Virginia Beach, as well as most local governments throughout Hampton Roads, remains ardently opposed to such a limitation. The City reduced the real estate tax rate by $1.22 to $0.99 since 2005, thereby reducing the yield of the real estate tax by $103 million. As was stated in the 2006 Community Legislative Agenda, "City Council does not need the assistance of the General Assembly to set property tax rates, to allow homestead exemptions or to cap assessment increases. City Council responds to its citizens and their concerns." As has been stated in the Community Legislative Agenda many times, if the General Assembly fully funded the true cost of state mandated government functions, such as education, courts, corrections, mental health and social services, then local governments could reduce the real estate burden markedly. For instance, in the City of Virginia Beach we currently put over $161.4 million into education above and beyond what is required by the Standards of Quality. This equals approximately $0.29 on our real estate tax rate. Although the General Assembly calls this local aspirations, our citizens and the parents of children in our school system demand a quality educational experience with high- standardized test scores to meet the Standards of Learning (SOL). If the General Assembly fully funded the true cost of education for instance, this would allow the City the option to reduce the real estate tax rate by $0.29 in FY 2008. Another example is that City Council is required to match the salaries of every deputy in the Sheriffs department and pay the total salaries of 55 deputies. This is so that our Sheriff, Page 3 a state official, can successfully recruit and reclaim deputies who provide a much-needed public safety service. Again as mentioned in last year's Community Legislative Agenda, the State should fully fund State services before it considers limiting the localities ability to provide the necessary funding to keep State services in satisfactory operation. The General Assembly also failed during the 2006 Session to address the under funding of the car tax relief program. When the car tax was capped during the 2004 General Assembly session there was approximately $270 million of under funding in car tax reimbursements to localities. This means that localities like Virginia Beach, who are so- called "spring billers", are reimbursed from the following fiscal year, instead of the year in which the year the car tax relief is provided. The General Assembly should fix this budget inaccuracy immediately. Localities would not be allowed to pay for current fiscal year liabilities with future fiscal years revenue. Finally, the General Assembly has not addressed the transportation issue, although a Special Session of the General Assembly may happen before the start of the 2007 Regular Session - it still remains highly likely that this action will leave transportation woefully under funded. As the City has repeatedly expressed, a statewide transportation revenue shortfall of close to $1 billion per year exists. Unless this is addressed soon the City will see even more pronounced cutbacks in the amount of urban allocation funds available to the City, for roads such as Nimmo Pkwy, Princess Anne Road, Witchduck Road Interchange, Witchduck Road improvements, Lynnhaven Parkway improvements, Shore Drive improvements, etc. Furthermore, the General Assembly will likely inadequately address the needs identified by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). There is still $275 million in long-term revenues needed in the region as well as the ability to toll both new and existing parallel facilities. The General Assembly also needs not to interpose its will in the Federal mandated MPO process. Prioritizing Route 460 for instance, as a higher priority than 1-64 on the Southside, makes little sense. Allowing travelers to utilize an improved Route 460 to then be stuck on four lanes of a very congested highway along 1-64 in Chesapeake is counter intuitive and makes little sense. This is also true if a new Southeastern Parkway and Greenbelt was constructed and then to be hamstrung by an unimproved 1-64 in Chesapeake. Finally, transportation funding should not be done at the cost of funding other State services. New revenues need to be found for transportation rather than stealing from under funded services as mentioned above, such as, education, public health, corrections, etc. Page 4 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH 2007 CHARTER CHANGES 1. SCREENING ABANDONED ESTABLISHMENTS - CHARTER CHANGE Andy Friedman Department Director Housinf? and Neif?hborhood Preservation Background Information: There are numerous abandoned retail and commercial properties on main intersections in Virginia Beach. These abandoned structures become blighted and require continuous attention from Code Enforcement for Code violations. The utilization of "spot blight" procedures against these properties is too limited, requiring acquisition as the final, expensive and time consuming, option. Request: The General Assembly is requested to amend the charter to authorize the City to require the addition of landscape screening for retail and commercial properties that have been abandoned for three (3) years or more in certain designated areas of the city. 2. CITY COUNCIL AND SCHOOL BOARD ELECTIONS - CHARTER CHANGE Les Lilley City Attorney City of Virf?inia Beach Background Information: On June 27, 2006, City Council adopted an ordinance that amended City Code S 2-15 to provide that City Council and School Board elections shall take place during the general election in November 2008 and during the November general election in even years thereafter. This ordinance was adopted pursuant to Virginia Code S 24.2-222.1. Pursuant to that section, Council Members whose term of office expires on June 30 shall continue in office until their successors take office on January 1. Request: Although the City Code has been amended to provide for November elections, the City Charter references May elections. The General Assembly should amend the City's Charter as follows: Page 5 Sec. 3.02:1. Election of Council Members. There shall be a general election on the first Tuesday in May in e':en nl:1mbered years for the election of cOl:1neilmembers to replace those whose terms expire at the end of Jl:1ne of that year. Pursuant to an ordinance adopted by City Council on June 27, 2006, City Council elections shall take place during the general election in November 2008, and during the November general election in even years thereafter, for councilmembers whose terms expire at the end of December of that year. Councilmembers, including the mayor, whose terms expire as of June 30, 2008 or June 30, 20 I 0 shall continue in office until their successors have been elected at the November election and take office on January 1. The term of office for each council member shall commence on :H:Hy January 1 next following the date of election and shall continue until his successor has been duly elected and qualified. Each candidate shall state, at the time of filing, whether he is running at-large, from the district of his residence or for mayor. Candidates for council shall be nominated only by petition in the manner prescribed by general law . Sec. 3.02:2. Election of mayor. The mayor shall be elected at the general election on the first Tl:1esday in May 1988 in November 2008, and each fourth year thereafter, to serve for a term of four years. Candidates for mayor shall run for one of the at-large seats. A candidate running for mayor shall not run for any other seat. In the event any councilman, including the mayor, shall decide during his term of office to be a candidate for mayor, he shall tender his resignation as a councilman not less than ten days prior to the date for the filing of petitions as required by general law. Such resignation shall be effective on June 30 December 31, shall constitute the councilman's intention to run for mayor, shall require no formal acceptance by the remaining couneilmen councilmembers and shall be final and irrevocable when tendered. The unexpired portion of the term of any eouncilman councilmember who has resigned to run for mayor shall be filled at the same general election. Sec. 16.04. Election of the board. A. ,^.t the general election held in May of 1991, the qualified voters of the city shall elect one board member from each of the boroughs of Bayside, Kempsville, Lynnhaven, and Pungo for terms of four years, and two at large members for terms of four years. ,^.t the general election held in May of 1996, the ql:1alified voters of the eity shall eleet one board member from each of the borol:1ghs of Blaekv:ater, Prineess ;\nne, and Virginia Beach for terms of tv: 0 years, and two at large members for terms of four years. Beginning with the general election held in May of 1998, a All board members shall be elected in the same manner and according to the same schedule that councilmembers are elected. Thereafter, all board members SHall Be elected.. for terms of four years. Beginning in 1998, and Page 6 every two years thereafter, there shall be a general election in May for the eleetioH of board members to replaee those v..hose terms expire at the end of June of a given eleetioH year. The term of office for each elected board member shall commence on the first day of :ffily January next following the date of election and shall continue until a successor has been duly elected and qualified. Pursuant to an ordinance adopted bv City Council on June 27. 2006. board members whose terms expire as of June 30. 2008 or June 30. 20 I 0 shall continue in office until their successors have been elected at the November election and take office on January 1. Each candidate shall state at the time of filing whether he is running at large or from the borough of his residence. B. Each of the eleven elected board members shall be elected by the voters of the city at large. 3. PHOTO RED LIGHT ENFORCEMENT - CHARTER CHANGE Virginia Beach Police Department Background Information: Red light running, which is defined as the act of a motorist entering an intersection after the traffic signal has turned red, caused almost 5,000 crashes in Virginia in 2003, resulting in at least 18 deaths and more than 3,800 injuries. (VDOT, 2004) Annually, the costs incurred by the City of Virginia Beach are over 2.5 million dollars in societal damages. Red light cameras can reduce crashes. Fairfax, V A had a 41 % reduction of red light related violations and crashes after the first year of implementation (National Cooperative Highway Research Program). The City of Virginia Beach's photo enforcement program titled PHOTOSafe Virginia Beach showed similar results. Over 80% of the City of Virginia Beach's residents indicated that they were in favor of the Photo Red Light Enforcement Program as indicated in a statically valid poll. Request: The General Assembly is requested to amend the charter of Virginia Beach to allow a Photo Red Light Enforcement Program in the City. This program would include all the safe guards built into the enabling legislation proposed in the 2006 Session. Page 7 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH 2007 NON-FuNDING ITEMS 1. CONFIDENTIALITY OF JUVENILE JUSTICE RECORDS - GANG ACTIVITY Police Department Human Services Department Background Information: Virginia Code S 16.1-300.A.6 requires law enforcement officers, school officials, and probation officers that have a legitimate interest in a juvenile case to obtain a court order before being allowed access to the social, medical, psychiatric and psychological reports and records of children who are or have been: before a court, under court supervision, receiving services from a court service unit, or committed to the Department of Juvenile Justice. A court order is not required for several other officials and agencies that have legitimate interests in a juvenile case. Instead, the law provides strict parameters around the circumstances under which such information may be released to those individuals. Law enforcement officers, school officials, probation officers, and juvenile courts need to be able to immediately share information during the investigation of criminal gang activity. Obtaining court orders every time information is needed is cumbersome and time-consuming and could impair time-sensitive gang-related investigations. Request: The General Assembly is requested to amend the State Code to allow law enforcement officers, probation officers, and school officials' access to juvenile court records when such officials are conducting an investigation into gang activity involving a specific juvenile. 2. CIVIL PENALTIES FOR FIRE CODE VIOLATIONS Chief Greg Cade Fire Department Background Information: The Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code (SFPC) provides for the use of summonses for fire code violations when the Fire Official is trained in accordance with the Code of Virginia (s 27-34.2). Violations of the SFPC are Class I misdemeanors (s 27-100). Page 8 Many businesses that become repeat offenders of the Fire Code rotate managers or responsible parties so that when a violation is caught the summons goes to a different person each time. When a magistrate summons is issued to a legal officer of the business the resulting defense is one of denial of responsibility because they were not on site. Summonsing the manager or responsible person who is on site results in a defense that they were acting as directed or that they had no knowledge of the occurrence of the violation of the ability to control the violation. This results in the Fire Official having to issue multiple summonses and or subpoenas to get all of the parties before the judge to sort out responsibility. In many cases since the responsible party is not brought into court they see this as a cost of doing business. This is a burden on the court system and on municipal resources. These cases usually result in multiple continuances with adjudication for a single offense sometimes exceeding eight to twelve months. Request: The General Assembly is requested to provide for civil penalties within the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code (SFPC). The proposal would provide the option for localities that enforce the SFPC to establish a civil penalty process and fee schedule if they elect to use civil penalties. The maximum penalty per violation should be capped at $2500, the maximum fine for a Class I misdemeanor. Civil penalties that could be levied against the business would provide for a greater incentive for the business to comply with the Fire Code. The defendant would be provided due process using the appeals process provided within the Fire Code. The civil penalty, when levied against a business, results in bringing the responsible party forward to either defend the business or pay the penalty. The civil penalty unveils the true responsible party. SAMPLE CIVIL PENALTY SCHEDULE 15t violation $500 2nd violation within 12 calendar months $1000 3rd violation within 12 calendar months $2000 4th and subsequent violations within 12 calendar months $2500 . A jurisdiction would be required to adopt a fee schedule using the ordinance process . All collections of fees would be within the existing framework of tax collection within the jurisdiction . No business or individual could be subjected to a civil penalty and a summons for the same offense . Fees collected would go to the local Fire Official to support enforcement activities Civil penalties provides for an alternative method to address violations of the SFPC and in many instances will eliminate salaried workers from being either charged with a violation of the SFPC or being subpoenaed to court for being in the wrong place at the wrong time. Civil penalties reduce the burden on an already overwhelmed judicial Page 9 system. A civil penalty would provide for a more timely resolve to violations making it less attractive to violate the Code and then manipulate the system while continuing to do business in the same unlawful manner. Civil penalties would, hopefully, result in a safer Commonwealth for our citizens and visitors. 3. CHILD ENDANGERMENT FROM ILLEGAL FIREWORKS Chief Greg Cade Fire Department Background Information: Fireworks are strictly regulated in the Code of Virginia and the Virginia Statewide Fire Prevention Code. The City of Virginia Beach strengthens the Code, declaring all fireworks illegal for use, sale or storage. Fireworks have become an increasing problem in the city on major holidays, such as Memorial Day and Independence Day. The quantity and quality of fireworks has continued to increase with professional quality fireworks being made available to consumers through out-of-state purchases and over the Internet. These fireworks pose a considerable hazard to both life and property. In many instances adults and fall into the hands of children obtain these fireworks. The fireworks problem out paces all enforcement efforts and the problem continues to increase every year. This year there were a number of children treated in emergency facilities across the city as a result of fireworks injuries. Request: The General Assembly is requested to enact mandatory reporting by all emergency medical facilities and Emergency Medical Technicians for all juvenile fireworks injuries. Reports should be filed with Child Protective Services (CPS) with the requirement that CPS forward the information to the local Fire and Police Official for further investigation. The investigation findings would be shared with CPS, and as a joint effort between Law Enforcement, Fire and CPS, each incident would be addresses. The intent of the investigation is to seek out parents who knowingly allow a child to utilize fireworks. The investigation would also help reveal where some of these more dangerous fireworks are coming from with the hope that additional enforcement actions could limit the influx of illegal fireworks into Virginia or may support increasing the penalty to a felony for selling fireworks. The felony charge would allow offenders to be brought to justice when out of state. 4. TRANSFER OF PROPERTY FOR LASKIN ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT James K. Spore City Manager City of Virginia Beach Page 10 Background Information: In the course of designing the Laskin Road Improvement Project east of Birdneck Rd, the City has identified several parcels of land that seem to be owned by the Commonwealth of Virginia. Under existing State law, the State can transfer property through sale or otherwise to localities without General Assembly (GA) approval. The exception to the law is if the property is sub aqueous bottom (basically land below the high water mark) specific legislation needs to be adopted by the GA. There is some doubt as to whether the property needed for the Laskin Road project is indeed sub aqueous bottom. Request: This item is a placed holder for a request for the GA to authorize the sale of sub aqueous bottom needed for the Laskin Road Improvement Project. Such legislation will only be necessary if continued investigation, by both the Commonwealth and the City, determines that the property in question is indeed sub aqueous bottom. Otherwise, the State may transfer the property through sale or otherwise to the City without GA action. 5. Loss OF MEDICAID ELIGIBILITY FOR TEENS IN FOSTER CARE WITH EARNED INCOME Terry Jenkins Department Director Human Services Background information: Under current Virginia law, the local Department of Social Services must discontinue Medicaid to a foster care child between the ages of 19 and 21, if the foster child earns more than $193.74 in gross income per month. These foster children need to have the benefit of Medicaid to cover the cost of their medical expenses, and they also need to have the opportunity to earn income beyond the current limitations. This law appears to be in direct conflict with the independent living program for foster children. The independent living program was designed to assist children in foster care aged 16-21 in becoming self-sufficient. Achieving the goal of self-sufficiency must include the opportunity for youth to earn income that will prepare them for survival in an independent living situation. Request: The General Assembly is requested to direct the Department of Medical Assistance Services to adopt regulations amending title 32.1 of the Code of Virginia to allow foster children between the ages of 19-21 to be exempt from the income limitation, thus allowing them to remain eligible for Medicaid. This would give older foster children the opportunity to earn the income necessary to achieve the goal of self-sufficiency. Page 11 6. MEDICAID COVERAGE FOR OUT OF STATE RESIDENTIAL PLACEMENTS Terry Jenkins Department Director Human Services Background Information: Due to the severity of illness and level of need for many CSA youth needing out of home placement, we are forced to seek residential treatment outside of the state of Virginia. While these children have Medicaid coverage, it is quite difficult to access coverage for these out of state services. Costs for out of state placement frequently exceed $130,000 per year. Medicaid policy states "If a child requires this level of service that is not available in Virginia, an out of state provider may enroll for a specific child for the duration of that admission." The time it takes to go through this child specific enrollment process does not take into account the need for emergency placement, and can take several weeks to authorize. If the locality, in the best interest of the child, proceeds with the placement without preauthorization, they run the risk of having to cover the cost of this stay, despite the fact that the child has Medicaid since there is no guarantee that Medicaid will authorize temporary provider status. This past fiscal year, Medicaid had a freeze on approving out of state providers which further complicated placement issues. Request: The General Assembly is requested to direct the Department of Medical Assistance Services to utilize the same authorization process as is currently used for in -state residential placements for out- of- state placements, provided the locality can assure that there are no willing in-state providers for needed services. 7. REVIEW OF ApPLICATIONS FOR STATE OR FEDERAL FUNDS OR SERVICES USED IN SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROGRAMS Terry Jenkins Department Director Human Services and Community Groups Background Information: In 37.2-311 of the Code of Virginia, states that no state agency that is authorized to issue final approval or disapproval of, or to make a final review and comment on any application for state or federal funds that are to be used in a substance abuse program shall take final action on an application until it is reviewed and commended on by the Department of Mental Health Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services (DMHMRSAS). It further states that every applicant for any federal or state funds to be Page 12 used in connection with any substance abuse program shall submit a copy of the application for review and comment. Request: The General Assembly is requested to amend 37.2-311 of the Code of Virginia to indicate that this provision does not apply to federal government applications made by local governments. 8. WORKFORCE HOUSING - AMENDMENT TO VIRGINIA CODE SECTION 15.2-2304 Andy Friedman Department Director Housing and Neighborhood Preservation and Community Groups Background Information: The Virginia Code currently contains two enabling statutes regarding workforce housing. One statute, Va. Code SI5.2-2304, confers upon the localities to which it applies (those with the urban county executive form of government, Albemarle and Loudon Counties and the City of Alexandria), very general authority to adopt zoning ordinances that provide for an affordable dwelling unit (i.e., workforce housing) program. The other statute, Va. Code S15.2-2305, applies to all other localities including Virginia Beach. It contains numerous limitations upon local workforce housing programs, thereby limiting the City's flexibility in designing and implementing such a program in Virginia beach. Based on work currently underway by the Workforce Housing Subcommittee of the Planning Commission, the ideas being discussed would not be feasible under SI5.2-2305. Although there is no guarantee that these ideas will be adopted by City Council, it is important to have the option available if Council wishes to adopt them. Request: The General Assembly is requested to Amend Virginia Code S 15.2-2304 to add Virginia Beach to the localities that are included within the statute. In addressing the City's workforce housing concerns, the City would greatly benefit from having broader latitude in adopting a workforce-housing program than is allowed under existing law. Page 13 9. RECOMMENDATION FOR JLARC To Do A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF VRS BENEFITS Patti Phillips Department Director Finance Background Information: The Virginia Retirement System has been in place since the 1950s and may not fit the needs of today's workforce. Therefore, we recommend that a thorough examination of retirement benefits be conducted. Request: JLARC is directed to conduct a comprehensive study of VRS benefits to include a review of law enforcement benefits, disability provisions, return-to-work, and defined contribution retirement plans, especially as they relate to attracting and retaining a quality workforce. 10. BETTER REPORTING OF VRS ACTUARIAL DATA TO LOCALITIES Patti Phillips Department Director Finance Background Information: Each locality in VRS receives an annual actuarial evaluation in a standard format. The actuarial evaluation is based on locality specific data, but much of it is not included in the report. This makes it very difficult for a locality to understand the retirement cost of the different classes of covered employees (such as general employees and public safety employees) and the specific assumptions for a locality that are driving its costs (such as job-related disability retirements). A recent study by JLARC concluded that is essential that VRS provide more information to localities and the City of Chesapeake is expressing the same concern. Request: The City of Virginia Beach supports a legislative directive to the Virginia Retirement System to provide local governments with expanded information on VRS costs. Page 14 11. UNCLAIMED PROPERTY PROGRAM Patti Phillips Department Director Finance Background Information: Currently all property presumed abandoned must be reported and remitted to the State Treasurer. This includes all outstanding checks and refunds. The City desires to establish a minimum threshold for reporting escheat and for remitting escheat funds to the State. We are proposing that accounts equal to or less than $15 would not be reported or remitted to the State. This change would save Virginia Beach from reporting over 70% of our escheat accounts, yet only represents about 13% or $8500 of the total dollars remitted. Request: The General Assembly is requested to amend the Code of Virginia to exempt from the requirement to report and remit to the State Treasurer escheat funds of $15 or less. 12. PATROL AND ENFORCEMENT OF FEDERAL SAFETY AND RESTRICTED ZONES Police Department Background Information: The U.S. Coast Guard, under the authority granted in 46 U.S.C. S70l19, has expressed a desire for the Virginia Beach Police Department Marine Patrol to have the ability to enforce safety and restricted security zones. However, state law grants that authority only to the Virginia Marine Police. The Virginia Beach Police Department has a full- time Marine Patrol. In order to better assist the U.S. Coast Guard as vessels pass through the local jurisdiction, the authority to enforce maritime laws and regulations should be extended to the Virginia Beach Police Department Marine Patrol Request: The General Assembly is requested to extend enforcement powers to members of local marine patrol units within their jurisdictional boundaries. Page 15 13. CARRYING A CONCEALED WEAPON Po/ice Department Background Information: There is no law prohibiting a person from carrying an otherwise legal concealed weapon when that person is in the possession of an illegal drug. In the interest of public safety and that of law enforcement, a law should be enacted that would prohibit such possession. Request: The General Assembly is requested to prohibit the possession of a concealed weapon while in the possession of an illegal drug. 14. BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT ApPLICANTS Police Department Background Information: Applicants for law enforcement positions are subject to stringent background investigations prior to employment. Due to the nature of law enforcement and the responsibilities that are associated with it, the public must know that law enforcement administrators have done everything possible to screen potential employees. Unfortunately, current state law prevents the examination of criminal records that were adjudicated when the applicant was a minor. Request: The General Assembly is requested to authorize access of juvenile criminal records to law enforcement officers conducting background checks on law enforcement officer candidates. 15. REQUIRED CRASH REPORTS Police Department Background Information: State law requires that an accident report be filed if the total damage to all involved vehicles exceeds $1000. That trigger amount was set approximately 10 years ago and is much too low based on current cost to repair vehicles. Raising the amount to $2500 would greatly reduce the amount of paperwork necessary at minor accident scenes, reduce the burden on the courts in their attempt to determine fault, and reduce the time officers spend investigating minor accidents. Page 16 Request: The General Assembly is requested to amend Virginia Code S 46.2-373 by increasing the dollar amount that triggers the filing of a mandatory accident report from $1000 to $2500. 16. PAWN SHOP, RECORDS AND PROPERTY Police Department Background Information: All pawnbrokers are required to keep records of each loan or transaction made in the course of business. Although state law requires that specific types of information be collected, it does not currently require the seller to provide a thumbprint. Additionally, the code does not currently authorize the law enforcement agency that provides oversight of the pawn establishment to mandate the format of such reports. A law requiring a person pawning an item to a pawnshop to provide a legible right thumb print at the time of the transaction will enable law enforcement officers to better identifY persons selling or trading stolen merchandise. Additionally, authorizing a local law enforcement agency charged with oversight of pawn shops to designate the format of the required reports will reduce the time and effort expended updating this information in the agency's computer system. Request: The General Assembly is requested to amend Virginia Code S 54.1-4009 to authorize local law enforcement agencies to mandate the format of the required reports and to require persons pawning items to provide a legible right thumbprint. 17. DEFINITIONS OF "CRIMINAL STREET GANG" AND "PREDICATE CRIMINAL ACT" Police Department Background Information: A. The current state law definition of "criminal street gang" requires the identification of at least one act of felony violence be attributed to the group. Once a group can be classified as a "criminal street gang," law enforcement can gain access to otherwise confidential information on the gang's members. Gang members are younger and younger. While many informally organized groups of young people have not yet committed a felony act of violence, their destructive and Page 17 unlawful conduct warrants the on-going attention of law enforcement. Amending the definition of "criminal street gang" by removing the act of felony violence requirement will allow law enforcement access to otherwise confidential juvenile records that will enhance their efforts to thwart the escalating gang activities of these younger groups. B. State law provides that a member of a gang who commits a "predicate criminal act" is guilty of a felony separate and in addition to the underlying predicate act. The current definition of "predicate criminal act" lists the limited offenses that constitute such an act. The definition of "predicate criminal act" needs to include any and all felony offenses involving a firearm or other weapon. Request: The General Assembly is requested to: . Amend the definition of "criminal street gang" found at Virginia Code ~ 18.2- 46.1 to remove the requirement that the group's members must have committed a felony act of violence in order for the group to be classified as a "criminal street gang." . Amend the definition of "predicate criminal act" found at Virginia Code ~ 18.2- 46.2 to include all felony acts involving the use of a firearm or weapon. 18. ENDORSEMENT OF GOVERNOR KAINE'S ENHANCING OPPORTUNITIES FOR SMALL, WOMEN AND MINORITY OWNED BUSINESSES Council Member Villanueva Virginia Beach City Council Background Information: Governor Kaine has stated that it is "imperative that the Commonwealth of Virginia maximize the participation of its citizens in the vast array of commercial opportunities in state government. The Commonwealth historical record in buying goods and services from small, women and minority owned businesses must be improved." City Council is fully in support of this initiative. Request: The General Assembly is requested to support Governor Kaine's effort to increase the participation of small, women and minority owned businesses in the State's contracting and purchasing processes. The goal is that 40% of the purchase be made from small Page 18 19. DOWNSIZING OF STATE FACILITIES FOR MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL RETARDATION Terry Jenkins Director of Human Services Background Information: Two facilities in HPR V are slated to be replaced with smaller facilities over the next two biennia. Eastern State Hospital in Williamsburg will be replaced with a 150 bed Adult Facility (a loss of approximately 110 beds), and Southeastern Virginia Training Center in Chesapeake will be replaced with a 100-bed facility (a loss of 100 beds). While there are plans to provide funds to localities to develop additional services to serve individuals who will be coming out of these facilities, it is not clear whether the funds will be sufficient to develop the level of services needed to meet their needs. Addressing existing community waiting lists must also be a priority in the expansion of community services. Senator Stolle and his staff convened a meeting in Virginia Beach on August 14, 2006 to address several concerns about the downsizing of these facilities and the impact this may have on other systems such as public safety and local and regional jails. It was determined, in part as a result of this meeting that a number of issues must be considered in determining the correct number of state psychiatric and state training center beds needed for the region. Request: The Virginia Beach City Council is requested to propose that a study resolution be completed General Assembly to determine the appropriate number of state psychiatric and state training center beds needed before state facilities are rebuilt at a smaller capacity. 20. TAX RELIEF FOR SENIOR CITIZENS - CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT Council Member Ron Villanueva City of Virginia Beach Background Information: The Virginia Beach City Council established a task force to examine the possibility of providing additional tax relief to elderly Virginia Beach residents. The task force published a report, in late 2003. The task force made three recommendations to change the existing state code as well as an amendment to the Virginia Constitution. Page 19 Request: The General Assembly is requested to amend the state constitution to allow for a local option non-means tested tax freeze for all senior citizens. The General Assembly would need to enact legislation during the 2007 Session. There would be an intervening election in 2007 and the same legislation would need to be passed in 2008. The voters would then vote on the referendum for the constitutional amendment in the November 2008 election. The constitution would then be amended effective January 1,2009. 21. CREATION OF STATE INSURANCE "WIND POOL" Council Member John Uhrin City of Virginia Beach Background: Property owners in Virginia Beach, particularly at the oceanfront, are able to purchase insurance for wind damage from the secondary insurance market at high rates and high deductibles. Many other coastal states have established a "wind pool" insurance program that is available in specific geographic areas. Policies have been provided at more reasonable rates and deductibles. Wind has become, to most insurance carriers, the biggest risk in the Virginia Beach area. A $25 million piece of property could have a two percent wind deductible making the deductible payment $500,000. This is in great contrast to the more reasonable $5,000 deductible that was available just a few years ago. The wind insurance premium increases must also be considered as many Virginia Beach businesses are being forced to pay 300 percent increases. Request: The General Assembly is requested to pass enabling legislation required for the creation of a state insurance "wind pool" so that wind damage insurance can be provided at a more reasonable cost with lower deductibles. Page 20 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH 2007 FUNDING ITEMS 1. NEED FOR ADDITIONAL GRoup-HoME BEDS IN THE LOCALITY FOR YOUTH NEEDING OUT OF HOME PLACEMENT Terry Jenkins Department Director Human Services Background Information: Efforts have been underway for the last several years to develop a 12-bed Group Home adjacent to the Juvenile Detention Center for teens needing out of home placement. This site has been approved previously and a conditional use permit was issued, however, funding for construction remains a need. The proposed facility would become a city- owned building, for the Tidewater Regional Group Home Commission to operate, setting up a fee structure with the Comprehensive Services Act to cover the operational costs using child specific billing for services. The adolescents served would be CSA-mandated older adolescents in foster care with some capacity to accept court-involved youth utilizing Juvenile Court Services and other funding sources for non-mandated youth. HB 577 now requires CSA to justify out of jurisdiction placements. In FY 2005, Virginia Beach youth were served in thirteen (13) Group Homes outside the city limits at a cost of $1,036,542. Development of this site would better enable us to serve youth within the city limits. We would also build in mental health services provided by Human Services as needed. Funding was requested in the amount of $1 ,000,000 several years ago for this project. Due to rising construction costs, this estimate has nearly doubled. Request: The General Assembly is requested to approve an appropriation of $1.9 million dollars for the construction of a l2-bed facility to be used as a group home for CSA-mandated and non-mandated youth needing out of home placement. Operational costs would be paid with CSA funds and Juvenile Court Services funds, and other fee revenue. Page 21 2. CSA ADMINISTRATIVE ALLOCATION Terry Jenkins Department Director Human Services Background Information: The funding formula to carry out the provisions of the Comprehensive Services Act defines the formula for local administrative costs based upon pool allocations from 1997. The maximum allocation any locality can receive for administrative costs is $50,000. This amount has not increased in the past 8 years, despite continuing increases in the oversight responsibilities of CSA. FY 05 expenditures for CSA in Virginia Beach were $8,460,206 million dollars, which required a supplemental request of additional state and local dollars. For FY 06, the CSA Budget is $5,479,949, which means a supplemental request will likely be needed again this year as well. Covering additional administrative costs on top of the local share of any supplemental request for child-specific services is an undue hardship. Request: The General Assembly is requested to amend Title 2.2, Chapter 52 of the Code of Virginia to increase the maximum administrative allocation to $100,000 in order to improve localities ability to meet the administrative requirements of the CSA. 3. SUPPORT FOR ADDITIONAL STATE GENERAL FUND DOLLARS FOR MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAMS Terry Jenkins Department Director Human Services and Community Groups Background Information: There continues to be substantial need in the community for mental health, mental retardation and substance abuse services, as evidenced by growing waiting lists for community-based care. There also continues to be substantial needs in child- care, housing, employment, health care, and transportation for low income and disabled families. Request: The General Assembly is requested to fully fund the mental health, mental retardation, and substance abuse system to meet the needs of children and adults on waiting lists for services. Additionally, the City requests that funds be made available to meet the needs Page 22 of low- income families to include childcare, affordable housing, employment, health care, and transportation. 4. FUNDING FOR THE VIRGINIA BEACH JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER James K. Spore City Manager City of Virginia Beach Background Information: The state code allows for the Commonwealth to reimburse construction costs for Juvenile Detention Centers, like the completed center in Virginia Beach for 50% of the cost. The State Board of Juvenile Justice approved a full reimbursement of 50% for our Detention Center; however, the amount we received equals only 48% of the cost. This has produced a shortfall to Virginia Beach of $297,684. Request: The General Assembly is requested to provide the full funding of 50% reimbursement to our Juvenile Detention Center as approved by the State Board of Juvenile Justice. This additional appropriation would be $297,684. 5. STATE AID TO VIRGINIA PUBLIC LIBRARIES Marcy Sims Department Director Public Libraries Background Information: The Code of Virginia (Chapter 3 of Title 42. 1) establishes Virginia's policy of granting financial aid for the development of local public libraries and provides a formula, which specifies how much each public library system should receive. This formula has not been fully funded since 2001. It is currently estimated that full funding of State Aid will require a $6,505,803 increase in FY 2008 over FY 2007 funding levels. Request: The General Assembly is requested to fully fund State Aid to Virginia Public Libraries in the amount of $24,500,000. Page 23 6. INFO-POWERING THE COMMONWEALTH Marcy Sims Department Director Public Libraries Background Information: The objectives of Infopowering the Commonwealth: Find It Virginia are to provide appropriate computer hardware, obtain adequate connections to the Internet, and resolve issues and costs associated with providing adequate access to all citizens to current, authoritative sources of information. Infopowering has assisted public libraries in obtaining hardware, Internet access, training labs, and some electronic databases. In addition, Infopowering funds were used in partnership with grant funds from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to extend activities to libraries that were not fully eligible for funding through the Gates Library initiative. Info-powering funds for FY 2002 had been reduced to $ 1.6 million. No funding was received in FY 2003 - 07. Request: The General Assembly is requested to provide $6 million in funding for FY 2008 and in each year of the biennium to support Infopowering the Commonwealth: Find It Virginia, to expand the core collection of full text reference, magazine and newspaper articles that are provided to all citizens of Virginia via their public library card or through the K-12 and community college programs. 7. VIRGINIA BEACH LIFELONG LEARNING CENTER (JOINT USE LIBRARY: A PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH AND TIDEWATER COMMUNITY COLLEGE- VIRGINIA BEACH CAMPUS) Marcy Sims Department Director Public Libraries Background Information: The City of Virginia Beach and Tidewater Community College are considering constructing and operating a single facility to house the proposed TCC/ Virginia Beach Campus Learning Resources Center and what is presently called the South Rosemont Area Library (CIP Project 3-175). The College is planning to build a 150,000 square foot Learning Resource Center (LRC) at the corner of Rosemont Road and Faculty Drive, The LRC is planned to be built in two phases: a 100,000 square foot project in the 2006-08 biennium and the remaining 50,000 square feet is planned for the 2008-2010 biennium. The South Rosemont Area Library (18,000 square feet) is scheduled for construction in Page 24 FY 2005-2006 on City owned property at the comer of Rosemont Road and Buckner Boulevard and adjacent to the Boys and Girls Club of Southeastern Virginia. A Joint Use Library Planning Committee was appointed in March 2004, to explore the possibility of creating an integrated joint use library. The same consultants who were part of the successful San Jose State University and San Jose City Public Library project, Anderson Brule Architects, have assisted the City and TCC in facilitating further strategic feasibility and operational planning. Other partners have been invited to take part in the planning. The Old Dominion University/Norfolk State University Higher Education Center is located adjacent to the TCC-Virginia Beach Campus. Its 85,000 square foot facility serves approximately 16,000 students in undergraduate, graduate, continuing education and workforce development programs. A strategic operational planning process is underway to further identify and refine the description of all service, operational, organizational and facility issues to be resolved and outlined in a Memorandum of Understanding between the partners. The work will also provide a conceptual building program to guide the architectural design. In the 2007/2009 budgets the General Assembly allotted the two agencies the authorization to use $3 million in City funding to complete the engineering on the property. Request: The General Assembly is requested to provide $38,037,975 as the state's share of the Joint Use Library. 8. SHERIFF'S WORK RELEASE FACILITY Paul Lanteigne Sheriff Sheriff's Office City Manager's Office Background Information: Currently the City of Virginia Beach Sheriffs Work Release Facility is housed in a leased space and the Sheriffs Workforce is housed in a landscape services building. While the City in cooperation with the Commonwealth completed a major jail expansion, there is still a need for additional bed space for prisoners. Co-locating both the Sheriffs Work Release and Workforce programs in a new facility would allow these programs the space necessary to operate at greater efficiencies. Page 25 Request: The total estimated cost for design, site selection and construction of a facility is $6.7 million. While total project costs are subject to change pending the completion of the design work and bid of the project. In 2005-2006, $600,000 in City dollars was allocated to fund preliminary design work and site selection of the facility. State funding for this project was recently eliminated from the State's Biennial budget and the City is requesting that in the interest of public safety the General Assembly restore funding of at least 25% of the total project. 9. TRANSPORTATION James K. Spore City Manager City of Vir[?inia Beach Background Information: Local governments under federal law are required to engage in a long-range transportation planning process. The long-range transportation plan must be both fiscally constrained and comply with air quality conformity requirements. The Hampton Roads region has been engaged for several years in the 2030 Long Range Plan and has identified a number of projects for funding. In addition to the six major projects that are part of the MPO package, which include, 1- 64 Improvements in the Peninsula and Chesapeake, the Third Crossing, the Mid-town Tunnel Improvements, Route 460 and the Southeastern Parkway and Greenbelt - including Route 17 improvements; there are also projects in the primary, secondary and urban system that need funding. It is predicted that by 2012 that the State will be unable to build any new transportation projects and will only have funds for maintenance of existing projects. The cost for maintaining Virginia's existing roads is increasing by $50 million per year. Unless substantial funds are made available on a statewide basis, the City will continue to see a decrease in urban funds, which fund projects like Nimmo Parkway, Princess Anne Road, Shore Drive, Northampton Boulevard, Witchduck Road, Indian River Road, etc. Furthermore, Virginia Beach is at the end of the cul-de-sac that begins along interstate 1- 64 in the Richmond area and the entire region is beginning to lose its edge in economic development because of transportation issues. For instance, the City of Virginia Beach has seen a decrease of over 300,000 overnight visitors per year for the last several years because of traffic congestion issues - according to the Old Dominion University Annual Survey at the oceanfront. Furthermore, there is quantifiable data that businesses have made decisions not to increase their presence in Hampton Roads or to institute a presence in Hampton Roads because of transportation issues. Suffice to say that the timely movement of people, goods and services is vital to the economic wellbeing of our Page 26 citizens, as well as traffic congestion becoming a very sever quality of life issue. Under federal law the region, through the MPO, is responsible for identifying projects and establishing priorities, as it is the General Assembly's responsibility to fund those projects. Request: The General Assembly is requested to fully fund the six major projects as identified in the MPO package, which includes the ability to toll new projects and existing parallel facilities. There is also $275 million of revenue needed on a yearly basis to make up the shortfall in funding that tolls will provide for these very expensive projects. The General Assembly is also requested to increase transportation funding on a statewide basis by $1 billion. This will provide funding for primary, secondary and urban road projects such as those mentioned above. Also as mentioned this has become more than a quality of life issue but also very much maintenance of our economic wellbeing. The General Assembly must act in order for the region to have an approved 2030 Long Range Plan by late Winter 2007. 10. VIRGINIA AQUARIUM & MARINE SCIENCE CENTER MARINE ANIMAL RESEARCH & CONSERVATION INITIATIVES Russell Turner Director of Development Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center Background Information: The Virginia Aquarium & Marine Science Center requests funding in the amount of $2 million that will help improve its marine animal research and conservation support facilities in order to better serve its mission of "Conservation through Education." Since the Aquarium first opened to the public in 1986, more than 10 million people have experienced the thrill of seeing Virginia's marine life in unique and educational exhibits and programs. As the Aquarium has grown, so has its reputation for expertise and contributions in marine animal husbandry, research and conservation. As an accredited member of the Association of Zoos & Aquariums and the Alliance of Marine Mammal Parks and Aquariums, it is important that the Aquarium continue to be recognized for its animal care and conservation science practices. The Aquarium is currently undertaking an exciting project that will add a major new exhibits gallery and introduce exotic species from across the planet to inspire our next generation of visitors. The new exhibits and programs will utilize the latest science and technology to inform over 600,000 annual visitors about marine life and habitats linked to Virginia's past. In addition, the Aquarium is constructing a new animal care center and research vessel to continue to strive for significant achievements in the areas of marine animal research, conservation and education. Page 27 Request: The General Assembly is requested to provide $2 million to be spent on the Aquarium's marine animal research and conservation resources. A modest investment can be leveraged to significantly impact research and education in Virginia's economically and ecologically important coastal communities and waters, and positions the Commonwealth for an international role in conservation initiatives. With advanced marine animal care facilities, Aquarium staff and research partners can study and develop innovative research practices, thereby increasing scientific understanding and the ultimate conservation of vital ocean resources. The Aquarium is in a unique position to bring the results of scientific research and conservation to a wide range of general audiences, from regional residents and school children to international visitors. The Aquarium's new exhibits will expand the scope of its collection to include species from other parts of the world. These unusual animals will illustrate adaptations to special environments and how these exotic habitats relate to Virginia and global conservation issues. Aquarium staff and research partners will have hands-on experience with these and other marine species and contribute directly to research and conservation efforts in Virginia and across the globe. The Aquarium will use this investment from the Commonwealth to provide equipment and technology to support these efforts. Funds will be used to equip advanced animal husbandry systems, research laboratories, and an exhibits and equipment shop in the new 16,000 square foot animal care center scheduled for completion in 2008. Sophisticated equipment for marine animal observations and oceanographic studies will enhance a new 46-foot research/education vessel being constructed for delivery in 2007. These resources will support research and conservation efforts of Aquarium staff and their partners from universities and industry. Equally important, the Aquarium's expertise with education and outreach will bring these efforts and the world of ocean science directly to students of all ages. 11. VIRGINIA BEACH CONVENTION CENTER FUNDING James Ricketts Department Director Convention & Visitors Bureau Background Information: In 2005, the City of Virginia Beach opened the first phase of the new Virginia Beach Convention Center. The new facility replaces the Pavilion Convention Center. Designed by the architectural firm of Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM) the complete facility is scheduled to open in early 2007. The old center had a total of 188,000 square feet and lacked the amenities essential for today's meeting planners. Even with only approximately half of the new facility opened, the new center is larger than the old facility and has amenities and technology that exceed meeting planners expectations. When completed, the new facility will have a total of 516,000 square feet. This includes 150,000 square feet of exhibition space, over 31,000 Page 28 sq. ft. of ballroom space and approximately 29,000 sq. ft. of meeting space. The total cost of the facility is $202.571 million. The new convention center will help put Virginia on the map as a viable convention state. According to the Feasibility Study conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers, the Commonwealth will realize the following economic benefits: Incremental tax revenues (in 2002 dollars) $1.2 to $2 million annually, between 900 - 1,500 additional jobs and between $27.7 million - $44.8 million in incremental direct expenditures new to the Commonwealth (not a transfer from other localities in the Commonwealth). The economic impact for Hampton Roads will be $50.5 million to $79.3 million in incremental direct expenditures and between 1,700 and 2,700 new jobs. This is in addition to the $2.1 million incremental tax revenue to the City of Virginia Beach, $97 million in Sales and 1,900 additional jobs. Already sales projects for 2006, with only half of the facility opened, are ahead of the Feasibility Study projections for 2009 when the entire facility would have been opened and fully operational for 1-2 years. Request: The General Assembly is requested to provide $10 million in funding for the new Convention Center. This is in keeping with the benefits to the Commonwealth based on the amount of state tax revenue that will be generated from the new facility over a ten- year period. 12. CONTEMPORARY ART CENTER OF VIRGINIA FUNDING Cameron Kitchen Executive Director Contemporary Art Center of Virginia Background Information: The Contemporary Art Center of Virginia (CAe) is seeking funds from the Commonwealth of Virginia for completion of renovations and upgrades to Virginia's leading contemporary art institution to support new and innovative educational programs and exhibits. As a major cultural amenity in Hampton Roads and a significant tourist attraction, the Contemporary Art Center of Virginia reaches over 560,000 people annually. The Contemporary Art Center of Virginia is a model of financial and artistic management and operates on a balanced budget. CAe completed Phase One of its capital improvement and endowment campaign in 2003 and opened the Rodriguez Pavilion, Butler Galleries, and new art storage areas with the support of the City of Virginia Beach, private donors, and corporations. Page 29 Now in Phase Two of its capital improvement and endowment campaign, CAC is seeking the Commonwealth of Virginia to complete its match of the City of Virginia Beach's Phase One appropriation. This investment by the Commonwealth will enable CAC to meet increasing demands for on-site educational programs, outreach, world-class exhibitions, performances, and corporate and private functions at CAC's museum and studio school in Virginia Beach. The Commonwealth of Virginia funds requested are a direct match for the funds appropriated in Phase One from the City of Virginia Beach. The grant will be used solely for the capital improvement and endowment campaign and will fund much-needed modernization of CAC's security systems, grounds, technical capabilities, galleries and classrooms. Request: The General Assembly is requested to provide $750,000 to the Contemporary Art Center of Virginia. 13. THE SANDLER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS FUNDING Emily Spruill Director of Cultural Affairs City of Virginia Beach Background Information: The Sandler Center for the Performing Arts, a 1200-seat, 84,000 square-foot facility, will be the cultural centerpiece of Virginia Beach, located at the core of the City's emerging Town Center. When it opens in Fall 2007, the Center will have spaces for performances, public and performer support and it will give the opportunity to expand the type and diversity of the performing arts programs in Hampton Roads and the State of Virginia. The $47 million facility, built under Virginia's PPEA process, will have a full range of amenities, meeting the needs of today and tomorrow. As a tangible demonstration of their commitment, the Virginia Beach City Council dedicated $35 million of City funds to the project. The Virginia Beach Performing Arts Center Foundation, a non-profit organization spearheaded by some of the City's top civic and business leaders, is leading a $12.5 million capital fundraising campaign. Over 70% of the goal has been raised to date. This includes $1,460,000 from the Commonwealth. The Sandler Center for the Performing Arts will have a dramatic impact to the State of Virginia's tax base, generating over $2.2 million for the construction phase and $35,500 in annual State tax revenue. We ask the State to strengthen its commitment and investment to the future of this cultural landmark and to the City as a whole, by appropriating $500,000 for the operations of the Center. The new location opening in Fall 2007 at the exciting Town Center development will become a defining asset for social development for the City and Hampton Roads. It will Page 30 become a focal point for social activities from education to the arts and entertainment and will illustrate the State's dedication to furthering the cultural life of its citizens. Request: The General Assembly is requested to appropriate $500,000 for the operations of the Sandler Center for the Performing Arts. Page 31 - 36 - Item v'J. 7. ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM #55591 The following registered to speak: Jorgja Jean, 1400 Mediterranean Avenue, Phone: 428-0299, Secretary of the Board of Governor ' sf or the Francis Land House which also administers the Adam Thoroughgood House, spoke in SUPPORT. City Council was presented with the Stumpf Report in 2004. A Foundation offers a great benefit to the City. There are many grants available in this area which can only go to a Foundation, not a Municipal entity. Dave Redmond, 1435 Ewell Road, Phone; 464-4114, President - Thoroughgood Civic League, spoke in SUPPORT and offered his neighborhood's assistance in crafting a truly excellent Foundation structure. The City Council committed earlier this year to purchase a 2.3-acre parcel of undeveloped land adjacent to the Adam Thoroughgood House to preserve the integrity of this historic house and its surrounding property and to open new avenues of historic and architectural exploration. Sarah Ward, 1640 Horton Place, Phone: 425-3902, represented herself and the Adam Thoroughgood Chapter of the Daughters of the American Revolution, current member - Board of Governors for Historic Houses, spoke in SUPPORT. Each historic house should have a Chapter of its own Friends. Judy Connors, 32-year resident of the City, first Chairman - Friends of the Francis Land House and ten- year member of the Board of Governors was concerned re the reality of a Foundation which this Organizing Committee will develop. Mrs. Connors is a strong supporter of accountability. Mrs. Connors suggested a couple of the Foundation Members also be Board Members to ensure open lines of communication. A Foundation and Board working together for historic preservation is exciting. Upon motion by Council Lady McClanan, seconded by Councilman Diezel, City Council ADOPTED, REVISED VERSION: Resolution to ESTABLISH the Historic Sites Organizing Committee re the creation and formation of a Foundation to assist in the support of City-owned "historic sites. " Voting: 11-0 Council Members Voting Aye: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James 1. Wood Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None September 12, 2006 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 A RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH AN ORGANIZING COMMITTEE TO ADVISE THE CITY COUNCIL CONCERNING THE CREATION AND ORGANIZATION OF A BOARD AND/OR A FOUNDATION TO ASSIST THE CITY IN PRESERVING HISTORIC SITES AND TO PROVIDE SUPPORT AND GUIDANCE TO THE CITY IN ITS OPERATION OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES 8 WHEREAS, the City Council desires to provide greater 9 awareness and preservation of its historic sites; 10 WHEREAS, the City, through the Department of Museums, 11 operates certain historic properties; and 12 WHEREAS, the City Council desires to create a committee of 13 knowledgeable citizens to review the possibility of establishing 14 a non-profit board and/or foundation to assist and advise the 15 City in its historic preservation efforts and in the efficient 16 administration, coordination and planning of its historic 17 properties. 18 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY 19 OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA THAT: 20 1. There is hereby created an organizing committee to 21 provide guidance to the City Council regarding a proposal to 22 create a board and/or a foundation (i) to assist and advise the 23 City in its historic preservation efforts and (ii) to advise, 24 support and guide the Department of Museums in the efficient 25 administration, coordination and planning of its historic 26 properties. 27 2. The committee shall be known as the Historic Sites 28 Organizing Committee, and shall have not less than five (5) nor 29 more than seven (7) members, all of whom are to be appointed by 30 City Council. 31 3 . The Committee shall be responsible for advising City 32 Council as to all issues pertinent to the creation and operation 33 of a non-profit board and/or foundation to assist and advise the City in its historic preservation efforts and in the 34 35 administration, coordination and planning of the historic 36 properties operated by the Department of Museums. 37 The Committee will prepare a purpose statement and by-laws 38 for the proposed board and/or foundation and will further make 39 recommendations to the City Council concerning appropriate 40 amendments to existing ordinances concerning the City's historic 41 sites. 42 In preparing its recommendation, the Committee shall a) 43 review and give consideration to the Stumpf Report, b) recognize 44 that it is the City Council's intention that the City shall 45 remain in control of all City-operated historic properties, and 46 c) recognize that it is the City Council's intention that the 47 Friends groups, which have been organized to support the City- 48 operated historic properties, shall remain in place, and all 49 funds raised by each Friends group shall be preserved for such 50 uses as were intended when the funds were raised. 51 The Committee will report its recommendation to the City 52 Council concerning the structure of the proposed board and/or 53 foundation, together with all other matters for which it has 54 been tasked, no later than November 14, 2006. 55 4. This resolution and the Committee created hereby shall 56 expire and terminate operation on January 31, 2007. 57 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, 58 Virginia, on this 12th day of Septemher , 2006. - 37 - Item V-K. PLANNING ITEM # 55592 1. MIKE'S PAINT & BODY SHOP INC. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT STREET CLOSURE 2. KAH PROPERTIES, L.L. C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 3. DR. ALAN MAHANES CONDITIONAL CHANGE OF ZONING 4. KEMP ENTERPRISES CONDITIONAL CHANGE OF ZONING 5. RHOMAN COMPANIES CONDITIONAL CHANGE OF ZONING September 12, 2006 - 38 - Item v.](. PLANNING ITEM # 55593 Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Council Lady Wilson, City Council ADOPTED Items 1,2,3 (DEFERRED), 4 AND 5 of the PLANNING BY CONSENT AGENDA. Item ](,3. was DEFERRED, BY CONSENT, until the City Council Session of September 26,2006. Item ](,4. was REFERRED BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, BY CONSENT. Voting: 11-0 (By Consent) Council Members Voting Aye: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None September 12, 2006 - 39- Item v'M.l. PLANNING ITEM # 55594 Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Council Lady Wilson, City Council ADOPTED an Ordinance upon application of MIKE'S PAINT & BODY, INC.for a Conditional Use Permit: ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF MIKE'S PAINT & BODY, INC. FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR GARAGE AND BULK STORAGE R090634173 BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA Ordinance upon application of Mike's Paint & Body, Inc. for a Conditional Use Permit for an automotive repair garage and bulk storage on property located at the northeast extremity of Progress Lane, approximately 460 feet west of Central Drive (GPIN 1496697416). DISTRICT 6 - BEACH The following conditions shall be required: 1. Development of the site shall substantially conform to the conceptual site plan and elevations entitled "Mike's Paint & Body Shop ", prepared by Burkhart, Thomas, Reed and dated May 26, 2006. Said plans have been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and are onfile in the Virginia Beach Planning Department. 2. A Lighting Plan and/or Photometric Diagram Plan shall be submitted during detailed site plan review. Said plan shall include the location of all pole-mounted and building mounted lighting fixtures, and the listing of lamp type, wattage and type of fixture. 3. The applicant shall obtain approval prior to any development within the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area. 4. No tires for sale, merchandise or parts shall be displayed or stored outside. 5. All automotive repairs shall take place inside the building. 6. No outside storage of vehicles in a state of obvious disrepair shall be permitted. If vehicles in this condition require storage, then such vehicles shall be stored within the building. 7. The only office space permitted shall be that maintained in connection with the allowed uses of automotive repair, service and warehousing. 8. No storage, distribution or handling of explosives, petrochemicals or petroleum-related products shall be allowed at the facility. 9. Nothing on the property shall exceed the height limitation of the restrictive easement over the property owned by the United States Navy. 10. The equipment storage yard shall be enclosed with Category VI screening, as specified in the Landscape, Screening, and Buffering Specifications and Standards for the City of Virginia Beach. September 12, 2006 - 40- Item v'M.J. PLANNING ITEM # 55594 (Continued) This Ordinance shall be effective in accordance with Section 107 (f) of the Zoning Ordinance. Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the Twelfth of September Two Thousand Six. Voting: 11-0 (By Consent) Council Members Voting Aye: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None September 12, 2006 - 41 - Item V.M.2. PLANNING ITEM # 55595 Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Council Lady Wilson, City Council ADOPTED an Ordinance upon application of KAH PROPERTIES, L.L.C. for a Conditional Use Permit: ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF KAH PROPERTIES, L.L.c. FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MOTOR VEHICLE SALES AND SERVICE R090634174 BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA Ordinance upon application of KAH Properties, L.L. C. for a Conditional Use Permit for motor vehicle sales and service on property located at 3222 Virginia Beach Boulevard (GPIN 1497050500). DISTRICT 5 - LYNNHA VEN The following conditions shall be required: 1. The site shall be developed substantially in accordance with the submitted conceptual site layout and landscape plan entitled "Conceptual Site Layout and Landscape Plan of Hall Pontiac / GMC, Virginia Beach Boulevard, Virginia Beach\ VA ", prepared by MSA, Pc. and dated 03/31/06. Said plan has been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and is onfile in the Virginia Beach Planning Department. 2. The proposed building shall be constructed substantially in accordance with the submitted conceptual elevation. Said elevation has been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file in the Virginia Beach Planning Department. 3. The applicant shall provide a photometric plan for review and approval by City staff. All lightingflXtures shall be designed to prevent any direct reflection or glare toward adjacent uses and public streets. Lighting shall be directed at the ground and not out horizontally or toward the sky 4. No outdoor loudspeakers or paging systems shall be permitted. 5. There shall be no pennants, streamers, balloons, portable signs or banners displayed on the site or the vehicles. 6. Vehicles shall be parked within the designated display areas, and no vehicles shall be parked or displayed within any portion of any public right-o.fway, or in any landscaped area. No vehicles shall be displayed on ramps. Vehicles shall not be used as barriers to prevent ingress or egress of the site. Storage of vehicles awaiting sale shall not obstruct Fire Department access to the site. September 12, 2006 - 42- Item V.M.2. PLANNING ITEM # 55595 (Continued) This Ordinance shall be effective in accordance with Section 107 (f) of the Zoning Ordinance. Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the Twelfth of September Two Thousand Six. Voting: 11-0 (By Consent) Council Members Voting Aye: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M Dyer, Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James 1. Wood Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None September 12, 2006 - 43 - Item v'M.3. PLANNING ITEM # 55596 Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Council Lady Wilson, City Council DEFERRED until the City Council Session of September 26, 2006, an Ordinance upon application of DR. ALAN MAHANES for a Conditional Change of Zoning: ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF DR. ALAN MAHANES FOR A CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM AG-2 TO CONDITIONAL 0-2 Ordinance upon application of Dr. Alan Mahanes for a Chanf!e of Zoninf! District Classification from AG-2 Agricultural District (Historic and Cultural Overlay) to Conditional 0-2 Office District (Historic and Cultural Overlay) on property located at 2513 North Landing Road (GPIN 1494717090). DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE Voting: 11-0 (By Consent) Council Members Voting Aye: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None September 12, 2006 - 44- Item v'M.4. PLANNING ITEM # 55597 Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Council Lady Wilson, City Council REFERRED BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION, an Ordinance upon application of KEMP ENTEPRlSES, INC. for a Conditional Change of Zoning: ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF KEMP ENTERPRISES, INC. FOR A CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM R- 5D TO CONDITIONAL A-24 Ordinance upon application of Kemp Enterprises, Inc. for a Chanf!e of Zoninf! District Classification from R-5D Residential Duplex District to Conditional A-24 Apartment District on property located on the south side of Bonney Road, approximately 540 feet east of Kenley Road (GPINs 1477009836; 1477009521; 1477100757; 1477101774; 1477101694). DISTRICT 2 -KEMPSVILLE Voting: 11-0 (By Consent) Council Members Voting Aye: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None September 12, 2006 - 45- Item v'M.5. PLANNING ITEM # 55598 Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Council Lady Wilson, City Council ADOPTED an Ordinance upon application of RHOMAN PROPERTIES: ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF RHOMAN COMPANIES, LTD. FOR A CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM R-I0 TO CONDITIONAL 1-1 Z09061265 BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA Ordinance upon application of Rhoman Companies, Ltd. for a Chanf!e of Zoninf! District Classification from R-I0 Residential District to Conditional 1-1 Light Industrial District on property located on the north side of Bells Road, approximately 584 feet east of South Birdneck Road, addressed as 1032 Bells Road (portion of) and 1041 Olds Lane (portion of) (GPINs 2416585191 (portion of); 2416584390). DISTRICT 6 - BEACH The following condition shall be required: 1. An agreement encompassing proffers shall be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and is hereby made a part of the record. This Ordinance shall be effective in accordance with Section 107 (f) of the Zoning Ordinance. Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the Twelfth of September Two Thousand Six. Voting: 11-0 (By Consent) Council Members Voting Aye: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None September 12, 2006 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE In Reply Refer To Our File No. DF-6476 DATE: August 23, 2006 FROM: Leslie L. LilleYn:L Q B. Kay Wilson~ DEPT: City Attorney TO: DEPT: City Attorney RE: Conditional Zoning Application: Rhoman Companies, Ltd. The above-referenced conditional zoning application is scheduled to be heard by the City Council on September 12, 2006. I have reviewed the subject proffer agreement, dated May 1 , 2006 and have determined it to be legally sufficient and in proper legal form. A copy of the agreement is attached. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter further. BKW lals Enclosure cc: Kathleen Hassen PREPARED BY: ~.m SYIU:S. ROURDON. ~r . ~ifRN & U:vv, p.c PROFFERED COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS RHOMAN COMPANIES, LTD., a Virginia corporation LORETIA V. BROWN TO (PROFFERED COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS) CI1Y OF VIRGINIA BEACH, a municipal corporation of the Commonwealth of Virginia THIS AGREEMENT, made this 1st day of May, 2006, by and between RHOMAN COMPANIES, LTD., a Virginia corporation, Grantor, party of the first part; LORETIA V. BROWN, Grantor, party of the second part; and THE CI1Y OF VIRGINIA BEACH, a municipal corporation of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Grantee, party of the third part. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the party of the second part is the owner of certain property located in the Beach District of the City of Virginia Beach, containing approximately 4.68 acres and described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the party of the first part, being the contract purchaser of the Property has initiated a conditional amendment to the Zoning Map of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, by petition addressed to the Grantee so as to change the Zoning Classification of the Property from R-I0 Residential District to I-I Industrial District; and WHEREAS, the Grantee's policy is to provide only for the orderly development of land for various purposes through zoning and other land development legislation; and WHEREAS, the Grantors acknowledge that the competing and sometimes incompatible development of various types of uses conflict and that in order to permit differing types of uses on and in the area of the Property and at the same time to recognize the effects of change that will be created by the Grantors' proposed rezoning, certain reasonable conditions governing the use of the Property for the protection of the community that are not generally applicable to land similarly zoned are needed to resolve the situation to which the Grantors' rezoning application gives rise; and GPIN: 2416-58-5191 2416-58-4390 1 PREPARED BY: WHEREAS, the Grantors have voluntarily proffered, in writing, in advance of and prior to the public hearing before the Grantee, as a part of the proposed amendment to the Zoning Map with respect to the Property, the following reasonable conditions related to the physical development, operation, and use of the Property to be adopted as a part of said amendment to the Zoning Map relative and applicable to the Property, which has a reasonable relation to the rezoning and the need for which is generated by the rezoning. NOW, THEREFORE, the Grantors, their successors, personal representatives, assigns, grantees, and other successors in title or interest, voluntarily and without any requirement by or exaction from the Grantee or its governing body and without any element of compulsion or quid pro quo for zoning, rezoning, site plan, building permit, or subdivision approval, hereby make the following declaration of conditions and restrictions which shall restrict and govern the physical development, operation, and use of the Property and hereby covenant and agree that this declaration shall constitute covenants running with the Property, which shall be binding'upon the Property and upon all parties and persons claiming under or through the Grantors, their successors, personal representatives, assigns, grantees, and other successors in interest or title: 1. When the Property is developed, the vehicular access, parking, landscaping, building locations and setbacks shall be substantially as depicted on the exhibit entitled, "FARRAR PROPERTIES - CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN", dated May 1,2006, prepared by WPL, which has been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning (hereinafter "Concept Plan"). 2. When the Property is developed, the buildings depicted on the Concept Plan shall be constructed substantially in accordance with the "CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS FARRAR PROPERTIES", dated May 1,2006, prepared byWPL, which has been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning (hereinafter "Elevations"). 3. When the Property is developed, all freestanding signs shall be no greater than eight feet (8') in height and shall be externally illuminated from lighting located at ground level. 4. When the Property is developed, Olds Lane shall not be utilized for access and all lighting shall be shielded, deflected, shaded and focused to direct light down on to the premises and away from adjoining residential properties. ~m SWJ::S. ROURDON. ~r TI;:RN &. LM. P.c. 2 PREPARED BY: ~.m SYKIS. ROURDON. ~r- '1ffiN & UVY. P.c. 5. When the Property is developed, all construction activities and any other operations conducted on an area of the property which is not completely enclosed (i.e. not within a building), shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 AM and 8:00 PM. 6. The following land uses shall not be permitted on the Property unless approved by subsequent Modification of these Proffered Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions by the Grantee in accordance with its Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance: a. Airports, heliports and helistops; b. Bingo halls; c. Car wash facilities; d. Childcare and childcare education centers; e. Eating and drinking establishments; f. Firewood preparation facility; g. Hotels and motels; h. Mobile home sales; 1. Personal watercraft rentals; J. Public schools, colleges and universities and private schools, colleges and universities; k. Public utility transformer stations and major transmission lines and towers; 1. Radio or television transmission, cellular telephone antenna and relay stations; m. Satellite wagering facility; n. Vocational, technical, industrial and trade schools. 7. Further conditions may be required by the Grantee during detailed Site Plan and/ or Subdivision review and administration of applicable City Codes by all cognizant City agencies and departments to meet all applicable City Code requirements. All references hereinabove to the R-10 and 1-1 Districts and to the requirements and regulations applicable thereto refer to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, in force as of the date of approval of this Agreement by City Council, which are by this reference incorporated herein. The above conditions, having been proffered by the Grantors and allowed and accepted by the Grantee as part of the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, shall continue in full force and effect until a subsequent amendment changes the zoning of the Property and specifically repeals such conditions. Such conditions shall continue despite a subsequent amendment to the Zoning Ordinance even if the subsequent amendment is part of a comprehensive implementation of a new or substantially revised Zoning Ordinance until specifically repealed. The conditions, however, may be repealed, amended, or varied 3 PREPARED BY: ~.m SYK~. ROURDON. ~r 'IERN & LM. P.c. by written instrument recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, and executed by the record owner of the Property at the time of recordation of such instrument, provided that said instrument is consented to by the Grantee in writing as evidenced by a certified copy of an ordinance or a resolution adopted by the governing body of the Grantee, after a public hearing before the Grantee which was advertised pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. . Said ordinance or resolution shall be recorded along with said instrument as conclusive evidence of such consent, and if not so recorded, said instrument shall be void. The Grantors covenant and agree that: (1) The Zoning Administrator of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, shall be vested with all necessary authority, on behalf of the governing body of the City of VirginIa Beach, Virginia, to administer and enforce the foregoing conditions and restrictions, including the authority (a) to order, in writing, that any noncompliance with such conditions be remedied, and (b) to bring legal action or suit to insure compliance with such conditions, including mandatory or prohibitory injunction, abatement, damages, or other appropriate action, suit, or proceeding; (2) The failure to meet all conditions and restrictions shall constitute cause to deny the issuance of any of the required building or occupancy permits as may be appropriate; (3) If aggrieved by any decision of the Zoning Administrator, made pursuant to these provisions, the Grantors shall petition the governing body for the review thereof prior to instituting proceedings in court; and (4) The Zoning Map may show by an appropriate symbol on the map the existence of conditions attaching to the zoning of the Property, and the ordinances and the conditions may be made readily available and accessible for public inspection in the office of the Zoning Administrator and in the Planning Department, and they shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, and indexed in the names of the Grantors and the Grantee. 4 PREPARED BY: ~m SillS. ROURDON. If.";r- . lI[RN & tM. P.c. WITNESS the following signature and seal: Grantor: Rhoman Companies, Ltd., a Virginia corporation By: STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, to-wit: (SEAL) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1st day of May, 2006, by Wayne Rhodes, President of Rhoman Companies, Ltd., a Virginia corporation, Grantor. ) ~ Lj! (!/v /. :;7 _ -:y{ft-1!2 - v V, m {fl~ Notary Public My Commission Expires: August 31, 2006 5 PREPARED BY: ~m SYKbS. ROURDON. gr- T-lbRN &. iM. P.C WITNESS the following signatures and seals: Grantor: d(eYfilL () M10t/ Loretta V. Brown (SEAL) STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, to-wit: / g- day of May, The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2006, by Loretta V. Brown, Grantor. My Commission Exlires.1' fO ?l 07 J 6 PREPARED BY: ~.m SillS. ROURDON. ~r 'i11m & LM. P.c. EXHIBIT "A" ALL THOSE certain lots, pieces or parcels of land, with the -buildings and improvements thereon and the appurtenances thereunto, lying, situate and being in the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, being known, numbered and designated as Lots 3 & 4, as shown on the plat entitled "Subdivision Plat of the Farrar Property (W.B. 37, PG. 207) (D.B. 223, PG. 221) (M.B. 149, PG. 52) Date: 7/20/02, Scale: 1"=50', Virginia Beach, Virginia, recorded at the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, as Instrument Number: 200301270010608. GPIN: 2416-58-5191 2416-58-4390 ConditionalRezonejRhomanCompaniesjProffer 7 - 46- Item V-L. APPOINTMENTS ITEM # 55599 BY CONSENSUS, City Council RESCHEDULED: BUILDING CODE OF APPEALS - New Construction COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD HISTORIC SITE ORGANIZING COMMITTEE INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP ADVISORY COMMITTEE - PPEA September 12, 2006 - 47- Item V-L.J. APPOINTMENTS ITEM # 55600 Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, City Council APPOINTED: Dr. George L. Grinnan 3-year term 07/01/06 - 06/30/09 BEACHES AND WATERWAYS COMMISSION Voting: 11-0 Council Members Voting Aye: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None September 12, 2006 - 48- Item V-L.2. APPOINTMENTS ITEM # 55601 Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, City Council APPOINTED: Dr. Miriam Villaseca Unexpired thru 12/31/08 EASTERN VIRGINIA HEALTH SYSTEMS AGENCY Voting: 11-0 Council Members Voting Aye: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None September 12, 2006 - 49- Item V-L.3. APPOINTMENTS ITEM # 55602 Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, City Council APPOINTED: Stephanie Diamapelis 09/01/06 - 08/31/08 (Student - Junior) PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD Voting: 11-0 Council Members Voting Aye: William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Reba S. McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None September 12,2006 - 50 - Item V-O. ADJOURNMENT ITEM # 55603 Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf DECLARED the City Council Meeting ADJOURNED at 6:38 P.M. c12~___~:_~~!~ Beverly 0. Hooks, CMC Chief Deputy City Clerk Louis R. Jones Vice Mayor Ruth Hodges Smith, MMC City Clerk Meyera E. Oberndorf Mayor City of Virginia Beach Virginia September 12,2006