HomeMy WebLinkAbout110607 GASB 45 TRUSTOptions for Virginia Beach
Options for Virginia Beach
to Manage a GASB 45 Trust
to Manage a GASB 45 Trust
November 6, 2007
November 6, 2007
Today’s Agenda
Today’s Agenda
Overview of GASB 45 Liability
Overview of GASB 45 Liability
1.
1.
Overview of Requirements of a Trust
Overview of Requirements of a Trust
2.
2.
Options for Managing a Trust
Options for Managing a Trust
3.
3.
Need for Legislation
Need for Legislation
4.
4.
A trust fund is being considered for funding the
A trust fund is being considered for funding the
Retiree Healthcare Liability –GASB 45
Retiree Healthcare Liability –GASB 45
The City of Virginia Beach will most likely need to
The City of Virginia Beach will most likely need to
?
?
establish a trust for GASB 45
establish a trust for GASB 45
Creation of a trust will enable the City to use a higher
Creation of a trust will enable the City to use a higher
?
?
discount rate, which translates into a smaller liability
discount rate, which translates into a smaller liability
and a smaller ARC
and a smaller ARC
Benefits of an OPEB Trust
Benefits of an OPEB Trust
2007 General Assembly granted authority to
2007 General Assembly granted authority to
?
?
localities to create trusts to accumulate OPEB
localities to create trusts to accumulate OPEB
funds
funds
It allows OPEB assets to be invested to receive
It allows OPEB assets to be invested to receive
?
?
pension-like returns
pension-like returns
This allows investment earnings to offset a large
This allows investment earnings to offset a large
?
?
portion of the costs (70% of VRS pension
portion of the costs (70% of VRS pension
funding is from investment earnings)
funding is from investment earnings)
GASB 45 Liability Estimates
*
Unfunded 3%Funded 7.5%
($Millions)
CITYSCHOOLSTOTALCITYSCHOOLSTOTAL
Actuarial Accrued Liability
$149.1$183.1$332.2$87.9$112.7$200.6
$332.2$200.6
Annual Required
Contribution
16.723.139.812.016.7
28.7
28.7
Expected 2007 Costs
3.56.29.73.56.29.7
9.7
Cash Flow Increase
0.00.00.08.510.519.0
19.0
*To be updated
Payments are considered to be an OPEB
Payments are considered to be an OPEB
contribution if:
contribution if:
Employer has made an irrevocable transfer of assets to the
Employer has made an irrevocable transfer of assets to the
1.
1.
plan (employer no longer has ownership or control of assets
plan (employer no longer has ownership or control of assets
except reversionary right once all benefits paid)
except reversionary right once all benefits paid)
The plan has been established as a trust –legally a separate
The plan has been established as a trust –legally a separate
2.
2.
entity under stewardship of a Board of Trustees or equivalent
entity under stewardship of a Board of Trustees or equivalent
Plan assets are dedicated to providing benefits to retirees and
Plan assets are dedicated to providing benefits to retirees and
3.
3.
their beneficiaries
their beneficiaries
Plan assets are legally protected from creditors of the employer
Plan assets are legally protected from creditors of the employer
4.
4.
or the plan administrator
or the plan administrator
Options for Investment Management of
Options for Investment Management of
Trust Assets
Trust Assets
Local Finance Board hires investment manager and
Local Finance Board hires investment manager and
1.
1.
advisor
advisor
Participate in a local option VML / VACo pooled
Participate in a local option VML / VACo pooled
2.
2.
trust which hires investment manager and advisor
trust which hires investment manager and advisor
Participate in a proposed local option VRS pooled
Participate in a proposed local option VRS pooled
3.
3.
trust (legislation required) where VRS is investment
trust (legislation required) where VRS is investment
manager
manager
Option #1 –Locality Creates and
Option #1 –Locality Creates and
Manages GASB 45 Trust
Manages GASB 45 Trust
A Finance board (or equivalent) is created to serve as
A Finance board (or equivalent) is created to serve as
?
?
Trustee and to manage and invest the assets of the
Trustee and to manage and invest the assets of the
Trust
Trust
Chief Financial Officer
Chief Financial Officer
•
•
Treasurer
Treasurer
•
•
Citizen with business experience
Citizen with business experience
•
•
Others as desired by City Council
Others as desired by City Council
•
•
Hires investment managers, advisors, actuary, etc.
Hires investment managers, advisors, actuary, etc.
?
?
Not liable for losses
Not liable for losses
?
?
“Prudent Person”Rule for investments
“Prudent Person”Rule for investments
?
?
Locality Creates and Manages GASB 45 Trust
Locality Creates and Manages GASB 45 Trust
Disadvantages
Disadvantages
Advantages
Advantages
City bears greater fiduciary
City bears greater fiduciary
Provided for under existing
Provided for under existing
1.
1.
1.
1.
responsibility
responsibility
law
law
Must create and oversee
Must create and oversee
Meets GASB 45requirements
2.
2.
Meets GASB 45requirements
2.
2.
Finance Board
Finance Board
Must hire investment manager,
Must hire investment manager,
3.
3.
actuary and other consultants
actuary and other consultants
through the RFP process
through the RFP process
Smaller trust since assets
Smaller trust since assets
4.
4.
would not be pooled with
would not be pooled with
other localities’OPEB or
other localities’OPEB or
pension assets
pension assets
Management fees likely to be
Management fees likely to be
5.
5.
higher
higher
Option #2 –VML / VACoto Manage a Local
Option #2 –VML / VACoto Manage a Local
Option Pooled Trust
Option Pooled Trust
Board of Trusteesto retain services of investment managers,
Board of Trusteesto retain services of investment managers,
?
?
investment consultants and custodial banks
investment consultants and custodial banks
VirginiaLocal Government Finance Corp (VLGFC) to carry
VirginiaLocal Government Finance Corp (VLGFC) to carry
?
?
out day-to-day administration of the trust, implement investment
out day-to-day administration of the trust, implement investment
instructions and coordinate investment managers as directed by
instructions and coordinate investment managers as directed by
Board of Trustees
Board of Trustees
Local Finance Boardto exercise voting rights, implement
Local Finance Boardto exercise voting rights, implement
?
?
investment decisions (e.g. investment mix), manage cash flow,
investment decisions (e.g. investment mix), manage cash flow,
and select other service providers (e.g. actuary)
and select other service providers (e.g. actuary)
VML / VACo Manage a Local Option Pooled Trust
VML / VACo Manage a Local Option Pooled Trust
Disadvantages
Disadvantages
Advantages
Advantages
Must still create and oversee Local
Must still create and oversee Local
Provided for under existing law
Provided for under existing law
1.
1.
1.
1.
Finance Board
Finance Board
OPEB assets pooled with those of
OPEB assets pooled with those of
2.
2.
Must hire an actuary and other service
Must hire an actuary and other service
other localities
other localities
2.
2.
providers not hired by the Board of
providers not hired by the Board of
Individual trust agreements not
Individual trust agreements not
3.
3.
Trustees
Trustees
required; joinderagreement instead
required; joinderagreement instead
VML and VACo are new to the trust
VML and VACo are new to the trust
3.
3.
Voting based on assets in the pool
Voting based on assets in the pool
4.
4.
and investment business
and investment business
Recordkeeping still at local level
Recordkeeping still at local level
5.
5.
Board of Trustees for pooled trust
Board of Trustees for pooled trust
4.
4.
Option #3 –VRS Invests Local
Option #3 –VRS Invests Local
OPEB Assets(Proposed)
OPEB Assets(Proposed)
VRS to be investment manager of local government OPEB trust
VRS to be investment manager of local government OPEB trust
?
?
funds
funds
Individual local trust agreement still required
Individual local trust agreement still required
?
?
MOU between each locality and VRS; VRS not a plan sponsor
MOU between each locality and VRS; VRS not a plan sponsor
?
?
Enrollment, recordkeeping, accounting, etc. to remain a local
Enrollment, recordkeeping, accounting, etc. to remain a local
?
?
responsibility
responsibility
Requires enabling legislation
Requires enabling legislation
?
?
Provides another option
Provides another option
?
?
Senate Bill 789 -2007
Senate Bill 789 -2007
Original bill granted VRS authority to invest local
Original bill granted VRS authority to invest local
?
?
OPEB funds
OPEB funds
This was stricken upon final passage
This was stricken upon final passage
?
?
House Appropriations Committee was concerned that VRS
House Appropriations Committee was concerned that VRS
?
?
or the state could be held liable for promises made to local
or the state could be held liable for promises made to local
employees by their employer
employees by their employer
VRS invests pension funds for each locality, and locality
VRS invests pension funds for each locality, and locality
?
?
pays full costs -therefore OPEB investment would be
pays full costs -therefore OPEB investment would be
the same
the same
Each locality would establish their own trust
Each locality would establish their own trust
?
?
documents, which should mitigate this concern
documents, which should mitigate this concern
VRS Investment Qualifications
VRS Investment Qualifications
Manages $58 billion in retirement assets
Manages $58 billion in retirement assets
?
?
$37.6 billion equities
$37.6 billion equities
?
?
$11.2 billion fixed income
$11.2 billion fixed income
?
?
$ 8.7 billion other asset classes
$ 8.7 billion other asset classes
?
?
Earned a 20.4% return in FY-07
Earned a 20.4% return in FY-07
?
?
3-yr annualized return of 14.9%
3-yr annualized return of 14.9%
?
?
5-yr annualized return of 12.8%
5-yr annualized return of 12.8%
?
?
Surpassed benchmark return of 18.5% in FY-07
Surpassed benchmark return of 18.5% in FY-07
?
?
Wilshire’s Trust Universe Comparison Service [TUCS] Report,
Wilshire’s Trust Universe Comparison Service [TUCS] Report,
?
?
places VRS in the upper 3 percent of public pension funds in
places VRS in the upper 3 percent of public pension funds in
fiscal year 2007 returns.
fiscal year 2007 returns.
VRS Management of Trust
VRS Management of Trust
OPEB funds are held in trust, but pooled with VRS
OPEB funds are held in trust, but pooled with VRS
?
?
funds for investing
funds for investing
Separate accounting of OPEB assets for each locality
Separate accounting of OPEB assets for each locality
?
?
Reasonable administrative fee to cover VRS’costs
Reasonable administrative fee to cover VRS’costs
?
?
VRS indemnified against investment losses so long as
VRS indemnified against investment losses so long as
?
?
funds invested according to the Prudent Person
funds invested according to the Prudent Person
principles
principles
VRS as Investment Manager of Local OPEB Assets
VRS as Investment Manager of Local OPEB Assets
Disadvantages
Disadvantages
Advantages
Advantages
Requires enabling legislation
VRS is experienced and well Requires enabling legislation
VRS is experienced and well
1.
1.
1.
1.
qualified to invest OPEB assets
qualified to invest OPEB assets
Individual trust agreement required
Individual trust agreement required
2.
2.
Provides reliable, cost-effective
Provides reliable, cost-effective
2.
2.
investment option for Virginia
investment option for Virginia
localities
localities
No RFP process required; use VRS
No RFP process required; use VRS
3.
3.
existing consultants
existing consultants
Economies of scale should result in
Economies of scale should result in
4.
4.
lower investment management fees
lower investment management fees
Recordkeeping at local level
Recordkeeping at local level
5.
5.
Avoids creation of Local Finance
Avoids creation of Local Finance
6.
6.
Board
Board
Next Steps
Next Steps
Include local option for VRS as investment manager
Include local option for VRS as investment manager
1.
1.
of local government OPEB trust funds in
of local government OPEB trust funds in
Community Legislative Package
Community Legislative Package
Continue work identified for 2009 Health Care Plan
Continue work identified for 2009 Health Care Plan
2.
2.
Update actuarial study for GASB 45
Update actuarial study for GASB 45
3.
3.
Return to Council for review of healthcare options
Return to Council for review of healthcare options
4.
4.