HomeMy WebLinkAbout120908 ComIT AuditPresentation to the City Council
December 9, 2008
Lyndon S. Remias, CPA, CIA
City Auditor
1.Determine whether amounts charged to departments for services
accurately reflect the cost of those services.
Result(s)
? We determined that WAN, Emergency Radio Maintenance, and
Subscription Services amounts charged to other departments for services
accurately reflect the cost of services provided.
? For multi-functional devices, we determined that forFY 08, ComIT
charged departments approximately $200K above the vendor direct costs
for the use of MFDsas shown below:
? Of the $200K difference, $30K was a result of ComIT using an incorrect
click rate per copy of $.008 as opposed to the correct rate of $.007. The
remaining $170K is the 20% overhead rate (the standard rate for all
services provided by the City/Schools Printing and Mail Services) on the
use of MFDsto all departments.
Conclusion(s)
? Except as noted above, we determined that amounts charged to
departments for services accurately reflect the cost of servicesprovided.
Recommendation(s)
1.1We recommend that ComIT begin charging departments the new,
renegotiated Xerox contractual click rate of $.007 per image as opposed to
the old rate of $.008. This rate was renegotiated in May 2007 but was not
passed on to departmental customers.
1.2We recommend maintaining the current overhead rate of 20% for multi-
function device (MFD) use at this time, even though when considering this
one service by itself the overhead charged does not approximate the cost
of administering the service. The MFD lease payments to Xerox
Corporation and corresponding charges received from departments are
booked in the Print Shop Internal Service Fund. City/Schools Printing is
funded by two revenue sources –the MFD charges and individual print
jobs for which ComIT charges departments throughout the year. When
considering City/Schools Printing Services as a whole (without the
knowledge of the effectiveness and efficiency of the entire City/Schools
Printing Services operations), it is evident that the enterprisefund needs
the excess overhead for its operations. It had an operating loss of $35,238
in the 2007 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). To attempt
to predetermine the number and exact cost of anticipated individual
departmental print jobs to charge overhead to with more accuracythan is
now being done is probably unrealistic.
2.Determine whether IDTs are necessary and/or warranted.
Results(s)
? The amount of IDTs initiated by ComIT during FY 08 totaled $2,536,742.
? All IDTswere deemed necessary and warranted.
Conclusion(s)
? We determined that the above IDTs initiated by ComIT were necessary
and warranted.
Recommendation(s)
? None.
3.Evaluate efficiency in responding to departmental needs for equipment,
communications, software and other IT-related items.
Result(s)
We reviewed Citywide IT-related purchasing transactions originating in FY 08.
? The average review by ComIT took 2.5 days to complete.
? 64.4% were reviewed and returned to the Purchasing Division within one
day.
? The longest review took 71 days.
? The average resolution time for FY 08 HEAT tickets related to purchase
orders was 20.1 days. The HEAT ticket resolution time represents the
time it takes to issue a purchase order, accept delivery, configure, image,
test and install the item.
? The City contracts with Electronic Systems, Incorporated (ESI) to provide
computer-related equipment, peripherals and software that adhere to the
standards developed by ComIT in accordance with AD 2.06.All
computer-related hardware purchases are subject to a $55 installation fee
and/or $25 asset tagging fee. Hardware is configured, imaged, delivered
and installed by ESI staff.
Survey QuestionYesNo
Was the product you received adequate to perform 92%8%
your job duties?
? Despite this high percentage, only 45% indicated “Very Satisfied”or
“Satisfied”when asked to rate their satisfaction with the overall IT-related
purchasing process.
5.Determine whether current policies unnecessarily limit purchasing
efficiency and restrictions on printers.
? The contract with ESI provides a selection of nine printers thatmeet the
City’s standards for compatibility, reliability and durability.
? During FY 08, the City purchased 89 printers (22 of which were non-City
standard desktop models purchased to address specific, unique business
needs) from ESI, ranging in price from a small desktop printer for $86 to a
high speed network printer for $3,507.
Conclusion(s)
? Based on the results of our analysis of procurement cycle data, the
stewardship responsibilities placed on ComIT by Administrative Directive
(AD) 2.06,Information Technology Infrastructure and Asset Management
and the results of the Technology Satisfaction Survey, we do notbelieve
unnecessarily
current IT-procurement policies limit departmental access
to hardware and software.
? We do, however, believe that the timeliness of new department technology
related initiatives implementation is somewhat impacted by the process.
? Given the purchase information provided above and the stewardship
responsibilities placed on ComIT by AD 2.06, we do not believe current
unnecessarily
policies limit purchasing efficiency, nor do they place
unnecessary restrictions on a department’s ability to purchase printers.
Recommendation(s)
3.1We recommend ComIT continually monitor and review their processes to
ensure efficiency with regard to approving departmental IT-related
purchases, and their role in the delivery, configuration, imaging, testing
and installation of technology-related items. Some improvements
suggested by survey respondents include:
? Require the City’s hardware vendor to prestock popular peripherals to
reduce delivery time.
? Make information readily available to user departments regarding
requirements and the approval process for purchasing “non-standard”
items.
? Provide a link to information concerning proper account coding on
beachnet (City’s intranet).
?“Sponsor an annual Technology Fair to share ideas about new
technology and receive input from operational divisions on what
hardware and/or software to make ‘City standards’.”
5.1We recommend that Administrative Directive 2.06, Information
Technology Infrastructure and Asset Management, adopted in June 2001,
be updated to reflect the current operating structure and practices within
the City.
5.2We recommend ComIT provide additional (easy to find) informationto its
customers with regard to their ability, and the requirements necessary, to
purchase “non-standard”computer-related hardware, software, and
peripherals in the form of “Frequently Asked Questions”or “How To”on
beachnet.
4.Evaluate efficiency in responding to HEAT ticket calls.
Result(s)
? ComIT resolved 26,302 calls for service during FY 08.
? 52.3% of all calls were resolved within one day.
FY 08 Resolution Hours by Priority Level
Calls that Met or
Exceeded Response
Goal
AverageMedian
Number%Number%
PriorityHoursResponse
of Callsof Callsof Callsof Calls
Per CallHours
1115 0.4%6.472.252 45.2%
2845 3.2%15.902.761272.4%
318,710 71.1%25.066.014,371 76.8%
46,632 25.3%77.6819.74,950 74.6%
TOTAL26,30219,985 76.0%
? With regard to problem resolution and requests for services, we asked the
respondents to rate their level of satisfaction in the followingareas:
Support Center Satisfaction
Dissatisfied/
Very Satisfied/
Survey AreaNeutralVery
Satisfied
Dissatisfied
Speed in reaching the HELP Desk74%16%10%
Timeliness of problem/request resolution70%18%12%
Knowledge and technical abilities of staff76%17%7%
Courtesy and helpfulness of staff87%10%3%
? Sixty-six percent (66%) selected “Always”or “Usually”when asked whether
their problems were resolved in a satisfactory manner. Less than 1%
responded “Never”.
Conclusion(s)
? Based on the results of our review of FY 08 call resolution dataand the
satisfaction ratings provided in the Technology Satisfaction Survey, we
found the technology-related support services provided by ComIT to be
operating efficiently and effectively.
Recommendation(s)
4.1We recommend that ComIT consider the following activities (many of which
were suggested by the respondents to the survey) to enhance the City’s
experience related to ComIT support:
Evaluate increasing the hours of available support to meet the needs of its
?
customers.
Provide the customer an estimated response time based on the call type.
?
Provide an online means of reporting issues and checking call status.
?
Have Support Center staff answer the telephone during normal business
?
hours, when feasible, rather than the calls going to automated
answering/voice mail.
Quickly acknowledge receipt of calls/requests left on voice mailand/or
?
received via email.
Enhance beachnet to include frequently asked questions and resolutions
?
for common problems (and make them easier to find).
Revisit the call closing process to ensure the information is useful and
?
beneficial to all parties. An option may be to confirm the technician’s
closing of the call via email or voice message and, then to periodically
send a short customer service satisfaction survey to a randomly-selected
sample of customers.
Provide periodic staff development and customer service trainingto all
?
levels of ComIT staff.
Evaluate solutions for further developing individual departmental
?
knowledge and direct relationships within City departments. We believe
that by doing so, ComIT, as well as the rest of the City, will benefit from
the shared understanding of operations, issues and needs. This would
result in enhanced quality and responsiveness of services provided both
internally by ComIT and externally by the operating departments.
Recommendation(s)
5.1We recommend that Administrative Directive 2.06, Information Technology
Infrastructure and Asset Management, adopted in June 2001, be updated
to reflect the current operating structure and practices within the City.
5.2We recommend ComIT provide additional (easy to find) informationto its
customers with regard to their ability, and the requirements necessary, to
purchase “non-standard”computer-related hardware, software, and
peripherals in the form of “Frequently Asked Questions”or “How To”on
beachnet.
6.Determine whether the final decision by ComIT on radio, in-vehicle
computers, and related purchases superseded recommendations from
end-users
.
Results
Radio Replacement
? The decision to select the Motorola XTS 2500 radio as the publicsafety
standard in 2002 was made after extensive review and stakeholderinput.
? The decision was directed by the then Chief of Operations and discussed
and agreed upon by the public safety Chiefs at a meeting in December
2002.
? A multitude of factors was considered before the decision was
rendered.Among these factors were:
the budget of $6.7 million,
future migration,
cost differences between the units,
expandability, and
the needs of the user agencies.
Mobile Data Terminal (MDTs) Replacement
? In late 2006, the City began the process of selecting new MobileData
Terminals (MDTs) to replace the keyboard data terminals (KDTs) in public
safety vehicles.
? As part of the process, representatives of Police, Fire and EMS were
afforded the opportunity to provide application functionality and hardware
specifications.They were asked to evaluate sample units from multiple
manufacturers to determine the most desirable features.
? The RFP evaluation criteria included functional aspects as well as provider
qualifications, service level ability, performance history, and other criteria
deemed appropriate, including unit cost and cost of all associated
accessories and required services.
? User departments requested USB ports and optical drives for use in
accessing Field Guides and other information needed while in their
vehicle.
? The new MDTshave USB ports, but they are not currently accessible, due
to virus/vulnerability issues.
? Optical drives (for use reading field manuals) were not provided.
? There are many public safety technology upgrade projects either actively
underway or in the planning stages that will greatly enhance theability of
public safety providers to communicate and operate in the field.
? The first step was to replace the MDTs.
? The decisions made by ComIT to ensure data integrity and security
relating to the use of the MDTscould have been better communicated to
the stakeholders.
Conclusion(s)
While there may have been some communication issues, we do not believe
the final decision by ComIT on radio, in-vehicle computers, and related
purchases superseded recommendations from end-users.
Recommendation(s)
None.
7.Review areas of concern regarding connectability between fire stations.
Conclusion(s)
? It is our conclusion (as well as ComIT and Fire Administration) that the
issue of network connectivity between fire stations has been addressed.
? All fire stations have network connectivity capabilities via Frame Relay or
Cox Business Internet.
? Responses from eight stations and one Battalion Chief indicated
agreement that the connectivity provided allowed them to access the City’s
wide area network, and seven of the eight agreed that the connectivity was
adequate to perform their job functions.Two respondents reported
recurring problems (one that the connection was too slow; and, the other
reported issues with printing).
Recommendation(s)
? None.
8.Review areas of concern regarding internet access at EMS stations:
Conclusion(s)
? We contacted all squads and substations and determined that all,with the
exception of Creeds and First Landing, have internet access.
Recommendation(s)
? None.
9.Evaluate employee efficiency, turnover, and morale of Emergency
Communications since ComIT took control of the VB 9-1-1 Call Center.
Result(s)
Efficiency of Service Delivery
? The results of our VB 9-1-1 Employee Survey (with 62% of employees
responding) show employees are generally satisfied with the Center’s
performance and their job responsibilities.
? Employees believe VB 9-1-1 rates “Excellent”or “Above Average”
when it comes to call response times, dispatch times, citizen
satisfaction, public safety (Police, Fire and EMS) customer satisfaction
and efficient call management.
? VB 9-1-1 has consistently received high satisfaction ratings as part of
the City’s Citizen Satisfaction Survey conducted every two years.
Citizens reported a satisfaction rating of 97.3% in 2007 and 96.4% in
2005.
VB 9-1-1 Internal Customer Satisfaction
? We met with representatives of each Public Safety Department to discuss
their issues and concerns; and
? Used the 321` respondents to our Technology Satisfaction Survey reporting
to have used emergency dispatch services.
Seventy-six percent (76%) of those responding reported their overall
satisfaction level with emergency dispatch services as “Very Satisfied”
or “Satisfied”.
Only 13% indicated “Dissatisfied”or “Very Dissatisfied”.
Staffing/Turnover
? The ECCS Division has 125 approved FTEs for FY 09.
? There were 16 vacancies as of July 1, 2008.This represents 13% of
the total approved FTEs.
? Vacancy rates have declined from 19% in FY 02 to 13% in FY 08, due
in large part to the enhancements made to the recruitment and training
processes by ComIT management.
Comparison of Budget to Actual FTEs
140
125125125
120120
117117
109109
105
103
102102
101
100100
95
FISCAL YEAR
8888
87
80
60
40
23
21
2020
19
16
15
14
13
7
0
FY00FY01FY02FY03FY04FY05FY06FY07FY08
NUMBER OF FTES
BUDGETED FTEsPOSITIONS FILLEDVACANCIES
? While employees rated the Center’s performance with regard to its ability to
adequately retain existing employees as “Poor”or “Very Poor”, the retention
rate for experienced employees remains over 90%.
? VB 9-1-1 employee turnover has increased over the last five years primarily
due to the increased number of academies and recruits that fail to complete
the probationary (training) period.
? Eleven (11) employees retired during the five-year period, accounting for
approximately 27% of the experienced employees who have left.
Employee Satisfaction Levels
5.00
4.00
3.00
Average
2.00
1.00
-
Respect Empowerment
Teamwork
TrustMorale
Compensation
Overall
Opportunity for Advancement
Communication
Physical Environment
Employed Prior to Move Employed After MoveAll Employees
Morale of VB 9-1-1 Operational Employees
? Of all ECCS respondents, almost 60% of the respondents evaluatedmorale
as “Poor”to “Very Poor”.
? Seventy-one percent (71%) of respondents indicated they believe that
employee morale is declining.
Based on the survey results, the comments provided and our interviews with
staff, it appears that morale is impacted by the following:
? Decision by City Management to move VB 9-1-1 from the Police
Department.
? Lack of recognition of VB 9-1-1 as a public safety function and its
organizational placement.
? Management decisions and interactions with staff.
? Shift level staffing deficiencies.
? Required overtime
? Inconsistencies in supervisory practices.
? Interaction and conflict with co-workers.
? Compensation.
? Lack of employee recognition and teambuilding activities.
Organizational Placement
? The current administrative placement and reporting relationship through the
City’s Department of Communications and Information Technology does not
accurately reflect the largely public safety nature of the work performed by
the Emergency Communications Center.
? The function has evolved significantly since its inception, and should be
recognized for making a direct contribution to the delivery of public safety
services to citizens.
? The current placement places the Center in a reactive position for handling
policy, practice and procedural changes within public safety agencies that
directly or indirectly impact the “work on the operations floor”.
? Additionally, the current placement also creates natural conflicts between
service delivery and technology support roles within ComIT.
? Placement within one of the Public Safety departments does not effectively
represent (and/or address) the diversity of VB 9-1-1’s multiple customer
base and the broader service delivery needs of all affected departments.
? Studies show placement within one agency creates both perceived and real
bias when communication needs and issues conflict.
? Placement within one of the Public Safety departments also causes an
internal “struggle”(within the department) for the resources necessary to
sustain and improve operations.
? Placement within one of the Public Safety departments administrative chain-
of-command is not representative of the largely operational nature of the
services provided or of the broader organizational role of public safety
communications service delivery.
Conclusion(s)
? Given the challenges associated with operating in a 24/7, emergency
operations environment, VB 9-1-1 provides an efficient level of service that
helps to ensure the safety of the City’s citizens and first responders due in
large part to the commitment and dedication of its management,
administration and employees.
? The overall turnover rate is better than national 9-1-1 turnover trends and
has been held relatively consistent over the last two fiscal years.
? Despite improvements to the physical environment, compensation,
increased staffing and enhanced recruitment efforts, employee morale
remains problematic.
Recommendation(s)
9.1We recommend, in conjunction with ComIT leadership, the City
consider designating VB 9-1-1 as a public safety activity and making the
communication functions within the Emergency Communications and
Citizen Services Division an independent City department (outside the
customer agencies it serves) with a reporting structure similar to the
City’s other public safety agencies. ComIT would continue to provide
support to the technology components of the division.
9.2We recommend the City create a Public Safety Advisory Board
composed of representatives from Police, Fire, EMS and Emergency
Communications to provide input and guidance with respect to
Emergency Communications, and that the Board be chaired by the City
Manager.
9.3We recommend services to internal customers be managed through
written Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) or other formal processin
order to clearly define the customers and VB 9-1-1’s needs and
expectations for service delivery.
9.4We recommend that ComIT work with a professional facilitator to
provide VB 9-1-1 staff an open forum to express, discuss, and resolve
workplace concerns.
9.5We recommend that ComIT evaluate utilization of 12 hour shifts for VB
9-1-1 operations.
10.Perform analysis of pertinent employee suggestions.
Results
? Feb 2005 –Mar 2005: Reviewed the master list of suggestions and hard
copy detail (now with Management Services). Determined that
suggestions were logged, reviewed and monitored until final disposition.
? Mar 2005 –Dec 2006: We were unable to determine if any suggestions
during this time period were logged, reviewed, or monitored.
? Jan 2007 –To current: Reviewed the master list of suggestions.
Determined that suggestions were logged, reviewed and monitored until
final disposition. Note: Five (5) of 77 suggestions received to date relate to
ComIT.
Conclusion(s)
? The City Auditor concluded that there is an employee suggestion program
forum in place whereby employees can make suggestions concerning
technology and other issues.
Recommendation(s)
10.1The “My Idea Works Program”should continue to operate in its present
form.
11.Perform confidential interviews with employees and volunteers
regarding ComIT.
Conclusion(s)
? Based on confidential interviews conducted and comments receivedfrom
theCitywide Technology Satisfaction Survey many respondents
acknowledged the challenges that ComIT faces in serving the entire City’s IT
needs.
? Many comments received praised ComIT’s courtesy and professionalism.
? However, one overarching theme that resonated from the interviews and
comments was that ComIT should recognize their role as that of asupport
department supporting, rather than determining a department’s technology
needs.
? In addition, the survey revealed that employees are not aware ofcommon
ComIT tools that can help them with IT/computer-related questions.
? Detailed results of the survey our included in Appendix 2 and Appendix 3
Recommendation(s)
11.1We recommend that ComIT thoroughly review the results of the City of
Virginia Beach Technology Satisfaction Survey and the VB 9-1-1
Employee Survey and develop an action plan to address those areas
which need significant improvement.
11.2We recommend that ComIT develop a plan to make employees more
aware of the common ComIT tools that can help users with IT/computer
related questions.
12.That if the City Auditor concludes that it would be prudent and cost
effective to retain on a contract basis the services of an outside
technology consultant or auditor with technological expertise, and the
City Auditor concludes that additional funds are needed to procure
those services, then the City Auditor shall submit an appropriations
ordinance for consideration by City Council.
Conclusion(s)
? The City Auditor determined that the current audit staff possessed the
expertise and experience to effectively address City Council concerns
expressed in items one through six of the City Council Resolution.
However, the scope of this audit did not include the City’s Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) for Communications and Information
Technology (CIT) which contains numerous projects totaling approximately
$107 million. In addition, the scope does not address the need for a
comprehensive Citywide Technology Plan. The technical skills, expertise
and experience needed to address these needs would have to come from
outside the organization.
Recommendation(s)
12.1We agree with City management that the City should engage an external
Information Technology consultant with established expertise to develop a
Citywide Technology Plan. The level of expertise and sophistication
required to develop an effective technology plan for an organization of our
size and complexity will no doubt require significant resources.We
recommend ComIT coordinate with the Office of the City Auditor,
appropriate City staff and City Council to develop the specific deliverables
and associated cost estimates that will meet City Council’s expectations
for such an endeavor.