The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About031209 STORMWATER PRESENTATION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM & FUNDING PROGRAM & FUNDING UPDATE UPDATE OVERVIEW OVERVIEW •Why Do We Have a SWM Program? •Why Do We Have a SWM Program? •Program Elements •Program Elements –Flood Control –Flood Control –Water Quality –Water Quality –Maintenance & Repair –Maintenance & Repair •Infrastructure •Infrastructure •Funding the SWM Program •Funding the SWM Program WHY DOES VIRGINIA BEACH WHY DOES VIRGINIA BEACH NEED A STORMWATER NEED A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM? MANAGEMENT PROGRAM? •A Stormwater Management Program is •A Stormwater Management Program is necessary to serve the Capital, Operating necessary to serve the Capital, Operating and Water Quality needs of the City. and Water Quality needs of the City. •An effective Stormwater Management •An effective Stormwater Management Plan addresses flood control, Plan addresses flood control, infrastructure management and regulatory infrastructure management and regulatory mandates. mandates. LEGISLATIVE MANDATES LEGISLATIVE MANDATES •Authority for State Stormwater Regulations •Authority for State Stormwater Regulations comes from the Federal Clean Water Act comes from the Federal Clean Water Act –State SW Law – –State SW Law – •VPDES Permit (Municipal Stormwater Discharge •VPDES Permit (Municipal Stormwater Discharge Permit) Permit) •TMDL’s (Daily Pollution Discharge Limits for •TMDL’s (Daily Pollution Discharge Limits for Impaired Waters) Impaired Waters) •General Construction Permit •General Construction Permit SW PROGRAM ELEMENTS SW PROGRAM ELEMENTS I.Flood Control I.Flood Control II.Water Quality II.Water Quality Repair III.Maintenance & Repair III.Maintenance & I. FLOOD CONTROL I. FLOOD CONTROL •Priorities of Concern •Priorities of Concern –Structural Flooding –Structural Flooding –Safety/Street Flooding –Safety/Street Flooding –Nuisance Ponding –Nuisance Ponding I. FLOOD CONTROL I. FLOOD CONTROL KEY FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS KEY FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS •North Virginia Beach Drainage •North Virginia Beach Drainage •Rosemont Forest •Rosemont Forest •North Lake Holly •North Lake Holly •South Lake Holly •South Lake Holly •Cape Henry Beach •Cape Henry Beach I. FLOOD CONTROL I. FLOOD CONTROL North Beach Drainage North Beach Drainage CIP 7-902 CIP 7-902 Re-Advertise on Approval of CIP in May Anticipate Completion Summer 2011 $23M I. FLOOD CONTROL I. FLOOD CONTROL Rosemont Forest -After Tropical Storm Ernesto Phase I -Advertise Pump Station -Sept. 2009 Phase I -Advertise Pump Station -Sept. 2009 $6.8M Anticipated Completion Dec. 2010 Anticipated Completion Dec. 2010 Phase II -Advertise Neighborhood Drainage Improvements -Jan 2010 Phase II -Advertise Neighborhood Drainage Improvements -Jan 2010 Anticipated Completion Dec. 2010 Anticipated Completion Dec. 2010 I. FLOOD CONTROL I. FLOOD CONTROL $8.2M Arctic Ave / Baltic Ave Section I -Completed Feb. 2003 Section II –Completed July 2004 Section III –Schedule Completion Sept. 2009 $15M North Lake Holly Section IA –Completed Sept. 2006 Section IB –Completed Oct. 2006 Section II –Advertise Oct. 2009 Section IV –Advertise Winter 2011 Section III –Advertise Winter 2012 Section IC –Advertise Winter 2014 $11.4M South Lake Holly Section III –Advertise Nov. 2009 Section II –Advertise Winter 2010 Section I –Advertise Winter 2012 Section IV –Advertise Fall 2014 I. FLOOD CONTROL I. FLOOD CONTROL North Lake Holly Watershed CIP 7-005 North Lake Holly Watershed CIP 7-005 Legend Section I-A $15M Section I-B Section II Section III Section IV Section I-C I. FLOOD CONTROL I. FLOOD CONTROL South Lake Holly Watershed CIP 7-016 South Lake Holly Watershed CIP 7-016 Legend $11.4M Section III Section II Section IV Section I Storm Drainage Revitalization I. FLOOD CONTROL I. FLOOD CONTROL Cape Henry Beach Cape Henry Beach Start Funding in FY 2011 to begin Analysis and Design. $5M in CIP Total Cost > $15M I. FLOOD CONTROL I. FLOOD CONTROL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS -CURRENT 10 YEAR PLAN Total Estimate Planned CostCompletion 1Kempsville Greens GC Bank Stabilization -Phase I$740,00005/22/09 2Arctic / Baltic -Sec. III -Arctic Avenue$8,253,00012/01/09 3Southern Canal/Lead Ditch and Culvert Improvement -Phase 1$550,00003/31/10 4South Lake Holly -Sec. III -Southwest$2,530,00007/30/10 5Elizabeth River Shores -Phase 1$1,000,00009/01/10 6Lake Smith Weir Replacement$1,000,00012/01/10 7Lawson Forest Drainage$630,00012/31/10 8Southern Canal/Lead Ditch and Culvert Improvement -Phase 1$400,00012/31/10 9Rosemont Forest Drainage Improvements$6,800,00006/01/11 10North Lake Holly -Sec. II -12th/13th & Lake Drive$5,240,00010/30/11 11Elizabeth River Shores -Phase 2$1,000,00012/01/11 12North Beach Drainage$14,400,00012/01/11 13South Lake Holly -Sec. II -East$4,920,00009/01/12 14North Lake Holly -Sec. IV -16th (Mediterranean to Arctic)$1,850,00010/30/12 15Baker Road Culvert & Ditch Improvements$450,00012/01/12 16Bellamy Manor Outfall Ditch$450,00012/01/12 17Thoroughgood Drainage$670,00012/01/12 18South Lake Holly -Sec. I -Lake Work (CIP 7-031)$530,00007/01/13 $75M 19Aragona Village$500,00012/01/13 20Level Green$450,00012/01/13 21North Lake Holly -Sec. III -14th, 15th, 16th (Mediterranean to Parks)$5,010,00010/30/14 22North Lake Holly -Sec. IC -Lake Work (CIP 7-031)$1,650,00010/30/15 23South Lake Holly -Sec. IV -Northwest$5,790,00004/01/16 24Cape Henry Beach Drainage (Partial)$10,000,000Beyond 2018 TOTAL$74,813,000 I. FLOOD CONTROL I. FLOOD CONTROL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS CURRENT 10 YEAR PLAN $75M II. STORM WATER QUALITY II. STORM WATER QUALITY •City increasingly regulated for quality of •City increasingly regulated for quality of water discharged from it’s system. water discharged from it’s system. •Environmental groups are pressuring the •Environmental groups are pressuring the EPA for stricter regulations EPA for stricter regulations •City becoming responsible for quality of •City becoming responsible for quality of receiving waters, regardless of cause receiving waters, regardless of cause (TMDL’s) (TMDL’s) II. STORM WATER QUALITY II. STORM WATER QUALITY INITIATIVES AND PROJECTS INITIATIVES AND PROJECTS •VPDES Requirements •VPDES Requirements •Green Ribbon Recommendations •Green Ribbon Recommendations •TMDL Implementation Plans •TMDL Implementation Plans II. STORM WATER QUALITY II. STORM WATER QUALITY VPDES REQUIREMENTS VPDES REQUIREMENTS •Reorganize existing tracking and •Reorganize existing tracking and inspection programs by HUC Codes inspection programs by HUC Codes •Maintain MS4 Program Plan –update, •Maintain MS4 Program Plan –update, expand, revise expand, revise •Monitoring and Source Elimination •Monitoring and Source Elimination Programs Programs •Inspections, Reporting and Tracking •Inspections, Reporting and Tracking Compliance Compliance II. STORM WATER QUALITY II. STORM WATER QUALITY GREEN RIBBON RECOMENDATIONS GREEN RIBBON RECOMENDATIONS •Comprehensive Stormwater •Comprehensive Stormwater Plans Management Plans Management (Study, Design, (Study, Design, Construction) Construction) •Retrofit of City Facilities •Retrofit of City Facilities •Education and Outreach •Education and Outreach •Revisions to the City Stormwater •Revisions to the City Stormwater Codes Codes II. STORM WATER QUALITY II. STORM WATER QUALITY COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROACH MANAGEMENT PLAN APPROACH YEAR 1YEAR 2YEAR 3YEAR 4…. First BasinStudyDesignConstruct Second BasinStudyDesignConstruct Third BasinStudyDesign Fourth BasinStudy II. STORM WATER QUALITY II. STORM WATER QUALITY Broad Bay COMPREHENSIVE COMPREHENSIVE Great Neck Rd SWM PLANMill Dam SWM PLANMill Dam Creek Creek First Colonial H.S. First Colonial Rd II. STORM WATER QUALITY II. STORM WATER QUALITY STORMWATER MASTER PLANNING -CURRENT 10 YEAR PLAN Planned Completion 1Mill Dam CreekFY 2011 2Thalia CreekFY 2012 3NanneyCreekFY 2013 4Lake SmithFY 2014 5Cedar Hill CanalFY 2015 6Fox Run DitchFY 2016 7Rudee/Owl CreekFY 2017 8West Neck CreekFY 2018 9Elizabeth River –ArrowheadFY 2019 10Centerville/Stumpy LakeFY 2020 II. STORM WATER QUALITY II. STORM WATER QUALITY ALANTON ELEMENTARY RETROFIT ALANTON ELEMENTARY RETROFIT $.25M II. STORM WATER QUALITY II. STORM WATER QUALITY LYNNHAVEN MIDDLE SCHOOL LYNNHAVEN MIDDLE SCHOOL RETROFIT RETROFIT $.3M II. STORM WATER QUALITY II. STORM WATER QUALITY City Facility Retrofits Cost 1Alanton Elementary$250,000 2Lynnhaven Middle School$300,000 3City Fueling Station$50,000 4Social Services Building$140,000 5Windsor Ditch Restoration$150,000 6Great Neck Park/Cox High School$800,000 7Great Neck Middle School$250,000 8Bow Creek Recreation Center$250,000 9Arrowhead Elementary School Outfall$650,000 10Municipal Center retrofit (Phased)$2,000,000 $4.8M II. STORM WATER QUALITY II. STORM WATER QUALITY TMDL IMPLEMENTATION PLANS TMDL IMPLEMENTATION PLANS •Lynnhaven/Broad Bay/Linkhorn Bay •Lynnhaven/Broad Bay/Linkhorn Bay •Southern Rivers –Nanney Creek/Milldam •Southern Rivers –Nanney Creek/Milldam Creek/West Neck Creek Creek/West Neck Creek •Elizabeth River •Elizabeth River •Chesapeake Bay •Chesapeake Bay II. STORM WATER QUALITY II. STORM WATER QUALITY TMDL PROCESS TMDL PROCESS •Impaired water placed on 303d list by state •Impaired water placed on 303d list by state •State develops TMDL with State & Stakeholder input •State develops TMDL with State & Stakeholder input •TMDL approval by EPA •TMDL approval by EPA •City/State develop implementation plan (IP) •City/State develop implementation plan (IP) –2 public meetings –2 public meetings –Several meetings of technical advisory committee & stakeholders –Several meetings of technical advisory committee & stakeholders –IP is drafted for review –IP is drafted for review •Approval of IP by State –Concurrence by EPA •Approval of IP by State –Concurrence by EPA •City begins IP •City begins IP •Process reported in Annual VPDES Report •Process reported in Annual VPDES Report II. STORM WATER QUALITY II. STORM WATER QUALITY LYNNHAVEN/BROADBAY/ LYNNHAVEN/BROADBAY/ LINKHORN BAY TMDL LINKHORN BAY TMDL •Public Educational Programs •Public Educational Programs •Stormwater Quality Retrofits •Stormwater Quality Retrofits •Water Quality Testing and Bacterial •Water Quality Testing and Bacterial Source Identification Programs Source Identification Programs •Marine Sanitation Programs •Marine Sanitation Programs •1/3 Open for Shell Fishing •1/3 Open for Shell Fishing II. STORM WATER QUALITY II. STORM WATER QUALITY SOUTHERN RIVERS –NANNEY SOUTHERN RIVERS –NANNEY CREEK/MILLDAM CREEK/ CREEK/MILLDAM CREEK/ WEST NECK CREEK TMDL WEST NECK CREEK TMDL •Septic System Assistance Programs •Septic System Assistance Programs •Ditch and Canal Maintenance Programs •Ditch and Canal Maintenance Programs •In Stream Bacterial Testing and Source •In Stream Bacterial Testing and Source Identification Programs Identification Programs •Public Educational Programs •Public Educational Programs II. STORM WATER QUALITY II. STORM WATER QUALITY ELIZABETH RIVER TMDL ELIZABETH RIVER TMDL •Expected to be issued in 2010 •Expected to be issued in 2010 •Will be another Bacterial TMDL similar to •Will be another Bacterial TMDL similar to the Lynnhaven the Lynnhaven •Multi-Jurisdictional •Multi-Jurisdictional II. STORM WATER QUALITY II. STORM WATER QUALITY CHESAPEAKE BAY TMDL CHESAPEAKE BAY TMDL •Expected in 2010 when Legislative •Expected in 2010 when Legislative deadline expires deadline expires •Will be state wide for Nutrients and •Will be state wide for Nutrients and Sediment Sediment •Will apply to all tidal rivers and creeks in •Will apply to all tidal rivers and creeks in Virginia Beach Virginia Beach •Implementation Plan will probably be •Implementation Plan will probably be written on the State or Federal level. written on the State or Federal level. II. STORM WATER QUALITY II. STORM WATER QUALITY Thalia Creek Thurston Branch PCB in Fish Tissue (2018) Dissolved Oxygen (2010) Aquatic Plant (Mactophytes) (2010) Enterococcus (2010) Fecal Coliform* (2004) Estuarine Bioassessments (2010) 54 Impaired Waters with 152 Impairments West Neck Creek (upper) PCB in Fish Tissue (2018) Dissolved Oxygen (2010) Aquatic Plant (Mactophytes) (2010) Enterococcus (2010) Estuarine Bioassessments (2010) Milldam Creek (lower) Escherichia Coli (2005) Dissolved Oxygen (2010) III. MAINTENANCE & REPAIR III. MAINTENANCE & REPAIR The maintenance & repair element supports Flood Control & Water Quality by utilizing: –Asset Management System –Accurate Inventory –Condition Assessment –Mapping Citizen Reports –Established Maintenance Cycles III. MAINTENANCE & REPAIR III. MAINTENANCE & REPAIR ASSETS ASSETS 696 wet ponds/lakes, 624 Dry •BMP’s, Lakes, Ponds •BMP’s, Lakes, Ponds ponds, & 665 Misc. BMP’s •Dams & Spillways •Dams & Spillways 38 dams/spillways •Off-Road Ditches •Off-Road Ditches 237 miles •Roadside Ditches •Roadside Ditches 448 miles •Canals •Canals 25 miles •Basins & Inlets •Basins & Inlets >53,000 basins/manholes •Pipes •Pipes >2500 miles of pipe •Pump Stations •Pump Stations 21 Stormwater Pump Stations III. MAINTENANCE & REPAIR III. MAINTENANCE & REPAIR GOALS GOALS •Systems Function to Design Capacity •Preventive and Remedial Maintenance Yearly Goal Accomplishments 8 yrs 29 miles –Ditch Maintenance –Street Sweeping Varies by area 11,416 miles/5712 CY –Storm Pipe Cleaning 50 miles 54 miles –CCTV Inspections Varies on development 15 miles –BMP Inspections 112 ponds/537 other 110 ponds •Aging Infrastructure Improvements –Neighborhood Infrastructure Rehabilitation –System Failures (>1000 cave in repairs this FY) III. MAINTENANCE & REPAIR III. MAINTENANCE & REPAIR STORM DITCH STORM DITCH MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE 237 Miles III. MAINTENANCE & REPAIR III. MAINTENANCE & REPAIR DITCH MAINTENANCE DITCH MAINTENANCE Head River Ditch Maintenance DITCH DITCH MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE Lotus Creek Ditch Pre Maintenance Lotus Creek Ditch Post Maintenance 11/2008 DITCH DITCH MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE Church Point/Pleasure House Rd Ditch Pre Maintenance Church Point/Pleasure House Rd Ditch Post Maintenance 09/2008 Planning Map Neighborhood Infrastructure Improvements •Review maintenance records •Locate & identify structures and pipes •Clean & perform closed circuit television inspection (CCTV) •Review inspection and develop repair plan •Perform repairs Neighborhood Infrastructure Rehabilitation & CCTV Inspection Failed joint Princess Anne Plaza CCTV Inspection AGING INFRASTRUCTURE AGING INFRASTRUCTURE NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION NEIGHBORHOODESTABLISHED / POPULATIONPROJECTED COMPLETIONCOST •Princess Anne Plaza 1960’s/ 11,0002011 $5.5M •Green Run1970’s / 19,0002013 $4M •Aragona1950’s / 9,0002014 $2M •Glenwood1980’s / 10,0002015 $2M •Ocean Lakes1980’s / 7,0002015 $2M •Kings Grant 1960’s / 9,0002016 $2M •Windsor Woods1960’s / 5,0002016 $2M •Indian Lakes 1970’s / 8,0002017 $2M •Salem Woods1980’s / 6,0002018 $2M $25.5M •Fairfield 1970’s/ 6,0002018 $2M •Salem Lakes 1980’s/ 10,0002019 $1M •Red Mill Farms 1980’s/ 19,0002019 $2M •Lagomar 1980’s/ 4,0002020 $1M •Magic Hollow 1970’s/ 10,0002021 $2M •Malibu 1960’s/ 5,0002022 $1M •Southgate 1980’s/ 3,0002022 $1M •Foxfire 1990’s/ 5,0002023$1M •Courthouse Estates 1990’s/ 8,0002023$2M $36.5M SYSTEM FAILURES Twin 72”pipes failing and resulting in cave-in along Arctic Avenue. System age: 9 years Repair Estimate: $400,000 Harris Teeter–Arctic Harris Teeter–Arctic Failing 42”pipe resulting in multiple cave-ins along Pleasant Valley. System age: 30 years Repair Estimate:$200,000 Additional Rehab: $550,000 Pleasant Valley Pleasant Valley III. MAINTENANCE & REPAIR III. MAINTENANCE & REPAIR Water Quality BMPs •BMPsreduce contaminant loading into •BMPsreduce contaminant loading into waters of the U.S. waters of the U.S. •Inspections performed on all BMPsas •Inspections performed on all BMPsas required by stormwaterpermits required by stormwaterpermits •BMPsmust be maintained to ensure they •BMPsmust be maintained to ensure they continue to function properly continue to function properly Water Quality BMPs Water Quality BMPs Infiltration: Types 1A-F Infiltration: Types 1A-F Water Quality BMPs Water Quality BMPs Detention & Retention Ponds(Lakes): Detention & Retention Ponds(Lakes): Types 2 & 3 Types 2 & 3 Water Quality BMPs Water Quality BMPs Filtration: Types 4A-4C Filtration: Types 4A-4C Water Quality BMPs Water Quality BMPs Control: Types 5A-5B Control: Types 5A-5B Water Quality BMPs Water Quality BMPs Other: Type 6 Other: Type 6 (Vortechnics, Stormceptors, etc.) (Vortechnics, Stormceptors, etc.) III. MAINTENANCE & REPAIR III. MAINTENANCE & REPAIR BMP LAKE MAINTENANCE BMP LAKE MAINTENANCE •Living/Dynamic Plan •Living/Dynamic Plan •Not for Recreation or Navigation •Not for Recreation or Navigation •Criteria •Criteria –Depth –Depth (less than 2.5 feet) (less than 2.5 feet) –Water Quality –Water Quality (discharging to impaired waters) (discharging to impaired waters) –Eligibility/Maintenance Agreements –Eligibility/Maintenance Agreements (ownership/responsibility) (ownership/responsibility) –Easements/Property –Easements/Property (dedicated easements from owner) (dedicated easements from owner) –Service Request/Maintenance Cost –Service Request/Maintenance Cost (flood calls/citizen impact) (flood calls/citizen impact) BMP MAINTENANCE BMP MAINTENANCE Top 20 LAKE NAMEPROJECTED COMPLETIONCOST •Kingston Lake2010 $0.4M •Brigadoon Lake 22014 $1M •Brigadoon Lake 32015 $0.5M •Brigadoon Lake 42015 $0.25M •Brigadoon Lake 52016$0.2M •Brigadoon Lake 6 2016$0.3M $4.15M •Green Run Lake 12018$1.5M •Green Run Lake 22020$1.5M Limitations require •Green Run Lake 3>2020$1M accumulation of •Green Run Lake 4 $0.75M funding to perform •Green Run Lake 5$0.5M maintenance •Brookside Lake$0.5M •West Lake Pembrook$6M •Stratford Chase 1 $0.25M •Stratford Chase 2$0.5M •Stratford Chase 3$0.15M •Level Green Lake 1 $0.5M •Level Green Lake 2 $0.25M •Reedtown Lake (Wishart) $0.75M •Rock Creek 1$0.25M $17.05M Kingston Lake LAKE MAINTENANCE Kingston Lake Green Run LAKE MAINTENANCE Brigadoon Lakes III. MAINTENANCE & REPAIR III. MAINTENANCE & REPAIR DREDGING LESSONS LEARNED DREDGING LESSONS LEARNED –“We would recommend that future prioritizing –“We would recommend that future prioritizing of City-wide dredging projects be the sole of City-wide dredging projects be the sole responsibility of Public Works”, Beaches & responsibility of Public Works”, Beaches & Waterways Commission Waterways Commission –Clarify Right of Entry agreements to manage –Clarify Right of Entry agreements to manage expectations expectations –Evaluate projects in compliance with existing –Evaluate projects in compliance with existing dredge Policy Report & Public Works Lake dredge Policy Report & Public Works Lake Management Plan Management Plan FY 08/09 FY 08/09 STORMWATER FUNDING STORMWATER FUNDING $0.2 M $5.2 M $22.9M $17.5 M SW FeesVDOT MaintenanceInterest/Transfers CURRENT FEES CURRENT FEES 25 21.3 21.3 19.3 17.5 20 15.7 15 Millions 10 5 0 FY 08FY 09FY 10FY11FY 12-19 SOURCES OF FEES SOURCES OF FEES Non- Non- Residential Residential 6.2% 47.6% Residential 52.4% Residential 93.8% ResidentialNon-Residential ResidentialNon-Residential Revenue Customers STORMWATER EXPENDITURES STORMWATER EXPENDITURES FY 08/09 Stormwater Funding $22,920,000 Direct/Indirect Water Quality, Support $2,037,470 $1,478,784 Flood Control, Maintenance & $8,005,352 Repair, $11,398,394 STORMWATER EXPENDITURES STORMWATER EXPENDITURES FY 09/10 Stormwater Funding $24,960,969 Direct/Indirect Support Water Quality, $1,547,314 $3,882,475 Flood Control, Maintenance & $6,582,462 Repair, $12,948,718 FY 08/09 Maintenance & Repair Budget $11,398,394 Lake Pipe Cleaning, Management, Street $1,257,714 $592,389Sweeping, $504,169 Environmental, $538,923 Pipe Rehab., Off Road Ditch, $5,870,967 $1,631,169 Roadside Ditch, $1,003,063 FY 09/10 Maintenance & Repair Budget $12,948,718 Lake Management, Pipe Cleaning, $588,332 $1,166,766 Street Sweeping, $472,584 Pipe Rehab., Environmental, $7,291,000 $530,496 Off Road Ditch, $1,969,010 Roadside Ditch, $930,530 SUMMARY SUMMARY •SW Requirements Will Continue to Grow •SW Requirements Will Continue to Grow •Water Quality Requirements Will Continue •Water Quality Requirements Will Continue to Grow to Grow •After 2011, Inflation Will Outpace Revenue •After 2011, Inflation Will Outpace Revenue Increases Increases