HomeMy WebLinkAboutNOVEMBER 10, 2009
II
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
"COMMUNITY FOR A LIFETIME"
CITY COUNCIL
MAYOR WILLIAM D. SESSOMS, JR., At-Large
ITCE MAYOR LOUIS R. JONES, Bayside - District 4
GLENN R. DA17S, Rose Hall - District 3
WILLIAM R. DeSTEPH, At-Large
HARRY E. DlEZEL, Kempsville - District 2
ROBERT M. DYER, Centerville - District I
BARBARA M. HENLEY, Princess Anne - District 7
JOHN E. UHRIN, Beach - District 6
RON A. 17LLANUEVA, At-Large
ROSEMARY WILSON, At-Large
JAMES L. WOOD, Lynnhaven -District 5
CITY COUNCIL APPOINTEES
('fTY MANAGER JAMES K. SPORE
CITY ATTORNEY MARK D. STILES
CITY ASSESSOR JERALD HANAGAN
('ITY AUDITOR LYNDON S. REMIAS
('fTY CLERK - RUTH HODGES FRASER, MMC
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
10 November 2009
I.
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS:
- Conference Room -
A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
Jack Whitney, Director - Planning
B. INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT A TION SYSTEM
Jason Cosby, Director - Public Works
C. DIGITAL BILLBOARDS
William Macali, City Attorney
II. CITY COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
III. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
IV. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REVIEW
v.
INFORMAL SESSION
- Conference Room -
A. CALL TO ORDER - Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr.
B. ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL
C. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
CITY HALL BUILDING
2401 COURTHOUSE DRIVE
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA 23456-8005
PHONE (757) 385-4303
FAX (757) 385-5669
E-MAIL: Ctycncl@vbgov.com
2:30 PM
4:30 PM
VI. FORMAL SESSION AGENDA
- City Council Chamber -
6:00 PM
A. CALL TO ORDER - Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr.
B.
INVOCATION:
Reverend Steve Christenson
Senior Chaplain, Virginia Beach Correctional Center
C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
D. ELECTRONIC ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL
E. CERTIFICATION OF CLOSED SESSION
F. MINUTES
1. INFORMAL and FORMAL SESSIONS
October 27, 2009
G, FORMAL SESSION AGENDA
H. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. EXCESS CITY PROPERTY
a. N elms Lane
b. 1000 Red Mill Boulevard
c. 1544 New York Avenue
d. 1540 New York Avenue, 232 Gatewood Avenue, 1525 Ohio Avenue, 109 and
111 Bob Lane
2. BAKER ROAD Extended Project
Condemnation of Property
3. WEST NECK ROAD INTERIM SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
Condemnation of Property
I. CONSENT AGENDA
J. ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS
1. Ordinances DECLARING City property to be EXCESS and AUTHORIZING the City
Manager to exchange, for the Zurich Arch property owned by Habitat for Humanity, the
property at:
a. Nelms Lane
b. 1000 Red Mill Boulevard
2. Ordinances DECLARING City property to be EXCESS and AUTHORIZING the City
Manager to sell the property at:
a. 1544 New Y ork Avenue to Mark W.C. McGohan
b. 1540 New York Avenue, 232 Gatewood Avenue, 1525 Ohio Avenue and 109 and
111 Bob Lane to Ocean Bay Homes, Inc.
3. An Ordinance to AUTHORIZE acquisition of property in fee simple for the right-of-way
for Baker Road Extended with temporary and permanent easements, by agreement or
condemnation
4. An Ordinance to AUTHORIZE acquisition of property in fee simple for the rights-of-way
for West Neck Road Interim Safety Improvement with temporary and permanent
easements, by agreement or condemnation
5. Resolution to REFER to the Planning Commission an Ordinance AMENDING SIll, S215
and S216 and ADDING S218 of the City Zoning Ordinance (CZO) re: defining electronic
display billboards and establishing requirements for such billboards (requested by
Councilman Diezel)
6. Resolution to SUPPLEMENT the 2010 Legislative Agenda to request the Governor and the
Virginia General Assembly fully fund the Virginia National Defense Industrial Authority
(VNDIA) and support legislation to provide additional monies to the Hampton Roads
Military and Federal Facilities Alliance (HRMFFA) to promote and protect defense spending
and other federal activities in Hampton Roads (requested by Councilman Uhrin)
7. Ordinance to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE a $64,600 Grant from the U.S. Department of
Homeland Security through the 2009 Infrastructure Protection Activities Program to the
FY2009-10 Operating Budget of the Police Department re: dive equipment and training for
the Police Marine Unit.
8. Ordinance to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE from the United States Department of Justice
Edward Byrne Justice Assistance Grant $214,208 re: Public Safety and Criminal
Processing as follows:
a. $13,000 to the Police Department re: the purchase of night vision goggles
b. $30,940 to the Police Department re: the purchase of surveillance equipment
c. $43,000 to the Police Department re: security improvement to the 4th Precinct
parking lot
d. $93,875 to the Sheriff re: security camera upgrade
e. $19,390 to Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court re: a contracted
Expungement Clerk
f. $2,148 to the Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court re: an on-line
training subscription
g. $11,855 to the Circuit Court re: Media Evidence Display System
9. Ordinance to ESTABLISH Capital Project #3-151, ACCEPT the Grant and APPROPRIATE
$800,000 from the United States Department of Justice re: mobile communications services and
equipment supporting regional communication needs for the COPS Law Enforcement
Technology
K. PLANNING
1. Ordinance to AMEND the Comprehensive Plan re: The Pembroke Strategic Growth Area
4 Implementation Plan and REPEAL the 1991 Virginia Beach Central Business District
(CBD) Master Plan.
RECOMMENDA TION
APPROVAL
2. Application of BRYANT & STRATTON COLLEGE for a Conditional Use Permit to
allow a private university or college in the existing building at 4740 Baxter Road.
DISTRICT 2 - KEMPSVILLE
RECOMMENDA TION
APPROVAL
3. Application of BEACH BINGO, INC., t/a PEMBROKE HALL for a Conditional Use
Permit re relocation of existing bingo operation to the Chimney Hill Shopping Center at
Suite 809, 3600 Holland Road.
DISTRICT 3 - ROSE HALL
RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL
4. Resolution to APPROVE the location of the existing mobile home at 2348 Vaughan Road.
DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE
RECOMMENDATION
APPROV AL
5. Ordinance to AMEND the City Zoning Ordinance (CZO):
a. S211 re: time limitations on political campaign signs posted on private property.
b. S201 re: setbacks for front porches (requested by Council Ladies Rosemary
Wilson and Barbara Henley).
c. S203, 900, 901, 902 and 905 re: The Pembroke Strategic Growth Area 4
Implementation Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
APPROV AL
6 Application of NEW FIRST COLONIAL ASSOCIATES for a Change of Zoning District
, Classification from R-15 Residential District to Conditional 0-1 Office District re a dental
office at 5315 Bonneydale Road (deferred by City Council October 27,2009).
DISTRICT 2 - KEMPSVILLE
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
DENIAL
APPROVAL
7. Application of EN DE A VOR ENTERPRISES, L.L.c. for a Change of Zoning District
Classification from AG-l and AG-2 Agricultural to Conditional B-IA Limited Business and
P-l Preservation District at Chestnut Oak Way (deferred by City Council June 9, July 14, and
August 11, 2009).
DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE
RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL
L. APPOINTMENTS
COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESORT ADVISORY COMMISSION (RAC)
REVIEW and ALLOCA nON (COG)
VIRGINIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
M. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
N. NEW BUSINESS
O. ADJOURNMENT
**********************************
PUBLIC DIALOGUE
Non-Agenda Items
Each Speaker will be allowed 3 minutes
and each subject is limited to 3 Speakers
**********************************
Thursday, November 12th
ANNUAL JOINT MEETING
General Assembly, City Council
and School Board
City Council Sessions
November 17 - Workshop
November 24 - Informal and Formal Sessions
December 1 and 8 - Informal and Formal Sessions
Town Hall Meetings - 2010-11 Municipal Budget
Wednesday, November 18, 7:00 PM
Green Run High School, 1700 Dahlia Drive
Thursday, December 3,7:00 PM
Kellam High School, 2323 Holland Road
***********
If you are physically disabled or visually impaired
and need assistance at this meeting,
please call the CITY CLERK'S OFFICE at 385-4303
***********
Agenda 11/10109afb
www.vbgov.com
- 1 -
MINUTES
VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Virginia Beach, Virginia
November 10, 2009
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., called to order the CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING re the
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE in the City Council Conference Room, Tuesday, November 10,
2009, at 2:30 P.M
Council Members Present:
William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Barbara M Henley,
Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., Ron A.
Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
[Entered: 3:03 P.M)
Robert M Dyer
[Absent - Ill)
John E. Uhrin
[Entered: 2:45 P.M)
November 10,2009
- 2 -
C IT Y MANA G E R 'S B R IE FIN G
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
2:30 P. M.
ITEM # 59347
Jack Whitney, Director - Planning, advised the Comprehensive Plan is one of the most important items
the Planning Department can deliver to its governing body. This is the 3o'h Anniversary of the
development of a Comprehensive Plan. The first Comprehensive Plan was ADOPTED in 1979. This is
the first Comprehensive Plan Post BRAC and the first primarily focused around redevelopment, giving
light and vision to the City's Strategic Growth Areas. This Comprehensive Use Plan is also the most user
friendly.
Mr. Whitney introduced Tom Pauls, Comprehensive Planning Coordinator and Mark Schnaufer,
Transportation Coordinator. to present more specific information concerning the Comprehensive Plan:
Mr. Pauls advised the Public Input Process entailed: twelve (12) Open Houses, three (3) Informational
Meetings and two (2) Public Hearings.
Stakeholder Groups
· City Executives, Administrators and Staff
· Regional Outreach
This Comprehensive Plan will include the Policy Document, Technical Report and Reference
Handbook.
Policy Document
Chapter 1 - Introduction and General Strategy
Chapter 2 - Urban Areas
Chapter 3 - Suburban Areas
Chapter 4 - Princess Anne Commons/Transition Area
Chapter 5 - Rural Area
Chapter 6 - Master Transportation Plan
Chapter 7 - Environmental Stewardship
Chapter 8 - Housing
Strategic Growth Areas
SGA 1 Burton Station - adopted January 27,2009
Residential, hotel, corporate office and light industrial
· SGA 2 Westview - under staffreview
Landfills, corporate office, light industrial
SGA 3 Newtown - Study currently underway.
SGA 4 Pembroke - Study Nearing Completion
SGA 5 North Rosemont - Study to be Conducted
· SGA 6 North Lynnhaven - Study to be Conducted
· SGA 7 Hilltop - Study to be Conducted
· SGA 8 Oceanfront Resort - adopted December 2, 2008
Entertainment, retail, hotels, residential, office
November 10, 2009
- 3 -
C IT Y MANA G E R 'S B R IE FIN G
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
ITEM # 59347 (Continued)
Strategic Growth Areas
StrategIc Growth Areas (SGA's,)
-t.
1 Burton Station
2 West\fleW
3 Newtown
4 Pe:-mtJroke
5 Rosernont
6 lynnhaven
7 HJlltop
8 Resort Area
~-'-"~"~'" -~_.~ ,--",,~,,*,~
The Suburban Focus Areas are special within the primary residential areas (the majority of the 170,000
homes within the City are located in these Suburban Focus Areas))
Suburban Focus Areas
"""- ..,.
"
"'\..
\,
'\
4,
'~':B. "-~~:....' \/r'~._~,-. 7
"', , -
',i"\. , .'. \ Oceon
: : in" ,.,~ '
'-'i,"::f2. '
" '
lf 'L
\ '.
<.~~-----,
'\
\
)
, I]':
November 10, 2009
- 4 -
C IT Y MANA G E R'S B R IE FIN G
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
ITEM # 59347 (Continued.)
Princess Anne Commons and Transition Area
Princess Anne Commons & Transition Area
Rural Area
For the most part, there are not many changes to the Rural Area. A Pungo Study is being recommended.
Rural Community Areas (circled) are suggestedfor non-residential rural growth.
A Technical Report is required by State Law and contains Citywide and Planning Area Information: Land
Use, Environment, Transportation, Public Facilities, Housing, Historic Cultural, Economic Vitality,
Tourism, Military Employment and Agriculture.
Reference Handbook
Community Design Guidelines
Adopted By Reference
Agendafor Future Action
November 10, 2009
! i.1
- 5 -
C IT Y MANA G E R 'S B R IE FIN G
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
ITEM # 59347 (Continued)
Mr. Pauls advised Mark Schnaufer, Transportation Coordinator, would present the overview of
Transportation Policies.
2009 Draft Plan Overview Transportation Policies
Citywide Policies and Roadway Network Plan
Reformatted Roadway Network Map
Roadway functional classification and amenities
Coordinated with Public Works standards
Access Control roadways mapped
Information re Roadway Network Map, Access Controlled Roads and a Primary Bike Network Commuter
Route Map were displayed. The City will adopt, under separate cover. road right-of way, if development
standards change or other issues change, as new roads are built, changes can be adjusted without going
through the old Comprehensive Plan Amendment process. This document will be developed with Public
Works and should be provided within two (2) months.
Transportation Policies
· Land Use/Transportation relationship
Coordinate with Strategic Growth Area (SGA) implementation
- Refine traffic model
· Traffic Demand and Congestion Management
Emphasis on multi-modal and off-peak trips
Use of ITS technology and development standards
Public Transit
Transit links to Norfolk Tide
Light Rail extension study
Transit in Strategic Growth Area (SGA) implementation
· Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
Primary Bike Network-Commuter Route
Develop City "Complete Streets" Policy
Connectivity through neighborhoods
· Regional Transportation Planning
Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization (HRTPO) and Hampton Roads
Transit (HRT) participation
Regional highway planning (Southeastern Parkway is still a major part of the City's
Transportation Plan)
High-speed rail
At a special meeting of the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization (HRPTO) at a Special
Board Meeting on October 30. 2009, the organization voted unanimously to support bringing high
speed rail down the 1-460 Corridor into the City of Norfolk.
November 10, 2009
i II
- 6 -
C IT Y MANA G E R 'S B R IE FIN G
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
ITEM # 59347 (Continued)
Mr. Pauls summarized the Environmental Stewardship Policies, all of which are addressed in the
Comprehensive Plan.
Environmental Stewardship Policies
Watershed Management
· Stormwater Management
· Floodplain and Wetland Protection
Energy Efficient Development
· Natural Hazard Mitigation
· Tree Protection
Other Planning Policies
Preserving, Renewing and Enhancing our Neighborhoods
Reaffirming our Commitment to the Oceana Land Use Conformity Program
Next Steps
November 12,2009 Planning Commission Public Hearing
December 1,2009 City Council Public Comment
December 8, 2009 City Council Considers Adoption
Prepare to launch new website: www.ourfuturevb.com
The new website will contain all information re the Comprehensive Plan.
.
Mayor Sessoms advised Council Lady Henley reminded him that Jack Whitney originally was the
Comprehensive Planner and prepared the first Comprehensive Plan in 1979.
November 10, 2009
! Ii
il
- 7 -
C IT Y MANA G E R 'S B R IE FIN G
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
2:50 P.M.
ITEM # 59348
The City Manager introduced Jason E. Cosby, Director - Public Works. Mr. Cosby described the
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS). Mr. Cosby recognized the support of the First Responders, the
attendance of Chief Bruce Edwards - Emergency Medical Service and ComIT, Captain Ray Eisenberg -
Police and Terrence J. McAndrews - Fire. Several staff members who are directing the ITS project were
in attendance: Frank Hickman, George L. Hardin, Robert K. Gey. Mr. Cosby recognized the newly
appointed Director - Emergency Communications and Citizens Services (ECCS) - Althena M Plummer.
The City Manager advised Ms. Plummer was previously the Deputy Director of Emergency Operations
for the District of Columbia in which she handled events such as the Presidential Inauguration. Previous
to this employment, she was in Anne Arundel County, Maryland, as the Commander of their Police
Communications and Patrol District Divisions. She possesses a Bachelor's Degree in Criminal Justice
and a Masters from John Hopkins in Management. The City is honored to have her as a Member.
c"CCC:'C~ c;,j';,: c '<Jf"'rc~...
, .c'" 'Irg
ci .~ .i';"i"""i"""'i. ",' "%i "... ...
, ........,...,. ;Iilm <,
-.-----,."..''''"''':"''~,,........ ......,_...
ITS Program
Public Works Department
Jason E. Cosby, P.E.
'"""".-
(i.),
:;>)
\~~ ~~... ~.i}
l:\.:~. ,.~fr.~:/'~/
\.,--'" .;A...Jjtff......_ ....J.'
\..;;.~~;.~o-4-..1
Mr. Cosby detailed the photographs:
Upper Left - Traffic Count Station on Princess Anne Road (near Landstown High Schools)
Upper Right- Dynamic Message Panels on Northampton
Lower Left- TMC at Landstown Yard
Lower Right - Independence Boulevard/Bonney Road Intersection
Overview
· ITS Definition
· Initial situation
· Transportation Needs
. Developed an ITS Master Plan
. Successfully Competed for Regional Funds
. Progress Toward ITS Goals
. Program Expenditures to Date
. Items Remaining to be Accomplished
· Future Projects
November 10, 2009
- 8 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
ITEM # 59348 (Continued)
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)
. ITS:
. A broad range of diverse technologies that provide the information necessary to enable
people and goods to move more safely and efficiently through a state-of-the-art,
intermodal transportation system
. Enable the rapid collection and dissemination of traffic incident and weather information
to the First Responders
Benefits of ITS
. Enables motorists to make smarter travel choices
. Through advanced accident/incident notification
. Increases Mobility
. Reduces stops and delays (*5% - 42%)
. Leads to a reduction in motorists frustration
. Improves the Environment and Saves Energy
. Reducesfuel consumption (*2% - 13%)
. Leads to improved air quality
· Improves safety
· Save lives
. Allows for efficient incident management
. Reduces construction cost
. Allows for the optimization of existing infrastructure
. Traffic Signal Retiming typically has a Benefit/Cost of 40: 1 *
Sources: www.itsbenefits.its.dot.gov,' ITEjournal
Video Imaging
Vehicle Detection System (VIVOS)
I Video Detection Device I
VIVDS Installed
November 10, 2009
I II
II
- 9 -
C IT Y MANA G E R 'S B R IE FIN G
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
ITEM # 59348 (Continued)
Emergency Preemption allows the Fire and EMS to cycle the light green within 1000 feet. The School
Flasher System operates using solar power and only while Schools are in session
t'I\':::::::.: ,::d:tj1il\~::;::::", ,.t::,,~~H11lJ)UjW2'>
___Examph~s ot:;l~r:S "eChnel~~;
-----. ~
Vehicle Emergency
Preemption School Flasher System
lb.
. Solar-powered
. operated through a
paging System
. Enhances time-critical travel
. Available in the CBD and other
corridors identified by the Fire/EMS Dept.
Typical ITS Improvements at an Intersection:
Vehicle Detection System
Countdown Pedestrian Signals
. Mast Arms Installations (to replace outdated span wires and allow utilization of more Joint
Use Polls)
. Emergency Vehicle Preemption
. Traffic Signal Coordination
November 10. 2009
- 10-
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
ITEM # 59348 (Continued)
The staffreviewed the City's replacement program in 1999 as the Public Works' System was well
beyond its useful life. Repair parts were no longer available because of the old technology
Transportation Needs
· Develop an ITS Transportation Program
· Better Travel Information to Motorists
· Improvements to Air Quality
· Better Signal Timing & Coordination
· Construct a Traffic Management Center
In August 2000, Public Works hired a design firm to develop an Intelligent Transportation System
(ITS) Master Plan, and, in October 2000, the Staff made an ITS presentation to City Council:
The Master Plan:
Documented existing conditions
Identified $15-MILLION in program needs
· Initiated an Implementation Plan
· Master Plan was completed in February 2002
--",,,-,,,,,,-,-'-;:"';'.;""..
Successfully Competed for Regional Funds
· April 2002 consolidated ITSJJrojects into the
Computerized Traffic Signal System Upgrade
project (CIP 2-039)
.. Vehicle Video Detection projects
.. Resort Area Variable Message Sign Project
" Shore Drive-Atlantic Avenue Improvement
project
· May 2002 presented to HRPDC Technical
Committee
· October 2003 HRPDC granted us CMAQ funds
Progress Towards ITS Goals
December 2003:
December 2003 -- September 2005:
March 2004
February 2006:
July 2004 -- January 2008
February 2008
Replaced the traffic signal computer system
Replaced traffic signal controllers and cabinets
Completed design of Traffic Management Center
Completed construction of the Traffic Management Center
Designed transportation system network project
Bid Transportation System Management Network project
November 10, 2009
- 11 -
C IT Y MANA G E R 'S B R IE FIN G
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
ITEM # 59348 (Continued)
· NEMA Controllers
· Coordinated Signal Timings
· Transit Priority
· Uninterruptible Power Supply UPS
FIBER
FIBER
NEMA
CONTROLLER
NEMA
CONTROLLER
NEMA
CONTROLLER
NEMA
CONTROLLER
City Wide Signal Retiming
w.e
s
_ UPC 82112 (58)
_ UPC 87091 (97)
=UPC84120(98)
Received $1. 7-MILLION in (Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Fund) CMAQfunds for signal retiming
from HRPDC (MPO). Plan to retime approximately two hundredfifty (250) signalized intersections.
Some corridors had not been retimed in ten (10) years. Goal is to retime all signals within afive (5-)
year period, which is within the industry standard
November 10, 2009
I
- 12 -
C IT Y MANA G E R 'S B R IE FIN G
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
ITEM # 59348 (Continued)
Began Retiming in October 2008
Completed so far:
.
Indian River Road (Military Highway to Ferrell Parkway)
Town Center (Independence Blvd from Jericho Drive to Holland I Virginia
Beach Boulevard from Thalia to Aragona Blvd)
Virginia Beach Boulevard East (from Thalia to Great Neck! Lynnhaven Pwy
from Virginia Beach Boulevard to Lynnhaven Mall)
First Colonial Road (from Wolfsnare Road to Oceana Blvd! Laskin Roadfrom
Republic Road to Hilltop East)
.
.
.
City Wide Signal Retiming
Program Expenditures To Date
Total Project Cost
Federal/CMAQ
City Funds
$21,165,833
$19,969,000 allocated
$1,196,833 allocated
Items Remaining to be Accomplished
Installation of Dynamic Message Panels
Six (6) panelsl major arterial locations
Estimated completion June 2010
November 10, 2009
I II
- 13 -
C IT Y MANA G E R 'S B R IE FIN G
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
ITEM # 59348 (Continued)
\
\"
w4r-'
.. )....
,,,,..---
/"",
..<i<
,- "-.",
~..,
f
.--...,,"""'''
,
\
t"
'\
",~#'."
\
.
DYNAMIC MESSAGE SIGNS
j
Signs are typically 6' tall by 12 'wide - Mounted 19 feet above roadway
Municipalities with Dynamic Message Panels are:
· Chesapeake received bid on 7 DMS in Sept 2009
VDOT has 298 DMS along 1-6412641664
· Northern Virginia! City of Richmond have DMS
- Norfolk 1 2 DMSI1 operationall has access to VDOTs DMS
- Hampton uses VDOTs DMS
- Newport News relies on VDOT DMS
Why they are needed???:
- Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) recognizes their value to convey timely
and important information to motorists
- FHWA discourages the display of general public information or non essential
messages
- FHWA criteriafor dynamic message panels are:
1. Used for emergency or security alert messages example the AMBER Alert and
Military Base Security
2. Included necessary coordination with Public Safety or Security agencies
3. Recommend formal policies among critical stakeholders (Law enforcement,
security. transportation, and public safety) be established.
Mr. Cosby displayed examples of Dynamic Message Panels on Princess Anne Road, Shore Drive/First
Court Road Northampton Boulevard, Shore Drive/First Landing and Independence Boulevard!
Haygood Road.
November 10, 2009
! II
- 14 -
C IT Y MANA G E R 'S B R IE FIN G
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTA TION SYSTEM
ITEM # 59348 (Continued)
Items Remaining to be Accomplished
Installation of Video Wall
Fully Staff the Traffic Management Center (TMC)
. Traffic Engineer(1}
. Engineering Technician (1)
. Traffic Signal Technicians (4)
Exporting Traffic Information to Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), Virginia Beach
Television (VB TV), and Emergency Operations Center (EOC)
. Estimated commencement date June 2010
Integration of Regional Traffic Incident Management System (RTIMIS)
. Help Police/Fire/Rescue localize crashes on interstates/major arterials
Complete Signal Retiming
Future Projects
Close Circuit Cameras (CCTV) with the pan tilt zoom capabilities that will allow
visibility to the road, intersections and surrounding area. These will be placed at thirty
(30) additional intersections.
LP generators operate as long as gas is available (no need to refuel) and will maintain
power to the intersection. These will be placed at Close Circuit Camera locations and
major intersections within the City of Virginia Beach. The typical installation cost will
entail $30,000.
.,--._...-..._---~-,
Future Projects
Resort Area Advanced
Parking Management System
~ Parking
example
November 10, 2009
i I
- 15 -
CITY MANA GER'S BRIEFING
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
ITEM # 59348 (Continued)
=:---._-""""',:.::~
Future Projects
Icy Bridge Monitors
Flooded Road Monitors
,
---
Futu re Project
.46.
Additional Pre-emption
Working with Police
Department/Fi re/Emer
ency Medical Services
Pre-emption will be added to twenty-six (26) intersections in the City. The staffwill be able to identifY
the pre-empting vehicles by: code! date-time! direction. These will be added on all major arterial roads
with the assistance of Police!Fire/Emergency Medical Services to determine additional locations.
A memorandum concerning the individual cost of the Dynamic Message Signs, the Closed Circuit
Television Cameras and parking signs, which is included in the $21-MILLION, will be provided as per
request of Councilman DeSteph. Mr. Cosby will review Councilman Woods' concern re the intersection
at Thalia and Virginia Beach Boulevard, as well as similar intersections. The Fire Trucks coming out
preempt that intersection and the turn lane signals are disoriented. The signals do not turn green for six
or more cycles.
November 10, 2009
- 16 -
C IT Y MANA G E R 'S B R IE FIN G
DIGITAL BILLBOARDS
3:16 P.M.
ITEM # 59349
Deputy City Attorney Macali described Digital (v. poster-style) billboards.
- internally illuminated (brighter)
_ can change messages, brightness and colors (8-10 seconds. is typical)
- video capability
- interactive capability
City Council may limit any features of digital billboards (except message content), e.g.
static display only/no audio
brightness ("luminance")
length of each display ("dwell time'')
Deputy City Attorney Macali displayed examples of Digital Billboards in Fredericksburg and 1-64, as
well as poster-style billboards on 1-64
Adams Outdoor Advertising Proposal
Preliminarv plan - convert three (3) billboards with City Council approval:
- 4356 Virginia Beach Boulevard
- 4719 Indian River Road
-1975 Diamond Springs Road
November 10, 2009
i I I
H
- 17 -
C IT Y MANA G E R 'S B R IE FIN G
DIGITAL BILLBOARDS
ITEM # 59349 (Continued)
At Councilman Diezel's request, an Ordinance has been drafted for discussion purposes. This Draft
Ordinance applies to all billboards in Virginia Beach. Currently there are thirty (30) billboards in
Virginia Beach: nineteen (19) are owned by Adams Advertising and there are four (4) other "quasi-
billboards"
Deputy City Attorney Macali cited components of the Draft Ordinance:
Only as replacement of existing billboard on same property
City Council approval required
Procedure the same as for other nonconforming uses/structures
Application Requirements
Includes standard requirements (site plan, landscaping plan, building code certification, etcetera)
Protocol for City's usage of billboard
DimensionallLocational Requirements:
No larger than old one; City Council may require to be smaller
No higher than old one; City Council may require to be lower. Maximum height 24 feet
No closer to street than old one
Maximum one (1) per zoning lot
Maximum two (2) faces
No vertical stacking
Not within:
- 400 feet of an Historic & Cultural District
- 2000 feet of another digital billboard
- Hampton Roads Transit (HRT) Light Rail Project Study Area
Illumination Requirements
Maximum illumination:
- sunrise to sunset = 7,000 cd/m2
- sunset to 1 AM = 500 cd/m2
- none between 1 AM and 5 AM
cd/m2 - (candelas per square meter) one candela is equal to the lightfrom one common candle.
City Council may require display to go dark at Midnight if visible from Residential or
Apartment District
Must have automatic dimmer control device
November 10, 2009
I II
- 18 -
C IT Y MANA G E R 'S B R IE FIN G
DIGITAL BILLBOARDS
ITEM # 59349 (Continued)
Display Requirements
Must be static (no blinking, flashing, etc)
Dwell time eight (8) seconds minimum
Changes to take no more than two (2) seconds
No audio
The Federal Highway Administration is performing a study concerning effect on driver distraction. This
should be completed early next year. There is no specific date re completion.
Landscaping Requirements
Sufficient at maturity to fully screen supporting structures from road
City Council may require additional landscaping
Maintained in good condition at all times
Other Provisions
No messages or symbols commonly used for traffic control purposes
May not block motorists' view of traffic signs, intersections, etc.
All electrical service lines must be underground
Public Safety Messages
Must be capable of displaying public safety messages transmitted by the City or other
authorized agencies
Public use per protocol agreed upon by City and applicant
- Protocol made a condition of approval
Enforcement
City Council may revoke approval for noncompliance with resolution or conditions of
approval
Zoning Administrator must first give notice to owner and specifY a reasonable period to
cure noncompliance
November 10, 2009
- 19 -
C IT Y MANA G E R 'S B R IE FIN G
DIGITAL BILLBOARDS
ITEM # 59349 (Continued)
Next Steps
Today (City Council Session of November 10, 2009) - City Council shall vote on a
Resolution to REFER this Ordinance to the Planning Commission for their Meeting in
January
Likely, Planning Commission will schedule Workshops/Public Comment Sessions in
January and vote in February
To City Council in March
Councilman Davis referenced an on-line poll of The Virginian-Pilot which overwhelmingly reflected the
citizens are interested in safety of the drivers. The citizens decided electronic billboards should be
allowed if the City can use them to display useful information. Councilman Davis believes the Adams'
proposal would provide the same ability as the Dynamic Message Signs (free of charge). This proposal
was mentioned in Mr. Cosby's earlier presentation.
November 10, 2009
- 20-
CITY COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
ITEM # 59350
3:48 P.M.
BIKEWAYS AND TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Council Lady Henley, Liaison - Bikeways and Trails Advisory Committee advised the Committee had a
meeting yesterday, November 9, 2009. There was discussion re education and enforcement and they are
concerned re safety issues. Two (2) representatives from the Police Department were in attendance. The
Police Department provided aflyer discussing bicycle laws and safety. Council Lady Henley requested a
Briefing re this topic be scheduled for a future City Council Session. The Police Officers advised so far
this year, there have been three (3) fatalities involving bicyclists. The City must do a better job of
educating the motoring public and the bicyclists of the regulations. The City needs to be aware of the
numbers of bicycle teams.
Next year, the Bikeway Plan will be updated. All members utilizing these bikes and trails should be
given consideration in the Study.
The City Manager advised of Briefings by the Virginia Beach Police re their educational safety efforts. A
Briefing re the Bikeways and Trails Committee planning process shall be scheduled.
Councilman DeSteph, Liaison - Bikeways and Trails Advisory Committee, advised there are four (4)
"bicycle awareness" type rides, in which he participated along with approximately two hundred (200)
and three hundred fifty (350) other individuals. This is a growing world-wide sport.
ITEM # 59351
MAYOR'S COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYEE PENSIONS
Councilman Diezel advised the Mayor had requested he Chair a Committee re the retirement system and
cost involved. The first meeting was very effective. The second meeting has been scheduled for November
J 8, 2009, and will involve a presentation re Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee (JLARC) and
the Virginia Retirement System (VRS) concerning their study re defined Contributions and Benefits.
Summary minutes are being prepared and he shall provide City Council a copy for their reference.
ITEM # 59352
MINORITY BUSINESS COUNCIL
Councilman Ron A. Villanueva, Liaison - Minority Business Council advised, on behalf of himself and
Councilman Robert M Dyer, the Minority Business Council Expo celebrated its fourteenth year on
Thursday, November 5, 2009, at the Westin Hotel. Approximately four hundred (400) businesses
attended. Awards were presented in the following categories: Small Woman and Minority-Owned
Businesses, Diversity Champion, Exceptional Achievement and Service Disabled Veteran-Owned
Businesses.
Mayor Sessoms expressed appreciation to the Council Members and referenced the dedicated staff who
supported this event.
November J 0, 2009
- 21 -
CITY COUNCILCOMMENTS
ITEM # 59353
3: 56 P.M.
Council Lady Henley referenced attending a Community Meeting re the 51% sewer project from the
Lotus Gardens. Lotus Gardens and Flanagan's Lane communities completed the documents to be a
51% sewer project with cost participation with the Ashville Park development. The purpose of this
meeting was to advise Ashville Park is not moving forward now, neither can the proposed sewer project.
The cost of serving the seventy-four (74) properties would be astronomical per lot. The community was
not pleased. Council Lady Henley requested a Briefing be provided relative the 51% Policy. There are a
number of issues.
ITEM # 59354
Councilman DeSteph provided an update re the Chinese Drywall issue. Friday, November 6, 2009, he
met with Congressmen Cantor and Nye re jointly signing correspondence to the Director of Consumer
Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to conduct a ten-to- fifteen day study whether the drywall met or did
not meet the Building Code standards. Monday, November 9, 2009, Councilman DeSteph met with
Senators Webb and Warner and all have agreed to this correspondence at the Federal level. Councilman
DeSteph is working with legislators at the State level to have the Commissioner of Insurance review the
pollution exclusion and abuse of this concept, or basically claiming the pollution exclusion tying into a
pollution event. Within the next thirty days, at this State level, Councilman DeSteph should be provided
with results. Councilman DeSteph should be advised concerning the correspondence at the Federal level
by the end of this week.
ITEM # 59355
Mayor Sessoms referenced the issue of Health Care - Reform, Implications and Recommendation. The
City Manager, based on the current health care reform discussion and potential impacts, has
recommended delay of the RFP process for one year. Instead of pursuing a new contract, staff would
negotiate fairly aggressively with Optima Healthfor a one-year contract renewal for 2011.
In June 2008, the City Council directed the Benefits Executive Committee to undertake an RFP process
for new medical contracts for Plan Year 2011. The five-month process will now begin the first week of
January 2010 and conclude the end of May.
ITEM # 59356
Mayor Sessoms referenced the "Requested Options for Life Safety Education Specialist Position"
contained in the City Council Package of November 6, 2009. Mayor Sessoms recommended Option #2,
Transfer a vacant Full Time Employee (FTE) and funding from elsewhere in the City to the Fire
Department.
ITEM # 59357
Mayor Sessoms requested the City Manager advise the process and time frame if a garbage fee should be
considered. In this request, Mayor Sessoms is not saying this City Council supports a garbage fee.
Councilman DeSteph advised this would equate to approximately 6 cents per $100 on the real estate tax.
If a fee is assessed, the assessment will not be tax deductible for citizens on their Annual tax return.
November 10, 2009
- 22-
AGE N DA REV IE W S E S S ION
4:10 P.M.
ITEM # 59358
This item shall be discussed during the Formal Session.
5. Resolution to REFER to the Planning Commission an Ordinance AMENDING
J1 1 1, J215 and J216 and ADDING J218 of the City Zoning Ordinance (CZO) re:
defining electronic display billboards and establishing requirements for such
billboards (requested by Councilman Diezel)
ITEM # 59359
BY CONSENSUS, the following items shall compose the CONSENT AGENDA:
J. ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS
1. Ordinances DECLARING City property to be EXCESS and A UTHORIZING the
City Manager to exchange for the Zurich Arch property owned by Habitat for
Humanity, the property at:
a. Nelms Lane
b. 1000 Red Mill Boulevard
2. Ordinances DECLARING City property to be EXCESS and AUTHORIZING the
City Manager to sell the property at:
a. 1544 New York Avenue to Mark w.e. McGohan
b. 1540 New York Avenue, 232 Gatewood Avenue, 1525 Ohio Avenue and
109 and 111 Bob Lane to Ocean Bay Homes, Inc.
3. An Ordinance to AUTHORIZE acquisition of property in fee simple for the right-
of way for Baker Road Extended with temporary and permanent easements, by
agreement or condemnation
4. An Ordinance to A UTHORIZE acquisition of property in fee simple for the rights-
of way for West Neck Road Interim Safety Improvement with temporary and
permanent easements, by agreement or condemnation
6. Resolution to SUPPLEMENT the 2010 Legislative Agenda to request the Governor
and the Virginia General Assembly fully fund the Virginia National Defense
Industrial Authority (VNDIA) and support legislation to provide additional monies
to the Hampton Roads Military and Federal Facilities Alliance (HRMFFA) to
promote and protect defense spending and other federal activities in Hampton Roads
(requested by Councilman Uhrin)
November 10,2009
- 23 -
AGE N DA REV IE W S E S S ION
ITEM # 59359 (Continued)
7. Ordinance to ACCEPT andAPPROPRlATE a $64,600 Grantfrom the u.s.
Department of Homeland Security through the 2009 Infrastructure Protection
Activities Program to the FY2009-10 Operating Budget of the Police Department re:
dive equipment and trainingfor the Police Marine Unit.
8. Ordinance to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE from the United States Department of
Justice Edward Byrne Justice Assistance Grant $214,208 re: Public Safety and
Criminal Processing as follows:
a. $13,000 to the Police Department re: the purchase of night vision
goggles
b. $30,940 to the Police Department re: the purchase of surveillance
equipment
c. $43,000 to the Police Department re: security improvement to the 4th
Precinct parking lot
d. $93,875 to the Sheri/fre: security camera upgrade
e. $19,390 to Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court re: a
contracted Expungement Clerk
f $2,148 to the Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court re: an on-
line training subscription
g. $11,855 to the Circuit Court re: Media Evidence Display System
9. Ordinance to ESTABLISH Capital Project #3-151, ACCEPT the Grant and
APPROPRIA TE $800,000 from the United States Department of Justice re: mobile
communications services and equipment supporting regional communication needs
for the COPS Law Enforcement Technology
*Council Lady Henley advised correction to Item 4 (West Neck Road Interim Safety
Improvement. "Construction of the Master Project is not projected to start until
2012". This line should be deletedfrom the Agenda Request Form.
November 10,2009
- 24-
AGE N DA REV I E W S E S S ION
ITEM # 59360
BY CONSENSUS, thefollowing items shall compose the PLANNING BY CONSENT AGENDA:
K. PLANNING
1. Ordinance to AMEND the Comprehensive Plan re: The Pembroke Strategic Growth
Area 4 Implementation Plan and REPEAL the 1991 Virginia Beach Central
Business District (CBD) Master Plan.
2. Application of BRYANT & STRATTON COLLEGEfor a Conditional Use Permit to
allow a private university or college in the existing building at 4740 Baxter Road.
DISTRICT 2 - KEMPSVILLE
3. Application of BEACH BINGO, INe, tla PEMBROKE HALL for a Conditional
Use Permit re relocation of existing bingo operation to the Chimney Hill Shopping
Center at Suite 809, 3600 Holland Road.
DISTRICT 3 - ROSE HALL
4. Resolution to APPROVE the location of the existing mobile home at 2348 Vaughan
Road.
DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE
5. Ordinance to AMEND the City Zoning Ordinance (CZO):
a. 9211 re: time limitations on political campaign signs posted on private
property
b. 9201 re: setbacks for front porches (requested by Council Ladies Rosemary
Wilson and Barbara Henley).
c. 9203, 900, 901, 902 and 905 re: The Pembroke Strategic Growth Area 4
Implementation Plan.
November 10,2009
- 25 -
ITEM # 59361
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. entertained a motion to permit City Council to conduct its CLOSED
SESSION, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A), Code of Virginia, as amended, for the following purpose:
PERSONNEL MA TTERS: Discussion, consideration oj, or interviews
of prospective candidates for employment, assignment, appointment,
promotion, performance, demotion, salaries, disciplining or resignation
of specific public officers, appointees or employees pursuant to Section
2.2-3711 (A)(l)
Council Appointments: Boards, Commissions, Committees,
Authorities, Agencies and Appointees
PUBLICLY-HELD PROPERTY: Discussion or consideration of the,
acquisition, or of the disposition of publicly-held property, where
discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining
position or negotiating strategy of the public body pursuant to Section
2.2-3711 (A)(3).
Acquisition/Disposition of City Property: Princess Anne District
Lynnhaven District
Kempsville District
Upon motion by Councilman Wood, seconded by Council Lady Wilson, City Council voted to proceed
into CLOSED SESSION at 4:13 P.M.
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Barbara M
Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E.
Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
(Break: 4:15 P.M. - 4:20P.M.)
(Closed Session: 4:20 p.M. - 5:05 P.M.)
(Dinner: 5:30 P.M. - 5:55 P.M.)
November 10,2009
- 26-
FORMAL SESSION
VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
November 10,2009
6:00 P.M.
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. called to order the FORMAL SESSION of the VIRGINIA BEACH CITY
COUNCIL in the Council Chamber, City Hall Building, on Tuesday, November] 0, 2009, at 6:00 P.M
Council Members Present:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones Mayor William D.
Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson
andJamesL. Wood
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
[Absent - Ill)
INVOCA TION: Reverend Steve Christenson
Senior Chaplain
Virginia Beach Correctional Center
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mayor Sessoms DISCLOSED as an officer of TowneBank (which has a corporate office located at 297
Constitution Drive in Virginia Beach), he is directly and indirectly involved in many of TowneBank's
transactions. However, due to the size of TowneBank and the volume of transactions it handles,
TowneBank has an interest in numerous matters in which he is not personally involved and of which he
does not have personal knowledge. In that regard, he is always concerned about the appearance of
impropriety that might arise if he unknowingly participates in a matter before City Council in which
TowneBank has an interest. Mayor Sessoms also has similar concerns with respect to Prudential Towne
Realty, which is an affiliate of TowneBank. In order to ensure his compliance with both the letter and
spirit of the State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act (the "Act"), it is his practice to
thoroughly review each City Council agenda to identify any matters in which he might have an actual or
potential conflict. If, during his review of an agenda, he identifies a matter in which he has a "personal
interest ", as defined by the Act, he will either abstain from voting, or file the appropriate disclosure letter
with the City Clerk to be included in the official records of City Council. Mayor Sessoms' letter of
March 24, 2009, is hereby made a part of the record
Vice Mayor Jones DISCLOSED, for many years, he served on the Board of Directors of Resource Bank.
Three (3) years ago, Fulton Financial Corporation ("Fulton Financial'') purchased Resource Bank. On
March 31, 2007, Vice Mayor Jones retired from the Board of Directors. Although, he is no longer a
Board Member, he owns stock in Fulton Financial, and that stock ownership causes him to have a
"personal interest" in Fulton Financial. However, due to the size of Fulton Financial and the volume of
transactions it handles in any given year, Fulton Financial, or any of the banks that are owned by Fulton
Financial, may have an interest in numerous matters in which Vice Mayor Jones has no personal
knowledge. In order to ensure his compliance with both the letter and the spirit of the State and Local
Government Conflict of Interests Act, it is his practice to thoroughly review the agenda for each meeting
of City Council for the purpose of identifying any matters in which he might have an actual or potential
conflict. If, during his review, he identifies any matters, Vice Mayor Jones will prepare and file the
appropriate disclosure letter to be recorded in the official records of City Council. Vice Mayor Jones
regularly makes this disclosure. Vice Mayor Jones' letter of April] 0, 2007, is hereby made a part of the
record
November 10, 2009
- 27-
Council Lady Rosemary Wilson DISCLOSED her husband is a principal in the accounting firm of
Goodman and Company and is directly and indirectly involved in many of Goodman and Company's
transactions. However, due to the size of Goodman and Company and the volume of transactions it
handles in any given year, Goodman and Company has an interest in numerous matters in which her
husband is not personally involved and of which she does not have personal knowledge. In order to
ensure her compliance with both the letter and the spirit of the State and Local Government Conflict of
Interests Act, it is her practice to thoroughly review the agenda for each meeting of City Council for the
purpose of identifying any matters in which she might have an actual or potential conflict. If, during her
review she identifies any matters, she will prepare and file the appropriate disclosure letter to be
recorded in the official records of City Council. Council Lady Wilson regularly makes this disclosure.
Council Lady Wilson's letter of January 27, 2004, is hereby made a part of the record.
Council Lady Rosemary Wilson DISCLOSED she is a Real Estate Agent affiliated with Prudential
Decker Realty. Because of the nature of Real Estate Agent affiliation, the size of Prudential, and the
volume of transactions it handles in any given year, Prudential has an interest in numerous matters in
which she is not personally involved and of which she does not have personal knowledge. In order to
ensure her compliance with both the letter and the spirit of the State and Local Government Conflict of
Interests Act, it is her practice to thoroughly review the agenda for each meeting of City Council for the
purpose of identifying any matters in which she might have an actual or potential conflict. If, during her
review she identifies any matters, she will prepare and file the appropriate disclosure letter to be
recorded in the official records of City Council. Council Lady Wilson regularly makes this disclosure.
Council Lady Wilson's letter of January 27,2004, is hereby made a part of the record.
November 10,2009
- 28 -
Item - V-E.]
CERTIFICATION
ITEM # 59362
Upon motion by Councilman Wood, seconded by Councilman DeSteph, City Council CERTIFIED THE
CLOSED SESSION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOTION TO RECESS.
Only public business matters lawfully exempt from Open Meeting
requirements by Virginia law were discussed in Closed Session to
which this certification resolution applies.
AND,
Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion
convening the Closed Session were heard, discussed or considered
by Virginia Beach City Council.
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Barbara M
Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E.
Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10, 2009
RESOLUTION
CERTIFICATION OF CLOSED SESSION
VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
WHEREAS: The Virginia Beach City Council convened into CLOSED SESSION, pursuant to the
affirmative vote recorded in ITEM #59361, Page 25, and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia
Freedom of Information Act, and,
WHEREAS: Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the governing body
that such Closed Session was conducted in conformity with Virginia law.
NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL VED: That the Virginia Beach City Council hereby certifies that,
to the best of each member's knowledge, (a) only public business matters lawfully exempted from Open
Meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in Closed Session to which this certification resolution
applies; and, (b) only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening this Closed
Session were heard, discussed or considered by Virginia Beach City Council.
~*;)
City Clerk
November 10, 2009
, III
- 29-
Item V-F.]
ITEM # 59363
Upon motion by Councilman DeSteph, seconded by Councilman Uhrin, City Council APPROVED the
MINUTES of the FORMAL SESSION of October 27,2009.
Voting: 9-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Barbara M
Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E.
Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Abstaining:
Rosemary Wilson
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
Council Lady Wilson ABSTAINED, as she was not in attendance during the City Council Session of
October 27, 2009, but onfamily vacation in New York City
November 10, 2009
- 30 -
Item V-G.l.
ADOPT AGENDA
FOR FORMAL SESSION
ITEM # 59364
BY CONSENSUS, City Council ADOPTED:
AGENDA FOR THE FORMAL SESSION
November 10, 2009
- 31 -
Item V-H.J.aIb
PUBLIC HEARING
ITEM # 59365
Mayor Sessoms DECLARED A PUBLIC HEARING:
EXCESS CITY PROPERTY
Nelms Lane
1000 Red Mill Boulevard
There being no speakers, Mayor Sessoms CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
November 10, 2009
- 32 -
Item V-H.J.c/d
PUBLIC HEARING
ITEM # 59366
Mayor Sessoms DECLARED A PUBLIC HEARING:
EXCESS CITY PROPERTY
1544 New York Avenue
1540 New York Avenue, 232 Gatewood Avenue, 1525 Ohio Avenue, 109 and 111 Bob Lane
There being no speakers, Mayor Sessoms CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
November 10, 2009
- 33 -
Item V-H.2.
PUBLIC HEARING
ITEM # 59367
Mayor Sessoms DECLARED A PUBLIC HEARING:
BAKER ROAD Extended Project
Condemnation of Property
There being no speakers, Mayor Sessoms CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
November 10, 2009
- 34 -
Item V-H.J.
PUBLIC HEARING
ITEM # 59368
Mayor Sessoms DECLARED A PUBLIC HEARING:
WEST NECK ROAD INTERIM SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
Condemnation of Property
There being no speakers, Mayor Sessoms CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
November 10, 2009
- 35 -
Item V-H4.
MA YOR'S RECOGNITION
ITEM 59369
Mayor Sessoms RECOGNIZED the following Boy Scout in attendance to earn his merit badge:
Logan Gardner
Boy Scout Troop #12
Mayor Sessoms presented Logan with a City Seal Pin.
November 10, 2009
- 36 -
Item V-J.
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS
ITEM # 59370
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Wood, City Council APPROVED in
ONE MOTION Items la/b, 2a/b, 3,4, 6, 7, 8a-g, and 9 of the CONSENT AGENDA.
Voting:
10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William D.
Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10,2009
- 37 -
Item V-J.1.aJb.
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS
ITEM # 59371
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Wood, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT:
Ordinances DECLARING City property to be EXCESS and
A UTHORIZING the City Manager to exchange, for the Zurich Arch
property owned by Habitat/or Humanity, the property at:
a. Nelms Lane
b. 1000 Red Mill Boulevard
Voting:
10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William D.
Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10, 2009
I. III
AN ORDINANCE DECLARING PROPERTY
LOCATED AT NELMS LANE (GPIN: 1467-77-
0386) TO BE IN EXCESS OF THE CITY'S
NEEDS AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXCHANGE SAME TO
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT ZURICH ARCH
WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach (the "City") is the owner of that certain
parcel of land located on Nelms Lane (GPIN: 1467-77-0386) (the "Nelms Lane
Property");
WHEREAS, the Nelms Lane Property was originally acquired for the Richard
Road Extension Project and is not needed for public purposes;
WHEREAS, a supermajority vote is needed for the disposition of the Nelms Lane
Property;
WHEREAS, Habitat for Humanity ("Habitat") is the owner of that certain parcel of
land located at Zurich Arch (the "Zurich Arch Property"), which is approved for the
development of six new townhouses;
WHEREAS, a land exchange has been proposed whereby the City would convey
to Habitat the Nelms Lane Property as well as another property located on Red Mill
Boulevard, and Habitat would convey the Zurich Arch Property to the City;
WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the Nelms Lane Property is in
excess of the needs of the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
That the Nelms Lane Property is hereby declared to be in excess of the needs of
the City and that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any documents
necessary to convey such property to Habitat and to accept the Zurich Arch Property
from Habitat in substantial conformity with the Summary of Terms attached hereto and
such other terms and conditions deemed necessary and sufficient by the City Manager
and in a form deemed satisfactory by the City Attorney.
This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its adoption.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the 10th day
of November , 2009.
THIS ORDINANCE REQUIRES AN AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF THREE-FOURTHS
OF ALL COUNCIL MEMBER ELECTED TO COUNCIL.
I 'II
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY AND FORM:
~ c. ~O>I.
?
~~
CA11211
Ilvbgov.comldfs I lapplicationslcitylawprod\cycom321 Wpdocs1D029\P006 100030353 .DOC
R-1
November 10, 2009
. I III
-<<l
CXl
.'--.:J 1# D ~ >- ~
~.~ ;Lo ffi ~
z- rI.l ~ r::::::J--"" l.., ~ ~ ~ )y N ::!: 0 Z ~ .~
'--- r Pl.1 ~ !. ~ ,>~~ ~ Z ~ :s:! ~
'" IL 'U th (I '?/~ w 0 == Ul co "
~. ..,
=11 s
I L:: :. J' F ": J J I l~
r~ .~ 'I I ~~ 'SH~iH';th\ ~o l /;
kJ ~ L C:7 om - I I~ I) ~ 0 oP CJ 1 f~
~fE[] ~~r) ~~ -'. ;:_ (I /
CJ I i v. i-I -f /;1 I
tJ C:!V J [ ~ D J / J I
~&I-...I r l ~ {:77/ I'll
VJ;~' r - - f, f
J-;.~ / I II/L
~~;: I I / I] d~-O:J:
h I I' 1 r
hi ~~C-~~ I / !;F! /~
(7~ - J J / II ~
.~ k ;; II
O-<,~ -IE
If__~
CXl
~
'<t
::I
III
ell
(1
ell
U)
15
>- 8:
ffi ~
c..
e ~
~ ~ ~
~ (] w
~ ~ ~
"~LU~ ~
t: 0 ~
J ~ i
SELLER:
PURCHASER:
PROPERTY TO BE
CONVEYED TO
HABITAT:
PROPERTY TO BE
CONVEYED TO
CITY:
EASEMENT TO BE
RESERVED:
SUMMARY OF TERMS
LAND EXCHANGE OF EXCESS PROPERTY AT
NELMS LANE
City of Virginia Beach ("City")
South Hampton Roads Habitat for Humanity, Inc. ("Habitat")
Property at Nelms Lane (GPIN 1467-77-0386) (supports four (4) new
townhouses)
1000 Red Mill Boulevard (supports two (2) new subdivided lots)
(See location map)
Zurich Arch Property (GPIN 1487-93-9540) (supports six (6) new
townhouses)
(See location map)
City will reserve an easement for the 8" gravity sewer line that runs
along the northern boundary line of the property
V :\applications\citylawprod\cycom32\ WpdocslDO 13\P004\00072313.DOC
1 AN ORDINANCE DECLARING PROPERTY
2 LOCATED AT 1000 RED MILL BOULEVARD
3 TO BE IN EXCESS OF THE CITY'S NEEDS
4 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER
5 TO EXCHANGE SAME TO HABITAT FOR
6 HUMANITY FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT
7 ZURICH ARCH
8
9 WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach (the "City") is the owner of that certain
10 parcel of land located 1000 Red Mill Boulevard (GPIN: 2414-36-7307) (the "Red Mill
11 Property");
12
13 WHEREAS, the Red Mill Property was originally acquired for the Red Mill Farm
14 Project and is not needed for public purposes;
15
16 WHEREAS, Habitat for Humanity ("Habitat") is the owner of that certain parcel of
17 land located at Zurich Arch (the "Zurich Arch Property"), which is approved for the
18 development of six new townhouses;
19
20 WHEREAS, a land exchange has been proposed whereby the City would convey
21 to Habitat the Red Mill Property as well as another property located on Nelms Lane, and
22 Habitat would convey the Zurich Arch Property to the City;
23
24 WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the Red Mill Property is in
25 excess of the needs of the City;
26
27 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
28 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
29
30 That the Red Mill Property is hereby declared to be in excess of the needs of the
31 City and that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any documents
32 necessary to convey such property to Habitat and to accept the Zurich Arch Property
33 from Habitat in substantial conformity with the Summary of Terms attached hereto and
34 such other terms and conditions deemed necessary and sufficient by the City Manager
35 and in a form deemed satisfactory by the City Attorney.
36
37 This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its adoption.
38
39 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the 10thday
40 of November , 2009.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY AND FORM:
czYmnUr c. ~Srrr. (?
CA11190
Ilvbgov .comldfs I lapplications\citylawprodlcycom32\ WpdocslD029\P006\00030380. DOC
R-1
November 10, 2009
1rtlli~
I III
SELLER:
PURCHASER:
PROPERTY TO BE
CONVEYED TO
HABITAT:
PROPERTY TO BE
CONVEYED TO
CITY:
SUMMARY OF TERMS
LAND EXCHANGE OF EXCESS PROPERTY AT
1000 RED MILL BOULEVARD
City of Virginia Beach ("City")
South Hampton Roads Habitat for Humanity, Inc. ("Habitat")
1000 Red Mill Boulevard (supports two (2) new subdivided lots)
Property at Nelms Lane (GPIN 1467-77-0386) (supports four (4) new
townhouses)
(See location map)
Zurich Arch Property (GPIN 1487-93-9540) (supports six (6) new
townhouses)
(See location map)
! il
-~-
~ '07
-------..---. ~ 0
-.......__...._ ch
--~___ M
-- .
-.----___ -.:t
-------~-..-J;
N
_ 0
. x
" :::;;
>- ~ g
1-1:0 :b
t:t:: _ ~
w == ~
1l.:IE ~
0" ~
, Il. 0:: Q) ~
<( Il. 0:: ~
o :IEee 9
owe ~
r:: z~~ ~
~ 0 S -g
g~o~f
C:) U>-~ ~
o I- I U
...JU~ ~
(J) I II
(J):t f
W ~ x
UN
xz
Wii:
C>
-
o
<
:2
:J
~
~
:J
lD
'"
2l
E' .~
OJ (/)
0.. 't:
a B:
~ E' ~
o ~ c
(/) a I.!!
(/) ..... 01
OJ 0... ~
"C u~:>
c: dJ 0 ~
j []O i
Q.
, 'II
- 38 -
Item V-J.2.aIb.
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS
ITEM # 59372
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Wood, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT:
Ordinances DECLARING City property to be EXCESS and
AUTHORIZING the City Manager to sell the property at:
",
a. 1544 New York Avenue to Mark We. McGohan
b. 1540 New York A venue/ 232 Gatewood Avenuel1525 Ohio Avenue/109
and 111 Bob Lane to Ocean Bay Homes, Inc.
Voting:
10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William D.
Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10,2009
1
2 AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE PROPERTY
3 LOCATED AT 1544 NEW YORK AVENUE TO BE
4 IN EXCESS OF THE CITY'S NEEDS AND
5 AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SELL
6 THE PROPERTY TO MARK W.C. McGOHAN.
7
8 WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach (the "City") is the owner of that
9 certain parcel of land located at 1544 New York Avenue (GPIN 2407-94-7780) (the
10 "Property"), more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto;
11
12 WHEREAS, the City acquired the Property pursuant to the APZ-1
13 Acquisition Program;
14
15 WHEREAS, the City funded the acquisition of the Property through a
16 partnership with the Commonwealth of Virginia (the "Commonwealth"), with each party
17 contributing fifty percent (50%) of the funds;
18
19 WHEREAS, the Property was improved with a single family residence
20 when the APZ-1 Ordinance was adopted on December 20, 2005;
21
22 WHEREAS, the residence was demolished on October 8, 2007 and the
23 APZ-1 Disposition Committee has determined that the Property should no longer be
24 developed with a dwelling unit in order to decrease residential density;
25
26 WHEREAS, Mark W.C. McGohan ("McGohan") owns the adjacent
2 7 property and he has requested to purchase the Property in order to utilize it in a manner
28 compatible with the APZ-1 Ordinance;
29
30 WHEREAS, the sale to McGohan accomplishes a reduction in residential
31 density while still preserving the integrity of the neighborhood;
32
33 WHEREAS, McGohan desires to purchase the Property in accordance
34 with the Summary of Terms attached hereto as Exhibit "B";
35
3 6 WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the property is in excess
3 7 of the needs of the City of Virginia Beach.
38
39 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
40 OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
41
42 That the Property is hereby declared to be in excess of the needs of the
43 City of Virginia Beach and that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any
44 documents necessary to convey the Property to Mark W. C. McGohan, in accordance
45 with the Summary of Terms attached hereto and such other terms, conditions or
46 modifications deemed necessary and sufficient by the City Manager and in a form
47 deemed satisfactory by the City Attorney.
48
49 Further, that the revenue from the sale of the Property in the amount of
50 $7,000 shall be received and appropriated as follows:
51 1. $3,500 shall be appropriated to CIP #9-060, Oceana and Interfacility
52 Traffic Area Conformity and Acquisition, for the purpose of the City Manager refunding
53 the Commonwealth's portion in accordance with the partnership agreement;
54 2. $3,500 shall be appropriated to CIP #3-368, Various Site Acquisitions.
55
56 This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its adoption.
57
58 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the
59 1 Oth day of November ,2009.
60
CA11196
R-1
10/28/2009
\ \vbgov.com\dfs 1 \applications\citylawprod\cycom32\wpdocs\dO 19\p005\000224 74.doc
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
B~)3,~
Management Services
EXHIBIT A
GPIN 2407-94-7780 (1544 New York Avenue):
ALL THAT certain lot and part of lot, with improvements thereon,
situate, lying and being in the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia and
designated and described on a survey of Block Number Six (6) of
Oceana Gardens made by W.B. Gallup, County Surveyor, March
20, 1947 and duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court
of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia in Map Book 21, at page 3, as
the whole of Lot Twenty (20) and the Western Twenty (20) feet of
Lot Twenty-one (21); said lot and part of lot taken as a whole face
seventy (70) feet on the North side of New York Avenue and extend
back between parallel lines one hundred twenty-five (125) feet,
reference to the aforesaid plat is hereby made for a more particular
description of said property.
LESS AND EXCEPT all right, title and interest of the Grantor in and
to any public road, public rights-of-way, or public easements adjacent
to the above-referenced property.
IT BEING a portion of the same property conveyed to the City of
Virginia Beach, by Deed from David E. Daskam, dated December
19,2007 and recorded as Instrument No. 20071219001669970.
EXHIBIT B
SUMMARY OF TERMS
SALE OF EXCESS PROPERTY AT 1544 NEW YORK AVENUE
SELLER:
City of Virginia Beach
PURCHASER:
Mark W.C. McGohan
PROPERTY:
8,711 square feet of property generally known as 1544 New York Avenue
[GPIN: 2407-94-7780]
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
ALL THAT certain lot and part of lot, with improvements thereon, situate,
lying and being in the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia and designated and
described on a survey of Block Number Six (6) of Ocean a Gardens made
by W.B. Gallup, County Surveyor, March 20, 1947 and duly recorded in
the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach,
Virginia in Map Book 21, at page 3, as the whole of Lot Twenty (20) and
the Western Twenty (20) feet of Lot Twenty-one (21); said lot and part of
lot taken as a whole face seventy (70) feet on the North side of New York
Avenue and extend back between parallel lines one hundred twenty-five
(125) feet, reference to the aforesaid plat is hereby made for a more
particular description of said property.
LESS AND EXCEPT all right, title and interest of the Grantor in and
to any public road, public rights-of-way, or public easements adjacent to
the above-referenced property.
IT BEING a portion ofthe same property conveyed to the City of Virginia
Beach, by Deed from David E. Daskam, dated December 19, 2007 and
recorded as Instrument No. 20071219001669970.
SALE PRICE:
$7,000
CONDITIONS OF SALE
. Property is purchased "As Is, Where Is."
. Buyer has been advised of APZ-1 restrictions for use.
. Buyer may use the Property for accessory structures, or Buyer may otherwise utilize the property
for construction in conjunction with his adjacent property upon Resubdivision to remove interior
lot lines; however, Buyer may not add any new dwelling units.
. Buyer shall resubdivide the Property at his expense should Buyer desire to construct across the
property line between the Property and Buyer's adjacent property.
. Seller will record deed restrictions permanently preventing new dwelling units prior to or
simultaneous with conveyance.
V :\Applications\CityLawProd\cycom32\ Wpdocs\D029\P003\0004 7926.DOC
~
0:::0
o.WCIC)
<eO'.....
cO.....
-=o:::~
zo.~
0>.....
-~o
t;-Olt
~ON
O(/)Z
O(/)-
...JWo.
O(!)
><
W
"0
X
E
ci
co
I'-
I'-
I
V
q
I'-
e
V
~
CI)
a.
o
a.
~
o
o
~
~
i
>-
Q)
~ ~
u ~
Q) 0
.0 0: ~
,g c ~
~ ~ e
Q) 0 a...
g. '3 ~ ~
ImDO i
())
e
;::::
......
(0
:::J
III
CI)
:;
III
III
CI)
o
.~
CI)
CJ)
1::
o
a.
a.
:::J
CJ)
OJ
c:
W
....,
OJ
c:
W
~
a.:
>-
..c
"0
~
III
a.
~
0..
1
2 AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE
3 PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 1540 NEW YORK
4 AVENUE; 232 GATEWOOD AVENUE; 1525
5 OHIO AVENUE; AND 109/111 BOB LANE TO BE
6 IN EXCESS OF THE CITY'S NEEDS AND
7 AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SELL
8 THE PROPERTIES TO OCEAN BAY HOMES,
9 INC.
10
11 WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach (the "City") is the owner of those
12 certain parcels of land located at (1) 1540 New York Avenue (GPIN 2407-94-8655); (2)
13 232 Gatewood Avenue (GPIN 2407-02-5418); (3) 1525 Ohio Avenue (GPIN 2417-05-
14 0182); and (4) 109/111 Bob Lane (GPIN 2407-74-0552) (the "Property", individually, or
15 the "Properties", collectively), more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto
16 and made a part hereof;
17
18 WHEREAS, the City acquired the Properties pursuant to the APZ-1
19 Acquisition Program;
20
21 WHEREAS, the City funded the acquisition of the Properties through a
22 partnership with the Commonwealth of Virginia (the "Commonwealth"), with each party
23 contributing fifty percent (50%) of the funds;
24
25 WHEREAS, the Properties are in the midst of other residences and at the
26 time of acquisition were improved with residential dwellings;
27
28 WHEREAS, City Council has elected to allow the rehabilitation or the
29 reconstruction of a single-family home of each of the four Properties in order to maintain
30 the integrity of the neighborhood; and
31
32 WHEREAS, in the event that a single-family home is reconstructed instead
33 of rehabilitated, said reconstruction is a grandfathered nonconforming use allowed
34 under current zoning law;
35
36 WHEREAS, a Request for Proposal ("RFP") was advertised for the
3 7 potential sale of the Properties;
38
39 WHEREAS, Ocean Bay Homes, Inc. ("Ocean Bay") was one of the
4 0 respondents to the RFP;
41
42 WHEREAS, the APZ-1 Disposition Committee has recommended that City
43 Council declare the Properties to be in excess of the City's needs and sell the
44 Properties to Ocean Bay;
45
46 WHEREAS, Ocean Bay will either renovate the existing single-family
47 home on each Property to prescribed standards acceptable to the City, including noise
48 attenuation and code compliance, or Ocean Bay will build a new single-family home on
49 each Property to prescribed standards acceptable to the City, including elevated noise
50 attenuation and design criteria, and Ocean Bay will thereafter convey the improved
51 Property to an owner-occupant;
52
53 WHEREAS, Ocean Bay will purchase the Properties in accordance with
54 the Summary of Terms attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof;
55
5 6 WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the property is in excess
5 7 of the needs of the City of Virginia Beach.
58
59 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY
60 OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
61
62 That the Properties located at (1) 1540 New York Avenue (GPIN 2407-94-
63 8655); (2) 232 Gatewood Avenue (GPIN 2407-02-5418); (3) 1525 Ohio Avenue (GPIN
64 2417-05-0182); and (4) 109 Bob Lane (GPIN 2407-74-0552) are hereby declared to be
65 in excess of the needs of the City of Virginia Beach and that the City Manager is hereby
66 authorized to execute any documents necessary to convey the Properties to Ocean Bay
67 Homes, Inc., in substantial conformity with the Summary of Terms attached hereto as
68 Exhibit "B" and such other terms, conditions or modifications as are deemed necessary
6 9 and sufficient by the City Manager and in a form deemed satisfactory by the City
7 0 Attorney.
71
7 2 Further, that the revenue from the sale of the Property in the amount of
7 3 $246,000 shall be received and appropriated as follows:
7 4 1. $123,000 shall be appropriated to CIP #9-060, Oceana and Interfacility
75 Traffic Area Conformity and Acquisition, for the purpose of the City Manager refunding
76 the Commonwealth's portion in accordance with the partnership agreement;
77 2. $123,000 shall be appropriated to CIP #3-368, Various Site Acquisitions.
78
79 This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its adoption.
80
81 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the
82 10th day of November ,2009.
R-1
1 0/28/2009
CA-11030
\ \vbgov.com\dfs 1 \applications\citylawprod\cycom32\wpdocs\d004 \p005\00020895.doc
~.
Public Works 10-).-1.5(;11
A~RQVEDAST8~
~~ ~ Q,
Management Services .
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
APPROVED AS TO L
SUFFICIENCY
EXHIBIT A
1) 1540 New York Avenue (GPIN 2407-94-8655)
All those certain parts of lots, or parcels of land, situate in the
Village of Oceana, Lynnhaven Magisterial District, County of
Princess Anne, State of Virginia, being known and designated on a
survey of Block No.6 of Oceana Gardens, made by W.B.Gallup,
County Surveyor, March 20, 1947, and duly recorded in the Clerk's
Office of the Circuit Court of Princess Anne County, Virginia in
Map Book 21, page 3. As the Eastern 30 feet oflot number twenty-
one (21) and the Western thirty (30) feet of lot number twenty-two
(22): the said parts of lots taken on a whole, face ("face" being
erroneously referred to as "fact" in prior deeds) 60 feet on the North
side of New York Avenue and extended back between parallel lines
one hundred twenty-five feet (125) feet, reference is hereby made to
the aforesaid plat for a more particular description of said property.
LESS AND EXCEPT all right, title and interest of the Grantor in and
to any public road, public rights-of-way, or public easements adjacent
to the above-referenced property.
IT BEING a portion of the same property conveyed to the City of
Virginia Beach, by deed of Wendy Davis (f/k/a Wendy McGuire),
dated December 28, 2007, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's
Office as Instrument No. 20080108000027160.
2) 232 Gatewood Avenue (GPIN 2407-02-5418)
ALL THAT certain lot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and
improvements thereon, situated in Lynnhaven District in the City of
Virginia Beach, Virginia (formerly Princess Anne County, Virginia),
being known, numbered and designated as Lot 39, on the Revised Plat of
Gatewood Park, which plat is recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court ofthe City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, in Map Book 25, at page 87,
to which plat reference is hereby made for a more particular description of
the property.
LESS AND EXCEPT all right, title and interest of the Grantor in and
to any public road, public rights-of-way, or public easements adjacent
to the above-referenced property.
IT BEING a portion of the same property conveyed to the City of
Virginia Beach, by deed of Antonio P. LaMotta and Nancy Sharp
LaMotta, dated May 22,2008, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's
Office as Instrument No. 20080528000622510.
3) 1525 Ohio Avenue (GPIN 2417-05-0182)
Parcel One:
ALL THAT certain lot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and
improvements thereon, situate in the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia,
and known, numbered and designated as Lot C, as shown on the plat
entitled "Property of Laura H. Boush, a part of Blocks Eighteen (18)
and Nineteen (19) Oceana Gardens", which plat is duly recorded in
the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach,
Virginia, in Map Book 26, at page 45.
Parcel Two:
ALL THAT certain lot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and
improvements thereon, situate in the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia
and known, numbered and designated as Lot D-3 on the plat entitled
"Resubdivision of Lot D and Property of H. Allen Gibbs," dated
November 29, 1985, made by Talbot & Associates, Ltd., which said
plat is duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the
City of Virginia Beach, Virginia in Deed Book 2534, page 1041.
LESS AND EXCEPT all right, title and interest of the Grantor in and
to any public road, public rights-of-way, or public easements adjacent
to the above-referenced parcels.
IT BEING a portion of the same property conveyed to the City of
Virginia Beach, by deed of Ella Poplin Trustee of the Ella Poplin
Revocable Living Trust Agreement dated October 31, 2006 and Ella
Poplin, dated May 1, 2008, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's
Office as Instrument No. 20080509000546110.
4) 109/111 Bob Lane (GPIN 2407-74-0552)
All that certain lot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and
improvements thereon numbered 109 and 111 Bob Lane, in the City of
Virginia Beach, Virginia, and being more particularly bounded and
described as follows, to wit: Beginning at a point on the western line of
Bob Lane where it is intersected by the northern line of Lot 97 as shown
on the Plat entitled, "Plat B of Additional Lots, West Oceana Gardens" of
record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia
Beach, Virginia, in Map Book 34, at page 49, and which point of
beginning is marked by an iron pin distant 176.92 feet from the northern
boundary line of Southern Boulevard; thence running South 87 degrees
39' west a distance of 120 feet to an iron pin, thence running North 2
degrees 21' west a distance of 75 feet to an iron pin, thence running North
87 degrees 39' east a distance of 120 feet to an iron pin in the western line
of Bob Lane; thence along said last mentioned line south 2 degrees 21'
east a distance of 75 feet to the point of beginning. Being Lot 98 on the
aforementioned Plat and a part of Lot 17 on the Plat entitled, "West
EXHIBIT B
SUMMARY OF TERMS
SALE OF EXCESS PROPERTY
SELLER:
City of Virginia Beach
PURCHASER:
Ocean Bay Homes, Inc, a Virginia corporation
PROPERTY:
1) 1540 New York Ave (GPIN 2407-94-8655)
2) 232 Gatewood Avenue (GPIN 2407-02-5418)
3) 1525 Ohio Avenue (GPIN 2417-05-0182)
4) 109/111 Bob Lane (GPIN 2407-74-0552)
More particularly described as:
1) 1540 New York Avenue (GPIN 2407-94-8655)
All those certain parts oflots, or parcels ofland, situate in the
Village of Oceana, Lynnhaven Magisterial District, County
of Princess Anne, State of Virginia, being known and
designated on a survey of Block No.6 of Oceana Gardens,
made by W.B.Gallup, County Surveyor, March 20, 1947, and
duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of
Princess Anne County, Virginia in Map Book 21, page 3. As
the Eastern 30 feet of lot number twenty-one (21) and the
Western thirty (30) feet of lot number twenty-two (22): the
said parts of lots taken on a whole, face ("face" being
erroneously referred to as "fact" in prior deeds) 60 feet on the
North side of New York A venue and extended back between
parallel lines one hundred twenty-five feet (125) feet,
reference is hereby made to the aforesaid plat for a more
particular description of said property.
LESS AND EXCEPT all right, title and interest of the Grantor
in and to any public road, public rights-of-way, or public
easements adjacent to the above-referenced property.
IT BEING a portion of the same property conveyed to the City
of Virginia Beach, by deed of Wendy Davis (f/k/a Wendy
McGuire), dated December 28, 2007, and recorded in the
aforesaid Clerk's Office as Instrument No.
20080108000027160.
1
2) 232 Gatewood Avenue (GPIN 2407-02-5418)
ALL THAT certain lot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings
and improvements thereon, situated in Lynnhaven District in the
City of Virginia Beach, Virginia (formerly Princess Anne County,
Virginia), being known, numbered and designated as Lot 39, on
the Revised Plat of Gatewood Park, which plat is recorded in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach,
Virginia, in Map Book 25, at page 87, to which plat reference is
hereby made for a more particular description of the property.
LESS AND EXCEPT all right, title and interest of the Grantor
in and to any public road, public rights-of-way, or public
easements adjacent to the above-referenced property.
IT BEING a portion of the same property conveyed to the City
of Virginia Beach, by deed of Antonio P. LaMotta and Nancy
Sharp LaMotta, dated May 22, 2008, and recorded in the
aforesaid Clerk's Office as Instrument No.
20080528000622510.
3) 1525 Ohio Avenue (GPIN 2417-05-0182)
Parcel One:
ALL THAT certain lot, piece or parcel of land, with the
buildings and improvements thereon, situate in the City of
Virginia Beach, Virginia, and known, numbered and
designated as Lot C, as shown on the plat entitled "Property of
Laura H. Boush, a part of Blocks Eighteen (18) and Nineteen
(19) Oceana Gardens", which plat is duly recorded in the
Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia
Beach, Virginia, in Map Book 26, at page 45.
Parcel Two:
ALL THAT certain lot, piece or parcel of land, with the
buildings and improvements thereon, situate in the City of
Virginia Beach, Virginia and known, numbered and
designated as Lot D-3 on the plat entitled "Resubdivision of
Lot D and Property of H. Allen Gibbs," dated November 29,
1985, made by Talbot & Associates, Ltd., which said plat is
duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the
City of Virginia Beach, Virginia in Deed Book 2534, page
1 041.
2
LESS AND EXCEPT all right, title and interest of the Grantor
in and to any public road, public rights-of-way, or public
easements adjacent to the above-referenced parcels.
IT BEING a portion of the same property conveyed to the City
of Virginia Beach, by deed of Ella Poplin Trustee of the Ella
Poplin Revocable Living Trust Agreement dated October 31,
2006 and Ella Poplin, dated May 1, 2008, and recorded in the
aforesaid Clerk's Office as Instrument No.
20080509000546110.
4) 109/111 Bob Lane (GPIN 2407-74-0552)
All that certain lot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and
improvements thereon numbered 109 and 111 Bob Lane, in the
City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, and being more particularly
bounded and described as follows, to wit: Beginning at a point on
the western line of Bob Lane where it is intersected by the northern
line of Lot 97 as shown on the Plat entitled, "Plat B of Additional
Lots, West Oceana Gardens" of record in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, in Map Book
34, at page 49, and which point of beginning is marked by an iron
pin distant 176.92 feet from the northern boundary line of Southern
Boulevard; thence running South 87 degrees 39' west a distance of
120 feet to an iron pin, thence running North 2 degrees 21' west a
distance of 75 feet to an iron pin, thence running North 87 degrees
39' east a distance of 120 feet to an iron pin in the western line of
Bob Lane; thence along said last mentioned line south 2 degrees
21' east a distance of 75 feet to the point of beginning. Being Lot
98 on the aforementioned Plat and a part of Lot 17 on the Plat
entitled, "West Oceana Gardens" and recorded in the Clerk's
Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia
in Map Book 25, at page 83.
LESS AND EXCEPT all right, title and interest of the Grantor
in and to any public road, public rights-of-way, or public
easements adjacent to the above-referenced property.
IT BEING a portion ofthe same property conveyed to the City of
Virginia Beach, by deed of James E. Dickie, dated December 18,
2008, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office as Instrument No.
2009112000031720.
SALE PRICE:
$70,000 (1540 New York Avenue)
$75,000 (232 Gatewood Avenue)
3
$75,000 (1525 Ohio Avenue)
$26.000 (109 Bob Lane)
$246,000
CONDITIONS OF SALE
. The buyer shall evaluate each property and determine whether to remodel
and renovate, or demolish and rebuild. Any renovation shall require noise
attenuation and compliance with City codes. If the buyer elects to
demolish and reconstruct, specific design criteria and enhanced noise
attenuation are required. In either event, only one single-family dwelling
unit shall be permitted in perpetuity.
. Properties are purchased "As Is, Where Is."
. Seller shall convey the properties subject to a deed restriction preventing
Buyer, or ultimate owner-occupant, from participation in the APZ-l
Acquisition Program.
. Seller shall convey the properties with restriction limiting each site to the
development of one single-family dwelling unit, in perpetuity.
. One single-family dwelling shall be permitted on each site, in a style that
substantially matches the style approved by the Planning Department.
. Purchaser shall deposit Five Thousand and noll00 Dollars ($5,000.00) per
property at the execution of the Purchase Agreement.
. Buyer is required to meet City's enhanced noise attenuation standards;
comply with all code regulations, and will meet design criteria for a
rebuild, if applicable.
4
; II
l'
I
..
~ct
~ WfIj !
::!: ~'" ~
Z lD~ ~
Q 1il~ 8 ;
!;( g:~ - f
o ;~ ~
g f2~ ~
o ~
e
~
8
~
"
~
,
~
i
~
li
N ~
~ i 0
~ % ~
~ a: ~
"C 0 -" ~
~D'" 0 ~
.J J
~
z+~
~ 11 ~
ffi ~ Lt ~
~ ~~ ~
::!: O~ t
~ ~~ 8 I
!;( ~~ ~ ~
o lh '!
o NO. ~_,
..J ::: ~ -
~ 0 ~
l
~
~
,
~
il
~ ~
~ i ~
~ 11. $
~ ~ e ~
JD f
J~1 ~ 1____ 1__ I I__~ - I
~ ._' ,__.__ ----'!i\'S vwn~
l-
UD u [) 0
IlcITl 0 D 0
o DO CJ
2p DD 0 D
I [}
lohj~~ 1Qf 0 I D
o 0 ~ 0 0
p } D,D
lIrJ] Q' ~ \G I
_ ... _. ,___ *ij~~J :?-=_
~ II \ D'[ LJb~ c=t Ii n[j
L_--.J I 0 0
u 11 D 0 LJ 0
u II 0 i j
rl D TIliJ~~i~
:10 [J ,lJ ~IE
~ 'I [ -g :;i:' ~
! II N 0 ~
Inn !D I
.. 1;
W ~ ct ~
0. ~N ~
< w" ,
::!: ~~ ~
z 0<;> ~
o x.... 8 .
j:: 0:;: ~ "
~ ~~ ?
g ;~ i
~ 0 u
~
o
[II\]~
[L~\ 1
~. t.~
~~~r~
~ ~K ~-'
v"~~'i!!
. iil
. 1.
lbik =rll' 0 II I
IfTD~ D II[ II. D ~!
~ U D 1_] 0. ~ '" ~ i
D II 0 D DO! i ~ ~
Q ;;;::; 8 l
I 0 I- >... ~ ~
o I 0 D 0 ~ ~~ f
o W; Ii \ 0 I ~ 0 9 ~~ 0 !
t=J Il.~__ il'l Co OU =1 0 D~oD II
__m __ _ ~'- -IR;!'1CIQIIIII.
~P: D_ I I g CJ ~I 0 c=) ~i
lD ~~ I 0 ' n/II 0 ,~ !I
0, 0 1!)1 "D;:,D ~I 0 D I
D.C? :n~1 c:=Jn D [
[ [J U D bW i
I D TI \ 0
,~ D I ~n .1
!~t.:]~? "~~'\ D fD!
< \_J~-' CJ fJnn LJ ,C:::J p L- ~ i !
.~'..~',.l 0 Diu D --=.!n
.~ - j I ~ 0'" ~ ~
.-:~! I
- 39 -
Item V-J.3.
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS
ITEM # 59373
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Wood, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT:
Ordinance to A UTHORIZE acquisition of property in fee simple for the
right-of-way for Baker Road Extended with temporary and permanent
easements, by agreement or condemnation.
Voting:
10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William D.
Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10, 2009
1 AN ORDINANCE TO AUTHORIZE
2 ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY IN FEE SIMPLE
3 FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR BAKER ROAD
4 EXTENDED PROJECT (CIP 2-071) AND THE
5 ACQUISITION OF TEMPORARY AND
6 PERMANENT EASEMENTS, EITHER BY
7 AGREEMENT OR CONDEMNATION
8
9 WHEREAS, in the opinion of the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, a
10 public necessity exists for the construction of this important roadway project to improve
11 transportation within the City and for other related public purposes for the preservation of
12 the safety, health, peace, good order, comfort, convenience, and for the welfare of the
13 people in the City of Virginia Beach.
14
15 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
16 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
17
18 Section 1. That the City Council authorizes the acquisition by purchase or
19 condemnation pursuant to Sections 15.2-1901, et seq., Sections 33.1-89, et seq., and Title
20 25.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, of all that certain real property in fee
21 simple, including temporary and permanent easements and entire tracts upon which such
22 rights of way or easements shall be located, within the limitations and conditions of Section
23 33.1-91 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the "Property"), as shown on the
24 plans entitled "Baker Road Extended, PWNCN-8-0121, CIP 2-071," (the "Project") and
25 more specifically described on the acquisition plats and plans for the Project (plats and
26 plans collectively referred to as the "Plans"), the Plans being on file in the Engineering
27 Division, Department of Public Works, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia.
28
29 Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to make or cause to be
30 made on behalf of the City of Virginia Beach, to the extent that funds are available, a
31 reasonable offer to the owners or persons having an interest in said Property. If refused,
32 the City Attorney is hereby authorized to institute proceedings to condemn said Property.
33
34 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the 10th day of
35 November , 2009.
PREPARED: 10/2/2009
CA-11204
R-1
\ \vbgov .com\dfs 1 \applications\citylawprod\cycom32\wpdocs\d009\p006\00024356.doc
amfkY C, ~tV\
BLlC WORKS/REAL ESTATE
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
AND FORM
~~
CITY ATTORNEY l
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
Q)
......
Cd
U
t+=:
'€ ~
Q) ~
S2 ~
...... Q)
~ 5h
S Cd
Q) >>
~]
~~
Q)
~
U
t+=:
'€
Q)
U
Q)
:0
.-
en
en
o
~
Q)
~
U
t+=:
'€
Q)
U
Q)
:0
.-
en
en
o
~
~-,-..., ,-...,>>
Q)~~6li 60.. ~~ "E:
~~""S:::S,-...,s:::S,-..,!::;o Q)~ c.H?
" ~. ~ ~ Q) en ~ Q) en c.H 0.. 8 0 . s:::
Q)""_............_......~.~ ~U en~
Cij I-< ~ ~"O ~ ~"O Ii) en ~~ t:: .~o I=<
o~~~8S~8S~......"E:Q)~2e~
~~s:::!::;enQ)~enQ)~OQ)S~~Q)~
Cij !::; .9 ~ a'J ~ Q) en ~ .:...;. - S Q) ...... S ~
.~ ~.8 ~ 5h Q) ~ ~ Q) ] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S
~ ~ S ~ ~ 1i ~ ~ 1i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 :s
~~~Cij~s:::Cijens:::_~ Cije'd ~S
~ _ Q) 0 ._ Q) 0 Cd - .- s::: Cd 0
o Cij ~ .~ 5h U t:: 5h U .- .~ ~ 'a ~
Uo~~ s::: ~s::: ~~ Cd I-< Cl
~ ~ ~ ...... ._ ~ ._ ~ ~ ~ "0
,-...,
-
r--
o
I
~
~
......
U
~
......
U
Q)
'0'
I-<
~
"0
Q)
"0
s:::
Q)
......
~
~
"0
Cd
o
~
I-<
Q)
~
o::l
....:l
~
u-
~o
~o
~
\0
\0
-
~'-;'
~~
o~
\0
~
-
u
~ 0
~ ~
~i
0._
>-- .8
~ S
~ 0
~"O
~ s:::
o 0
~u
~ Q)
~
....:l
~
rn
I-<
i
C/J.
~
o
o
~
r--
~
~
I
0'\
00
I
r--
\0
~
-
u
s:::
......
;.g
en
~
o
~
as
-
o
!a
U
~
"0
!a
~
"0
~
~
o
o
~
o
\0
-
I
0'\
r--
I
r--
\0
~
-
~
.S
.s
o
"0
s:::
o
U
Q)
~
....:l
~
U
.g
"fi
......
~
4-<
o
rn
I-<
Q)
s:::
~
o
.......
'S
;::J
~VI
00
00
~~
~VI
- -
00
I I
~ -
O~
\O~
- -
I I
0'\ 0'\
r-- 00
I I
r-- r--
\0 \0
~~
- -
Q)
Q)
.l:l
rn{l
Cd I-<
~U
s:::U
o ......
.1:: '0)
Cd !a
~C/J.
\0
o
o
VI
VI
......
o
I
......
~
~
......
I
0'\
00
I
r--
\0
~
......
~
~
o
U
::r:
......
Q)
'6
Cd
::r:
r--
o
o
r--
r--
0'\
~
I
0'\
r--
I
r--
\0
~
......
~
.-
s:::
's
o
"0
s:::
o
U
Q)
~
....:l
~
::3
"0
~
U
~
4-<
o
rn
I-<
Q)
s:::
~
o
......
'S
::J
u
o
'1:l
~
..c:
U
c
.52
~
E
<2
..s
~
<:<l
.....:i
Q)
~
."i
u
<:<l
0...
<:<l
'1:l
5
OJ)
5
-
t-
o
N
0...
o
'1:l
~
'1:l
C
~
~
W
'1:l
<:<l
o
~
!J
~
e;l
0...
o
--
rn
U
~
0'
.....
eo
~
Q)
rn
Q)
05......
...... ~
0...,..,
: 8
o 0..
I-< Q)
Q)~
~......
~ S
~~
0"0
...... Q)
en ......
Cd Q)
>>"Q)
rn"O
~ Q)
;;.,D
0_
~~
Or--
Uo
~O...
Q) - ~
,D Q) ""
~ ~ 5
~ 0.. ~
Q) ...... Q)
I-< ::3
Q),D >>
~ aJ;:E
" ~ .,p
rn ...... ::3
"E:Cij]
Q)............
S .8 .~
~Cd"Q)
Cd Q) U
~,D !a
~::;:1 0..
~1ii~
~::::o5
Cd .~ s:::
.s...... 0
.- 0 Q)
e.n 0 I-<
.- - 'g.
> ~ U
s::: I-< Cd
o Cd 0
._ 0........
s::: ......
.- 0 rn
S s::: 13
o Q) Q)
Cl !a s:::
Q)>>>>
;;. Q) .-<;::
Cd~ U
~ ...... Q)
~4-<~
0-......
,D . 01)
"0 s:::
r-- Q) .-
O"O~
0Q)......
"o~..Q
8 ~ S
...... Cd Q)
orn~
O"E:......
...:!l Q) ~
Q) S g
g ~ U
"" e'd Q)
~Q),D
rn
Q)
......
o
Z
......
~
-0
a ~
o Q-g
~ ~ Q lD
tC ~'q~ S
tJ:iia )( ('ol~ %
~ u- us ~.. ~
00 Ul ~
~ oo..-a ~
'do ~O~ ~
o It ~
o ~ If
::1 do ~
dl v.
'0
(l)
o
~
)(
- 40-
Item V-J.4.
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS
ITEM # 59374
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Wood, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT:
Ordinance to A UTHORIZE acquisition of property in fee simple for the
rights-ofway for West Neck Road Interim Safety Improvement with
temporary and permanent easements, by agreement or condemnation.
Voting:
10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William D.
Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10, 2009
! I
1 AN ORDINANCE TO AUTHORIZE
2 ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY IN FEE SIMPLE
3 FOR RIGHTS-OF- WAY FOR WEST NECK
4 ROAD INTERIM SAFETY IMPROVEMENT #1,
5 (CIP 2-502) AND THE ACQUISITION OF
6 TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT
7 EASEMENTS, EITHER BY AGREEMENT OR
8 CONDEMNATION
9
10 WHEREAS, in the opinion of the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, a
11 public necessity exists for the construction of this important roadway project to improve
12 transportation within the City and for other related public purposes for the preservation of
13 the safety, health, peace, good order, comfort, convenience, and for the welfare of the
14 people in the City of Virginia Beach.
15
16 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
17 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
18
19 Section 1. That the City Council authorizes the acquisition by purchase or
20 condemnation pursuant to Sections 15.2-1901, et seq., Sections 33.1-89, et seq., and Title
21 25.1 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, of all that certain real property in fee
22 simple, including temporary and permanent easements (collectively, the "Property"), as
23 shown on the plans entitled "INDIAN RIVER ROAD/WEST NECK ROAD INTERSECTION
24 IMPROVEMENTS CIP #2-502 PWCN-8-0386," (the "Project") and more specifically
25 described on the acquisition plats forthe Project (plats and plans collectively referred to as
26 the "Plans"), the Plans being on file in the Engineering Division, Department of Public
27 Works, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia.
28
29 Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to make or cause to be
30 made on behalf of the City of Virginia Beach, to the extent that funds are available, a
31 reasonable offer to the owners or persons having an interest in said Property. If refused,
32 the City Attorney is hereby authorized to institute proceedings to condemn said Property.
33
34 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the 10th day of
35 November ,2009.
36
CA-11203
PREPARED: 10/29/2009
R-1
\ \vbgov .com\dfs 1 \applications\citylawprod\cycom32\wpdocs\d008\p009\00024299 .doc
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY AND FORM
CITY~
\
Jfi~ \
\ I
VJ.
z. '~~ '\
~I
\
"
~
w
u..
<t
(/)
~~
0.. ~# 1
<t W!:;Ng 15
c:: I-....w 0 (""J l\)
~ % ..q ~I ~
% -~~.... ~
o ow#~ .-
;::; <t >0 0.. c5
<( 0 -00
o u:u:O
o ~o..
..J O~
W
%
l-
(/)
W
~
~
E
iii
i
~
'e
0..
E
.c
l\)
:E
1j
.!!..
o
0:
.~
~
~
-0
<D
o
Q:
~
Z
111
~
~
~
Gl
-0
C
~
'"
~
~
(j
\
~
'e
9-
x
5
..,
~
~
>-
t-
o:
~
o
"Of
C
~.
a>
o
~
~
!2
.-
....
~
~
::>
lD
'"
B
.~
Ul
1::
o
8:
::>
Ul
c
c
\!,
t
t
~
.
I
, I
- 41 -
Item V-J.5.
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS
ITEM # 59375
Attorney R. J. Nutter, 222 Central Park Avenue, Phone: 687-7500, represented Adams Outdoor
Advertising, and spoke in SUPPORT
Upon motion by Councilman Diezel, seconded by Councilman Davis, City Council ADOPTED:
Resolution to REFER to the Planning Commission an Ordinance
AMENDING ~lJJ, ~215 and ~216 and ADDING ~218 of the City
Zoning Ordinance (CZO) re: defining electronic display billboards and
establishing requirements for such billboards (requested by
Councilman Diezel)
Voting: 6-4
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin and Ron A.
Villanueva,
Council Members Voting Nay:
Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10, 2009
1 REQUESTED BY COUNCILMEMBER HARRY E. DIEZEL
2
3 A RESOLUTION REFERRING TO THE PLANNING
4 COMMISSION AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTIONS
5 111, 215 AND 216 AND ADD A NEW SECTION 218 TO
6 THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE, DEFINING
7 ELECTRONIC DISPLAY BILLBOARDS AND
8 ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR SUCH
9 BILLBOARDS
10 WHEREAS, the public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice so
11 require;
12
13 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
14 OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
15
16 That there is hereby referred to the Planning Commission, for its consideration
17 and recommendation, proposed amendments to Sections 111, 215 and 216 and adding
18 a new Section 218 of the City Zoning Ordinance, defining electronic display billboards
19 and establishing requirements for such billboards.
20
21 A copy of such proposed amendments is attached hereto.
22
23 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the
24 Tenth day of November, 2009.
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
()J~/W~J-
City Attorney's Office
CA11318
R-1
November 2, 2009
REQUESTED BY COUNCILMEMBER HARRY E. DIEZEL
1 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTIONS 111, 215 AND
2 216 AND ADD A NEW SECTION 218 TO THE CITY
3 ZONING ORDINANCE, DEFINING ELECTRONIC DISPLAY
4 BILLBOARDS AND ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR
5 SUCH BILLBOARDS
6
7 Sections Amended: City Zoning Ordinance Sections 111,
8 215 and 216
9
10 Section Added: City Zoning Ordinance Section 218
11
12 WHEREAS, the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning
13 practice so require;
14
15 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
16 BEACH, VIRGINIA:
17
18 That Sections 111,215 and 216 of the City Zoning Ordinance are hereby
19 amended and reordained, and a new Section 218, pertaining to electronic display
20 billboards, is hereby added, to read as follows:
21
22 ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
23
24
25
26 Sec. 111. Definitions.
27
28 For the purpose of this ordinance, words used in the present tense shall include
29 the future; words used in the singular number include the plural and the plural the
30 singular; the use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders; the word "shall" is
31 mandatory; the word "may" is permissive; the word "land" includes only the area
32 described as being above mean sea level; and the word "person" includes an individual,
33 a partnership, association, or corporation.
34
35 In addition, the following terms shall be defined as herein indicated:
36
37
38
39 Billboards. A sign, as defined in this zoning code section, including the
40 supporting sigR structure, which advertises or directs the attention of the general public
41 to an establishment, business or service and which is located on a separate site from
42 the establishment, business or service 'Nhich the billboard advertises.
43 Billboard. electronic displav. A billboard. as defined in this section. containinq
44 liqht emittinq diodes (LEOs). fiber optics. Iiqht bulbs. plasma display screens or other
45 internal illumination devices that are used to chanqe the messaqes, intensity of liqht or
46 colors displayed by such siqn. The term shall not include billboards on which Iiqhts or
47 other illumination devices display only the temperature or time of day in alternatinq
48 cycles of not less than five (5) seconds.
49
50 COMMENT
51
52 The amendments in Lines 39-42 are intended to simplify the existing definition of billboard
53 and do not substantively change that definition.
54
55 The new language added in Lines 44-49 define the term "electronic display billboard."
56
57
58
59 ARTICLE 2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES APPLICABLE
60 TO ALL DISTRICTS
61
62
63 B. SIGN REGULATIONS
64
65
66
67 Sec. 215. Nonconforming signs.
68
69 (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 105(f) of this ordinance, and
70 except as provided in section 218. no nonconforming sign shall be structurally altered,
71 enlarged, moved or replaced, whether voluntarily or by reason of involuntary damage to
72 or destruction of such sign, unless such sign is brought into compliance with the
73 provisions of this ordinance. Except as provided in section 216, no nonconforming sign
74 shall be repaired at a cost in excess of fifty (50) percent of its original cost unless such
75 sign is caused to comply with the provisions of this ordinance. Any nonconforming sign
76 which is not maintained continuously in good repair, and any nonconforming sign which
77 is abandoned shall be removed. For purposes of this section, a sign shall be deemed to
78 be abandoned if the business for which the sign was erected has not been in operation
79 for a period of at least two (2) years. Following the expiration of at least two (2) years,
80 any abandoned nonconforming sign shall be removed by the owner of the property on
81 which the sign is located, after notification by the zoning administrator. If, following such
82 two-year period, the zoning administrator has made a reasonable attempt to notify the
83 property owner, the city through its own agents or employees may enter the property
84 upon which the sign is located and remove any such sign wherever the owner has
85 refused to do so. The cost of such removal shall be chargeable to the owner of the
86 property. Nothing herein shall prevent the city from applying to a court of competent
2
, 'I
. ,
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
jurisdiction for an order requiring the removal of such abandoned nonconforming sign by
the owner by means of injunction or other appropriate remedy.
(b) [Not set out]
(c) [Not set out]
COMMENT
The amendment is necessary to conform the provisions of Section 215(a) to the new Section
218. Subsections (b) and (c) are not set out, as they do not pertain to the subject of this ordinance.
Sec. 216. Outdoor advertising structures, billboards, signboards and poster
panels Billboards.
(a) Except as provided in section 218. no We new billboards shall be erected
within the city limits, effective immediately. All existing billboards shall be governed by
the provisions of section 215 of this ordinance. No billboard heretofore erected shall be
located, in whole or in part, upon improved property.
(b) Except as provided in section 218, no We billboard shall be located within
five hundred (500) feet of an interchange, or intersection at grade, on any highway,
interstate or city council designated expressway (measured along the highway,
interstate or expressway to the nearest point of the beginning or ending of pavement
widening at the exit from or entrance to the main traveled way). On all other streets, no
billboard shall be located within two hundred (200) feet of any right-of-way of any
underpass, overpass, bridge or tunnel or a plaza serving such facility.
(c) Except as provided in section 218. no We billboard shall be closer than fifty
(50) feet to any property line nor located closer than six hundred sixty (660) feet to the
right-of-way line of any interstate or expressway designated by city council, nor closer
than twenty-five (25) feet to the right-of-way of any other street. However, no billboard
shall be located within two hundred (200) feet of any established residential or
apartment zoning district. No billboard shall be located upon any lot having a frontage of
less than two hundred (200) feet and an area of less than ten thousand (10,000) square
feet.
(d) The repair of lawfully nonconforming billboards visible from the main
traveled way of any interstate highway, federal-aid primary highway as that system
existed on June 1, 1991, or national highway system highway shall be governed by the
provisions of Virginia Code section 33.1-370.2. No building permit authorizing the repair
of any such billboard shall be issued unless owner of the billboard provides to the
building codes administrator a letter from the commonwealth transportation
3
I II
132 commiSSioner approving the proposed repairs. In the event the building codes
133 administrator determines that the cost of the proposed repairs exceeds fifty (50) percent
134 of the replacement cost of the billboard, he shall, within thirty (30) days of the filing of
135 the building permit application, submit an objection to the determination of the
136 commissioner, together with documentation supporting such objection. A copy of such
137 objection and documentation shall be provided to the billboard owner. The
138 determination of the commissioner upon reconsideration shall be binding.
139
140 COMMENT
141
142 The amendments in subsections (a), (b) and (c) are necessary to conform the provisions of
143 Section 216 to the new Section 218. The amendments to the catchline replace outdated terminology
144 and have no substantive effect.
145
146
147 Sec. 218. Electronic displav billboards.
148
149 Subiect to the followino provisions. electronic display billboards replacino existino
150 billboards on the same lot may be allowed by resolution adopted by the City Council:
151
152 (a) Application requirements. Applications for approval of an electronic
153 display billboard shall be sioned by the applicant and property owner and filed with the
154 Plannino Director. No application shall be accepted by the Plan nino Director unless all
155 required items are included. Applications shall include the followino items:
156
157 (1) A site plan drawn to scale, showino the location of lot lines. utility
158 and other easements. abuttino roadways. existino structures,
159 includino any existino sions and billboards on the lot. the proposed
160 location of the electronic display billboard, and containino an inset
161 location map;
162
163 (2) A landscapino plan showino the type. size. number and location of
164 plant materials to be used;
165
166 (3) Buildino plans showino the heioht. dimensions. structural elements,
167 includino supportino elements, and electrical connections for the
168 proposed billboard;
169
170 (4) A certification sioned by an enoineer licensed to practice in Viroinia
171 that the proposed billboard meets all applicable requirements of the
172 Viroinia Uniform Statewide Buildino Code;
173
174 (5) A certification from the manufacturer of the proposed electronic
175 display billboard that the lioht intensity has been pre-set not to
176 exceed seven thousand (7,000) candelas per square meter and
4
I I
177 that the proposed billboard is eQuipped with a workino control
178 device capable of automaticallv reducino the illumination as
179 reQuired bv this section;
180
181 (6) A plan settino forth the protocol for implementation of the
182 reQuirements set forth in subsection (e). Such protocol shall
183 address the circumstances under which the city or other authorized
184 aoencv may displav emeroencv and other public safety messaoes,
185 the freQuency and duration of such messaoes and such other
186 matters as the city council may deem appropriate;
187
188 (7) Anv other information deemed necessary bv the Plannino Director
189 in order to fullv evaluate the application; and
190
191 (8) An application fee in the amount of four hundred dollars ($400.00).
192
193 (b) Dimensional and location requirements:
194
195 (1) No electronic displav billboard shall be oreater in sion area. as
196 defined in Section 111. than the sion area of the billboard it
197 replaces; provided. however. that the city council may prescribe a
198 lesser sion area for any such billboard.
199
200 (2) No electronic displav billboard shall exceed a heioht eQual to that of
201 the billboard it replaces or such lower heioht as the city council may
202 prescribe. and in no event shall any electronic displav billboard
203 exceed twenty-four (24) feet in heioht. as measured from the orade
204 of the public street toward which the billboard is oriented.
205
206 (3) The city council may prescribe that an electronic displav billboard
207 be located on a different portion of the lot from that of the billboard
208 it replaces; provided. however, that no portion of such billboard
209 shall be located closer to any public street than any portion of the
210 billboard it replaces.
211
212 (4) No more than one (1) electronic displav billboard structure shall be
213 allowed on any zonina lot. and no structure shall contain more than
214 two (2) electronic displav faces. No more than one such face shall
215 be oriented in each direction and vertical stackina of advertisina
216 faces shall be prohibited.
217
218 (5) No electronic displav billboard shall be located in or within four
219 hundred (400) feet of an Historic and Cultural District thereof. or
5
220 within two thousand (2,000) feet of any other electronic display
221 billboard.
222
223 (6) No electronic displav billboard shall be located within the proiect
224 study area of the Viroinia Beach Transit Extension Study initiated
225 bv Hampton Roads Transit in Mav 2009.
226
227 (c) Illumination and displav reauirements:
228
229 (1) No electronic displav billboard shall exceed a maximum illumination
230 of seven thousand (7.000) candelas per square meter from sunrise
231 to sunset or five hundred (500) candelas per square meter between
232 sunset and one o'clock (1 :00) a.m.. as measured from the sion face
233 at maximum briohtness. No such billboard shall be illuminated.
234 either internallv or externallv. at any time between one o'clock
235 (1 :00) a.m. and five o'clock (5:00) a.m., except as may be
236 necessary to displav an emeroencv or other public safety messaoe
237 pursuant to subsection (e).
238
239 The city council may require that where the electronic displav face
240 is visible from a Residential or Apartment zonino district.
241 illumination cease between midnioht and five o'clock (5:00) a.m..
242
243 (2) Electronic displav billboards shall be equipped with a workino
244 dimmer control device capable of automaticallv reducino the
245 illumination to required levels in accordance with subdivision (c) (1).
246
247 (3) No electronic displav billboard shall displav a messaoe or svmbol
248 common Iv used a traffic-control direction or warnino, and no such
249 billboard shall obstruct motorists' view of any street sion. traffic
250 sional. street or intersection.
251
252 (4) No portion of the messaoe displaved bv any electronic displav
253 billboard. includino backorounds. colors. letterino, pictures or other
254 oraphics. shall be chanoed more freQuentlv than once every eioht
255 (8). seconds. Movino. blinkino. flashino. scrollino or pulsatino
256 elements shall be prohibited. The entirety of each display shall be
257 chanoed simultaneouslv within a period of no more than two (2)
258 seconds.
259
260 (5) No electronic displav billboard shall contain any audio speakers on,
261 or electronicallv connected to. such billboard.
262
6
I I
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
(6) All electrical service lines providinQ service to electronic display
billboards shall be underQround.
(d) Landscapinq requirements:
(1) LandscapinQ sufficient to fully screen supportinQ structures from all
abuttinQ roadways at maturity. and any additional landscapinQ
required by the city council. shall be provided by no later than the
first QrowinQ season after approval of the application.
(2) All landscapinQ shall be maintained in Qood condition at all times.
and all veQetation determined by the city arborist to be diseased.
dyinQ or dead shall be replaced in a timely manner consistent with
Qood landscapinQ practices.
(e) Public safety requirements. Electronic display billboards shall be capable
of displayinQ emerQency and other public safety messaQes transmitted by the city or
other authorized aQencies in accordance with the protocol approved by the city council.
(f) Enforcement. Noncompliance with any of the provisions of this section or
the conditions of approval of an electronic display billboard by the city council shall be
Qrounds for revocation of such approval; provided. however. that the zoninQ
administrator shall provide prior written notice of such violation to the owner of the
electronic display billboard and a reasonable period. specified in such notice. to cure
such noncompliance prior to the institution of proceedinQs to revoke approval or other
enforcement action.
COMMENT
Section 218 sets forth the requirements for applications for electronic display billboards.
Such billboards are allowed only as replacements of existing billboards on the same lot, and only
by resolution of the City Council. The ordinance does not allow electronic display billboards under
any other circumstances. Specific requirements are as follows:
Subsection (a) sets forth the information that is required as part of an application for an
electronic display billboard. The requirements include:
(1) A site plan;
(2) A landscaping plan;
(3) Building plans;
(4) An engineer's certification as to compliance with Building Code
req uirements;
7
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
(5) A manufacturer's certification regarding certain illumination capabilities of
the billboard;
(6) A plan for the City's use of the billboard to display emergency and other
public safety messages;
(7) Other information deemed necessary by the Planning Director to fully
evaluate the application; and
(8) A $400 application fee.
Subsection (b) sets forth the requirements pertaining to the location and dimensions of
electronic display billboards. They include:
(1) Restrictions on the size of the billboard;
(2) Restrictions on the height of the billboard;
(3) Restrictions on the location of the billboard;
(4) Limitations on the number of billboards on one lot and a prohibition of
subdividing lots for billboards;
(5) Prohibition of billboards in or within 400 feet of an Historic and Cultural
District or in proximity to other electronic display billboards; and
(6) Prohibition of billboards within the Light Rail Corridor Study Area.
Subsection (c) sets forth the requirements pertaining to the illumination and displays of
electronic display billboards. They include:
(1) Restrictions on the intensity of illumination of billboards and a requirement
that they not be illuminated at certain times, except for emergency and other
public safety messages;
(2) Requirements for automatic control of illumination;
(3) Prohibition of messages or symbols commonly used for traffic-control
purposes and of locations that obstruct motorists' vision of streets,
intersections, etc.;
(4) Requirements that messages be static and displayed for no less than 8
seconds and the messages change within two seconds or less; and
(5) Prohibition of speakers or other audio equipment.
Subsection (d) sets forth the requirements pertaining to the landscaping of electronic
display billboards. They include:
8
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
(1) A requirements that full screening of the supporting structures of a
billboard, as well as any other landscaping required by the City Council, be
provided; and
(2) Landscaping maintenance requirements.
Subsection (e) requires electronic display billboards to be capable of displaying emergency
and other public safety messages transmitted by the City or other authorized agencies.
Subsection (t) sets forth the means of enforcement of the section and provides that the
owner of an electronic display billboard in violation of this section shall be granted a reasonable
opportunity to cure the violation prior to the institution of enforcement proceedings.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the
day of , 2009.
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
City Attorney's Office
CA-11248
R-6
October 13, 2009
9
- 42-
Item V-J. 6.
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS
ITEM # 59376
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Wood, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT:
Resolution to SUPPLEMENT the 2010 Legislative Agenda to request
the Governor and the Virginia General Assembly fully fund the Virginia
National Defense Industrial Authority (VNDIA) and support legislation
to provide additional monies to the Hampton Roads Military and Federal
Facilities Alliance (HRMFFA) to promote and protect defense spending
and other federal activities in Hampton Roads (requested by Councilman
Uhrin)
Voting:
10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William D.
Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10, 2009
I II
REQUESTED BY COUNCILMEMBER UHRIN
1 A RESOLUTION SUPPLEMENTING THE 2010
2 LEGISLATIVE AGENDA BY REQUESTING THE
3 GOVERNOR AND THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY MORE
4 FULLY FUND THE VIRGINIA NATIONAL DEFENSE
5 INDUSTRIAL AUTHORITY (VNDIA)
6
7 WHEREAS, the City Council has become aware that funding for VNDIA, which
8 works on statewide basis to maintain defense funding throughout the Commonwealth,
9 has been significantly reduced; and
10
11 WHEREAS, the recent State of the Region report released by Dr. James Koch
12 from Old Dominion University indicates that 45% of Hampton Road's economy is based
13 on military spending, and
14
15 WHEREAS, our competitor regions and states, such as North Carolina, Florida
16 and Texas, are spending considerably larger efforts than what the Commonwealth is
17 committing to maintain their military and federal activities generally.
18
19 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
20 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
21
22 1. That the City Council hereby requests that the Governor expand funding
23 to VNDIA in his budget to be presented to the General Assembly on December 18,
24 2009. City Council is aware of the fiscal constraints facing the Commonwealth,
25 however, it is vital that defense industry and defense spending be given as much
26 attention by the Commonwealth as possible, which is VNDIA's primary goal.
27
28 2. That the City Council hereby requests that the Governor and General
29 Assembly support legislation whereby additional monies would be provided by the State
30 to the Hampton Roads Military and Federal Facilities Alliance (HRMFFA) to promote
31 and protect defense spending and other federal activities in Hampton Roads.
32
33 3. That the City Clerk shall provide certified copies of this resolution to the
34 Governor and the members of Virginia Beach's General Assembly delegation.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, this 10th
day of NO'TE'mQE'T , 2009.
APPROVED TO CONTENT:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY:
:e~~
City Attorney's Offic
--.....
~SOffice
CA11317/R-1/0ctober 30,2009
- 43 -
Item V-J. 7.
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS
ITEM # 59377
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Wood, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT:
Ordinance to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE a $64,600 Grantfrom the
u.s. Department of Homeland Security through the 2009 Infrastructure
Protection Activities Program to the FY2009-10 Operating Budget of the
Police Department re: dive equipment and training for the Police
Marine Unit.
Voting:
10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William D.
Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10, 2009
1 AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE
2 FUNDS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
3 SECURITY TO THE FY 2009-10 OPERATING BUDGET OF
4 THE POLICE DEPARTMENT
5
6 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,
7 VIRGINIA:
8
9 That $64,600 is hereby accepted from the U. S. Department of Homeland
10 Security Federal Emergency Management Agency through the 2009 ARRA Port
11 Security Grant and appropriated, with federal revenues increased accordingly, to the FY
12 2009-10 Operating Budget of the Police Department.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the 10th
day of November , 2009.
Requires an affirmative vote by the majority of all of the members of City Council.
Approved as to Content:
Approved as to Legal Sufficiency:
~Q~jO"~
anagement Services
~'- --
City tt ney's Office
CA11315
R-2
October 29,2009
- 44-
Item V-J.8.a-g.
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS
ITEM # 59378
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Wood, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT:
Ordinance to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE from the United States
Department of Justice Edward Byrne Justice Assistance Grant $214,208
re: Public Safety and Criminal Processing as follows:
a. $13,000 to Police
b. $30,940 to Police
c. $43,000 to Police
d. $93,875 to Sheriff
e. $19,390 to Juvenile/Domestic District Court
f $2,148 to Juvenile/Domestic District Court
g. $11,855 to Circuit Court
Voting:
10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William D.
Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10,2009
1 AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE FUNDS
2 FROM THE EDWARD BYRNE JUSTICE ASSISTANCE
3 GRANT
4
5 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,
6 VIRGINIA:
7
8 That $214,208 is hereby accepted from the U. S. Department of Justice and
9 appropriated, with federal revenues increased accordingly, to the following agencies and
10 departments in the amounts and for the purposes set forth below:
11
12 a. $13,000 to the Police Department for the purchase of night vision goggles;
13 b. $30,940 to the Police Department for the purchase of surveillance equipment;
14 c. $43,000 to the Police Department for a security improvement to the 4tli Precinct
15 parking lot;
16 d. $93,875 to the Sheriff for a security camera upgrade;
17 e. $19,390 to the Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court for a contracted
18 expungement clerk;
19 f. $2,148 to the Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court for an on-line
20 training subscription; and
21 g. $11,855 to Circuit Court for a Media Evidence Display System.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the 10th day
of November 2009.
Requires an affirmative vote by a majority of all of the members of City Council.
Approved as to Content:
Approved as to Legal Sufficiency:
1J:ZI- ---
City mey's Office
CA11316
R-2
October 29,2009
, I
- 45 -
Item V-J. 9.
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS
ITEM # 59379
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Wood, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT:
Ordinance to ESTABLISH Capital Project #3-151, ACCEPT the Grant
and APPROPRIATE $800,000 from the United States Department of
Justice re: mobile communications services and equipment supporting
regional communication needs for the COPS Law Enforcement
Technology.
Voting:
10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William D.
Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10, 2009
1 AN ORDINANCE TO CREATE CAPITAL PROJECT #3-151
2 - COPS LAW ENFORCEMENT TECHNOLOGY GRANT
3 AND TO APPROPRIATE $800,000 FROM THE
4 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
5
6 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
7 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA, THAT:
8
9 1. Capital Project #3-151 - COPS Law Enforcement Technology Grant is hereby
10 established as a project in the FY 2009-10 Capital Budget; and
11
12 2. $800,000 is hereby accepted from the U.S. Department of Justice and
13 appropriated, with revenue from the federal government increased accordingly, to
14 Capital Project #3-151 - COPS Law Enforcement Technology Grant in the FY 2009-10
15 Capital Budget to procure mobile communications services and equipment supporting
16 regional communications needs, and to establish a geographically central location
17 supporting the wireless interfacing and backhaul of the interoperability communications
18 equipment.
19
20 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the 10th day
21 of November ,2009.
Requires an affirmative vote by a majority of all of the members of City Council.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY:
~~(l,
~~ ~
Ci Y AU6r (6ffice
CA11314
R-2
October 29,2009
I I
- 46-
K. PLANNING
ITEM # 59380
1. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMEND re The Pembroke Strategic
Growth Area 4 Implementation Plan
and REPEAL the 1991 CBD Master
Plan
2. BRYANT AND STRATTO COLLEGE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
3. BEACH BINGO, INC. t/a PEMBROKE HALL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
4. ROBERTANDKARENVAUGHAN
LOCATION OF MOBILE HOME
5. AMEND CITY ZONING ORDINANCE (CZO)
~211 re: time limitations on political
campaign signs posted on private
property
~201 re: setbacks for front porches
(requested by Council Ladies Rosemary
Wilson and Barbara Henley).
~203, 900, 901, 902 and 905 re:
The Pembroke Strategic Growth Area 4
Implementation Plan.
6. NEW FIRST COLONIAL ASSOCIATES
CONDITIONAL CHANGE OF ZONING
7. ENDEA VOR ENTERPRISES, L.L.c.
CONDITIONAL CHANGE OF ZONING
November 10, 2009
! I
- 47-
Item V-K.
PLANNING
ITEM # 59381
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Wood, City Council APPROVED in ONE
MOTION Items 1,2,3, 4, and 5a.h.c. of PLANNING BY CONSENT AGENDA.
Voting:
10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William D.
Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10, 2009
- 48 -
Item V-K.I.
PLANNING
ITEM # 59382
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Wood, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT:
Ordinance to AMEND the Comprehensive Plan re: The Pembroke
Strategic Growth Area 4 Implementation Plan and REPEAL the 1991
Virginia Beach Central Business District (CBD) Master Plan.
Ordinance to AMEND the Comprehensive Plan by REPEALING the
provisions within the Policy Document pertaining to the Virginia Beach
Central Business District Master Plan, adding provisions to the Policy
Document pertaining to the Strategic Growth Area 4 Implementation
Plan-Pembroke Area, adopting the Strategic Growth Area 4
Implementation Plan-Pembroke Area by reference, and repealing the
1991 Virginia Beach Central Business District Master Plan.
Voting:
10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Barbara M
Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E.
Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10,2009
I I
1 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE
2 PLAN BY REPEALING THE PROVISIONS WITHIN THE
3 POLICY DOCUMENT PERTAINING TO THE VIRGINIA
4 BEACH CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT MASTER PLAN,
5 ADDING PROVISIONS TO THE POLICY DOCUMENT
6 PERTAINING TO THE PEMBROKE STRATEGIC GROWTH
7 AREA 4 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN, ADOPTING THE
8 PEMBROKE STRATEGIC GROWTH AREA 4
9 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN BY REFERENCE AND
10 REPEALING THE 1991 VIRGINIA BEACH CENTRAL
11 BUSINESS DISTRICT MASTER PLAN
12
13 WHEREAS, the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning
14 practice so require;
15
16 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
17 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
18
19 1) That the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Virginia Beach be, and hereby
20 is, amended and reordained by the deletion in the Policy Document of pages
21 68 through 71 pertaining to, the Virginia Beach Central Business District
22 Master Plan, and the addition to the Policy Document of that certain
23 document, consisting of seven (7) pages, entitled "Strategic Growth Area 4
24 Pembroke Area", a true copy of which is attached hereto, and
25
26 2) That the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Virginia Beach be, and hereby
27 is, amended and reordained by the deletion in the Appendix of the 1991
28 Virginia Beach Central Business District Master Plan and the adoption in the
29 Appendix of the "Pembroke Strategic Growth Area 4 Implementation Plan"
30 dated September 4, 2009. Such document is made a part hereof, having
31 been exhibited to City Council and is on file in the Department of Planning.
32
33 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on this _1...o.t.h-
34 day of Novemher , 2009.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
~
...
.---.1
CA11266
R-3
September 21, 2009
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
tIJ~/~.1{,j
City Attorney's Office
2
Ill:I"
<(
w
0::
<(
:I:
l-
S
0<1:
O::LU
l!)a::
<(
ULU
G~
wO
~~
o::~
I-LU
\1)0..
\~,Oggg.d.
0000
~o
00
00
I~
z
o
-
I-
0..
-
a::
u
V')
w
C
-5 15 ,~ -g
~u1!e
... ~I-CO
<..9"", -0
>c
..0 ro
(l)
-0 C
C C
::l ro
o (l)
..0-'
-0 >
w (l)
'-E 2
roo..c
(l)CO~
'0-00
C Vl
..c' rp ~
t:t;14-l
o (l) 0
c 3: ~
-0
ro
o
0:::
<t C (l)
<..9 (u E
Vl 1:;: 0
ro Vl
Vl Q. OJ
..cC-o
""',-2 -5
t ::l C
2i -g :!::
Vl
"'" U
Vl
o
E
~-5roQj
U ro (l) "'"
(l) (l) ... C
Q.coro(l)
Vl C U
ro ro C
roc:'::ro
-(5..0
tlOQ....
~ .:.:: 0 ::l 1::
> ... -0 (l)
ct}(l)Ero
..cEc(l)',p
"'" ,1?:9-;:; C
.- So- I./'J ~
3: (l)(l) E..g;
-0 C t:.D"'9 0 'Vi
(l)oro-U(l)
..c ',p (l) ...
Vl ro (l) 3: ro
c..c
..0 ',p "'"
roVl-o
Et;;(l)C
(l) -0 ro
-0
(l)
>
...
(l)
Vl Vl
~ Vl
ro
Q.<t
Vl<..9
Vl
C Vl
~:.c
1::01-
(l)
E "",' Vl
C C (l)
ro Vl
ro ... ::l
"'" ::l ...
... ro
(l) "'" (l)
""'Vl..c
C (lJ "'"
(l) ... 0
.....c
o U
'ro 23
Eco
o ro
3:
"'"
ro ro ~ 1::
... ~ 0
ro ...
-0 Vl .~]
3;..cU(l)
2 "'" ~ ~
::l ..c ..2 (lJ
tlO.....c
::l 0 "'"
~ezo
-5 g .~
Vl ..::: C
~ ~ ~ ~'5
>ro ro ro ,- (l)
> Q. -0 ..c
(l) (l) C "'"
::l::l(l)(l)-o
ooc't<c
coco (l)ro
ro ro
(l) (lJ
... ...
ro <(
t C
o ro
Vl .0
(lJ ...
... =>
(l)
U
C
(l)
-0
C
(l)
C Q.
.- (lJ
t:.D-o
:> C
, , '-0
::3 ro ~ C
iE6::lro
o ',p .:!::::
ro ::l
...... U U
o ::l
-0
(l)
U ~
'- U
&ro
""'0
~o
t1~
(l) ro
-6 ,~
...
..0
E
(l)
0.
-0
C
ro
<::t
<.D
N
(l)
"'"
ro
"'"
Vl
...
.e! ro
C 'L:
(l)
>t
..0 ro
C::!:;:
ro (lJ
..0 Vl
~ :~
Vl
>-0
ro C
3: ro
-0
ro
o
...
"",'
~~
ro (l)
- (u (l) ...
<t C -5 (l)
<..9 (l) 0 't<
VltlO""'Vl(l)ro
~""'::lco
(l) (l) C
(l)~(l)-o
ut1~~
"'"
c-o
(l) C
E ro
Q.ro E
o ',p 0
wc-O
~ i5 ,~
-oVl"'"
o~.E
(l) (l)
..c..c
"'" "'"
Vl
Vl
ro
U
(l) ro
..c Vl
""'u
(l)
o1B
u... ...
o 0
"'" "'"
C
3:
-o~
C
ro Vl
ro..c-
Vl"",.::g
:!:: '3 ~
~, ro -0
"" (l) C
t:~J:2
V'\
V'\
uJ
Z
V'\
::::>
co
...I
<(
0:::
I-
Z <(
UJ uJ
Uo:::
<(<:(
~UJ
<:(~
~~
ot)
0::: _
co 0:::
~I-
UJ~
0..0
2:
o
i=
Q..
ex:
w
VI
I.l.l
a
~
ex:
<C
I.l.l
ex:
8
Cl.I
...c
-'-' Cl.I
~ e,J)
en ~
rj, ~
~
0.0
i="-'
(3 v;
U 3
::: 0
Cl.I_
-'-' ro
U-o
Z) c
,r.;:. ~
-0 Cl.I
.~ ~
...c 'li
E-U
"'0 _
C,)-
v: ~ '3
-~ ~. ~ c
.:=: Co) ~ ~
~C{:,.6~
.~ C) --:~
_ ..!::..j. 'OJJ
~ ::: ~ B"
v: ~ p_o
(,) - CJ
c2-cV;
v: Q)''''''' V"J
;:: ;: -c .;:
co~:::J:;
--' r..J) ':V f""'"
X ~ U :::
g ~ CJ .:
.< 2"'3
5 ro
CJ ~
U (tl
o
U
Q ~
..c.. 0
E-U
<c :'S '...... C'
uP C.-
if) ~ Z
:'J.) f-l ~_
.:L. CC
o
~ .:!3 ~
.D. -.."t
E a 1::
cfC:5
(;) c ~
.::c~
~ '-8 .-=:
,..... lj <;
,,,J::: !:: ....
f::
<:(
uJ
0::
4:
uJ
~
o
ex::
co z
~ ~
0.. >
__ v
,....
__ c:
u
-
C.
-
:::
G[J~
\h1'" gggg.
~G-'
00
00
(g
.)..J
(/)
. C,)
~b ...c
e .SJ)
~-C
Q) :>l
;::j ,- J-'
..o~u
Q) -U Cl.I
cCs=
_\CJ,-'
.l-i !,/) C
..2 Q) .-
o..V'1
90:C
~ ~ ~.D
N Q) .~
r.r:,~..r:..
~ Z oC
.2 ~ ::
fr~:9.
o.p .:;
2:3..0
e
~ 3
~ 0
<cE-
VI
VI
<lJ
c:
'u;
::s
co
~
...
c:
<lJ
\.J
V1
eJ)
(;~:::.
-,-,o-w
~'p --'
tj,) r:: ....,l
Ec"c
e C,) :::
2. (/) C,)
0) C,)
5. to
>
C
0)"'0
. ,....
V1 '-
0) 0
(...) ..r::.
rc :-
_ 0
o..J::
cD ..c
~ .S!:'
C1)
0) e
':-W
ro e
':f) .','
VI
2:
o
~
o
2:
I.l.l
~
~
o
w
UJ
c:x::
<(
I.l.l
ex:
<C
I.l.l
ex:
8
~
ro
r.,j
(/)
Q)
,-
....,
.;:::- :::
...c
.3 '..) 0
:.- .2:.
O,,-w
p.. "-' :::
p.. ''"';::: ro
o '-' r..)
~ ~C,)_ b"'z:l
~ 0 IJ',
OJ.B t
~ f5 ~ tV v)
u~ro~,ro
,... ~ - 2.
;; 2. ~.~ w
~ C 'S ~ ~
-w-w';::E"-'
c: ~ c .~
,...,- ~, ~ f....,i '''''';
(/)
~
'v .,;.
-o<c
1::::0
.)..JCCr./)
Vl
W
......
U
1-
.)..J
'J'!
;a
Q)
...c
.)..J
r;
U rJ,
o c..l
,-.'...0-_ t.r';
(; ~ w ~
..o(/)"-'U
~ ~ ?.> U
~'fl-~
:1) cD'..l.-
> C C
~ .?_ -U
Vl ~
'lJ c1
-rn1-o
,.... c
C5J:;O~
Z ~ ~ 'cr.:...c
~,~ ~ ~ C \:j
r; ''2 r= t- .r:;
:::e;o..Cr-
Q)-oO~C:;
::: ...c Q) e "'0
o .SJ) ~ '0 '~
u ...c "'0 c... ~
<(
uJ
0::
<:(
rw
z
z
o
co
~
u
~
t;
6
V'\
V'\
uJ
Z
;:n
::::>
co
...I
<(
0::
I-
Z
uJ
U
Cl.I
>-
J.-I c.;
U V1
rv :;j
b"'O
.J.,.ol 0
ro x
.- :u
ro~
::: 0
~ ~;
::; ~
~..;; -
'l>
(/)0-.
(/)
C) J.J
,S ::
,::;. :r.t.....-
~ ..c '0
..t:JcB
.3 'C; C
!,j) ~ (j)
W c: u
;<,
o
~
<(
>.
QJ
C
C
o
~
...
IJ
.;::
...
cS
'"
'"
<lJ
C
'u;
:J
co
o
....
....
c:
<lJ
\.J
-
>,(':5
n '.0
rJ"J c::
I Q)
~"'O
"'0 .v)
C ~
Q)
~- $
2! 'l>
-0>
~
<::t
..-I
I
N
1-
(;)
en
o ~
(:j~
1=_ C,)
...c
ro"-'
'/;
Vl Q)
>-
cti >... 0 0
:::: -0 (/)
~U --0
VJ $ c ~
\ 1lJ U o:u
u C -4-i
r- Q) i f-J.
c~~~
~~ur.J)
tJ) -0 :.;::::
_ CU v
,....., ~ __ v"}
- r/J ~;
~ c,e~ ~
C c"'to- ~
u ~ OJ ";::
~_.c."Z
p .... to- .- ro
~..o .3p
..... ...., -
>>~eO)<C
0) ._ 0) V1 Q)
~tt:2~~
e c 0.- v
c vi 0 co
CO....---~...c
'l) ,'l} ::::i ,-
~b~~S
E=.c"'Oeo..
2:
o
i=
Q..
ex:
v
VI
I.l.l
a
~
ex:
<C
>-
I.l.l
2:
2:
o
co
C
1-
Q) (/)
...... 0)
~ ~ro~
5"';OP;;
.';-...) x ,- -
....;. ,- ~ ~ ~-'
.S ,;:; E u p..
1:> V1 >-. "'0 -g 8
VJo~.SrcCJ
OWe ,....t:
~~~'C3w.J....J
00 1- "'0 "'0 ro E
~9""ccass:
~ -So r-
v:. - - cc..;:.
Cl.I Q) > o.c';::: V)
,... 1- U ..... e Q)
,.n 'J) J:j '"f3 <c (\j cc ;::: .- .-
.J-1,';..;-ll_ 0) C -Vl ,;:; c€ ...., b E ~ 3 ~;~
'G 0 ~ c ~ = ,- Q ~ r-
U r_IWl-O'll"cCU~>;
'J'! '0 ~ b U <C ,1:: U ":j 1:> '!2 b "'0
..s ~c V1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 e ....,...... W
r-_ .___ _'A 0 J:j 0 ':::, J:j r./) ~ c: Cl.I v;
~ ~J ___ U \\; ~ (t Co ::;
w _w::>Vl,-,c..o
<( '-'fj' >Q)_OI-<-"'O
o '&: ::: cC ro "'S .Vl Vl;:S u ::; G> ~
r./) c: ro vi c: -G "G"S ~ "G ~ (" V; cu
~ .90 :: ;:;:; e 'S cu p...;- 0 ~ ro cS::
~ VI P ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ c 3 ~ ~ ~'
r.__ ~ ~ _ ~ ~I J -,~ ~
~ -c IV Vi .... .,... W O~' - "-' Vl
.c__..6(\j'f;O.'2UO~O)"iCro
,- <1) '> :; :? _'r- r./1 ~ .:;: ;\'1) I-< ?J_"
~29rfj -to-Vl>'l>'!2ro':
:f Cl.I - X:::: ~ Cl.I' c 0.. J::: -;.:: U 'a:;
_ c..- (\j ,..."" (/) ,.... ~ v
~ "'"C Vl .J::; o.'Vi;:: E ,'-:2 E :)
i= E ~ ,2 ~ ~ g g ~ 0 ?= 8 ~ ~
'J'!
."::'.
0) e
..r::. .--
"-' e
1) 0 ('C
..r:........O"
J.-l C
'- Q) Q)
o-:->...c
~gt-
.S r..; c;
t) O-J C"O
1.1 ,J::. ";:::"
'/' .....-
V'.: r.f:. C
::.; 0 c:
~ N .~ ~
~ .t-< -
C (\j.8 ~
v2~~';::
~~~~~
.:::: ~ Q..I r"""
~ c~$~
2~t:.~r-1
0.. 0.... .- 'S: ~
::=0~:;E
>-<C..D 0
~_,v 'r;; U >, ~
,- rfJ ~ ~,
E 1) ~ E --
_,...c '-..~, of)
w:::: 2: _ ~"c>-
::: -
c...o t'. ~
'1J 2 E ,- "-
..r:.cC)~:>
r-- (~ C- ~ '5
z
<(
...I
Q.
0::
w
t-
\I)
<(
2~
Zu
<(0::
lXlt;;
0::_
::>0
~
~"'~" o.L " '"
. 'i-;. }IJII"JJ~ t " ;;; '" cS
~ Vi '"
~, "". cS ~ '" 5 "
;; '" 5 cS ~
I <:- a:: '" " <=
\7 u uu u ~T '" ~ '" ~ g ~ E "-
~~ ~ c;, '" > ~ (5
~ ~ '"
-, .:J :: 5; '-' u n:l
,- is cO '" c :> C]J
r;o 0; g c 0 '" ~ '-
";,~ ... ;;; u CD :0: <(
, <( !: I ~ '"
.' <= '" ;;
'" <= " :0: c:
en a. '-' u en n:l
- . I I ..0
-
,~ - '-
::)
o
......
;()
;()
3 ~ ~
E~~
V')
~6
~i=:
f- d
< <
a IJ.J
s: ~
c:c:~
~8
~~
......
C\j
~
-;c:
C'C'-U-c
2:: ....J ,....., r-
<:r:~-,rv
.u -.: 0.. :"oj
-~ y;~
p '~,.O) urv
't bJ:i c::
OJ rv 0
.u.u"O
~$,~
> ro tV CJ
~'.,J ""0 = E ~
OJ C'O 0
~ VJ 'C
~ c; ("!3
2:: ~ u
ui:3O
'"
-0
;() ~
OJ
u 2
:::...-
>,......
. rv "'1:,
5 -= ;:..
~. ~ J....j ;:::
'.I"; VJ !;/J ';..,.;
(l) '.p ~ ~
~-S~=
~Q..C
cS: - r/) '::::;
CJj r- ~
~ ~ ii ,~
'= 0 0..,-=
,...j ,-.. 0 r./j
...o.;::,.....~
-ow~
(""1 r.r; 'C:- ~
m...c :>
r- cJ) (!)
M'- ::
.:;: :r: ,G
aj CJ U
u ::: 2
G ..- .L..,\
C:C:<C(j")
.... '-'
c ~ 0
;:) a; ~
't.8~
OJ :J) .~
...j......i :1..) .....
rv ~ t:i
$ r: _ :r;
, Q.;
rv 0.
~ w
~ (d
~ -0 w
~ t2 ~
~@
w 0
......
o..rc
o..c
- ......
~ rc
.... (!)
0...
o ~
rv E
C/') C
tlJ C
C
0.. ~
~
':v
~ ~
OJU
~.~
r- -
,..... (\j
- ~
BE-
(V
~ ~
OJ ~
~:i::
- .
w -
OD .8
.u 1/)
~ ..2
V')
<
a
i=:
d
<
IJ.J
~
~
8
l.u
Cl::
~
Cl::
<::(
;:...
IJ.J
<
<
a
CCl
-0
rv
ro C)
b-wQ::;
~ ~ >,
u OJ rc Q.J
r- U:v<-
"v J....,l ~ f'-
JJ- .8 ~ IV 0
U C'O C'O U ca
~._, .~ 2: .~ ~ CD
~:. v ~ v 8 3
:i) -0 1/) C'O .w
:;: 1/) r- OJ U r<::i
7'2::;::":z:;~
~ - ,5 ;:: :JJ 2::
xrc~a:;ar..r.
E '~ ::s E i2 ~
:1J ('tj\lJ~_
~E::~-':::;r-~
~ r- n. :=.~ 2::
~-g6t: v:
~u-8~2
C(~'" gggg,
\~U~u: _
Ow
Ow
,frij
tl
~
~
....
t::
e
'f.
~
~
~
.~
....
.">
cS
">
~
,t::
~
Cl:l
-g
t::
a
>-, -0 CD
.c ~
;.... ro
2"20..
~ ~ 'E:
U O.J 0
~
'.;:i ~
~-l 'J)
:1)
r:: f:
::..l....J
C ''J)
r- V 4--l
--0'- ':1)
3: ,-v:,
c ca '';:; r:; '-
~...c: ~ 2 -v
'-, V +..J ~
W ro '.c:;
voOJ r/)
:r;CQ
(!)
u
u
'-
:i)
r- ,-..
o~
'LJ
::...; '-' ~
OJ ~ .;:)
2 ~ ,E ,5
o 1) ~ ' CD
~~~~~~
~ U ,-,-LJ
~ ro u 0 ,~
t1~r.~c.>
<1J ~ '- "'0
U E= ~_'.J c:3 ==
0.; ::; rv
~~~C72'
~ :..; ? ~ ~
::<"OU'J)c
,::Q B ~~ ,~ 3;
OJ '"'
-.;::;
r:-o
o
ro U l\j ,'';
'v':: t'!l Q. ~
Q) p:,1.S ~ ~
"0 .:::: "0 0 Q)
> c u ~
',-S u 1i ("1)0 ~
r- ::.< ~.
0: r:; (!) r:; ca
:;::
p .;;:
a3:p
c..-
':V
-0
u
C
rv~~
r=:~-o
'J.; C Q.)
4-1 1""'1 ,.....
'"': (~~
~
CIJ
,-..
w
.-9 :v
>, ;t E
r<::i C:::. ~
v -0 :;:
'SfJ j~ C
'li ,- C
4-J - ,_
',,) 1.; ~
0:
-1-.1 .- -I-'
C/j c: VJ
J2
....
d:
'l:l
t::
tl
\l)
<.>
tl
~
t::
\l)
8-
t-
U
0:::
t-
~
a
LU
~
<(
...J
...J
:>
...J
<(
0:::
t-
Z
LU
U
<
a
i=:
0...
B
~
c
:i) ::l
-;::~
~ c (I..)
~;:~
E
ro ~ '"../) ro
Q..(jOro
Vi O-.,J....J .-
- ;:"1) E-
.~ ~ - 0
~ :J; C .J....,I
~ u c. C
~ CJ
'fj U
C C'O
~~
J-.>
-0 OJ
:.t') iJJ
C
~ ()
t--o
'7"
\0
N Vl
,
-
>-,-0 ;:::; rv
~ ~
c
cG
<(
LU
0:::
<(
t-
2
o
a:::
u.
a:::
LU
t-
~
~
u
a:::
t-
~
a
V'l
V'l
LU
2
V'l
:)
co
...J
<(
a:::
t-
z
LU
U
r/)
0..-0
VJ =
...,
vo
(l,'J Vl
(!J CI)
~ OJ
t c
o rcl
C-c
1) "'-J
.: .~
~
a
i=:
d
<
IJ.J
~
~
8
IJ.J
Cl::
~
Ul 0
t~
.t 0
1/) ,;::$
~ S
~
o 1/)
o ~
......
-o~
";::: rt;
r- ,_
- .....
u~ E
'ti "0
Q.l v:
u 2
(lJ ,
:: C
rc ~
;()
rv -'
0.._
.0Jj ~
, -
,5'] (ij
~
::: rv
0..
Vl
-' 0..
o Vl
,!:: -'
~-g
2 :.-:
~
v t:
~
':V Q)
..;::::
4- ~
,..., ~
- ~
,..7 Cor.
-;- '"f'j
2) ~
~=:
I :'lJ
g: 3:
.;:)
~~
C r::i
"-'
~Eg:~~\!)
Q) ro r- ~
~~;:13
~~2':
c r:; > v
0.. ~ ~ ~
.: ;?:: CJ ~
-oE-
:=:
..c
.~.o
::c
"""
'<
Vl
1/)
::: t1:j ~
2 J::
v C't r-.
B~o...
cv J-l r,/)
~saSl:i_
P"OVlr:;
r/) ~ ~
51<: _
ro "~ c
2: OJ)'~
<eE.....
cb~
~ V) cv
r/) ~
u
<
a
i=:
0...
B
~
Cl
~
0::
<::(
f-
<:
a
Cl::
I.l.
Cl::
~
~
~ ~
<:!.J '-,
+-J.J:::::
~ ~
o ~
C:..o...
.~r..-.
t; 0 ~ r-'
-:;
>)
~z
.2 c:
(':j OJ
=-r:J
~, ;2
'- -
~ '';::
~ w
~S
......
r,:; rz.
0-0
-0
(lJ -
~ .~ ,S ~
3:';07900
~..cc-e
(!) b}j E-- .- :_ '"
t:'"~r--WC)t:~
l"' 8 ;::; rfJ a.. :"':; (.;
r _
--=:
ro
OJ
~
c
ro
..0
L..
:)
.....
:'t
,....
:c; c ~
~.:-J..i-l
':'J:;""'Q ~
~ .:.; c
-~u
'S: ~ ""0
,....
~ i) ','J
...,)
^ 0.0
-.!,..l ~ ~
.-
C
'-..J'S:
[S '.:J
CC W
~
-0
~-c
,- ;:
'fj cv
...c. 2::
rc I
..... ,-.
V')
:J.) C
l..t-)
r- '../j
rv r::; - ....:
~ W :.iJ Cl
;$ - V; 'u
--a r:)
~O,JJ::~
~ ~ U ~
~ ~
::;; ~
3:: G
~ YJ
:: CJ
o t::
:.... 0
'0.0 '...-.
v
Q)
J-.)
C
:J) C"';j
c
6 ~
4-- ~
v: v::
,.... e
;v c
r= ~
j) ':1.;
v (,rj
:::; ~
w
~ ~
o
v ,.....
VJ
::::
\'..i
-c-C
C./'J r.:;
V':J .\)
2 E
.-I 1)
,-.
:v r-<
1:: :::...
.::
--
__ ::J
-::: >-
'",) :::.>
~CJ
"
n OLOG
'v" uuuu
~uuuu
\~
.[@
bJ)
,....
t:
.!-< ::Li
~ ~
"- 0
, '",-
o .,.
+-.l"t
-!.. 0
g $
.....
V') 0
.;: ~
~ :=
~ 0
Jj .l-'
c: B
fJ) :::
.....-c
..0 ~
c
:J.)
~ 1.;
:J.) ,.... $
Q; J-l
b':'tl,l"":J
VJ ,,=,.!::J. 0::
1-, ;:: ;>}.s
c-..j......i~
>'.) ~"G :
:J.) . ,....
> 3 ,~ ~_
:1) V -::: ,--~
U 3 ~ ~
(lj !- 0
,.... ,....
"t: ,::2 :::: u
,~ ~ ..6 u
> CJ) ::; ~
V'1 ,- ~
~ - ,- t
u
~
c
t '::; S;
.~ C::3:;
~ 2 ~ ~
IlJ ~ '1J CO
~.cu.:;
oW >-.~.t: u
~~CU~
~ ~ ~ "'Ci
':J) l:i > c:
> w J-.) :.>
2~;.,)c..
!::.cE~
E c ~ C
:.J rc
V')
~
-0 v
,- 8
, '" a...
-c
r- \..'
@ ~ .~
- C
CC :::: ClJ
W""''"O
o :::: V)
1fJ.~ ~_
'4-0 _
o :::i ~~.
V) r-
:J r- "": V":.
v 1) ::::_ :)
2 t: z
':t :J.) ',.
:.i) > 'J": :v
;'j J.J
-= ;-'
.:1> 'V
~',:~~
r-' < 5
35 ~ ~ ....
>. c;: U
-0.+-\"'=
'S: ~,..j C~
~ '-C: ~ ~
~ u --' ;:::
rp C ~ ~
~ E
~ a ~ (.)
('0 C..c ,-..
v:' C ':I. E
- u ''-' '_'
E-- 1) c: -'
eo
c
:1.;
,....
'::;
~D
,....
,:1;
~
c~
-0 ~
~ cv
r:; 0..
r~ ""Ci
,....
> 7l
G V')
-
o N
cc
~ P-
C ,....
__ rv
~1:
" =:i
,.- ~_',(I
'f,
,~ ::;
\"'J
J-l i..J
'.11 ,....
r...:.:
I-
U
ex:
l-
I/)
o
w
~
ex:
o
Cl.
ex:
o
U
Z
ex:
w
J:
I-
::>
o
V>
v
~~'"O
-o~ c
~~3~
'0 .8 ~ ("j
,-: 'c
2~65-
~~-c~
:; :: '''',
~ ~ ~ 2
:: J-'
ClJ :J
cL ...c
fJ~
<.--J\D
WN
I
!-. -
~ ....
~
o
f::
Cl.
cc
u
V')
Lu
a
u ,....
v:. ...... "'0 ~, r-
::; ~ ~ ==
-cO.-C-..;!
-v:O:::r-W
:J
,....
'Z
rr:;
"'C
,
'/'j i
-..l './.. C
2 ~
> !-.
~, 23
o u
W Q)
U ==
~ c
~ U
:.> .....
$ :J.)
~ f::
~ ~/)
:;-0
:.> c
> cv
20:;
~t
Er:...;
'J"': :.; -
~ ~
'f, .,( [.f1
..... :J
::: ';= ~
I-" '~
E -s 0..
:; ;'::;-0
9 ,~ fj
-- ':"'- r- {f)
P-'~ ra ~
:= ~ ~ ~
:::: -!-J ~ .2
~~ ~ 2
~ ~12-g
),J '\ ~
.t:J ;''':_
C./"'.:- :> ~
,',./ r../')
o Q) ',,/;,
O:::-c&;
>..=: ~
:J.) W
r- ,- cU
2 -
o cv ~
CD 2: 'l)
':V E
>,
'0
Cl::
.....
-'=
01
:::;
1:l
c:
o
1:l
'-
o
::.
(\J
:;
o
co
(\J
<.J
c:
(\J
1:l
c:
(\J
Cl
(\J
1:l
~
~
o
J-.)
Q;
o~ Ero~
o x ~ Q) W \fJ
p.c ...:: cJ; +-: V) ::::
-_c.o::(;!-.
~ :: '.f1 0 ,....__Q;
c ~ ro
Q)_,-~ ~ J-iro ~.(!)
-_C,-._
E~7V':r;.:.;Cv
-c .~ ~ ~ E ~
1) Q) '"C W p.. ~ rv
::::: !-fj r- 0 C ,- U)
:::2S-a.;:=::u
r,j-"'O ~ > 'cE
0..'> '.f1 ~ ClJ 0
VJ-2:~v(l)_
rt ~ IT; ~ .
m..!:J 1) ,.!:: ~ -b ~
ill:::>::::E-..... -
_.-;'r;-C.' U~..J
cv U .~
:: cv :J.) ":j- ::l -0 lr.
(/) ~ L W l..C 0 \./)
~ 'fJ jj ;::::: (""\l ...c ~_CJ ~
t--rJCV 'lj_
V')
~
o
f::
~
~
Lu
~
~
o
I..J
Lu
Cc:
I-
U
ex:
l-
V)
o
V)
:::l
Cl.
~
od:
U
Z
ex:
UJ
l-
V)
w
~
"i" ,.... Q;
.:\C-C-'
$ r,J ~ ~
'0 0 ~,~ ~
,.!::.. G-u
.....
uc..::;
~
o
f::
Cl.
cc
u
V')
l.lJ
a
z.~ ~ ,:: Cl>
'.jj CD = cD u::
~ .-I ~ ':.....
UJ-IO ~
~w..!:>l)
~ .b >.~ -0 r-y
r-C/):;S2-o
:::: -l.I; '- r-
~:S:;~:'t;
(1) ~ ,..... 'y'
"-' r- J:j W t:
v; ~ :ct :=
0EJ'JwX
$:; ,.... S
,~ u... ,'-' u
-~;LJ~-'
.c,.... >,-
J.j < ,::;> CCJ
'"
::3
Cl
E
(3
c:
'-
(\J
.....
'"
~
~
<.J
',=
.....
cS
'"
'"
(\J
c:
'Vi
::3
co
"0
'-
.....
c:
~
rc CJ i2;
,.-. ~ .:: .~
u o~.1:
63 'j) U ~L
:> C
CQ ;> :t C'
rc (jj
ro ~ cv
C u >
'rr ~".:.-'~
~:=;...,LC
....... :t)"'= v;
>-OC~
~ G ;:: ,-
'Z<w""-
v; :w .8 ~
~ ~ fa ~
_ r;: f"-
~~~>-.
~ r;o: -0 r:::
A ,..... E ~
# Q; ,
--w cc: :: "1i
o :-
~ 0.)
~:
"'0 c
=- '.....J
~ .-
c ~
~
~
~ ~
~E)
~7
~'-D
=N
~ I
~ - ,-
5"0 ;;:: t
-i-' :::
~ c c
w ~ ClJ
~. .G..:
Vi':2: 0
:::: .;,....; .j.....I
~uu
~~~
1; ~ U
J-' -_0
~ ~
o c '{j
c': w
o ;:
~ ~ v;
.c .......;
V)
~
o
j::
~
~
Lu
~
~
o
U
I.I..i
Cc:
I'
M
,
.... N
W
.....
'.f1
V".-v
~ ~
:: ....
rfJ r....-
::::
r-
::::::..':;
~ ~
~J-I
'wi- './:.
o
~
'l; r-
N ~
J1
:;
,.... "-'
C 'fI
::: 0.;
-0$'1::
:u ~ B
E::cc
B=-G
.w ___
ro"""v
E 1) r-
v: ::: 5:;
~ 5-3:
o
~ :-
;t <i: 2
~""':::i"""
'"
VJ
U
:lJ
,-.
":;::J
>.
::i u cv
j)..!:; r-
'J)J....J<-cr'"O
;..... ~ :w ~
~~r-~
O~'zrJ:
:) ..w rc ../j
-l-J ~ V 'j
-::J r.J
""''''0
C Q.)
cv 'J:
-0
.~ '...,.;
.1:)1) C
':"V = f'(j
2-c:;;2
1.> :::
1) :-; ~ *-"'
> r: ~ r't
:;
~ :'-- ~
'"t; .- :::.
:J ,'.; C :..>
,1;
.c ::oJ: j,;
;,j'; ~
'f!
~ -
u >
U
.w
Z' .-
-:'u ";-.;.,) c .
.) t:
.c ~ :- :l;
\C
- ,
c..~
1.:
::'.
~- t
rtl
QI
...
od:
C
rtl
..a
...
::>
u
is
u.J
~
cC
~
u.J
~
~
ct:l
~
u.J
0-
cC
o
u..
f,j)
z
Q.
~
o
z
u.J
~<:t
~ d
o u.J
u cC
~4.
:a.~
cC3
u.J 0
Z cC
::9\.9
-0
~
-;j
o
""'
K>
~
~
:lJ
""
~
0-
o
-;)
't
o
-0
Co)
~
~
.~ ~
;.. 0
q '0
~ t:\
.,- ~
if) if)
c ~
~':ji
t- c.
~ ('V
cP
;l~
c (:)
O.J ~
~\ C
~(U
,...-
;;:;0-.
-0
C
~ ....:;
-0 C
~ .~
o 0
c:t.0-
~ v fJ}
C) rj (j)
'S-;j'0
;.. -0 u
0... ~ ~
~B.-o
.':: ..,.- ~
(V3-~
'S; ~ ~
rJ) Co ('0
[.n \V ,.:;f;
~~ .S
ul--o
~~-o
~ 'l) ~
~~~
o 0 ~
,{, CO ?
..c1J~
t: f~ ~
I~ S ~
~"C
C; C ~
'> :]) <;:..
00-0
:.- :]) CD
p.. -0 1-
sc2.
,.....-
o
,~
~
~
C
~
-
~
~
...)
.,-
p
Vl
:;s
:;::..
'J
~
Q)
cD ,S
~
'v,
-;j
o
:;::..
6 ~
''';'''''- U
'.t. 0
,~ '~
u~
~o
0-'5
,...-
if-, cD
~, .S
~ I./).
~ ~
rf) __1
~:;::..
~
C)
~
C)
;..
o
U
C)
:;::..
.....
,So
.....
V
.,-
;..
.....
<.f.
-0
C)
-0
o
U
-0
V
'f)
K>
CO
r-'
~
;..
C
<,;r...
\C
~
~
-;j
o C)
~ U
C; ~
-0-0
';:i C.
'"U C)
c ~
."- ~
O""G
~ C
~--
<(-:0
V ?
r.f) '-"
:]) if) ;..
;;t---Ci.9.
9 c.. v
S ~ ~
S~ C
c.; ('(, ,...)
p..p..-
(,.) 'l.' .~
r '.- ~...)
~ ~ ~
-cS~
Co ,- ~
(V ~ ~
p... (~ ~
~<. '- ~'-"'l
\..:.J r- '.-"
'.f;
.....
~
...-
rc
\-
-;::.
.....
...-
-;::.
u
,::,
-
.s
r-
:;::..
rf;
:.::::
.e-
cc;
.....
'r.
~
, ~~
~
C)
~ ';;>-.
~ ~ C.
if)cc;K>
-o(l)S
~:;::..
~BS
? .~ ?
C) C) ~
'O~if)
'....- ~ 'j)
o if) '-
....(l)JS
~~~
cD 53.. "'8)
~ p..-;j
53..S2.
1) 0 0
.~~ ~
C ~ ~
C.i (/) ~
Q) K> .~
':::':"'0'..,)
~t"0:\.C
..-0 0 (~
~c:t.::'
~ ~ :..,,;
j;).-vt::
-- .,.- ~
.~ '5
-; ~
C)
Co cv
cD 'i.-
'if, V
C) 0
0.....
"'"'
I
("'4
-0
Q)
c
5 S
o -;j
. (l)
~~
u S
\- .
o :;;>-.
u- I-
>;;>,K>
eO ~
C) .,-
.......-
K> .
l,..- C
tf) .S
~ ~ ,j,
'0 ~ (l)
:..::::. u rj)
.r""- (j) ~
~ ~ ~
u- cD C)
.~ .~~
p ~ 0
::.J""O""V
O-'v, ~
\V C './"l.
0- '? (l)
o w ~
-;)if)~
? -0 C)
C)S:;::..
0.::.:::.......
z.'c
..... './'J
,..) C)
K>-o
~ c
~ ~
~ -
...-
C)
:>
~
b
;;,
.( ..
~r ~
lit
{It
z+
>-
.....
""
~
~ ~
u; a
;> ~ ~
i ~ ~
~ 8 ~
~ . r
.
"
~ ~
>-
~ ~
<5
U o:l
:;
u ;;
a
u t;;
:li 0:0:
~ c5 'J"J ~
C} ~
~ ~ 8 3
~ :>
~ ~ s
> = '"
I ~ ~ V5
I
l'tl
OJ
~
C
l'tl
.0
'-
::>
Item #14 & 15
An ordinance to amend the Comprehensive Plan by repealing the
Provisions within the Policy Document pertaining to the Virginia
Central Business District Master Plan, adding provisions to the
Policy Document pertaining to the Strategic Growth Area 4
Implementation Plan-Pembroke Area, adopting the Strategic
Growth Area 4 Implementation Plan-Pembroke Area by reference,
and repealing the 1991 Virginia Beach Central Business District Master
Plan with Exhibits 1 and Exhibits 1.1.
An ordinance to amend Section 203,900,901,902, & 905 of the
City Zoning Ordinance pertaining to the Strategic Growth Area 4
Implementation Plan-Pembroke Area
October 14, 2009
CONSENT
Joseph Strange: The next items are 14 & 15. An ordinance to amend the Comprehensive Plan
by repealing the provisions within the Policy Document pertaining to the Virginia Central
Business District Master Plan, adding provisions to the Policy Document pertaining to the
Strategic Growth Area 4 Implementation Plan-Pembroke Area, adopting the Strategic Growth
Area 4 Implementation Plan-Pembroke Area by reference, and repealing the 1991 Virginia
Beach Central Business District Master Plan with Exhibits 1 and Exhibits 1.. An ordinance to
amend Section 203,900,901,902, & 905 of the City Zoning Ordinance pertaining to the
Strategic Growth Area 4 Implementation Plan-Pembroke Area.
Tom Pauls: Madame Chair and Planning Commissioners. It's a pleasure to be here. Very
briefly, I just want to say that this ten month process had an incredible amount of input, and the
effort towards where we are today. The steering committee did an amazing job. I want to
recognize David Redmond and Ron Ripley, as Planning Commissioners on the steering
committee, who also helped us measurably during this process. This plan will provide land use,
transportation, environment, open space, parks, urban design, and guidelines for form-based
codes, among other things. I think it is a really good foundation and a very good document from
which we can begin to implement the planning policies cited in the Comprehensive Plan for this
area. The project team included the CMSS Architects, Kimley-Hom, Delcino Miles, and I want
to recognize Cynthia Whitbread-Spanoulis from the Department of Economic Development,
because she contributed an incredible amount of work to make this the success I hope it will be.
So, with that, I thank you.
Janice Anderson: Thank you.
Joseph Strange: Thank you Tom. Is there any opposition to these matters being placed on the
consent agenda? Madame Chair, I make a motion to approve agenda items 14 & 15.
Janice Anderson: We have a motion by Joe Strange.
I II
Item #14 & 15
City of Virginia Beach - Implementation Plan
Page 2
Eugene Crabtree: I'll second it.
Janice Anderson: A second by Gene Crabtree.
Ronald Ripley: Madame Chair?
Janice Anderson: Yes.
Ronald Ripley: May I make a comment if you don't mind?
Janice Anderson: Regarding item 14. One of the new amendments that Tom Pauls handed out
dealt with transportation considerations in the future. And he talked about following further
traffic analysis as part of the Transportation Improvement Program, identify appropriate roadway
segments to reduce traffic speed consistent with planning principles in this plan. I just want it on
the record to state that this segment that we we're talking about, because this is a general
statement that refers to the entire planning district which is good. But what prompted this, and I
just want it on the record, that we we're talking about specifically looking at speed limits right in
the immediate Town Center area on Virginia Beach Boulevard, hopefully looking to reduce that
to 35 mph. That is in keeping with the recommendation of the Central Business District
Association. I would just like to have that on the record. I mentioned to Tom that I would bring
this up, and so noted.
Janice Anderson: Thank you very much.
Ronald Ripley: Thank you.
Janice Anderson: Go ahead.
David Redmond: While we're at it, one other quick comment, which I know Mr. Ripley shares
because we're doing this by consent very quickly. I just want to thank Burrell Saunders and his
team from CMSS, Tom Pauls and the entire Planning staff, the Pembroke SGA 4 Implementation
Plan. It is as good of a work product I've seen. It's probably as good a work product that we
could find. It is an extraordinary plan. It was a terrific process. It is no great surprise that we
got something that good, given how the process was planned and implemented. So, I'm very
proud of that effort Tom, Burrell, all you guys did just a fantastic job. It is by no means
farfetched either. I think moving towards this, you know, something with an awful lot of thought
as opposed to kind of a half-hazard way of developing. It is really an advance for this
community. I think it is something we all can be proud of. So thank you all.
Janice Anderson: Thank you for those comments Dave. Are we ready for the vote?
Bill Macali: Madame Chair, the vote on the SGA plan will include the amendments provided to
the Commission from Mr. Pauls, as well as this new one.
Janice Anderson: That's correct.
Item #14 & 15
City of Virginia Beach - Implementation Plan
Page 3
Bill Macali: For the record.
Janice Anderson: Yes. Thank you.
AYE 9
NAY 0
ABSO
ABSENT 2
ANDERSON AYE
BERNAS
CRABTREE AYE
HENLEY AYE
HORSLEY AYE
KATSIAS
LIV AS AYE
REDMOND AYE
RIPLEY AYE
RUSSO AYE
STRANGE AYE
ABSENT
ABSENT
Ed Weeden: By a vote of9-0, the Board has approved agenda items 14 & 15 for consent.
- 49-
Item V-K.2.
PLANNING
ITEM # 59383
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Wood, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT, Ordinance upon application of BRYANT & STRATTON COLLEGE for a Conditional
Use Permit to allow a private university or college in the existing building at 4740 Baxter Road:
ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF BRYANT & STRATTON
COLLEGE FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A
PRIVATE UNIVERSITY OR COLLEGE IN THE EXISTING BUILDING
AT 4740 BAXTER ROAD R0110935378
BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA
Ordinance upon application of BRYANT & STRATTON COLLEGE for
a Conditional Use Permit to allow a private university or college in the
existing building at 4740 Baxter Road: (GPIN#: 14773021770000)
DISTRICT 2 - KEMPSVILLE
The following condition shall be required:
I. Prior to operating the school at this location, a Certificate of Occupancy shall be
obtained from the Building Official's Office
This Ordinance shall be effective in accordance with Section 107 (f) of the Zoning Ordinance.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the Tenth of November Two
Thousand Nine
Voting:
10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Barbara M Henley,
Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Ron
A. Villanueva, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10, 2009
- 50 -
Item V-K3.
PLANNING
ITEM # 59384
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Wood, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT, Ordinance upon application of BEACH BINGO, INC., 1/a PEMBROKE HALL for a
Conditional Use Permit re relocation of existing bingo operation to the Chimney Hill Shopping Center at
Suite 809, 3600 Holland Road
ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF BEACH BINGO, INC., TIA
PEMBROKE HALL FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RE
RELOCATION OF EXISTING BINGO OPERATION TO THE
CHIMNEY HILL SHOPPING CENTER AT SUITE 809, 3600 HOLLAND
ROAD R0110935379
BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA
Ordinance upon application of BEACH BINGO, INC., 1/a
PEMBROKE HALL for a Conditional Use Permit re relocation of
existing bingo operation to the Chimney Hill Shopping Center at Suite
809,3600 Holland Road: (GPIN#: 14865422830000)
DISTRICT 3 - ROSE HALL
The following condition shall be required:
1. The applicant shall obtain all necessary building permits, inspections, and a Certificate of
Occupancy from the Building Official before a business license is issued.
2. The days and hours of operation are Tuesday and Thursday from 10:30 AM until 10:30 PM
3. No LED/electronic display signs shall be permitted in association with the bingo hall.
This Ordinance shall be effective in accordance with Section 107 (f) of the Zoning Ordinance.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the Tenth of November Two
Thousand Nine
Voting:
10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William
D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary
Wilson and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10, 2009
- 51 -
Item V-K.4.
PLANNING
ITEM # 59385
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Wood, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT, Resolution APPROVING the location of the existing mobile home at 2348 Vaughan Road
DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE
Resolution APPROVING the location of the existing mobile home
(Robert and Karen Vaughan - the Applicants) at 2348 Vaughan Road
(GPIN # 2401-28-7374) DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE
1.
The mobile home has been situated at this location for more than 40
years. The new single-family home will be located approximately
eighteen hundred (1,800) feet to the North of the mobile home. While
both structures will be on the same parcel, it will appear as though they
are on separate lots. The continued existence of the mobile home at its
current location is compatible to the surrounding area.
Voting:
10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William
D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary
Wilson and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10, 2009
1 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LOCATION OF AN
2 EXISTING MOBILE HOME AT 2348 VAUGHAN ROAD
3 (PRINCESS ANNE DISTRICT)
4
5
6 WHEREAS, Robert and Karen Vaughan (the "Applicants") are the owners of a
7 30.86 - acre parcel of property located at 2348 Vaughan Road (the "Property"), in the
8 Princess Anne District; and
9
10 WHEREAS, there is a freestanding mobile home located on the Property, which
11 mobile home was placed on the Property approximately forty (40) years ago, prior to the
12 date on which approval of the Department of Public Works pursuant to City Code
13 Section 19-19 was required forfreestanding mobile homes in Agricultural Districts; and
14
15 WHEREAS, the said mobile home is currently the only structure on the Property,
16 and is currently occupied by a member of the Applicants' immediate family; and
17
18 WHEREAS, the Applicants desire to construct a new single-family dwelling on
19 the Property, at a distance of approximately one thousand, eight hundred (1,800) feet
20 from the freestanding mobile home; and
21
22 WHEREAS, City Code Section 19-19 provides that the City Council may, by
23 resolution, allow the continuation of an existing freestanding mobile home if the
24 circumstances under which the original approval took place change, provided that the
25 City Council finds that the mobile home is compatible with surrounding land use; and
26
27 WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds that the mobile home is compatible
28 with surrounding land use and that the construction of the Applicants' proposed single-
29 family dwelling constitutes a change in circumstances within the meaning of City Code
30 Section 19-19;
31
32 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
33 OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
34
35 That the City Council hereby approves the continuation of the freestanding
36 mobile home located at 2348 Vaughan Road, in the Princess Anne District, upon the
37 condition that the said mobile home be occupied by a member of the immediate family
38 of the Applicants or of the immediate family of the Applicants' successors-in-interest to
39 the Property.
40
41
42 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the
43 Tenth day of November, 2009.
I II
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
CA 11319
R-1
November 3, 2009
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY:
. )~
! ! //L fA '
))~ ,l '<
City Attorney's 0 Ice
2
GALLUP
SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, LTD.
September 17, 2009
Mrs. Karen Lasley
Zoning Administrator
Municipal Center
Virginia Beach, V A 23456
Re: Single Family Site Plan for Robert & Karen Vaughan, 30.86 Acre Parcel, Vaughan Road,
Instrument No. 200501190008921 (plat): GPIN: 2401-28"7374
_D~~. ~J~y,
Mr. & Mrs. Vaughan wish to build a single-family home for themselves on this property. The property
is' located at the western termirius of V augban Road. A copy of the site plan is included for your review.
Please note that a freestanding mobile home ~xists near the eastern boundary of the property. The new
house wiU be approximately 1750 feet from the mobile home. The mobile home is located in "front" of
the proposed home. The location of the mobile home with respect to the new house will not be in
compliance with Sect 19-19(a)(I) of the City Code, which requires the mobile home to be located to the
side or rear of the principal residence. The mobile home has been located on this property for
approximately 40 years. In past years, it has housed fann laborers. It is currently occupied by Mr.
Vaughan's son. '
I am writing to you to request that City Council consider approving a resolution, in compliance with
Sect. 19-19(b), to allow the continuation of the existing freestanding mobile home and the cOnstruction of
a new sin'gle-family home on this property. I am including the following documents for your use in the
request:
1.) One full-size copy of the site plan.
2.) One 8 !12" x 11" reduction of site plan.
3.) Letter from Paul Phillips, dated 8120/09, disapproving the construction of new
home because of the mobile home.
4.) Copy of Sect. 19-19 of City Code provided by Mr. Phillips.
Thank you in advance for your time and consideration of this request. Please do not hesitate to caU if
you have any questions or if I may be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
GALLUP SURVEYORS & ENGINEERS, LTD.
~~~.~
Bruce W. Gallup, P.E., L.S.
cc: Bobby Vaughan
323 First Colonial Road · Vrrginia Beach, Virginia 23454-4605
Phone (757)428-8132. Fax (757)425-2390
I II
Sec. 19.19. Location in agricultural districts.
(a) A permit to allow one (1) freestaFlding mobile home may be approved by the department of public works in any area
zoned agricultural district, provided the following conditions are complied with:
(1) The mobile home is located to the rear or side and on the same lot or parcel with a principal residential
building and all dimensional requirements for two (2) dwellings are complied with and the required yards or open
space of the principal dwelling are not encroached upon.
(2) The mobile home is not located within four hundred (400) feet of any other residence existing at the time
application is made to locate the mobile home.
(3) The immediately adjoining property owners and those directly across the fronting street shall be notified by
the department of public works of the receipt of an application to place a mobile home. Such notice shall be
mailed at least fifteen (15) days prior to the issuance of a permit by the department of public works. The address
to which such notice shall be sent by the department of planning shall be that as shown on the tax records of the
city.
(4) The department of publiC works shall not issue a permit to locate a freestanding mobile home until the
method of sewage disposal for such mobile home is approved by the department of public health.
(5) A freestanding mobile home authorized under the terms of this section shall not be occupied by anyone not a
member of the immediate family resident in the principal dwelling on the lot or parcel and such mobile home shall
not be occupied by more than one (1) family. For the purpose of this section, a member of the immediate family is
defined as any person who is a natural or legally adopted child, grandchild or spouse or parent of the owner.
(6) The department of planning shall, upon written receipt of an objection from persons set forth in (3) above to
the placement of a freestanding mobile home, refer the application to the city council for approval or disapproval. If
no objection is received by the department of public works, it shall be authorized to issue the freestanding mobile
home permit at the expiration of the notification period.
(b) Nol\...ithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) hereof, the city council may, by resolution, allow the continuation of
an existing freestanding mobile home if the circumstances under which the original approval took place change, provided
the council finds the mobile home to be compatible with surrounding land use. In the resolution permitting such
continuation, the city council may attach conditions and safeguards to its approval as it deems necessary to assure such
compatibility.
(c) A temporary special permit may be issued by the department of public works for a period not to exceed nine (9)
months in a case where a single-family dwelling has been destroyed or damaged by fire or other disaster to an extent
which makes such dwelling uninhabitable and only where such dwelling is to be rebuilt or repaired.
(Code 1965, ~ 35-4; Ord. No. 1006, 11-19-79; Ord. No. 1822, 12-5-88; Ord. No. 2112, 2-4-92; Ord. No. 2148, 6-23-92)
r
sli
!Il'll
I;~I
lilt
~18'
!;d
;111111
vrati
...,
\
-
I
Il~la.l
ii~~~ .
l"E:,:il
J~1I,1I1
I
"
"...
-
11i: ,
~"i,d
III ~c
I~
"I:
..
~
..
Existing
Mobile Home
i
"
I~
~~
1=
i~
~~
12
I
!
'....
'"
',....
........'
/ ~
'*'
0.'1<.<-
,......~.p~
~>~~
<' 0-
<,
,.
\
\
, <
a;:
~ '1'"
:IdJ,
:>. .~..,
~ t:~. ~.
"" "
i
g
<~ .,
~..
S'.., 'l,l
~... lo, ,
~...
r
'"
~,
\
~
c,'
~
?
<'"
'"
~,
a
~'
0:
:r-
4.
b
:>
t"
<~ ;
~<
0:: -
;
Military AvIalion Museum -1341 PriDcessAnne Road' VugiDia Beach, VA 23457 - Phone: (157) 721-7767
_Milifi1lyAviatiOflMumJ1tl.olg
October 19,2009
Stephen J. White, Ph.D., AICP
Chief Planner
Department of Planning
2405 Courthouse Dr., Room 115
Virginia Beach, V A 23456-9040
RE: 2348 Vaughan Road
Dear Mr. White,
We are in receipt ofyoue notice concerning the request of the City Council to grant
pennission for the continued existence of a free-standing mobile home on the property of
GPIN 2401-28-7374 and also the construction of an additional future single-family
dwelling. Our property is adjacent to this existing lot with the mobile home.
We would like to infonn you that we have no objection to the construction ofan
additional home to be built on this lot. We feel it to be a benefit to the neighborhood and
encourage the City Council to approve this request.
COIPOratc OffiCC$ - 44SS South Boulevard- vqinia Beach, VA 23452
Phone: (157) 490-3157' Fax: (157) 497-8083
I II
- 52 -
Item V-K.5.
PLANNING
ITEM # 59386
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Wood, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT:
Ordinances to AMEND the City Zoning Ordinance (CZO):
a. 9211 re: time limitations on political campaign signs posted on private property.
b. 9101 re: setbacks for front porches (requested by Council Ladies Rosemary Wilson
and Barbara Henley).
c. 9203, 900, 901, 902 and 905 re: The Pembroke Strategic Growth Area 4
Implementation Plan.
Voting: 10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William
D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary
Wi~onandJamesL. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10, 2009
1 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 211
2 OF THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE
3 PERTAINING TO POLITICAL CAMPAIGN
4 SIGNS
5
6 Section Amended: S 211
7
8 WHEREAS, the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning
9 practice so require;
10
11 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
12 BEACH, VIRGINIA:
13
14 That Section 211 of the City Code is hereby amended and reordained to read as
15 follows:
16
17 APPENDIX A ZONING ORDINANCE
18
19
20 ARTICLE 2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO
21 ALL DISTRICTS.
22
23
24 B. SIGN REGULATIONS
25
26
27 Sec. 211. Signs permitted in all districts.
28
29 The following types of signs are exempted from all of the provisions of this
30 ordinance, except for illumination, construction, and safety regulations and the following
31 standards:
32
33 (a) Public signs. Signs of a noncommercial nature and in the interest of,
34 erected by or on the order of, a public officer in the performance of his
35 public duty, such as directional signs, regulatory signs, warning signs, and
36 informational signs.
37
38
39 (e) Political campaign signs. Signs announcing candidates seeking public
40 political office and other data pertinent thereto shall be permitted up to a
41 total area of eight (8) square feet for each premises in a residential zone
42 and thirty-two (32) square feet in a commercial or industrial zone. These
43 Such signs shall be confined within private property and shall not
44 encroach into the visibility triangle at street intersections. These signs may
45 be displayed sixty (60) days prior to and seven (7) days 3fter the eleotion
46 for which intended. In cases where a final election follows a primary
, II
47 election, those candidates ....'ho won in the primary election may continue
48 to display their signs during the interim period and up to seven (7) days
49 after the final election.
50
51
52 (h) Commercial signs used for political campaign advertising. Commercial
53 signs may be used for political campaign advertising.:..,. sixty (60) days prior
54 to and seven (7) days after the election for .:thich intended. In cases where
55 a final election foIlO'.~.'s a primary election, those candidates who 'Non in the
56 primary election may continue to display their signs during the interim
57 period and up to seven (7) days after the final election.
58
59 The political campaign advertisement shall encompass the entire surface
60 area upon which it is placed. The advertisement shall be secured to the
61 commercial sign in a manner acceptable to the department of permits and
62 inspections.
63
64
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the 10th day of
November, 2009.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTION 201
OF THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE
PERTAINING TO SETBACKS FOR FRONT
PORCHES IN THE R-7.5, R-10 AND R-15
RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS
Section Amended: 9201
WHEREAS, the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning
practice so require;
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
BEACH, VIRGINIA:
That Section 9201 of the City Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended and
reordained to read as follows:
Sec. 201. Yards.
(a) General. All required yards shall be unobstructed by any structure or other
improvement which exceeds sixteen (16) inches in height as measured from
ground elevation; provided, however, the following improvements may be located
in a yard:
(6) Covered, unenclosed front porches on single-family or duplex structures
constructed prior to the effective date of this ordinance, may extend into
tRe ~ required front yard setback, provided, however, that:
a. Except as allowed in subdivision (6.1 ), such porches shall
have a maximum depth of six (6) feet, as measured from the
exterior wall of the main structure to the exterior edge of the
porch foundation and a maximum width of twelve (12) feet;
and
b. in no case shall the setback from the nearest lot line to the
exterior wall of the porch foundation be less than five (5)
feet~
(6.1) In the R-7.5. R-10 and R-15 Residential Zoninq Districts. the minimum
front yard setback for covered. unenclosed front porches havinq a
maximum depth qreater than six (6) feet or a maximum width qreater than
twelve (12) feet shall be twenty (20) feet; and
! II
46 (7) Handicapped ramps, to the extent necessary to perform their proper
47 function.
48
49 In addition, certain other structures, uses or accessories may be prohibited in
50 certain yards as set forth in the applicable district regulations.
51
52
53 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the 10th day of
54 November, 2009.
I II
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTIONS 203, 900, 901,
902 AND 905 OF THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE
PERTAINING TO THE PEMBROKE STRATEGIC GROWTH
AREA 4 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.
Sections Amended: 99203,900,901,902, and 905
WHEREAS, the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning
practice so require;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
That Sections 203, 900, 901, 902, and 905 of the City Zoning Ordinance are
hereby amended and reordained to read as follows:
ARTICLE 2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO
ALL DISTRICTS
Sec. 203. Off-street parking requirements.
(i) Public parking in the B-3A Pembroke Central Business Core and B-4C
Central Business Mixed Use Districts.
(3) Public Parking,
B. The extent to which the proposed use conforms to the Urban
Design Plan component of the Virginia Beach Central Business
District M3stor Plan Pembroke StrateQic Growth Area 4
Implementation Plan if such proposed use is within the B-3A
Pembroke Central Business Core District or, if the proposed use is
within the B-4C Central Business Mixed Use District, the extent to
which it conforms to the Mixed Use Development Guidelines; and
ARTICLE 9. BUSINESS DISTRICTS.
Sec. 900. Legislative Intent.
The purpose of the B-1 Neighborhood Business District is to provide areas where
a limited range of business establishments can be located near or adjacent to
residential development without adversely impacting the adjacent residential area. . . .
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
The B-3A district is intended to comprise publicly accessible community open space
areas, generally reflective of the concepts identified in the city's Comprehensive Plan
and the Pembroke Centr31 Business District Master Plan Pembroke Strateaic Growth
Area 4 Implementation Plan.
Sec. 901. Use regulations.
(a 1) Outdoor cafes and outdoor plazas in the B-3A Pembroke Central Business
Core District.
(a) Notwithstanding any contrary provision of this ordinance, outdoor cafes
within the B-3A Pembroke Central Business Core District shall not occupy
more than one thousand (1,000) square feet of area outside of an
enclosed building.
(b) Notwithstanding any contrary provision of this subsection, outdoor plazas
within the B-3A Pembroke Central Business Core District shall be subject
to the following criteria:
(1) Outdoor plazas should be located at the entrance to major buildings
and other appropriate areas to provide safe, attractive and
accessible public urban open spaces for those who live, work and
visit the area. The size and configuration of outdoor plazas and
attendant amenities shall be reviewed by the Planning Director to
ensure conformance with these and other related objectives as set
forth in the Comprehensive Plan and Pembroke Central Business
District Master Plan Pembroke Strateaic Growth Area 4
Implementation Plan; and
(2) The architectural design shall conform to the purpose and intent of
the Centr31 Business District M3ster Plan Pembroke Strateaic
Growth Area 4 Implementation Plan.
Sec. 902. Dimensional Requirements.
(f) Notwithstanding the requirements of subsection (a), the Planning Director
may allow a reduced front yard setback on any zoning lot within the B-3 Central
Business District directly opposite property located within the B-3A Central Business
Core District, and separated from such property by a public right-of way having a width
of no less than one hundred (100) feet under the following circumstances:
(1) The zoning lot is at least five (5) acres in area;
2
I II
92
93 (2) The proposed development for which the reduced setback is sought is of a
94 type and quality consistent with the standards set forth in the
95 Comprehensive Plan and Pembroke Central Business District Master Plan
96 Pembroke Strateqic Growth Area 4 Implementation Plan; and
97
98 (3) The proposed development does not include any buildings or parcels
99 which are not visually and functionally integrated into the entire
100 development.
101
102 Sec. 905. Sign regulations.
103
104
105 (d) Within the B-3A Pembroke Central Business Core District and the B-4C
106 Central Business Mixed Use District, signs shall be permitted as follows:
107
108
109 (4) All freestanding signs shall be approved by the City Council, as consistent
110 with the general purpose and intent of the design provisions presented in
111 the July, 1991, Pembroke Centr31 Business District Master Plan Pembroke
112 Strateqic Growth Area 4 Implementation Plan and any applicable design
113 standards approved by city council.
114
115 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on this 10th day of
116 November, 2009.
3
II
- 53 -
Item V-K.6.
PLANNING
ITEM # 59387
The following registered in SUPPORT:
Attorney R. J. Nutter, 222 Central Park Avenue, Phone: 687-7500, represented the applicant, New First
Colonial Associates. This property is bordered on two (2) sides by office and commercial zoning. The
property is zoned B-1 to the South and 0-2 to the West of the site. The entire corridor is all zoned B-2 at
a depthfar in excess of this single lot. Mr. Nutter's clients have been at this location for over twenty-five
years. The applicant has a successful orthodontic dental practice. The adjacent property is zoned R-15
and has been on the rental market for a period of time. His clients purchased this property over a year
ago with intent to provide a low intensity project, a barrier for the neighborhood. The size of the building
would be reduced, setbacks would be provided as with a residential home and a curb cut would be
eliminated as requested by the staff assuring no additional traffic into the neighborhood. The parking
requirement on the site was also doubled. The building would be brick and one-story. The applicant
originally met with the property owners most affected. Matt Nettesheim, an adjacent neighbor, spoke at
the Planning Commission in SUPPORT. A letter in SUPPORT from Matt and other residents on
Bonneydale in SUPPORT were provided as well as the SUPPORT of Dr. Townsend, the owner of an
adjacent professional building.
Dr. George Sabol, 1509 Oak Hill Court, Phone; 496-0381, one of the applicants, provided a copy of
Matt Nettesheim's correspondence, which is hereby made a part of the record.
The following registered in OPPOSITION:
Wanda Whittaker, 1221 Acredale Road, advised this is a unique neighborhood and their homes are their
sanctuaries. Her husband recently retired from twenty (20) years of service in the Navy. Her husband
works very hard and likes to relax by gardening and maintaining a variety of fruits and vegetables. Mrs.
Whittaker distributed photographs and leasing options available, which are hereby made a part of the
record. This Orthodontic group has four (4) other locations and photographs were distributed.
Rick West, 5220 Sharon Drive, advised there are no guarantees that the proposed application will always
be a dental office. The property shown as Parcel A was originally Acredale Confectionary, later a
mattress outlet and now a payday loan business. Parcel B was a Pizza Hut and is now a Bar and Grill.
Parcel C was a single family home and is now a massage parlor. Parcel D was a 7-11 and more recently
a pawn shop. All the areas shown as Parcels 1 through 5 were once single family residences and have
been rezoned to commercial uses. There are many alternatives that are commercially rezoned.
Nelene Gibbs, 1129 Burlington Road, resident of Acredale for twenty (20) years. Acredale is one of the
oldest platted neighborhoods in Virginia Beach. It has maintained its stability and desirability in spite of
the recent real estate downturn. The property values have increased. Acredale is a desirable place to live
and a multi generational neighborhood.
Howard Pearce, Jr., 1121 Minden Road, 27 years old, represented a third generation resident of
Acredale. The proposal sounds like only one home being rezoned, but the potential for future
encroachment could easily follow. Mr. Pearce requested the proposal be DENIED.
William Knowles, 1128 Olive Road, represented the residents of Acredale. He and his wife, Barbara, are
42-year residents. His three (3) children are all graduates of Kempsville High School. The community
consists of several original homeowners
November 10, 2009
- 54 -
Item V-X 6.
PLANNING
ITEM # 59387 (Continued)
Doug Ferguson, 1148 Olive Road, 17-year resident of Acredale. Mr. Ferguson advised Dr. Sabol
attended one of neighborhood meetings in October. Dr. Sabol advised when questioned that he was
planning to rezone the run-down property. It was not economically feasible to buy commercial. Mr.
Ferguson distributed a petition in OPPOSITION containing 415 signatures.
Michael Whittaker, Acredale Road, Phone: 467-1245, adjacent property owner, 20-year veteran of the
Military and government employee.
Pat Ferguson, 1148 Olive Road, proud President - Civic League, speaking on behalf of the 415 voices
contained in the petition of OPPOSITION If this application is approved, the City cannot control the
amount of their growth or activity. Since purchasing the home in December 2007, the applicant has
failed repeatedly to obtain the necessary inspections by the City for even renting a property nor complied
with code requirements to make the necessary repairs for a rentable home or providing heat to their
tenant.
Sam Reid, President - Council of Civic Organizations. speaking on behalf of the citizens in one of the
oldest and finest neighborhoods in the City, Acredale. One of the Planning Commissioners who voted
against this application said the Commission is not in the business of assisting someone to build or
expand their businesses. The applicant has not shown any significant reason for the rezoning. Mr. Reid
quotedfrom the Comprehensive Plan.
Upon motion by Councilman Diezel, seconded by Council Lady Henley, City Council DENIED an
Ordinance upon application of NEW FIRST COLONIAL ASSOCIATES for a Change of Zoning
District Classification from R-15 Residential District to Conditional 0-1 Office District re a dental office
at 5315 Bonneydale Road:
ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF NEW FIRST COLONIAL
ASSOCIATES FOR A CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT
CLASSIFICATION FROM R-15 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO
CONDITIONAL 0-1 OFFICE DISTRICT RE A DENTAL OFFICE AT
5315 BONNEY DALE ROAD
Ordinance upon application of NEW FIRST COLONIAL
ASSOCIATESfor a Change ofZoninf! District Classiticationfrom R-15
Residential District to Conditional 0-1 Office District re a dental office
at 5315 Bonneydale Road (GPIN# 14654920690000)
DISTRICT 2 - KEMPSVILLE
November 10, 2009
- 55 -
Item V-K.6.
PLANNING ITEM # 59387 (Continued)
Voting: 7-3
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, Harry E. Diezel, Barbara M Henley, Vice
Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E.
Uhrin and Ron A. Villanueva
Council Members Voting Nay:
William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10, 2009
-56-
Item V-K. 7.
PLANNING ITEM # 59388
The following registered in SUPPORT:
Attorney Edward Bourdon, Pembroke Office Park, Building 1, 281 Independence Boulevard,
Phone; 499-8971, represented the applicant (Village Center @ Holland Creek), and was accompanied
by Bob Miller, MSA, Architects for the project, and the principals. The uses available for this
property are almost any type of industrial use, commercial or off ce use. Many Virginia Beach
residents have borne burdens as a result of the major changes adopted in response to BRAC.
However, few have borne a more substantial burden then has his clients in this particular application.
This plan is accepted by the vast majority of surrounding property owners as a fair and
equitable method for this property to be developed. The purpose of the rezoning is to develop in two (2)
Phases, Phase I - a 9300 square foot single story day care use and a 25, 000 square foot building
for offices, personal services and limited restaurant use. The restaurant use cannot serve alcohol and
cannot exceed 4500 square feet. Phase II will not occur until Holland Road is widened into four (4)
lanes, or until July 1, 2020. Phase II also consists of two (2) buildings, an 11, 000 square foot, 2-story
office building and a 9, 000 square foot one-story office and personal services use building. There is no
longer any retail component with this project. Yet the extensive proffered road improvements have not
changed.
Eric Sivertsen, 2940 Mimosa Court, Phone: (757) 368-4322, lived with his family for nine (9) years,
as an adjacent resident to the applicant. His family is concerned with the development of this land
and approves Endeavor's project, which will be a welcome addition to the neighborhood.
Ez~gene Thompson, 293 Independence Boulevard, Phone (757) 343-2461, Senior Architect and Principal
with Ionic DeZign Studios. His office was introduced to this project by MSA and has been working
through the entire process.
Alejandro Caro, 2809 Saville Garden Way, Phone: 621-3334, appreciates child care closer to his
residence.
The following registered in OPPOSITION.•
Dan Dunaway, 2933 Chestnut Oak Way, believes this application is inconsistent with the Corridor.
Holland Road, until expanded, cannot handle the volume of traffic, even with a reduced footprint
Stuart Koegle, 1992 Berry Garden Way, Phone; 468-4001, President -Greenwood Community
Association, would prefer not to see the property developed.
Upon motion by Council Lady Henley, seconded by Council Lady Wilson, City Council ADOPTED an
Ordinance upon application of ENDEAVOR ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. for a Chance of Zoning District
Classification from AG-1 and AG-2 Agricultural to Conditional B-IA Limited Business and P-1
Preservation District at Chestnut Oak Way.
November 10, 2009
- 57 -
Item V-K.7.
PLANNING
ITEM # 59388 (Continued)
ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF ENDEAVOR ENTERPRISES,
L.L.c., CHANGE OF ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION, AG-1
AND AG-2 AGRICULTURAL DISTRICTS TO CONDITIONAL B-1A
LIMITED BUSINESS DISTRICT AND P-1 PRESERVATION DISTRICT,
EAST SIDE OF HOLLAND ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 120 FEET
SOUTH OF CHESTNUT OAK WAY. Z011091230
BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA
Ordinance upon application of ENDEA VOR ENTERPRISES, L.L.c.,
for a Chanf!e of Zoninf! District Classification. AG-1 and AG-2
Agricultural Districts to Conditional B-1A Limited Business District and
P-1 Preservation District, east side of Holland Road, approximately 120
feet south of Chestnut Oak Way. (GPIN # 14954173360000,
14955195180000 portion of 14955126960000)
DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE
The following condition shall be required:
1. An Agreement encompassing proffers shall be recorded with the Clerk of Circuit Court.
This Ordinance shall be effective in accordance with Section 107 (f) of the Zoning Ordinance.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the Tenth of November Two
Thousand Nine
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William
D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary
Wilson and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10, 2009
I II
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
In Reply Refer To Our File No. DF6518
DATE: October 30,2009
TO:
FROM:
Mark D. Stiles
8. Kay Wilson~
DEPT: City Attorney
DEPT: City Attorney
RE: Conditional Zoning Application; Endeavor Enterprises, L.L.C.
The above-referenced conditional zoning application is scheduled to be heard by the
City Council on November 10, 2009. I have reviewed the subject proffer agreement, dated
October 5, 2009 and have determined it to be legally sufficient and in proper legal form. A
copy of the agreement is attached.
Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter
further.
8KW/ka
Enclos~
cc:~hleen Hassen
PREPARED BY,
D SVHS. BOURDON.
III AllmN & [I:VY. P.c.
ENDEAVOR ENTERPRISES, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company
RADHAKRISHNA RENUKUNTA and KAVITHA VURIMINDI ajkja KAVITHI
VURIMINDI, husband and wife
NEW ENDEAVOR ENTERPRISES, L.C., a Virginia limited liability company
TO (PROFFERED COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS)
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, a municipal corporation of the Commonwealth of Virginia
THIS AGREEMENT, made this 5th day of October, 2009, by and between
ENDEAVOR ENTERPRISES, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, party of the first
part, Grantor; RADHAKRISHNA RENUKUNTA and KAVITHA VURIMINDI ajkja
KA VITHI VURIMINDI, husband and wife, parties of the second part, Grantors; NEW
ENDEAVOR ENTERPRISES, L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, party of the third
part, Grantor; and THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, a municipal corporation of the
Commonwealth of Virginia, party of the fourth part, Grantee.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the parties of the second part are the owners of two (2) parcels of
property located in the Princess Anne District of the City of Virginia Beach, containing a
total of approximately 6.158 acres as more particularly described as Parcell and Parcel 2
in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, which parcels along
with Parcel 3 is hereinafter referred to as the "Property"; and
WHEREAS, the party of the third part is the owner of a parcel of property located in
the Princess Anne District of the City of Virginia Beach, containing a total of approximately
13.77 acres as more particularly described as Parcel 3 in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference, which parcel along with Parcels 1 and 2 are hereinafter
referred to as the "Property"; and
GPIN: 1495-41-7336
1495-51-2696
1495-51-9518
Prepared By:
R. Edward Bourdon, Jr., Esquire
Sykes, Bourdon, Ahem & Levy, P.C.
281 Independence Blvd.
Pembroke One, Fifth Floor
Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462
1
PREPARED BY:
~ SYHS. ROlJImON.
111 AllmN & H:VY. P.c.
WHEREAS, the party of the first part as the contract purchaser of Parcels 1, 2 and 3
has initiated a conditional amendment to the Zoning Map of the City of Virginia Beach,
Virginia, by petition addressed to the Grantee, so as to change the Zoning Classification of
the Property from AG-1 and AG-2 Agricultural District to Conditional B-1A Commercial
District and P-1 Preservation District; and
WHEREAS, the Grantee's policy is to provide only for the orderly development of
land for various purposes through zoning and other land development legislation; and
WHEREAS, the Grantors acknowledge that the competing and sometimes
incompatible development of various types of uses conflict and that in order to permit
differing types of uses on and in the area of the Property and at the same time to recognize
the effects of change that will be created by the Grantors' proposed rezoning, certain
reasonable conditions governing the use of the Property for the protection of the community
that are not generally applicable to land similarly zoned are needed to resolve the situation to
which the Grantors' rezoning application gives rise; and
WHEREAS, the Grantors have voluntarily proffered, in writing, in advance of and
prior to the public hearing before the Grantee, as a part of the proposed amendment to the
Zoning Map with respect to the Property, the following reasonable conditions related to
the physical development, operation, and use of the Property to be adopted as a part of
said amendment to the Zoning Map relative and applicable to the Property, which have a
reasonable relation to the rezoning and the need for which is generated by the rezoning.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Grantors, their successors, personal representatives,
assigns, grantees, and other successors in title or interest, voluntarily and without any
requirement by or exaction from the Grantee or its governing body and without any
element of compulsion or quid pro quo for zoning, rezoning, site plan, building permit, or
subdivision approval, hereby makes the following declaration of conditions and
restrictions which shall restrict and govern the physical development, operation, and use
of the Property and hereby covenant and agree that this declaration shall constitute
covenants running with the Property, which shall be binding upon the Property and upon
all parties and persons claiming under or through the Grantors, their successors, personal
representatives, assigns, grantees, and other successors in interest or title:
1. When the portion of the Property zoned B-tA is developed, it shall be
developed and landscaped substantially as shown on the exhibit entitled "CONCEPTUAL
. SITE LAYOUT & LANDSCAPE PLAN OF VILLAGE CENTER at HOLLAND CREEK",
2
PREPARED BY:
_SYI:.[S. ROlll~I)O,N:
L\1I AIIWN & t[\!Y.I.L
prepared by Ionic DeZign Studios and MSA, P.C., dated 09/29/09, which has been
exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file with the Virginia Beach
Department of Planning (hereinafter "Conceptual Site Plan").
2. When the Property is developed, the exterior building materials, colors and
architectural design elements of the four (4) buildings designated on the Conceptual Site
Plan shall be substantially as depicted on the exhibits entitled "VILLAGE CENTER AT
HOLLAND CREEK -TIPICAL RETAIL BUILDING ELEVATION; VILLAGE CENTER AT
HOLLAND CREEK - DAYCARE ELEVATION; and VILLAGE CENTER AT HOLLAND
CREEK - OFFICE BUILDING ELEVATION", dated 03/04/09, prepared by Ionic Dezign
Studios, which have been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and are on file with
the Virginia Beach Department of Planning (hereinafter "Building Elevations").
3. When the Property is developed, the Grantor shall make those road
improvements to Holland Road as depicted on the exhibit entitled "Conceptual Right of
Way Improvement Plan For Village Center at Holland Creek", dated 12/9/08, prepared by
MSA, P.C., which has been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file with
the Virginia Beach Department of Planning (hereinafter "Right of Way Improvements").
4. When the Property is developed, if the improvement and widening of
Holland Road to four (4) through lanes of vehicular capacity from its intersection with
Dam Neck Road, south to its intersection with Chestwood Drive has not commenced, only
the buildings designated "#1, Single Story Daycare 9,315 square feet" and "#2, Single Story
25,000 square feet total" on the Conceptual Site Plan may be developed. No occupancy of
the buildings designated "#3, Single Story 9,000 square feet" and "#4, 2-Story Office
17,000 square feet" on the Conceptual Site Plan shall be permitted until (a) the
improvement and widening of Holland Road to four (4) through lanes of vehicular
capacity from Dam Neck Road to its intersection with Chestwood Drive has been
completed (Phase II); or (b) July 1,2020 whichever shall first occur.
5. The Grantor shall not be required to install that portion of 8' Privacy
Fencing along the northwestern section of the Property's perimeter, as depicted on the
Conceptual Site Plan, until construction plans for Building "#3, Single Story 9,000 square
feet total" are approved by Grantee.
6. The Building designated "#2, Single Story 25,000 square feet total" on the
Conceptual Site Plan shall have (a) no more than 4,500 square feet of space occupied by
restaurant uses, none of which may serve or sell any alcoholic beverages; (b) no more than
3
PREPARED BY:
;JDJ SYl(I~S. Hi)j !1~1)1 >N,
III ,\lImN & IJVY. P.r.
7,500 square feet of space occupied by any of the following service uses permitted in the B-
tA zoning district: veterinary establishments; financial institutions (which shall not
include "pay day" loan services which shall not be permitted); funeral homes; repair
services, dry cleaning agencies; medical and dental clinics and offices; museums and art
galleries; commercial printers; personal service establishments, other than those listed
separately; and (c) all remaining space in Building #2 shall be occupied by office uses. No
retail uses shall be permitted on the Property.
7. The Building designated "#3, Single Story 9,000 square feet total" on the
Conceptual Site Plan shall have (a) no more than 5,000 square feet of space occupied by
any of the service uses listed in the preceding proffer numbered 6; and (b) all remaining
space in Building #3 shall be occupied by office uses. No retail uses shall be permitted on
the Property.
8. Prior to submittal of a Site Development Plan for the Buildings designated
"#3, Single Story 9,000 square feet total" and "#4, 2-Story Office 17,000 square feet" (i.e.
Phase II), Grantor shall prepare and submit a "Supplemental Traffic Impact Study" to the
Director of the Virginia Beach Department of Planning.
9. The Grantor proffers that building "#4, 2-Story Office 17,000 square feet
total" shall only be used for office uses and not be used for any retail, restaurant or service
uses, except those service uses which may be permitted in the 0-2 Office Zoning District.
10. The Grantor proffers that building "#1, Single Story Daycare 9,315 square
feet" shall only be used for an educational/child daycare or office uses and shall not be
used for any retail, restaurant or service uses, except those service uses which may be
permitted in the 0-2 Office Zoning District.
11. When the Property is developed, only one (1) freestanding monument style
sign may be erected on the Property, constructed with a base matching the material and
predominant color of the buildings as depicted on the Conceptual Site Plan. All building
mounted sign age shall be channel letters on a raceway (Le. no block signs) and only the
lettering may be illuminated. No signage may use L.E.D. or a similar electronic display
unless it is both (a) permitted in the B-tA Zoning District; and (b) approved in advance by
the Director of the Virginia Beach Department of Planning.
12. When the Property is developed, the dumpsters depicted on the ConceptualiSite Plan shall be screened/housed in a masonry structure (3 sides) with the exterior
4
PREPARED BY'
I' SYK.[S. Hot!IIIHlN,.
. ,\IIUm 1\ L[vY.I'.r,
surface matching the building material and color. Dumpsters shall not be tipped/emptied
before 8:30 AM nor after 8:30 PM.
13. The hours of daily operation for any educational/child daycare use in the
building designated #1, Single Story Daycare 9,315 square feet on the Conceptual Sit Plan
shall not commence prior to 6:00 AM nor conclude subsequent to 7:00 PM.
14. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded, deflected, shaded and focused to
direct light down onto the premises and away from adjoining property. The development
shall use "The Largent" lighting fixtures and a complete photometric plan shall be
submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval during detailed site plan
reVIew.
15. When the Property is developed, the Grantor shall install and maintain an 8'
wide multi-purpose trail from Holland Road through the open space within the developed
portion of the property, through the open space at the eastern end of the center and
terminating at the 5.18 acres of land to be zoned P-1 Preservation District substantially as
depicted on the Conceptual Site Plan. The Grantor shall dedicate to the Grantee a
pedestrian access easement over the multi-purpose trail and create a second pedestrian
walkway from the multi-purpose trail to the small City owned park which abuts the
southern boundary of the Property, as depicted on the Conceptual Site Plan.
16. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any building on the
Property, the Grantor shall dedicate to the Grantee, the 5.18 acre portion of the property to
be zoned P-l Preservation District.
17. Prior to Grantee issuing Site Plan approval for any of the development on
the Property as depicted on the Conceptual Site Plan, Grantors shall have recorded a
Private Deed Restriction enforceable by the record title holders to Lots numbers 26
through 33 as depicted on the plat of "Subdivision of Greenwood" (recorded in the Clerk's
Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia in Map Book 280, a.t Page
84), dedicating a Preservation Easement 35 feet in width over that portion of the Property
which adjoins and runs parallel to the southern boundary of the referenced lots. This
Preservation Easement shall require that all trees and vegetation within this area remain
undisturbed if the remainder of the parcel is used for any purpose other than a residential
use.
5
PREPARED BY'
~ WI; IS. 1.!OI'HPON.
.;\IIUIN & IJVY. p.r.
18. Further conditions may be required by the Grantee during detailed Site Plan
review and administration of applicable City codes by all cognizant City agencies and
departments to meet all applicable City code requirements.
All references hereinabove to B-lA and P-l Districts and to the requirements and
regulations applicable thereto refer to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision
Ordinance of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, in force as of the date of approval of this
Agreement by City Council, which are by this reference incorporated herein.
The above conditions, having been proffered by the Grantor and allowed and
accepted by the Grantee as part of the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, shall continue
in full force and effect until a subsequent amendment changes the zoning of the Property
and specifically repeals such conditions. Such conditions shall continue despite a
subsequent amendment to the Zoning Ordinance even if the subsequent amendment is
part of a comprehensive implementation of a new or substantially revised Zoning
Ordinance until specifically repealed. The conditions, however, may be repealed,
amended, or varied by written instrument recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, and executed by the record owner of the
Property at the time of recordation of such instrument, provided that said instrument is
consented to by the Grantee in writing as evidenced by a certified copy of an ordinance or a
resolution adopted by the governing body of the Grantee, after a public hearing before the
Grantee which was advertised pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2204 of the Code
of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Said ordinance or resolution shall be recorded along with
said instrument as conclusive evidence of such consent, and if not so recorded, said
instrument shall be void.
The Grantor covenants and agrees that:
(1) The Zoning Administrator of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, shall be
vested with all necessary authority, on behalf of the governing body of the City of Virginia
Beach, Virginia, to administer and enforce the foregoing conditions and restrictions,
including the authority (a) to order, in writing, that any noncompliance with such
conditions be remedied; and (b) to bring legal action or suit to insure compliance with
such conditions, including mandatory or prohibitory injunction, abatement, damages, or
other appropriate action, suit, or proceeding;
6
PREPARED BY-
I" Sy~\\ Ufllll~I:OlN:
,\lILl,Pi 1\ Ll:\ \ .l.l.
(2) The failure to meet all conditions and restrictions shall constitute cause to
deny the issuance of any of the required building or occupancy permits as may be
appropriate;
(3) If aggrieved by any decision of the Zoning Administrator, made pursuant to
these provisions, the Grantor shall petition the governing body for the review thereof prior
to instituting proceedings in court; and
(4) The Zoning Map may show by an appropriate symbol on the map the
existence of conditions attaching to the zoning of the Property, and the ordinances and the
conditions may be made readily available and accessible for public inspection in the office
of the Zoning Administrator and in the Planning Department, and they shall be recorded
in the Clerk's Office ofthe Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, and indexed
in the names of the Grantor and the Grantee.
7
PREPARED BY:
ISYI(-'~S; UOl!I~I)()~~.
AIIl:llN & L[\ V.l.r.
WITNESS the following signature and seal:
Grantor:
Endeavor Enterprises, L.L.C.,
a Virginia limited liability company
.. -....,.. \ /~
.",' ,/" .
By: \ \' // lSEAL)
Radhakfishrul Renukunta, Managing Member
STATE OF VIRGINIA
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, to-wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 12th day of October,
2009, by Radhakrishna Renukunta, Managing Member, of Endeavor Enterprises, L.L.C., a
Virginia limited liability company, Grantor.
. /'
I ". ./1 ,"i .......... .
, I, .., .... /. l
r:v.- '/ '.' .',./
",. "\ -'/.'(~.i/J. ,f), ,\, / j"_
Notary Public
. /.
/ ,:. /
. ,.tV ;,<,
~, ':y LI
My Commission Expires:
Notary Registration No.:
August 31, 2010
192628
8
I II
PREPARED BY:
_ SVHS. nOURPON.
_ Am:nN & IXVY. !l.r.
WITNESS the following signatures and seals:
'".
Grantors:
/---.....~
'. ': y\,,'-.......~, .~ /
Radh~kfisl.lHra Renukunta
/"
(SEAL)
! . r .
: // , - (~ I -~--- - \ I
j\,[)\,\..- I ~ \.... " (SEAL)
Kavitha Vurimindi ajkja Kavithi Vurimindi
STATE OF VIRGINIA
CI1Y OF VIRGINIA BEACH, to-wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 12th day of October,
2009, by Radhakrishna Renukunta and Kavitha Vurimindi ajkja Kavithi Vurimindi,
husband and wife, Grantors.
1 i
,
,
/,.,.:til,
.- '
/ : 5. .' -::
, ., " / I
,. d : 1 i (! ,/..'~' !
.- I \} i J I i I" II ,.. i I
.; '.' . ,. I '. L", .~.
Notary Public ' -
My Commission Expires:
Notary Registration No.:
August 31, 2010
192628
9
I II
PREPARED BY'
ISYI:~S. UOl!lmON.
. AIIWN &. LEVY. PF
WITNESS the following signature and seal:
Grantor:
New Endeavor Enterprises, L.L.C.,
a Virginia limiteCi liability company
~ , ~'
, / "'-..,l /' ,,,,,,.
By: I:: J' ~.//' (SEAL)
Radhakrishna Renukunta, Managing Member
STATE OF VIRGINIA
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, to-wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 12th day of October,
2009, by Radhakrishna Renukunta, Managing Member, of New Endeavor Enterprises,
L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Grantor.
.I /~
,--'..J -.....',.4. /~'~
-,' j t ..../... ~_:.
My Commission Expires:
Notary Registration No.:
August 31, 2010
192628
10
EXHIBIT "A"
PARCEL 1:
ALL THAT certain lot, piece or parcel of land, lying situate and being in the Princess Anne
District of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, and being designated as "PARCEL A-I" as
depicted on the "RESUBDIVISION OF PARCEL A, SUBDIVISION OF PROPERlY OF
AMERICA WILSON ESTATE, AND 'LUCINDA HASKINS 2 ACRES"', dated November 7,
2005, prepared by Rouse-Sirine Associates, Ltd. and recorded in the Clerk's Office of the
Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, as Instrument # 200601040002057.
Containing 3.74 acres ofland, more or less.
GPIN: 1495-41-7336
PARCEL 2:
All that certain lot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon,
belonging, lying, situate in the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, and known, numbered and
designated as LUCINDA HASKINS 2 ACRES as shown on that certain plat entitled
Property of G. B. Wilson Located in Princess Anne County dated September 12, 1936,
prepared by W. B. Gallup, Certified Surveyor, which said plat is recorded in the aforesaid
Clerk's Office in Map Book 10, page 113.
GPIN: 1495-41-7336
PARCEL 3:
All that certain tract of land, lying being and situate in Seaboard Magisterial District,
Princess Anne County, (now City of Virginia Beach), Virginia designated as Lot One (1) on
the Plat of HARGROVE FARMS, made by E.E. Burroughs, C.S. for W. W. Sawyer, and
recorded in Map Book 1, at Page 6(a), in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Princess
Anne County (now City of Virginia Beach), Virginia (erroneously referred to as 25 acres
more or less in the previous source deed). Said tract or parcel of land fronts on Holland
Road in said District, Princess Anne County (now City of Virginia Beach).
Said property being more particularly bounded and described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the eastern right of way of Holland Road, said point of being 67.35
feet northerly from the intersection of the eastern right of way of Holland Road and the
northern right of way of Sugar Maple Drive; thence S 75 degrees 30' W. 60.16 feet to a
point on the eastern right of way of Holland Road; thence N 7 degrees 24' 47" W. 141.78
feet along the eastern right of way of Holland Road to a point; thence continuing along the
PREPARED BY eastern right of way of Holland Road N 2 degrees 32' 31" W. 219.90 feet to a point; thence
1IB5YI(IS IWIlRIlON. N 87 degrees 20' 11" E. 676.03 feet to a point; thence N 75 degrees 39' 19" E. 113.68 feet to
.. AllmN & ll:.-VY.IIJ-:' a point; thence N 78 degrees 18' 28" E. 168.64 feet to a point; thence N 76 degrees 44' 20"
E. 56.77 feet to a point; thence S 74 degrees 10' 04" E. 75.42 feet to a point; thence N 85
degrees 04' 03" E. 104.19 feet to a point; thence N 52 degrees 34' 24" E. 159.75 feet to a
11
I II
PREPARED BY:
;tBSVKIS ROlmllON.
.. AllmN & IXVY, Il.l~.
point; thence N 26 degrees 34' 53" E. 60-42 feet to a point; thence N 83 degrees 24' IS" E.
113.99 feet to a point; thence N 81 degrees 35' 43" E. 505.80 feet to a point; thence S 86
degrees 38' 25" E. 403.60 feet to a point; thence N 67 degrees 46' 21" E. 362.68 feet to a
point; thence N 84 degrees 08' 26" E. 578.52 feet to a point; thence S 3 degrees 44' 54" W.
29.91 feet to a point; thence S 75 degrees 30' W. 3280.13 feet to the point of beginning.
Containing 13-43 acres ofland, more or less.
GPIN: 1495-51-9518
ConditionalRezonejEndeavor EnterprisesjHollandLifestyleCenter jProffcr4_ Clean
Rev_lOjosjo9
12
I II
- 58 -
Item V-L.J.
APPOINTMENTS
ITEM # 59389
BY CONSENSUS, City Council RESCHEDULED the following Appointments:
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESORT ADVISORY COMMISSION (RAC)
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William
D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary
Wilson and James 1. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10, 2009
I II
- 59 -
Item V-L.2.
APPOINTMENTS
ITEM # 59390
Upon NOMINA TION by Vice Mayor Jones, City Council APPOINTED:
Chris Calcagno
Unexpired thru 12/31/10
COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD - CSB
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William
D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary
Wilson and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10, 2009
, II
- 60-
Item V-L.3.
APPOINTMENTS
ITEM # 59391
Upon NOMINATION by Vice Mayor Jones, City Council APPOINTED:
Robert Spadaccini, Ex Officio
REVIEW and ALLOCATION (COG)
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William
D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary
Wilson and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10,2009
I II
- 61 -
Item V-L.4.
APPOINTMENTS
ITEM # 59392
Upon NOMINATION by Vice Mayor Jones, City Council APPOINTED:
James Banks
4-Year Term
1/1/10-12/31/13
VIRGINIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
V oring: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R Jones, Mayor William
D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva, Rosemary
Wilson and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Robert M Dyer
November 10, 2009
I II
- 62-
Item V. O.
ADJOURNMENT
ITEM # 59393
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. DECLARED the City Council Meeting ADJOURNED at 7:18 P.M.
a~_JLi1L~.l~
Beverly 0. Hooks, CMC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
(2~~~
~dges Fraser, MMC
City Clerk
William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Mayor
City of Virginia Beach
Virginia
The Public Dialogue re Non-Agenda items adjourned at 7:33 P.M.
November 10, 2009
- 63 -
PUBLIC DIALOGUE
Leslie Stukey, 2905 Sugar Maple Drive, Phone: 301-6885, retired Navy Veteran with a 100% disability.
Mrs. Stukey advised she had appeared before City Council on several previous occasions. No action has
been taken to-date. Her son, Kendall Lawson, plays Soccer for the Hampton Roads Piranhas and is on
afull scholarship for High Point University. Her daughter is a Principal List student at Christopher
Farms Elementary Schoo/. Ms. Stukey, mistaken for a robber, was pulled over in December of last year
by two (2) Police Officers, which turned into approximately twenty (20) Police Officers all holding guns
on her. She had only been leaving her Chiropractor's appointment. After she was found innocent, she
was informed there was a bank robbery on Virginia Beach Boulevard and her truckfit the description of
the vehicle.
Richard L. Yount, 3407 Norfeld Court, Phone; 368-0505, represented Atlantic Coast Cab Company of
Virginia Beach, which has been in operation for over 5-Y2 years. During this time, Norfolk Black and
White Cab Company was forced from utilizing their Norfolk cabs in Virginia Beach, which assisted his
business. Many of the drivers in Norfolk would share the Atlantic Coast Cab Company phone number for
return trips. This lasted for approximately a year and then Black and White Cab Company decided to
start their company in Virginia Beach. Mr. Yount was not in opposition to their company, it is the non-
professional method by which they continue to operate their business in violation of business standards.
Their computer systems will give a job to any taxi driver that accepts, even if it is a Norfolk, Hampton
Newport News or even Williamsburg cab while in Virginia Beach. There needs to be some kind of
separation between the cabs from other cities while in Virginia Beach.
Lynne Johnston, 3712 South Plaza Trail, Phone: 718-8294, majority stockholder and owner of All-City
Cab Company, Inc. Mrs. Johnston was the recent recipient of the Minority Business Council's Woman-
Owned Business-of-the-Year Award Mrs. Johnson advised all are concerned that the Police Department
is not enforcing City Codes designed to protect Virginia Beach cabs from other cab companies that are
not licensed to operate in this City and are doing so with the knowledge of the Police. Mrs. Johnston
represented five (5) other Virginia Beach Cab Companies: AA, AI's, AI, Atlantic Coast and Tank's.
Darrell W. Johnston, 3712 South Plaza Trial, Phone: 428-8294, minority owner of All-City Cab
Company, Inc. Three years ago, he and his wife started a business in Virginia Beach. They started with
two (2) taxies that have grown to fifteen (15) despite having started in one of the worst economic times in
the last sixty years. He and his wife are members of the Hampton Roads Chamber of Commerce and
Virginia Beach Motel-Hotel Association. They have an office in Suffolk, but have always been a Virginia
Beach company. All-City Cab Company believes there are several cab companies operating in Virginia
Beach, simply by registering cabs at some one's house or Post Office Box. Thus, they are not operating a
business location within the City of Virginia Beach.
The City Manager shall have the Police Department and staff review the issues concerning the Cab
Companies and report to City Council. Mr. Yount shall provide a copy of his statement.
Mayor Sessoms will discuss an acceptable concept for all the cities to work regionally on these issues.
November 10, 2009
- 62-
Item V. O.
ADJOURNMENT
ITEM # 59393
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. DECLARED the City Council Meeting ADJOURNED at 7:18 P.M.
c~3~__e~__t:.;! 4J
Beverly 0. Hooks, CMC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
r-
~~
City Clerk
jULL
William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Mayor
City of Virginia Beach
Virginia
The Public Dialogue re Non-Agenda items adjourned at 7:33 P.M.
November 10, 2009