Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMARCH 30, 2010 SPECIAL FORMAL SESSIONCITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH "COMMUNITY FOR A LIFETIME" CITY COUNCIL MAYOR W!/.LIAM D. SF.SSOMS, JR., At-Large VICF, MAYOR LOUlS R. JON6:S, Bayside -District 4 RITA SWEET BF,'Ll./TTO, At-Large GLENN R. DAMS, Rase Hall -District 3 WILL/AM R. DeSThPH, At-Large HARRY E. DlI:'7F,L, Kemp.eville -District 1 ROBERT M. DYER, Centerville -District / BARBARA M HENLEY, Princess Anne -District 7 JOHN E. UHRIN, Beach -District 6 ROSEMARY WILSON, At-Large ./AMES I. WOOD, Lynnhaven -District 5 CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL FORMAL SESSION ('/TY MANAGER -JAMES K. SPORE' CITY A7TORNF.Y - MARK ST/LES C!/YASSESSOR - JERALD BANAGAN C/7Y A(JDITOR - LYNDON S. REM/AS CITY C/.ERK - R t /TH HODGE.S FRASER, MMC 30 MARCH 2010 C/TY HALL BU/LD/NG 240/ COURTHOUSE DRIVE VIRGIN/A BEACH, V/RG/N/A 23456-8005 PHONE: (757) 385-4303 FAX (757J 385-5669 E- MAIL: Ctycncl@vbgov. com I. SPECIAL FORMAL SESSION -City Council Conference Room - 4:00 PM A. CALL TO ORDER -Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. 1. READING OF THE MAYOR'S CALL FOR FORMAL SESSION B. ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL C. PROPOSED FY 2010-2011 OPERATING BUDGET and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM James K. Spore, City Manager Catheryn Whitesell, Director -Management Services D. COMPENSATIONBENEFITS Fagan Stackhouse, Director -Human Resources E. STATE BUDGET IMPACTS Catheryn Whitesell, Director -Management Services II. REVIEW OF SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 5:30 PM III. LED SIGN ORDINANCE -Council Chamber - 6:00 PM Ordinance to AMEND § 111 and ADD §217 of the City Zoning Ordinance (CZO) re requirements for monument and electronic display signs (LED) (deferred February 9, March 9 and March 23, 2010). IV. ADJOURNMENT -1- MINUTES VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Virginia Beach, Virginia March 30, 2010 Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. called to order the Virginia Beach City Council's SPECIAL FORMAL SESSION, in the City Council Conference Room, Tuesday, March 30, 2010, at 4:00 P.M. Council Members Present: Rita Sweet Bellitto, Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Absent: Robert M. Dyer [Late entering -caught in tra~cJ March 30, 2010 -2- MAYOR'S CALL FOR FORMAL SESSION ITEM # 59784 Mayor Sessoms read the Mayor's Call for Special Formal Session: March 25, 2010 "THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF CITY CO UNCIL In accordance with the Virginia Beach City Code Section 2-21, and by the authority vested in me as Mayor of the City of Virginia Beach, 1 hereby call for a SPECIAL FORMAL SESSION of the VIRGINL4 BEACH CITY COUNCIL in the City Council Conference Room, March 30, 2010, 4:00 P.M., for the following purposes: City Manager's Presentation: PROPOSED FY 2010-2011 Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program Compensation/Benefits State Budget Impacts After which to RECONVENE into the City Council Chamber, at 6:00 P.M. for the following purpose: Ordinance to AMEND X111 and ADD ,¢217 of the City Zoning Ordinance (CZO) re requirements for monument and electronic display signs (LED) (deferred February 9 and March 9, 2010). Sincerely, s/ William D. Sessoms, Jr. Mayor " cc: Mayor and Members of City Council James K Spore, City Manager Mark D. Stiles, City Attorney Lyndon S. Remias, City Auditor Ruth Hodges Fraser, MMC, City Clerk Susan D. Walston, Deputy City Manager Robert S. Herbert, Deputy City Manager David L. Hansen, Deputy City Manager Catheryn Whitesell, Director of Management Services Mary Hancock, Media and Communications Administrator Matt Cernigliaro, Director of Multimedia Services March 30, 2010 -3- CITY COUNCIL `SBRIEFINGS PROPOSED FY 2010-2011 OPERATING B UDGET and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 4:00 P.M. ITEM # 59785 The Mayor introduced James K. Spore, City Manager, to present the FY 2010-2011 Resource Management Plan in five (S) parts: 1. Formal presentation of the Budget and the distribution of the documents; 2. Compensation/Benefits; 3. Stale Budget Impacts; 4. Review of fourteen (l4) dedications S. Discussion of Revenues Mr. Spore introduced, Catheryn Whitesell, Director -Management Services Mrs. Whitesell discussed various notebooks/handouts given to City Council. In November, the City was expecting an $84.4-MILLION deficit. As this budget came together, the decrease in home values greater than anticipated; the economic recovery was slower than projected; and, the State's Budget deficit actually worsenecb This is the second year in a row that revenues have declined and the Real Estate Assessor's Office is estimating next year's assessments may be down another S%. That information led to seek permanent solutions rather than temporary ones. Mrs. Whitesell stated that when approaching this Budget, the City sat five (S) goals: 1. Not to increase the costs of services to most taxpayers beyond the 2010 level 2. Focus on maintaining critical services 3. Make all services as efficient as they can be 4. Attempt to minimize the City's impact on the economy by trying to avoid lay-offs of City Employees S. Look to the future, position services appropriately and ensure that we have basic capabilities to move forward The Problem O Revenues have decreased for a second year in a row and it is very possible we could face this again next year. ~ We must balance the budget - we either cut services or raise fees and taxes. None of the choices are easy. ~ S% and 15% reductions would have eliminated 363 positions and nearly $37-Million in programs. ~ Schools were hit hard by State Budget reductions. Local revenues to Schools only decreased by $13-Million. March 30, 2010 -4- CITY COUNCIL`S BRIEFINGS PROPOSED FY 2010-2011 OPERATING BUDGET and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ITEM # 59785 (Continued) Strategy for Developing a Balanced Budget ~ Strive to not increase the tax burden local government places on taxpayers beyond current levels D Focus on critical services this government provides to the community to retain quality-of- life ~ Identify and initiate efficiencies which reduce resource requirements ~ Nol add to the unemployment rolls and further erode the local economy ~ Preserve basic capabilities in anticipation of an economic recovery First Step O Continue to look for efficiencies ^ We do this every year, all the time ^ Saved or avoided over $10-Million in costs last year. (Striving For Excellence Report - March 2010) ^ Will save another $2.6-Million upon adoption of this Budget ^ Study the savings potential of contracting yard waste and hazardous household waste product disposal -could save an additional $1-Million through a reduction to the tipping fee Second Step D Examine Fund Balances and City Council Dedications ^ Last year the City used $23.5-Million in Fund Balance as a one-time strategy to balance the Budget while the economy recovered -Not available this year ^ Budget proposes a 2 year moratorium on open space acquisition and diverts $1.6- Million per year ^ CIP uses $8-Million surplus funding from the Sandbridge TIF to support City and March 30, 2010 -5- CITY COUNCIL`S BRIEFINGS PROPOSED FY2010-2011 OPERATING BUDGET and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM March 30, 2010 ITEM # 59785 (Continued) -6- CITY COUNCIL`S BRIEFINGS PROPOSED FY 2010-2011 OPERATING BUDGET and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ITEM # 59785 (Continued) The full list of recommended education totals over $19-Million and effects two hundred (200) positions. March 30, 2010 -~- CITY COUNCIL`S BRIEFINGS PROPOSED FY 2010-2011 OPERATING BUDGET and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ITEM # 59785 (Continued) An additional $2.6-Million in official savings is identified in this Budget. One of the items which is not on the list (on page 55) states the City rebid its copier contract saving over $600, 000. Two (2) of the items moving forward will be the disposal of yard debris and hazardous household waste (contract purposes) combined could save the City approximately $1-Million. After this Briefing, David Bradley reviewed the dedications. The Path Not Taken ~ Reduce services and programs by $19-Million and eliminate 200 positions ~ Ffee and tax rates be increased to avoid cutting an additional $17.4-Million, in services and 164 jobs. ~ ~ Reduce the number of firefighters by 30 which may take fire trucks out of service ($2.2- Million) ~ Eliminate 17 Deputies that book inmates into the Jail ($966,139) ~ Eliminate VB Alert (Reverse 911) and rely on local media outlets to notify residents of emergency situations. ($92,000) ~ Eliminate funding for 12 School Resource Police Officers in middle and high schools ($846, 768) ~ Further reduce Detectives in the Police Department by 12 positions ($704,250) ~ Eliminate 36 positions that provide yard debris collection for homeowners ($3.3-Million) D Reduce the number of HRT bus routes throughout the City ($437,395) March 30, 2010 -8- CITY COUNCIL`S BRIEFINGS PROPOSED FY2010-2011 OPERATING BUDGET and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ITEM # 59785 (Continued) The Path Not Taken (Continued) ~ Cut 9 positions from Beach Operations which results in the elimination ojtrash collection and beach cleaning on the non-resort area beaches ($1.2 million) ~ Eliminate the Lake Edward Summer Program. ($60,000) ~ Eliminate support for the Old Coast Guard Station, the Atlantic Wildfowl Museum, the Sandler Center for the Performing Arts and the new Union Kempsville Museum ($354, 628) ~ Eliminate one Auditor position and reduce the mandated External Audit ($92, 703) ~ Defer park maintenance which could shut down certain parks and facilities ($825,000) D Cut back on food and care of the animals at the Aquarium ($25,000) D Reduce 2 staff and support costs for Substance Abuse Outpatient Services reducing counseling and treatment for over 650 people ($242, 757) D Eliminate transportation services to mental health clients which would reduce access to doctors, care coordination and work opportunities ($229,927) D Eliminate the Maternity Program in the Health Department that provides a continuum of care for women who otherwise would receive no prenatal care ($49,877) O Cut Library materials and 3 collection management staff ($401,989) O Reduce advertising outside of Hampton Roads to attract businesses and jobs ($126,911) ~ Eliminate 2 positions that support various Wetland programs and plan reviews lengthening the time for reviews ($1 SS, 045) D Reduce the overall cleanliness, appearance and aesthetics throughout the City ($520,450) ~ Reduce 3 staff for Diversity programs throughout the City which would eliminate some of the strides the City has made in attracting diverse businesses and employees ($259.259) ~ Close the parking lots for the Aquarium and for Croatan Beach ($274,329) ~ Eliminate the City's computer replacement program and 1 position, which will impact service delivery throughout the organization if machines fail ($977,107) ~ Reduce 7 positions that provide technology repair and operational software support to various departments, including public safety ($994,103) ~ Reduce support to various regional agencies such as the Eastern Virginia Medical School, Hampton Roads Planning District Commission, Economic Development Alliance and Military and Federal Facility Alliance ($246,180) A small tri fold "pocket budget" FYIO-11 Resource Management Plan was distributed. Two Paths to Balancing the Budget - An Alternative Not Taken is detailed (commencing on page 9) March 30, 2010 -9- Revenues for Schools D State budget reductions totaled $51.6-Million ^ Hold harmless for one year on the Composite Index ^ Retirement system rate reduction saved the system roughly $10.2-Million. ^ The City's Budget includes an adjustment entitled "State Revenue Reduction" of $35.8- Million. (The School Board will need to make adjustments match to the final State Budget which increased funding) D City/School Revenue Sharing Formula reductions totaled $13.3-Million ^ An adjustment entitled "City Manager Adjustment" is shown in the amount of $4.9- Million to reflect unallocated Revenue Sharing Funds ~ Schools used $16.9-Million in various Fund Balances ^ $3.9-Million in unused GASB 45 payment. ^ $4.2-Million from the School Reserve Fund ^ $8.8-Million in last year's Reversion Funds School Expenditures ~ Improved energy efficiencies by $2.4-Million D Eliminated 59.6 positions, but through grants was able to add 79. S for a net increase of 19.9. D "Baseline" reductions ^ Reduced all non personnel accounts by 3% which will impact Schools' ability to purchase instructional supplies and materials ^ Increase attrition calculation, overtime and adjustments to salary and benefit accounts to bring closer to actual expense. ^ No layoffs or furloughs D School Board will need to resolve the decrease in State Revenues, either by additional use of fund balances or by additional service and staff reductions March 30, 2010 CITY COUNCIL`S BRIEFINGS PROPOSED FY 2010-2011 OPERATING BUDGET and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ITEM # 59785 (Continued) -10- CITY COUNCIL`S BRIEFINGS PROPOSED FY 2010-2011 OPERATING BUDGET and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ITEM # 59786 Total Compensation Update 4:30 P.M. The City Manager introduced Fagan Stackhouse, Director -Human Resources, to provide information re Total Compensation and the results of the latest Market Salary Survey. The City has a policy to perform a Market Salary Survey every three (3) years. Today's Goal: Information Sharing on -Salary - Benefits Comparison base: Area Cities (Norfolk, Portsmouth, Chesapeake, Hampton, Newport News) FY2011- No salary or benefit changes recommended Salary: Base Pay Increases Previously Established Goal: 4.5% Merit Increase Salary: Base Pay Increases FY 07/08: 1. S % General Increase 2% Merit Increase FY 08/09: 2. S % General Increase (1 % Public Safety) 0% Merit Increase FY 09/10: 0% General and Merit Increase FY 10/11: 0 % Proposed Market Salary Survey • Originally conducted Market Salary Survey annually, changed to every three (3) years in 2004 • Last survey implementation: July 2004 • 1, 700 employees received pay range upgrades Survey conducted to assess market. Preliminary survey results: Up to 2,328 employees impacted Cost: $7.4-Million if implemented - pay range increase if 2.5% below highest market midpoint - employee receives pay increase with market adjustment Note x Market adjustment if S% below highest market midpoint: Impacts 1,286 employees Cost: $4.7-Million x Market adjustment if position ranked 3'd or lower: Impacts 1, 063 employees Cost: $3.4- Million March 30, 2010 -11- CITY COUNCIL`S BRIEFINGS PROPOSED FY 2010-2011 OPERATING B UDGET and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ITEM # 59786 (Continued) Total Compensation Update Comparison of Total Salary Increases in Local Market as a~ c w a~ Ci ^Chesapeake ^Hampton ^ Newport News ^Norfolk ^ Portsmouth ^Virginia Beach 18 and y ."~c~,°t ~"'s`.±~;+ ,.~ 1`~~(1:_ ~~`~E'i't1C'<'l~~ :~~ls~,"•~ ~.~!tl.Tl};;~`C"'S1t)1'1 Vertical pay compression occurs when a supervisor makes less than a subordinate Supervisor's Pay Range ...Min Max $38,484 42,250 $50,554 1 1 Subordinate's Pay Range Min Max $30,063 43000 $43,591 1 1 Typical causes: Supervisor less senior than subordinate, promotions. Common occurrence in most pay plans. ', 2001 thru 2008 Compression ~djustmrnt Curt = ~12.9~,~1 5x~ ~.vv'io _- _----- -- - 4.54% 4.44% 3.54% Y 3.44% - ~ ~, 2.54% _ 1.54% 1.44% - 4.54% - 4.44% FY 47-48 FY 48-49 FY 49-14 FY 14-11 ^Chesapeake 4.54% 3.44% 4.44"/0 4.44"/0 ^Hampton 4.44% 2.81% 4.44% 4.44% ^Newport News 4.44% 3.44% 4.44% 4.44t'/o ^Norfolk 4.54% 3.54% 4.44% 4.44% ^Portsmouth 4.54% 3.44% 4.44"/0 4.44"/0 OVirginia Beach 3.54% 2.54% 4.44% 4.44% March 30, 2010 -12- CITY COUNCIL`S BRIEFINGS PROPOSED FY 2010-2011 OPERATING BUDGET and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ITEM # 59786 (Continued) Total Compensation Update City Council Resolution: Address supervisory pay compression within three (3) years ojidentification 2010 Supervisory Compression Review Total Number of Employees Impacted: 119 Total Cost if Implemented: $611,927 Note: Horizontal salary compression is building at the minimum of pay ranges due to lack of merit increases s ~„'..,~~ ~ ~.;:r~l,r ~ ~ E _ _ _ _ g _. __.. a _~~ - ~~~~r~~~~® Benefit Formula: -General Employees AFC x YR5 Service x .0170 No Change -Public Safety AFC x YRS Service x .0185 No Change AFC Calculation 3 Highest Years 5 Highest Years Unreduced Retirement: -General Employees 50 Years OId/30 Years Service Age and Service = 90 -Public Safety 50 Years Old/25 Years Service No Change Normal Retirement 65 Years Old/5 Years Service Conform to Social Security COLA First 39'0 of CPI First 2% of CPI + Next 4% of CPI x 0.5 + Next 8% of CPI x 0.5 Cap of 59'0 Cap of 69'0 Local Employee Contribution Currently 5% paid by city Optional 0-5% Optional 0-59'0 Note: State Budget (HB3o) does not impose employee contribution on current state employees; doire ~% contribution for new State employees. ~~... Y:~+rt~nvacac-'_h d4~''h`Il kri^imNl`x4 ~~pr,1Croz~~kF rvm^~'T:5'~.':".,,""fAP~'~A~#~~"~"~'!t°YM ~~'q .SrR~~~~ui~"pd4~19B".''r'} - ~r Y?~ ~ Benefits Overview Virginia Retirement System (VRS) • S% Employee Contribution Currently paid by City • Prior to Jan. 1, 1978, employees paid S% contribution • Since Jan. 1, 1978, City contributes employer and employee rates • VRS rate of 17.58% of Payroll (7-1-10) amounts to $50.3-Million in FYIl. (Current rate = 16.48%) • City of Virginia Beach VRS Employer Plan has unfunded liability of $275.1-Million • Acturial Study project rate to increase 1. S % more in FY 13 to total of 19.13 March 30, 2010 -13- CITY COUNCIL`S BRIEFINGS PROPOSED FY 2010-2011 OPERATING BUDGET and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ITEM # 59786 (Continued) Total Compensation Update New Employees -Local Option Employee Contribution 0% - S% Advantages x Reduces Cityls annual costs over time -not large savings initially, but with future retirements, impacts could be substantial x Preserves Defined Benefit Plan for employees Disadvantages x Potential negative impact on employer competitiveness x Creates two-tier system of employee benefits (Note: New State Employees Must Contribute S%) Existing Employees -Local Option Employee Contribution of 0 % to OS Advantages • Preserves Defined Benefit Plan for employees • Reduces City annual costs - 1 % $2.86-Million - 2 % $S. 72-Million - 3 % $8.58-Million - 4 % $11.44-Million - S % $14.3-Million Disadvantages • Potential negative impact on employer competitiveness • Reduces employee pay if no salary increase Employee Contribution 0% - S% Recommendation: All Employees pay S% employee share over time once economy recovers and pay increases can be reinstituted No Changes Recommended for FY2011 Annual Leave -Accrual Based on Years of Service Sick Leave -One Day/Month Major Holidays -11.5/Year (Includes lwo flex days) Retirement/Virginia Retirement System (VRS) March 30, 2010 -14- CITY COUNCIL`S BRIEFINGS PROPOSED FY 2010-2011 OPERATING B UDGET and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ITEM # 59786 (Continued) Total Compensation Update Summary • We are still competitive in our market. However, x We must continue to show our employees, who deliver services to our citizens, that they are our most valuable resource x We must be mindful of market trends and changes in pay and benefits x Pay increases need to be competitive for both recruitment and retention x We need to move employees within their pay range to mitigate salary compression Benefits Overview Number of Annual Leave/Paid Personal Leave Days Accrued Based on Service Chesapeak Newport Virginia State of e Ham ton News Norfolk Portsmouth Beach Vir inia Av Med From 12 12 13 12 14.1 12 12 12.62 12 1 Year to 5 From 5 15 15 16 15 15 15 15 15.20 15 years to 10 From 10 1$ 18 18 18 17.1 18 18 17.82 18 Years to 15 From 15 21 21 19 20 19.1 21 21 20.02 20 Years to 20 From 20 24 24 20 23 21 24 24 22.40 23 Years to 25 From 25 24 24 20 23 21 24 27 22.40 23 Years and above Benefits Overview Mnrimum Arrnin/ fnr Anmin/ /.onva/Pnid Porcnnn/ /.onvo Anizc Rncad nn .Caroira Newport Virginia State of Chesa eake Ham ton News Norfolk Portsmouth Beach Vir inia Av Med From 36 24 80 48 44 50 24 46.40 44 1 year to 5 From 5 36 30 80 48 44 50 30 47.6. 44 years to 10 From 10 36 36 80 48 44 50 36 48.80 44 Years to 15 From 15 36 42 80 48 44 50 36 50 44 Years to 20 From 20 36 48 80 48 44 50 42 51.20 48 Years to 25 From 25 36 48 80 48 44 50 42 51.20 48 Years and above March 30, 2010 -15- CITY COUNCIL`S BRIEFINGS PROPOSED FY 2010-2011 OPERATING BUDGET and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ITEM # 59785 (Continued) Summary Impacts of General Assembly S:OS P.M. 599 Monies Catheryn Whitesell, FY 2010-11 reduction is $1,180,344 from the FY 2009-10 budgeted amount. This actually represents less of a reduction than Governor Kaine originally proposed a -($2,329,295). In FY 2011-12: the General Assembly will reduce this funding by an additional $1,184,370. • The City has experienced a cumulative reduction oj$4,458,002 in 599 Funding since FY 2000 (unadjusted for inflation) this equates to almost one cent on the Real Estate Tax Reduction in Aid to Localities • The final State Budget increased this general reduction in State Aid to Localities from $SO- Million to $60-Million For Virginia Beach, this reduction increases from the current $2.2-Million to $2.65- Million. • The State allows localities to determine which revenue streams to reduce or send the State a check. We have not made either selection allowing the State to determine where to apply their cut Constitulutional Officers • Commissioner of the Revenue: -$173,404 (further reduction needed is $48,404) • Treasurer: -$192,479 (further reduction needed is $79,505) • Clerk of the Circuit Court: $179,023 (no further reduction) • Commonwealth Attorney: -$222,294 (further reduction needed is $193,977) • Sheriff.• -$3,139,566 (further reduction needed is $1,089,566) The State is no longer providing the same level of support for "locally responsible prisoners" costing the City $1.3-Million -reducing the daily rate to $4. They are redefining "state responsible"from sentenced to 12 months to sentenced to longer than 2 years, meaning more prisoners are now local • Per the Non-Supplanting Policy, these Constitutional Offices are expected to absorb these additional decreases. For many this will mean additional staff reductions. March 30, 2010 -16- CITY COUNCIL`S BRIEFINGS PROPOSED FY 2010-2011 OPERATING BUDGET and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ITEM # 59785 (Continued) Summary Impacts of General Assembly Human Services • Total reductions to Mental Health/Mental Retardation, Social Services and Juvenile Probation: $506,996. • If Congress extends ARRA FMAP, the Department of Human Services would receive an additional $201,689 in Federal revenue which will partially offset the State reduction. Importantly, if Congress does not extend this Federal aid, the City would experience a more significant reduction than the aforementioned $500,000. State Aid to Libraries • -$41,897 reduction State Aid to Education • To balance the State budget ,the General Assembly reduced, for teachers and other educational positions, the employer payment to VRS from 10.49% to 3.93% for FY 2011 and to 5.16% in FY 2012. Eventually rates will have to rise to fully fund VRS. • Covers the increased cost of the Composite Index totally in FY 2011 and SO% in FY 2012 saves $14.9-Million in FY 2011 Reduces Basic Aid for Virginia Beach by $51.8-Million. Total State Reductions from FY 09-10 to FY 10-11 • S. 7-Million for the City • $51.8-Million for Schools • This equates to 11.1 cents of the City's Real Estate Tax. PPTRA Funding was Restored • The General Assembly fully funded reimbursement for Personal Property • City receives $53.4-Million and this will provide a 70% reduction on taxpayer's Personal Property bills VRS Life Insurance Rate • The Life Insurance rate in FY 2010 Budget was 1.02 % of salaries. The recommended Budget reduces this rate to 0.69% • The final State Budget further reduced the rate to 0.33% for an additional savings of $800,000 STATE BRAC Funding • The $7.5-Million was restored for FY 2010-11, but is unfunded for the second year of the State's Biennium (FY20I1-12) March 30, 2010 -17- CITY COUNCIL`S BRIEFINGS PROPOSED FY 2010-2011 OPERATING BUDGET and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ITEM # 59785 (Continued) State Fee Increases • The State will increase the charge for Deeds as well as the Four for-Life charge • Normally, these are shared with local governments. The State Budget changes this relationship allowing neither to be shared Reduction in Dealer Discount for General Sales The Mayor and City Manager introduced Fagan Stackhouse, Director -Human Resources, • The Dealer Discount only applies to the first 3 % of sales tax collected and allows retailers/dealers to retain a portion of this tax. The complete elimination of this discount would have resulted in an additional $65-Million in General Sales Tax Revenue • The adopted compromise was to retain 40% of the Dealer Discount for retailers that do not e- file (those that manually tabulate the General Sales tax), which will generate $49.0-Million in General Sales tax revenue to the State • This could generate $1-Million for Schools which would be available as additional State Share Sales Tax in future budgets Elimination of Dealer Discount for Virginia Telecom Tax • The State will completely eliminate the Dealer Discount for the Virginia Telecommunication Tax, which costs the City approximately $312, 000 per year. Virginia Telecommunication Tax • The House proposed siphoning over $20.6-Million from the local Virginia Telecommunication Tax to restore funding to Constitutional Officers. • The House/Senate Conference Budget eliminated this shift; however, the final Budget for the first time treats the Virginia Telecommunication Tax as a State General Fund Revenue rather than a local revenue, which represents an undesirable precedent for local governments The Second Year of the Biennium • FY 2011-12 Concerns: 599: As previously noted, the State's Biennial Budget includes a reduction in 599 funding for FY I1-12 (City's reduction will be $1,184, 370) Line of Duty Charge: The State has historically funded. In FY 2011, this cost will be shifted to the VRS Life Insurance Fund. In FY 2012, this cost will be shifted to localities. The minimum budget impact will be $325,000, but it could be as high as $1-Million BRAC : As previously noted, the State 's Biennial Budget does not include funding for FY 2011-2012. March 30, 2010 -18- CITY COUNCIL`S BRIEFINGS PROPOSED FY 2010-2011 OPERATING B UDGET and CAPITAL IMPROi~EMENT PROGRAM ITEM # 59786 5:24 P.M. DEDICATIONS David A. Bradley, Resources and Management Services Administrator, detailed information re Dedications. These major dedications are approximately 28% of the Budget. SUMMARY OF MAJOR CITY COUNCIL DEDICATIONS Parks and Recreation/Recreation Centers „ $17.7-MILLION Parks and Recreation/Outdoor Initiative ~ $2.4 million Open Space ~ $5.3 million Tourism Growth investment Fund (TGIF) I $13.8 million MaJor Projects - ~ $21 million Tourism Advertising Program ~ $9.1 million Agriculture Reserve Program I $4.6 mihlon `LynnhavenMaIITIF ~ $2.1mlllion ~SandbridgeTlF ~ $8.3mlUton Sandbridge Special Service District ~ $4.6 million Central Business District -South T1F ~ $6.2 mtllion Town Center Special Service District I $2.1 million f Economic Development Investment Program (EDIP) ~ $2.3 mlNion City/School Revenue Sharing Formula - X365.8-Million Purpose: Provides local support for education, including debt service and pay-as you-go financing Maior Dedicated Source: 51.3% of real estate, personal property, sales, utility, telecommunications/cellular, business license, and cable franchise is dedicated to Schools (before proposed tax increases) - FY 2010-11 amount of $365.8-Million is less than what was transferred in FY 2006-07 - 3.6% less than FY 2009-10 amount of X379.4-Million and 7.2% less than FY 2008-09 - 8.8-Million of Reversion Funds requested in Schools FY 2010-11 Budget proposal Parks and Recreation Centers - $17.7-Million Purpose: Provides staffing, operations and maintenance, and renewal and replacement of 6 Recreation Centers. Maior Dedicated Source: 3.48 cents of real estate tax dedication June 30, 2009 Fund Balance -$S.1-Million Projection of Fund Balance and .3 tenths of proposed real estate tax increase used to renovate Bow Creek and Kempsville Recreation Centers March 30, 2010 -19- CITY COUNCIL`S BRIEFINGS PROPOSED FY2010-2011 OPERATING BUDGET and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ITEM # 59786 (Continued) DEDICATIONS Outdoor Initiative - $2.4-Million Purpose: Provides funding to Parks and Recreation CIP Maior Dedicated Source: .47 cents of real estate tax dedication No Fund Balance All dedicated to Parks and Recreation CIP projects like 4-074 City Bikeways and Trails and 4-303 Greenways, Scenic Waterways and Natural Areas Open Space - $5.3-Million Purpose: Provides funding for acquisition and maintenance of open space. Maior Dedicated Source: .44% ojthe S.S% restaurant ta.~ - FY 2010-11 Operating Budget proposes a two (2) year moratorium of Open Space acquisition funding - $2.SMillion for debt service - $1.2-Million for open space development and maintenance - $825, 000 for park infrastructure repairs - $616,000 for various site acquisitions - $149,000 to General Fund for issues such as landscape maintenance of new roadways June 30, 2009 Fund Balance - $S-Million Tourism Growth Investment Fund (TGIF) $13.8-Million Purpose: Provides operation and maintenance costs for the Resort Area; beach events such as holiday lights and the Neptune Festival; resort area trolleys; and, provides pay-as you-go and debt service costs for Resort Area projects. Maior Dedicated Sources: - .S% of the S.S% restaurant tax - 2.5% of the 8% hotel tax - 2% of the 10% amusement tax (or 1 % of the S%) June 30, 2009 Fund Balance -$1.8-Million (used $1 Million to balance FY 2010 Budget). In the long run, may have capacity to address future Resort area projects March 30, 2010 -20- CITY COUNCIL`S BRIEFINGS PROPOSED FY2010-2011 OPERATING BUDGET and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ITEM # 59786 (Continued) DEDICATIONS Major Projects - $21-Million Purpose: Provides funding stream to pay debt service for the Convention Center, Sandler Center, Virginia Aquarium Parking and Phase II of the Virginia Aquarium Major Dedicated Sources: - . 56 % of the S. S cents restaurant tax. - 2.5% of the 8% hotel tax. - 8% of the 10% amusement tax (or 4% of the S%). - Scents of the 65 cents cigarette tax. June 30, 2009 Fund Balance - $14.5-Million With a projection of minimal fund balance by FY 2012-13 (used $1-Million to balance FY 2010 Budget). Tourism Advertising Program (TAP) - $9.1-Million Purpose: Provides funding for advertising Virginia Beach as a "tourist destination" and operation of the Visitor Center Major Dedicated Sources: - .S% of S.S% restaurant tax - I % oJ8% dedicated hotel tax June 30, 2009 Fund Balance - $185,000. Agriculture Reserve Program (ARP) - $4.6-Million Purpose: Acquires development rights to farmland Major Dedicated Source: .9 of 1 cent of the real estate tax June 30, 2009 Fund Balance -$1 S-Million. (used $4.2-Million in the FY 2009-10 Operating Budget and CIP) March 30, 2010 -21 - CITY COUNCIL`S BRIEFINGS PROPOSED FY2010-2011 OPERATING BUDGET and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ITEM # 59786 (Continued) DEDICATIONS Sandbridge TIF and SSD - $12.9-Million Purpose' Beach replenishment at Sandbridge Ma%or Dedicated Sources: - TIFs -Incremental real estate tax revenue - SSD - - 6 cents additional real estate tax revenue - 2.S% additional hotel tax - Other Sandbridge revenue Combined June 30, 2009 Fund Balance - $11.1-Million Town Center TIF, SSD and Lynnhaven Mall TIF- $10.4-Million Purpose: - Central Business District TIF -Debt associated with public parking facilities - Town Center SSD - O & Mfor parking facilities, sidewalks, streets, etc - Lynnhaven TIF-Transit in Lynnhaven Mall area and obligation to the Developer Ma%or Dedicated Sources: - TIFs -Incremental real estate tax revenue. - Town Center SSD - 45 cents additional real estate tax rate. Combined June 30, 2009 Fund Balance - $2.8-Million Economic Development Investment Program - $2.3-Million Purpose: Attract additional economic development to the City Ma%or Dedicated Source: 12 cents of the 65 cents cigarette tax (including Z cents proposed in FY 2010-11 budget). Funds transferred to Economic Development Authority March 30, 2010 -22- ITEM # 59787 Ciry Council RECESSED at 5:53 P.M. to RECONVENE into CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER to CONDUCT THE SPECL4L FORMAL SESSION. March 30, 2010 -23- SPECIAL FORMAL SESSION VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL March 30, 2010 6:00 P.M. Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. called to order the FORMAL SESSION of the VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL in the Council Chamber, City Hall Building, on Tuesday, March 30, 2010, at 6:00 P.M. Council Members Present: Rita Sweet Bellitto, Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill " DeSteph Harry E. Diezel, Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood. Council Members Absent: None Mayor Sessoms read the Mayor's Call for the Special Formal Session: March 25, 2010 "THE HONORABLE MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL In accordance with the Virginia Beach City Code Section 2-21, and by the authority vested in me as Mayor of the City of Virginia Beach, I hereby call for a SPECIAL FORMAL SESSION of the VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL in the City Council Conference Room, March 30, 2010, 4:00 P.M., for the following purposes: City Manager's Presentation: PROPOSED FY 2010-2011 Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program Compensation/Benefits State Budget Impacts After which to RECONVENE in the City Council Chamber, 6:00 P.M. for the following purpose: Ordinance to AMEND X111 and ADD x'217 of the City Zoning Ordinance (CZO) re requirements for monument and electronic display signs (LED) (deferred February 9 and March 9, 2010). Sincerely, s/ William D. Sessoms, Jr. Mayor " March 30, 2010 -24- Item III PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM # 59788 Mayor Sessoms INVITED PUBLIC COMMENT: MONUMENT AND LED SIGNS The following registered to speak in SUPPORT.• Dr. Rick Klobuchar, 758 Suffolk Lane Phone: 463-4885, strong proponent of LED's as they are great attention getters and he displayed examples of underwater lights for caving, an example with a flashing siren and a LED utilized to emphasize a "flat tine ". John Wilson, 3213 Virginia Beach Boulevard, Phone: 340-0028, Chair -Virginia Beach Division of Chamber of Commerce, advised the Planning Commission came to the Chamber in December with a proposed Ordinance of Councilman Villanueva with this change and requested their opinion. A proposal with modifications was formed and delivered to the Planning Commission. The Business Community referenced their recommendation re policing: "there should be restrictions on scrolling, flashing, blinking or any other types of intermittent elimination ". The Business owners do not want a restriction of "no LED signs "; however, the City needs some type of ordinance with regulations and compromise of restrictions. Chandler Scarborough, 1248 Green Garden Circle, Phone: 427-2600, respects the value of the Garden Club representatives. He did not envision the LED signs being flashing billboards. He understands the City Council is going to create a work group re the Ordinance so all representative organizations may provide comments. As latest versions have not been published, he recommended deferral of the Ordinance to allow publication and further comment. Chris Wiemken, 1248 Green Garden Circle, Phone: 472-2845, current President of the Green Run Homes Association. Mr. Wiemken urged City Council not to take action, but to DEFER and allow consideration from all stakeholders. He understands a work group has been proposed to make recommendations re an LED Ordinance that reflects interest of all citizens. The following registered in OPPOSITION: Elizabeth Ann Brown, served as President -Council of Garden Clubs, from 1987 - 1989. Ms. Brown served on several committees which wrote the Ordinances: "Banning New Billboards ", "Tree Ordinance ", "Landscape Ordinance ". Although she did not serve on the Committee that banned the overhanging signs and regulated the size and height of signage, this Ordinance probably did more that any other accomplishment. These Ordinances made a great deal of difference in the appearance of the City. All worked together to accomplish the goal of a better looking city. Restrictions can be developed with the business representatives that will still allow them to advertise. Glenda Knowles, represented Council of Garden Clubs, referenced correspondence to City Council. Representatives of the Council of Garden Clubs and Virginia Beautification Commission reviewed the latest version of the LED Ordinance, dated March 17, 2010. It was determined there should be additional changes to allow the City Council more oversight and control during the interim period prior to when the Citizens Study Committee could bring forward their recommendations. Ms. Knowles stressed [line 141J "which discusses the size of the electronic display as recommended by the Planning Commission in their December 4, 2009, consideration of the Ordinance ". This is SO% of the total area or 32-square feet per face, whichever is less. The representatives are in support of this and line 170d8, "recommendation of the 24-hour dwell time (as proposed by Mayor Sessoms). March 30, 2010 -25- ITEM III PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM # 59788 (Continued) The following registered in OPPOSITION.• (Continued) Admiral Tom Ward, 201 78`" Street. Admiral Ward also a Past President of the Virginia Beach Beautification Commission and currently Member of their Board of Directors. Mayor Sessoms advised it is his intent to propose an Ordinance that would contain the 24-hour dwell time. He does not believe the smaller businesses can afford these expensive signs. Reba McClanan, 3224 Burnt Mill Road, advised the President of the Virginia Beach Garden Clubs and members are in attendance. Scenic Virginia should have forwarded correspondence re their opinion on LED's. Said information is hereby made a part of the record. With the Federal Legislation, once a Billboard is established, one cannot afford to buy a billboard. The City cannot afford to buy the ones on Shore Drive. Betty Kennedy, 2700 Cattayle Run, represented the Chesopeian Colony Garden Club. She supports the Beautification Committee and is totally against all large signs or lights. The LED signs are a distraction to drivers. Ms. Kennedy urged the erection of these signs be ceased. Robert G. Jones, former Mayor, advised the LED signs do not add value to the City in terms of its appearance nor value to the businesses against the existing signage Ordinances. LED signs do not create wealth in the City. Actually, this creates a burden on the small business. A $60, 000 expenditure would add greatly to the cost of doing business. Attorney Jones represents approximately fifty (50) small businesses. March 30, 2010 -26- III LED SIGN ORDINANCE ITEM # 59789 A MOTION was made by Councilman DeSteph, seconded by Councilman Wood to ADOPT: Mayor's Alternative -Line 181 through 185: "All electronic displays shall remain static jor a period of at least e~re~-key twenty-four 24 hours: Ordinance to AMEND X111 and ADD X217 of the City Zoning Ordinance (CZO) re requirements for monument and electronic display signs (LED) (deferred February 9 and March 9, 2010). Upon SUBSTITUTE MOTION by Councilman Davis, seconded by Councilman Uhrin, City Council DEFERRED INDEFINITELY the Alternative Ordinance, in order to receive comments. Ordinance to AMEND ~I11 and ADD X217 of the City Zoning Ordinance (CZO) re requirements for monument and electronic display signs (LED) (deferred February 9 and March 9, 2010). Voting.• 6-S Council Members Voting Aye: Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill "DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M. Dyer, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, John E. Uhrin, Council Members Voting Nay: Rita Sweet Bellitto, Barbara M. Henley, Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Absent: None March 30, 2010 -27- III LED SIGN ORDINANCE ITEM # 59789 (Continued) Upon motion by Council Lady Henley, seconded by Councilman Diezel, City Council in the Interim shall REFER to the Planning Commission consideration of a ban re LED signs. City Attorney Stiles advised in the Interim there is no prohibition on LED signs and applications made will have to be considered based on the existing law. Voting.• 11-0 Council Members Voting Aye: Rita Sweet Bellitto, Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill " DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Voting Nay: None Council Members Absent: None March 30, 2010 -28- Items M-O. ADJOURNMENT ITEM # 59790 Mayor William D. Sessoms DECLARED the City Council Meeting ADJOURNED at 6:42 P.M. - ------- --------- --------- Beverly O. Hooks, CMC Chief Deputy City Clerk Ruth Hodges Fraser, MMC City Clerk City of Virginia Beach Virginia William D. Sessoms, Jr. Mayor March 30, 2010 -zg- Items M-O. ADJOURNMENT ITEM # 59790 Mayor William D. Sessoms DECLARED the City Council Meeting ADJOURNED at 6:42 P.M. Beverly O. Hooks, CMC Chief Deputy City Clerk - -- ----- - - .,~r5-s-~cJ uth Hodges Fraser, MMC City Clerk City of Iirginia Beach Virginia ~~~~t=~~! --------------- William D. Sessoms, Jr. Mayor March 30, 2010