HomeMy WebLinkAboutSEPTEMBER 28, 2010 MINUTESCITY COUNCIL
MAYOR WILLIAM D. SESSOMS, .11t., At -Large
VICE MAYOR LOUIS R. JONES, Bayside - District 4
RU'IA SWEETBELL/7TO, At -Large
GLENN R. DAVIS, Rose Hall - District 3
WILLIAM R. DeSTEPH, At -Large
HARRY E. DIEZEL, Kempsville - District 2
ROBERT M. DYER, Centerville - District I
BARBARA M. HENLEY, Princess Anne - District 7
JOHN E. UHRIN, Beach - District 6
ROSEMARY WILSON, At -Large
JAMES L. WOOD, Lynnhaven -District 5
CITY COUNCIL APPOINTEES
CITY MANAGER - JAMES K. SPORE
C'I'TY ATTORNEY - MARK D. STILES
CITY ASSESSOR - JERALD BANAGAN
(:17'Y AUDITOR - LYNDON S. REMIAS
CI7'Y CLERK -- RUTH HODGES FRASER, MMC
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
"COMMUNITY FOR A LIFETIME"
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
28 SEPTEMBER 2010
CITY HALL B UILDINC
2401 COURTHOUSE DRIVE
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA 23456-800_`
PHONE: (757) 385-430.
FAX (757) 385-5665
E-MAIL: Crycncl@vbgov.coie
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING -Conference Room -
A. UNAUDITED FY 2010 FINANCIAL STATEMENT
Patricia Phillips, Director — Finance
B. VRS DEFINED BENEFITS vs. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION OPTIONS
Patricia Phillips, Director — Finance
C. HOMELESS ASSISTANCE UPDATE
Andy Friedman, Director — Housing and Neighborhood Preservation
II. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
III. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REVIEW
IV. INFORMAL SESSION -Conference Room -
A.
B.
C.
CALL TO ORDER — Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr.
ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
4:00 PM
5:30 PM
V. FORMAL SESSION
- City Council Chamber - 6:00 PM
A. CALL TO ORDER — Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr.
B. INVOCATION: Reverend Caroline Jinkins
Associate Pastor
First Presbyterian Church
C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
D. ELECTRONIC ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL
E. CERTIFICATION OF CLOSED SESSION
F. MINUTES
1. INFORMAL and FORMAL SESSIONS
G. FORMAL SESSION AGENDA
H. MAYOR'S PRESENTATIONS
1. RESOLUTIONS IN RECOGNITION
a. Chesapeake Bay Wine Classic Foundation
b. Max Bartoli and Ethan Marten — "Atlantis Down"
September 14, 2010
2. RESOLUTION TO DECLARE:
September 28`""Virginia Beach City Public Schools Day"
3. WESTERN BAYSIDE SUMMER CAMPS
Barbara A. Brinson, Youth Opportunities Coordinator
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. LEGISLATIVE AGENDA FOR 2011 GENERAL ASSEMBLY
2. PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTIONS
a. Back Bay Restoration Foundation Ltd.
b. Lynnhaven River Now
c. REN Group
d. Virginia Beach Police Foundation, Inc.
3. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant
J. CONSENT AGENDA
K. ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS
1. Ordinances to EXEMPT certain organizations from Personal Property Taxes:
a. Back Bay Restoration Foundation, Ltd.
b. Lynnhaven River Now
c. REN Group
d. Virginia Beach Police Foundation, Inc.
2. Ordinance to AMEND the Economic Development Investment Program (EDIP) Policy
and Procedure and AUTHORIZE the Mayor to EXECUTE the amended Policy.
3. Ordinance to AUTHORIZE the City Manager to EXECUTE a Mutual Aid Agreement
for Emergency Fire and Emergency Medical Services with Currituck County, North
Carolina.
4. Resolution to DIRECT the City Auditor to conduct an audit of the Procurement Card
Program.
5. Resolution to ENCOURAGE preservation of the Historic Brick Sidewalks at Cavalier
Shores.
6. Ordinances to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE:
a. $314,485 from Federal revenue to the Department of Housing and Neighborhood
Preservation FY 2010-11 Operating Budget to assist Homeless Veterans and
other individuals
b. $198,676 from the United States Department of Justice Edward Byrne Assistance
Grant re: Public Safety and Criminal Processing as follows:
(1) $50,000 to the Police Department and Sheriff re: fiber installation at the
Law Enforcement Training Academy
(2) $44,496 to the Police Department re: Digital Storage
(3) $24,000 to the Circuit Court Clerk's Office re: Part-time Office Assistant
(4) $44,000 to the Sheriff re: Courthouse Security Improvement
(5) $18,720 to the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court re: Records
Expungement
(6) $15,050 to Community Corrections and Pretrial re: Batterer's Intervention
(7) $2,410 to Community Corrections and Pretrial re: Intoxilyzer
c. $1,000 from the National Library Service (NLS) and $1,085 in donations to the
Library Gift Fund re purchase of cartridges that enhance the use of NLS talking
books and playback machines
7. Ordinance to TRANSFER $26,512 from the General Fund Reserve for Contingencies to
the FY 2010-11 Operating Budget of the Clerk of the Circuit Court and APPROVE
reinstatement of a full-time City position in the Clerk's Office
L. PLANNING
1. Application of S. DAWSON and SUSAN P. STERLING for a Nonconforming Use to
allow for an expansion of their existing dwelling at 801 Baltic Avenue.
BEACH — DISTRICT 6
RECOMMENDATION DEFERRAL
2. Application of BEN JOHNSON for Modification of Condition No. 1 at 612 Nevan Road
to expand the tattoo parlor into Suite 104.
LYNNHAVEN — DISTRICT 5
RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL
3. Application of CAVALIER GOLF & YACHT CLUB c/o JOHN MILLESON, SR.
for a Conditional Use Permit re an outdoor recreational facility at 1052 Cardinal Road.
LYNNHAVEN - DISTRICT 5
RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL
4. Application of GAIL HARTS PERFORMING ARTS GROUP, INC./TIBBITT
PROPERTIES ACREDALE, L.L.C. for a Conditional Use Permit re an indoor
recreation facility at 5224 Indian River Road, Suite 113-116.
KEMPSVILLE - DISTRICT 2
RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL
5. Application of OCEAN RENTAL PROPERTIES, LLC for a Modification of
Conditional Change of Zoning (previously approved by City Council on September 12,
2000) at 3202 Holly Road to modify all previously approved Proffers to allow access
from Holly Road in lieu of the approved access through the Huntwick Condominium
development.
BEACH - DISTRICT 6
RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL
6. Application of GEO I, L.L.C. c/o JOHN GEORGHIOU for a Change of Zoning
District Classification from R-10 Residential to Conditional R -5D (WF) Residential at
4480 and 4488 Indian River Road to allow residential development with workforce
housing.
CENTERVILLE — DISTRICT 1
RECOMMENDATION INDEFINITE DEFERRAL
7. Application of LITTLE THEATRE OF VIRGINIA BEACH at 550 Barberton Drive to
allow five (5) roadside guide signs in the public right-of-way along Birdneck and Laskin
Roads in accordance with Section 211.1 of the City Zoning Ordinance (CZO).
BEACH — DISTRICT 6
RECOMMENDATION APPROVE THREE (3)
ROADSIDE GUIDE SIGNS
M. APPOINTMENTS
ENERGY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
HEALTH SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD
HISTORICAL REVIEW BOARD
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
VIRGINIA BEACH TOMORROW COMMISSION
N. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
O. NEW BUSINESS
P. ADJOURNMENT
If you are physically disabled or visually impaired
and need assistance at this meeting,
please call the CITY CLERK'S OFFICE at 385-4303
* * * * * * * * * * *
.++++44.4+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++.4.++
:
4.!.4.4 ►.
.4 • •♦ •� ►'
.4 ••+S: : 1
`"-•-"--`"•4 .4 ►. ►
.4 CITY COUNCIL :, ;:
:4 : RETREAT 4 •
.4 i ;� .'
A w: 8:30 AM — 5:00 PM i +
.4 * .. ►.
�,. ►.
.4 !: FRIDAY and SATURDAY
.4 I January 21-22, 2011
.4 *•
.4 ;: CONFERENCE ROOM
.4 ► Suite 1000
.4 ;: 222 Central Park Avenue
.4 * TOWN CENTER
.4 *•
.4 *
.4 *
.4 i#
.4 it
+�* 4.-s, 111.-
+*
+***♦ +.
4
4.
.4,
4
4
4
4
.4
►.
CITY COUNCIL / SCHOOL BOARD
"FIVE YEAR FORECAST"
Building No. 19
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2010
Agenda 09/28/10gw
www.vbwv.com
1
MINUTES
VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Virginia Beach, Virginia
September 28, 2010
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., called to order the CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING re UNAUDITED
FY 2010 FINANCIAL STATEMENT in the City Council Conference Room, Tuesday, September 28,
2010, at 4:00 P.M.
Council Members Present:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel.
Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
In Richmond, attending a Gubernatorial Reception
celebrating the opening of the new Operation Smile
Global Headquarters in Virginia Beach,
[Rose Hall District]
September 28, 2010
2
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
UNAUDITED FY 2010 FINANCIAL STATEMENT
4:00 P.M.
ITEM # 60280
Patricia Phillips, Director — Finance, presented the Unaudited FY 2010 Financial Statement. Mrs.
Phillips introduced and expressed appreciation to Don Barnett — Comptroller, and Aaron McCoy,
Accountant III, who were very instrumental in preparing the Power Point. She also recognized all the
individuals still working on the Financial Statement. On August 13, 2010, Finance "closed the books ".
On December 14, 2010, the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, (CAFR), containing audited
financial statements for all funds, will be presented to City Council.
Preliminary Status — Unaudited Results
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010
➢Status of Three Major Funds
— General Fund
— School Operating Fund
— Water and Sewer
General Fund Budget to Actual at June 30, 2010
% of
BUDGET ACTUAL VARIANCE Budget
REVENUES $ 1,051.7 $ 1,048.2 $ (3.5) -0.3%
EXPENDITURES (1,095.4) (1,040.9) 54.5 5.0%
EXCESS OF REVENUES
OVER (UNDER) EXPENDITURES $ (43.7) $ 7.3 $ 51.0
FUND BALANCE - JULY 1 162.1
FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30 169.4
LESS: RESERVATIONS (67.4)
UNDESIGNATED FUND BALANCE - JUNE 30 $ 102.0
Fund Balance as a percent of FY 2011 Revenues is 10.05%
September 28, 2010
100%
80%
160% 160%
t°-
0
20%
0%
3
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
UNAUDITED FY 2010 FINANCIAL STATEMENT
ITEM # 60280 (Continued)
FY201.0 General Fund Revenues
Compared to Historic Trend at June 30;',
99.7%
FY10 ACTUAL = $1,048.2M
ANNUAL BUDGET = $1,051.7M
71.3%
42.8%
45.7%
55.3%
45.7%
49.5%
42.5%
1.9% 4.3%
Jul
7o/o
14.0%
5.2%
9.5%
Aug Sep
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
—s®Rev Trend 444% of FY 10 Rev Budget
Apr
May June
The General Fund Revenues compared to the Historic Trend at June 30, 2010, is 99.7%. Since June
Thirtieth, approximately $63 -MILLION came from the State (Single largest personal property tax
relief came in August, right at close out) There are many occurrences after June Thirtieth to make this
Budget work.
General Fund Revenues
Budget to Actual at June 30, 2010
(in Millions)
Budget Actual Variance
Local $ 923.0 $ 923.5 $ 0.5
State 105.7 102.5 (3.2)
Federal 23.0 22.2 (0.8)
Total $ 1,051.7 $ 1,048.2 $ (3.5)
September 28, 2010
-4 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
UNAUDITED FY 2010 FINANCIAL STATEMENT
ITEM # 60280 (Continued)
General Fund FY2010 Local Revenue Variances
(in Millions)
Variance
Real Estate $ 4.8
Personal Property (6.7)
General Sales (0.9)
Utility Taxes (0.7)
Telecommunications Taxes (2.0)
Business Licenses (2.5)
Hotel Taxes (1.1)
Restaurant Meals (1.1)
Cigarette Taxes (0.4)
Fines and Forfeitures (1.6)
Virginia Aquarium (1.2)
Interest (4.4)
Other Local Revenue 0.1
SP SA
Total Variance
$ (17.6)
18.1
$ 0.5
Local Revenues were $17.6 -Million under Budget; however, because of an unbudgeted Revenue
receipt from Southeastern Public Service Authority (SPSA), which had not been planned, the Local
Revenues resulted in $0.5 -Million over.
General Fund FY2010 State Revenue Val
(in Millions)
Constitutional Officers Reimbursements
State Aid Law Enforcement
Recordation Fee
Maintenance of Roads
Human Services
Other
Total Reductions
Less: Estimated Original Budget Reduction
Net Additional Variance
Va
1 7)
(0.6)
(1.1)
(0.9)
(0.7)
(5.3)
2.1
(3.2)
September 28, 2010
Revenues Million
-5 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
UNAUDITED FY 2010 FINANCIAL STATEMENT
ITEM # 60280 (Continued)
Real Estate Tax Revenues
June 30, 2006 — 2010
($4.7M Over Budget)
060 -
020 --
SO
$59.8
F1' 2008
FY 2007
FY 2008
FV 2008
Budget
■ Actual
FV 2010
Personal Property Taxes - Loca
June 30, 2006 — 2010
($6.4M Under Budget)
$81.7 679.8
73.1
$70.0 67.6
$64.4
68.1
664.2
FY 2008
FY 2007
FY 2008
FY 2009 FV 2010
® Budget
■Actual
September 28, 2010
6.0%
4.0%
2.0%
0.0%
-2.0%
-4.0%
-6.0%
-8.0%
-10.0%
410
{O
'CC) J�i�O G�C�O P+ Oq. +V. PQM
O' O �O Opt' �
eMonthly % Change..
280
250
$40
230
220
210
00
-6-
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
UNAUDITED FY 2010 FINANCIAL STATEMENT
ITEM # 60280 (Continued)
General Sales Taxes
June 30, 2006 — 2010
($900K Under Budget)
S50.8 S51.4-
$53.4 $54.0 555 7 54.1
FY 2001
FY 2007
FY 2002
FY 2008
e Budget
•Actual
FY 2010
General Sales Taxes
FY 2010 Monthly Change from Prior Year
0%
September 28, 2010
I I
-7-
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
UNAUDITED FY2010 FINANCIAL STATEMENT
ITEM # 60280 (Continued)
660
Business License
June 30, 2006 — 2010
(S2.5 -Million Under Budget)
626
620
616
610
66
0
FY 2006 FY 2007
Hotel Room Taxes
June 30, 2006 — 2010
($1.1 -Million Under Budget)
FY 2006
FY 2007
FY 2008
FY 2009 FY 2010
® Budget
■Actual
September 28, 2010
460
440
r 840
1
3
se
820
410
40
-8 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
UNAUDITED FY 2010 FINANCIAL STATEMENT
ITEM # 60280 (Continued)
Restaurant Meal Taxes
June 30, 2006 - 2010
($1.4 -Million Under Budget)
$48.1 Sdg 848.7 $48.3 $49.8 848.4
FY 2004
FY 2007
FY 2008
FY 2009
® Budget
• Actual
FY 2010
General Fund Expenditures
For Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010
(in Millions)
Budget Actual Variance % Savings
City Expenses:
Departments $ 611.5 $ 582.9 $ 28.6
Debt Service 41.3 33.8 7.5
Capital Projects 58.6 58.6
Total 711.4 675.3 36.1 5.1%
Schools (City Funding):
Operating Transfers $ 335.2 $ 317.5 $ 17.7
Debt Service 44.2 43.5 0.7
Capital Projects 4.6 4.6 -
Total 384.0 365.6 18.4 2.6%
Total Expenditures $ 1,095.4 $ 1,040.9 $ 54.5 5.0%
September 28, 2010
-9 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
UNAUDITED FY 2010 FINANCIAL STATEMENT
ITEM # 60280 (Continued)
General Fund FY2010 Expenditure Variances
(in Millions)
School Reversion
City:
Human Services 5.9
Police 4.8
Public Works 3.3
Fire 1.7
ComIT 1.4
Employee Special Benefits 1.1
Museums 1.1
Debt Service 8.2
Transfers 1.6
Other Depts 7.7
Total Variance
200
150
100
a
S
50
Variance
$ 17.7
$ 36.8
$ 54.5
Undesignated General Fund Balance
8.8%
63.1[
9.3%
.0'
$96.6'
512;
0 1
2003 2004 2005 2006
5103..4
.4
592.7
1:=Undeslgnated GF Balance
of Budgeted GF Revenue
September 28, 2010
Percent of Total Expenditures
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
- 10 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
UNAUDITED FY 2010 FINANCIAL STATEMENT
ITEM # 60280 (Continued)
J1-7
FY2010 General Fund Expenditures
Compared to Historic Trend at June 30, 201
95.0%
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mur Apr May June
Expenditure Trend
94. of FY10 Exp Budget
General Fund Undesignated Fund Balancet
June 30, 2010
(in Millions)
Total Fund Balance June 30, 2010
Less: Reservations & Designations
Loans
Department Reservations
Norfolk Southern
Risk Management
City CIP - 2011
School CIP - 2011
Net School Reversion
Undesignated Fund Balance
..,,•$, ' ''''' , '' '
Percent of 13udge' Cs
,..
$ 9.8
3.4
5.0
2.8
27.4
4.1
14.9 67.4
10.05%
September 28, 2010
YTD ACTUAL = $1,040.9M
ANNUAL BUDGET = $1,095.4M
66.9%
73.9%
, 44.3%
51.7%
59.4%
37.3%
28.4%
s.r.,.,
17.0%
9.8%
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mur Apr May June
Expenditure Trend
94. of FY10 Exp Budget
General Fund Undesignated Fund Balancet
June 30, 2010
(in Millions)
Total Fund Balance June 30, 2010
Less: Reservations & Designations
Loans
Department Reservations
Norfolk Southern
Risk Management
City CIP - 2011
School CIP - 2011
Net School Reversion
Undesignated Fund Balance
..,,•$, ' ''''' , '' '
Percent of 13udge' Cs
,..
$ 9.8
3.4
5.0
2.8
27.4
4.1
14.9 67.4
10.05%
September 28, 2010
I
- 11 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
UNAUDITED FY 2010 FINANCIAL STATEMENT
ITEM # 60280 (Continued)
School Operating Fund — Revenues & Expenditures
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2010
(in Millions)
Budget Actual Variance
REVENUES:
City $ 329.5 $ 329.4 $ (0.1)
Local 2.9 2.7 (0.2)
From Commonwealth 327.0 317.0 (10.0)
From Federal Government* 28.3 32.2 3.9
Total Revenues $ 687.7 $ 681.3 $ (6.4)
EXPENDITURES
$ (701.5) $ (677.6) $ 23.9
Excess Expenditure Savings
Over Revenue Variance 17.5
Prepaid Items 0.2
Total Reversion to City $ 17.7
* Includes $13.7 Million in ARRA Funding for Basic School Aid
Water & Sewer Enterprise Fund
Budget to Actual at June 30, 2010
(in Millions)
Budget Actual
Total Revenues $ 102.0 $ 100.0
Total Expenses (116.2) (100.4)
Net Change $ (14.2) $ (0.4)
September 28, 2010
I
- 12 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
UNAUDITED FY2010 FINANCIAL STATEMENT
ITEM # 60280 (Continued)
Summary
> Fund Balance within Policy, higher than 2009
> (10.05% FY10 versus 8.9% FY09)
> One time benefits
> SPSA $18.1 -Million
> Debt Service $8.2 -Million
➢ Departments continue to manage their budgets
> Reductions in personnel have operating impacts
➢ Real Estate and Personal Property — impact on FY2011 — levy is down
> Audited Financial Statements on December 14
➢ Storm Water Revenues Refunding Bond for additional savings
> November 23rd — First briefing on FY2011
The City Manager expressed appreciation to the Department Directors in terms of watching
expenditures.
September 28, 2010
- 13 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
VRS DEFINED BENEFITS vs. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION OPTIONS
ITEM # 60281
4:22 P.M.
Patricia Philips, Director of Finance, presented information re a Comparison of Virginia Retirement
System to a Defined Contribution System for Employee Pensions. Mrs. Phillips recognized David
Hartzog, Payroll Administrator, who works closely with Virginia Retirement System, providing beneficial
assistance. The Briefing will be focused on five (5) areas:
Importance of Retirement Benefit
Mayor's Committee on Pensions
Virginia Retirement Plan — a Defined Benefit
Defined Contribution Plans
Proposed Legislative Package Item
Importance of Retirement Benefits
® Recognition that retirement is part of employees' quality total compensation package
® Important for competiveness as an employer
® Fair to Taxpayers
Mayor's Committee on Pensions
Councilman Harry Diezel Chair
Councilman Glenn Davis Vice Chair
Jim Flinchum Managing Principal, Bay
Capital Advisors
Anthony Jernigan
Hank Kim
The Pinnacle Group
Executive Director and
Counsel for the National
Conference on Public
Employee Retirement
Systems
Tom Langley
President, Langley and
McDonald
Kenny Pravetz
Battalion Chief, Virginia
Beach Fire Department
- Report Issued September 3, 2010
Recommendation:
Flexibility to determine how to continue
to provide benefits in a way that is fair
to both employees and taxpayers
Not full agreement on best direction
for future
• Some want to maintain commitment to
employees
• Some want to require employees to
participate in Defined Contribution Plan
September 28, 2010
- 14 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
VRS DEFINED BENEFITS vs. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION OPTIONS
ITEM # 60281 (Continued)
Virginia Retirement System (VRS)
Defined Benefit Plan
Not Based on
Contributions
• The Virginia Retirement System (VRS) is a Defined Benefit Plan
• The Plan is funded by contributions from employers and members
• Benefit is NOT based on how much has been contributed to the account. The Benefit is based
on a formula which has been established by the General Assembly. The monthly Retirement
Benefit is calculated using a formula based on compensation, years of service, and age at
retirement.
September 28, 2010
-15 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
VRS DEFINED BENEFITS vs. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION OPTIONS
ITEM # 60281 (Continued)
Most Other Neighbor States Have Higher
Income Replacement, But Employees
Contribute
Income Replaced / Employee
Contribution
Source: JLARC staff analysis of state retirement plan documentation, 2008.
Note:. Va. Beach new employees hired 7-1-10 pay 5%.
4;74ettromitk:, 7".
VRS and Social Security Benefits Replace
More Than 80% of Pre -Retirement Income
Compensation
100%
90
80
70
60
711 50
ii.
o 40
30
a y
aE
20
10
Before
Social
Security
After
Social
Security
Source: JLARC staff analysis of VRS and Social Security Administration data, 2008.
September 28, 2010
-16 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
VRS DEFINED BENEFITS vs. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION OPTIONS
ITEM # 60281 (Continued)
Funding VRS Benefits
0 INVESTMENT EARNINGS - PAY 68% OF ALL BENEFIT COSTS
0 EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS - SET EVERY TWO YEARS, BASED ON ACTUARIAL ANALYSIS AND
DEMOGRAPHICS
0 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS - ESTABLISHED IN STATUTE AT 5% OF SALARY; MOST EMPLOYERS,
INCLUDING VIRGINIA BEACH, PAY ON BEHALF OF EMPLOYEE
NOTE: VIRGINIA. BEACH NEW EMPLOYEES PAY 5% EFFECTIVE 7-1-10
Virginia Beach Contributions
Fiscal Year
1998
1999
(Percent of Payroll)
Rate
11.88%
13.59%
13,.59%
*Note: Enhanced benefit coverage for hazardous duty employees added for EMS employees
12/1/06. Increased multiplier to 1.85% for hazardous duty employees 1/1/08.
Source: VRS
Table 2
Virginia Beach Annual Contribution VRS Pension
18,00
16.00
14.00
12.00...,,.,
10.00
.6.00 ;x
6i
as
September 28, 2010
- 17 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
VRS DEFINED BENEFITS vs. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION OPTIONS
ITEM # 60281 (Continued)
Comparison of Nla jor Benefit Provisions for 'meal Employees
Current Employees and New Employees
07-01-10
PLAN 1
PLAN 2
Benefit Formula:
-General Employees
-Public Safety
AFC Calculation
AFC x YRS Service x .0170
AFC x YRS Service x .0185
(plus $12,456 annually until social security)
3 Highest Years
No Change
No Change
5 Highest Years
Unreduced
Retirement:
-General Employees
-Public Safety
COLA
50 Years Old/30 years Service
50 Years Old/25 Years Service
First 3% of CPI
+ Next 4% of CPI x 0.5
Cap of 5%
Age and Service = 90
No Change
First 2% of CPI
+ Next 8% of CPI x0.5
Cap of 6%
Local Employee
Contribution
-as set forth in #HB1189 and
contribution on current state
Currently 5% paid by City
No option to change
H830 (BUDGET) (State Budget (H1330) does not impose employee
employees; does require 5% contribution for new State
Optional 0-5%
Selected VRS Information for
Virginia Beach
o Current VRS rate paid by City: 17.58% of payroll: $50.5m
o Sworn Officers 23.19% of payroll
o General Employees 14.53% of payroll
()Actuarial study projects rates will increase 1.5%
more in FY13 to total of 19.13%
o City of Virginia Beach VRS has an Unfunded Liability
of $275.1 -Million at June 30, 2009, or 80% funded
(most recent data, based on 2008 data)
o In 2002 Unfunded Liability was $23 -Million or 97%
funded
September 28, 2010
-18 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
VRS DEFINED BENEFITS vs. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION OPTIONS
ITEM # 60281 (Continued)
Unfunded Liabilities at
June 30, 2009
o VRS state employees:$2.9-Billion
® Teachers (entire state): $8.1 -Billion
o Total local employees in VRS: $2.2 -Billion
® The City of Virginia Beach: $275.1 -Million, or 80%
funded
84% funded
® Caused by investment performance and actuarial
assumptions different than actual
�, ,,, •s�riwa �� n, ...ff .. � ,r9���,, �dt „a..... ,. , t��a�.,,iS�u�� ,r �_._. �, �.���4�i�1(
The 2009 information is based on 2008 data. This number is expected to be much greater than the
actuarial study
Virginia Retirement System
Investment Performance Summary
As of June 30, 2010
10 Year
5Year
3 Year
1 Year
Quarter
Month
Fiscal YTD
Calendar YTD
- 0.8%
14.1%
- 0.5%
September 28, 2010
- 19 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
VRS DEFINED BENEFITS vs. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION OPTIONS
ITEM # 60281 (Continued)
Examples of Modifications to
Defined Benefit Plan
• Many states have changed benefits for new members
(and in some cases current members)
o Increase employee contribution
® Increase age and service requirements
Normal retirement 65 age
Actual average 62/30 Year
o Longer periods for average final compensation (AFC)
o Caps on salary or on benefits
® Reductions on multiplier
JLARC Study
Retirement Benefits
Less Important for New Employees:
® Rarely an employer's primary recruiting tool
® Less than 1/2 of employees agreed that VRS retirement plan
played significant role in decision to work for State
■ Ranked 4th as reason to work for the State
Retirement Benefits Retain Longer -Tenured
Employees:
® 93% of agencies agreed
O 3/4 of employees within 5 yrs of retirement agreed
o More important for longer tenured than for recently hired
employees (Mercer)
JLARC
September 28, 2010
- 20 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
VRS DEFINED BENEFITS vs. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION OPTIONS
ITEM # 60281 (Continued)
Future
(,-.) It is unlikely future investment performance will
resolve underfunding
(4) Funded status will decline further
® GASB Preliminary Views Pension Accounting and
Financial Reporting
- Portion of unfunded liabilities will be recorded on the employer's
balance sheet beginning in 2013
- Changes in discount rate
- Annual rates paid by City will be high s
® Potential solutions
Plan desifjn changes
More funding $
Defined Benefit Plans Like VRS
Have Been the Choice for Decades
The number of defined contribution and hybrid plans is growing
South Carolina
Montanalter
Colorado
District of
Columbia
Some have switched back!
tamegyatsimatelmafiatz
September 28, 2010
- 21 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
VRS DEFINED BENEFITS vs. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION OPTIONS
ITEM # 60281 (Continued)
Defined Benefit (DB) Plans More
Cost Effective
® DB less expensive than DC for same level of benefit
• Longevity risk pooling in DB saves 12%
• Maintenance of portfolio diversification saves 5%
▪ DB superior return save 26%
® Study by AON consulting
® "No one can dispute that public pension plans have
efficiently and prudently discharged their responsibilities
to provide stable and secure income streams — a record
that DC is unlikely to achieve" — Girard Miller
!;04,ThigiY3AZINE0930.3if
„v110:1101111111111111111,i0,,,,a.
® No implicit or explicit guarantee of retirement income
® Employers (and usually employees) contribute to
plan over career
()Amount of funds in account to meet retirement
needs depends on:
1, amount of "ER" and "EE" contributions
2. investment returns
3. lifespan
4. individual investment portfolio management
® Employee bears investment risk
!ilinatill,11,111111011;
Aildegtat,i,MimertM;11z4zrtgi,:;-;!,a,
September 28, 2010
-22 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
VRS DEFINED BENEFITS vs. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION OPTIONS
ITEM # 60281 (Continued)
Advantages and Disadvantages of Defined
Benefit and Defined Contribution Plans
DEFINED BENEFIT
Advantages:
✓ Employees are guaranteed specific
benefit for life at time of retirement
V Benefit amount is formula driven
including years of service and salary
✓ Rewards long term employees
✓ More cost effective than DC plans to
provide the same level of benefit
Disadvantages:
o Employer responsible to ensure system
has sufficient funds
o Requires actuarial projections
o Difficult to include in budget projections
Advantages:
✓ Employees and employer contribute a
specific amount each period
✓ Employee is responsible for investment
decisions
✓ Tends to be more portable
✓ Generally has shorter vesting period
✓ Easier to administer
✓ Easy to include in budget projections
Disadvantages:
o Employee is not guaranteed specific
amount at retirement
o Less cost effective than DB plans to
provide the same level of benefit
Proposed Legislative Package Item
® Amend Code of Virginia to enable Virginia localities to:
® Develop a Defined Contribution Plan instead of the current VRS Defined
Benefit Plan for new employees
• At new employee's option
• Full portability
® Option: allow Virginia Beach to be able to develop its own Defined
Contribution Plan as a model for the State
September 28, 2010
- 23 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
HOMELESS ASSISTANCE UPDATE
4:47 P.M.
ITEM # 60282
Andrew Friedman, Director — Housing and Neighborhood Preservation, advised the purpose of the
presentation.
• To respond to Council's request for public input regarding ways to enhance resources to
address Homelessness
• To provide options for consideration
• To provide for dialogue and understanding
Mr. Friedman distributed a summary entitled "How People With Housing Crises Get Housed and Stay
Housed in Virginia Beach ", which is hereby made a part of the record.
Many individuals, in and outside of city government, are already working hard to help the Homeless and
to end Homelessness. The City Council adopted a Ten Year Plan to End Homelessness in 2007. Virginia
Beach is partnering internally with churches and non profits and externally with our neighboring
localities to make progress.
In the current budget, there is significant funding allocated for the replacement of the Lighthouse Center
and for many of the activities listed on the handout.
Our Approach to the Issue
• We understood that City Council wanted input from those who are involved and knowledgeable
• We understood that an increase of resources would most likely be one-time
• We understood that reasonably quick turn -around was desired
• We wanted to provide a "menu" of choices so that City Council had the opportunity to choose
more than one option
• We were looking to identify Raps that aren't, or can't be filled with existing funding sources
or programs
Who Housing and Neighborhood Preservation Involved
• Michael Knockett Family: Letter sent to Attorney LaMondue on Friday 9/10 (no response as
of Thursday 9/23)
• BEACH — the Faith, non-profit and City partnership
• VBHARP — the Virginia Beach Homeless Advocacy and Resource Partnership, which consists
of agencies serving the Homeless and receiving funds as part of our continuum of care
• OEC - the RAC/Oceanfront Enhancement Committee
• "Hope in the Upper Room" — which consists of currently Homeless persons working on
improvement initiatives
• Homeless persons at the Lighthouse Center and Judeo Christian Outreach Center
September 28, 2010
I
- 24 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
HOMELESS ASSISTANCE UPDATE
ITEM # 60282 (Continued)
• All the ideas from the groups consulted were consolidated into a list of short, medium and
long-term actions
• A meeting was convened of the Planning committee of the BEACH Partnership
• BEACH added new items to the list
• They voted, using "dot" voting, to indicate priorities within each grouping
• The following charts depict the short, medium and long-term items and the relative priorities
voted by the group
• Staff reviewed the group voting and identified recommendations for City Council's
consideration
Short Term Items
Item
% of Votes in this Category
Comment
Funding for medical, dental,
pharmaceutical assistance,
identification, transportation
and daily living supplies *
76%
Specific uses would be
recommended by the committee
overseeing the donation meter
program
Homelessness Prevention for
People aging out of Foster Care
18%
This is probably more
appropriately a medium-term
program
Move -in packages for Homeless
persons moving into permanent
housing
6%
*Top Priority
Medium term items
Item
% of Votes in this Category
Comment
Piot Program for Summer
Shelter
33%
Lengthen Winter shelter
program
10%
Medical Assistance Funding*
35%
Employment Assistance
7%
Housing Assistance
13%
*Top Priority
September 28, 2010
II
I
- 25 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
HOMELESS ASSISTANCE UPDATE
ITEM # 60282 (Continued)
Long-term items
II I
Item
% of Votes in this Category
Comment
Fund a new efficiency
apartment project in Virginia
Beach — like Cloverleaf
4%
These items are not mutually
exclusive.
Fund a regional "Healing
Place" for substance abuse
recovery and treatment
15%
Finding land for facilities that
serve the Homeless is the most
difficult part of our work;
therefore, action to identify and
secure land was the top priority.
Endow enhanced services at the
new Lighthouse Center
7%
The "Healing Place", that
would provide shelter,
transitional housing and
Close the funding gap for the
Lighthouse
4%
peer -based counseling and
recovery services for those with
substance abuse problems
Build a shelter facility
4%
is a project already in progress
that will need a site.
Make land available for a
shelter and other facilities to
assist ending homelessness
31 %
Through the regional task force,
a Business Plan is being
developed
*Establish a "land trust" to
obtain and make land available
for housing and shelter facilities
38%
and various other aspects are
being worked on.
*Top Priority
Staff Recommendations
Item
Suggested Amount
Comment
Funding for basic living
assistance, including medical,
dental, Pharmaceutical
assistance, identification,
transportation and daily living
supplies
$ 25,000
This could help people in
significant ways within a few
months. Funding would be
added to the "Donation Meter"
fund and allocated based on
recommendations of a
stakeholder group at the
oceanfront. Grants would be
made based on proposals
received from providers.
Medical Assistance Funding
$ 50,000
This has been identified as a
severe and significant need —
everything from housing for
people recovering from surgery,
to transportation to
appointments, to basic medical
supplies. This would be
development of a program
beyond the short term funding.
Provide funding and staff
support to support the location
of a site and establishment of a
Healing Place
$100,000
Funding for ongoing required
program planning to identify
and secure a location would
accelerate the project, increase
its likelihood of success.
September 28, 2010
I
- 26 -
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING
HOMELESS ASSISTANCE UPDATE
ITEM # 60282 (Continued)
Mr. Friedman referenced Medical Assistance Funding. There are Homeless individuals receiving
medical care, but being discharged within twenty-four (24) hours of surgery, having no access to
housing or ability to get to their follow-up appointments. This item is not funding medical procedures, it
is simply assisting individuals recover or obtain access to the medical care available.
Mr. Friedman displayed a photograph of South Bay Efficiency Apartments for the Homeless. This
facility is under construction in Portsmouth and also supported by Virginia Beach, Norfolk and
Chesapeake.
The City Manager advised the funding would come from the Reserve for Contingencies.
BY CONSENSUS, an Ordinance re funding for Homeless will be SCHEDULED for the City Council
Session of October 12, 2010.
September 28, 2010
-27 -
CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
4:58 P.M.
ITEM # 60283
Councilman Dyer referenced a constituent's request for City Council and staff to consider Urban
Archery Season for deer hunting. The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries established
this to help keep the deer population down in urban areas. There are thirty (30) cities in the
Commonwealth who are participating.
ITEM # 60284
Councilman DeSteph advised today, September 28, 2010, was the Grand Opening of the SEAL Heritage
Center, which is basically the Navy's Special Operations Warfare Community Center for the SEALs
and their families. Last evening, there was a reception for the donors. Councilman DeSteph distributed a
photograph, of Captain Bill Shepherd, the First SEAL in Outer Space with three (3) Space missions (one
on a Russian Space Shuttle), Admiral Olson, the first Two, Three and Four Star Navy SEAL, first United
States SOCOM Navy SEAL, and was awarded the Silver Star for Bravery. Said photograph is hereby
made a part of the record. Mayor Sessoms also attended the event. The SEAL Heritage Center was built
by donations. The Navy gave them the land.
ITEM # 60285
Council Lady Henley requested an updated briefing re the Transit Study be provided to City Council.
Council Lady Henley was particularly concerned re the access of this facility and how it will reach out to
the entire City. The City Manager shall schedule a Briefing.
ITEM # 60286
Council Lady Bellitto referenced good news on the School side our current "Teacher Of The Year",
Karen Drosinos of Pembroke Elementary has recently announced she is the "2011 Virginia Region II
Teacher of the Year ". There are eight (8) regions in the State thus, she is one of eight Finalists for State
Teacher of the Year.
ITEM # 60287
Mayor Sessoms praised the Thirty -Seventh Annual Virginia Beach Neptune Festival. This was a
spectacular weekend, September 24 — 26, 2010. This was a spectacular event consisting of a Grand
Parade, North American Sand sculpting Championship, Volleyball Tournament, Fireworks
Extravaganza, Surfing Classic, Neptune's 8K/5K/1 Mile Run and Endless Summer Beach Bash.
September 28, 2010
I
- 28 -
AGENDA REVIEW SESSION
5:03 P.M.
ITEM # 60288
Resolution re Recognition of the high honor of Virginia Beach Schools being named 51h
Best Large City Public School Division in the Nation.
This Resolution shall be PRESENTED and ADDED to the Consent Agenda.
ITEM # 60289
BY CONSENSUS, the following items shall compose the CONSENT AGENDA:
K ORDINANCES/RESOLUTION
1. Ordinances to EXEMPT certain organizations from Personal Property Taxes:
a. Back Bay Restoration Foundation, Ltd.
b. Lynnhaven River Now
c. REN Group
d. Virginia Beach Police Foundation, Inc.
2. Ordinance to AMEND the Economic Development Investment Program (EDIP)
Policy and Procedure and AUTHORIZE the Mayor to EXECUTE the amended
Policy.
3. Ordinance to AUTHORIZE the City Manager to EXECUTE a Mutual Aid
Agreement for Emergency Fire and Medical Services with Currituck County,
North Carolina.
4. Resolution to DIRECT the City Auditor to conduct an audit of the Procurement
Card Program.
5. Resolution to ENCOURAGE preservation of the Historic Brick Sidewalks at
Cavalier Shores.
6. Ordinances to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE:
a. $314,485 from Federal revenue to the Department of Housing and
Neighborhood Preservation FY 2010-11 Operating Budget to assist
Homeless Veterans and other individuals
September 28, 2010
I
-29-
AGENDA REVIEW SESSION
ITEM # 60289 (Continued)
b. $198,676 from the United States Department of Justice, Edward Byrne
Assistance Grant, re: Public Safety and Criminal Processing:
$50, 000 to the Police Department and Sheriff re: fiber
installation at the Law Enforcement Training Academy
$44,496 to the Police Department re: Digital Storage
$24, 000 to the Circuit Court Clerk's Office
re: Part-time Office Assistant
$44, 000 to the Sheriff re: Courthouse Security Improvement
$18, 720 to the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court re:
Records Expungement
$15, 050 to Community Corrections and Pretrial re: Batterer's
Intervention
$2,410 to Community Corrections and Pretrial re: Intoxilyzer
c. $1, 000 from the National Library Service (NLS) and $1, 085 in donations
to the Library Gift Fund re purchase of cartridges that enhance the use of
NLS talking books and playback machines
7. Ordinance to TRANSFER $26, 512 from the General Fund Reserve for
Contingencies to the FY 2010-11 Operating Budget of the Clerk of the Circuit
Court and APPROVE reinstatement of a full-time City position in the Circuit
Clerk's Office
September 28, 2010
- 30 -
A GEN DA REVIEW SESSION
ITEM # 60290
BY CONSENSUS, the following items shall compose the PLANNING BY CONSENT AGENDA:
L. PLANNING
1. Application of S. DAWSON and SUSAN P. STERLING for a Nonconforming
Use to allow for an expansion of their existing dwelling at 801 Baltic Avenue.
BEACH— DISTRICT 6
2. Application of BEN JOHNSON for Modification of Condition No. 1 at 612
Nevan Road to expand the tattoo parlor into Suite 104.
LYNNHAVEN— DISTRICT 5
3. Application of CAVALIER GOLF & YACHT CLUB c/o JOHNMILLESON,
SR. for a Conditional Use Permit re an outdoor recreational facility at 1052
Cardinal Road.
LYNNHAVEN - DISTRICT 5
4. Application of GAIL HARTS PERFORMING ARTS GROUP, INC./TIBBITT
PROPERTIESACREDALE, L.L.C. for a Conditional Use Permit re an indoor
recreational facility at 5224 Indian River Road, Suite 113-116.
KEMPSVILLE - DISTRICT 2
5. Application of OCEAN RENTAL PROPERTIES, LLC for a Modification of a
Conditional Change of Zoning (previously approved by City Council on
September 12, 2000) at 3202 Holly Road to MODIFY all previously approved
Proffers to allow access from Holly Road in lieu of the approved access through
the Huntwick Condominium development.
BEACH - DISTRICT 6
6. Application of GEO I, L.L.C. c/o JOHN GEORGHIOU for a Change of
Zoning District Classification from R-10 Residential to Conditional R -5D (WF)
Residential at 4480 and 4488 Indian River Road to allow residential
development with Workforce Housing.
CENTERVILLE — DISTRICT 1
7. Application of LITTLE THEATRE OF VIRGINIA BEACH at 550 Barberton
Drive to allow five (5) three (3) Roadside Guide Signs in the public right-of-way
along Birdneck and Laskin Roads in accordance with Section 211.1 of the City
Zoning Ordinance (CZO).
BEACH— DISTRICT 6
Item LI. (S. DAWSON and SUSAN P. STERLING for a Nonconforming Use) and Item L. 6 (GEO I,
L.L.C. c/o JOHN GEORGHIOU for a Conditional Change of Zoning) shall be DEFERRED
INDEFINITELY.
September 28, 2010
I
-31-
ITEM # 60291
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., entertained a motion to permit City Council to conduct its CLOSED
SESSION, pursuant to Section 2.2-3711(A), Code of Virginia, as amended, for the following purpose:
PERSONNEL MATTERS: Discussion, consideration of or interviews
of prospective candidates for employment, assignment, appointment,
promotion, performance, demotion, salaries, disciplining or resignation
of specific public officers, appointees or employees pursuant to Section
2.2-3711 (A)(1)
Council Appointments: Boards, Commissions, Committees, Authorities,
Agencies and Appointees
PUBLICLY -HELD PROPERTY. Discussion or consideration of the,
acquisition, or of the disposition of publicly -held property, where
discussion in an open meeting would adversely affect the bargaining
position or negotiating strategy of the public body pursuant to Section
2.2-3711(A)(3).
Acquisition/Disposition of City Property: Bayside District
LEGAL MATTERS: Consultation with legal counsel or briefings by
staff members or consultants, pertaining to actual or probable litigation,
where such consultation or briefing in an open meeting would adversely
affect the negotiating or litigating posture of the public body, or
consultation with legal counsel employed or retained by a public body
regarding specific legal matters requiring the provision of legal advice
by counsel pursuant to Section 2.2-3711 (A) (7).
City of Virginia Beach v. C. W. Williams and Company and Fire Dex
Upon motion by Councilman Wood, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council voted to proceed
into CLOSED SESSION at 5:06 P.M.
September 28, 2010
- 32 -
ITEM # 60291 (Continued)
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel.
Robert M Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
[Closed Session: 5:06 P.M. — 5:25 P.M.]
In Richmond, attending a Gubernatorial Reception
celebrating the opening of the new Operation Smile
Global Headquarters in Virginia Beach,
[Rose Hall District]
September 28, 2010
- 33 -
FORMAL SESSION
VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
September 28, 2010
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. called to order the FORMAL SESSION of the VIRGINIA BEACH CITY
COUNCIL in the Council Chamber, City Hall Building, Tuesday, September 28, 2010, at 6:00 P.M
Council Members Present:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel.
Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
INVOCATION: Reverend Caroline Jinkins
Associate Pastor
First Presbyterian Church
In Richmond, attending a Gubernatorial Reception
celebrating the opening of the new Operation Smile
Global Headquarters in Virginia Beach,
[Rose Hall District]
PLEDGE OFALLEGL4NCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mayor Sessoms DISCLOSED as an officer of TowneBank (which has a corporate office located at 297
Constitution Drive in Virginia Beach), he is directly and indirectly involved in many of TowneBank's
transactions. However, due to the size of TowneBank and the volume of transactions it handles,
TowneBank has an interest in numerous matters in which he is not personally involved and of which he
does not have personal knowledge. In that regard, he is always concerned about the appearance of
impropriety that might arise if he unknowingly participates in a matter before City Council in which
TowneBank has an interest. Mayor Sessoms also has similar concerns with respect to Prudential Towne
Realty, which is an affiliate of TowneBank. In order to ensure his compliance with both the letter and
spirit of the State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act (the "Act"), it is his practice to
thoroughly review each City Council agenda to idents any matters in which he might have an actual or
potential conflict. If, during his review of an agenda, he identifies a matter in which he has a `personal
interest ", as defined by the Act, he will either abstain from voting, or file the appropriate disclosure letter
with the City Clerk to be included in the official records of City Council. Mayor Sessoms' letter of
March 24, 2009, is hereby made a part of the record.
September 28, 2010
- 34 -
Vice Mayor Jones DISCLOSED, for many years, he served on the Board of Directors of Resource Bank.
Three (3) years ago, Fulton Financial Corporation ("Fulton Financial') purchased Resource Bank. On
March 31, 2007, Vice Mayor Jones retired from the Board of Directors. Although, he is no longer a
Board Member, he owns stock in Fulton Financial and that stock ownership causes him to have a
"personal interest" in Fulton Financial. However, due to the size of Fulton Financial and the volume of
transactions it handles in any given year, Fulton Financial, or any of the banks that are owned by Fulton
Financial, may have an interest in numerous matters in which Vice Mayor Jones has no personal
knowledge. In order to ensure his compliance with both the letter and the spirit of the State and Local
Government Conflict of Interests Act, it is his practice to thoroughly review the agenda for each meeting
of City Council for the purpose of identifying any matters in which he might have an actual or potential
conflict. If during his review, he identifies any matters, Vice Mayor Jones will prepare and file the
appropriate disclosure letter to be recorded in the official records of City Council. Vice Mayor Jones
regularly makes this disclosure. Vice Mayor Jones' letter of April 10, 2007, is hereby made a part of the
record.
Council Lady Rosemary Wilson DISCLOSED her husband is a principal in the accounting firm of
Goodman and Company and is directly and indirectly involved in many of Goodman and Company's
transactions. However, due to the size of Goodman and Company and the volume of transactions it
handles in any given year, Goodman and Company has an interest in numerous matters in which her
husband is not personally involved and of which she does not have personal knowledge. In order to
ensure her compliance with both the letter and the spirit of the State and Local Government Conflict of
Interests Act, it is her practice to thoroughly review the agenda for each meeting of City Council for the
purpose of identifying any matters in which she might have an actual or potential conflict. If, during her
review she identifies any matters, she will prepare and file the appropriate disclosure letter to be
recorded in the official records of City Council. Council Lady Wilson regularly makes this disclosure.
Council Lady Wilson's letter of January 27, 2004, is hereby made a part of the record.
Council Lady Rosemary Wilson DISCLOSED she is a Real Estate Agent affiliated with Prudential
Decker Realty. Because of the nature of Real Estate Agent affiliation, the size of Prudential, and the
volume of transactions it handles in any given year, Prudential has an interest in numerous matters in
which she is not personally involved and of which she does not have personal knowledge. In order to
ensure her compliance with both the letter and the spirit of the State and Local Government Conflict of
Interests Act, it is her practice to thoroughly review the agenda for each meeting of City Council for the
purpose of identing any matters in which she might have an actual or potential conflict. If during her
review she identifies any matters, she will prepare and file the appropriate disclosure letter to be
recorded in the official records of City Council. Council Lady Wilson regularly makes this disclosure.
Council Lady Wilson 's letter of January 27, 2004, is hereby made a part of the record.
September 28, 2010
Item V -E.1
CERTIFICATION
- 35 -
ITEM # 60292
Upon motion by Councilman Wood, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council CERTIFIED THE
CLOSED SESSION TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOTION TO RECESS.
Only public business matters lawfully exempt from Open Meeting
requirements by Virginia law were discussed in Closed Session to
which this certification resolution applies.
AND,
Only such public business matters as were identified in the motion
convening the Closed Session were heard, discussed or considered
by Virginia Beach City Council.
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel.
Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
September 28, 2010
RESOLUTION
CERTIFICATION OF CLOSED SESSION
VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
WHEREAS: The Virginia Beach City Council convened into CLOSED SESSION, pursuant to the
affirmative vote recorded in ITEM #60291, Page 31, and in accordance with the provisions of The Virginia
Freedom of Information Act, and,
WHEREAS: Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia requires a certification by the governing body
that such Closed Session was conducted in conformity with Virginia law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Virginia Beach City Council hereby certifies that,
to the best of each member's knowledge, (a) only public business matters lawfully exempted from Open
Meeting requirements by Virginia law were discussed in Closed Session to which this certification resolution
applies; and, (b) only such public business matters as were identified in the motion convening this Closed
Session were heard, discussed or considered by Virginia Beach City Council.
uth Hodges Fraser, MMC
City Clerk
September 28, 2010
Item V -F.
MINUTES
- 36 -
ITEM # 60293
Upon motion by Councilman Dyer, seconded by Councilman DeSteph, City Council APPROVED the
MINUTES of the INFORMAL and FORMAL SESSIONS of September 14, 2010:
Voting: 9-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel.
Robert M Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
Council Members Abstaining:
Rosemary Wilson
Rosemary Wilson ABSTAINED as she was participating in the Hampton Roads Chamber of
Commerce 's "World Expo 2010 in Shanghai, China ", September 14 - 22, 2010. Council
Lady Wilson was not in attendance for the City Council Session of September 14, 2010.
September 28, 2010
I
- 37 -
Item V G.1.
ADOPT AGENDA
FOR FORMAL SESSION ITEM # 60294
BY CONSENSUS, City Council ADOPTED:
AGENDA FOR THE FORMAL SESSION
ADDED to the Consent Agenda:
Resolution to DECLARE September 28, 2010 "Virginia Beach City Public
Schools Day". (5th Best Large City Public School Division in the Nation)
Resolution RECOGNIZING Chesapeake Bay Wine Classic Foundation's 20th
Anniversary and more than $3-M charitable funds raised
Resolution RECOGNIZING Max Bartoli and Ethan Martin for choosing
Virginia Beach for the filming of "Atlantis Down"
September 28, 2010
1
- 38 -
RECOGNITION OF BOY SCOUTS ITEM # 60295
Mayor Sessoms RECOGNIZED THE FOLLOWING Boy Scouts and their leaders:
Boy Scout Troop 660
Kempsville
Billy Bingham
Sebastian Pommerenk
Leader: Laura Pommerenk
II 1
Mayor Sessoms presented each Scout with a City Seal Pin. These young men are working on their
Citizenship in the Community Merit Badge.
September 28, 2010
Item V -G.2.
ADDED
- 39 -
ITEM # 60296
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council ADDED to the
Consent Agenda:
Resolution to DECLARE September 28, 2010 "Virginia Beach City Public Schools
Day". (51" Best Large City Public School Division in the Nation)
Resolution RECOGNIZING Chesapeake Bay Wine Classic Foundation's 201"
Anniversary and more than $3-M charitable funds raised
Resolution RECOGNIZING Max Bartoli and Ethan Martin for choosing Virginia Beach
for the filming of "Atlantis Down"
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel.
Robert M Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
September 28, 2010
I
Item V -H.1.
MAYOR'S PRESENTATIONS
Mayor Sessoms PRESENTED:
- 40 -
ITEM # 60297
Resolution in Recognition
II
Resolution to DECLARE September 28, 2010 "Virginia Beach City Public Schools
Day". (5th Best Large City Public School Division in the Nation)
GreatSchools analyzed 17,377 cities to idents the "Best Public School Districts" by population and
median home price. Ratings were based on a number of factors, such as performance on state standards
and the most recent data from the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP).
Virginia Beach City Public Schools was cited for the high performance of its students, namely its rising
scores on the SAT, Advanced Placement tests above the national average, state awards for excellence for
most of its schools, the high percentage (84 percent) of students planning to pursue higher education, its
listing of many of its eleven (11) high schools in Newsweek's annual report of the "Best United States
High Schools" and its posting a graduation rate of nearly 83 percent, which is above the state average.
September 28, 2010
RESOLUTION
RECOGNITION OF THE HIGH HONOR OF VIRGINIA BEACH SCHOOLS
BEING NAMED 5TH BEST LARGE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOL DIVISION IN THE NATION
WHEREAS, the Virginia Beach City Council acknowledges the high honor the public school division
has incurred in being ranked the fifth best large city public school division in the nation;
and
this prestigious award resulted from a study conducted by GreatSchools, a national non-
profit group which focuses on public and private education; and
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
RESOLVED:
RESOLVED:
GreatSchools analyzed 17,377 cities to identify the best public school districts by
population and median home price; and
Ratings were based on a number of factors such as performance on state standards and
the most recent data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP); and
VBCPS was cited for the high performance of its students, namely its rising scores on the
SAT, Advanced Placement tests above the national average, state awards for excellence
for most of its schools, the high percentage (84 percent) of students planning to pursue
higher education, its listing of many of its 11 high schools in Newsweek's annual report
of the best U.S. high schools, and its posting a graduation rate of nearly 83 percent, which
is above the state average; and
GreatSchools characterizes VBCPS as "Clearly a district on the move!" and now
therefore be it
That the City Council approve a recommendation to make Tuesday, September 28, 2010,
Virginia Beach City Public Schools Day; and, be it further
That a copy of this resolution be spread across the official minutes of this Council.
Presented September 28, 2010
illiam D. Sessoms, Mayor
Attest:
I
Item V -H.2.
MAYOR'S PRESENTATIONS
Mayor Sessoms PRESENTED :
-41-
ITEM # 60298
Resolution in Recognition
To
Max Bartoli and Ethan Marten
"Atlantis Down"
II 1
Two Men. One Vision. One Passion. Max Bartoli and Ethan Marten first met in 2006 at the
New York International Film Festival where both entered short films in the competition. They got to
know each other because their respective films were scheduled back-to-back in the same theater.
In the end, they each achieved individual success and their films each won in their respective
categories. Thus a lasting friendship was formed and, eventually, they became partners. While they met
by accident, their decision to film in Virginia was, by no means, an accident. New York transplant and
Hampton Roads resident, Ethan Marten, and Italian Max Bartoli put together the motion picture,
ATLANTIS DOWN, in Virginia Beach and Portsmouth. Although this project could have taken place
anywhere - - Italy, Spain, Los Angeles [where it was originally planned to be filmed], Ethan Marten
believed Virginia, particularly Hampton Roads, had everything they needed to produce the film so he
persuaded Max Bartoli to visit Virginia Beach. They found the perfect location at First Landing which
offered a variety of looks, including woods. Here they could produce the film for far less expense with the
same quality of production. Some said this was impossible. They actually completed the filming in just
thirteen days, a day short of the anticipated schedule.
Just as the movie could have been filmed anywhere, the World Premiere could have taken place
anywhere. However the Producers chose the Commodore Theatre for the screening and World Premiere,
which is to be held October First and is already "sold out ". The cast, crew, director and producer will be
at each of the subsequent screenings at 7:00 PM October 2-7, 2010.
The Virginia Beach City Council recognized Max Bartoli and Ethan Marten for their foresight,
appreciation of the amenities in Virginia Beach where America's history actually began at Cape Henry
April 26, 1607, and achievement of this World Premiere movie.
September 28, 2010
RES01,UTION
E .AS': Two Merz One Vision. One Passion. Max,Bartah and -Ethan £Marten first met in 2006 at the New
Torklnternationaf Firm Pestivaf where Both entered short films in the competition. They got to know each other because their
respective firms were scheduled back-to-6ackin the same theater
WJiE itS: In the end they each achieved individual- success and their films each won in their respective
categories. Thus a lastingfrendship wasformed and eventuaffy, the became partners. White they met 6y accident, their decision
to firm in Virginia was, 6y no means, an accident. New Torktransplant and5lampton Roads resident, 'Ethan Marten, and
Italian MaxBartoli put together the motion picture, AL .fi7 IISgXYT47, in 'Virginia Beach and Portsmouth. Although this
project could have taken place anywhere - - Italy, Spain, LosAngefes [where it was originally planned to 6e filmed], Ethan
Marten 6efievedVirginia, particularly Jfampton Roads, had everything they needed -to produce the film so he persuadedMax
Bang to visit Virginia Beach. They foundtheperfect location at rirst Landing which offereda variety of looks, including
woods. 7fere they couldproduce the film forfar fess expense with the same quality of production. Some said this was impossible.
They actually completed the firming in just thirteen days, a day short of the anticipated schedule;
WiftE J4S: Just as the movie coufd have beenfirmed anywhere, the `World Premiere could have taken place
anywhere. 7fowever the Producers chose the Commodore Theatre for the screening and WorfdPremiere, which is to 6e herd
October Pirst and is already "so hfout". The cast, crew, director and producerwill-be at each of the subsequent screenings at 7:00
QPM October 2-7 2010;
ryilt[tEWS; Atlantis Down' takes place in the year 2025 when the space shuttle program has been privatized and
Atlantis has been relegated to nothing more than a glorified tai Between space stations. Its crew is on a routine mission, thinking
they are conducting experiments when they encounter 6ursts of fight shutting down its instrumentation and leaving it adrift in
space with the Rookie Astronaut in command Most of the crew is transported to another planet white others find themselves in
the middle of a Barren, desert wasteland Then the Rookie Astronaut realizes he has been chosen to compete in a sort of gafactk
chess game with a superior intelfrgence where losing means death; and
4 JltE SE./lS: Commodore Theatre Owner, 'FreefSchoenfeld, Director and Producers 1axBarto1r, andrEthan
Marten, are proud to present A7c,AS IXY4''.N" in the fu-uriousfy restored 1945 Art Deco -style, state-of-the-art
Commodore Theatre in Ohre Towne, Portsmouth, with its forty-one foot screen and INX and 130LBTDIGITA.L sound
NOW, TLER;ErFO . E, BE IT laSOLVED: That the Virginia Beach City Councifpauses in its
deliberations to recognize MaxBarto1i and'than Marten for their foresight, appreciation of the amenities in Virginia Beach
where America's history actuaffy began at Cape .7fenryAprif26, 1607, and achievement of this World Premiere movie.
Given under our hands and seats this Twenty-eighth day of September, 'Two Thousand and Ten,
CouncifLady Rita Sweet Beaitto Councilman Glenn <iZ Davis
Council Yliam X 'BO DeSteph CoWY. 'Carry Do
✓11 roc/ _ ....
Councilman Rp6ert 9 . Bob" Dyer Lv Council- Laay Barbara 7-fenfey
Vice Mayor Louis ]Jones
ouncifLady Ros ry Wilson
Ctman John E. 7.1 firth
Jaynes L. Wood
- 42 -
Item V -H.3.
MAYOR'S PRESENTATIONS
ITEM # 60299
Mayor Sessoms PRESENTED:
Resolution in Recognition
The Resolution RECOGNIZED Chesapeake Bay Wine Classic Foundation's 2061 Anniversary and more
than $3 -MILLION charitable funds raised.
Chesapeake Bay Wine Classic Foundation was founded in 1991. The Foundation is now a
501(c)(3) non-profit organization celebrating its Twentieth year of service to the City of Virginia Beach,
as well as all Hampton Roads communities, with a primary focus of helping to educate our youth.
The activities of the Chesapeake Bay Wine Classic have brought Virginia Beach national
attention through its fund raising events, including the "Grand Auction" and "Vintner of the Year
Dinner.
Vintners and wine enthusiasts from all over the United States have come to Virginia Beach and
provided a forum for local restaurants to feature their culinary skills. The Foundation's "Grand
Tasting" held at the Virginia Beach Convention Center, educates the general public through wine and
food seminars and provides a forum for local wine distributors to showcase their specialties; and the
Foundation also sponsors a fishing tournament: "Wine, Women and Fishing" to support efforts for a
cure of breast cancer.
September 28, 2010
RESOLUTION
% E1?;EAS: the Chesapeake Bay Wine Classic Foundation was founded in 1991;
Pi gElaAS: the Foundation is now a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization cele6rating its
'Twentieth year of service to the City of Virginia Beach, as well as al- 7-fampton Roads communities,
with a primary focus of helping to educate our youth;
WJiE E)4S: the activities of the Chesapeake Bay Wine Classic have 6rought Virginia Beach
national attention through its fund raising events, including the "Grandfluction" and "Vintner of the
Tear Dinner" ;
WMEq EAS: `vintners and wine enthusiasts from all over the `United States have come to
Virginia Beach and provi&d a forum for local restaurants to feature their culinary skills. The
Foundation's "Grand Tasting" held at the Virginia Beach Convention Center, educates the general
pu6Cu through wine andfood seminars and provides a forum for local wine dutri6utors to showcase
their specialties; and,
WJFERESS: The Foundation also sponsors a fishing tournament, "Wine, Women and
Fishing" to support efforts for a cure of 6reast cancer.
NOW, 2IPEUtF'ORE, BE IT 2ZE.SOLVED, that the Virginia Beach City Council here6y
recognizes the Chesapeake Bay Wine Classic Foundation on its 20t4 Anniversary and its mem6ers for
their steadfast dedication in raising more than $3-5Million for various charitable funds as well as their
tireless efforts andpersonalsacrifices to serve theirfellow citizens, educate their children and provi fe
funding for medical -research.
Given under our hands and seals this 14th day of Septem6er, 2010.
Council Lady Rita Sweet Bethtto
Mayor 4NifEam CD. "Will" Sessoms
Item V -H.4.
WESTERN BA YSIDE SUMMER CAMPS
- 43 -
ITEM # 60300
Mayor Sessoms introduced Barbara Brinson, Youth Opportunities Coordinator, and advised Enoch
Baptist Church submitted the winning proposal in Western Bayside re the "Western Bayside Summer
Camp" which served one hundred ten (110) youth this Summer,. The partnership with Enoch has
continued to strengthen. Dr. Michael Daniels, Pastor, is leading the effort and represented Enoch Baptist
Church.
Enoch Baptist Church was awarded $60,000 via an RFP process. This benefit cannot be measured.
Not only did the children benefit, but so did the parents and the community. The parents knew the
children were in a safe environment and were comfortable knowing the children were being well cared.
In appreciation, Dr. Daniels presented a pictorial entitled "Western Bayside Community Summer Camp
2010 June 28 — August 27, 2010" to the Mayor and City Council. The booklet encompassed "Letters of
Appreciation ", Daily Camp Life, Guest Speakers, Field Trips and Parent Dinner.
Mayor Sessoms is grateful for this partnership. Attendees of the Summer Camp expressed their
appreciation to the Mayor and Members of City Council.
September 28, 2010
- 44 -
Item V -L1.
PUBLIC HEARING
ITEM # 60301
Mayor Sessoms DECLARED a PUBLIC HEARING:
LEGISLATIVE AGENDA FOR 2011 GENERAL ASSEMBLY
The following registered to speak:
Michael Norment, 4004 Atlantic Avenue (#1906), Phone: 491-4118, spoke re Paddle Boarding. This is an
opportunity for growth and prosperity. This sport has been around for a number of years and is another
way to enjoy the awesome resource the City is fortunate to have near the Atlantic Ocean, This is a major
draw to our area and allows the City to flourish, reaping financial resources. The sport of stand-up
Paddle Boarding has a huge potential to increase the revenue. Taxes on sales and use of boards have
added to the tax base in the last several years. These boards will continue to be financially beneficial for
our local economy. Visitors and residents of Virginia Beach should be allowed to enjoy the resources in a
safe manner. The City Code does not govern stand-up Paddle Boards currently. Mr. Norment received a
suggestion rather than petitioning the General Assembly, to amend the City Code to change the
"definition" of surf boards.
Glenn Stevenson, 909 Ditchley Road, Phone: 285-2169, advised there is a rift between the two camps of
Prone Surfers and Stand -Up Paddle surfing. Stand -Up Paddle Boarding is the same pursuit as surfing.
Most Paddle Boarders ride boards that are no heavier or longer than the modern version of the
traditional longboard, ridden by Prone Surfers. Surfboard leashes are worn, as required by the City, to
avoid losing the board and prevent it from washing into the shore break area. The same rules are
observed as Prone Paddlers re the times when surfing is permitted at each of the area public beaches.
There should not be a reason to discriminate between the two (2) types of surfing or require any different
regulations.
Attorney Glen Thompson, 2205 Childeric Road, Phone 490-6284, stated that because of bad knees he had
to forgo his love of surfing. In the 1980's and 1990's it was windsurfing. In 1987, the City Council voted
to outlaw wind surfing in Lynnhaven Inlet. Since 1987, there has been no further regulation of
windsurfing. There is already a wreckless use of watercraft in the State Code. Stand-up Paddle Boarding
is not really understood. Attorney Thompson advised the Paddle Boarders do not wish to be treated
separately from the Surfers.
Mike Barrett, represented Virginia Beach Vision, 212 72nd Street, Phone: 422-1560, and suggested issues
which he hoped could be included in the Legislative Package: Intergovernmental Relations — advocate
creation of a Commission to address realignment of duties and responsibilities, particularly in regard to
funding; Investment Development; Transportation; Light Rail/Mass Transit (General Assembly idents a
funding source, particularly re the passenger rail in 2013 from Harbor Park to Richmond and
Washington; as well as Defined Contributions and Benefits.
Councilman Uhrin, advised a meeting was held with the Paddle Boarding Community last Thursday to
clarify the request. The General Assembly will be requested to provide a local option which would allow
the City to have the ability to regulate the Stand-up Paddleboards as surfboards within the swimming
areas.
There being no further speakers, Mayor Sessoms CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
September 28, 2010
Item V-L2.a/b/c/d
PUBLIC HEARING
- 45 -
ITEM # 60302
Mayor Sessoms DECLARED a PUBLIC HEARING:
Personal Property Tax EXEMPTIONS:
a. Back Bay Restoration Foundation, Ltd
b. Lynnhaven River Now
c. REN Group
d. Virginia Beach Police Foundation, Inc.
There being no speakers, Mayor Sessoms CLOSED THE PUBIC HEARING.
September 28, 2010
I
- 46 -
Item V -I.3.
PUBLIC HEARING
ITEM # 60303
Mayor Sessoms DECLARED a PUBLIC HEARING:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bryne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant
There being no speakers, Mayor Sessoms CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING.
September 28, 2010
- 47 -
Item V K.
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM # 60304
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council APPROVED in ONE
MOTION Items 1 a/b/c/d, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 a/b/c, 7, 8, 9 and 10 (ADDED) of the CONSENT AGENDA.
Voting: 10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M Dyer, Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
The following Resolutions were ADDED, as Item 8, 9 and 10 of the Consent Agenda:
Resolution to DECLARE September 28, 2010 "Virginia Beach City Public Schools
Day". (5`" Best Large City Public School Division in the Nation)
Resolution RECOGNIZING Chesapeake Bay Wine Classic Foundation's 20`"
Anniversary and more than $3-M charitable funds raised
Resolution RECOGNIZING Max Bartoli and Ethan Martin for choosing Virginia Beach
for the filming of "Atlantis Down"
September 28, 2010
1
- 48 -
Itein VK.1. a/b/c/d
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM # 60305
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT:
Ordinances to EXEMPT certain organizations from Personal Property Taxes:
a. Back Bay Restoration Foundation, Ltd.
b. Lynnhaven River Now
c. REN Group
d. Virginia Beach Police Foundation, Inc.
Voting: 10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
September 28, 2010
II 1
1 AN ORDINANCE TO DESIGNATE BACK BAY
2 RESTORATION FOUNDATION, LTD. AS BEING
3 EXEMPT FROM LOCAL PERSONAL PROPERTY
4 TAXATION
5
6 WHEREAS, in accordance with § 58.1-3651 of the Code of Virginia, the Council of
7 the City of Virginia Beach has advertised and conducted a public hearing on the issue of
8 granting an exemption from local personal property taxes to Back Bay Restoration
9 Foundation, Ltd.
10
11 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
12 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
13
14 1. That the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, hereby designates Back
15 Bay Restoration Foundation, Ltd. as a charitable organization within the context of § 6(a)(6)
16 of Article X of the Constitution of Virginia.
17
18 2. That personal property owned by Back Bay Restoration Foundation, Ltd. located
19 within the City of Virginia Beach that is used exclusively for charitable purposes on a
20 nonprofit basis is hereby exempt from local property taxation.
21
22 3. This exemption is contingent on the following:
23
24 (a) continued use of the property owned by Back Bay Restoration Foundation,
25 Ltd. for exclusively charitable purposes;
26
27 (b) that each July 1, Back Bay Restoration Foundation, Ltd. shall file with the
28 Commissioner of the Revenue a copy of its most recent federal income tax
29 return, or, if no such return is required, it shall certify its continuing tax
30 exempt status to the Commissioner of the Revenue;
31
32 (c) that every three years, beginning on July 1, 2013, Back Bay Restoration
33 Foundation, Ltd. shall file an exemption application with the Commissioner of
34 the Revenue as a requirement for retention of the exempt status of the
35 property; and
36
37 (d) that Back Bay Restoration Foundation, Ltd. cooperate fully with the
38 Commissioner of the Revenue with respect to audit of its financial records,
39 compliance with the terms of this ordinance.
40
41 4. That the effective date of this exemption shall be January 1, 2011.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the 28th day of
September , 2010.
Requires an affirmative vote of three-fourths of the members of the City Council.
I
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Commission=' 4g e Revenue
CA11592
R-1
August 18, 2010
2
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY:
ENTITY NAME
Back Bay Restoration Foundation LTD
3022 New Bridge Rd
Virginia Beach, VA 23456
Website
http://www.bbr£org/
SUMMARY OF NONPROFIT BUSINESS ACTIVITY
The Back Bay Restoration Foundation, Ltd. ("BBRF") is a nonprofit organization founded in 1984 to
address the deteriorating water quality of Back Bay.
BBRF's Mission:
1. Preserving, protecting and promoting sustainability of Back Bay and its watershed through
conservation efforts and by encouraging stewardship through education, research and
communication.
2. Preservation, enhancement and improvement of the water quality and wetlands located in the
Back Bay and North Landing has become BBRF's expanded focus.
3. BBRF is dedicated to helping the residents indentify the various problems, learn about solutions
and work with each other and governmental and private agencies to improve the way we treat the
land and waterways.
4. BBRF offers a tram service, providing transportation from Little Island City Park through Back
Bay National Wildlife Refuge to False Cape State Park. The BBRF volunteer guided tram ride
program has been an enormous success, bringing regional attention to BBRF efforts and
thousands of interested people to the Refuge and State Park.
TAX IMPACT —
Business Property: Assessment: $6,839.00
Tax: $101.22
Personal Property Assessment: None
Tax
Real Property Assessment: None
Tax:
RELEVANT INFORMATION
IRS Granted 501 (c) 3 status —May 13, 1986
1 AN ORDINANCE TO DESIGNATE LYNNHAVEN
2 RIVER NOW AS BEING EXEMPT FROM LOCAL
3 PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXATION
4
5 WHEREAS, in accordance with § 58.1-3651 of the Code of Virginia, the Council of
6 the City of Virginia Beach has advertised and conducted a public hearing on the issue of
7 granting an exemption from local personal property taxes to Lynnhaven River Now.
8
9 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
10 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
11
12 1. That the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, hereby designates
13 Lynnhaven River Now as a charitable organization within the context of § 6(a)(6) of Article
14 X of the Constitution of Virginia.
15
16 2. That personal property owned by Lynnhaven River Now located within the City of
17 Virginia Beach that is used exclusively for charitable purposes on a nonprofit basis is
18 hereby exempt from local property taxation.
19
20 3. This exemption is contingent on the following:
21
22 (a) continued use of the property owned by Lynnhaven River Now for exclusively
23 charitable purposes;
24
25 (b) that each July 1, Lynnhaven River Now shall file with the Commissioner of
26 the Revenue a copy of its most recent federal income tax return, or, if no
27 such return is required, it shall certify its continuing tax exempt status to the
28 Commissioner of the Revenue;
29
30 (c) that every three years, beginning on July 1, 2013, Lynnhaven River Now
31 shall file an exemption application with the Commissioner of the Revenue as
32 a requirement for retention of the exempt status of the property; and
33
34 (d) that Lynnhaven River Now cooperate fully with the Commissioner of the
35 Revenue with respect to audit of its financial records, compliance with the
36 terms of this ordinance.
37
38 4. That the effective date of this exemption shall be January 1, 2011
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the 28th day of
September , 2010.
Requires an affirmative vote of three-fourths of the members of the City Council.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
ission- bf tfbe Revenue
CA11590
R-1
August 18, 2010
2
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY:
- • •'ney's Office
ENTITY NAME
Lynnhaven River Now
1608 Pleasure House Rd Ste 108
Virginia Beach, VA 23455
Website
http://www.lynnhavenrivemow.org/
SUMMARY OF NONPROFIT BUSINESS ACTIVITY
Lynnhaven River Now is a committed group of local citizens who came together to foster partnerships
that would apply public and private resources to the challenge of reducing pollution in the Lynnhaven
River.
They want a clean and healthy Lynnhaven River. Their objectives are:
1. Identify and reduce sources of contamination in the river; reduce nutrient, sediment and chemical
run off of our lawns, parking lots, roadways and septic systems;
Educate and engage the community and partner organizations in restoring and protecting the
Lynnhaven River; and
3. Restore lost habitats such as oyster reefs, salt marshes, and other buffers that help to filter
polluted runoff and protect the river and its marine life.
TAX IMPACT —
Business Property: Assessment: $3245.00
Tax: $48.03
Personal Property Assessment: 863.50
Tax 31.95
Real Property Assessment: None
Tax:
RELEVANT INFORMATION
IRS Granted 501 (c) 3 status —March 29, 2007
1 AN ORDINANCE TO DESIGNATE REN GROUP AS
2 BEING EXEMPT FROM LOCAL PERSONAL
3 PROPERTY TAXATION
4
5 WHEREAS, in accordance with § 58.1-3651 of the Code of Virginia, the Council of
6 the City of Virginia Beach has advertised and conducted a public hearing on the issue of
7 granting an exemption from local personal property taxes to REN Group.
8
9 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
10 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
11
12 1. That the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, hereby designates REN
13 Group as a charitable organization within the context of § 6(a)(6) of Article X of the
14 Constitution of Virginia.
15
16 2. That personal property owned by REN Group located within the City of Virginia
17 Beach that is used exclusively for charitable purposes on a nonprofit basis is hereby
18 exempt from local property taxation.
19
20 3. This exemption is contingent on the following:
21
22 (a) continued use of the property owned by REN Group for exclusively charitable
23 purposes;
24
25 (b) that each July 1, REN Group shall file with the Commissioner of the
26 Revenue a copy of its most recent federal income tax return, or, if no such
27 return is required, it shall certify its continuing tax exempt status to the
28 Commissioner of the Revenue;
29
30 (c) that every three years, beginning on July 1, 2013, REN Group shall file an
31 exemption application with the Commissioner of the Revenue as a
32 requirement for retention of the exempt status of the property; and
33
34 (d) that REN Group cooperate fully with the Commissioner of the Revenue with
35 respect to audit of its financial records, compliance with the terms of this
36 ordinance.
37
38 4. That the effective date of this exemption shall be January 1, 2011.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the 28th day of
September , 2010.
Requires an affirmative vote of three-fourths of the members of the City Council.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Commissioner - {he Revenue
CA11589
R-1
August 18, 2010
2
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY:
ENTITY NAME
REN Group Inc.
1328 Myrica Place (Office use only)
Virginia Beach, VA 23462
Website: None
SUMMARY OF NONPROFIT BUSINESS ACTIVITY
REN Group is a registered nonprofit (501-c [3]) whose purpose is to mobilize volunteers and resources to
peoples living on the Tibetan plateau for sustainable economic development and disaster relief. They
conduct leadership training through religion and economic development projects throughout Asia with a
goal to empower Tibetan families to transform their communities into vibrant, caring, communities,
healthy in every way.
The REN Group is currently managing relief and development projects in the Sichuan and Qinghai
earthquake zones of China and a series of children's emotional relief camps this summer.
In past few years the REN Group with the help of other non-government organizations, focused its
efforts to provide relief to earthquake -hit communities. While the Chinese government and army did their
part in the major areas of population, the REN Group focused on more remote and mountainous areas
with lower population density and where the elderly and lower income families were in need.
TAX IMPACT
Business Property:
Personal Property
Real Property
Assessment: $1,331.00
Tax: $19.70
Assessment: $2,175.00
Tax $80.48
None — above address is a private resident, not owned by the nonprofit.
RELEVANT INFORMATION
IRS Granted 501 (c) 3 status — May 25, 2007
1 AN ORDINANCE TO DESIGNATE VIRGINIA BEACH
2 POLICE FOUNDATION, INC. AS BEING EXEMPT
3 FROM LOCAL PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXATION
4
5 WHEREAS, in accordance with § 58.1-3651 of the Code of Virginia, the Council of
6 the City of Virginia Beach has advertised and conducted a public hearing on the issue of
7 granting an exemption from local personal property taxes to Virginia Beach Police
8 Foundation, Inc.
9
10 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
11 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
12
13 1. That the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, hereby designates
14 Virginia Beach Police Foundation, Inc. as a charitable organization within the context of §
15 6(a)(6) of Article X of the Constitution of Virginia.
16
17 2. That personal property owned by Virginia Beach Police Foundation, Inc. located
18 within the City of Virginia Beach that is used exclusively for charitable purposes on a
19 nonprofit basis is hereby exempt from local property taxation.
20
21 3. This exemption is contingent on the following:
22
23 (a) continued use of the property owned by Virginia Beach Police Foundation,
24 Inc. for exclusively charitable purposes;
25
26 (b) that each July 1, Virginia Beach Police Foundation, Inc. shall file with the
27 Commissioner of the Revenue a copy of its most recent federal income tax
28 return, or, if no such return is required, it shall certify its continuing tax
29 exempt status to the Commissioner of the Revenue;
30
31 (c) that every three years, beginning on July 1, 2013, Virginia Beach Police
32 Foundation, Inc. shall file an exemption application with the Commissioner of
33 the Revenue as a requirement for retention of the exempt status of the
34 property; and
35
36 (d) that Virginia Beach Police Foundation, Inc. cooperate fully with the
37 Commissioner of the Revenue with respect to audit of its financial records,
38 compliance with the terms of this ordinance.
39
40 4. That the effective date of this exemption shall be January 1, 2011.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the 28th day of
September , 2010.
Requires an affirmative vote of three-fourths of the members of the City Council.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Commissione he Revenue
CA11591
R-1
August 18, 2010
2
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY:
ENTITY NAME
Virginia Beach Police Foundation
2900 Einstein Dr (office use only)
Virginia Beach, VA 23456
Website
http://www.vbpolicefoundation.org/
SUMMARY OF NONPROFIT BUSINESS ACTIVITY
The Virginia Beach Police Foundation is a charitable, non-profit, private organization distinct and
separate from the Virginia Beach Police Department and the City of Virginia Beach. Its mission is:
• Provide financial assistance for the design, creation and installation of an appropriate monument
memorializing law enforcement officers who have died in the line of duty serving the City of
Virginia Beach;
• Provide financial support and other appropriate assistance to families of sworn law enforcement
officers of the City of Virginia Beach who were killed or seriously injured in the line of duty.
• Encourage citizens and businesses to contribute to the Foundation in support of the morale and
welfare of the Virginia Beach Police Department;
• Provide programs and equipment to the Virginia Beach Police Department to support and
improve the capabilities, performance and efficiency of the Department;
• Encourage public support for and an understanding of the Virginia Beach Police Department and
its members.
TAX IMPACT
There is no tax impact at this time. The volunteers within the organization use their own phone
and homes to solicit donations. The organization is registered with the Virginia Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Services to solicit donations.
Business Property: Assessment None
Tax:
Personal Property Assessment: None
Tax
Real Property Assessment: None
Tax:
RELEVANT INFORMATION
IRS Granted 501 (c) 3 status — April 23, 2009
Philip J. Kellam
Commissioner
September 14, 2010
Commissioner of the Revenue
City Hall
Virginia Beach, VA 23456-9002
The Honorable William D. Sessoms, Jr., Mayor
Members of City Council
Subject: Initial Report on Applicants for Exemption from Property Taxes
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
VBgov.com/cor
Effective January 1, 2003 the General Assembly transferred its sole authority to grant exemptions by designation
from personal and real property taxes'. The City Council accepted this authority and ordained a policy utilizing
the Community Organization Grant Committee (COG) to administer the review of applicants for tax exemption'.
On May 6, 2008 the City Council revised and re -ordained the process providing for the Commissioner of the
Revenue to review and report to City Council on such applications3.
The Commissioner's Office has received 4 applications in this reporting period. The following applicants qualify for
exemption from personal property taxes:
REN Group Inc
Lynnhaven River Now
Virginia Beach Police Foundation
Back Bay Restoration Foundation LTD
I am available if you have questions or concerns regarding the recommendations.
Since
y,
Philip J. Kella
Commissioner of the Revenue
Enclosures
Code of Virginia 58.1-3651
2 ORD -2798I
3 ORD -3009K
1
Gity Council Policy
Original Proposal
Title: City Council Policy Regarding Applications for Tax Exemption by
Designation
Date of Adoption: February 3, 2004
Dates of Revisions: May 6, 2008
Page
1 of
4
1.0 Purpose and Need
Purpose: To establish criteria for approval of resolutions by City Council to exempt, by
designation, local nonprofit organizations from real and personal property taxes.
Need City Council has requested guidance as to criteria for considering exemptions as well as a
procedure for reviewing requests for exemption from local property taxes. The Commissioner of
the Revenue has offered revisions to Council's policy adopted on February 2, 2004 in an effort
to streamline the exemption review process for local nonprofit organizations and provide
necessary analysis and oversight of the application process.
Legislative Background: The Virginia Constitution provides that, after January 1, 2003, local
governments may, by designation, exempt the real and personal property of nonprofit
organizations from local property taxes if used exclusively for religious, charitable, patriotic,
historical, benevolent, cultural, or public park and playground purposes. However, as provided
in Virginia Code § 58.1-3651, the local governing body must adopt an ordinance to exempt the
property.
2.0 Policy
The City Council is not required to designate any organization properly applying for exemption
from taxation, and every designation of an organization is conditioned upon compliance with the
terms of this policy and any ordinance granting the exemption. If an organization does not
comply with these requirements, the City Council may revoke the tax exemption after providing
notice and a hearing to the organization. Any revocation of an exemption shall be effective at the
beginning of the tax year during which the revocation occurs.
The applicant or a representative of the applicant shall provide the Commissioner of the Revenue
detailed information necessary to determine the benefits to the public that will result from
granting tax exemption. In considering applications, the Commissioner of the Revenue shall
employ the following guidelines:
Title: City Council Policy Regarding Applications for Tax Exemption by
Designation
Date of Adoption: February 3, 2004
Dates of Revisions: May 6, 2008
Page 2 .of 4
1. The organization must be exempt from federal income tax pursuant to Internal Revenue
Code § 501(c).
2. Personal or real property for which an exemption is sought cannot be used by any member
of the organization or other persons except for non-profit purposes benefiting the non-profit
organization applying for exemption.
3. The organization must be in compliance with all City ordinances and regulations (including
but not limited to building, property maintenance, and zoning codes) and all applicable tax
obligations.
4. The organization must provide a service to the residents of the City that results in a benefit to
the public (tangible or intangible).
The following requirements apply to each entity exempted from local property taxes by the City
Council:
1. Upon obtaining exemption, the organization must annually submit (by July 1 of each year)
its Internal Revenue Service Forrn 990 or 990 EZ to the Commissioner of the Revenue. If
not required to file Form 990 or 990 EZ, then the organization must annually certify on
form(s) prescribed by the Commissioner of the Revenue its continuing tax exempt status.
Loss of 501(c) status must immediately be reported to the Commissioner of the Revenue and
City Attorney, and is grounds for revocation of tax exempt status.
2. Pursuant to Virginia Code § 58.1-3605, each entity exempted from local property taxes shall,
every three years, file an exemption application with the Commissioner of the Revenue as a
requirement for retention of the exempt status of the property. The application form shall be
approved as to form by the City Attorney.
3. Each entity exempted from local property taxes must cooperate fully with the Commissioner
of the Revenue with respect to audit of its financial records, compliance with the terms of this
policy, and compliance with any ordinance granting tax exemption.
3.0 Procedure to Accomplish Policy
1. Organizations applying for exemption must request a determination from the Commissioner
of the Revenue as to whether the organization is or may be tax-exempt by classification,
pursuant to Article 2 (§58.1-3606 et seq.) or°Article 3 058.1-3609 et seq.) of Title 58.1 of the
Virginia Code. If the organization is not exempt, but meets the criteria of organizations that
can be exempted by designation (see Virginia Code §58.1-3651), the organization will receive
Title: City Council Policy Regarding Applications for Tax Exemption by
Designation
Date of Adoption: February 3, 2004
Dates of Revisions: May 6, 2008
Page 3 of 4
an application from the Commissioner of the Revenue. The application form shall request all
information required by Virginia Code §58.1-3651 and be approved as to form by the City
Attorney.
2. Applications for exemption shall be considered quarterly. Applications for exemption must
be submitted to the Commissioner of the Revenue. Applications shall be submitted no later
than October 1 of the year preceding the effective date of the exemption. Based on the
criteria set forth in section 2.0 of this policy, the Commissioner of the Revenue will review
each application and make a report to City Council regarding whether an organization
qualifies for exemption under law and City policy. The Commissioner of the Revenue will
not submit applications he deems incomplete to City Council for a determination.
3. The Commissioner of the Revenue shall forward copies of the applications along with his
written findings to the City Attorney. The City Attorney shall prepare the necessary
ordinances for City Council and coordinate with the City Clerk to ensure that the applications
are properly advertised and placed on the City Council's agenda for a public hearing and
formal consideration.
4. The City Council will conduct a public hearing and consider the criteria set forth in Virginia
Code §58.1-3651, section 2.0 of this policy, and the findings of the Commissioner of the
Revenue.
5. Any exemptions granted shall be effective as of the next January 1.
6. Exemptions, as well as any departure from these guidelines, shall require approval by three-
fourths (3/4) of the members of City Council.
4.0 Responsibility and Authority
Responsibility for initiating application for exemption and timely providing any information or
application required by the Commissioner of the Revenue shall rest with the organization seeking
exemption. Responsibility for making available information, application for exemption, verifying
submitted tax information and reporting on the initial and continuing status of the taxpayer shall
rest with the Commissioner of the Revenue.
Responsibility for preparing required ordinances, arranging for the advertising of public hearings,
and placing items on the City Council's agenda for a vote on proposed exemptions shall rest with
the City Attorney. Responsibility for the final determination of the public benefits resulting from
tax exemption shall rest exclusively with the City Council.
Tide: City Ccuncil Policy Regarding Applications for Tax Exemption by
Designation
Date of Adoption: February 3, 2004
Dates of Revisions: May 6, 2008
Page 4 of 4
5.0 Definitions
PUBLIC BENEFIT- Any benefit or advantage expected to be realized by the public, whether
tangible or intangible, which may accompany the tax exemption.
LOCAL PROPERTY TAXES- Ad valorem taxes levied by the City of Virginia Beach on real
estate or tangible personal property.
6.0 Specific Requirements
In addition to the procedures and responsibilities set forth in paragraphs 3.0 and 4.0, respectively,
documentation forwarded to the City Council shall include submission of an application form in
form and substance substantially as presented in the attached Exhibit A, as well as any additional
information that the applicant wishes to present to the City Council.
- 49 -
Item V -K.2.
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM # 60306
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT:
Ordinance to AMEND the Economic Development Investment Program
(EDIP) Policy and Procedure and AUTHORIZE the Mayor to
EXECUTE the amended Policy.
Voting: 10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
September 28, 2010
1 ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE ECONOMIC
2 DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT PROGRAM
3 ("EDIP") POLICY AND PROCEDURE
4
5 WHEREAS, on January 25, 1994, the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach
6 (the "City Council") and the City of Virginia Beach Development Authority (the
7 "Authority") approved the Economic Development Investment Program Policy and
8 Procedure (the "EDIP Policy") to ensure that the expenditure of Economic Development
9 Investment Program ("EDIP") funds is made in the public interest and is in furtherance
10 of the purposes for which the EDIP was established;
11
12 WHEREAS, on February 10, 2004, City Council and the Authority approved
13 certain amendments to the EDIP Policy;
14
15 WHEREAS; on March 21, 2006 and March 28, 2006, the Authority and City
16 Council approved additional amendments to the EDIP Policy to further the City's goals
17 to convert certain property in APZ-1 and Clear Zones area to uses that conform to the
18 APZ-1 Ordinance (the "APZ-1 Amendments");
19
20 WHEREAS, on September 21, 2010, the Authority approved further amendments
21 to the EDIP Policy to allow for reimbursement of additional expenses, to allow
22 incentives for additional job creation and to clarify the APZ-1 Amendments. Such
23 approval by the Authority is subject to City Council concurrence; and
24
25 WHEREAS, Part C, Section 6 of the EDIP Policy provides that the EDIP Policy
26 shall not be amended without the prior consent of the City Council and the Authority.
27
28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
29 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
30
31 1. That the amendments to the EDIP Policy are hereby approved in the form
32 as attached hereto as Exhibit A; and
33
34 2. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the amended EDIP Policy
35 on behalf of the City.
36
37 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the 28th
38 day of September , 2010.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Economic Development
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY.
City Attorney
i
CA11021
\\vbgov.com\DFS1 \Applications\CityLawProd\cycom32\W pdocs\D016\P008\00071334. DOC
September 20, 2010
R-1
II 1
EXHIBIT A
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
INVESTMENT PROGRAM
POLICY AND PROCEDURE
WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach Development Authority (the
"Authority") was created pursuant to Chapter 643 of the Acts of Assembly of 1964, as
amended (the "Act");
WHEREAS, one of the primary purposes of the Act is to enable
development authorities "to promote industry and develop trade by inducing
manufacturing, industrial, governmental and commercial enterprises to locate in or
remain in the Commonwealth....";
WHEREAS, pursuant to § 6 of the Act, the Authority has the power, inter
alia, "to sell, exchange, donate and convey any or all of its facilities or other properties
whether realty or personalty whenever the Authority shall find any such action to be in
furtherance of the purposes for which the Authority was organized";
WHEREAS, pursuant to §7 of the Act, "the Authority may foster and
stimulate the development of industry in the area within its jurisdiction... [and] may
accept, and expend for the purposes stated above, money from any public or private
source....";
WHEREAS, pursuant to § 10 of the Act, the City of Virginia Beach (the
"City") "is authorized and empowered to make appropriations and to provide funds for
the operation of the Authority and to further its purposes";
WHEREAS, the economic development goals and objectives of the City
include achieving a higher ratio of nonresidential to residential real estate assessments,
investing in land and infrastructure to benefit future economic growth, and maximizing
the return of economic development efforts through the development and implementation
of programs and strategies that facilitate new business investment and encourage
retention and expansion activities thereby improving the overall quality of life in the
City;
WHEREAS, other than JEB Little Creek Fort Story, NAS Oceana is the
single largest employer in the City is NAS Oceana, and investments and economic
development efforts aimed at retaining NAS Oceana as a master jet base are critical to the
City's economic "health";
WHEREAS, the City has established the Economic Development
Investment Program ("EDIP") as part of its overall effort to enhance the City's ability to
accomplish these goals and objectives;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority and empowerment set forth in ' 10 of
the Act, City Council has determined that it would be in the best interests of the City to
provide EDIP appropriations to the Authority to enable the Authority to more effectively
continue its efforts to foster and stimulate economic development by (i) inducing
businesses to locate or remain in the City; and (ii) providing incentives to qualifying
developers and_property owners for the development or redevelopment of under
improved or underdeveloped properties, or brownfields, grey fields, or abandoned or
blighted properties in areas of the City which have been designated as "Strategic Growth
Areas"". "Special Economic Growth Areas" or "Economic Redevelopment Areas",
including infill development within such areas; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Authority have agreed that the provision of
funds in the EDIP account to the Authority for economic development purposes, and the
subsequent provision of such funds by the Authority to qualifying recipients, should be
subject to policies and procedures which will ensure that the expenditure of such funds is
in the public interest and is in furtherance of the purposes for which the EDIP was
established;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Virginia Beach and the City of Virginia
Beach Development Authority hereby adopt the following Economic Development
Investment Program Policy and Procedures (the "Policy"):
PART A: POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR THE PROVISION OF EDIP FUNDS
TO QUALIFYING BUSINESSES.
1. PURPOSE AND INTENT. The animating purpose of Part A of
the Economic Development Investment Program shall be to enhance the ability of the
City of Virginia Beach Development Authority to foster and stimulate economic
development in the City by inducing new businesses to locate in the City, and existing
businesses to remain in the City or to expand their operations.
2. INVESTMENT CRITERIA. Except as otherwise provided in
paragraph 4 of this Part A, EDIP funds may be awarded pursuant to Part A of this Policy
where the Director of Economic Development (the "Director") has determined, and has
advised the Authority that one or more of the following criteria have been met:
a. The net amount of direct tax revenues returned to the City by a
business to which EDIP funds are provided will exceed the amount
of EDIP funds so provided no later than thirty (30 -six (30) months
from the date on which the business commences operations at a new
or renovated facility;
b. For every one dollar ($1) in EDIP funds provided, the business to
which such funds are provided will spend twenty-five dollars ($25)
or more in new capital investment, including buildings, furnishings,
and/or equipment; and/or
c. Every one thousand dollars ($1,000) in EDIP funds provided will
yield at least one (1) new "full-time equivalent" employment
opportunity in the business to which such funds are provided.
However, for businesses paying an average annual s
(excluding benefits) the criteria shall he However. (i) up to two
thousand dollars ($2,000) in EDIP funds provided will yield at least
one (1)shall be available for businesses who create new "full -_time
equivalent" employment opportunityopportunities in the business for
which such funds are provided, where such employment
opportunities pay an average of S35,001 to $50,000, excluding
benefits, (ii) up to three thousand dollars ($3.000) shall be available
for businesses who create "full time equivalent" employment
opportunities in the businesses for which such funds are provided
where such emplovment opportunities pay an average of 550.001 to
$75.000, excluding benefits, and (iii) up to four thousand dollars
($4.000) shall be available for businesses wbo create "full time
equivalent" employment opportunities in the businesses for which
such funds are provided. where such employment opportunities pay
an average of over $75,001, excluding benefits. For new FTE
employment opportunities paying an average up to $35,000 the
business must demonstrate associated workforce development
training costs. For any job to qualify for an award_ that position must
be filled for at least one year.
I*
These criteria shall be reviewed by the Director and the Director of the
Department of Management Services on a bi-annual basis. The Director shall
recommend any appropriate revisions to the City Council and the Authority for further
consideration and action.
3
In addition to the foregoing criteria, it is the goal of the Authority to
approve EDIP funds to businesses that pay an average annual salary of $35,000
(excluding benefits). However, the Authority reserves the right to deviate from this goal
in exceptional cases and for good cause shown.
3. APPLICATION FOR EDIP AWARD. A business who desires
EDIP funds to locate, relocate or expand its business in the City of Virginia Beach may
make application for that purpose through the Department of Economic Development.
The applicant shall submit such information and documentation concerning its
application as may be required by the Director. The Director shall review the application
and information submitted and may, if the Director finds that the application meets the
requirement of this Part A, recommend to the Authority that it award EDIP funds to the
business.
4. COUNCIL APPROVAL OF CERTAIN EDIP AWARDS. If the
Director, acting on behalf of the Authority, determines the need to provide EDIP funds to
a specific business, but the criteria set forth in paragraph 2 of this Part A have not been
met, the Authority shall obtain specific approval from City Council prior to its approval
of the provision of EDIP funds for such purpose.
5. AUTHORITY FINDINGS AND ACTION. Based upon the
recommendation of the Director, the Authority shall either approve or disapprove the
proposed provision of EDIP funds to the business. The Authority shall not be required to
approve the Director's recommendation, but shall exercise its legislative discretion in
determining whether, and to what extent, the application satisfies Part A of this Policy
and the Authority's objective of fostering and stimulating the development of industry in
the_City. Provided, however, that prior to approval, the Authority must make the
following findings:
a. That the animating purpose of the proposed provision of EDIP
funds to the business is to serve the public purpose of fostering and
stimulating economic development in the City of Virginia Beach,
and that the expenditure of such funds will only incidentally enure to
the benefit of private interests, if at all;
b. That the proposed provision of EDIP funds to the business is in
furtherance of the purposes for which the Authority was created:
4
c. That without the stimulus of the EDIP award, it is unlikely that
the business would locate or remain in the City; and
d. That as of the date of approval of the EDIP award, the business _
had not yet commenced construction of the proposed improvements.
6. APPROVAL OF AWARD OF EDIP FUNDS. Approval by the
Authority of the provision of EDIP funds to a specific business pursuant to this Part A
shall be in the form of a resolution which shall include the following information:
a. The name, location, and nature of the business to which the funds
will be provided;
b. The amount of funds that will be provided;
c. The purpose or purposes for which the funds will be provided;
d. A statement that the criteria set forth in paragraph 2 of this Part A
have been met; or, in the alternative, that City Council has
specifically approved provision of EDIP funds for such purpose
pursuant to paragraph 4 of this Part A; and
e. A statement that the findings set forth in paragraph 5 of this Part
A have been made by the Authority.
PART B: POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR THE PROVISION OF EDIP FUNDS
TO QUALIFYING DEVELOPERS AND PROPERTY OWNERS FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OR REDEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTIES IN STRATEGIC
GROWTH AREAS, SPECIAL ECONOMIC GROWTH AREAS OR ECONOMIC
REDEVELOPMENT AREAS.
1. PURPOSE AND INTENT. It is recognized that within the City
there are areas that are currently brownfields, greyfields or vacant, abandoned, under
improved or underdeveloped with improvements or land uses which are not
economically viable or, in APZ 1 and Clear Zones, not advancing the City's purpose of
retaining NAS Oceana as a master jet base in Virginia Beach, but, if developed. but. if
developed, should stimulate industry and economic development within the City.
Moreover, such properties and areas, if developed or redeveloped, may reasonably be
5
expected to (i) generate additional tax revenue as a result of capital investment; (ii) create
additional job opportunities; (iii) influence similar redevelopment and additional
investment in nearby properties;(iv) further the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and be
consistent with the City's Economic Development Strategy and good zoning principles;
(v ' . Z 1 and Clear Zone areas, encoara ersicn of property that does
Oce-ctobe
Or
20, 2005 (the APZ 1 Ordija.'e-e41)–to-uses that do conform to the APZ 1
outsi tlh – 'Z 1 and Clear Zones and tl-loe-at-o conform
and (v) lead to the establishment of safe and convenient
neighborhoods and workplaces. Accordingly, it is the animating purpose of the
Economic Development Investment Program under Part B of this Policy to enhance the
ability of the City of Virginia Beach Development Authority to foster and stimulate
economic development in the City by providing incentives for the development or
redevelopment of properties described herein.
2. ECONOMIC REDEVELOPMENT AREAS, SPECIAL
ECONOMIC GROWTH AREAS AND STRATEGIC GROWTH AREAS. The
Directors of the Departments of Economic Development and Planning shall identify areas
of the City (i) that are currently brownfields, greyfields, or vacant, abandoned, under
improved or underdeveloped, or that are in the areas of the City designated as APZ 1 or
Clear Zones, and (ii) which should be considered for redevelopment or special
development opportunities, but may lie outside of the Strategic Growth Areas as set forth
in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Such areas shall be known as "Economic
Redevelopment Areas". Once identified, an Economic Redevelopment Area must be
submitted to the City Council for designation as such by ordinance. To qualify for EDIP
funds under Part B of this Policy, a developer or owner of property must demonstrate that
the subject property is located within a Special Economic Growth Area or Strategic
Growth Area which has been designated as such in the Comprehensive Plan or has been
designated an Economic Redevelopment Area as defined herein by ordinance of the City
Council. For purposes of this Policy, the term "brownfields" means vacant, abandoned or
under improved real property large enough to support significant expansion,
redevelopment or reuse, but for which such expansion, redevelopment or reuse is
complicated by the presence of a substantial amount of hazardous substances, pollutants,
or contamination. The term "greyfields" means underperforming, declining or vacant
real estate.
6
3. QUALIFYING LAND USES. EDIP funds under Part B of this
Policy may be provided for office, industrial, retail, hotel and mixed use development
(including high density and multi -family residential uses). Notwithstanding the
fry e ing EDIP fi.iuds under Part 13- of this policy for
tl=r
the APZ 1 Ordina-nc and anv
eats there+
4. INVESTMENT CRITERIA.
(a) For Economic Re went Areas not located in : APZ 1 or Clear
nes, EDIP funds may be awarded pursuant to Part B of this Policy in such instances
where the Director has determined, and has advised the Authority, that both of the
following criteria have been met:
i. The net amount of direct tax revenues returned to the City as
a result of the development or redevelopment for which the EDIP funds are provided will
exceed the amount of the EDIP funds provided no later than 48 months following the
payment of the EDIP award; or where flexibility for tax abatement has been granted by
the City, the amount of direct tax revenues not abated as a result of the development or
redevelopment for which EDIP funds are provided will exceed the amount of the EDIP
funds provided no later than 48 months following the payment of the EDIP award; and
ii. For every one dollar ($1) in EDIP funds provided, the owner
or developer of the development or redevelopment for which such funds are provided
will spend twelve and 50/100 dollars ($12.50) or more in new capital investment,
including buildings, furnishings, and/or equipment.
(b) For Economic Redevelopment Areas located in the APZ 1 or Clear
L. es EDIP funds n - ant to Part B of this Policy in such instances
D-irector, t 7at the-levelopmein, or redevelopni
Audi- g bringing netes into APZ 1 an o a4-eonform to the-APZ 1
Ordinance, L. onverting nonconforming uses to conforming uses, retaining conforming
trues in -A -PZ 1 and—g-ear Zones. an -c locating nonconforming uses in APZ 1 and Cle--a--
Zones to other areas of the City AAvhe-rc such uses would be consistent with the
A:
C-T
onfornhIty COmmittee.
-441-P funds will be provided
7
The foregoing investment criteria and required return to the City shall be
interpreted as being a threshold for consideration for the award of EDIP funds. No award
of such funds may be made unless all other requirements of Part B of this Policy are
satisfied and all findings stated in Part B of this Policy are made. The Authority shall
have complete discretion as to the award of funds and the amount of funds awarded, as
well as whether or not the criteria have been met.
5. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS.
(a}5. EDIP funds may be authorized for use pursuant to Part B of this
Policy only to the extent that they have been appropriated by the City Council. Further,
provided that in any given fiscal year, the Authority shall not award more than fifty
percent (50%) of its appropriation for EDIP use for that year for development or
redevelopment purposes pursuant to Part B of this Policy without authorization of the
City Council.
anticipated that such funds for EDIP use in APZ 1 and Clear Zone areas will he made
a-'ailable from CIP 9.060 (Oceana and lnte fae -lity Traffic Area Conformity and
6. APPLICATION FOR EDIP AWARD. A qualifying developer or
owner of land who desires EDIP funds for use in the development or redevelopment of
property located in a Strategic Growth Area. Special Economic Growth Area or an
Economic Redevelopment Area may make application for that purpose through the
Department of Economic Development. The applicant shall submit such information and
documentation concerning its application as may be required by the Director. The
Director shall review the application and information submitted and may, if the Director
finds that the development or redevelopment of the property described in the application
satisfies all requirements of this Part B, recommend to the Authority that it award EDIP
funds to the applicant. In determining whether to recommend that EDIP funds be
awarded to an applicant, the Director shall find as follows:
a. Whether the provision of EDIP funds is necessary to stimulate the
8
b. Whether the development or redevelopment satisfies the
investment criteria set
forth in paragraph 4 of this Part B.
Additionally, the Director may consider the following:
c. The amount of EDIP funds remaining and available for use
pursuant to this Policy
for the fiscal year.
d. The economic return to the City generated by the development or
this Part B .
e. The expertise and experience of the developer or property owner
improved and underdeveloped properties.
f. The degree to which the -redevelopment may influence
development or
redevelopment within the Special Economic
Growth Area, Strategic Growth Area or the Economic
Redevelopment Area and adjacent or nearby properties.
g.
serve
furthers
The extent to which the development or redevelopment may
to implement a change in use which is consistent with and,`or
the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, the City' s Economic
serve to implement a change in use which is consistent with
and/or furthers the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. the City's
Economic Development Strategy.
h. The number and types of jobs which the development or
i. i -The amount of the applicant's capital investment in the
development or
redevelopment of the property.
j. The extent to which the plan of development or redevelopment
7. AUTHORITY FINDINGS AND ACTION. Based upon the
recommendation of the Director, the Authority shall either approve or disapprove the
award of EDIP funds to the applicant. The Authority may attach conditions to the
9
approval of the award of EDIP funds. In the case of a brownfield property, the Authority
shall attach the condition that prior to receiving EDIP funds, the recipient of EDIP funds
shall provide to the Authority evidence of all permits or approvals as required by state,
federal and local regulatory agencies and compliance therewith. The Authority shall not
be required to approve the Director's recommendation, but shall exercise its legislative
discretion in determining whether, and to what extent, the applicant's proposed
development or redevelopment satisfies Part B of this Policy and the Authority's
objective of fostering and stimulating the development of industry in the City, includ-in€.„
the–re nt-i-o;n— f NAS 0—an—a--as a master jet bay., Provided, however, that prior to
approval of the award of EDIP funds to an applicant, the Authority must make the
following findings:
a. That the animating purpose of the proposed provision of EDIP
funds to the applicant is to serve the public purpose of fostering
and stimulating economic development in the City of Virginia
Beach,
Kase, and that the expenditure of such funds will only incidentally
enure to the benefit of private interests, if at all;
b. That the proposed provision of EDIP funds to the applicant is in
furtherance of the purposes for which the Authority was created;
c. That without the stimulus of the EDIP award, it is unlikely that the
property would be developed or redeveloped to the extent
proposed, or at the current time;
d. That as of the date of approval of the EDIP award, the applicant
had not yet commenced construction of the proposed development
or redevelopment;
e. That the property has been designated (or is in an area which has
been designated) as a Special Economic Growth Area or Strategic
Growth Area by the Comprehensive Plan or an Economic
Redevelopment Area by ordinance of the City Council;
f. That the proposed development is consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan, and the City's Economic Development
Strategy and the APZ 1 Ordinance, as amended; and
10
II I
g. That the scope and quality of the plan of development or
redevelopment as proposed, will serve to influence redevelopment
and additional capital investment in adjacent or nearby properties
will foster the retention of NAS
Oceana as a ni-a-iter jet base.
8. APPROVAL OF THE AWARD OF EDIP FUNDS. Approval by
the Authority of the provision of EDIP funds pursuant to this Part B shall be in the fonn
of a resolution which shall include the following information:
a. The naive of the owner or developer of the property, and the
location and a brief description of the development or
redevelopment;
b. The amount of funds that will be provided;
c. The purpose or purposes for which the funds are to be provided;
d. A statement that the criteria set forth in paragraph 4 of this Part B
have been met;
e. A statement that the findings set forth in paragraph 7 of this Part
B have been made by the Authority; and
f. Any conditions to the approval of the award of the EDIP funds by
the Authority.
9. ALTERNATIVE USES OF PART B FUNDS BY THE
AUTHORITY TO PURCHASE AND IMPROVE PROPERTY IN A STRATEGIC
GROWTH AREA, SPECIAL ECONOMIC GROWTH AREA OR AN
ECONOMIC REDEVELOPMENT AREA. The Authority may use EDIP Funds to
purchase and improve property within a Special Economic Growth Area. a Strategic
Growth Area or an Economic Redevelopment Area. Prior to the approval of the use of
EDIP funds for such acquisition, the Authority must find that:
a. The property is located within a Special Economic Growth Area, a
Strategic Growth Area or an Economic Redevelopment Area; and
b. The acquisition and/or improvement of the property by the
Authority and its subsequent development or redevelopment will
11
be in conformity with and/or furthers the goals of the City's
Comprehensive Plan, the City's Economic Development Strategy,
the APZ-1 Ordinance, as amended, and Part B of this Policy.
In addition to any property purchased using EDIP funds pursuant to
paragraph 9 of this Part B, the Authority may also use EDIP funds for the following
improvements to such property: (i) the installation of infrastructure; (ii) the demolition of
existing structures; or (iii) the remediation or cleanup of adverse environmental
conditions. The Authority may dispose of such property in accordance with state law and
may subsequently sell such property to a private party for development or redevelopment.
In the event of such sale, the Authority shall attach appropriate conditions to assure that
the development or redevelopment is in conformity with and/or furthers the goals of the
City's Comprehensive Plan, the City's Economic Development Strategy, the APZ-1
Ordinance, as amended, and is in furtherance of the objectives of Part B of this Policy.
The proceeds of any property purchased by the Authority and sold
pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Part B shall be returned to the EDIP fund account.
PART C: POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR THE PROVISION OF EDLP FUNDS
TO QUALIFYING DEVELOPERS AND PROPERTY OWNERS FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OR REDEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTIES IN APZ-1 OR THE
CLEAR ZONES.
1. PURPOSE AND INTENT. It is recognized that within the City
there are areas that are not advancing the City's purpose of retaining. NAS Oceana as a
master jet base in Virginia Beach, but, if developed with conforming uses, should.
stimulate industry and economic development within the City. Moreover, such properties
and areas. if developed or redeveloped, may reasonably be expected to (i) generate
additional tax revenue as a result of capital investment; (ii) influence similar
redevelopment and additional investment in nearby properties;(iii) further the goals of the
Comprehensive Plan and be consistent with the City's Economic Development Strategy
and asood zoning principles; (iv) in the .:A -PZ -1 and Clear Zone areas, encourage the
conversion of property that does not. conform to the City's zoning amendments adopted
in response to the BRAC Order on December 20, 2005 (the "APZ-1 Ordinance") to uses
that do conform to the APZ-1 Ordinance. including the relocation of nonconforming
properties to areas of the City outside the APZ-i and Clear Zones and the location of
conforminC1 properties within the APZ-l: and (v) lead to the establishment of safe and
convenient neighborhoods and workplaces. Accordingly, it is the animating Purpose of
the Economic Development Investment Program under Part C of this Policy to enhance
the ability of the City of Virginia Beach Development Authority to foster and stimulate
12
economic development in the APZ- by providing incentives for the development or
redevelopment of properties as described herein.
2. &PZ -1 AND THE CLEAR ZONES. The term "APZ-1" means
Accident Potential Zone 1 and the areas identified as APZ-1 on the 1999 "Air
installations Compatible Use Zones" ("AICUZ") pamphlet published by the U.S.
Department of the Navv. 'Ihe term "Clear Zones" are those areas designated as "Clear
Zones" on the 1999 A.ICITZ pamphlet
3. QUALIFYING LAND USES. EDIP funds under Part C of this
Policy may be provided only for uses consistent with the APZ-1 Ordinance and any
amendments thereto.
4. INVESTMENT CRITERIA.
(a) For Areas located in the APZ-1 or Clear Zones, EDIP funds may be
awarded pursuant to Part C of this Policy in such instances where the Oceana Land Use
Conformity Committee has determined, and has advised the Director. that the
development or redevelopment for which EDIP funds will be provided will have the
effect of furthering the goals of the Ocean.a Land Use Conformity Program. including
bringing new uses into APZ-i areas that conform to the APZ-1 Ordinance, converting
nonconforming uses to conforming uses, retaining conforming uses in APZ-1, and
relocating 'nonconforming uses in APZ-1 and Clear Zones to other areas of the City
where such uses would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the City Zoning
Ordinance. The Director shall advise the Authority of all determinations and
recommendations made by the Oceana Land Use Conformity Committee ("01...UCC").
(b) In determining the amount of the award recommended to OLUCC.
the Director shall determine whether both the following criteria have been met:
(i) The net amount of direct tax revenues returned to the City as a
result of the development or redevelopment for which the EDIP funds are provided will
exceed the amount of the EDIP funds provided no later than 48 months following the
Nyment of the EDIP award; or where flexibility for tax abatement has been granted by
the City, the amount of direct tax revenues not abated as a result of the development or
redevelopment for which .EDIP funds are provided will exceed the amount of the EDIP
funds provided no later than 48 months following the payment of the EDIP award; and/or
(ii) For every one dollar ($1) in EDIP funds provided, the owner or
developer of the development or redevelopment for which such funds are provided will
13
II I
spend ten and 50/100 dollars ($10.50) or more in new capital investment, including
buildings, furnishings, and/or equipment.
The foregoing investment criteria and required return to the City shall be
interpreted as being a threshold for consideration for the award of EMI) funds. No award
of such funds ma be made unless all other requirements of Part C of this Policy are
satisfied and all findings stated in Part C of this Policy are made. The Authority shall
have complete discretion as to the award of funds and the amount of funds awarded, as
well as whether or not the criteria have been met.
5. ADDITIONAL USES OF FUNDS UNDER PART C. A
oalifying owner of land located in APZ-1 or the Clear Zones who desires to (i) move a
nonconforming use of that land out of APZ-1 or the Clear Zones and into another part of
the City where the use is compatible and (ii) if owner retains ownership of the subject
land, agrees to restrict the further use of that land to uses compatible with those allowed
in the APZ-1 Ordinance. shall be entitled to apply for an award of up to $75,000 to offset
actual moving expenses incurred in moving the said nonconforming use out of APZ-i or
the Clear Zones.
6. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS. The City Council specifically
appropriates funds for ED1P use in APZ-1 and Clear Zone areas, It is anticipated that
such funds for EDIP use in APZ-1 and Clear Zone areas will be made available from
C1P-9.060 (Oceana and Interfacility Traffic Area Conformity and Acquisition).
7. APPLICATION FOR EDIP AWARD. A qualifying developer or
owner of land who desires EDIP funds for use in the development or redevelopment of
IKoperty located in APZ-1 or the Clear Zones may make application for that purpose
through the Department of Economic Development. The applicant shall submit such
information and documentation concerning its application as may be required by the
Director. The Director shall review the application and information submitted and may.
if the Director finds that the development or redevelopment of the property described in
the application satisfies all requirements of this Part C, recommend to the Authority that
it award EDIP funds to the applicant. In determining whether to recommend that EDIP
funds be awarded to an applicant. the Director shall find as follows:
a. Whether the provision of EDIP funds is necessary to stimulate the
development or redevelopment of the property/areai, and
b. Whether the development or redevelopment satisfies the
investment criteria set forth in paragraph 4 of this Part C.
14
c. Whether the development or redevelopment is consistent with the
APZ-1 Ordinance.
Additionally, the Director may consider the following,:
d. The amount of EDIP funds remaining and available for use
pursuant to this Policy for the fiscal year.
e. The economic return to the City generated by the development or
this Part C.
f. The expertise and experience of the developer or property owner
in redeveloping brownfields, greyfields, abandoned, blighted,
under improved and underdeveloped properties.
g. The degree to which the redevelopment may influence
compatible development or redevelopment within the APZ-1 and
development of adjacent or nearby properties.
h. The extent to which the development or redevelopment may
serve to implement a change in use which is consistent with
and/or furthers the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, the City's
Economic Development Strategy, and the APZ-i Ordinance, as
amended.
i. The amount of the applicant's capital investment in the
development or redevelopment of the property.
j. The value of moving a use of property that is inconsistent with the
APZ-1 Ordinance out of the APZ-1 or the Clear Zones.
8. AUTHORITY FINDINGS AND ACTION. Based upon the
recommendation of the Director, the Authority shall either approve or disapprove the
award of EDIP funds to the applicant. The Authority may attach conditions to the
approval of the award of EDIP funds. The Authority shall not be required to approve the
Director's recommendation. but shall exercise its legislative discretion in determining
whether. and to what extent, the applicant's proposed development or redevelopment
satisfies Part C of this Policy and the Authority's oftective of fosterinc, and stimulatin_
15
the development of industry in the City, including the retention of NAS Oceana as a
master jet base. Provided, however, that prior to approval of the award of EDIP funds to
an applicant, the Authority must make the following findings:
a. That the animating purpose of the proposed provision of EDIP
funds to the applicant is to serve the public purpose of fostering
and stimulating economic development in the City of Virginia
Beach, including the retention of NAS Oceana as a master jet
base, and that the expenditure of such funds will only incidentally
enure to the benefit of private interests, if at all;
b. That the proposed provision of EDIP funds to the applicant is in
furtherance of the purposes for which the Authority was created;
c. That without the stimulus of the EDIP award, it is unlikely that the
property would be developed or redeveloped to the extent
proposed. or at the current time;
d. That as of the date of application for the EDIP award, the
applicant had not yet commenced construction of the proposed
development or redevelopment;
e. That the property is in APZ-1 or the Clear Zones;
f. That the proposed development is consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan. the City's Economic :Development Strategy
and the APZ-1 Ordinance, as amended;
g. That the scope and quality of the plan of development or
redevelopment as proposed, will serve to influence redevelopment
and additional capital investment in adjacent or nearby properties
or. in APZ-1 and Clear Zones, will foster the retention of NAS
Oceana as a master jet base; and
h. The Oceana Land Use Conformity Committee has endorsed in
writing the award of EDIP funds as proposed by the Authority
9. APPROVAL OF THE AWARD OF EDIP FUNDS. Approval by
the Authority of the provision of EDIP funds pursuant to this Part C shall be in the form
of a resolution which shall include the following information:
16
a. The name of the owner or developer of the property, and the
location and a brief description of the development or
redevelopment;
b. The amount of funds that will be provided;
c. The purpose or purposes for which the funds are to be provided;
d..A statement that the criteria set forth in paragraph 4 of this Part C
have been met;
e. A statement that the findings set forth in paragraph 8 of this Part
C have been made by the Authority; and
f. Any conditions to the approval of the award of the EDLP funds by
the Authority.
10. ALTERNATIVE USES OF PART C FUNDS BY THE
AUTHORITY TO RETAIN A REAL ESTATE BROKER. The Authority may use
ED1P funds to retain a licensed real estate broker to sell property located in APZ-1 or the
Clear Zones and owned by the Authority or the City. The Authority is authorized to pay
a commission to that broker in an amount not to exceed the following:
Sale Price Cumulative Commission Rate
$ 0 - $500,000 5%
5500.001 - $1,000.000 3%
1,000,001 and up 2%
PART D: GENERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO BOTH PARTS A AND �B
AND C.
1. SEPARATE ACCOUNT FOR EDIP FUNDS. EDIP funds shall
be maintained by the Authority in a separate account and shall not be commingled with
other Authority funds.
2. EDIP FUND EXPENDITURES. All expenditures of EDIP funds
shall be in keeping with this Policy and may enure only incidentally to the benefit of
1 private interests. In addition to the use of EDIP funds pursuant to Parts A, and B or C of
this Policy, EDIP funds may also be utilized to conduct appraisals, financial and market
studies, and architectural and engineering studies directly related to specific economic
17
development initiatives and/or projects being conducted by the Authority on behalf of the
City.
3. PAYMENT OF EDIP FUNDS. When EDIP funds are awarded
pursuant to either Part A or Part B this Policy, they shall be paid to the authorized
business or the owner or developer at such time as the Director shall (i) obtain copies of
invoices/receipts from the business, or owner or developer showing the actual costs
incurred for the purpose or purposes for which the funds are to be provided; (ii)
determine that the development or redevelopment is in conformity with the plan of
development presented to the Authority and with all conditions which may have been
attached to the approval of the award of the funds by the Authority; and (iii) where
required by the Authority, the business, or owner or developer shall execute and deliver
to the Authority an EDIP Recapture Agreement in a form acceptable to counsel for the
Authority.
4. SPECIFIC PURPOSES FOR THE USE OF EDIP FUNDS. When
EDIP funds are awarded to an applicant pursuant to this Policy, such funds shall be used
only_for the following purposes set forth in § 2.2 115( C ) of the Code of Virginia.
Th. se purposes are as follows::
a. Public and private utility extension or capacity development
on and off -_site; road.
b. Road, rail, or other transportation access costs beyond the
funding capability of existing programs; training costs;_
c. Public and private installation, extension or capacity
development of high-speed of broadband Internet access.
whether on or off site.
d. Site acquisition; grading_
e. Grading, drainage, paving, and any other activity required to
prepare a site for construction; construction.
f. Construction or build -out of publicly or privately owned
buildings; or anything else permitted_
2. Training costs
18
h. Purchase and installation of tangible business property,
located in the City of Virginia Beach, in the following
categories:
• Machinery and Tools
• Tangible personal property used for research and
development
• Computer hardware used by l-aw:businesses primarily
engaged in providing data processing services to other
nonrelated or affiliated businesses
• Programmable computer equipment and peripherals
employed in a trade or business (not individual
workstations)
• Tangible personal property used in the provision of
Lnternet services
• Equipment used primarily for research, development,
production or provision of biotechnology for the
purpose of providing products or processes for specific
commercial or public purposes
• Tangible property designed and used primarily for the
purpose of manufacturing a product from renewable
energy
5. REPORTING. The Authority shall provide City Council semi
annual reports, on or before June 30 and. December 31 of each year, outlining, in detail,
the manner in which the funds were provided. Such reports shall include, at a minimum,
the information required by subsections a, b, and c of paragraph 6 of Part A, subsections
a, b, and c of paragraph 8 of PaftParts B and C, and information demonstrating
compliance with the provisions of this Policy and Procedure.
6. AMENDMENTS TO POLICY. The provisions of this Policy shall
not be amended without the prior consent and approval of the City Council and the
Authority.
7. APPLICATION OF POLICY. This Policy is specifically
applicable to the expenditure of EDIP funds. This Policy is not intended to be, nor shall
it be deemed to be, applicable to the use of public funds from any source other than the
EDIP.
8. EFFECTIVE DATE OF POLICY. This Policy shall become
effective immediately upon its approval by the City of Virginia Beach and the City of
19
Virginia Beach Development Authority, which approval shall be evidenced by signature
of the Mayor of the City of Virginia Beach and the Chair of the City of Virginia Beach
Development Authority acting by, and on behalf of, the City and the Authority,
respectively.
Mayor, City of Virginia Beach
Chair, City of Virginia Beach
Development Authority
7D-EVALTH`.EDirED1P 2006 Policy & P nt.DOC
20
- 50 -
Item V -K.3.
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM # 60307
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT:
Ordinance to AUTHORIZE the City Manager to EXECUTE a Mutual
Aid Agreement for Emergency Fire and Emergency Medical Services
with Currituck County, North Carolina.
Voting: 10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
September 28, 2010
1 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
2 EXECUTE A MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT FOR
3 EMERGENCY FIRE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL
4 SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
5 AND CURRITUCK COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
6
7
8 WHEREAS, Code of Virginia Section 27-2 authorizes local governments to enter
9 into mutual aid agreements for emergency fire and emergency medical services with
10 adjoining counties outside the Commonwealth;
11
12 WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach and Currituck County, North Carolina
13 maintain equipment and personnel for emergency fire and emergency medical response
14 within their respective jurisdictions, as well as, for the protection of adjacent
15 communities in other jurisdictions;
16
17 WHEREAS, the proximity of the Virginia Beach Emergency Medical Services and
18 the Virginia Beach Fire Department makes it the appropriate primary responder to the
19 Gibbs Woods area of Currituck County, and the location of the Currituck County
20 Emergency Medical Services and Fire Department makes it the appropriate primary
21 responder to the Knotts Island area of Virginia Beach;
22
23 WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach and Currituck County are each cognizant
24 of the benefits they will derive from a mutual aid agreement for emergency medical
25 services assistance; and
26
27 WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach and Currituck County desire to
28 memorialize their relationship and their respective responsibility as they relate to the
29 providing of emergency medical services assistance in a Mutual Aid Agreement (the
30 "Agreement").
31
32 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
33 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
34
35 1. That the Mutual Aid Agreement for emergency medical services (the
36 "Agreement") is hereby approved.
37 2. That the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
38 Agreement on behalf of the City of Virginia Beach in accordance with the Summary of
39 Terms attached hereto.
40
41 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the 28th day
42 of September , 2010.
I
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Emergency Medical Services
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
<i a,
Fire Department
CA10246
R-1
September 1, 2010
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY:
AGREEMENT FOR MUTUAL AID EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
ASSISTANCEBETWEEN THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VA AND
CURRITUCK COUNTY, NC
SUMMARY OF TERMS
PARTIES: City of Virginia Beach (the "City")
Currituck County, NC ("Currituck")
PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT: To augment emergency response availability in the
Gibbs Woods or Knotts Island area of Currituck County/Virginia Beach and the area of
Virginia Beach south of Indian River Road and North Landing Road to Muddy Creek and
Back Bay to the North Carolina border.
TERM OF AGREEMENT: From date of execution until terminated by either
party with 30 days written notice.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF CURRITUCK:
• Shall be primary responder for emergency medical services ("EMS") for Virginia
Beach area of Knotts Island.
• Shall be secondary responder for EMS for rural area of Virginia Beach south of
Indian River Road from North Landing to Muddy Creek and Back Bay extending
to the North Carolina border.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY:
• Shall be primary responder for emergency fire and medical calls for service to the
Currituck County area of Gibbs Woods
• Shall be secondary responder for emergency fire and medical calls for service to
Currituck County area of Knotts Island.
SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Billing: Currituck shall bill the City for service calls by invoice. The City
shall invoice Currituck annually in an amount equal to the total of
all invoices received from Currituck during the year to achieve a
zero balance.
Insurance: Each party shall be responsible for meeting any insurance
requirements.
Liability: Each party agrees to hold the other harmless. Virginia Code § 27-
2 expressly states that the parties must indemnify each other.
- 51 -
Item V -K.4.
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM # 60308
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT:
Resolution to DIRECT the City Auditor to conduct an audit of the
Procurement Card Program.
Voting: 10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M Dyer, Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
September 28, 2010
11
REQUESTED BY COUNCILMEMBER WOOD
1 A RESOLUTION DIRECTING THE CITY AUDITOR TO
2 CONDUCT AN AUDIT OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
3 PROCUREMENT CARD PROGRAM
4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,
5 VIRGINIA:
6 1. That, pursuant to City Code 2-470, the City Auditor is hereby directed to conduct
7 an audit of the City of Virginia Beach procurement card program. The City has
8 established a procurement card program to streamline the acquisition and
9 payment process for low -dollar -value goods and for employees' City business
10 travel costs, which reduce paperwork and administrative costs.
11
12 2. That the audit shall address: (1) whether each Department or Office Director has
13 established documented Internal Control Procedures for his/her
14 department/office; (2) whether the procedures address the approval function, the
15 accounting/reconciling function, and any proposed card custody functions; (3)
16 whether proper review and approval is performed before payment of
17 procurement card transactions; and (4) whether transactions made with the
18 procurement card are made in accordance with Small Purchase/Travel Card
19 Procedures Manual.
20
21 3. That the City Auditor, in order to ensure a value-added and efficient audit, shall
22 use a risk assessment process to determine those cardholders and transactions
23 to be audited.
24
25 4. That, pursuant to City Code 2-468, the City Auditor shall have unrestricted
26 access to, and inspection of, all records of employee procurement card
27 transactions, bank statements, transaction Togs, and any other records necessary
28 to complete the audit.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, this
28thi day of September , 2010.
Requires an affirmative vote by a majority of all members of the City Council.
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY:
X.7'•'),zeted
City Attorney's Off! e
CA11607
R-1
September 10, 2010
- 52 -
Item V -K.5.
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM # 60309
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT:
Resolution to ENCOURAGE preservation of the Historic Brick
Sidewalks at Cavalier Shores.
Voting: 10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
September 28, 2010
REQUESTED BY COUNCILMEMBER WILSON
1 A RESOLUTION TO ENCOURAGE PRESERVATION OF
2 THE HISTORIC BRICK SIDEWALKS AT CAVALIER
3 SHORES
4
5 WHEREAS, in 1927, Virginia Beach's historic Cavalier Hotel was constructed;
6
7 WHEREAS, also in 1927, brick sidewalks were installed in the adjacent Cavalier
8 Shores subdivision, east and west along the south side of 45th Street, and east and
9 west on both the north and south sides of 43rd and 44th Street, as well as the walk from
10 the Old Cavalier Hotel on the hill from Cavalier Drive to 45th Street;
11
12 WHEREAS, like the Cavalier Hotel, these brick sidewalks are historic structures
13 that form an integral part of Virginia Beach's architectural history;
14
15 WHEREAS, despite their historic nature, over the past ninety years, some of the
16 original bricks have been removed to accommodate utilities and curb cuts for residents
17 of Cavalier Shores;
18
19 WHEREAS, although City Code § 21-303 prohibits motorists from parking a
20 vehicle (or any portion of a vehicle) on a City sidewalk, some drivers have nevertheless
21 illegally parked their vehicles on the brick sidewalks, resulting in damage to the
22 sidewalks and creating a potential safety hazard for pedestrians and drivers; and
23
24 WHEREAS, City Council recognizes the historic nature of these brick sidewalks
25 and desires that the City and its residents take steps to preserve these brick sidewalks
26 as an historic amenity.
27
28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
29 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA THAT:
30
31 1. The City Manager is hereby requested to direct the Planning and Public
32 Works departments to ensure that actions are taken to preserve these historic brick
33 walkways to the extent feasible;
34
35 2. The City Manager is hereby requested to direct the Police Department and
36 its Community Service Officers to provide increased enforcement of the prohibition
37 against parking a vehicle on these sidewalks; and
38
39 3. The City Manager is hereby requested to direct the Department of
40 Museums and Historic Preservation to work with the City's Historic Preservation
41 Commission and other community groups to raise awareness of these historic
42 sidewalks, with the goal of preserving these sidewalks for future generations.
I
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach this 28th day of
September, 2010.
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
CA11598
R-2
August 31, 2010
11 1
1 � �
/tlirl,%,5T f
1
2?b:d37770.
NrS a 3Na-rnv 0Ito doar [w+ r'_io at
ori
e
.1� O
Q a 4 4
k
'
'tlM-
ON✓
OdON ill
11
i.+a.w .,as�afr" ad
HON
t,
.4 77oH
r(5l .V//l7
-53 -
Item V-K.6.a/b/c
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM # 60310
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT:
Voting:
Ordinances to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE:
a. $314, 485 from Federal revenue to the Department of Housing and
Neighborhood Preservation FY 2010-11 Operating Budget to assist
Homeless Veterans and other individuals
b. $198,676 from the United States Department of Justice Edward Byrne
Assistance Grant re: Public Safety and Criminal Processing:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
$50, 000 to the Police Department and Sheriff re: fiber
installation at the Law Enforcement Training Academy
$44, 496 to the Police Department re: Digital Storage
$24, 000 to the Circuit Court Clerk's Office
re: Part-time Office Assistant
$44, 000 to the Sheriff re: Courthouse Security Improvement
$18, 720 to the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court re:
Records Expungement
$15, 050 to Community Corrections and Pretrial re: Batterer's
Intervention
$2,410 to Community Corrections and Pretrial re: Intoxilyzer
c. $1, 000 from the National Library Service (NLS) and $1, 085 in donations
to the Library Gift Fund re purchase of cartridges that enhance the use of
NLS talking books and playback machines
10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
September 28, 2010
II I
I
1 AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS TO THE
2 FY 2010-11 OPERATING BUDGET OF THE
3 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOOD
4 PRESERVATION
5
6 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,
7 VIRGINIA:
8
9 That $314,485 is hereby appropriated, with federal revenues increased
10 accordingly, to the FY 2010-11 Operating Budget of the Department of Housing and
11 Neighborhood Preservation to assist homeless veterans and other homeless
12 individuals.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the 28th day
of September , 2010.
Requires an affirmative vote by a majority of all of the members of City Council.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Management Services
CA11610
R-2
September 14, 2010
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY:
orney's Office
I
1 AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE
2 GRANT FUNDS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY AND CRIMINAL
3 PROCESSING
4
5 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,
6 VIRGINIA:
7
8 1. That $198,676 is hereby accepted, with federal revenues increased accordingly,
9 from the Edward Byrne Justice Assistance Grant, through the United States Department of
10 Justice, and appropriated to the following agencies and departments as set forth below:
11
12 a. $50,000 to the Police Department and Sheriff's Office for fiber installation at the
13 Law Enforcement Training Academy;
14 b. $44,496 to the Police Department for a digital storage project;
15 c. $24,000 to the Circuit Court Clerk's Office for a contracted office assistant;
16 d. $44,000 to the Sheriff for the Courthouse Security Project;
17 e. $18,720 to the Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court for a contracted
18 expungement clerk;
19 f. $15,050 to Community Corrections and Pretrial for a Batterer's Intervention
20 Program; and
21 g. $2,410 to Community Corrections and Pretrial for the purchase of intoxilyzers.
22
23 2. That all contracted positions funded through this grant shall be eliminated when
24 grant funding expires.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the 28th day
of September 2010.
Requires an affirmative vote by a majority of all the members of City Council.
Approved as to Content:
Management Services
CA11612
R-1
September 16, 2010
Approved as to Legal Sufficiency:
1 AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE $2,085
2 TO THE LIBRARY GIFT FUND
3
4 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,
5 VIRGINIA:
6
7 That $1,000 from the National Library Service (NLS) and $1,085 in donations are
8 hereby accepted and appropriated, with estimated revenue increased accordingly, to
9 the Library Gift Fund for the purchase of cartridges that enhance the use of NLS talking
10 books and playback machines.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the 28th day
of September , 2010.
Requires an affirmative vote by a majority of all of the members of City Council.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
Management Services
CA11608
R-2
September 14, 2010
IZ
ity A �� ey's Office
I
-54-
Item V -K 7.
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM # 60311
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT:
Ordinance to TRANSFER $26, 512 from the General Fund Reserve for
Contingencies to the FY 2010-11 Operating Budget of the Clerk of the
Circuit Court and APPROVE reinstatement of a full-time City position
in the Circuit Clerk's Office
Voting: 10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
September 28, 2010
II 1
I
1 AN ORDINANCE TO TRANSFER FUNDS
2 FROM THE GENERAL FUND RESERVE FOR
3 CONTINGENCIES TO THE FY 2010-11
4 OPERATING BUDGET OF THE CLERK OF
5 THE CIRCUIT COURT AND TO APPROVE
6 THE REINSTATEMENT OF A FULL-TIME
7 CITY POSITION IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE
8
9 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
10 BEACH, VIRGINIA:
11
12 1. That a previously eliminated, full-time, City position be reinstated in the FY
13 2010-11 Operating Budget of the Clerk of the Circuit Court; and
14
15 2. That $26,512 is hereby transferred from General Fund Reserve for
16 Contingencies to the FY 2010-11 Operating Budget to fund the full-time City position.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on this 28th
day of September , 2010.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
Management Services
CA11613
R-2
September 16, 2010
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
- 55 -
Item V -K.8.
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM # 60312
ADDED
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT:
Resolution to DECLARE September 28, 2010 "Virginia Beach City
Public Schools Day". (5`" Best Large City Public School Division in the
Nation)
Voting: 10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M Dyer, Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
September 28, 2010
11 1
RESOLUTION
RECOGNITION OF THE HIGH HONOR OF VIRGINIA BEACH SCHOOLS
BEING NAMED 5TH BEST LARGE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOL DIVISION IN THE NATION
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
RESOLVED:
RESOLVED:
the Virginia Beach City Council acknowledges the high honor the public school division
has incurred in being ranked the fifth best large city public school division in the nation;
and
this prestigious award resulted from a study conducted by GreatSchools, a national non-
profit group which focuses on public and private education; and
GreatSchools analyzed 17,377 cities to identify the best public school districts by
population and median home price; and
Ratings were based on a number of factors such as performance on state standards and
the most recent data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP); and
VBCPS was cited for the high performance of its students, namely its rising scores on the
SAT, Advanced Placement tests above the national average, state awards for excellence
for most of its schools, the high percentage (84 percent) of students planning to pursue
higher education, its listing of many of its 11 high schools in Newsweek's annual report
of the best U.S. high schools, and its posting a graduation rate of nearly 83 percent, which
is above the state average; and
GreatSchools characterizes VBCPS as "Clearly a district on the move!" and now
therefore be it
That the City Council approve a recommendation to make Tuesday, September 28, 2010,
Virginia Beach City Public Schools Day; and, be it further
That a copy of this resolution be spread across the official minutes of this Council.
Presented September 28, 2010
illiam D. Sessoms, Mayor
Attest:
-56-
Item V -K. 9.
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM # 60313
ADDED
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT:
Resolution RECOGNIZING Chesapeake Bay Wine Classic
Foundation 's 20`" Anniversary and more than $3-M charitable funds
raised.
Voting: 10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
September 28, 2010
RIESOL UTIOIa'
EES: the Chesapeake Bay Wine Clasp Foundation was founded in 1991;
WI -PERMS: the (Foundation is now a 501(0(3) non-profit organization celebrating its
Twentieth year of service to the City of Virginia Beach, as weir as alT.7fampton Roads communities,
with a primary focus of Helping to educate our youth;
WXER,EAS: the activities of the Chesapeake Bay Wine Classic have 6rought Virginia Beach
national attention through its fundraising events, including the "GrandAuction" and "Vintner of the
Tear Dinner" ;
ZEAS: Vintners and wine enthusiasts from all over the 'United States have come to
Virginia Beach and provided a forum for local restaurants to feature their culinary skills. The
Foundation's "Grand Tasting" held at the Virginia Beach Convention Center, educates the general
pu6Cu through wine andfood seminars and provides a forum for local wine distri6utors to showcase
their specialties; and,
WXEREAS: The Foundation also sponsors a fishing tournament, "Wine, Women and
Fishing" to support efforts for a cure of 6reast cancer.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Virginia Beath City Councilhere6y
recognizes the Chesapeake Bay Wine Classic `Foundation on its 20th Anniversary and its members for
their steadfast dedication in raising more than $3-.Miltwn for various charita6Cefunds as welCas their
tireless efforts andpersonaCsacrifices to serve theirfellow citizens, educate their children and provide
funding for medical -research.
Given under our hands and seals this 14th day of Septem6er, 2010.
Council -Lady Zta Sweet Bet:Etto Councilman CjCenn 'Davis
Counci
Councilman6ert . '0o6" Dyer Lv
Vice Mayor Louis1�JSones
Counti[ #(arry Da.
( $. .
Counci[LaIy Bar6ara7-renCey (
fr
C. incifman John E. Vfirin
9v(ayor'William D. "'Will" Sessoms
-57 -
Item V -K10.
ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS ITEM # 60314
ADDED
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT:
Resolution RECOGNIZING Max Bartoli and Ethan Martin for choosing
Virginia Beach for the filming of "Atlantis Down"
Voting: 10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
September 28, 2010
41'Z: Ita-
5)
+'y
!ui
:,,.,,*.,,,,'"x44... -.._,'
M �11 .f•1
v
RESOLUTION
WIPEUAS: Two 9ilen. One 'Vision. One (Passion. 9ila.x,Bartofi and Ethan 94arten first met in 2006 at the New
7orklnternationatTi[m Festivafwhere both entered short films in the competition. they got to know each other because their
respective firms were scheduled back-to-6ackin the same theater,
i,j[EWLST: In the end they each achieved individual success and their films each won in their respective
categories. Thus a fasting friendrhip was formedand, eventually, the became partners. `White they met 6y accident, their decision
to film in' Virginia was, by no means, an accident. New 'Yorktranspfant and7-rampton Roads resident, Ethan 91arten, and
Italian 9KaxBarto& put together the motion picture, ATLANTIS (D0`W}N, in 'Virginia Beach and cTortsmouth. Although this
project could have taken place anywhere - - Italy, Spain, LosAngeles !where it was originally planned to 6efilmed7, Ethan
9ylarten Believed 'Virginia, particularly 7fampton Xoads, had everything they needed to produce the firm so he persuaded.MaX
Barto& to visit 'Virginia Beach. They foundtheperfect location at'First Landing which offereda variety of Cooks, including
woods. 7fere they couldproduce the firm for far less expense with the same quality of production. Some said this was impossible.
They actually completed the filming in just thirteen days, a day short of the anticipated schedule;
WieE Ef S': Just as the movie could have been filmed anywhere, the World (Premiere could have taken place
anywhere..9fowever the (Producers chose the Commodore Theatre for the screening and 'Wort 'Premiere, which is to 6e held
October'First and is aiready "sold out". The cast, crew, director and producer will be at each of the subsequent screenings at 7:00
TN October 2-7, 2010;
EQEAS: Atrantis Down' takes place in the year 2025 when the space shuttle program has been privatized and
Atlantis has been refegated to nothing more than a glorified between space stations. Its crew is on a routine mission, thinking
they are conducting experiments when they encounter bursts of fight shutting dawn its instrumentation and feaving it adrift in
space with the Rookie Astronaut in command Most of the crew is transported to another planetwhile others find themselves in
the mid(& of a barren, desert wasteland Then the Rookie Astronaut realizes fie has been chosen to compete in a sort ofgafactic
chess game with a superiorintelligence where losing means (Math; and
WXERaiS: Commodore Theatre Owner, TreeSchoenfefd, Director and TroducersWa. Bartofr, andcEthan
6larten, are proud to present 7A74A90TS cDO`ws.N' in the luxuriously restored 1945 Art (Deco -style, state-of-the-art
Commodore Theatre in Of& Towne, (Portsmouth, with its forty-one foot screen anCDC( andOOLB'YDIGITAL sound
NOW g' [tEUTCYla, BE IT SOL'GW: That the 'Virginia Beach City Council- pauses in its
deliberations to recognize 9,4ax,Bartofi andEthan Marten for their foresight, appreciation of the amenities in 'Virginia Beach
where America's history actual& began at Cape 9fenryApril 26, 1607, and achievement of this' WorldcTremiere movie.
Given under our hands and seals this Twenty-eighth day of September, Two Thousand andTen,
lam- s. i4"'
Council Lady tta Sweet Beliitto
Councilman Glenn R (Davis
Council it iam qi; "Bill" cDeSteph�
Citric -it -man trbert j. "0o6" (Dyer
Vice 9rlayor Louis
ncitman John rE. `ZJhrin
uncif Lady 2 os
ry 'WiEwn
James L 'Wood
I
- 58 -
Item V -L.
PLANNING ITEM # 60315
1. S. DA WSON and SUSAN P. STERLING NONCONFORMING USE
2. BEN JOHNSON MODIFICATION OF CONDITION No. 1
3. CAVALIER GOLF & YACHT CLUB CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
c/o JOHN MILLESON, SR.
4. GAIL HARTS PERFORMING ARTS
GROUP, INC./TIBBITT PROPERTIES
ACREDALE, L.L.C.
5. OCEAN RENTAL PROPERTIES, LLC
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL
CHANGE OF ZONING (previously
approved by City Council (9/12/2000)
6. GEO I, L.L.C. c/o JOHN GEORGHIOU CONDITIONAL CHANGE OF
ZONING
7. LITTLE THEATRE OF VIRGINIA BEACH APPROVE THREE (3) ROADSIDE
GUIDE SIGNS
September 28, 2010
I
-59-
Item V -L.
PLANNING ITEM # 60316
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council APPROVED in ONE
MOTION Items 1 (DEFERRED, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (DEFERRED) and 7 of the CONSENT AGENDA.
Voting: 10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
Item L.1. (S. DAWSON AND SUSAN P. STERLING) for a Nonconforming Use was DEFERRED
INDEFINITELY, BY CONSENT.
Item L.6. (GEO I, L.L.C. c/o JOHN GEORGHIOU) for a Conditional Change of Zoning was
DEFERRED INDEFINITELY, BY CONSENT.
September 28, 2010
- 60 -
Item V -L.1.
PLANNING ITEM # 60317
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council DEFERRED
INDEFINITELY, BY CONSENT, application of S. DAWSON and SUSAN P. STERLING for a
Nonconforming Use to allow for an expansion of their existing dwelling at 801 Baltic Avenue.
BEACH— DISTRICT 6
Application of S. DAWSON and SUSAN P. STERLING for a
Nonconforming Use to allow for an expansion of their existing dwelling
at 801 Baltic Avenue (GPIN #2427133700)
BEACH— DISTRICT 6
Voting: 10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
September 28, 2010
Item V-L.Z.
PLANNING
-61 -
ITEM # 60318
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council APPROVED, BY
CONSENT, application of BEN JOHNSON for Modification of Condition No. 1 at 612 Nevan Road
(GPIN #2407885484) to expand the tattoo parlor into Suite 104. LYNNHAVEN— DISTRICT 5
BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA
Application of BEN JOHNSON for Modification of Condition No. 1 at
612 Nevan Road (GPIN #2407885484) to expand the tattoo parlor into
Suite 104. LYNNHA VEN — DISTRICT 5
The following conditions shall be required:
1. All conditions, with the exception of Number 1 attached to the Conditional Use
Permit granted by the City Council on September 23, 2008, remain in effect.
2. Condition Number 1 of the September 23, 2008, Conditional Use Permit is deleted
and replaced with the following: The Conditional Use Permit for a tattoo
establishment with body piercing and permanent make-up applications in Suites 106
and 104 is approved for a period of one (1) year with an administrative review every
year thereafter.
This Ordinance shall be effective in accordance with Section 107 (f) of the Zoning Ordinance.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the Twenty-eighth of September,
Two Thousand Ten
Voting: 10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
September 28, 2010
Item V -L.3.
PLANNING
- 62 -
ITEM # 60319
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT, an Ordinance upon application of CAVALIER GOLF & YACHT CLUB C/O JOHN
MILLESON, SR., for a Conditional Use Permit, outdoor recreational facility, 1052 Cardinal Road
(GPIN #2418246584). LYNNHA VEN - DISTRICT 5.
BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA
Ordinance upon application of CAVALIER GOLF & YACHT CLUB
C/O JOHN MILLESON, SR., for a Conditional Use Permit, outdoor
recreational facility, 1052 Cardinal Road (GPIN #2418246584).
LYNNHAVEN - DISTRICT 5. R091037437
The following conditions shall be required:
1. The site shall be developed substantially in accordance with the Chesapeake Bay Area
Preservation Board variance conditions approved May 24, 2010. Said Variance
information is on file in the Virginia Beach Planning Department.
2. Additions and alterations to the Clubhouse facilities shall substantially adhere to the
submitted plans titled "Upper Level Existing and New Work, Lower Level Existing and
New Work and North and West Elevation Cavalier Golf & Yacht Club" prepared by
Tymoff & Moss Architects. Said plans have been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City
Council and are on file in the Planning Department.
3. Site improvements shall substantially adhere to the submitted plans entitled "CBPA
Variance Exhibit, Parcel A, Re -subdivision of Property of Cavalier Golf & Yacht Club"
dated March 30, 2010, and prepared by Gallup Surveyors & Engineers, LTD. Said plans
have been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and are on file in the Planning
Department.
4. The four (4) inflatable tennis court enclosures shall only be on the site November 1"
through April 1s1 yearly. The inflatable enclosures shall be green in color so as to blend
with the existing vegetation. The applicant shall obtain all necessary building permits,
inspections and a Certificate of Occupancy from the Permits and Inspections Division of
the Planning Department before occupying the enclosures. During the months of
November 1' through April r, the hours of operation shall be 8:00 AM through
9:00 PM.
The applicant shall plant evergreen trees and shrubs along the Eastern side of the
entrance road to the Clubhouse. The applicant shall work with current Planning
Staff to determine an appropriate planting plan. The applicant shall install the
plants as soon as possible upon approval by the City Council of this request.
September 28, 2010
- 63 -
Item V -L.3.
PLANNING ITEM # 60319 (Continued)
This Ordinance shall be effective in accordance with Section 107 (f) of the Zoning Ordinance.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the Twenty-eighth of September,
Two Thousand Ten
Voting: 10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
September 28, 2010
- 64 -
Item V -L.4.
PLANNING ITEM # 60320
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT, an Ordinance upon application of GAIL HARTS PERFORMING ARTS GROUP,
INC./TIBBITT PROPERTIES ACREDALE, L.L.C. for a Conditional Use Permit re an indoor
recreational facility at 5224 Indian River Road, Suite 113-116 (GPIN #1465472824)
KEMPSVILLE - DISTRICT 2
BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA
Ordinance upon application of GAIL HARTS PERFORMING ARTS
GROUP, INC./TIBBITT PROPERTIES ACREDALE, L.L.C.,
Conditional Use Permit, indoor recreational facility, 5224 Indian River
Road, Suite 113-116 (GPIN #1465472824).
KEMPSVILLE DISTRICT— 2 RO91037438
This Ordinance shall be effective in accordance with Section 107 () of the Zoning Ordinance.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the Twenty-eighth of September,
Two Thousand Ten
Voting: 10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
September 28, 2010
1
- 65 -
Item V -L. 5.
PLANNING ITEM # 60321
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT, an Ordinance upon application of OCEAN RENTAL PROPERTIES, LLC, re Modification
of Conditional Change of Zoning (previously approved by City Council on September 12, 2000), 3202
Holly Road (GPIN #2418922503) to mods all previously approved Proffers to allow access from Holly
Road in lieu of the approved access through the Huntwick Condominium Development. BEACH -
DISTRICT 6
BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA
Ordinance upon application of OCEAN RENTAL PROPERTIES, LLC,
re Modification of Conditional Change of Zoning (previously approved
by City Council on September 12, 2000), 3202 Holly Road (GPIN
#2418922503) to mods all previously approved Proffers to allow
access from Holly Road in lieu of the approved access through the
Huntwick Condominium Development.
BEACH - DISTRICT 6
The following condition shall be required:
1. An Agreement encompassing proffers shall be recorded with the Clerk of Circuit Court and is
hereby made a part of the record.
This Ordinance shall be effective in accordance with Section 107 ( of the Zoning Ordinance.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the Twenty-eighth of September,
Two Thousand Ten
Voting: 10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent.:
Glenn R. Davis
September 28, 2010
II 1
In Reply Refer To Our File No. DF -7738
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
INTER -OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
DATE: September -16, 2010
TO: Mark D. Stiles DEPT: City Attorney
FROM: B. Kay Wilson DEPT: City Attorney
RE: Conditional Zoning Application; Ocean Rental Properties, LLC
The above -referenced conditional zoning application is scheduled to be heard by the
City Council on September 28, 2010. I have reviewed the subject proffer agreement,
dated April 28, 2010 and have determined it to be legally sufficient and in proper legal
form. A copy of the agreement is attached.
Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter
further.
BKW/ka
Enclosure
cc: Kathleen Hassen
SB
PREPARED BY:
S\' ES. 11O1JRDON.
MI AHERN & LEVY. P.C.
FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROFFERED COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS AND
CONDITIONS
OCEAN RENTAL PROPERTIES, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company
TO (PROFFERED COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS)
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, a municipal corporation of the Commonwealth of Virginia
THIS AGREEMENT, made this 28th day of April, 2010, by and between OCEAN
RENTAL PROPERTIES, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Grantor; and THE
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, a municipal corporation of the Commonwealth of Virginia,
Grantee.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the party of the first part is the owner of a certain parcel of property
located in the Beach District of the City of Virginia Beach, containing approximately 1.183
acres which is more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference. Said parcel is hereinafter referred to as the "Property"; and
WHEREAS, the Grantor has initiated a modification to a conditional amendment to
the Zoning Map of the City of Virginia Beach, by petition addressed to the Grantee so as to
modify conditions to the Zoning Classification of the Property; and
WHEREAS, the Grantor has requested Grantee to permit this modification of the
previously proffered Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions dated June 14, 2000, and
recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach,
Virginia in Deed Book 4297, at Page 1194 (hereinafter "2000 Proffers"), to reflect
amendments applicable to the land use plan on the Property; and
WHEREAS, the Grantee's policy is to provide only for the orderly development of
land for various purposes through zoning and other land development legislation; and
WHEREAS, the Grantor acknowledges that the competing and sometimes
incompatible development of various types of uses conflict and that in order to permit
differing types of uses on and in the area of the Property and at the same time to recognize
the effects of change that will be created by the proposed modification of conditions to the
zoning, certain reasonable conditions governing the use of the Property for the protection
of the community that are not generally applicable to land similarly zoned are needed to
resolve the situation to which the application gives rise; and
GPIN: 2418-92-2503
1
PREPARED BY:
5 13 SYKES, BOURIION.
MI AH ERN & LEVY, P.C.
WHEREAS, the clustered townhouse development Huntwick Condominium located
adjacent to the south and west sides of the Property provides an appropriate residential
transition between commercial development south of Pinewood Road and the residential
uses to the North and this Property serves as a transition between the clustered
condominiums to the South and the single family zoning to the North, and the swale on
the north side of the Property forms a natural boundary; and
WHEREAS, the Grantor has voluntarily proffered, in writing, in advance of and
prior to the public hearing before the Grantee, as a part of the proposed modification to
the existing zoning conditions with respect to the Property, the following reasonable
conditions related to the physical development, operation, and use of the Property to be
adopted, which conditions have a reasonable relation to the proposed modification and the
need for which is generated by the proposed modification.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Grantor, its successors, personal representatives, assigns,
grantees, and other successors in title or interest, voluntarily and without any requirement
by or exaction from the Grantee or its governing body and without any element of
compulsion or quid pro quo for zoning, rezoning, site plan, building permit, or subdivision
approval, hereby makes the following declaration of conditions and restrictions which
shall restrict and govern the physical development, operation, and use of the Property and
hereby covenants and agrees. that this declaration shall constitute covenants running with
the Property, which shall be binding upon the Property and upon all parties and persons
claiming under or through the Grantor, its successors, personal representatives, assigns,
grantees, and other successors in interest or title:
1. When the Property is redeveloped as a five (5) unit residential condominium
consisting of two (2) separate buildings containing two (2) and three (3) dwelling units
respectively, in order to achieve a coordinated design and development of the site in terms
of vehicular circulation, parking, buffering, landscaping, tree preservation, building
location, setbacks, building orientation, stormwater management facilities and open space
to better foster a sense of community, it shall be developed substantially in accordance
with the "ZONING/LANDSCAPE EXHIBIT FOR HOLLY ROAD TOWNHOME
CONDOMINIUMS", dated 4/28/10, prepared by MSA, P.C., which has been exhibited to
the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file with the Virginia Beach Department of
Planning ("Concept Nan").
2
S
1
PREPARED BY:
SYKES, BOURDON,
® AH RN & LEVY, P.C.
2. When the Property is redeveloped, vehicular ingress and egress shall be via
one (1) entrance from Holly Road.
3. When redeveloped, the architectural design, and exterior building materials
of the residential buildings depicted on the Concept Plan will be substantially as depicted
on the exhibit entitled, "HOLLY PINES CONDOMINIUMS", dated 4/27/10, prepared by
Treystone, Inc. which has been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file
with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning ("Elevations").
4. When redeveloped, those upland portions of the property's frontage on
Holly Road shall be landscaped and fenced substantially as depicted and described on the
"LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR HOLLY ROAD FRONTAGE, HOLLY PINES CONDOMINIUM",
dated 4/28/10, prepared by MSA, P.C., which has been exhibited to the Virginia Beach
City Council and is on file with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning ("Landscape
Plan"). The only permanent community identification sign shall be no larger than four (4)
square feet in size and imbedded in the eastern face of the brick column as noted on the
Concept Plan. The sign may not be internally illuminated.
5. Further conditions may be required by the Grantee during detailed Site Plan
review and administration of applicable City Codes by all cognizant City agencies and
departments to meet all applicable City Code requirements.
6. The Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions set forth herein replace and.
supersede the "2000 Proffers".
The Grantor further covenants and agrees that:
All references hereinabove to the A-12 District and to the requirements and
regulations applicable thereto refer to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and
Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, in force as of the date of
approval of this Agreement by City Council, which are by this reference incorporated.
herein.
The above conditions, having been proffered by the Grantor and allowed and
accepted by the Grantee as part of the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, shall continue
in full force and effect until a subsequent amendment changes the zoning of the Property
and specifically repeals such conditions. Such conditions shall continue despite a
subsequent amendment to the Zoning Ordinance even if the subsequent amendment is
part of a comprehensive implementation of a new or substantially revised Zoning
Ordinance until specifically repealed. The conditions, however, may be repealed,
amended, or varied by written instrument recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, and executed by the record owner of the
Property at the time of recordation of such instrument, provided that said instrument is
consented to by the Grantee in writing as evidenced by a certified copy of an ordinance or a
resolution adopted by the governing body of the Grantee, after a public hearing before the
Grantee which was advertised pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2204 of the Code
of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Said ordinance or resolution shall be recorded along with
said instrument as conclusive evidence of such consent, and if not so recorded, said
instrument shall be void.
(1) The Zoning Administrator of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, shall be
vested with all necessary authority, on behalf of the governing body of the City of Virginia
Beach, Virginia, to administer and enforce the foregoing conditions and restrictions,
including the authority (a) to order, in writing, that any noncompliance with such
conditions be remedied; and (b) to bring legal action or suit to insure compliance with
such conditions, including mandatory or prohibitory injunction, abatement, damages, or
other appropriate action, suit, or proceeding;
(2) The failure to meet all conditions and restrictions shall constitute cause to
deny the issuance of any of the required building or occupancy permits as may be
appropriate;
(3) If aggrieved by any decision of the Zoning Administrator, made pursuant to
these provisions, the Grantor shall petition the governing body for the review thereof prior
to instituting proceedings in court; and
(4) The Zoning Map may show by an appropriate symbol on the map the
existence of conditions attaching to the zoning of the Property, and the ordinances and the
conditions may be made readily available and accessible for public inspection in the office
of the Zoning Administrator and in the Planning Department, and they shall be recorded
in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, and indexed
in the names of the Grantor and the Grantee.
PREPARED BY:
EU SYKES. POURDON.
M ANERN & LEVY. P.C.
WITNESS the following signature and seal:
Grantor:
Ocean Rental Properties, L.L.C., a Virginia limited
liability company
By: i/J/' (,l4.41-"'
Steven Bishard, Managing Member
(SEAL)
STATE OF VIRGINIA
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, to -wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 29th day of April,
2010, by Steven Bishard, Managing Member of Ocean Rental Properties, L.L.C., a Virginia
limited liability company.
My Commission Expires: August 31, 2010
Notary Registration No.: 192628
PREPARED BY:
SYI:ES. 1OURDON,
l ABERN & LEVY. P.C.
Notary Public
IS
PREPARED BY:
SYIC£S. BOURDON.
AH£RN & LEVY. P.C.
EXHIBIT "A"
All that certain lot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon,
lying, situate and being in the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, known, numbered and
designated as Site Number Eighty -Two (82), on that plat entitled, "Map of Linkhorn Park",
which plat is duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virgin: a
Beach, Virginia, in Map Book 5, at Page 151.
GPIN: 2418-92-2503
ModificationofProffers\Ocean Rental Properties\Holly Road Townhome Condos First Amendment to Proffers.doc
- 66 -
Item V -L.6.
PLANNING ITEM # 60322
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council DEFERRED
INDEFINITELY, BY CONSENT, Ordinance upon Application of GEO I, L.L.C. c/o JOHN
GEORGHIOU for a Change of Zoning District Classification from R-10 Residential to Conditional R -
5D (WF) Residential at 4480 and 4488 Indian River Road (GPIN #1474254827) to allow residential
development with Workforce Housing. CENTERVILLE — DISTRICT 1
This item is DEFERRED to allow sufficient time to further refine the proposal and proper
advertisement.
Voting: 10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
September 28, 2010
- 67 -
Item V -L.7.
PLANNING ITEM # 60323
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Jones, seconded by Councilman Dyer, City Council ADOPTED, BY
CONSENT, Resolution upon application of LITTLE THEATRE OF VIRGINIA BEACH at 550
Barberton Drive to allow three (3) Roadside Guide Signs in the public right-of-way along Birdneck and
Laskin Roads in accordance with Section 211.1 of the City Zoning Ordinance (CZO). BEACH —
DISTRICT 6
BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA
Resolution upon application of LITTLE THEATRE OF VIRGINIA
BEACH at 550 Barberton Drive to allow three (3) Roadside Guide
Signs in the public right-of-way along Birdneck and Laskin Roads in
accordance with Section 211.1 of the City Zoning Ordinance (CZO).
BEACH — DISTRICT 6
The following conditions shall be required:
1. Three(3) Roadside Guide Signs are approved as follows:
a. One (1) sign within the Birdneck Road right-of-way on the East side of the road
opposite the exit off Eastbound 1-264. This sign shall have one (1) face and be
visible from the exit at the intersection with Birdneck Road.
b. One (1) sign in the right -of way on the East side of Birdneck Road, South of the
intersection of 24`h Street and Birdneck Road. This sign shall have one (1) face
and be visible to Northbound traffic on Birdneck Road.
c. One (1) sign in the median North of the intersection of 24`h Street and Birdneck
Road. This sign shall have one (1) face and be visible to Southbound traffic on
Birdneck Road.
The general location of these signs is shown in red as "Staff Recommended Sign
Location" on the map labeled, "Little Theatre of Virginia Beach."
2. Prior to installation of any Roadside Guide Sign, the applicant shall meet with the Traffic
Engineer, or his designee, to determine exact locations and avoid conflicts with any
existing signs.
3. Prior to erecting any sign, the Little Theatre shall provide Public Works, Real Estate,
with a copy of a liability insurance policy naming the City as co-insured on the policy for
the signs.
4. Sign and sign post materials shall meet specifications in the Public Works Standards for
use in the public right-of-way. Contact must be made with the Traffic Engineer with any
questions regarding the requirements.
5. The Roadside Guide Signs for the Little Theatre of Virginia Beach shall substantially
adhere to the attached sign elevation submitted by the applicant.
September 28, 2010
-68 -
Item V -L.7.
PLANNING ITEM # 60323 (Continued)
6. The signs shall be installed with a maximum height of nine and one -half -feet (9-1/2 )
above ground level and shall have a minimum clearance of seven (7) feet.
7. The Little Theatre shall maintain the signs in good condition at all times. Any sign not in
good condition shall be subject to removal and disposal by the Department of Public
Works.
8. The Department of Public Works may relocate any sign if necessary to accommodate
public signage requirements.
Voting: 10-0 (By Consent)
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M Dyer, Barbara M Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
September 28, 2010
1 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ROADSIDE
2 GUIDE SIGNS FOR THE LITTLE THEATRE
3 OF VIRGINIA BEACH, 550 BARBERTON
4 DRIVE (BEACH DISTRICT)
5
6
7 WHEREAS, the Little Theatre of Virginia Beach, (hereinafter the "Applicant),
8 located at 550 Barberton Drive (Beach District), is an establishment operated
9 exclusively for cultural and artistic purposes on a not-for-profit basis; and
10
11 WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested that it be allowed to erect five (5)
12 roadside guide signs in the public rights-of-way along Birdneck and Laskin Roads in
13 order to provide directions to the Little Theatre for the benefit of motorists unfamiliar
14 with its location; and
15
16 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that three (3) roadside guide signs are
17 sufficient to provide motorists with adequate guidance to the Little Theatre;
18
19 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
20 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
21
22 That the placement of roadside guide signs by the Applicant is hereby
23 authorized, upon the following conditions:
24
25 1. Three roadside guide signs are approved as follows, and upon the following
26 conditions:
27
28 a. One sign within the Birdneck Road right-of-way on the east side of the
29 road opposite the exit off eastbound 1-264. This sign shall have one
30 face and be visible from the exit at the intersection with Birdneck Road.
31
32 b. One sign in the right-of way on the east side of Birdneck Road, south
33 of the intersection of 24th Street and Birdneck Road. This sign shall
34 have one face and be visible to north bound traffic on Birdneck Road.
35
36 c. One sign in the median north of the intersection of 24th Street and
37 Birdneck Road. This sign shall have one face and be visible to south
38 bound traffic on Birdneck Road;
39
40 The general location of these signs is shown in red as "Staff Recommended
41 Sign Location" on the map labeled, "Little Theatre of Virginia Beach." Said
42 map has been exhibited to City Council and is on file in the Planning
43 Department;"
44
45 2. Prior to installation of any roadside guide sign, the applicant shall meet with
46 the Traffic Engineer or his designee to determine exact locations and avoid
47 conflicts with any existing signs;
1
48
49 3. Prior to erecting any sign, the Little Theatre shall provide the Public Works
50 Real Estate Division with a copy of a liability insurance policy naming the City
51 as co-insured on the policy for the signs;
52
53 4. The sign and sign post materials shall meet applicable specifications in the
54 Public Works Standards for use in the public right-of-way;
55
56 5. The signs for the Little Theatre of Virginia Beach shall substantially adhere to
57 the attached sign elevation submitted by the Applicant. Said elevation has
58 been exhibited to City Council and is on file in the Planning Department;
59
60 6. The signs shall be installed with a maximum height of 9.5' above ground level
61 and shall have a minimum clearance of seven feet;
62
63 7. The Little Theatre shall maintain the signs in good condition at all times. Any
64 sign not in good condition shall be subject to removal and disposal by the
65 Department of Public Works;
66
67 8. The Department of Public Works may relocate any sign if necessary to
68 accommodate public signage requirements; and
69
70 9. Such signage shall in all other respects conform to the provisions of Section
71 211.1 of the City Zoning Ordinance.
72
73
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the 28th day
of September , 2010.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
W1 A.1
Planning I -'•artment
CA11611
R-3
September 17, 2010
2/
2
ice
City Attorney's O
1
Little Theatre of Virginia Beach
OSTAFF RECOMMENDED SIGN LOCATION
IIAPPLICANT'S PROPOSED SIGN LOCATIONS
LITTLE THEATRE OF VIRGINIA BEACH
P. O. BOX 1053 • 24TH STREET 8 BARBERTON DRIVE • VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23451 • (757) 428-9233
July 22, 2010
Mr. William Whitney, Jr.
Director of Planning and Community Development
2405 Courthouse Drive
Municipal Center, Bldg. 2
Virginia Beach, VA 23456
Dear Mr. Whitney:
The Little Theatre of Virginia Beach requests approval to place roadside guide signs at three
strategic locations as permitted under Section 211.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. LTVB is a not-for-
profit, all -volunteer arts organization that is supported by the Virginia Beach Arts and
Humanities Commission. Because we are located in a residential area away from the normal
traffic patterns of residents as well as visitors, LTVB has sometimes been called "Virginia
Beach's best kept secret." To remedy that, we propose to place signs to (1) increase the
awareness of its existence and (2) help patrons find the theatre.
We propose three locations, as detailed in the enclosed site plans. Since the signs must be visible
to traffic going in both directions in two of those locations — on Birdneck Road at 24th Street and
on Laskin Road at Birdneck Road — we are requesting that two signs be allowed in each of those
locations, for a total of five signs.
Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me if you need any more information.
Robin C. Chapman
President
Little Theatre of Virginia Beach
robin.chapman@cox.net
650-0138 cell, 629-2713 office
Enclosures:
Site plans (3)
Sketch of proposed sign
Check in the amount of $250.00
IJ -
0
w
w
w
J
H
J
IR INIA BEACH
seg3u! 8 1004 I
sign area = 5 square feet
H
I
I
I
-4<z
From:CVB Planning
09/15/2010 13:01 #206 P.003/003
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPLICANT DISCLOSURE
If the applicant is a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or other unincorporated
organization, complete the following:
1. List the applicant name followed by the names of all officers, members, trustees,
partners, etc. below: (Attach list if necessary)
Cee 44cAto/
2. List all businesses that have a parent -subsidiary' or affiliated business entity2
relationship with the applicant (Attach list if necessary)
N/4
❑ Check here if the applicant is NOT a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or
other unincorporated organization.
PROPERTY OWNER DISCLOSURE
Complete this section only if property owner is different from applicant.
If the property owner is a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or other
unincorporated organization, complete the following:
1. List the property owner name followed by the names of all officers, members,
trustees, partners, etc. below: (Attach list ifnecessary)
2. List all businesses that have a parent -subsidiary' or affiliated business entity2
relationship with the applicant: (Attach list ifnecessary)
N/�
❑ Check here if the property owner is NOT a corporation, partnership, firm,
business, or other unincorporated organization.
& 2 See next page for footnotes
Does an official or employee of the pity of Virginia Beach have an interest in the
subject land? Yes No �'
If yes, what Is the name of the official or employee and the nature of their interest?
Conditional Rezoning Application
Page 11 of 12
Revised 11!1812008
From:CV6 Planning
09/15/2010 13:01 #206 P.002/003
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES
List all known contractors or businesses that have or will provide services with respect
to the requested property use, including but not limited to the providers of architectural
services, real estate services, financial services, accounting services, and legal
services: (Attach list if necessary)
1 "Parent -subsidiary relationship" means "a relationship that e xists when one
corporation directly or indirectly owns shares possessing more than 50 percent of the voting
power of another corporation." See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, Va.
Code § 2.2-3101.
2 "Affiliated business entity relationship" means "a relationship, other than parent -
subsidiary relationship, that exists when (i) one business entity has a controlling ownership
interest in the other business entity , (ii) a controlling owner in one entity is also a controlling
owner in the other entity, or (iii) there is shared management or control between the business
entities. Factors that should be con sidered in determining the existence of an affiliated
business entity relationship include that the same person or substantially the same person
own or manage the two entities; there are common or commingled funds or assets; the
business entities share the use of the same offices or employees or otherwise share activities,
resources or personnel on a regular basis; or there is otherwise a close working relationship
between the entities." See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, Va. Code §
2.2-3101.
CERTIFICATION: I certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate.
I understand that, upon receipt of notification (postcard) that the application has been scheduled for
public hearing, I am responsible for obtaining and posting the required sign on the subject property at
least 30 days prior to the scheduled public hearing according to the instructions in this package. The
undersigned also consents to entry upon the subject property by employees of the Department of
Planning to photograph and view the site for purposes of processing and evaluating this application.
Applicant's Sigrratu
PeL%n C.
Print Name
Property Owner's Signature (if different than applicant) Print Name
Conditional Rezoning Application
Page 12 of 12
Revised 713/2007
II 1
Board of Directors of Little Theatre of Virginia Beach, 2010-2011
Robin Chapman, President
Mary Lou Mahlman, Vice President, Production
Robin Martineau, Vice President, Business
Jim Russell, Treasurer
Lisa Bolen, Corresponding Secretary
Shirley Hurd, Recording Secretary
Paul Berryman
Nancy Bloom
Jeff Brangan
James Bryan
Kay Burcher
Tom Coffey
Beth Fotheringham
Rita Gordon
Donna Lawheed
Dennis Lawheed
Joan Patterson
Gillian Spencer
I
- 69 -
Item M.1
APPOINTMENTS ITEM # 60324
City Council RESCHEDULED, BY CONSENSUS the following Appointments:
ENERGY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
HEALTH SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
VIRGINIA BEACH TOMORROW COMMISSION
September 28, 2010
11 1
I
-70-
Item M.2
APPOINTMENTS ITEM # 60325
Upon NOMINATION by Vice Mayor Jones, City Council REAPPOINTED:
Sheila P. Brathwaite
Marjorie B. Smallie
2 year term
11/01/2010 —10/31/2012
HISTORICAL REVIEW BOARD
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson
and James L. Wood
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Glenn R. Davis
September 28, 2010
I
-71 -
Items P.
ADJOURNMENT ITEM # 60326
Mayor William D. Sessoms DECLARED the City Council Meeting ADJOURNED at 6:34 P.M.
Beverly O. Hooks, CMC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
Ai._rAz—i'J
ulh Hodges Fraser, MMC
City Clerk
City of Virginia Beach, Virginia
William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Mayor
September 28, 2010
-71 -
Items P.
ADJOURNMENT ITEM # 60326
Mayor William D. Sessoms DECLARED the City Council Meeting ADJOURNED at 6:34 P.M.
Beverly O. Hooks, CMC
Chief Deputy City Clerk
Ruth Hodges Fraser, MMC
City Clerk Mayor
William D. Sessoms, Jr.
City of Virginia Beach, Virginia
September 28, 2010