HomeMy WebLinkAbout11152011 RESORT PARKING~~~
r
8/16/2011
_~ , . , :~
i° ~
i.-~g~~ 1`~.
_ .. _ ... t
. ., ,
,E~
1~_~ ~ .
_ _ ~-
..
~1 ~6
:~--
"No one owns parking; there are
limited spaces; and everyone
wants to use them;" moreover
users perceive parking as a free
public good.
"No great city is known for its
abundant parking supply; yet, it
is necessary, because having an
optimal parking supply is an
integral part of a great city."
UCLA's parking economist
Donald Shoup, PhD.
~~
:~'~
~~ \
~, ~ ~'.
~ ~,
.~,,.~ '' `t s, 3
_ ~ ~
-~ : ~ ~~``
-.
~'~
.:
,~ y} ~~
_. - i / ~
.~
Y-~ -
Proposed District Plan
1 3
8/16/2011
2
III •'
~~
t
i
8/16/2011
_ ~.=.
~` ~ ~,
:;
,.r.
*-, ~,
,{
d ~. ~ ~,.
~ 1. ~.
~ .tl, µ~ r ~civ., ~~
~'
8/16/2011
l :: ` Staff working with RAC, Vision and Hotel Motel
,' `aj~p ~ ~ ~., ~
~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ . ~
• •
Existing Parking Supply:
• 2,887 public fee parking spaces in 11 off-street
locations and on-street parking
• 2,050 commercial spaces in 31 private parking lots
• 4,058 spaces in the RPP (+/-1,500 permits @$20 a
year)
Association, Citizen Groups
1. Analysis of Existing Parking Inventory and Usage
~~
~~ -~ - No new public parking needed
~- Replace existing public parking if removed by new
---~ development opportunities.
~ 2. Project Future Parking Needs
- _ +/- 12,000 spaces needed to meet district/shared
parking development.
~~,1 Estimate based on reduced parking requirements.
'`~~ Need to resolve RPP/Employee Parking concerns.
~- _. 3. Identify Parking Districts
j 4. Parking Management Structure and Policy
t !~~~}~~) Recommendations: Recommend Parking
~ 1 Authority (or subset of Development Authority)
Conclusion: The current supply of public and
private parking spaces satisfies existing consumer
demand except for a few peak days each year.
4
8/16/2011
BLOCK DESCRIPTION UNITS
Evaluate needs bysub-districts based on FBC development:
K MAX MAX FLOOR
Common hotel block east of Atlantic 233
Similarrormto'A'buthalfthesize 116
Common block between Atlantic and Pacific 122
Similarto'B+'butheightlimitedto75' 104
Similar formto'B'buthalfthesize 52
Similarformto'B'buttwicethesize 208
Common block west of Pacific along 19"' 185
Similar formto'C'buthalfthesize 93
Similarrormto'C'bulMncethesize 370
Similar form to'C' but height limited to 45' 102
Similar roan to'D' but hall the size 22
Similarformto'C'butheigMincreasedro110' 240
Similarformto'E'bulhalfthesize 120
Similar form to'C' but height limited to 35' 160
Similar formto'F'buthalfthesize 80
11,480
45,920
42,212
21,106
8a.a24 Note: Future Parking Need
42,212
estimated based on reduced
21,1os
Bs,ooo parking space requirements:
aa.5oo 2 -Duplex Lot
42,212 1 -Lodging or Residential
21,1os Unit
• 1/300 sf all other approved
uses
8/16/2011
IMMEDIATE REPLACE REMAINING -•• -~ RESORT
PARKING EXIST. PUBLIC LONGTERM LONGTERM •4~ `•. Pa«RA
)ISTRICT NEED PARKING PARKING NEED PARKING NEED '•, No~
•'•, Nw„~~
forth Beach 0 0 1,867 1,867 ~
~ ~'~ ~ ~"~~~"
.askin Gateway 2,020 0 0 2,020 ~ '•, •'
` ' ~~.` ~'
)Id Beach 200 244 870 1,314
ventral Beach 2,000 538 2,050 4,588 ~.- ~ ~:~°w""
~
"he Lakes 0 0 1,995 1,995 ~ •'~
•
rlarina-(Rudee `,
e~>°",i ^-
0 318 794 1,112 '
=
iortion onl
. «~,
'OTAL 4,220 1,100 7,576 12,896 ~a,..~,.~,o~ ',
• •
NOTE: ::
.
,: ~...... ,
• All new parking dependent on and coordinated with 1
eke, `•,
new development opportunities. ,
,
• ALL existing public parking replaced by new ~ ~
`~'• `{~,.
development to be replaced. ~ : ~ ~,~* e~„
,
-
-- RPP Alternatives
._
o.~n~~,
{ , s'", ,
y ~ ~ ~
PNO~I~n~.~
,
- ~ P.~.o~o t~
` ~ ` `~ """"`
~ ~
•
Concern about increased parking
demand on residential
~; ~ neighborhoods: In response,
additional adjacent use restrictions
~~
• have been addressed.
- --
~~ Restrictions in Key Areas: Some
~ ~ areas of the existing RPP are
impacted more than others. An
alternative may be to restrict
parking in these areas. Examples
- _ ~-
~`' are residential neighborhoods on
th
___ the south side of 17
Street.
~-
6
8/16/2011
Excluding employee parking in RPP areas would have a negative impact on
many businesses; moreover employees need to have reasonable parking
access. Alternatives discussed include:
• Reduced Employee Rates for City Facilities: This alternative would
provide a reduced City parking facility rate. Businesses have expressed
concern about rates and space availability.
• Reduced Rate HRT Transit Passes: Supplementary to other alternatives,
reduced public transit employee rates could be considered.
• Satellite Parking Facilities: With the exception of peak demand
requirement periods, the analysis indicates ample employee parking
supply. To meet the demand for the estimated 1,500 person workforce,
satellite facility locations could be considered and identified.
• • ~ •
• Guidelines and Alternatives: RAC TPPC
Meeting November 17, 2011
• Public Meeting Comments November 17,
2011.
• Stakeholder Involvement/Resort
Management Office: December 2011.
• Recommendations RAC TPPC January 2012.
8/16/2011
• Local government oversight: the municipality plans for,
finances, manages, operates, and maintains all parking
functions
• Parking authority governance: An authority plans for,
finances, manages, operates, and maintains all parking
functions
• Business improvement districts (BID): Small commissions
plans for, finances, manages, operates, and maintains all
parking functions
• Privatization: Public parking is sold to a private business
enterprise
<<~,
• SGA office is exploring the establishment of a hybrid
parking management structure
• It would include a parking authority supported by a
modified local government parking enterprise; AND,
opportunities for private parking to meet district
parking needs.
• Additional study and review to follow.
8
•
8/16/2011
.~ _ ~ •
• Establish a Parking Facility Annual Lease Program: Immediately develop a
policy and gain authorization allowing 1-5 year City and/or private facility
parking leases which meet land use/zoning requirements for use or
development. Collaboration and coordination will occur with the City
Attorney's Office, Planning Department, Police, City Manager and City
Council.
• Create Public Parking Bicycle Program: Develop recommendations for
bicycle parking in city parking lots, facilities and on streets.
• Research Parking Technological Management Programs: Research
ingress/egress counting, wayfinding, metering, and occupation censoring
technologies for creating efficient performance parking opportunities.
• Initiate Consultant Services: Source a parking consultant's services to
specifically address parking phases; rate structures; financing and costs;
forecasted demand; and fiscal impact.
~~;~~;_t~_ _
• Residential Permit Parking Program and
Employee Parking -complete by the end of
this year.
• Parking Management Plan including Parking
Authority or other Management Structure
Recommendation and Fiscal Impact Analysis -
complete early 2012
~.
• 2"d Draft Oceanfront Form-Based Code/Draft
Resort Parking Strategy: Provided to RAC,
Vision, posted on website.
• Planning Commission Briefing: November 14,
2011
• City Council Workshop: November 15, 2011
• Public & Stakeholder Meetings -November
17, 2011, 6 PM VBCC
~ L ._.' t i..?~ '.. r
@- ° ~ ~ ` .~c^ Ste. a ~ r, A~ - I..,~
~' ~ ..
r, j ~ ~a f.~y, ~ ii __
-~ . > -_
~,r , ~~
~ ~,~ ~ ^ <
_!~'~ ~
~e
N~ `\
`~
i~ t
8/16/2011
10