The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAPRIL 19, 2011 MINUTESCITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH "COMMUNITY FOR A LIFETIME" CITY COUNCIL MAYOR WILLIAM D. SESSOMS, JR., At-Large VlC'E MAYOR LOUIS R. JONES, Baystde -District 4 !UlA SWEET 86'LL7770, At-Large GL6'NN R. DAV/S, Rose Hall -District 3 WILL/AM R. DeST EPH, At-Large HARRY E. DIEZEL, Kempsville -District 2 ROBERT M. DYER„ Centerville -District I BARBARA M Hh.'NL EY, Princess Anne -District 7 JOHN E. UHRIN, Beach -District 6 ROSEMARY WILSON, At-Large JA:tiIES L. WOOD, I.ynnhaven -District S CITY COUNCIL APPOINTEES CITY MANAGER - .LAMES K. SPORE CITY ATTORNEY - MARK D. STILES CITY ASSESSOR - .IERALD D. BANAGAN CITY AUDITOR - LYNDON S. REMIAS CITY CLERK - RUTH HODGF,S FRASER, MMC I. II. III CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP AGENDA 19 APRIL 2011 CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING -Conference Room - A. 2011 REDISTRICTING OF CITY COUNCIL RESIDENCE DISTRICTS Kimball Brace, President -Election Data Services, Inc. CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING A. PLANNING ITEMS PENDING Jack Whitney, Director -Planning FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN 3:30 PM - Conference Room - 4:30 PM A. FAMILY and YOUTH OPPORTUNITIES 1. Overview 2. Health Dr. VenitaNetyby-Owens, Director 3. Human Services Robert R. Morin, Jr., Director CITYHALL BUILDING 2401 COURTHOUSE DRIVE VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRG/NIA 23456-8005 PHONE: (757) 385-4303 FAX (757J 385-5669 E- MAIL: ctycncl@vbgov. com B. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) 1. Overview a. Buildings b. Communications and Information Technology c. Economic and Tourism/Strategic Growth Areas d. Parks and Recreation e. Coastal £ Storm Water g. Roadways h. Water and Sewer -1- MINUTES VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Virginia Beach, Virginia April 19, 2011 Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., called to order the CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP BRIEFING re the 2011 REDISTRICTING in the City Council Conference Room, Tuesday, April 19, 2011, at 3:30 P.M. Council Members Present: Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill " DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel, Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., Rosemary Wilson, and James L. Wood Council Members Absent.• Rita Sweet Bellitto [Family Vacation) John E. Uhrin [Entered.• 3:58 P.M.J April 19, 2011 -2- CITY COUNCILBRIEFING 2011 REDISTRICTING OF CITY COUNCIL RESIDENCE DISTRICTS 3:30 P.M. Mayor Sessoms recognized City Attorney Mark Stiles to introduce Kimball Brace, President -Election Data Services, Inc. In the past, Mr. Brace has assisted City Council and the City Attorney's Office re Redistricting issues. Election Data Services also "keeps track" of the type of voting equipment utilized in every single County in the United States and has since 1980. Election Data Services is also involved with Election Administration issues. Election Data Services, Inc. is located out of Washington, D. C. irginia Beach, ~~~ Redistrictinag: Nuts Oc B o~'1 ~' By Kimbal(Brace Election Data Services, Inc. Since 1986, we've been on your wall. ~'`5:"="",,W -~°"'- ~'' ' ~ _-~ ~~-S' - ~ ~ ~i ~- y~ '~, ~.- i t .;~ ~,~ t ib.,, s hips ~ ~ ~ * ~ + . Nov. NtF, l~ .A~. ~ti ~ Y~ ~ i - - ~ L^ ~ A ? T: 4 ~ ~t ivf,~` i $ *~ ~ ~ In 2010/11 yo'lL.rte~ed arger.,wall ~~: t_ ~ April 19, 2011 ~a .~ Who is Election Data Services, -3- CITY COUNCILBRIEFING 2011 REDISTRICTING OF CITY COUNCIL RESIDENCE DISTRICTS (Continued) Since 1979, more than `half the Nation has been helped by Election Data Services in Redistricting. Reapportionment and Redistricting are two (2) different terms. Reapportionment is the first and takes place for the allocation of Districts to an area. This is, in many instances, similar to Congressional Districts going to States. This process took place by December Thirty-first. In some states, the process of Reapportionment is used to allocate local Districts to areas or Legislative Districts to Counties and the Cities. Therefore, some states still call their Redistricting process, Reapportionment. Redistricting is the determination: the crafting of those District configurations in that particular area (involves anything from Congressional, State Legislative down to local Districts, similar to Virginia Beach's Residency Districts.) Redistricting usually takes place once every decade and that is the reasoning behind conducting the Census every ten years. ~~~~ Who is Election Data. Services, Inc:? ~.:_'"_-_r ~' Since 1979, ~. '~4., -~ more than half the nation has been helped by Election Data Services in redistricting ~~~~_ ' 4 ---~ -,,;I -- _' ~ ~' ~,. ~' ~ 1 f ,. } Who is Election Data Services, Since 1980, kept track of what voting equi is used in every county of the nation Type of Voting Equipmei by County - 1980 .e: a~ ! ~.;_ ,~ ..._.~ ~, EkcU ~] .x<t.y-e<n~i April 19, 2011 -4- CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING 2011 REDISTRICTING OF CITY CO UNCIL RESIDENCE DISTRICTS (Continued) -~~ Who is Election Data Services; ~ , If it concerns elections, ` And it deals with data ... .. ~~. W We're probably involved Reapportionment vs Redistrict What's the difference • Reapportionment - Afloc'ation of districts to an area. -~ 'k: • US Congressional. Districts to states • Some statesuseto allocate legislative counties • Redistricting - Craffng of district configurations withl • Congressional, state legislative, county wards, etc... • Usually happens once a decade - Unless you're Tom Delay April 19, 2011 -5- CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING 2011 REDISTRICTING OF CITY COUNCIL RESIDENCE DISTRICTS (Continued) Mr. Brace referenced the Redistricting Factors (all must be considered). He believes these encompassed a three tier approach. The first tier is the first and foremost according to the Court: equal population (equal size Districts). Congressional Districts must be exactly equal and exactly the same in a particular State. The Courts have advised that for State Legislative and Local Districts, there is a "window" -ten percent (10%): S% of both the ideal population and S% below the ideal population. All Districts must fall into this "window" in order to ass muster re "One Person, One Vote': Redistricting Factors • pne Person, One Vote -Equal size Dic `" -Congressional - - State legislative -Local • Voting: Rights. Act - "Fairly reflect minority strength" • Kitchen sink '~ -Jurisdiction geography -how to divide~_ _. ~- - "Community of interest" 'Political factors & incumbancy .Compactness - Others The second tier is the Voting Rights Act: "Fairly reflect minority strength': The third tier is the "kitchen sink" (all added together as a third tier), which could be anything from Jurisdictions - how to divide; "Community of Interest'; Political factors and incumbency; Compactness; and, Others (which were spoken out in terms of kind of factors) This third tier must be subordinate in terms of the other two (2) tiers. ~- , Federal Census Efforts 8~ Timef _ • 2011 ~` -Jan -Special Citizenship tabulation r -Feb. -Marche. -Redistricting data relea_ • Redistricting can start • Data for every block • Total & Voting Age Population, by Rac - May -Group quarters file released • Total Count of persons for group quart s, college dorms, etc. Summer-full SF1 data file released - • Includes Hispanic subgroup data (Cuban, PR, Mexican) Fall - 2011 ACS data released April 19, 2011 -6- CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING 2011 REDISTRICTING OF CITY CO UNCIL RESIDENCE DISTRICTS (Continued) Within the next two (2) weeks, a special Group quarters file shall release data i. e. prisons, college dorms. The American Community Survey data will be provided in the Fall. This use to be the long form Census (age, income, education, other forms of demographic data) .The Election Process - from adata prospective Total Population Voting Age Population Citizen Voting Age Populati 2010 Census Questions on Hispanic Origin -i HOT(cd Pteasa ahsvmr BOTH 4uastfoh 6 a5out Htspankc origM and OuestiohS ahotrt rase. For Utis census, Hispanic origins are hot racos. 5, ks thls parson of H[spantc, Latino, or Spantah origlM Mo, not at Hispan~, latlno, ar Spanish origin .. Yes. Mtezican. Rdexi;an Am„ Chicarus Yes, Poe:".~ R+can ': Yea, Cutran _ - ..- Yes. arsoth, His:uvdc. Laf~c. w S{raa4sh origin - F>r: ~ro r rreiur<rk, ~ ~,.. rears ~ ..._ f •. r ~lt~,~:s~, SB~Yautrffis, ~,?rffrs, mJ s^ v:. $. What fE ihls person's raceY ~±,~rk X aha or mtxa boxc&. ', WTrdc '. Bn<k A^!can Am_ x Negro Amc in If>u'icR Y A"sska NaU<<6 - ~.Sk'iY a exY.t;~ e C+ftK.N acs. ~' Asian Indian Java~3ese Ke;we liar~atien Cl,enesu Korvs=~ GUU~tIFUttatt p(Ctwitloe>o Fo~lno veto»rnese &a moan Ulhsr Asian - P:~+u rocs. 3ar ~:. Othsr Pacitic tsfander - tin<' srrs!ps. PNrtcrtg, Lr.~iaa Fha++. race br axsrr;3!e. filar?. To^~:r. Ftx<is ~.::; Cart¢'~u.^., etas; m. ~ ar!J sa rr~. Soma other race - Pr!nt rats ~° and Race 5:xxse: 2C19Le~ws United States" CenSUS Not everyone in total population (indicated on chart) can vote as one must be of voting age. Not everyone of voting age can vote as they must be citizens. Not every one of voting age and a citizen can vote because they must be registered. A "stepping stone " of data results. The Census Bureau gives the City a cross tabulation between these two sets. April 19, 2011 -~- CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING 2011 REDISTRICTING OF CITY COUNCIL RESIDENCE DISTRICTS (Continued) Race Data -- Decision on user.. x~:. Amenean ~ White Black tnd~an & Asian Hawaiiwn & Somw Two or ' TOTAL Hispanic TOTAL 7at~POputatum.. Naskfl : Pac~nc CNhwr Ma'e PERCENT. ,.. '. Natrva ' Islander Racw Races '. Race Akute 41 97% ~ 77% 038%. d 354n 00695 13.58x6 2.92% 100.00°5 ~YOn HisVarric Race Abnw 31.32% 31i "s~4o 015% d304'o 0034ir 0.75% 1.84Yo 28.02%. 10000%., F NBCe Gwnbuied (Max} 44 2890 37.4x96. 0.7245 d.854'0 016°,'0 15.82°%0 00095 103.0790 Non HispanicRace Comtwned (Max) <S2.S796. F 38.8846 0.4Q % 4.73°."0 0.09% t.059n 00090 2802°6. i0t 7445: . FRace CoirQurp,W (OMB) 41.97:0 37.0095 O.dT95 d.6090 0.0896 75.18%.. 0.0096. 99.28%. -Nan Hispanic Race Cornninod (QMB} 31.32% 38.57% 023% d S:f% 005"6 O81% 0.00% 28.02% 99.53% Voting Age F'opulwtion r 2.9% United States` ~~us A "stepping stone " of data results, not only are these unique and distinct instances in terms of data, they change by the geography. Race Rknx; d6.22%. 34.09%.. 0.3395 4.79°'° 0.08°5 11.8895 Non Hispanic Race Abne 36 729Sr 33.7795 0.15% 4.75% 0.03%. O. ta~.0 Racs ComWnad (Maz} 48 32% :SA 82 % 088% 5 24% 0 78% 73.76`+0 Mott H~spanrc RwceComt»ned (Max) 37.43% 3A 79% Odt%.. 515% U0996 1.0906 Race (lombined (OMB} 46.22% 34 24%'.. O d4'% S Ota 0-0&0'0 t3.3fi°'u Non H~spenic Rwce Corripined (OMB). 36.7296 33.68%! 0.2395' 4.9545 0 D`,9o 0 FS<i°;° 2.65% t00.W%. 7.8090 22.83% 100.0096 0 0046 702 7846 0.0046' 22.83%, 101,69% 0.00% 99.35°~ 0.0090 22 E33°0 ~ 5z°~. 2010 Census Race Distribution 12.6% (14.7m) Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander ~ 0.2% alone (0.5m) { Some Other Race 6.2% alone (19.1m) ~ White alone ' (223.6m) Black alone American Indian and Alaska Native alone Q.9% (2.9m) Asian alone 4 $% Two or More Races (9.Om) April 19, 2011 -8- CITY COUNCIL BRIEFING 2011 REDISTRICTING OF CITY CO UNCIL RESIDENCE DISTRICTS (Continued) 2010 Census Race Alone or !n Combination N,jhite alone or i in combination (231.Om) { i x_ 63ack alone or ~ ~~ ~a~ in combination (A2.Om) { American Indfan and Alaska Native alone or ~.7°/0 in combination {S ern} Asian alone or ~ I 5 6°0 in combination(17.3m} . ~ Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific islander alone or ~.4% in combination (1.2m} Sorns Other Race alone or ~ ~ ~~ in combination (21.7m} ';~~o ,.^ar? Rvices :` V';? r ~as~ Race In Combination '~ United States Census ~~ sa,Ha ' Race Alone Nationwide, the Race in Combination added slightly to each of the groups. As a beginning point, a set of maps has been created utilizing the demographic and racial groups. "Yellow " indicates the white race, "red " -African American, "blue " -Hispanic origin race, and a couple of "spots "depicting Asian and American Indian. Relative terms of different racial groups, in a predominate sense; there are pockets throughout the City. April 19, 2011 -9- C ITY COUNCIL BRIEFING 2011 REDISTRICTING OF CITY COUNCIL RESIDENCE DISTRICTS (Continued) l April 19, 2011 X041 ~ ~ .. ~:. ~'~ ~9 c s Op Oua NA"n~C1 WILLIAM D. SESSOMS, JFt. IJIAYOR March 29, 2011 Virginia Beach General Assembly Delegation Subject: Senate Redistricting Process Dear Senators and Delegates, V$gOV.CC1Tri MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING 1 2401 COURTHOUSE DRIVE VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23456-9000 (757) 385-1581 FAX (/57) 3855699 vrsessoms v~ vbgov.com Tire City Council of Virginia Beach is very concerned about the redistricting process that will . begin next week. We are particularly concerned about representation in the Senate of Virginia for Virginia's largest city. The population of Virginia Beach, according to the 2010 Session; is 437,494 persons. We understand that a perfect sized Senate seat under the 2010 Census would, be 200,206 persons. Virginia Beach is currently represented by two senators who represent only Virginia Beach, plus three senators who represent smaller portions of the city. 'We are very concerned that one of the plans that has been put forward at this tinne for Senate representation would have only one senator solely represent the City of Virginia Beach. We believe very strongly that the City should be repxesented by two senators who represent only the City of Virginia Beach, plus other senators who represent smaller portions of the population. 'We respectfully request that any redistricting plan that goes forward would, to the extent possible, address our request. City of Vir~i~ia Baach We certainly understand that regardless of how the redistricting process is completed, whomever is elected to represent Virginia Beach will do an excellent job. We believe, however, that two senators representing just the City of Virginia Beach is the most fair and representative outcome. The Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Subject: Senate Redistricting Process Mardi 29, 2011 Page 2 Thank you far addressing our concerns. Staff is available to help in any way possible. Respectfully, Louis R. Jon Vice-Mayor William R. DeSteph Council Member Rita Sweet-Bellitto Council Member airy E ~ iezel Counci enib. .~ William D. Sessoms, Jr. Mayor /k• Glenxz R. Davis, Jr. Council Member Robert M. Dyer Council 1Vlember Rosemary i n Council er tai--i. C> > ' l Barbara M. Henley J lirin cii Membex uncil Member J es ood C it Member cc: Members Senate Privileges & Election Committee Members House Privileges & Election Committee DATE: March 25, 2011 TO: Local Governing Bodies, Virginia Municipal League, and the Virginia Association of Counties FROM: State Board of Elections (SBE) RE: Submission Date far Local Redistricting Plans CC: General Registrars and Electoral Board Members; Mary Spain, Division of Legislative Services; Joshua Lief, Office of the Attorney General This memorandum provides official guidance and recommendations from the State Board of Elections for your locality's redistricting preparation and preclearance submission to the Department. of Justice under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. The SBE is highhly recommending an Anri129 2011 submission deadline for your locality's redistricting Mans In addition, the SBE is recommending that your locality seek expedited tn'eclearance review from the Department of Justice (DOJ) of your redistnctmg elan. The SBE believes an Apnl 29 subrmssion date combined with the possibility of expedited precleazance review will ensure orderly, cost-effective, and successful elections in 2011. 2011 Va Acts Ch 3 Schedule Supports Submission on or before April 29.2011 - As you likely know, Governor McDonnell recently signed into law HB 1507 (now 2011 Acts of Assembly - Chapter 3), a bill that .modifies the. 2011 election. calendar due to the effects of the decennial redistricting process. Subject to preclearance, this legislation moves the primary date from June 14,:2011, to August 23, 2011, while also preserving a full 45=day window fvr the transmission, of overseas absentee ballots for both the primary and general elections. Consequently, absentee ballots fvr primaries must be sent out.. by July 8, 2011, and additional deadlines have been pushed into<May and June. While `elected offices associated with your local redistricting plans may not have primaries, it is extremely important for many reasons that you begin work on your plans immediately.. ln_particular, if local primaries are utilized, timely distribution of those absentee ballots in compliance.with.-the. statutory deadline makes it imperative that local redistricting plans be submitted without delay on or before April 29, 2011.. The Secretary of the State Board of Elections would have difficulty exercising discretion to waive the 45-day deadline for an emergency created by a failure to plan accordingly. Historical Precedent Supports Submission on or before April 29, 2011 There is significant historical precedent for the Department of Justice to reject or amend plans causing a delay in preclearance and affecting important ballot preparation and delivery deadlines under the calendar. For example,. four localities were directed to delay their Board of Supervisor General Elections in 1991 due to a lack of DOJ preclearance. State law (Va. Code § 24.2-313) makes only limited provision for delaying local governing body and school board elections scheduled for the general election date. Minimizing preclearance delay is essential to avoid unnecessary complication and cost. In sum, the condensed calendar makes it especially important that you prepare and submit your local .redistricting plans for preclearance at the earliest possible date. Please keep in mind that under the Voting Rights Act, the locality has the burden to prove that the proposed redistricting plan or other changes meet Section 5 standards. There is no guarantee that this process will go smoothly. Delay Can Adversely Impact Your Locality Delayed action on your end could significantly impact your locality financially. There is no way to know for certain whether a state legislative primary will take place in your locality until, at the earliest, May 27 (the earliest official date under Chapter 3 where SBE would know whether or not a particular primary will be held). Tn the event of your locality's participation in a local, State Senate and/or House of Delegates primary, new voter identification cards must be mailed out to voters affected by redistricting at least 1S days before the primary election (i.e., by Monday, August 8, 2011). Please keep in mind that your General Registrars are working closely with the State Board of Elections in printing voter identification cards and we need the updated information contained in your plans in order to print these cards timely. If your plans are not precleared by the Department of Justice in time for the printing of these voter cards, it is quite likely that a new set of cards will need to be printed and mailed to reflect your local plan. In addition, SBE is attempting to secure funds to help localities defray the costs of the voter cards; however, the SBE will not pay for printing two. sets of voter cards in the event your redistricting plan has not been precleared by the Department of Justice within enough time. Inaction could cost your locality twice as much in printing these cards. Please keep in mind that your general registrars and Electoral Board members are under considerable stress leading up to an election in any year. The added duties caused by redistricting and the. condensed elections calendar compound these pressures.. Thef Commonwealth is under increased scrutiny not only because it is the only state under the Voting Rights Act to hold a General Election in a redistricting year, but also because of heightened scrutiny of timely mailing of military and overseas absentee. ballots. There are many challenges to overcome and Virginia will certainly be in the national spotlight this fall. Please do everything you can to provide the time. and planning necessary to ensure your general registrars and local electoral boards succeed. Remember to Request ExQedited Review---SuQaested Lanauase In addition to the April 29, 2011, deadline,. the SBE also recommends that your legal counsel ask for expedited review when submitting your plan to the Department of Justice.. 28 CFR § 51.34 {a) provides that a submitting authority. "may request that the ,submission be given expedited consideration" and "[w]hen a submitting authority demonstrates good cause ...the Attorney General will attempt to make a decision by the date requested. However, the Attomey General cannot guarantee that such consideration can be given: '~ Submissions asking for expedited consideration "should explain why such consideration is needed and provide the date by which a determination is required: ' Below, please find suggested or sample language that your. locality can use when seeking expedited review when submitting your local redistricting plan to the Department of Justice: Expedited consideration by [insert date 30 days after submission date], is requested to assure absentee ballots can be sent to absent active duty military and overseas applicants at least 4S days before primary elections scheduled for August 23, 2011 under 2011 Va. Acts Ch. 3. Va. Code § 24.2-612 implementing the MOVE Act, as well as Virginia's consent decree in US v. Cunningham, Case No. 3:08CV709 (12.14.2010), establish a 45-day standard for sending absentee ballots that cannot be achieved without expedited review. Preclearance on the requested expedited review calendar of 30 days ~ Please see § 24.2-306 of the Code of Virginia. A new voter card must be sent to all registered voters whose election district, town, precinct or polling place is changed. ~ Please see: htt~•//www iustice goy/crt/abouUvot/28cfr/S1/subpart e.phn. 2 instead of 60 days will greatly benefit voters, particularly absent military and overseas citizens, as well as candidates and election officials .affected by the redistricting transition. C1osel~Monitor Your Submission SBE recommends taking a proactive approach during the preclearance process. A DOJ redistricting analyst should contact the local submitting official and this would be an opportune time to underscore the need for expedition from DOJ. If you have not heard from DOJ by Day 10 after submission, you should take the initiative to contact the Voting Section with a phone call and reiterate your desire for expedited preclearance to facilitate the mailing of absentee ballots to overseas civilian and military voters. Further, if you have not received a response on your request from the Department of Justice after 30 days, then SBE recommends you again contact DOPs Voting Rights Section of the Civil Rights Division and inquire as to status of submission. Resources on Preclearance Process These suggestions are consistent with Virginia Division of Legislative Services' (DLS) guidance, in particular its suggested Redistricting Calendar recommending that preclearance submissions should follow "as promptly as possible" adoption of local redistricting plans in March and April, 20113 DLS's publications, along with Chapter 25 of the General Registrars and Electoral Board Members Handbook," provide important practical guidance for specifics on the redistricting. process, including information on the preclearance process. SBE. staff is also available at your convenience to discuss the 2011 elections calendar and other items contained in this memo. cerely, ,.--- _~~ ~ .. Donald Palmer Secretary, State Board of Elections s wide to Redistricting for 2011, http I/redistricting dls virginia gov/2010/Data/Publications/GuideRedist2011.ydf (suggested Calendar timeline on pdf page 45); Additional publications, including the March 2011 Part 2 Drawing the Line are available here: http•//redistricting dls virginia Qov/2010/Publications.asnx . ° Available here: htta'//townhall virginia gov/L/ViewGDoc.cfm?adid--4333 The Handbook is being updated to reflect more recent DLS guidance. 3 -10- CITY MANAGER `S BRIEFING PLANNING ITEMS PENDING 3:58 P.M. Jack Whitney, Director of Planning, detailed the Planning Items to be heard by the City Council on May 10 and May 24, 2011. May 1 D, 2011 Darshak Patel (Kaveri, L.L.C.) Greyhound Lines, Inc. Great Neck Baptist Church, Inc. City of Virginia Beach -Commercial and Recreational Vehicles Amendments City of Virginia Beach -Zoning Ordinance Amendments City of Virginia Beach -Sign Posting Amendment 7-Eleven, Inc. May 24, 2011 Agapae International Church Charles Payne Breathwaite Place, L.L.C. Whitaker Place, L.L.C. Virginia Beach City Public Schools April 19, 2011 4/19/2011 ~:_~~:~ -~ _-_ .._ ~ _~~;~~ ~ s I _ _ L~.` ~. _ .~ 4/ 19/2011 ', ( L \ iI' .fpgj{E~.CV."(ION- WGIL ~G LOlNW~FJCt VWf .1~1flN~~~ •~~ ~ wu,y +ww Hi.ir i ...mygk+!E` ~ - ~-+~ 4/19/2011 ... ..<<. •._._._ . f .. L_ .~.yyf~ra_"'-.~. __.___ 4/19/2011 °= . ~.~~_ _ __., __~ ~- 4/19/2011 4/19/2011 .~~. ~... ,,.~.,,,;.; ARapae Inlernatitmal C'hurth sib*,. ~q~~l ~Q . ~ Acs ' ~.. nab ~ ~ •~/ ~..AG. \ ., .L ~ ~' . AGt AG/ AGt ` i7 AGi nv /~ u ~. RG3' / Gt: ' \ \. '~/ ~ ~ ~~ .. ACt 91 /' I 6r' ii~~°' ~~,-9T 07 oz 4/ 19/2011 ~~;\ ~ ~y~ - t , ~r `~t , F 1 ~ .r _ N.X ~ l .^~ f _ -- - -- - - ~ .~ s~ wen C'harlcn Pm ne E 5- ; Rsa ~ : ~: } ~ . ~ X 0 F M 1 ~~~Y d13 list rus .1 ', j ~1 ` 9 ` ' - 1 1 i v "Y p. 1 ~ ~ ~ ~R55 ?. ' ` . ~ 4/19/2011 .,; °i.. -~.~ ~~, I .~.•,_ ~_ f. .mss y~. . :~_ - ~~~:° 8 Y ~~~f Q 4/ 19/2011 --- ._ „L~ w ~ W ~ ~;~ treathwaite %att ~_ 1 ~ ;i+. t_ \ ~~~ ~~ r f-- ~-.. ~ r- .- ,~ '' r .J?~ = __- _._ 4/19/2011 ~~ :~~ 3REATHV~AIT°_ ?LAG= $; ,e >`.. -. ~af8' _ _ ~ '" pia. ---- -- ;' - ~.. Nfii2akerl'Ixc L.4C. aN . ~- l~;a 4/19!2011 - _- ~. I,, - _ ,~ . `~ _ ~T j 1 ~~ ~ r At. i I `~ ~ _! I .i s '~ ~_ , ,~ o I____ r~ ~ ~: I ° _.l 1 ELEVATION TWO -~.--- ~_ _ ~ v L ~ ~ . ._- _. ~ f' ', L V3 r-ever.-v,__ y 1 , '~ma[x7G! 1 F •,Whltaker Place,~trA:.C`, PRINCESS ANNE aW,..-.: Vir~,;inia Beach Citc Public Schools ~ ~ £~ ~ C , ., Sufi.-area ? °~" ~ ~' ' b.w, . ~ ~~ ,•s act ' ,. ~ .~-.{' T j- cll3 ! do , ,\ k~ _~ q ~{ '~ ~ A2;2 . ~ Rib' << ' f AGt Rte-. ~v~i+r .. ~~I.tlr ~~~ CUP Iof ~NVnfr Sewage ireabrwnt 4/19/2011 T-- ~ - -~ . - - - LIVING p I 'µ I,~MR CMINF e/ ~ 9 ~~~~- I ~ ,~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~.I., ~! Kd1 m Hlgh S h of Rcplacemenc h-_^r= ,~ ~'nr ress~~xr..fi ..H.'tie~. M Vifg~n a Beach``Cky p11~1~C SCf1OO~5 -11- C ITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 4:18 P.M. The City Manager introduced Catheryn Whitesell, Director -Management Services, to provide a brief review of the City's FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM re FAMILY and YOUTH OPPORTUNITIES concerning the two (2) departments of HEALTH and HUMAN SERVICES. Family and Youth Opportunities FY 2010 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 Family and Youth Opportunities Actual Adjusted Proposed % Change Budgeted Expenditures $ 111,119,307 $ 115,124,392 $ 112,828,787 -1.99% FTEs 1,087.98 1,056.43 1,077.15 1.96% Includes Health and Human Services Departments City Council Goals: r Create a financially stable City providing excellent services Increased service demands for assistance from FYO agencies given slow economic recovery. Continued reduction of State funding and shifting costs to the City. 6.596 of TnYal Family and Youth Opportunities Balance 0.9°'° Local (Transfers) 0.2°'° Major Revenues Fees and Charges r Medicaid and Insurance Payments Charges for Services Other Local (Transfers) 'r Services provided to user Departments State and Federal v Health Grants r Human Services Programs Fund Balance For local construction, capital and start-up costs for the Indian River Road Intermediate Care Facility to be constructed with the State. April 19, 2011 Revenue Sources -12- C ITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HEALTH 4:22 P.M. Dr. Venita Newby-Owens, Director -Health, provided a summarization re the Health Department and their accomplishments. Health Department .."~`s`..e.a Sv,~: "::7~,'931w ~~ x, c:.4 f ~ ~ t x i "" Y°' ') fi i ' Gty Public Health 3,040,204 10.75 2,858,445 10.75 (181,759) State Public Health 2,554,329 108.0 2,554,329 108.0 0.00 Grants .:.2,496;387 0.00 TBD 0.00 TBD. Total 8,090,920 118.75 5,412,774 118.75 (181,759) CITY FUNDINCa ONLY 12.0% /~ 88.03'0 _, ^ Personnel O Operations ^ City Mandated Contribution ®CKher Local Revenue ^ State ^ Federal Health Department Received $150,000 in Federal funding to develop and implement a pandemic plan; and to increase outreach/marketing to vulnerable and underserved populations in Virginia Beach. Received funding to provide general nutrition education classes and individual breastfeeding education to WIC clients. During fiscal year 2012, approximately 1,000 clients will receive nutrition education classes and 450 nursing moms will receive counseling support. >= Began annual inspections of nail salons to enhance the safety of these establishments. In fiscal year 2012 it is anticipated over 250 establishments will be inspected in Virginia Beach. VBDPH has experienced an increase in demand for services from our senior citizen population. An additional senior health education clinic location will be added in fiscal year 2012 to address this need. April 19, 2011 -13- CITYCOUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP FY2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HEALTH (Continued) Health Department FY 2011-12 Trends & H'sghlights 3> VBDPH will partner with the Virginia Beach Family Health Center to provide a permanent medical home for SO% of the uninsured / underinsured children who will be seen in our clinic in 2012. Approximately 48 child safety seat education classes will be held in English and Spanish and 570 safety seats will be distributed to low- income children during 2012. :- VBDPH will continue actively working with the State task force and local healthcare providers to increase testing and treatment for STDs. April 19, 2011 -14- C ITY COUNCIL B UDGET WORKSHOP FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HUMAN SERVICES 4:38 P.M. Robert Morin, Director -Human Services, distributed brochures re the Department of Human Services, which are hereby made a part of the record. Mr. Morin recognized the staff in attendance. Randy Thompson -Social Services, has been with the Department for many years and assists with specific responses concerning the Budget. Social Services 40,108,379 309.29 38,261,586 3D5.29 (1,846,793} Mental Health 23,574,496 263.01 23,037,122 259.01 (537;374) Developmental Services 21,384,045 289.70 21,863,316 319.42 479,271 Comprehensive Services 14,487,119 2.00 13,931,191 2.00 (555,928} Central5ervices 4,663,331 65.87 4,712,867 66.87 49,536 Juvenile Detention Center 4,302,533 67.56 4,226,213 65.56 (76,320) Grants 1,867,284 25.00 2,261,788 25.00 394,504 Pendleton Child Center 1,697,001 23.25 1,676,259 23.25 (20,742} Total 112,084,188 1,045.68 iQ9,970,342 1,066.40 (2,113,846) Mr. Morin advised the "bottom line" is the proposed cut of $2.1-MILLION received on the proposed FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN (Human Services) Human Services FY 2011-12 Proposed Revenues $6,733,482 $28,690,313 $19,019.410 6% , ~ , 184 FY 2011-12 Proposed Expenditures 13% $33,248,220 $22,278,917 30% 20% ^ General Fund ^ Federal ^ State ^ Medicaid O Fees ^Personnel ^Assistance Payments OOperations April 19, 2011 Human Services -15- CITYCOUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW HUMANSERVICES (Continued) Human Services DFiS Service Changes .- Juvenile Detention Center reduction of $107,401 (2 FTE) which reflects the decline in admissions. Y Mediation and Visitation Services reduction of $244,968 (3 FTE) will affect services to 140 families. :- Mental Health/Substance Abuse reduction of $121,596 will create a waiting list for psychiatric evaluation and medication treatment to 450 consumers. ~~ Mental Health Residential Services reduction of $86,881 (1 FTE) will affect service coordination for residential services and reduce service to 42 consumers. %- Substance Abuse Prevention Education services reduction of $70,042 (1 FTE) will serve 149 fewer students. r- New Intermediate Care facilities (Two 5-bed facilities) with cost of $1,027,299 (31.5 FTE). Human Services FY 2011-12 Trends Se. Highlights r Since the FV 2009 Adopted Budget, the ae neral Fund portion of the Human Services budget has been reduced by $5,252,597 (15.5%) from 31.2% to 26.6%. .~ Since FY 2008 SNAP (Food Stamps) cases have increased 94.7% with a current recipient count of 31,516. Human Services FY 2011-12 Trends $c Highlights (continued Y Since 2008, provided Crisis Intervention training and services through collaborative efforts with the Police Department and the Sheriff's office. CIT Assessment Center opened in 2010. Despite budget reductions in other areas, we've continued to fund nine staff to serve approximately 190 Jail inmates per month. In FY 2010, Federal and State assistance payments made to or on behalf of Virginia Beach residents totaled $256,874,586 (Medicaid, SNAP, TANF, Energy Assistance). April 19, 2011 -16- C ITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN and CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM HUMANSERVICES (Continued) Human Services FY 2011-12 Trends & Highlights {continued) ~- In FY 2010, CSB served 10,087 persons (an increase of 1345, or 15%) with Mental Health, Substance Abuse and Developmental Disabilities. Although our numbers served increased, we still have a substantial waiting list: 310 persons waiting for Mental Health Substance Abuse services >- 337 waiting for Developmental Services Human Services FY 2011-12 Treads & Highlights (continued} ;~ DHS is proposing 31.5 FTEs to staff two five bed Intermediate Care Facilities serving individuals discharged from the Southeastern Virginia Training Center. On-going operations funded by Medicaid; startup operating and construction costs @ $1,027,299 are proposed to be funded from the DHS fund balance. Operating enhancements due to Social Services Computer Migration Y Health Care Reform April 19, 2011 -17- C ITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW FY2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN S: 07 P.M. David Bradley, Management Services Administrator, referenced prior presentations to City Council, relative the Capital Improvement Program. Prior Presentations to Council Communication and Info Technology -February 1, 2011 Roadways -March 1, 2011 ~~~ i~~=,,, Storm Water-March 8, 2011 ~~' ~_ ~~_ ,`.~= Coastal -March 15, 2011 ~ -~_I=`~ ~i"~ -- ~,_~ Debt- March 15, 2011 - Facilities and Fleet -March 22, 2011 ;t ' z FY 2012/FY 2017 Capital Improvement Program _ ~~ s~ ~:. ,'~~ Schools _ - - ~ ~ ~ $456,624,035 Roadways 745,157,586 _._... Buildings/Equipment ~___m___ ___._. 135,870,125 ,___. _.m_____~ ..~~_._....._._ Parks and Recreation 123,491,762 _.__~w____.__ _____ _.._ Water. and Sewer __... _. 328,796,774 Storm Water 226,022,610 j Coastal 142,460,37.1 Economic and Tourism Development 239,287,405 Communications & Information Technology... 68,786,645; Total Funding $2,466,497,313 Relative Roadways, the Lesner Bridge Replacement is $90-Million, which is one-eighth of the Total funding of Roadways: $745,157,586. Kellam High School costs slightly over $100-Million, which is just under one-fifth of the School section. Just these two (2) projects alone encompass one-twelfth of the entire Capital Improvement Program. April 19, 2011 -18- CITYCOUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN (Continued) Capital Budget Parks and Recreation 33.6 12.0 (21.6)' ~___ __ i Water and Sewer 25.0 40.0 15.0 Economic and Tourism 20.1 Development Communications & ` 4.3 lnformationJechnology Total Capital Budeet $ 201.7 The first year of the Capital Improvement Program, which is the only year actually appropriated by City Council, is $108.5-Million more than the current Capital Budget due to the infusion of funds from the Governor's Transportation Plan. This alone added $86-Million in the first year of the proposed CIP. Buildings, Utilities, and Communication and Information Technology all are seeing increases in funding as the City begins to address the backlogs in building maintenance, neighborhood drainage, technology and the Sewer Consent Order. Buildings/Equipment are increasing approximately $5-Million due to backlog issues. Parks and Recreation appears to be taking a "large cut ". The Williams Farm Recreation Center project was in the FY 2011 CIP and the reason for a reduction. There was a 4 year sewer increase, which City Council APPROVED last year. This was to address a Consent Order. This is part of their program to increase the Capital Improvement Program from $25-Million to $40-Million a year. There is a significant backlog in Storm Water with proposed rate increases in the upcoming Capital Improvement Program. Economic and Tourism Development appears to be taking a slight "cut ". When this program was being submitted the end of March 2011, the $7.5-Million from the State for the BRAG program had not been received. The City Manager's transmittal letter referenced areas desired to be addressed over several years: Risk Management, Storm Water, Information and Technology infrastructure. Capital Funding comprises the $310-Million. Pay-As-You-Go financing has been significantly decreased over the last several years. Part has been to mitigate some of the issues on the Operating Budget to save some of the programs. April 19, 2011 Storm Water 8.6 27.1 18.5 -19- CITYCOUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW FY2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN (Continued) Capital Funding Pay-as-you-go $33.7 $ 41.0 $7.3 __ - _. _. General Fund Balance 31.5 23.9 (7.6) Other Fund Balances 22.7 13.7 (9.0) State and Federal Funds 16.8 93.2 76.4 Bonds & Lease Purchases 87.5 133.3 45.8 Other Sources 9.5 5.1 (4.4) _.. Total Capital Budget _. $201.7 $ 310.2 .. $ 108.5 Funding for the Capital Budget includes $41-Million of Pay As-You-Go financing, $32-Million which comes from dedicated sources; $37.6-Million in fund balance usage, including the use of $20- Million in School Risk Management Fund surplus; $93.2 Million in state and federal funds, comprised mainly of the $86-Million in new state funding for roadways; and $133.3 Million in debt. The remaining $S.1-Million comes from various other sources. Mr. Bradley advised Staff only appropriates the first year of the Capital Budget (Year One). Years Two through Six are just for planning purposes. Why Raise Debt Per Capita to $2,800? Not for Operating Budget Y Proposed CIP exceeds $2,400 in FY 2013, FY 2014, and FY 2016 and helps to address infrastructure backlog ~ Capacity held to accommodate future City Council priorities: r Headquarters Hotel Development of Dome Site ;: Pleasure House Point y Actual debt per capita ($2,235) is one of lowest of Hampton Roads cities; most exceed $2,900 > Actual debt per capita is one of lowest of AAA cities nationally with population 250,000 to 500,000 -below the mean of $3,433 and median of $3,163 Y Financial Advisor supports increase to $2,800 April 19, 2011 -20- CITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN (Continued) Roadway Projects ~= VDOT Six Year Urban Funding for Virginia Beach: - FY09 - FY14 (original) r FY09 - FY14 (revised) - FY10 - FY15 = FY11- FY16 r FY12 - FY17 $ 62.8 M ~ ` ~'~ ~ ~-~-~~~"'t ~~ $ 10.2 M :{'~~~, $ 0 ~ X= %' Success in obtaining COF (Competitively Obtained Funds): := FY 07 - FY12 funding $ 92.8 M *includes ARRA ~~ FY12 $ 8.4 M := Annual Avg. with ARRA $ 15.5 M Annual Avg. without ARRA $ 7.9 M Roadway Projects Major roadway projects continued to move forward through increased City funding and reallocated State and Federal funds (with VDOT approval): r Birdneck Road -Phase II ($49,374,000) Lynnhaven Parkway-Phase IX ($44, 288,127 ) r' Witchduck Road - Phase I ($26,486,900) r' Princess Anne Road -Phase IV ($61,450,270) r Princess Anne Road/Kempsville Road Intersection Improvements ($89,636,045) Nimmo Parkway- Phase V-A ($64,288,216) y Lynnhaven Parkway- Phase XI ($38,553,413) ~~~~~~~ . ~, _ .... t ~- F '_~ yY ~' <~,~~' ~' ~ .~ .. April 19, 2011 -21- CITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW FY2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN (Continued) Roadway Projects ' $362 million from Governor's ~. Transportation Plan includes: Lesner Bridge Replacement ($90,215,600) Lynnhaven Parkway -Phase XI ($38,553,413) Witchduck Road -Phase II ($32,582,950) r Elbow Road Extended -Phase II ($53,360,642) Laskin Road - Phase I ($112,934,495) Laskin Road -Phase II ($22,866,723) Indian River Road -Phase VII ($77,514,600) r Holland Road -Phase VI ($52,718,249) ;= Seven positions added because of additional project funding-three Engineers, one Contract Specialist, o Construction Inspector, and two Accountants (paid for by projects) Building Projects 1 Replace Anu~ial l,ar~ &Adoptiun Center w is `-~ 2 Replace Parks & Rec City-Wide Programs Office 3 Relocate Resort Maintenance Compound 4 Replace Fire/Large Vehicle Repair Shop 5 Replace Euclid Yard Buildings 6 Relocate Treasurer's Beach Branch 7 - Replace Town Center (Thalia) Fire Station. 8 Replace Police Special Ops/Evidence Storage/Forensics Complex 9-- Replace Parks & Recreation Landscape Services/Parks Construction Facilities 10 Replace Chesapeake Bch Fire & Rescue Station 11 Replace Police 4`h Precinct 12 Replace PW/Highways Modular Buildings 13 Replace Blackwater Fire & Rescue Station $13,401,000 Contitruction 337,500 Design b Not Funded 1,799,970 Construction 0 Not Funded:' Recommend Closure of 0 Office 9,435,000 Construction 7,809,420 Construction Included with Design #2above 5,248,800 Construction 434,504 Design 0 Not Funded 306,091 Design April 19, 2011 -22- CITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN (Continued) Building/Equipment = Backlogs being partially or fully addressed: Fire Apparatus (#'s 3371 and 3134) r Building Rehabilitation Various Buildings HVAC Rehab and Renewal (#3136) Various Buildings Rehab and Renewal (#3137) :~ Fire Stations (#3506) - Heritage Buildings (#3103) Judicial Center Water Intrusion Abatement (#3507) = Aquarium Building Systems and Infrastructure Rehab (#'s 3146 and 3152) r Alarm System/MOSCAD (#3102) _,~- ~,. --. 3 ~- -` P ~ ~ ~ I 5 r /Wif~tkt~ Parks and Recreation Projects Includes funding for: y Williams Farm Recreation Center -Scheduled for opening September 2012 :j Modernization of Bow Creek (1960) and Kempsville (1977) Recreation Centers r Financed through existing dedicated real estate tax - Bow Creek staff will be temporarily assigned to Williams Farm and other recreation centers April 19, 2011 -23- CITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN (Continued) Parks and Recreation Projects Bikeways and Trails Plan (BTP) Implementation ~= Begins a funding strategy to implement the BTP that Council is to consider as part of the Comprehensive Plan next Tuesday (4/26/11) Top Priority Infrastructure Projects include: ;= Bike lanes on Shore Drive (Kendall Drive to Atlantic Avenue) i Shared-use path along the former Norfolk-Southern Right of Way corridor NimmoTrail (Lago Mar tosandbridge) Thalia Creek Greenway := Bike-pedestrian connection over I-264 to connect Mt. Trashmore to Thalia Creek Greenway/Town Center r' Bike route signs on new "signed shared roadways" A shared-use path along Buckner Boulevard r Rosemont Road to near Independence Boulevard Council's Bikeways and Trails Advisory Committee will help identify and prioritize additional bikeways and trails projects Water and Sewer Projects The Sanitary Sewer Consent Order mandates overhauling the sewer system Council approved afour-year stepped rate increase in FY 2010-11 to address compliance Funding is included for: r Landstown Yard Improvements ($3,172,000) .- Princess Anne Road Water Improvements ($2,416,145) i Resort Area Neighborhood Revitalization ($3,746,636) 'r Water Transmission System Upgrade Program ($15,415,391) :- Sewer Pump Stations Modifications ($67,066,885) r Sanitary Sewer System Revitalization Program ($25,014,000) Sanitary Sewer Regulatory Compliance Program ($28,593,476) Annual funding includes $27 million in utility bonds, $8 million pay-as-you- go, and $5 million retained earnings April 19, 2011 -24- CITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW FY2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN (Continued) Storm Water Projects Proposed fee increases for FY 2012 (7.5C), FY 2013 (5G), & FY 2014 (5C). FY 2012 will address: = Flood Control Project Backlog y Water Quality Project Backlog r Maintenance Project Backlog Two crews to address ditch and pipe cave-in maintenance and an Engineer and a Construction Inspector to meet project management requirements Unfunded Federal mandate to address pollution limits is not yet addressed Storm Water Projects -Flood Control 7005 North Lake Holly Watershed $17,071,135 7010 Elizabeth River Shores 2,130,450 7016 South Lake Holly Watershed 12,738,000 7024 Southern Canal/Lead Ditch and Culvert 950,000 7033 Rosemont Forest Drainage Improvements 6,800,000 7035 Lawson Forest Drainage 1,080,000 7036 Baker Road Culvert & Ditch 450,000 7037 Bellamy Manor Outfall Ditch 450,000 7038 Thoroiaghgood Drainage -Interim 670,000 7039 Level Green -Interim 675,000 7040 Aragona Village -interim 650,000 7049 Beach Garden Park - Kilborne Court & Holly Road 900,000 Improvements 7063 Neighborhood Storm'Water Infrastructure 9,159,886 7145 Arctic Avenue -Baltic Avenue 7,345,181 7151 Cape Henry Beach Drainage 10,618,066 7409 Shore Drive Drainage Preliminary Design 428,152 7902 North Beach Drainage. 29,142,523 TOTAL $101,258,393 April 19, 2011 -25- CITYCOUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN (Continued) Storm Water Projects -Water Quality 7027 SWM Master Planning, Analysis, and Inventory $1,895,906 7153 Lynnhaven Watershed Restoration 5,014,16$ 7159 Water Quality Participation Projects 1,501,500 7183 Storm Water Quality Enhancements 21,138,063 7406 Elizabeth River TMDL Implementation Plan 1,200,000 7412 Southern River TMDL Implementation Plan 1,200,000 TOTAL $31,949,637 s ~_, . 'fir.' i ~. ,~`~. Storm Water Projects -Maintenance 7004 Storm Water lofrastriacture Rehabilitation $40,456,052 7067 Primary System Infrastructure Improvements 14,510,393 709.1 Residential Drainage Cost Participation Program 550,000 7152 Lake Management 24,758,135 7404 Aragona Neighborhood Infrastructure Rehab 2,000,000 7405 Brigadoon Lakes Maintenance Dredging 2,250,000 7407 Green Run Lakes Maintenance Dredging 750,000 7408 Green Run Neighborhood Infrastructure Rehab 4,000,000 7411 Oceanfront Storm Water Facilities Maintenance 1,062,000 7412 Storm Water Pump Station Modifications 2,478,000 TOTAL $92,814,580 April 19, 2011 -26- CITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN (Continued) Coastal Projects r Neighborhood Dredging Program initiated r Partnership between City and waterfront neighborhoods $809,388 in reserve for City dredging and upfront costs Will create SSD's for each neighborhood requesting dredging Policy included in ordinance for adoption r Financing of sand replenishment being studied over the next year <~ ~ _~, -- * ~ ,- ~; ~' r ~ ~~,~~' - '~~ Economic and Tourism Projects ~ Governor's Budget includes $7.5 million for Oceana project y Includes three SGA projects: Burton Station Road Improvements -Phases II and III and other funding for SGA initiatives ~= Maintenance funding provided for Oceanfront and Town Center garages and Amphitheater ~;~ .. ~~~ r~ ~~ ~' ~ ~~~=~ . ;_ - - .- April 19, 2011 -27- CITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORKSHOP CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW FY 2011-2012 MANAGEMENT RESOURCE PLAN (Continued) Communications & Information Technology Projects r New projects include: VBAIert Replacement v' ALI Database Management & Selective Routing r Data Storage and Management for Evidentiary Files eGIS Master Address Repository Library Automated Material Handling r Two positions added to help meet communication and technology needs (paid for by projects) Future Concerns r Future concerns continue to address backlogs in each CIP section Restoring Pay-As-You-Go funding to the CIP April 19, 2011 -28- A SPECIAL SESSION shall be SCHEDULED for the purpose of conducting a PUBLIC HEARING at Green Run High School, 1700 Dahlia Drive, on Thursday, April 21, 2011, at 6:00 P.M. The purpose of this SPECIAL FORMAL SESSION will be to invite all citizens to share their concerns re the Management Resource Plan (FY 2011-2012 Budget) April 19, 2011 -29- ADJOURNMENT Mayor Sessoms DECLARED the City Council Workshop ADJOURNED at S:SO P.M. Beverly O. Hooks, CMC Chief Deputy City Clerk <~1--'~-!~~~ --------------- Ruth Hodges Fraser, MMC City Clerk April 19, 2011