Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFEBRUARY 12, 2013 AGENDACITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
"COMMUNITY FOR A LIFETIME"
CITY COUNCIL
MAYOR WILLIAM D. SESSOMS, JR., At -Large
VICE MAYOR LOUIS R. JONES, Bayside - District 4
GLENN R. DAVIS, Rose Hall - District 3
WILLIAM R. DeSTEPH, At -Large
ROBERT M DYER, Centerville - District 1
BARBARA M. HENLEY, Princess Anne — District 7
JOHND.MOSS, At -Large
AMELIA N. ROSS-HAMMOND, Kempsville - District 2
JOHN E. UHRIN, Beach —District 6
ROSEMARY WILSON, At -Large
JAMES L. WOOD, Lynnhaven -District 5
CITY COUNCIL APPOINTEES
CITY MANAGER - JAMES K. SPORE
CITYATTORNEY-MARK D. STILES
CITY ASSESSOR - JERALD D. BANAGAN
CITYAUDITOR - LYNDON S. REMIAS
CITY CLERK- RUTH HODGES FRASER, MMC
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
12 FEBRUARY 2013
I. CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING - Conference Room -
A. CENTERVILLE SGA MASTER PLAN — FINAL DRAFT
Paul Ostergaard, Vice President, Urban Design Associates
II. CITY COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
III. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
IV. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REVIEW
V. INFORMAL SESSION
A. CALL TO ORDER — Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones
B. ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL
C. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
CI THALLBUILDING
2401 COURTHOUSE DRIVE
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA 23456-9005
PHONE: (757) 385-4303
FAX (75 7) 385-5669
E-MAIL: Ctycncl@vbgov.com
4:00 P.M.
5:00 P.M.
VI. FORMAL SESSION - City Council Chamber - 6:00 PM
A. CALL TO ORDER — Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones
B. INVOCATION — Reverend Tommy Taylor
Pastor, Trinity Church
C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
D. ELECTRONIC ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL
E. CERTIFICATION OF CLOSED SESSION
F. MINUTES
1. INFORMAL and FORMAL SESSIONS
G. FORMAL SESSION AGENDA
1. CONSENT AGENDA
H. MAYOR'S PRESENTATION
1. PROCLAMATION
"Captain Charles L. Stuppard Day" — February 12, 2013
I. PUBLIC HEARING
1. SALE OF EXCESS CITY -OWNED PROPERTY
a. Proposed 25`h Street Development
J. PUBLIC COMMENT
1. SUSTAINABILITY PLAN
January 22, 2013
K. ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS
1. Ordinance to DECLARE the parcel at 310 25th Street to be in EXCESS of the City's needs and to
AUTHORIZE the EXECUTION of a Comprehensive Agreement with 25th Street Associates,
LLC (DISTRICT 6 — BEACH)
2. Resolution to PETITION the VDOT to CONVEY certain real property re right-of-way of
Commuter Drive to the City
3. Resolution to AUTHORIZE the City Manager to EXECUTE an Accord, Satisfaction and
Release Agreement with the Southeastern Public Service Authority (SPSA) re Landfill Phase I
Capping project
4. Resolution to AUTHORIZE the City Manager to EXECUTE two (2) Agreements with the
Patriotic Festival, LLC ($325,000 Sponsorship Grants)
5. Ordinance to EXTEND the date for Town Center Associates, LLC, to satisfy conditions re closure
of a portion of Market Street (DISTRICT 4 — BAYSIDE)
6. Ordinance to AUTHORIZE $1,000 reimbursement re employee legal fees
7. Ordinances to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE donated funds:
a. $130,000 from The Virginia Beach Library Foundation and $50,000 from the Friends of the
Virginia Beach Public Library to the Operating Budget of the Department of Public Libraries
b. $100,000 from Dominion Virginia Power to the City's Beautification Fund re landscape
management
c. $ 3,337.60 from the Parks and Recreation Foundation re improvement of
the Bellamy Woods Park
8. Ordinances to ACCEPT, APPROPRIATE and TRANSFER Grant Funds:
a. $ 40,000 for creation of the Cercle Des Vacances French Co-op Partnership re Virginia
Tourism Corporation Marketing Leverage program
b. $ 36,250 from the Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) through the Byrne
Justice Assistant Grant Program re implementation of an aggression replacement training
program
c. $ 13,000 from the Virginia Department of Emergency Management (VDEM) re upgrades to
the City's Emergency Operations Center
d. $72,010 to the General Registrar FY 2013 Budget re replacement of pollbooks
L. PLANNING
1. Application of OCEAN CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPERS, LLC for a Variance to §4.4(b)
of the Subdivision Ordinance to SUBDIVIDE one lot into two (2) at 4805 Lee Avenue
DISTRICT 4 - BAYSIDE
RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL
2. Application of MICHAEL T. ABENANTE for a Variance to §4.4(b) of the Subdivision
Ordinance to CREATE an additional lot at 716 Woodstock Road
DISTRICT 1 - CENTERVILLE
RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL
3. Application of C &C DEVELOPMENT CO., INC., Christopher J. Ettel and Chancey
W. Walker, III to reconstruct a Non -Conforming Use and DEMOLISH and
CONTRUCT two single family residences at 207 51St Street
DISTRICT 5 - LYNNHAVEN
RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL
4. Application of SURF BEACH CLUB, INC. to reconstruct a Non -Conforming Use and
REPLACE nine (9) cabana structures at 5704 Ocean Front Avenue
DISTRICT 5 - LYNNHAVEN
RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL
5. Application of BURNETTE DEVELOPMENT, LLC and PARETTA D. MUDD for a
Conditional Use Permit re a self -storage at 5737 Northampton Boulevard
DISTRICT 2 - KEMPSVILLE
RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL
6. Application of PRINCESS ANNE MASONIC LODGE #25 and EMMA SMITHSON
FOUNTAIN for a Conditional Use Permit to MOVE the Masonic Lodge from Princess Anne
Road to 3067 West Neck Road (the Thomas Woodhouse historical property)
DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE
RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL
7. Application of TRUSTEES OF FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF VIRGINIA
BEACH for a Conditional Use Permit re a columbarium at 300 36th Street
DISTRICT 6 - BEACH
RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL
8. Application of BAKER ROAD SENIORS, LLC for a Change of Zoning from Conditional A-
36 Apartment to Conditional A-24 Apartment at 544 Baker Road
DISTRICT 4 - BAYSIDE
RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL
9. Application of MPB, INC. for a Conditional Change of Zoning from AG -1 and AG -2
Agricultural to Conditional 0-2 Office re an office structure at Princess Anne Road and
Elson Green Avenue (deferred November 13, December 4, 11, 2012 and January 22, 2013)
DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE
RECOMMENDATION
M. APPOINTMENTS
APPROVAL
BOARD OF BUILDING CODE APPEALS
COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD (CSB)
HAMPTON ROADS ECOCNOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE (HREDA)
PROCESS IMPROVEMENT STEERING COMMITTEE
N. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
O. NEW BUSINESS
P. ADJOURNMENT
PUBLIC COMMENT
Non -Agenda Items
Each Speaker will be allowed 3 minutes
and each subject is limited to 3 Speakers
*******************
If you are physically disabled or visually impaired
and need assistance at this meeting,
please call the CITY CLERK'S OFFICE at 385-4303
CITY COUNCIL SESSIONS
February, 2013
February 19 Workshop 4:00-6:00 P.M.
February 26 Briefing, Informal, Formal 6:00 P.M.
2013 CITY HOLIDAYS
.Memorial nay - Monday, May 27
Independence Day - Thursday, July 4
Labor Da.1, - Monda.y, September 2
Veterans Day - ,Vlonda.V, November /I
Thanksgiving Da.), & Day qfter Thanksgiving - Thursda.V,
November 28 & Friday, November 29
Christmas 1-,-ve (half day) - Tuesday, December 24
Christmas Day - Wednesday, December 25
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFING - Conference Room - 4:00 P.M.
A. CENTERVILLE SGA MASTER PLAN — FINAL DRAFT
Paul Ostergaard, Vice President, Urban Design Associates
II. CITY COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS
III. CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
IV. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REVIEW
V. INFORMAL SESSION - Conference Room - 5:00 P.M.
A. CALL TO ORDER — Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones
B. ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL
C. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
V. FORMAL SESSION - City Council Chamber - 6:00 PM
A. CALL TO ORDER — Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones
B. INVOCATION —Reverend Tommy Taylor
Pastor, Trinity Church
C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
D. ELECTRONIC ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL
E. CERTIFICATION OF CLOSED SESSION
F. MINUTES
1. INFORMAL and FORMAL SESSIONS January 22, 2013
G. FORMAL SESSION AGENDA
1. CONSENT AGENDA
H. MAYOR'S PRESENTATION
1. CAPTAIN CHARLES L. STUPPARD DAY— February 12, 2013
WHEREAS: Captain Charles L. Stuppard, PhD, USN was born in St Marc, Haiti, and graduated Cornell University, he
joined the Navy in 1985 as an Aviation Officer Candidate. After he was commissioned and he completed flight training,
he switched to the Surface Warfare community,
WHEREAS: He served with distinction on the USS BIDDLE, REEVES, SIDES, GONZALEZ, NICHOLAS and the
ARLEIGH BURKE. While there, Captain Stuppard deployed to the Mediterranean Sea as the Commander of the US
Surface Strike Group 06-1;
WHEREAS: His shore duty assignments included: student at the Naval War College in Newport, Rhode Island, where
he earned a Masters in National Security and Strategic Studies. He studied at the Armed Forces Staff College in Norfolk,
Virginia, the Command Leadership School in Newport, Rhode Island, and served a one year Individual Augmentee tour
in Kuwait from May 2007 -June 2008 caring for a Force of 10,000 sailors and served as Executive Assistant to the
Commander of Navy Installations Command at the Washington Navy Yard prior to assuming his current assignment as
Commander at the Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek -Fort Story;
WHEREAS. His awards include the Legion of Merit, Defense Meritorious Service Medal, three Meritorious Service
Medals, four Navy Commendation Medals, the Joint Service Achievement Medal and various Unit citations and ribbons;
WHEREAS: In November 2012, Captain Stuppard earned his Doctoral Degree in Humanities from Salve Regina
University in Newport, Rhode Island;
WHEREAS. During his tour as Commander of Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek -Fort Story, he executed $3 Million
in facilities sustainment work, executed over $184- Million in construction for Commander, Navy Installations Command
(CNIQ facilities which vastly improved the operational capabilities and quality of life for those who live and work on the
Installation;
WHEREAS. He opened an $11 Million LEED Silver Child Development Center, a $47 -Million Navy Exchange (NER7
Mini -Mart, and the $8.2 -Million First Naval Construction Division Headquarters, a LEED Gold facility that incorporates
cutting edge energy saving designs into a state-of-the-art Command Center for the Naval Construction Force, and,
perhaps most importantly, after determining that Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek's electrical distribution system
was inadequate to support current and future operations as well as posing life safety risks, he and his staffpursued and
were successful for emergent Congressional funding in support of a $2 Million project that will double the installation's
capacity two full fiscal years earlier than would have been accomplished otherwise,
WHEREAS. His service to the nation has been exemplary since taking the Oath as an Officer in the United States Navy,
and,
WHEREAS. Throughout his career, he has been a Patron, a Statesman, a Strategic Thinker and an accomplished
Leader.
NOW THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED: That the Virginia Beach City Council pause in its deliberations to recognize
Captain Charles L. Stuppard, PhD, USN, and to THANK him for the tremendous contribution he has made to ensure
"Virginia Beach is the best City in the world to live, work and play":
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That all citizens recognize Captain Stuppard's exemplary military service and that this
Twelfth day of February, Two Thousand Thirteen, be commemorated as:
CAPTAIN CHARLES L. STUPPARD DAY
Given under our hands and seals this Twelfth day of February, Two Thousand Thirteen,
Councilman Cjlenn R, Davis
Council Lady Barbara Henley
Councifman john D. Uhnn
Councifman Wif iam R. "Biil" DeSteph Councilman Robert M 'Bob' Dyer
Councifman7ohn D. Moss
Council Lady Rosemary IM[son
Virz Mauar Louis ?t. Tones
Dr. Amelia N Ross -Hammond
CounciGnan7ames L. Wood
Mayor 'WifliamD. "Nhff'Sessoms
PUBLIC HEARING
1. SALE OF EXCESS CITY -OWNED PROPERTY
a. Proposed 25th Street Development
The Virginia Beach City Council will
hold a PUBUC HEARING on Tuesday,
February 12, 2013, at 6:OOP.M. in
the Council Chamber, City Hall -
Bldg. 1, Virginia Beach Municipal
Center to hear public comment on
the sale of:
the 2.18 -acre municipal
parking lot on 25- St.
between Arctic Ave. and
Pacific Ave. (GPIN 2427-09-
5787).
Any questions concerning this matter
should be directed to the Strategic
Growth Area Office, 222 Central Park
Ave., Suite 1540, Virginia Beach, VA
23462. (757) 385-2900.
If you are physically disabled or
visually impaired and need
assistance at this meeting, please
call the CITY CLERK'S OFFICE at 385-
4303; Hearing impaired, call TDD
711 (Telephone Device for the Deaf).
Ruth Hodges Fraser, MMC
City Clerk
Beacon Feb. 3, 2013 23413209
J. PUBLIC COMMENT
1. SUSTAINABILITY PLAN
K. ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS
1. Ordinance to DECLARE the parcel at 310 25th Street to be in EXCESS of the City's needs and to
AUTHORIZE the EXECUTION of a Comprehensive Agreement with 25th Street Associates,
LLC (DISTRICT 6 — BEACH)
2. Resolution to PETITION VDOT to CONVEY certain real property re right-of-way of
Commuter Drive to the City
3. Resolution to AUTHORIZE the City Manager to EXECUTE an Accord, Satisfaction and
Release Agreement with Southeastern Public Service Authority (SPSA) re Landfill Phase I
Capping project
4. Resolution to AUTHORIZE the City Manager to EXECUTE two (2) Agreements with the
Patriotic Festival, LLC ($325,000 Sponsorship Grants)
5. Ordinance to EXTEND the date for Town Center Associates, LLC, to satisfy conditions re closure
of a portion of Market Street (DISTRICT 4 — BAYSIDE)
6. Ordinance to AUTHORIZE $1,000 reimbursement re employee legal fees
7. Ordinances to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE donated funds:
a. $130,000 from The Virginia Beach Library Foundation and $50,000 from the Friends of the
Virginia Beach Public Library to the Operating Budget of the Department of Public Libraries
b. $100,000 from Dominion Virginia Power to the City's Beautification Fund re landscape
management
c. $ 3,337.60 from the Parks and Recreation Foundation re improvement of the Bellamy
Woods Park
8. Ordinances to ACCEPT, APPROPRIATE and TRANSFER Grant Funds:
a. $ 40,000 for creation of the Cercle Des Vacances French Co-op Partnership re Virginia
Tourism Corporation Marketing Leverage program
b. $ 36,250 from the Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) through the Byrne
Justice Assistant Grant Program re implementation of an aggression replacement training
program
c. $ 13,000 from the Virginia Department of Emergency Management (VDEM) re upgrades to
the City's Emergency Operations Center
d. $72,010 to the General Registrar FY 2013 Budget re replacement of pollbooks
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM: An Ordinance (1) Declaring the 2.18 +/- Acre Municipal Parking Lot Located on
25th Street Between Pacific and Arctic Avenues to be in Excess of the City's
Needs and (2) Authorizing the Execution of a Comprehensive Agreement
Between the City of Virginia Beach and 25th Street Associates, LLC
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2013
■ Background: The City of Virginia Beach (the "City") owns the approximately
2.18 acre parcel located at 310 25th Street between Pacific and Arctic Avenues (GPIN
2427-09-5787) currently being utilized as a municipal parking lot (the "Property").
On June 24, 2003, the City, acting under the Virginia Public -Private Education Facilities
and Infrastructure Act of 2002 ("PPEA"), adopted guidelines to establish procedures for
development of public facilities utilizing public-private partnerships in compliance with
the PPEA and made those guidelines publicly available. On July 7, 2009, the City re-
adopted guidelines for that purpose (the "Guidelines"), which supersede those originally
adopted, and made the Guidelines publicly available.
On September 26, 2011, the City received an unsolicited PPEA conceptual proposal
(the "Proposal") from the Breeden Company for the development of a public parking
structure along with apartments and an entertainment facility, and related facilities on
the Property (this proposal, and the underlying project, collectively, the "Proposed
Project").
As set forth in the Proposal, the developer proposes purchasing the Property from the
City, demolishing the existing parking lot, and re -developing the Property, to consist of
an approximate 147 -unit apartment complex (the "Apartments"), an approximate 8,000
square foot "iFly" entertainment facility (the "Entertainment Facility"), approximately
2,500 square feet of potential commercial space (the "Commercial Space"), and a
structured parking garage containing approximately 598 parking spaces, 377 of which
would be dedicated for use by the general public (the "Parking Garage"). There are
currently 244 public parking spaces on the Property.
Following completion of construction of the Apartments, Entertainment Facility,
Commercial Space and Parking Garage (collectively, the "Improvements"), Developer
further proposes conveying the Parking Garage to the City, together with the real
property upon which the Parking Garage is located, subject to a long-term lease of
approximately 221 parking spaces for the exclusive use and benefit of the Apartments.
On October 13, 2011, the City accepted the Proposal, and, as required by the PPEA
and the Guidelines, the City gave notice of the Proposal on the City website and The
Virginian -Pilot on October 23, 2011, and sought competing conceptual proposals from
the public. For a period of 90 days, the City sought competing conceptual proposals for
a public parking structure and mixed use development, with responses due to the City
Purchasing Agent by 5:00 p.m. on January 24, 2012.
The City received no other responses from its solicitation for competing conceptual
proposals, and pursuant to the Guidelines, the City moved to the detail proposal stage
of the PPEA process.
A related entity of the Breeden Company, 25th Street Associates, LLC (the "Developer")
and City staff have negotiated the terms and conditions of a Comprehensive Agreement
(the "Agreement"), by which the Property would be sold to the Developer and the
Improvements constructed. A summary of terms is attached to the Ordinance as Exhibit
A. The Agreement is the "Comprehensive Agreement" (as that term is used under the
PPEA and the Guidelines) between the City and the Developer setting forth the
elements of the Proposed Project.
The City held a public hearing on December 11, 2012, allowing City Council to receive
input from the public on the Proposed Project, and this public hearing was held at least
30 days prior to the date of execution of the Agreement.
As required by the PPEA and the Guidelines, the City has posted the Agreement on the
City website for 30 days to allow public inspection.
■ Considerations: Prior to effectuating the transaction set forth in the Agreement,
the City Council must vote to declare the Property excess and authorize the sale to the
Developer, as contemplated by the Agreement. Since the Property was previously put
to a public use, a supermajority vote is required.
■ Public Information: Advertisement of the public hearing for the proposed sale of
City -owned property in The Virginian Pilot. The Agreement has been posted for public
review since January 11, 2013. Advertisement of City Council Agenda.
■ Alternatives: Approve the Ordinance as presented, deny approval of the
Ordinance, or add conditions or modifications as desired by Council.
■ Recommendations: Declare the Property excess and authorize the City
Manager to execute all necessary documents to convey the Property and enter into the
Agreement, subject to the terms and conditions in the Summary of Terms, and such
other terms, conditions or modifications as may be satisfactory to the City Council.
■ Attachments: Ordinance, Summary of Terms, Location Map
Recommended Action: Approval V�
Submitting Department/Agency: Strategic Growth Area Office
City Manage . r��..j
\\vbgov.com\DFS 1 \Applications\CityLawProd\cycom32\ Wpdocs\D023\P015\00054754. DOC
I AN ORDINANCE (1) DECLARING THE 2.18+/-
2 ACRE MUNICIPAL PARKING LOT LOCATED ON
3 25TH STREET BETWEEN PACIFIC AND ARCTIC
4 AVENUES TO BE IN EXCESS OF THE CITY'S
5 NEEDS AND (2) AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION
6 OF A COMPREHENSIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN
7 THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH AND 25TH
8 STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC
9
10 WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach (the "City") is the owner a 2.18+/- acre
11 parcel of land located at 25th Street between Pacific and Arctic Avenues, known as 310
12 25th Street (GPIN 2427-09-5787), which is currently being utilized as a municipal
13 parking lot (the "Property");
14
15 WHEREAS, on September 26, 2011, the City received an unsolicited conceptual
16 proposal (the "Proposal") under the Virginia Public -Private Education Facilities and
17 Infrastructure Act ( the "PPEA") and PPEA Guidelines adopted by City Council (the
18 "Guidelines") from the Breeden Company for the development of a public parking
19 structure along with apartments, an entertainment facility, and other related commercial
20 facilities on the Property (this proposal, and the underlying project, collectively, the
21 "Proposed Project");
22
23 WHEREAS, the Proposed Project contemplates the Developer, defined below,
24 purchasing the Property from the City, demolishing the existing parking lot, and re -
25 developing the Property, to consist of an approximate 147 -unit apartment complex (the
26 "Apartments"), an approximate 8,000 sq. ft. "iFly" entertainment facility (the
27 "Entertainment Facility"), approximately 2,500 sq. ft. of potential commercial space (the
28 "Commercial Space"), and a structured parking garage containing approximately 598
29 parking spaces, 377 of which would be dedicated for use by the general public (the
30 "Parking Garage");
31
32 WHEREAS, following completion of construction of the Apartments,
33 Entertainment Facility, Commercial Space and Parking Garage (collectively, the
34 "Improvements"), Developer further proposes conveying the Parking Garage to the City,
35 together with the real property upon which the Parking Garage is located, subject to a
36 long-term lease of approximately 221 parking spaces for the exclusive use and benefit
37 of the Apartments;
38
39 WHEREAS, on October 13, 2011, the City accepted the Proposal, and, as
40 required by the PPEA and the Guidelines, on October 23, 2011, the City gave notice on
41 the City website and The Virginian -Pilot of the Proposal and sought competing
42 conceptual proposals from the public, for a period of 90 days;
43
44 WHEREAS, the City received no other responses from its solicitation for
45 competing conceptual proposals, and pursuant to the Guidelines, the City moved to the
46 detail proposal stage of the PPEA process;
47 WHEREAS, an affiliated entity of Breeden Company, 25th Street Associates, LLC
48 (the "Developer") and City staff have negotiated the terms and conditions of a
49 comprehensive agreement, as defined in the PPEA (the "Agreement") by which the
50 Property would be sold to the Developer and the Improvements constructed. A Summary
51 of Terms setting forth the details of the Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit A;
52
53 WHEREAS, as required by the PPEA, the City held a public hearing on December
54 11, 2012, to allow the City Council to receive input from the public on the Proposed
55 Project, and this public hearing was held at least 30 days prior to the date of execution of
56 the Agreement;
57
58 WHEREAS, as required by the PPEA, the Agreement has been publicly posted
59 since January 11, 2013; and
60
61 WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the Property is in excess of the
62 City's needs and the sale of the Property to Developer, pursuant to the terms of the
63 Agreement, would promote the City's goals by providing additional public parking for the
64 citizens of the City.
65
66 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
67 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
68
69 1. That the 2.18+/- acre parcel of land located at 25th Street between Pacific and
70 Arctic Avenues, known as 310 25th Street (GPIN 2427-09-5787), which is currently being
71 utilized as a municipal parking lot (the "Property") is hereby declared to be in excess of
72 the needs of the City of Virginia Beach.
73
74 2. That City Council has determined entering into a comprehensive agreement
75 under the PPEA on the terms and conditions set forth in the Summary of Terms,
76 attached hereto as Exhibit A, and made a part hereof, will serve a public purpose
77 because (i) there is a public need and benefit to be derived from such agreement, (ii) the
78 price of such design, construction, and outfitting is reasonable in relation to similar
79 facilities, and (iii) the agreement will result in the timely development of additional
80 structured public parking.
81
82 3. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the Agreement and any
83 and all other documents necessary to convey the Property to 25th Street Associates,
84 LLC, so long as such documents are in substantial conformity with the attached
85 Summary of Terms, and such other terms, conditions or modifications deemed
86 necessary and sufficient by the City Manager and in a form deemed satisfactory by the
87 City Attorney.
88
89 This Ordinance shall be effective from the date of its adoption.
90
91 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the day
92 of 2013.
93 THIS ORDINANCE REQUIRES AN AFFIRMATIVE VOTE OF THREE -
94 FOURTHS OF ALL COUNCIL MEMBERS ELECTED TO COUNCIL.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
r �
•
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
LA -
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY:
i
City Attorney
CA12157
\\vbgov.com\DFS1Wpplications\CityLawProd\cycom32\W pdocs\[)030\P011\0001 3007. DOC
R-1
February 1, 2013
EXHIBIT A
SUMMARY OF TERMS
25" STREET DEVELOPMENT
PPEA COMPREHENSIVE AGREEMENT
City: City of Virginia Beach
Developer: 250h Street Associates, LLC
Property: 2.18 +/- acre municipal parking lot at 310 25th Street between Pacific
and Arctic Avenues (GPIN 2427-09-5787).
Agreement: "Comprehensive Agreement" pursuant to the Virginia Public -Private
Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act ( the "PPEA") and PPEA
Guidelines adopted by City Council.
Project
Description:
Developer to purchase the Property from City for $7.65MM. After purchase,
Developer to construct 147 +/- apartment units, "iFly" entertainment facility,
approximately 2,500 square feet of retail space and a 598 +/- space parking garage
(collectively the "Improvements").
Once complete, City to purchase parking garage, subject to Developer's lease of
221 +/- parking spaces, for $7.65MM plus Developer's right to receive the
Incentive Payment, defined below. City to operate parking garage and Developer to
operate the balance of the Improvements. Exact number of parking spaces leased to
be determined based on final number of apartment units and parking spaces
constructed but in no event shall lease to Developer be for more than 230 spaces.
Garage
Operations:
• Developer to contribute 37% of the operations and maintenance costs associated
with parking garage annually.
• City to be responsible for operations of entire parking garage.
• Developer lease of 221+/- parking spaces for a term of 40 years at $1 per year
(exact number to be equal to 1.5 spaces per apartment unit constructed, with a 230
space cap).
• Developer to pay $70 per space per year (adjusted by the CPI beginning in year 11)
for capital reserves.
Page 1 of 2
Incentive Payment:
• Developer to receive a reimbursement incentive equal to 90% of admissions taxes
collected at My facility.
• Incentive Payment expected to be capped at a total of $2,100,000.
• Exact amount to be determined based on actual cost of construction of parking
garage. $2.1MM cap subject to adjustment of 15% up or down.
• Incentive Payment equals difference in value of fifty-five percent (55%) of the
Property ($4,207,500) and costs of construction of parking garage, plus interest
during payment of incentive. Interest is included in the cap.
Rights and Responsibilities of City:
• Subdivide the Property into three parcels prior to sale to Developer.
• Acquire parking garage for $7.65MM, plus Incentive Payment on completion of
all Improvements.
• City to pay 45% or $250,000, whichever is less, for total costs of landscaping and
streetscape improvements for entire block.
• City to make annual Incentive Payment.
• City to operate parking garage (except for spaces leased to Developer) as a public
parking garage.
Rights and Responsibilities of Developer:
• Acquire Property from City for $7.65MM no later than June 30, 2014.
• Pay all costs of development of Project.
• Complete construction of all Improvements before December 31, 2015.
• Obtain all permits and zoning approvals for Improvements.
Page 2 of 2
m
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM: Resolution Petitioning the Commonwealth of Virginia Transportation Board to
Convey Certain Real Property to the City of Virginia Beach
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2013
■ Background: In 1996, the Commonwealth of Virginia (the "Commonwealth")
acquired a parcel of land for the construction of the commuter parking lot located
south of Silverleaf Drive, between Independence Boulevard (South) and Holland
Road, also known as VDOT Project Number P044-134-102, RW201, C-501 (the
"Project").
As part of the Project, the Commonwealth constructed Commuter Drive, running
between Independence Boulevard (South) and Holland Road, as shown on the
exhibit attached to the Resolution (the "Right -of -Way"). The issue of ownership
of the Right -of -Way arose during site plan and plat review of a portion of the
Commonwealth's residual parcel, which is currently under contract to sell to a
third party.
The Project has been completed; however, title to the Right -of -Way remains
vested in the Commonwealth. The Commonwealth of Virginia Transportation
Board (the "CTB") will not begin the process of transferring title to a locality until
that locality formally petitions the CTB, pursuant to Virginia Code Sections 33.1-
89 and 33.1-149.
■ Considerations: The City of Virginia Beach (the "City") receives funds from the
Commonwealth to assist with physically maintaining the Right -of -Way.
Conveying the Right -of -Way to the City would not affect funding from the
Commonwealth or increase costs to the City.
■ Public Information: Advertisement of City Council Agenda
■ Alternatives: Commonwealth of Virginia retains title to the Right -of -Way.
■ Recommendations: Approval
■ Attachments: Resolution
Location Map
Recommended Action: Approval
Submitting Department/Agency: Public Works / Real Estate
City Manager:� �.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
RESOLUTION PETITIONING THE COMMONWEALTH
OF VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION BOARD TO
CONVEY CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY TO THE CITY
OF VIRGINIA BEACH
WHEREAS, the Commonwealth of Virginia (the "Commonwealth") acquired a
parcel of real estate for the construction of a commuter parking lot between
Independence Boulevard (South) and Holland Road, also known as VDOT Project
Number P044-134-102, R201, C-501 (the "Project");
WHEREAS, as part of the Project, the Commonwealth constructed Commuter
Drive, running between Independence Boulevard (South) and Holland Road (the "Right -
of -Way");
WHEREAS, all aspects of the construction of the Project are complete and title to
the Property remains vested in the Commonwealth; and
WHEREAS, the Right -of -Way constitutes a public road and the City of Virginia
Beach (the "City") maintains the Right -of -Way and believes it would be in the City's best
interest for title to the Right -of -Way to be transferred to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
1. That the City hereby petitions the Commonwealth of Virginia, Transportation
Board, pursuant to §33.1-89 and §33.1-149 of the Code of Virginia, as amended, to
convey the Right -of -Way to the City, and to take such other action as necessary to
complete the conveyance of title of the Right -of -Way to the City, and upon transfer, the
Right -of -Way shall cease being a part of the State Highway System.
2. That the City Manager, or his authorized designee, is hereby authorized to
execute any and all documents to complete the conveyance of title to the Right -of -Way,
so long as said documents contain such terms, conditions and modifications as may be
acceptable to the City Manager and in a form deemed satisfactory by the City Attorney.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, this
day of , 2013.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
�. c. a�"
tbi---Of Public Works / Real Estate
CA12431
\\vbgov.com\DFS1Wpplications\CityLawProd\cycom32\Wpdocs\1)022\P015\00054537.DOC
R-1
January 31, 2013
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY:
i11// iLin UN- I
G
�0
w
ao•
p
,c
<m
l
O <
QS
�
Id NO
1
12�
w
ao•
p
,c
<m
o
v
�
f D
O
�*
-ml
O
S
rt
0,
O
r
O
D
O
Z
Z
M
6 0
0 C:)
n
p N--1 O
""0029
N C
�Ofpzm
Om D
r Z z
A D m
m
W Z
v o
-w.r-
�A ;eAc,
•uy+e�
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM: A Resolution to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Accord, Satisfaction
and Release Agreement with the Southeastern Public Service Authority of
Virginia ("SPSA") Regarding the Virginia Beach Landfill Phase I Capping Project
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2013
■ Background: The City is preparing to cap Phase I of Virginia Beach Landfill II.
Pursuant to the terms of the City of Virginia Beach/SPSA Agreement for Disposal of Ash
and Process Residue (the Ash & Residue Agreement"), SPSA has periodically utilized
space in the landfill for the placement of ash and residue and bears responsibility for a
portion of the capping and post -closure costs for Phase I. SPSA acknowledged
responsibility for a share of these costs but disagreed as to the manner in which its
share should be calculated. Additionally, SPSA claimed entitlement to certain offsetting
credits. The City and SPSA have negotiated a resolution of these issues. This
proposed resolution is set forth in the attached Accord, Satisfaction and Release
Agreement, which provides for a payment of $9.5 million dollars by SPSA to the City
and for mutual releases of claims.
■ Considerations: SPSA's Board of Directors approved the agreement on
January 23, 2013.
■ Public Information: Public information will be handled through the normal
Council agenda notification process.
■ Attachments: Resolution and Accord, Satisfaction and Release Agreement
Recommended Action: Approval
Submitting Department/Agency: Public WorksNVaste Management
Pc Q
City Manage . lTlY'L
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER
TO EXECUTE AN ACCORD, SATISFACTION AND
RELEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE SOUTHEASTERN
PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY OF VIRGINIA ("SPSA")
REGARDING THE VIRGINIA BEACH LANDFILL PHASE I
CAPPING PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City is preparing to cap Phase I of Virginia Beach Landfill II; and
WHEREAS, the City and SPSA have reached an Accord, Satisfaction and
Release Agreement regarding their respective rights and obligations with respect to the
capping, closure, and post -closure of Phase I of the landfill, which was approved by
SPSA's Board of Directors on January 23, 2013.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the City of
Virginia Beach the Accord, Satisfaction and Release Agreement in the form attached
hereto.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the day
of 2013.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY:
Public Wbrks
CA12506
R-1
February 1, 2013
City Attorney's Office
ACCORD, SATISFACTION AND RELEASE AGREEMENT
THIS ACCORD, SATISFACTION AND RELEASE AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made
as of [January , 2013] (the "Effective Date"), by and between the SOUTHEASTERN PUBLIC
SERVICE AUTHORITY OF VIRGINIA, a public body corporate and politic of the Commonwealth of
Virginia ("SPSA"), and the CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, a municipal corporation of the
Commonwealth of Virginia (the "C"). (Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Agreement shall
have the respective meanings ascribed thereto in the Ash & Residue Agreement described below.)
WHEREAS, on August 8, 1984, the City and SPSA entered into a City of Virginia Beach/SPSA
Agreement for Disposal of Ash and Process Residue (the "Ash & Residue Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Ash & Residue Agreement, (a) the City agreed to accept at the
Landfill defined maximum quantities of Ash and Residue delivered by SPSA and, in exchange, (b) SPSA
agreed to reimburse the City for (i) all reasonable costs incurred by the City in operating the Landfill, plus
specified adjustments and less certain credits and (ii) certain expenditures relative to regulatory
compliance and/or site preparation or modification; and
WHEREAS, such expenditures relative to regulatory compliance and associated site preparation
and modification consist primarily of costs and expenses incurred in connection with (a) designing,
engineering, obtaining necessary regulatory approvals and constructing Landfill phases/segments
necessary for disposal of Ash and Residue in amounts contemplated by the Ash & Reside Agreement,
(b) closure construction for applicable Landfill phases/segments and (c) maintenance of applicable
Landfill phases/segments after a geosynthetic cap is constructed in respect of such Landfill
phases/segments, each in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the Virginia Department of
Environment Quality (the "DEQ") (elements (b) and (c) are further described in Schedule A attached
hereto and collectively referred to herein as the "Closure/Post-Closure Costs"); and
WHEREAS, the parties agree that SPSA is obligated to reimburse the City for a portion of the
Closure/Post-Closure Costs that will be incurred in connection with the City's closure and post -closure
care of the part of the Landfill that SPSA has in the past utilized for the disposal of Ash & Residue, but
have disagreed on both (i) the exact portion of such Closure/Post-Closure Costs for which SPSA is
obligated to reimburse the City and (ii) the extent to which SPSA is entitled to any "credits" against its
portion of such Closure/Post-Closure Costs; and
WHEREAS, the City and SPSA are also parties to an Agreement for Use and Support of a Solid
Waste Disposal System, dated August 8, 1984, as amended (the "Use & Support Agreement"), certain
provisions of which may have implications regarding the extent to which SPSA may be entitled to
"credits" against its share of Closure/Post-Closure Costs under the Ash & Residue Agreement; and
WHEREAS, without making any admission of liability or accepting the other party's position
with respect to the portion of Closure/Post-Closure Costs for which SPSA is obligated to reimburse the
City or the extent to which SPSA is entitled to any credits in respect thereof, the parties have agreed to the
full accord and satisfaction of SPSA's responsibility for Closure/Post-Closure Costs under the Ash &
Residue Agreement and the complete resolution of their disagreement with respect thereto in accordance
with the terms hereof;
1-1140547.8
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties do hereby agree
as follows:
1. Recitals. The Recitals set forth above are not merely recitation and are confirmed and
acknowledged by the parties by this reference as true, correct, substantive and material part of this
Agreement.
2. Accord and Satisfaction. Promptly following the execution and delivery of this
Agreement by both parties, SPSA shall deliver to the City, by wire transfer or other immediately available
funds, payment in the amount of Nine Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($9,500,000) (the "SPSA
Payment"), which such SPSA Payment shall constitute full accord and satisfaction of SPSA's
Closure/Post-Closure Cost obligations in respect of the Landfill, subject only to the terms of
Section 3(a)(ii)(B) below.
3. Special Acknowledgements; Limited Releases.
(a) Special Acknowledgements. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the
Ash & Residue Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until December 31, 2015 (or its earlier
termination in accordance with the terms thereof). In connection therewith, and consistent with their
respective rights and obligations under this Agreement, the parties acknowledge and agree as follows:
(i) Except to the extent expressly contemplated herein, this Agreement does
not and shall not in any event be deemed to waive, supersede, amend or in any way modify the terms or
conditions of the Ash & Residue Agreement or any of the rights, obligations or remedies of either party
contained therein, which such terms and conditions shall remain in full force and effect until the
expiration or earlier termination of the Ash & Residue Agreement.
(ii) (A) SPSA currently is not disposing any Ash & Residue at the
Landfill, but SPSA shall have the continuing right to dispose of Ash & Residue at the Landfill,
exercisable on prior written notice to the City, until the expiration (or earlier termination) of the Ash &
Residue Agreement.
(B) If prior to the expiration or earlier termination of the Ash &
Residue Agreement SPSA elects to recommence disposal of Ash & Residue at the Landfill, then as an
express condition to such recommencement the parties shall mutually agree upon a mechanism pursuant
to which SPSA would reimburse the City for the portion of Closure/Post-Closure Costs incurred by the
City that are relative to SPSA's disposal of any such additional Ash & Residue.
(iii) Subject only to Section 3(a)(ii)(B) above, the total amount that SPSA shall
be required to pay towards any Closure/Post-Closure Costs in respect of the Landfill shall in no event and
under no circumstances exceed the SPSA Payment (i.e., $9,500,000), regardless of the
Closure/Post-Closure Costs actually paid or otherwise incurred by the City.
(b) Limited Releases.
(i) Except for its right to receive the SPSA Payment in accordance with
Section 2 above, and subject only to the terms of Section 3(a)(ii)(B) above, the City does hereby and
forever waive, release and discharge any and all rights and claims that the City currently has or may in the
2
I-1140547.8
future have against SPSA, and/or SPSA's affiliates, member communities, successors, officers, directors,
agents, employees and representatives, for any past, current and/or future liability regarding, contributions
or other payments to, reimbursement of or other responsibility for any Closure/Post-Closure Costs
incurred in respect of the Landfill, whether arising under the Ash & Residue Agreement or otherwise;
provided, however, that the City expressly does not release SPSA from any losses, claims, liabilities or
damages arising out of SPSA's breach of, violation under or failure to perform or honor any provisions of
this Agreement.
(ii) SPSA does hereby and forever waive, release and discharge any and all
rights and claims that SPSA currently has against the City, and/or the City's affiliates, successors,
officers, directors, agents, employees and representatives, for any losses, liabilities or damages arising out
of, resulting from or related to the City's actual or alleged breach of the Ash & Residue Agreement and/or
the Use & Support Agreement occurring through the Effective Date of this Agreement; provided,
however, that SPSA expressly does not release the City from any losses, claims, liabilities or damages
arising out of, resulting from or related to (x) any breach of, violation under or failure to perform or honor
any provision of the Ash & Residue Agreement by the City that occurs subsequent to the Effective Date
of this Agreement, (y) any breach of, violation under or failure to perform or honor any provision of the
Use & Support Agreement by the City that occurs subsequent to the Effect Date of this Agreement or
(z) the City's breach of, violation under or failure to perform or honor any provisions of this Agreement.
4. Miscellaneous.
(a) Entire Agreement. This Agreement, together with the applicable provisions of the
Ash & Residue Agreement, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties hereto with regard to the
subject matter hereof. Each party acknowledges and agrees that all prior discussions, negotiations and
correspondence between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof are hereby merged into this
Agreement and that there are no other oral, written or other agreements of any nature whatsoever between
the parties with respect to such subject matter hereof.
(b) Applicable Law. This Agreement is an agreement under seal, and this Agreement
shall be construed, performed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of
Virginia.
(c) Mediation and Litigation.� Any dispute, claim or controversy between the parties
arising under, out of, in connection with or relating to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated
hereby, or any course of conduct, course of dealing, statements (oral or written) or actions of any party
relating to this Agreement, including any claim based on or arising from an alleged tort (each, a
"Dispute"), shall be resolved solely in the following manner:
(i) Mediation.
(A) Each party shall cause its designee to first meet with the other
party's designee and attempt to resolve the Dispute by mutual agreement.
(B) Failing such resolution, either party may submit to the other party
a written request for non-binding mediation. Within twenty (20) days after such written request is made,
the parties shall agree on a single mediator.
3
I-1140547.8
(C) Mediation shall take place at the place or places and at the time or
times set by the mediator, but shall not be held in public. The rules of procedure, evidence and discovery
with respect to any mediation shall be as directed by the mediator. Each party may be represented by an
attorney at hearings before the mediator.
(D) The mediator's expenses shall be borne equally by the parties.
(ii) Litigation. If any Dispute is not resolved by mediation as provided above,
either party may resort to litigation.
(d) Modifications and Waiver. No modification or waiver of any provision of this
Agreement, and no consent by any party to any departure therefrom, shall be effective unless such
modification or waiver shall be in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of both parties,
and the same shall then be effective only for the period and on the conditions and for the specific instance
and purposes specified in such writing. No waiver of any breach or default under this Agreement shall be
deemed to be a waiver of any breach or default thereafter occurring. No omission or delay by any party in
exercising any right or power hereunder or under any document executed pursuant hereto shall impair
such right or power or be construed to be a waiver of any default or any acquiescence therein.
(e) Severability. Should any one or more of the provisions contained in this
Agreement be declared invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, the validity, legality and
enforceability of any of the remaining provisions contained herein shall not in any way be affected or
impaired thereby.
(f) Successors and Assigns. This Agreement and the respective covenants,
provisions, terms, conditions and agreements herein contained shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding
upon, the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.
(g) Notices. All notices, requests, demands or other communications provided for
herein shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given and received when hand -delivered to
the person designated on the signature page hereto for the receiving party or when mailed to the receiving
party at the address stated on the signature page hereto, postage prepaid by certified or registered mail of
the United States, return receipt requested, or via nationally -recognized overnight courier service. All
notices, requests, demands or other communications that are addressed in accordance with the foregoing
terms and given in the manner herein provided shall be conclusively deemed valid notice; however, actual
receipt of any such notice, request, demand or other communication shall be sufficient. Each party to this
Agreement may change its designated person or designated address at any time and from time to time by
giving notice of each such change to the other party to this Agreement in the manner set forth in this
paragraph.
(h) Power and Authority. Each of the parties to this Agreement warrants that this
Agreement has been approved to the extent legally required by its applicable governing body and that
such party has full power and authority to enter into, execute, deliver and perform this Agreement, and
that no other consent, approval, authorization, registration or declaration from, by or with any court,
governmental authority or any other person or entity is required in connection with the execution,
delivery, performance, validity and enforceability of this Agreement.
4
I-1140547.8
(i) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, and
such executed counterparts shall constitute one agreement, binding on all the parties hereto, notwithstanding
that the parties are not signators to the original or the same counterpart.
[Signatures begin on next page]
I-1140547.8
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of the date set
forth above.
To SPSA:
SPSA:
Rowland L. Taylor SOUTHEASTERN PUBLIC SERVICE
Executive Director AUTHORITY OF VIRGINIA,
Southeastern Public Service Authority of Virginia a public body corporate and politic of the
723 Woodlake Drive Commonwealth of Virginia
Chesapeake, VA 23320
With a copy to:
Henry J. Huelsberg, III, Esquire
Willcox & Savage, P.C.
440 Monticello Avenue, Suite 2200
Norfolk, VA 23510
To the City:
James K. Spore
City Manager
2401 Courthouse Drive
Municipal Center
Virginia Beach, VA 23456
With a copy to:
Mark D. Stiles, Esquire
City Attorney
2401 Courthouse Drive
Municipal Center
Virginia Beach, VA 23456
6
I-1140547.8
By:
Name:
Title:
CITY:
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, a municipal
corporation of the Commonwealth of Virginia
By:
Name:
Title:
SCHEDULE A
Closure/Post-Closure Costs
GENERAL:
Engineering Design and Consultation
Mobilization/Demobilization
General Requirements
Bond
:yYY&`.'[llR"Ic
Temporary Erosion & Sediment Control
Stabilized Construction Entrance
Silt Fence
Surveying
Site Restoration (Laydown/Staging Area)
Temporary Construction Fence
GEOSYNTHETIC CAP SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION:
Final Cap Area
Fine Grading
Flexible Geomembrane Liner
Geocomposite Drainage Net
Soil and Geosynthetic Testing
Protective Cover Layer
Topsoil Layer
Toe Drain
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL/STORM WATER CONTROL SYSTEM:
Seeding/Stabilization
Downchutes
Access Road
Access Road Culverts
Endwalls / Flared End Section
Outlet Protection (Rip Rap)
Erosion Control Matting
POST -CLOSURE COSTS:
Engineering Consultation
Personnel Costs Associated with Post -Closure Activities
Groundwater Compliance
Leachate Management
Stormwater Management
Corrective Maintenance
I-1140547.8
Landfill Gas Compliance
Vector and Rodent Control Costs
Routine Maintenance and Repairs:
• Settlement/depression fill
• Mowing
• Repair of Washouts
• Reseeding (as needed)
• Inspections (as required under the DEQ -approved Post -Closure Plan)
2
I-1140547.8
fT
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM: A Resolution to Authorize the City Manager to Execute Two Agreements with the
Patriotic Festival, LLC
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2013
■ Background: The Patriotic Festival, LLC ("Patriotic Festival") has scheduled the
Ninth Annual Patriotic Salute and Celebration ("Celebration") for May 31, 2013 through June
2, 2013. The Celebration historically has included festive activities, musical entertainment,
and other events in appreciation for our nation's military service members ("Musical Event").
In 2012, the Celebration included an oceanfront air show ("Air Shove'). City Council has
financially supported the Musical Event since 2005 and the Air Show since 2012.
This year, the Patriotic Festival requested that the City co-sponsor the Celebration
by providing: 1) a $100,000 sponsorship grant, and up to $15,000 for marketing costs for
the Musical Event; and 2) a $225,000 sponsorship grant for the Air Show.
■ Considerations: The FY 2012-13 Convention and Visitors Bureau budget includes
funding for the requested grants and marketing costs. Two agreements will memorialize the
understanding between the City and the Patriotic Festival with respect to the Celebration.
The first agreement will provide that the City will grant $100,000 to the Patriotic
Festival for procuring and producing entertainment for the Musical Event. The City will also
reimburse the Patriotic Festival up to $15,000 for out -of -area marketing and advertising
support for the Musical Event from the Tourism Advertising Program ("TAP") Fund. The
agreement requires the Patriotic Festival to raise a minimum of $300,000 in private -sector
sponsorship funds to be used in direct support of the Musical Event.
The second agreement will provide that the City will grant $225,000 to the Patriotic
Festival to produce the Air Show. $150,000 of that amount would come from the TAP Fund,
and the remaining $75,000 would come from the Tourism Investment Program ("TIP") Fund.
The agreement will contain a revenue-sharing provision that requires the Producer to pay
the City 50% of the first $150,000 in Event Net Revenue. (The City's contract for last year's
show contained a similar provision (50% of the first $200,000 in Event Net Revenue, and
30% of any net revenue in excess of $200,000), and the Producer returned $54,504 to the
City under that provision.) The agreement also will require the Patriotic Festival to raise a
minimum of $100,000 in private -sector sponsorship funds to be used in direct support of the
Air Show.
■ Public Information: Public information will be provided through the normal process
of advertising the Council's agenda.
■ Attachments: Resolution, Summary of Terms
Recommended Action: Approval
Submitting Department/Agency: Convention and Visitors Bureau, �
City Manager: ��
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE TWO AGREEMENTS WITH
THE PATRIOTIC FESTIVAL, LLC
WHEREAS, City Council has adopted ordinances in the past authorizing the City
of Virginia Beach ("City") to enter into agreements with the Patriotic Festival, LLC, a
Virginia limited liability company with 501(c)(3) status, to bring musical entertainment
events and, in 2012, an air show, to Virginia Beach to honor the nation's military; and
WHEREAS, the City again wishes
sincere appreciation and admiration for
protecting America's freedoms; and
to express its wholehearted support and
our nation's military for their bravery in
WHEREAS, in furtherance of that objective, theCi desires to co-sponsor
events to honor the military by providing festive activities, m ical entertainment, and an
air show on May 31, 2013 through June 2, 2013, to be known as the Ninth Annual
Patriotic Salute and Celebration ("Celebration"); and
WHEREAS, the City and the Patriotic Festival, LLC have tentatively agreed to
terms and conditions describing each party's responsibilities, as set forth in the
summary (attached); and
WHEREAS, the first agreement addresses the festive activities and musical
entertainment, and the second agreement addresses the oceanfront air show.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
VIRGINIA BEACH:
That the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute two
agreements between the City and the Patriotic Festival, LLC for the production of the
Celebration, in a form acceptable to the City Manager and approved by the City
Attorney, consistent with the attached summary of terms.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the day
of , 2013.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
Conv tion & Visitors Bureau City Attorney's O-fficEb
CA12516
R-4
February 5, 2013
SUMMARY OF TERMS
AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
BEACH AND PATRIOTIC FESTIVAL, LLC
Purpose: To honor the military community, the City desires to provide grants to facilitate a
celebration for the military on May 31, 2013 through June 2, 2013, to be known
as the Ninth Annual Patriotic Salute and Celebration ("Celebration").
Parties: City of Virginia Beach ("City") and Patriotic Festival, LLC ("Producer")
1. Agreement for Musical Event
Responsibilities and Rights of the City:
• Provide a $100,000 grant to the Producer to procure and produce musical entertainment
for the Celebration ("Musical Event"). Producer has no obligation to repay the grant.
• Convention and Visitors Bureau shall reimburse Producer up to $15,000 for out -of -
market promotion, advertising and marketing costs for the Musical Event.
• Provide waste receptacles for Musical Event.
• City shall have the right to audit all books and records of Producer relating to the
agreement.
Responsibilities of Producer:
• Organize, plan, initiate, promote, conduct or otherwise provide managerial, operational,
and logistical support for the Musical Event.
• Secure all necessary permits required by federal, state or local statutes, ordinances and
regulations, including special event permits.
• Procure, negotiate and book the entertainment.
• Develop and implement recycling and waste disposal plan.
• Collect and dispose of trash and recyclables daily.
• Ensure that Event Area is cleaned and free of debris by 9 a.m. each morning following
each day of the Event.
• Raise a minimum $300,000 in private -sector sponsorship solicitations to be used in direct
support of the Musical Event.
2. Agreement for Air Show
Responsibilities and Rights of the City:
• Provide a $225,000 grant to the Producer to procure and produce an oceanfront air show
("Air Show").
• Provide waste receptacles for Air Show.
• City shall have the right to audit all books and records of Producer relating to the
agreement.
Responsibilities of Producer:
• Produce, manage, facilitate and supervise the Air Show.
• Refund to the City $75,000: By September 30, 2013, Producer will refund to the City
fifty percent (50%) of the first one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) in Event
Net Revenue ("Refund Payment"). If Event Net Revenue does not equal or exceed
$150,000, then the Producer shall pay to the City the difference between $75,000 and
the amount of the Refund Payment. That payment shall be made by December 31, 2014.
• Secure all necessary permits required by federal, state or local statutes, ordinances and
regulations, including special event permits.
• Develop and implement recycling and waste disposal plan.
• Collect and dispose of trash and recyclables daily.
• Ensure that Event Area is cleaned and free of debris by 9 a.m. each morning following
each day of the Event.
• Enter into contracts, in Producer's name, to facilitate Air Show.
• Raise a minimum of $100,000 in private -sector sponsorship solicitations to be used in
direct support of the Air Show.
2
o.
S si
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM: An Ordinance extending the date for satisfying the conditions in the matter of
closing, vacating and discontinuing a portion of that certain street known as
"Portion of Market Street to be Closed Area = 8 Square Feet" as shown on that
certain plat entitled "PLAT SHOWING PORTION OF MARKET STREET TO BE
CLOSED, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA". (Town Center - Block 9, GPIN 1477-
54-1429)
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2013
■ Background:
On March 24, 2009, by Ordinance ORD -3074A, City Council approved the
closure of an 8 square foot portion of Market Street right-of-way and 7 square
feet of adjoining subjacent air space for the purpose of constructing a 15 -story
building consisting of apartment units, hotel, conference center and retail space.
■ Considerations:
There were six conditions to the approval of the street closure:
1. The City Attorney's Office will make the final determination regarding
ownership of the underlying fee. The purchase price to be paid to the City is
normally determined according to the "Policy Regarding Purchase of City's
Interest in Streets Pursuant to Street Closures," approved by City Council.
Copies of the policy are available in the Planning Department. No purchase price
shall be charged in this street closure; however, because the City of Virginia
Beach Development Authority (the current owner of the property affected by the
street closure) shall reconvey to the City, as consideration for this street closure,
any interest in subjacent air space that it no longer needs to be reserved by
reason of this street closure.
2. The applicant shall resubdivide the property and vacate internal lot lines to
incorporate the closed area into the adjoining parcels. The plat must be
s0bmitted and approved for recordation prior to final street closure approval.
3. The applicant shall verify that no private utilities exist within the right-of-way
proposed for closure. Preliminary comments from the utility companies indicate
that there are no private utilities within the right-of-way proposed for closure. If
private utilities do exist, easements satisfactory to the utility company, must be
provided.
Market Street — Town Center Block 9
Page 2 of 2
4. The applicant shall cause to be conveyed to the City of Virginia Beach any
interest in adjoining subjacent air space that is no longer needed by reason of
this street closure. In exchange, the City shall convey to the City of Virginia
Beach Development Authority the closed portion of Market Street together with
the closed portion of subjacent air space, subject to the same terms and
conditions set forth in those Deeds of Dedication recorded in the Clerk's Office of
the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach as Instrument Numbers
200212313087765 and 200402100024237.
5. Closure of the right-of-way shall be contingent upon compliance with the
above stated conditions within 365 days of approval by City Council. If the
conditions noted above are not accomplished and the final plat is not approved
within one year of the City Council vote to close the right-of-way this approval
shall be considered null and void.
6. If required by the City of Virginia Beach Public Works Department, the
applicant shall relocate, in a manner satisfactory to the City of Virginia Beach
Public Works Department, the existing traffic signal pole and any other signal
equipment now located within the right-of-way proposed for closure.
On March 9, 2010, the applicant was granted an extension of time to satisfy the
conditions, and on March 22, 2011, the applicant was granted a second
extension of time to satisfy the conditions. On January 16, 2013, the applicant
requested additional time to complete satisfaction of conditions 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6.
Staff concludes that the request for additional time is reasonable.
■ Recommendations:
Allow an extension of time for satisfaction of the conditions until April 30, 2015.
■ Attachments:
Staff Review
Location Map
Disclosure Statement
Planning Commission Minutes
Ordinance
Recommended Action: Staff recommends approval. Planning Commission
recommends approval.
Submitting Department/Agency: Planning Department
City Manager: ZN
1 AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING THE DATE
2 FOR SATISFYING THE CONDITIONS IN THE
3 MATTER OF CLOSING, VACATING AND
4 DISCONTINUING A PORTION OF THAT
5 CERTAIN STREET KNOWN AS "PORTION
6 OF MARKET STREET TO BE CLOSED AREA
7 = 8 SQUARE FEET" AS SHOWN ON THAT
8 CERTAIN PLAT ENTITLED "PLAT SHOWING
9 PORTION OF MARKET STREET TO BE
10 CLOSED, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA".
11 (TOWN CENTER - BLOCK 9)
12
13 WHEREAS, on March 24, 2009, the Council of the City of Virginia Beach
14 acted upon the application of Town Center Associates, L.L.C., for the closure of a
15 portion of Market Street and its subjacent air space at the southwestern corner of Block
16 9 at Town Center, as shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto;
17
18 WHEREAS, on March 24, 2009 the Council adopted an Ordinance to
19 close the aforesaid street, subject to certain conditions being met on or before March
20 24, 2010; and
21
22 WHEREAS, on January 20, 2010, the applicant requested and was
23 granted an extension of time to March 24, 2011, to satisfy the conditions attached to the
24 aforesaid street closure;
25
26 WHEREAS, on February 25, 2011, the applicant requested and was
27 granted an additional extension of time to March 24, 2013, to satisfy the conditions
28 attached to the aforesaid street closure; and
29
30 WHEREAS, on January 16, 2013, the applicant requested an additional
31 extension of time to satisfy the conditions attached to the aforesaid street closure.
32
33 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of
34 Virginia Beach, Virginia:
35
36 That the date for meeting conditions of closure as stated in the Ordinance
37 adopted on March 24, 2009 (ORD-3074A), upon application of Town Center Associates,
38 L.L.C., is extended to April 30, 2015.
39
40 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on this
41 day of , 2013.
42
43 GPIN:1477-54-1429
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
CA12434
\\vbgov.com\DFS 1 W pplications\CityLawProd\cycom32\W pdocs\D008\PO14\00009163. DOC
R-1
February 1, 2013
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY:
City Attorney
2
ci z
cn
Q
z�
0 0000
Urn
84.
EXHIBIT A — Page 1 of 2
��-'pyTH pp
� fA
<rylGRDCTI-ICR,'t-
VIRGINIA BEACH BLVD
m BANK cn ST
UW�QO
z
a
COMMERCE Q ST
N
O
a=�a~SITE
F
Z
COLUMBUS ST Lw
o
z
SOUTHERN BLVD
LOCATION MAP - SCALE: 1" = 2,000'
COMMERCE STREET 81' R 3' P418LIC INGRESS/,CGRESS
�% AND 1177jz/7Y EASEMENT
(/NST. ,#200402060023049,) (/NST. 12004021000242J7)
(FORAfERL Y CLE-kELANO. 57REE J (INST. ,2°200404080055240) (TYP)
N 89'35'57" E -200.26' p100
�N 3.474,594.1037 N 3,474,595.5046
E 12,175,006.2284 E 12.175,206.4835
.3' sum ✓ACENT A/R, SPACE
(/NST. e200212 -r13087765)
(/NST. 1200402100024237)
(/NST. 1000404080055240) (7YP) I
in
o TOWN CENTER BLOCK 9
N (INST. #200402060023049)
AREA= 44.062 SF
OR 1.012 AC
I GPIN:1477-54-1429
oI NOTE: MERIDIAN SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON THE
VIRGINIA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE,
,cs,4 NORTH AMERICAN DATUM 1983/1993 HARN (NAD 83/93,
o HARN) AND REFERENCED TO VIRGINIA BEACH GPS
zl STATIONS "4737-1744" & "4793".
REV I AS PER CLIENT
PWWOUS
RIGHT— OF— WAr OE0/CA710N
(INST. 4200440206002J,049)
.--SEE DETAIL 'A'
PREWOUS S 44'35'53" W
RIGHT-OF-WAY DED/CAAON 10.38'
K/NST. ,f200212303086483)
S 89'35'53" W -190.63 vW(f
COLUA611S STREET (VAR X01 -H RIW)
(MB /10, PG 12,) (/NST. 20021230.3086483
KCR 11-26-2009
PLAT SHOWING
PORTION OF MARKET STREET
TO BE CLOSED
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA
I
�o
ao
(V
N to
I o
Q�
N
w O
ih
N [Q y
O
O yWZ
t V
pIN(F)
SHEET 1 OF
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES • GEOSCIENCES
PLANNING , SURVEYING *ENGINEERING
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
5033 ROUSE DRIVE, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23,
757-490-9264 (OFC) 757-490-0914 (Fe
PROJ. NO.: 06161B DRAWN: KCR
nATF• 12-1R-9nna crrni C. ,—
EXHIBIT A — Page 2 ®f 2
w
LINE TABLE
CURVE TABLE
BEARING
LENGTH
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
TANGENT
CHORD
BEARING
DELTA
Cl
25.00
10.78
5.48
10.70
S 12'42'36" E
24'42'36"
C28.00
L6
10.71
5.42
10.65
S 11'19'42" E
21'55'04"
C3
25.00 1
3.42
1.71
1 3.42
N 29'01'48" W
7'50'21"
w
18'
E:
N 00'24'10" W N
10.45'
L6
L5
89'35':
3' SUB✓ACENT AIR SPACE 2.28'
(/NST. ,20021231.3087765)\
(INST. ,2004021000242.37)
(INST. ,200404080055240) (7),)
3
LINE TABLE
LINE
BEARING
LENGTH
L1
N 00'24'10" W
10.45
L2
S 89'35'53" W
2.02
L3
S 89'35'53" W
0.97
L4
S 00'24'10" E
3.00
L5
S 89'35'53" W
11.08
L6
N 89'35'53" E
1 12.72
18'
E:
N 00'24'10" W N
10.45'
L6
L5
89'35':
3' SUB✓ACENT AIR SPACE 2.28'
(/NST. ,20021231.3087765)\
(INST. ,2004021000242.37)
(INST. ,200404080055240) (7),)
3
o
®
SUBJACENT AIR SPACE TO BE CLOSED.
AREA = 7 SQUARE FEET
®
SUBJACENT AIR SPACE TO BE CONVEYED
o
TO THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH.
z
AREA = 36 SQUARE FEET
PORTIOOF MARKET STREET AND 3'.
PUBLICnINGRESS/EGRESS AND UTILITY
EASEMENT TO BE CLOSED. AREA = 8
SQUARE FEET
PREl90US
(/NST. R00212JO 08648,0
N 89'35'53" E
3' PUBLIC INGRESS/,'GRESS
h AND l/AUTY EASEMENT
.� (iNST. 1200212JIJ087765)
(INS7 ,200402100024237)
(INS7 1200404080055240) (T),)
DETA/L A
SCALE: i'" = 10'
ILU IREVI AS PER CLIENT IKCR 11-26-20091
PLAT SHOWING
PORTION OF MARKET STREET
TO BE CLOSED
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA
SHEET 2 OF
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES •GEOSCIENCES
PLANNING • SURVEYING -ENGINEERING
•LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
5033 ROUSE DRIVE, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23,
757-490-9264 (OFC) 757-490-nF3a (Fe
PROJ. NO:: 06161B DRAWN: KCR
nATC. 11) 10
Item # 18
Town Center Associates, L.L.C.
Discontinuance, closure and abandonment of a portion of
Market Street
Northeast corner of the intersection of Market Street and Columbus Street
District 5
Lynnhaven
February 11, 2009
CONSENT
Joseph Strange: The next item is item 18, an application of Town Center Associates, L.L.C.
for a discontinuance, closure, and abandonment of a portion of Market Street located at the
northeast corner of the intersection of Market Street and Columbus Street, District 5,
Lynnhaven with six (6) conditions.
Mike Nuchols: Good afternoon for the record, Mike Nuchols representing the applicant.
The applicant is in agreement with all the conditions.
Joseph Strange: Thank you very much. Is there any opposition to this matter being placed on
the consent agenda? If not, the Chairman has asked Ron Ripley to review this item.
Ronald Ripley: Thank you Joe. This is really a housekeeping matter too. It's a
discontinuance, closure, and abandonment of a little small portion, actually the northeast
corner of Market Street and Columbus Street at the Town Center. It really kind of squares
the block off for this next development that Armada Hoffler will be developing, which is a
208 -unit apartment building, a hotel, and some retail component. It does include adjacent air
space, which is, in the case of zero lot line developments like this, where you build right up
to the right-of-way. Sometimes you might impede the right-of-way with your foundations or
your beams and this basically it avoids those conflicts. There is method worked out for the
City. So, it was very minor matter, and we felt that it ought to go on consent.
Joseph Strange: Thank you Ron. Madame Chairman, I make a motion to approve item 18.
Janice Anderson: We have a motion by Jae Strange and a second by Gene Crabtree. Mr.
Redmond?
David Redmond: Madame Chairman, I will be abstaining on item 18, as I have a business
conflict.
Janice Anderson: Thank you.
AYE 10 NAY 0 ABS 1 ABSENT 0
ANDERSON AYE
BERNAS AYE
Item #18
Town Center Associates, L.L.C.
Page 2
CRABTREE
AYE
HENLEY
AYE
HORSLEY
AYE
KATSIAS
AYE
LIVAS
AVE
REDMOND
RIPLEY
AYE
RUSSO
AYE
STRANGE
AYE
If:
Ed Weeden: By a vote of 10-0, with the abstention so noted, the Board has approved item 18
for consent.
loin
Ilii -- �` 1� ' -�• - � i• -
1
. y., .■■a urn■nm,
i ��II�ICI�' � ':!::ai�l�ii1111111
aL i
Street Closure
# 18
February 11, 2009 Public Hearing
APPLICANT:
TOWN CENTER
ASSOCIATES, LLC
PROPERTY OWNER:
VIRGINIA BEACH
DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
STAFF PLANNER: Carolyn A.K. Smith
REQUEST:
Discontinuance, closure and abandonment of a portion of right-of-way known as Market Street, and subjacent
air space, at the northeast corner of Columbus Street and Market Street
ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION: Property located on the northeast corner of corner of Columbus Street and
Market Street
GPIN:
1477541429
ELECTION DISTRICT:
LYNNHAVEN
SITE SIZE:
8 square feet: portion
of Market Street
7 square feet:
subjacent air space
AICUZ:
Less than 65 dB DNL
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
The applicant requests closure of a very small portion of the
Market Street right-of-way and subjacent air space in order to square off the corner and ultimately
construct a 15 -story building consisting of a retail component and up to 208 units as a mix of hotel and
apartments. A Conditional Use Permit is required, and follows, to construct this structure. Specifically, the
request is to close eight (8) square feet at the corner of Columbus and Market Streets and to close seven
(7) square feet of subjacent air space, for improvements to the site. As part of this agreement, the City
will receive 36 square feet of subjacent airspace to be conveyed by the Virginia Beach Development
Authority.
TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES / VBDA
Agenda Item 18
Page 1
LAND USE AND ZONING INFORMATION
EXISTING LAND USE: Undeveloped vacant site
SURROUNDING LAND North: . Commerce Street, restaurant and retail / B -3A Business District
USE AND ZONING: South: . Columbus Street, office, open space/ B-3 Business District
East: . Central Park Avenue, apartments / B -3A Business District
West: . Market Street, hotel and apartments / B -3A Business District
NATURAL RESOURCE AND The site is within the Chesapeake Bay watershed. There do not appear
CULTURAL FEATURES: to be any significant environmental or cultural features on the site.
IMPACT ON CITY SERVICES
WATER & SEWER: There are no water or sewer lines in the area proposed for closure.
PRIVATE UTILITES: Preliminary comments from private utility companies indicate that there are no private
utilities within the area proposed for closure.
Recommendation: EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of this
request with the conditions below.
Evaluation:
The Street Closure Viewers met and determined that no public inconvenience will result by approving the
requests to close eight (8) square feet of the right-of-way and seven (7) square feet of subjacent air space
at the northeast corner of Columbus and Market Streets.
Most of the streets in Town Center were dedicated with subjacent rights, meaning, a differentiation is
made between ownership of property above, below, and at grade. As the subjacent rights are those
under the land that, in this case, the City owns, the closure of the right-of-way includes property below
grade as well as above grade in order to avoid possible future legal encroachment issues with
underground supporting structures and utilities serving the improvements constructed on adjacent blocks.
As many of the buildings in Town Center are constructed with a zero setback from the right-of-way, the
foundations for the buildings (some of which are constructed on deeply driven pilings that may not be
TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES / VBDA
Agenda Item 18
Page 2
driven exactly vertical) and utility facilities serving the buildings may protrude beneath the surface of the
adjacent streets. The request to vacate the seven (7) square feet of subjacent air space means that the
City will relinquish its rights to the property beneath a small portion of the right-of-way to the Virginia
Beach Development Authority (VBDA). Upon closure of the eight (8) square feet of Market Street and the
City's relinquishment of its subjacent air rights, the underlying area in which any supporting structures and
utilities may be located can be done so without constituting encroachment.
As part of this agreement, the Virginia Beach Development Authority (VBDA) will also convey 36 square
feet of subjacent airspace to the City. This area was reserved by the VBDA per the 2002 Phase 1-A
subdivision plat and related Deed of Dedication. A 2004 resubdivision plat and related Deed of
Dedication dedicated an 18 -foot wide strip of Market Street immediately to the north of this area, leaving
out this portion of the subjacent area. This action wil I simply clean up and finish off what probably should
have been included in the 2004 resubdivision.
Staff recommends approval of both the closure of eight (8) square feet and seven (7) square feet of
subjacent airspace at the northeast corner of Columbus and Market Streets subject to the conditions
below.
CONDITIONS
The City Attorney's Office will make the final determination regarding ownership of the underlying fee.
The purchase price to be paid to the City is normally determined according to the "Policy Regarding
Purchase of City's. Interest in Streets Pursuant to Street Closures," approved by City Council. Copies
of the policy are available in the Planning Department. No purchase price shall be charged in this
street closure; however, because the City of Virginia Beach Development Authority (the current owner
of the property affected by the street closure) shall reconvey to the City, as consideration for this street
closure, any interest in subjacent air space that no longer needs to be reserved by reason of this street
closure.
2. The applicant shall resubdivide the property and vacate internal lot lines to incorporate the closed area
into the adjoining parcels. The plat must be submitted and approved for recordation prior to final street
closure approval.
3. The applicant shall verify that no private utilities exist within the right-of-way proposed for closure.
Preliminary comments from the utility companies indicate that there are no private utilities within the
right-of-way proposed for closure. If private utilities do exist, easements satisfactory to the utility
company, must be provided.
4. The applicant shall cause to be conveyed to the City of Virginia Beach any interest in adjoining
subjacent air space that is no longer needed by reason. of this street closure. In exchange, the City
shall convey to the City of Virginia Beach Development Authority the closed portion of Market Street
together with the closed portion of subjacent air space, subject to the same terms and conditions set
forth in those Deeds of Dedication recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of
Virginia Beach as Instrument Numbers 200212313087765 and 200402100024237.
5. Closure of the right-of-way shall be contingent upon compliance with the above stated conditions
TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES / VBDA
Agenda Item 18
Page 3
within 365 days of approval by City Council. If the conditions noted above are not accomplished and
the final plat is not approved within one year of the City Council vote to close the right-of-way this
approval shall be considered null and void.
6. If required by the City of Virginia Beach Public Works Department, the applicant shall relocate, in a
manner satisfactory to the City of Virginia Beach Public Works Department, the existing traffic signal
pole and any other signal equipment now located within the right-of-way proposed for closure
NOTE: Further conditions may be required during the administration of applicable City Ordinances.
Plans submitted with this rezoning application may require revision during detailed site plan review to
meet all applicable City Codes and Standards.
TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES / VBDA
Agenda Item 18
Page 4
VIRGINIA BEACH BLVD
Sy ft
fir, m BANK VI �T <
uj
JEDWKETHEV�-:
w COMMERCE ST aFz Z *iR
lJJ. CL ❑ZSITE N
C.COLUMBUS ST vz
o
z0) \-Zld qN0 SU
0 ro SOUTHERN BLVD
U O�
z o LOCATION MAP - SCALE: 1" 2,000'
a¢
J Z
o_ LLWA/ERCE STREET 81' R �PUBL/C INGRE'.SS/1'GRESS
�%LAA10 UACITY EASEMENT
6 N (/NST. 1,?"0206002J049� T. 12004021009241J7)
(FC3RA M Y af'PEZANO S7RE£T� T 1200404080055240) (T)P)f)
z N 89'35'57" E— - �--200.26'-
0
200.26'— �N�
1�(F
N 3,474,594.1.037 N 3,474,595.5046
E 12,175,006.2284 LE 12,175,206.4835
J' SUBJACENT AIR SPACE
(/NST. R2000231"7765)
1 (/NST. ,200402100024237)
(71ST. 1200404080055240) (nF)
TOWN CENTER BLOCK 9
o o N
(INST. #200402060023049) N ,�
o AREA- 44,062 SF N '$
oL-p I OR 1.012 AC
3 GPIN:1477-54-1429 I , o
`6 NOTE: MERIDIAN SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON THE
y y WQ VIRGINIA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZONE, I e N
j�•+ N NORTH AMERICAN DATUM 1983/1993 HARN (NAD 83/93, W
�c '. lz' $ HARN) AND REFERENCED TO VIRGINIA BEACH GPS q
W z STATIONS "4737-1744" & "4793". o y
a
j o
84.85' PRF NpUS rn
R10Y 0,F WAYMUCAR6W
is
(INST. 1200 4 02 0 6 0 02J049)
SEE DETAIL 'A'
Q\a�� PREVIOUS_ 910A_ S 44'35'53" W
\ill (NST. 0700212JOUT06*03) i 0.38'
-190.63 — —
M2111 11S SNEET (YAR NON R/W)
("S Ifo, PC 2) (INST. 2002230-T0864&V
AS PER CLIENT IKCR11-26-
PLAT SHOWING
PORTION OF MARKET STREET
TO BE CLOSED
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA
SHEET
5033 RINSE DRIVE, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA
757-490-9264 (OFC) 757-490-0634
www.msaonllne.Com
PROJ. NO.: 06161B DRAWN: KCR
DATE: 12-18-2008 SCALE: 1" - 40
SURVEY OF AREA TO BE CLOSED
TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES / VBDA
Agenda Item 18
Page 6
DEML A
SCALE: I' = 10'
AS PER CLIENT
PLAT SHOWING
PORTION OF MARKET STREET
TO BE CLOSED
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA
SHEET 2 OF
ROUSE
PROJ. NO.:06161B DRAWN: KCR
DATE; 12-18-2008 SCALE: 1" 10'
DETAIL: SURVEY OF AREAS
TO BE CLOSED
TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES / VBDA
Agenda Item 18
Page 7
LINE TABLE
CURVE TABLE
Lt N 00'24'10" W 10;45
L2 S 89'35'53" W 2.02
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
TANGENT _
CHORD
I BEARING
DELTA
Ct
25.00
10.78
5.48
10.70
S 12'42'' E
36
24'42'36"
C2
28.00
10.71
5.42
10.65
S 11'19'42" E
21'55'04"
C3
25.00
3. 42
1.71
3.42
N 29'01'48" W
7'50'21"
DEML A
SCALE: I' = 10'
AS PER CLIENT
PLAT SHOWING
PORTION OF MARKET STREET
TO BE CLOSED
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA
SHEET 2 OF
ROUSE
PROJ. NO.:06161B DRAWN: KCR
DATE; 12-18-2008 SCALE: 1" 10'
DETAIL: SURVEY OF AREAS
TO BE CLOSED
TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES / VBDA
Agenda Item 18
Page 7
LINE TABLE
LINE BEARING LENGTH
Lt N 00'24'10" W 10;45
L2 S 89'35'53" W 2.02
S 6935'53" W 0.97
rL3
L4 S 00'24'10" E 3.00
L5 S 89'35'53" W 11.08
L6 N 8935'53" E 12.72
DEML A
SCALE: I' = 10'
AS PER CLIENT
PLAT SHOWING
PORTION OF MARKET STREET
TO BE CLOSED
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA
SHEET 2 OF
ROUSE
PROJ. NO.:06161B DRAWN: KCR
DATE; 12-18-2008 SCALE: 1" 10'
DETAIL: SURVEY OF AREAS
TO BE CLOSED
TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES / VBDA
Agenda Item 18
Page 7
o SUBJACENT AIR SPACE TO BE CLOSED.
p AREA = 7 SQUARE FEET
N
o SUBJACENT AIR SPACE TO BE CONVEYED
TO THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH.
z AREA = 36 SQUARE FEET
/8
~PORTION
OF MARKET STREET AND 3'
Q
Ftp PUBLIC INGRESS/EGRESS AND UTILITY
EASEMENT TO BE CLOSED. AREA = 8
p G
wt
SQUARE FEET
",
N 00'24'10" W
�105 5'
n PRENDUS
�'
=lrQ1a`ll r (/NST. /2�0212.i0 X6483
W2L3
N 89'3553" E
C L5
N 89 35'53" E 1n J' PITBL/C /NGB£SS/£(d'£SS
ANO U17L17Y rA5'E.4tE'NT
2 28' h
J' SUB✓ACE7VT A/R SPAQI `L (iWr /2002113f3L197763f
(/NST. X200?7237i0BTT65f \ (/NST.
�41Gi7{pp70002fZiTf
(/NST. /7004021000202JT)
(/NST.,/?"04080055140) MR) _.-
DEML A
SCALE: I' = 10'
AS PER CLIENT
PLAT SHOWING
PORTION OF MARKET STREET
TO BE CLOSED
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA
SHEET 2 OF
ROUSE
PROJ. NO.:06161B DRAWN: KCR
DATE; 12-18-2008 SCALE: 1" 10'
DETAIL: SURVEY OF AREAS
TO BE CLOSED
TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES / VBDA
Agenda Item 18
Page 7
1
03/09/04
CHANGE OF ZONING B-3 to B -3A)
—
Granted
2
03/11/03
09/24/02_
STREET CLOSURE
CUP(multifamily dwellings)
Granted
Granted
_ 3 —
05/10/05
CHANGE OF ZONING B-3 to B -3A
Granted
4
_06/28/05
CUP multifamily dwellings)
Granted
5
02/08/00
Creation of B -3A Pembroke Central Business
Core District
Granted
ZONING HISTORY
TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES / VBDA
Agenda Item 18
Page 9
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPLICANT DISCLOSURE
If the applicant is a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or other unincorporated
f{ organization, complete the following:
1. list the applicant name followed by the names of all officers, members. trustees,
partners, etc. below: (Attach list if necessary}
Town Center Associates, L.L.C.
Members: City Center Associntes, LLC and armada Hoffler Properties,
L.L.C.; Managers: Louis S. Haddad,Anthong P. Nero and Gerald S Di.varis
2. List all businesses that have a parent -subsidiary' or affiliated business entity`
relationship with the applicant: (Attach list if necessary)'
Armada/Hoffler entities and numerous Town Center -related and other
unrelated business entities are affiliated with the Applicant through
its principals; Daniel A. Hoffler, A. Russell Kirk and Anthony P- Ne ;
and Div; pntitiec through its nrinrinal-r rnral'li 4 it vnris
D Check here if the applicant is NOT a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or
other unincorporated organization.
PROPERTY OWNER DISCLOSURE
Complete this section only if property owneris different frorn applicant.
If the property owner is a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or other
unincorporated organization, complete the following:
1. List the property owner name followed by the names of all officers. members,
trustees, partners,, etc. below: (Attach list if necessary_)
City of Virginia Beach Development Authority (see 11si. of members
I attached as Exhibit 11B 11. -
List all businesses that have a parent -subsidiary' or affiliated business entity''
relationship with the applicant: (Attach list ifnecessaty)
Check here if the property owner is NOT a corporation, partnership, firm,
business, or other unincorporated organization.
& ` See next gage for foolootes
- -- -- — — --- - -------------------- -- --
Does an official or employee of the City of Virginia Beach have an interest in the
subject IanV Yes ---- No a —
If ye;, wh�ll is the name of the official ur employee ;and then 3;ute of their interest?
TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES / VBDA
Agenda Item 18
Page 10
}aISCLC7SURE STATEMENT
ADDITIONAL DISCLCDSt1RES
List all known contractors or businesses that have or will provide services with respect
to the requested property use, including but not limited to the providers of architectural
services, real estate services, financial services, accounting services, and legal
services: (Attach list if necessary)
Town Center Associates L.L.C.• Fa,gert & Frieden.,.P.C.; 1`1SA, P.C.;
Divarls Real ;Estate, Inc. ; Cherry . 13ck4tert & liol tand Arntadd/lloff ter
Constructiotn Co.; Beatty Harvey & Associates Architects
"Parent -subsidiary relationship" means"a relationship that exists when one
corporation directly or indirectly owns shares possessing more than 50 percent of the voting
power of another corporation." See State and Local Government Conflict of interests Act,Va.
Code § 2.2-3101.
1 "Affiliated business entity relationship;' means "a relationship, other than parent -
subsidiary relationship, that exists when (i) one business' Entity has a controlling ownership
interest in the other business entity, (ii) a, controlling owner in one entity is also a controlling
owner in the other entity. or (ill) there is shared management or control between the business
entities. Factors that should be considered in determining the existence of an affiliated
business entity relationship include that the same person or substantially the same person
own or manage the two entitles;' there are common or commingled "funds or assets; the
business entities share the use of the sarne offices or employces or othenwst; share activities,
resources or personnel on a regUlir basis; .or there is otherwise a close working relationship
between the entities.- See State arid Local Govermtent Conflict of Interests Act V . Code{
2.2-3101.
CERTIFICATION: I certify that the information contained hereitl is trtae and accutale.
I understand that, upon receipt of notification (postcard) that the application has been srh-�dutecf fi r
public hearing, I am responsible for obtaining and posting the required sign on the subject property at
least 30 days prior to the scheduled public heari ng according to the instructions In this package. The
undersigned also consents to entry upon the: subject property by employees of the Department of
Planning to photograph and viuvv the site for purposes of processing and evaluating this application;
Town C..entnr Astiociates, LAX.
t �'f BY: Lottis S. 14utLind
ApplicantsSigrlalure' '' {PYint)
l'it.,` of V:irgucia Beach Develcipment
t` Authority
Properly Owner's 5i, tial (if different than applicant) Ry : 4Id U hair
;-_- (Fr int) �•
PC]y,.
Rei
Q
r 'i
TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES / VBDA
Agenda Item 18
Page 11
ENIlibit "IF,
I,ist of .11ell ibers of the (it. o f Vir giIIia Bell cli DCN efulrment,kit lhorilN'
C. \lasuiil Marl olciittcw..lr;
Dan 1-1. 131twlcwell
1 orcca 11. CaurioLion
Doolihis D, Elli
Uu�ttllti \'..11li�*
Page U. Lca
flout V. 1lichcl�s
1crrold I., ""filler
John W. Richard.S011
I'tLsiotl Si3crrod
Pli:raheth- I't oll�
S Eli ci0, 13 - 11.,, ,FV III)A Mcmlwrs.c
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
TOWN CENTER ASSOCIATES / VBDA
Agenda Item 18
Page 12
/ V\,NIA 6CA��l�
t C4 4C)
i Mh T`
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM: An Ordinance Authorizing the Reimbursement to an Employee for Legal Fees
Incurred in the Successful Defense of a Misdemeanor Charge Arising Out of the
Discharge of Official Duties
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2013
■ Background: On Election Day, a citizen swore out a criminal warrant against
the Chief Election Official of the Glenwood Precinct for assault. The Chief Election
Official was attempting to assist the citizen because her current address was not
reflected in the voter registration records. When the Chief Election Official asked the
citizen to complete the required form, the citizen became belligerent, and the Chief
Election Official placed her hand on the citizen's arm.
On December 10, 2012, the criminal charge was heard in the Virginia Beach General
District Court, and the charge was dismissed. The employee was represented at trial by
defense counsel David Cardon. Mr. Cardon rendered an invoice for $1,000.00 in legal
fees that has been paid by the City employee.
■ Considerations: Section 15.2-1521 of the Code of Virginia authorizes local
governing bodies to reimburse the legal fees and expenses incurred by any employee
of the locality on any criminal charge arising out of any act committed in the discharge
of the employee's official duties if at trial the employee is found not guilty.
The City Attorney's Office has reviewed the circumstances of the case and determined
that the employee's legal fees of $1,000.00 are reasonable.
■ Recommendation: Approval of ordinance
■ Attachments: Ordinance
Recommended Action: Approval
Submitting Department/Agency: Voter Registrar's Office o4J
City Manager. V ,L
1 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE REIMBURSEMENT OF
2 AN EMPLOYEE'S LEGAL FEES INCURRED IN THE
3 SUCCESSFUL DEFENSE OF A MISDEMEANOR CHARGE
4 ARISING FROM THE DISCHARGE OF OFFICIAL DUTIES
5
6 WHEREAS, a Virginia Beach employee was charged with a misdemeanor for
7 actions arising out of the performance of her official duties;
8
9 WHEREAS, on December 10, 2012, the Virginia Beach General District Court
10 dismissed the charge;
11
12 WHEREAS, in the defense of said charge, the employee incurred legal fees in the
13 amount of $1,000.00 and has requested the City to reimburse her for such fees;
14
15 WHEREAS, Section 15.2-1521 of the Code of Virginia provides that "(i)f any officer
16 or employee of any locality is investigated, arrested or indicted or otherwise prosecuted on
17 any criminal charge arising out of any act committed in the discharge of his official duties,
18 and no charges are brought, the charge is subsequently dismissed, or upon trial he is
19 found not guilty, the governing body of the locality may reimburse the officer or employee
20 for reasonable legal fees and expenses incurred by him in defense of such investigation or
21 charge, the reimbursement to be paid from the treasury of the locality"; and
22
23 WHEREAS, the Department Director and the City Attorney's Office have reviewed
24 the circumstances of this case, assessed the bill submitted by the employee's legal
25 counsel, and determined that the legal fees and expenses are reasonable.
26
27 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
28 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
29
30 That the General Registrar of the Voter Registrar's Office is hereby authorized to
31 expend funds in the amount of $1,000.00 from the FY 2012-13 Operating Budget of the
32 Voter Registrar's Office for the purpose of reimbursing the employee for legal fees incurred
33 by her in defense of said misdemeanor charge brought against her arising out of the
34 performance of her official duties.
35
36 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the
37 day of 2013.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY:
a
oter Regi trar's Office City o y's O e
CA12490
R-2
January 18, 2013
I,- eri
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM: An Ordinance to Accept and Appropriate Donated Funds from the Virginia Beach
Library Foundation and the Friends of the Virginia Beach Public Library
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2013
■ Background: The Joint -Use Library, a collaborative partnership with Tidewater
Community College, will be the largest library in Virginia Beach. It is anticipated to open
at the end of May 2013 to students, faculty, and the general public. Since the original
design of the building was complete, staff began working with the College to pursue the
potential to develop a specialized entrance gateway and ceiling features and interactive
components in the Children's Area to make this space a dynamic early literacy center
for the community. These gateway and ceiling features represent non-structural
modifications. The Library Department was able to secure donations from the Friends of
the Virginia Beach Public Library ($50,000) and the Virginia Beach Library Foundation
($130,000) to fund these enhancements.
■ Considerations: The donated funds will be used to engage the Burgeon Group,
which has designed, manufactured and installed early literacy environments in public
libraries across the country. Two such installations are in Virginia Beach. Because of
the unique characteristics and capabilities of the custom gateway, interactive features of
the early literacy programs, as well as the company's demonstrated expertise in these
areas, the Purchasing Division has determined that the Burgeon Group can serve as a
sole source for this procurement.
■ Public Information: Public information will be disseminated through the City
Council agenda process.
■ Recommendation: Adopt the attached budget amendment.
■ Attachment: Ordinance
Recommended Action: Approval
Submitting Department/Agency: Department of Public Libraries
City Manager: r
S l4. , �
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND
APPROPRIATE DONATED FUNDS FROM THE
VIRGINIA BEACH LIBRARY FOUNDATION AND
THE FRIENDS OF THE VIRGINIA BEACH
PUBLIC LIBRARY
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,
VIRGINIA:
That $180,000 in donations are hereby accepted and appropriated, with
estimated miscellaneous revenues increased accordingly, to the FY 2012-13 Operating
Budget of the Department of Public Libraries, in the amounts set forth below:
1. $130,000 from the Virginia Beach Library Foundation; and
2. $50,000 from the Friends of the Virginia Beach Public Library.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the day
of , 2013.
Requires an affirmative vote by a majority of all of the members of City Council
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
Manage nt ervices
CA12510
R-1
January 28, 2013
_ C. � ey's Office
��nIA�U�gc�
o�~ k77
.y
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM: An Ordinance to Accept and Appropriate Donated Funds from Dominion Virginia
Power
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2013
■ Background: Virginia Dominion Power has informed the City's Parks and
Recreation Department of its desire to donate $100,000 to the City's Beautification Fund
by way of the Landscape Management Division. The purpose of this donation is to plant
trees in specific areas of the City.
■ Considerations: The Tree Planting Initiative Team, consisting of staff from
Virginia Power and the City of Virginia Beach, has identified seven projects for which
this funding will be used. These projects are:
• Lynnhaven Parkway Bradford Pear Replacements
• Baxter Road Tree Canopy Project
• Ferrell Parkway Interchange Tree Canopy Project
• Cape Henry Trail Planting Augmentation Project
• Kemps Landing Park Transformer Project
• Northampton Boulevard Screening Replacement
• Neighborhood Street Tree Replacements
■ Public Information: Public information will be coordinated through the normal
City Council agenda process.
■ Recommendation: Adopt the attached budget amendment.
■ Attachments: Ordinance; and Memorandum from Michael Kalvort, Director of
Parks and Recreation
Recommended Action: Approval
Submitting Department/Agency: Parks and Recreation
City Manager: k .
DATE: January 14, 2013
TO: Catheryn Whitesell, Director, Management Services
FROM: Michael Kalvort, CPRE, Director, Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: Dominion Virginia Power Donation
Dominion Virginia Power is interested in donating $100,000 to the City of Virginia Beach, Landscape
Management Division for various tree planting projects throughout the City.
The following projects were identified by the Tree Planting Initiative Team, consisting of
Michael Kirk - Dominion Virginia Power Forester, Susan French - City Arborist, and staff from Parks
and Recreation/Landscape Management Division, Planning/Environment and Sustainability Office,
and Parks and Recreation/Planning, Design and Development Division.
• $8,000 — Lynnhaven Parkway Bradford Pear Replacements
• $5,000 — Baxter Road Tree Canopy Project
$16,000 - Ferrell Parkway Interchange Tree Canopy Project
$7,500 — Cape Henry Trail planting augmentation project
• $3,500 — Kemps Landing Park transformer project
• $25,000 — Northampton Boulevard screening replacement
• $35,000 — Neighborhood street tree replacements —120 to 150 trees
We are requesting approval to accept the donation and have it placed in our Landscape
Management Beautification Fund. We hope to plant the majority of the trees this spring. This
donation will go far in helping us to replace lost tree canopy in specific areas, enhance public safety,
as well as generally helping us to achieve the desired tree canopy coverage throughout the City.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. I may be reached at extension 1122.
Thank you for your help and continued support.
MK/FF/jp
cc: Cindy A. Curtis, CPRP, Deputy City Manager
Frank Fentress, Landscape Management
Susan French, Landscape Management
Maile Hildenbrand, Parks and Recreation
Pam Pearce, Parks and Recreation
sCity
of V�Lr� r�i a $each
9,➢�s ::
6E'
5
t7p 011R N)k%%0
VftOv om
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES
(757) 985-6234
MUNICIPAL CENTER
FAX (757) 3851857
TTY. 711
BUILDING 1
2401 COURTHOUSE DRIVE
VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23456-9012
INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 14, 2013
TO: Catheryn Whitesell, Director, Management Services
FROM: Michael Kalvort, CPRE, Director, Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: Dominion Virginia Power Donation
Dominion Virginia Power is interested in donating $100,000 to the City of Virginia Beach, Landscape
Management Division for various tree planting projects throughout the City.
The following projects were identified by the Tree Planting Initiative Team, consisting of
Michael Kirk - Dominion Virginia Power Forester, Susan French - City Arborist, and staff from Parks
and Recreation/Landscape Management Division, Planning/Environment and Sustainability Office,
and Parks and Recreation/Planning, Design and Development Division.
• $8,000 — Lynnhaven Parkway Bradford Pear Replacements
• $5,000 — Baxter Road Tree Canopy Project
$16,000 - Ferrell Parkway Interchange Tree Canopy Project
$7,500 — Cape Henry Trail planting augmentation project
• $3,500 — Kemps Landing Park transformer project
• $25,000 — Northampton Boulevard screening replacement
• $35,000 — Neighborhood street tree replacements —120 to 150 trees
We are requesting approval to accept the donation and have it placed in our Landscape
Management Beautification Fund. We hope to plant the majority of the trees this spring. This
donation will go far in helping us to replace lost tree canopy in specific areas, enhance public safety,
as well as generally helping us to achieve the desired tree canopy coverage throughout the City.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. I may be reached at extension 1122.
Thank you for your help and continued support.
MK/FF/jp
cc: Cindy A. Curtis, CPRP, Deputy City Manager
Frank Fentress, Landscape Management
Susan French, Landscape Management
Maile Hildenbrand, Parks and Recreation
Pam Pearce, Parks and Recreation
Dominion Virginia Power - City of Virginia Beach
Landscape Projects Proposal
August 23, 2012
The following projects were identified and estimates were prepared through the cooperation of
Michael Kirk, Dominion Virginia Power Forester, Susan French, City Arborist, and a team of
staff from Parks and Recreation/Landscape Management Division, Planning/Environment and
Sustainability Office, and Parks and Recreation/Planning, Design and Development Division.
We believe these projects would be mutually beneficial to both Dominion Virginia Power and
the City of Virginia Beach, and the City would also be happy to help publicize these projects to
whatever degree desired if any of them are approved.
Baxter Road
Tree Canopy Enhancement
Estimate
Narrative: The Larkspur transmission maintenance project will impact tree canopy on both private and City
property. The center medians of Baxter Road, which leads up to the front gate of one of Dominion Virginia
Power's maintenance facilities, is currently planted with a very small variety of Crape Myrtle, so the benefits
of high quality tree canopy are not realized. The City of Virginia Beach would transplant the existing Crape
Myrtles to a more appropriate location, if underground utilities allow. This proposed funding would then be
used to replace the small Crape Myrtles with approximately 25 `High Rise' Live Oaks (Quercus virginiana
`High Rise'). With a heavier canopy, these upright Live Oaks will help minimize the heat island effect along
Baxter Road, as well as providing many other desirable environmental benefits.
Date: 8/20/2012
nstatled,�__.
Item Synibol Caii er H 6t poi Size Qty: Unit Price -=
Trees
Quercus virginiana `High Rise' QH 1 3/4"-2" 25 EA $5,000.0
TOTAL $5,000.0
Cape Henry Trail
Planting Augmentation Project
Estimate
Narrative: This proposed project is along the Cape Henry Trail in Virginia Beach between Scallop Road and
Jade Street. Transmission clearance work along the trail last summer necessitated the removal of quite a few
Loblolly Pines and the pruning of several Live Oaks between the trail and residences to the north. In order to
replace the lost tree canopy and recreate the buffer between the trail and homes, the City of Virginia Beach
proposes the planting of about 50 small blooming trees that will restore the lost tree canopy and enhance the
trail experience, while remaining small enough to eliminate any future transmission line conflicts.
Date: 8/20/2012
Ferrell Parkway Interchange
Tree Canopy and Public Safety Enhancement
Estimate
Narrative: Close to the South Independence Boulevard corridor, five acres of sparsely planted grass fields
exist to the north and south of the Ferrell Parkway/Princess Anne Road interchange. The slopes are perfect for
sledding when the occasional snow event occurs, and Public Safety officers find the location challenging to
patrol. This is also an excellent location to establish new tree canopy close to South Independence Boulevard,
but out of the way of transmission lines. To establish new tree canopy and enhance public safety the City of
Virginia Beach would like to plant approximately 100 trees of varying species in a naturalized manner along
the slopes and field areas.
Date: 8/20/2012
:Item . -f
., lea i Cali r...
> "lit
Fot-�'ize 04.1
f Brice
-
Trees
Various Tree Species
AmelanchierX andi ora
AG
6'-8'
16
EA
$2,500.00
M. grandiflora `Little Gem'
MLG
6'-8'
16
EA
2500.00
M. stellata 'Royal Star"
MRS
6'-8'
16
EA
$2500.0
TOTAL
$7,500.0
Ferrell Parkway Interchange
Tree Canopy and Public Safety Enhancement
Estimate
Narrative: Close to the South Independence Boulevard corridor, five acres of sparsely planted grass fields
exist to the north and south of the Ferrell Parkway/Princess Anne Road interchange. The slopes are perfect for
sledding when the occasional snow event occurs, and Public Safety officers find the location challenging to
patrol. This is also an excellent location to establish new tree canopy close to South Independence Boulevard,
but out of the way of transmission lines. To establish new tree canopy and enhance public safety the City of
Virginia Beach would like to plant approximately 100 trees of varying species in a naturalized manner along
the slopes and field areas.
Date: 8/20/2012
Item
Sy boli
f Brice
Cali er bt Pot Size Q unit:
Trees
Various Tree Species
1 3/4"-2" 100 EA
$16,000.0
TOTAL
$16,000.0
Kempes Landing Park
Transformer Relocation Project
Estimate
Narrative: Due to a conflict, the City of Virginia Beach has requested that Dominion Virginia Power relocate
a large transformer at Kempes Landing Park. The relocation will require repairs to be made to the landscaping
in the transformer's current location as well as the installation of some planting to screen the transformer in its
new location. Once the relocation is complete, a plan will be prepared, and this proposed funding would be
used to accomplish the planting enhancements at Kempes Landing Park.
Date: 8/20/2012
Idem ' i `�y ' bat Gatipek H lbt . Ni ¢ ?I,Ta�t~ _ Price
TOTAL
Lynnhaven Parkway
Bradford Pear Replacement
Estimate
Narrative: Also very close to the South Independence Boulevard corridor, the center medians on
Lynnhaven Parkway from Indian River Road to Princess Anne Road were planted approximately 15-20
years ago with a long line of `Bradford' Pears. Invasiveness and poor branch structure has landed this
species on the unacceptable tree list for the Hampton Roads area. Their tendency to break apart poses
safety concerns. The City of Virginia Beach proposes removing the existing pears and replacing them
with 38 Common Baldcypress (Taxodium distichum). This is a much more desirable species, and these
trees would improve public safety and restore healthy tree canopy in the area.
Date: 8/20/2012
{
teM S* -.b ty
I Taxodium distichum I TD 1 1 8-10' 1 1 38 1 EA 1 $8,000.001
TOTAL
Neighborhood Street Tree Replacements
Planting Estimate
Narrative: Although the planting of neighborhood street trees by developers has been required by
Virginia Beach City Code since the late 1980's, funding has never been available for their replacement
when those trees decline or die. Over time vehicular accidents, storm damage, disease and environmental
stress have contributed to the loss of many individual trees that make up our subdivision tree canopy.
Many Virginia Beach citizens have been dismayed to learn their dead or dying trees would be put on a list
for replacement, but the replacement would not occur until new funding was available. The City of
Virginia Beach proposes using this funding to replace more than 175 trees of varying species in
neighborhoods. This project could also be a great public relations opportunity for Dominion Virginia
Power, and the City would prepare press releases if desired.
Date: 8/20/2012
Northampton Boulevard DVP Transmission Line Corridor
Landscape Planting Estimate
Narrative: At the request of the City of Virginia Beach, DVP has repeatedly pruned large, mature trees to
eliminate conflicts along the Northampton Boulevard transmission line corridor between Jack Frost Road
and Independence Boulevard. As time has passed, this directional pruning has created potential safety
hazards. Dominion Virginia Power and the City of Virginia Beach are negotiating a cooperative effort to
remove the trees and debris. In order to replace the lost canopy and the planted buffer zone that was
provided to the adjacent residences to the north of this busy highway, the City proposes using this funding
to plant smaller tree species and evergreen shrubs along the corridor.
Date: 8/20/2012
>Cecrn ' .
LL Sync l
tui �[
i'! 't oaf '�z 1V '
Pry
Trees
Tliix
` tall
r Puce '
Trees
Quercus phellos
P
13/4-2"
EA
Quercus virginiana
V1
3/4-2"
EA
Ulmus parvifolia
UP
1 3/4-2"
EA
Pinus virginiana
Zelkova serrata
ZS
1 3/4-2"
EA
27
Chioanthus vir inica
CV
1 3/4-2"
EA
Carpinus betulus
CB
1 3/4-2"
EA
Myrica cerifera
MC
TOTAL
$35,000.0
Northampton Boulevard DVP Transmission Line Corridor
Landscape Planting Estimate
Narrative: At the request of the City of Virginia Beach, DVP has repeatedly pruned large, mature trees to
eliminate conflicts along the Northampton Boulevard transmission line corridor between Jack Frost Road
and Independence Boulevard. As time has passed, this directional pruning has created potential safety
hazards. Dominion Virginia Power and the City of Virginia Beach are negotiating a cooperative effort to
remove the trees and debris. In order to replace the lost canopy and the planted buffer zone that was
provided to the adjacent residences to the north of this busy highway, the City proposes using this funding
to plant smaller tree species and evergreen shrubs along the corridor.
Date: 8/20/2012
_. Item_S`
tui �[
Ca'
`F . >Eie . lit.
_3In�
-ot.izie Q
Tliix
` tall
r Puce '
Trees
La erstroemia indica
LI
6'-7'
45
EA
$9,895.00
Pinus virginiana
PV
6'-8'
27
EA
$7,305.00
Shrubs
Myrica cerifera
MC
3'-4'
7 al. 60 1
EA
$3,740.0
Illicium parviflorum
IP
24"-30"
3 al. 92
EA
$4,060.0
TOTAL
$25,000.0
1 AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND
2 APPROPRIATE DONATED FUNDS FROM
3 DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER
4
5 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,
6 VIRGINIA:
7 That a donation of $100,000 from Virginia Dominion Power is hereby accepted
8 and appropriated, with donation revenue increased accordingly, to the City's
9 Beautification Fund for the purpose of completing seven tree planting projects.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the
day of 2013.
Requires an affirmative vote by a majority of all of the members of City Council.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
4
ManagerKent ervices 61ys 6ffice
CA12512
R-1
January 30, 2013
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM: An Ordinance to Accept and Appropriate Donated Funds from the Bellamy
Woods Civic League to Improve Bellamy Woods Park
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2013
■ Background: The Virginia Beach Parks and Recreation Foundation ("the
Foundation"), a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, exists to support the Department of
Parks and Recreation by raising funds, accepting gifts and providing other resources to
enhance existing programs, services, facilities and technology. The Foundation has
established a unique program whereby a civic league, local business, or organization
can partner with the Foundation to improve a City park. The project's donors receive
charitable gift receipts through the Foundation, which establishes a specific account for
receiving and holding donations for the project. Ultimately, the funds are used to
improve a public park.
The Bellamy Woods Civic League was the first organization to apply to the Parks Plus
project. The Department of Parks and Recreation developed a park improvement plan
for the Civic League to consider. Parks and Recreation and the Civic League agreed to
the park improvements plan and the Foundation facilitated the Civic League's donation
through the Parks Plus program.
■ Considerations: The Bellamy Woods Civic League has donated $3,337.60
through the Virginia Beach Parks and Recreation Foundation's Parks Plus program for
the estimated cost of park improvements to Bellamy Woods Neighborhood Park.
■ Public Information: The Department of Parks and Recreation has coordinated
with the Virginia Beach Parks and Recreation Foundation and the Bellamy Woods Civic
League on this request in openly discussing and deciding -by -consensus the
improvements for the Bellamy Woods Neighborhood Park and associated costs.
■ Recommendation: Approval the attached CIP amendment.
■ Attachment: Ordinance
Recommended Action: Approval
Submitting Department/Agency: Parks and Recreation
City Manager: b%k
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND
APPROPRIATE DONATED FUNDS FROM
THE BELLAMY WOODS CIVIC LEAGUE TO
IMPROVE BELLAMY WOODS PARK
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,
VIRGINIA:
That a donation from the Bellamy Woods Civic League in the amount of
$3,337.60 is hereby accepted and appropriated, with local revenue increased
accordingly, to CIP 4-500 Park/Playground Renovations Phase III to improve Bellamy
Woods Neighborhood Park.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the day of
2013.
Requires an affirmative vote by a majority of all of the members of City Council.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
Managem nt ervices s bffice
CA12509
R-1
January 28, 2013
it°k �as�71
jai , wha
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM .
ITEM: An Ordinance to Accept and Appropriate Funds and to Transfer Funds for the
Virginia Tourism Corporation Marketing Leverage Program
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2013
■ Background: The Virginia Tourism Corporation (VTC) Marketing Leverage
Program is designed to stimulate new tourism marketing programs through the creation
of tourism partnerships and to extend the "Virginia is for Lovers" campaign. This
program seeks to leverage limited marketing dollars to increase visitor spending. In
accordance with the VTC initiative, the City of Virginia Beach through its Department of
Convention and Visitors Bureau will partner with Destination DC, Busch Gardens
Williamsburg, Jamestown, Rudee Tours and Cercle Des Vacances to form the Cercle
Des Vacances French Co-op Partnership.
The purpose of the Cercle Des Vacances Partnership is to leverage resources of the
Virginia Beach Convention and Visitors Bureau and our six partners to create Capital
Region USA brand awareness and increase visitation from France to the Capital
Region. The partnership recognizes that French travelers visit multiple destinations,
stay longer and spend considerably more than domestic visitors. By working together,
the partners are committed to a co-op marketing program that is compelling to the
French market and mirrors their vacation desires and needs. The French have an
average of 5 weeks of holiday per year and are repetitive travelers seeking new
destinations. Washington, D.C. is ranked as a top destination for French travelers as
they enjoy activities such as shopping, dining, historical places and many outdoor water
sports. As a secondary market for the Capital Region, it is the partners' desire to plan
and implement strategies with Cercle Des Vacances that advance the brand, influence
the consumer and increase room nights.
■ Considerations: The grant involves a "2 for 1" match with $24,000 awarded by
the Commonwealth of Virginia, and a $48,000 grant match provided as follows: Cercle
Des Vacances $32,000; City of Virginia Beach Convention and Visitors Bureau $7,500;
Destination DC $7,500; Busch Gardens Williamsburg $500; Jamestown $250; and
Rudee Tours $250. The City would appropriate the State grant and a portion of the
overall grant match provided by Destination DC, Busch Gardens Williamsburg,
Jamestown and Rudee Tours. However, the City would not appropriate the match from
Cercle Des Vacances, because Cercle Des Vacances will be paying their $32,000
share of the grant match in France. Therefore, this amount will not pass through the
City's books. Cercle Des Vacances will furnish verification that the $32,000 in expenses
paid for its share of the grant is in accordance with grant requirements. The funding for
Virginia Beach's share of the grant match of $7,500 is available in the Tourism
Advertising Program Fund International Media budget.
■ Public Information: Public information will be provided through the normal
Council agenda process.
■ Recommendation: Approve the attached budget amendment
■ Attachment: Ordinance
Recommended Action: Approval
Submitting Department/Agency
City Manager: Qig l�
Convention & Visitors Bureau �
1 AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE
2 FUNDS AND TO TRANSFER FUNDS FOR THE
3 VIRGINIA TOURISM CORPORATION MARKETING
4 LEVERAGE PROGRAM
5
6 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,
7 VIRGINIA THAT:
8
9 1) $24,000 is hereby accepted from the Virginia Tourism Corporation and
10 appropriated, with estimated state revenues increased accordingly, to the FY 2012-13
11 Operating Budget of the Department of Convention and Visitors Bureau for costs to
12 create Capital Region USA brand awareness and increase visitation from France to the
13 Capital Region that includes Washington, D.C., Williamsburg, Jamestown and Virginia
14 Beach;
15
16 2) $8,500 is hereby accepted and appropriated from the following
17 organizations, with estimated revenues increased accordingly, to provide a portion of
18 the local grant match: Destination DC, $7,500; Busch Gardens Williamsburg, $500;
19 Jamestown, $250; and Rudee Tours, $250; and
20
21 3) $7,500 of existing funds are hereby transferred within the Tourism
22 Advertising Program Special Revenue Funds for a portion of the local grant match and
23 CVB will seek confirmation of the $32,000 spent by Cercle Des Vacances, which is also
24 required for the grant match.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the day
of , 2013.
Requires an affirmative vote by a majority of all of the members of City Council.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
anage e t Services -C' ` rnKs Office
CA12496
R-1
January 7, 2013
i
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM: An Ordinance to Accept and Appropriate Grant Funds and to Transfer Funds for
Aggression Replacement Training
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2013
■ Background: The Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) has
awarded the Virginia Beach Court Service Unit funding through the federal Juvenile
Accountability Block Grant (JABG): One Time Special Fund Initiative. The grant period
will run from July 1, 2013 — November 30, 2013. This grant will provide $36,250 of
federal funding and requires a $4,028 local match.
The JABG funding will be used to train Juvenile Probation staff in Aggression
Replacement Training (ART). This training will allow Juvenile Probation staff to
implement an ART Program designed specifically for youth offenders who struggle with
violence and aggression. Training probation staff will eliminate the need to locate
alternative and often expensive treatment providers to offer this evidence -based
treatment program.
The grant is non-renewable. Once training is completed, there will not be any ongoing
needs. The work will be completed and sustained by the Virginia Beach Court Service
Unit at the end of the grant funding.
■ Considerations: The grant match will be provided by Juvenile Probation's FY
2013 budget.
■ Public Information: Public information will be coordinated through the normal
Council Agenda process.
■ Recommendation: Adopt the attached budget amendment.
■ Attachment: Ordinance
Recommended Action: Approval
Submitting Department/Agency: VB Court Service Unit / Juvenile Probation
City Manager:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE GRANT
FUNDS AND TO TRANSFER FUNDS FOR AGGRESSION
REPLACEMENT TRAINING
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,
VIRGINIA:
1. That $36,250 is hereby accepted from the Department of Criminal Justice
Services through the Byrne Justice Assistance Grant Program and
appropriated, with federal revenue increased accordingly, to the FY 2012-13
Operating Budget of Juvenile Probation for the purposes of implementing an
Aggression Replacement Training Program; and
2. That $4,028 is available in the FY 2012-13 Operating Budget of Juvenile
Probation and is hereby transferred with this budget to provide the required
local match.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the day
of 2013.
Requires an affirmative vote by a majority of all of the members of City Council.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
r
Manage a Services
CA12502
R-1
January 17, 2013
City AttaFxey' Office
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM: An Ordinance to Accept and Appropriate Funds from the Virginia Department of
Emergency Management and to Transfer Funds for the Emergency Operations
Center
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2013
■ Background: The City has been awarded $13,000 by the Virginia Department of
Emergency Management (VDEM), from the FY 2012 Emergency Management
Performance Grant Program. This is a federal grant from the Department of Homeland
Security that is passed through VDEM. The grant's purpose is to cover costs of
purchasing Smart Boards, projectors, microphones, and flat screen monitors for the
Emergency Operations and Joint Information Centers.
■ Considerations: The City of Virginia Beach's Emergency Operations Center
(EOC) has been operational for a number of years. The upgrade of equipment provides
an opportunity to integrate new technology to keep the EOC a state of the art facility.
These funds will be used to enhance the situational awareness capabilities of the EOC
and to support the EOC mission of community wide direction and control in large scale
emergencies.
The grant requires a $13,000 match. $9,175 of the required grant match will come from
local funds that were appropriated to the Project Impact Grant in 2008 for emergency
preparedness activities, but have yet to be expended. The remaining $3,825 will be an
in-kind match from the cost of an emergency management exercise that the City will be
conducting after the equipment is installed. This grant will allow the City to complete this
project and greatly improve the capabilities of the EOC.
■ Public Information: Public information will be coordinated through the normal
Council agenda process.
■ Recommendation: Adopt the attached budget amendment.
■ Attachment: Ordinance
Recommended Action: Approval
Submitting Department/Agncy: Fire Department
City Manager. , . )r7v
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE
FUNDS FROM THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AND TO TRANSFER
FUNDS FOR THE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS
CENTER
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,
VIRGINIA:
1. That $13,000 in grant funding from the Federal Emergency Management
Administration is hereby accepted and appropriated, with estimated federal
revenues increased accordingly, to the FY 2012-13 Operating Budget of the
Fire Department to provide upgrades to the City's Emergency Operations
Center;
2. That $9,175 of in the Grants Consolidated Fund (Project Impact Grant) is
hereby transferred to the FY 2012-13 Operating Budget of the Fire
Department to provide a portion of the required match; and
3. That $3,825 in in-kind support for an emergency management exercise will be
provided for a portion of the required match.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the day
of 2013.
Requires an affirmative vote by a majority of all of the members of City Council.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
i
Management'Services
CA12511
R-1
January 30, 2013
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
CityAttor �. office
�.
rQry NV` DP-9��
p
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM: An Ordinance to Appropriate State Revenue and to Transfer Funds from the
General Fund Reserve for Contingencies for the Replacement of Pollbooks
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2013
■ Background: In 2009, the General Registrar replaced the paper pollbooks with
refurbished Dell laptop units. Of the 300 pollbooks purchased, 297 are still operational.
These units are past their useful life expectancy and are in need of replacement. The
General Registrar's Office will need to upgrade the current software in the following
months. The software runs best on Windows 7, not the current operating system
installed on the electronic pollbooks. During the 2012 Presidential Election, issues with
the pollbooks indicated the need to replace the laptops.
The State Board of Elections, through Help America Vote Act funding, will reimburse the
City $190 per pollbook for a maximum of two per precinct. The General Registrar's
Office would like to begin a phased approach in replacing the existing pollbooks. A
pollbook can be purchased for $379 dollars ($189 City/$190 State).
■ Considerations: The General Registrar's Office request that City Council
appropriate $36,100 in estimated state reimbursement revenue and transfer $35,910
from the General Fund Reserve for Contingencies into the General Registrar's FY 2013
budget for the purchase of 190 pollbooks at an estimated cost of $72,010. If approved,
the remaining balance of the General Fund Reserve for Contingencies will be $138,795.
■ Public Information: Public information will be provided through the normal
Council Agenda process.
■ Recommendation: Approval of attached budget amendment.
■ Attachment: Ordinance
Recommended Action: Approval
Submitting Department/Agency: General Registrar
City Manager. I,L - bVq,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE STATE REVENUE
AND TO TRANSFER FUNDS FROM THE GENERAL FUND
RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES FOR THE
REPLACEMENT OF POLLBOOKS
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,
VIRGINIA:
1. That $36,100 in State Revenue is hereby appropriated, with estimated state
revenues increased accordingly, to the FY 2012-13 Operating Budget of the
General Registrar to partially fund the purchase of 190 pollbooks; and
2. That $35,910 is hereby transferred from the General Fund Reserve for
Contingencies to the FY 2012-13 Operating Budget of the General Registrar
to partially fund the purchase of 190 pollbooks.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the day
of , 2013.
Requires an affirmative vote by a majority of all of the members of City Council.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
r'` 6
Managem nt ervices
CA12513
R-1
January 30, 2013
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
City Attorne''Office
L. PLANNING
1. Application of OCEAN CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPERS, LLC for a Variance to §4.4(b)
of the Subdivision Ordinance to SUBDIVIDE one lot into two (2) at 4805 Lee Avenue
DISTRICT 4 - BAYSIDE
RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL
2. Application of MICHAEL T. ABENANTE for a Variance to §4.4(b) of the Subdivision
Ordinance to CREATE an additional lot at 716 Woodstock Road
DISTRICT 1 - CENTERVILLE
RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL
3. Application of C &C DEVELOPMENT CO., INC., Christopher J. Ettel and Chancey
W. Walker, III to reconstruct a Non -Conforming Use and DEMOLISH and
CONTRUCT two single family residences at 207 51 st Street
DISTRICT 5 - LYNNHAVEN
RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL
4. Application of SURF BEACH CLUB, INC. to reconstruct a Non -Conforming_ Use and
REPLACE nine (9) cabana structures at 5704 Ocean Front Avenue
DISTRICT 5 - LYNNHAVEN
RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL
5. Application of BURNETTE DEVELOPMENT, LLC and PARETTA D. MUDD for a
Conditional Use Permit re a self -storage at 5737 Northampton Boulevard
DISTRICT 2 - KEMPSVILLE
RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL
6. Application of PRINCESS ANNE MASONIC LODGE #25 and EMMA SMITHSON
FOUNTAIN for a Conditional Use Permit to MOVE the Masonic Lodge from Princess Anne
Road to 3067 West Neck Road (the Thomas Woodhouse historical property)
DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE
RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL
7. Application of TRUSTEES OF FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF VIRGINIA
BEACH for a Conditional Use Permit re a columbarium at 300 36th Street
DISTRICT 6 - BEACH
RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL
8. Application of BAKER ROAD SENIORS, LLC for a Change of Zoning from Conditional A-
36 Apartment to Conditional A-24 Apartment at 544 Baker Road
DISTRICT 4 - BAYSIDE
RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL
9. Application of MPB, INC. for a Conditional Change of Zoning from AG -1 and AG -2
Agricultural to Conditional 0-2 Office re an office structure at Princess Anne Road and
Elson Green Avenue (deferred November 13, December 4, December 11, 2012 and
January 22, 2013)
DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE
RECOMMENDATION
APPROVAL
11.1 .I,I,
� N
❑❑❑❑❑ G ❑❑❑❑❑❑ a G G❑ ! m
(y) �WU)0uiv,G�in U)0Q)
cuiCnNU?4 v, fG�r (11) V)
,
G,p a o a a a o d a a G a
V V)(n U) (j)Cn 0 U) V) V) 0 U) V) N Ui �.
C '--RD -- O a p G O a G p o a p a a a O a d a O G !�
U, (n 60._ n U) U) U) U) (n (n (n V) (n N Cn U) Cn N to Ln , N M
^CiO a a a O �_ -�[:. N Can 0U) 0 (0 N (n f( ipn N (n N � (1) U) {n a VO) Ua) W�
(n (1� lf)_ N (n U) U) Cn _
C, a 0 0 ❑ ❑❑❑ 0 -C7-Q--4Qp❑p d a a❑ d a a a a a a a❑ a a
t1 &ice 0 Cn (n U) Cn U) V) ❑ -�69--(1)`V) () V) 0U) to N U, V to U) V) V) 0 U) (n W (n O
G o a e'er o p G a G- a a a ❑ G a
(n U) rn U) 60--b4-10- ) U) Vi 0 UI U) U) U7 V) U) Cn U) Cn fTi-'dY-iA- Sli (F, (n U)
G-a--La-.o o G a o a G-ZY-® II o 0 0 0 d❑ o o G o❑ o 0 0❑❑
/� � N -b9-1p v) (n U) U) UI U) �-r/1_� V) V) (n U) [n 4'1 L7 to N U) rn Vi UI N U) i•
C;a o a -f3- G o a a a a d o a a G a o G 0❑ o G a O in
mom
O_ p p p p p p p p -� G G D a G❑ a O G O o G d L'r G❑ `id
i U' Cn (f) UI Cn fn Cn Cn U) U) Cn U7 �-vt-�A-.-C/�Ul
C; n a -C}- a O d O o a ❑ O O O a OG O �`t�£ p❑ a d o❑ a
U, N V) U) G')
1 O O a 0 0 0 0 [V V, a❑ U) V) O
C U �: , u LQ a o O G a G a a❑ O a C
U) U7 t G7 V� IJ�Cn U) (f, Cn U7 to �(a�{() (n Cn U) (�
A V ua(n att -�(WN U) a 0V) �
❑ a aGda r7 Q%�S G p❑
fn (j) V w (n (n (n W \.�, l Cn v, (n cn
5J63 ___ oO o ac 1cl LJ ~7Jd Jaa�� a C
f r N (n (n rn (! ? (J) U) (n Cn V) - - O
o_ a O G O J a a 0 - p 0 0 G d a -a
A rn cn v, Cn cn u) t W u) (n n (n (n (r -�,s- Cn V UI .y
a ❑ aaa r❑apo of aaa a❑I
Cn , Ul U) Cn rn N ; rn n (A U) (A 0 U) U)
G O o O G O 0 d a /❑ a
t V) (n (n r (n 0 (n v, (n
U) U) U) Ul Vi 0 U)
C, o a p p o a s -tif a d t a G
V, Cn U) U) V) U, 0 (i) rY, � U) U) (Q U)
D O D O O O o G a G 0� G
i rn (n V (A}•'�,I J-$ Cn u) sn v) (n V) (n rn rn - r t r
Q O a G G �.i p G❑ a
O , rIt ❑�iCr-,I ,fl ; (n q c _ J
0 a a ai
VW 0 N r
❑ o G G G u G o o G G (
V) O d '48
(n V) (n c, r „
1 G O❑❑ a' r a a❑
Cn U) (n N V)
a a❑❑ a a a G ❑❑ d o G o o a a 0 d o
C,1 Cn U) G? U) Cn CO U) U) U r i/}-- 0 N 0 U) U) U) rn U)
r
a O G o a a a C-, G G G a a
(n co (!) rn V U) i N r VG o o G a
J -
G G p G G ❑ a
•'� (n (!, rn rn C U) '. � N to U) Ui rn Cn L7 V, Cn 0 V (n , rn
o CGa a o o p d a s u
v, -69-u �, - (n v (n n cn v, N 0rn cn v) (10)(n V) C
o ca - C, G
Vd a a
T' --GQ V U, UT --Wo �V) U) U) U) U) 0 V, U) � (.0 (1) , U, C V,
7 _ `r
G GG G ❑❑ �f1;1O r a~ -
G i 0 U,,f U)� r--ti�1.. U) li r-t� rn (n rn ±, �{ U) 4� U1 y
ti
4+
r
all
Ga}1 0V) �(A C o V) irn r:. _ foI) U 0 Vtf yam' r>
f ❑ a cl_ 4:1 d O / ❑ r ❑ o ¢i
(1) V) U) U N UI �: ?
_--- j ';
u a c,'- a G G a a -zoo a a p
(n . rn V, i; V V1 (n ui u) v, u); C. O 4 d
Q a a ❑ a
W C� rn U) ! W U'} (n U) U) , V
C_l
rc�V,1 <' p
❑ a a 0 0 o a❑ G a o ❑ o G y
N W �) a (n in v, N (n to (n is Q (n u) vi U) -'
�� - a apan O as a0Q.
7 4 0 (n n -,. (i) i,l N U7 in U) 47 Cn � V) U) rn V) C �- � � Cn
cn �c. o a a G o �Lj a a a a -'u i� ❑ G a II
�! (n u) v) 0 c ) ' (n n V, U) V cn '' N 4
ZONING HISTORY
#
DATE
REQUEST
ACTION
1
7/13/04
Subdivision Variance
Approved
2
10/23/98
Subdivision Variance
Denied
3
8/25/98
Rezoning (B-1 Business and R5R Residential to
R2.5 Residential with a PD -1-12 Overlay)
Approved
OCEAN CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPERS, LLC
Agenda Item 3
Page 9
�jp O£gC�v
iV
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM: OCEAN CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPERS, LLC (Applicant & Owner), Variance
to the Subdivision Ordinance, Section 4.4(b), to subdivide one lot into two lots,
neither of which will meet required minimum lot area for the R -5R District. 4805
Lee Avenue (GPIN 1570510374). BAYSIDE DISTRICT.
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2013
■ Background:
The applicant is requesting approval of a variance to the requirement of the Section
4.4(b) of the Subdivision Ordinance that all lots created through subdivision must
meet all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.
9.3 of the Subdivision Ordinance provides for variances from the regulations of the
Subdivision Ordinance. As provided for in Section 9.3, no variance shall be
authorized by the Council [and, by extension, the Planning Commission] unless it
finds that:
A. Strict application of the ordinance would produce undue hardship.
B. The authorization of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to
adjacent property, and the character of the neighborhood will not be
adversely affected.
C. The problem involved is not of so general or recurring a nature as to make
reasonably practicable the formulation of general regulations to be
adopted as an amendment to the ordinance.
D. The hardship is created by the physical character of the property,
including dimensions and topography, or by other extraordinary situation
or condition of such property, or by the use or development of property
immediately adjacent thereto. Personal or self-inflicted hardship shall not
be considered as grounds for the issuance of a variance.
E. The hardship is created by the requirements of the zoning district in which
the property is located at the time the variance is authorized whenever
such variance pertains to provisions of the Zoning Ordinance incorporated
by reference in this ordinance.
■ Considerations:
The existing lot is 8,890 square feet, has a lot width of 100 feet, and is currently
being used for a single-family dwelling. The applicant proposes to subdivide the lot
and develop two single-family homes. The site is zoned R -5R Resort Residential
District, and can currently be developed with a duplex.
Ocean Condominium Developers, LLC
Page 2 of 3
Proposed Lots: The two proposed lots will meet all of the requirements of the R -5R
District, except the requirement for a minimum lot area of 5,000 square feet:
Item Required lot; 8-1L.ot -2-2
Lot Width in feet 50 50 50
Lot Area insquare feet 5,000 4,445* 4,445*
As noted above, the intent of the applicant is to construct a single-family dwelling on
each lot rather than one duplex on the existing lot. The construction of two single-
family dwellings is more consistent with the recommendations of the Comprehensive
Plan than is the construction of a duplex. The Comprehensive Plan designates this
site as being within the Suburban Area. The general planning principles for the
Suburban Area focus on preserving and protecting the overall character, economic
value, and aesthetic quality of stable neighborhoods. This is accomplished by having
all new development proposals either maintain or enhance the existing
neighborhood through compatibility with surroundings, attractiveness of site and
buildings, environmental responsibility, livability, and effective buffering of residential
from other residential and non-residential with respect to type, size, intensity, and
relationship to the surrounding uses.
The proposed subdivision variance would result in redevelopment of the parcel in a
manner that is consistent with and furthers the Suburban Area land use policies of
the Comprehensive Plan by ensuring compatibility with the surrounding area and
preserving neighborhood stability. Constructing two single-family detached
residential units would not result in greater density than the duplex unit that could be
built by -right. Single-family homes are compatible with the character of the
Chesapeake Beach neighborhood. Moreover, there are single-family homes to the
west and east of the subject property and duplex units to the south and north, all
within the same zoning district. The residents of this neighborhood, much like those
of the North End community of Virginia Beach, prefer single-family residential
development as opposed to large duplex structures. The applicant's description of
the request submitted as part of the variance application notes that the civic league
and the surrounding homeowners prefer the construction of single-family dwellings
of the type and design provided by applicant as part of the application.
There was no opposition to the request.
■ Recommendations:
The Planning Commission placed this item on the Consent Agenda, passing a
motion by a recorded vote of 10-0, to recommend approval of this request to the City
Council with the following conditions:
1. The site shall be subdivided in accordance with the submitted subdivision plan
entitled "Subdivision of Lot B Division of Lot #5 Chesapeake Park," dated
October 30, 2012, prepared by WPL Landscape Architecture, Land Surveying,
and Civil Engineering. Said plan has been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City
Ocean Condominium Developers, LLC
Page 3 of 3
Council and is on file in the Planning Department.
2. Proposed Lots B-1 and B-2 are approved for single-family dwelling development
only. This restriction shall be noted on the subdivision plat.
3. The architectural design of the dwellings shall be "coastal cottage" style as
depicted in the rendering submitted with the applicant. Building materials shall
include Hardieplank® (or comparable) lap siding, architectural -grade shingles for
the roof, and composite decking and porch rails. All windows and building trim
shall be vinyl clad. The foundation of the structures shall be brick clad.
■ Attachments:
Staff Review and Disclosure Statements
Minutes of Planning Commission Hearing
Location Map
Recommended Action: Staff recommends approval. Planning Commission recommends
approval.
Submitting Department/Agency: Planning Departmen
City Manager. IL , 7� N?k
enrsIoE Ocean Condominium Developers, LLC 3
,
R2.5*
January 9, 2013 Public Hearing
5
RfRR Q APPLICANT AND PROPERTY
m OWNER:
OCEANf
1.
R>.5 ' =Q
o
I AU R5R
RSR CONDOMINIUM
5R DEVELOPERS, LLC
R7.s �O Cr
- B2 a �t
Subdivision Variance Lot B Into Lots B1 d 02
M«. vrw�tlne. w inn.t n...W.
fD - Sbw. DiY. <Yr«q
STAFF PLANNER: Faith Christie
REQUEST:
Subdivision Variance to Section 4.4(b) of the Subdivision Ordinance that requires all newly created lots meet
all the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance.
ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION: 4805 Lee Avenue
GPIN: ELECTION DISTRICT: SITE SIZE: AICUZ:
15705103740000 BAYSIDE 8,890 square feet Less than 65 dB DNL
BACKGROUND / DETAILS OF PROPOSAL
Existing Lot: The existing lot is 8,890 square feet and 100 -feet in width.
Proposed Lots: It is the intent of the applicant to subdivide the lot into two single-family lots of 50 -feet in
width and 4,445 square feet in land area.
ARM Required Lot B.1 Lot B.2
Lot Width in feet 50 50 50
Lot Area in square feet 5,000 4,445* 4,445*
Variance required
LAND USE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
EXISTING LAND USE: Single-family dwelling / R -5R Residential Resort (Shore Drive Corridor Overlay)
SURROUNDING LAND North: . Lee Avenue
OCEAN CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPERS, LLC
Agenda Item 3
Page 1
USE AND ZONING: • Across Lee Avenue are single-family and duplex dwellings / R -
5R Residential Resort (Shore Drive Corridor Overlay)
South: a Duplex dwellings / R -5R Residential Resort (Shore Drive
Corridor Overlay)
East: . Single-family dwelling / R -5R Residential Resort (Shore Drive
Corridor Overlay)
West: . Single-family dwelling / R -5R Residential Resort (Shore Drive
Corridor Overlay)
NATURAL RESOURCE AND There are no natural resources or cultural features associated with the
CULTURAL FEATURES: site.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Suburban Area
The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as being within the Suburban Area. The general planning
principles for the Suburban Area focus on preserving and protecting the overall character, economic value,
and aesthetic quality of stable neighborhoods. This is accomplished by having all new development proposals
either maintain or enhance the existing neighborhood through compatibility with surroundings, attractiveness
of site and buildings, environmental responsibility, livability, and effective buffering of residential from other
residential and non-residential with respect to type, size, intensity, and relationship to the surrounding uses.
IMPACT ON CITY SERVICES
MASTER TRANSPORTATION PLAN (MTP) / CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP): Lee Avenue is a
two-lane undivided local street. It is not included in the Master Transportation Plan. There are no Roadway
Capital Improvement Program projects slated for this roadway
TRAFFIC:
Street Name
Present
Volume
Present Capacity
Generated Traffic
Lee Avenue
No traffic
Local street (capacity is
Existing Land Use — 10
counts
adequate for adjacent
ADT
available
land use)
Proposed Land Use 3— 19
ADT
Average Daily Trips
las defined by a single-family dwelling
Sas defined by two single-family dwellings
WATER: There is a 6 -inch City water main along Lee Avenue. The development must connect to City water.
SEWER: There is 8 -inch City sanitary sewer gravity main along Lee Avenue. The development must connect
to City sanitary sewer. Sanitary sewer and pump station analysis for Pump Station 302 is required to
determine if future flows can be accommodated.
OCEAN CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPERS, LLC
Agenda Item 3
Page 2
EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION
Section 9.3 of the Subdivision Ordinance provides for variances from the regulations of the Subdivision
Ordinance. As provided for in Section 9.3, no variance shall be authorized by the Council [and, by
extension, the Planning Commission] unless it finds that:
A. Strict application of the ordinance would produce undue hardship.
B. The authorization of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property,
and the character of the neighborhood will not be adversely affected.
C. The problem involved is not of so general or recurring a nature as to make reasonably
practicable the formulation of general regulations to be adopted as an amendment to the
ordinance.
D. The hardship is created by the physical character of the property, including dimensions
and topography, or by other extraordinary situation or condition of such property, or by
the use or development of property immediately adjacent thereto. Personal or self-
inflicted hardship shall not be considered as grounds for the issuance of a variance.
E. The hardship is created by the requirements of the zoning district in which the property is
located at the time the variance is authorized whenever such variance pertains to
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance incorporated by reference in this ordinance.
Staff finds that the proposed subdivision variance would result in redevelopment of the parcel in a manner
that is consistent with and furthers the Suburban Area land use policies of the Comprehensive Plan by
ensuring compatibility with the surrounding area and preserving neighborhood stability. Constructing two
single-family detached residential units would not result in greater density than the duplex unit that could
be built by -right on this legal non -conforming lot. Single-family homes are compatible with the character of
the Chesapeake Beach neighborhood. Moreover, there are single-family homes to the west and east of
the subject property, and duplex units to the south and north, all within the same zoning district. The
residents of this neighborhood, much like those of the North End of Virginia Beach, prefer single-family
residential development as opposed to large duplex structures. The applicant's description of the request
submitted as part of the variance application notes that the civic league and the surrounding
homeowners, as well as the applicant, prefer the construction of single-family dwellings with building
elevations that the applicant proffered as conditions of this variance approval instead of the construction
of a three-story duplex structure on the site.
Staff, therefore, recommends approval of the request subject to the conditions listed below.
CONDITIONS
1. The site shall be subdivided in accordance with the submitted subdivision plan entitled "Subdivision of
Lot B Division of Lot #5 Chesapeake Park," dated October 30, 2012, prepared by WPL Landscape
Architecture, Land Surveying, and Civil Engineering. Said plan has been exhibited to the Virginia
OCEAN CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPERS, LLC
Agenda Item 3
Page 3
Beach City Council and is on file in the Planning Department.
2. Proposed Lots B-1 and B-2 are approved for single-family dwelling development only. This restriction
shall be noted on the subdivision plat.
3. The architectural design of the dwellings shall be "coastal cottage" style as depicted in the rendering
submitted with the applicant. Building materials shall include Hardieplank® (or comparable) lap siding,
architectural -grade shingles for the roof, and composite decking and porch rails. All windows and
building trim shall be vinyl clad. The foundation of the structures shall be brick clad.
NOTE: Further conditions may be required during the administration of applicable City Ordinances.
Plans submitted with this rezoning application may require revision during detailed site plan review to
meet all applicable City Codes and Standards.
The applicant is encouraged to contact and work with the Crime Prevention Office within the Police
Department for crime prevention techniques and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
(CPTED) concepts and strategies as they pertain to this site.
OCEAN CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPERS, LLC
Agenda Item 3
Page 4
AERIAL OF SITE LOCATION
OCEAN CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPERS, LLC
Agenda Item 3
Page 5
THS s m COM TFNT ON Nx;M 24 1074, WE RR&M THE PRW" =0 ON THS PIAT
AND M7 M PROPERTY LRE.S OF RECORD AS SNOOK N: WP WW 27, PACE 47 AND THE WVLS
OF IK DADM AS WoW THE SAW PRDKM
LM AND DW AARE W DORDI R D(M TM OF OMR BULONCS ON THE PSOPPUM.. OUR AS -0040006-
tilt
\ c AD" LL
[f.K Ja��M7o)
aft Jl
NPL SIpiD NY1'T8 `'N''p
IWMI R. PREHO
Lie. No. 220E
08/28/1012
c&W iv
a uc
(U! f�OaAlJ7aAaU/II0) 10
Ra awt II. - if
r w (U6 20
raw ux sn
�r
LOT-0
GrM: I77G-OJ-NN
rar
a. ria u
/-amrwa
nr .a%m= a
v
- n ao iv n r — ra-
/QD• ID ri JiT Ji
-------------
SLtlBE htlYlSE
Ap40 and r.n
w.oi .ot H. sriar
/rn ♦ �ipw ri u�i.�
LEE A VENUE
- 50'"-
(�x Y2 EWW RAW)
8000 IIOaN710N: M PROPERTY sIDNN IEEEDN APPEARS m PAu R7DNI ZONE X oETOMED ro BE OUI510E OF TIE 0118
C01/RNIIYwNEt ��ss 7aO�i °7FR"a n wEY 4 �Z � NANMNCE PATE WP (FJ.R.N•1 roR TE CITY aE VRCrAA B:A&HNRORIYI
NPL s NOT A PARTY N OE7DM11111G M RE011R�IDRS i'OR FI000 NSURANfE ON M PROPERLY SIOWN ILZttpl. 1}IS SURVEY GOES NOT
NFLY 1Wi TFK PROPERII' RLL OR KILL NOf [E SU[SECf m FIDOOR7C. FDR fTNOHDt NFDIIWTON, CONOCf THE LOCAL COIMMIY FIDOD
CfT10Al. 7Hs SURVEY NAS PEI6DRIE0 RI111011f M F7ilEiif Oi A TREE REPORT AID WY NOT SNOW AFFf/Nl EASEIENIS OR IESIPoCIgl6
1X17 WY AFFECT SAO PROPERTY AS SfOMM. TNS RAT GOES NDT MEND m REPRFSEN7 A SURDNsIpI OF LAN0.
OF
LOT B �s
CHM � P&
PLAT RECORDED DY YAP BOOK 27, PACE 47. IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE
OF THE CIRCi7T1' CO OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA
GI
BICACCK,�GMU
ZXCLUSIMY OCEAN CONDOLWAL M DEVELOPER. LLC
ax: 1` - 251 AUGUST 28- EI
PHYSICAL SURVEY OF EXISTING LOT
OCEAN CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPERS, LLC
Agenda Item 3
Page 6
tWHVEY AMC BE AL NO 8
1. THE MERIDIAN SOURCE OF THIS PLAT 15 INSW ON PIE VIRGINIA STATE RAVE COORDINATE SYSTEM, SOUTH ZME, HAD 1983/1993 (HARM).
COORDINATE VALUES SNOWTT ARE E%PRC45E0 IN US. SUWEY FEET.
2. THE CITY OF WRQNN BEACH CONTROL REFERENCE SATIONS USED 10 ES AGM THE MOROIAl VALUES SHONN HEREON ARE 35_300_,
P5 301 . k _13_0_1_ .
3. THE TOTAL AREA ElAC01PISSED WHIN TMS RESUBDIVISION IS ILWO SCI. FT OR 0.704 ACFFS
4. THS SITE LIES WW ARCRAFT ACCICEW POTENTUL ZONE(Y) „N/A ANO/OR MOM 201[(5) 465 dB Ldr AND MAY BE SLHOECI TO ARiCAAFT
ACCIDENTS ANC/OR ATOVE AVERAGE NOSE LEVELS DUE TO ITS PROIDYIY TO AIRCHAr OPERATIONS. NOSE AFTINUANON MEASURES FOR NTN
CONSIRIMM MAY BE IEgRRED M ACCORDANCE WITH THE 01WOR" NOSE ATTDIWTW ANO SAFM OROWWNCE 40 H D6mT RESTRCIN7N5
HAVE BEEN IW MV RT ACCURUAHM WFH SECTION 202(8) OF THE ERY ZONING oAOINRLCE.
5. FURRIER EIMOPNENI OF THESE LOTS WL9014G ANY num OR OM'SICk ALffWIDNIS OF THE LOTS MAY RE0JRE ADDITIONAL FERMIS
FRX RE CITY OF MW KETCH OR OTHER CK"IENOL. !GEODES.
Cy B. NO FINCI WHIMFNT (If. PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY ABOVE -GRADE SIRUCRFES) ILL BE ALLOWED WHOM THE DRANW, PEDESIRNN AND/OSI
U7lT1Y EASrUFVTS UNLESS APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORMS
7. LOTS B t A E 2 NE APPROW-_0 FORM COHSTROCTION OF CW (I) SWWE-rAMtY UNIT ONLY PER LOT.
IE
LOT AREA
S LOT
CPIN
I/F
C R
a N
(SCI. FT.) (AG)
8-1
4,443 1 0.102
(M B. 11, PG. 4
IT -2
4,445 1 0.102 1_70-31-^
J
c 0flC, OL
I C DTA, LLC
LOT 4D
- P.I. 20OIOLD10W3VA")
LOT 0c
I Dx 200IN3F0/0.Dlf4Q 10• PCIONE DNRAOC
o
Lu
(lA. CM: 150061 123-Ti,1T)
CCM: ,570-51 1130
PA. M100Jt70=1110-RAT)
IN`N ,570-51�„ �I
�
--------�---------
-- O.Lmmw7�m37TINDFup
-74-'5 -1'S-O-
U
le
I 1
/Ay
N 4312T0' W 100. 00, CII
Q
C1�
I/F
C R
a N
OMCLEY A. LOOW)D
3
NWA E LOCKWOODLOT
A
700(062M730100) o
(M B. 11, PG. 4
b,g'
m
4tiR 1570-31
At 13or.xs.s0
I
LOT B -Y cl LOT B-2
7L I
OI
�I
�I
J0.00•
4G .f /4'Jr.2V L JW.vu
l LEE AMAXIE
(f2YWFNTY CEWW AMIE)
(J0' R/W)
" 27. 7G 47)
SHL WNILRRGED CUM THAT THE SUBDM9CN AS 0 W MS ON THIS PUT CONFMS 7C ALL
THE M'W. NF REQUIONS 7EUTIIC 10 THE SUNWSW OF LAND N0 5 ACCORDINGLY APPROVED.
BY 4" WAV! - THE UMXR961EC CO NOT CERAS a THE CORRECTNESS OF THE BOUNDARY.
51RLL I DR DHFR LNNES SHOWN ON THS PUT. Ei6TNG PUBUC RRiOS-OF-MY, EASEIE K OR
OBER PIBLC INTERESTS NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT RERAN W EFFECT AND AAE NOT TERNNATED OR
E)UPGLMEU Br OYNSSUA TROY THIS RAT.
A{PR1fEU
FON:
0
Cil
W Y/T
P. L WAWicu t
p NFWTcd ULOT IIQ4101UN
Lor c
coos-
M11A1)
L; (Y9 27. PC. 47)
OPN� ISIO-41-94N
2
7f
MAP
SCALE : 1'- 1000•
LEGEND
O DENOTES FOLND PIN OR PPE
20 10 O 20 40 60 Fwat
CkRAPMC SCALE
1" a 20•
SHEET 1 OF 1
SUBD'VISION 07
LOT B
DIVISION OF LCT #5
CHESAPEAKE PARK
(M.D. 27, PG. 47)
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA
OCPOBER 30, 2012
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION
OCEAN CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPERS- LLC
Agenda Item 3
Page 7
EXAMPLE OF PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY
DWELLING
OCEAN CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPERS, LLC
Agenda Item 3
V
W
COMM)
O
cn
A
11 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPLICANT DISCLOSURE
If the applicant is a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or other unincorporated
organization, complete the following:
1. List the applicant name followed by the names of all officers, members, trustees,
partners, etc. below: (Attach list if necessary)
Ocean Condominium Developers, LLC: Steven Bishard, Manager; John Bishard,
Member
2. List all businesses that have a parent -subsidiary' or affiliated business entity,
relationship with the applicant: (Attach list if necessary)
❑ Check here if the applicant is NOT a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or
other unincorporated organization.
PROPERTY OWNER DISCLOSURE
Complete this section only if property owner is different from applicant.
If the property owner is a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or other
unincorporated organization, complete the following:
1. List the property owner name followed by the names of all officers, members,
trustees, partners, etc. below: (Attach list if necessary)
2. List all businesses that have a parent -subsidiary' or affiliated business entity,
relationship with the applicant: (Attach list if necessary)
❑ Check here K the property owner is NOT a corporation, partnership, firm,
business, or other unincorporated organization.
& See next page for footnotes
Subdivision Variance Application
Page 10 of 11
Revised: 9/1/2004
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
OCEAN CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPERS, LLC
Agenda Item 3
Page 10
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES
List all known contractors or businesses that have or will provide services with respect
to the requested property use, including but not limited to the providers of architectural
services, real estate services, financial services, accounting services, and legal
services: (Attach list if necessary)
R. Edward Bourdon, Jr., Esquire
WPL
Harry R. Purkey, Jr., Esquire
1 "Parent -subsidiary relationship" means "a relationship that exists when one
corporation directly or indirectly owns shares possessing more than 50 percent of the
voting power of another corporation." See State and Local Government Conflict of
Interests Act, Va. Code § 2.2-3101.
2 "Affiliated business entity relationship" means "a relationship, other than
parent -subsidiary relationship, that exists when (i) one business entity has a
controlling ownership interest in the other business entity, (ii) a controlling owner in
one entity is also a controlling owner in the other entity, or (iii) there is shared
management or control between the business entities. Factors that should be
considered in determining the existence of an affiliated business entity relationship
include that the same person or substantially the same person own or manage the two
entities; there are common or commingled funds or assets; the business entities share
the use of the same offices or employees or otherwise share activities, resources or
personnel on a regular basis; or there is otherwise a close working relationship
between the entities." See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, Va.
Code § 2.2-3101.
CERTIFICATION: I certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate.
I understand that, upon receipt of notification (postcard) that the application has been
scheduled for public hearing, I am responsible for obtaining and posting the required
sign onthe�Cibje t property at least 30 days prior to the scheduled public hearing
according to the n tructions in this package.
Ocean Pp9d i iu Developers, LLC
By: W Steven Bishard, Manager
Applicants Signature Print Name
Property Owner's Signature (if different than applicant)
Subdivision Variance Application
Page 11 of 11
Revised 9/1/2004
Print Name
OCEAN CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPERS, LLC
Agenda Item 3
Page 11
Item #3
Ocean Condominium Developers, L.L.C.
Variance to the Subdivision Ordinance
4805 Lee Avenue
District 4
Bayside
January 9, 2013
CONSENT
An application of Ocean Condominium Developers, L.L.C. for a Subdivision Variance to
Section 4.4(b) of the Subdivision Ordinance that requires all newly created lots meet all the
requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance on property located at 4805 Lee Avenue, District
4, Bayside. GPIN: 15705103740000.
CONDITIONS
The site shall be subdivided in accordance with the submitted subdivision plan entitled
"Subdivision of Lot B Division of Lot #5 Chesapeake Park," dated October 30, 2012,
prepared by WPL Landscape Architecture, Land Surveying, and Civil Engineering. Said
plan has been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file in the Planning
Department.
2. Proposed Lots B-1 and B-2 are approved for single-family dwelling development only.
This restriction shall be noted on the subdivision plat.
3. The architectural design of the dwellings shall be "coastal cottage" style as depicted in
the rendering submitted with the applicant. Building materials shall include Hardieplank®
(or comparable) lap siding, architectural -grade shingles for the roof, and composite
decking and porch rails. All windows and building trim shall be vinyl clad. The foundation
of the structures shall be brick clad.
NOTE: Further conditions may be required during the administration of applicable
City Ordinances. Plans submitted with this rezoning application may require revision
during detailed site plan review to meet all applicable City Codes and Standards.
The applicant is encouraged to contact and work with the Crime Prevention Office
within the Police Department for crime prevention techniques and Crime Prevention
Through Environmental Design (CPTED) concepts and strategies as they pertain to
this site.
AYE 10 NAY 0 ABS 0 ABSENT 1
BERNAS ABSENT
FELTON AYE
HENLEY AYE
Item #3
Ocean Condominium Developers, L.L.C.
Page 2
HODGSON
AYE
HORSLEY
AYE
LIVAS
AYE
REDMOND
AYE
RIPLEY
AYE
RUCINSKI
AYE
RUSSO
AYE
THORNTON
AYE
By a vote of 10-0, the Commission approved item 3 by consent.
Eddie Bourdon appeared before the Commission on behalf of the applicant.
W
J
J
5;
Ca
CLI
2
W
it
rr'A�`�U Egt,HUY
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM: MICHAEL T. ABENANTE (Applicant & Owner), Variance to the Subdivision
Ordinance, Section 4.4(b). 716 Woodstock Road (GPIN 1456659948).
CENTERVILLE DISTRICT.
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2013
■ Background:
It is the intent of the applicant to create a lot that will not have frontage on a
public street. Section 4.4(d) of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that new lots
created through subdivision have frontage on a public street. The subject site
totals 29,926.60 square feet and is currently developed with an existing single-
family dwelling. The site and the surrounding community are zoned R-10
Residential District. The lot was created by deed without the benefit of a
subdivision plat, as required. If this application is approved, the recording of the
subdivision plat will rectify this issue.
Section 9.3 of the Subdivision Ordinance provides that no variance shall be
authorized by the City Council [and, by extension, the Planning Commission]
unless it finds that:
A. Strict application of the ordinance would produce undue hardship.
B. The authorization of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to
adjacent property, and the character of the neighborhood will not be
adversely affected.
C. The problem involved is not of so general or recurring a nature as to
make reasonably practicable the formulation of general regulations to be
adopted as an amendment to the ordinance.
D. The hardship is created by the physical character of the property,
including dimensions and topography, or by other extraordinary situation
or condition of such property, or by the use or development of property
immediately adjacent thereto. Personal or self-inflicted hardship shall not
be considered as grounds for the issuance of a variance.
■ Considerations:
The applicant intends to create a lot that does not have frontage on a public
street. The surrounding residential area contains numerous flag lots, similar to
the applicant's proposal, that do not meet lot width requirements as well as lots
that do not have frontage on a public street. There are several lots directly
adjacent to the subject site that are either a flag lot or are not located on a public
street.
Michael T. Abenante
Page 2 of 2
While the applicant's proposed lots exceed the minimum lot width requirement
and will significantly exceed the lot area requirement of the R-10 Residential
District, the only access the lot will have to a public right-of-way will be via an
existing ingress -egress easement that serves existing lots. The applicant will be
entering into an existing Road Maintenance Agreement with the other parties that
currently utilize the existing ingress/egress access easement. This agreement
specifies the use of and the maintenance responsibilities for the easement area.
The subject request is in keeping with the recommendations of the
Comprehensive Plan for the Suburban Area, as it is compatible with the existing
surrounding neighborhood development pattern, and is thus in keeping with the
neighborhood stability and compatibility land use goals of Comprehensive Plan's
Suburban Area objectives.
There was no opposition to the request.
■ Recommendations:
The Planning Commission placed this item on the Consent Agenda, passing a
motion by a recorded vote of 10-0, to recommend approval of this request to the
City Council with the following conditions:
The existing lot shall be subdivided in accordance with the submitted
subdivision plan entitled "Preliminary Resubdivision of Site 15, Portion of Lot
13, Survey Made for Jesse J. Parkerson," dated March 16, 2012, prepared by
NDI Engineering Company- Basgier and Associates Division. Said plan has
been exhibited to the Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council
and is on file in the Planning Department.
2. A private utility easement shall be required across Lot 13-A or within the
existing ingress/egress easement for the purpose of providing water and
sewer service to Lot 13-B.
■ Attachments:
Staff Review and Disclosure Statements
Minutes of Planning Commission Hearing
Location Map
Recommended Action: Staff recommends approval. Planning Commission
recommends approval.
Submitting Department/Agency: Planning Department
City Manager: � 1 66ft
r�
_
January 9, 2013 Public Hearing
APPLICANT & PROPERTY OWNER:
MICHAEL T.
ABENANTE
STAFF PLANNER: Ray Odom
REQUEST:
Subdivision Variance to Section 4.4(d) of the Subdivision Ordinance which requires that all newly created lots
must have direct access to a public street (frontage on a public street).
ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION: 716 Woodstock Road
GPIN: ELECTION DISTRICT: SITE SIZE: AICUZ:
14566599480000 KEMPSVILLE 29,926.60 square Less than 65 dB DNL
feet
BACKGROUND / DETAILS OF PROPOSAL
It is the intent of the applicant to create a lot that will not have frontage on a public street. Section 4.4(d)
of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that new lots must have frontage on a public street.
Existing Lot: The subject site totals 29,926.60 square feet and is currently developed with an existing
single-family dwelling. The site and the surrounding community are zoned R-10 Residential District.
A Map Book reference could not be found for the existing lot. Staffs understanding of the lot's history
indicates the site was created by deed without the benefit of a subdivision plat, as required. If this
application is approved, the recording of the subdivision plat will rectify this issue.
Proposed Lots: It is the intent of the applicant to subdivide the subject site into two lots. The lots are
designated as Lots 13-A and 13-B on the submitted exhibit. Proposed Lot 13-A will front on Woodstock
Road. Proposed Lot 13-13, however, will not have frontage on a public street as required by the
Subdivision Ordinance. To create Lot 13-13, the applicant will need the approval of this variance request.
Proposed Lot 13-B will front on and be accessed by a private 25 -foot ingress/egress easement. The
applicant has entered into a purchase agreement with the owner of the easement to provide legal access
to this site. The proposed lots exceed the minimum lot width requirement and will well exceed the lot
area requirement of the R-10 Residential District.
MICHAEL T. ABENANTE
Agenda Item 6
Page 1
RIG I
®
,oIWAI-
77
R10IM
R10
Rio
_-R10
R10
--
Subdivision Variance
r�
_
January 9, 2013 Public Hearing
APPLICANT & PROPERTY OWNER:
MICHAEL T.
ABENANTE
STAFF PLANNER: Ray Odom
REQUEST:
Subdivision Variance to Section 4.4(d) of the Subdivision Ordinance which requires that all newly created lots
must have direct access to a public street (frontage on a public street).
ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION: 716 Woodstock Road
GPIN: ELECTION DISTRICT: SITE SIZE: AICUZ:
14566599480000 KEMPSVILLE 29,926.60 square Less than 65 dB DNL
feet
BACKGROUND / DETAILS OF PROPOSAL
It is the intent of the applicant to create a lot that will not have frontage on a public street. Section 4.4(d)
of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that new lots must have frontage on a public street.
Existing Lot: The subject site totals 29,926.60 square feet and is currently developed with an existing
single-family dwelling. The site and the surrounding community are zoned R-10 Residential District.
A Map Book reference could not be found for the existing lot. Staffs understanding of the lot's history
indicates the site was created by deed without the benefit of a subdivision plat, as required. If this
application is approved, the recording of the subdivision plat will rectify this issue.
Proposed Lots: It is the intent of the applicant to subdivide the subject site into two lots. The lots are
designated as Lots 13-A and 13-B on the submitted exhibit. Proposed Lot 13-A will front on Woodstock
Road. Proposed Lot 13-13, however, will not have frontage on a public street as required by the
Subdivision Ordinance. To create Lot 13-13, the applicant will need the approval of this variance request.
Proposed Lot 13-B will front on and be accessed by a private 25 -foot ingress/egress easement. The
applicant has entered into a purchase agreement with the owner of the easement to provide legal access
to this site. The proposed lots exceed the minimum lot width requirement and will well exceed the lot
area requirement of the R-10 Residential District.
MICHAEL T. ABENANTE
Agenda Item 6
Page 1
hm
Required
Lot 3-A LQ 1i@
Lot Width in feet
80
89.50 83.32
Lot Area in square feet
10,000
15,751.40 14,175.20
Frontage on a public street
Yes
Yes No*
*Variance required
LAND USE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
EXISTING LAND USE: Single-family home
SURROUNDING LAND North:
. Single-family home/ R-10 Residential District
USE AND ZONING: South:
. Undeveloped parcel / R-10 Residential District
East:
. Single-family home / R-10 Residential District
West:
. Woodstock Road
• Single-family homes / R-10 Residential District
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the city as Suburban Area and
contains policies to guide and protect the overall character, economic value, and aesthetic quality of the stable
neighborhoods in the Suburban Area. Three key planning principles have been established in the
Comprehensive Plan to guard against possible threats to this stability: preserve neighborhood quality, create
and protect open spaces, and connect suburban mobility. Achieving the goals requires that all new
development or redevelopment, whether residential or non-residential, either maintain or enhance the overall
development of the area. This is accomplished through having development, such as infill development, being
compatible with surroundings, quality and attractiveness of site and buildings, improved mobility,
environmental responsibility, livability, buffering of residential from other residential and non-residential with
respect to type, size, intensity, and relationship to the surrounding uses.
IMPACT ON CITY SERVICES
WATER: This site must connect to City water. There is an eight -inch City water line in Woodstock Road.
SEWER: This site must connect to City sanitary sewer. There is an eight -inch City sanitary sewer gravity main
in Woodstock Road. There is an eight -inch City sanitary sewer force main line in Woodstock Road.
Analysis of Pump Station 413 and the sanitary sewer collection system is required to ensure future flows can
be accommodated.
MICHAEL T. ABENANTE
Agenda Item 6
Page 2
NOTE: A private utility easement will be required across Lot 13-A or within the existing ingress/egress
easement to service Lot 13-B with water and sewer.
EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION
Section 9.3 of the Subdivision Ordinance provides for variances from the regulations of the Subdivision
Ordinance. As provided for in Section 9.3, no variance shall be authorized by the Council [and, by extension,
the Planning Commission] unless it finds that:
A. Strict application of the ordinance would produce undue hardship.
B. The authorization of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property, and
the character of the neighborhood will not be adversely affected.
C. The problem involved is not of so general or recurring a nature as to make reasonably
practicable the formulation of general regulations to be adopted as an amendment to the
ordinance.
D. The hardship is created by the physical character of the property, including dimensions and
topography, or by other extraordinary situation or condition of such property, or by the use or
development of property immediately adjacent thereto. Personal or self-inflicted hardship shall
not be considered as grounds for the issuance of a variance.
E. The hardship is created by the requirements of the zoning district in which the property is
located at the time the variance is authorized whenever such variance pertains to provisions of
the Zoning Ordinance incorporated by reference in this ordinance.
The applicant intends to create a lot that does not have frontage on a public street. The surrounding
residential area contains numerous flag lots that do not meet lot width requirements as well as lots that do
not have frontage on a public street, similar to the applicant's proposal. There are several lots directly
adjacent to the subject site that are either a flag lot or are not located on a public street. The applicant's
proposed lots exceed the minimum lot width requirement and will significantly exceed the lot area
requirement of the R-10 Residential District. The applicant will be entering into an existing Road
Maintenance Agreement with the other parties that currently utilize the existing ingress/egress access
easement. This agreement specifies the use of and the maintenance responsibilities for the easement
area.
The subject request is in keeping with the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan for the Suburban
Areas. This development proposal is compatible with the existing surrounding neighborhood
development pattern, and is thus in keeping with the neighborhood stability and compatibility land use
goals of Comprehensive Plan's Suburban Area objectives.
In sum, staff recommends approval of this request with the conditions below.
CONDITIONS
MICHAEL T ABENANTE
Agenda Item 6
Page 3
1. The existing lot shall be subdivided in accordance with the submitted subdivision plan entitled
"Preliminary Resubdivision of Site 15, Portion of Lot 13, Survey Made for Jesse J. Parkerson," dated
March 16, 2012, prepared by NDI Engineering Company- Basgier and Associates Division. Said plan
has been exhibited to the Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council and is on file in the
Planning Department.
2. A private utility easement shall be required across Lot 13-A or within the existing ingress/egress
easement for the purpose of providing water and sewer service to Lot 13-B.
NOTE: Further conditions may be required during the administration of applicable City Ordinances.
Plans submitted with this rezoning application may require revision during detailed site plan review to
meet all applicable City Codes and Standards.
The applicant is encouraged to contact and work with the Crime Prevention Office within the Police
Department for crime prevention techniques and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
(CPTED) concepts and strategies as they pertain to this site.
MICHAEL T. ABENANTE
Agenda Item 6
Page 4
AERIAL OF SITE LOCATION
MICHAEL T. ABENANTE
Agenda Item 6
Page 5
Olotl )oois000M
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION PLAN
MICHAEL T.
ABENANTE
Agenda Item 6 2
Page 6 wa
1
�
n
Olotl )oois000M
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION PLAN
MICHAEL T.
ABENANTE
Agenda Item 6 2
Page 6 wa
ZONING HISTORY
#
DATE
REQUEST
ACTION
1
11/09/2004
Subdivision Variance (lot width, no access to a
public street
Approved
2
09/08/1992
Subdivision Variance (lot width, no access to a
public street
Approved
3
07/13/1976
Subdivision Variance (lot width, no access to a
public street
Approved
4
02/23/1987
Subdivision Variance lot width
Approved
5
12/12/1978
Subdivision Variance lot width
Approved
MICHAEL T. ABENANTE
Agenda Item 6
Page 7
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPLICANT DISCLOSURE
If the applicant is a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or other unincorporated
organization, complete the following:
1. List the applicant name followed by the names of all officers, members, trustees,
partners, etc. below: (Attach list if necessary)
Michael T. Abenante
2. List all businesses that have a parent -subsidiary' or affiliated business entity2
relationship with the applicant: (Attach list if necessary)
X Check here if the applicant is NOT a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or
other unincorporated organization.
PROPERTY OWNER DISCLOSURE
Complete this section only if property owner is different from applicant.
If the property owner is a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or other
unincorporated organization, complete the following:
1. List the property owner name followed by the names of all officers, members,
trustees, partners, etc. below: (Attach listifnecessary)
2. List all businesses that have a parent -subsidiary' or affiliated business entity2
relationship with the applicant: (Attach list if necessary)
❑ Check here if the property owner is NOT a corporation, partnership, firm,
business, or other unincorporated organization.
& See next page for footnotes
Subdivision Variance Application
Page 10 of 11
Revised: 9712004
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
MICHAEL T. ABENANTE
Agenda Item 6
Page 8
11 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES
List all known contractors or businesses that have or will provide services with respect
to the requested property use, including but not limited to the providers of architectural
services, real estate services, financial services, accounting services, and legal
services: (Attach list If necessary)
Sykes, Bourdon, Ahern & Levy, P.C.
NDI Engineering Company, Basgier & Associates Division
' "Parent -subsidiary relationship" means "a relationship that exists when one
corporation directly or indirectly owns shares possessing more than 50 percent of the
voting power of another corporation." See State and Local Government Conflict of
Interests Act, Va. Code § 2.2-3101.
2 "Affiliated business entity relationship" means "a relationship, other than
parent -subsidiary relationship, that exists when (i) one business entity has a
controlling ownership interest in the other business entity, (ii) a controlling owner in
one entity is also a controlling owner in the other entity, or (iii) there is shared
management or control between the business entities. Factors that should be
considered in determining the existence of an affiliated business entity relationship
include that the same person or substantially the same person own or manage the two
entities; there are common or commingled funds or assets; the business entities share
the use of the same offices or employees or otherwise share activities, resources or
personnel on a regular basis; or there is otherwise a close working relationship
between the entities." See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, Va.
Code § 2.2-3101.
CERTIFICATION: I certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate.
I understand that, upon receipt of notification (postcard) that the application has been
scheduled for public hearing, I am responsible for obtaining and posting the required
sign on the subject property at least 30 days prior to the scheduled public hearing
according to the instructions in this package.
wN--� Michael T. Abenante
Applicant's Signature Print Name
Property Owner's Signature (if different than applicant) Print Name
Subdivision Variance Application
Page 11 of 11
Revised 9112004
con
Q
con
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
MICHAEL T. ABENANTE
Agenda Item 6
Page 9
Item #6
Michael T. Abenante
Variance to the Subdivision Ordinance
716 Woodstock Road
District 2
Kempsville
January 9, 2013
CONSENT
An application of Michael T. Abenante for a Subdivision Variance to Section 4.4(d) of the
Subdivision Ordinance which requires that all newly created lots must have direct access to
a public street (frontage on a public street) on property located at 716 Woodstock Road,
District 2, Kempsville. GPIN: 14566599480000.
CONDITIONS
�. The existing lot shall be subdivided in accordance with the submitted subdivision plan
entitled "Preliminary Resubdivision of Site 15, Portion of Lot 13, Survey Made for Jesse
J. Parkerson," dated March 16, 2012, prepared by NDI Engineering Company- Basgier
and Associates Division. Said plan has been exhibited to the Virginia Beach Planning
Commission and City Council and is on file in the Planning Department.
2. A private utility easement shall be required across Lot 13-A or within the existing
ingress/egress easement for the purpose of providing water and sewer service to Lot 13-
B.
NOTE: Further conditions may be required during the administration of applicable
City Ordinances. Plans submitted with this rezoning application may require revision
during detailed site plan review to meet all applicable City Codes and Standards.
The applicant is encouraged to contact and work with the Crime Prevention Office
within the Police Department for crime prevention techniques and Crime Prevention
Through Environmental Design (CPTED) concepts and strategies as they pertain to
this site.
AYE 9 NAY 0 ABS 1 ABSENT 1
BERNAS
ABSENT
FELTON
AYE
HENLEY
AYE
HODGSON
AYE
HORSLEY
AYE
LIVAS
AYE
REDMOND
AYE
RIPLEY
AYE
Item #6
Michael T. Abenante
Page 2
RUCINSKI ABS
RUSSO AYE
THORNTON AYE
By a vote of 9-0-1, with the abstention so noted, the Commission approved item 6 for
consent.
Eddie Bourdon appeared before the Commission on behalf of the applicant.
LYNNH"EN
'Zoning with Conditions Proffers. Non -Conforming Use - Alterations
Space Promotion or PDH -2 Overlays
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM: A Resolution Authorizing the Reconstruction of a Nonconforming Use on
Property Located at 207 51St Street. LYNNHAVEN DISTRICT. C & C
DEVELOPMENT
MEETING DATE: February 12. 2013
■ Background:
The applicant requests permission to demolish two existing single-family
dwellings located on the lot and to reconstruct on the same lot two cottage -style
single-family dwellings. The existing dwellings were developed in 1945, when
there was no zoning ordinance in Princess Anne County or the Town of Virginia
Beach. The current City Zoning Ordinance does not permit more than one single-
family or duplex dwelling to be developed on one lot within the R -5R Resort
Residential District; therefore, two single-family dwellings on one lot is
nonconforming, as provided for by Section 105 of the City Zoning Ordinance
■ Considerations:
The existing dwellings on the lot consist of a 1Y2 -story house situated on the
portion of the lot located at the intersection of 51st Street [Dwelling A] and Myrtle
Avenue and a 1 -story house situated on the portion of the lot located on Myrtle
Avenue [Dwelling B].
The two proposed new dwellings will be 2Y2 -story houses. One will be situated on
the portion of the lot located at the intersection of 51st Street and Myrtle Avenue
[Dwelling A] and the second will be situated on the portion of the lot located
adjacent to Myrtle Avenue [Dwelling B].
Proposed Dwelling A will have a porch that fronts on 51st Street setback 21 feet
from the right-of-way line with steps 18 feet from the line. Proposed Dwelling B
will have a porch that fronts on Myrtle Avenue setback 11.73 feet from the right-
of-way line with steps 9.45 feet from the line.
There is a separation of 19 feet between the rear of Proposed Dwelling A and the
side of Proposed Dwelling B. There will be a driveway and a parking pad for each
unit. The driveway for Proposed Dwelling A will be located on 51st Street; the
driveway for Proposed Dwelling B will be located on Myrtle Avenue.
The submitted elevations for the dwellings depict `coastal cottage' style
structures. Each unit will have porches along the front of the homes, as well as
C & C Development
Page 2 of 4
garages with pergolas. Decorative molding and brackets will provide architectural
interest to the `coastal architecture' theme of the dwellings.
■ Recommendations:
The proposed reconstruction of the nonconforming use of the site for two single-
family dwellings is consistent with the land use policies of the Comprehensive
Plan and Suburban Focus Area 7 — North Beach. The type of redevelopment
proposed for the site is consistent with the goal of 'density stability' of the North
Beach Suburban Focus Area, in that the construction of two single-family homes
is preferable to the construction of duplex dwelling, which is permitted by -right
without any subdivision of the lot. The North End Civic League supports the
request and a letter is in the file.
The redevelopment as proposed also supports the broader Suburban Area goal
of neighborhood preservation, given that the proposed single-family homes
would be more in keeping with the character of the neighborhood than would be
a duplex. Staff also finds that the building elevations are compatible with the
`coastal' architectural theme of the area.
Staff, therefore, concludes that the proposed reconstruction and enlargement of
the nonconforming use of the site is reasonable, will have a minimal impact, and
will be as appropriate to the surrounding R -5R Residential District as is the
existing nonconforming use. Approval is recommended with the conditions
below.
1. The site shall be redeveloped substantially in accordance with the
submitted "Exhibit Site A re -subdivision of Lots 14-19, & 'h of 2, Block 14
Ubermeer", dated October 9, 2012, and prepared by Gallup Surveyors &
Engineers, Ltd., except that the proposed concrete patios, walkways, and
driveways shall consist of pavers, permeable pavers, or permeable
pavement. Said plan has been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council
and is on file in the Planning Department.
2. The proposed dwellings shall be constructed substantially in accordance
with the three submitted elevations. Said elevations have been exhibited
to the Virginia Beach City Council and are on file in the Planning
Department. Building materials shall include HardiePlanke (or
comparable) lap siding, standing seam metal roofs for the porches,
architectural -grade shingles for main roof, and composite decking and
porch rails.
3. The maximum width of the driveways will be 12 feet, measured at the
property line.
■ Attachments:
Staff Review and Disclosure Statement
C & C Development
Page 3 of 4
Resolution
Location Map
Recommended Action: Approval
Submitting Department/Agency:
City Manager: V .
Planning Departmen
LYNNHAVEN
L -a C & C Development Co., Inc.
i 6tt'`
XX
Pt R
all
a
1,' � � 1ti ,i i i �i6i• 14 � � � l
Non -Conforming Use - AHerations
REQUEST:
Reconstruction of a Nonconforming Use
ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION: 207 51St Street
February 12, 2103 City Council
Hearing
APPLICANT:
C & C
DEVELOPMENT
CO., INC.
PROPERTY OWNER:
CHRISTOPHER J.
ETTEL &
CHAUNCEY W.
WALKER, III
STAFF PLANNER: Faith Christie
GPIN: ELECTION DISTRICT: SITE SIZE: AICUZ:
24188920290000 LYNNHAVEN 6,371 square feet Less than 65 dB DNL
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
The applicant requests permission to demolish two existing single-family dwellings located on the lot and
to reconstruct on the same lot two cottage -style single-family dwellings. The existing dwellings were
developed in 1945, when there was no zoning ordinance in Princess Anne County or the Town of Virginia
Beach. The current City Zoning Ordinance does not permit more than one single-family or duplex dwelling
to be developed on one lot within the R -5R Resort Residential District; therefore, two single-family
dwellings on one lot is nonconforming, as provided for by Section 105 of the City Zoning Ordinance.
The existing dwellings on the lot consist of a 1'/z -story house situated on the portion of the lot located at
the intersection of 51s' Street [Dwelling A] and Myrtle Avenue and a 1 -story house situated on the portion
of the lot located on Myrtle Avenue [Dwelling B]. The two dwellings have the following dimensional
attributes:
C & C DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.
February 12, 2013 CITY COUNCIL HEARING
Page 1
Rear Yard 51st Street Myrtle
Avenue
Lot
Total
Impervious
Setback Setback
Setback
Coverage
Cover
DWELLING A n/a 18.5 feet 2.3 feet
25%
34%
DWELLING B 2.3 feet n/a feet 4.6 feet
Located at 51" Street and Myrtle Avenue
2 Located on Myrtle Avenue
The two proposed new dwellings will be 2'/z -story houses. One will be situated on the portion of the lot
located at the intersection of 51St Street and Myrtle Avenue [Dwelling A] and the second will be situated
on the portion of the lot located adjacent to Myrtle Avenue [Dwelling B]. The two dwellings will have the
following dimensional attributes:
Located at 51s` Street and Myrtle Avenue
2 Located on Myrtle Avenue
Proposed Dwelling A will have a porch that fronts on 51St Street setback 21 feet from the right-of-way line
with steps 18 feet from the line. Proposed Dwelling B will have a porch that fronts on Myrtle Avenue
setback 11.73 feet from the right-of-way line with steps 9.45 feet from the line.
There is a separation of 19 feet between the rear of Proposed Dwelling A and the side of Proposed
Dwelling B. There will be a driveway and a parking pad for each unit. The driveway for Proposed Dwelling
A will be located on 51s' Street; the driveway for Proposed Dwelling B will be located on Myrtle Avenue.
The submitted elevations for the dwellings depict 'coastal cottage' style structures. Each unit will have
porches along the front of the homes, as well as garages with pergolas. Decorative molding and brackets
will provide architectural interest to the 'coastal architecture' theme of the dwellings.
LAND USE AND PLAN INFORMATION
EXISTING LAND USE: The site is occupied by two single-family dwellings, constructed in 1945. The site is
zoned R -5R Residential Resort.
SURROUNDING LAND North:
Rear Yard 51 St Street
Myrtle
Lot
Total
. Single-family dwelling / R -5R Residential Resort
Setback Setback
Avenue
Coverage
Impervious
Setback
Cover
DWELLING A
n/a feet 18 feet
9.73 feet
34.96%
57.44%
DWELLING B
10 feet n/a feet
9.45 feet
Located at 51s` Street and Myrtle Avenue
2 Located on Myrtle Avenue
Proposed Dwelling A will have a porch that fronts on 51St Street setback 21 feet from the right-of-way line
with steps 18 feet from the line. Proposed Dwelling B will have a porch that fronts on Myrtle Avenue
setback 11.73 feet from the right-of-way line with steps 9.45 feet from the line.
There is a separation of 19 feet between the rear of Proposed Dwelling A and the side of Proposed
Dwelling B. There will be a driveway and a parking pad for each unit. The driveway for Proposed Dwelling
A will be located on 51s' Street; the driveway for Proposed Dwelling B will be located on Myrtle Avenue.
The submitted elevations for the dwellings depict 'coastal cottage' style structures. Each unit will have
porches along the front of the homes, as well as garages with pergolas. Decorative molding and brackets
will provide architectural interest to the 'coastal architecture' theme of the dwellings.
LAND USE AND PLAN INFORMATION
EXISTING LAND USE: The site is occupied by two single-family dwellings, constructed in 1945. The site is
zoned R -5R Residential Resort.
SURROUNDING LAND North:
0 Duplex dwelling / R -5R Residential Resort
USE AND ZONING: South:
. Single-family dwelling / R -5R Residential Resort
East:
. Single-family dwelling / R -5R Residential Resort
West:
. Single-family dwelling / R -5R Residential Resort
NATURAL RESOURCE AND There are no significant natural resources or cultural features associated
CULTURAL FEATURES: with the site.
C & C DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.
February 12, 2013 CITY COUNCIL HEARING
Page 2
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Suburban Area - Suburban Focus Area (SFA 7) - North Beach Area
The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as being in the Suburban Area, Suburban Focus Area 7 -North
Beach Area. North Beach, located on both sides of Atlantic Avenue from 42nd Street to 89th Street, is
characterized by a compact arrangement of single-family and duplex units with much of the land zoned
Residential Resort District (R -5R). Moreover, the North Beach area is characterized by a relatively high
density of single-family/duplex housing.
CITY SERVICES
MASTER TRANSPORTATION PLAN (MTP) / CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP): Access to this
site is proposed from 515 Street and Myrtle Avenue. 515 Street is a two-lane local street with a forty -foot (40')
right-of-way width. Myrtle Avenue is a two-lane local alley with a twenty -foot (20') right-of-way width. These
roadways are not included in the City's Master Transportation Plan, and there are currently no CIP projects
scheduled for either street.
PUBLIC WORKS/TRAFFIC ENGINEERING:
• Right-of-way improvements, including but not necessarily limited to pavement widening, will be required
along the western side of Myrtle Avenue from the proposed driveway to the intersection with 51St Street.
• Improvements to the radius at the northwestern corner of 51St Street and Myrtle Avenue are required to bring
the pavement to a 15 -ft radius.
• The maximum width of the driveway along 51St Street will be 12 feet, measured at the property line.
• A five-foot (5') right-of-way dedication is requested along 51St Street from the property line to this roadway's
intersection with Myrtle Avenue, to provide for a future 50 -foot minimum right-of-way width in accordance with
the City of Virginia Beach Public Works Standards.
• A new street light at the corner of 51St Street and Myrtle Avenue will be required with this site plan.
TRAFFIC:
Street Name
Present
Volume
Present Capacity
Generated Traffic
515 Street
No counts
9,900 ADT
Existing Land Use — 20
available ADT'
ADT
Proposed Land Use 3— 20
ADT
Average Daily Trips
z as defined by 2 single-family dwellings
3 as defined by 2 single-family dwellings
WATER and SEWER: This site is connected to City water and sewer. The existing 5/8 inch water meter may
be used or upgraded for the development. Analysis of Pump Station #102 and the sanitary sewer collections
system is required to ensure future flows can be accommodated.
C & C DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.
February 12, 2013 CITY COUNCIL HEARING
Page 3
EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION
The proposed reconstruction of the nonconforming use of the site for two single-family dwellings is
consistent with the land use policies of the Comprehensive Plan and Suburban Focus Area 7 — North
Beach. The type of redevelopment proposed for the site is consistent with the goal of `density stability' of
the North Beach Suburban Focus Area, in that the construction of two single-family homes is preferable
to the construction of duplex dwelling, which is permitted by -right without any subdivision of the lot. The
North End Civic League supports the request and a letter is in the file.
The redevelopment as proposed also supports the broader Suburban Area goal of neighborhood
preservation, given that the proposed single-family homes would be more in keeping with the character of
the neighborhood than would be a duplex. Staff also finds that the building elevations are compatible with
the 'coastal' architectural theme of the area.
Staff, therefore, concludes that the proposed reconstruction and enlargement of the nonconforming use
of the site is reasonable, will have a minimal impact, and will be as appropriate to the surrounding R -5R
Residential District as is the existing nonconforming use. Approval is recommended with the conditions
below.
CONDITIONS
1. The site shall be redeveloped substantially in accordance with the submitted "Exhibit Site A re-
subdivision of Lots 14-19, & X2 of 2, Block 14 Ubermeer", dated October 9, 2012, and prepared by
Gallup Surveyors & Engineers, Ltd., except that the proposed concrete patios, walkways, and
driveways shall consist of pavers, permeable pavers, or permeable pavement. Said plan has been
exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file in the Planning Department.
2. The proposed dwellings shall be constructed substantially in accordance with the three submitted
elevations. Said elevations have been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and are on file in
the Planning Department. Building materials shall include HardiePlanke (or comparable) lap siding,
standing seam metal roofs for the porches, architectural -grade shingles for main roof, and composite
decking and porch rails.
3. The maximum width of the driveways will be 12 feet, measured at the property line.
C & C DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.
February 12, 2013 CITY COUNCIL HEARING
Page 4
NOTE. Further conditions may be required during the administration of applicable City Ordinances and
Standards. Any site plan submitted with this application may require revision during detailed site plan
review to meet all applicable City Codes and Standards. All applicable permits required by the City
Code, including those administered by the Department of Planning / Development Services Center and
Department of Planning / Permits and Inspections Division, and the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy, are required before any uses allowed by this application are valid or any structures may
be occupied.
The applicant is encouraged to contact and work with the Crime Prevention Office within the Police
Department for crime prevention techniques and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
(CPTED) concepts and strategies as they pertain to this site.
C & C DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.
February 12, 2013 CITY COUNCIL HEARING
Page 5
AERIAL OF SITE LOCATION
C & C DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.
February 12, 2013 CITY COUNCIL HEARING
Page 6
6 B
N /F N /F
DAVID A. AND JESSICA A. O'CONNER ROBERT D. O'CONNER
D.B. 3796 P. 1970 ' D.B. 944 P. 283
M.B. 7 P. 150 ' M.B. 7 P. 150
GPIN: 2418-89-1157 GPIN: 2418-89-1199
ZONED R -5R ZONED R -5R
J
PIN($) PIN(S)
PROPOSED %-
HVAC PAD
�+ f
a.00'
PATIO OR DECK 8 $
8 20'PROPOSED
2'00 2.5 STORY a33 S
FRAME \
5.96' :.'`::.;'..;...; RESIDENCE
UNIT B
9.45'
B w
N /F 30,67. 200 11.73'
ANNE C. HEYNIGER, TRUST
I.N. 20100519000479360
M.B. 12 P. 93 Ld 0
GPIN: 2418-89-1086 NATIO OR DECK
ZONED R -5R Z 0 -
PROPOSED
PROPOSED � ,sr R 22.33'
HVAC PAD PROPOSED
2.5 STORY Q
FRAME
RESIDENCEg18• LLI i NLT$ OF
Q A UNIT A h1.eJ3' 9.73'
8.20'8 p
6.25' m 7�L'
c $ 70.27 O
Qi 1212 ApIgk4UTLER
J''
Lic. No.
38395
J o o (�41F 1019112\
O SS/ONAL ENG
PiN(5) DH(S)
51 st STREET (40' R/W) EXHIBIT
1. GPIN: 2418-89-2029 (M.B. 7 P. 150) SITE ill
2. ZONED: R -SR
3. LOT AREA: 6,371.6 S.F. RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 14-19, & 1/2 OF 20,
4. LOT COVERAGE (STRUCTURE): 2,227.2 S.F., 34.96 % BLOCK 14
5. IMPERVIOUS AREA: 3,660 S.F., 57.44 % UBERMEER
6. BUILDING FLOOR AREA M.B. 12 P. 93
UNIT A: 2,023 S.F. VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA
UNIT B: 2,358 S.F.
TOTAL: 4,381 S.F. SCALE: 1" = 20' OCTOBER 9, 2012
(ALLOWABLE = 4,460 S.F.) GALLUP
7. BUILDING FLOOR AREA OBTAINED FROM ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SURVEYORS do ENGINEERS, LTD.
323
111151 COLONIAL ROAD
G: \04\04-102-3 sp.dwg NR GINIA BEACH. VIRGINIA 23454
(757)428-8132
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
C & C DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.
February 12, 2013 CITY COUNCIL HEARING
Page 7
MAI
A ks�.
a
-Jr+
Job
As
f M.-
-Jr+
7`ii x.r..
.
;�.:- . \
tiftitti[M1
LYNNHAVEN
Map L-4
&A—f
&Anf fn Cr�io
C & C Development Co., Inc.
`Zoning with Conditions Proffers. Open
Space Promotion or PDH -2 Overbys
ZONING HISTORY
Non -Conforming Use - Alterations
# DATE
REQUEST ACTION
PP
Subdivision Variance Approved
Street Closure Approved
iffi0a
ILI
I
dO
I
0000��
rgo
��, �����
r�op
+ x,11
',
� �� ,� �.�► � .
E
► rr
��� r
r..
I ��
MW
`Zoning with Conditions Proffers. Open
Space Promotion or PDH -2 Overbys
ZONING HISTORY
Non -Conforming Use - Alterations
# DATE
REQUEST ACTION
1 3/22/11
7/10/01
Subdivision Variance Approved
Street Closure Approved
r'�, .f w,l � �1 • R U
C & C DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.
February 12, 2013 CITY COUNCIL HEARING
Page 11
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 11
APPLICANT DISCLOSURE
If the applicant is a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or other unincorporated
organization, complete the following:
1. List the applicant name followed by the names of all officers, members, trustees,
partners, etc. below: (Attach list if necessary)
C and C Development Co., Inc.: Christopher J. Ettel, President; Chancey W. Walker,
III, Director
2. List all businesses that have a parent -subsidiary' or affiliated business entity2
relationship with the applicant: (Attach list if necessary)
❑ Check here if the applicant is NOT a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or
other unincorporated organization.
PROPERTY OWNER DISCLOSURE
Complete this section only if property owner is different from applicant.
If the property owner is a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or other
unincorporated organization, complete the following:
1. List the property owner name followed by the names of all officers, members,
trustees, partners, etc. below: (Attach list if necessary)
Christopher J. Ettel and Chancey W. Walker, III
2. List all businesses that have a parent -subsidiary' or affiliated business entity2
relationship with the applicant: (Attach list if necessary)
X Check here if the property owner is NOT a corporation, partnership, firm, business,
or other unincorporated organization.
& See next page for footnotes
Non -Conforming Use Application
Page 8 of 9
Revised 9/1/2004
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
C & C DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.
February 12, 2013 CITY COUNCIL HEARING
Page 12
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES
List all known contractors or businesses that have or will provide services with respect
to the requested property use, including but not limited to the providers of architectural
services, real estate services, financial services, accounting services, and legal
services: (Attach list if necessary)
Sykes, Bourdon, Ahem & Levy, P.C.
Land Planning Solutions
Gallup Surveyors & Engineers, Ltd.
1 "Parent -subsidiary relationship" means "a relationship that exists when one
corporation directly or indirectly owns shares possessing more than 50 percent of the
voting power of another corporation." See State and Local Government Conflict of
Interests Act, Va. Code § 2.2-3101.
2 "Affiliated business entity relationship" means "a relationship, other than
parent -subsidiary relationship, that exists when (i) one business entity has a
controlling ownership interest in the other business entity, (ii) a controlling owner in
one entity is also a controlling owner in the other entity, or (iii) there is shared
management or control between the business entities. Factors that should be
considered in determining the existence of an affiliated business entity relationship
include that the same person or substantially the same person own or manage the two
entities; there are common or commingled funds or assets; the business entities share
the use of the same offices or employees or otherwise share activities, resources or
personnel on a regular basis; or there is otherwise a close working relationship
between the entities." See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, Va.
Code § 2.2-3101.
CERTIFICATION: I certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate.
I understand that, upon receipt of notification (postcard) that the application has been
scheduled for public hearing, I am responsible for obtaining and posting the required
sign on the subject property at least 30 days prior to the scheduled public hearing
according to the instructions in this package.
C and C Develop ent C :, Inc.
By: P I''IS Christopher J. Eitel, President
Applicant's Signa ur _ Print Name
Christopher J. Eitel
l'v. w-, Chancey W. Walker, III
Property Owner's Sign ure (if different than applicant) Print Name
Non -Conforming Use Application
Page 9 of 9
Revised 911/1001
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
C & C DEVELOPMENT CO., INC.
February 12, 2013 CITY COUNCIL HEARING
Page 13
1 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
2 RECONSTRUCTION OF A NONCONFORMING
3 USE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 207 51s'
4 STREET
5
6 WHEREAS, C & C Development (hereinafter the "Applicant") has made
7 application to the City Council for authorization to reconstruct a nonconforming use
8 located at 207 51St Street in the R-5R Resort Residential District by demolishing and
9 reconstructing two (2) existing single -family dwellings on the same parcel; and
10
11 WHEREAS, there are two (2) single -family dwelling units located on the same
12 parcel, which is not allowed in the R-5R Resort Residential District, however, the two (2)
13 dwellings were built prior to the adoption of the applicable zoning regulations and are
14 therefore nonconforming; and
15
16 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 105 of the City Zoning Ordinance, the
17 reconstruction of a nonconforming use is unlawful in the absence of a resolution of the
18 City Council authorizing such action upon a finding that the proposed use, as
19 reconstructed, will be equally appropriate or more appropriate to the zoning district than
20 is the existing use;
21
22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
23 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
24
25 That the City Council hereby finds that the proposed use, as reconstructed, will
26 be equally appropriate to the district as is the existing nonconforming use under the
27 conditions of approval set forth hereinbelow.
28
29 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
30 BEACH, VIRGINIA:
31
32 That the reconstruction of the nonconforming use is hereby authorized, upon the
33 following conditions:
34
35 1. The site shall be redeveloped substantially in accordance with the
36 submitted "Exhibit Site A re-subdivision of Lots 14-19, & Y2 of 2, Block 14
37 Ubermeer", dated October 9, 2012, and prepared by Gallup Surveyors &
38 Engineers, Ltd., except that the proposed concrete patios, walkways, and
39 driveways shall consist of pavers, permeable pavers, or permeable
40 pavement. Said plan has been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council
41 and is on file in the Planning Department.
42
43 2. The proposed dwellings shall be constructed substantially in accordance
44 with the three submitted elevations. Said elevations have been exhibited
45 to the Virginia Beach City Council and are on file in the Planning
46 Department. Building materials shall include HardiePlanO (or
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
comparable) lap siding, standing seam metal roofs for the porches,
architectural -grade shingles for main roof, and composite decking and
porch rails.
3. The maximum width of the driveways will be 12 feet, measured at the
property line.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the day
of , 2013.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
Planni partment
CA12505
R-1
January 23, 2013
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
IA
All_;
,t
City Attorney's Office
2
LYNNH"EN
'Zoning with Conditions Proffers. Open Expansion to Non -Conforming Use
Space Promotion or PDH -2 Overlays
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM: SURF BEACH CLUB, INC. A Resolution Authorizing the Reconstruction of
a Nonconforming Use on Property Located at 5704 Ocean Front Avenue.
LYNNHAVEN DISTRICT.
MEETING DATE: February 12. 2013
■ Background:
The applicant requests to replace nine existing structures on the site: eight beach
cabanas on concrete pads and one restroom that is located on the existing
asphalt parking lot. The 100 foot by 150 foot (100'x150') lot is an assemblage of
a portion of Lots 3 and 5 and all of Lot 4, in Block 7 of the Ubermeer plat. These
buildings are owned by an entity, formed 37 years ago, with 16 shareholders.
Beach cabanas and the restroom facility have been located on this site for
approximately 70 years; however, they are not a permitted use in the H-1 Hotel
District; therefore, they are `nonconforming' per Section 105 of the City Zoning
Ordinance. Section 105 provides that "any condition of development prohibited
by this section may be permitted by resolution of the City Council based upon its
finding that the proposed condition [of development] is equally appropriate or
more appropriate to the district than is the existing nonconformity." The applicant,
therefore, is requesting such approval from the City Council allowing the
replacement of the cabanas and the restroom facility.
■ Considerations:
It is the applicant's desire to replace the cabana structures utilizing the same
footprint of each of the existing cabanas; however, the new A -frame structures
will be slightly taller (13 feet at the ridge of roof) than the existing cabanas (8 feet
at top of flat roof). The elevations depict the use of vinyl shingles on the exterior
of the east and west facades, vinyl lap siding on the north and side facades, and
asphalt shingles on the roofs. The interior of the cabanas provide storage,
showers, and kitchen facilities (no oven).
■ Recommendations:
Staff concludes that the proposed reconstruction of and continued use of the
existing cabanas and restroom facility is reasonable, will have a minimal impact,
and will be as appropriate to the surrounding area as are the existing
nonconforming cabanas and restroom facility. The proposed reconstruction of the
35 year old cabanas will provide for structures that resemble very small cottages,
and will improve the aesthetics of the site. In terms of what is possible under the
SURF BEACH CLUB
Page 2 of 3
existing H-1 Hotel District zoning, Staff's opinion is that replacement of these
structures, although nonconforming, is a better fit for the surrounding properties
and land uses than the use of this site either by the nearby hotel or by the
development of a new hotel. The request, therefore, is acceptable as submitted,
subject to the conditions below.
The cabanas and restroom structure, when constructed, shall be in
substantial conformance with the site survey entitled, "Physical Survey of
Lots 3-4 and Part of 5, Block 7, Obermeer, Virginia Beach, Virginia for Surf
Beach Club," dated April 9, 2008, prepared by Dennis J. Gerwitz, P.C.,
and the structures themselves shall be constructed in substantial
conformance with the building elevations entitled, "Cabana Rehab for Surf
Beach Club, VA Beach," prepared by Edward R. Roehm, AIA, dated
February 4, 2011, which have been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City
Council and are on file with the Planning Department.
2. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded to direct light and glare onto the
premises; said lighting and glare shall be deflected, shaded, and focused
away from adjoining properties. In order to meet this condition the existing
light pole within the parking lot must be retrofitted with a new light fixture.
3. The existing chain link fence along Ocean Front Avenue shall either be
removed or replaced with a black vinyl -clad fence, at the same height as
the existing fence. The new fence may be installed with the same location
and alignment as the existing fence, as depicted on the physical survey
identified in Condition 1, above.
■ Attachments:
Staff Review and
Resolution
Disclosure Statement
Recommended Action: Approval.
Submitting Department/Agency: Planning
City Manager: l�_ ,
Z�r
Department
LYNNNAVEN
February 12, 2013 City Council
Meeting
APPLICANT & PROPERTY OWNER:
SURF BEACH
CLUB, INC.
STAFF PLANNER: Carolyn A.K. Smith
REQUEST:
Reconstruction of a Nonconforming Use (reconstruction of eight existing beach cabanas and one restroom
structure).
ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION: 5704 Ocean Front Avenue
GPIN:
ELECTION DISTRICT:
SITE SIZE:
AICUZ:
24198142400000
LYNNHAVEN
15,000 square feet
Less than 65 dB DNL
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
The applicant requests to replace nine existing structures on the site: eight beach cabanas on concrete
pads and one restroom that is located on the existing asphalt parking lot. The 100 foot by 150 foot
(100'x150') lot is an assemblage of a portion of Lots 3 and 5 and all of Lot 4, in Block 7 of the Ubermeer
plat. These buildings are owned by an entity, formed 37 years ago, with 16 shareholders. Beach cabanas
and the restroom facility have been located on this site for approximately 70 years; however, they are not a
permitted use in the H-1 Hotel District; therefore, they are 'nonconforming' per Section 105 of the City
Zoning Ordinance. Section 105 provides that "any condition of development prohibited by this section may
be permitted by resolution of the City Council based upon its finding that the proposed condition [of
development] is equally appropriate or more appropriate to the district than is the existing nonconformity."
The applicant, therefore, is requesting such approval from the City Council allowing the replacement of the
cabanas and restroom facility.
It is the applicant's desire to replace the structures utilizing the same footprints; however, the new A -frame
structures will be slightly taller (13 feet at the ridge of roof) than the existing cabanas (8 feet at flat roof).
The elevations depict the use of vinyl shingles on the exterior of the east and west facades, vinyl lap siding
SURF BEACH CLUB, INC.
February 12, 2013 City Council Hearing
Page 1
on the north and side facades, and asphalt shingles on the roofs. The interior of the cabanas provide
storage, showers, and kitchen facilities (no oven).
LAND USE AND PLAN INFORMATION
EXISTING LAND USE: parking lot, beach cabanas, restroom, beach
SURROUNDING LAND North: . Beach cabana / H-1 Hotel District
USE AND ZONING: South: . Beach cabanas, parking lot / H-1 Hotel District
East: . Undeveloped Atlantic Boulevard, beach
West: . Ocean Front Avenue, duplex dwellings / R -5R Residential
District
NATURAL RESOURCE AND The site is within the Atlantic Ocean watershed. As it has been
CULTURAL FEATURES: developed with a parking lot and cabanas many years. A bulkhead is in
place adjacent to the beach. There do not appear to be any significant
environmental or cultural features on the site.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as being in the Suburban Area,
Suburban Focus Area 7 -North Beach Area. North Beach, located on both sides of Atlantic Avenue from 42nd
Street to 89'" Street, is characterized by a compact arrangement of single-family and duplex units with much of
the land zoned Residential Resort District (R -5R). Moreover, the North Beach area is characterized by a
relatively high density of single-family/duplex housing, high impervious surface coverage and problematic
topographic conditions, all of which combine to create recurring stormwater drainage problems.
Recommendations for North Beach include parcel consolidation, density stabilization and the use of Best
Management Practices (BMPs) for stormwater control. Improvement and reconstruction should use porous
materials for driveways, walkways and other similar surfaces, where feasible, to achieve a net reduction of
impervious coverage. Attractive and high quality materials capable of withstanding severe weather events
should be used (p. 3-24).
No impact to City services is anticipated with this request.
Staff recommends approval of this
CITY SERVICES
EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION
SURF BEACH CLUB, INC.
February 12, 2013 City Council Hearing
Page 2
request.
The proposed reconstruction of the 35 year old cabanas and restroom facility will provide for structures
that resemble very small cottages, and will improve the aesthetics of the site. In terms of what is possible
under the existing H-1 Hotel District zoning, Staff's opinion is that replacement although nonconforming, is
a better fit for the surrounding properties and land uses than the use of this site either by the nearby hotel
or by the development of a new hotel. The northernmost and southernmost cabanas currently encroach
into the required side yard setbacks, and will continue to do so with the replacement of the cabanas. This
encroachment into the setbacks is allowed as part of City Council's approval of this request. In addition,
the existing chain link fence along Ocean Front Avenue is also nonconforming. A condition is
recommended that the existing fence be either removed or replaced with a black vinyl -clad style fence as
security is a concern for the neighbors of this site. It is also recommended that the new fence be permitted
within the setback along the property line as it currently exists. This change to the nonconformity of the
fence may be approved by City Council through this request. Staff also recommends a condition requiring
the existing lighting on the site be retrofitted to reduce glare, as the light given off at night currently spills
over onto adjacent properties.
Staff concludes that the proposed reconstruction of and continued use of the existing cabanas and
restroom facility is reasonable, will have a minimal impact, and will be as appropriate to the surrounding
area as are the existing nonconforming structures, subject to the conditions below.
CONDITIONS
The cabanas and restroom structure, when constructed, shall be in substantial conformance with the
site survey entitled, "Physical Survey of Lots 3-4 and Part of 5, Block 7, Obermeer, Virginia Beach,
Virginia for Surf Beach Club," dated April 9, 2008, prepared by Dennis J. Gerwitz, P.C., and the
structures themselves shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the building elevations
entitled, "Cabana Rehab for Surf Beach Club, VA Beach," prepared by Edward R. Roehm, AIA, dated
February 4, 2011, which have been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and are on file with
the Planning Department.
2. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded to direct light and glare onto the premises; said lighting and glare
shall be deflected, shaded, and focused away from adjoining properties. In order to meet this
condition the existing light pole within the parking lot must be retrofitted with a new light fixture.
3. The existing chain link fence along Ocean Front Avenue shall either be removed or replaced with a
black vinyl -clad fence, at the same height as the existing fence. The new fence may be installed with
the same location and alignment as the existing fence, as depicted on the physical survey identified in
Condition 1, above.
SURF BEACH CLUB, INC.
February 12, 2013 City Council Hearing
Page 3
NOTE. Further conditions may be required during the administration of applicable City Ordinances and
Standards. Any site plan submitted with this application may require revision during detailed site plan
review to meet all applicable City Codes and Standards. All applicable permits required by the City
Code, including those administered by the Department of Planning / Development Services Center and
Department of Planning / Permits and Inspections Division, and the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy, are required before any uses allowed by this application are valid or any structures may
be occupied.
The applicant is encouraged to contact and work with the Crime Prevention Office within the Police
Department for crime prevention techniques and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
(CPTED) concepts and strategies as they pertain to this site.
SURF BEACH CLUB, INC.
February 12, 2013 City Council Hearing
Page 4
AERIAL OF SITE LOCATION
SURF BEACH CLUB, INC.
February 12, 2013 City Council Hearing
Page 5
T IS TO CERTIFY THAT I ON APRIL 9, 2008 SURVEYED THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. THIS SURVEY
AS PERFORMED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT. THE ONLY EASEMENTS APPEARING ON THIS
EY ARE THOSE WHICH WERE SHOWN ON THE RECORDED SUBDIVISION PLAT.
._., OP.
CONC. SEA WAL:
O --DFNNS aJ. 11T]�
U ""` �• 9
LIC�NO'.
1500
ATLANTIC BLVD. SURLY°�
S M'00• E ml 00'
2 PT.3 j PT.3 4 PT.5
a
� I I
FRAME
8'' I CABANAS
9i ON CONC.
1ST RR I f `
0UNINR
DEO VERFAKG ` 6' WOOD f[NCE
2ND FMR. • . • I. ' ... :. •:
2.0'i DECK �'.- '• • • . -. -
.. .'
)2.b' 11.0' 11.7 11.7 11.0' 11.0' 11.0'
I STORY
FRAME CABANA .. N N N N
=11.7^ ^11.0^ '11.0'' ^11.0^ ^11.0• ^11.0'^
t 34.6' 11.0' 11.0
IBJ
C 9•'�
�. "
UNE
-___ - ... ;
IC FRA►[ 1-tNF6LAMP
POST - CABNIA wONCOIIC.11.0'^
o �
i 6• WRE FENCLON
_I
Il
:i a'' 0.2 N B'S6'00' W 0.6' PN iFi
76.tO' TO PIN (F)56TH
S7 OCEAN FRONT AVENUE 20'
PHYSICAL SURVEY OF
LOTS 3-4 AND PART OF 5
Aw
BLOCK 7, UBERMEER
NOTE: THIS PROPERTY APPEARS TO FALL IN VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA M.f) T P 150
FLOOD ZONE($) VE AS SHOWN ON THE Fc
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM MAP SURF BEACH CLUB
FOR THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
COMMUNITY N0.515531-00116F OA-ED 12155 DATES APRIL 9, 2008 f� f1 DENNIE J. GERWIfZ, P.C.
BASE ELEVATION 11.0 SCALE: t" = 290 DIG ��N.wu.E.R. suite Iz
�mc�wr,e, Hna�u. ���
LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION • F.B. 497 CAD TECH'. JSO nvunA,.�vwc.cai m+ss,ax�
EXISTING PHYSICAL SURVEY
SURF BEACH CLUB, INC.
February 12, 2013 City Council Hearing
Page 6
Z
Cp CUR N-1�G .u(
CONC. SEAWALL
- _ ---5 T56-00" 135.00' _
6' `.W
O
O
� WD FENCE
LINE OF CANOPY
NEW CABANA
W XISTING CONCRETE WALKWAY
O Cn
h. .P� I• O
0 32.8' • • �La ii.a n.v n a no » a �i a n o
OG ^ EXISTING STRUCTURE
Z TO REMAIN
CEJ
CO
• _ NEW RESTROOM•BLDG. p
+ •' , EAISTIRG ASPHALT• , • MP PS7ST-
?ARKNG
e' 1 a ... • . • 6f YIIAi FENCE. .
�,,��•,• ' • � • • • ••,� • • ~ • •1E•L•SLIDINGENTRAyCEiaA, • •, ,� ••
N 8 56'-00" W 135.00'
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
SURF BEACH CLUB, INC.
February 12, 2013 City Council Hearing
Page 7
pR. OUR,•. N;,o
CABANA ELEVATIONS
SURF BEACH CLUB, INC.
February 12, 2013 City Council Hearing
Page 8
�F SUR N„t,ON�
b�o
PROPOSED CABANA ELEVATIONS
SURF BEACH CLUB, INC.
February 12, 2013 City Council Hearing
Page 9
9
a"s
Z 1 v)
ELEVATION DRAWINGS OF INTERIOR LAYOUT
SURF BEACH CLUB, INC.
February 12, 2013 City Council Hearing
Page 10
SUR N�At s1 �0,[N� JJIIM�M���
�%'
r��
X
RENDERING OF PROPOSED CABANAS
iA•B.M A
SURF BEACH CLUB, INC.
February 12, 2013 City Council Hearing
Page 11
�. t
r,
LYNNH"EN
— I
* Zoning with ConditionsProffers, Open
Space Promotion or POH•2 Overlays
A&M11111111
ZONING HISTORY
Expansion to Non -Conforming Use
#
DATE
REQUEST
ACTION
1
05/22/07
NONCONFORMING USE
Granted
2
07/18/06
SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
Granted
3
09/10/96
CUP (communications tower)
Granted
SURF BEACH CLUB, INC.
February 12, 2013 City Council Hearing
Page 12
O 11 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPLICANT DISCLOSURE
If the applicant is a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or other unincorporated
organization, complete the following:
1. List the applicant name followed by the names of all officers, members, trustees,
Vpartners, etc. below: (Attach list if necessary)
Surf Beach Club, Inc.: Joseph Cotton, President/Director; Steve Freeman,
Secretary/Director; Beau Holland, Vice President/Director; Julie Fortier Houser, vice
President/Director; Chris Caton, Tresurer/Director
2. List all businesses that have a parent -subsidiary' or affiliated business entityZ
relationship with the applicant: (Attach list if necessary)
❑ Check here if the applicant is NOT a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or
other unincorporated organization.
PROPERTY OWNER DISCLOSURE
Complete this section only if property owner is different from applicant.
If the property owner is a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or other
unincorporated organization, complete the following:
1. List the property owner name followed by the names of all officers, members,
trustees, partners, etc. below: (Attach list if necessary)
2. List all businesses that have a parent -subsidiary' or affiliated business entityZ
relationship with the applicant: (Attach list if necessary)
❑ Check here if the property owner is NOT a corporation, partnership, firm, business,
or other unincorporated organization.
8 See next page for footnotes
Non -Conforming Use Application
Page 8 of 9
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
SURF BEACH CLUB, INC.
February 12, 2013 City Council Hearing
Page 13
=DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES
List all known contractors or businesses that have or will provide services with respect
to the requested property use, including but not limited to the providers of architectural
services, real estate services, financial services, accounting services, and legal
services: (Attach list if necessary)
Sykes, Bourdon, Ahern & Levy, P.C.
Edward R. Roehm, Architect
Pisces Construction, Mike Fischetti
"Parent -subsidiary relationship" means "a relationship that exists when one
corporation directly or indirectly owns shares possessing more than 50 percent of the
voting power of another corporation." See State and Local Government Conflict of
Interests Act, Va. Code § 2.2-3101.
2 "Affiliated business entity relationship" means "a relationship, other than
parent -subsidiary relationship, that exists when (i) one business entity has a
controlling ownership interest in the other business entity, (ii) a controlling owner in
one entity is also a controlling owner in the other entity, or (iii) there is shared
management or control between the business entities. Factors that should be
considered in determining the existence of an affiliated business entity relationship
include that the same person or substantially the same person own or manage the two
entities; there are common or commingled funds or assets; the business entities share
the use of the same offices or employees or otherwise share activities, resources or
personnel on a regular basis; or there is otherwise a close working relationship
between the entities." See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, Va.
Code § 2.2-3101.
CERTIFICATION: I certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate.
I understand that, upon receipt of notification (postcard) that the application has been
scheduled for public hearing, I am responsible for obtaining and posting the required
sign on the subject property at least 30 days prior to the scheduled public hearing
according to the instructs n ' this package.
Surf Beach Club, I . Cf�jQlS
By: t C47 -0N
Applicant's Signatur Pi Na e
r,"O 7? 7
Property Owners Signature (if different than applicant) Print Name
Non -Conforming Use Application
Page 9 of 9
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
SURF BEACH CLUB, INC.
February 12, 2013 City Council Hearing
Page 14
1 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
2 RECONSTRUCTION OF A NONCONFORMING
3 USE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5704
4 OCEAN FRONT AVENUE
5
6 WHEREAS, Surf Beach Club, Inc. (hereinafter the "Applicant") has made
7 application to the City Council for authorization to reconstruct a nonconforming use
8 located at 5704 Ocean Front Avenue in the H-1 Hotel District by reconstructing eight (8)
9 cabanas and a restroom facility; and
10
11 WHEREAS, there are eight (8) cabanas and a restroom facility located on this
12 parcel, which are not allowed in the H-1 Hotel District, however, the cabanas and
13 restroom facility were built prior to the adoption of the applicable zoning regulations and
14 are therefore nonconforming; and
15
16 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 105 of the City Zoning Ordinance, the
17 reconstruction of a nonconforming use is unlawful in the absence of a resolution of the
18 City Council authorizing such action upon a finding that the proposed use, as
19 reconstructed, will be equally appropriate or more appropriate to the zoning district than
20 is the existing use;
21
22 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
23 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
24
25 That the City Council hereby finds that the proposed use, as reconstructed, will
26 be equally appropriate to the district as is the existing nonconforming use under the
27 conditions of approval set forth hereinbelow.
28
29 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
30 BEACH, VIRGINIA:
31
32 That the reconstruction of the nonconforming use is hereby authorized, upon the
33 following conditions:
34
35 1. The cabanas and restroom structure, when constructed, shall be in
36 substantial conformance with the site survey entitled, "Physical Survey of
37 Lots 3-4 and Part of 5, Block 7, Obermeer, Virginia Beach, Virginia for Surf
38 Beach Club," dated April 9, 2008, prepared by Dennis J. Gerwitz, P.C.,
39 and the structures themselves shall be constructed in substantial
40 conformance with the building elevations entitled, "Cabana Rehab for Surf
41 Beach Club, VA Beach," prepared by Edward R. Roehm, AIA, dated
42 February 4, 2011, which have been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City
43 Council and are on file with the Planning Department.
44
45 2. All outdoor lighting shall be shielded to direct light and glare onto the
46 premises; said lighting and glare shall be deflected, shaded, and focused
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
away from adjoining properties. In order to meet this condition the existing
light pole within the parking lot must be retrofitted with a new light fixture.
3. The existing chain link fence along Ocean Front Avenue shall either be
removed or replaced with a black vinyl -clad fence, at the same height as
the existing fence. The new fence may be installed with the same location
and alignment as the existing fence, as depicted on the physical survey
identified in Condition 1, above.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the day
of 2013.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT
Planning De artment
CA12504
R-1
January 22, 2013
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
V
City Attorney's Office
2
'In,
r
,�ee1�t
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM: BURNETTE DEVELOPMENT, LLC (Applicant) / PARETTA D. MUDD (Owner),
Conditional Use Permit for a self -storage facility at 5737 Northampton Boulevard
(GPIN 1468099601). KEMPSVILLE DISTRICT.
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2013
■ Background:
The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit to allow development of the site
for a climate -controlled self -storage facility. The site is currently undeveloped with
broken asphalt, having been used in the past by a commercial use.
The site is located in Strategic Growth Area 1 - Burton Station/Northampton
Boulevard Corridor Strategic Growth Area (SGA). The Burton
Station/Northampton Boulevard Corridor SGA Implementation Plan, adopted
December 2008, is one of the eight SGAs within the city identified to provide
opportunities for continued physical and economic growth; to protect established
neighborhoods from incompatible development; to maximize infrastructure
efficiency; and to create unique and exciting urban destinations.
■ Considerations:
The building will be 4 -stories in height and contain 89,412 square feet of floor
area. The proposed building is a climate -controlled structure with access only
from the interior. The building will have a fully monitored camera system and will
use `dark sky' guidelines for lighting on the exterior at night. The facility will
operate Monday through Saturday, from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., and Sunday from
12:00 p.m. (noon) to 5:00 p.m.
Currently, there are three access points into the site; the applicant has reduced
the number to one access point, which is centered on the site. Twelve parking
spaces are depicted on the plan. Street frontage, foundation, and perimeter
landscaping is also depicted on the plan.
The submitted elevation drawings of the proposed building show `coastal style'
architectural elements in the form of tower features with hipped roofs and
decorative brackets. Decorative banners are depicted on the front of the building
and provide some architectural relief to the building wall. Windows with coastal
style storm shutters help break up the mass of the long walls of the building.
Building materials include exterior insulation finish system, split face block
veneer, metal wall panels, and corrugated metal roofing.
Burnette Development, LLC
Page 2 of 3
The use, site design, and building design is compatible with the surrounding
community and is consistent with the recommendations of the Burton Station
Strategic Growth Area Implementation Plan. The proposed use will have a
minimal impact on the existing service level or traffic impact of the roadway,
especially when compared to the majority of permitted uses allowed on the site.
and should not significantly alter traffic flow.
There was no opposition to the request.
■ Recommendations:
The Planning Commission placed this item on the Consent Agenda, passing a
motion by a recorded vote of 10-0, to recommend approval of this request to the
City Council with the following conditions:
The site shall be developed substantially in accordance with the submitted
plan entitled "Conditional Use Permit for Northampton Blvd. Self Storage",
dated 10/19/12, prepared by Kellam Gerwitz Engineering, Surveying, and
Planning. Said plan has been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and
is on file in the Planning Department.
2. The proposed building shall be constructed in substantial accordance with the
submitted renderings entitled "Ocean Storage A Proposed Commercial
Storage Facility for Northampton Storage L.L.C. "View from North" and "View
from Northwest", dated 12-14-12, prepared by GMF + Associates. Said
renderings have been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and are on
file in the Planning Department.
3. The storage units shall be used only for storage. The units shall not be used
for office purposes, band rehearsals, residential dwellings, or any other
purpose not consistent with storage.
4. Signage for the site and building shall be reviewed and approved by the
Zoning Office within the Current Planning Division of the Department of
Planning. The decorative banners on the front of the building may be allowed
provided there is no signage on the banners.
5. A photometric plan shall be submitted for review during detailed site plan
review. The plan shall include the location of all poles and building mounted
lighting fixtures, and the listing of lamp type, wattage, and type of fixture. All
lighting on the site shall be consistent with those standards recommended by
the Illumination Engineering Society of North America. The plan shall include
provisions for implementing low-level security lighting for non -business hours.
■ Attachments:
Staff Review and Disclosure Statements
Minutes of Planning Commission Hearing
Burnette Development, LLC
Page 3 of 3
Location Map
Recommended Action: Staff recommends approval. Planning Commission
recommends approval.
Submitting Department/Agency: Planning Departmen
City Manager: S�- ,
KEMPSVILLE _ a i 1 'r
TQUDUI
t(' -a 4
ELECTION DISTRICT:
SITE SIZE:
IICIIC Vc'm IU1)lllClil, L U%-
14680996010000
KEMPSVILLE
43,000 square feet
H1
H1
62
B2
B2
0�J0
a
001
A18•
H1 4
82
s
82
A18*
H1
B2
R16
z..�.�x C_Pro 0—
fpw. PrerisMo� wPOHa Onrlrys
CUP for U/nl Warehouse
REQUEST:
Conditional Use Permit (Mini -Warehouse / Self -Storage Facility)
ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION: 5737 Northampton Boulevard
2
January 9, 2013 Public Hearing
APPLICANT:
BURNETTE
DEVELOPMENT,
LLC
PROPERTY OWNER:
PARETTA D MUDD
STAFF PLANNER: Faith Christie
GPIN:
ELECTION DISTRICT:
SITE SIZE:
AICUZ:
14680996010000
KEMPSVILLE
43,000 square feet
Less than 65 dB DNL
BACKGROUND / DETAILS OF PROPOSAL
The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit to allow development of the site for a self -storage
facility. The building will be 4 stories in height and contain 89,412 square feet. The proposed building is a
climate -controlled structure with access only from the interior. The building will have a fully monitored
camera system and will use `dark sky' guidelines for night lighting. The management of the operation will
be by a professional management company. The facility will operate Monday through Saturday from 9:00
a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and Sunday from 12:00 p.m. (noon) to 5:00 p.m.
The submitted Use Permit plan depicts the building situated 35 feet from the front property line and 15
feet from the sides and rear property lines. Currently, there are three access points into the site; this
development will have a single centered access point into the site. Twelve parking spaces are depicted
on the plan. Street frontage, foundation, and perimeter landscaping is also depicted on the plan.
The submitted elevation drawings of the proposed building show `coastal style' architectural elements in
the form of tower features with hipped roofs and decorative brackets. Decorative banners are depicted on
the front of the building and provide some architectural relief to the building wall. Windows with coastal
style storm shutters help break up the mass of the long walls of the building. Building materials include
exterior insulation finish system, split face block veneer, metal wall panels, and corrugated metal roofing.
BURNETTE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Agenda Item 2
Page 1
LAND USE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
EXISTING LAND USE: Vacant site
SURROUNDING LAND North: . Northampton Boulevard
USE AND ZONING: . Hotel/ H-1 Hotel
South: . Hotel / H-1 Hotel
East: . Hotel / H-1 Hotel
West: . Northampton Boulevard
• Hotel/ H-1 Hotel
• Baker Road and Northampton Boulevard intersection
NATURAL RESOURCE AND There are no natural resources or cultural features associated with the
CULTURAL FEATURES: site.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Strategic Growth Area (SGA) 1 - Burton Station (Northampton Boulevard Corridor)
The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the City as Urban Area, Strategic Growth Area 1 - Burton
Station (Northampton Boulevard Corridor). The Burton Station/Northampton Boulevard Corridor / SGA
Implementation Plan, adopted December 2008 is one of the eight SGAs within the city identified to provide
opportunities for continued physical and economic growth; to protect established neighborhoods from
incompatible development; to maximize infrastructure efficiency; and to create unique and exciting urban
destinations.
IMPACT ON CITY SERVICES
MASTER TRANSPORTATION PLAN (MTP) /_CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP): Northampton
Boulevard in front of the subject site is an eight -lane divided major urban arterial. The Master Transportation
Plan proposes an eight -lane facility within a 190 -foot right-of-way. There are no Roadway Capital Improvement
Program projects for this area. Currently, this segment of roadway is functioning over -capacity at a Level Of
Service "F".
TRAFFIC:
Street Name
Present
Volume
Present Capacity
Generated Traffic
Northampton
66,803 ADT
56,240 ADT (maximum
Existing Land Use — 0
Boulevard
Level of Service "D")
ADT
64,260 ADT (max.
Proposed Land Use 3— 224
Level of Service "E")
ADT (13 AM Peak Hour
Vehicles 124 PM Peak
BURNETTE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Agenda Item 2
Page 2
Hour Vehicles)
Average Daily Trips
Y as defined by a vacant lot
3 as defined by an 89,412 square foot self -storage facility
WATER: This site must connect to City water. There are 20 -inch and 12 -inch City water mains along
Northampton Boulevard.
SEWER: This site must connect to City sanitary sewer. Sanitary sewer and pump station analysis for Pump
Station 302 is required to ensure future flows can be accommodated. There are 8 -inch and 12 -inch City
sanitary sewer gravity mains along Northampton Boulevard. There is a 20 -inch Hampton Roads Sanitation
District (HRSD) force main along Northampton Boulevard.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CENTER: Stormwater quality and quantity shall be addressed in accordance
with the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance, Stormwater Management Ordinance, and Virginia
Stormwater Management Handbook.
EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of this request with the conditions below. Staff finds that this use is
compatible with the surrounding community and is consistent with the recommendations of the Burton
Station Strategic Growth Area Implementation Plan. Staff notes that while Northampton Boulevard is
currently functioning over its designed capacity, the proposed use is a relatively low traffic generator.
There are numerous other by -right uses allowed on this site under the existing zoning that would
generate a greater impact on traffic. Staff concludes that the proposed use will have a minimal impact on
the existing service level of the roadway and should not significantly alter traffic flow. Staff, therefore,
recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit request for mini-warehouse/self-storage facility
subject to the conditions listed below.
CONDITIONS
1. The site shall be developed substantially in accordance with the submitted plan entitled "Conditional
Use Permit for Northampton Blvd. Self Storage", dated 10/19/12, prepared by Kellam Gerwitz
Engineering, Surveying, and Planning. Said plan has been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council
and is on file in the Planning Department.
2. The proposed building shall be constructed in substantial accordance with the submitted renderings
entitled "Ocean Storage A Proposed Commercial Storage Facility for Northampton Storage L.L.C.
"View from North" and "View from Northwest', dated 12-14-12, prepared by GMF + Associates. Said
renderings have been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and are on file in the Planning
Department.
BURNETTE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Agenda Item 2
Page 3
3. The storage units shall be used only for the storage o€geed& The units shall not be used for office
purposes, band rehearsals, residential dwellings, or any other purpose not consistent with the storage
ofgoods.
4. Signage for the site and building shall be reviewed and approved by the Zoning Office within the
Current Planning Division of the Department of Planning. The decorative banners on the front of the
building may be allowed provided there is no signage on the banners.
5. A photometric plan shall be submitted for review during detailed site plan review. The plan shall
include the location of all poles and building mounted lighting fixtures, and the listing of lamp type,
wattage, and type of fixture. All lighting on the site shall be consistent with those standards
recommended by the Illumination Engineering Society of North America. The plan shall include
provisions for implementing low-level security lighting for non -business hours.
NOTE: Further conditions may be required during the administration of applicable City Ordinances and
Standards. Any site plan submitted with this application may require revision during detailed site plan
review to meet all applicable City Codes and Standards. All applicable permits required by the City
Code, including those administered by the Department of Planning / Development Services Center and
Department of Planning /Permits and Inspections Division, and the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy, are required before any uses allowed by this Use Permit are valid.
The applicant is encouraged to contact and work with the Crime Prevention Office within the Police
Department for crime prevention techniques and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
(CPTED) concepts and strategies as they pertain to this site.
BURNETTE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Agenda Item 2
Paae 4
�-i
AERIAL OF SITE LOCATION
BURNETTE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Agenda Item 2
Page 5
y
ƒ
!
� /
|■§
{ 2
■■,§(
]
\
q§
§\
(
� 9
�
§)+
\
2°
%e g
of /
\§
._,,.
.; „ �|r
|•■ ;
�\
§ |
.�....(
-
§
/
! Q
y
ƒ
!
?)
II I
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
BURNETTE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Agenda Item 2
Page 6
(
\
�
2
�|q=■)
\§
._,,.
.; „ �|r
|•■ ;
§ |
.�....(
§
\
k
?)
II I
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
BURNETTE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Agenda Item 2
Page 6
�X4
1�
PROPOSED ELEVATION
BURNETTE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Agenda Item 2
Page 7
PROPOSED ELEVATION
BURNETTE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Agenda Item 2
KEMPSVILLE
U..�.,»..�+�. 71.x.-nl�»mnr�♦ T T �
INIJ 1 \ --1 1J �,ll llt,l ll� Lir �.11/�/lll�ilfi' LL ti
Ma of (o Scele
rx �
'X'0W 4W
r7
t
D �
O� 28*
v �
i
82 a o
__I41
1§2 _-
' Zorring with Conditions Proffers. Open CUP for Mini WarehOU!
Space Promotion or PDH -2 Overiays
ZONING HISTORY
#
DATE
REQUEST
ACTION
1
10/12/64
REZONING (CL 1 Limited Commercial to CG 1 General
Approved
Commercial and RS 3 Residence Suburban to CL 1 Limited
Commercial
2
11/22/01
REZONING (B-2 Business and 1-1 Light Industrial to
Approved
Conditional A-18 Apartment
3
9/26/06
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (Car wash)
Approved
7/12/05
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (Gasoline sales in conjunction
Approved
with a convenience store
4
6/27/00
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (Gasoline sales in conjunction
Approved
with a convenience store
BURNETTE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Agenda Item 2
Page 9
[DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPLICANT DISCLOSURE
If the applicant is a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or other unincorporated
organization, complete the following:
1. List the applicant name followed by the names of all officers, members, trustees,
partners, etc. below: (Attach list if necessary)
j3uw,w5,rrr DELIEuPMI✓ t I-�C• 1MItNWEL i$ B►�r21�eT71^
114-iiMA-S OAQ-1`1VA)
2. List all businesses that have a parent -subsidiary' or affiliated business entity2
relationship with the applicant: (Attach list if necessary)
❑ Check here if the applicant is NOT a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or
other unincorporated organization.
PROPERTY OWNER DISCLOSURE
Complete this section only if property owner is different from applicant.
If the property owner is a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or other
unincorporated organization, complete the following:
1. List the property owner name followed by the names of all officers, members,
trustees, partners, etc. below: (Attach list if necessary)
PADDY YIA V212
2. List all businesses that have a parent -subsidiary' or affiliated business entity2
relationship with the applicant: (Attach list if necessary)
F] Check here if the property owner is NOT a corporation, partnership, firm,
business, or other unincorporated organization.
' & see next page for footnotes
Does an official or em loyee of�City of Virginia Beach have an interest in the
subject land? Yes H No
If yes, what is the name of the official or employee and the nature of their interest?
Conditional Use Permit Application
Page 9 of 10
Revised 7/32007
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
BURNETTE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Agenda Item 2
Page 10
E:_7
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES
List all known contractors or businesses that have or will provide services with respect
to the requested property use. including but not limited to the providers of architectural
services, real estate services, financial services, accounting services, and legal
services: (Attach fist If necessary)
14 s
6-M i�tt rue NSSOG ig1tC►krl:d5
WMA46 Is fn
SV13JKAIJAJ 065
' 'paront-subsidiary relationship" means "a relationship that exists when one
corporation directly or indirectly owns shares possessing more then 50 percent of the voting
power of another corporation." See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, Va.
Code § 2.2-3101.
2 "Affiliated business entity relationship" means 'a relationship, other than parent -
subsidiary relationship, that exists when (I) one business entitf' has a controlling ovarter 1
interest In the other business MARY, (ii) a controlling owner in one entity le also a conirotlIng
owner in the other entity, or (iii) there is shared management or control between the business
entities. Factors that Owuld be considered in determining the existence of an affiliated
business antigr relationship Include that the same person or substantially the same person
own or manage the two entities; two are common or commingled funds or assets; the
business entities share the use of the same offices or employees or otherwise share activities,
resources or personnel on a regular basis; or there is otherwise a close working relationship
between the entitles.' See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, Va. Code §
2.2-3101.
CERTIFICATION:#W, won receipt of notincatlon (postcard) that the application has been scheduled for
public hearing, I sun responsible for obtaining and posting the required sign on die subject PmPwty at
Iasi 30 days Prior to the scheduled upblic on
the
subject
to of dro Depar nwit of
urMteriiDned ons In 0118 PW*AgO. The
WW oor�►rts to srNry upon
planning to photograph and view the site for purposes of processing and evewating this application.
Applkant's Sigrwture t Name
property ownees Signature (if different than applicant) print Name
ConditW Use PmM Appksb-
pwtoof10
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
BURNETTE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Agenda Item 2
Page 11
Item #2
Burnette Development, L.L.C.
Conditional use Permit
5737 Northampton Boulevard
District 2
Kempsville
January 9, 2013
CONSENT
An application of Burnette Development, L.L.C. for a Conditional Use Permit (Mini-
Warehouse/Self-Storage Facility) on property located at 5737 Northampton Boulevard,
District 2, Kempsville. GPIN: 14680996010000.
CONDITIONS
�. The site shall be developed substantially in accordance with the submitted plan entitled
"Conditional Use Permit for Northampton Blvd. Self Storage", dated 10/19/12, prepared
by Kellam Gerwitz Engineering, Surveying, and Planning. Said plan has been exhibited
to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file in the Planning Department.
2. The proposed building shall be constructed in substantial accordance with the submitted
renderings entitled "Ocean Storage A Proposed Commercial Storage Facility for
Northampton Storage L.L.C. "View from North" and "View from Northwest", dated 12-14-
12, prepared by GMF + Associates. Said renderings have been exhibited to the Virginia
Beach City Council and are on file in the Planning Department.
3. The storage units shall be used only for #4e storage of goods. The units shall not be
used for office purposes, band rehearsals, residential dwellings, or any other purpose
not consistent with the storage of goods.
4. Signage for the site and building shall be reviewed and approved by the Zoning Office
within the Current Planning Division of the Department of Planning. The decorative
banners on the front of the building may be allowed provided there is no signage on the
banners.
5. A photometric plan shall be submitted for review during detailed site plan review. The
plan shall include the location of all poles and building mounted lighting fixtures, and the
listing of lamp type, wattage, and type of fixture. All lighting on the site shall be
consistent with those standards recommended by the Illumination Engineering Society of
North America. The plan shall include provisions for implementing low-level security
lighting for non -business hours.
Item #2
Burnette Development, L.L.C.
Page 2
NOTE: Further conditions may be required during the administration of applicable
City Ordinances and Standards. Any site plan submitted with this application may
require revision during detailed site plan review to meet all applicable City Codes and
Standards. All applicable permits required by the City Code, including those
administered by the Department of Planning / Development Services Center and
Department of Planning / Permits and Inspections Division, and the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy, are required before any uses allowed by this Use Permit are
valid.
The applicant is encouraged to contact and work with the Crime Prevention Office
within the Police Department for crime prevention techniques and Crime Prevention
Through Environmental Design (CPTED) concepts and strategies as they pertain to
this site.
AYE 10 NAY 0
BERNAS
F E LTO N
AYE
HENLEY
AYE
HODGSON
AYE
HORSLEY
AYE
LIVAS
AYE
REDMOND
AYE
RIPLEY
AYE
RUCINSKI
AYE
RUSSO
AYE
THORNTON
AYE
ABS 0 ABSENT 1
ABSENT
By a vote of 10-0, the Commission approved item 2 by consent.
Robert Kellam appeared before the Commission on behalf of the applicant.
�h •.Y
71
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM: PRINCESS ANNE MASONIC LODGE #25 (Applicant) / EMMA SMITHSON
FOUNTAIN (Owner), Conditional Use Permit for an assembly use (fraternal lodge).
3067 West Neck Road (GPIN 2403042343). PRINCESS ANNE DISTRICT.
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2013
■ Background:
The subject site consists of 41.58 acres and has an existing single-family home
and numerous outbuildings. The existing home is known as the Thomas
Woodhouse House. It was constructed circa 1810, and is listed on the National
Register of Historic Places and is on the Virginia Landmarks Register. The
current property owner has gifted a Conservation Easement to the City over this
site. The easement was approved by City Council on August 9, 2011 and
recorded on September 21, 2011. The easement designates two "building
envelopes" for the property. The first building envelope is for the Thomas
Woodhouse House and totals three acres. The second building envelope
contains 3.75 acres and is designated for one building with a maximum floor area
of 8,000 square feet. The remainder of the site is to remain in open space. It is
the intent of the applicant to move the building that serves as the existing
Masonic Lodge, located at 2849 Princess Anne Road, to the `building envelope'
designated for the lodge on the subject site. The lodge is considered by the
Zoning Ordinance to be an Assembly Use. A Conditional Use Permit is required
for an Assembly Use in the Agricultural Districts.
■ Considerations:
The existing 2,120 square foot lodge building will be relocated to the `building
envelope' on the site as designated by the conservation easement. The
submitted site plan shows the footprint for the relocated building, as well as a
proposed future expansion. The future expansion will contain a lodge room,
social room, a kitchen, and restrooms. A 40 -foot by 100 -foot (40' x 100') covered
picnic area with an outdoor kitchen and storage area is also proposed for the
site. The existing driveway will be upgraded and utilized for access. The driveway
and heavy traffic areas will be aggregate with Tensar® (plastic grid soil
reinforcement) or equally compacted sub -base to support the weight of
emergency response vehicles and delivery truck traffic. Eighty-seven (87)
parking spaces with aggregate surface treatment will be provided. Eighty-six
(86) spaces are required.
Single-family homes are located adjacent to the southern property line. The
applicant is providing a landscape buffer consisting of native evergreen eastern
Princess Anne Masonic Lodge #25
Page 2 of 2
red cedar trees, wax myrtle shrubs, and a four -foot split -rail fence along, as
stated above, to screen the site from the adjacent homes. An existing ditch with
vegetation along its edge is located along this property line, providing an
additional buffer and screening between the two uses.
The applicant has indicated that the lodge meets four times a month on a
Tuesday or Wednesday evening from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. with 25 to 30
members per meeting. Several family-oriented social events also occur during
the year.
There was opposition to the request.
■ Recommendations:
The Planning Commission, passing a motion by a recorded vote of 9-0,
recommends approval of this request to the City Council with the following
conditions:
1. The site shall substantially adhere to the submitted site plan entitled
"Conditional Use Permit of Masonic Lodge #25 for Masonic Lodge #25,"
dated March 29, 2011, prepared by Kellam Gerwitz, Inc.. Said site plan has
been exhibited to the City Council and is on file in the Planning Department,
2. The building additions to the existing structure shall substantially adhere to
the submitted floor plan, entitled "Existing Floor Plan w/ Proposed Addition,
Princess Anne Lodge No. 25," dated April 1, 1996, Said plan has been
exhibited to the City Council and is on file in the Planning Department.
3. Per the restrictions of the Deed of Easement, recorded at the Virginia Beach
Circuit Court on September 21, 2011 (Instrument Number
20110921000978710), the aggregate maximum floor area of the existing
lodge and any future addition to the lodge (referenced as the "Primary Lodge
Building" in said Deed of Easement) shall not exceed a maximum of 8,000
square feet.
■ Attachments:
Staff Review and Disclosure Statements
Minutes of Planning Commission Hearing
Location Map
Recommended Action: Staff recommends approval. Planning Commission
recommends approval.
Submitting Department/Agency: Planning Department%
City Manager. L v-
PRINCESS ANNE
Princess Anne Masonic Lodge #25
P1* W�c ' AG2 AGI
tNfCKRp .
AG2
P1 *
AGI
17,
m AG2 AGI
R AG2
ix�o• -iz� 5*
"z�^"^��""�°�dti^"•P CUP /or Assembly Use
Spec. P.omereo. wPLWS U.,*ye
REQUEST:
Conditional Use Permit (Assembly Use - Masonic Lodge)
ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION: 3067 West Neck Road
17
January 9, 2013 Public Hearing
APPLICANT:
PRINCESS ANNE
MASONIC LODGE
#25
PROPERTY OWNER:
EMMA SMITHSON
FOUNTAIN
STAFF PLANNER: Ray Odom
GPIN: ELECTION DISTRICT: SITE SIZE: AICUZ:
2403-04-2343-0000 PRINCESS ANNE 41.58 acres Less than 65 dB DNL
BACKGROUND / DETAILS OF PROPOSAL
The Planning Commission heard this item at the December 12, 2012 public hearing and deferred the item
at the request of the applicant for the purpose of meeting with the civic league of the adjacent
neighborhood and the owners of the adjoining lots. A meeting was held on December 12, 2012. As of
January 2, 2013 (printing of the agenda package) no new revisions had been submitted to staff. A
revised site plan was submitted on January 3, 2013. The revised site plan depicts that the buffer area
between the lodge and the adjacent single family homes has been increased from 20 -feet to 40 -feet. A
four foot high split rail fence has been provided along the drive aisle and parking area. Native evergreen
wax myrtle shrubs are shown along the fencing forming a continuous hedge. Two staggered rows of
native evergreen eastern red cedar trees have also been provided. Approximately 15 -feet of the buffer
area between the existing ditch and the tree plantings will remain in turf grass.
The subject site consists of 41.58 acres and has an existing single-family home and numerous
outbuildings. The existing home is known as the Thomas Woodhouse House. It was constructed circa
1810, and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and is on the Virginia Landmarks Register.
The current property owner has gifted a Conservation Easement to the City over this site. The easement
PRINCESS ANNE MASONIC LODGE #25
Agenda Item 17
Page 1
was approved by City Council on August 9, 2011 and recorded on September 21, 2011. The easement
designates two "building envelopes" for the property. The first building envelope is for the Thomas
Woodhouse House and totals three acres. The second building envelope contains 3.75 acres and is
designated for a Masonic Lodge, which is the subject of this request. The remainder of the site is to
remain in open space. It is the intent of the applicant to move the building that contains the existing
Masonic Lodge located at 2849 Princess Anne Road to the `building envelope' designated for the lodge
on the subject site. The lodge is considered by the Zoning Ordinance to be an Assembly Use. A
Conditional Use Permit is required for an Assembly Use in the Agricultural Districts.
The Princess Anne Masonic Lodge 25 traces its origin to Kempsville Masonic Lodge Number 12 that was
chartered on October 5, 1785 (Masonic Lodges are traditionally numbered according to the order of their
establishment in the respective Masonic district). It is believed that Kempsville Lodge Number 12 met in
the area now known as Kempes Landing (Kempsville). It became inactive on December 12, 1848. The
lodge was again chartered on December 12, 1871 as Kempsville Lodge Number 25 and met in a rented
hall located north of the intersection of Kempsville and Princess Anne Roads. In 1887, the Board of
Supervisors for Princess Anne County granted a request from the Lodge to lease land within the public
grounds of the Princess Anne County Courthouse for the purpose of constructing a two-story lodge
building. In January 1884, the name of the lodge was changed to Princess Anne Masonic Lodge Number
25. The two-story structure was moved to the western edge of the Courthouse property in 1936, and
moved again in 1968 to its present location on Princess Anne Road.
The current improvements to Princess Anne Road on a wider right-of-way have significantly decreased
the size of the existing lodge site. Thus, the lodge, seeking a permanent location in a setting that is more
rural than the current location and which will provide sufficient area for its activities, has acquired the
proposed site through a donation from the current owner of the site, whose father was a past member of
the lodge. Relocation to the proposed site will provide the lodge sufficient area for its actives as well as
expansion if necessary.
The existing 2,120 square foot lodge building will be relocated to the 'building envelope' on the site as
designated by the conservation easement. The submitted site plan shows the footprint for the relocated
building, as well as a proposed 6,500 square foot future expansion. The future expansion will contain a
lodge room, social room, a kitchen, and restrooms. The exterior building material will be Hardiplank® or
similar fiber -cement siding to match the wood siding of the existing lodge structure. A 16 -foot by 20 -foot
(16' x 20') foyer will separate the old building from the new structure. The total building area will be 8,620
square feet. A 40 -foot by 100 -foot (40' x 100') covered picnic area with an outdoor kitchen and storage
area is also proposed for the site. The existing driveway will be upgraded and utilized for access. The
driveway and heavy traffic areas will be aggregate with a Tensar (plastic grid soil reinforcement) or
equally compacted sub -base to support the weight of emergency response vehicles and delivery truck
traffic. Eighty-seven parking spaces with aggregate surface treatment will be provided. Eighty-six spaces
are required.
Single-family homes are located adjacent to the southern property line. The applicant is providing a
landscape buffer consisting of native evergreen eastern red cedar trees, wax myrtle shrubs, and a four -
foot split -rail fence along, as stated above, to screen the site from the adjacent homes. An existing ditch
with vegetation along its edge is located along this property line, providing an additional buffer and
screening between the two uses.
The applicant has indicated that the lodge meets four times a month on a Tuesday or Wednesday
evening from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. with 25 to 30 members per meeting. Several family-oriented social
events also occur during the year.
PRINCESS ANNE MASONIC LODGE..#25
Agenda Item 17
Page 2
LAND USE AND PLAN INFORMATION
EXISTING LAND USE: Single-family home / cultivated field.
SURROUNDING LAND North: . West Neck Road
USE AND ZONING: . Cultivated fields / AG -2 Agricultural District
South: . Single-family residential / R-20 Residential District
East: . West Neck Road
• Forested / AG -2 Agricultural District
West: . Single-family residential / R-20 Residential District
NATURAL RESOURCE AND The majority of the site is a cultivated field. The existing dwelling
CULTURAL FEATURES: was constructed circa 1810 and is listed on the National Register of
Historic Places and is on the Virginia Landmarks Register. There
are numerous outbuildings on the site including a smokehouse and
the original kitchen that was constructed circa 1904. There are
also several old graves on the site including Captain Thomas
Woodhouse who build the existing home and died in 1813.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the City as Transition Area.
The Transition Area is strategically located between the more urbanized region of the City to the north
and the rural area to the south. The Comprehensive Plan also encourages owners of qualified historic
properties to participate in the Virginia Beach Historical Register program and receive recognition for their
contributions to our City's Heritage.
CITY SERVICES
MASTER TRANSPORTATION PLAN (MTP) / CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP): The curve in
the West Neck Road right-of-way is the site of CIP Project #2.502.003 (West Neck Road Interim Safety
Improvements Phase III). This project will widen the curve to improve safety on West Neck Road.
TRAFFIC:
Street Name
Present
Volume
Present Capacity
Generated Traffic
West Neck Road
3,200 ADT
15,000 ADT (Level of
Existing Land Use —
Service "D") - Capacity
102 ADT
Proposed Land Use' —
803 ADT
Average Daily Trips
2 based on one single-family dwelling
3 based on one single-family dwelling and lodge
WATER: The lodge must connect to City water. There is a 12 -inch City water line in West Neck Road.
SEWER: The lodge must connect to City sanitary sewer. Analysis of Pump Station 640 and/or 636 and the
sanitary sewer collection system is required to ensure future flows can be accommodated. There is a 6 -inch
PRINCESS ANNE MASONIC LODGE #25
Agenda Item 17
Page 3
City sanitary sewer force main in West Neck Road.
EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION
The proposed Conditional Use Permit for an assembly use of a Masonic Lodge is acceptable. The
existing 137 -year old building and use complements the existing historic context of the subject site, and
the proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's land use policies for the Transition Area
and for the preservation of historic resources within the city. The current property owner has gifted a
Conservation Easement to the City over this site. The easement establishes a "building envelope" for the
relocation of the subject lodge. The existing lodge building has been relocated several times since its
construction in 1875. The current widening of Princess Anne Road has significantly decreased the size of
the existing site. The relocation, therefore, will allow the lodge to have a permanent location in a rural and
historical setting, while being able to expand and have sufficient area for its activities.
Although, the lodge will be located adjacent to single-family homes, the members meet an average of four
times a month between the hours of 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. and conduct family-oriented social events
several times during the year. The existing vegetation as well as a new buffer of evergreen tree and shrub
plantings along the drive aisle and parking area will provide adequate screening and buffering of the
lodge use. The proposed use of the property, therefore, will not have an adverse impact on the adjoining
neighborhood.
Staff, therefore, recommends approval of this request with the conditions below.
CONDITIONS
1. The site shall substantially adhere to the submitted site plan entitled "Conditional Use Permit of
Masonic Lodge #25 for Masonic Lodge #25," dated March 29, 2011, prepared by Kellam Gerwitz, Inc..
Said site plan has been exhibited to the City Council and is on file in the Planning Department.
2. The building additions to the existing structure shall substantially adhere to the submitted floor plan,
entitled "Existing Floor Plan w/ Proposed Addition, Princess Anne Lodge No. 25," dated April 1, 1996,
Said plan has been exhibited to the City Council and is on file in the Planning Department.
PRINCESS ANNE MASONIC LODGE #25
Agenda Item 17
Page 4
NOTE: Further conditions may be required during the administration of applicable City Ordinances and
Standards. Any site plan submitted with this application may require revision during detailed site plan
review to meet all applicable City Codes and Standards. All applicable permits required by the City
Code, including those administered by the Department of Planning / Development Services Center and
Department of Planning /Permits and Inspections Division, and the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy, are required before any uses allowed by this Use Permit are valid.
The applicant is encouraged to contact and work with the Crime Prevention Office within the Police
Department for crime prevention techniques and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
(CPTED) concepts and strategies as they pertain to this site.
PRINCESS ANNE MASONIC LODGE#25
Agenda Item 17
Page 5
f
O
i � V
Ln
W
1
R' S_7
ttl
�9
U z
F Z a�y
a
� O
a:a
cc
I
t
I
E
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
PRINCESS ANNE MASONIC LODGE #25
Agenda Item 17
Page 7
J
P aV
cl-
s 22'S5'OC W 407.15' 0%A)
18260
55 �p
242EX N 77'11'47'
i b� EX. SHED I� 80 33'
5TSTIN Ji G to [* SHED P
\ I gyp' N 2479'5
�1ADo
(/E� 4%,
74721
WTDOOR IOTZxEN �tl �G' rEX
SITE OF
IASONIC STORAGE AREA) b/ 11L//
ZG£ v NO CURB DUty SE `prL \Q.
NO
�ry EXISTI
I �p•\p. CECIETF
(Typ•) N 1
(a '; ••e .y.��.t,i �p EXISTfNG
s.
,4E LUNG
Vk #3067
atl� EXISTING
DITCH
EXISTING
0 HOME SITE
E>
it'OH• E 314.65' fho
a
EXf5TING
D11•CH
DETAIL OF PROPOSED SITE PLAN
PRINCESS ANNE MASONIC LODGE #25
Agenda Item 17r'a
Page 8
S
Oa
aw
IN
tl'
\32)
j O
�!
.jjj
>a
6
PROPOS
FEN
PROPOSED
SWALE
\�/
P aV
cl-
s 22'S5'OC W 407.15' 0%A)
18260
55 �p
242EX N 77'11'47'
i b� EX. SHED I� 80 33'
5TSTIN Ji G to [* SHED P
\ I gyp' N 2479'5
�1ADo
(/E� 4%,
74721
WTDOOR IOTZxEN �tl �G' rEX
SITE OF
IASONIC STORAGE AREA) b/ 11L//
ZG£ v NO CURB DUty SE `prL \Q.
NO
�ry EXISTI
I �p•\p. CECIETF
(Typ•) N 1
(a '; ••e .y.��.t,i �p EXISTfNG
s.
,4E LUNG
Vk #3067
atl� EXISTING
DITCH
EXISTING
0 HOME SITE
E>
it'OH• E 314.65' fho
a
EXf5TING
D11•CH
DETAIL OF PROPOSED SITE PLAN
PRINCESS ANNE MASONIC LODGE #25
Agenda Item 17r'a
Page 8
S
PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN
PRINCESS ANNE MASONIC LODGE #25
Agenda Item 17
Page 9
or SUR NA�
DA4
zz ]]jaaJJJJJjjj o
1+
L
PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN
PRINCESS ANNE MASONIC LODGE #25
Agenda Item 17
Page 9
or SUR NA�
PRINCESS ANNE r• A w AW • T , t,^
r�11I1�`1:�IIII' \ %Y1, 1 11[ �Llll\!
1
V� � 1 —
r I-
AG1 Vii
AG2
'Zoning with Conditions Proffers. Open
Space Promotion or PDH-,' Overlays
z AG2 AGI
CUP for Assembly Use
ZONING HISTORY
5*
#
DATE
REQUEST
ACTION
1
01/04/1994
Change of Zoning (AG -1 to R-20)
Approved
2
03/25/2003
Change of Zoning (AG -1 to R-15/OP)
Approved
PRINCESS ANNE MASONIC LODGE #25
Agenda Item 17
Page 10
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPLICANT DISCLOSURE
If the applicant is a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or other unincorporated
organization, complete the following:
1. List the applicant name followed by the names of all officers, members, trustees,
partners, etc. below: (Attach list if necessary)
2. List all businesses that have a parent -subsidiary' or affiliated business entity2
relationship with the applicant: (Attach list if necessary)
✓❑ Check here if the applicant is NOT a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or
other unincorporated organization.
PROPERTY OWNER DISCLOSURE
Complete this section only if property owner is different from applicant.
If the property owner is a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or other
unincorporated organization, complete the following:
1. List the property owner name followed by the names of all officers, members,
trustees, partners, etc. below: (Attach list if necessary)
2. List all businesses that have a parent-subsidiaryl or affiliated business entw
relationship with the applicant: (Attach list if necessary)
0 Check here if the property owner is NOT a corporation, partnership, firm,
business, or other unincorporated organization.
& See next page for footnotes
Does an official or employee of�City of Virginia Beach have an interest in the
"
subject land? Yes No ✓
If yes, what is the name of the official or employee and the nature of their interest?
Conditional use Permit Application
Page 9 of 10
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
PRINCESS ANNE MASONIC LODGE #25
Agenda Item 17
Page 11
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES
List all known contractors or businesses that have or will provide services with respect
to the requested property use, including but not limited to the providers of architectural
services, real estate services, financial services, accounting services, and legal
services: (Attach list if necessary)
t 'Parent -subsidiary relationship" means "a relationship that exists when one
corporation directly or indirectly owns shares possessing more than 50 percent of the voting
power of another corporation.' See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, Va.
Code § 2.2-3101.
2 "Affiliated business entity relationship' means 'a relationship, other than parent -
subsidiary relationship, that exists when (i) one business entity has a controlling ownership
interest in the other business entity, (ii) a controlling owner in one entity is also a controlling
owner in the other entity, or (iii) there is shared management or control between the business
entities. Factors that should be considered in determining the existence of an affiliated
business entity relationship include that the same person or substantially the same person
own or manage the two entities; there are common or commingled funds or assets; the
business entities share the use of the same offices or employees or otherwise share activities,
resources or personnel on a regular basis; or there is otherwise a dose working relationship
between the entities.' See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, Va. Code §
2.2-3101.
CERTIFICATION: I certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate.
I understand that, upon receipt of notification (postcard) that the application has been scheduled for
public hearing, I am responsible for obtaining and posting the required sign on the subject property at
least 30 days prior to the scheduled public hearing according to the Instructions in this package. The
undersigned also consents to entry upon the subject property by employees of the Department of
Plannin to photograph
Qand view the site for purposes of processing and evaluating this application.
7�cx-�--"� Wayne S. Flora
Applica 's Signature Print Name
llyliyy��J L'� Emma Smithson Fountain
Property Owner's Signature (if different than applicant) Print Name
Conditional Use Permit Application
Page 10 of 10
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
PRINCESS ANNE MASONIC LODGE125
Agenda Item. 17
Page 12
Item #17
Princess Anne Masonic Lodge #25
Conditional Use Permit
3067 West Neck Road
District 7
Princess Anne
January 9, 2013
REGULAR
An application of Princess Anne Masonic Lodge #25 for a Conditional Use Permit
(Assembly Use - Masonic Lodge) on property located at 3067 West Neck Road, District 7,
Princess Anne. GPIN: 2403-04-2343-0000.
CONDITIONS
1. The site shall substantially adhere to the submitted site plan entitled "Conditional Use
Permit of Masonic Lodge #25 for Masonic Lodge #25," dated March 29, 2011, prepared
by Kellam Gerwitz, Inc.. Said site plan has been exhibited to the City Council and is on
file in the Planning Department.
2. The building additions to the existing structure shall substantially adhere to the submitted
floor plan, entitled "Existing Floor Plan w/ Proposed Addition, Princess Anne Lodge No.
25," dated April 1, 1996, Said plan has been exhibited to the City Council and is on file in
the Planning Department.
NOTE: Further conditions may be required during the administration of applicable
City Ordinances and Standards. Any site plan submitted with this application may
require revision during detailed site plan review to meet all applicable City Codes and
Standards. All applicable permits required by the City Code, including those
administered by the Department of Planning / Development Services Center and
Department of Planning / Permits and Inspections Division, and the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy, are required before any uses allowed by this Use Permit are
valid.
The applicant is encouraged to contact and work with the Crime Prevention Office
within the Police Department for crime prevention techniques and Crime Prevention
Through Environmental Design (CPTED) concepts and strategies as they pertain to
this site.
AYE 9 NAY1 ABS 0 ABSENT 1
BERNAS ABSENT
FELTON AYE
HENLEY AYE
HODGSON NAY
Item #17
Princess Anne Masonic Lodge #25
Page 2
HORSLEY
AYE
LIVAS
AYE
REDMOND
AYE
RIPLEY
AYE
RUCINSKI
AYE
RUSSO
AYE
THORNTON
AYE
By a vote of 9-1, the Commission approved item 17.
Robert Kellam appeared before the Commission on behalf of the applicant.
Kenneth Harris, J.W. Wilson, and David Kellam appeared before the Commission in
support.
Dave Aguilino appeared before the Commission in opposition.
4 POC
V C
� 4
pm
�a
.o
0 POOv
�% • po
r�00
� L
•POO
wo
4-1a
a�
a�
tl
l
VM
OP
A
r F
r ..
��?�t� •
t-, 1
=,o
jjP
0
v
4°
j
V
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM: TRUSTEES OF FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF VIRGINIA BEACH
(Applicant & Owner), Conditional Use Permit for construction of a columbarium
on the church grounds. 300 36 th Street (GPIN 2418938644). BEACH DISTRICT.
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2013
■ Background:
The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit to construct a columbarium on
the grounds of the church. The site is zoned R-7.5 Residential District and is
located in Strategic Growth Area 8 — Resort Area.
■ Considerations:
The columbarium will be located within a side lawn enclosed by a 44 -inch high
brick wall on the northeast corner of the property, adjacent to the intersection of
Pacific Avenue and 36th Street. The columbarium will be comprised of two six-
foot high walls. The outer columbarium wall will contain 460 niches and the inner
columbarium wall will contain 260 niches for the internment of human cremains.
A landscaped brick plaza will be constructed with garden benches facing the
niches. Low lighting will be provided for security purposes. The design of the
columbarium walls and the building materials will mimic those of the church. The
front of each niche will be granite.
The proposed use will generate little activity beyond what is normally associated
with a church. The proposed location of the columbarium is inconspicuous from
any public rights-of-way. The project's design and materials will blend with the
existing church. The columbarium walls will resemble another brick garden wall
as one passes by the site. The applicant has submitted a detailed landscape plan
for the area around the columbarium. The plan depicts trees, shrubs, low growing
plants and flowers, as well as retaining existing trees.
There was no opposition to the request.
■ Recommendations:
The Planning Commission placed this item on the Consent Agenda, passing a
motion by a recorded vote of 10-0, to recommend approval of this request to the
City Council with the following conditions:
The location of the columbarium shall be limited to that shown on the
submitted plan, which has been exhibited to the City Council and is on file in
Trustees of First Presbyterian Church of Virginia Beach
Page 2 of 2
the Planning Department.
2. The columbarium walls shall complement the exterior building materials of the
existing church in color and material. The walls shall be substantially in
conformance with the drawing entitled "First Presbyterian Church
Columbarium, Columbarium Wall Perspective," which has been exhibited to
the City Council and is on file in the Planning Department.
3. Grading and drainage plans for the columbarium shall be submitted to and
approved by the Development Service Center prior to development.
■ Attachments:
Staff Review and Disclosure Statements
Minutes of Planning Commission Hearing
Location Map
Recommended Action: Staff recommends approval. Planning Commission
recommends approval.
Submitting Department/Agency: Planning Departmen#
City Manager. Jam. , "
BEACH Trustees of First Presbvterian Church
nlvn nl-c n..—t.
R7.5
A24
�Al2
R20
A1�
lnwy rXh foWMom P.M. 0
1Pa�� Piwnwbn a� P(W-: unrtry�
01
,12 OR OR
R7.6a 4
OR i
02' :S
FS'�EEt
3(,th OR
mz OR
z
02
35tH
02 OR
A,
REQUEST:
Conditional Use Permit (Columbarlum)
ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION: 300 36`" Street
OR
OR.
CUP for Columbarlum
8
January 9, 2013 Public Hearing
APPLICANT & PROPERTY OWNER:
TRUSTEES OF
FIRST
PRESBYTERIAN
CHURCH OF
VIRGINIA BEACH
STAFF PLANNER: Karen Prochilo
GPIN:
ELECTION DISTRICT:
SITE SIZE:
AICUZ:
24189386440000
BEACH
83,013 square feet
70 - 75 dB DNL
BACKGROUND / DETAILS OF PROPOSAL
The applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit to construct a columbarium, associated with the existing
church on the property. The columbarium will be located within a side lawn enclosed by a 44 -inch high
brick wall on the northeast corner of the property. The columbarium will be comprised of two columbarium
walls 6'-0" in height. The outer columbarium wall will contain 460 niches and the inner columbarium wall
will contain 260 niches for the internment of human cremains. A landscaped brick plaza will be
constructed with garden benches facing the niches. Low lighting will be provided for security purposes.
The design of the columbarium walls will mimic the building materials already on the site. The
columbarium walls will consist of block construction faced with brick to match the existing church and
topped with a solid stone "capstone". The front of each niche will be granite.
LAND USE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
EXISTING LAND USE: church with parking lot
TRUSTEES OF FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
OF VIRGINIA BEACH
Agenda Item 8
Page 1
SURROUNDING LAND North: . 36th Street
USE AND ZONING: . Office building / 0-2 Office District
South: 0 Single-family dwelling / A-12 Apartment District
East: . Pacific Avenue
• Hotel and parking / OR Ocean Front Resort District
West: . Sea Pines Road
• Apartments / A-12 Apartment District
NATURAL RESOURCE AND
CULTURAL FEATURES: There are no significant environmental features associated with this site.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The site is located within an area that the Comprehensive Plan designates as
Urban Area / Resort Strategic Growth Area (SGA) 8. There are no specific recommendations pertaining to the
area of the Resort SGA within which the church is located. In general, the recommendations of the
Comprehensive Plan for Urban Areas, as well as the 'guiding principles' for the City's SGAs, are applicable to
this site: efficient use of land resources; full use of urban services; compatible mixes of uses to live, work, play,
learn, shop, exercise and relax; a range of transportation options; and, creation of a human pedestrian -
oriented scale with safe and attractive urban design. The existing church plays an important cultural role in this
area, but also plays an important urban design role, as it is a 'oasis of green' located in a area dominated by
buildings and parking. Accordingly, consistent with the design guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan, as well
as the Plan's recommendations regarding open space and quality of life, the design of the columbarium must
be sensitive to the need to maintain the role of the subject site as an 'oasis of green.'
IMPACT ON CITY SERVICES
MASTER TRANSPORTATION PLAN (MTP) / CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP): There is no
traffic volume or safety related concerns as a result of this proposed use.
HEALTH DEPARTMENT: No comments.
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CENTER: All existing trees along 36th Street and Pacific Avenue must be
protected and remain.
EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION
The applicant's request to have a columbarium on the subject site is acceptable. The proposed use will
generate little activity beyond what is normally associated with a church. The proposed location of the
columbarium is inconspicuous from any public rights-of-way. The project's design and materials will blend
with the existing church. The columbarium walls will resemble another brick garden wall as one passes by
TRUSTEES OF FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
OF VIRGINIA BEACH
Agenda Item 8
Page 2
the site. The applicant has retained the existing trees as part of the design and will enhance the area by
supplementing the area around the columbarium with additional landscaping.
The applicant has submitted a detailed landscape plan for the area around the columbarium. The plan
depicts trees, shrubs and low growing plants and flowers
Staff recommends approval of this request with the conditions below.
CONDITIONS
1. The location of the columbarium shall be limited to that shown on the submitted plan, which has been
exhibited to the City Council and is on file in the Planning Department.
2. The columbarium walls shall complement the exterior building materials of the existing church in color
and material. The walls shall be substantially in conformance with the drawing entitled "First
Presbyterian Church Columbarium, Columbarium Wall Perspective," which has been exhibited to the
City Council and is on file in the Planning Department.
3. Grading and drainage plans for the columbarium shall be submitted to and approved by the
Development Service Center prior to development.
NOTE: Further conditions may be required during the administration of applicable City Ordinances and
Standards. Any site plan submitted with this application may require revision during detailed site plan
review to meet all applicable City Codes and Standards. All applicable permits required by the City
Code, including those administered by the Department of Planning / Development Services Center and
Department of Planning /Permits and Inspections Division, and the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy, are required before any uses allowed by this Use Permit are valid.
The applicant is encouraged to contact and work with the Crime Prevention Office within the Police
Department for crime prevention techniques and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
(CPTED) concepts and strategies as they pertain to this site.
TRUSTEES OF FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
OF VIRGINIA BEACH
Agenda Itern 8
Page 3
AERIAL OF SITE LOCATION
TRUSTEES OF FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
OF VIRGINIA BEACH
Agenda Item 8
Page 4
1
I
Z
EXISTING SITE SURVEY
TRUSTEES OF FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
OF VIRGINIA BEACH
Agenda Item 8
Page 5
w
D
Z
w
a
LL
a
a
PROPOSED CONCEPT AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
TRUSTEES OF FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
OF VIRGINIA BEACH
Agenda Item 8
Page 6
a
>y
�x
W
W S
02
WO
a ~
133HIS H19£
W-4
OW
K U
4Qi
LL C
'rz
J
J
Q fn
y W
S
�=
70
J K
U y
=�
N
ion
a
o
W
Q
a
a ra
�
~
J Z
Q
3
m W
.q K
H
N
w w
❑
J
Z
O
aOC
a�a
CL
_
Q
I
W
Z
o
a
a
V
QO
w
W J
120
CL
t
w
�
2
Wcn
O W
Q,
G
Q
O
p
¢v)
=3V
(7 J=
J
a
O
LL
W
�3ry
a
u
lio
w
D
Z
w
a
LL
a
a
PROPOSED CONCEPT AND LANDSCAPE PLAN
TRUSTEES OF FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
OF VIRGINIA BEACH
Agenda Item 8
Page 6
r - db
M ''o
Agr
J
4 �
w -
JAME
PHOTOGRAPH OF PROPOSED LOCATION
TRUSTEES OF FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
OF VIRGINIA BEACH
Agenda Item 8
Page 8
r,
t
1
PHOTOGRAPH OF PROPOSED LOCATION
TRUSTEES OF FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
OF VIRGINIA BEACH
Agenda Item 8
Page 8
BEACH Trustees of First PresbN-terian Church
'\ lap M -S Rn •a ry h
_ - 0� 7�
A44 c �
R20 ..0�
Z
5-(rt2EE i
0-2' t
'Zoning with Conditions Proffers, Open CUP for Columbarium
Space Promotion or PDH -2 Overlays
ZONING HISTORY
# DATE REQUEST
ACTION
1 10/26/1999 Conditional Use Permit (Religious Facility)
Approved
2 09/26/1988 Conditional Use Permit (mini -golf)
Approved
3 05/08/1989 Conditional Use Permit (church expansion)
Approved
TRUSTEES OF FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
OF VIRGINIA BEACH
Agenda Item 8
Page 9
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPLICANT DISCLOSURE
If the applicant is a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or other unincorporated
organization, complete the following:
1. List the applicant name followed by the names of all officers, members, trustees,
partners, etc. below: (Attach list if necessary)
Trustees: Judith Dockery (former Planning Commissioner); Joseph W. Hood, Jr.,;
David Koch; Frances Maragon; May Henry Midgett; Thomas M. Ward, Jr.
2. List all businesses that have a parent -subsidiary' or affiliated business entity2
relationship with the applicant: (Attach list if necessary)
❑ Check here if the applicant is NOT a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or
other unincorporated organization.
PROPERTY OWNER DISCLOSURE
Complete this section only if property owner is different from applicant.
If the property owner is a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or other
unincorporated organization, complete the following:
1. List the property owner name followed by the names of all officers, members,
trustees, partners, etc. below: (Attach list if necessary)
2. List all businesses that have a parent -subsidiary' or affiliated business entity2
relationship with the applicant: (Attach list if necessary)
❑ Check here if the property owner is NOT a corporation, partnership, firm, business,
or other unincorporated organization.
& See next page for footnotes
Conditional Use Penult Application
Mega 9 of 10
Revised 9112004
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
TRUSTEES OF FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
OF VIRGINIA BENCH
Agenda Iton 8
Page 10
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES
List all known contractors or businesses that have or will provide services with respect
to the requested property use, including but not limited to the providers of architectural
services, real estate services, financial services, accounting services and legal
services: (Attach list if necessary)
Sykes, Bourdon, Ahem & Levy, P.C.
WPL
' "Parent -subsidiary relationship" means "a relationship that exists when one
corporation directly or indirectly owns shares possessing more than 50 percent of the
voting power of another corporation.* See State and Local Government Conflict of
Interests Act, Va. Code § 2.2-3101.
Z "Affiliated business entity relationship" means "a relationship, other than
parent -subsidiary relationship, that exists when (i) one business entity has a
controlling ownership interest in the other business entity, (ii) a controlling owner in
one entity is also a controlling owner in the other entity, or (iii) there is shared
management or control between the business entities. Factors that should be
considered in determining the existence of an affiliated business entity relationship
include that the same person or substantially the same person own or manage the two
entities; there are common or commingled funds or assets; the business entities share
the use of the same offices or employees or otherwise share activities, resources or
personnel on a regular basis; or there is otherwise a claw working relationship
between the entities! See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, Va.
Code § 2.2-3101.
CERTIFICATION: I certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate.
I understand that, upon receipt of notification (postcard) that the application has been
scheduled for public hearing, I am responsible for obtaining and posting the required
sign on the subject property at least 30 days prior to the scheduled public hearing
according to the instructions in this package.
First Presb n hur f Virginia Beach
By:
Applicants gnature rint Name
Property Owners Signature (if different than applicant) Print Name
Comftonal Use Permit Appketan
Pape 10 of 10
Revised 9111004
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
TRUSTEES OF FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
OF VIRGINIA BEACH
Agenda Item 8
Page 11
Item #8
Trustees of First Presbyterian Church of Virginia Beach
Page 2
LIVAS
AYE
REDMOND
AYE
RIPLEY
AYE
RUCINSKI
AYE
RUSSO
AYE
THORNTON
AYE
By a vote of 10-0, the Commission approved item 8 by consent.
Eddie Bourdon appeared before the Commission on behalf of the applicant.
Item #8
Trustees of First Presbyterian
Conditional Use Permit
30036 th Street
District 6
Beach
January 9, 2013
CONSENT
Church of Virginia Beach
An application of Trustees of First Presbyterian Church of Virginia Beach for a Conditional
Use Permit (Columbarium) on property located at 300 36th Street, District 6, Beach. GPIN:
24189386440000
CONDITIONS
1. The location of the columbarium shall be limited to that shown on the submitted plan,
which has been exhibited to the City Council and is on file in the Planning Department.
2. The columbarium walls shall complement the exterior building materials of the existing
church in color and material. The walls shall be substantially in conformance with the
drawing entitled "First Presbyterian Church Columbarium, Columbarium Wall
Perspective," which has been exhibited to the City Council and is on file in the Planning
Department.
3. Grading and drainage plans for the columbarium shall be submitted to and approved by
the Development Service Center prior to development.
NOTE: Further conditions may be required during the administration of applicable
City Ordinances and Standards. Any site plan submitted with this application may
require revision during detailed site plan review to meet all applicable City Codes and
Standards. All applicable permits required by the City Code, including those
administered by the Department of Planning / Development Services Center and
Department of Planning / Permits and Inspections Division, and the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy, are required before any uses allowed by this Use Permit are
valid.
The applicant is encouraged to contact and work with the Crime Prevention Office
within the Police Department for crime prevention techniques and Crime Prevention
Through Environmental Design (CPTED) concepts and strategies as they pertain to
this site.
AYE 10 NAY 0
BERNAS
FELTON
AYE
HENLEY
AYE
HODGSON
AYE
HORSLEY
AYE
ABS 0 ABSENT 1
ABSENT
IV
jh;
a
CM
^'NiA�OEq�
ro
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM: BAKER ROAD SENIORS, LLC (Applicant & Owner), Change of Zoning,
Conditional A-36 Apartment to Conditional A-24 Apartment. 544 Baker Road
(GPIN 1468308528). BAYSIDE DISTRICT.
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2013
■ Background:
A Change of Zoning from 1-1 Light Industrial District to Conditional A-36
Apartment District was granted by the City Council on August 28, 2007. The
proffers of that zoning change allowed the development of two three- and four-
story buildings with up to 108 age -restricted, multifamily units with a density of 19
units per acre. Amenities proposed as part of that project included a swimming
pool, a gazebo, a small park, and garden plots. At that time, the applicant
indicated that the multifamily units would be offered for sale to seniors at least 55
years and older.
The applicant is now requesting a Change of Zoning request from Conditional A-
36 to Conditional A-24 that will result in the following: (1) a revision to the site
layout and building design, (2) a reduction in number of units and unit type (rental
units instead of owner -occupied), and (3) the applicant's voluntary removal of the
age -restriction.
■ Considerations:
The proposal includes the development of a 96 -unit apartment community,
resulting in a density of 17 units per acre. The applicant anticipates applying for
Housing Tax Credits, which will allow the applicant to offer rents that are kept to
60 percent of area median income. The unit mix is proposed as 66 two-bedroom
units and 30 three-bedroom units (with rents in the mid-$800/month) and up to 10
fully accessible ADA -compliant units. Proposed amenities include a passive
recreation area, a playground, and an upscale community center with a
swimming pool, a fitness room, and a laundry room.
The proposed site layout orients activities towards Baker Road, including
vehicular ingress/egress. As Paca Lane is a street lined with single-family
dwellings, no vehicular ingress/egress is proposed from the apartments onto
Paca Lane. Adjacent to Paca Lane, a passive recreation area will contain a dog
park as well as any required stormwater management facilities. This open space
will serve as a buffer for much of the existing homes along Paca Lane. The
northernmost apartment building is approximately 40 feet to the closest, existing
dwelling on Paca Lane, while the majority of the units will be at least 125 feet
Baker Road Seniors, LLC
Page 2 of 3
from the Paca Lane right-of-way. The applicant indicates that the buildings will
be EarthCrafto certified, and thus, will be very energy-efficient. 'Energy Star'
windows, water heaters, and appliances are all proposed as well as
'WaterSense' fixtures.
The proffered elevation depicts a 44 -foot tall, three-story building with exterior
building materials comprised of a mix of brick and vinyl — 80 percent and 20
percent respectively. The color scheme reflects a neutral palate of reddish -brown
brick, tan vinyl siding with white vinyl shake, and white trim accents. The use of
shutters and keystones over the windows add architectural interest. A proffer
indicates that any signage will be monument style utilizing brick to match the
apartment buildings.
The proposal, as proffered, is compatible to the single-family neighborhood to the
north and the townhouse community on the south side of Baker Road. The
submitted proffers provide a high level of certainty that the project will be a
quality addition to this area.
There was no opposition to the request.
■ Recommendations:
The Planning Commission placed this item on the Consent Agenda, passing a
motion by a recorded vote of 10-0, to recommend approval of this request to the
City Council with the following proffers:
PROFFER 1:
When developed, the Grantor shall develop the Property in substantial conformity
with the conceptual site plan prepared by Cox, Kliewer & Company, P.C., entitled
"Baker Road Apartments — Preliminary Site Plan," dated October 25, 2012 (the
"Concept Plan"), a copy of which on file with the Planning Department and has
been exhibited to the City Council.
PROFFER 2:
When developed, the Grantor shall develop the structures on the Property in
substantial conformity with the building elevation prepared by Cox, Kliewer &
Company, P.C., entitled "Baker Road Apartments — Elevation," which is dated
October 25, 2012 (the "Building Elevation), a copy of which on file with the Planning
Department and has been exhibited to the City Council.
PROFFER 3:
The number of multi -family residential units developed on the property shall not
exceed ninety-six (96).
PROFFER 4:
Freestanding signage for the apartment complex located on the Property, when
developed, shall be monument style, no larger than eight feet (8') in height, and
Baker Road Seniors, LLC
Page 3of3
shall have a brick base complementary in color to the brick used for the apartment
buildings.
■ Attachments:
Staff Review and Disclosure Statements
Minutes of Planning Commission Hearing
Location Map
Recommended Action: Staff recommends approval. Planning Commission
recommends approval.
Submitting Department/Agency: Planning Department
City Manager: S I& ,-�
[EMPSVILLE 13
Baker Road Seniors, LLC
s�
&R7,6-
8l*
Bl- January 9, 2013 Public Hearing
A� s R7.5
62 B2 rzrs APPLICANT & PROPERTY OWNER:
BAKER ROAD
82 SENIORS, LLC
R7.5
Ale
.,B'-
12 1
Co dh/onal Zoning Change from CondlNonal A-36 to Condldonal A-24
STAFF PLANNER: Carolyn A.K. Smith
REQUEST:
Change of Zoning from Conditional A-36 Apartment District (approved by the City Council) on August 28,
2007, to Conditional A-24 Apartment District.
ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION: Property located on the north side of Baker Road, approximately 510 feet east
of Newtown Road.
GPIN: ELECTION DISTRICT: SITE SIZE: AICUZ:
146830852800000 KEMPSVILLE 5.446 acres Less than 65 dB DNL
BACKGROUND / DETAILS OF PROPOSAL
A Conditional Change of Zoning from 1-1 Light Industrial District to A-36 Apartment District was granted by
the City Council on August 28, 2007. This approval permitted the development of two three- and four-
story buildings with up to 108 age -restricted, multifamily units with a density of 19 units per acre.
Amenities proposed as part of that project included a swimming pool, a gazebo, a small park, and garden
plots. At that time, the applicant indicated that the multifamily units would be offered for sale to seniors at
least 55 years and older. As the request did not meet the Zoning Ordinance definition of "senior housing"
— 62 years or older, a Conditional Use Permit was not required.
This current Change of Zoning request from Conditional A-36 to Conditional A-24 consists of the
following: (1) a revision to the site layout and building design, (2) a reduction in number of units and unit
type (rental units instead of owner -occupied), and (3) the applicant's voluntary removal of the age -
restriction.
This new proposal includes the development of a 96 -unit apartment community, resulting in a density of
17 units per acre. The applicant anticipates applying for Housing Tax Credits, which will allow the
BAKER ROAD SENIORS, LLC
Agenda Item 13
Page 1
applicant to offer rents that are kept to 60 percent of area median income. The unit mix is proposed as 66
two-bedroom units and 30 three-bedroom units (with rents in the mid-$800/month) and up to 10 fully
accessible ADA -compliant units. Proposed amenities include a passive recreation area, a playground,
and an upscale community center with a swimming pool, a fitness room, and a laundry room.
The proposed site layout orients activities towards Baker Road, including vehicular ingress/egress. As
Paca Lane is a street lined with single-family dwellings, no vehicular ingress/egress is proposed from the
apartments onto Paca Lane. Adjacent to Paca Lane, a passive recreation area will contain a dog park as
well as any required stormwater management facilities. This open space will serve as a buffer for much of
the existing homes along Paca Lane. The northernmost apartment building is approximately 40 feet to
the closest, existing dwelling on Paca Lane, while the majority of the units will be at least 125 feet from
the Paca Lane right-of-way. The applicant indicates that the buildings will be EarthCrafe certified, and
thus, will be very energy-efficient. 'Energy Star' windows, water heaters, and appliances are all proposed
as well as 'WaterSense' fixtures.
The proffered elevation depicts a 44 -foot tall, three-story building with exterior building materials
comprised of a mix of brick and vinyl — 80 percent and 20 percent respectively. The color scheme reflects
a neutral palate of reddish -brown brick, tan vinyl siding with white vinyl shake, and white trim accents.
The use of shutters and keystones over the windows add architectural interest. A proffer indicates that
any signage will be monument style utilizing brick to match the apartment buildings.
LAND USE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
EXISTING LAND USE: Undeveloped wooded site
SURROUNDING LAND North: . Paca Lane
USE AND ZONING: • Single-family dwellings / R-7.5 Residential District
South: . Baker Road
• Townhomes / A-18 Apartment District
East: • City property purchased for open space / R-7.5 Residential
District
West: . Window manufacturer & sales / 1-1 Light Industrial District
NATURAL RESOURCE AND The wooded site is located in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. A portion
CULTURAL FEATURES: of the property has been cleared where Virginia Dominion Power
transmission tower and lines cross the site. There do not appear to be
any significant environmental or cultural features on the property.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the City as Suburban Area and contains policies to guide
and protect the overall character, economic value, and aesthetic quality of the stable neighborhoods in the
Suburban Area. Three key planning principles have been established in the Comprehensive Plan to guard
against possible threats to existing, stable residential areas: preserve neighborhood quality, create and
protect open spaces, and connect suburban mobility. Adherence to these principles requires that all new
development or redevelopment, whether residential or non-residential, either maintain or enhance the overall
development of the area. This can be accomplished through ensuring infill development, such as this site, be
compatible with surrounding uses, provide high quality and attractive of site and building design, improve
mobility for pedestrians and vehicles, promote environmental responsibility, enhance livability of the
BAKER ROAD SENIORS, LLC
Agenda Item 13
Page 2
community, and provide buffering of uses where appropriate with respect to type, size, intensity, and
relationship to the surrounding uses.
It should be noted that this site is one of three parcels generally identified in the City Council -adopted
Outdoors Plan as a Top Priority for acquisition through the City's Open Space Acquisition Program.
Specifically, the recommendation of the plan states: "Establish a community -sized park within the
southern Bayside/Amhurst area; an area densely developed with residential and commercial
development, yet void of basic active recreational opportunities for the community's residents." Public
Works Real Estate has been in contact with the property owner on several occasions since 2001;
however, the property owner has not indicated a desire to sell this site to the City.
IMPACT ON CITY SERVICES
MASTER TRANSPORTATION PLAN (MTP) /CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP): Baker Road in
the vicinity of this project is a two-lane undivided collector street. The MTP proposes a two-lane facility within a
70 foot right-of-way. A roadway CIP project has recently been completed for Baker Road to meet the MTP.
The Baker Road Extended (CIP 2-071) project provided for a two-lane collector street within a 70 foot right-of-
way from Bulls Bay Drive to just west of Holly Farms Drive and a signalized intersection at Witchduck Road.
Baker Road now connects from Newtown Road to Witchduck Road.
TRAFFIC:
Street Name
Present
Volume
Present Capacity
Generated Traffic
Tri -City Elementary
Baker Road
No Data
6,200 ADT 1 (Level
Existing Zoning — 376 ADT
Bayside Middle
996
Available
of Service "C") —
Proposed Land Use 3— 636 ADT
11,100 ADT'
(Level of Service
"E")
Average Daily Trips
2 as defined by 108 senior multifamily units
3 as defined by 96 apartment units
WATER: This site must connect to City water. There is an eight -inch City water main in both Baker Road and
Paca Lane.
SEWER: This site must connect to City sanitary sewer. There is an existing eight inch City gravity sanitary
sewer main in Paca Lane and an eight -inch City gravity sanitary sewer on Baker Road. There is also an
existing 10 -inch City gravity sanitary sewer main crossing through the property from Baker Road to Paca Lane.
Analysis of Pump Station 344 and the sanitary sewer collection system is required to ensure future flows can be
accommodated.
SCHOOLS:
School
Current Enrollment
Capacity
Generation
Change 2
Tri -City Elementary
1,426
1,503
18
18
Bayside Middle
996
1,176
7
7
BAKER ROAD SENIORS, LLC
Agenda Item 13
Page 3
Bayside High 1,803 1,895 10 10
"generation" represents the number of students that the development will add to the school
2 "change" represents the difference between generated students under the existing zoning and under the proposed zoning. The number
can be positive (additional students) or negative (fewer students).
EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION
The Change of Zoning from Conditional A-36 to Conditional A-24 for the development of
up to 96 apartment units is acceptable, subject to the submitted proffers and several minor revisions
suggested below.
In Staff's opinion, the lower density zoning is preferred, given the surrounding residential densities of R-
7.5 and A-18, and is more consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's land use policies for the Suburban
Area, which seeks to preserve neighborhood stability. The proposed development is also consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan's goals as provided in the `Housing and Neighborhoods Plan' section. The Plan
stresses the need to address future housing demand by providing an adequate supply of safe, decent,
attractive and diverse housing to a range of income groups, ages, cultures and household types including
owner -occupied and rental units and to implement ways to assist those requiring special housing.
A significant impact on the site is a 150 -foot wide Virginia Power easement that encumbers 2.412 acres
of the 5.501 -acre site. An exhibit depicting the location of the easement is included at the end of this
report. Only parking, pavement, stormwater management facilities, and landscaping are permitted within
the easement. All permanent structures must be outside the limits of the easement, making the site a
difficult to develop.
Some minor tweaks to the site layout have been discussed with the applicant and will be made prior to
City Council's consideration of this application. These adjustments include: a reduction of ingress/egress
points along Baker Road from two to one at a location acceptable to the Department of Public Works, and
the addition of a dedicated left turn lane into the site. As noted in the 2007 rezoning request, with only 20
vehicles expected to exit the site during a peak hour, one entrance can handle the traffic needs of the
site. In addition, Baker Road now connects Newtown Road to Witchduck Road, and thus, the number of
access points along Baker Road should be minimized in order for the roadway to function as designed. If
deemed necessary by the Fire Department, a second "emergency access only" entrance may be
installed. The applicant is also aware that right-of-way improvements may be required along Baker Road
and Paca Lane. Necessary improvements to be shown on the final site plan will be similar if not identical
to the approved construction plans for this site (associated with the previously approved development),
and will likely include pavement widening, curb and gutter, drainage, sidewalk, and street lighting.
Staffs conclusion is that this proposal, as proffered, will be a good neighbor for the single-family
neighborhood to the north and the townhouse community on the south side of Baker Road. The submitted
proffers provide a high level of certainty that the project will become a quality addition to this area.
PROFFERS
The following are proffers submitted by the applicant as part of a Conditional Zoning Agreement (CZA). The
applicant, consistent with Section 107(h) of the City Zoning Ordinance, has voluntarily submitted these
BAKER ROAD SENIORS, LLC
Agenda Item 13
Page 4
proffers in an attempt to "offset identified problems to the extent that the proposed rezoning is acceptable,"
(§107(h)(1)). Should this application be approved, the proffers will be recorded at the Circuit Court and serve
as conditions restricting the use of the property as proposed with this change of zoning.
PROFFER 1:
When developed, the Grantor shall develop the Property in substantial conformity with the conceptual site
plan prepared by Cox, Kliewer & Company, P.C., entitled "Baker Road Apartments — Preliminary Site Plan,"
dated October 25, 2012 (the "Concept Plan"), a copy of which on file with the Planning Department and has
been exhibited to the City Council.
PROFFER 2:
When developed, the Grantor shall develop the structures on the Property in substantial conformity with the
building elevation prepared by Cox, Kliewer & Company, P.C., entitled "Baker Road Apartments —
Elevation," which is dated October 25, 2012 (the "Building Elevation), a copy of which on file with the
Planning Department and has been exhibited to the City Council.
PROFFER 3:
The western vehicular access way to Baker Road as shown on the Site Plan shall be eliminated, unless
requested by the Fire Department as a secondary access to Baker Road during site plan review.
PROFFER 4:
The fence along Paca Lane depicted on the Site Plan shall be a six foot (6) tall ornamental, metal fence
installed five feet (5') from the Paca Lane right-of-way with Category I landscaping between the fence and
the right-of-way. This fence may also be extended along the Grantor's northern property line within the area
where Category 4 landscaping is depicted on the Site Plan.
PROFFER 5:
The number of multi -family residential units developed on the property shall not exceed ninety-six (96).
PROFFER 6:
Freestanding signage for the apartment complex located on the Property, when developed, shall be
monument style, no larger than eight feet (8') in height, and shall have a brick base complementary in color
to the brick used for the apartment buildings.
PROFFER 7:
Further conditions lawfully imposed by applicable development ordinances may be required by the Grantee
during detailed site plan and/or subdivision review and administration of applicable City Codes by all
cognizant City Agencies and departments to meet all applicable City Code requirements.
STAFF COMMENTS: The proffers listed above are acceptable as they dictate the level of quality of the
project.
The City Attorney's Office has reviewed the proffer agreement dated October 31, 2012, and found it to be
legally sufficient and in acceptable legal form.
BAKER ROAD SENIORS: UC
Agenda Item 13
Page 5
NOTE: Further conditions may be required during the administration of applicable City Ordinances and
Standards. Any site plan submitted with this application may require revision during detailed site plan
review to meet all applicable City Codes and Standards. All applicable permits required by the City
Code, including those administered by the Department of Planning / Development Services Center and
Department of Planning / Permits and Inspections Division, and the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy, are required before any uses allowed by this Change of Zoning are valid.
The applicant is encouraged to contact and work with the Crime Prevention Office within the Police
Department for crime prevention techniques and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design
(CPTED) concepts and strategies as they pertain to this site.
BAKER ROAD SENIORS, LLC
Agenda Item 13
Page 6
= 9Z58 -Of -89b; :NIJ9
SS NMV4OON00 HOM35 OVOH H3INV9 _. - .,`•G.% ,
cq5 z 1 I
e
F I r—'—•, '-- �4 1 e
iii .s�A
M 1
r'er
G
-lam
015l� ' +'F, a I•Y I 1 ( 13 �,s
Nil.
it
!73 !� i t l;Httf�,:a jl ,}, ° , , ti (•tel- - v �.:, ( � ..... '.
��iitt3tlat�iS9€ �I� I " +-— � `•��� 6Lai#! ,I.
F�
i
EXISTING SITE SURVEY
BAKER ROAD SENIORS, LLC
Agenda Item 13 zz
Page 8la
.do
-P i
is
a
CL(Z Sc 89%01M VgWjdl H3VNVml0bn
LJ
2
O
Ovca Nlwe
--
U
N
W
S9INddW03 NOSMV] 3Hl
U
w m
N > 6
LL
o
f!)
F
NVId 311S A8VNIW113Nd- 31N9Wl8Vcl`d abO8 N3Nd9
I
o Pait
N Q
tr b e
M.bS_D5.9ZS
iiY Q {� rVwis
moi-
r _
°11111 r
a
LJ
LJ
2
O
--
U
N
W
U
w m
N > 6
LL
o
f!)
F
ZLL<i¢
R
(3
N Q
^
lo
NZ�U
Z70
M Z
fb
fLaOWQy
Z3:o
a
to O
wcc
;)
O
h
N
z
W
in
W
�
�y
O4
�t
wo
z
o�
�<
Z
�Ozy
O
oa
ao
w>
wr
xo
Wo
om
f
.Q
�W
Fg
h
VW
�i as
C7N
<a
as
0o
�m
iiY Q {� rVwis
moi-
r _
°11111 r
Z
.5
a_
uj
H
r
oe
Z`
W
ad
a
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
BAKER ROAD SENIORS, LLC
Agenda Item 13
Page 9
--
0
o
�
_
A CdZ
I u
Z
.5
a_
uj
H
r
oe
Z`
W
ad
a
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
BAKER ROAD SENIORS, LLC
Agenda Item 13
Page 9
0
LLb(
L.cz a aaa ,ia:� v.w Asn �ue3a wnc,n,e
7V(1H tl3'h a
SDINVdWOD NOSMV� 31-11
NOUVn313 - S1N3WlaVdV aV06 83WO
ELEVATION DRAWINGS OF PROPOSED
BUILDINGS
BAKER ROAD SENIORS, LLC
Agenda Item 13
Page 10
U
J
a
Q
2
J
m
Q
w w2
V
�
SZZw
H
_
(r
m,
W
I
�Yt
cog>
QOZYH_
W—QS
UQO =
z
cr cc Z
Om>
ZY
Jm3
H O
J
W" e�QZZQ
pp
m
J
_7
F
N
M>>,
Z'
Q m
W
m
H
N
ELEVATION DRAWINGS OF PROPOSED
BUILDINGS
BAKER ROAD SENIORS, LLC
Agenda Item 13
Page 10
ZONING HISTORY
#
DATE
REQUEST
ACTION
1
07/05/11
MOD (church)
Granted
05/11/10
CUP (religious use)
Granted
08/14/07
CUP (religious facility)
Granted
04/10/07
CUP (vocational school)
Granted
07/11/06
CUP (church)
Granted
01/11/05
CUP (mini -storage)
Granted
07/13/04
CUP (church with childcare facility)
Granted
05/13/03
CUP church
Granted
2
09/11/07
SVR
Withdrawn
3
08/28/07
REZ 1-1 to Conditional A-36
Granted
4
06/12/07
CUP car wash
Granted
5
10/24/00
CUP(housing for seniors/disabled
Granted
6
02/01/00
CUP motor vehicle rental
Granted
7
05/22/89
CUP auto repair
Granted
BAKER ROAD SENIORS, LLC
Agenda Item 13
Page 11
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 11
APPLICANT DISCLOSURE
If the applicant is a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or other unincorporated
organization, complete the following:
1. List the applicant name followed by the names of all officers, members, trustees,
partners, etc. below: (Attach list if necessary)
The Lawson Companies, Inc. - Directors:
Steven E. Lawson; Robert R. Lawson; Michael A. Lawson; Jeffry A. Lawson; John Dale Terry; Carl
—L—Hardee ._
2. List all businesses that have a parent -subsidiary' or affiliated business entity2
relationship with the applicant: (Attach list if necessary)
The Lawson Companies, Inc.; The R.A. Lawson Corp. t/a Lawson Homes; Lawson Realty
Corporation; Lawson Asset Management, Inc.; Multifamily Mortgage Lending, LLC
❑ Check here if the applicant is NOT a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or
other unincorporated organization.
PROPERTY OWNER DISCLOSURE
Complete this section only if property owner is different from applicant.
If the property owner is a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or other
unincorporated organization, complete the following:
1. List the property owner name followed by the names of all officers, members,
trustees, partners, etc. below: (Attach list if necessary)
Baker Road Seniors, LLC - Directors: Steven E. Lawson; Robert R. Lawson; Michael A. Lawson;
Jeffry A. Lawson; Cynthia B. Clifton; Claremont J. (Jack) Clifton Jr.; Carl L. Hardee
. List all businesses that have a parent -subsidiary' or affiliated business entity,
relationship with the applicant: (Attach list if necessary)
Same as above.
❑ Check here if the property owner is NOT a corporation, partnership, firm,
business, or other unincorporated organization.
& ` See next page for footnotes
O
1M-01
V
O
N
O
Does an official or employee of the City of Virginia Beach have an interest in the fit
subject land? Yes ❑ No ✓❑
If yes, what is the name of the official or employee and the nature of their interest?
0
Conditional Rezoning Application
Page 11 of 12
Revised 11116/2006
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
BAKER ROAD SENIORS, LLC
Agenda Item 13
Page 12
Film 0
A
O
V
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES
List all known contractors or businesses that have or will provide services with respect
to the requested property use, including but not limited to the providers of architectural
services, real estate services, financial services, accounting services, and legal
services --(Attach list if necessary)
A�chitectiiral-Services` Cox, Kliewer & Co.
Legal: Williams Mullen
All Other Services: TBD
' "Parent -subsidiary relationship" means "a relationship that exists when one
corporation directly or indirectly owns shares possessing more than 50 percent of the voting
power of another corporation." See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, Va.
Code § 2.2-3101.
2 "Affiliated business entity relationship" means "a relationship, other than parent -
subsidiary relationship, that exists when (i) one business entity has a controlling ownership
interest in the other business entity, (ii) a controlling owner in one entity is also a controlling
owner in the other entity, or (iii) there is shared management or control between the business
entities. Factors that should be considered in determining the existence of an affiliated
business entity relationship include that the same person or substantially the same person
own or manage the two entities; there are common or commingled funds or assets; the
business entities share the use of the same offices or employees or otherwise share activities,
resources or personnel on a regular basis; or there is otherwise a close working relationship
between the entities." See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, Va. Code §
2.2-3101.
CERTIFICATION: I certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate.
I understand that, upon receipt of notification (postcard) that the application has been scheduled for
public hearing, I am responsible for obtaining and posting the required sign on the subject property at
least 30 days prior to the scheduled public hearing according to the instructions in this package. The
undersigned also consents to entry upon the subject property by employees of the Department of
Planning to photograph and view the site for purposes of processing and evaluating this application.
Steven E. Lawson
Applicant's Signatur'Y Print Name
President of The Lrason Companies
Steven E. Lawson
Property Owner's Signature (if different than applicant) Print Name
Panager of Baker Road Seniors, LLC
Conditional Rezoning Application
Page 12 of 12
Revised 7/312007
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
BAKER ROAD SENIORS, LLC
Agenda Item 13
Page 13
Item #13
Baker Road Seniors, L.L.C.
Change of Zoning
544 Baker Road
District 4
Bayside
January 9, 2013
CONSENT
An application of Baker Road Seniors, L.L.C. for a Change of Zoning from Conditional A-36
Apartment District (approved by the City Council) on August 28, 2007, to Conditional A-24
Apartment District on property located at 544 Baker Road, District 4, Bayside. GPIN:
146830852800000.
PROFFERS
The following are proffers submitted by the applicant as part of a Conditional Zoning
Agreement (CZA). The applicant, consistent with Section 107(h) of the City Zoning
Ordinance, has voluntarily submitted these proffers in an attempt to "offset identified
problems to the extent that the proposed rezoning is acceptable," (§107(h)(1)). Should this
application be approved, the proffers will be recorded at the Circuit Court and serve as
conditions restricting the use of the property as proposed with this change of zoning.
PROFFER 1:
When developed, the Grantor shall develop the Property in substantial conformity with the
conceptual site plan prepared by Cox, Kliewer & Company, P.C., entitled "Baker Road
Apartments — Preliminary Site Plan," dated October 25, 2012 (the "Concept Plan"), a copy
of which on file with the Planning Department and has been exhibited to the City Council.
PROFFER 2:
When developed, the Grantor shall develop the structures on the Property in substantial
conformity with the building elevation prepared by Cox, Kliewer & Company, P.C., entitled
"Baker Road Apartments — Elevation," which is dated October 25, 2012 (the "Building
Elevation), a copy of which on file with the Planning Department and has been exhibited to
the City Council.
PROFFER 3:
The number of multi -family residential units developed on the property shall not exceed
ninety-six (96).
PROFFER 4:
Freestanding signage for the apartment complex located on the Property, when
developed, shall be monument style, no larger than eight feet (8') in height, and shall have
a brick base complementary in color to the brick used for the apartment buildings.
Item #13
Baker Road Seniors, L.L.C.
Page 2
PROFFER 5:
Further conditions lawfully imposed by applicable development ordinances may be required
by the Grantee during detailed site plan and/or subdivision review and administration of
applicable City Codes by all cognizant City Agencies and departments to meet all
applicable City Code requirements.
STAFF COMMENTS: The proffers listed above are acceptable as they dictate the level of
quality of the project.
The City Attorney's Office has reviewed the proffer agreement dated October 31, 2012, and
found it to be legally sufficient and in acceptable legal form.
NOTE: Further conditions may be required during the administration of applicable
City Ordinances and Standards. Any site plan submitted with this application may
require revision during detailed site plan review to meet all applicable City Codes and
Standards. All applicable permits required by the City Code, including those
administered by the Department of Planning / Development Services Center and
Department of Planning / Permits and Inspections Division, and the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy, are required before any uses allowed by this Change of
Zoning are valid.
The applicant is encouraged to contact and work with the Crime Prevention Office
within the Police Department for crime prevention techniques and Crime Prevention
Through Environmental Design (CPTED) concepts and strategies as they pertain to
this site.
AYE 10 NAYO
BERNAS
FELTON
AYE
HENLEY
AYE
HODGSON
AYE
HORSLEY
AYE
LIVAS
AYE
REDMOND
AYE
RIPLEY
AYE
RUCINSKI
AYE
RUSSO
AYE
THORNTON
AYE
ABS 0 ABSENT 1
ABSENT
By a vote of 10-0, the Commission approved item 13 by consent.
R.J. Nutter appeared before the Commission on behalf of the applicant.
�9
s
�p OUR NP���NS
In Reply Refer To Our File No, DF -8579
TO: Mark D. Stiles
FROM: B. Kay Wilson
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
INTER -OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
DATE: January 30, 2013
DEPT: City Attorney
DEPT: City Attorney
RE: Conditional Zoning Application; Baker Road Seniors, LLC
The above -referenced conditional zoning application is scheduled to be heard by the
City Council on February 12, 2013. 1 have reviewed the subject proffer agreement, dated
January 11, 2013 and have determined it to be legally sufficient and in proper legal form.
A copy of the agreement is attached.
Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter
further.
BKW/ka
Enclosure
cc: Kathleen Hassen
Document Prepared By:
Troutman Sanders LLP
222 Central Park Avenue, Suite 2000
Virginia Beach, VA 23462
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made as of this 11`h day of January, 2013, by
and between BAKER ROAD SENIORS, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company
("Grantor"); and the CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, a municipal corporation of the
Commonwealth of Virginia (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Grantor is the current owner of that certain property located in the City
of Virginia Beach, Virginia, identified by GPIN 1468-30-8528-0000, as more particularly
described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Property was previously re -zoned by the Virginia Beach City Council in
2007 from I-1 to Conditional A-36, subject to proffered development conditions recorded in the
Virginia Beach Circuit Court Clerk's Office as instrument number 20070907001227350 (the
"Prior Proffers"); and
WHEREAS, the Grantor has initiated an amendment to the Zoning Map of the City of
Virginia Beach, Virginia, by petition addressed to the Grantee, so as to change the classification
of the Property from Conditional A-36 to Conditional A-24; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement is intended to supersede and replace the Prior Proffers in its
entirety; and
WHEREAS, the Grantee's policy is to provide only for the orderly development of land
for various purposes, including mixed-use purposes, through zoning and other land development
legislation; and
WHEREAS, the Grantor acknowledges that competing and sometimes incompatible uses
conflict, and that in order to permit differing uses on and in the area of the subject Property and at
the same time to recognize the effects of the change and the need for various types of uses,
certain reasonable conditions governing the use of the Property for the protection of the
community that are not generally applicable to land similarly zoned Conditional A-24 are needed
to cope with the situation to which the Grantor's rezoning application gives rise; and
WHEREAS, the Grantor has voluntarily proffered in writing in advance of and prior to
the public hearing before the Grantee, as part of the proposed conditional amendment to the
GPIN NO. 1468-30-8528
201760570
Zoning Map, in addition to the regulations provided for in the existing A-24 zoning districts by
the existing City's Zoning Ordinance (CZO), the following reasonable conditions related to the
physical development, operation and use of the Property to be adopted as a part of said
amendment to the new Zoning Map relative to the Property, all of which have a reasonable
relation to the rezoning and the need for which is generated by the rezoning; and
WHEREAS, said conditions having been proffered by the Grantor and allowed and
accepted by the Grantee as part of the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, such conditions shall
continue in full force and effect until a subsequent amendment changes the zoning on the
Property covered by such conditions; provided, however, that such conditions shall continue
despite a subsequent amendment if the subsequent amendment is part of the comprehensive
implementation of a new or substantially revised zoning ordinance, unless, notwithstanding the
foregoing, these conditions are amended or varied by written instrument recorded in the Clerk's
Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia and executed by the record
owner of the subject Property at the time of recordation of such instrument; provided, further,
that said instrument is consented to by the Grantee in writing as evidenced by a certified copy of
the ordinance or resolution adopted by the governing body of the Grantee, after a public hearing
before the Grantee advertised pursuant to the provisions of the Code of Virginia, Section 15.2-
2204, which said ordinance or resolution shall be recorded along with said instrument as
conclusive evidence of such consent.
NOW THEREFORE, the Grantor, for itself, its successors, assigns, grantees, and other
successors in title or interest, voluntarily and without any requirement by or exaction from the
Grantee or its governing body and without any element of compulsion of quid pro quo for
zoning, rezoning, site plan, building permit or subdivision approval, hereby makes the following
declaration of conditions and restrictions which shall restrict and govern the physical
development, operation and use of the Property and hereby covenants and agrees that these
proffers (collectively, the "Proffers") shall constitute covenants running with the said Property,
which shall be binding upon the Property and upon all parties and persons claiming under or
through the Grantor, its heirs, personal representatives, assigns, grantees and other successors in
interest or title, namely:
1. When developed, the Grantor shall develop the Property in substantial conformity
with the conceptual site plan prepared by Cox, Kliewer & Company, P.C., entitled "Baker Road
Apartments — Preliminary Site Plan," dated October 25, 2012 (the "Concept Plan"), a copy of
which is on file with the Department of Planning and has been exhibited to the City Council.
2. When developed, the Grantor shall develop the structures on the Property in
substantial conformity with the building elevation prepared by Cox, Kliewer & Company, P.C.,
entitled "Baker Road Apartments — Elevation," which is dated October 25, 2012 (the "Building
Elevation"), a copy of which is on file with the Department of Planning and has been exhibited to
the City Council.
201760570 2
3. The western vehicular access way to Baker Road as shown on the Site Plan shall
be eliminated, unless requested by the Fire Department as a secondary access to Baker Road
during site plan review.
4. The fence along Paca Lane depicted on the Site Plan shall be a six foot (6) tall
ornamental, metal fence installed five feet (5) from the Paca Lane right-of-way with Category 1
landscaping between the fence and the right-of-way. This fence may also be extended along the
Grantor's northern property line within the area where Category 4 landscaping is depicted on the
Site Plan.
5. The number of multifamily residential units developed on the Property shall not
exceed ninety-six (96).
6. Freestanding signage for the apartment complex located on the Property, when
developed, shall be monument style, no larger than eight feet (8') in height, and shall have a
brick base complementary in color to the brick used for the apartment buildings.
7. Further conditions lawfully imposed by applicable development ordinances may
be required by the Grantee during detailed site plan and/or subdivision review and administration
of applicable City Codes by all cognizant City agencies and departments to meet all applicable
City Code requirements.
All references hereinabove to zoning districts and to regulations applicable thereto, refer
to the City Zoning Ordinance of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, in force as of the date the
conditional zoning amendment is approved by the Grantee.
The Grantor covenants and agrees that (1) the Zoning Administrator of the City of Virginia
Beach, Virginia shall be vested with all necessary authority on behalf of the governing body of
the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia to administer and enforce the foregoing conditions,
including (i) the ordering in writing of the remedying of any noncompliance with such
conditions, and (ii) the bringing of legal action or suit to ensure compliance with such conditions,
including mandatory or prohibitory injunction, abatement, damages or other appropriate action,
suit or proceedings; (2) the failure to meet all conditions shall constitute cause to deny the
issuance of any of the required building or occupancy permits as may be appropriate; (3) if
aggrieved by any decision of the Zoning Administrator made pursuant to the provisions of the
City Code, the CZO or this Agreement, the Grantor shall petition the governing body for the
review thereof prior to instituting proceedings in court; and (4) the Zoning Map shall show by an
appropriate symbol on the map the existence of conditions attaching to the zoning of the subject
Property on the map and that the ordinance and the conditions may be made readily available and
accessible for public inspection in the office of the Zoning Administrator and in the Department
of Planning and that they shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City
of Virginia Beach, Virginia and indexed in the name of the Grantor and Grantee.
201760570 3
[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank.
20176057v3
Separate Signature Page to Follow.]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Grantor executes this Agreement as of the
date first written above.
BAKER ROAD SENIORS, LLC,
a Virginia limited liability company
By:
Name: Steven E. fa son
Title: President Mana in Member
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, to -wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this pfN day of January 2013, by
S j E vE w E. LAW 5 0 N/' , who is personally known to me or has produced
as identification, in his capacity asPRE51DEW o17MANAGWI MEMISEaof Baker
Road Seniors, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company, on behalf of the company.
i
Notary Public
My Commission Expires: dhu,tg ,31 .2O 13
Registration Number: 3 5 8 6
[NOTARIAL SEAL/STAMP]
t/tW"-
20176057x3 5
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
ALL THAT certain lot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon,
lying, situate and being in the City of Virginia Beach, State of Virginia, and known, numbered
and designated Parcel B on that certain plat entitled "Subdivision of part of Lot 34, Plat Showing
a survey and division of Newsome Farm, Bayside Borough, Norfolk (SIC), Virginia", made by
Wilfred P. Large, Certified Land Surveyor, Norfolk, VA, March 23, 1976, and duly recorded in
the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia in Map Book 116,
at page 1.
LESS AND EXCEPT the following:
1) That portion of the property conveyed to the City of Virginia Beach by Deed and Deed of
Easement recorded in Deed Book 2793, page 2025.
2) That portion of the property acquired by the City of Virginia Beach for widening of Paca Lane
Road, as shown in Deed Book 2707, pages 1367 and 1368 and amended in Deed Book 2718,
pages 360 and 361.
201760570 6
W
Z
Z
Q
U)
�V)
uj
V
_Z
E
IL
� s
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGENDA ITEM
ITEM: MPB, INC., Conditional Change of Zoning, AG -1 & AG -2 Agricultural
Districts to Conditional 0-2 Office District, southwest corner of Princess Anne
Road and Elson Green Avenue (GPIN 2414137942). PRINCESS ANNE DISTRICT.
MEETING DATE: February 12, 2013
■ Background:
The City Council has deferred this item four times:
• November 13, 2012 (deferral to December 4);
• December 4, 2012 (deferral to December 11);
• December 11, 2012 (Indefinite Deferral - After this deferral, the applicant
requested that the item be rescheduled for the January 22, 2013 meeting.
Since the item had been indefinitely deferred with no known date of return
to City Council, the subject site was posted with new public notice signs
providing the date and time of the January 22 meeting and letters of
notification were mailed to the owners of the adjacent properties).
• January 22, 2013 (deferral to February 12).
The applicant requests a Change of Zoning for a 6.5 -acre site from AG -1 & AG -2
Agricultural Districts to Conditional 0-2 Office District for the purpose of
constructing a three-story medical office building. The proposed building will
contain approximately 60,000 square feet of leasable space intended for
physician groups. The applicant anticipates that the medical groups will include
general family practice, internal medicine, as well as an advanced imaging center
and/or urgent care unit.
■ Considerations:
The proposed building is located close to the right-of-way of Princess Anne
Road. Due, however, to the acquisition of right-of-way in 2009 for Princess Anne
Road, Phase VII (CIP Project 2-195), there is currently a gap between the right-
of-way line for Princess Anne Road and the existing pavement of Princess Anne
Road. The gap ranges between 85 feet at the northern end of the site to 260 feet
at the southern end of the site.
There is no parking placed between the side of the building facing Princess Anne
Road and the right-of-way. Parking areas are grouped around the three
remaining sides of the building. Bicycle and motorcycle parking are also
provided. A stormwater management facility with an aerator is located in the
southernmost corner of the site. The stormwater facility is designed not only for
MP13, Inc.
Page 2of3
management of the stormwater, but as an attractive feature for the site in
combination with surrounding landscaping, a bench, and multipurpose path.
Accenting the main entrance of the building is a large landscaped island with a
drop-off area consisting of colored stamped concrete. A portion of the drop-off
area is covered by a modern awning that extends to the front entry. The building
is contemporary in design. The exterior building materials are predominately
brick veneer, composite metal panel, and glass.
Revisions to the Proffered Building Plan: Prior to the January 26 City Council
meeting, a revised building elevation was proffered that reduced the number of
floors of the building from three to two. The reduction in building height was
accompanied by a reduction in floor area from 75,000 square feet to 60,000
square feet. All other aspects of the building plan remain the same.
Prior to the February 12 City Council meeting, the applicant submitted new
building renderings that maintains the overall design of the building but changes
the exterior building materials to a system of architectural composite metal
panels. The revised renderings are included in the attached staff report.
Revisions to the Proffered Site Plan: The reduction in floor area noted above
corresponds to a reduction in the portion of the site covered by the building as
well as a reduction in the number of parking spaces being provided on the site.
As a result, 42 percent of the site is not covered by building, parking area, or
sidewalk access to the building. The walking trail around the stormwater pond is
included in the 42 percent open space, as it is recreational in nature.
The proposed rezoning of the subject property is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan's land use policies for the Transition Area.
There was no opposition to the request.
■ Recommendations:
The Planning Commission placed this item on the Consent Agenda, passing a
motion by a recorded vote of 11-0, to recommend approval of this request to the
City Council with the following proffers:
PROFFER 1:
When developed, Grantor shall develop the property including the building and
landscaping thereon, in substantial conformity with the Preliminary Site Plan
prepared by VHB, Inc. dated May 17, 2012, and titled "Munden Property, Residual
Parcel B, Virginia Beach, Virginia", (the "Plan"), a copy of which has been is on file
with the Department of Planning and has been exhibited to the City Council.
PROFFER 2:
When developed, the building shown on the Plan shall be developed using
MPB, Inc.
Page 3of3
architectural designs and building materials shown on the six renderings by
Innovate Architecture — Interiors dated May 7, 2012, grouped together and titled
"Nimmo Medical Center, Virginia Beach, Virginia, "the "Renderings"), copies of
which are on file with the Department of Planning and have been exhibited to the
City Council.
PROFFER 3:
The signs on the buildings shown on the Plan shall be in substantial conformity with
the building signs shown in the Renderings.
PROFFER 4:
The monument signs shown on the Plan shall be in substantial conformity with the
sign plan by Artlite Signs and Awnings titled "Sentara Nimmo Medical Center,
Virginia Beach, VA.," (Drawing #052112 -AM -1 and #052112 -AM -2), a copy of which
sign plan is on file with the Department of Planning and has been exhibited to the
City Council.
PROFFER 5:
Further conditions lawfully imposed by applicable development ordinances may be
required by the Grantee during detailed site plan review and/or subdivision review
and administration of applicable City Codes by all cognizant City Agencies and
departments to meet all applicable City Code requirements.
■ Attachments:
Staff Review and Disclosure Statements
Minutes of Planning Commission Hearing
Location Map
Recommended Action: Staff recommends approval. Planning Commission
recommends approval.
Submitting Department/A ency: Planning Department
City Manager: a loot U�'
real estate acquisition is underway.
Generated Traffic
Existing Land Use —10 ADT
Proposed Land Use 3— 2,168
ADT (208 PM Peak Hour)
2 as defined by 6.5 acres of agricultural zoning
3 as defined by 60,000 SF medical office buildinc
s a
ce
eds the
The calculated trip generation for the proposed use of this siteeer n Nregluaed aI mi building
Traffic impact pact Studyer
for a traffic impact study to be required. As such, Traffic Engin
(TIS) to examine:
he
impacts to the existing signalized intersection at Princess Anne Road, as well as toe relation
o The P
proposed improved intersection,
o Queue lengths at the in rest
°nearest the intersection
and Princess Anne oa
f Elson Green Avenue
to the proposed exit -only driveway
' d September 25, 2012, concluded that the proposed development does not significantly
ll not
The TIS submltte P reviewed this study, and agrees
opera at the existing or future signaTraffic Engineering ng re and that queue lengths nd agrees
as
impact the traffic P exit -only driveway. improvements
impact the operation of the proposed
su
substantially with the conclusions and does not foresee the need for significant right-of-way
a result of the proposed rezoning.
required to comply with City of Virginia Beach Public Works Standards for width, radii,
All entrances hcdistance, etc.
throat length, sight
WATER: This site must connect to City water. There is a 10 -inch City water line in Princess Anne Road and a
10 -inch City water line in Elson Green Avenue. pump station service
n any
is not
SEWER: City sanitary sewer does not and 626 front on are is adjacent to thiste and this es to plansandbonds are required for
6hydraulic analysis of selected pump station to serve this
area. Pump Station service areas 615
extension of sanitary sewer system. An system
engineering
sanitary sewer collection system is required to ensure future flows can be accommodated an o
site and the sa ry modifications.
determine any required system
e er the subject property is adjacent to
MWATER: The applicant will coordinate all drainage and easstot
edge of management design andthe east
STOR y ro ects. The east edg
project. A permanent utility easement is shown along
construction with adjacent Cit and other public p propos
utility work
the Princess Anne Road Phase h which is indicafive of future prop
edge of the subject property,
MPB, INC.
Agenda Item 14
Page 3
Present
Present Capacity
TRAFFIC: Street Name
Volume
6,200 ADT (Level of
Elson Green
No recent
count data
Service "C")
(Level of
Avenueavailable.
9,900 ADT'
Service "D") ; Capacity
11,100 ADT Level of
Service "E"
Princess Anne
15,950 ADT
13,600 ADT (Level of
Service "C")
Road
15,000 ADT' (Level of
Service "D") - Capacity
16,200 ADT' (Level of
Service
Generated Traffic
Existing Land Use —10 ADT
Proposed Land Use 3— 2,168
ADT (208 PM Peak Hour)
2 as defined by 6.5 acres of agricultural zoning
3 as defined by 60,000 SF medical office buildinc
s a
ce
eds the
The calculated trip generation for the proposed use of this siteeer n Nregluaed aI mi building
Traffic impact pact Studyer
for a traffic impact study to be required. As such, Traffic Engin
(TIS) to examine:
he
impacts to the existing signalized intersection at Princess Anne Road, as well as toe relation
o The P
proposed improved intersection,
o Queue lengths at the in rest
°nearest the intersection
and Princess Anne oa
f Elson Green Avenue
to the proposed exit -only driveway
' d September 25, 2012, concluded that the proposed development does not significantly
ll not
The TIS submltte P reviewed this study, and agrees
opera at the existing or future signaTraffic Engineering ng re and that queue lengths nd agrees
as
impact the traffic P exit -only driveway. improvements
impact the operation of the proposed
su
substantially with the conclusions and does not foresee the need for significant right-of-way
a result of the proposed rezoning.
required to comply with City of Virginia Beach Public Works Standards for width, radii,
All entrances hcdistance, etc.
throat length, sight
WATER: This site must connect to City water. There is a 10 -inch City water line in Princess Anne Road and a
10 -inch City water line in Elson Green Avenue. pump station service
n any
is not
SEWER: City sanitary sewer does not and 626 front on are is adjacent to thiste and this es to plansandbonds are required for
6hydraulic analysis of selected pump station to serve this
area. Pump Station service areas 615
extension of sanitary sewer system. An system
engineering
sanitary sewer collection system is required to ensure future flows can be accommodated an o
site and the sa ry modifications.
determine any required system
e er the subject property is adjacent to
MWATER: The applicant will coordinate all drainage and easstot
edge of management design andthe east
STOR y ro ects. The east edg
project. A permanent utility easement is shown along
construction with adjacent Cit and other public p propos
utility work
the Princess Anne Road Phase h which is indicafive of future prop
edge of the subject property,
MPB, INC.
Agenda Item 14
Page 3
De artment of Public Health: Any n food service operations will require obtaining Food Service Operations
.
Permits.
EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION
mr-nons area
node. Thus,
This proposed medicate office is in close P, to the Red Mill mime automobile mobile commercial
encouraging
has an opportunity to reduce the number of noontime this proposal
pedestrian activity. the parking areas to the entrance sidewalk on
conceptual plan depicts internal pathways connecting path with the existing
The a in the connection of the internal
to
the stormwater BMP. There is the a ementary to tie their internal path into this sidewalk
n school to the seudth and Red Mill Commons retail center
Elson Green Avenue between applicant has agreed
the north across Princess Anne Road. The app setback. However,
he building area for better
deep
ear of osed to Princess Anne Road with minimal landscape
is oriented to Princess Anne Road and does not have
Ther are exp around the loading
the loading areas at the rear of the buildingparking spaces exceeds the amount
buffering. The applicant intends to install additional landscapingfpardue to the medical use within the
screening along Princess Anne oad. e needIn 'for the additiotion the nal spacesP
required. The applicant has indicated
building.
The
d building g ns. Theproposed
t an si ns exceeds the number
aovariance IforJtheus ger the zoning.
The number of monumen
theatible with the Comprehensive
applicant intends u either reduce from agricultural u turalber nt office use is comp
rezoning of the subject property
Plan's land use policies for the Transition Area. plan and the following proffers.
Staff recommends approval with the above revisions to the final site p PROFFERS
art of a Conditional Zoning Agreement (CZA)• The
rollers submitted by the applicant as table,"
The following are p ction 107(h) of the City Zoning Ordinance, has voluntarily submitted these
e
applicant, consistent{ oh,offset identified problems to the extent that the proposed rezoning
proffers in an attemp be approved, the proffers will be recorded f zoning* at the ircuit Court and serve
1 Should this applicationas proposed with this change
§107(h)( ))• the use of the property
as conditions restricting
the building in thereon, in
and landscaping
PROFFER 1: the property including VHB Inc. dated May 17, 2012, and titled
When developed, Grantor shall develop Site Plan prepared by a copy of which has been is on
with the Preliminary Virginia" (the "Plan"), substantial conformity Virginia Beach, Virg Council.
,'Munden Property, Residual Parcel B, 9
file with the Department of Planning and has been exhibited to the City
ed using architectural designs and
PROFFER 2: Interiors dated May 7, 2012,
When developed, the building
shown on the Plan Innlo ate Architecture — copies of
Vir inia, "the "Renderings P
building materials shown on the six renderings by Council.
ical Center, Virginia
grouped together and titled "NimMofPlann ng and have been cexhib ed to the City
which are on file with the Department
MPB, INC.
Agenda Item 14
Page 4
shown on the Plan shall be in substantial conformity with the building signs
PROFFER 3:
The signs on the buildings
shown in the Renderings. rmity Artlite
n Ian by
with the sig p#052112 -AM -1
PROFFER 4: Drawing
Virginia Beach, VA.," � and has been
The monument signs shown on
N ml mo Medical Center, Vi g co efoartment of Planning
Signs and Awnings titled "Sen Ian is on file with the Department
and #052112 -AM -2), a copy of which sign p
exhibited to the City Council. 6 the Grantee
be required by
PROFFER 5: imposed by applicable development ordinances may applicable City Codes by all
Further conditions lawfully
nts to meet all applicable City Code requirements.
Burin detailed site plan review and/ore subdivision review and administration o
g Agencies and departm
cognizant City Ag dictate the level of quality of the
STAFF COMMENTS: The proffers listed above are acceptable as they
project.31, 2012, and found it to be legally
s Office has d the proffer agreement dated May
The City Attorney' reviewe
sufficient and in acceptable legal form.
MPB, INC.
Agenda Item 14
Page 5
AERIAL OF SITE LOCATION
MPB, INC.
Agenda Item 14
Page 6
wa
(O" Goc
on
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
MPB, INC.
Agenda Item 14
Page 7
41,
I
PERSPECTIVE RENDERING
OF BUILDING (from southwest)
MPB, INC.
Agenda Item 14
Page 8
cr-
W
H
z
W
u
d
V
w
PERSPECTIVE DRAWING
OF BUILDING (from northwest)
MPB, INC.
,genda Item 14
Page 9
i
s�y '�rwY
W
W'
U
J
Q
u
W
N
J
H
z
W
rA
PERSPECTIVE DRAWING
OF BUILDING (from north)
MPB, INC.
Agenda Item 14
Page 10
PERSPECTIVE DRAWING
OF BUILDING (from southeast)
MPB, INC.
Agenda Item 14
Page 11
PERSPECTIVE DRAWING OF BUILDING
SHOWING LOCATION OF SIGNAGE (from west)
MPB, INC.
Agenda Item 14
Page 12
I
cifW
F—
Z
W
U
J
Q
V_
E
LLJ
I
`l
PERSPECTIVE DRAWING
OF BUILDING SHOWING SIGNAGE (from north)
MPB, INC.
Agenda Item 14
Page 13
PRINCESS ANNE
Nlap K-12_,
MpB, InC.
Zoning with sProffers. Open
OverL�ys
Space Promotion or PDH -2
# DATE
1 0:06/28/20
012
12/14/2010
010
009
003
001
964
1963
2 2011
3 10/0912007
08122/2006
08/2212006
4 03/25/2003
5 1211112001
6 111141995
_
G-1 & AG =Z to Cc�t�3dtiotlal 0-2
t2 ff'C}itl A property is located in Ala1Z Norse Lone
COC ditional Zona 5 65.10 1113 Ldn and Snir Area 2
ZONING HISTORY
Modification of Conditions
Conditional Use Permit (Fitness Facility)
Modification of Condition
Conditional Use Permit Flea Market)
Conditional Use Permit (Bulk Storage)
Conditional Use Permit (Automobile Repair)
Conditional Use Permit (Raceway)
RNCondi��
zoning (R -S 1 Residence Suburban to C -L 1 Limited
rcial)
losure
g (R-20 Residential wl PD -H2 to P-1
ation) Street closure
onal Rezoning (AG -1 & AG -2 to R-2- Residential
H2 overla
ng (B-2 Business to Conditional B-2 Business an
ional A-18 Apartment artment
innal UsPermit Business to Au omobilenService Station)
io
ACTION
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
I Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
Approved
roved
roved
MPB, INC.
Agenda Item 14
Page 14
pISGLOSURE STATEMENT
APPLICANT DISCLOSURE
applicant is a corporation, partnership, firm, business, or other unincorporated
o the app complete the following.
organization,
1. List the applicant name followed by the names of all officers, members, trustees, �ar�
partners, etc. below: (Attach fist if necessary)
SEE ATTACHED
tyz
parent -subsidiary' or affiliated business enti
relationship with the applicant
2. List all businesses that licae . Attach fist if necessary)
SEE ATTACHED
applicant is Nora corporation, partnership, firm, business, or(�✓)'
[� Check here if the app
other unincorporated organization.
PROPERTY OWNER DISCLOSURE applicant.
complete this section only if property owner is different
from s n ss, or other
if the property owner is a corporation, partnership,
unincorporated organization, complete the following:
u List the property owner name followed by the names of all officers, members,
trustees, partners, etc. below: (Attach list if necessary)
SEE ATTACHED
2. List all businesses that have a Parent -subsidiary or affiliated business entityz
relationship with the applicant: (Attach fist if necessary)
SEE ATTACHED
❑ wner is NOT a corporation, partnership, firm,
Check here if the property 01
1�
business, or other unincorporated organization_
& See next page for footnotes
of the City of Virginia Beach have an interest in the
Does an official or employee0
subject land? Yes Q No io ee and the nature of their interest?
if yes, what is the name of the official or emp Y
cof'(wo,a7 ReMling g4yp11cattan
Page 11 of 12
11,mled 11(16'2309
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
MPB, INC.
Agenda Item 14
Page 15
D S=CL0SU=RETATEMENT
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES rvices with
List all known contractors or businesses that
ng noa limited ve or will pr providers f arc -
services,
vide se
to the requested property use,
services, real estate services, financial services, accounting services, and legal
services: (Attach list if necessary)
}� SEE ATTACHED
"Parent -subsidiary relationship" means
°a relabonship that exists when one
on directly or indirectty owns shares possessing more than 50 percent. of the voting
another corporation " See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests
power ti Act, Va.
corporati
Code § 2.2-3101. parent -
one business entity relatiansop business entity has a coeans "a relationship, tntrrolling ownership
subsidiary relationship, that exists when (i)
interest in the other business entity, (ii) a controlling owner in one entity is also n controlling
owner in the other entity, or (iii) there is shared management or control between the business
person or substantially the same p
entities. Factors that should be considered in determining the existence of an affiliate
business entity relationship include that the some P gle or otherwise share activities,
ntities; there are common or commingled funds or assets; the
own or manage the two e
business entities share the use of the same offices or employe
Va. Code §
resources or Personnel on a regular basis; or there is otherwise a close working relationship
between the entities " See State and Local Government Conflict of interests Act,
22-3101.
is true a nd accurate.
CERTIFICATION: I certify that the information contained hereinfica on has been scheduled for
on recei t of notification (postcard) that the app at
stip the required ton the subject property
i understand that, up Psign
I responsible for obtaining and po 9 , he
public hearing, public hearing according to the in of ees of the tDepartmen t of
least 30 days prior to the scheduled p rt b emp Y ticatiom
Purposes of Processing
and evaluating this aPP
undersigned also consents to entry upon the subject property
Planning to photograph and view the site for p ppS Inc.
�♦ _ By:Robert A. Broermann, President
'C.■..d r c .� __ Print Name
Applic8rKs,ignature
Ow,nes's Si nature (if different than applicant}
Print Name
Property, g
Ccmdttiwrak Rezoning AppiiPage
12 of 12
Page 12 of 12
Revised 7f3/20V
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
MPB, INC.
Agenda Item 14
Page 16
i
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES
List all known contractors or businesses that have or will provide services with respect
to the
services, realted propty use, estate services, finaincdial services,limited
accounting services, and legal,
services: (Attach list if necessary)
SEE ATTACHE©
' "Parent -subsidiary reiationship" means "a relationship that exists when one
corporation directly or indirectly owns shares possessing more than 5o percent of the voting
power of another corporation." See State and Local Government Conflict of interests Act, Va.
Code § 2.2-3101.
' "Affiliated business entity relationship" means `a relationship, other than parent -
subsidiary relationship, that exists whenf(j) one
business
else entity
ones a cons also a ng ownership
rsh controlling
interest in the other business entity, (' )
owner in the other entity, or (iii) there is shared management or control between the business
entities, Factors that should be considered in determining the existence of an affiliated
business entity relationship include that the same person or substantially the same person
own or manage the two entities: there are common or commingled funds or assets; the
business entities share the use of the same offices or employees or otherwise share activities,
resources or personnel on a reguiar basis; or there is otherwise a close working relationship
between the entities." See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, Va. Code §
2.2-3101 _
CERTIFICATION: I ice tify that the information contained he°ein is true and accurate.
I understand that, upon receipt of notification (postcard) that the application has been scheduled for
public hearing, I am responsible for obtaining and posting the required sign on the subject preperfy at
least 30 days prior to the scheduled public hearing according to the instructions t the ,his pa ag of he
undersigned also consents to enbe o
entry upon the subject property Y employees
Planning to photograph and view the site for purposes of processing and evaluating this application.
licant's 6�gnature
propedy Owner's Signature (4 di iesert than applicant)
Print Name
Munden and Associate-, I -.P,
13yWilliam C Munden
Print Name
C�nd1f-onaRezvntng Appt;cauan
Pape 12 of 12
Revsed Ttat2007
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
MPB, INC.
Agenda Item 14
Page 17
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES
List all known contractors or businesses that have or will provide services with respect
to the requested property use, including but not limited to the providers of architectural
services, real estate services, financial services, accounting services, and legal
services: (Attach list if necessary)
SEE ATTACHED
1 "Parent -subsidiary relationship" means `a relationship that exists when one
corporation directly or indirectly owns shares possessing more than 50 percent of the voting
power of "her corporation." See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, Va.
Code § 2.2-3101.
2 'Affiliated business entity relationship" means "a relationship, other than parent -
subsidiary relationship, that exists when (1) one business entity has a controlling ownership
interest in the other business entity, (li) a controlling owner in one entity is also a control
owner in the other entity, or (ill) there is shared management or control between the business
entities. Factors that should be considered to determining the existence of an affiliated
business entity relationship include that the same person or substantially the same person
own or manage the two entities; there are common or commingled funds or assets; the
business entifies share the use of the same offices or employees or otherwise share activities,
resources or personnel on a regular basis: or there is otherwise a close working relationship
between the entities." See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, Va. Code §
2.2-3101.
CERTIFICATION: 1 certify that of tinformation
(postcard) that the application has been scheduled for
I understand that, upon receipt notticstionscheduled
public hearing, I am responsible for obtaining and pasting the required sign on the subject propany at
least 30 days prior to the scheduled public hearing according to the instrudio Department hisp�of
undersigned also consents to entry upon the subject property by employees
of Planning to photograph and view the site for purposes of processing and evaluating Nos application.
AppBca rVs Signature PrW Name
411147,1111 LOA/ Martha Susan Williamson Cruz
p s signaturedi rent ttrea114 &4&�ican Print Name
Conddionai Rozonap APWA Wn
Page 12 or 12
Revised 7l3M7
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
MPB, INC.
Agenda Item 14
Page 18
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURES
List all known contractors or businesses that have or will provide services with respect
to the requested property use, including but not limited to the providers of architectural
services, real estate services, financial services, accounting services, and legal
services: (Attach list if necessary)
SEE ATTACHED
' "Parent -subsidiary relationship" means "a relationship that exists when one
corporation directly or indirectly owns shares possessing more than 50 percent of the voting
power of another corporation." See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, Va.
Code § 2.2-3101.
2 "Affiliated business entity relationship" means "a relationship, other than parent -
subsidiary relationship, that exists when (i) one business entity has a controlling ownership
interest in the other business entity, (ii) a controlling owner in one entity is also a controlling
owner in the other entity, or (iii) there is shared management or control between the business
entities. Factors that should be considered in determining the existence of an affiliated
business entity relationship Include that the same person or substantially the same person
own or manage the two entities; there are common or commingled funds or assets; the
business entities share the use of the same offices or employees or otherwise share activities,
resources or personnel on a regular basis; or there is otherwise a close working relationship
between the entities." See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, Va. Code §
2-2-3101.
CERTIFICATION: I certify that the information contained herein is true and accurate.
I understand that, upon receipt of notification (postcard) that the application has been scheduled for
public hearing, I am responsible for obtaining and posting the required sign on the subject property at
least 30 days prior to the scheduled public hearing according to the instructions in this package. The
undersigned also consents to entry upon the subject property by employees of the Department of
Planning to photograph and view the site for purposes of processing and evaluating this application.
Applicant's Signature Print Name
jam± Nancy Ellen Williamson
C • L-$ra�-ryB,-�✓
asp"OWw"s Signature (if different than applicant) Print Name
Conditional Rezoning Application
Page 12 of 12
Revised 7r31 07
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
MPB, INC.
Agenda Item 14
Page 19
Owner Disclosures
1. Owner name: Munden and Associates, L.P., a Virginia limited partnership (1/2 undivided
interest)
General Partner: Wayne F. Munden (25% partnership interest)
Limited Partners: William C. Munden (25% partnership interest)
Thomas A. Munden (25% partnership interest)
Richard L. Munden (25%n partnership interest)
2. Parent -subsidiary and affiliated business entities:
Affiliates:
The four (4) partners are also co-owners of the following entities:
Four Sons Development, LLC
Munden Land, LLC
Wayne F. Munden owns controlling interests in the following entities:
Meadow Lake MHP, LLC
Mineral Springs MHP, LLC
NOTE: Property owners Martha Susan Williamson Cruz and Nancy Ellen Williamson are
individual owners and not legal entities.
ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE ATTACHMENT
The following is a list of known contractors and businesses that have or will provide services
with respect to the requested property use:
Willcox & Savage, P.C.
Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.
Innovate Architecture & Interiors, Inc.
Artlite Sign Company, Inc.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Applicant Disclosures
1. Applicant name: MPB, Inc., a Virginia corporation
Officers: Robert A. Broermann — President and Treasurer
Jeffrey P. King — Secretary
Directors: David L. Bernd - Chairman
Robert A. Broermann
Howard P. Kern
2. Parent -subsidiary and affiliated business entities:
Parent — Sentara Enterprises, which is itself wholly-owned by Sentara Healthcare
Affiliated business entities:
Sentara Medical Group
Sentara Hospitals
Sentara Life Care Corp.
Tidewater Health Care, Inc. (formerly Sentara Princess Anne Hospital)
MPB, INC.
Agenda Item 14
Page 20
M. APPOINTMENTS
BOARD OF BUILDING CODE APPEALS
COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD (CSB)
HAMPTON ROADS ECOCNOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE (HREDA)
PROCESS IMPROVEMENT STEERING COMMITTEE
N. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
O. NEW BUSINESS
P. ADJOURNMENT
PUBLIC COMMENT
Non -Agenda Items
Each Speaker will be allowed 3 minutes
and each subject is limited to 3 Speakers
*******************
If you are physically disabled or visually impaired
and need assistance at this meeting,
please call the CITY CLERK'S OFFICE at 385-4303
CITY COUNCIL SESSIONS
February, 2013
February 19 Workshop 4:00-6:00 P.M.
February 26 Briefing, Informal, Formal 6:00 P.M.
2013 CITY HOLIDAYS
Memorial Day - iVonday, Altt.Y 27
Independence Dq-V - Thursday, July 4
Labor Day - Monday, September 2
Veterans Day - Mondal,, November /I
Thanksgiving Dal, & Dm, after Thanksgiving - ThursdaV,
November 28 & Friday, November 29
Christmas Eve (hatl-dtq) - Tuesday, December 24
Christmas Day - K'ednesdtry, December 25
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS
SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTIONS
A. SUSTAINABILITY PLAN
Walt Cole, Director of
R
Planning—Clark Nexsen
O
Clay Bernick,
S
DATE: 01/22/2013 PAGE: 1
Environment and
S-
D
Sustainability
H
S
AGENDA
E
H
A
E
W
ITEM # SUBJECT MOTION VOTE
D
S
E
J
M
S
U
1
Planning
A
T
D
N
O
M
M
S
H
L
W
V
E
Y
L
N
O
O
O
R
S
O
1
P
E
E
E
S
N
M
1
O
O
S
H
R
Y
S
S
D
S
N
N
D
1.
CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS
A. SUSTAINABILITY PLAN
Walt Cole, Director of
Planning—Clark Nexsen
Clay Bernick,
Environment and
Sustainability
Administrator —
Planning
B. VIRGINIA BEACH TRANSIT
William Harrell,
President and CEO -
EXTENSION STUDY
Hampton Roads
Transit HRT
D
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
A. INVESTIGATION REVIEW PANEL
Regina Hilliard,
ANNUAL REPORT
Director — Human
Resources
B. INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENT
Patti Phillips,
Director — Finance
III/IV/V/VI
CERTIFICATION OF CLOSED
CERTIFIED
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A
A
Y
-E
SESSION
F
MINUTES — January 8, 2013
APPROVED
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A
A
Y
G/H-1
MAYOR'S PRESENTATION
Proclamation:
Virginia Beach Mustangs Da
1-1
PUBLIC HEARINGS
No Speakers
LEASES OF CITY -OWNED PROPERTY
a. Farmers Market
(1) The Nesting Box
(2) Chapman's Flowers & Gifts
(3) Holland Produce
(4) Creekmore's Place
(5) Kempsville Florist & Gift Shop,
Inc.
(6) The Country Butcher
(7) S & H Produce
(8) Virginia Garden, Inc.
b. Virginia Wild Horse Rescue at
No Speakers
2865 Indian River Road
2
SALE OF EXCESS CITY -OWNED
No Speakers
PROPERTY
a. 1536/1540/1556 Ohio Avenue
b. 254 Rosel nn Lane
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
AGREEMENT (ARP)
No Speakers
SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTIONS
a. 1845 North Muddy Creek Road
J-1
R
ADOPTED, BY
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A
O
Y
Code re dangerous animals
CONSENT
S
DATE: 01/22/2013 PAGE: 2
Ordinances to AUTHORIZE the City
ADOPTED, BY
9-0
Y
Y
Y
S-
Y
Y
Y
Y
A
A
D
Manger to EXECUTE:
CONSENT
H
S
AGENDA
E
H
A
E
W
ITEM # SUBJECT MOTION VOTE
D
S
E
J
M
S
U
I
A
T
D
N
O
M
M
S
H
L
W
V
E
Y
L
N
O
O
O
R
S
O
I
P
E
E
E
S
N
M
1
O
O
S
H
R
Y
S
S
D
S
N
N
D
3
AGREEMENT (ARP)
No Speakers
a. 1845 North Muddy Creek Road
J-1
Ordinance to AMEND Sec 5-527 of City
ADOPTED, BY
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A
A
Y
Code re dangerous animals
CONSENT
2
Ordinances to AUTHORIZE the City
ADOPTED, BY
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A
A
Y
Manger to EXECUTE:
CONSENT
a. Leases at the Farmers Market
(1) The Nesting Box
(2) Chapman's Flowers & Gifts
(3) Holland Produce
(4) Creekmore's Place
(5) Kempsville Florist & Gift Shop
(6 The Country Butcher
(7) S&H Produce
(8) Virginia Garden, Inc.
b. Lease with the Virginia Wild Horse
ADOPTED, BY
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A
A
Y
Rescue at 2865 Indian River Road
CONSENT
3
Ordinances to DECLARE property in
ADOPTED, BY
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A
A
Y
EXCESS of the City's
CONSENT
needs/AUTHORIZE sale
a. 1536/1540/1556 Ohio Avenue to
Ocean Bay Homes (DISTRICT 6 —
BEACH)
b. 254 Roselynn Lane to Millard F./
Audrey A. Jent (DISTRICT 6 —
BEACH
4
Ordinance to AUTHORIZE acquisition
ADOPTED, BY
7-1
Y
A
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
A
A
Y
of ARP easement to Sidney G.
CONSENT
B
Lawrence/Karen A. Burch at 1845
T
North Muddy Creek Drive
A
N
E
D
5
Ordinances to AUTHORIZE the City
ADOPTED, BY
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A
A
Y
Manager to EXECUTE:
CONSENT
a. Deed of Release/Exchange re ARP
Easement at Dawley Farms, LLC
b. Intergovernmental Agreement
between the City/Va Agriculture/Consumer
Services ARP easements
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
Ordinance to AUTHORIZE dedication of
ADOPTED, BY
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTIONS
A
Y
conservation easement at Pleasure House
CONSENT
R
O
7
Ordinance to ESTABLISH Thalia
ADOPTED, BY
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
S
Y
A
A
Y
DATE: 01 /22/2013 PAGE: 3
Creek Greenway Trail/ACCEPT/
CONSENT
S-
D
APPROPRIATE Grant Funding from the
H
S
AGENDA
E
H
A
E
W
ITEM # SUBJECT MOTION VOTE
D
S
E
J
M
S
U
I
A
T
D
N
O
M
M
S
H
L
W
8
V
E
Y
L
N
O
O
O
R
S
O
A
I
P
E
E
E
S
N
M
I
O
O
S
H
R
Y
S
S
D
S
N
N
D
6
Ordinance to AUTHORIZE dedication of
ADOPTED, BY
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A
A
Y
conservation easement at Pleasure House
CONSENT
Point, Parcel 3
7
Ordinance to ESTABLISH Thalia
ADOPTED, BY
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A
A
Y
Creek Greenway Trail/ACCEPT/
CONSENT
APPROPRIATE Grant Funding from the
Federal Highway Admin/TRANSFER
funds
8
Resolutions REQUESTING Va VDOT
ADOPTED, BY
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A
A
Y
ACCEPT additional streets/corrections to
CONSENT
the Road Inventory for Urban
Maintenance
9
Ordinance to APPROPRIATE $33,769
ADOPTED, BY
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A
A
Y
from the Oyster Heritage Trust Fun'
CONSENT
Planning/Community Development re pilot
Oyster Shell Education/Recycling/ initiate
annual survey of oyster populations in the
L nnhaven River Watershed
10
Ordinance to APPROPRIATE $318,000
ADOPTED, BY
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A
A
Y
to Public Utilities/TRANSFER $32,000
CONSENT
from the Water/Sewer Fund Reserve re
partial payment for the purchase of a
replacement sewer vacuum truck
K-1
SALEM WOODS CIVIC
APPROVED/
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A
A
Y
ASSOCIATION Variance to §4.5 of the
CONDITIONED AS
Subdivision Ordinance re public
REVISED
sites/open spaces for residential
subdivisions at 4609 Rothwell Court
DISTRICT 3 - ROSE HALL
2
SURF BEACH CLUB, INC. alteration to
DEFERRED TO
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A
A
Y
a non -conforming use to replace existing
02-12-13, BY
cabana structures at 5704 Ocean Front
CONSENT
Avenue DISTRICT 5 - LYNNHAVEN
3
CHRISTINE WERNE/PEMBROKE
APPROVED/
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A
A
Y"
OFFICE PARK, L.P. CUP re
CONDITIONED BY
technical/vocational school (School of
CONSENT
Esthetics) at 289 Independence Blvd
DISTRICT 4 — BAYSIDE
4
OCEAN HORIZON PROPERTIES,
APPROVED/REVISED
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A
A
Y
L.C. CUP for commercial valet parking
CONDITIONS,
lot at 209 20" Street DISTRICT 6 _
BY CONSENT
BEACH
5
MPB, INC. Conditional COZ from AG-
DEFERRED TO
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A
A
Y
1/AG-2 to Conditional 0-2 at Princess
02-12-13, BY
Anne Road/Elson Green Ave DISTRICT
CONSENT
7 - PRINCESS ANNE
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
WILLIAM McCARTHY COZ from
APPROVED AS
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTIONS
A
Y
AG -2 to Conditional B-2 re a hair care
PROFFERED, BY
R
CONSENT
O
center/retail shops at 3004 Holland Road
S
DATE: 01/22/2013 PAGE: 4
DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE
S-
D
K
APPOINTMENTS
RESCHEDULED
H
S
C
O
N
AGENDA
E
E
S
H
S
A
E
W
ITEM # SUBJECT MOTION VOTE
D
S
E
J
M
S
U
I
A
T
D
N
O
M
M
S
H
L
W
V
E
Y
L
N
O
O
O
R
S
0
I
P
E
E
E
S
N
M
I
O
O
S
H
R
Y
S
S
D
S
N
N
D
6
WILLIAM McCARTHY COZ from
APPROVED AS
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A
A
Y
AG -2 to Conditional B-2 re a hair care
PROFFERED, BY
CONSENT
center/retail shops at 3004 Holland Road
DISTRICT 7 - PRINCESS ANNE
K
APPOINTMENTS
RESCHEDULED
B
Y
C
O
N
S
E
N
S
U
S
BOARD OF BUILDING CODE
APPEALS
HAMPTON ROADS ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
APPOINTED:
9-0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A
A
Y
Unexpired thru 3/31/13
plus 3 Year Term
4/l/13-3/31/16
Elaine 1 lecia
ADJOURNED
6:14 P.M.
9-0
CITY COUNCIL RETREAT
Economic Development Conference
Room
February 4-5, 2013
8:30 A.M. — 5:00 P.M.