Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNOVEMBER 17, 2009 WORKSHOP MINUTES SQy,akeE9cs,i
o�
E / , \,'. 1 s
.. ..,,ate'`
MINUTES
VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Virginia Beach,Virginia
November 17, 2009
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., called to order the JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD
BRIEFING re the ANNUAL FIVE-YEAR FORECAST in Building 19,at 3:00 P.M.
Council Members Present:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. `Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Ron A. Villanueva,
Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood
Council Members Absent:
None
School Board Members Present:
Rita Sweet Bellitto, William J. Brunke, IV, Todd C. Davidson,
Emma L. Davis, Chairman Daniel D. Edwards, Brent N. Mckenzie,
Patrick S. Salyer, Sandra Smith-Jones and Carolyn D.Weems
School Board Members Absent:
Patricia Edmondson
November 17, 2009
JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SCHOOL BOARD BRIEFING
FIVE-YEAR FORECAST
3:00 P.M.
Catheryn Whitesell, Director — Management Services, distributed a copy of the presentation, which is
attached hereto and made a part of this record. Ms. Whitesell advised there will be a discussion regarding
the Economy, Revenues and the Next Five Years. A deficit is projected with four main drivers: loss of
real estate tax revenue, increasing VRS Rates, increasing Health Insurance costs and some increasing
disposal costs. The local economy hinges on consumer confidence, defense spending and real estate
assessments. The State Revenue for Schools, Human Services and transportation continue to decline and
Federal Revenues are expected to follow suit. The forecast does not project any salary adjustments for
the second year;however,VRS and Health Insurance costs are expected to increase.
The Joint City Council/School Board Five-Year Forecast ADJOURNED at 3:47 P.M.
November 17, 2009
4
rJ YEAR FORECAST
r 'f .°`� 1 ' . OUGH FY 2015
November 17, 2009
_J
nues
ext Five Years
o Final Thoughts
1
economy
..‘. .
this recession will be our worst in 40 years."
i/h "lute of The Region,Hampton Roads 2009,ODU
•
' ' , 1'10 Ill
o Our employment mix helps the City weather recessions
better than the State or the National economies.
Employment Category Number of Jobs Unemployment Rate Comparison
10
Lot al Government - 20,981 9 US
StateGovcrnment J 1,981
Fdtrol Gov,rn.,,,9 o 5.117 8
Military 21,375 7
anerservt<er 5,526 6
Aocommodatton and Food Services itattl 19,273
5B
n
1rts,Enteamment,and Re<reatton V 1,707 -:r --
HmlthCare and Social Assistance Imitiaamal 18,562 4
Educational Servicer taa 3,120 3 fi14,
Adminiarauvesuppon 11.327 2
Wane Services 209
Company Management and.. 2,865 Aug Oct Dee Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dee Feb Apr Jun Aug
'07 '07 '07 '08 '08 '08 '08 '08 '08 '09 '09 '09 '09
'rofes<ional and Techm,al Sertmes Itiora 11,977
Real Estate,Rental,and Leasing ��r 4,816 -•+•—VB—1—HR SVA U.S.
Finnnce•and In uranin I 8,035
Information r7 3,778
Tmnvportauon and Warehousing A 1,748
Retail Trade r 21,802
WhobsaleTrade b.m71 5,011
Manufaturing 5,587
Construction • 9,975
.,�n Nuhn Fmpiolmrnt Canmwan and Nunvu M
2
fl y
a If a healthy consumer confidence is a reading of around
100, then we have recovered from the low of 25, but at a
rating of 47.7 the economy remains weak.
Consumer Confidence Index
,25.0
110.0 - ----t' � Q�
95.0 , .t., - ► .
80.0
1
65.0 14 -
50.041111
35.0
20.0
9 9 4 4
C C C C C C C C C C
Source Tne Cc,erence Board
Consumer Price Index(CPI)&State-Local Price Index(SLPI)
7%
%
411.1 5 --
S%
4% —
3% _
2%
1% -
0%
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
State-Local Price Index -CPI
Source Bureaus of Labor Statistics and Economic Analysis
o Cost of goods for consumers and governments are
declining due in part to the recession. This low inflation
rate is expected to continue through the first couple of
years of the forecast.
3
/ / r
ID Even with the "Cash for Clunkers" Program, new
car registrations remain down.
Virginia Beach New Car Registrations
20.0% - --
j 15.0% -
-
10.0% _
5.0%
0.0% ��.�
5.0% _
IIIIMIIIII
-10.0% -.♦
-15.0%
-20.0%
-25.0%
M lt) (0 1,4 CO 0) O N CO R to /D I-- CO 0)
O 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) O O O O O O O O O O
0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) O O O O O O O O O O
N N N N N N N N CNN
Source:Virginia Automobile Dealers Assouation
Virginia Beach Foreclosures
Real estate drives the 1,500
City's budget comprising 1,000
-28% of all revenues. 500
•
Virginia Beach
Change in Appreciation Commercial Vacancies and Rent
200%
15.0% • Vacancies Rent
2009 2010 est 2009 2010 est
10.0% � Office 15.0% 15.0% -11.4% -11.7%
_
Industrial 13.0% 15.0% -6.1%1.4% 1.7%%
5.0% Retail 11.7% 12.9% 4.9%
0.0% - Apartments 7.4% 7.1% -1.5% -0.8%
-5.0%
m �m rn m m N0 CO
m rn i m m m o 0 0 0
N N N N N
4
r 7
o Nationally construction of both housing and
commercial properties remain down.
Single Family Housing 200e 2ooe Commercial Building zoo 2009
Billions of Dollars -39% -22% &mons of Dollars -1696 -43
350 120 --
275 , 100
200 rr 60 �� _Ain
125 - e0
20
50
90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08 10
''Source: Mctir lss I lilt Construction Outlook 21110 lixcculive(onfcrcncc
C0 .11.1. [ t.! 1 I V Stress Index
Current Month Oct 2007
Community Stress Index Stress Index
We are less Virginia Beach 7.65 3.51
.-,,Chesapeake 8.40 3.65
fiscally stressed Norfolk 10.18 4.78
than many Portsmouth 10.51 4.72
Newport News 8.88 4.29
communities Hampton 9.35 4.13
gFairfax County 7.07 2.65
both reionally
Henrico County 9.05 3.54
and nationally. Chesterfield County 8.76 3.42
Clark County Nevada 23.83 9.24
Los Angeles California 16.38 6.63
Miami-Dade Florida 16.22 7.33
Charleston County South Carolina 10.47 4.86
Baltimore County Maryland 8.37 4.29
Source:Associated I'ress Interaclicr:.\l'Pcunontic Stress Index
Hp
5
•
`service Demand
140%
120% 115%
100%
SO% __-_---- ------ 70.7%
Iii ; i1I _
7.15
20% c9N° Q ea o
S45.
S
� oa Ecco �ro
4o e e` �`'S `fop �0�,�. C.,°‘
oma' -1•• abS• ��, 'csea
d�� e - \ <e".
�o
5
o Unlike most private businesses that reduce staff
when business is down and add staff when it is
strong, the City often finds itself reducing staff
even when demand is growing.
. venues
The economy expanded by 3.5 percent in the third
6juarter — the first increase since the second quarter
of 2008 — and retail sales revived in October.
12
6
1,1, -(-1, r , Taxes
$500
••......................•••••
''',-!3,: ' $450
$d s Comprises 28%of the total
.;Vo'. 5400 budget and will decline by
'� $21.6 million in FY 2011.
' ��t $350
$300
N bO P l0 O O l 05 ♦ h
8 N )N} E )N} N ry N N N N
LL L- LL LL LL LL LL LL W LL
o Reflects the decline in real estate values,
both residential and commercial.
nal Property
5,50
• .
5130 ...•••
° .v•
•v
Comprises 7%of the
$110 total budget and is
projected to decline by
$5.5 million in FY 2011.
$90
R $ 8 a a a a a Sa
LL L. LL a.- L. LL LL LL LL
LL
o This revenue is predominately related to the
value of vehicles.
o State provides $53.4 million as a credit to taxpayer
bills through Personal Property Tax Relief Act.
i,
!-;11 gales
o This revenue stream will signal the beginnings
of recovery for the City.
$60
$55
0 $50 ""
General Sales comprises
3%of the total budget.
$45 - Due to the economy,this
revenue is projected to
decline by$1.7 million.
$4o 1
s snn 8o F.
o a eo a 40
}N }N} }N} }N} tFy. N N N }N} )N) )N)
LL LL LL LL LL � � � LL LL LL
Utility,Cable,Cell Phone,and Virginia Telecommunications
$70.0
$60.0
2 $50.0
$40.0 This combination of taxes
$30.0 comprise 3%of the total
$20.0 budget and are expected to
slightly decline in FY 2011 by
$10.0 $1.4 million.
$0.0
,cA`' ct1° cfil tic+� otic e o>> tioNe 1"
[.. Utility voxes will remain fairly constant through out the
forecast period and are somewhat resistant to changes
in the economy.
a One threat to this stream over the forecast period is the
trend to drop land line telephones and rely solely on
cellular phones.
8
is nses
,
$50.0
$40.0
$30.0
Business Licenses comprise
$20.0 2.3%of the total budget and
are expected to remain
$10.0 relatively stable.
$0.0
ik
a Business Licenses reflect the impact of the
economy on businesses.
0 'lmoHweaItl1
State Revenues
$600
$500 ..,.— �„��...N••..a
E s400 State revenues for Schools,
saw Human Services,and
$200 transportation comprise over
f,00 28%of the total budget.
so
Elkg g g g
S 6 8 S R R R R R ;
E The Composite Index-the determination by the State of a
localities ability to pay for schools is increasing from
37.04% to 40.6.-This results in a loss of$15.3 to$16
million for Schools.
Fl State Aid to Localities is expected to also drop with the
next State Budget.
Is
9
o Stimulus Funds are not anticipated to be available
in FY 2011 and if they do become available should
be treated as one-time revenues.
$600Federal Revenues
$500
Federal revenues comprise 8%of
Ai $400 the total budget and support
I$300 — education,housing and public _
assistance programs.
$200 -
- .....a a . ......•
$100 -
$0 y
O (4i O O O O ; N M Q N
R >N N N N N N N N
LL (L LL LL LL LL LL it LL LL L-
' ,
-
' , (11 Keven Les
Percent Change in Total Revenue to Support City and School Programs
6.0%
5.1%
5.0%
4.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2.1% 1.8% 2.0%
2.0%
1.0%
1.0%
0.2%
0.0%
-1.0%
i -2.0% The 3.5%drop in revenues is a
$61.3 million decline in revenues.
-3.0%
-4.0% .5.514 . .
}N )N
R R R R R R
10
$2,000 Forecast Period ■Charges
$1,800
$1,600 ilm
Federal
$1,400 a Commonwealth
$1,200
•Hotel,Meals&
H $1,000 Admissions
, a
$800 ■Business License
$600 •Utilities
$400
$200 •General Sales
$0 Personal
\N �1ti X13 �tiD� pti5 Property
`k ■Real Estate
I IRI
iii'1" Fl ..' � k, ri s
•
FY 2011 through FY 2015
After six consecutive quarters in retreat,businesses in the
third quarter increased spending on new computers and
software at an annual rate of 1.1 percent.The first quarter's
annualized plunge, by way of contrast, was 36.4 percent.
September was the first month of growth in manufacturing
employment in more than a year.Of Health Organizations
surveyed in October,38 percent reported that their organization
will increase hiring in the next six months.
11
r - re Assumptions for both
',c_hooIs
o No increase in operational costs (electricity, supplies,
contracts) allowed through the first two years of the
forecast, 2% after that.
o Capital Improvement Program
• Local pay-as-you-go funding for the capital construction program has been
reduced by S15 million in the first two years and$10 million each year
thereafter.
• School debt allocation was reduced by$5 million.
• State transportation construction funding is held at zero through the
forecast period.
• Only known allocations of Federal Stimulus Funding for capital projects
were included,even though both the City and Schools may have
outstanding requests for funding.
• No adjustment in the City Council's Debt per Capita limit
of$2,400 is assumed.
Assumptions for both
Ci t1. . hoofs (continued)
1.5% of payroll (this includes all salaries and fringe benefits)
set aside beginning i n FY 2012 then increases to 3/o of
payroll for each year f ollowing
2011 which would mean the second year
Ind School employees
No funding set aside for market survey adjustments for either City
employees or the School's Unified Scale employees is included.
xpected increase in VRS rates for both City and Schools
due to actuarial losses not included in FY 2011
• Health Care costs could increase by 5% to 10% each year
• Federal Health Care Mandates may increase costs in order
to provide coverage to part-time employees
o Both City and School GASB45 payments will be made
through'the Health Insurance Fund for the five years which
may eventually require increases in premiums
12
Expenditure Assumptions
o Student enrollment is projected to decline by
approximately 400 students each year.
o All current School programs continue through the
forecast period.
o School teaching staff will decline due to the
decline in students. The ratio of 22 students to 1
teacher will be maintained.
' ) pe_ rating A. ' oUnts
a Inflation is expected to keep supply and
contract costs low for the first few years of the
forecast.
School Operating Accounts
$230
$225 – A
$220 ,,-
$215
i $210 –
$205 .-•'
$200 - - -
$195 —
$190
FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
13
ills . pensation Accounts
School Salaries School Fringe Benefits
$540 ------ ---- 5140 -
r S154 - _+
$180
5520 - '�_ S173
SSW _��� c 5170
5160 —1/
i S1
S150 —
r>,
$440 - — S145 --
�" $420
$140
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Threats to this forecast exist in the area of benefits
to employees.
• Federal Health Care Initiatives
• Pension costs
4-cirtures per Pupil
o School expenditures are leveling off to reflect the
forecast assumptions and the economy.
Total Per Pupil Spending
516.000
514.000
512.000
510.000
58.000
56.000 . . . . . . . . . . . . .
52,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
52,000
5-
e ryo0 rye ryo�0) rye rye rye �OQ1 0
oo0 ry.A 0
�0 ryo� 0,0
�1A 0O^p ti;
'EnroMMrt n o1 September 30th
14
School Total Revenue&Expenditures
School's gap is
$1.000.0 543.4 million — — --"°
0 $950.0 - — ..+ .�I I�-•-^'
'T 5900.0 �' "� - �'__,�� ""•'
$850.0 '"
'1';4i '':.'.' 5500.0
�"� ,f'1<1 tRevenue --,--Expenditures
..vs., $750.0
•>a. FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
o The School's forecast reflects the assumption of
no increases in first year expenses with
moderate growth beginning in the second year
and beyond.
lF ' per
nctiture Assumptions
El Population is expected to remain relatively flat
over the next five years.
o All current City Council Revenue Dedications
are assumed to continue through the five years.
o Opening of new facilities
• Joint Use I ihrary in FY 2012
• Thalia Fire and Rescue Station in FY 2012
a Federal Sanitary Sewer Consent Decree resulted
in small cost increases in the Utility Forecast.
o The Forecast includes no utility rate increases.
S((
15
ry .-1Ni;ng Accounts
o Supply and contract costs remain low for the first few
years of the forecast after that they increase by 2%.
D Opening new facilities are also impacting these
accounts.
City Operating Accounts
$320
$310 w
$300 - -
S290 -- -~
S280 — ---- —
S270 —
S260
FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
•
nsation Accounts
City Salaries City Fringe Benefits
$360 $122
$120
5350 ��' $118
5340 3116
"" $114
C 5330 "c $112
-orSilo "♦""'
5320 •—f" 5108
5310 $106
5104
$300 5102
FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY 2010 FY2011 FY 2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015
City Virginia Retirement • Compensation increases 1.5"u
System Contribution beginning in FY 2012 and by 3%
24.0% -- • thereafter.
R•
•20.0% --
tr 16.0% r o Staffing is added in FY 2012 for
12.0% - the opening of new facilities.
80%
4.0% --- - - o Threats to this forecast exist in
00% the area of benefits to employees.
o v c '8 o N
m m m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Federal Health Care Initiatives
LL Iii Iii LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL • Pension costs
16
Wxnrhltittv __
i'.,_,_.
1
l.a 1-
Growth of City Budget Per Capita
52,500
52,000 •---t=�:-=� �_-'--�
5,,500
$1,000
$500
5-
&
,C ,A ,1�'
tiQ' ,e n& ^73' ,, $ 1 '„g '�i 'b" 're 4' ^.R 4^� '4i•a y
4, 4'' F'' 4- 4'' , c� F'' k'' 4, F'' 4, F'' 4'" , 4,
a City expenditures decline from the current budget
due to the economy.
n Increases in operating costs and compensation
remain relatively low until the new facilities come
on-line.
t:
11040„
o The City's forecast also holds expenses flat in the first year,
but increases expenditures beginning in FY 2012 and
beyond.
o Adding to the deficit in the out years is the opening of the
Thalia Fire and Rescue Station and the Joint Use Library .
City Total Revenue and Expenditures
$1,050.0
$1,000.0 City gap is$41
million which talk
$950.0 includes Utilities -
$900.0 -_-:-Nr- I
$850.0 ------
$800.0
- -Revenue Expenditure
$750.0
FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
17
iho Future Holds
Base Forecast
$2.100
$2.000 Projected gap is — —
$1.900 $84.4 million in "
0 First Year
0
o
= 61.800
GO
$1.700 �
$1.600
51.500
FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Budget Forecast
—Revenues Expenditures
o This forecast is driven predominately by declines in
revenues.
o No increases in major accounts allowed in FY 2011.
\./` f 1 11 . Future Holds(continued)
Capital Improvement Program
5250 $xse
5215 5220 Forecast Period
5
$200 203
SILO 5178 5,79
$150 i153 5,52
c 31,6
$100
$50
$_ SII iii
F�200F�200F�20�F�2p0F�200F�20, �20,��201 �201 �201�02o1y
Schools Roadways •Buildings •Other ■Utilities
.0111•I mcI do Valls&Rwaanon.Economic Oeniopmant,Conir.an]Goasla'
o Reduction of State construction funding and reducing
local pay-as-you-go funding is significantly impacting
the CIP over the next five years.
18
1f )•_. ) c[ liores were Level 11
Level Expenditures
$2.100
$2.000 Gap would be reduced
from$84.4 million to
$1.900 $61.1 million
m
$1.800
I
$1.700
$1.600
$1.500 -FY 2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015
Budget `-_ -- _ Forecast ---------_--
-Revenues--- Expenditures Expenditures(FY 2010 Flat Amount)
expenditures could be held level through the
forecast period revenue growth could close the gap by
FY2014 -HOWEVER, that would mean:
• No compensation increases for 4 more years
• Any increase in VRS, fuel,health care would have to be
absorbed through other reductions to offset
t for Virginia Beach for
_ t ('u$.8 09 through FY 2014- 15
FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Real Estate Tax $2,308.66 $2,224.16$2,112.95 $2,070.70 $2,070.70 $2,112.11 $2,175.47
Personal Property Tax 244.11 155.08 154.93 152.84 148.97 143.85 137.83
Electricity Utility Tax 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00
Gas Utility Tax 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00
Va Telecommunications Tax 70.68 70.68 70.68 70.68 70.68 70.68 70.68
Water Utility Tax 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00 36.00
Restaurant Tax 251.48 251.48 251.48 251.48 251.48 251.48 251.48
Admissions Tax 25.69 25.69 25.69 25.69 25.69 25.69 25.69
Vehicle License Decal 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00
Stormwater Utility Fee 73.37 80.67 87.97 87.97 87.97 87.97 87.97
Water&Sewer 509.52 518.52 518.52 518.52 518.52 518.52 518.52
Residential Refuse Fee None None None None None None None
Total Tax Impact $3 643.51 $3 486.28$3 382.22 $3 337.88 $3 334.01 $3 370.30 3 427.64
Variance ($157.22) ($104.06) ($44.35) ($3.86) $36.28 $57.35
Note:Real Estate.5247 400/median home assessment.Personal Pro.e :2 cars=57 762 Vehicle License Decal 2 vehicles
19
venue was Made Up ., . ,.
62.100
Increase Real Estate and Personal Property Tax Rates
$2.040
$1.980
$1.920
Gap is reduced from
$1.860 $84.4 million to$57
million
$1.800
$1.740
".........
•• ..
•I
m ..�.�.....
$1.680
51.620
$1.560
•
$1.500 ---- ,.
FY 2010 Budget 'FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Forecast
—Revenues --Expenditures Revenue Neutrality
Depending upon the increase to the rate, some
residents could see an increase in their tax
bills, however, most would not.
•
is Budget and CIP are predicated on the economy
:roving; if the recession lingers into FY 2011, we will have a
difficult budget".
2010 Bi,/' 't(mil(7P I'r,'s,n/liiori k'('illi('omn(71 on March 23,2000
20
to Last Year's Forecast
FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Last year's forecast
Revenues $1,786.4 $1,828.9 $1,884.6 $1,941.8 n/a
Expenditures $1,884.7 $1,931.3 $1,984.6 $2,038.5 n/a
Variance ($98.3) ($102.4) ($100.0) ($96.7) n/a
Current Forecast
Revenues $1,702.0 $1,719.4 $1,750.9 $1,786.2 $1,839.9
Expenditures $1,786.4 $1,813.8 $1,870.9 $1,930.7 $1 985.6
Variance ($84.4) ($94.4) $120.0) $144.5 $145. ,
rojec ed revenues are$84 million lower than we were forecasting;
• last year for FY 2011.There was an assumption that the economy,
particularly real estate would be recovering by now.
CI Expenditures in last year's forecast included operating and salary
account increases.This forecast does not include any operating
increases for FY 2011 other than slight increases in School Grants
and Utility funds.
11
() J J ,N Juest(ons
e ways to control costs together?
a What services/programs is the community willing to
,pay for?
Should there be a consideration of changing revenue
rates?
o Can we sustain the expenditure assumptions
included in the base forecast involving:
• Low inflation
• Reduced capital construction funding
• Compensation
• New facilities
• VRS costs
12
21
' , fights
a The National economy is recovering but slowly,
and with it the I lampton Roads economy.
o How the State resolves its budget situation will
have huge impacts on Transportation and
Education Funding - and we will not know until
early spring.
i ogetb* r, we have a long-term structural
mbalance - tough decisions lie ahead in terms of
cutting programs and/or raising revenues. In
either case input from the community will be
critical.
22
41-01'14
t
E. v/17
2
J Of OOR•MI."
MINUTES
VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Virginia Beach, Virginia
November 17, 2009
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., RECONVENED the City Council Meeting in the City Council
Conference Room, Tuesday, November 17, 2009, at 4:00 P.M., re the HISTORIC PRESERVATION
COMMISSION—First Annual Report.
Council Members Present:
Glenn R. Davis, William R. "Bill" DeSteph, Harry E. Diezel,
Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones,
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., Ron A. Villanueva, John E. Uhrin,
Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood
Council Members Absent:
None
November 17, 2009
CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFING
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
First Annual Report
4:00 P.M.
Mayor William D. Sessoms,Jr. welcomed C. Mac Rawls,Chair—Historic Preservation Commission.
Mr. Rawls advised he will be providing an overview of the Commission's work:
Virginia Beach
Historic Preservation Commission
Annual Report
November 17, 2009
Tallwood Manor
Then and Now
err • �
rr mi. ' I
November 17, 2009
CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFING
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
First Annual Report
(Continued)
Historic Preservation Commission
Committees
• Significant Historical Structures Committee
• Historic House Network Committee
• Historic Sites Preservation Committee
• Resort Area Historic Properties Committee
• Projects Coordination Committee
• Certified Local Government Committee
Here are Items for consideration:
Items for Consideration
A. Preservation of Historic Buildings and Sites
B. Public Awareness of Virginia Beach
History/Historic Resources
C. Recommendations for Historical Preservation
Policies
November 17, 2009
CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFING
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
First Annual Report
(Continued)
Here are the results of the October 6, 2009, Public Meeting:
Results of Public Meeting
October 6, 2009
Preservation of Historic Buildings and Sites
First Priority
• Create a revolving fund that would allow for purchase
and resale of historical properties
Second Priority
• Save the Roland Court Theatre
Third Priority
• Create a network of historic house owners
Results of Public Meeting
October 6, 2009
Public Awareness of Virginia Beach History
First Priority
• Promote importance of the First Landing
• Increase VB history interest in schools and colleges
Second Priority
• Sponsor/promote history lectures,tours,programs
Third Priority
• Encourage enlargement of VB history reference
center/archives at Oberndorf Library
November 17, 2009
CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFING
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
First Annual Report
(Continued)
Results of Public Meeting
October 6, 2009
Recommendations for Historic Preservation Policies
First Priority
• Become a Certified Local Government community
Second Priority
• Update city's inventory of historic sites
Third Priority
• Recommend ordinances to Council that maximize
incentives for preservation
Here are the Future Recommendations:
Future Recommendations
• Historic overlay district for 17th Street
• Increased incentives for private owners of historic
properties
• Increased revolving fund to purchase historic
properties and to then sell them with historic
easements
• Development of procedures for the city's role in setting
and monitoring historic easements
• Greater inclusion of historical properties as part of the
goals of Neighborhood Preservation and Economic
Development
• Buffington House
November 17, 2009
CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFING
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
First Annual Report
(Continued)
17th Street
:-
Ur"'
' L Ipl um III
Future Recommendations
• Historic overlay district for 17th Street
• Increased incentives for private owners of historic
properties
• Increased revolving fund to purchase historic
properties and to then sell them with historic
easements
• Development of procedures for the city's role in setting
and monitoring historic easements
• Greater inclusion of historical properties as part of the
goals of Neighborhood Preservation and Economic
Development
• Buffington House
Mayor Sessoms thanked Mr. Rawls and the entire Commission for their hard work.
November 17, 2009
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
CITY SUSTAINABILITY EFFORTS
4:36 P.M.
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. welcomed Clay Bernick, Environmental Management Center
Administrator— Planning. Mr. Bernick distributed a copy of the presentation, which is attached hereto
and made a part of this record.
November 17, 2009
11/17/2009
Virginia Beach
Sustainability Efforts
Clay Bernick
Department of Planning
Environmental Management Center
November 17, 2009
Sustainability — What is It?
"development that meets the needs of the present without
compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own
needs"
- United Nations World Commission on Environment &
Development, 1987
"meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of
future generations to meet their own needs"
- Bruntland Commission (1983) World Commission on Environment
& Development
1
11/17/2009
Virginia Beach's Advantages
Multiple renewable energy resource opportunities (e.g. Wind,
Biodiesel)
• Unique, strategically critical geographic location
■ Strong military and maritime industry in region
■ Favorable climate
• Exemplary natural resources
■ Strong agricultural base
• Naturally attractive location and connectedness to the environment
• Strong educational base with tremendous further potential
Related City Activities
Mayor's Alternative Energy Task Force
Green Ribbon Committee
Joint Energy Committee
Clean Waters Task Force
Economic Vitality Team Green Jobs Work
Group
Blue Ribbon Committee
2
11/17/2009
Virginia Beach Examples of
Interconnectedness
For Promoting Sustainability
PUBLIC
• • WORKS
L•d,
PLANNINGECONOMIC
11 DEVELOP- i
MENT
Council Directives to Date
Council resolved on September 23, 2008 to develop a Sustainable
Virginia Beach Initiative to be known as "Go Green Virginia Beach" to:
Meet or exceed applicable state or federal regulatory requirements
and provide for periodic compliance reviews of City-owned operations
and properties;
Maintain an Environmental Emergency Response Plan to effectively
address potential incidents;
Create a Sustainability Plan for the City of Virginia Beach to be
presented to City Council by March 31, 2010. The Plan will establish
1, 5, and 10 year sustainability targets as well as define initiatives
designed to reach the targets set out in the Plan; and
Establish a Sustainability Advisory Team, in order to oversee and
coordinate these efforts within the City organization and with the
community, and to promote, implement, oversee, recommend, and
track sustainable practices and activities.
3
11/17/2009
City Actions to Date
Climate Protection Agreement—November 2005
City Council Endorsement of Initial Sustainability Efforts-
September 2008
VML Go Green Virginia 2008 -
September 2008
Green Meeting Industry Council Platinum Member—
September 2009
AIA SDAT Grant—
September 2009
VML Go Green Virginia 2009 -
October 2009
Virginia Green Program —
Climate Protection Agreement
Cities' Commitments Under the Agreement:
Strive to meet or beat the Kyoto Protocol targets in their own
communities, through actions ranging from anti-sprawl land-use
policies to urban forest restoration projects to public information
campaigns
Urge their state governments, and the federal government, to
enact policies and programs to meet or beat the greenhouse gas
emission reduction target suggested for the United States in the
Kyoto Protocol
Strive for 7% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from 1990
levels by 2012
Urge the U.S. Congress to pass the bipartisan greenhouse gas
reduction legislation, which would establish a national emission
trading system
4
11/17/2009
rvML GO Green Virginia
An initiative of the VML to encourage local governments to reduce
energy usage and promote sustainability
Named Certified Green Government in 2008
Named Silver Award Certified Green Government in 2009 with 20
percent improvement on City score
Topics addressed: Government Policy Adoption; Energy Efficiency;
Green Building; Waste Management; Vehicles; Land Use/
Transportation; Water/Air Quality; Employee Incentives; Education/
Community Participation; Schools; Innovation
Go Green
Virginia
Virginia Green
Virginia Green is the statewide program that works to reduce the
environmental impacts of Virginia's tourism industry. It is a
partnership between the Virginia Tourism Corporation and the
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality. The program awards
Virginia Green Certification to tourism-related business such as
hotels, restaurants and attractions taking voluntary actions to reduce
harmful impacts on the environment.
City Achievements to Date:
First VA certified Convention Facility
First VA certified Destination
32 VA certified Hotels
20 VA certified restaurants
Virginia Green
13 VA certified events
4 VA certified attractions
5
11/17/2009
AIA and SDAT Program
. May 2009 Advance Team Site Visit
lb September 2009 Full Team Site Visit
. Interviews
▪ Public Meetings and Input
• Initial SDAT Recommendations & Draft Report
AlACommunities by Design
ENVISION , CREATE S U STA I N . i III
Other AIA Selected Communities for 2009
Beatrice, Nebraska
Chattanooga, Tennessee
Cleveland, Ohio
Eagle River Valley, Colorado
Hilo, Hawaii
Indianapolis, Indiana
Los Angeles, California
Orange, Massachusetts
Port Angeles, Washington
Past selected communities include Detroit, Fort Worth, New
Orleans, Tampa, Albany, Tucson, Syracuse, Oklahoma City
6
11/17/2009
1�Ir� & SDAT Program Steering
Committee
Councilwoman Rosemary Steve Herbert (Deputy City
Wilson Manager)
Councilman Bob Dyer Cynthia Whitbred-Spanoulis
Nicole Davilli (Hampton Roads (Economic Development)
AIA) Clay Bernick (Planning)
Karen Forget (Lynnhaven Ross Brockwell (Public Works)
River NOW)
Initial SDAT Recommendations
Urban Design -walkability & connectivity; articulate neighborhoods;
establish connections; centers along transit boulevard; mixed use
development at beach; open space; phased implementation
Agriculture— neighborhood markets; preserving farm(er)s/watermen;
connecting to the "country" best practices; local food system
Transportation & Complete Streets - provide viable choices to shift a
proportion of SOV to alternate modes (light rail, bus rapid transit,
bicycle and pedestrian systems); complete streets
Green Economy- Increase Communication; Grow the Energy
Efficiency Sector; Pursue Renewable Energy Investments; Prepare
Your Workforce; Leverage Growth Along Light Rail to Create
Communities
7
11/17/2009
Initial SDAT Recommendations
Virginia Beach sustainability is:
J NOT simply a series of actions
❑ A comprehensive lens of how we look at EVERY city action
❑ Community engagement
o Lower energy use & higher renewables
❑ Viable multimodal transportation options
o Mixed use walkable redevelopment
o Farms AND the farm economy
❑ Healthy natural systems
❑ Ready for sea level rise
o Green Economic Development
Next Steps
Completion of AIA SDAT Team Process
Completion of First Sustainability Report by SAT
Formal Council Establishment of City Sustainability Program
(Physical Location in City Organization, Staffing, Budget,
Relationship to Quality Organization/Management Leadership
Team/Strategic Issue Teams)
Add as Item on City Council Pending Items List
Designate Council Liaisons
Focus Public Information and Education Efforts
Revise City Procurement Policy
Develop Energy Strategy
Designation of Department and Program Staff Contacts
8
11/17/2009
Why Sustainability?
Save City Money
., Convention Center as Model
u Study Potential for Reorganization to Better Utilize Limited City Resources
u Aggressively Pursue Grants and Other Funding Sources
Better Sustain Natural Environment
u Green Infrastructure.Urban Forestry Management Plan,TMDL Implementation
Plan Development
u Agricultural Strategy
u Oyster Heritage Restoration Strategy and Seafood Industry
Better Sustain Built Environment
▪ Energy Efficiency Retrofits
▪ Building Lifecycle Costs
Gray Infrastructure Maintenance
Attract Sustainable Economic Development
Alternative Energy Development—Offshore Wind,Biodiesel
Expanded Research Partnerships with ODU,NSU,TCC and Others
Workforce Training and Development for Green Jobs
What can a Sustainability Strategy help
Virginia Beach do in the Longer Term?
Workforce development, retention and attraction of young
professionals
Bolstered tourism and increased recognition; defined local niche
Improved infrastructure
Optimized operational and maintenance costs
Increased City revenues
Attraction of general businesses insisting on "green" locales and
recruitment of green industry
Increased opportunities for potential investment
Diversification and enrichment of our local economy
9
11111111111111. 411111111011.11111111.1111,
11/17/2009
Questions?
• 4041,-
•
\ft •
t
. , .• :
-• J
11.0.44416 4 1 MN .101911
'•'-°
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA-A
Community for a Lifetime
... and A Community for Lifetimes to
Come!
10
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
"RESTLESS PLANET" GRAND OPENING
5:00 P.M.
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. welcomed Lynn Clements, Director—Museums and Cultural Arts. Mrs.
Clements distributed a copy of the presentation,which is attached hereto and made a part of this record.
November 17, 2009
11/12/2009
C1)\11 %won.
VIRGINIA
AQUARIUM
& MARINE SCIENCE CENTER
*Nied4rk
r s
- ,
5
i 4 4
•
01111111111111k
11/1 2/2 0 n 9
.4.
,.........— -
boo"
vsook
4 '
if-,;"
....._.
,k4 —
•
- 4 ,
' --,,,,,,z1744411111014•
,L.........______
-.A...
,,,--„- -
land River Gal
.7 ,i ',.: °!, ii ": . -
-
...,*
'••'.4, ok.A1„
--- « „2,7•1*" ,. '''' , ...-- , , '-').. 4.«:« ookitoyer.--,
•pl-
*':- .:''re**4' ' -"A• 1 A-,do,
/ AC
.0;'''V
. ...
2
11/12/2009
• -. The Fall Zone Aquarium
represents the area
between the Piedmont
and the coastal plains.
� f
•
JM�
SSS
Asian pond turtles ,�z
•
•
2
11/12/2009
i
04
i
s.
.}
•
A� Ni. •
, Each of the 4 habitats is explained r
• 4
11/12/2009
II
gytw#ian cobra represe
coastal Sahara.
affr
.4**::tz .
11/12/2009
•
Guests will be able to interact with live
an
••
- -
.ry ..•.a 4
r;Yu
•� Red Sea Tunnel Aquarium
11/12/2009
I
•
1
The Komodo Dragon"Bubble0::::::":',
4
•
11/12/2009
r'
II
. li, At„'z% '.c,
m
a �: T 4114 p. z
:►x p
, , ,..7.
, . , t. ,
„ , : , , .,
:,
,, •
'a
j'
R
11/12/2.009
11111111111.1111111111..111
p•
r4.11....-.:,-:-, t..:;!<111 / n:..:!/1 . 4i l
ii foto �..
E 'er..', ,,
�� a es .,.>
IPIR . ilv
... tte!#t , .
o,y
i
#[: 0,,,,,,,..0,,,,,,,........;) :;,gyp`'
., ,
'?.
t'''''
a "":""'''.1 .1 /. r1}a 1V.a,. •:. _ ' c.w.o...
?union. t
' • -TM:teN
Oman Bravej
• M,m Wal) / ,,�"1".'._!d
V CamPeai0elon ,
• VA Apart.A MSC a.t h.swe Pudic SYrofY
-Lai -Ila tree pigs=L.,. ;Il
ikt
a
CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS
PLANNING ITEMS PENDING
5:24 P.M.
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. welcomed Jack Whitney,Director—Planning. Mr. Whitney distributed
a copy of the presentation, which is attached hereto and made a part of this record.
December 1, 2009:
Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing
Enoch Baptist Church
Katherine Pennington
Faith Christian Ministries, Inc.,
The Breaking of Day
Kimberly Vakos
Philsand Investments, Inc.
December 8,2009
Comprehensive Plan
Viola Building Corporation
Daniel E. Poston
Central Associates Owner's Association, Inc.
Rock Church
Jessup Construction, LLC
Living Word Gospel Use Permit
Taddeo and Sim Use Permit
Amendment to the zoning Ordinance—Accessory Structure Floor area
Amendment to the zoning Ordinance—Cul-de-sac radius
Fitness5 Use Permit
November 17,2009
11/17/2009
..........-.....„,..c., i-. December 1 Items
1
. .y • Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing(vote
on December 8)
/"I+ • Enoch Baptist Church(Use Permit and
_,s rile, = `t Modification of Use Permit)
J' • Pennington(Use Permit)
• Faith Christian Church(Use Permit)
• Breaking of Day(Use Permit)
PLANNING • Kimberly Vakos(Use Permit)
40
wy�,, ITEMS TO • Philsand Investments(Conditional
BE HEARD Rezoning)
IN DECEMBER
8 �
.t
c
... / 4Enoch Ba,nst Church •',
Ner � •+- f. Zs/ J
Qs`f>LJ iir zilh9 t 7 �}�r
A
dr.„,..:
•
KEMPSVILLE DISTRICT' 11_ ., 1 ;'.'" D' —
Relevant Information '"'=__ _ / II
• The applicant requests a Conditional Use 1 .x+14,1444 I ! !' ---
Permit to allow the addition of a basketball
court to the site that will provide T''
recreational opportunities for local ''',,-.9* - '
b n,
residents during the day(court is off-limits .t •r lit ff
at night). ��_ p, 1f ill .
,:;:t. „. ., . •.
• The applicant is also requesting a '-` ",`:''',;--• >. -,
=x .±:1:-1.2 . ,:,,• , a
Modification of the Use Permit for the __ _ _ _
church for the purpose of providing J
additional parking spaces on the site in an I- - ,1-7-7--.:=:area that is currently vacant. .r ==
Enoch Baptist
• 1
11/17/2009
Evaluation and
Recommendation
• fib ; s • Planning Staff recommended approval
e • • -* , • Planning Commission recommends
approval (9-0)
• There was no opposition.
• Consent agenda.
Relevant Information
Katherine P renin• 'n • The applicant requests a Conditional Use
T'' Permit for a residential kennel for up to 20
WV' dogs.
• �` � ! • The applicant currently cares for dogs that
71-411[14111�' have been abandoned;she attempts to find
+ ��l�l+, z •
new homes for the dogs.
efrZ • Due to the current economic conditions,
Ir- / �' #- :: which contributes to an increasing
g
� s _ ������ �= abandonment of dogs by those unable to care
for them,the applicant requests a 20-dog
a } maximum.Typically, she has five to ten dogs.
_-� • The dogs are kept in an air-conditioned and
PRINCESS ANNE DISTRICT soundproofed kennel,but they do have
outside runs.
N
A
gyp.
r` - r ; pee?3; r ..
4 1,441000.4. .
2,4
ameamirriewPreereeme
Katherine Pennin ton -
2
11/17/2009
7
P . f, Evaluation and
Recommendation
• Planning Staff recommended approval
• Planning Commission recommends
- "' approval (9-0)
-,...,...i • There was no opposition at the hearing.
•
M. 1 _ h 'tion Ministries Inc _
lti�a 1t91M1 `r. x
.iitwe gir ribt,..,Be,„'at'
Aillsk,.., , .. —
1 k.t. ivira...,..,1. -1:
.� � e �-_c
amnion tic
ROSE HALL DISTRICT 1 f
Relevant Information
• The applicant requests a Conditional Use
Permit to allow use of a unit within a small
commercial strip for a church.
• The applicant holds religious services on
Sunday,from 9:00 a.m.to 1:00 p.m. and ''F Ili int Jt w� r
Wednesday from 7:00 p.m.to 8:00 p.m. i
The church currently has about 45
members.
• The site has 19 parking spaces on the east
and south sides of building. Sufficient
parking exists on the site to accommodate
the religious use and the other business in
the center.
3
11/17/2009
Evaluation and
RecommendationThe Breakin o Da
• Planning Staff: :a1ommended app =_ Ir i
allialwtms
• Planning Comsion onsir. ..,
•
• ;::: opposition.
g�4> 3.t
V
0 •, ` `
• Consent agendac ° .;,. ;�
t 9'
KEMPSVILLE DISTRICT
lir
11." Relevant Information
%VISA • The applicant requests a Conditional Use
illikriy, Permit to allow use of three units within a
small commercial strip for a church.
• The applicant holds religious services on
�Y __ Sunday,from 11:30 a.m.to 2:00 p.m.,and
F Bible study is held on Wednesday from 7:00
°', p.m.to 8:00 p.m.The church currently has 50
,� 'yam•„ ok r,,-. \ members and hopes to grow to a regular
•• �/ attendance of 60 members.
v o . :;
` ' \ • The site consists of a horse-shoe shaped
'• building centered on the site and 86 parking
../'. •.., spaces.The Zoning Ordinance requires 12
• ..- J parking spaces for a church this size.
`nillte v .0
® .. s
Evaluation and
lritllIll' . - Recommendation
A
• Planning Staff recommended approval
• Planning Commission recommends
-41approval (8-0-1)
• There was no opposition.
• Consent agenda.
4.-_
4
11/17/2009
—. r„,„„, v rl,l
/ •
Kimber! Vakos ` r�ro-Immii- wiliow--_A.r. . —
Iii yy .c}10 },,�I n y ,,.rte_
#*
•-.1:- 1,si`j
/ ," ` n.? s ' 83
11i � �u
� ' "_
.,..4.,. .:,„ _
2 ... iy.7., . ...::-.....4.,_-_.. ...,..a ....,. ...,.._. ,..,.... .....,
ROSE HALL DISTRICT w. .,
Relevant Information
• The applicant requests modification of the
existing Conditional Use Permit to allow :t:iIr •.'���?.,"1: � 'i
motor vehicle sales, limiting the request to '
no more than five (5)vehicles.
• According to the applicant, most of the
sales will be to existing customers in -' -' -
search of a vehicle due to repair of their r
existing vehicle being cost-prohibitive. -
• The motor vehicle sales will be a
secondary use on this site; the automobile
repair business will remain the prominent
use.
‘IIIIIIIIIPIIIIIIIIIIPIIIIIIIRIIIIPIIIIIII
Evaluation and
•'e 3,•;� Recommendation
+ x ,; ; *I.' "`. • Planning Staff recommended approval
'2N • Planning Commission recommends
approval (9-0)
- • There was no opposition.
• Consent agenda.
11/17/2009
_ .,;., r a
•
t"- P ilsand Investments Inc. • c
kyr• 1
FIErot/c Rro :� a
,1 ; .
le . ....._
l , _,��e
...,,
... _ 0
� br il�-T �
mrvia,...Atztio;,,- :„ittin L.
KEMPSVILLE DISTRICT F•++‘'ae..eRI-_•7 i."?'"114,7,'''''''!e!s+T., —,151001119
• r
,V1Relevant Information :;f-,
• The applicant requests a rezoning from 0-2 to - ' E'
B-2 Community Business,for the purpose of J+' .
allowing manufacture of dental implants. `=�•
Such use is not allowed in the 0-2 District. �j _ fK '••�
• The proposed proffers limit allowable uses on I� e ,
the site to approximately 10 land uses,rather ��1R
than the full list of 80 uses that are otherwiseI isi
111
allowed within the B-2 Community Business
District. Thus,only low-intensity business
and office uses that are not expected to ....•••••••""i s
require more parking than is available on the
site are allowed.
Evaluation and December 8 Items
Recommendation
• Planning Staff recommended approval • Comprehensive Plan Vote
• Viola Building(Nonconforming)
• Planning Commission recommends • Daniel Poston(Use Permit)
approval (9-0) • Central Associates (Use Permit)
• There was no opposition. • Rock Church(Use Permit)
• Consent agenda. • Jessup Construction (Conditional
Rezoning deferred on 10/27)
6
•
11/17/2009
•
, 1
°j° Viola BuildingCOrDOr%tio(1 a —
Ese ; 'i
; a- zt'V.t'a11$
_
P-1 D,\NtQ -;;;I`'..- ‘V�:a�•Ir ,� •v
c .. ? giit'z_,-, - y- iIN O .. 1
b',4 F1>ti� ' Isike-
•
19 a .`4
x1 w, r
61
LYNNHAVEN DISTRICT
Relevant Information
• The applicant requests to renovate and
add a second story to the dwelling unit at r _
6900 Atlantic Avenue and to partially
demolish and construct a new dwelling �,�
unit at 203 69th Street. ' II- - 6
• Both units are on the same 9,000 square
4
foot lot. t
• The proposed alterations are considered
changes to a nonconforming use because
both units are on one parcel, contrary to
the Zoning Ordinance requirement that
each single-family dwelling in the R-5R
�r
district be located on a separate parcel.
Evaluation and
Recommendation
• This item is not heard by the Planning
_ Commission; therefore,there is no
o_Jo _ ii= ;. recommendation.
iliVIOL...RE51DE\TI'U.DEVELOPMENT -'-
7
11/17/2009
A I '.
r ___..
e/
S.:;t,'\\ '• .-..1-)4_, • ."(44114::.:( .
:.
i , , ,, .4 0(Ad
o '4
/ 4/s
pp w L.,,..,ii a •
,0,4\
0
4 V.- . to, -tr....., .4‘,
i ,
ROSE HALL DISTRICT
a�a�.rc�.iR,.,.
Relevant Information •*.. „. -
• The applicant requests a Conditional Use p6a.� = .- -
Permit to allow development of the site for `"d;"" _ .'' ==
11/17/2009
Evaluation and
Recommendation -' irrar,l„o<rar.•,a:,ler,A not lawn,Inc,
NJ
• Planning Staff recommended approval Ld+ %ii% 1131dl,
• Planning Commission recommends - "•`
approval (9-0) nil LI �'�`1
liAln
• There was no opposition. '.�' ,. ,
• Consent agenda. HOIR11�{U,
tr.&A 1 V./
BEACH DISTRICT
lii 4.1' " • Relevant Information
V .fr T:,fi r, ..4 .
The applicant requests a Conditional Use
1 Permit to allow a bulk storage yard for the
� ' purpose of storing materials used by the
office,warehouse,and manufacturing
.i lit businesses located on-site.
.,•1,,.:, • The applicant,unaware of the requirement for
1 =44 `. a Conditional Use Permit, has allowed the
•" - area behind the multi-unit industrial buildings
it
i. 44.4. . .: , ' if
to be used for bulk storage by business
owners with condominium units located on
x the parcel.
• Examples of items that are currently stored
•
,.1 within the yard consists of landscaping
/rte ` equipment,playground equipment,materials
used in carpentry,and storage containers
- Central Associates Owner's Association,Inc.- containing pipes, plumbing fixtures,etc.
IIIIIII 100.44,
IFS
'
I
Central Associates Owner's Association,Inc. Pyr-lr11M "1J 1. - , IA%
, n
11/17/2009
Evaluation and
Recommendation Rock Church-John Gnomes
ti
.,_
• Planning Staff recommended approval t , , j d a
• Planning Commission recommends tr.. ..;•��:;P►: ;. . . „
approval (9-0) �•,*- ., 1..4.4.1,i,,,......,
• There was opposition. ;�`-:.. o e..,1. ; p
ra to AZ'•Y7 .` v..%kO i
Yd
KEMPSVILLE DISTRICT
Relevant Information
J L_f
• The applicant requests a Conditional Use
r Permit to allow a religious use for adult
education of potential ministers. Up to 20
c- ,,.,, men will be at the school.
• The education program,including dormitory
•'' `' ; space,will be located on two floors of an
7. `- , existing section of building that is on part of
.•;• r' the church property.These floors were used
previously as office space.
• Additional windows will be added to the
building,and other modifications will be
made as necessary to meet Code
1 { ':' requirements.
•
Y
P4II
..omaaw nu !
y ..0.61.0 m..0. I
VOMen wars
Kat 6r•.• 'Nit
n G
0
1_
i 1-TTII T-1, .- -- ____,___. .
_ _
r i
... .
,i. ., . .} 4 . G 1d pQz International Rock Church-John Gimenez International -ii
...... ...............,.. School of Ministry
10
11/17/2009
0
Evaluation and
Recommendation `"'"" ,""°Construction,
LI.
A: •
01 - off_
• Planning Staff recommended approval a" ° ''ao xl s w.'',,
• Planning Commission recommends . a ,0 sr,V,4'Vit. oto'
approval (9-0) 9a •9 0.0. �•1
• There was no opposition.pP ►0. � i � �1 i.,� ► '�9
• Consent agenda. 4.i>,',. -'-'9)........41.,......„,' • .1ffi 1 :ill
LYNNHAVEN DISTRICT
e1. 1
Relevant Information
• The applicant proposes to change the zoning of two
' ,:.
existing single-family lots,zoned R-40 Residential,to
�' R-20 Residential District.
The applicant's purpose in rezoning these lots is to
• '� divide the combined property into four single-family
"h waterfront lots.
,. • The applicant has been notified by the City-Navy MOU
tv _ Committee that the proposal for four lots is not
t•_, '( - consistent with the regulations provided in the AICUZ
.• Ordinance for discretionary applications,as one
• additional unit is being added to the 65-70 AICUZ
' .
J � • Under the AICUZ Ordinance,City Council cannot
� !r 21-y . ' approve this proposal unless it finds that the proposal
' represents the lowest reasonable density.
The applicant,however,wishes to proceed with four
r.1z ,t,'.1. d, .x_, lots.
Jessup Construction,LLC
\\ .- ' is his v +rt �.cf•
•
\v..471\
-.41 '111111.:1 -7:7151611:4":-....,.741 ;'-."'"'"Li ii .
, r
Jessup Construction,LLC
-1'l
11/17/20'09
M
Evaluation and
Recommendation
• Planning Staff recommended denial.
• Planning Commission recommends
denial (11-0).
• There was opposition.
12
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr.,DECLARED the City Council Meeting ADJOURNED at 5:42 P.M.
Ruth Hodges Fraser, MMC William D. Sessoms,Jr.
City Clerk Mayor
City of Virginia Beach
Virginia
November 17, 2009