Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
OCTOBER 27, 2020 WORKSHOP MINUTES
ra.' = s) CI o,&� a�rr 9}so J V y-uy W6 i n„FM"�S`O� VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Virginia Beach, Virginia October 27, 2020 Mayor Dyer called to order the CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS in the Virginia Beach Convention Center, Suite 5, Tuesday, October 27, 2020, at 2:31 P.M Council Members Present: Jessica P. Abbott, Michael F. Berlucchi, Mayor Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Louis R. Jones, Guy K. Tower, Rosemary Wilson, Vice Mayor James L. Wood and Sabrina D. Wooten Council Members Absent: John D. Moss—Out of town,family illness Aaron R. Rouse-Ill 2 CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS AMERICAN FLOOD COALITION 2:33 P.M. Mayor Dyer welcomed Annabel Cryan, Outreach Associate — American Flood Coalition. Ms. Cryan expressed her appreciation to City Council for their continued support: AMERICAN FLOOD COALITION .: - iii1111111111 American Flood Coalition • Virginia Beach City Council presentation October 27,2020 � ...'.s..,..... Here is the Agenda: OAgenda • AFC mission O Introductions and who we are • Policy platform • O Member resources Dual Disaster Handbook • Flood Funding Finder • Local subgranting O Pilots and thought leadership • Turning the Tide on social equity O Federal policy • Our engagement thus far • Looking ahead OQuestions p l z October 27, 2020 3 CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS AMERICAN FLOOD COALITION (Continued) Here are the American Flood Coalition members: OAmerican Flood Coalition :01 Annabel Cryan Matthew Rowland Anne Baker Susan Gaston Coalition Outreach Policy Manager Coalition Outreach Advisor Associate Manager The American Flood Coalition is a non-profit and nonpartisan coalition: We are the American Flood Coalition A 501(c)3 nonprofit organization and nonpartisan coalition advocating for national solutions to flooding and sea level rise Poe Federal Cities,Towns Elected Businesses Military Civic and Champions and Counties Officials Groups Academic Groups Q i . October 27, 2020 4 CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS AMERICAN FLOOD COALITION (Continued) Here is a breakdown of over 240 coalition members: Our coalition membership Breakdown of our over 240 members ------ If24 Federal Champions T, 69 Municipalities 1r ■s . 86 Elected officials di 38 Businesses and Associations �} IVI 5 Military leaders Legend •<5 members ow. 20 Academic partners and civic groups ■>5 mambas 6 I a Here is the breakdown of Virginia's forty-six(46) members: Virginia membership Our Virginia coalition members Virginia federal champions 3 federal champions a. 4 municipalities ¢� 1 planning district commission Rep.Bobby Scott A 23 elected officials di 10 businesses&associations 4 military groups Rep.Elaine Luria Rep.Donald McEachin qr lerr 1 civic organization Qi October 27, 2020 5 CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS AMERICAN FLOOD COALITION (Continued) Here is, "Our mission" OOur mission I ,qX Protecting communities that are vulnerable to 1 } flooding and sea level rise is a national issue that ; must be met with national solutions—it is vitally 1 important to our well-being,economic strength, J, 1 and security. _ aulii { . i . 7, ' . �K s M With effective flooding and sea level rise planning Y our communities can adapt and thrive. But we must act now. f i, d Here are the four(4)pillars for coastal and inland solutions: ,... emu,- .. , 1.i I I'4 : U:imil ..,,.. ...". III P i 40., . i „. _ 1 ..„.,., . _ . .,.... „...... ... Our 4 pillars for coastal and inland solutions Economy Communities Rebuilri4i0_, Military Invest in infrastructure that Use smart planning to Build back stronger Ensure our military boosts the economy and keep communities safe to protect communities installations are ready to protects property values and save taxpayer dollars from future flooding deploy 365 days a year O October 27, 2020 6 CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS AMERICAN FLOOD COALITION (Continued) Here are a few of the services the coalition offers: What we offer 41114 Best-in-class Tools for effective Networks of leaders Competitive local Platform for advocacy educational guides communication on flooding resilience pilots and education Scalable educational Opportunities end tools Forum to connect virtually Competitive local pilots Strong platform that makes resources to meet our for communicating about and in-person with other that promote deeper local voices and needs members'needs flooding with stakeholders leaders and share Warnings engagement on flooding heard at the federal level at all levels and sea level rise ® I c The next two (2)slides provide an overview of member resources: Member resources: Flood Funding Finder This new tool breaks down federal grant and technical assistance programs best suited for flooding and sea level rise - initiatives Identifies programs by characteristics including: Requires Presidential Disaster Declaration 111711111 • Sit No local cost share requirements icA Special considerations for small municipalities aSupports project planning ei Administered by state 0 a October 27, 2020 7 CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS AMERICAN FLOOD COALITION (Continued) OMember resources: Dual Disaster Handbook • In collaboration with the American Public Health Association,this guide highlights recommendations for community leaders to prepare for the dual disasters of flooding and COVID-19 i • Many places face an overlap of COVID-19 and hurricane activity alongside long-term - budget strain ��' •• Local leaders are grappling with unique challenges,such as sheltering and evacuation during the pandemic Smaller,under-resourced communities are disproportionately affected by COVID-19 and flooding and could be left behind ® I Here are three (3) areas the coalition has identified to increase equity: OThought leadership: Turning the Tide Toward Equity Average change in wealth after disasters' Eligibility restrictions.Program eligibility and requirements exclude applicants on racial and class lines. Black haaa•hak1+ • Procedural gaps.Renters, wh••haa+••ate• unbanked populations,and non- English speakers fall through the cracks of federal flood assistance Hbaank hw+MoW+ programs • Application complexity.Complex applications exclude small municipalities and low income ,For counties with disaster damage of at least$10 billion from 1999-2013 individuals O I 17 October 27, 2020 8 CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS AMERICAN FLOOD COALITION (Continued) Here is an overview of three(3)projects the coalition is supporting: Local grants: potential models for across the country .fi r• } • , r♦ri~ y �• s t Modeling multi-cropping Funding equitable flood resilience Creating resilient land use benefits in NE Iowa in Texas strategies in coastal Virginia Iowa's state flood center partnered A community-based group is A nonprofit will work with two with a conservation group to model holding Harris County accountable municipalities to create resilient the benefits of having farmers plant for allocating the$2.5 billion bond land use strategies that combine a second crop in addition to money for flood control projects buyouts,conservation,and market- soy/com equitably based tools to reduce flood risk and benefit landowners and communities I 13 Here are two(2)Federal Policies the coalition worked on: 0 Federal policy: examples of our work Members of the Virginia Congressional delegation submitted a SLR Defense Access Roads amendment to the Defense Access Roads program in the NDAA to allow Program DAR funds to be used to address flooding on military access roads • NDAA was signed into law in August of 2018 with the DAR amendment included • We've been working with Congressional champions to create designated DAR account • AFC has submit letters on behalf of our members throughout the program FEMA's new BRIC Program development process • We participated in discussions with FEMA to assist in the creation of a robust and effective federal program October 27, 2020 9 CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS AMERICAN FLOOD COALITION (Continued) Here are two(2)Federal Policies currently being worked on: 0 Federal policy update: Looking ahead • Earlier this year,the House of Representatives passed an infrastructure package as part of COVID stimulus relief. COVID and infrastructure We worked with AFC Federal Champions in the House to include provisions related to flooding and sea level rise in that package. • It is likely that Congress will attempt to pass another stimulus package early next year and we are continuing to monitor the process. • We are continuing to discuss ways we can promote flood resilience at our Building policy concepts for military facilities to mitigate the impact of flooding and sea level rise. the next Congress • We're looking at ways the federal government can expand how it supports mitigation activities nationwide. We're looking into how data is unveiling social inequities related to federal disaster assistance and how policy could be improved. AMERICAN FLOOD COALITION Thank you! Questions? Anne Baker Annabel Cryan Matthew Rowland Susan Gaston Coalition Outreach Coalition Outreach Policy Manager Advisor Manager Associate anne@floodcoalition.org annabel@floodcoalition.org matthew@floodcoalition.org susan@gastongroup.com Mayor Dyer expressed his appreciation to Ms. Cryan for the presentation. October 27, 2020 10 CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS RECREATION CENTERS MODERNIZATION STUDY CENTERVILLE RECREATION CENTER FEASIBILITY STUDY 2:50P.M. Mayor Dyer welcomed Michael Kirschman, Director — Parks and Recreation, Chad Morris, Planning Design and Development Administrator—Parks and Recreation,Mike Ross,President—HBA Architecture and Troy Sherrard, Partner-Practice Leader—Moody-Nolan. Mr. Kirschman expressed his appreciation to City Council for their continued support and distributed a copy of the presentation, attached hereto and made a part of the record. Mayor Dyer expressed his appreciation to Mr. Kirschman, Mr. Morris, Mr. Ross and Mr. Sherrard for the presentation. October 27, 2020 aA N` fA�1,�, VIRGINIA BEACH COMMUNITY ti, ii, z RECREATION CENTERS ati,N, � ": .`: Modernization Study & f• ``D o Feasibility Masterplan Recommendations 6 ' �'l- ��-, m h y P'�� r�, I A` $ a FINAL REPORT 'A3T :_ . A l fl� i• AO I •.I ^: Michael Kirschman i ,, tllll C. Michael Ross, AIA Troy Sherrard, FAIA Director 1 President Partner — Practice Leader VIRGINIA BEACH ' _ I-B` " PARKS & , ARCHITECTU'. , . , \. 711611\ p,oSie.j :9 RECREATION City Co u nci I Presentation 10.27.2020 Background and Purpose of Study a��,"A y s: ....., v, ....,, r 4 V'' Williams Farm .., ,.i., ,�f t1 ,,��, ;-",,..v. � ';�;�,h Great Neck er .ate fN t r ._ r y Community Recreation ' Community Recreation' ' ,=1 " c�z, ` ,, " °' Center ; x �� Center :r '' 4 / I _7 .. ;.� 1990 __ _rir.�w 2012 reQ Ur Bayside ^�'L. Community Recreation 6Bow Creek Center - 1992 . - -W Community Recreation ,�� �, Center Al ill Princess Anne - r. �.-- al_ -- 2015 Community Recreation ,.�_.1.r o,._ , --.,�. 144 , , _,1 ‘ . Center s�`�. R —amok ..... 1994 1 ,,, Kempsville Seatack ,---... .a..,r Community Recreation ^��r Community Recreation —ry T kt a ka � ,r, Center Center 2017 1997 — Background and Purpose of Study �V SS Satisfaction with Cit Services * Individual services with the highest satisfaction ratings: ✓Fire Department - 100% ✓Public Libraries or accessed library Virginia Beach information by computer - 98% Citizen Satisfaction Survey VParamedic and Rescue Squad services - Highlights 98% January 21,2020 ✓Recreation Centers - 96% ✓Parks - 95% issues©nsweas GLOBAL MARKET RESEARCH i CONSULTING 3 Background and Purpose of Study Secondary objectives of this modernization feasibility study included driving the following outcomes into the 4 existing community recreation centers: ■ A Healthy Lifestyle Focus . . .program improvements ■ Improved Program Utilization . . . increase memberships ■ Improved Operational Efficiencies . . . save operational $$ ■ Improved Sustainable Strategies . . . save operational $$ ■ Improved Energy Efficiencies . . . save operational $$ 4 —sal I 1110 it! - ,_ . ,, ...._ . _ . 4, i--- 4 ._ ... .... . . _ , z .Z._, ', ,,, •• , .,, • .-:•_ = -: ....-• . ..• .; . ..„ : ,..,..... . .. : ., al. z .,..... ,.... :. ,. (I) 0 - - .., .., . ,... 0 --II w ii— < co 1-1 < co 0 ( 9 I 0 0 . Qu i c i 00 13 m i I i ini C I D et < L I U c.9— 1 IIC X CI a Strategic Plan Goals & Objectives = y 6 4‘ : ) \, ak I? 5.6.1 KEY ISSUES FOR PROGRAMS :5:. = = The following are the key findings and challenges related to programs that need to be addressed in this CD 0 Strategic Plan: icc . • A need exists to determine whether the Department is a facility provider, a program offeror, or both. LWQ • Membership Tiers are too limiting. m 61.1' • The future of Early Childhood and drop-in area is unclear. Q • Early childhood program has wed space for relatively few participants. = W • • Facility utilizati not optimal, at n times. _ • inifilkilitidinillifilliiiiiiiirialalllitillill = 11= _�_.. ,.��0!! �`� • Technology hurdles limit department's performance. Z •'-`� J l..,•.s' r ' • Programming has a heavy recreation center vs.park focus. Q Illll��tl� 1II� I1IIII I • need t i e po a rexpan a pr i e.g. fitness, adventure recreation, etc.). ^^ I :!I t I. 11 :,�'���I I .' • Premier memberships may be reducing drop-in fitness participation and revenue. be :ter_..— -:—~-- ----r .. • New core programs based on trends and community appeal needed (e.g. adventure, e-gaming, = ..-„ __...._. special events, etc.). Q -?' • Inconsistency in program info delivery and customer service currently. a_ x _ - 5.6.2 KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROGRAMS '" = �-.� `-' -_ Based on the key findings and challenges identified for programs, the consultant team developed the 2018 �.�� - -_ .;:=_' -- following recommendations: Strategic 5 • Establish Membership Tiers driven by cost recovery range desired (conduct a Global Membership Plan • Review). • Develop Business plans for each recreation center. IB _ „ • I)tilize Data to Enhance Program gad Facility Perforgiaggb • evaluate a regional approach fo�at,.,� dha� �or�d pros allillikat Virginia Brach consul-, • Expand collection of user data for non registered programs(e.g. special events attendance). f • Lontinue to align progra • Track and communicate marketing return on investment(ROI). • ■ ble. 6 Strategic Plan Goals & Objectives , '== yl L 5.9.1 KEY ISSUES FOR PARKS, TRAILS,AND FACILITIES '' ` = Z The following are the key findings and challenges related to parks, trails, and facilities that need to v 0 be Q . addressed in this Strategic Plan: m 1151 • Lack of consistency in Parks and Landscape management. W • E.g. Consistency between neighborhood and community park maintenance. Q = V • E.g. Consistency in tree care: tree planting / pruning etc. ZW • • Non-prime times underutilized in parks and facilities. CO _ !'_ J e*oom/s% • Need to maintain/improve what exists. Z ..•. I .,„,,•',.- •• User needs keep growing and evolving constantly. Q III1:III I ` I I 11111411 5.9.2 KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PARKS, TRAILS,AND FACILITIES . Based on the key findings and challenges identified for parks, trails, and facilities, the consultant = -- `,�,. . _ team Q developed the following recommendations: • Assess efficiencies of spaces and11.111pn rates. ; . • Continue to conduct a lifecycle manaassessment for all assets systemwide. 2018 _ ~ --, ~ } _ • Update all maintenance management plans. Strategic • Enhance trail connections and connectivity. Plan • Conduct a special events facility feasibility study to identify need outside of the oceanfront. • g"RegfiarRecreatron'Center by themes to create uniqueness in offerings. -V3 pros V ii gini;i K,•ai h cons II.11.;. 7 ,fr4 CD < (I) -IQ J ZOZ a 2 Q LLI CL LIJ Yam a U) < 0 M 7‹ hen Ci acz z = cc > � cc Market Analysis Study Summary (-1.---..C1j ' j, izz.„N....,*..irjr Q6 :: Level of Importance for Virginia Beach Parks & Q6. Level of Importance for Virginia Beach Recreation to Provide Various Benefits: Parks & Recreation to Provide Various Benefits (% of Respondents Agree or Strongly Agree) by percentage of respondents #1 — Make Virginia Beach a more desirable place to live — 91% Make Virginia Beach a more desirable place tolive 56% 35% II: #2 — Maintain & preserved open space/parks/facilities — 89% Maintain 8 preserve open space/parks/facilities 53% 36% r0% { Provide access to parks/facilities/programs 46% 42% 10% #3 — Provide access to parks/facilities/programs— 88% iii Promote healthy lifestyles 48% i #4 — Promote Healthy Lifestyles— 87% ®N Offer social activities for all ages 44'-, 40% #5 — Offer Social Activities for all ages — 84% Protect the environment 42%-;, 41% 15% 1 L5sessrnentsurve Virginia Beach Parks and Increase property values 15%ecreation NeedsProvide places to meet 31%41% 46%41% rsx Help attract new residents&businesses 30% 45% 20% Help reduce crime 36% 32% 23% Promote tourism to the city 2T 38°b 27% ����ifings Report 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% ■Strongly Agree ❑Agree ❑Neutral ❑Disagree/Strongly Disagree its ETC Source Fir Institute(2017) Market Analysis StudySummary ,Jttr.- .E^y� -- Y? ` N��N Q8 :: Parks & Recreation Facilities Q8. Parks & Recreation Facilities Respondent Households Have a Need For: Respondent Households Have a Need For by percentage of respondents(multiple choices could be made) (Filtered for Indoor Facilities) Community recreation centers 70% Paved walking&jogging trails 65% Indoor fitness&exercise facilities .4/° #1 — Community Recreation Centers — 70% Natural areas 63% Large community parks 63% Small neighborhood parks 59% #3 — Indoor Fitness and Exercise Facilities — 64% Picnic shelters/areas 57°%° Biking trails 56% Children's playgrounds 47'/0 #11 — Indoor Walking/JoggingTrack— 42% Unpaved walking&jogging trails 42% Indoor running/walking track 4Z% Indoor leisure pool(i.e.slides,sprays) 41/° % Indoor pool lap lanes(exercise) 9% #12 — Indoor Leisure "Fun" Pool — 41 Fishing piers&dock areas 38% Indoor gymnasium 38% Canoe/Kayak launches 33% #13 — Indoor Pool Lap Lanes (exercise) — 39% Off-leash dog park 30% Outdoor fitness stations _ 25% Youth multi-purpose fields 24% Adult multi-purpose fields 22% Outdoor basketball courts 20% Marina 20% Indoor competition pool 19% Outdoor tennis courts 19% Youth ball diamonds 18% Skate parks 16% Cross country/5K course 16% Motorized boat launches 14% Synthetic multi-purpose fields 14% Indoor tennis courts _ 13% Indoor racquetball courts 13% Disc golf courses 12% Adult ball diamonds 10% Outdoor pickleball courts °, 0% 20% 40% 60% Source: ETC Institute(2017) 10 Market Analysis Study Summary ''.' �y? 4: --''y zz S .1 l Q8-3 :: Estimated Number of Households Q8-3. Estimated Number of Households Whose Needs for Whose Needs for Facilities are Being Met 50% Facilities Are Being Met 50% or Less or Less: by number of households based on 180,824 households in Virginia Beach Biking trails I 7 0 47,609 (Filtered for Indoor Facilities) Paved walking&jogging trails I 36,897 Natural areas 32,799 Small neighborhood parks 30,887 Unpaved walkingl jogging trails ! ]29,309 #7 - Indoor Walking/Jogging Track - 28,639 Off-leash dog park 1 29,093 Indoor running/walking track 28,639 Picnic shelters/areas ,,, - . 1 i 27,266 #12 - Indoor Fitness and Exercise Facilities - 22,612 Canoe/Kayak launches 1 _1 26,857 Large community parks 1I 26,261 Fishing Piers&dock areas 1 1 25,074 #13 - Indoor Leisure Pool "Fun" - 19,894 Indoor fitness&exercise facilities I 122,612 Indoor leisure pool(i.e.slides,sprays) -----I 19,894 Outdoor fitness stations I 119,290 #16 - Community Recreation Centers - 16,086 Cross count course •- I 117,969 Community recreationon centers I 116,086 Children's playgrounds I 115,723 I #18 - Indoor Tennis (Pickleball) Courts - 15,600 Adult lmulti mur lti-purpose fieldnis s I I 1115,270 • Outdoor basketball courts I 114,538 Marina I 113,998 Skate parks I 112,832 Youth multi-purpose fields I 112,646 Outdoor tennis courts - 12,261 Indoor pool lap lanes(exercise) "1 11,898 Motorized boat launches 11,275 Indoor gymnasium MAN 10,582 Estimated Number of VB Households = 169,290 Indoor racquetball courts %ii/% 10,207 Indoor competition pooll %/%%/AI 9,981 Synthetic multi-purpose fields artA 8,515 Youth ball diamonds (KWh 8,418 [2014-2018 US Census] Adult ball diamonds I .�a 7,248 Disc golf courses 4,340 Outdoor pickleball courts i 3.101 0 25,000 50,000 75,000 I•0%Met C125%Met 050%Met Source: ETC Institute(20I7) 11 ,.r,, cv r�`�1. �h wy S g c COI o 042 aNi O U Lo 2 L N _c c.) ^o V O NNo� ❑ N Nr-o Cl- N•- C O = CDE i o — -� a in U) - -- `-- +- = 0 — O E �'�o = a) - ❑ - Cn O - - ` o o C-_+ r• o▪ C 5 ---0 E U▪ � - c000 • -_ - Lor:oL -� � o o Cl) 0 CC 0 L _ — M )( oV_ Q N - I-�N ��a 73 C N Nom GC dC c _C, `NoN na)V 0.,0.,N^Nyy yfn EN NNQ yt0o v)N.)raNN v) o to N a) V/ 8 y.a)1.EiN(`,75d N N a7a7>4.=�C32 0202`7'C-7E Oj� (Q 0 cam-a-m. onb`° F,„-0no,Uoomnoo' 0 _O UOATSOSyX`O CmE0oEOsUNyNUNUNU0. C ar . 2. c U E _co w.m n_.E, coY E , O f0YOc) `Ly, 9-5 O`. C y C,y,E-S �3 NaOOOmLO�V)a)N--8 a)OI- D_—01(C-E. f) y a)Q d a) EZ O-0f)a)La)3_>O 0 7EmOCdyyC Uy _O a) � °6 E ,-C N a)Cy co O Q -u U.0 _ co.. d C.)U U X CO -= a U— YO_.c—O_.—c=O O co'"'on 2 ` _ n T.,„._a) cYcr-asc)0c�-o-EOEOQ y j8: Eo yt'aco - a oa 208 -}.c-0O �0 0��8.U0 Ec"-J Ea y a 8 OV ¢ o c 2U 0 -.o0 e E`= > �>LLo . } L)e 0- n -OO c t° T u N c O o a c E E = O r in . C 0 O ... C..) (i) N i 1- v 0 a) CO 2 C O X CZ ■_ O s 4) I- O 0L O Q p W C •O) tC — - O) (B O LL U f6 (13 0 O O O -I C i Q N O O — _� O C 0 a) A� = - � —I L I- L W •� 0 0 O 0 0 0 Ism U- N O E (Z I I I I I 0 = O) O X— �t L.n E a. ._ , , , Market Analysis Study Summary s ��0 = 'y ..c,1\-7:::.Q20 :: Reasons Households Have Used Q20. Reasons Households Have Used Any Any of the Seven Community of the Seven Community Recreation Centers Recreation Centers3 by percentage of respondents(multiple choices could be made) (Filtered for Indoor Facilities) Aquatics-laps/open swim 24% Cardiovascular equipment 22% Weight room = 20%#1 —Aquatics-Laps/Open Swim — 24% Parks&Recreation events 15% Group fitness classes _ 13% #2 — Cardiovascular Equipment— 22% Indoor track 12% Aquatics-swim lessons 7% #3 —Wei ht Room — 20% Personal training 7% g Water fitness classes 6% Private/community special events 6% #5 — Group Fitness Classes — 13% Youth sports&leagues 6% Out-of-school time after school programs 5% #6 — Indoor Track — 12% Adult sports&leagues 5% Out-of-school time summer camp 5% Pick-up basketball 4% Forever Young senior programs 3% Therapeutic recreation 3% Arts&crafts 3% Out-of-school time break camps 3% Aquatics-leagues/clinics 3% Dance&performing arts 3% Martial arts 2% Archery 1% Pickleball 1% Out-of-school time early childhood programs 1% Other 4% 0% 10% 20% 30% Source: FTC Institute 12017) 13 Market Analysis Study Summary _ Top Priorities for Investment for Recreation Facilities Based on the Priority Investment Rating Biking trails Recreation Facilities Priority Investment Paved walking&jogging trails IMINIMNIMMIN 149 Natural areas M110 136 Ratings Community recreation centers 134 High Priority Indoor fitness&exercise facilities 130 �100+) (Filtered for Indoor Facilities): Small neighborhood parks 126 Large community parks 125 High Priority: Unpaved walking&jogging trails 113 Children's playgrounds IIIIIIMMINMMINNIMM.1 106 Off-leash dog park MINIMMI 98 Picnic shelters/areas 1111111111. 94 #4 — Community Recreation Centers Indoor running/walking track 92 Medium Priority Fishing piers&dock areas 90 (50 99t #5 — Indoor Fitness and Exercise Facilities Canoe/Kayak launches 81 Indoor leisure pool(i.e.slides,sprays) IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 70 Indoor pool lap lanes(exercise) 62 Adult multi-purpose fields 48 Medium Priority: Cross country/5K course MII11.11111 48 Outdoor fitness stations 44 #12 — Indoor Running/Walking Track Youth multi-purpose fields 42 Indoor tennis courts 41 #15 — Indoor Leisure "Fun" Pool#16 — Indoor Indoor gymnasium IIIII 41 Marina 1111==1111 38 Pool Lap Lanes Outdoor basketball courts 35 Motorized boat launches 34 Lower Priority Skate parks 33 Indoor competition pool IIII 33 (0-49) Youth ball diamonds 33 Outdoor tennis courts 32 Adult ball diamonds 26 Indoor racquetball courts 25 Synthetic multi-purpose fields 21 Disc golf courses 20 Outdoor pickleball courts M. 8 0 40 80 120 160 200 1 4 Source: ETC Institute(2017) Cif) /fr, z In o ,aaCl) 0 . W It FIZ ^o � � `;WWo ocC0 ci) J COel— WwjW UIII I- Cl) (1111119 J0 = CIO Q CI < c"1 cia a < Ile n u.,,, ,...\,_ .. . ._ . � 1 a � Summary - Facilities Conditions Assessments :���� �Ky ;y Estimated Capital Renewal <tyA---". $12.5M $12.5M $10.0M $1.0M Expenditures over next 15 Years `7.`.,%... ': .4 Facility Site Name: Great Neck Bayside Princess Anne Seatack `�'` Original Building Open Date: 1990 1992 1994 1997 BUILDING&SITE SYSTEMS&COMPONENTS System Condition System Condition System Condition System Condition Index(SCQ Index[SCI) Index[SCI) Index[SCI] STRUCTURAL FLOOR SYSTEMS 0.342 0.270 0.337 0.220 SCI Scoring Legend STRUCTURAL WALL/FRAME SYSTEMS 0.290 0.270 0.250 0.220 1.000=Building System or Building Component Life Exceeded-Replace Immediately STRUCTURAL ROOF SYSTEMS 0.290 0.270 0.250 0.220 0.750=Building System or Building Component Life Remaining=25% EXTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS 0.504 0.344 0.400 0.275 0.500=Building System or Building Component Life Remaining=50% ROOFING SYSTEMS 0.884 0.926 0.706 0.345 0.250=Building System or Building Component Life Remaining=75% DOOR SYSTEMS 0.561 0.542 0.552 0.533 0.000=Building System or Building Component Life Remaining=100%[New] WINDOW SYSTEMS 0.588 0.558 0.527 0.526 INTERIOR FLOORING SYSTEMS 0.540 0.526 0.495 0.516 INTERIOR WALL SYSTEMS 0.390 0.363 0.311 0.330 INTERIOR WALL FINISH SYSTEMS 0.362 0.217 0.120 0.107 $36M Total Estimated Capital INTERIOR CEILING SYSTEMS 0.594 0.614 0.642 0.465 SPECIALTIES COMPONENTS 0.366 0.314 0.312 0.410 - - Renewal Expenditures over EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS 0.576 0.505 0.503 0.577 FURNISHINGS[BUILT-IN]COMPONENTS 0.350 0.350 0.350 0.325 next 15 Years N/A ELEVATOR SYSTEMS POOL COMPONENTS&SYSTEMS 0.485 0.459 0.503 0.433 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS 0.737 0.596 0.596 0.570 PLUMBING SYSTEMS 0.698 0.660 0.622 0.555 Capital Renewal Priority Legend HVAC SYSTEMS 0.621 0.620 0.561 0.402 Priority 1 [SCI>.9]::Capital Renewal recommended within 3 years ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS 0.787 0.770 0.753 0.735 Priority 2 (.9>SCI>.8)::Capital Renewal recommended in 4 to 7 years ELECTRICAL SPECIAL SYSTEMS 0.970 0.970 0.970 0.915 Priority 3 (.8>SCI>.7)::Capital Renewal recommended In 8 to 11 years i SITE 0.665 0.660 0.625 0.629 Priority 4 [.7>SCI>.6)::Capital Renewal recommended In 12 to 15 years FACILITY CONDITION INDEX 0.5481 j 0.5180 0.4990 0.4263 1 16 r--,. ffr, it $1 --- --, Z 1:e < imM 0 Z 0 °elk' Z 0 W Z M 01. I-- 2 11.1 < w w w c ,,,,E ., ul u.I u.i m Ce co ille .......... L.L.1 - cc z ,cc _ „- i=c ,.,,„,„,,,, What Does Being Healthy Mean? 6.o,‘ = 'IA . ���l � � eJ�l qA V M ' Proactive Health + Wellness ,,_ „� , �_ 11 What problems are we trying to solve? w. '. r ,, °IP , What positive outcomes are we looking for? t 4 ; ,1 STRESS, DEPRESSION, ISOLATION, it . ,_ = ' a�• SICKNESS, LACK OF SLEEP, INJURY, 11�1 r ill ' 3'''r « ' � 2 ill BELIEF IN ONESELF, ETC. _,,i v.3,1 It's about improving the quality of our lives and '"" being more inclusive It is multi-dimensional \ 4,1 : ktf, .. ' ' ' Lit:goi More than just physical wellness — a "holistic - - '" �. IV— and whole body" focus ,,-. dmi• _ , L li, ..- iii ,.., _ . .. liii is ,Vfi :. ji __I L '34,1. i ..... Off-set Negative Outcome- 18 ram, Recreation Opportunity - Engagement - Wellness Centers will become more integrated, more diverse and more complex in the future. • Evolving User Expectations 4:00µlA 41. ....t ok •l " • - .of ' ° --610 , . ,.. _ • l Y ` .. -- IDS �..:... `j TEENS ADULTS SENIO a -__ - User experience, expectations, and demographics is critical Who are we designing for? The future of fitness is all about inclusivity 20 CrossFit & Functional Training ,,NURe, y�' ‘,.--;.,___ _ jc..) Customization + Adaptability p Y .. , - -- ii- - - el , .....,.....: .,,, x it ...a....a. 0 ie i't _ �1.1 J t'! ks it 1 1 )' le .._.. ,.' , m ram-- . fi , - •?,f--, -- i dB.. * t dill 1; -. 0* a4 ,; Ways to customize recreational experience? Performance training? Individuals vs. groups? 21 Healthcare Partnerships f,,„...7 , 2 1s� `tom' ---,,—„,„,..._______ „ :,* i_________ ............ t t. _ , , I *- -1 fl ,.AE+.i J_ I •� ` ss V.I r #4. .400 . -N _ , _ . r _ 0 k � o 4)111k4 1 ,...' . ' re t f ' tom- PROACTIVE and INTEGRATED Health and Wellness Wellness resources — Counseling — Fitness Assessment / Data Collection / Benchmarking / Rehab 22 Focus on Wellness & Healthy Lifestyles oa� '--�y4- t. NI (zy,z,,,:::4.,,,::"..,pr Nutrition ,, .. I I M .�. ,, Try a \ z:. Aly t t L4\ 1i V, * JJJIII t 1 VVV ik, f 0111 i rr C{,Yeab ... ' y ;y' r - y ..M+"".,I. ♦r.1 ' �y I i IL,,. .1 1 ►�' l'4446114,44, , ... 1 , ,. , ... _ ft. ram,.. ! ,,.-.�_.. > � 1"F,% % �� 1 ,0, SillavitrIll . IC IDt --- / t ' , , ...._ .... -_,-,-,- Cooking Classes for Nutrition Education, Creative Arts Childhood Obesity, Diabetes. Creative Cuisine: Learn to Cook international Dishes, just for FUN 23 r$�� . a w. N fri- z fit`( wrmel ` 4!) i'Ik = I ' 1T : I jolt. h , • t..k. . ,. ,,,,.... e, i C ' , ...,„ .ik 4-• : i'll , . 5 1 03 '= � di„' 0 r c..) 0. ., u ›. -, ..., 0. ,g. .4-- co co M a 0 .x , 17. r b ■— . 4.▪ 11 1 M • 2 fe3 r, r � I , vii 1 + S i7yo,,(,„_,.,11,mmtf J d te) a_- Alp• t a . 4s , 11 1 1 a 1 :T ; CO t'k. 1 . \tee• O --—— l+ , '` 'I,4 ` ' CD CO ,, , il i i -4 1 1 U .. .t I,' 1 U a) 1 ,t •— -o O 1 Cl) L ;' Q I ' i cc - .. 1instu it a //) 1`111� Imo/ �t Q 4/_ *��, , 4 L "%swain 0 a) .. _ '� - —_. ca � * EI of/I//4 ' ~ , .4., .— co (i) ,- itp...r..-litiku . . 11,91s E = : it !t ` ' V/ i s-s,2i�4-`�'- tom,;: V) L .'i4lri nt sjaw�.sw � ram V "taa .t,w •.fir. i ..i i- ' _( - .. M �r ► \ it. Cr ft i 1 CO i1 ,;, 14iii �s t V' 1 V ., I O I:vain ! U t Aill.IIIIP I :C - t� f' ;'i�a'� � x z a �� is 4V a ems. Ali IV J ft . I MI Cl) C t,) aS CO .!III� R _ C • um..... • S. N rs a) \ .. f'. O a '° a-+ i� t ',' A.t /7' Q _ . I-- cy 7fr 1 4 in z ce< >11111 FM. 0 (.9 Z 0 Z Z Cie p Z CIE FIN. 1112 0 •I' .., , iiikh.1 r.ri! Ull mg 11 III M Ur)Ow: imiggir.- re 0 > (I) 0 >111 • Ce 11.1 ill 1 015 M - A Li CD 1111V: < Con iiim, CCI Nie ICC 11111111111!ir Lil % IICX . ., LIU IX ..... .. ...,0,--M '. \ , - Om CC ". 'il . . ...,,,_. , , , k r > ur- -11.111"Al , Visioning Workshop with VB Parks & Recreation Staff' ' = , " CommunityRecreation Centers? `.',; a" - `'2" What are Must Haves for all Virginia Beach �;wJ,, GNCRC BCRC PACRC SCRC WFCRC BCCRC KCRC • Curb Appeal • Aquatics Wow Factor i4 • Center Uniqueness informed by Community Wi Demographics and Partnerships • Large Fitness Areas for a Variety of Fitness Activity g Wi Types • Indoor Walking/Jogging Track • Improved Program Utilization with Multi-Purpose Spaces • Dedicated (and strategically located) Space for Drop-In [.� g 121 Child Care for Parents while recreating • Welcome / Control Desk with excellent Access and [� Oversight • Improved Sustainable Strategies Visioning Workshop with VB Parks & Recreation Staff r,. �yy How would you improve Program Accommodation 4 .p � at each center to provide "Uniqueness" ? Great Neck Community Recreation Center: Sports-related Physical Therapy & Sports Medicine Potential Partnerships with adjacent Cox High School and nearby Sentara Virginia Beach General Hospital Bayside Community Recreation Center: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Potential Partnerships with Sentara Bayside Hospital and nearby Assisted Living Communities Princess Anne Community Recreation Center: Healthy Cooking, Multi-Cultural Cooking & Nutritional Education; Community Gardens Potential Partnerships with Farmer's Market and Kellam High School Seatack Community Recreation Center: Connections to Arts and the VB Resort Area Potential Partnerships with MOCA, VIBE District Businesses and the new VB Sport Center adjacent to the Convention Center It was also generally agreed that all community recreation centers could potentially provide extended hours support services for the Virginia Beach Library System. 29 FACILITIES MODERNIZATION PROGRAM ENHANCEMENT SCENARIOS EA � H3X�PARKS&N , COMMUNITY *11,,/ 44,41 GREAT NECK 5 , r •+ ,Ira^ �a AONIPIP ....„*.i. 4 fi "it CENTER .. .. . ciii ,:,.. 0 ,c,„ isonwom > , . . .. 44 ,, �E '�P"t�'r aa� 7� 7 , r E - •. ...: . 31 Facilities Modernization Program Enhancement Scenarios F�"�\�'= y kN44 **n Great Neck "� :""111111141111*‘16, `��;� ► - _ 1 Proposed Sports-Related ''-� — �� Theme or Physical Therapy, ' soHl' Brand Sports Medicine % y - ,, Potential Cox High School, "'�-„ Community Sentara VB General Hospital, n Partnerships Great Neck Public Library - 11 ... . et,,,..,,, .. .,_ , , . „ Add for Preferred Aqua Track .0 .',4) O 1, / , ,, , 0 , . To Improvements Big MAC ,. , ,, ,� e� . iI i ' A \ ## • '� I - Minimum New Entrance/ Lobby r L • elQ to el I� IN 1 Modernization Indoor Track on Mezzanine Improvements Flow Rider Y "" p . ry� = `,�+a i, Recommended Add Multi-Purpose Fitness i , ..__ Little MAC � " 9 ' rig �� r x � Capital Renewals Only ; , , over 15 Years I / �� �w��� �' 32 „.....„,-,.., GREAT NECK COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER or 1 yy ,.:,-,-i ...„;., Site Development Potential -.1 T 14:,:Xelt7:4'. S7-.0&"37:”' ANtit X 11 , qs .. ''.- '1147-t ii.k , . )ii: 'i..11', -' ' ,-;* ''. . ,• - . 1, -- ...., .., . . •.... ..e''''''..'" V '., '- 0 . .,• .10) !Of' \ ' ' , ' ot; - ',..../.;,.,' --, •• st ..... 1401:1 r. - I . ..'.".:..,:. . Ti•'. .- '4- ' .e. ' :--- --- , --T,I$1 • ..p 1 :Sr- , lc, ... , . ,4" ,,,.41 lo • s. • _ ....14. r--- • •. T - „Air ilk: - t- , .. . I. m .. . . . • ,„.f -., . .10" I 14* ,41 ...— .4111111111111011 . -.. "\'... ; '''t ' '. *s.e. = • 1, "4' VT,' ',''' 11.0. ', It '' '4.0.‘ IV„. • .% 1 A , . , % . .-- ... • ". A, 1. 1,1r7 .:, mi" ' . _'.47(::.,.t. ti, .• , .. . . . ;t:' 4.N.•,- :"' . ' ' 4.-.., :', i ' •- - ..... _ — ' - • " , ,, ' &-. 4„„: •, ''''-• . .. _,...„ ''''' • ,'` 1 .t,,er', .. 14 t, . litlffiNilltir.- ...rv.0 k . 61 ' *, 1 =,.........., ,„a-,z4.,.. . . ...5 1%.:.^4t ,4'.. - ' =--— =.".7.•." 1.1". ) . ''': ' '''.• A '''' .1% 7 • ',y, 1'. ".. ."..=:..' =...."'- : i 04N° % 8 •. , . . -, .: 1(...„ ,...„. It .. 11 0 ,r 1 A -,:"., 41,'.• 4 'I' , tit,., ,...,..4., , /1 i i , • , r c 40 .041110r* 4/4 ‘ POTENTIAL DEVELOPABLE ARFA• ., .-,' / . . • ,,f.-f .- • , ago-IO'N . ''•-- .-,i .--- ..._, 41. • .. ,_'‘11•':444". , iollit.V16,1.114r"I'e ,41111/11 AR 1111pr:° ' - 4111 ? . ' ', ••,44, ., • '0 33 GREAT NECK COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER F4.-" ,.„ Preferred Modernization Improvements ( --- s ''' s lr.), • ,,,,,7,,,,,,„,,,„ , to .` 1 EN t ` ' Center Themes: 67 ��' �` i 01:- .tIf Sports related Physical '� �. ; Therapy & Sports "OKitt-tt: p 4Y �� - ADDITIONAL PARKING - ,�'" ;;, - Medicine :OlIP �L# .w, `1 Potential Community �, � ,t •- -f Partnerships: $10% •♦ �''' Cox High School, y. '31)•, ` • 0. 0 • \ x Y ., • - Sentara Virginia Beach 4kC, �� "� R,• ^ •�. ,`` ,.��.• sty • General Hospital, J16" k t ' 1 V . •r• -t,, '' iii �� .. -. g - . Great Neck Public Library Aitoit �, r• Capital Project a � � �; , a �� �: Budget Estimate for ft �'�e 1 �;► 1' la v t ,�\.:00,.0.- , Q ;'4. :;i ' Program Accommodation £ I'1 qr,.*,$ : Modernization* 1 ^N s If T r k _, � 7 rti, $ 18.5M r yes '� ' �' % '" , ' *in addition to 20 Year Estimated '� r • Capital Renewal Budget • . 4, , 4 *• ,A 7 34 GREAT NECK COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER r'" y,‘,. Modernization Improvements t -- Preferred p ` .�". � ,... 4: «7 " .� �"° � '` ��' t Center Themes: .�' .y Sports-related Physical ' d, rMO SF Therapy & Sports -1 , r' , ,* Medicine Yr '. LIME 0.1 on. ! El: . : . . , Potential Community ' *. Partnerships: ;, !. r Cox High School, ^�.',k, , , , �°` existing footprint Sentara Virginia Beach, , ,. General Hospital, ift -` q°r c A t Great Neck Public Library 8 V . { 4' Capital Project *Z,-;„ �' N • Budget Estimate for Program Accommodation . i ' '4 4. Modernization* a $ 18.5M T '�'- *in addition to 20-Year Estimated ., NAV AMR 0%, ri y y\ Capital Renewal Budget Passim 1 3 ``y Y \ { GREAT NECK COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ��' y�, o T, Preferred Modernization Improvements 4 .- t DOOk Center Themes: ACTIVITY ARE \,-- lif L. .".. .... • yr g s Sports-related Physical 4 p , Therapy & Sports —, ; Medicine aFu �— ' �r Potential Community ROANE MF 01.111 "••• Partnerships: "•" l Cox High School, WM gr 7 Sentara Virginia Beach, ;i h . �g , g General Hospital, ! �- '' Great Neck Public Library OMEN DM SMC SF MCII F ,,,,A Y ,:• Capital Project 414 ;; M"� O •° E a,F Budget Estimate for 1 I'. Program Accommodation ,., .. m �„F \ F ,,,.. ,X i .4 Modernization* ;': mod, mod, um„ nOW_ l L $ 18.5M MF • LON. n J LA,G, r 8 ."F F _._ _ *in addition to 20-Year Estimated �" Capital Renewal Budget a ., ' _ 36 GREAT NECK COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER Preferred Modernization Improvements ..,,, � ) ►"� ' , Center Themes: ,,,, ..°, Sports-related Physical Therapy & Sports ., Medicine - _- Potential Community Partnerships: • i Cox High School, �.on� �« i Sentara Virginia Beach, rill General Hospital, [411 ►z� m. �.ob i s.M Great Neck Public Library n ;� I I" MEWL WO OF A Capital Project 1 4 Budget Estimate for WI"°" • Program Accommodation Modernization* $ 18.5M ,�,,,,,E,, *in addition to 20-Year Estimated .. _- . / , ..„.. Capital Renewal Budget N nln .. , r' 37 BAYS I D E COMMUNITY & i a IY -'- M 9,p..'1sl,1 �ryF t P ,'E ame N. ;.. Vr x & CENTER ifr.. , . .s. i Mai a .r a .. :.. 4, w 111 lit: gill' 10 .y v sa � w ,, 38 Facilities Modernization Program Enhancement Scenarios ,` 8y, ...7%iit.,... .,) Bayside ' ...,,. Proposed Physical Therapy, —� c Theme or Physical Rehabilitation , ;r� :•a �'� -al 7' '1'�A. 1 Brand ....- " 71.:7 Potential Sentara Bayside Hospital, ��""' 4 Community Assisted-Living Communities 11111111111M1ry . 11 Partnerships Bayside Public Library . '' f m _ Add for Preferred Aqua-Track �i``.`, 1.r3'o; � o'-lit , I I. r 1 \ Improvements Little MAC :, ,, , 1 .._ _.� ' Minimum New Entrance/ Lobby rt`� IN 1 L Modernization Indoor Track on Mezzanine Improvements Warm Water Pool Recommended Add Multi-Purpose Fitness '‘t1 r Ai -.g-' ) -- : IIIII al O!W1.',,10": -A-,-2 1'"-; -0---10.--,'1",\ -, 6 i.-.. tea . fr. i 'ri r let . , 1 O 4 Capital Renewals Only Ii, i, ,, rs. a '�� ; � ��. over 15 Years r.- t.z:�s Tii � r 39 BAYSIDE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ,N,....... .,_ U"`^°'� iri .,. 5 Site Development Potential c„, A° i x ,-• 4 -1.' 4.111.Sf.ft..,;;' ':IV%-4 .' '4 .' .1 i x • F'. .4 -d'1 1 ,'Nay, ti - . �. 4n y ! , - : 4 f� qr S x{LA !�L qq��, • rtsi I to ' • f �' • f ,i •Mies`Y •e• // 4lig-�`!�s F,. iik �'" r. f vim•• ' F �,r .. Q.A 4 • _. + j POTENTIAL DEVELOPABLE AREA ..J W. 40 jA:;;; b. BAYSIDE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER �,- .any m rovements1. s Preferred Modernization I << _ .- , rI.7771 a . ' ,} /` K - or r.1f ' Center Themes: 1 _ !, L l `"� �' ,• Physical Therapy, a i r ...."`� s ,. r ,�� it,L ., r •4 .; ,,, 4 A' Rehabilitation u)I�i —�r,x,�... �A r'" ► f to a, r 4 t. • ,.•"` >) ai a•' i. • .t .(�yt•.tixa 1 +} •. AliNo' w.r{'�' r'4 ,': 'ya:'''/ a - • q. � �vr, ' •, ��1/4 �� ''" ,." S .; .> � �+� l•� '� rQ*'�� ��..^��'� f'' �,' �0�'. . � �+ Potential Community w 1 m. V4114, r1r "qr, v,,.t�, 4 � tPartnerships:Fiw,a• . w — ;� Sentara Bayside Hospital, isy ti t Assisted-Living f. L. • �' ADDITIONAL PARKING g '' �. `� , „, `'' rw ir_ Si- Communities, is ■ } rti., , . . 1 _ Bayside Library � N {,yy T •' •4 %S7 i� �.;Vr"af1 i _ r R F r� t k ,i ç ?Jji$ * 1 .• eir Budget Estimate for . �h r.� Program Accommodation � a, fir rt k`: _ Modernization* r $ 16.0 M T. '�s',..'a",,..m a +r'•'rw"i r�'�f '4 r�7 , �' V 4 )1. ,y� .+ *4S' ` �„ .) ).�. � � �..- "�'� �" If *in addition to 20-Year Estimated !� :' r Capital Renewal BudgetYtt �� . i 1 t • r, , !• 41 7 BAYSIDE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER oa4 . may, Preferred Modernization Improvements V -- _- • i .-4,,,, ,,,"4„i. yf 4. e yr w a �� .5� ram.. %v ,u � .,,- . Center Themes: 4cr. 4ortt, : E , ,E r.a "'' Physical Therapy, r+ „ks 4 `existing foot , litt� Rehabilitation 411X4401015 4C1t114.011 A 45i ' 4. ' N'� Potential Community L. `t; Partnerships: Sentara Bayside Hospital, N. SCErICS iota w� Assisted-Living SCENARIOS Communities, �� Bayside Library ;; p\ ,� Capital Project si ' Budget Estimate for ` , - ' ' r - - `° T NE Program Accommodation �., •� , .w ` Modernization* . NEW POOL 1,11/1.8, COMP E a 16.0 M lbw . �� � *in addition to 20 Year Estimated -4,,,,,,,, .,,,,*,It,." r " "'" a '414:` -lir 41 " Capital Renewal Budget . $'. 42 BAYSIDE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER o,,,o'--�y,ii r Preferred Modernization Improvements �44�:. • y ii 9 .FII: nw�¢'t' lc-, , :; * yf•i.j�,•� '• 6, ;�•� ,t +ry�� d` , x + '- i�'�A.}• M �.Ke } rV� ti, •a'► -1, !...4 l A�'..sz I r ,r-.�i/', r Ft y v Y "'1r� . . dry d" s'. r s " O . yp • .,1 . a " 1..', lR,1•Rvt y Y Ct, 4' Center Themes: _ 1 :K ab .r „« Physical Therapy, . Rehabilitation .i,l.yl,t,,..z.. Ifi/t;*,a, ...., r•5 +, �; � y :y Potential Community .x...ii• .- ,—,. •,a ; : Partnerships: ,' u Sentara Bayside Hospital,fq r „' ps ubX �, MOMS, > MOD i'l .,f •: Assisted Living • 4 = p� I a.,> ii, Communities, .it., Bayside Library r I , ,....r �,;'r S. Capital Project y •, n�., Y Budget Estimate for Off V .- �. 9 -- ir Pro ram Accommodation ,.MP V g MLR .N. �� �;, •� Modernization* F w .. , .Fv �� ♦Nfa .WM u,c .., 0 ' C $7.5 m� 16.0M , , . r gt ® ® ' 4 *in addition to 20 Year Estimated z.e ; �L�J P��; l -'117f ��. Capital Renewal Budget BAYSIDE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER �" yrt , a Preferred Modernization Improvements a!* `f 4P,,„`,4.w'r * .-,r A- .�q� 5. P .:.°", tit q'� A .,n. r }.y t _ a1 ,, , ,: Center Themes: x t1a ' ' � Physical Therapy, w +r °G, �,.,. MINNCFli _, Jh i Rehabilitation :t.,' `+4.`♦µN', 1•,7r, 6":14.1 c+-E '� ,e2,A., _..-__-_ _... a :OInA:IPI. - __ —_ .q. Ir - ►t Potential Community 1' Partnerships: .. Sentara Bayside Hospital, )1 , . OFF1 SF Assisted-Living --_\ 1 1 0146 Communities, Bayside Library t , c Capital Project Budget Estimate for Program Accommodation I --°- 1 Modernization* es c $ 16.OM 17-1 44 hp ria. *in.4" i._ ikon to 20 Year Estimated a a 4, , ,, ,T , y Capital Renewal Budget Mezzanine Level "uu_. 44 „ii 1 h F. — _ _Alb r .r PRINCESS ANNE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER Facilities Modernization Program Enhancement Scenarios (.... ' may', .F 2 S Princess Anne \ �.�, F YM c 1 1 Proposed Healthy Cooking & Eating, rt 4_o i,..�, I Theme or Multi-Cultural Cooking, +-'y ,.� 'h `- 1•i :, -.' I i t \ \ \, Brand Community Gardens _'` __ Potential Farmers Market, IN �d Community Kellam High School, Partnerships Princess Anne Public Library ! ' ` rSilik f i 4 ! c�I�t1® A. Add for Preferred Little MAC '.t -'' �°I',c 9 ;4. '' ' ` °. '1 j,I 'a . Rk Improvements „ " ■ a t. 1 Minimum New Entrance/ Lobby '� '" 1•1 Modernization Indoor Track on Mezzanine Improvements Indoor Splash Pool �'P 1 II _y. Recommended Nina Cross @ Pool 1 '� `� /, ' .'-�w � 5s. Reno Multi-Purpose Fitness iis ,, Outdoor Playground - - 4 Capital Renewals Only l ly I, over 15 Years u, 46 PRINCESS ANNE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER r� �`�y Site Development Potential V - s t •, ... lel' . . .d . ti (i .. \ `• a ti �i f i / " II - • ,tam 1k' talibt, ji,. . if-....,: ,.-di - - .-:t.---- -- ,.. ve.i - - - . ,e- - . • ",,----i•; \ j, •ql,If ..,-- . •t kt.e 4a1V,4 It .. ir it** dimilimb ....... u•fitto.,- „4.,„ ., . �` iikr. e+ S ti ! lir(' --: r. N ,F+ w ifTsr t r' If it' _ ' j POTENTIAL DEVELOPABLE AREA OUTDOOR ACTIVITY it_ it ., OUTDOOR FITNESS,SHELTER.COMMUNITY -. w . e ill GARDEN.PLAYGROUND,PLAYGROUND.PLAYGROUND. riONINsir47 s PRINCESS ANNE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER a�3 'N ,' Preferred Modernization ImprovementsN. Pit z➢; - � ,� �*�J�'���' ,�'' y� Center Themes: --- �_ c Healthy Cooking, 4,. E • 4 e 4 "'� <• , , , r: Multi Cultural Cooking, F I y,.I • e 10 . �. _ Nutritional Education, t.,lit ►� :'� 'r •. ', - � ,;A Community Gardens r ., -w � , R.' ., ;• .• :,�: . , ,R ; - ,. Potential Community ►ems,•_ "' ' 4 ,� `, �♦ r , . .Y . Partnerships: t.y � a • Farmer' Market, , •` , , ".• •` -� � ��. ' •= ►` Kellam High School, `.' I Ii, Princess Anne Library t Y74. ' st ~� r .� o - - , •, ;i Capital Project ,,. , a it It re - '' �` ,. ift •a i Budget Estimate for a f Program Accommodation • * + ' ; " y • Modernization* . if illi t As* $ 13M I.. i' •'4 'r ! 4 • .: _ „ �, *in addition to 20-Year Estimated • * t': fr. . Capital Renewal Budget ' ' 4 °y° i:'Y ''„";R'a' 0 ' - 48 PRINCESS ANNE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ,il?�, �-ail-s, Preferred Modernization Improvements 44:.:, 5Jii ,{ 0Center Themes: t Healthy Cooking, "` Multi-Cultural Cooking, LIT E nd° Nutritional Education, ""� NEW l: Community Gardens "''re' 1 2nx , a ., Potential Community 147-1 " ., "; Partnerships: Phi' 1 ., ' Farmer's Market, Kellam High School, ,,•• i, Princess Anne Library • • 1, , Capital Project p , s. ,�� • " 1,.. N, Budget Estimate for Program Accommodation , . . J.I.llilk, 4 ''' OW. ' r Modernization* �'" _ 13 M ik, it. . ... --: lit ', i ,t. ,.., -, L''2 .in addition to 20-Year Estimated Capital Renewal Budget ,._ b tile+ 49 PRINCESS ANNE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ���'" '?, Preferred Modernization Improvements (.,A---. • a t� 1 k x. iii a n mo' ,° , • � Center Themes: w�H.3r 1 ;�.; Healthy Cooking, w\ onwell �T E Multi Cultural Cooking, ouTp� a�. :� .0 �u ENN Nutritional Education, "TS SE Sin Si Ma SF .L.v.,O OW Al ,..E.' ,: Community Gardens L'CVER 1--- ""\ nS n Potential Community .. . , „ i .. Partnerships: 1s ,, Farmer's Market, COMMUNITY ,. 0"' 1 r Kellam High School, GARDENS ` =II .« ns°"S` Princess Anne Library J j „Aron. 1,4140 .;' Mt OF - i• ,�, i a s. I am SF �„, M 1s Capital Project • 11.. ME ,_„,., lom , �,� Budget Estimate for NEW WET �, ,, Program Accommodation rewaooA, nA. Aeas 4. TES SS Modernization* SPASM r NEK. A.n Prol rYSY:Fa '� +� 1NE SF s • .. a Y� W • m - Ilk , =, - =_ - r--.-.. if!, ", • . • *in addition to 20-Year Estimated Capital Renewal Budget �ti. 50 PRINCESS ANNE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER �� �N--,'�y,� :."'.4-/1 ) Preferred Modernization Improvements ; M Center Themes: Healthy Cooking, TRACK ,IA Multi-Cultural Cooking, Nutritional Education, °,ro � ik . my ��.� Community Gardens Potential Community E..0 a Partnerships: � III' 1 M Farmer's Market, Kellam High School, 4 ;f Princess Anne Library 4. . 40 -•:; i Capital Project ,� Budget Estimate for --- i .. ., Program Accommodation / Modernization* _. =-. ., $ 13M IT - =* in addition to 20-Year Estimated Capital Renewal Budget wZ ar icy" �. Zc! 51 Existing 4 a IP 111*0044 .. -... _..e _.. 75 +�'- �► Cw'M1gtn-. i i 44.1 r • , ....‘; ,,..• , # Vision ., .., •, ,• ...., , , . , .. .4100 ,.„ • .• „.... -,, P ,. -.•,. .. ...OP . , ,•. . .. ',// 1111111111%11111 - !Il'-' s i ._ , ... .. „!".”., maz,k •I ' -------, . 111111- I' ------r—r— P ' , ,,, ' l', -, .3 0, , • v1 i a • , '.'*41 ' , • ireit*-. '' ' .. •4:''' 4 '', .... Miteikligi i". '" . - -- ' 1:! -- • i'' •'; --„------041111r mo, . .. ,,. . -. , _....._ „, _ ii, -Ighlp, - 1 i4 . 4 , ' i ti,,,., -__-: _ . . . ___ , ,k ‘ - - ..._ . :.. 01.,"*.••)- I „ t\I , ...-Ali:Z. - , _ .. . .. ,. , / . - .;1' 1,,.? • - • • see XIN / ". ---* .,. • _ . ar.••-: dna WA/kV --- .°.. , lio -- AINIk• -41Riw — . ] -1,- . , . ..74,:. "1211.1..,_. ,•.- ' ,.- '''''','" * - -41114kNi/7 / ••;„.., 4. I ..... MP Or i 3. ,' # 4. 1 .'d ttt , s i'. F c i ,, :e q AL •... ,,... : . ., ,J . .., , Q, ,.. .,,,‘ *.,.--.,,, , . •-t. . ,-.:, 7e4,?•;,...' ‘,. ' •". ' ' r. • ...,.. . • 't. • • ij - ai t • _ " e , „...,.. ' tision 1 • . ... • , . kir _ _,‘,,,,....7:_,..,'-'-''',.:', ..... .. . ,... . . .:, ... ., . _.,.,:.- '-. „..,.. .,:,'.,:-' •• ,.:_, •..,,,,,'.1...-.' , - ,,,•,. .. ..„.,,,,,,,• .. . le, ..,.,...„„ ..1.....,. . . ... -.,.. „..,.. . .....- 'i 1 P •• ie ... '''',.. y ...... — ,, ,t,...., , Air4bi•- , ------- ,•••,', ;,17140•ort 4-4---,,,. ,,„,-.--:. •iit,,,, ., ...........,,.... ,,.: ...... f • ,..koNcEss A.,4NE, . . IIIREGREA. ,C4NTER0-L-, - -,-- . - • -• - • . _411.... - --- -- - - . . . . , , . -. , . ft,:41$ , . „ . . •''. , . '' i ., ..4,4ty,le . '' td,,,,, ,‘'.. - . 4., , , ,- ---,,-- , - , • • ,, .0 , -, _ ., ,,,,,• ..„1 , , tliii,- „4,,,, ,,•, , - ,, . , . , -,,, P..,,,...'ZI,i.,,,,....ifftefti .- . - . - -, -_. • 111 . . lts.„.. . ._ , , . ..., ...-- - _ . ......„... _ _ ___, , ,- ,_ „.. ! ._ 7. •... . a — ilir \ ....,.. Af. '14,,,, .„. . r , . '... 7—. ,. , , ,.. . , e - 111111111111 ,_ ------- li..,-„- • f lb 4', 44 F ,. . _ __.. ... __...... . .... __------- „ ........ , . . . -... ... . :•:',7;7;„,. -,,,,1''''--• •••• - ., . , .,. ., ..411111111111111111111°P' / -- „ . .,., 55 . ... , . .. ,. Facilities Modernization Program Enhancement Scenarios y�� Great Neck Bayside Princess Anne `` z, It ,14 ` J'' Proposed Sports-Related Physical Therapy, Healthy Cooking & Eating, Theme or Physical Therapy, Physical Rehabilitation Multi-Cultural Cooking, Brand Sports Medicine Community Gardens Potential Cox High School, Sentara Bayside Hospital, Farmers Market, Community Sentara VB General Hospital, Assisted-Living Communities Kellam High School, Partnerships Great Neck Public Library Bayside Public Library Princess Anne Public Library Add for Preferred Aqua-Track Aqua-Track Little MAC Improvements Big MAC Little MAC +$14- Minimum New Entrance/ Lobby New Entrance/ Lobby New Entrance/ Lobby Modernization Indoor Track on Mezzanine Indoor Track on Mezzanine Indoor Track on Mezzanine Improvements Flow Rider Warm Water Pool Indoor Splash Pool Recommended Add Multi-Purpose Fitness Add Multi-Purpose Fitness Ninja Cross @ Pool +$34 Little MAC Reno Multi-Purpose Fitness Outdoor Playground Capital Renewals Only Capital Renewals Only Capital Renewals Only $35 over15Years over15Years over15Years 56 SEATACK COMMUNITY R1 ri......., , ,, cENTER ..T. :., r. „ . t lh, . . I. ... .. Joy 1 kiboo,o, ,., „,,: . , . 4. ' 57 Facilities Modernization Program Enhancement Scenarios , ,‘,__. w Seatack ``` 'J Proposed Connection to Arts District Replacement Theme or and VB Resort Area Options Brand New Community Recreation Potential MOCA, VIBE District, similar to Williams Farm on $35M Community VB Sports Center Option A new Seatack Area Site. + Partnerships Oceanfront Public Library Convert existing center to Community $4M Services, Library and/or Public Park Preferred Improvements " �' �` � " `' "�'"" "`"�" '""' � ` " " ' "� New Community Recreation similar to Williams Farm on $51M Minimum Add 2nd Story Option 6 new Seatack Area Site + Modernization for Indoor Track & Fitness + 50M Competition Pool. $4M Improvements [keep Pool] Convert existing center to Community Recommended +$5M Services, Library and/or Public Park Add 2nd Story for Indoor Track & Fitness $7M Option C Convert Pool to Little MAC. + Capital Renewals Only New 50M Pool Aquatic Center on $30M over 15 Years $1M new Seatack Area Site 58 %N. • 4,- SEATACK COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ,....t. 7,.. ot...._, .,.... % Existing Site Development Potential - Minimal tils•N•...-':'1"". 1 • 1 / 1 ••= .. . - a' It ,,,,,-,„L.,,• ' t :.. .._L.';'4,'.:::-.s:•••'''.4.":',4'....,'....../.‘.._:'_,..._'1 . - ''''-' .:' i '.' T.-......,.- ....... ^ ' ,- i '' ':'' Fla" toul ,, . ,. • • — •":•N,4- .. , ',..,...i, ,,, ' r.•• 4." 4.,'`. ., .„ . • ... . .. .. ii, . ......_.... , . i,„,,•„, 4'''4'i ':.Y' 1 ,,__....,.°': ,.._ • •• . . - • itilia Preto ' 11 • ,,., •;.'':' , , ,---ir , , .44 . - • ' —V • " :, ' 0 / :,., ,,, i ! I__' !-, ,,,,1:,4,'',':,,,',2:1,''''' ....,• i, 1:1 ' ' . ---t---._. ---_.,....._ --, F ...,......,. , • • , -,...- Clr..)-- -- . ', . _... - ... -4 „ • i . .,. / 1 . • I ,.....-, .., Site eleyations fall ` . ,- --,.- -- ------:' --,----1 :,:,,,' ',•.,i G Otta wetland ,•' . -/;• . , 1 .------, cito ;--) •.--'',......_,, .., / ..„, .. . . ---....., . • . / • 1::: .• i .--, i 1 -.......-- 1,, r ! ., ..„ ......,.. * ......... . . ' :,,- ' ,. ,......-., ' • r-,-----7,---, - --i- i , , • -,,, f: . . \ 59 i ...• 1 i • SEATACK COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER 8 - 1 New Site Development Potential . _ . . \ ell '.4.,,.%.,,,,z,z,....... IN -; ,,.. -.--4: _--V't.' 1-.: . `'.‘ ' •A'-- , -At...,., Name: 928 S Birdneck Rd Property Owner:City ..,,,,, I-'','''' . ''',Irt i ,j,. .". .. .,•• ,." ''' '' „c'• ,, ''•c.''•'',it i. Area 442.365 SE 10.16 Acres OPINt, 24167588580000 Land Use.Public/Semi Public :-- VLT-1=-Z-- •'., ,, , :7"..--7" ........--7---- _. , , .,,,,,' -.„, ,_, 4, ,•.,, 1111 ' • 'r ',,. .1.'' :/ ;.: . .'il1'.- ..A .-‘ ' . ,,-, SI • Zoning: PI Om ant*, 29 ' I•'"4",,, ..,-- -"''''....i• .c..:'.:. -' '.'...4',.*:--- ' S. ';:,- --.;;-,, ' J1, :-' .":'',. . • '4 t ta . ' \ • Or . ,.. 4: a;•.: ..,..,„',... Existini:Ses;actif, ;SIW_, ., ----,. ,tr'-'1,-• • . . ., * , , .' ...,ce,,-.,,,:.-....„,, ...„ ,..÷-. ,.., „„,, -., , --.. _., --;‘":...-..-:•.A", h‘•' ., - -:--tr4'----- ' _ • . •, _ ,,,, , . ,-... 4 L0 Ai A• ,..i e 1, •--"! ' : . .. .. t ' • .4 4 . A , ' .'-iS 4 Al 4%.4 ---"• •— ' ..1-.':-':; . '' -A'''.'••,'A' .:'.Y/ A• ' ., ,: I .., / , r 1 ' '', -'; *7.........::' S . ,;4'!,,,8$ .:Ai ..., ‘'','4( 4';'*4'''-' ,-"X"F. '''';'";•\•:' '' r • , , ' , Zr .1,‘,.4.••, , r 'tz -.A.,,,,..........4_,r1/•„-„,„ r' \'`4,,e.,;.,. ' 4 ‘,,,,,m#:4",,4,44./i0,4• ' ''''''' \.., :. '_.‘ . .'.: ''' 7:1:.''''.11:..,:',...,:i.'' ..... ..14, 1,r• I.,,,,, ,* I. • , . ' -..;:t-4'::, • , ' .'...-.-r:-t-4.,--!ifi- 4. , 4-1-s• 'sr* . 4.... — „dr-L 0, 6 7 .....5.- , ,,', ,.• ,.„,,''.r.:,:'. 7';,-;,-- i,..:1= lir- . , .., ?., ,,.."03-iirri_ ...,",". ,,,.;..•• s ...,-- ,' • ;,.,..- ; ... ')101 l•..- ' ;4;4, 1 IV '::* ."' ,-,. -,. . ,•'.-, • , 1 ' f- • -• , , •• ..-- ''.. ' l 'b. , „4,1.tAt•A$.14 , / • ''t IC' . I 41 I % r•.,t4,.. 1 .. .,-; ii ,• . . , I. 7' '(". -" `'' 46. 'rl• P ''....Siiiii...s............ ' ,-,...!.-1,08866 , t.,....• ,, ft.1%''' ------s _ - ' ....V \ , 1 . r . . ' 'Ate*:t '' -'.. :. C't • . , i., , 0i— --. 4-.....*.....‘'..%. ,4.;r,'"' ---_-1--.•_.__•._•„9.+ 1,,.7.,..1 08;_-. 15. - -.,....-..:.-'_-I'.II ir,e,m4 ••'••'•-6, :.- I.'1. -1*I - '''" ',,, "' — - Potential Site for New Scale . - • - a - _ < q 200t I _ L_Seatack - -mmunity - - ., t- . . - Recreation Center (Owl Creek Tennis C en e ,.,^:,-.A•, •,). ,... - ,I 4 ,.., 60 1. .. t t. SEATACK COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER — OPTION A o`` - 7 Preferred Improvements — Total Replacement on New Site --` , aa f if 441, it -4 . N,,,, .f 1;:i.* 4,,,,,,,. .-Ili it ,'. .. 4 .... A .01;- , a, ! *, "1t is i Aa r IV Center Themes: 4 -46 , Connections to Arts and I \ �. : 4 the VB Resort Area 1 ' IL.,i,..„. , ,i1,e.. ,� 0; r E, Potential Community �. r4�. f Partnerships: 1 _I, N., M O CA, �. , k ` VIBE District Businesses, .�a riiii � ` . • ' a new VB Sport Center, ,,,,,,„.. __tulle 441, ; * '16 * it _ MI; r \ VB Public Library mo : -- •.,. 'w,,,� �� , , , ir glit `' t� . Capital Project ,� �: =s,1. ': Budget Estimate for w ,e . ,� New Facility r� a,�� $35 M SEATACK COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER — OPTION B o, ,N` "�yi Preferred d Improvements ents — Total Replacement on New Site q -- FJ,s y �", ' r! . - Center Themes: Connections to Arts and the VB Resort Area • TTj/l�T , y �-�-' • �f�� � . Potential Community lir T . I. ;r�� �1��1 /���f��� �llll/fj///l7 , ,Y f t ,,� �� . Partnerships: // ���` ///// , M O CA, • � `• �`�` ������/d ..-re i ''., VIBE District Businesses, . ��„ a�I . p I. OPTIONAL COMMUNITY SPACES v C -- ` t ) new VB Sport Center, iitggIi ;.. 2 :. - NEriliP .+_ ,�,., .� VB Public Library am3a ,. i en• 40- ma. O lei- r...,'. 111' ..�.n X �n �d' :� ,,�,� , ,4 . Capital Project .,, o aMo +. Budget Estimate for New Facility^ ,, . ; � a • � $5 1 M �.,e" • UN - A I. i,virENT �k POOL + �1000 SPESEATS , 62 SEATACK COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER — OPTION C ,��'N" ,,„41 Preferred Modernization Improvements + 50m Pool on New Site 0 r. -_-- f Center Themes: Connections to Arts and , , '. / I / the VB Resort Area 4. r ,. imlas- � Potential Community t •.. Partnerships: r % r.n,cu.o^. y :ors. Hoy ••� MOCA, �` �° "" VIBE District Businesses, I = .-.: '" T IP new VB Sport Center, o VB Public Library - _ � m,w as n ..a+.oe ...M r + i 1 N1., le s. i Xs. I I . �It. V' . CapitalProject i _ - Ujii6:�:-a�a la. -, _ Budget Estimate for °• . , �� R' ' Program Accommodation It . T ; • Modernization* i , , - - • lit II. sl $7M r ,,, *in addition to 20-Year Estimated 1 q Capital Renewal Budget SEATACK COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER — OPTION C 'N 8i;Z.t';! PreferredModernization Improvements + 50m Pool on New Site -Mode+eAt; �. �'1, Center Themes: .,, n - II Connections to Arts and .µ , / the VB Resort Area J_��010g01A k 1�" � Potential Community k _ Partnerships: MOCA, ,, x VIBE District Businesses, �•,. ^ • • # } new VB Sport Center, . . $ VB Public Library v r se ®0 ■ ti? , .. Illattit 1Y . 4,' �: � c Capital Project 4. ilk. . — • - ,.a p ,0. Budget Estimate for • -- — • • Program Accommodation .. • s. �) Modernization* 4 r qs u $7FV1,16 : 40 Iop r • i r; ,, *in addition to 20-Year Estimated me c Capital Renewal Budget e2 .,1 @ Level _.. ." ,, 64 { FACILITIES MODERNIZATION MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS PARKS & HIA �s RECREATION 65 Have We Achieved our Modernization Program Goals?"Must-Haves"What are Must-Havesn for all Virginia Beach Community Recreation Centers? GNCRC BCRC PACRC SCRC WFCRC BCCRC KCRC • Curb Appeal k/I l l • Aquatics Wow Factor j4 I4 I I 7 • Center Uniqueness informed by Community121 I I I Demographics and Partnerships • Large Fitness Areas for a Variety of Fitness Activity Types • • Indoor Walking/Jogging Track k/i' WI • Improved Program Utilization with Multi-Purpose Wr Spaces • Dedicated (and strategically located) Space for Drop-In WI? Child Care for Parents while recreating • Welcome / Control Desk with excellent Access and 12r I 1 Oversight • Improved Sustainable Strategies WIWIWIWIWT12112r66 Facilities Modernization Master Plan Recommendations .111 The recent investment in the construction of 3 new community recreation centers over the span of approximately 10 years represented a tremendous commitment on the part of the City of Virginia Beach towards providing the highest quality recreation amenities for the health and pleasure of its citizens. These 3 new community recreation centers have been well received by the citizens as evidenced by dramatic increases in attendance and participation, and they certainly contribute to the perceived high quality of life in Virginia Beach as documented in the most recent 2019 Citizen Satisfaction Survey where Recreation Centers received an overall satisfaction rating (96%). The present value of this previous 10-year investment is approximately $95,000,000, or an average expenditure of $9,500,000 per year over that time frame. Estimated Present Value Estimated Annual Cost (over 15-year period Recreation Center Modernization Master Plan Investment Levels: Preferred Modernization Improvements (High) $139,000,000 $9,267,000 Preferred Modernization Improvements (Low) $121,000,000 $8,067,000 Minimum Modernization Improvements Recommended $75,000,000 $5,000,000 Capital Renewal Replacements Only $36,000,000 $2,400,000 67 r05,1 1 VIRGINIA BEACH COMMUNITY ..._.__. _ )!' RECREATION CENTERS t'°*19.4.-- 'o e, J Modernization Feasibility Study & „� Masterplan Recommendations FINAL REPORT QUESTIONS ? „,.. . .. j '! ;w,z r r 4,, r . !. Michael Kirschman a ..tF :. •` C. Michael Ross, AIA Troy Sherrard, FAIA Director President Partner — Practice Leader VIRGINIA BEACH fflk 'i 1.i S71..liN PARKS & v 'ARCHITECTURE RECREATION Council ' rsë ntation 10.27.2020 CENTERVILLE AREA r ro RECREATION & COMMUNITY 004 4., PROGRAMS & SERVICES ,...oto„R...,‘...,„ FEASIBILITY STUDY .. _ FINAL REPORT 11, 0 Comillite. .: liMichael Kirschman , - .• , C. Michael Ross, AlA Troy Sherrard, FAIA r it..0 , i' Director President Partner — Pract' Leader. J .. a 41 ARCHITECTURE MOODY•NOLAN v . . 1 ,L _ y Council - - . 0- . • 10 2 .2020 Background and Purpose of Study The primary purpose of this study is to explore the programmatic, preliminary conceptual design and economic feasibility of opportunities for providing City of Virginia Beach furnished recreation and community service program activities and service levels in the Centerville Area of the City, either as stand-alone programs and services, in partnership with other VB municipal services, and/or in partnership with other municipal or institutional entities. The rationale behind this exploration is in response to public perception that the Centerville Area is somewhat underserved by public indoor recreation and community facilities and services in terms of proximity and capacity. 2 2t, trigte442A c . MARKETz "cz . A '4 % yi 114 P't DEMOGRAPHICS ANALYSIS VIRGINIA BEACH PARKS & RECREATION RCHITECTURE MOODY.NOLAN Market Analysis Study Summary Q8 :: Parks & Recreation Facilities Q8. Parks & Recreation Facilities Respondent Households Have a Need For: Respondent Households Have a Need For by percentage of respondents(multiple choices could be made) (Filtered for Indoor Facilities) Community recreation centers 70 Paved walking&jogging trails 65% Indoor fitness&exercise facilities 64% #1 — Community Recreation Centers — 70% Natural areas 63°/0 Large community parks _ 63% Small neighborhood parks 9% #3 — Indoor Fitness and Exercise Facilities — 64% Picnic shelters/areas /1/° Biking trails 5.% #11 — Indoor Walking/JoggingTrack— 42% Unpaved walk walking&jogging trails 42°%s ,41011000liffig 47% Indoor running/walking track 42/° Indoor leisure pool(i.e.slides,sprays) r„ 41% ° Indoor pool lap lanes(exercise) K 39% #12 — Indoor Leisure "Fun" Pool —41 /o Fishing piers&dock areas .._, ^' 38% Indoor gymnasium 38% Canoe/Kayak launches 33% #13 — Indoor Pool Lap Lanes (exercise) — 39% Off-leash dog park 30% Outdoor fitness stations 25% Youth multi-purpose fields 24% Virginia Beach Parks and Adult multi-purpose fields 22% Outdoor basketball courts 20% Recreation Needs Marina 20% Indoor competition pool 19/° Assessment Survey Outdoor tennis courts 19% Youth ball diamonds 18% Skate parks 16% Cross country/5K course 16% Motorized boat launches 14% Synthetic multi-purpose fields 14% Indoor tennis courts 13% Indoor racquetball courts 13% Disc golfcourses 12% Adult ball diamonds 10% Outdoor pickleball courts ° 0% 20% 40% 60% z=." + . . tETC Source: ETC Institute(2017) 4 Market Analysis Study Summary . ' ; : ; Nyr.M J� Q8-3 :: Estimated Number of Households Q8-3. Estimated Number of Households Whose Needs for Whose Needs for Facilities are Being Met 50% Facilities Are Being Met 50% or Less or Less: by number of households based on 180,824 households in Virginia Beach Biking trails 47,609 (Filtered for Indoor Facilities) Paved walking&jogging trails °" ' .' 36,897 Natural areas I ,r <I+trut�,,,rai 32,799 Small neighborhood parks 30887 Unpaved walking&jogging trails 29309 #7 - Indoor Walking/Jogging Track - 28,639 Off-leash dog park 29,093 Indoor running/walking track r 28,639 Picnic shelters/areas f 127,266 #12 - Indoor Fitness and Exercise Facilities - 22,612 Canoe/Kayak launches f ' - 26857 Large communityparks 26,261 Fishing piers&dock reas 25,074 #13- Indoor Leisure Pool "Fun" - 19,894 Indoor fitness&exercise facilities I 1 22,612 Indoor leisure pool(i.e.slides,sprays) 1 19,894 Outdoor fitness stations .1 19,290 #16 - CommunityRecreation Centers16,086 Cross country/5K course I 117,969 - Community recreation centers I 116,086 Children's playgrounds I 115,723 #18 - Indoor Tennis (Pickleball) Courts- 15 600 Indoo tennis courts I I ,5soo • Adult multi-purpose fields I 1 15,270 • Outdoor basketball courts - I 114,538 Marina '4= I 113 998 Skate parks I 112,832 Youth multi-purpose fields I 112,646 Outdoor tennis courts I 112,261 Indoor Mopooltoriz lap ed b lanes oat la(exuncerciseh )es II 1 J 1111 ,275898 , Indoor gymnasium I 1 10,582 Estimated Number of VB Households = 169,290 I Indoor n pool I 1 1Q81 � Indoor competition pool _ `_ 1 9,981 Synthetic multi- urpose fields 1 jI 8,515 [2014-2018 US Census] Adult ball diamonds I 17,2488 Disc ggolf courses 4,340 Outdoor pickfeball courts II 3.101 0 25,000 50,000 75,000 1.10%Met 025%Met E50%Met Source. FTC Institute 120171 5 Market Analysis Study Summary Q9 :: Facilities That Are Most Important to Q9. Facilities That Are Households: Most Important to Households (Filtered for Indoor Facilities) by percentage of respondents who selected the items as one of their top four choices Community recreation centers 1 31% Indoor fitness&exercise facilities ' � "'� 'o #1 — Community Recreation Centers Children's playgrounds I I .J 223'0 Paved walking&jogging trails I �] I Large community parks I I J 21% #2 — Indoor Fitness and Exercise Facilities Natural areas I 1 7.1 z1°r° Biking trails I f 119% Small neighborhood parks I f 19% Unpaved walking&jogging trails k I I 16/ #11 — Indoor Pool Lap Lanes (exercise) Fishing piers&dock areas I I 12% Indoor pool lap lanes(exercise) I I 1 11° Picnic shelters/areas I I 11% #14 — Indoor Walking/Jogging Track Off-leash dog park 1 I 111% Indoor running/walking track l I I 10% _ Indoor leisure pool(i.e.slides,sprays) 1 I 1 #15 — Indoor Leisure "Fun" Pool Canoe/Kayak launches 1 I 1 7% Indoor gymnasium 6% Adult multi-purpose fields 5% Youth ball diamonds : I 5% Youth multi-purpose fields 5% Indoor competition pool Adult ball diamonds t.: I 3% Disc golf courses 1 L I ° Motorized boat launches ,„"IUI 3% Cross country/5K course 1 11 3% Indoor tennis courts 3% Marina 3% Skate parks 2% Outdoor tennis courts =•11 2% Outdoor basketball courts I11 1% Outdoor fitness stations III 1% Indoor racquetball courts 111 1 Synthetic multi-purpose fields III 1 Outdoor pickleball courts 'I 0.4% 0% 10% 20% 30% ■Most Important ❑2nd Most Important ❑3rd Most Important 04th Most Important Source: ETC Institute(20171 6 Market Analysis Study Summary AE,y' rJ Nel It, .S D y si Lwv jJ Q10-3 :: Estimated Number of Households • Q10-3. Estimated Number of Households Whose Needs for Whose Needs for Programs are Being Met Programs Are Being Met 50% or Less 50%%0 or Less: by number of households based on 180,824 households in Virginia Beach Adult fitness&wellness `�,,-/,/,,;, 33,959 (Filtered for Indoor Facilities) Large special events in City parks I 130,771 Special events at community recreation centers 25,092 #1 -Adult Fitness & Wellness- 33,959 Adult art,dance,performing arts maw6 i24,243 Adult water fitness programs 121,039 Events CommunityRecreation Centers - 25,092 Therapeutic recreation programs ,I 1 19,381 #3 - Special � Senior adult recreation programs(ages 65+) } sW1 18,848 Senior adult fitness&wellness(ages 65+) '';1 ".%/, 16,795 #4 -Adult Art, Dance, Performing Arts - 24,243 Adult learn to swim WM 14,270 Adult sports leagues /,, 13,910 #5 -Adult Water Fitness Programs - 21,039 Toddler programs&activities(ages 1-3) 13,476 Youth Learn to Swim(ages 5-15) rAg 12,826 #6 -Therapeutic Recreation Programs - 19,381 Summer camp gal 11,862 Youth art,dance,performing arts(ages 7-12) 11,754 #7 - Senior Adult Recreation Programs - 18,848 Drop-inl childcare / 11028 g � After school childcare /////i,', 11,028 Youth fitness&wetness(ages 7-12) 7/////, 10,990 #8 - Senior Adult Fitness & Wellness- 16,795 Teen fitness&wellness(ages 13-17) VV ,,, 9,667 Youth sports leagues(ages 7-12) "''''''1 9,422 Teen sports leagues(ages 13-17) I 19,215 Preschool education school preparedness(ages 3-4) I 19,070 Teen art,dance,performing arts(ages 13-17) I 18,133 Before school childcare I 16,585 Other II 2,208 0 25,000 50,000 75,000 I®0%Met 025%Met o50%Met Source: ETC Institute 12017) 7 Market Analysis Study Summary Q19. Do You Currently Have a Membership to Q21. Reasons Preventing Household Use of the Seven the Seven Community Recreation Centers by percentage of respondents Virginia Beach Community Recreation Centers More Often by percentage of respondents(multiple choices could be made) Yes 38% I do not have time 22% Fees are too high 10% Facilities are overcrowded 13% Program times are not convenient 13% .444 � ;;WA. ?:. r } I do not know what is being offered 11% Operating hours not convenient 10% Use other agencies in Virginia Beach 10% Not interested 10% Too far from our residence 8% Program not offered 6% I do not know locations of facilities 5% No Waiting list/class full 5% 62% Facilities lack the right equipment 4% Availability of parking 3% Source.ETC io I,I u(20171 Lack of quality programs 3% Poor customer service by staff 3% Facilities are not well maintained 2% Registration for programs is difficult 2% Security is insufficient 2% Lack of handicap accessibility 1% 0% 10% 20% 30% Source: ETC Institute(20i7) 8 Market Analysis Study Summary ,���^Aay• Tr, LTC t�L� y► } Top Priorities for Investment for Recreation Facilities Based on the Priority Investment Rating Biking trails 163 Recreation Facilities Priority Investment Paved walking&jogging trails 149 Natural areas 136 Ratings Community recreation centers 134 High Priority Indoor fitness&exercise facilities 130 ( 00+l (Filtered for Indoor Facilities): Small neighborhood parks 126 Large community parks 125 High Priority: Unpaved walking&jogging trails 113 Children's playgrounds 10A Off-leash dog park Picnic shelters/areas 11.1111111M111111111M1 #4 — Community Recreation Centers Indoor running/walking track 9ll Medium Priority Fishing piers&dock areas 9() #5 — Indoor Fitness and Exercise Facilities Canoe/Kayak launches (50 81 99) Indoor leisure pool(i.e.slides,sprays) 70 Indoor pool lap lanes(exercise) 62 Adult multi-purpose fields 48 Medium Priority: Cross country/5K course IIIIII 48 Outdoor fitness stations 44 #12 — Indoor Running/Walking Track Youth multi-purpose fields 42 Indoor tennis courts 1111.11 41 #15 — Indoor Leisure "Fun" Pool#16 — Indoor Indoor gymnasium 41 Marina 38 Pool Lap Lanes Outdoor basketball courts 35 Motorized boat launches 34 Lower Priority Skate parks 33 Indoor competition pool 33 (0-49) Youth ball diamonds 33 Outdoor tennis courts 32 Adult ball diamonds 26 Indoor racquetball courts 25 Synthetic multi-purpose fields 21 Disc golf courses 20 Outdoor pickleball courts • 8 0 40 80 120 160 200 Source: ETC Institute(2017) 9 Demographics Analysis 2 s IDemographic Bayside Bow Creek Great Neck Kempsville Princess Anne Seatack Williams Farm Centerville Area '+a - + 12016 US Total Population(ESRI) 58,849 115,550 49,537 142,101 52,930 53,833 100,166 110,925 �`w5!""� 12016USTotalHouseholds(ESRI) 24,099 44,032 20,899 53,114 17,470 23,000 39,755 41,662 The Demographics Chart4 on this page 2016 US Median Household Income(ESRI) $ 68,711.00 S 61,046.00 $ 83,603.00 5 65,846.00 $ 89,742.00 $ 55,581.00 $ 59,372.00 $ 72,080.00 compares the population demographics living I 2016US Population- within a 3-mile radius of each of the current I Male 49.78% 48.69% 48.33% 48.45% 49.40% 50.35% 47.89% 48.12% community recreation centers and also shows I Female 50.22% 51.31% 51.67% 51.55% 50.60% 49.65% 52.11% 51.88% the corresponding population demographics I 2016US Total Marital Status Above 15- living within a 3-mile-radius of the approximate I Never Married 30.22% 35.11% 26.23% 32.87% 26.62% 38.26% 33.25% 29.40% geographic center point-of the Centerville Area. I Married 53.00% 48.07% 55.79% 50.98% 60.29% 43.61% 48.69% 53.70% I Widowed 6.66% 4.40% 6.44% 5.14% 3.67% 4.72% 6.19% 5.21% Major takeaways from this data: Divorced 10.12% 12.41% 11.54% 11.01% 9.42% 13.41% 11.86% 11.70% I • A future community recreation center in I US Total Educational Attainment- the Centerville Area would have the 3rd No High School 1.30% 1.94% 1.20% 2.07% 1.20% 2.13% 2.28% 1.88% I Some High School 4.30% 5.02% 2.50% 4.84% 2.67% 4.17% 6.57% 4.46% highest total population and the 3rd I High School Diploma 15.95% 20.13% 12.66% 19.14% 16.94% 16.50% 21.07% 18.87% highest number of households living I GED or Alternative Credential 2.48% 4.66% 2.51% 3.61% 3.33% 3.37% 3.47% 3.56% within a 3-mile radius. 6 Some College or No Degree 22.94% 27.04% 20.94% 27.68% 25.50% 25.90% 27.64% 26.56% Demographic Bayside Bow Creek Great Neck Kempsville Princess Anne Seatack Williams Farm Centerville Area 2016 US Total Population(ESRI) 58,849 115,550 49,537 142,101 52,930 53,833 100,166 110,925 2016 US Total Households(ESRI) 24,099 44,032 20,899 53,114 17,470 23,000 39,755 41,662 15-19 5.50% 5.78% 6.00% 5.86% 7.19% 5.44% 6.01% 5.77% • The Centerville Area's educational 20-24 8.36% 7.30% 6.21% 6.61% 6.47% 10.39% 7.40% 6.17% attainment demographic is most similar to 25.29 7.90% 9.25% 6.39% 8.42% 7.48% 11.19% 8.42% 7.88% those within the Kempsville 3-mile radius 30-34 7.29% 8.91% 5.90% 8.48% 7.17% 8.91% 8.19% 7.99% p 35-39 6.88% 7.91% 5.80% 7.92% 6.76% 7.00% 7.48% 7.57% and the Seatack 3-mile radius. 40-44 5.76% 6.46% 5.64% 6.51% 6.92% 5.62% 6.13% 6.42% The Centerville Area's age demographics 45-49 5.93% 6.21% 6.51% 6.16% 7.77% 5.50% 5.91% 6.25% e g 50-54 6.41% 6.19% 7.54% 6.23% 8.21% 5.80% 6.17% 6.42% are most similar to the Bayside, Bow Creek, 55-59 6.74% 6.01% 8.20% 6.40% 7.80% 5.89% 6.37% 6.88% Kempsville, Seatack and Williams Farm 3- 60-64 6.31% 5.11% 7.55% 5.63% 5.55% 5.33% 5.64% 6.24% mile radii and least similar to the Great 65-69 5.69% 4.22% 6.64% 4.88% 3.91% 4.31% 4.93% 5.43% Neck and Princess Anne radii. 70-74 4.37% 3.18% 5.17% 3.64% 2.52% 3.15% 3.80% 4.01% 75-79 3.35% 2.16% 3.75% 2.43% 1.62% 2.26% 2.78% 2.62% 80-84 2.56% 1.45% 2.78% 1.55% 1.08% 1.57% 2.07% 1.68% 4 Source:Andru Fratarcangeli,Customer Service Initiative Admin.Analyst,Virginia Beach Parks&Recreation:2016 ESRI adjustments to 2010 Census 10 Current Recreation Center Usage Analysis r"° c� r., r 3 F jj LW Bayside Bow Creek Great Neck Kempsville Princess Anne , Seatack Williams Farm Totals Total Number of Patron Card Scans per Fiscal Year FY 2016/2017 196,487 205,115 218,708 1,438* 282,338 38,038 237,724 1,179,848 FY 2017/2018 215,543 205,567 238,226 411,319 288,467 43,591 240,871 1,643,584 FY 2018/2019 169,044 159,666 179,576 307,154 206,507 I 32,941 j 196,098 1,250,986 3 Year Totals 581,074 570,348 636,510 719,911 777,312 114,570 674,693 4,074,418 Average Number of Patron Card Scans per Day FY 2016/2017 561 586 625 4* 807 109 679 3,367 FY 2017/2018 616 587 681 1,175 824 125 688 4,696 FY 2018/2019 483 456 513 878 590 94 560 3,574 2 Year Average 550 522 597 1,027 707 1104 624 4,135 Average Percentage of Patron Card Scans per Day FY 2016/2017 16.66% 17.40% 18.56% 0%* 23.97% 3.24% 20.17% 100.00% FY 2017/2018 13.12% 12.50% 14.50% 25.02% 17.55% 2.66% 14.65% 100.00% FY 2018/2019 13.51% 12.76% 14.35% 4.57% 16.51% 2.63% 15.67% 100.00% 5 Source: Virginia Beach Parks&Recreation Patron Scan Data 11 ''' -. 2 .., „ _ , ,, . ,,,, 7,,,,,,,,,,77 , z6 Nd IoN•ACIOOT I 3bn1J311HJVV . . NOI1VU3]H ,(TT 2 SMUild ha HDV38 VINIDdIA 11. SISA1VNV ' "_, . S3111N1111:10dd0 , „ .... ,. , , . .„,.T,.. , ,, , I d I H St1 3 NINNid ,. .... , ..,..,„...,..,„:„, ,, , ,- ,.., f ii e I Shared Space Partnership Opportunities with VB Entities ., aoy1aN w.� VIRGINIA BEACH VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC pARKs & LIBRARY RECREATION VIRGINIA BEACH PARKS & me '<\,S4 r lb' - RECREATION VIRGINIA BEACH CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CHARTING THE COURSE 13 � Partnership Opportunity with the City of Chesapeake =y. `-, if 4 4 L r r�► A pyi ` 7j4°.?"'[ V t 4 / r� ' e . ii.4t, . i'.. .4., ' , ± '; t':,e,..:*.f.,:,,,, 1. \IL tf O Vi V n . ti :v Y . � y r• r � , w3G•0UR NM� rN.,rN `YA �vv✓n iii i ",. , 2. , • - ,-,..- , '.,,17i=,,,e- ' - - - 4.7.747,--, '`., • . ' ..., r,,,,,,, , , . , . ,. to.., iii .. ...,. - ., 'iiiiiii.:-:,.., .: , --,-----. ., .. , . . . ! �O,Mai, , ` '.\ _ - r- _ _ ti ,,., , , ......,..._ ....... ,.... .. , .... . ,r /� "� ' --,' : , „„, ,''''''',.'...:,:. ilit::::i.?:t!,..:-0,,ft:,, or,T.1, Rom. F 4 . h 'd A. };: .-Na - _ 14 `yam 4r A My .4 Si SITE PP T NITIE ANALYSIS VIRGINIA BEACH PARKS & .. _. _„ , ,,„„ H3N RECREATION " ARCHITECTURE MOODY•NOLAN ���::Av:3 H Site Opportunity Analysis ( s x 1. 13ngadon Park 8. I.andsunvn Cenue'evv 3068 15. Princess Anne Park 22.Salem Rd Ste 1525l 3 '„i ,•�+�7.- ,1� 2. Charlestonon Pines Park 9. Landstown Centre Way land 16. Princess Anne Rd,'near TCC 23.Salem Rd.2325 'C'••'a�+'��..° 3. Brigadon Woods Park 10.Landstown Rd,2152 17. Prr,widener Park 24.Salem Rd.2328. "twi' 14. Athletic Park I 11.Landstown Rd land 18. Regent University Dr land. 25.Woodbridge Park Virginia Beach 5. Charleston Lakes South Park 12.Level Green Park 19. Regent University's mull.lots. 26.Woodstock Park 6. Dam Neck Rd land 13.Lynnhaven Parkway,2150 20. Rosemont Forest Park 7. 1)am Neck Rd,40(11 14.1,'nnhaven Parkway,2289 21. Rosemont Forest West Park a -. "e. �3„„, Eon ' fit© ',^�� ���s et ,tie "' � `x •` 7 i e, The Consultant performed a Site Opportunity Analysis for • • s 17 �� i $ '\ •r� po ,' ,V(h • 3, `"" 'CR, ER' \E each of these potential sites identifying and documenting � 9� �r" s µma �Qgg � `�, g g �aF 51 �� ��� boundaries, site areas, zoning, existing improvements, A '' • ct r i. W 4,$ a `' (� • y �9'°;\ easements, adjacent uses and structures, transportation �, -• 12. I. � Sw °°`a° ''C' 3 infrastructure, available municipal utilities and stormwater • / P`" .�F�-�` 9 Prv�+ i. N ERE 4Nt"0RC �o-• �d on N management opportunities. „ 5# ck .r e, t om , o- a �. • s F''°" rAE4et�° 44,4.4.0Q The Consultant then made the first cut down to 16 sites, RR $ a 20 wR: ,. ,�/�, w"' it ° eliminating sites that were too small, too far way from the �,r� r S;° x �Ai N:• ...goo"c'. " .,c). c target service area, or undesirable for some other ` � �` 4,Fw� �, '' ,,°«2 reason. The Consultant then conducted a workshop with E `'' r / g • l` • "°"" � � selected Parks& Recreation Staff to analyze the pros 9 \ c� e e er,, .prTF t1 gy1DEPENDENLEOtVD yx s ` l ® P and cons of the 16 remaining sites, and this process led AO �E •� EAGLE Wr • z �� �` ��- �' $ � ��, E. "� .v,w "� �'_' to a consensus decision that there were 3 sites in Virginia A-Woodstock Es , t I I .wAAE o d• Beach and 2 sites in Chesapeake that warranted further B- College Park ES ENy�W : P „. - City of µPt O N eaaw,,,„ pA,,s N,rt 9 C-Brandon MS a ` ��.'' ,. E� .� ' [ exploration for feasibility in supporting recreation and D-TallwnodF.S [ ? i ' ntervl '""'BEY• - community programs and services that could support the F.- Tallwood HS l�l wGSTON OM D - 's IF 0. ,6 r- Salem Ms • _ �?y"1�¢,� ��P; •, a, t,,w, 1 B citizens of the Centerville District. Ci-Salem HS ® .-_ r1 c k-'` H-Glenwood ES ` �� y itri f-Salem ES I o � �1� These 5 sites are identified by green outlines in the K-Rosemont Forest Es '� o ▪f r ^„°"°° �� diagram and tables to the left. 1.-Landstown HS M-Landstown ES,MS \ s 11 N-Rnsemnnt ES I r+•r - --ritii Virginia Beach Site A [4.Charlestown Athletic Park] P- Indian Lakes ES City of Chesapeake FN� �3 Virginia Beach Site B [13.Lynnhaven Pkwy 2150] t2-Parkway ES RryER R- Green Run ES • °Neq` '' Virginia Beach Site C [14. Lynnhaven Pkwy 2289] s- Farmer;Market CIO �:� Chesapeake Site A 28.Centerville Turnpike] T- Operations tic Maintenance Bldg _n 27.Elbow Road 1��, p [ p ] U-Amphitheater 6 28 CentetvilleTumpike A r I Chesapeake Site B [27. Elbow Road] Site Opportunity Analysis — Virginia Beach Site A a� ""A"� y�? Name: Charleston Athletic Park Property Owner: City ',\ �..�' x� Area: 313,172 SF,7.19 Acres GPIN#: 146,1186-1360(100 '"'" ` Land Use: Public/Semi Public Zoning:Zoning: N51) Option#: 4 . a M:,N+„oN GALE r w S ry'�1•p. ' ' eve 4>i� 4, `�o 3 ;Y"`,^.'''., ' —. - J --'�",""'!- , .. - , ,,,, , ",„` 4 /:. / II, G� o'ry1oN `s' , /,� `�tu`, �'¢ ej °P� { w {{ 1 / ,, rf I �F = d g c� p3 1 3 4r°f' cQo *s t5. `y4 ,�... • l h .' / .'M w»r / w ' '� J0�}`i°�` .yre Q P,�Y •E� N eERrr R IOO RD . r: .,'�. :: ,/ ° yy ' r• (v q,�.f a1 h° eoxFolxo Ro ort x > °aq�dr s°I- a° 0' A2014go� •Ickes : �Lo ;e "e ao+ • x v o c 3. ` ✓ + L Sr^+ ,+e '. 3 ,lty.. ^'t � .nose IN. ;� '.. ,,„�/' w ✓' a Oa vk� 3rFyy `r £ 1 , 42' • 4 A "",' ..,"" r"r!+, -4M,f , k °"�'P"; �/a c{> ry q� .A - sii�?� o:A p� NDENCEBLV( tin Y: p'.. I y, F• i, '9 J� T aP g iNOEPE A • ` '" • / ,'" R 8h� •p 4� -, QyFq CIIy of . y ,,F`µ 11RnNN N .r` < irginia Beach 5,U*F��' `� J. ., r • "" `,t �.. �-i '. •n �. 1,} � x, N. „: 4-'.• (. :,,:l': v r �. ,,ems d r .•� ; � • City of Chesapeake 5 , • F ce Bldg y= I Eo ao o •Tie t. - ' .F , 'e , . - • l W 17a 0 200ft I. anti' g BPIA ar:''''' ' r «" [{ _ +• -' ,-',, lik r' 3146 p}j „1, ��, 71 ` 'ram '` C. �^ �ea�e�uiJoRio3li d° Y o a ...2�y R ' .p „di 4 lip A '1. 4—to.i 4 4 'IP �� eaJ .. tC ' " g�s s S3JIA2IS „T�, is inB3 qp".�� �' �4: � � t -/w 3:)NtJNIdW 3d+JSrINVI = s ..,,]IfGV1u '- g s • �' Y ,,.I• x . II , J 4] }i T e: ii lair no csra' o ., g F ,y Kb 1�� $' / rPs NI • r tl �i •be 3�+ �.r+3r ,a� m �'8 ^_ _ ' w oaax,m aaae" d opt- 6 a 'ors • is ,,a0, a L� r �r� , � { 1 a O �a • 6 O .c��, t 1 411 o . Arm . 4 i ht.''000441' imp 40 :? ',6 O !R i El :#euotld() OIN i111u07 a!Iynd nuaS/agynd :c'1 purl r+°'�4:ZZ}% OOOO 9l8S9SLfI #N1d9 sa-I3Yl''ZI •.iSOt6'StS t''IV' rf * '`�y 'a; (11.) aau %o:Suadwd OS'Z'tr..ttyand uateyuu.il atur' 4r �" a•, �3�L. �.y. 8 ails goeee elui6ain sisicieud kliunlJoddp axis Site Opportunity Analysis - Virginia Beach Site C �� „ .., s Name: L nnh .aenPatio%a .2289 PropertyOw•ner:City ty ✓, A, , Area. 328,852 SF, ?.SS;\cres GPIN#: 14753523380000 W�``!�+,yam., Land Use: Public/Semipublic Zoning: RIO Option#: 14 ffic.,- It .� .+ '�:� • "+ �rr.nwo q+GALE oa` S.- �' ..Q. Qd" \ �' r ' ?11 p ir . � S. + +44. �. 'M m hew'° \� � ° �a" � �� o"y ... A I 2 O O N • o�f ~ f • r Y: ` � f 1+ ; =:{ - s •'utc++9a " . �Q'. r Oy. O`•� °� O+{' � ' 7j�+ ytlx }ft4jk t !t J I /�it .- - y A� •�J1• '♦ .° U ' I.'F C ) •7' m r r"AR' '�' '� 6 'I+{! �' r�' I •T iC'— BE\r .1'lf. C ! f,' • r. ,c 4- ". "•:41 -.,4 • 0, i ygiOPO fiL 1141 r'°1;.(•' i ." •, t+ m , • -_ .�� + , �� ;,, . $ .,� N, • �•+ '//// Y ir /k lA •t ' .{ ;`" '[ q� �''�T A 'A Gr,1 V'r • _% IP ap�y — p� 41NDEPENDENGE BLVI ♦ /fit///'� ? ' �� • f� . � A �.�,�t . ' * , �+�, a r? 4A1 ,� ' � � p\_ r��, � p EAGI.E'NAV _ L ' .R, 4" E w t a ,,+ j !'- . . \ ♦.,` ' 5 `•+ f i .� Ef" �p • `.9 1 �nHEP�`E l l ..vnRt c• r lvt p N i J ( oa 1t• � +y: /� '* - 1 �EN��� !1� �• .P• City OI• P•'`V , F�RRANN(1N Fill W N_ ,A, rr i`. � l r�•...f. *i} f.i,, r .; }� .�;,oa ; irginia Beach ,,0°" • i' 1`I' ,. t. t�i f . \*,/,' `.: ` + ■ r N ` Op. r. le '41111111- 1,, i L. ‘,. e 414 ,g ii;;)1,— . *Ns'or. 1 , 11.: .•''' ''' !II's'''. . ( .r a/ ..� t t, i i City of Chesapeake A..r ':11;* . scale 1'' r. „ � cc Bldg �vao E I 0 s°ti'r API$ay «, _I:. r r dti s a 01 • v a E� lv\ M .� r r• w „ `a v'. rr ((wr rrrrr f a r ur ayeadesag)4o klip 3 1 ,56 Al •Alic' i•"` ' •o �,�� 2 as Hvo r+oasoNI 4 .. . GCS /t (�72'4� Q 1. 7 .1ONMYnd N'� ' 'P O AID bay, fx9 7 M'000 - % :.,t 1 -. • r . ..ir° . ..-4 fa) — ,••• AVM 3101/3 �N3d30MIS s .- a ,$ (s(.�N s ` y. .` 4 - }'� S d -: ! anise �& J" g3 T! N ��f( _,, 1 ,5 re S v 11 C _ in, •° ._, a , 1a `m 4. 1- i O-.Donors" s .,fi1 ic,ilauadi1.1� m e � r e �� y _ . ^�e g .,ay •-0, Rip,, ' „,ror � r , . ;, • a \ .d*° � �.._ S .. now.q o"Y'' J >• I 46 # n 8Z :#uondp 71u!un7 ald!Unic :Smuoz padolanapull •3Sfl pugl M1� ,.• N;,,, � �'�:,, 01910000008£0 •#?'11(rJ salaV t'0'S[l `CIS lLZ'1110'S :vary ft.r „, 't ayeadesa4:)10A)1.3 :JaumO,cuadoid ayldum.l.alll+aalua.) :swig <SS - 'j ; -.. 41% Y, �. e«3a3�N,� -^7y;.,:, br axis ameadeseg3 - s!s/Cleud /C}iunlioddp axis \4hv$ Site Opportunity Analysis — Chesapeake Site B .,,,,- ,K >�,, 8�r���- y , } 7 V _ - unc: 2004 Elbow Road Property Owner: City of Chesapeake � '=_ Area: 879,912 SF, 20.21 Acres GPIN#: 03900001100381 'e'L.A * F� Lind Use: Undeveloped .,a ' tr: % Zoning: \lulliple Zoning Option#: 27 �Y �,., W A �"4.„... pv 1 NI.NDC•AlE DR •' ''Q• C' QY N tft:oio' ;4yrFes. •'1 2f'i vt�SD z ;• •`�,`\ • ,� ��1r'to, 4r ti � p 4 g o� '• ,`:Pl." 9k s + .k o •µroN�yt �4. d r, ,� :k: "• g • RA c:,3ori`t ' o L �, ��i a� $ a7 y • S a 8. "E °jgsleD A g pµv > `N BERR�a'RD ^:\�(� ` DR '\6. A!L m' 0.RE AERRE _Q DR + r R '• t� �T • „p41F�: 44e�yy�, •BOXfORD RD CAkMSf D C.4 f 4 � • •Rgti a�1.;, '•)-� o-o a R V' �7Gi!�►H,3 . Ic sn Do x . �' l? 40 8• _I �y �' punRf LN f.. i k 9‹. 1,74,, Sr` N/)I y Cs•t• GP B T v t, e } j t. Iiii, ',- " * +7 5' t.,.,...,..., ^-w,..,w._ J_,.''r..... \ p 4 Y�6i 3 �''m p m QE` ENCE BLVf q ;1,44 w."s .. .... y.` ,.p"_` .,..T y } M/ fF' � (- [5B EAGLE WAY tic w ~, / l �fR'+ , ,t •-- _ ,.. K ..'' :. L'. ,',.T+ __r„✓'../ we d A 1 / .Qq ) �M„E`L� Oa 11 .wANE .cr< •. .'� w. .rM .r... �ns fl 'P `fa :,4, City o �+ L,� BRPNNDN -: `J i �� ,0` y irginia BeacN,,,e's'k 1' 1 a . , ,% « dr + INGS1'GN OAK YDR• Gr" el, d �ry �2 s • . os •. ,_ k;, ate ' A ' r � ,. v r '' Z ' r• ,(5.4,:: 1- C` x l., City of Chesapeake ?Ill1 Scale #Ik0` t 1, / t ��IA 4 f 4w"d t '' ''r }f cc Bldg i •0 D r u rrl = IMO < rrmImAqD 4 0 Z E > < r• m •• al< _4 114,7J ci) rn m m C m 0 / 0 o N ,➢ N Drive Time Analysis — Current Recreation Centers r', y ,j - Current Recreation Centers it t Y; Yr 5&10 Minute Drive Time Maximums The diagram on this page depicts the estimated Bays: Recreatior enter drive times to and from each of the existing 0 Great Neck Recreati°r. o°tar Virginia Beach Community Recreation Centers. Williams Farm Recealion Oenler The light blue shaded areas depict the estimated Seatack Racreatl°n 5-minute drive time boundary around each Center Bow Creak Q Recreation recreation center in the closest proximity. Kempsville Oenter Recreation Center The light pink shaded areas depict the estimated 10-minute drive time boundary around each Mi' Princess Anne Recreae°r Center recreation center in the closest proximity. O The light purple shaded areas depict the boundaries of residences within the estimated 5-minute drive time around each recreation lesapeake ,; 2 4Mllas center in the closest proximity and also within the Drive Time Sm.nates estimated 10-minute drive time from the next 10 minutes 5 minutes810 minutes closest recreation center. (second site) Q Recreation Facilities 23 Drive Time Analysis - Virginia Beach Site A Current Recreation Centers New Virginia Beach Recreation Center-Site A i 15&10 Minute Drive Time Maximums 5&10 Minute Drive Time Maximums Bays,. gay Recreation Recreation Center Center Great Neck O Great Ile c Recrealion Recreation OCenter Center Williams Farm '>Yilliams Farm Recreation Recreation Center Center 0 0 Seatack Seatack Recreation Recreation Center Center Bow Creek 0 Bo»Creee O Recreation Recreation Kempsville Center Kemp,rile Center Recreation 0 Recreation Q Center Center 0 p Princess Arne Virginia Beach Princess Anne Recreation Ste A Recreation Center Center J O 0 paa 0 1 2 4 Miles 0 1 2 4 Miles I r t r I r 1 r I Drive Time Drive Time 5 minutes 5 minutes 10 minutes 10 minutes 5 minutes 8 10 rr.nutes 5 minutes 8'0 mmu:es l seconc sitar Isecorlo slier 0 Recreation Facilities r 0 Recreaion=acmes 24 Drive Time Analysis - Virginia Beach Site B �� '= A�1 Current Recreation Centers New Virginia Beach Recreation Center-Site B , . f tzspi5&10 Minute Drive Time Maximums 5 &10 Minute Drive Time Maximums K,�#J` Baysice Bay i Recreation Recreation Center Center 0 Great Ned O Great Neck • Recreation Recreation Center Center 0 0 Williams Farm .. Williams Farm Recreation Recreation Center Center ,,,„......,,„,„.........„,„„.. 0 0 Seatack Seatack Recreation Recreation Center Center Bow Creek 0 Bow Creek O Recreation Recreation Kerepsville 0Center Kempsville Center RecreationRecreation 0 Center Center 0 0 ..,.. Virginia Beach Site B 0 ./7 Pnncess Anne Princess Anne Recreation Recreation Center Center 0 0 ,r•sapeake q 0 41 2 4 Miles U 1 2 4 Miles I t r I r r r I I k t i i i J Drive Time Drive Time 5 minutes 5 minutes 10 minutes . 10 minutes 5 minutes 8 10 minutes 5 mmttes 8 10 minutes (second site) (second slle) 0 Recreation Facilities 0 Recreation Facilities 25 Drive Time Analysis — Virginia Beach Site C Current Recreation Centers New Virginia Beach Recreation Center-Site C �s 5&10 Minute Drive Time Maximums 5 &10 Minute Drive Time Maximums f Bays... ea,i. Recreation Recreation Center Center O Great Nec, O Great lief, Recreation Recreation Center Center 0 0 W Tams Farm 'A511iams Farm Recreation Recreation Center Center 0 0 Seatack Seatacn Recreation Recreation Center Bow Creek 0 Center Bow Creek 0 Recreation Recreation Kempsville OCenter Kemper Center er ilie Recreation Center Recreation 0 Center Virginia Beach Site C Princess Arne V Princesslion Recreation Recreation Center OCenter 0 I 2 4 Miles �0 1 2 4 Miles I I r r r I 1 i l Drive Time Drive Time 5 minutes 5 minutes 10 minutes 10 minutes 5 minutes&10 minutes 5 minutes 8 10 minutes Isecono site) tsecort0 shill 0 Recreation Facilities 0 Recreation Facilities 26 Drive Time Analysis — Chesapeake Site A "y' Current Recreation Centers New Centerville Area Recreation Center-Chesapeake Site iCIA 1 91 5&10 Minute Drive Time Maximums 5&10 Minute Drive Time Maximums • • Baysi. Recrcalgn Recreation Gorier Center O Great Keck Q Great Neon Recaeatnr Center Recreation O Center Weiama Farm ORecreaeoe VWliams Farm 0 er Recreation Center Berea Itecreet,n Genre, Sealack Bow creek 0 Recreation ' Remy'anon Kemus Center Mk Recreaton C Bow Creek 0 r.onter Recreation Kempsville Center Recreation Center 0 Pnncea•Anne Rec Carr,tc totar ecrasem 8O Canter_Pro Princess Anne peaka srte Recreation / Center 0 as • • • w.aww 0 1 2 4 Miles 0 1.25 2.5 5 Miles I i l i i r l I t r s I r I i I Drive Time Drive Time 5 minutes 5 minutes 10 minutes 10 minutes 5 minutes&10 minutes 5 minutes&10 minutes (second site) (second site) 0 Recreation Facilities 0 Recreation Facilities 27 ,,A,„.„,?, RECREATIONAL & ,, ���-=r� COMMUNITY PRO ;. . No A ACCOMMODA • SERVICE • . , ,, , LEVEL ,, � � � � , N � sE � � � schN ARI OS PARKs &EriN �A � What are "Must-Haves " for all Virginia Beach ,�,� �N--� y��Y Community Recreation Centers ? <<.�.�.�..�.�:, GNCRC BCRC PACRC SCRC WFCRC BCCRC KCRC • Curb Appeal VW1WIWIWT i4 • Aquatics Wow Factor I4 • Center Uniqueness informed by Community 121 Wi k/f i Wr Demographics and Partnerships • Large Fitness Areas for a Variety of Fitness Activity Wir i 'I Types • Indoor Walking/Jogging Track 14Ri • Improved Program Utilization with Multi-Purpose Spaces • Dedicated (and strategically located) Space for Drop-In J,4 I'./I' Child Care for Parents while recreating • Welcome / Control Desk with excellent Access and I4 Oversight • Improved Sustainable Strategies 121 k/I' g Wi29 CENTERVILLE AREA RECREATIONAL & COMMUNITY PROGRAM ACCOMODATION & SERVICE LEVEL SCENARIOS ui 4. J41 U• Building Option 1 Building Option 2 Building Option 3 BuildingOption 4 Building Option 5 Community CommunHy Community t" 5 Community Community Recreation Center Recreation Center Recreation Center #ji Program Element Recreation Center Recreation Center +Big MAC+50M \+Big MAC +Big MAC+50M +-f Only +Public Library , +Public Library Pool+Public Pool 'k,:µ;,°✓' Librar NET SF NET SF NET SF NET SF NET SF The Consultant worked with Virginia Beach Welcome Desk/Lobby/Lounge 2,325 2,525 2,525 2,525 2,525 City Parks & Recreation Staff to develop five Community Spaces 5,470 5,470 5,470 5,770 5,770 (5) Recreation & Community Program Accommodation & Services Level Scenarios Public Library 0 17,000 17,000 17,000 0 that explore a full range of what might be Gymnasium 13,500 13,500 13,500 13,500 13,500 possible. Walking/Jogging Track 4,500 4,500 5,600 5,600 5,600 Building Option 1 is a Community Recreation Fitness(includes offices IL storage) 9,215 9,215 9,215 9,215 9,215 Center with Aquatics similar in size to Williams Farm Community Recreation Multipurpose-Fitness 2,275 2,275 15,063 15,063 15,063 Center. Multipurpose-Specialized 1,360 1,360 1,360 1,360 1,360 Building Option 2 is the same as Option 1 but Aquatics 17,080 17,080 17,080 39,156 39,156 adds a connected Public Library with some shared support spaces. Childcare 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 3,700 Administrative 1,975 1,975 1,975 1,975 1,975 Building Option 3 adds a Large Multi-Activity Court(Big MAC)-facility to-Building Option-2. Locker Rooms/Showers 3,050 3,050 3,050 11,550 11,550 Building Option 4 adds a 50-meter Total Net(Assignable)Building Area 64,450 81,650 95,538 126,414 109,414 Competition Pool plus 750 spectator seats Building Support 1,940 1,940 1,940 2,540 2,540 and sports team locker rooms and meeting facilities to Building Option 3. Building Efficiency SF 16,220 21,066 25,007 33,079 28,289 Total Gross Building Area 82,610 104,656 122,485 162,033 140,243 Building Option 5 eliminates the connected Public Library from Building Option 4. Building Efficiency Factor 78.0% 78.0% 78.0% 78.0% 78.0% 30 Building Options 1 , 2 & 3 - Community Recreation ,��-- y ,, Center + Public Library Partnership - ' f NATATORIUM \ i 14814 Option 2 Public Library / Option 2 Public Library I_ I OPEN TO BELOW CANOPY I LIBRARY KITCHEN "° WET CHILDCARE SENK1Rl ADULT- LIBRARY LOBBY ADMIN ,______4 OPEN TO MP 7 105 SF CLASSROdm 10.601 SF CLASSROOMS / 459 SF r-._ 2.482 SF 1,950 SF It4j4 I 542 SF 2,780 SF y �I •R••� A it DROP-IN PLAYGROUND 0UTHI TEE ROOF _ ry dss o0 S amis CHILDCAREirip ROOM MO WJ r LOW r� 698 SF a 6a' 1.344 SF "JJJ���4447dsF1 -• CARDIO/ Ma - POOLOEROUIPI LOCKER ROOMS __._____ _ �! FUNCTIONAL 2 0 SF 20C.5 200 SF 1.971 SF 2 22?S ■ MECH. TRAINING M./ L., z 2.992 SF 2,673 ��\ TRACK .- I ^f dECH 15TOF �/ �i 8,697 SF -� 1 353 SF whir: MA.TI .., % '� .. FITNESS- ma• II /1111 I. "; (1�) Il OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW STRENGTH 14."' /� I1 OPEN TO BELOW / \ \� fi 459 SF II { s \a ! STOR 1--"- 1 1,260 SF FITNESS I LOW ROOF 2,195 SF Option 3 Big MAC Option 3 Big MAC FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN 31 Building Options 4 & 5 - Community Recreation ==y. Center + 50M Pool + Public Library Partnership s L' /"K-2---. IOW •1 I s'.-*AV W ( )// 18 iji..:M. 3 ii jAe 40,-., g h. 1 /.0 p ''. G ice'// !s.. ,g glik illartiMIL.1 liliallil ' _ L Option 4 0-1 E 11 r.1 linitii Public Library FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN 32 009) CONCEPTUAL SITE TEST- FIT STUDIES BEACH PARKS & , . H3` �s �R ECREATI N ARCHITECTUREMn.,,�,„ 33 VC s14 44 f w .40 4 • �� Oi•-4, • sy .,, / •N _ ' ` .. ma RIB Mavd Furwrwisa� ► vx • G �• Oaf ,.,� _n r„ 1° •• .� •7,tom' / �� , �s �"" f . may I l �,,p; v lC t • for d*+ 1 ir, s. i ..sv . v ��9� 1 �� % 441. f e / ; . 0111' . • 2 i 4"�, •, ,fps 4'.;1 r ., rm.-4 o., r -• « 4"' 1 , T� ` 4 • n> L 1 _ -.., . r - • `�_ - �� suoi d dui in - elm !pees �iui�ai LiVti3 :i..1 `� E '8 Z . O .p i . 8 d .S �I 8 . . ./� Virginia Beach Site A — Building Options I9 2 & 3 ,, ... # „. iiiiiimin <.... • , i i il 0.1, -J..4:........, . ,. . .. 'V..,..V'4.V•11'.5',q,.t''''''..' 0>. ilq0 Vii ,,,,,, ' Ati,',ok••,-,'..,. .... .4.-.11.•::: ,f.::;r:" c)-4- ..„,0-",`::,:' :.,4,'•:-4 ,- ' '• - ,,<P• „.. -„p.4,,,,iY'''',"11i''Ar''''E'v' Vi' _\ \>• '', ',,,',',44;,,rr' •-j''',7 liboo, ,k1 . _..- .------- ----- 4'1, , .-- • ,.„7.... . 0 • \ . \ \\\ 4'4:ra .' OS ..A••• - .-* \ \\\'''': 1.010 •AA%411700''''‘' > ' Ilk ` ,i14 \ Att;lo '17- s 1 • ,?Z''4 11;4 i 016 or.0 # 1' Ni , wo -\,-1 , t , ......, . ,. 4 /0 1 CHARLESTOWN ATHLETIC PARK-FIRST FLOOR \ 11.......:1.m. , • A\ c --,, \ „\----- 35 9£ , ,. Y . YL� PRO6..4 ' ,n, .•, ,, Rom '. Ma311E.A M)Itllfd N3AYNNNA1 HMO. .. r'"a , 4 A R i f • .. 1 A. I. 4 J ' r .. i.- , . a., • ` Mr'r 4 •� So ,uounel ,,.� • 1 ..� /, ►' „alls9W xe(ya)ffN peuopuega- , i *4 ,. �,� ZI, 4o uoiieool�ajew!xoaddy �,.. ,,, , I % " S, r �, v`+. ti a 5 . er �dM�bKd'N3� �. _.1;. .�+ 'a �: • 11 p . JK b K b f." a _. � 1 s- 1 .. av } 4 . 4, e 5; 44 � rV E '8 z ` I. suoi4dp 6u!pi !ng - 9 ells goeas e! U !6J !A Virginia Beach Site B — Building Options 13 2 & 3 ,.•zo 0,), __--- _---- LY --------- ' _-----------a-----L-a-L---a--------"ji "---" -- _-----_-.-_-:-::::::---- __------ --- ' It ',...W.i. _-- _----- - ___-----. 320 PARKING SPOTS NEEDED 11, BASED ON I SPOT 350 SF ,-- litt , ./...-.... it 'I 1 -ao 41t.i _e___-:-..,...------ -7 , ,.--- dip ' t........................„.... ..- ..... .0 . e V • . 4 -------i \ . .._. 37 (. \---1 _:1.!Cl..1.YNNHAvEN PARKWAY•FIRST FLOOR I . *Ill I 8£ Wild 311S-AVMN2IVd N3AVHNNAI OW / o. " Q r AC • .. ... ,...b _ �� .�,� ► a�issiw xefya�iN,pa�aopuege' � ;r sons qounei ,� ��+� � � �®G�.��`" . w� . � � 10 uoi�eool a;euaixoadd2 :11" ,� �. ( 'k Yt , -•+ I a _. 1� • • ltfMNbtld N3lvdHlitin • • r • i r• -y. e n (14 "±-t-ti, - .� suoi d dui in — a i a�a siui �ai � nNA� 5 O .pl . s 9 �.S u 8 • Virginia Beach Site C — Building Options 1 , 2 & 3 - yy d 0 Of :::" 1 r NI s 1 1 - O • ill. . Nt' . - tot 1:11111,1I ' ' ''''' ''‘.. , ° rru y n' " f LYNNHAVENRKWAY _ i : . p • A f 1. 4 . 11 ro 11 A ia. .•x.0m ' e r tl, ,, E ' '122MLYNNHAVENPARKWAY•SITEPLAN ' x 11 a.. 1 0,7 It _.. .., .„. . . _, ... . __ _-_ - -----„ ___-- 21001A iS1111•AWAXINd NMYHt441A1 da'. , ..., ------- 1011-3Vd __ _ XV --_.,• r______------\\ __------___- - __- _____ __- _ __- - 0 , .7.:4;i: \ \...._.---------- ._., ,,,, \ '1 '1,,,,i'',.• „:,:;;;‘--.,,1 4,..i,,,4 ..., JS OSLIOdS t NO 03SVEI ., 03033N S.1.0dS ONINNVd OZC '**. . . , . , 11 i4 N ''''''• '\ .•'•':''';''; •0 , • A A • • S A 0, • •, ik , :' . . 4 ....' ‘$' ' a .. ". 0•. 1111 ' ,i -..•,0 • ,40d0 T 1 II t. \ 6 i RI I.,, Ti Oil \ 440 init. 1 \- , - • . - I-4 1 Tigi 0 ,.. . _ 1- - _11141 II_ Ilia ( K., . _ .... _ fircr„.1:,„ 3 %.,...,,,..) E 111 Z i 1 suouldo Buipline - 3 aps qoeee e! u . • . N.2,„........._....„ ! Bi !A ,e....., Chesapeake Site A Building Options 4 & 5 .;;A f�1' 2-5 a ii .,.w 4,.k. t 4 4 i t I ,,yy,�.. ♦ �r M` 1 `` eie 'IO „ „„ ,, i ',an owl imaimmall!,11.!ag- ErANIEMN ,7 al 4 iltV ,' '',' ' '', , 2 ;Null Mil I n.. . , - ., . . GENT�YILLL 11r: PIKE A Iliiimiumiarsc, __..__._rif li . /- rn k -- / ,\C.E,_t tiYILL TURNPIKE$LTE.PLAN (W 1 tii zt il -h.,. -, 211001.4/S2114•MIId*IfIl 3111M3.1.1130 1 .. ..-."-. .."'""". .........i... .. -- WV _ _ U 3)-liamlni 3111A891.N20 —1-- 11010101 stNntsessivid=MO r... 1 3510 /3.(44 3.44 / • • WC iS OSE tOdS t ONV 1004 en IN OS NO 03Stre 03(133N !' 1 SlOdS ONIVEitid SO — n . t'T',2";1 _liYgio 04.1m, llII— Ir, ii -ii COT I 1 3S GIL tioEMI. 0 31,014 31.1Vn01 , N1330,H3Z I i 1003 3231301 I . IS/5134 art100 /6 3011 3,t'::/".•.•44,' 45 L. 0004,.., /A? V `, ' 110011003 • 41 bnr*P1°' - Ti 1,.,,,, ............. ..... /7 i' .,otzre Za..i ..,'"" 4.i , , ___, . , k,.. v...c.,-.4.----.,- 0 s ig 17 suo!4clo 6u ! pnne - v e4m emeadeseqo iti •11E44,, Building Options 4 & 5 (•.., 16:11* 1...1 ..; .. ktts. it*. Chesapeake Site B — . 11 45,,,,:„..,<„,..),, i4:5_,-, , • 1... ..' ..' kg '\' Ill - , • • i • I I• ''' •. , • 1 g 11 -1, ,-,' 0 ,..i. 47 IIII4,ALIIMM , : , ( 0 ,4 k k * t r • .9. C 111,11, . . %1011110 . 1 • 11 * l'' \‘‘',1....c........' YPS71k •'''' ' 'VS° .el T4 ' '014 Cl.°4°‘‘, ,lk‘ . ,i•Nli;. ..,, ., ......_,, - - ,--- • . V:• Ir1;12 ' -.--" lt• IllummA 4* if) . 1 • ,, f ROADOITEPIAN 43 ' Ilir411 II I il k --,' i -Ammo& 1�_ —B dI 1 A0913 I' MO0 �, \ ilt\\\......................... dO� t VW O IM \ 1100 �- ds sseiods`oaa ioc �,,�� w as uo aasve aaaaan 7dl[ ' sioas aeaava sse mot+ `r i \'111 _, \\ eoai ill vvlt N 0 100a w - i V �,,14_t. fs rnu s s t. loans, nx30 pi MA . WI. 1 .1 . � a.rL 30vvOls _-_.t Y TT° 3 ._, 4,+ b\' ?i; - 5 ig p suoUUdp 6uipiine - 8 apes a eedeseq BUDGET ESTIMATES FOR SCENARIOS VIRGINIA BEACH PARKS & RECREATION ARCHITECTUREMOODY•NOLAN CIP Budget Estimates for Scenarios'- " ..� r_ 4 y3 4 Fits on Fits on Fits on Fits on Fits on VA Beach Site B VA Beach Site B All 5 Sites All 5 Sites All 5 Sites Chesapeake Site A Chesapeake Site A Chesapeake Site B Chesapeake Site B Building Option 1 Building Option 2 Building Option 3 Building Option 4 Building Option 5 Community Recreation Community Recreation Community Recreation Community Recreation Community Recreation Center+ Big MAC Center+ Big MAC + 50M Center+ Big MAC+50M Center Only Center+ Public Library 1 + Public Library Pool + Public Library Pool $37.0M $45.8M $53.3M $70.0M $61 .3M Total Estimated Project Budget (2020 Dollars) Allowances for Relocation of Existing Facilities: • For Virginia Beach Site A, include an Allowance of $4.0M to relocate the Charleston Athletic Park Facilities • For Virginia Beach Site B, include an Allowance of $10.0M to relocate the Life Cycle Landscape Maintenance Services Facilities 46 Operating Budget Estimates for Building Options Estimated VB Community Recreation Center Operating Budget History NPV** Facility FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY19 Cost/GSF* FY20 Cost/GSF* Kempsville $1.913.733 $0 $1,290,321 $1.801.867 $1,969,408 $22.61 $23.28 Bow Creek $49.610 $1.975,388 $1,968,495 $2.020.685 $1.969,720 $29.08 $29.95 Seatack $1,050.856 $1.059,631 $1,065,269 $1,029.549 $1,015,258 $49.12 $50.60 Great Neck $1,825.819 $1,870,415 $1,910,168 $1,975.501 $1,885.361 $20.02 $20.62 Bayside $1,919.657 $1.869,116 $1,896,591 $1,940,746 $1.867,872 $19.83 $20.43 Princess Anne $1,813.188 $1,897,406 $1,888,723 $1,836,724 $1,938,817 $20.58 $21.20 Williams Farm $1,860.371 $1.862,403 $1,790.754 $1.838,056 $1,985,919 $26.54 $27.33 Subtotals $10,433,234 $10,534,359 $11,810,321 $12,443,128 $12,632,355 $23.70 $24.41 Building Maintenance $2.723.119 $2,638,206 $2,631,292 $3.100,000 $3,235,299 $6.07 $6.25 Landscape Maintenance $56.033 $56,033 $152,988 $163,554 $198,149 $0.37 $0.38 Grand Totals $13,212,386 $13,228,598 $14,694,601 $15,706,682 $16,065,803 $30.15 $31.05 Estimated Operating Budget Projections for Centerville Area Building Options NPV** Option Option Description GSF* GSF* x$31.05 Building Option 1 Community Recreation Center Only 82,610 $2,565,077 Building Option 2 Community Recreation Center + Public Library 104.656 $3,249,616 Building Option 3 Community Recreation Center+ Big MAC 122,485 $3,803,214 Building Option 4 Community Recreation Center + Big MAC + 50M Pool + Public Library 162,033 $5,031,197 Building Option 5 Community Recreation Center + Big MAC + 50M Pool 140,233 $4,354,297 47 , '..--1, � ,, CENTERVILLE AREA �_rp _ RECREATION & COMMUNITY cc rJ ` °°°9�so-:1 PROGRAMS & SERVICES . . .41 FEASIBILITY STUDY ��� . . . , - -.L.,'"0:10-,,.1.4. --41,0 .. _ , ..........;:..;, ,..-,,7,‘,. .'.011* r...inoz„itwig, _ FINAL REPORT ' . , (2 U E ST 1 0 :,,,,,,k ,,:„. _. .,0.4, o_� ASK .��, { k+" ,.,,,,:._‘, ., , . .„...,„ ..:.......„ ....‘. “; ,,.„.„..,,,,,,,,, Michael Kirschman C. Michael Ross, AIA Troy Sherrard, FAIA Director President Partner — Practice Leader i . ' 4. ft I_B -ix. i ARCHITECTURE MOODY•NOLAN H , 1 ,-- - - 1 :.., L 1 \ , Counc 11 CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS VIRGINIA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION(VBCDC) PROPOSAL FOR ASSISTANCE 4:14 P.M. Mayor Dyer welcomed Andy Friedman, Director — Housing and Neighborhood Preservation. Mr. Friedman expressed his appreciation to City Council for their continued support: 'NB ;rg;,»aH,,.,, Virginia Beach Community Development Corp. (VBCDC) Recommendations October 27, 2020 "Andrew Friedman Department of Housing and Neighborhood Preservation Here is the Background: Background 1. VBCDC was created by City Council in 1985 to assist in achieving city goals for affordable housing and neighborhood revitalization 2. VBCDC is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit that has an exemption from real and personal property taxes 3. City Council appoints VBCDC's board of directors, and because of this level of control, the VBCDC is listed as a component unit in the City's CAFR 4. VBCDC owns and operates over 400 units of affordable rental housing 5. Due to various concerns, City Council asked the City Auditor to review VBCDC's operations in 2019. October 27, 2020 ro c z A A' h n COco c rn I a s�' 0 3 �n ' A o n D /�� 'N �, QU q i 2 .i $ M c g 3.c 0 \• . ^ Co ' 2 0 < ' a > d S og5r2" ; 2 013 Z n v n Ts _ -v o� s 1"F ° v T. i w . n I c) '�I O n $v ' aoaZ,r�, RN 0 '.1j cm . ° c3 >- °' 0 S� b O g aA ' = d ' ' 2 a b e„ drr. � 3 ~g a � - c :b ,y Q r. a> I R 3 ? 0 -1 a Q O C am. og IU n C I 0.. Oti a _ c o 1 OO � as NI I j b O < •CITY. /� ^a G W ^ N p5q CO CL ' Co .0 O p ,i _ tk •-Q Z. N N N N N N N N N N A < iY V 1 A l I `,^54Q J . O ^, •�/ oa •�� t a o c- a b a le g Ca 4 W 4 $• iY: tY rh 0 O 3 N N N N N N N N N N O Z. n -10 �w � ti ., NB" u'. 2 y m-.mo p 0 o ,n o " 'r a . v r�.�. o m o? o W o b cr n ti ..,4 IV O ti 0 13 CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS VIRGINL4 BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION(VBCDC) PROPOSAL FOR ASSISTANCE (Continued) The next three(3)slides provide an overview of the audit results pertaining to VBCDC's Line of Credit: Auditor highlighted Line of Credit as one of several issues contributing to financial problems To help finance normal operations, funds generally reserved for housing development opportunities were used,which resulted in VBCDC's inability to compete with its peers: • Prior years'retained earnings of$343K were depleted • Seven revenue-producing assets were sold(with one more under contract to be sold), and • A line of credit(IOC)was used to fund operations and has since risen sharply.See Chart 4. VBCDC Line of Credit Issue (2) "'' Office of the City Auditor Audit of the Virginia Beach Community Development Corporation �.,..✓ _ Chart 4:VBCDC line 1,800.000 Of Credit 1.600000 $i,sa.707 1.400,000 1.200AMY 1,000.001NAM 600.0M.a00,M200.000 0 201S 2016 2011 2016 Source audded(nWnool slolemenb for fatal yeon 20151o2018 6 October 27, 2020 14 CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS VIRGINIA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION(VBCDC) PROPOSAL FOR ASSISTANCE (Continued) Line of Credit — History and Current Amount Item Amount Balance—end of FY 2018 $1,540,737 Draws since then—last draw $ 325,000 February,2019 Payments since then $ (100,000) Current balance: $1,765,719 Note:VBCDC is currently making interest-only payments The next two slides provide the progress and achievements of the VBCDC since the audit results: VBCDC has made significant progress addressing issues in the Audit 15 total recommendations from the Auditor Only 6 (six) outstanding as of March, 2020 review Since then, additional items have been addressed (see next slide): 8 October 27, 2020 15 CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS VIRGINIA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION(VBCDC) PROPOSAL FOR ASSISTANCE (Continued) VBCDC Progress on Audit Issues n Occupancy rate at or above 95% n FY 19-20 Operating surplus n FY 20-21 proposed balanced budget n Closing permanent financing on Cypress Landing n Agreement with Second Act Communities to merge > Obtained consultant's report on additional recommendations to improve operations 9 Here is an overview of the Federal Funding to be provided to VBCDC by way of the Department of Housing and Neighborhood Preservation: DHNP is Providing Federal Funding Federal funding from DHNP planned for VBCDC • $150,000 for rehab of Beach Park apartments $200,000 for rehab of 32 scattered site units- Citywide Homes $200,000 to support ongoing unit turns where major systems need replacement $750,000 toward acquisition of Morgan Terrace Apts. However, Federal funds cannot be used for a refinancing that does not have a housing result(ie development, acquisition or rehab) 10 October 27, 2020 16 CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS VIRGINIA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION(VBCDC) PROPOSAL FOR ASSISTANCE (Continued) Outstanding Issue Key development funders have identified the line of credit as an impediment to future development 11 VBCDC Request to the City Manager �V i rg i n i a Beach Building,Supporting&Preserving Communities since 1985. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION VBCDC Funding Proposal to the City of Virginia Beach Executive Summary: VBCDC would like to approach the City for participation in paying down a$1.8 million short term line of credit at whatever level is determined to be appropriate. a. Preference would be for the City to provide$1,800,000 In financing in the form of a grant or 0%interest loan which could be forgivable upon VBCDC's compliance with whatever the terms are. b. If option(a)above is infeasible,a second option could be for VBCDC to commit to paying 5700,000 principal on the line of credit from the sale of VBCDC unencumbered properties and/or refinancing of its properties and request $1,100,000 from the City in funding to repay the remainder of the line. 12 October 27, 2020 17 CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS VIRGINIA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION(VBCDC) PROPOSAL FOR ASSISTANCE (Continued) The next two (2) slides provide an overview of the Proposal Developed by Council Liaisons, staff and VBCDC Leadership: Proposal Developed by Council Liaisons, staff and VBCDC Leadership: Funding Proposal Proposed source of funding: Fund Balance of the General Fund (Pandemic Relief funds) City to provide a grant$1.1 million to VBCDC City to provide$700,000 to the VBDA VBDA to provide a loan of$700,000 to the VBCDC The total$1.8 million pays off the line of credit The VBDA loan is to be repaid out of net proceeds from sale of properties owned in Norfolk Balance of loan($700,000 less net sale proceeds)would be forgiven 13 Proposal from Council Liaisons (2) Conditions of VBDA: Use$700,000 for loan to VBCDC Interest free for two years from the date of loan ➢ Allow forgiveness if the net proceeds of sale of properties is insufficient to pay off loan Conditions of VBCDC: ➢ Grant funds are for the repayment of line of credit ➢ Board passes a resolution agreeing not to use line of credit for operations Compliance with loan terms set forth by VBDA ➢ Board agrees to allow City Auditor to conduct an audit in FY21, FY22,and FY23 to determine compliance with grant and previous audit findings [There would be a related action wherein the Council asks the City Auditor to make such review.] 14 October 27, 2020 18 CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS VIRGINIA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION(VBCDC) PROPOSAL FOR ASSISTANCE (Continued) Council discussion and direction Thank you! 15 Mayor Dyer expressed his appreciation to Mr. Friedman for the presentation. October 27, 2020 19 CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS INITIAL CITY COUNCIL GUIDANCE ON FY2021-22 BUDGET 4:30 P.M. This presentation is postponed to a later date; however, after City Council discussion, City Manager Duhaney will schedule a retreat for further discussion on December 15, 2020. October 27, 2020 20 CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS MARKET SALARY STUDY 5:00 P.M. Mayor Dyer welcomed Regina Hilliard, Director — Human Resources. Ms. Hilliard expressed her appreciation to City Council for their continued support: Market Salary Survey and 2006 Resolution City Council Meeting Regina S.Hilliard Director of Human Resources October 27,2020 Here is the purpose of Market Salary Surveys: Market Salary Surveys PURPOSE • Remain mindful of market trends and movement in pay and benefits • Maintain competitiveness for recruiting • Retain quality employees October 27, 2020 21 CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS MARKET SALARY STUDY (Continued) The last Market Salary Survey was conducted in 2011: Market Salary Surveys • Historically,market salary surveys conducted annually • In 2004,we moved to every 3 years • Last market salary survey implementation:2011 MMPACT • Multiple recruitments needed for hiring • Caliber of candidate pools not as strong • Address positions as pay issues arise • Many presume turnover to be due to pay An Ordinance requesting funding is planned to be brought forward to City Council: Market Salary Surveys • Funding originally included in proposed FY 2021 budget,eliminated due to COVID-19 reductions • Our plan is to bring an ordinance to City Council requesting transfer of$200,000 from Reserve for Contingencies October 27, 2020 22 CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS MARKET SALARY STUDY (Continued) Here is the Background on the 2006 Resolution pertaining to a market salary survey specific to public safety: 2006 Resolution BACKGROUND • Includes requirements for market salary survey implementation • Specific to public safety • Purpose Help ensure retention Minimize salary compression The next two (2)slides provide an overview on completed requirements from the resolution: 2006 Resolution COMPILE-MD requirements from the resolution For FY 06-07 and 07-08,adjustments based on years of service and years in grade shall be made to the current public safety pay and classification plans at a maximum cost of$4.5 million per fiscal year ✓Prior to December 1,2007,a revised step-plan shall be submitted to Council for review and discussion so it may be considered as part of the FY 08-09 budget � 6 ] October 27, 2020 23 CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS MARKET SALARY STUDY (Continued) 2006 Resolution COMPLETED requirements from resolution (cont:d) ✓Even if the above steps fail to alleviate supervisory pay compression,such compression shall be alleviated within three years of identification The next three (3)slides provide an overview on ongoing considerations from the resolution: 2006 Resolution ONGOING considerations from resolution • To prevent future pay compression in the public safety pay and classification plans,pay adjustments shall be applied to all employees and ranges • Still necessary to provide pay with market adjustments • Flexibility in implementation needed October 27, 2020 24 CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS MARKET SALARY STUDY (Continued) 2006 Resolution ONGOING considerations from resolution (cont.'d) • Future market salary surveys shall be restricted initially to Hampton Roads communities • Surveys since 2006 have been restricted to Hampton Roads;"initial"restriction may have been met [ 9 ] 2006 Resolution r)INrs considerations from resolution(cont.'d) • Proposed budgets shall include an annual summary of entry-level public safety salaries in surrounding Hampton Roads communities • Need could be met with market salary surveys [10I October 27, 2020 25 CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS MARKET SALARY STUDY (Continued) Here is the proposal: 2006 Resolution PROPOSAL • Replace 2006 resolution • Enable flexibility in implementing pay with market salary implementations • Allow organizations within Hampton Roads,such as VB City Public Schools and Hampton Roads Sanitation District(HRSD),to be included as survey participants • Provide flexibility to survey organizations outside of Hampton Roads depending on recommendations from survey consultant Guidance requested • Provide a new market salary survey resolution as proposed • Specific to the market salary survey: • Present an ordinance to authorize funding for the market salary survey • Present an ordinance to authorize funding for market salary survey,including a scope for teacher salary survey • Do not present an ordinance to authorize funding for market salary survey Mayor Dyer expressed his appreciation to Ms. Hilliard for the presentation. October 27, 2020 26 CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION ENHANCED PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS 5:23 P.M. Mayor Dyer opened the discussion and turned it over to Council Member Henley. Council Member Henley reminded Council Members of the Enhanced Public Engagement Proposal draft policy distributed last week. Council Member Henley advised, one of the concerns with redevelopment is the impact the development will have on adjoining property owners and explained the draft policy focuses on establishing requirements for developers to have meaningful engagement with surrounding property owners during the application process. Council Member Henley advised she received feedback from Council Member Moss and then asked Council Members to share their opinion. Vice Mayor Wood advised he likes the idea of having increased civic engagement and believes it is key. Council Member Abbott thanked Council Members Henley and Rouse for their work on the draft and advised it is important that developers who may want to significantly change the look of an area have a clear path on how to engage the surrounding residents. Council Member Abbott added it will be helpful to know all the public engagement requirements have been met before the application is brought to City Council for consideration. Council Member Henley asked the body how they would like to go forward with the proposal and if should be a policy or should the proposal be written as an Ordinance? Council Member Tower suggested having developers provide feedback before moving forward. Council Member Henley advised it is difficult to speak to groups and civic leagues with COVID-19 but has considered soliciting written input. Council Member Wilson advised the proposal is good, believing it is necessary and asked if the proposal will apply to all applicants or if there is any distinction on requirements based on the type of development? Council Member Henley advised it is currently written as developments that are three (3) acres or more but the size can be changed, as well as basing requirements on the type of development. Mayor Dyer advised when he represented the Centerville District, he had developers come to him early on to discuss their project ideas and was able to ensure neighbors were engaged during the concept phase, their feedback enhanced the process, it was called, "the good neighbor policy". Mayor Dyer expressed Council Member Henley is on the right track going forward and encouraged Council Members to get involved as well. October 27, 2020 27 CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION ENHANCED PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS Council Member Henley requested Patrick Duhaney, City Manager, draft the proposal to codify the requirements for the next City Council Meeting adding, this will be a start and as it is refined, it can then be written as an Ordinance. Mr. Duhaney advised he would work with the City Attorney's Office in drafting and advised it will be beneficial for staff when they are working with developers. Mayor Dyer expressed his appreciation to Council Member Henley for her work on the proposal and to the Council Members for the discussion. October 27, 2020 28 ADD ON CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION 5:40 P.M. Vice Mayor Wood advised he was contacted by a concerned citizen who was asked if he wanted to join a City Council Commission which has not been created and distributed a memorandum to Council Members with supporting emails, attached hereto and made a part of the record. Vice Mayor Wood advised the citizen who informed him also stated he was asked to keep everything quiet. Vice Mayor Wood advised it was very unsettling and wanted to ensure the body is aware. Mayor Dyer advised he and Council Member Wooten are working with the African American Roundtable and the City Manager to repurpose the Investigative Review Panel emphasizing the members will be appointed by City Council when the composition is determined. Mayor Dyer advised the memorandum brings up a serious issue and it must be understood that a future committee and its members will be appointed by City Council. October 27, 2020 , c cc"; `�G� PBF,gy w z City of Virini� Bea�.h cZ 2 lt y��.� Si 99k6 S 0J L OUR NAZ1�M,j `WISdr \Itgo%AINII JAMES L.WOOD,VICE MAYOR MUNICIPAL CENTER COUNCILMAN-DISTRICT 5-LYNNHAVEN CITY HALL.BUILDING 1 (757)366-1011 2401 COURTHOUSE DRIVE EMAIL:JLWOOD@VBGOV.COM VIRGINIA BEACH,VA 23456 MEMORANDUM To: The Honorable Mayor Bobby Dyer The Honorable Members of City Council From: Jim Wood Subject: Correspondence regarding a new commission Date: October 27, 2020 Copies to: City Manager, City Attorney, City Clerk This weekend I received copies of emails that indicate some citizens are attempting to create a citizen review board and present it to the city council at a future council without advance notice to anyone other than the City Manager. I spoke to the manager this weekend and he assured me that he has received no information on this and would not withhold such information from the council. This started when I received a phone call from a friend who advised that he was approached about being appointed to this new committee and then his application was rejected by one of the citizens who was forming the committee. He thought that it was an official city effort,thought the citizen who vetted him was a city employee and was concerned that he would not be qualified or permitted to serve. I advised him that there was no such council-appointed committee and that all committees, boards and commissions are appointed by council and that council had the ultimate decision regarding who served. I have compiled a chronological series of the subject emails attached to this memo and have saved all of them in the Council Retention folder so that they can easily be accessed by anyone concerned. Jim Wood From: Gary Mah <garymah3@icloud.com> Sent: Friday, 23 October, 2020 19:46 To: Jim Wood Subject: Appointment to Citizen Review Board Vice Mayor Jim Wood, I would like to state that I had no idea the appointment for the Citizen review Board referenced by Shewling Moy and Andrew Jackson was not something the City of Virginia Beach was not involved with establishing. I was contacted by Shewling Moy by email on Oct. 17, 2020 and asked if I would be interested in serving on an unbiased review board . I responded yes and sent an email to her and a Mr.Andrew Jackson with a short Resume of myself as she requested. I have never met Mr. Andrew Jackson and incorrectly assumed he was with the City of Va. Beach. I will be sending you as many emails as I have retained. There was never an application for an Appointment presented to me to fill out. After some unusual responses by Mr. Andrew Jackson I started to find some of his comments troubling and very biased and began to question if I should be involved in this Appointment.Today, Oct 23, 2020 I received an email from Mr. Jackson stating"a difficult fight with the Council to get it adopted and passed". It was this email that made me realized this was not a City Council sanctioned Appointment. I called you today to ask about it and have decided it would be better to send you the emails I have so that I do not become a pawn to be used for someone else's agenda. The last email dated Oct. 23, 2020 seems to imply a surprise presentation to City council during the 3`d week in November where Mr. Jackson states "So I have done my homework and when I present to Council I am going to try to pack the room with supporters to give me some advantage. I will see if I can get presentation scheduled for the 3rd week in November." I again state I have no intertest in participating in any of this and am forwarding you about 11 emails. Thank you for letting me know this is not a sanctioned City of Va. Beach Review Board. Gary C. Mah sff EpUILC From: "smwjune@yahoo.com" <smwjune@yahoo.com> Reply-To: "smwjune@yahoo.com" <smwjune@yahoo.com> Date: Saturday, October 17, 2020 at 5:04 PM To: Gary C Mah <garymah3@cox.net> Subject:An Appointment Gary, I lope you and your family arc healthy and doing well. I was asked to name a person to be on a diverse board for investigating cases involving police officers. The most important thing that they ask is "the person is able to control their bias." Would you be interested to serve? I need to know asap. "Thank you in advance. W/R, Shewling Jim Wood From: Gary Mah <garymah3@icloud.com> Sent: Friday, 23 October, 2020 19:45 To: Jim Wood Subject: FW: An Appointment email k 2 Attachments: GARY C MAH background.doc From: Gary Mah <garymah3@icloud.com> Date: Saturday, October 17, 2020 at 7:10 PM To: "smwjune@yahoo.com" <smwjune@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: An Appointment Attached is a short background on myself. Gary From: "smwjune@yahoo.com" <smwjune@yahoo.com> Reply-To: "smwjune@yahoo.com" <smwjune@yahoo.com> Date: Saturday, October 17, 2020 at 6:49 PM To: <garymah3@icloud.com>, Gary Mah <garymah3@icloud.com> Subject: Re: An Appointment Do you have a bio or resume that I could forward,along with contact information. I will let them know it will be coming. Glad that you accept.Thank you on the behalf of our community. Shewling Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Sat. Oct 17, 2020 at 6:17 PM. Gary Mah <garymah3@icloud.com>wrote: Yes. I would be interested if this involves Va. Bch.Officers. Gary C. Mah From: "smwjune@yahoo.com" <smwjune@yahoo.com> Reply-To: "smwjune@yahoo.com" <smwjune@yahoo.com> Date: Saturday, October 17, 2020 at 5:05 PM To: Gary C Mah <garymah3@cox.net> Subject:An Appointment Gary, Jim Wood From: Gary Mah <garymah3@icloud.com> Sent: Friday, 23 October, 2020 19:45 To: Jim Wood Subject: FW: Gary C. Mah background email # 3 From: Gary Mah <garymah3@icloud.com> Date: Monday, October 19, 2020 at 8:28 PM To: "smwjune@yahoo.com" <smwjune@yahoo.com> Subject: Gary C. Mah background I have been a resident of Virginia Beach since 2002. I am registered to vote in Virginia Beach and have already voted during early in person voting at BId. 14 Board of Elections location this current election. Background: Since moving to Virginia Beach in 2002 I have been very involved with Community Service through my membership as a Cape Henry Rotary Club member. The Cape Henry Rotary Club has been responsible for raising about $50,000 annually for local charities through our popular Cape Henry Oyster Crush fundraiser which was usually held in Oct. at Marina Shores. I had been a Rotarian for 42 years and last July stepped down from active membership. I have been President of the Chinese Community Association of Hampton Roads since 2005. Our Community Center is located at 722 Newtown Rd. Virginia Beach Va. 23462. The Chinese Community Association of Hampton Roads is a non-profit organization with a 501-c-3 tax status, tax ID #1 54-1151298. The Chinese Community Association of Hampton Roads is organized for charitable, religious, educational, and scientific purposes, including the education of its members and the general public about Chinese culture and history. Through fundraisers such as Golf tournaments, auctions and participating in Norfolk Festevents Beverage Program The Chinese Community Association of Hampton Roads is able to recognize local High School students with Scholarships who have shown leadership and academic achievement. In addition we support our Senior Citizens in our community with monthly lunches that allow them a chance to interact with friends and not be confined to their homes. Other local charities we support as an organization are the Food Bank and the Red Cross emergency relief funds. Another community service that I was involved in was being a Durham Police Dept. Reserve Officer. This past July I retired after 32 years of service and am no longer sworn or associated with The Durham Police Department. A Reserve Police Officer with Durham, North Carolina Police Dept is a non-paid volunteer position. The Durham Reserve Police Officer is a fully sworn and state certified position and requires about 600 hours of training and a passing of a State written exam. State and Department mandated in-service training is required annually on topics such as Use of Force, Legal Updates, Diversity Training, Dealing with Emotional Disturbed Individuals, Ethics, and Criminal Justice Diversion programs to name a few. The Durham Reserve Officer has full arrest power and carries a handgun and is eligible to carry off duty. This position requires the individual to complete the same required training as a paid Officer including a Field Training program before being allowed to have ride alone status in a marked Police vehicle. The Reserve officer supplements the police force during times of emergency natural and man-made as well as during manpower shortages. Reserves are required to work special events such as the Holiday Parade, July 4th Fireworks, Haunted House, Latino Festival, and Bimbe Music festival which were run almost entirely by Reserve Officers saving the City of Durham overtime hours which would have been paid to fulltime officers. During my 32 years at the Durham Police Dept. I obtained the rank of Captain and at one time Supervised the Reserve Unit which was about 40 Sworn Reserve Offices. I was a backup Hostage Negotiator trained by the FBI, helped start the K9 Caine program and I started the Officer Teddy program. The Officer Teddy program was my getting a local Department store to donate surplus stuffed teddy bears from a special promotion that had ended to have these bears made available to patrol officers to give to children during a high stress incident for a calming effect. I want to emphasize that I have had no disciplinary actions against me during my career, have been in a Supervisory position to make sure our program remained well respected and having retired in July 2020 am no longer in any way associated with any Police Dept. If appointed to this Board I believe I am uniquely qualified to understand issues, know what questions to ask and can serve in an unbiased manner as I have my entire life. Gary C. Mah 2 From:Andrew Jackson <arjackso@msn.com> Date: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 at 1:21 PM To: "smwjune@yahoo.com" <smwjune@yahoo.com>, "garymah3@icloud.com" <garymah3@icloud.com> Subject: Re: Gary C. Mah background So that we are clear for any other type of group, I would love to be involved with Gary because I can see by his BIO who and what he is in terms of people. That said, part of the reason for forming this panel or group is oversight which will put pressure on law enforcement to stay within policy driven procedures. And, I agree with the statistics,that the problem in policing is normally a small percentage of the bad guys. However,the part of the problem is that the "blue shield" that protects them is in place to the point the bad guys keep covered. The above is true in all of the areas of the country and that is the reason that oversight is now the program that is in place and even recommended by many of the veteran police chiefs. Most, if not all by now,of the oversight/review groups are forming under the advise and guidelines of"NACOLE"which is the national association of oversight groups that have formed or in progress. One of the best out there is the Atlanta group. As I told Shewling, I have analized 35 oversight organizations across the country and the big no no is to have law enforcement a part of the group. The big reason there is the erosion of poblic trust. The community doesn't bring issue forward because"they see" a cover-up or compromise of purpose. Now,what I know about police (in general) is that there is a certain culture built up in trainiing and brought forth in the carrying out of their duties. A sort of machoism or gladiator mentality. My step-father, brother and nephew were all police officers. My relationship here in VB is with many of the officer level and quite a few of the MPO's. I have many conversations with them and I can see the culture of self and group protection and some of that is rightly so and understandable because of the job and danager thereof. In that regard, I understand police much more than most. I have attended both the civilian police academy for VB and also the civilian FBI equivalent. But, I am also a veteran of the Human Rights and Race Relations side and have facilitated approx 60 race relations seminars,conducted many workshops and presentations re power and priviledge, etc. What I have seen is that even the most open police officers I know have some of that machoism in their conversation and therefore in their thoughts or view of subjects after all,that is what keeps them alive many times. The overall and overriding objective is Community Policing and not just to have it but be the best at it. That takes community trust to the max. For that reason, screening and selection rules out sworn law enforcement officers. However, if you like, I will submit your name and even give it a push. But I know it will probably not past for(1) its in the selection rules and (2)there would be fear if one is approved it would be hard to say no to the next one in terms of conflict of interest and maybe even a law suit. Now that I have that said, I am also including in the plan another group that would be outside advisor/consultant (lawyers(constitution,legal definition,etc.),ex law enforcement (policy/procedure issues), Investigators(investigation methods/practices). I was a licensed VA DCJS investigator(fraud (social security,workmans comp.,and insurance)end also did several cases as Criminal Defense Investigator CDI. I did race relations at the executive level for the Navy and military contractors. Corporate trainer and free lance training. Spent 10 years in the middle as a consult, to Saudi and gulf group counties for military communications security for their underground command centers. I started this project because of several incidents that have really gone unchecked and I feel the present Investigation Review Panel is not what is needed and lacks expertise. A little long-winded but I wanted to lay it out as best I can in an email. Would enjoy meeting you one day and having a conversation. I would really like the diversity of the group to include Asian input. Andrew From: "smwjune@yahoo.com" <smwjune@yahoo.com> Reply-To: "smwjune@yahoo.com" <smwjune@yahoo.com> Date: Thursday, October 22, 2020 at 9:20 AM To:Gary Mah <garymah3@icloud.com>, Andrrew Jackson <arjackso@msn.com> Subject: Re: Good News questions Andrew, I am glad that things are working out. We have known each other for many years. I also have established myself as someone who makes decision and recommendation diligently. I am confident that Gary Mah is one of the best choices for this Board. Look at his well-thought-out questions (email) that he has for you. Ile will be a great asset. Since your last email, I actually have scheduled a call with Delegate Kelly Fowler. Kelly and I have known each other prior to her election as a Delegate. And her husband is in the law enforcement. I was going to further look into the matter. I am glad that you have done just that. (When I know I am right, I am right. Lol) Please let me know if there is anything that I can do to further this appointment. If needed, I will speak with our elected officials and city manager. W/R, Shewling From:Andrew Jackson <arjackso@msn.com> Date: Thursday, October 22, 2020 at 1:10 AM To: "smwjune@yahoo.com" <smwjune@yahoo.com>, "garymah3@icloud.com" <garymah3@icloud.com> Subject:Good News Contacted Delegate Folwer earlier this evening concerning the police reform bill that just passed. It has a provision that allows former police to sit on oversight boards. The reqirement that former service was outside the area and presently oiutside of law enforcement. That opens the door so if you are still willing let me know. Delegate Fowler will be forwarding me a copy of the legislation even though it hasn't been signed by the Governor. I'm putting the finishing touches on the proposal for submissioin by Friday (or at the latest Monday). I'm asking for an opportunity to do a power point presentation before the Council and then hopefully approval. With the election followed by the holiday seasons coming up, I doubt if approved, it won't replace the current Review Panel until the first of the year. Andrew From: Gary Mah <garymah3@icloud.com> Date: Thursday, October 22, 2020 at 8:22 AM To: Andrew Jackson <arjackso@msn.com> Subject: Good News questions That is great news that I may still be eligible. I would like to speak with you by phone or Zoom to ask some questions. Some questions I have are: Will the reviews be in private or open forum to the public? If these are closed review meetings will the individual decisions by Committee members be made public at some point. How many members will make up the Review Board? What influence or authority will the Review Board have on individual Officers? • Will there be an appeal process for the decisions? How often will the Review Board meet? Will the Review Board members have access to people like Commonwealth Attorney, City Human Resource personnel for policy or even the Professional Standards personnel in the Police Dept i.e. Internal Affairs,to ask questions for clarification on topics What training will be required of the members besides the Citizen Police Academy and possibly FBI Citizen Academy. How much time per month is estimated for this position and when will meeting be held and at about what time. I will have more questions but these are the type of questions that initially come to mind. I would like to take some time to formulate more questions as these are only a few that come to mind. I would like to write down my questions and submit before we talk. I am out of state visiting Grandchildren this weekend and may not be able to submit my questions until Monday. I am very interested in participating on this Review Board but want to make sure I can dedicate enough of my time to do this in a professional manner as well as be effective. I view this as my Community service as has all my prior volunteer work has been and want to make sure I can meet the high standards this position requires. Thank you for looking further into this for me. Gary C. Mah I Iv17,. .1n1rvJuIicL yaIwvA.JIII v11111VJUI �L aiwv.avnI, • Reply-To: "smwjune@yahoo.com" <smwjune@yahoo.com> Date: Friday, October 23, 2020 at 11:14 AM To:Andrew Jackson <arjackso@msn.com> Cc: "garymah3@icloud.com" <garymah3@icloud.com> Subject: Re:Good News questions Andrew, The third week of November, that is a month from now. I think Gary is in the same Cape I lenry Rotary Club as Jim Wood? Right, Gary?? We probably could run this as a political campaign. Do some lobbying as well. Gain/get support from the delegates and senators in writing for your presentation. Maybe some community leaders too. Meet with police chief and the city manager. I know the manager has said that there are plans for department restructure. I le also has plan for the police dept. Let me know if I can help. W/R, Shewling On Friday, October 23, 2020, 01:08:19 AM EDT, Andrew Jackson <arjackso@msn.com> wrote: El LOL Yeah I am glad also when I saw his background, it hit the spot but I am staying tight on the requirements because I know it will be a difficult fight with the Council to get it adopted and passed so I wanted to make sure I didn't give them any argument andfor reason to turn it down. The Council fight I know will be mostly with Wood, Wilson, Jones, Henley and Dyer _maybe even Belucchi but with him it's a toss 1, . I have put together a good oversight plan by researching the plans of 35 of the best across the country plus the advise of the National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement(NACOLE). The strongest of the bunch that I looked over was Atlanta. It's tough, respectable, fair and balanced. I also researched the relationship between Oversight groups and their Police organization. So I have done my homework and when I present to Council I am going to try to pack the room with supporters to give me some advantage. • I will see if I can get presentation scheduled for the 3rd week in November. By then "hopefully"all the election issues are out of the way. In the mean time, I will be smoothing over the rough edges of the proposal and looking for others to make up the 11 person board membership. Even then I am hoping to get all that I suggest a favorable vote from Council.With Gary, myself and maybe one other we'll have three with various degrees of investigation experience, My areas as a licensed investigator were workmans comp, lawsuit fraud and criminal defense investigations. I let my license expire when I was running for Council the second time in 2010. ......Andrew p.s. Gary in response to your questions, I am going to take a couple of sections from the draft and send to you in a new email. That should answer some of your questions and also give you a degree of where the oversight plan is going. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 3:49 AM, Andrew Jackson <arjackso@msn.com> wrote: So you will understand 1 picked the 3rd week because the first week is Tuesday 1113 (election day). That Council meeting has been moved until the 10th (2nd week). The 3rd week is on off Council week and norally a day for the Manager's meeting and presentations. I consaider you a friend so I will say to you straight up I'm feeling uneasy that I have shared as much of the plan as I have. I am leary of the need for some many questions on something that is still being smoothed out and ready for presentation. At this point I am shutting down any more information on the plan until after the presentation. The manager will be the only one that has a chance to — review it until the presentation to Council. I don't want this out until I have made the presentation. No lobbying, etc. please. Yes, you can help by keeping the lid on it would be greatly appeciated. My internal antennas are up and that's not a good thing. Andrew 2 29 ADJOURNMENT Mayor Robert M. Dyer DECLARED the City Council Meeting ADJOURNED at 5:43 P.M. Chelius Chief Deputy Ci Clerk A n a Barnes,MMC Ci lerk October 27, 2020