HomeMy WebLinkAboutII. D. HOMELESS ISSUES AND SERVICE DELIVERY 10.8.24Collaborative Unsheltered Homelessness and
Encampment Response Strategy
City Council Workshop
Senior City Attorney Dana Harmeyer, Police Chief Paul Neudigate,
Director Ruth Hill | Oct. 8, 2024
1
Multi-Departmental Effort
•Led by Housing & Neighborhood Preservation
(Homeless Services and Code Enforcement)
•Human Services (PATH/Behavioral Health)
•Parks & Recreation (Landscape Services)
•VBPD (all 4 precincts)
•City Attorney’s Office
•EMS
•Public Health
•Zoning Administration
•Fire
•City Manager’s Office
2
Recent Supreme Court Ruling
History & Background of Johnson v. Grants Pass
3
Robinson v. California (1962)
•U.S. Supreme Court read the Eighth Amendment as prohibiting a state from
criminalizing the “status” of narcotics addiction.
•The California law at issue in Robinson was not one which punished a person for the use
of narcotics, for their purchase, sale or possession, or for antisocial or disorderly
behavior resulting from their administration; it punished addiction itself.
•Robinson has opened the question as to what other “statuses” could be subject to
Eighth Amendment prohibitions.
•Powell v. Texas, 392 U.S. 514 (1968). The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a
man under a Texas statute criminalizing public intoxication. The court did not accept
the argument that the specific drunkenness was an involuntary byproduct of his status
as an alcoholic.
4
Martin v. Boise (9th Cir. 2018)
•Plaintiffs experiencing homelessness filed lawsuit against Boise seeking relief from their
fines under city’s anti-camping ordinance.
•Holding: So long as there is a greater number of homeless individuals in a jurisdiction
than the number of available beds in shelters, the jurisdiction cannot prosecute
homeless individuals for “involuntarily sitting, lying, and sleeping in public.” That is, as
long as there is no option of sleeping indoors, the government cannot criminalize
indigent, homeless people for sleeping outdoors, on public property, on the false
premise they had a choice in the matter.
•Decision was based on the Eighth Amendment.
•Impacted nine states: Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Montana, Nevada, Oregon,
Washington, Idaho
Formed backdrop to the Johnson v. Grants Pass district and appellate rulings.
5
About Grants Pass, Oregon
•General Pop.: 38,000
•Homeless Pop.: About 600
•Limited shelter capacity:
•Attend daily Christian services
•Abstain from smoking
•Did not allow socializing between
genders
•Only recognized binary and
cisgender identity
•Local ordinance prohibits
camping on public property or
parking overnight in the city’s
park
•Violations can result in fines
($295) up to imprisonment
•Individuals experiencing
homelessness filed lawsuit in
2018
6
Defining “Camping/Encampments”
A campsite is defined as “any
place where bedding, sleeping
bags or other material used for
bedding purposes or any stove or
fire is placed for maintaining a
temporary place to live.”
Grants Pass Ore. Ordinance
Municipal Code 5.61.030
7
Johnson v. Grants Pass (2024)
•Two homeless individuals, representing a class of “all involuntarily
homeless people living in Grants Pass,” challenged three City ordinances
as violative of the Eighth Amendment’s Cruel and Unusual Punishment
Clause.
•The laws in question prohibit sleeping, camping, and overnight parking
on public property, including sidewalks, alleyways, and parks.
•2022: Ninth Circuit Court upheld the district court and ruled the city’s
ordinance as unconstitutional.
8
Grants Pass Holding
•The Supreme Court held first that the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition
against cruel and unusual punishment was a “poor foundation” on which to
challenge the City’s public camping laws, since this clause restrains the
method or kind of punishment that a government may impose after a
criminal conviction. The Eighth Amendment does not touch upon the
question of whether a government may criminalize a particular behavior.
•The Court held second that the Ninth Circuit erred in basing its decision on
Robinson v. California. The anti-camping laws at issue criminalized actions
that could be undertaken by any person, not the status of being homeless.
9
Grants Pass Holding, cont.
•The Supreme Court stressed that questions about whether an individual who
has committed a proscribed act with requisite mental state should be
relieved of responsibility due to lack of ‘moral culpability’ are generally best
resolved by the people and their elected representatives, not be judicial fiat.
•Thus, the Court sends the issue back to the elected representatives at the
state and local level.
10
Dissenting Opinion: Justice Sotomayor
•Sleep is a biological necessity, not a crime. For some people sleeping
outside is their only option.
•Criminalization creates a costly revolving door that recycles individuals
experiencing homelessness from the street to the criminal justice system
and back again
•91% of homeless people living in encampments surveyed reported
remaining outdoors most often, moving only two to three blocks away
when they received a move along order.
•Ruling focused on needs of local governments and leaves the most
vulnerable with an impossible choice: Either stay awake or be arrested.
11
After Grants Pass
•Enforcement of anti-camping laws does not offend the Eighth Amendment.
•Localities have enforcement as a tool in its toolbox to impose rules and a means of
encouraging other outreach and services.
•City ordinance prohibitions for sleeping/camping on the beach, public parks, and other
public property applies from 8 p.m. to 8 a.m.
•Loitering cases make clear that unless a person is breaking a law, one has a right to loiter.
This is especially true when a person is engaging in expressive conduct.
•Recent actions by the General Assembly have removed the ability of law enforcement to
use jaywalking as a reason to stop a person. This has impacts on panhandlers that enter
traffic.
•Laws of general applicability, e.g. indecent exposure and defecating in public, remain
available for enforcement.
12
Homelessness Considerations
for VBPD
13
Ongoing Engagement
Process
Outreach first
•Notify Outreach Team of location.
•Provide individuals with Pocket Pal
(listing of resources) or Housing Crisis
Hotline number.
•Discussed at bi-weekly collaboration
meeting with DHS, City Attorney, CMO,
Housing, etc.
•Outreach Team will engage on their own
at all property types. VBPD will
accompany if requested.
14
How Encampments Are Identified for Clearance
•Near a school or day care
•Near residential areas
•Near a business
•50 ft. from highway, bridge
•Known criminal activity
15
Accompanying Concerns
•Crime
•Victimization of homeless individuals
•Drug & Alcohol addictions / Mental Health
Needs assistance of counselors
•Trash accumulation & quality of life concerns
Trash is often biohazardous requiring special cleanup
considerations which can be costly.
p16
Property Types – City Fields/Land
Discussed during bi-weekly meeting
•Parks & Rec post 21-day clearance notice
Allows Outreach time to offer resources
•Parks & Rec provides 72-hour trespassing notice to individuals in
VBPD’s presence
•After 72 hours, VBPD will enforce trespassing violations but
does not clear encampment
•Parks & Rec obtains quote and facilitates cleanup – time varies
Done when encampment is no longer occupied
Concerns/complications
•Ensuring P&R has sufficient budget to clean and landscape
Thinning of underbrush and trimming tree branches for sight lines is
important to discourage continued unauthorized use of property p17
Not an encampment
•Mere presence is not criminal
•Behavior can have mental health component but usually does
not reach ECO/TDO thresholds
Constant engagement by Outreach Team is important
•Specialized counselors for mental health & substance abuse
Visibility leads to more complaints and VBPD interaction
•Sleeping in public (8pm-8am), tent on beach (8pm-8am),
urinating/defecating in public, open container – cite only
offenses, not physical arrest
•Disorderly conduct, disturbing the peace, public intoxication,
narcotics possession, public nudity
Victim/Witness willingness to prosecute/participate
Misdemeanors must occur in officer’s presence
Property Types – City Boardwalks/Benches
p18
Property Types – State Owned
VDOT generally notified by Code Enforcement
•VDOT communicates with Outreach Team
•VSP has primary enforcement responsibilities
•Cleanup is on an unknown VDOT timeline with own budgetary
implications
At one point, we were notified they were out of funding and had to
pause cleanup
Area at Laskin/Va. Beach Blvd. split believed to have cost $100K
Complications/Concerns
•Very few – cleanup is speedy for most sites
Laskin Road/VA Beach Blvd area is an exception but not generally
visible
p19
Property Types – Federal
VBPD generally notifies military liaison
•Site visits with liaison, base PD & NAS Oceana Security Department
•Enforcement begins after landowner decision
Complications/Concerns
•Jurisdictional considerations
Federal Property with concurrent or proprietary jurisdiction. Abide by MOUs.
Usually prosecuted in local courts with USN representative needed to attend
court case
•Cleanup – USN currently has no budget to cleanup after property is vacant
Broken Windows Theory – without cleanup, property appears abandoned &
people return
Massive amounts of trash with biohazard considerations
•Timeliness – generally the longest resolution of all property types
•Monitoring of property to prevent reoccupation
Patrol by USN departments in conjunction with VBPD important
Individuals state they actively seek these locations
p20
Property Types - Private
Cooperative/Complaining Property Owner
•Owner tells occupants to leave – can request PD assist
Some will give a grace period for occupants to cleanup and vacate
Owner can obtain trespassing charges but often doesn’t reach this level
Owner responsible for cleanup
Unknown or Uncooperative Property Owner
•Zoning – unauthorized use (i.e. “camping” on property) enforcement
•Code Enforcement – trash, maintenance & cleanup enforcement
•PD often becomes involved after violations issued – owner wants to trespass
individuals.
Concerns/Complications
•Underlying zoning/code violations have minor repercussions
•Timeframe is unknown and varies
Cooperative properties can be immediate or take time (depending on cost/size of
litter cleanup)
Unknown/uncooperative properties dependent upon notice of violation and court
process.p21
Lynn Shores at Virginia Beach Blvd.
22
Potters Road at Wesley Drive, Part I
23
Potters Road at Wesley Drive, Part II
24
Potters Road at Wesley Drive, Part III
25
Our System of Services
26
We Address Homelessness as a Community System
•City-Faith -Nonprofit Partnership
•Represents 30-year commitment of
working together
•Coalition formalized in 2009
•BEACH Governing Board is required by HUD
•Three ways to access the service system:
o Housing Resource Center:Day Services,
Homeless Services, Health Center, Human Services
o Regional Housing Crisis Hotline:(757) 227-5932
o Homeless Outreach:Unsheltered population p27
Our Partners Include...
•5 Star Residential
•Begin Again Foundation
•BrightView Health
•Community Alternatives
Management Group (CAMG)
•Catholic Charities of Eastern
Virginia
•Charity Tracker
•Christ Investment Corp.
•Church of the Ascension
•Connect With A Wish
•DHS Behavioral Health
•Endependence Center
•Hampton VA Medical Center
•Interfaith Alliance at the Beach
•JCOC
•LGBT Life Center
•Lift Fitness
•Open Alter Ministries
•Sentara Health (formerly Optima)
•PiN Ministry
•Potter's House
•Samaritan House
•Senior Services of SE Virginia
•Seniors Unlimited Lifestyles Inc.
•Seton Youth Shelters
•StandUp for Kids Hampton Roads
•The Planning Council
•VB Home Now
•VB City Public Schools
•VBCDC
•VBDPH Community Development
•Virginia Beach Dept. of Health
•Virginia Employment Commission
•Virginia Supportive Housing
•Virginia Veteran and Family
Support
•Vision Life Ministries
28
Community Resources Include...
Homeless Services:
•Prevention assistance
•Permanent housing
•Transitional Housing
•Shelter
•Case management
Food/Meals:
•Community dinners
•Bag lunches
•Pre -packed grocery
•Food pantries
Basic Assistance:
•Day Support: showers, laundry, housing support
•Clothing
•ID/birth certificate assistance
•Hygiene items
•Bike program
•LGBTQ+ youth meetings
Health Services:
•Preventative medical
29
Our Goal Is To Make Homelessness...
Rare,
Prevent people
from experiencing
homelessness
Brief,
Shorten the length of time
that people experience
homelessness
and Nonrecurring
Stably house & provide
wraparound support to
help people leave
homelessness behind
30
Unsheltered Homelessness in VB
150 unsheltered households at any given time.
Small subset live in encampments:
•Approx. 75 people
•30-35 encampments known to
Outreach
Marginalization:
•Presence of unsheltered individuals
in places people would rather not see
them
•Not considered a part of the
community
31
Emerging Challenges in Addressing
Unsheltered Homelessness
Inadequate supply of shelter and
housing to meet the need.
Growing preference for non-communal
shelter programs:
•Do not want to leave belongings or pets
•Couples want to be sheltered together
•Concern about communicable illnesses
•Want autonomy
Addressing encampment issue involves
balancing:
•Health and safety of surrounding community
•Our shelter and housing capacity
•Compassion
•Personal choice and service resistance
•Property ownership
•Legal precedents
32
Approaches to Addressing Unsheltered
Homelessness
Criminalize
•100% encampment sweeps
•Making panhandling illegal
•Enforcing anti-camping bans
•Penalizing individuals based
on housing status by
assessing fines, tickets or
imprisonment
Balanced
•Address sites that pose the biggest threat to public health and safety
•Humanitarian front-line response
•Providing adequate notification for compliance with clearance and connection to shelter and housing services
Normalize
•Prioritizing encampments
over public health and
safety
•Enabling homelessness
instead of collectively
resolving the issue
•No commitment in
addressing service gaps
and affordable housing
33
Emergency
Shelter Inventory
in Virginia Beach
196 total beds:
•87 beds: Single men and
women
•41 beds: Families and singles
experiencing domestic
violence (DV)
•40 beds: Families with minor
children (Non DV)
•20 beds: Youth (ages 18-24)
•8 beds: Youth (ages 9-17)34
Emergency Shelter Placement
•Accessed through Hotline, Housing
Resource Center (HRC) walk-ins,
Outreach Housing Navigators
•Prioritize Most Vulnerable:
•65+
•Acute health conditions: diabetes
(insulin dependent),kidney
disease,cancer, heart disease,COPD
•Families with minor children (ages 0-5)
•Received a notice to vacate from an
encampment
•Shelter providers report numbers
daily to Coordinated Assessment
(CA) Team
•Referrals are a collective decision by
Outreach, Day Services and CA staff
•The length of shelter stays is not
based on a predetermined period of
time.
•Shelter rules are based on safety –
low barrier
35
Street Outreach Housing Navigators
Five-person team conducts outreach during business hours
and early morning/evening as needed:
•Persons living in cars, encampments, boardwalk, benches,
storefronts, sidewalks.
Purpose & Role:
•Build trust
•Offer connections to shelter and services; facilitate securing ID
documentation
•Create actionable plans with individuals that will lead to
permanent housing and help them navigate their plan
Misperception the team is an enforcement authority.
p36
Summary
37
Outcomes to Date (April 2024-Current)
Total Encampments Cleared: 38
•Public Property: 13
•Federal/State Property: 7
•Private Property: 18
Total # of Individuals Impacted: 38
•Accepted Shelter: 14
•Working with Outreach: 24
•Not Interested in Shelter: 18
•Issued Summons After Remaining on Property: 10
•Arrested: 5
Encampments Reactivated:5-6
Resident’s Concern:
“…I am concerned about the increasing
number of homeless people on Witchduck
Road near the Housing Resource Center. I'm
seeing more people, and it appears that a
homeless camp is being established on the
state property by the entrance ramp for
interstate 264 West.”
Resident’s Feedback After:
“Thank you for what you do.It looks so much
better out there now.I hope you were able to
help those folks get more appropriate shelter.”
38
Key Takeaways
•Addressing homelessness
is complex.
•Multiple partners are
working together.
•We’re making progress.
•We continue to learn and
create solutions.
39
PIT 10-Year Trend: Sheltered and Unsheltered
•Unsheltered count has
increased by 43%.
•Making co-occurring
investment in non-
communal shelter and
permanent housing
resulted in lowest
unsheltered count in 2021
40
How We
Compare to
Other
Communities
Community Total Unsheltered % Unsheltered
San Diego, CA 10,605 6,110 57.6%
Columbus, OH 2,380 514 21.6%
Orange County, FL 2,013 759 37.7%
Baltimore, MD 1,551 113 7.3%
Daytona, FL 1,164 786 67.5%
Richmond Region 681 206 30.2%
Norfolk / Ches. /
West. Tidewater*
670 123 18.4%
Newport News /
Peninsula*
412 50 12.1%
Virginia Beach 311 83 26.7%
2024 PIT Count
“Community of One: All In” Strategies &
Objectives
•Expand coordination between City departments to develop an encampment response
strategy.
•Increase non-congregate sheltering opportunities when year-round shelter beds are full.
•Build partnerships for storage and pet support.
•Invest in a tool to better map and track encampments and improve opportunities to
provide targeted services to those areas.
•Create a small overflow shelter program from April to November in available space at the
Housing Resource Center.
•Increased Outreach staff (peer recovery/mental health).
•Address primary causes of homelessness by ensuring there is an adequate supply of
affordable housing targeting low-income households.
42
Thank You
Questions & Comments
43