The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutJUNE 28, 2016 WORKSHOP MINUTES CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH "COMMUNITY FOR A LIFETIME" CITY COUNCIL �'�N,A.B o J MAYOR WILLIAM D.SESSOMS,JR.,At-Large e. VICE MAYOR LOUIS R.JONES,Bayside-District 4 c � . Lip M.BENJAMIN DAVENPORT,At Large ROBERT M.DYER,Centerville-District I [ BARBARA M.HENLEY,Princess Anne-District 7 5 SHANNON DS KANE,Rose Hall--District 3 s !r , ' JOHN D.MOSS,At Large AMELIA ROSS-HAMMOND,Kempsville-District 2 JOHN E.UHRIN,Beach-District 6 OUR ""`SOS ROSEMARY WILSON,At-Large JAMESL. WOOD,Lynnhaven-District 5 CITY HALL BUILDING CITY COUNCIL APPOINTEES 2401 COURTHOUSE DRIVE CITY MANAGER-DAVID L.HANSEN VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA 23456-9005 CITY ATTORNEY-MARK D.STILES CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PHONE:(757)385-4303 CITY ASSESSOR-JERALD D.BANAGAN FAX(757)385-5669 CITY AUDITOR-LYNDON S.REMIAS E-MAIL:Ctycncl@vbgov.com CITY CLERK-RUTHHODGESFRASER,MMC 28 June 2016 MAYOR WILLIAM D. SESSOMS PRESIDING I. CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS - Conference Room - 4:00 PM A. HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION—Accountability Commission Kevin P. Page, Executive Director B. HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL BENCHMARKING STUDY Greg Grootendorst, Chief Economist- HRPDC C. ARENA FINANCING Andrea Kilmer, President and CEO—ESG Companies II. CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS A. PLANNING ITEMS - Pending Barry Frankenfield, Director- Planning -1- Un ca1 s y er ;q9 *y�,, °P VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL Virginia Beach, Virginia June 28, 2016 Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., called to order the CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS in the City Council Chamber, Tuesday,June 28, 2016, at 4:00 P.M. Council Members Present: Robert M. Dyer, Barbara M. Henley, Vice Mayor Louis R. Jones, Shannon DS Kane, John D. Moss, Amelia N. Ross-Hammond, Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr., John E. Uhrin, Rosemary Wilson and James L. Wood Council Members Absent: M. Benjamin Davenport family vacation Jae 28, 2016 -2- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION— Accountability Commission 4:00 P.M. Mayor Sessoms welcomed Kevin Page, Executive Director — Hampton Roads Transportation Accountability Commission "HRTAC". Mr. Page expressed his appreciation to City Cormcil for their continued support. Mr. Page is happy to report in less than one (1)year, $1.2-Billion has seen received for projects funded and constructions underway; however, there is a long way to gc to meet the transportation needs within the Region: HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION ACCOUNTABILITY COMMISSION R TA 10 Economic Vitality and Quality of Life Unlocking Hampton Roads Kevin Page HRTAC was created by the General Assembly a few years ago to develop a funding plar.for planned projects and work within VDOT to deliver those projects: HRTAC Overview Purpose: To develop a funding plan for planned projects and work with VDOT to deliver those projects. Empowered to procure,finance,build and operate highway,bridge and tunnel projects in Hampton Roads Authorized to use HRTF monies and tolls for construction projects on new or existing highways,bridges and tunnels and to issue bonds using revenues to support bond debt Regional Collaboration-Works closely with the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization(HRTPO)who determines Project Prioritization for the region Jane 28, 2016 -3- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION— Accountability Commission (Continued) HRTAC Membership is made up of nineteen (1) Voting Members plus five (5) Members ,f the General Assembly and four(4) non-voting Ex-officio members. HRTAC Membership HA.MIIOI arMnf ; ;19 Voting members At n ntawtwau+ 10 Cities 4 Counties Chesapeake Isle of Wight Franklin lames City Hampton Southampton s... Newport News York --" Norfolk Poquoson 5 VA General Assembly Members Portsmouth Two Members of the Senate Suffolk Three Members of the Mouse of — Virginia Beach Delegates ?. Williamsburg 4 Non-Voting Ex-officio members Commonwealth Transportation Board Member Virginia Department of Transportation Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation Virginia Port Authority • HRTAC is a political subdivision of the Commonwealth $ 'y • Primarily funded with HB 2313 revenue(Hampton Roads Transportation Fund) approved by the 2013 General Assembly HRTAC receives funds from two different revenue sources: HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION FUND Additional Sales Tax -Additional 0.7% $129.1M Est. Revenue FY16 (Updated by TAX 2/2016)—($129.97M FY2015) Additional Fuels Tax - Regional tax on motor fuels -Additional 2.1%-$34.6 Est. Revenue FY16 (Updated by TAX 2/2016)—($40.94M FY2015) Fuel tax not floored in 2013—Loss of nearly $14-15M per year State Code requires HRTF funds to be spent Hampton Roads highway construction projects Jime 28, 2016 -4- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION— Accountability Commission (Continued) Below are the roles of HRTPO and HRTAC: Roles of the HRTPO and HRTAC ac's CHM 'rev PREPARES AND MAINTAINS LONG RANGE YES NO TRANSPORTATION PLAN(LRTP) ALLOCATES ISTP AND CMAQ MONIES YES NO MAINTAINS TRANSPORTATION YES NO IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM(TIP) USES HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION FUNDIHRTF)TO BUILD HIGHWAYS, NO YES BRIDGES,AND TUNNELS YES ISSUES BONDS AND USES HRTF TO SUPPORT NO 1 v ES THESE BONDS PROCURES,FINANCES)HRTF,TOLLS,BONDS) AND OPERATES HIGHWAY,BRIDGE,AND NO YES TUNNEL PROTECTS Below is the evolution of HRTAC Projects: EVOLUTION OF HRTAC Projects blip Program Finance&Deliver •MPo •HRTPO •NRTRC (Lang-Rang (Tmn.PsrblMn •VDOT , Transportation Plan) In^Prorans•rrr Program) •CTB(SI.•Yaar lmpmramam Program) • HRTPO Long Range Transportation Plan identifies priority projects in the constrained plan or vision plan as understudy/development/construction • HRTAC develops a six year funding plan to guide in project funding for development and construction • HRTAC allocates funds to specific projects,asks that the HRTPO add them to the TIP • The CTB selects the Local Preferred Alternative,maintains Statewide Transportation Improvement Program,allocates state funding to projects in Six Year Improvement Program • VDOT assists in project readiness and construction Jayne 28, 2016 -5- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION— Accountability Commission (Continued) Below are the regional priority projects: HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL PRIORITY PROJECTS oi TWO • p 9 C as • HRBT and Craney Connector are not included by HRTPO as HRTF funded projects,but are being studied in the SETS. Hampton Roads Transportation Fund Nine Candidate Projects* 1-64 Peninsula(6-Lane Option) •1.Segment 1(Jefferson Ave(exit 255)to Route 238/Mile Marker 248(exit 247) •2.Segment 2(Route 238/Mile Marker 248(exit 247)to Route 199 East of Williamsburg(exit 242) •3.Segment 3(Route 199 East of Williamsburg(exit 242)to Route 199 West of Williamsburg(exit 234) •4.Fort Eustis Blvd Interchange •5.Patriots Crossing(with Craney Island Connector-Provided by VPA) •6.4664 Widening(Includes Bowers Hill Interchange) 9.U5 460/58/13 Connector(Suffolk Bypass to 1-664,includes SPSA and Hampton Roads Executive Airport interchanges) "All projects but the Patriots Crossing improve existing VDOT Highways Jane 28, 2016 -6- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION— Accountability Commission (Continued) Here is the sequencing of Regional Priority Projects based on project readiness: 2040 LRTP: Regional Priority Projects 'Sequencing Based on Project Readiness' HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL PRIORITY PROJECTS -64 Peninsula Widening ••norm,Projects Por...rd-HRrS Inresnn•nts" •1-64/1-264 Interchange 6'. `• TPO ,OITA , - urr...___:r( ma's l •1-64 Southside Widening/High- 1 ~ � a Rise Bridge-Phase 1 ., ->- !t "�°;"' •Hampton Roads Crossing:Locally —. — a Preferred Alternative-Phase 1 J^..- z 01:, •I64Southside Widening/High- '1 - '% Rise Bridge-Phase 2 """� •I-64/Fort Eustis Blvd Interchange I J_- _ - . •US Route 460/58/13 Connector •:Approved by the HRTPO Board at its February 18,2016 Meeting. A Below are construction projects totaling$1.5-Billion that will be fully underway by September—2016: HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL PRIORITY PROJECTS "Moving Projects Forward—HRTF Investments" TPO k:R T A. �• 'li.Peninsula Wldening.Sag.3 ;7•�, J I.Peninsula Widening.Seg.x PO mllan in SMART SCALE l ,�y. , •Fully Funded •Rlldlrp • Convecta.erd!env.,tole 1...enln.uI.Widening Seg.1 `-- - -- • Fully Funded • Undo, tiw C .ucrbn f �. - tampion Road.Crossing Study _ c C. • SEIS O,parp ----, U.S.Route.60/511/1l Connect. •P.OWnticS Erpine.eh,O(PE)IM... L G Z L 144 SoulMld•WN.ning/HprM6..Badge N_ 1• Y.' i 14snss6 MwWn.Mae.el.M+• -- ;- Irr...r sry rid O •Mum y PE a RbMsw.y June 28, 2016 -7- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION— Accountability Commission (Continued) Here is a look at Smart Scale (HB2)Funding Requests: HRTPO - SMART SCALE (HB2) FUNDING REQUESTS Project Costs and Funding $Millions HRTF State/Federal Additional Projects Total Cost Allocations Allocations HRTF Request HB2 Re,uest I-64 Peninsula Widening $6474 $257.6 $100.0 $0.0 $289.8 1-64 southsl widening, $2,050.0 $20.0 $0.0 $1,730.0 $300.0 High High Rise Bridge 1-64/1-2641nterchange $343.7 $69.7 $16.7 $0.0 $257.3 • The Commonwealth Transportation Board at its June meeting awarded 5144,927,752 to the 1-64 Widening Project • The Hampton Roads Region will spend significant regional funds to improve the VDOT highway network A Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement(SEIS) is underway to reevaluate the Hampton Roads Crossing Study: Hampton Roads SEIS VDOT and FHWA have initiated work on a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement(SEIS)to reevaluate the Hampton Roads Crossing Study. HRTAC continues to advance project finance • Funding setout for first phase in approved 2016-2022 funding plan • Bond Counsel engaged to begin bond validation work { _ S_.,. 'Yt,. AT./ ,z "1rd leIEEEi . • •k — WU ®Ali tat lw. Alt.A Alt.B Alt.C Alt.D 1-64 improvements • 1-64/HRBT • 1-664 • Alt.B and C b/w 1-664&1-564 • 1-564 • 1-664/1-564 ;,,.,,'„ • HRBT • 1-564 Connector Connectors r'+ • Route 164 Connector• 1-564 • Route 164 • Route 164 Connector Jane 28, 2016 -8- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION— Accountability Commission (Continued) Below is the HRTAC Adopted Funding Plan and HRTPO Pending Long Rang Plan: HRTAC Funding Plan Adopted and HRTPO Long Range Plan Pending • Anticipated revenues are down for 2040 Constrained Long Range Plan • HRTAC's Funding Plan was approved and communicated on March 17, 2016 to update HRTAC projects in the Constrained Long Range Plan • Consultants assisted in the development of a Plan of Finance/Funding Plan Update to finance and build the projects • Identified project financing scenarios and information shared with HRTPO for the Constrained Long Range Plan-first constrained plan for construction of HRTAC Regional Projects. • HRTPO approved project sequencing approach at its February meeting • Legislation adopted to assist in advancing the mission of the HRTAC and improve its ability to conduct business Below is HRTAC 2016-2022 Funding Plan: HRTAC Funding Plan HRTAC 2016-2022 Funding Plan HRTAC Program Level Spreadsheet Approved March 17,2016 ... wo .._ 44,,ppn„ �!• ...o.ma£�xx� cst x..x.nr l sit 7 wnn !I!'f�u f J T 7 ,ti '1'n. t t i r r r June 28, 2016 -9- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION— Accountability Commission (Continued) Below are the transportation issues to be considered by the General Assembly in 2016: General Assembly- 2016 HRTAC Omnibus Bill HB1111 • Allows investment and provides liability protections. • Allows counties to designate a representative. Allows all localities to have representation at the meetings if Chief Elected Officer or County Designee is unable to attend.Notice must be given 48 hours before meeting if regular member is unable to attend. Administrative and operating expenses shall be paid by HRTAC Revenues. No Floor on Gas Tax for HRTAC or NVTA. General Assembly Actions - 2016 Tolling Language within the budget establishes new toll policy restricting CTB,VDOT, HRTAC,and NVTA from tolling existing un-tolled lanes without General Assembly approval except on: • HOV/HOT Lanes • New Lane capacity • New bridges • Short segments of highways between existing toll facilities Legislation was adopted allowing better collection of unpaid toll bills from other states. J_ne 28, 2016 -10- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS TRANSPORTATION— Accountability Commission (Continued) Here are the Next Steps: Next Steps HRTAC will continue work to develop solutions • Considerations will be made as more information is available • Incorporate General Assembly and Smart Scale(HB2) outcomes • High Rise Bridge—Advance Construction Phase I • SEIS—Draft August 2016—Available for 45 day public comment period-Final SEIS Record of Decision Summer 2017 • Public discussion on how to fund the projects • HRTAC will advance its approved 2016-2022 Funding Plan and bond validation work • HRTPO will approve its Long Range Transportation Plan riI' Iammo H.+.an•waa�+.w.o..e.uw ceww411w www.hrtac.org Mayor Sessoms expressed his appreciation to Mr. Page for this informative presentation and for all of the work of HRTAC. Jane 28, 2016 -11- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL BENCHMARKING STUDY 4:20 P.M. Mayor William D. Sessoms, Jr. welcomed Greg Grootendorst, Chief Economist — FiRPDC. Mr. Grootendorst expressed his appreciation to City Council for their continued support. Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study Presented to Virginia Beach g°, City Council . HAMPTON ROADS Greg Grootendorst Chief Economist June 28,2016 The original Benchmarking Study was funded by the Federal Government for the purpose be.ow: Provide quality indicators for socioeconomic variables in Hampton Roads to help inform the decision-making process Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 2 Jane 28, 2016 -12- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL BENCHMARKING STUDY (Continued) The Report is available online for anyone to view and covers the below topics: efc rr . r r` . ap ers • Introduction Hampton Roads • The Economy Regional Benchmarking Study', • Defense Industry • The Port • Tourism Industry t • Retail Industry • Demographics 1,4% • Real Estate k • Transportation ,' r • Education T s • Government Finances • Quality of Life • Local Comparison Available Online ,s.2 EDE Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 3 Below is the comparison of Hampton Roads to the other similar Metropolitan Areas: 2 i "'erican Community Survey Da '"':" : pton Roads HR Rank in the Comparable Metro Areas Highest Value Lowest Volt, 7 8% %c of the Labor Force that ale C •le n the Armed Forces i:ho%fc,'I;nd Out'me ®3e 46.2% County of Residence 84.2% `.`.of Renters Spending',WA , (- ®oe of Income on Housin $28,755 Per Capita Income c •'e 29.6% %of People Who Hove a , _ 1110 oe Bachelor's Degree 35.5 Meclian Age ' t - 74 Je Gi,li Cncffici:nt (f�9ea:::r• 43 I„corn. F:u1it,l I ( 36 POt Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 4 haze 28, 2016 -13- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL BENCHMARKING STUDY (Continued) The Hampton Roads Economy is comparable to economies of small countries: The Economy Nominal Gross Product in 2014 $120 0$100 $91 IEII1II1IiI t7 0 `o $20 m $0 �raca Sera �sk'a or. oa `ac a��oc ac Pa FQ �a r_ F¢cy ¢ ,da ge Hampton Roads and Selected Countries Sou rae:UA W orldboos,Bureau of Economic Analyse and NBVDC Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 5 Here is a look at the Hampton Roads Gross Product since 2001: he Economy Hampton Roads Gross Product (Inflation-Adjusted 2009 Dollars) $90 $85 1:8 . ._ fl so 75 11 706560 Non-Zero 1 $55 Axis $50 �~ c4s� cfl° c£sy 65^ tiSC ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti Source:Bureau of @onom¢Amlyse and MRDDr %7> Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 6 Jane 28, 2016 -14- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL BENCHMARKING STUDY (Continued) Here is a comparison of the Annualized Percent Change in Total Employment between Harm_ton Roads and similar Metropolitan Areas: cono y Annualized Percent Change in Total Employment 4.5% a.0% > 3.5% 0 g 3.0% i2.5% U.S.Metro Area Average is 10.54% .94% 111 ". 2.0 1.5%0 r 050 IIIIIIIlIIlIIIIii1� 0.0% Po;o V Pc µ Q�Jo oiy�c*';Z k J6,\ s`° ,;4" tF Metropolitan Areas with Population between 1 and 3 Million sou,ce:a,rea�o�r000,c Main'n and HRRrA )PriYe Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 7 Public Employment has stayed constant, while Private Employment has grown: Th* on. Public and Private Employment in Hampton Roads 1,200,000 Government if Private 1,000,000 p 800,000 a 600,000 Z 400,000 200,000 0 ti ti NO‘ ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti° so.�:soeao of tcoom<nmr:s ae a Rvoc ,)payie Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 8 June 28, 2016 -15- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL BENCHMARKING STUDY (Continued) Healthcare and Social Assistance employment has grown since 2005, while Construction employment has decreased: The Economy Ten-Year Change in Civilian Employment by Sector an O 25,000 N 20,000 15,000 N 10,000 N 5,000 N E 0 u t (5,000) i ' i (10,000) W (15,000) d (20,000) s4 `p/ C n¢ l� �(�L'�c�Y Y F� cs `a�°' `aGc .cF sc ;6 �c U ` "f .0 ..p� �,,Y�a a`psae"a\?�a\\4�l°�`�°'ea�Oa�Sab�°c``c) a"r "ti `M``22v''''per `(„,b tAj° 4 ,y et• t z¢ a Industry Sector Source Bureau of labor st.os,la and HRBDC ' Z Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 9' The Unemployment Rate in Hampton Roads has stayed consistently below the National Avercge: U 11Ir m p!o Unemployment Rate in the U.S.,Virginia,and Hampton Roads 12% 10% s E 8% 0 n E 6% 4% V a 2% A C S 0% A' 8 8 i; p S o 8 o g 8 n c c c c c c c c c c c c c Source:Bureau of Labor Statistic and HRPOC /,_2,lr Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 10 June 28, 2016 -16- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL BENCHMARKING STUDY (Continued) Here is a look at the Ratio of Hampton Roads Per Capita Income (PCI) to the U.S. and Virginia: Wages & Income Relative Per Capita Income 110% -`� rd Share of US PCI ...Share of Virginia PCI > 105% 95% v r a 90% E 85% = Noe-Zero 'S 80% Axis re 75% Source:Bureau of Economic Analysis and HBP°C 22Eirgr Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 11 Here is a look at the Ratio of Hampton Roads vs. U.S. Weekly Private Wages: Wages & Income Average Weekly Private Wages Hampton Roads vs.U.S. 120% 100% 80% 3 60% !_ a, 3 40% `o 0 20% C 0% Source.Bureau of tabor TtatisHa and HBVfX ,alsze Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 12 JJne 28, 2016 -17- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL BENCHMARKING STUDY (Continued) Here is a comparison of Real Median Family Incomes between Hampton Roads and the U.S. Wages & Income U.S.and Hampton Roads Real Median Family Incomes $80,000 Hampton Roads —U S. $70,000 $60,000 0 v $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 E $20,000 -- - - —$10,000 $0 ��A 99A OOy 0 0^ 0 0ti0s' Oti pti~ti 01ti Otis Otib ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti Souie.US Censuz Bureau,American Conmuni,y Suney aiiA IIHCD( Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 13 The average Earnings Per Working in Hampton Roads has been slightly lower than the National Average: Wages & Income Earnings Per Worker (Inflation-Adjusted) $45,000 IHampton Roads —U.S. $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 2 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 ti0;C~ti��y tic)%tiON'ti°,p s tic';‘\ti�41 c)c?'ti°Ob ti045 ryds-v ry00%tip~~ Source:Bureau of Economic Analyse and HR>DC Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 14 June 28, 2016 -18- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL BENCHMARKING STUDY (Continued) Here is a look at money spent during times of War: Industry: Defense Annualized Real Defense Outlays (U.S.quarterly Data,Seasonally Adjusted) $1,000 War on Terror a $900 80s Cold $800 Vietnam War ' p $700 Korean c $600 War $500 'S S400 _ $ $300 10%of 5%of GDP GDP III II $100 ti a°\ a'"' eye a° a�~ a�� a� ��e a° -cfl"S ti ti ti ti ti ti ti 1• Sour,,:Bureau of Economi<Ana lysis and HRPDC Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 15 Here is a look at Defense Contract Spending in Hampton Roads: Industry: Defense Defense Contracts in Hampton Roads (Inflation Adjusted) $12,000 $10,000 n_ o° $8,000 Q 0 m o 2 $4000 $2,000 iiillilililiilillflfl $0 'tio'c''S5( N,e; ti'ca19c3~19C'''034'- 105 19N>ti.~'' Source:USAspending.gov,Consolidated federal Funds Report and HRPDC Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 16, June 28, 2016 -19- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL BENCHMARKING STUDY (Continued) Here is a look at Military Personnel as a Share of Hampton Roads Employment: Industry: Defense Military Personnel as a Share of Hampton Roads Employment 30% 145K Personnel W 25% Since 1969 Past 10 years -58,800 -26,200 • 20% 15 15% r,• 10% L 86K Personnel 5% 0% 'y°'tDa tiA^Cb ti� 'Yo' 'Y 'sdbc 'e 'se le. 'yc ' Source:Bureau of Economic Analysis and HRVDC ` �'YK' Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 17' Here is a comparison of Average Monthly Level of Trade between Hampton Roads and the World: Average Monthly Level of Trade 250 $6 «..Hampton Roads Trade —World Trade n 200 $5 ✓ d • S $q w 150 5 o $3o oLL .i c 100 2 z ' `� of c G aF $2 a E =a 50 $1 0 $0 9c).1°°�~ ~ °'L°°'LT IT'L°°'L°°'°°�'L°~'1°~'L°~~'5) r Source'.Pon of V.rglnla,Org,rrnrion for Ecunomi<Co Operation,and NIPDC nchmarking Study 18 Jalne 28, 2016 -20- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL BENCHMARKING STUDY (Continued) Hampton Rods Employment in the Leisure and Hospitality Industry has steadily grown: Industry: Tourism Hampton Roads Employment in the Leisure and Hospitality Industry 100,000 . .. 90,000 80,000 70,000 60000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 yeti 40 �40 ryA etiv �e tie DyO ryDyL�e CS' Source:Bureau of Labor ScaHstla and HOODS Inge Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 19 Hampton Roads'Retail Share of Total Employment has been consistently higher than the Naional Average: Industry: Retail Retail Share of Total Employment 13.5% 13. 1990 HR Share I! E 13.2% U.S.Share p 12. 12. 2015 tt 11.4% 1990 12.0% 2015 1 e 10.5% g11.0% A 10.0% - Non-Zero s Axis I•u 9.5%ay p p {� _ eay 'ti"' .�e'LQ' 1C�~ '1Q' 'y0' 'L ,os° 4§)'L�tia Source:Virginia E,nyiOymam COmmbsiOO and HRRDC Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 20 Jame 28, 2016 -21- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL BENCHMARKING STUDY (Continued) Internet Sales make up 7.84%of U.S. Retail Sales as of 2016: 1-1 . stry: Retail Internet Sales as a Share of U.S.Sales 9% 7.84% m 8% �► 7% ui 6 6% — 0 w 5% n 4% i• 3% 0.78% E illllllllll� � 1111) 'S ti°°~ti9 ti 10''10e tip^ Source:U.S.Census Bureau and HFPDC Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 21 Here is a look at the Value of Building Permits based on Unit Size: Value of Building Permits (Inflation-Adiosted) $2.5 5 Units or More V 3 or 4 Units •2 Units •1 Unit ,,, $2.0 a • $1.5 6 $1.0 2 $0.5 in $0.0 tieey cc'^ eee tip �e ti° CO 0 ti�'e ti°~ ti°' ti Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 22 Jam 28, 2016 -22- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL BENCHMARKING STUDY (Continued) The House Prices in Hampton Roads have been consistently above the National Average: • f Real Estate House Price Index 250 0 —Hampton Roads Virginia —U.S. 0 200 t 0o 150 C 100 W a` 50 • c 00 0 x pC> C> Oa' C> 0..> 01,,(pC> C> do1',p.C> C> Oa'' (5> Off' Off' C> CY (0 (0CPS tY (0' Q' CQ (Slb CY 04> O%~ t (3;'' O%* ti ti ti ti . ti ti ti ti % ti ti ti ti ti ti Source:Federal Housing Finance Agency and HRDDC - ]51Z Hampton Roads Restonal Benchmarking Study 23 Hampton Roads has experienced a-2%Change in Home Price Index over eight(8) Years: Real Estate 8-Year Change in FHFA Home Price Index 4% a 3% -o c 2% 1% tr 0% O o -1% c d -2% -3% 2% c 0 C N L— -4% -5% -6% J�.°.hdpai�r'PU`�jdfl��'fi eba°moo°+�'�ar+Fc�?`�Rv`D ricJd a°sca.�S',p �p°v'�,°1ctP P4rki pf9f,c+t}` "rl`2t c+oF2;4 .6 4�.`g°Loot` +i�acfc`a<:'1d.,8lZ1; cb+ Metro Areas Source:Federal Housing Finance Agency and HRDDC -5 -a Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 24 June 28, 2016 -23- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL BENCHMARKING STUDY (Continued) Hamptor, Roads Population has grown steadily, reaching over 1.7-Million in 2016: •emographics • Hampton Roads Population 2,000,000 1,800,000 1,725,777� 1,600,000 Only Year 1,400,000 of Decline 0 927,854 '- 0 1,200,000 0 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 oNb sou,,e:weidon coocer ceme,and HRPDC y1 Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 25 Here is a Histogram of the Hampton Roads Population in 2014: Demographics • Hampton Roads Population Histogram 2014 85 years and over 80 to 84 years Greatest 1....r11111111 • Females 75 to 79 years (silent) hi Males 70 to 74 years 65 to 69 years 60 to 64 years Boomers ▪ 55 to 59 years O 50 to 54 years — u 45 to 49 years --- m 40 to 44 years Gen X - c' 35 to 39 years no 30 to 34 years — ¢ 20 to 24 years 20 to 24 years -- 15 to 19 years 1 M4 z 11111 10to14years 5 to 9 years Next.. Under 5 years 100,000 50,000 0 50,000 100,000 Population Source:U.S.Census Bureau American community Survey and HXPOC Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 26' June 28, 2016 -24- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL BENCHMARKING STUDY (Continued) A Hampton Roads Auto Commuter will experience 45 hours of Traffic Delay annually: Transportation Annual Hours of Delay Per Auto Commuter 80 70 60 45 50 430 0 0 10 111111111111111111111111101111 yc Qo 0 0a.tio��o+:4,°„caae4S �a�d'5 oa L��• Federal Aid Urbanized Areas m�<e.r:.n:tt,�.v�meo�m:nmre,oe Harvo Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 27 The average cost for One-Way Airfare in Hampton Roads is over$250 as of 2015: Transportation Average Airfare in Hampton Roads&the U.S. $300 SZ50 MI Hampton Roads I National Average 5200$150$100 $50 a 50 00'Y 061' 00'y OOP e 000 e 000 e e e 01 Otis e ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti so�a.reaeni n�,eo�aa�,�:v.no�:�a Ha.vo -'PLTZ� Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 28 June 28, 2016 -25- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL BENCHMARKING STUDY (Continued) Here is a look at Local and National Amtrak Ridership: Transportation Local and National Amtrak Ridership 250 35,000 National 30,000 " 200 y `w s 25,000 °c t 1111 ,I 20,000 15000 10,000rfl 5,000 0 Source:federal Aviation Admmrst ration and HBIDO Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 29 Education High School Equivalence and Greater,2014 ,, 94% 92% 90.2% ° 90% U.S.Average o 86.9% 88% r W g 86% o 84% o = o X ` 82% 80% 78% q' ,o4419-4`.Ve4�:#.444,P°ap4 6,-�ic+Q°POa�'i ° j ?i� 9 F��;°xl �c 0a "`'y!_�,�Jc.a� s1'ii43 c,? t e3es°�1,4' Metropolitan Areas with Population between 1 and 3 Million Source:U.S.Census Bureau,American Community Survey and HflPDC Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 30 June 28, 2016 -26- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL BENCHMARKING STUDY (Continued) Here is a look at Four(4) Year Graduation Rates in Hampton Roads: Education Graduation Rates 100% 90% a 80% z 70% ° IE: i 30% Fl e20% n Rate10% n Rate-Cohort 0% - MI I� IN 69ticp~1. �cp�,1�°tioo`�oo°cp�ti�� °� °atio 'ti yo'ti yo'4tie h •Dates are Graduation Rates Calculated Using the Cohort Method Source:Virginia Department of Education and HRGDC ♦ paQ'� Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 31 Hampton Roads has consistently spent less Per Pupil than the State Average: Education Per Pupil School Spending (Inflation-Adjusted) $14,000 rr Hampton Roads Virginia $12,000 $10,000 111111 $8,000 $6,000 111111111 ti $4,000 $2,000 $0 ti9' 6,-6,- e S e 11tie e tie 639ti6,9 .6,~tio,�tio��tioo-tio�y Source:U.S.Census Bureau,Anterlon Community Survey and HRVDC g.g7C Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 32 Jne28, 2016 -27- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL BENCHMARKING STUDY (Continued) Here is a look at Per Capita Local Spending since 1988, broken down by sector: Government Finances Per Capita Local Spending $4,000 (Inflation-Adjusted) u Education $3,500 Other w Public Works • — $3,000 Health and Welfare $2,500 Public Safety C $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $Soo -- m so 4'9 ti��ry ti ,90 15 40 1 —r,e:wdnor of Dude Accounts,Weldon Cooper center,us,and aneoc '/'1 Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 33 The Gini Coefficient, a Measure of the Amount of Inequality in a Region, was 0.43 in Hamptcon Roads in 2014: Gini Coefficient,2014 0.52 0.5 .e 0.48 II 0.460.0.44 0.42No n-Zero 0.4 Axis _„ 0.38 " `aova w`vs `F`'o ere.cesd�+�d�c.+`Ayss•d''c5`+f e'e`ead`cmoz rF,S`" �b'1oti, e"F `° I 0 F�oeA d'o'FF°w`p `c?e ' daae bQ;�i: P ' c`*�''c > e 92"axP� Qac Metropolitan Areas with Population between 1 and 3 Million so�„e:a s.cep:�,e�en�,nme,�ca�com�u�nv survey ma envtx .2 PVC Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 34 Jeree 28, 2016 -28- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL BENCHMARKING STUDY (Continued) Here in a comparison of the Violent Crime Rate between Hampton Roads and the National Average: Quality of Life Violent Crime 600 Hampton Roads —United States 500 0 as 400 0 0 300 Cif 200 ci 100 0 �� 0e �0 otio otiti otiti oti� otia ti ti IT ti 1 ti ti I ti6) ti ti ti ti ti •rne Fai aa got repon dna for Hamp<o aoaa:m zoos Source Federal Bureau of Investigation and HfVDC ) r Hampton Roads Regional Bench marking Study 35 Here in a comparison of the Poverty Rate between Hampton Roads and the National Averag:: Quality of Life Poverty Rate 18% 16% `+Hampton Roads ...United States 14% 12% Fj Source.U.S.Census Bureau antl HHGDC • ?VIC Hampton Roads Regional Be nchmarking Study 36, Jae 28, 2016 -29- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL BENCHMARKING STUDY (Continued) Here is a look at Population Metric Comparisons: Local Comparisons / ---/ \ v_ \ ==_= _ . I1. .1 I . III ///ff.1'r///7/ �"r//i7/////i/' AMC Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 38 Questions/Discussion Greg Grootendorst Hampton Roads Planning District Commission ggrootendorst@hrpdcva.gov 757.420.8300 Hampton Roads Regional Benchmarking Study 39 Mayor Sessoms thanked Mr. Grootendorst for the informative presentation. June 28, 2016 -30- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS ARENA FINANCING 4:50 P.M. Mayor Sessoms welcomed Andrea Kilmer, President and CEO—ESG Companies. Ms. Kilmer expressed her appreciation to City Council for their continued support of the proect: • OUSM Virginia-Beach Arena Financing Proposal , , -- --- ,June_28,2016 tp - Andrea Kilmer,USM a-0,' 4.4 %;,, lit 41, Here is the vision for the Arena: Our Vision Create a flexible,state-of-the art R i.; ''-'. a,e. venue that: I r ',.t. OS • Serves as an iconic symbol for ` z s the City,Region,&State ---- - • Offers events for everyone ��,.�) • Creates memories of a lifetime ,,, i trE• Creates jobs and business ; _ ,, V 1 ;S • Draws major acts and top tier !. • ' events i I 1 rj • Year-round playground Jane 28, 2016 -31- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS ARENA FINANCING (Continued) The Arena will have a significant Economic Impact on the City: City Economic Impact 2,300 $240M ,L,L,i,.1.dl Salaries i� L,i�,1 JO 4. AAA 'o. IIf III Ill III till iryr' Matervirices als/ InI 1n1 fnl/I n 1 ��III Se rn New Jobs �1\ New Spending Construction Impact City Economic Impact 440 $15M 65,500 $111M q�+ Ishii 20-Year 'lf _ 4-rr. NPV New Jobs New Salaries Room Nights Net New Spending Annual Operations Impact Jz ie 28, 2016 -32- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS ARENA FINANCING (Continued) Here is what will Remain the Same for the Area Financing Proposal: What Remains the Same • Everything,except the lender and loan structure • All previously negotiated agreements(with changes on 1 page out of over 400) • Fundamental business model and market analysis • City incentives • Privately financed and locally owned • Highly qualified,experienced team • Minority participation Here is What Changes: What Changes •LM • Lender will be a US Investment Bank • Loan structure • 2 clauses on 1 page of the Development Agreement Jane 28, 2016 -33- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS ARENA FINANCING (Continued) Here are the Main Benefits of the Proposed Financing Change: Main Benefits of Proposed �� Financing Change • Domestic Alternative to Chinese Loan ➢Addresses any perceived security concerns ➢Removes procurement requirement ➢Removes political volatility • Accelerated Development/Opening D.2016 ground breaking/2018 grand opening • US Bank Trustee administrates Loan Proceeds • No balloon payment or interest rate risk in year 15 • Early pro sports team potential Here is the Plan of Finance: Plan of Finance OUSM • Taxable Municipal Bond - Known Finance Structure • U.S.Investment Bank > Large Institutional Investors • Bond Proceeds will be limited to use for the Construction Contract, related Cost of Issuance,and required Reserves and Escrows • No Developer Fees or cost to date reimbursement • USM fully responsible for the debt • Bonds repaid by same revenue streams as current Agreement - 1%of Hotel Tax and"But For"Taxes — Payments from Arena Operations • VBDA may serve as the Conduit Issuer — No obligation and no recourse to VBDA,City,or State — Same role it plays for other private entities,such as Westminster Canterbury — Annual fee revenue Jerrie 28, 2016 -34- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS ARENA FINANCING (Continued) Here is the Proposed Change in Terms: Proposed Change in Terms emu, Umr•a WSW 1114npem144, • Type of lender/form of commitment • USM's debt to equity ratio will change >Loan will fund full Construction Contract >Debt payments likely to decrease based on current market >Payment Cap of City incentives cannot increase and will likely decrease >Equity contribution estimated to be $10 million Here is the Loan Commitment: 4.3 J.oan Commitment.Developer will use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain and deliver to City an executed copy of a loan commitment or bond purchase or with the VBDA or other appropriate entity serving as a conduit issuer(the"Construction Loan Commitment")from an Institutional Lender committing to provide construction and permanent financing(a "Construction Lender")to Developer(the"Construction Loan")adequate to construct the Arena Improvements a nd fulfill Devebper's other obligations under the Transaction Agreements,subject to customary lender requirements and conditions.City will have the right to approve the Construction Loan Commitment and the documents ultimately evidencing and securing the Construction Loan(the"Construction Loan Documents")which approval right for purposes of this Section 4.3 shall be limited to the right to approve those terms and provisions of the Construction Loan Commitment and the Construction Loan Documents which concern(i)funding mechanisms and reasonable assurances that any everseas lender will fully fund the Construction Loan,(ii)protections and cure rights of City and the Construction Lender in the event of a Developer default under the Construction Loan and/or Transaction Agreements,(lii)City Credit Rating Concerns,and(iv)verification that the plan of finance will fund no more than(1)one-hundred percent(100%)of the fixed price of the Construction Contract and A&E Contract,(2)costs of the financing. and(3)required reserves and escrows,without inclusion of any reimbursement to Developer for other costs incurred or payment of any developer fee general io4be-Cityawd iheTerm-Sheet. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld,conditioned,delayed or denied. Jane 28, 2016 -35- CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFINGS ARENA FINANCING (Continued) Here are the City Protections: City Protections OUSM City retains the right to review: • Funding Mechanisms and Assurances • Protections and the Right to Cure, but not the obligation to do so • City Credit Rating Implications Here is a rendering of the completed Arena: Future Vision (Strategic Growth Area) • t . ei l ^ � .esl 711,- +ym -r, i 1 Yr. -„ La i CENTRAL BEACH DISTRICT Mayor Sessoms thanked Ms. Kilmer for the informative presentation. June 28, 2016 -36- CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS PLANNING ITEMS PENDING 5:10 P.M. Mayor Sessoms welcomed Barry Frankenfield, Director—Planning. Mr. Frankenfield expressed his appreciation to City Council for their continued support. \fi3 Virginia Beach !I —. a * '-i 1-4--' \t Planning Items July 5th and 12th, 2016 City Council Meetings There are five (5)planning items scheduled for July 5`h: SUMMARY - July 5th Five Planning items are proposed for City Council's consideration. 1. UHT Community Campus,LLC-Bayside District • Conditional Use Permit(Assembly Use) 2. Tonya Mitchell—Princess Anne District • Conditional Use Permit(Family Day-Care Home) - ,- 3. Walmart 41688—Beach District • Conditional Use Permit(Bulk Storage Yard) 4. Reed Enterprises,Inc.—Princess Anne District • Conditional Use Permit(Motor Vehicle Sales) 5. Old Dominion Tobacco Company,Inc.—Kempsville District • Conditional Rezoning from 1-1 Light Industrial and B-2 Community Business Districts to Conditional A-18 Apartment District Jdne 28, 2016 -37- CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS PLANNING ITEMS PENDING (Continued) UJFT Community Campus, LLC Council District Bayside Location 5000 Corporate Woods Drive Conditional Use Permit '':(Assembly Use) 'fir (w, .t Planning Commission R i0.l 1 ' (" z" a { x 'yY voted 11-0 to recommend • �'' f - ° ~ approval, i- t!:; • �▪ ,-_ C, 't A, UJFT Community Campus, LLC • Subject 20-acre site is developed with the Simon Family Jewish Community Center(JCC). • Since construction of the facility in 2004,the Zoning Ordinance was amended.The use of the facility is now considered an"Assembly" . 1111 use and requires a Conditional Use Permit. • Request includes the placement of two storage • i buildings on an existing tennis court. *PAM" * —4 7W_ ' tr6,,7,;*`, Sc.:7\,s, ir ,,,, ,,,,,, r y" Jane 28, 2016 -38- CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS PLANNING ITEMS PENDING (Continued) Tonya Mitchell Council District:Princess Anne 2 Location.441 Crow Wing Drive Conditional Use Permit �_+a��,�,_ j X►'_; (Family Day-Care Home) 74# • Planning Commission voted 11-0 to recommend ok ' • u i approval. °o • r. c • I S Tonya Mitchell • Proposes to care for up to 12 children within a single-family dwelling. • Hours of operation proposed between 6:00 a.m.and 6:00 p.m., Monday-Friday. • Large backyard for children to play outdoors. Jvie 28, 2016 -39- CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS PLANNING ITEMS PENDING (Continued) Walmart #1688 Council District Beach 3 Location 657 Phoenix Drive Conditional Use Permit ,e) 'i _j '' L—=t t !"..-,At ^� ' ` (Bulk Storage Yard) j '--- 1L\_ __ '""" Planning CommissionP.voted 11-0 to recommend _ } I — .i 'M approval. .�. i , i ,I._ ; Tr! F L En i Walmart #1688 • Request is to allow a portion of the parking area to be used for the seasonal storage and display of WALMART°3G°8 lawn and garden products. I OUTDOOR SEASONAL DISPLAY AREA `--`-f I "l' • Split-rail fencing will surround the area and a row of r —--t f-' ] existing mature vegetation will aid in screening the ] i ' area from view. IT 3 • The storage area and materials for sale will be ftt�e 1 t .,.. q removed from the parking lot when not in use to :„ , accommodate seasonal demands. d --r k - ...�� , sureJ J\ Jane 28, 2016 -40- CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS PLANNING ITEMS PENDING (Continued) Reed Enterprises, Inc. Council District:Princess Anne 4 Location 3249 Dam Neck Road Conditional Use Permit \ r/ (Motor Vehicle Sales) ''' o� G 2 r .. ," K • ago Planning Commission Qj. voted 11-0 to recommend j 82 f t �9�r approval. noso jj/ ` Reed Enterprises, Inc. • Applicant proposes to add motor vehicle sales to the existing auto repair operation. • The entire auto sale operation will be located inside the existing building with no more than five vehicles v displayed within the showroom at any one time. • No outdoor display of vehicles is proposed. ''- �. -a. 1 i a , WILI E ,4 p1 e l _ J. ne 28, 2016 -41- CITYMANAGER'S BRIEFINGS PLANNING ITEMS PENDING (Continued) Old Dominion Tobacco Company, Inc. Council District Kempsville 5 Location West of 5400 Virginia Beach Boulevard Conditional Rezoning q; ^1l From 1-1 Light Industrial ',7- y ° • .;.4:� &B-2 Community Business Districts to e; 4 _,' Conditional A-18 !* i p i r t I IA Apartment District �a "zii� b $ + } PlanningCommission / . voted 11-0 to rja.'. / Q . recommend approval. If' I ..: B 1 e • ,;. ,411 r t i Old Dominion Tobacco Company, Inc. • Rezone 16.12 acres to A-18 for a 282-unit apartment r;Ezm a;,;;RT,"„i,R„or.,r- complex with a density of 17.49 units per acre. . .«.. -" • The plan depicts ten,three-story apartment buildings oriented around a large retention pond. r +� i err ` • The buildings have a contemporary design. • " 411=110 el • Many amenities are proposed such as a clubhouse, . 1 riddecks and outdoor gathering spaces. y am ++410-� 5FrPt — Wi, wJrt ' J June 28, 2016 -42- CITYMANAGER'S BRIEFINGS PLANNING ITEMS PENDING (Continued) There are four(4)planning items scheduled for July 12`h: SUMMARY - July 12th Four Planning items are proposed for City Council's consideration. 1. Acela Aguerrebere—Centerville District r'—/Th • Conditional Use Permit(Family Home Day-Care) CT' 2. Waller Enterprises,LLC—Lynnhaven District • Subdivision Variance to Section 4.4(b)&(d)of the Subdivision Regulations 3. Iglesia Christiana Nueva Vida—Kempsville District -- _ • Modification of Land Use Plan(Indian Lakes Land Use Plan) - • Conditional Use Permit(Religious Use and Child Care Center) 4. Christian Brothers Automotive Corporation—Rose Hall District • Conditional Use Permit(Automobile Repair Garage) Acela Aguerrebere Council District Centerville Location 1425 Glenwood Links Lane Conditional Use Permit (Family Day-Care Home) a t t o 41; Planning Commission �, j ,�rr l� t ' ,• `` voted 11-0 to recommend 'C approval. \ \ I , C' ' Opposition was present at the Planning Commission " • public hearing citing "t' t r concerns about traffic and V- - �- �� - - congestion in the cul de- \ / sac. June 28, 2016 -43- CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS PLANNING ITEMS PENDING (Continued) Acela Aguerrebere • Applicant desires to care for up to 8 children within "•; '• -?a., her single-family dwelling. ^ l; r • Proposed hours of operation are from 6:00 a.m.to , 6:00 p.m.,Monday through Friday. t0 • The applicant has submitted a proposed staggered drop-off/pickup schedule to address a neighbor's _l t ' concern. ` • The Zoning Office is currently monitoring the parking _ -- on this cul-de-sac during pick-up and drop-off times. Waller Enterprises, LLC Council District Lynnhaven 2 Location:221 75th Street i Subdivision Variance man j� to Section 4.4(b)&(d)of �%;.•• the Subdivision = 1 ♦ - 1 Regulations r >) " Planning Commission r'� k�.;t voted 111-0 to recommend 4 ii+r ci ;,approval. � o: � ftio a s I, ,00 r." .+ .H.s Jane 28, 2016 -44- CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS PLANNING ITEMS PENDING (Continued) Waller Enterprises, LLC -`" = .;-- ' I • Proposal is to subdivide the 10,000 square foot lot into l i two 5,000 square foot lots for the development of two t' , single-family dwellings. =- m- �W: - • Variances requested: • Proposed Lot A-1—Variance to allow for a lot width of 20 feet,rather than 50 feet as required. • Proposed Lot A-2—Variance to allow for a zero lot width, rather than 50 feet as required,and to allow the lot to be accessed via a 20-foot ingress/egress easement across proposed Lot A-1,rather than directly onto a public street , • - • 1 11. 1 • II f . Iglesia Christiana Nueva Vida Council District Kempsville 3 Location 1100 Indian Lakes Boulevard Modification of Land Use Plan(Indian Lakes Land aye Use Plan) '0,. •='�• , 44,r,' R Conditional Use Permit 1 \ a,o r✓, 'n ^4 (Religious Use&Child < /I ."//`/�ift .t , : -�, Care Center) ,//ni� ` Planning Commission i� ,r` 9 voted Planning recommend f roH+/ . i' - + T. r Y approval. \ r , .' Jw'ie 28, 2016 -45- CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS PLANNING ITEMS PENDING (Continued) Iglesia Christiana Nueva Vida • The existing three-unit building is designated on the Indian Lakes Land Use Plan for a I•— c "Day Care"use. , • As a church proposes to occupy the building with a 100-seat sanctuary,and rooms for n i in children's ministry and daycare operations,a MOD to the LUP to add that use and a CUP I U+ for a Religious Use are required. I • Typical hours of operation for the church will be Sundays between 10:30 a.m.and noon and Wednesday from 6:00 p.m.and 9:00 p.m. I 1 il■i�� primma a - Christian Brothers Automotive Corporation Council District.Rose Hall 4 Location Corner of Holland Road and Warwick Drive Conditional Use Permit \ (Automobile Repair ,4 �' Garage) Planning Commission c e� �- •_so voted 11-0 to recommend approval. As E r • ....a... ate •�' >`iett 70' � `M._ t June 28, 2016 -46- CITYMANAGER'S BRIEFINGS PLANNING ITEMS PENDING (Continued) Christian Brothers Automotive Corporation • A site plan for a large,commercial development for is currently under review near Holland Road and ---- Warwick Boulevard. F@) • This is a request for a CUP for an Auto Repair ' s, Garage on a 0.68-acre outparcel. +" : • A 5,000 square-foot,24-foot high building is proposed on the site. ---- , i'; � • Typical repair activities include oil changes, .}{ I —•--- ali nment,suspension,exhaust systems and other 9 P Y M 'is -- light repair. No body work will occur . .J g.._. x o i..•o • CHRISTIAN BROTHERS AUTOMOTIVE r'�6 1l31 !l Er Mayor Sessoms expressed his appreciation to Mr. Frankenfield and the entire Department fa--a job well done. Jvne 28, 2016 -47- ADJOURNMENT Mayor William D. Sessoms,Jr., DECLARED the City Council Meeting ADJOURNED at 5::6 P.M. Ama a Finley-Barn s, M C Chief Deputy City Clerk Ruth Hodges Fraser,MMC City Clerk Jure 28, 2016