Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3-24-2026 SPECIAL FORMAL SESSION AGENDA City of Virginia Beach of ouR N a VirginiaBeach.gov MUNICIPAL CENTER,BUILDING 1 2401 COURTHOUSE DRIVE Robert M. "Bobby" Dyer VIRGINIA BEACH,VA23456-9000 MAYOR OFFICE:(757)385-4581 CELL:(757)407-5105 BDYERQVBGOV.COM March 19, 2026 HONORABLE MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL In accordance with the Virginia Beach City Code Section 2-21, and by the authority vested in me as Mayor of the City of Virginia Beach, I hereby call for a SPECIAL FORMAL SESSION of the VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL: Tuesday, March 24, 2026, at 5:00 P.M. City Council Chamber Building 1 —2"d Floor 2401 Courthouse Drive The purpose of this SPECIAL FORMAL SESSION is to allow the City Council to hold a Public Hearing and consider the application of Harrison and Lear, Inc./JBWK LLC and White Clover LLC, as listed in the attached agenda. The Special Formal Session will be broadcast on the Cable TV, virginiabeach. oovv and Facebook Live. Sincerely, Robert M. Dyer Mayor Enclosure cc: City Manager City Attorney City Clerk Deputy City Managers FOIA Officer Communications Office 04 swr � City of Virginia Beach R A LIFETIME S �p BUR NAtaN� City Council Members Mayor Robert M. "Bobby" Dyer bdver@VBgov.com 1 757-385-4581 Vice Mayor Rosemary Wilson, District 5 Cal "Cash"Jackson-Green, District 7 rcwilson@VBgov.com 1 757-422-0733 CJacksonGreen@VBgov.com 1 757-629-8792 Michael F. Berlucchi, District 3 Robert W. "Worth" Remick, District 6 mberlucc@VBgov.com 1 757-407-5105 wremick@VBgov.com 1 757-840-5855 Stacy Cummings, District 8 Dr.Amelia N. Ross-Hammond, District 4 StCummings@VBgov.com 1 757-629-8691 arosshammond@VBgov.com 1 757-840-0735 Barbara M. Henley, District 2 Jennifer Rouse, District 10 bhenley@VBgov.com 1 757-426-7501 ivrouse@VBgov.com 1 757-840-1821 David Hutcheson, District 1 Joashua F. "Joash"Schulman, District 9 dhutcheson@VBgov.com 1757-651-7641 ischulman@VBgov.com 1 757-840-1291 Email all City Council members at CitVCouncil@VBgov.com. City Council Appointees Patrick A. Duhaney City Hall, Building 1 City Manager 2401 Courthouse Drive Mark D. Stiles Virginia Beach, VA 23456 City Attorney Phone: 757-385-4303 Lyndon S. Remias City Auditor Fax: 757-385-5669 Amanda Barnes City Clerk Sue Cunningham City Real Estate Assessor City Council Special Formal Session Agenda March 24, 2026 Mayor Robert M. "Bobby" Dyer Presiding I. SPECIAL FORMAL SESSION -CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER- A. CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Robert M. "Bobby" Dyer 5:00 P.M. 1. READING OF THE MAYOR'S CALL FOR SPECIAL FORMAL SESSION B. ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL C. PLANNING 1. HARRISON AND LEAR, INC. /JBWK LLC/WHITE CLOVER, LLC for a Modification of Proffers to a Conditional Change of Zoning & a Conditional Change of Zoning from a P-1 Preservation District & PD-H1 Planned Unit Development to a Conditional PD-H2 Planned Unit Development (R-20 Residential) and P-1 Preservation District re develop 143 age-restricted (55+) single- family homes and a revitalized 9-hole golf course at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive DISTRICT 2 RECOMMENDATION: STAFF— DENIAL PLANNING COMMISSION - APPROVAL D. ADJOURNMENT If you are physically disabled or visually impaired and need assistance at this meeting, please call the City Clerk's Office at 757-385-4303. The full Agenda with all backup documents can be viewed in the eDocs Document Archive under: Current Session. If you would like to receive an email with a list of the agenda items for future City Council meetings, please submit your request to TChelius@vbgov.com or call 757-385-4303. AGENDA ITEMS Citizens who wish to speak can sign up either in-person or virtually via WebEx. Anyone wishing to participate virtually must follow the two-step process provided below: 1. Register for the WebEx Meeting. 2. Register with the City Clerk's Office by calling 757-385-4303 prior to 5:00 p.m. on March 24, 2026. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING A Special Formal Session of the Virginia Beach City Council will be held on Tuesday,March 24, 2026 at 5:00 p.m.in the Council Chamber at City Hall, Building 1,21d Floor at 2401 Courthouse Drive,Virginia Beach,VA 23456.Members of the public will be able to observe the City Council meeting through livestreaming on https://virginiabeach.gov, broadcast on VBTV, and via WebEx.Citizens who wish to speak can sign up to speak either in-person at the Council Chamber or virtually via WebEx by completing the two-step process below.All interested parties are invited to observe. Ifyou wish to make comments virtually during the 1 public hearing,please follow the two-step process provided below: 1. Register with the City Clerk's Office by calling 7573854303 prior to 4:00 p.m. on March 24,2026. 2. Download WebEx and view the meeting at: https://vbeov.webex.com/weblink/registe r/r16167fb8b6527517c8df63c806b89c a8 The following request is scheduled to be heard: Harrison and Lear,Inc.Property Owners:JBWK LLC&White Clover LLC Modification of Proffers& Conditional Rezoning(P-1 Preservation District& PD-H1 Planned Unit Development District to Conditional PD-H2 Planned Unit Development(R- 20 Residential) & P-1 Preservation District) Address:3100 Arnold Palmer Drive GPINs: 1493859520, 1493667436, 1493637894, 1493543952. 1493757869,1493759705 City Council:District 2(Henley) Copies of the proposed plans, ordinances, amendments and/or resolutions are on file and may be examined by appointment in the Planning Department at 2403 Courthouse Drive,Municipal Center,Building 3,Virginia Beach,VA 23456 or online at https://virginiabeach.gov/pc. For information call 757-385-4621. If you require a reasonable accommodation for this meeting due to a disability,please call the City Clerk's Office at 757-385-4303.If you are hearing Impaired,you can contact Virginia Relay at 711 for TOO service. The meeting will be broadcast on cable TV,https://virginiabeach.gov and Facebook Live. Please check our website at https://clerk.virginiabeach.gov/citycouncil for the most updated meeting information. All interested parties are invited to participate. Amanda Barnes,MMC City Clerk PILOT-MARCH 10,2026&MARCH 17,2026- 1 TIME EACH ut Q 0: sT �� 1,1V1NGs TO AG2 _... �"`� x �lax: P1 � BR AM;pii ,j,OR` O P F yONNE-r O��Y/NG SAC Off' cE C4 LN DR ZVR�% Q�SIGNA o � � �m �ecENP1 0 R24(P1)(PDH2 ,sway c , <'�F b0' wEST�V� i PDH1 3 �u �° �� AG1 E' y AG2 AG1 R\oo�c qN �o 4VVA PDH.1 R�0 4:e.t %.N NF p/ J ,N, �Es71c ,V i/ f AG2 OAK cgLR20 R20 FST<FeR AG2 � � l -AG2 �, R202Q o sr NF / - -- f / \Iyp�AlyRl � 4{rAY I i�2 2 a R20 / — LNSTREL Site Harrison and Lear, Inc. Zoning 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive Property Polygons s Feet 0 310 620 1,240 1,860 2,480 Map created by Planning Department on 2/26/2026 u 7 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH AGENDA ITEM ITEM: HARRISON AND LEAR, INC. [Applicant] JBWK LLC & WHITE CLOVER, LLC [Property Owners] Modification of Proffers to a Conditional Rezoning & Conditional Rezoning (P-1 Preservation District & PD-H1 Planned Unit Development to Conditional PD-H2 Planned Unit Development (R-20 Residential) & P-1 Preservation District) for the property located at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive (GPINs 1493859520, 1493667436, 1493637894, 1493543952, 1493757869,149375970). COUNCIL DISTRICT 2 (Henley) MEETING DATE: March 24, 2026 ■ Background: The applicant proposes to rezone approximately 86.04 acres of a 203.62-acre portion of the Villages at West Neck community from Conditional PD-1­11 and P-1 Preservation District to Conditional PD-1­12 (R-20 Residential) and P-1, along with a Modification of Proffers, to develop The Preserve at West Neck. The proposal includes 143 age-restricted (55+) single-family homes, resulting in an overall residential density of 2.79 units per acre, and a revitalized 9-hole golf course. The original Villages at West Neck development, approved by the City Council in 1999, included a total of 974 units on a 419.8-acre site, 386.2 of which are considered developable, for a density of 2.52 units per acre, as well as a Conditional Use Permit for an 18-hole Arnold Palmer signature golf course. A subsequent Modification of Proffers, approved in 2001, reduced the number of dwelling units to 934; although 936 units were ultimately constructed, for a density of 2.42 units per acre. The proposed homes include a mix of one- and two-story dwellings ranging in size from 1,600 to 3,200 square feet, and will be governed by a new homeowners association (HOA). Architecturally, the homes reflect a rural transitional design utilizing high-quality materials, such as brick and cement fiber siding, as recommended by the Transition Area Design Guidelines (TADG). As is required for PD-H2 districts, development standards for lot size, setbacks, height, and lot coverage are established through proffered criteria. The request includes the revitalization of the golf course from an 18-hole course to a 9-hole course, operating under the approved 1999 Conditional Use Permit. The course will be a semi-private facility, developed and operated by a separate developer, under a 50-year lease with two 15-year extension options. The applicant intends to complete construction in phases, with the residential Harrison and Lear, Inc. Page 2 of 9 construction anticipated to take three to five years, and golf course renovations anticipated to take one to two years. While the overall open space for Villages at West Neck area would decrease from approximately 45% to 40% with this proposal, falling short of the 50% open space recommended by the TADG, all of the open space is proposed to be usable and accessible to all residents. Conversely, the current Villages at West Neck open space comprises primarily the 175-acre golf course, with only 3.79% (14.66 acres) usable and accessible to residents since the course's closure. Proposed amenities include preserved wetlands and woodland areas, reforestation with native species, managed meadows and buffers, enhanced stormwater facilities, and an interconnected trail and sidewalk network. As indicated by the Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis, the proposed development generates a need for a new traffic signal at the intersection of West Neck Road, Signature Drive, and Tin Barn Way. As proffered, the applicant will be responsible for the design and installation of the signal, at their sole expense, and the signal shall be operational prior to the first certificate of occupancy being issued for the residences. A preliminary drainage study was provided and reviewed by staff. It was determined that the strategy has the potential to meet stormwater regulations. Three acres of additional detention and retention areas to expand capacity for current and future conditions are proposed. Environmental review included a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, which found no significant risk requiring further investigation. A small portion of the site lies within the 65-70 dB DNL noise zone and was reviewed through the Joint City-Navy Review Process in accordance with AICUZ regulations. ■ Considerations: Staff recommends denial of the request, finding the proposal inconsistent with the density and open space recommendations of the Transition Area Design Guidelines (TADG). Since the acreage associated with the project was included as part of the original 1999 approval and subsequent modifications for the Villages at West Neck, staff evaluated the proposal holistically as part of the original 419.8 acres. When evaluated in this manner, the proposed 143 additional units result in an overall density of 2.79 units per developable acre, exceeding the TADG recommendation of one dwelling unit per developable acre. Staff further finds the proposal deficient in meeting the TADG's recommended 50% open space minimum. Although the plan would provide 40.1% open space, all of which would be usable and accessible to residents, this falls approximately 9.9% short of the TADG recommendation. Staff acknowledges, however, that the proposal significantly improves functional open space compared to existing conditions and includes a range of active and passive amenities, such as Harrison and Lear, Inc. Page 3 of 9 preserved wetlands, reforestation areas, trails, managed meadows, community gardens, enhanced stormwater facilities, and a renovated 9-hole golf course. Despite these concerns, Staff recognizes several positive aspects of the proposal. The architectural design aligns with the rural transitional character encouraged in the TADG, incorporating high-quality materials and pedestrian-oriented features. Infrastructure impacts are manageable: the age-restricted nature of the development minimizes school impacts; Public Utilities has identified requirements for sanitary sewer pump station expansion and buffer compliance, which the applicant has addressed; the Fire Marshal identified no concerns; and Traffic Engineering has confirmed that a signal is warranted at West Neck Road and Signature Drive, to be fully funded and installed by the developer prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. Stormwater improvements, including expanded detention capacity and sustainable design features, have the potential to enhance water quality and mitigate flooding in the broader watershed. The Joint City-Navy Review Process determined the project complies with AICUZ noise zone regulations, as no dwellings are proposed within the 500 square foot portion of the site that lies within the 65-70 dB noise zone. In summary, while Staff commends the thoughtful design, infrastructure coordination, stormwater enhancements, and provision of age-restricted housing, the proposal does not meet two fundamental TADG criteria, specifically regarding maximum density and minimum open space. For these reasons, Staff is recommending denial of these requests. Planning Commission, however, recommended approval of these requests based on the information presented at the public hearing. As part of the motion to recommend approval, the Planning Commission also recommended that the applicant consider certain revisions and additions to the proffers prior to consideration by the City Council. These recommendations were primarily related to more clearly detailing the accessibility and maintenance of the proposed open space areas, homeowners' association (HOA) responsibilities, and ensuring the construction and long-term viability of the proposed golf course. Following the Planning Commission's recommendation and prior to the City Council hearing, the applicant worked with Planning Staff and the City Attorney's Office to address many of the recommendations raised by the Planning Commission. As a result, several updates have been made. A minor revision was made to the Development & Design Criteria Land Use Plan — Conceptual Master Plan legend, changing note 7 and all accompanying map references from "Proposed 3-Par Course & Putting and Chipping Practice Green" to "Proposed Outdoor Practice Facility."Additionally, an Open Space Exhibit has been prepared and proffered to clearly identify ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the open space areas proposed with the development. Harrison and Lear, Inc. Page 4 of 9 Further details pertaining to the application, as well as Staffs evaluation, are provided in the attached Staff Report. There were 23 speakers in support and 22 speakers in opposition at the Planning Commission, with those in support expressing their excitement for the revitalization of the golf course, and those in opposition noting concerns related to density, open space, inconsistency with the Transition Area Design Guidelines, increased traffic and congestion, safety, and stormwater impacts. A total of 173 letters of support and 278 letters of opposition were received by staff as of February 11, 2026. The proposal was reviewed by the Transition Area/Interfacility Traffic Area Citizens Advisory Committee, which recommended denial due to concerns regarding density and open space consistency with the Transition Area Design Guidelines and Comprehensive Plan. ■ Recommendation: On February 11, 2026, the Planning Commission passed a motion to recommend approval of this request by a vote of 7 to 3 with 1 abstention. PROFFERS Proffer 1 When the Property is developed, the layout, land uses, recreation and open spaces shall be in substantial conformance with the exhibit entitled, "Conceptual Master Plan, Preserve at West Neck, Virginia Beach, VA," prepared by WPL and found on pages 1 and 2 of the multi-page document entitled "The Preserve at West Neck Development& Design Criteria Land Use Plan," prepared by WPL, VHB, and Harrison and Lear, dated November 3, 2025, and revised on January 5, 2026 and February 27, 2026, which have been exhibited to the City of Virginia Beach City Council and are on file with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning and Community Development (hereinafter the "Concept Plan" and "The Preserve at West Neck Development & Design Criteria Land Use Plan", respectively). The Concept Plan and The Preserve at West Neck Development & Design Criteria Land Use Plan are incorporated herein by this reference. Proffer 2 When the Property is developed, the land uses; layout; trail section; roadway sections with street widths, curb heights; and development criteria to include building elevations, lot dimensions, setbacks, building heights, buffers, and reforestation shall be as set forth in the multi-page document entitled, "The Preserve at West Neck Design & Development Criteria Land Use Plan", prepared by WPL, VHB, and Harrison & Lear, Inc., dated November 3, 2025 and revised on January 5, 2026 and February 27, 2026, and which has been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning and Community Development, and is incorporated herein by this reference. The dimensional requirements identified in The Preserve at West Neck Design & Development Criteria Land Use Plan shall be in lieu of all corresponding Harrison and Lear, Inc. Page 5 of 9 criteria in the Virginia Beach Zoning Ordinance (the"Zoning Ordinance")applicable to the R-20 Residential District. Proffer 3 When the Property is developed, the number of residential dwelling units thereon shall not exceed one hundred forty-three (143). Proffer 4 When the Property is developed, all residential structures constructed on the Property shall be in substantial conformance with the conceptual architectural exhibit entitled, "Residential Dwelling Precedent Images, The Preserve at West Neck", which has been provided within The Preserve at West Neck Development & Design Criteria Land Use Plan and exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning and Community Development. Exterior building materials shall be of high quality and include the use of cement fiber siding, brick, and asphalt shingle roofing. The use of exterior vinyl siding shall be prohibited on the principal dwellings. Proffer 5 As and when each subdivision plat of the Property is recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia ("Clerk's Office"), the Grantors shall record in the Clerk's Office a Declaration submitting the property shown thereon to restrictive covenants governing the use and occupancy of the Property, including, without limitation, a covenant that imposes a mandatory membership in the Preserve at West Neck Homeowners' Association ("HOX) for each owner of a subdivided residential lot. The open space (as that term is defined in Section 1127 of the CZO) shown on such subdivision plats shall be conveyed to the HOA, which shall be responsible for maintaining all of the following area on the Property: multi-use trail system, entrance feature signage, and other improvements in the common area of the Property as depicted on the Concept Plan. Proffer 6 The multi-use paths and water quality improvements depicted on the Concept Plan shall be installed within twelve (12) months of approval of the Erosion and Sediment Control/Stormwater Management Plan or Construction Plan by the City of Virginia Beach, whichever is approved first. Proffer 7 Prior to the turnover of the HOA from the Grantors to the property owners, as set forth in the Virginia Property Owners Association Act established in Title 55.1 Chapter 18 of the Code of Virginia, the Grantors shall perform a Reserve Study Harrison and Lear, Inc. Page 6 of 9 and post a Performance Bond, to the benefit of the HOA, to subsidize any deficit identified in the Reserve Study. Proffer 8 As part of the site plan approval process and subject to the approval of the Department of Public Works/Traffic Engineering Staff("Traffic Engineering Staff'), the Grantors will design and construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Signature Drive and West Neck Road (the "Traffic Signal"), in accordance with the City of Virginia Beach Public Works Design Standards Manual. The cost of design and construction of the Traffic Signal will be at the Grantors' sole expense; and the Traffic Signal shall be installed and fully operational with the completion of site construction, prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. Proffer 9 The design and building materials of all street lighting shall be complementary to the lighting within the Villages at West Neck and Indian River Plantation. Proffer 10 The design and building materials of all new fencing or fencing which is replaced when the Property is developed shall be complementary to the fencing within the Villages at West Neck and Indian River Plantation. Proffer 11 The design, dimensions, and building materials of any monument-style neighborhood identification sign shall be complementary to the neighborhood identification signs throughout the Villages at West Neck and Indian River Plantation. Proffer 12 The final stormwater management plan submitted to the Development Services Center (DSC) during the site plan review process for the development of the Project shall comply with applicable City Stormwater Management Ordinance(s). Proffer 13 When the Property is developed, the Property will be developed in accordance with the exhibit entitled "Open Space Exhibit", which is dated March 4, 2026, has been prepared by WPL, has been exhibited to the City Council, and is on file with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning and Community Development. The Open Space Exhibit is incorporated herein by this reference. Upon establishment of the HOA and completion of the proposed reforestation and proposed multi-use trail system identified on the Concept Plan and located in that portion of Parcel A to remain P-1 ("Conservation Area"), JBWK shall convey title to the Conservation Harrison and Lear, Inc. Page 7 of 9 Area to the HOA. For the secondary trails referred to herein this Proffer or otherwise identified as "Proposed Multi-Use Trail System" on the Concept Plan, JBWK will record an easement sufficient to convey public access to said trails immediately prior to conveying title to the Conservation Area to the HOA. Proffer 14 Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy (a "CO") for the proposed residential development (the "Housing Development"), the City of Virginia Beach shall have approved a land disturbance permit and associated site-plan (the "LDP") for the proposed 9-hole (minimum) golf course (the "Golf Course") on that area identified on the Open Space Exhibit as New 9 Hole Golf Course (the "Golf Course Property"). Proffer 15 Until such time as the Golf Course is open and operational, no more than 50% of the CO's will be issued for the Housing Development. Proffer 16 JBWK shall convey title to the Golf Course Property by Deed of Gift to the HOA upon establishment of the HOA, provided that the Golf Course Property has not previously been conveyed to the Homeowners' Association for the Villages at West Neck, the Homeowners' Association for Indian River Plantation, or a joint venture between the same, with any such conveyance being subject to a ground lease for the operation of the Golf Course. Said ground lease will contain certain provisions that it will automatically terminate on the earlier of(i) after opening as a golf course, the date that the Golf Course has been closed on an uninterrupted basis for eighteen (18) months; or (ii) the five (5) year anniversary of recordation of this proffer agreement, provided that the Golf Course has not been substantially completed and begun operations as a 9-hole (minimum) golf course. Proffer 17 Further conditions may be required by the Grantee during the detailed review of the Conceptual Plan and Review Set and administration of applicable City Codes by all cognizant City agencies and departments to meet all applicable City Code requirements. Proffer 18 Further conditions lawfully imposed by applicable development ordinances may be required by Grantee during detailed site plan and/or resubdivision review and administration of applicable City Codes by all relevant City agencies and departments to meet all applicable City Code Requirements. Harrison and Lear, Inc. Page 8 of 9 Proffer 19 All references hereinabove to the PD-H2 Zoning District and to the requirements and regulations applicable thereto refer to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, in force as of the date of approval of this Agreement by City Council, which are by this reference incorporated herein. Proffer 20 Except as expressly superseded and/or modified herein, all Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions as set forth in the "Proffered Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions" dated January 14, 1999, accepted by the Grantee and are recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, in Deed Book 4081, at Page 206, and any amendments or supplements thereto, are ratified, affirmed, and remain binding on the Property. Proffer 21 The above conditions, having been proffered by the Grantors and allowed and accepted by the Grantee as part of the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, shall continue in full force and effect until a subsequent amendment changes the zoning of the Property and specifically repeals such conditions. Such conditions shall continue despite a subsequent amendment to the Zoning Ordinance even if the subsequent amendment is part of a comprehensive implementation of a new or substantially revised Zoning Ordinance until specifically repealed. The conditions, however, may be repealed, amended, or varied by written instrument recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, and executed by the second by the record owner of the Property at the time of recordation of such instrument, provided that said instrument is consented to by the Grantee in writing as evidenced by a certified copy of an ordinance or a resolution adopted by the governing body of the Grantee, after a public hearing before the Grantee which was advertised pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amendment. Said ordinance or resolution shall be recorded along with said instruments as conclusive evidence of such consent, and if not so recorded, said instrument shall be void. ■ Attachments: Staff Report and Disclosure Statements Location Map Proffer Agreement Minutes of Planning Commission Hearing Letter(s) of Support (173) Letter(s) of Opposition (278) Revised Development& Design Criteria Land Use Plan, dated November 3, 2025, rev. January 5, 2026; February 27, 2026 Harrison and Lear, Inc. Page 9 of 9 Open Space Exhibit Preserve at West Neck dated March 4, 2026 Recommended Action: Staff recommends Denial. Planning Commission recommends Approval. Submitting Department/Agency: Planning Department C City Manager: A• • A•• Harrison • Lear, Inc • ••'rty Owners:JBWK LLC i White Clover, CouncilPlanning Commission Public Hearing: February 11, 2026 VB_ City Project Details East Requests Single-family dwellings, open space/ PD-H1 Modification of Proffers Planned Unit Development, R-20 Residential Conditional Rezoning (P-1 Preservation District & WestWest Neck Road PD-H1 Planned Unit Development to Conditional Single-family dwellings / PD-H2 Planned Unit PD-H2 Planned Unit Development (R-20 Development, R-20 Residential, P-1 Preservation Residential) & P-1 Preservation District)) Staff Recommendation Vt ,COP_ mo Denial z* Staff Planner = oti�bro ritnK[ y�MeeyP�ykyc= z ' Wk Marchelle Coleman - �t N ti Location 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive r _; ✓`? GPINs 1493859520, 1493667436, 1493637894, 1493543952, 1493757869,149375970 2. z Site Size "?��, Qw,,, "` • 1 203.62 acres " `M,tfga AICUZ Less than 65 dB DNL, 65-70 dB DNL I - - � :NtinNu•v tuuu Watershed - Southern Rivers Existing Land Use and Zoning District Single-family dwellings, townhomes, duplexes, co '' multi-family dwellings, restaurant golf course PD- a'� Gam` BROiNly�q H1 Planned Unit Development, P-1 Preservation Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning Districts North Multi-family dwellings, undeveloped land, single- family dwellings/ PD-H1 Planned Unit Development, AG-1 & AG-2 Agricultural South >�^ E T `_m Ro Indian River Road llyp�• ,s c Mgt cRF- Single-family dwellings/ R-20 Residential,AG-1 & gN ��4 o q 0. N`LEB O t Trp E AG-2 Agricultural WAv�•�rrrwR,,, m Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 1 of 46 Background & Summary of Proposal • The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 86.04 acres of a 203.62-acre property, currently designated as Conditional PD-H1 Planned Unit Development District and P-1 Preservation District to Conditional PD-H2 Planned Unit Development District (R-20 Residential District) and P-1 Preservation District. In addition, the applicant is seeking a Modification of Proffers to allow for the development of The Preserve at West Neck, a 143-unit residential community with a 9-hole golf course, on site at the Villages of West Neck. This development would result in a total density of 2.79 units per acre. • On May 11, 1999, the City Council approved a Conditional Rezoning and Conditional Use Permit (golf course) for the development of a 974-unit, active-adult community (ages 55 and older) in conjunction with an 18-hole Arnold Palmer signature golf course on a 419.8-acre site. After excluding 33.6 acres of wetlands, 386.2 acres remained as developable land.The project was designed at a density of 2.52 units per acre, which included a diverse mix of single-family homes, townhouses, duplexes, and multi-family dwellings. • On June 26, 2001, a Modification of Proffers was approved by City Council to modify the land use plan and the architectural elevations for the Village Commons area to provide additional open space for the community. With this subsequent modification, two townhouse buildings and apartment units from Village Commons were relocated to the commercial area to provide a scenic view of the golf course and additional open space. As noted in the 2001 Staff Report,the overall number of residential units was reduced from 974 units to 934; however, 936 were constructed, resulting in an overall density of 2.42 units per acre. • Density Calculation: Developable Number of Units Acreage Acreage Proposed Density (Outside of Per Wetlands,Villages at West Neck 419.8 386.20 974 2.52 (CRZ 1999) Villages at West Neck 419.8 386.20 934 2.42 (MDC 2001) (936 units constructed) The Preserve 203.62 portion at West Neck of 419.8 140.38 143 2.79 (Proposed) • The applicant is now seeking to rezone a portion of the property and amend the existing proffers to develop 143 single-family residential units. The proposed units will include a mix of one- and two-story dwellings ranging in size from 1,600 to 3,200 square feet and would be subject to a newly established homeowners association (HOA). Similar to the existing Villages at West Neck, the development will be Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 2 of 46 exclusively for residents aged 55 and older, and the dwellings will be designed with features that facilitate aging-in-place and enhanced accessibility for residents. • The proposal also includes the revitalization of the golf course from an 18-hole course to a 9-hole course and will operate under the existing 1999 Conditional Use Permit for the golf course. A modification to the Conditional Use Permit is not required for this proposal, as the golf course developers are not seeking to amend any conditions associated with the prior approval. Alongside the redeveloped 9-hole golf course, a complementary par-3 course, and an accessory golf simulator building are proposed. The existing clubhouse with associated hospitality facilities will remain for continued use. The golf course is proposed to operate under a semi-private membership model intended to maximize community benefit, with membership opportunities available for players seeking priority tee times and member amenities, while maintaining daily public tee times to ensure broad community access. Although the golf course is depicted as part of this overall redevelopment, it will be developed and operated by a separate developer under a 50-year lease, with two IS-year options to extend. • As indicated by the applicant, the proposed development is expected to be completed in three to five years, with construction occurring in phases to reduce impact to nearby residents. The golf course renovation is expected to be completed in one to two years. The applicant has stated that most residents will not experience any significant disruption, as only 3.4%of existing homes are immediately adjacent to the Preserve at West Neck Development. • As proffered, the building renderings incorporate elements that reflect a traditional southern residential vernacular to create a rural transitional design.These features include front porches with simple columns, horizontal siding, and pitched roof lines, which are compatible with the Transitional Area Design Guidelines. Exterior building materials will be of high quality and include the use of brick, cement fiber siding, and asphalt shingle roofing. Vinyl siding will not be allowed on the principal dwellings, as specified in the proffers. • The proffered development criteria establishes the minimum lot sizes, setbacks, lot coverage, and height restrictions for the proposed development. A copy of the development criteria is provided on page 19 of this staff report. • The proposed plans show new open space areas for residents to utilize, connected by new trails and sidewalks. Currently, the Villages at West Neck provides approximately 45.17%open space across the development. Of this total, 41.38% (175.83 acres) is contained within the privately owned golf course, while only 14.66 acres (3.79%) are usable and accessible to residents. Under the proposed plan, the overall open space would decrease from 45.17%to 40.1% (154.84 acres); however, all proposed open space would be usable and accessible to all residents. The proposed open space amenities feature preservation of forested wetlands and woodland canopy, large-scale reforestation areas with native species, a newly renovated and professionally managed 9-hole golf course, complementary par-3 course and practice facilities, managed meadows and vegetated buffers, a comprehensive network of multi-use trails, and enhanced stormwater management facilities. Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 &3 page 3 of 46 • Open Space Calculation: TotalRecommended Total (includingMinimum Open Space Open Space provided Usable & Accessible Open in percent per TADG in percent Space Provided to . • Residents Villages at /3 79 West Neck 50% 45.17% ° (CRZ 1999) (14.66 acres) The Preserve at West Neck 50% 40.1% 40.1% (Proposed) (154.84 Acres) • As depicted in the proffered exhibit, the proposed public roads will feature a typical two-way street design to minimize impervious surface areas. The submitted exhibit provides a detailed roadway section, including designated areas for street trees, utilities, and sidewalks. The typical sections for the proposed roadways within the development have been reviewed and deemed acceptable by Public Works Traffic Engineering. • A Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis was conducted and provided to Staff for review, confirming the need for a traffic signal at the intersection of West Neck Road and Signature Drive. The traffic signal will be designed, installed, and fully operational with the completion of site construction, prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, as noted in Proffer 8. • Since the property is located within the Transition Area,the applicant appeared before the Transition Area/Interfacility Traffic Area Citizens Advisory Committee (TA/ITA CAC) on February 5, 2026, to brief the Committee on the proposal. The TA/ITA CAC voted to recommend denial due to noncompliance with key elements of the Transition Area Design Guidelines and the Comprehensive Plan related to density and open space. • A Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was provided by Map Environmental, Inc, dated November 9, 2023. The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment found no evidence of Recognized Environmental Conditions (REC, Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions (CRECs), or Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions (HREC) connected with the property. A CREC is a recognized environmental condition resulting from past releases of hazardous substances or petroleum by-products that has undergone some assessment or remediation with satisfactory results. However, the assessment revealed Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) connected with the property. A REC is the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property. It is the opinion of Map Environmental, Inc that the subject property does not pose a significant risk to human health or the environment, and additional environmental investigation is not warranted at this time. • As a portion of the site is located in the 65-70 dB DNL noise zone (approximately 500 square feet), the proposal was considered by the Joint City-Navy Review Process (JRP) Group. Section 1803 (a) of the Zoning Ordinance provides regulations that apply to discretionary development applications for uses within the AICUZ. Details of the JRP's findings are provided in the Evaluation Section of this report. Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 4 of 46 Zoning • PDH1 # Request G1 � MDP Approved 10/07/2025 e Rp CUP (Outdoor Recreational Facility) Approved 10/07/2025 LUP (Amendment) Approved 05/13/2008 `lip MDP Approved 11/23/2004 p, MDP Approved 06/26/2001 CUP (Golf Couse) Approved 05/11/1999 z D t / ' P� , 6 1 CRZ (AG-1 to Conditional AG-1 with PD-Hi '`'` 5��r 9 Overlay, AG-1 to Conditional AG-1 with PD-H1 3 Overlay, AG-2 to Conditional AG-2 with PD-H1 , a ON F� Ri�N��AN �. �� `R20tpR ,RE�•$To Overlay, R-40 to Conditional R-40 with PD-H1 �2 FRRo - �12001 R c NE Overlay, R-20 to Conditional R-20 with PD-H1 Overlay, AG-1 to Conditional P-1, AG-2 to Conditional P-1, R-20 to Conditional P-1. and R- 40 to Conditional P-1) Approved 05/11/1999 2 SVR Approved 07/11/2023 3 CUP (Residential Kennel)Approved 11/21/2018 MDP Approved 06/07/2016 4 CRZ (AG-land AG-2 to Conditional PD-1-12 (R-20 and P-1)) Approved 03/03/2015 FVR Approved 03/03/2015 5 SVR Approved 09/15/2015 6 CUP (Assembly Use (Fraternal Lodge)) Approved 02/12/2013 CUP (Private Sewage Treatment System) 7 Approved 05/24/2011 REZ Approved 06/08/2010 CRZ (AG-1 and AG-2 with a Historic and Cultural Overlay to Conditional R-10 with a PD-H2 Overlay) Approved 08/24/2004 8 CRZ (AG-1 and AG-2 to Conditional R-30) Approved 03/04/2003 CUP (Open Space) Approved 03/04/2003 SVR Approved 03/04/2003 9 CUP (Cemetery, Columbarium, Crematory, and Mausoleum) Approved 03/09/1999 LUP (Administrative Change) Approved 10 01/14/1998 LUP (Amendment) Approved 06/02/1993 LUP (Courthouse Estates) Approved 05/11/1970 Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 5 of 46 Zoning • # Request g{AiE`' — / SVR Approved 01/04/1994 oG� mT / e I i 4 REZ Approved 01/04/1994 ?off ' i Ropy ' SVR Approved 07/14/1992 N CUP (Golf Course) Approved 07/14/1992 CRZ (R-10 to Conditional R-40) ApprovedPi `�� 07/14/1992 CRZ (R-15 to Conditional R-40) Approved Z �' �'/ 6 /3 07/14/1992 �.5 9 CRZ (AG-1 to Conditional R-40) Approved 07/14/1992 ,,. 11 t©u!Nl = CRZ (AG-2 to Conditional R-40)Approved C.O®M Et1 S' " T�o&1 R2o 07/14/1992 E.CRZ (R-20 to Conditional AG-2) Approved 07/14/1992 CRZ (R-10 to Conditional AG-2) Approved 07/14/1992 CRZ (AG-2 to Conditional R-40) Approved 07/14/1992 CRZ (R-15 to Conditional AG-2) Approved 07/14/1992 CUP (TV Transmitter Tower and Satellite Up-Link 12 Site) Approved 03/21/1986 CUP (Recreational Facilities of an Outdoor Nature (Tent Site)) Approved 07/16/1985 Application Types CUP: Conditional Use Permit MDP: Modification of Proffers SVR:Subdivision Variance REZ: Rezoning NON: Nonconforming Use LUP: Land Use Plan CRZ: Conditional Rezoning STC:Street Closure STR:Short Term Rental MDC: Modification of FVR: Floodplain Variance Conditions ALT. Alternative Compliance Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 6 of 46 Evaluation • • • In Staff's opinion, the request to rezone approximately 86.04 acres of a 203.62-acre property from Conditional PD-H1 Planned Unit Development District and P-1 Preservation District to Conditional PD-H2 Planned Unit Development District (R-20 Residential District) & P-1 Preservation, along with a Modification of Proffers, does not align with the density and open space recommendations set forth in the Transition Area Design Guidelines. While Staff recognizes several positive aspects of the proposed development, the higher density and deficiency in the recommended open space have led Staff to recommend denial of this proposal. Staff's rationale is provided below. Since the property is located within the Transition Area as defined by the Comprehensive Plan, Staff has evaluated the proposal to ensure its compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and, specifically, the Transition Area Design Guidelines (TADG). The Design Guidelines call for high-quality developments of low-impact, low- density residential; low-intensity, neighborhood-serving, non-residential uses, along with open space, recreational, agricultural farming, and equestrian uses. Additionally, the guidelines encourage residential developments to have a maximum average calculated density of up to, and no greater than, one unit per developable acre, with a preference for minimum lot sizes of 15,000 square feet. Smaller lot sizes may be considered if they include additional active open space, as recommended by the Transition Area Design Guidelines. In staff's view, the proposed density of 2.79 units per developable acre does not align with the recommended density of one unit per developable acre, as outlined in the TADG, which is a contributing factor to staff's recommendation of denial. When looking solely at the 203.62 acres that is the subject of this request, of which 140.38 acres are considered developable and able to be used when calculating allowable density in accordance with Section 200(b) of the Zoning Ordinance, the resulting density is 1.01 units per acre. However, since the subject acreage was included when calculating the allowable density for the 1999 approval and subsequent modifications, the total acreage and existing 936 residential units for the Villages of West Neck must be considered with this request, bringing the overall density to 2.79 units per acre, which exceeds the density recommended by the Transition Area Design Guidelines. In 1999, the Villages of West Neck development was approved by the City Council for 974 units for a density of 2.52 units per acre; however, the number of units decreased to 934 units with the 2001 Modification of Proffers, with 936 units being constructed, resulting in the current density of 2.42 units per acre. The maximum allowable density calculated in the April 14, 1999 staff report included the total acreage of the proposed Villages at West Neck, plus reallocated unused dwelling units from two adjacent neighborhoods, Courthouse Estates Phases IV and V and Indian River Plantation. The Comprehensive Plan in effect at that time recommended that residential density in the Transition Area not exceed the traffic equivalent of one dwelling unit per developable acre, which was considered ten generated trips per developable acre. Utilizing that guidance, the 1999 staff report applied a "density credit" to the original Villages at West Neck project based on the assumption that in an age-restricted development, residents would generate fewer trips per acre and therefore the traffic equivalent of one dwelling unit per acre was doubled. This resulted in potential of 1,082 units that could have been developed at that time; however, the approved development only included 974 units, which was reduced to 934 units with the 2001 Modification. The current Comprehensive Plan does not allow for this same rationale, and as such, staff believes the new development should align with the current Comprehensive Plan recommendations for the Transition Area, which call for one dwelling per developable acre. Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 7 of 46 Furthermore, the TADG require that open space, both passive and active, be a key component of the development. The 50% minimum open space recommended in the TADG is not met with this proposal. As mentioned previously, the Villages at West Neck provides approximately 45.17% open space across the development. However, the majority of the area, approximately 41.38% (175.38 acres), is located within the privately owned closed golf course, leaving only 14.66 acres, or 3.79% usable and accessible to residents. Under the proposed plan for The Preserve at West Neck, the total open space would decrease from 45.17%to 40.1%; however, unlike the existing conditions, all designated open space will be usable and accessible to all residents. Ultimately, the development, in conjunction with the existing open space for the Villages of West Neck, provides approximately 40.1% of accessible and usable open space, which falls short of the minimum recommended by the TADG by approximately 9.9%. Despite not meeting the minimum, the proposal does include a variety of both active and passive open space amenities to include the preservation of forested wetlands and woodland canopy, large-scale reforestation areas with native species, newly renovated and professionally managed 9-hole golf course, complementary par-3 course and practice facilities, managed meadows and vegetated buffers, community gardens, a comprehensive network of multi-use trails, and enhanced stormwater management facilities. In many ways, the project aligns with the recommendations in the TADG. For example, the architectural designs for the proposed dwelling units reflect the rural transitional architecture recommended in the TADG. The proposed designs incorporate key elements and characteristics of the rural transitional style, with features to include front porches with simple columns, horizontal siding, and pitched roof lines. Additionally, the use of high-quality materials such as cement fiber siding, brick, and asphalt shingle roofing, along with front facades facing other homes and streets, supports both aesthetic and durability standards. This design is further enhanced by porches, sidewalks, and connections to common open spaces, ensuring a harmonious integration with the surrounding environment while maintaining a timeless and appealing character, consistent with the TADG's emphasis on blending with the natural landscape and creating a cohesive neighborhood feel. The Design Guidelines also emphasize the importance of adequate infrastructure to service the needs of proposed developments without compromising the existing infrastructure to the detriment of existing development. The request has been reviewed by the City of Virginia Beach Public Schools. The impact on the school population will be minimal to nonexistent due to the designation as a 55+ community. In addition, the proposed request has also been reviewed by both the Department of Public Utilities and the Department of Public Works Traffic Engineering. As noted below in the Public Utility Impact section of this report, connection to both City water and sewer will be required. The Department of Public Utilities has stated future interest in expanding the existing 50'x 50' pump station parcel to 100'x 100' to meet current standards. This will allow space for future replacement of the existing pump station along West Neck Road when needed. Public Utilities' standards require that no buildable area be located within 100' of the existing or future pump station wet well. The applicant is aware of this requirement and does not show any encroachment into this area with this proposal. Additionally, a Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis, performed by VHB dated November 2025 and revised January 8, 2026, has been submitted and reviewed by the Department of Public Works/Traffic Engineering. Staff has determined that the traffic generated by this development will result in approximately 2,470 average daily trips. The analysis studied the unsignalized intersection in the existing conditions and in the future year of 2028 with the traffic generated by the proposed 143 residential units, 9-hole golf course, factoring in some Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 8 of 46 nominal growth on West Neck Road.The analysis shows that with the additional traffic generated by the proposed development, the intersection will meet multiple signal warrants for the majority of the daytime hours, which indicates that a traffic signal should be seriously considered for installation. As part of the analysis accepted by Traffic Engineering staff and as outlined in Proffer 8, the traffic generated from an additional 143 residential units, a 9-hole golf course, and the existing restaurant on the site will create significant traffic delays,justifying the need for a traffic signal at the intersection of West Neck Road, Signature Drive, and Tin Barn Way. As part of the site plan approval process, and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works/Traffic Engineering, the developer will design and install the traffic signal in accordance with the City of Virginia Beach Public Works Design Standards Manual. The developer will bear the full cost of design and construction, and the traffic signal shall be installed and fully operational prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the Preserve at West Neck, as noted in Proffer 8. The Department of Public Works/Traffic Engineering reserves the right to make detailed comments on the design of the public roadways during site plan review. Lastly, the site is located in the Southern Rivers watershed, and a narrative was provided to the Development Services Center (DSC) by the applicant outlining the proposed stormwater strategy, indicating the intention to address water quality and quantity on site. As indicated in the TADG, stormwater management should be incorporated into project design in accordance with state stormwater management regulations. The applicant is proposing comprehensive stormwater management improvements as a key component of the project. These improvements include expanding the existing system capacity by adding approximately three acres of additional detention and retention area to accommodate both current conditions and future development. The project also incorporates sustainable design practices, including vegetated wetland benches to provide enhanced water quality treatment. According to the project's design engineers, these upgrades may contribute to reducing or alleviating flooding in the surrounding watershed, thereby providing water quantity and quality benefits that extend beyond the project site to the broader West Neck area and nearby communities. The DSC has reviewed the narrative and finds that the submitted stormwater strategy has the potential to successfully comply with stormwater regulations for this site. More detailed information can be found in the Stormwater Impacts section of this report. As previously stated, a Joint City-Navy Review Process Group (JRP) meeting was held on August 23, 2024, to discuss the residential development proposal. The Joint Review Process Group determined that, based on the criteria for discretionary proposals, the proposed development will not encroach into the approximately 500- square-foot area of the site that is located within the 65-70 dB DNL, making it consistent with the recommendations outlined in Section 1803(a) of the Ordinance. The proffered conceptual site plan has been reviewed by the Fire Marshal's Office, and no concerns were raised regarding the proposed layout and circulation. Additional review, however, will take place during the final site plan review process. While Staff acknowledges and commends the applicant for this well-designed proposal, which offers ,;;; dedicated housing for aging residents, improves the site's aesthetics through regular vegetation maintenance, creates natural meadows and reforestation areas, increases usable recreational open space, and upgrades the stormwater system, Staff believes the development does not meet two key factors outlined within the Transition Area Design Guidelines, namely density and open space. As a result, Staff recommends denial of Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 9 of 46 these requests. Proffers are provided below should the Planning Commission deem this proposal appropriate for the redevelopment of the former golf course within the Villages of West Neck. The following are proffers submitted by the applicant as part of a Conditional Zoning Agreement (CZA). The applicant, consistent with Section 107(h) of the City Zoning Ordinance, has voluntarily submitted these proffers in an attempt to "offset identified problems to the extent that the proposed rezoning is acceptable," (§107(h)(1)). Should this application be approved, the proffers will be recorded at the Circuit Court and serve as conditions restricting the use of the property as proposed with this change of zoning. Proffer 1 When the Property is developed, the layout, land uses, recreation and open spaces shall be in substantial conformance with the exhibit entitled, "Conceptual Master Plan, Preserve at West Neck, Virginia Beach, VA," prepared by WPL and found on pages 1 and 2 of the multi-page document entitled "The Preserve at West Neck Development & Design Criteria Land Use Plan," prepared by WPL, VHB, and Harrison and Lear, dated November 3, 2025 and revised on January S, 2026 and February 27, 2026, which have been exhibited to the City of Virginia Beach City Council and are on file with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning and Community Development (hereinafter the "Concept Plan" and "The Preserve at West Neck Development & Design Criteria Land Use Plan", respectively). The Concept Plan and The Preserve at West Neck Development & Design Criteria Land Use Plan are incorporated herein by this reference. Proffer 2 When the Property is developed, the land uses; layout; trail section; roadway sections with street widths, curb heights; and development criteria to include building elevations, lot dimensions, setbacks, building heights, buffers, and reforestation shall be as set forth in the multi-page document entitled, "The Preserve at West Neck Design & Development Criteria Land Use Plan", prepared by WPL, VHB, and Harrison & Lear, Inc., dated November 3, 2025 and revised on January 5, 2026 and February 27, 2026, and which has been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning and Community Development, and is incorporated herein by this reference. The dimensional requirements identified in The Preserve at West Neck Design & Development Criteria Land Use Plan shall be in lieu of all corresponding criteria in the Virginia Beach Zoning Ordinance (the "Zoning Ordinance") applicable to the R-20 Residential District. Proffer 3 When the Property is developed,the number of residential dwelling units thereon shall not exceed one hundred forty-three (143). Proffer 4 When the Property is developed, all residential structures constructed on the Property shall be in substantial conformance with the conceptual architectural exhibit entitled, "Residential Dwelling Precedent Images, The Preserve at West Neck", which has been provided within The Preserve at West Neck Development & Design Criteria Land Use Plan and exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file with the Virginia Beach Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 10 of 46 Department of Planning and Community Development. Exterior building materials shall be of high quality and include the use of cement fiber siding, brick, and asphalt shingle roofing.The use of exterior vinyl siding shall be prohibited on the principal dwellings. Proffer 5 As and when each subdivision plat of the Property is recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia ("Clerk's Office"), the Grantors shall record in the Clerk's Office a Declaration submitting the property shown thereon to restrictive covenants governing the use and occupancy of the Property, including, without limitation, a covenant that imposes a mandatory membership in the Preserve at West Neck Homeowners' Association ("HOA") for each owner of a subdivided residential lot. The open space (as that term is defined in Section 1127 of the CZO) shown on such subdivision plats shall be conveyed to the HOA, which shall be responsible for maintaining all of the following area on the Property: multi-use trail system, entrance feature signage, and other improvements in the common area of the Property as depicted on the Concept Plan. Proffer 6 The multi-use paths and water quality improvements depicted on the Concept Plan shall be installed within twelve (12) months of approval of the Erosion and Sediment Control/Stormwater Management Plan or Construction Plan by the City of Virginia Beach, whichever is approved first. Proffer 7 Prior to the turnover of the HOA from the Grantors to the property owners, as set forth in the Virginia Property Owners Association Act established in Title 55.1 Chapter 18 of the Code of Virginia, the Grantors shall perform a Reserve Study and post a Performance Bond, to the benefit of the HOA, to subsidize any deficit identified in the Reserve Study. Proffer 8 As part of the site plan approval process and subject to the approval of the Department of Public Works/Traffic Engineering Staff ("Traffic Engineering Staff"), the Grantors will design and construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Signature Drive and West Neck Road (the "Traffic Signal"), in accordance with the City of Virginia Beach Public Works Design Standards Manual. The cost of design and construction of the Traffic Signal will be at the Grantors' sole expense; and the Traffic Signal shall be installed and fully operational with the completion of site construction, prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. Proffer 9 The design and building materials of all street lighting shall be complementary to the lighting within the Villages at West Neck and Indian River Plantation. Proffer 10 The design and building materials of all new fencing or fencing which is replaced when the Property is developed shall be complementary to the fencing within the Villages at West Neck and Indian River Plantation. Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 11 of 46 Proffer 11 The design, dimensions, and building materials of any monument-style neighborhood identification sign shall be complementary to the neighborhood identification signs throughout the Villages at West Neck and Indian River Plantation. Proffer 12 The final stormwater management plan submitted to the Development Services Center (DSC) during the site plan review process for the development of the Project shall comply with applicable City Stormwater Management Ordinance(s). Proffer 13 When the Property is developed, the Property will be developed in accordance with the exhibit entitled "Open Space Exhibit", which is dated March 4, 2026, has been prepared by WPL has been exhibited to the City Council and is on file with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning and Community Development. The Open Space Exhibit is incorporated herein by this reference. Upon establishment of the HOA and completion of the proposed reforestation and proposed multi-use trail system identified on the Concept Plan and located in that portion of Parcel A to remain P-1 ("Conservation Area"), JBWK shall convey title to the Conservation Area to the HOA. For the secondary trails referred to herein this Proffer or otherwise identified as "Proposed Multi-Use Trail System" on the Concept Plan, JBWK will record an easement sufficient to convey public access to said trails immediately prior to conveying title to the Conservation Area to the HOA. Proffer 14 Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy (a "CO")for the proposed residential development (the "Housing Development"), the City of Virginia Beach shall have approved a land disturbance permit and associated site-plan (the "LDP")for the proposed 9-hole (minimum)golf course (the "Golf Course") on that area identified on the Open Space Exhibit as New 9 Hole Golf Course (the "Golf Course Property"). Proffer 15 Until such time as the Golf Course is open and operational, no more than 50% of the CO's will be issued for the Housing Development. Proffer 16 JBWK shall convey title to the Golf Course Property by Deed of Gift to the HOA upon establishment of the HOA, provided that the Golf Course Property has not previously been conveyed to the Homeowners' Association for the Villages at West Neck, the Homeowners' Association for Indian River Plantation, or a ioint venture between the same, with any such conveyance being subject to a ground lease for the operation of the Golf Course. Said ground lease will contain certain provisions that it will automatically terminate on the earlier of(i)after opening as a golf course, the date that the Golf Course has been closed on an uninterrupted basis for eighteen (18) months; or (ii) the five (S) year anniversary of recordation of this proffer agreement provided that the Golf Course has not been substantially completed and begun operations as a 9-hole (minimum) golf course. Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 12 of 46 Proffer[begin strikethroughJ4-3[end strikethrough]17 Further conditions may be required by the Grantee during the detailed review of the Conceptual Plan and Review Set and administration of applicable City Codes by all cognizant City agencies and departments to meet all applicable City Code requirements. Proffer/begin strikethroughJ44[end strikethrough]18 Further conditions lawfully imposed by applicable development ordinances may be required by Grantee during detailed site plan and/or resubdivision review and administration of applicable City Codes by all relevant City agencies and departments to meet all applicable City Code Requirements. Proffer[begin str1kethroughJ4-5[end strikethroughJ 19 All references hereinabove to the PD-H2 Zoning District and to the requirements and regulations applicable thereto refer to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, in force as of the date of approval of this Agreement by City Council, which are by this reference incorporated herein. Proffer[begin strikethroughJ3,6[end strikethroughJ 20 Except as expressly superseded and/or modified herein, all Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions as set forth in the "Proffered Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions" dated January 14, 1999, accepted by the Grantee and are recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, in Deed Book 4081, at Page 206, and any amendments or supplements thereto, are ratified, affirmed, and remain binding on the Property. Proffer/begin strikethroughJ [end strikethroughJ 21 The above conditions, having been proffered by the Grantors and allowed and accepted by the Grantee as part of the amendmentto the Zoning Ordinance,shall continue in full force and effect until a subsequent amendment changes the zoning of the Property and specifically repeals such conditions. Such conditions shall continue despite a subsequent amendment to the Zoning Ordinance even if the subsequent amendment is part of a comprehensive implementation of a new or substantially revised Zoning Ordinance until specifically repealed. The conditions, however, may be repealed, amended, or varied by written instrument recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, and executed by the second by the record owner of the Property at the time of recordation of such instrument, provided that said instrument is consented to by the Grantee in writing as evidenced by a certified copy of an ordinance or a resolution adopted by the governing body of the Grantee, after a public hearing before the Grantee which was advertised pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia, 1950,as amendment.Said ordinance or resolution shall be recorded along with said instruments as conclusive evidence of such consent, and if not so recorded, said instrument shall be void. Staff Comments: Staff has reviewed the Proffers listed above and finds them acceptable. The City Attorney's Office has reviewed the agreement and found it to be legally sufficient and in acceptable legal form. Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 13 of 46 Comprehensive Plan Information The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the city as the Transition Area which consists of about 5,900 acres bounded by Princess Anne and Sandbridge Roads along the 'Green Line' to the north, North Landing and the Princess Anne Commons area to the west, Indian River Road to the South, and New Bridge Road to the east. The objective for the Transition Area is to be "respectful of(the Transition Area's) natural heritage and historical legacy and sensitive to its environmental value" (p. 5, TADG. It is characterized by several high- quality neighborhoods that include significant open space and recreational areas. Commercial development is primarily located at major intersections. The Plan calls for an integration of natural resources and open space to protect the unique natural character of the area and to enable a true transition into the Rural Area to the south. In order to provide an apparent visual shift from the suburban development character and form to rural development character and form, it should reflect a noticeable transitional pattern with contiguous and unified open space throughout. (p. 11, TADG) Uses in this area should be limited to low-impact, low-density residential, low-intensity non-residential, open space and recreation, and agricultural, including row-crop farming and equestrian uses. For residential development, a maximum average of up to and no more than one unit per developable acre can be earned through demonstrated conformance with the Transition Area Design Guidelines. Minimum lot sizes of 15,000 square feet are preferred; however, lot sizes of less than 15,000 square feet are appropriate if additional active open space location recommendations as set forth in the Transition Area Design Guidelines are incorporated into the site design. (p. 9, TADG) Focus should be placed on an attractive streetscape view into the site from the roadway. Parking areas should be situated behind or on the side of buildings and should incorporate landscaping throughout the parking areas. (p. 17, TADG The Plan calls for open space areas to be deliberately included and designed as a site amenity in all development. Open space should comprise a minimum of 50 percent of the developable area for residential development and 30 percent for non-residential development and should provide a balance of both "active" and "passive" open space areas. (p. 27-32, TADG) A Rural Transitional architectural theme is preferred. Rural Transitional is defined as featuring certain architectural treatments that take cues from local farm buildings, hunting clubhouses and other examples that reflect the architectural heritage and agrarian character of southern Virginia Beach, and that demonstrate a change from the design of development north of the Green Line. Architectural features may include large, open wraparound porches, pitched roof lines, cross-gabled,front gabled or front-to-back main gabled roof forms and detached or side-loading garages. Beyond these architectural features, the Rural Transitional theme extends to building materials, site design and landscaping forms that are reflective of the existing traditional rural character (p. 13, TADG) Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 14 of 46 ResourcesNatural & Cultural • The site is located in the Southern Rivers Watershed. Drainage in the Southern Rivers watershed is highly impacted by the presence of high ground water, poorly draining soils, and high-water surface elevations in downstream receiving waters. The applicant has provided a preliminary stormwater analysis for their proposal, which is discussed in detail below. There are no known historic or cultural resources that will be affected by this project. Stormwater • Project Stormwater Design Staff Summary This project consists of the construction of single-family and multi-family developments along with their associated recreational amenities. The project area currently consists of a golf course, cart paths and wet ponds. Stormwater runoff from the site is currently directed towards the existing golf course wet ponds, which ultimately drain into West Neck Creek. The wet ponds that currently serve the site are interconnected and will be expanded and reshaped to provide additional stormwater storage volume designed to accommodate and treat the proposed development. New wet ponds are also proposed to supplement and provide additional stormwater management. Public drainage easements have been taken into account for wet ponds that will treat public water. The wet ponds will be retrofitted to meet current Department of Quality (DEQ) and City of Virginia Beach Public Works standards. Based on the information provided by VHB in the Preliminary Drainage Study, the DSC agrees that the proposed conceptual stormwater management strategy can successfully comply with all stormwater regulations. Final design and detailed updates will be made during site plan submittal to ensure conformance with requirements set forth in the Public Works Design Standards Manual. More detailed project stormwater information is listed below. Project Information Total project area: 86.04 acres Pre-Development impervious area: 13.5 acres Post-Development impervious area: 33 acres Stormwater Management Facility Design Information Type of facility proposed: Wet Ponds Description of outfall: Stormwater runoff from the project will collect through the onsite wet ponds, before discharging into a ditch that outfalls into West Neck Creek. Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 15 of 46 Downstream conveyance path: This site is part of the Upper West Neck Creek drainage basin. Stormwater runoff from this site drains across West Neck Road through a ditch and culvert system that leads into West Neck Creek. West Neck Creek ultimately drains into the North Landing River, through the Currituck Sound and into the Atlantic Ocean. Traffic Impacts/Transportation Traffic Counts Street Name Present Volume Present Capacity Generated Traffic Existing Land Use 2-0 ADT West Neck Road 7,900 ADT' 11,200 ADT'(LOS 4 "D") Proposed Land Use '-2,470 ADT 'Average Daily Trips 'As defined by an 'As defined by 143 4LOS = Level of abandoned 175-acre single-family units, Service golf course nine-hole golf course, & existing restaurant Master Transportation Plan(MTP)and Capital Improvement Program(CIP) West Neck Road, in the vicinity of this application, is a two-lane undivided minor suburban arterial. Active Transportation Plan There are no improvements or recommendations in the Active Transportation Plan applicable to the subject site. Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 16 of 46 Public Utility Impacts Wa ter There is an 8-inch City water main along Browning Drive (private). There is a 6-inch City water main along Legendary Drive. There is an abandoned 8-inch City water main bisecting GPIN 1493-66-7436. There is a 10- inch City water main along Cadence Way. There is an abandoned 10-inch City water main bisecting GPINs 1493-54-3952 & 1493-63-7894. There is a 6-inch City water main along Arnold Palmer Drive (private). A 20- foot public utility easement must be recorded over the water main if not existing. City water mains designed to Public Utilities Standards must be extended to serve the proposed development. Single-family dwellings must be individually served by an exclusive water service line and meter. Sewer There is a 10-inch City sanitary sewer gravity main along the western portion of Legendary Drive. There is an fl- inch City sanitary sewer lateral extended to GPIN 1493-66-7436. There is an 8-inch City sanitary sewer gravity main along Cadence Way. There is an active 8-inch City sanitary sewer force main and an abandoned 8-inch City sanitary sewer force main along portions of Cadence Way. There is an abandoned 8-inch City sanitary sewer force main bisecting GPINs 1493-54-3952 & 1493-63-7894. There is an 8-inch City sanitary sewer gravity main along Signature Circle. City sanitary sewer gravity mains designed to Public Utilities Standards must be extended to serve the proposed development. Single-family dwellings must be individually served by an exclusive sanitary sewer lateral and cleanout, and any multi-family area must be served by a single sanitary sewer lateral. City Sanitary Sewer Pump Station #635 is adjacent to the proposed project. Public Utilities would have interest in expanding this 50'x 50' pump station parcel to our current standard of 100' x 100'. This will allow space for future replacement of the pump station. Public Utilities requires that no buildable area be located within 100' of the existing or future pump station wet well. This is to reduce odor complaints and frequent maintenance work in close proximity to homes. Additionally, when this pump station requires future replacement, sheet piling will need to be driven deep for the construction of a new wet well. This can potentially damage nearby structures, causing significant cost to the City for monitoring and repair. Public Outreach Information Planning Commission • The Applicant and project team conducted extensive community outreach over a nearly four-year development and planning process from 2022 through 2025, demonstrating a sustained commitment to incorporating community input and building project support. Engagement began in March 2022 with a presentation to the Villages at West Neck Board, followed by large-scale public meetings in April 2022, including a community meeting attended by approximately 250 residents and a presentation to the Indian River Plantation (IRP) Board with more than 50 attendees. During this same period, a Steering Committee was established and continued from Spring 2022 through Fall 2025, consisting of 10 meetings over more than three years, with up to 30 residents per meeting representing diverse Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 17 of 46 viewpoints and community interests, providing ongoing dialogue and feedback that was integrated throughout the design refinement process. Additional broad public outreach occurred in October 2023 with a community meeting attended by approximately 125 residents, and in October 2025 with a presentation to the Indian River Plantation Board. On November 3, 2025, the Applicant hosted a community open house, and a subsequent community meeting is scheduled for January 27, from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. at the Wave Church on Seaboard Road, where the Applicant, along with the proposed golf course operators and designers, gave an overview of the project and answered questions. Throughout this process, the project team has supplemented in-person engagement with comprehensive information dissemination, including video presentations, flyers,fact sheets, mailing campaigns, and the launch of a dedicated project website featuring conceptual plans, design drawings, frequently asked questions, and updated project information, with opportunities for residents to submit questions directly. In addition, project leadership, including the President of Harrison & Lear and Marc and Audrey Leishman, has remained personally available for resident discussions, and the broader project team has remained responsive to community questions and concerns throughout the design and application process. • 173 letters of support & 278 letters of opposition have been received by Staff noting concerns related to disruption in quality of life for existing residents due to construction, noise, increased traffic, safety, stormwater impacts, privacy, impacts to wildlife habitat, and inconsistencies with Transition Area design guidelines related to density. • As required by the Zoning Ordinance,the public notice sign(s) was placed on the property on January 12, 2026. • As required by State Code, this item was advertised in the Virginian-Pilot on Wednesdays, January 28, 2026 and February 4, 2026. • As required by City Code,the adjacent property owners were notified regarding the request and the date of the Planning Commission public hearing on January 26, 2026. • This Staff report, as well as all reports for this Planning Commission's meeting, was posted on the Commission's webpage of virginiabeach.gov/pc on February 5, 2026. City Council • As required by City Code,this item was advertised in the Virginian-Pilot on Tuesdays, March 10, 2026 and March 17, 2026. • As required by City Code, the adjacent property owners were notified regarding both the request and the date of the City Council's public hearing on March 9, 2026. • The City Clerk's Office posted the materials associated with the application on the City Council website of https://clerk.virginiabeach.gov/city-council on March 20, 2026. Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 18 of 46 Development &Design Criteria Land Use Plan Total Number of Residential Dwelling Units: Parking Summary The number of single-family dwellings shall not exceed 143. Residential Unit Type: Single-Family Dwelling Proposed Single Family Dwellings Required Off-Street Spaces: 143 Dwelling Units Minimum Lot Area 4,000 SF x 2 Spaces per Unit 286 Required Spaces Lot Area outside of Water,Marsh,Wetlands 4,000 SF provided Off-Street Spaces: 286 Driveway(9')(18'min.) Minimum Lot Width 50 feet 286 Garage572 Total Off-Street Spaces Minimum Front Yard Setback from a public right-of-way 20 feet Off-Street Parking Requirement for each single-family dwelling unit shall be a Except as provided in Section 502(a)Subsection(6.1)of minimum of 2 parking spaces on the driveway,each no less than 18 feet by 9 feet, the Zoning Ordinance,Minimum Side Yard Setback for a total of 286 spaces. Each single-family dwelling unit shall also have a 2-car except when adjacent to a street 5 feet garage for an additional 286 off-street garage parking spaces. Minimum Side Yard Setback-Accessory Structures no larger than a 150 square foot footprint with a height to On-Street parking provided on 1 side of all public right-of-way eave of no higher than 8 feet 5 feet Minimum Side Yard Setback adjacent to a street 15 feet Minimum Side Yard Setback-Adjacent to a public right- of-way 15 feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback except for Accessory Structures 10 feet Except As Provided In Section 502(a)Subsection(6.1) of the Zoning Ordinance, Minimum Rear Yard Setback for Accessory Structures 3 feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback-Accessory Structures no larger than a 150 square foot footprint with a height to eave of no higher than 8 feet 3 feet Minimum Setback On Through Lots For Accessory Structures that are physically located to the rear of the Principal Structure 3 feet Maximum Lot Coverage In Percent 60% Maximum Building Height 45 feet = Mechanical Equipment,Generators,&Chimneys D Setback In Side&Rear Yards 3 feet 0'Q �. M in v ° DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA & PARKING SUMMARY 0o r+ THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK N 3 r �D N d O NJ Ql LU t1 LEGEND -.� .� .,.K. -a��•#ti` P.�Wre egmm.n f ; �. gNgAr Um Typq antl.F.iiN • 1. EXISTING STORMWATER POND le P-14 Aft !!2. ENHANCED STORMWATER POND . s qwq 3. PROPOSED STORMWATER POND 4 I R•q.lr ap- 4. PROPOSED LUXURY SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 0. t n >o v qr spque: ae OR (ez to vyn) 5 PROPOSED REFORESTATION . 9. 8. PROPOSED RESTORED GOLF COURSE T 7. PROPOSED OUTDOOR PRACTICE FACILITY r� I Tar lLbtrw[apwa 18, PROPOSED INDOOR PRACTICE FACILITY of dTeo-eel Pu d p 9 PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY HOMES Repuiemq q for e.h rNI.f—fly dd g one ghrl be . ' 10 RESTORED GOLF CART PATH s t /I , mlllmum or 2 penury vpeoaq on'ne arl.w,vy seen no Ivae Inen to root try 9}wL 11 EXISTING PARKING LOT TO REMAIN by- ^ •pr%. Y 2 p.MaQ np.—r�o nary q 2wr a 12 PROPOSED MULTI-USE TRAIL SYSTEM n In 413.NATIVE i POLLINATOR MANAGED FLOWERING MEADOW le ? t '` f pgHip aerrM m I rM d A npfivd..q j14.EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN 15.EXISTING WETLANOSTOREMAIN _ �• .' 1 j44 ,,� i&EXISTING FORESTICANOPYTO REMAIN 17 EXISTING CLUBHOUSE TO REMAIN I 13 DO w , a If f � le m }� y - - 4r ' y IS ♦ ' � w a•"� w�Y '�4fy �� �+ +aTv B�, d F� JA`,".ry..i D 3 as � !' ���.'�,.��-°,- _.':•.,, .:. .t..i I ��.;.. �:�'1� �" ��..�'.' �. L' Z, o v = CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN `D f D °- THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK N 3 � o In O N lu �. 2 7 M W C1 LEGEND i.a- r �aaas '; Prldlp]ummery EGEN w Rwd.lAd un Type 91nAIKr.rIM Dxdy 1. EXISTING STORMWATER POND 'A •+ , Repahwort-*.O3em: 1430.ympu,m A 2. ENHANCED STORMWATER POND x 2 s >W ®fir 3- PROPOSED STDRMWATER POND i - Raquhw ap— P 4 PROPOSED LUXURY SINGLE FAMILY HOMES w 5 PROPOSED REFORESTATION ;j,' } , � eA IAzte ein) 6 PROPOSED RESTORED GOLF COURSE Sn Talei 47, PROPOSED OUTDOOR PRACTICE FACILITY tia 3 B. PROPOSED INDOOR PRACTICE FACILITY 6 Pericnp Repurtmenl for eAch rrple•lvnily deefrp and eheA bee 9. PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ; tt mhltwm o<Z pedEry papa}on tna d,%-my.ea,h.I—then 10 lad by A feel 10 RESTORED GOLF CART PATH WftmRy dmItVp unit"F a%o hm A 2a 11.EXISTING PARKING LOT TO REMAIN 12,PROPOSED MULTIUSE TRAIL SYSTEM 1 �13.NATIVE(POLL}NATOR MANAGED FLOWERING MEADOW 1. _ ,. ,. pdmp pvridedmtedeWr public n0&o6wq a 14.EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN 15.EXISTING WETLANDS TO REMAIN . a A 4 '}'�' S'•. ,, � w r '$ 16.EXISTING FOREST,CANOPY TO REMAIN 17.EXISTING CLUBHOUSE TO REMAIN ❑ ' ' f I I ' TY' 5 :4 1} I I. y R y k * ♦� r to n >Z � cu �' m 3 � CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN N r— o N °1 { THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK � 20 Project C• • • Exhibit I V 6;i 89 89 r„ 89 o x OS 00 OS OC Ol Jt �. vs m am R o am S 8 yv� yy yyp! v U n tv =1 t v O�] hP A ¢ O2J �.tll nI, 00 �vxi Oa u S O .9 ` �a o0 8o FKr O� "� aL .. OG mo10 og ti ivArl r� � T I � O ? t' V t �a y_ LT:; a H Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 22 of 46 C e a _ ; u , Proposed Neighborhood Overlay n �"..K o a o0 1 f r.11..`-,. I\l/...� °a <�gIs °t <m���"t ff:O i S 3W a a / 1 J T Q f O _.: W a � Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 23 of 46 Lot Lines i Zoning Overlay 3 Cs 8 ; F E = on O z n a Qm O s s u rc mN c 1z ` s I 1 fL_J i i �4 yam" oo Qp T i / u( IT 1 _� z « <Zz�. <�o aNF<$W I �j �Y % a o� oo o�� Ww L. a o i �� �r ((t i ( t! a �EL a s v � 0Sz O -a 1 oZ$ W a W / t - � x Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 24 of 46 Proposed Home Styles 00 _ a Y t f.$.F,.P�. I ! a MW ee. p u � � W ` U � 2 ® ✓ i � m z u; c Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 25 of 46 CONCEPT A THE PRESERVE AT WEST N- ` D COMMUNITY BRANDING SIGNAGE CONCEPTS � o Q THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK A 90 0) w n Roadway Overlay & Typical • 4 I � i O f U � 6 o o a Q fi U Fw-� ✓ � � �� l ate.. a � • � { 1F r z O •1 i _ vr••. O it .► �:� `: _ � *��'i _/ U t...; x _ � •:,•-tea '4L�� � � Z �•• H _ Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 &3 page 27 of 46 RecreationActive n o gG= z 0 s V u h i V -1_;_ i w w � r a o= wa< `Cf V E� Q Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 &3 page 28 of 46 U yyee P N So O� Si N W Om .� OO fMM$ �v YVf 00 Oy%p� Oo OyRo� off, -� I� � fl - Qn ui gj Yd aP rF. •O nM �in �ip rj ♦m 1 Naturalization & Planting Overlay o0 v O e 00 yy.P. O�.. n x� � o 00 n�� �g R Wa�3.,Wr Oz Ei �• � E--��� � 1�_L� �i iog3W' �m am��~a� :�3 i� �o -- k� J i �D x z � Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 29 of 46 r 1 ' ,,, � / l \ \y NECKi r—y. ( 4 ��y''^\�./,> - f \`%�}, ,� ��� 1 �'`^•1 �1 'PARCEL METRICS L CALCULATIONS PARCEL A B C D E TOTAL B � TOTAL3116 30.8G 25 T3 11083 5.04 20362 ACREAGE OUTSIDE 2']t 21 5% 14 R 72 91 S- 18 94 (09 T 2208) (1156 (80 43 C413_o; (140.38) C-CM1RRSFMEN� ACREAGE TO ]'I p 25]3 532C 0 86.04 �1 • j t ",�]�� ACREAGE TO BE REZONED OUTSIDE 4.14 0 tt55 3098 0 46.68 OF - WETLwND6•• ($B"f ) (4d 9%) (Stt^%) (64 %) EASEMENTS 592 4.62 135 958 031 22N \\ •.. . i( F - rz Q: �� Ct9.0%) (I50%7 (S^.%) (88%) (6?%) (lO B6%) h "! 10.60 0.00 484 4 U 000 15.93 o - - l qa 1., I yr ..'!f J REFORESTATION (340%) (00%) (18.0%) (3.fi%) (00%) (]B2%) f � '• '%/�� - I l _._ may/tom., 1 J�_.�! r "„• I 4r•I w ',. r ®IMft M �IJ H Haa>tiy b.taJ>wM q :s tZ 1 E Tr.-ocsrxlc ypM LOWER DENSITY oryi�rmty Arx rU f ' 1 ti L J I 11 AREA B A Y p n v nuns 6 , �• a.�`.. ;�` �•� ��/�--__.�_�L� NwvsH aLI�r3.v� n ] 4w 1.T Type. a% � / / l ( �... I f I J� • � � wv- a � ��`�,...�� � �� �- �..__�_//_1� u1w. �rtinw"' Ik`n`,00>,�I+a•n�In I_e REFORESTATION & BUFFER OVERLAY o r+ THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK CD M 0- w 3 I— O w O N 20 7 0) W t� r LANCF.LFIPCORE.OPSIS MISIELOWER COREOIIYK 1.:1Ac of %F EUPATORIMCOELF41'INL!.l LITTLE RLUESTEM NEW ENGLAND ASTER VIRGINIA WILD RYE SCIIPLACIIYR1UMS. ASTER NOVAE-ANGLIAI FLYMUSVIRGINICUS NARROW MOUNl'A1N MLN1' RLACKL'YED SUSAN PYCNAN?HEMUMT. RUDRECKIA HIRTA MANAGED MEADOW COMPOSMON NCLUDES GRASSES,GRAS5-LTKE SPECIES,HERBACEOUS PEREANIALS& I IERBACEOUS FLOWERING SPECIE.&PLANTS SIIOWN ABOVE ARE CONCEVIVAL&TYPICAL OF REGIONAL MEADOW C.OMPOSITTOVS;FINAL PATYM..TO BE DEVELOPED&DEFINED Di 7RING SITE.PLAN DOMIME.NTATTON PHASE.. D MANAGED MEADOW CONCEPTUAL PALETTE aq N, THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECKID 13 OCU m CU as m m sz w 3 r i O LN lu l > W rn � ' Reforestation Typology-(Higher Density/Area A) wz At St e F#• .m j T '��}'1N• F� 3 n: ' ��'tii. "may`{" h ZS&-x • .rYA�w .•.•s c `a�y � to ... < a • • Reforestation T • • • •y — (Lower Density Area • v¢�t �� G4 z W Q G a � z f; Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 33 of 46 Reforestation Typology — (Lower Density Mixed Forest / Area C & D) • REA OF FOCUS 4, VIM GANNOI ITOi: ,.. � r - «0 SMNG h. PLAN VIM aV W,A.9TATi(Jn. � •A� coNTExr I AP �' r �V� i� ri r1 " _r—� ELEVATION(1-3 YE 50'MIN.TYPICAL BUFFER SECTION (AREA X) r.VF.RCRM. FORFS'F UNDFR,70RY SHRUB& TURF WALKMG LAYER PERENNIAL LAYER LAYER rarH ELEVATION(5+YEARS) 2 '< d BUFFER EXHIBIT (CARROLLTON NEIGHBORHOOD) o THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK cu m a " Lnn � O N 4�b 9 v �P r Y' lff i ARIIIUR 1 k _ .t�i f & C.Y"��� I%'r Pl NN RiC l A Y�+�4:�.'.: � 5 •INI IA AREA OF FOCUS y 'PLAN VIEW 'GROVI: Syyr k.' �y�•.. .Jr�f ntA\Rh'FR t T �� t'L\N'IATIONi CONTEXT MAP r ,• �, A � '" •k �"�.rrw.esnva. L'�4a�t �e. • • ,ELEVATION(1-3)EARS) 50'MIN.TYPICAL BUFFER SECTION (AREA..B») �q p Y ELL1 A'l ION (5-+-YEARS) °' BUFFER EXHIBIT (THE GROVE NEIGHBORHOOD) Z) o THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK 0- :3 00 r+ 7 N M C_ w 3 r O N •P Qo � ' L, W Five-foot Concrete Pedestrian Sidewalk Exhibit IM z IZ+ Q r U U x Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 &3 page 37 of 46 i I ` 'r I Li I r 1 Illustrative Rendering Overlay J, w/� z k 1 1 -1- z Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 &3 page 38 of 46 Hydrology o6 m vd o9 ai 89 te Q ¢ ry0 : u0 tl J�z V o 0 ` �X / O6Z 0-2 .- -_7 7 ~ wWi w 01 Tj r �/ 7717 7 `�Cy xx Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 &3 page 39 of 46 ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF i RED CLAY BRICK VENEER �� 11 I'll 1111 ' ASPHALT SHINGLE ROFF:; f l • I, WHITE PVC TRIM Q N �;. RED CLAY WH'IITE ( _ — TRIM r GOLF SIMULATOR BUILDING 3029 ARNOLD PALMER DRIVE CD Un o v fD m O L O N cu 9 Site Photos .ate. a � � �- +aa•� i , A. w � Ov Site Photos k r` I 4 ' � s s K.k rs e i ... ... e yy. + 7 7 k4 y� 7 Disclosure VAVIRGINIA Disclosure BEACH Statement The disclosures contained in this form are necessary to inform public officials who may vote on the application as to whether they have a conflict of interest under Virginia low.Completion and submission of this form is required for all applications that pertain to City real estate matters or to the development and/or use of property in the City of Virginia Beach requiring action by the City Council, boards, commissions, or other bodies. SECTIONDISCLOSURE APPLICANT INFORMATION Applicant Name: as listed on application Harrison and Lear, Inc. Is Applicant also the Owner of the subject property? Yeso Noe If no,Property Owner must complete SECTION 2:PROPERTY OWNER DISCLOSURE(page 3). Does Applicant have a Representative?Yese No() If yes,name Representative: Jonathan Skinner Is Applicant a corporation,partnership,firm,business,trust or unincorporated business? Yes@Noo If yes,list the names of all officers,directors,members,or trustees below AND businesses that have a parent-subsidiary'or offiliated business entity-'relationship with the applicant.(Attach list if necessary.) a.h.a.T�c+�-cmrr srr.�o !aieTan s6inar-VrteHenl Lyra Bm1xw-6ecMxywe Tmafum HL14M W Lau C—ArkMoK—K LLG HWmn W Lw HaI&W.LLC;Hsiem end Leer Land Cc par Does the subject property have a proposed or pending purchaser? YesiT Nod if yes,name proposed or pending purchaser: Harrison and Lear, Inc. KNOWN INTEREST BY PUBLIC OFFICIAL OR EMPLOYEE Does an official or employee of the City of Virginia Beach have an Interest in the subject land or any proposed development contingent on the subject public action? Yes©No0 !f yes,name the official or employee,and describe the nature of their interest. APPLICANT SERVICES DISCLOSURE READ:The Applicant must certify whether the following services are being provided in connection to the subject application or any business operating or to be operated on the property. The name of the entity and/or individual providing such services must be identified.(Attach list if necessary.) SERVICE YES NO SERVICE PROVIDER (Name entity and/or!ndlvidua!L____ Financing(mortgage,deeds of trust,' Q O cross-collateralization,etc.) Real Estate Broker/Agent/Realtor © 0 Disclosure Statement I rev. May-2024 page 1 of 3 Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 43 of 46 Disclosure SECTIONDISCLOSURE continued SERVICE YES NO SERVICE PROVIDER (Name entity_onwor individual) Accounting/Tax Return Preparation © 0 Architect/Designer/Landscape Q © WPC-Land�pekchned:,m-811�MroM,Nmks�W1wSM5, Arch iWe LLand Planner Construction Contractor O O Engineer/Surveyor/Agent Q 4 VHB-Civil Engineering-J.D.Hines,Matt Mader,Sean Becket Legal Services Q Wolcott Rivers,Gates Christopherok Pocta&Leslie R.Watson APPLICANT CERTIFICATION READ.-i certify that all information contained in this Form is complete,true,and accurate.I understand that upon receipt of notification that the application has been scheduled for public hearing,i am responsible for updating the information provided herein three weeks prior to the meeting of Planning Commission, City Council,VBDA,CBPA,Wetlands Board or any public body or committee in connection with this application. Applicant Name(Print) 'Applicant Signature Date 1"Parent-subsidiary relationship"means"a relationship that exists when one corporation directly or indirectly owns shares possessing more than 50 percent of the voting power of another corporation."See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act,VA,Code§2.2-3101. 2 Affiliated business entity relationship"means"a relationship,other than parent-subsidiary relationship, that exists when(i)one business entity has a controlling ownership interest in the other business entity,(h) a controlling owner in one entity is also a controlling owner in the other entity,or(III)there is shared management or control between the business entities.Factors that should be considered in determining the existence of an affiliated business entity relationship include that the some person or substantially the some person own or manage the two entities,there are common or commingled funds or assets;the business entities share the use of the same offices or employees or otherwise share activities,resources or personnel on a regular basis;or there is otherwise a close working relationship between the entities."See State and Local Government Conflict of interests Act;Va.Cade§2.2-3101. FOR CITY USE ONLY: No changes as of(date): 3/13/2026 Marchelle L. Coleman 3/13/2026 Staff Name(Print) Staff Signature Date Disclosure Statement i rev. May-2024 page 2 of 3 Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 44 of 46 Disclosure SECTION - •- OWNER DISCLOSURE PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION Property Owner Name: as listed on application JBWK LLC &WHITE CLOVER LLC Is the Owner a corporation,partnership,firm,business,trust,or unincorporated business? Yes( Noo If yes,list the names of all officers,directors,members,or trustees below AND businesses that have a parent-subsidiary'or affiliated business entity z relationship with the a2plicant.(Attach list if necessary.) David La Clair-Sole Member/Manager JBWK&White Clover John McIntyre S cial Manager Does the subject property have a proposed or pending purchaser? YesO No© If yes,name proposed or pending purchaser: Harrison and Lear, Inc. KNOWN INTEREST BY PUBLIC:OFFICIAL OR EMPLOYEE Does an official or employee of the City of Virginia Beach have an interest in the subject land or any proposed development contingent on the subject public action? Yes C) Noe if es,name the official or employee,and describe the nature of their interest. i i PROPERTY OWNER SERVICES DISCLOSURE READ:The Owner must certify whether the following services are being provided in connection to the subject application or any business operating or to be operated on the property.The name of the entity or individual providing such services must be identified.(Attach list if necessary.) SERVICE YES NO SERVICE PROVIDER Name entity and/or individual Financing(mortgage,deeds of trust, © Q cross-collateralization,etc.) Real Estate Broker/Agent/Realtor Accounting/Tax Return Preparation Q Architect/Designer/Landscape o O Architect/Land Planner _ Construction Contractor ® O Engineer/Surveyor/Agent _ _ .�.- --------------_.------ John D.McIntyre-McIntyre Thanasides Bringgold Lega ll Services O © Elliott Grimaldi&Guito.PA.,PC PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION READ:I certify that all information contained in this Form is complete,true,and accurate.i understand that, upon receipt of notification that the application has been scheduled for public hearing, i am responsible for updating the information provided herein three weeks prior to the meeting of Planning Commission, City Council, VBDA,CBPA, Wetlands Board or any public body or committee in connection with this application. j�t l<�L(G /6.'ft �lovv LG( %✓ 5�. it�r /l_ , .,,�( /G/zC Property Owner Name(Print) Property Owner Sigiiature Date Disclosure Statement I rev. May-2024 page 3 of3� Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 45 of 46 Next Steps • Upon receiving a recommendation from Planning Commission, this request will be scheduled for a City Council public hearing. Staff will inform the applicant and/or their representative of the date of the hearing in the upcoming days. • Following City Council's decision, the applicant will receive a decision letter from Staff. • Once the conditions of approval are in place and/or completed, the applicant must contact the Zoning Division of the Planning Department to obtain verification that the conditions have been met. Contact the Zoning Division at 757-385-8074. • If the request requires land disturbance and/or a subdivision of property, please contact the Development Services Center (DSC)to discuss next steps for site plan/plat review. Contact the DSC at 757-385-4621 or the Development Liaison Team at 757-38S-5692. • Please note that further conditions may be required during the administration of applicable City Ordinances and Standards. Any site plan submitted with this application may require revision during detailed site plan review to meet all applicable City Codes and Standards. All applicable permits required by the City Code, including those administered by the Department of Planning/ Development Services Center and Department of Planning/ Permits and Inspections Division, and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, are required before any approvals allowed by this application are valid. • The applicant is encouraged to contact and work with the Crime Prevention Office within the Police Department for crime prevention techniques and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) concepts and strategies as they pertain to this site. Harrison and Lear, Inc Agenda Items 2 & 3 page 46 of 46 MODIFICATIONS TO PROFFERED COVENANTS,RESTRICTIONS, AND CONDITIONS JBWK, LLC, a New Mexico limited liability company; WHITE CLOVER,LLC, a New Mexico limited liability company; and HARRISON AND LEAR, INC.,a Virginia corporation MODIFICATIONS TO(PROFERRED COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS) CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, a municipal corporation of the Commonwealth of Virginia THIS AGREEMENT,made this 3rd day of November,2025,by and between JBWK,LLC, a New Mexico limited liability company ("JBWK"), and White Clover, LLC, a New Mexico limited liability company ("WC"), JBWK and WC are collectively referred to as the party of the first part, HARRISON AND LEAR, INC., a Virginia corporation, party of the second part, the party of the first part and party of the second part are collectively referred to herein as the "Grantors", and THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, a mumicipal corporation of the Commonwealth of Virginia (hereinafter referred to as the "Grantee", and to be indexed as Grantee). WITNESSETH. WHEREAS, JBWK is the owner of four (4) parcels of land which are hereinafter collectively referred to as the"JBWK Property"located in District 2 of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, containing an aggregate of 202.01 acres, designated as Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 4 on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; WHEREAS,WC is the owner of two(2)parcels of land which are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "WC Property" located in District 2 of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, containing an aggregate of 1.61 acres, designated as Parcels 5 and 6 on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; 1 GPIN(s): 1493-85-9520-0000 Prepared by: Christopher A. Pocta,Esq. 1493-66-7436-0000 Wolcott Rivers Gates 1493-63-7894-0000 4417 Corporation Lane 1493-54-3952-0000 Suite 400 1493-75-7869-0000 Virginia Beach,VA 23462 1493-75-9705-0000 WHEREAS, the Grantors have filed a conditional rezoning application, whereby the Grantors request to rezone a portion of the JBWK Property, which is hereinafter referred as the "Property," containing an aggregate of 86.04 acres, designated as follows on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference: (a) Parcel A, less and except that area identified as P-1 thereon; (b) Parcel C; and Parcel D, less and except that area identified as P-1 thereon; WHEREAS, the Grantors have initiated a conditional amendment to the Zoning Map of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, by petition addressed to the Grantee so as to change the Zoning Classifications of Parcel A from P-1 Preservation District to Conditional PD-H2 Planned Unit Development District(R-20 Residential District)and P-1 Preservation District;Parcel C from PD-H1 Planned Unit Development District and P-1.Preservation District to Conditional PD-H2 Planned Unit Development District(R-20 Residential District) and P-1 Preservation District; and Parcel D from PD-H1 Planned Unit Development District and P-1 Preservation District to Conditional PD-H2 Planned Unit Development District (R-20 Residential District) and P-1 Preservation District;as identified on the exhibit attached hereto as Exhibit B; WHEREAS, the Grantee's policy is to provide only for the orderly development of land for various purposes though zoning and other land development legislation; WHEREAS, the Grantors acknowledge that competing and sometimes incompatible uses conflict and that in order to permit differing uses on and in the area of the Property and at the same time to recognize the effects of change, and the need for various types of uses,certain reasonable conditions governing the use of the Property for the protection of the community that are not generally applicable to land similarly zoned are needed to address the situation to which the Grantors' rezoning application gives rise; WHEREAS,the Grantors desire to change the conditions affecting the properties identified as "Village Commons", "The Signature' Golf Course", "Residential", and "Community Greenspace" as adopted by the Conceptual Master Plan of Indian River Plantation and The Villages at West Neck,prepared by The TAF Group,dated January 14, 1999,and any amendments thereto(the"West Neck Land Use Plan"),without affecting or altering those conditions contained in the West Neck Land Use Plan relating to the properties other than the Property; WHEREAS,the Grantors have voluntarily proffered,in writing,in advance of and prior to the public hearing before the Grantee,as a part of the proposed amendment to the Zoning Map, in 2 addition to the regulations provided for in the R-20, P-1, and PD-H2 Zoning Districts by the existing overall City Zoning Ordinance (the "CZO"), the following reasonable conditions related to the physical development, operation, and use of the Property to be adopted as a part of said amendment to the Zoning Map relative and applicable to the Property, which has a reasonable relation to the rezoning and the need for which is generated by the rezoning; WHEREAS, said conditions having been proffered by the Grantors and allowed and accepted by the Grantee as part of the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, such conditions shall continue in full force and effect until a subsequent amendment changes the zoning on the Property covered by such conditions; provided however, that such conditions shall continue despite a subsequent amendment if the subsequent amendment is part of the comprehensive implementation of a new or substantially revised Zoning Ordinance, unless, notwithstanding the foregoing, these conditions are amended or varied by written instrument recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia and executed by the record owner of the subject Property at the time of recordation of such instrument; provided, finrther, that said instrument is consented to by the Grantee in writing as evidenced by a certified copy of the ordinance or resolution adopted by the governing body of the Grantee,after a public hearing before the Grantee advertises pursuant to the provisions of the Code of Virginia,Section 15.2-2204,which said ordinance or resolution shall be recorded along with said instrument as conclusive evidence of such consent; NOW, THEREFORE, the Grantors, for themselves, their successors, personal representatives, assigns, grantee, and other successors in title or interest, voluntarily and without any requirement by or exaction from the Grantee or its governing body and without any element or compulsion or quid pro quo for conditional use, site plan, or building permit, hereby make the following amended declaration of conditions and restrictions which, along with the unchanged covenants,conditions and restrictions set forth in the Proffers shall restrict and govern the physical development, operation, and use of the Property and hereby covenants and agrees that this declaration shall constitute covenants running with the Property, which shall be binding upon the Property and upon all parties and persons claim under or through the Grantors, their successors, personal representatives, assigns, grantees,and other successors in interest or title: 3 1. When the Property is developed, the layout, land uses, recreation and open spaces shall be in substantial conformance with the exhibit entitled, "Conceptual Master Plan, Preserve at West Neck, Virginia Beach, VA,"prepared by WPL and found on pages I and 2 of the multi-page document entitled "The Preserve at West Neck Development & Design Criteria Land Use Plan,"prepared by WPL, VHB, and Harrison and Lear, dated November 3, 2025, and revised on January 5,2026 and February 27, 2026,which have been exhibited to the City of Virginia Beach City Council and are on file with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning and Community Development (hereinafter the "Concept Plan" and "The Preserve at West Neck Development & Design Criteria Land Use Plan", respectively). The Concept Plan and The Preserve at West Neck Development&Design Criteria Land Use Plan are incorporated herein by this reference. 2. When the Property is developed, the land uses; layout; trail section; roadway sections with street widths, curb heights; and development criteria to include building elevations, lot dimensions, setbacks, building heights, buffers, and reforestation shall be as set forth in the multi-page document entitled, "The Preserve at West Neck Design & Development Criteria Land Use Plan",prepared by WPL,VHB,and Harrison&Lear,Inc.,dated November 3,2025 and revised on January 5, 2026 and February 27, 2026, and which has been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council, is on file with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning and Community Development, and is incorporated herein by this reference. The dimensional requirements identified in The Preserve at West Neck Design & Development Criteria Land Use Plan shall be in lieu of all corresponding criteria in the Virginia Beach Zoning Ordinance (the"Zoning Ordinance")applicable to the R-20 Residential District. 3. When the Property is developed, the number of residential dwelling units thereon shall not exceed one hundred forty-three(143). 4. When the Property is developed, all residential structures constructed on the Property shall be in substantial conformance with the conceptual architectural exhibit entitled, "Residential Dwelling Precedent Images,The Preserve at West Neck", which has been provided within The Preserve at West Neck Development & Design Criteria Land Use Plan and exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning and Community Development. Exterior building materials shall be of high quality and include 4 the use of cement fiber siding, brick and asphalt shingle roofing. � g> p g g. The use of exterior vinyl siding shall be prohibited on the principal dwellings. 5. As and when each subdivision plat of the Property is recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia ("Clerk's Office"), the Grantors shall record in the Clerk's Office a Declaration submitting the property shown thereon to restrictive covenants governing the use and occupancy of the Property, including, without limitation, a covenant that imposes a mandatory membership in the Preserve at West Neck Homeowners' Association ("HOA") for each owner of a subdivided residential lot. The open space(as that term is defined in Section 1127 of the CZO)shown on such subdivision plats shall be conveyed to the HOA, which shall be responsible for maintaining all of the following area on the Property: multi-use trail system, entrance feature signage, and other improvements in the common area of the Property as depicted on the Concept Plan. 6. The multi-use paths and water quality improvements depicted on the Concept Plan shall be installed within twelve (12) months of approval of the Erosion and Sediment Control/Stormwater Management Plan or Construction Plan by the City of Virginia Beach, whichever is approved first. 7. Prior to the turnover of the HOA from the Grantors to the property owners, as set forth in the Virginia Property Owners Association Act established in Title 55.1 Chapter 18 of the Code of Virginia, the Grantors shall perform a Reserve Study and post a Performance Bond, to the benefit of the HOA, to subsidize any deficit identified in the Reserve Study. 8. As part of the site plan approval process and subject to the approval of the Department of Public Works / Traffic Engineering Staff ("Traffic Engineering Staff"), the Grantors will design and construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Signature Drive and West Neck Road (the "Traffic Signal"), in accordance with the City of Virginia Beach Public Works Design Standards Manual. The cost of design and construction of the Traffic Signal will be at the Grantors' sole expense; and the Traffic Signal shall be installed and frilly operational with the completion of site construction,prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. 9. The design and building materials of all street lighting shall be complementary to the lighting within the Villages at West Neck and Indian River Plantation. 5 i I 10. The design and building materials of all new fencing or fencing which is replaced when the Property is developed shall be complementary to the fencing within the Villages at West Neck and Indian River Plantation. 11. The design, dimensions, and building materials of any monument-style neighborhood identification sign shall be complementary to the neighborhood identification signs throughout the Villages at West Neck and Indian River Plantation. 12. The final stormwater management plan submitted to the Development Services Center(DSC) during the site plan review process for the development of the Project shall comply with applicable City Stormwater Management Ordinance(s). 13. When the Property is developed,the Property will be developed in accordance with the exhibit entitled"Open Space Exhibit", which is dated March 4, 2026,has been prepared by WPL,has been exhibited to the City Council, and is on file with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning and Community Development. The Open Space Exhibit is incorporated herein by this reference. Upon establishment of the HOA and completion of the proposed reforestation and proposed multi-use trail system identified on the Concept Plan and located in that portion of Parcel A to remain P-1 ("Conservation Area"),JBWK shall convey title to the Conservation Area to the HOA. For the secondary trails referred to herein this Proffer or otherwise identified as "Proposed Multi-Use Trail System" on the Concept Plan, JBWK will record an easement sufficient to convey public access to said trails immediately prior to conveying title to the Conservation Area to the HOA. 14. Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy (a "CO") for the proposed residential development(the"Housing Development"), the City of Virginia Beach shall have approved a land disturbance permit and associated site-plan (the "LDP") for the proposed 9-hole (minimum) golf course(the"Golf Course") on that area identified on the Open Space Exhibit as New 9 Hole Golf Course(the"Golf Course Property"). 15. Until such time as the Golf Course is open and operational,no more than 50%of the CO's will be issued for the Housing Development. 16.JBWK shall convey title to the Golf Course Property by Deed of Gift to the HOA upon establishment of the HOA, provided that the Golf Course Property has not previously been conveyed to the Homeowners' Association for the Villages at West Neck, the Homeowners' 6 Association for Indian River Plantation, or a joint venture between the same, with any such conveyance being subject to a ground lease for the operation of the Golf Course. Said ground lease will contain certain provisions that it will automatically terminate on the earlier of(i) after opening as a golf course,the date that the Golf Course has been closed on an uninterrupted basis for eighteen(18)months;or(ii)the five(5)year anniversary of recordation of this proffer agreement, provided that the Golf Course has not been substantially completed and begun operations as a 9-hole(minimum) golf course. 17. Further conditions may be required by the Grantee during the detailed review of the Conceptual Plan and Review Set and administration of applicable City Codes by all cognizant City agencies and departments to meet all applicable City Code requirements. 18. Further conditions lawfully imposed by applicable development ordinances may be required by Grantee during detailed site plan and/or resubdivision review and administration of applicable City Codes by all relevant City agencies and departments to meet all applicable City Code Requirements. 19. All references hereinabove to the PD-H2 Zoning District and to the requirements and regulations applicable thereto refer to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, in force as of the date of approval of this Agreement by City Council, which are by this reference incorporated herein. 20. Except as expressly superseded and/or modified herein, all Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions as set forth in the "Proffered Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions" dated January 14, 1999,accepted by the Grantee and are recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, in Deed Book 4081, at Page 206, and any amendments or supplements thereto,are ratified,affirmed,and remain binding on the Property. 21. The above conditions, having been proffered by the Grantors and allowed and accepted by the Grantee as part of the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, shall continue in full force and effect until a subsequent amendment changes the zoning of the Property and specifically repeals such conditions. Such conditions shall continue despite a subsequent amendment to the Zoning Ordinance even if the subsequent amendment is part of a comprehensive implementation of a new or substantially revised Zoning Ordinance until specifically repealed. The conditions,however,may be repeated,amended,or varied by written instrument recorded 7 in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach,Virginia,and executed by the second by the record owner of the Property at the time of recordation of such instrument, provided that said instrument is consented to by the Grantee in writing as evidenced by a certified copy of an ordinance or a resolution adopted by the governing body of the Grantee, after a public hearing before the Grantee which was advertised pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amendment. Said ordinance or resolution shall be recorded along with said instruments as conclusive evidence of such consent, and if not so recorded, said instrument shall be void. The Grantors covenant and agree that: (a) The Zoning Administrator of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia shall be vested with all necessary authority,on behalf of the governing body of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia to administer and enforce the foregoing conditions and restrictions, including the authority (i) to order, in writing, that any noncompliance with such conditions be remedied, and (ii)to bring legal action or suit to insure compliance with such conditions,including mandatory or prohibitory jurisdiction, abatement,damages, or other appropriate action, suit or proceeding; (b) The failure to meet all conditions and restrictions shall constitute cause to deny the issuance of any of the required building or occupancy permits as may be appropriate; (c) If aggrieved by any decision of the Zoning Administrator,made pursuant to these provisions, the Grantors shall petition the governing body for the review thereof prior to instituting proceedings in court; and (d) The Zoning Map may show by an appropriate symbol on the map the existence of conditions attaching to the zoning of the Property, and the ordinances and conditions may be made readily available and accessible for public inspection in the office of the Zoning Administrator and in the Planning Department, and they shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach,Virginia,and indexed in the names of the Grantors and the Grantee. [Signature Page Follou s) 8 WITNESS the following signatures and seals: JBWK, LLC, a New Mexico limited liability company By: / (SEAL) Name:St- r' 1- Title:S,.«•u l`t.--„�� STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY/COUNTY OF Qr--p , to-wit: I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for my City/County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that" V-n 0 .b0bmtt Li0. fJBWK, LLC, a New Mexico limited liability company, whose name is signed to the foregoing instrument, has acknowledged the same before me this 21 day of , 2025, who is p5sonall known to me or has produced as identification. rx� O(L_j A , ellaaaa& Nota6 Public My Commission Expires: My Commission Number: a\�$� WENDY A.EDWARDS Commoaweatth of Virginia Notary Public C frin*nJon No.212895 My CW iS$iM Ev mi AM 90,2= 9 WITNESS the following signatures and seals: WHITE CLOVER, LLC a New Mexico limited liability company (SEAL) Name: J-,s. s STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY/COUNTY OF NoC,(�p Lk , to-wit: I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for my City/County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that�—ems ( ��nfi rL ,�p��a\ Mtt,nQ�opf WHITE CLOVER, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company, whose name is signed to the foregoing instrument,has OL acknowledged the same before me this � day of Y—, 2025, who is personally known to me or has produced as identification. Notary Public My Commission Expires: L-Of> Dna9 My Commission Number: a`am a ENDY A.EDWARDSommonweafth of Virgtn#allotary Publicommisston No.2r28g5+heuion F fires Arne 30.Ve 10 WITNESS the following signatures and seals: Harrison and Lear. Inc., a Virginia corporation By: U 1 SEAL) Name: ;1%4 > :e•�r,.� Title: -vas i Jetti" STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY/COUNTY OF H4-MerOAJ to-wit: 1, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for my City/County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that f pyts idt-t I— of n4yr;500L'Chet 4ekv,�Hc, a Virginia corporation, whose name is signed to the foregoing instrument, has acknowledged the same before me this 3� day of Aayfm ,2025,who is personally known to me o as identification. 1,10L MICIA ftal Notary Public f My Commission Expires: 63131 �XA ANGELA MICHELLE MARTINEZ NOTARY PUBLIC REGISTRATION#00339353 My Commission Number: t)b W 563 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 11MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 03/3112028 11 EXHIBIT A JBWK Property Description(s) PARCEL ]: ALL THAT certain lot,piece or parcel of land with the buildings and improvements thereon and the appurtenances thereunto belonging, situate, lying and being in the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia,and being known,numbered and designated as"PARCEL 1-3 A, 1,343,377 S.F.,30.840 AC.", as shown on that certain plat entitled, "SUBDIVISION GOLF COURSE PARCEL 1-3 `WEST NECK' M.B. 303,PG.96 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,VIRGINIA",which said plat is duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia as Instrument No. 201407030000695830(erroneously referenced in prior instruments as Instrument No.20140808000696150). PARCEL 2: ALL THAT certain piece or parcel of land,with the buildings and improvements thereon and the appurtenances thereunto belonging,situate,lying and being in the City of Virginia Beach,Virginia, and being known, numbered and designated as"GOLF COURSE PARCEL 14-16", as shown on that certain plat entitled, "SUBDIVISION OF VILLAGE E, F, G, H & GOLF COURSE AT `WEST NECK' FOR BAYMARK CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, REF. D.B. 4129, PG. 1937, D.B. 4129, PG. 1939, D.B. 4081, PG. 700, M.B. 279, PG. 82-84, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA",which said plat is duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia in Map Book 303,at pages 96 through 107, inclusive. PARCEL 3: ALL THAT certain piece or parcel of land,with the buildings and improvements thereon and the appurtenances thereunto belonging,situate,lying and being in the City of Virginia Beach,Virginia, and being known, numbered and designated as "GOLF COURSE PARCEL 4-11, 17, 18", as shown on that certain plat entitled,"SUBDIVISION OF VILLAGE E,F,G,H&GOLF COURSE AT `WEST NECK' FOR BAYMARK CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, REF. D.B. 4129, PG. 1937,D.B.4129, PG. 1939,D.B.4081, PG. 700,M.B. 279,PG. 82-84, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA",which said plat is duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia in Map Book 303,at pages 96 through 107, inclusive. TOGETHER WITH that certain piece of land added to GOLF COURSE PARCEL 4-11, 17 18 containing 3,747 S.F. or 0.086 AC. By the vacating of a property line depicted on that certain "PLAT OF INDIAN RIVER PLANTATION PHASE-TWO SECTION ONE, BEING SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL `Y' - PROPERTY OF BAYMARK CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION & GOLF COURSE PARCEL 4-11, 17, 18 - PROPERTY OF BAYMARK, L.L.C. (REF. M.B. 282, PG. 26-33, M.B. 303, PG. 96)",which plat duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, as Instrument Number 200409280154491. 12 PARCEL 4: ALL THAT certain piece or parcel of land,with the buildings and improvements thereon,and the appurtenances thereunto belonging,situate,lying and being in the City of Virginia Beach,Virginia, and being known, numbered and designated as "GOLF COURSE PARCEL 12-13-A" as shown on that certain plat entitled, "RESUBDIVISION OF VILLAGE G& GOLF COURSE PARCEL 12-13, SUBDIVISION OF VILLAGE E, F, G, H & GOLF COURSE AT 'WEST NECK', FOR BAYMARK CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION(M.B. 303,PG.96-107),VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA",which said plat is duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, as Instrument Number 200408180131343. IT BEING a portion of the same property conveyed to WC CAPITAL L.L.C.,by Special Warranty Corrected Substitute Trustee's Deed from Peter G. Zemanian, Substitute Trustee, said Deed dated 4/28/2020, and recorded 6/29/2021, in the Clerk's Office, Circuit Court, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, as Instrument Number 202103052602. Second Corrected Substitute Trustee's Deed recorded 5/30/2024 at Instrument Number 202403022342. WC Property Description(s) PARCELS 5 & 6: ALL THOSE certain pieces of parcels of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon and the appurtenances thereunto belonging, situate, lying and being in the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, and being known, numbered and designated as "PARCEL C" and "PARCEL D",all as shown on that certain plat entitled, "SUBDIVISION OF VILLAGE AT 'WEST NECK' FOR BAYMARK CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION,REF.D.B.4129, PG. 1939,M.B.279,pg.82- 84,VIRGINIA BEACH,VIRGINIA,"which said plat is duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, in Map Book 290, at pages 1 through 8, inclusive. 13 EXHIBIT B LOT LINES AND ZONING OVERLAY 14 Virginia Beach Planning Commission February 11, 2026 City Council Chambers Formal Hearing, 12:00 P.M. i Public Meeting Items #2 & 3 Harrison and Lear, Inc. Recommendation: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Discussion Clerk: Our final items are items 2 and 3, Harrison and Lear, Inc. Ms. Byler: Mr. Chair,I regret that I need to abstain from this vote for reasons that are stated and on record with the City attorney and a letter. Mr. Coston: Thank you. Mr. Pocta: Thank you, Chair Coston, Vice Chair Byler, members of the Planning Commission. Good afternoon, and thank you for your time. My name is Chris Pocta. I'm a land use and zoning attorney with the Wolcott Rivers Gates. I'm here on behalf of the applicant, Harrison and Lear, and I'm also here with other members of our team. Jonathan Skinner is the president of Harrison and Lear. Audrey Leishman is going to speak to the golf course component. Will Surge from WPL, the landscape architects, and Matt Mader from VHB on stormwater and traffic. It's a phenomenal team I'm glad to be a part of I want to thank Marchelle Coleman, the city attorneys, the staff, and the residents. Despite coming to a different conclusion than we would have hoped,they worked incredibly hard on this application and in dialogue with us for over, I think it's been almost four years now, working on a submission for this property. And then also thank you to the residents, residents of Indian River Plantation, West Neck, but also surrounding communities in the city of Virginia Beach. To put it simply,we are here to present a solution to a problem that has plagued a Virginia Beach neighborhood, in fact,two neighborhoods, for over six years. In 2019, the golf course of the Villages at West Neck, also known as Signature at West Neck, closed. More than 200 acres of land became closed,private,overgrown land that no resident could access or enjoy. For six years, this community has waited for a solution, and today we are presenting one. Harrison and Lear, the applicant, has been in the business for more than 60 years with a track record of high quality developments across Hampton roads. And we assembled a team of engineers, attorneys, and other land use professionals, and then committed to listening. Not once, but over four years now, listening, dialoguing, discussing. The numbers: a committee of community members that met 10 times over three years,eight hosted meetings attended by more than 560 surrounding homeowners, direct outreach to approximately 1,200 households, and six village-level sessions designed for smaller, more collaborative sessions, ongoing resident engagement and dialogue. This process produced real changes. Our original plan, if you recall, was Signature Meadows. Filed that back in 2024, but it didn't include golf, if you recall. When residents told us overwhelmingly that they wanted some form of golf back, we pulled back the application before this body's consideration. We absorbed the cost and delay because the community told us a better compromise was possible. That led us to discuss with Mark and Audrey Leishman. And Audrey Leishman's here today,and ultimately,the plan before you this evening. This project is the product of compromise and collaboration, shaped by the community it's designed to serve. I want to spend a moment on Mark and Audrey Leishman. Mark, who's not here tonight, he's golfing. He's a six-time PGA Tour winner and current live golf professional. His design partner on this course will be Ian Baker-Finch, an internationally recognized golf course designer. Their operations partner, Mike Bennett of Commonwealth Golf Asset Management, a proven professional course operator. These are world class credentials. Mrs. Leishman, who is here, is dedicated to her community and founded and runs a local nonprofit. She and Mark are raising their family in this community and have been since 2015. To them, this is not a business transaction. The golf course property is quite literally in their backyard. This is about investing in their community and bringing back an amenity that defined their neighborhood. They're putting their own time, their own effort, and their own money into this project. They've agreed, is my understanding, to a 50-year lease with two 15-year renewal options, 80 years of commitment to the community. We're proud to call them partners, and we believe this community could not ask for better stewards of its most important amenity. The project. Let me give you an overview of what we're actually proposing, because I think the details matter. The site, as you know, is 203 acres, approximately. While the overall land use plan for West Neck and the Preserve is proposed to be at 40% open space,more than 87%of this property remains open space:golf,preservation,and recreation. Only about nine% of this subject property is being used for new homes. First, we're restoring a championship quality nine-hole golf course, indoor and outdoor practice facilities, and fully operational clubhouse. This is a real, funded, professionally managed golf operation. The clubhouse will once again be a place where neighbors can gather, share a meal, and enjoy the community they chose to live in. We've heard many residents say about just how much they miss that. Second, we're creating large-scale reforestation areas with native species. We're preserving forested wetlands and woodland canopy. We're building a comprehensive trail network that connects every village in the community. We're creating managed meadows,community gardens, and vegetated buffers. WPL has done a masterful job with this part of the proposal. And their representative, Mr. Surge, is here to answer any questions on that point. Third, at the direction and under the guidance of VHB,we're making important stormwater infrastructure improvements. As the staff report confirmed,we're adding approximately three acres of additional detention and retention capacity. Staff noted that the city's DSC office reviewed the strategy and confirms it successfully complies with the stormwater regulations. The stormwater upgrades, though, they're not just a project benefit. It's a community benefit and a citywide priority. Fourth,we're funding a traffic signal at the West Neck Road and Signature Drive, entirely at the developer's expense, before the first certificate of occupancy can be issued. No cost sharing with the city or expense to the taxpayer. And yes, we have a residential component. If you recall, in the last iteration,I believe it was 159 homes with this proposal. That is reduced to 143. The component that makes all of the rest of this feasible, 143 homes all age restricted to residents 55 and older. One resident described this to me as, It sounds like essentially a new village within West Neck, designed to the same high-quality standard, serving the same demographic, and fitting within the community fabric. These homes have not been randomly placed. Our team has spent countless hours, years actually, designing this plan so that the least amount of homes would be directly affected as possible by the new construction. More than 95% of the current West Neck residents will not have construction directly adjacent to their properties. Those who are adjacent will have substantial buffers, a minimum of 50 feet of natural screening and layered landscaping, no new cut-through streets into any existing neighborhood, and the staff confirmed that the architecture is fully compliant with the transition area design guidelines. High quality materials,rural transitional design,no vinyl siding,and what staff called harmonious integration with the surroundings. I wish those were my words. The plan was designed so that every single resident in the community will benefit from the return of golf, the trails,the accessible open space, stormwater improvements, increased property values that come with a healthy and thriving neighborhood, and the restored pride of place that this community deserves the Comprehensive plan. Staff did a thorough job evaluating this project against the transition area design guidelines,and we appreciate their work. But the comprehensive plan is more than just two design guidelines. It contains adopted policy directives, and this project advances an extraordinary number of them. First, senior housing. The adopted comp plan directs the city to allow and encourage housing for seniors to meet their needs. And the draft 2040 comp plan, as I understand it, that you're working on, specifically identifies an objective to accommodate the future senior housing demand. This project delivers 143 age-restricted homes purpose-built for aging in place, and staff confirmed that the school impact is minimal to non-existent. Stormwater and flood mitigation, the project delivers three acres of new capacity and 19 acres of native reforestation. This is the adopted plan's natural mitigation strategy, implemented at zero public cost. Neighborhood stability, the adopted comp plan warns that the demise of neighborhoods is quickened when they're in the vicinity of abandoned, aging properties. It also states that underperforming properties are prime locations for adaptive reuse that could improve the quality of surrounding area, help absorb the housing demand, and increase the tax base. This is a rather unique property in the transition area in the sense that it is infill. Whereas many other places in the transition area are not like that. But that's the description of this project, converting a six-year community liability into a maintained, accessible and usable asset. The project also advances policies on environmental stewardship, strategically planned networks of natural lands, with clustering natural buffers and minimizing impervious cover. With housing on just nine% of the site. It fulfils a directive that all open space be connected by trails. On the preserved development side, multi-use trail. On the golf course side, again, golf cart paths. The draft 2040 priority policies direct staff to identify opportunities during private development to review how to protect and connect natural lands and open spaces. As you know, this entire property is disconnected at the moment. It's inaccessible, it's not usable, and it's disconnected. It will once again be connected. This advances the design principle to design with nature as well. Staff's recommendation. Staff recommended denial on two grounds, density and open space percentage. And I respectfully disagree with that conclusion. But before I address each a critical distinction, number one,the transition area design guidelines are just that, guidelines. That doesn't mean they're not important. They're significant, but they are not rules, nor law, nor ordinance. Previous transition area staff reports stated that the transition area design guidelines are guidance, not law, an important distinction. The Planning Commission has confirmed in several instances that density is just one factor and that benefits may outweigh the deviation. But I want to be clear, this project supports the guidelines. We designed this project to honor them. The staff states that in many ways,this project aligns with the recommendations in the guidelines and found our design consistent with the emphasis on blending with natural landscape and a harmonious integration with the surrounding environment. Keep in mind, no project has ever met every single one of the guidelines based on my research. I'd be glad to be proven wrong on this point. And the Heritage Park staff report. The staff wrote, no project will ever fully meet the provisions of the comprehensive plan for the transition area. A couple of examples: Victoria Park, 39%open space. Sherwood Lakes,2.2 units per acre. Princess Anne Village, 2.4 and then 2.5 units per acre. Cordell's Estates, which was in the transition area at the time it was approved. It's an important point. Everyone was approved because benefits outweigh, in these cases, deviations. Density. The staff reports that 2.79 units per acre community-wide. That's the proposal. The West Neck community was approved in 1999 at a density of 2.52 and was built out at 2.42. Something that was missed I find to be an important point in the informal today. Is that the department, the director of planning at the time,Bob Scott, in the staff report says the development potential was actually 1,082 units, and with our proposal we come under that, I believe at 1,079. But the actual increase, it's 0.37 units per acre, 0.27 units increased from what was approved. That's 27 one-hundredths of an acre. City Council has approved other projects in the transition area that exceed one-to-one and fail to meet the 50%open space. For that reason, this project does not set a precedent. But also because every other neighborhood in the transition area, with one exception in that city- owned property at the golf course at Heron Ridge, every other transition area neighborhood owns its own open space. That makes this project, this property, unique and not precedent setting. But what this proposal delivers, like other projects in the transition area that exceeded the one-to-one, are the benefits. Restored golf course, tenfold increase in accessible open space, 19 acres of reforestation, stormwater improvements, all at zero public cost. Open space. The guideline calls for 50%. We don't dispute that. We provide 40.1%, but the existing 45% is dominated by 175 acres of closed golf course that no resident can access. Only 3.79% is actually usable. Why is that significant? Because the design guidelines say there should be a balance of active and passive, and put markers, essential characteristics on it as usable,accessible, and visible. Right now,that property,that area does not meet that definition. And so,therefore, it's at 3.79% open space. The guidelines provide for that. But by that standard,this is a transformative improvement, 4%to 40%. And without this project, the amount of accessible, visible, usable space, open space, remains at less than 4%, a staggering deviation from the guidelines. What's the intent of the guidelines? I think that's really important as you weigh your decision here. Infrastructure and agriculture. Those two things have always been woven, from 1979 through the present of transition area design, guidelines, priorities, and policy. Why do we even have the one-to-one unit per acre? Much of it had to do, yes, with traffic equivalents, like you discussed earlier, but health. What do you mean by that? Septic, you needed at least an acre of land to have a septic system there. We are not proposing to rezone any active agricultural farmland. And those neighborhoods in the transition area, since that one-to-one unit per acre, based on that health consideration, have been built out. The infrastructure is now here. And agriculture, that's the other tenant of the design guidelines. This is the first application that I can recall in the transition area of a neighborhood like this to not rezone it from agriculture. It's already rezoned from agriculture back in 1999. Commissioners, let me step back from the technical and speak to the practical reality. Since 2019, this property has been embroiled in controversy. It's torn a community apart. I think we see it here today. Neighbors who used to share a round of golf or a meal at the clubhouse now find themselves on opposite sides of a fight. Lawsuits back and forth,overgrowth,deterioration. This project provides a real, funded, professionally backed solution. It restores an amenity that defined this neighborhood. It transforms more than 200 acres of blighted and inaccessible land into maintained, accessible open space. It builds trails that connect villages. It delivers 143 senior homes that the city needs. All of this at zero public cost. And I want to be direct with you. It's my understanding there is no backup plan. There's no alternative. If this application is denied, it's my understanding that this land would remain closed,private,and deteriorating,as it has been. There's no other proposal that I'm aware of on the table. This may represent the last viable opportunity for a long-term solution. So, this ask, we request that you recognize the significance of the open space, despite the slight deviation in density. And the fact that these significant benefits,just like those other projects that exceeded one-to-one or didn't meet 50% open space, justify making a decision as a planning commission to recommend approval of this application. And before I realize I have about one minute left. Over the course of the last couple of weeks, there have been some requests from residents and from discussions with the city and City Attorney's Office for any additional protections that might be possible. On the front end of the golf course and the back end of the golf course. So in discussions with my client, I've got the authority to volunteer, which I think would happen from you all, in your recommendation, if you make one between Planning Commission and City Council, the following two. That in the event the golf course contemplated in the application ceases operation, if that exceeds a year of cessation, the grantor agrees to negotiate in good faith with the proper authorities of the city of Virginia Beach to enter into an open space agreement or easement as contemplated by the Virginia Code,stating that no homes will be built on this property and a landscape maintenance plan will be proffered. The second one. No certificate of occupancy will be issued for the Preserve housing development until construction of the golf course commences and they've received the issuance of a land disturbance permit for the golf course. So with that, I'll yield the rest of my five seconds. And I understand there will be questions later. Our team is available to answer any of those questions. And thank you again for your consideration. Mr. Coston: Commissioner Mauch. Mr. Mauch: Yeah, I have some questions about the overall. This is a very and Chris, you might want to answer these, but. It's a very complex piece of property. We have an established golf course community without a golf course, and now we're taking the inside of a community and trying to create a new community, is the idea with a nine-hole golf course. And so what is the breakdown of the land that is going to be developed and the land that's going to be retained by the current ownership? Mr.Pocta: Yeah,so I think an exhibit was circulated. If it hasn't yet, okay,great,because I know this question was asked in the informal. So the applicant, who's Jonathan Skinner, Harrison and Lear,he's got a contract for the purchase of the property that's going to be rezoned PD-H2,which is essentially the new development. Mr. Skinner, please correct me if I'm wrong on any of this, which is essentially going to be rezoned PD-H2. Everything else that's to remain P-1 and the golf course component of this,you can almost see it like, on the left-hand side of your exhibit,not the exhibit that's up here, but on the left-hand side of your exhibit is the PD-H2 development, if you will, and then on the right side is the golf course, the proposed golf course. And on the right side, that is going to be leased and operated as a golf course by the Leishmans. Mr. Mauch: Okay. Mr. Pocta: I don't know what the breakdown of acreage is offhand,but I can get that to you. Mr.Mauch: No,that's okay. I think what is going to be a part of the HOA use,and what is going to be retained by the ownership,that's not going to be a part of it? Mr. Pocta: Sure. I'm going to ask, actually, Mr. Skinner to come up and address that. Not only because he's the applicant,but because he regularly establishes HOAs. Mr. Skinner: Good afternoon, Chairperson Coston and Chairperson Byler and fellow planning commissioners. If I could, ask the staff to bring up the lot lines and zoning overlay map. Page 24 of the staff report. Oh, that is helpful. Thank you, Marchelle. So to answer your question, Commissioner Mauch, the PD-H2 zoned areas, excluding the small parcel on the left hand side, which is labeled PD-H1 to P-1, that would be the areas comprised by the development in HOA. Mr. Mauch: So that would be the pink area or orange? Mr. Skinner: Yes. The pinkish orange, excluding that small piece on the left. Salmon,yes. Mr. Mauch: And how much acreage does that comprise of? Mr. Skinner: Let me just check this exhibit one moment. Mr. Mauch: I think I see 75.08. Mr. Skinner: It's about 64 acres that's comprised in our part, and then the PD-H1 to P-1 section that I mentioned a moment ago is 12.2 acres. But that is not part of the development or HOA, so it's approximately 63. Mr. Mauch: Okay, so 63, and that's what's going to be for use for all HOAs in that? Mr. Skinner: That is where the housing and the majority of the walking trails will occur. The green area,that's a bit like an elbow near the top of it, is a preservation area. That also will involve walking trails and reforestation as part of the proposal. Mr. Mauch: Okay, so that will be a part of the active and passive recreation? Mr. Skinner: Correct. Mr.Mauch: And then the buffer zones,I mean the buffer,I believe that there was a minimum of 50 feet. Is what Mr. Skinner? Are those going to be a part of the active and passive, or are there going to be lot lines that just go to the water, then to the water itself? Mr.Skinner: The buffer areas will in many areas actually have walking trails in them. And those will be part of the HOA's responsibility to maintain that. Mr. Mauch: Okay, and then what is the portion of the unretained tracks? Mr. Skinner: Primarily the green and the blue. The owner retained the majority of the green area to the right. Bottom is going to be the golf course, the nine hole championship course, with the practice area. The elbow that I mentioned to the upper left is going to be preservation, walking trails and reforestation. Mr. Mauch: Okay, and the active and passive recreation will be allowable on the golf course as well. That's being considered in the yes. Mr. Skinner: The cart paths will be accessible and usable. Mr.Mauch: And how big is,what is the amount of acreage of the golf course? Mr. Skinner: The proposed nine hole was,one moment. It's about 87 or 88 acres that comprise the proposed nine-hole golf course practice area. Mr.Mauch: Okay, and is that land going to be conveyed to the HOA? Mr. Skinner: No, the current property owner and the Leishmans, with the group that they are organizing,to Chris's highlights,have agreed to a 50-year lease with two 15-year renewal periods. But ownership will remain with the current owner of that acreage. Mr.Mauch: So similar to how the site was built originally. When Signature was there? Mr. Skinner: Oh,yes, the original developer retained the golf course. Mr.Mauch: Yes. Okay, Alright. I'll yield to some other people for questions. Mr. Plumlee: I thought we had discussed a procedure where we were waiting for questioning until everyone's had an opportunity to speak. Am I miss remembering? Was that not for applicant? Mr.Mauch: I thought that was for the public. Mr. Plumlee: Not for the applicant. Okay. Mr. Coston: Mr. Camp? Mr. Camp: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Excuse me, both of you just spoke a moment about opening up public access into more of the property, and you reference these trails. I'd like to put a finer point on that,please,because I didn't quite understand it. And Mr. Pocta, I think you and I spoke at one point about this, but I'd like to get it right. I believe you said that the proposal includes roughly four miles of pathways through the overall development. However, I understood that a significant number of those miles are part of the golf course. And when you and I spoke, and it made sense to me, that people will not be allowed to bicycle, jog, walk through an active golf course, because it'd be distracting, it would be unsafe. And so to say that those paths are really part of a comprehensive network of trails, in the sense that people could use them in the same way as some of the other pathways, I didn't reconcile that. Could you please clarify, are there actually two categories of pathways? One that is part of the golf course for people playing golf, and others that are part of a recreational amenity for the rest of the folks. Mr. Pocta: Thank you, Commissioner Camp. Your conclusion is accurate. Of the 4.2 miles, approximately 1.7 of those miles will be walking trails that are open around the clock. The remaining 2.5 miles will be cart paths with limited access while golf is being played, but at other times will be open and accessible throughout. Mr. Camp: Alright. Thank you for the clarification. I appreciate putting that on a finer point. And then,Attorney Pocta, I have one question about the new information that you shared with us at the opening of your remarks here. You mentioned two concepts that I believe you framed it that your client had authorized you to be amenable to. Did I understand at one of them, the open space agreement that your client has authorized you, should it come up here, to be agreeable to a reduction in real estate taxes for your client for 10 years in exchange for the promise not to develop for those 10 years? That is my understanding of what an open space agreement actually means in the city of Virginia Beach. Mr. Pocta: So, Commissioner Camp, a few points of clarification. One is that, it's my understanding, there's already a reduction in real estate taxes due to the fact that it's zone preservation. I could be wrong on that. Mr. Camp: You are. I am incorrect on that. Mr. Pocta: At least as compared to maybe a residential development,right, it would be assessed at a different value. The second thing is that what the proffer suggests, what we're volunteering, is for the grantor. As a property owner, we technically have to enter into an agreement with the city of Virginia Beach. This is what was,well, let me backtrack. So,there's a state code provision that provides for a couple of additional opportunities, I'll put it, for preservation of land. And the code provision is, if you want to look it up, 58.1-3233. And one of those provisions is, as you all discussed in the informal, it's an open space agreement. The open space agreement, I think it's got a cap on the low end at three years. It can't be any less than three years. It can't be any more than 10. It's my understanding that what the city does with other golf courses is it has these 10-year open space agreements. And then,when the time comes for renewal, they've got maybe a log, and then they renegotiate or reestablish the open space agreement,because it's rather statutory, kind of form-based. There's really not much negotiating that happens. Another option under that same code provision would be an easement. And the easement would extend beyond 10 years. So, in my opinion, would be more protective, if you will. What the proffer says is, and what Mr. Skinner has volunteered here, is that should the golf course close, stop operations. This was a concern that some residents brought up. What happens if it closes? If it closes, then what this proffer says is, at that point, after a year of it closing,because let's say there's a COVID event that has to close it for a couple of months or something, we would need some kind of time. We're suggesting a year. If it closes for a year, then the property owner would subject the property to an open space agreement at a bare minimum or an easement. I could get rid of the open space agreement altogether and just suggest easement. However,the easement requires a little bit more negotiation with the city attorney's office. The open space agreement is blanket. It's simple, it's statutory, so it would at least require the property owner to obligate itself to that. This does not present,I know your question came up in the informal,this does not presently exist on this property. It phased out or terminated on its own terms back in 2019. It's not existed since then, and so this was, to be quite honest with you,collaboration between the Leishmans and the applicant to get to the property owner to agree to something like this, which I found pretty astounding and remarkable. But nonetheless,that will be a binding proffer. Mr. Camp: So, to understand this, a reduction in real estate taxes, that is assessing the property based on use rather than market value, is an element of that agreement,too. Mr. Pocta: I can't speak to the real estate tax. I don't know if you're suggesting we ask for the different appropriation of real estate taxes. I don't know,but if that's what comes with it. Mr.Camp: That's what the agreement is. So,when you say we're open to it,there's also a benefit to your client. Mr.Pocta: No. Well,remember,my client is not the property owner. My client is the applicant. Mr. Camp: There is a benefit to the property owner. So,then my question shifts to our counsel. May an applicant before us be introducing new proffers at this moment? Ms. Eisenberg: I don't believe that's what is occurring. So, the applicant's representative can correct me if I'm wrong, but what I believe is happening is that they are volunteering that they would add an additional proffer between this hearing and the City Council hearing if this body would recommend that that proffer be added. So, what the planning commission will be voting on today is the current application that is before this body. But if there is a desire to see an additional proffer added,that can be made as part of the recommendation. It won't be conditioned on the approval or denial recommendation. But if it is something you would like to see,that could be recommended. And I believe that's what the applicant's representative is proposing. Mr. Pocta: That's correct. Mr. Camp: But I thought that a proffer is a voluntary gesture that we, the body, can't require or recommend that someone else voluntarily do something, that appears that we're putting pressure on them to do something and we're not allowed to do that. Ms. Eisenberg: Correct. That is why I said, what this commission will be voting on is the application that's before it today. But there is a city code provision that allows for the Planning Commission to make a recommendation to either add, modify or remove a proffer. But that recommendation is not,it would not be conditioned on the recommendation for approval or denial. So, in other words, you would still be voting to recommend approval or denial based on what is before you today, but you could also include a recommendation if you think that it would be preferable to see an additional proffer. And then the applicant,if they so choose,would have until at least 10 days prior to City Council to make that addition,modification, or removal of a proffer, but that is at their discretion, and it is not something that we would be requiring of them. It would still be voluntary. Mr. Plumlee: Can I clarify what I've heard? I just hope to. If it is voted upon, let's say as recommended for approval, and it's made part of the recommendation that there be this proffer, that's what we've considered, is it your position that while before the City council, the applicant would enjoy the benefit of the recommendation for approval, but not be required to go forward with the proffer that we make part of that, if we do. Ms. Eisenberg: And that is why I tried to make clear that the commission is voting on the application that is before it. So,there could be a motion that exists that would be a recommendation for denial,but could also include in the event that city council feels that this is an appropriate land use, that include a proffer to whatever they are seeking to do. So, you could recommend denial, but have the motion follow-up,but in the event the council also chooses or deems this appropriate, the Planning Commission would recommend an additional proffer that states something along the lines of XYZ. Or, if you think that this is an appropriate land use application, you can vote for approval and do the same recommendation. Mr. Plumlee: It's non-binding on the applicant, I think. Ms.Eisenberg: Correct. Proffers remain voluntary. Ms. Schoonover: I do have a question for Tori in relation to this specific thing before we move forward. Just for clarification, it's my understanding because all these questions are related to worries, that if we approve this and for some reason, they don't want to build a golf course, they can just willy-nilly go and build whatever they want over there without having to come back to us. It's my understanding that if, for some reason, there's a desire to not build a golf course after all, they have to come back to us. And then we have to re-approve a new project. Is that correct? Ms. Eisenberg: That is mostly correct. So, there would not be a requirement to make them construct the golf course. But yes, it is true that if they desired to develop something else that wasn't in accordance with this plan, they would have to come back and seek a modification in order to do so. Ms. Schoonover: Thank you. Mr. Coston: Commissioner Mauch and then Commissioner Cuellar. Mr. Mauch: I just wanted to clarify something. The parcel A, is that being maintained by the HOA or is that being owned by the current owner? Is that being retained by the current owner? Is that the elbow that's in the corner, top left hand? Mr. Pocta: Yeah, I'll let Jonathan speak to that further. Some of that's accurate. Mr. Skinner: Parcel A is, Commissioner Mauch, being maintained under the ownership of the current property owner. But through this plan,the current owner has agreed to the what is shown in our submitted plans: walking trails, reforestation, etc. And, if I may, Commissioner Camp,the genesis of what we've discussed had nothing to do with real estate tax reductions, but giving assurances that the golf course component of the plan would be delivered sooner than the housing component. Ms. Eisenberg: Chair, if I may just have one second, just in case anyone was looking at it, I should have told you that the code section that allows for that recommendation of an additional proffer is going to be found in section 107 1­16C. Mr. Coston: Thank you. Commissioner Cuellar. Ms. Cuellar: Hi, Mr. Pocta. My question is about the golf course as well. You had mentioned in your introductory remarks that there's this overwhelming support for a golf course. And certainly all the letters that I've received indicates the same. Can you just give me maybe a little more detail at the very end of your comments? And I wrote this down in reference to the golf course. You had said there would be no certificate of occupancy on the houses until the golf course was built. And just as I'm processing this,I'm hoping to,you know, avoid a negative parcel from, you know,what we're seeing right now,that's just so in disarray. And I feel like the residents are so passionate. It's why they bought their property. It's one of the reasons why they want to stay. And it's such a community builder for all families that live out there. Mr. Pocta: Yeah. So, it's Thank you for the question, Commissioner Cuellar. So, as Jonathan kind of mentioned the genesis of it a bit, how it arose is from the beginning. The intention has always been on this application from the Leishmans to invest significantly time, money, effort, etc. To restore nine holes of the golf course. In fact, they were even part of a previous offer,with the last application to try and get 18 holes. So,they've been working at trying to do this, spending time and resources,et cetera,and gathering investors to put back some form of a golf course. And the component that you have before you that was agreeable to the applicant, agreeable to the property owner, and workable for the Leishmans is what you've got. But at all times, the expectation,the intention on their part is to rebuild,restore this nine-hole golf course as set forth in the plans and is subject to a conditional use permit for a golf course and traffic studies based on a golf course. That's everyone's expectation all along the way. And in the last maybe three, four weeks, the notion came up, what can you do to further guarantee? I think if this application were still kind of in its genesis, what we would have done is just added those proffers at the time but already been filed,reviewed by staff,reviewed by the city attorney's office. And so it would have required to go back and change it,some kind of a deferral. So instead, I,you know,conversed with the city attorney's office,and it looked like an option could be. How do we guarantee this? Well,one add these proffers,but when could you do that and still not have to make these nice folks have to come back for another hearing? It would be between now and City Council. And so the specific proffer that you're asking about achieves the latter, the former end. So, on the front end, how do we guarantee even further? In addition to the things I already said, the lease, the use permit,the conceptual site plan,all the rest of it,what else could you do? Well,we could volunteer a proffer that says no certificate of occupancy. In other words, no one could move into these houses until the city has reviewed and approved a land disturbance permit with a site plan for the golf course, and the Leishmans have started construction on the golf course. So that's what the proffer says,which we think achieves that. That's where that came from. Ms. Cuellar: Thank you very much. Mr. Coston: Commissioner Schoonover? Ms. Schoonover: I know you've done a lot of outreach work with this, and I know there's more than one project. Did you sit down with the current association and discuss this specific project? Mr.Pocta: So,we attempt,we have attempted to on multiple occasions. So,you'll probably hear from some of the speakers in support and in opposition on why that has been difficult. But the first time we tried sitting down with a land use plan, we were told if you're not bringing back an 18 hole golf course,we're not meeting with you. So, and it's been very challenging to meet with the existing board, but I'm optimistic, I think that that can and should still happen. I think there are a lot of benefits that could work both ways between both associations. Sharing of things offers from the applicant to the existing HOA, but it would require a meeting between the current HOA board and Mr. Skinner's office. Ms.Schoonover: That actually brings you to my second question,which I'm guessing the answer to now. Why exactly is there going to be a separate association for this project, as opposed to just being tied to the original association? Mr. Pocta: Sure. That has a lot to do with the answer to the first question. I think Mr. Skinner thinks it would be ideal to, as you suggested, but without a formal meeting and arrangement with the existing HOA board, it's not feasible. It's not possible, but the applicant is willing to do that and would like to. Mr. Coston: Commissioner Anderson. Mr. Anderson: I think this is probably better for you, Mr. Skinner. I want to kind of change gears a little bit more construction minded,with the way my mind works. A couple of weeks ago at the presentation at Wave Church,and since then,and before then,there has been a lot of concern about construction during construction and the dirt and everything. You mentioned that it wasn't definite yet, but you were trying to get a construction entrance, separate entrance for all construction traffic to be able to stay away from any of the residents. So, I wanted to see where we were on that process. Mr.Skinner: Yes,Commissioner Anderson,we have been pursuing diligently an agreement. It's actually a city-owned property off of Indian River Road that is near the existing village, Wordsworth, towards the bottom of the map on the screen, although you can't quite see the city- owned property in its entirety. We have liaised with the farmer who currently leases that property. We're not at the point of reaching an agreement yet, but there is certainly a strong possibility of having a temporary construction easement. Now, that would be singularly for major construction equipment. It wouldn't be for the home building operation, where you have trades such as electricians and plumbers. We're more trying to respond during the course of our eight community meetings over the last three months with 600 plus attendees. There was a concern voiced repeatedly about construction traffic and noise. And both with the golf course proposal to reopen it, and with our proposal three acres of additional storm water. That's heavy, heavy equipment, loud equipment. Mr.Anderson: Bulldozers, graders, dump trucks. So,the construction entrance would be for the big yellow trucks from Caterpillar and the like. Do you have an idea? I mean, are we working with city staff, or is it just through the farmer? Mr. Skinner: We've coordinated both with city staff and with the leaseholder to get to the point where we're at now. Mr.Anderson: Okay. Thank you. Mr. Coston: Mr. Mauch? Mr. Mauch: Would you mind reading that voluntary proffer that you? I just want to hear it. Mr. Pocta: Sure. So, it's two. And think of it this way. Protection on the back end if the golf course fails,protection on the front end to ensure the golf course starts. The first one, in the event the golf course contemplated and described in this application ceases operation, with such cessation continuing for a period exceeding 12 months, the grantor agrees to negotiate in good faith with the proper authorities of the city of Virginia Beach in order to enter into an open space agreement or an easement as contemplated in Virginia Code 58.1-3233 stating that there will be no homes built on the golf course property and subject to a landscape maintenance plan for the golf course property upon mutually agreeable terms between the city and the grantor. And then the second one is that no certificate of occupancy will be issued for the Preserve housing development until the construction of the golf course commences and a land disturbance permit has been issued for the proposed golf course. Mr. Mauch: Okay, I definitely think it provides in the front and in the back end. The middle, I almost feel like it's lacking. I feel like somewhere we need to say, finish construction of a golf course and open as well. Because nothing's requiring you to, you could get the permit and start building the houses, and then you could never finish it. And then it just goes into open space. Do you see what I'm saying? Somewhere in there, there needs to be a protection that there will be a golf course, operational golf course that's finalized and open. Mr. Pocta: Yeah, I think the issue you've, I mean, there are a couple of issues with that. In theory, you know, I understand where that comes from in practice. And perhaps Mrs. Leishman can speak to this as well. But there's a couple of difficulties with it. You know, one, should something happen? Right. You know, I don't know if that something happens is, you know, untimely death. You know, I mean, if something serious happens, that interferes with that would constitute a violation of a proffer. Second is the whole issue with the market, right? So, and perhaps that's why, with the original development that wasn't suggested, it required, you know, the construction,you know,start on the golf course. And I don't remember differently,but before, any certificate of occupancy could be issued, but it didn't require that, you know, for a period of X amount of years, some golf course operator, and it'd be like requiring this for any business owner, right? You shall operate a, whatever the business is, for a certain amount of time, right? The lady who was here with the daycare earlier, you know, you shall operate this daycare for a year or two years,you know,continuously. So, I see those two kind of issues with that. But I do think this gets at the front end and the back end of that. Because the issue from residents that was brought to us was, how do we ensure that if it closes,no houses get built there? Mr.Mauch: The only reason I ask is because I think we want to make sure that we have seen the amount of support that is for this project. And 99% of every single email is for the golf course. And so we want, I think, assurances that there will be an open golf course. Because currently, I mean, the property owner could have put a golf course on there four years ago if they wanted to. They've chosen not to, and that's fine. That's what they've chosen not to do. But a lot of the support is predicated upon the golf course being open and operational,and there's nothing to state that this will be finalized as a golf course and open. Because, realistically, it would give you the ability to get the permit to start digging. But it doesn't say that there needs to be one there. And God forbid, there be a contract dispute or something happened in the middle of it, and then all of a sudden that goes away. The assurance is on the back end, or that it remains open space, but that doesn't give anybody that's in support of it majority. Maybe I should say the assurance is that this golf course will happen. Legally binding is what I have full faith in the Leishmans and in doing what they say they're going to do. I know that I know them through the community and I know the type of people that they are, and I know that their intent is to do it. But I'm just saying that we need something that is firm, legally binding, to say that there will be an operational golf course. Because the assurances on the front end and the back end are there,but there's nothing to state that it has to open and it needs to be operational. Ms. Leishman: Tell us what to do and we'll do it. I'm Audrey Leishman. Thank you so much for having us here. I did want to speak a little bit. I've been referenced quite a bit, and I wanted to introduce myself. I'm a Virginia Beach native. I moved here when I was four years old through the Navy, went to Salem High School, moved back here after college. And my parents actually moved into Indian River Plantation in 2001. This has been my home since I was 17 years old. We chose to build here in 2015. It is where we want to raise our kids. I have neighbors here that I have known since I was 17 years old. We have been trying to make this a golf course for four years now. We have entered into an investment group. It is not just us that wants to see this a golf course. We also have investors that want to see this a golf course. We have entered into good faith on an agreement to have a 50-year lease with two 15-year renewals. It has been me behind the scenes speaking with the property owner after listening to resident concerns to continue to try to provide protections for them. That is where the open space agreement came from. That is where the easement came from. That is where the promise to start construction before a certificate of occupancy came from. And that is because I am a resident and I do care about my neighbors, even the ones who are angry with me. I do very much care about this community and we have every intention and I have invested many, many of my own time into this, and I plan to continue to do so. We have a really great team. Ian Baker-Finch is very excited about it. Mike Bennett, he is crawling out of his skin to get started on this project. We have every intention to start as soon as if this is approved. We will start immediately. Mr. Mauch: Thank you. And I trust and believe that that's the case. I just want to make sure that we have assurances to know that whatever is said will be done. I think through the proffers, then we can accomplish that. So,however that that needs to be, I think it,we've. You guys have told the public that this is going to be here and I think that legally they need to. There needs to be assurances to state that. Mr. Pocta: I just one other point, too, I mentioned a couple of challenges with the suggestion. I think a third one is. It could pretend this is. I don't represent the city, but just thinking out loud here, that could potentially put the city in a difficult position. Because, like I was talking about, with the requiring of the maintenance of a business, they cease operation, that's somehow a violation of the proffers. So, do you make someone step in and operate a business, you know, operate a golf course? If not, does the city take that over? I think that would just need to be kind of thought through. Mr.Mauch: I don't think that's the intent of this is to require somebody to operate it because you have the assurances on the back end. It's to require that it open, that the golf course open and be accessible to whomever it's going to serve. I don't think there's a requirement asking to say it needs to be open for 10 years, 20 years, but there needs to be assurances to state that it will be operational. Doesn't have to require a certain amount of time,because if it becomes unoperational, then you have your assurances on the back end. After a year of sitting there, then it becomes open space in an agreement with the city. Mr. Pocta: Commissioner Mauch, if we could, you know, especially given all the resident speakers and things,if we could,sort of,you know,consider,you know,their thoughts and things, and then perhaps address. Mr.Mauch: That'd be wonderful. Thank you. Mr. Skinner: And if it pleases the gathered body,we the three of us can consider your suggestion and come up with a meaningful suggestion for that, because that is our overall commitment. Just further, Chris's point, depending on growing season and timing of approvals to the golf course operation. Hypothetically, if we were approved in March, a land disturbance permit plans are designed, but they get approved in December of this year. They won't be able to get to work as promptly. So,there's a little bit we need to discuss about the machinations of that. Mr. Coston: Commissioner Camp and then Commissioner Plumlee. Mr. Camp: Mr. Chair, I have several other questions for the applicant, but I am mindful of the number of members of the public who would like to also share their thoughts. So, I would like to hold the remainder of my questions until after rebuttal by the applicant, at which time, if they remain unanswered, I'll ask them. Mr. Plumlee: I just want to add to the discussion about the proffer. You know this is a serious concern about whether there is an operating golf course. I think you have to look at it conceptually. If you don't begin the construction,it's as though you ceased the operation. If there's a year period that goes on,that open space needs to be dedicated one way or the other. If it's based on the failure to initiate or it ceases in operation,it doesn't matter. I think that's where you can focus potentially. And I think I now understand, after reading the code a little more carefully, how this works. Essentially, what we're telling council is, if we add this, we're saying we're recommending it. They always consider our recommendations and then they set them aside and do what they're going to do anyway. But if you don't see this proffer in there, you didn't really get our recommendation. It's sort of a write-out to them. But I think Mr. Mauch, Commissioner Mauch, has made an excellent point. This has gained the traction it has since the last effort because of the golf course. And so you'll have a chance to hear people and consider that. Mr. Coston: Thank you. Madam Clerk, could we start calling in our speakers? Clerk: Yes, our first speaker is Susan Cox, followed by Eleanor Macy, Brian Bowers, Mari Grindle, and Marcianne Rush. Ms. Cox: Good afternoon. My name is Susan Cox, and I live in the villages of West Neck. I'm speaking today in support of the Preserve at West Neck,a proposal by Audrey and Mark Leishman in partnership with Harrison and Lear,which provides a thoughtful and reasonable solution for our community. Since the golf course closed,a small group of individuals became fixated on restoring an 18-hole golf course. Over the years, they have repeatedly rejected opportunities for compromise, spending over $200,000 in litigation with the property owner without notifying or engaging the residents. Since August of'24,under the banner of SOTAR,residents have been subjected to messaging that has relied heavily on misrepresentations, fear-based rhetoric, and personal attacks. Expressing an opinion outside of the accepted narrative, or even asking reasonable questions was treated as disloyal. As a result, many residents are now reluctant to express their views publicly, and our community has become divided. In addition, SOTAR leadership has never proposed a viable solution. Their position has consistently been,we'd rather leave it like it is. We like the peace and quiet. That is not a plan. That reflects unwillingness to collaborate in building a prosperous and thriving community for all of us. This project will transform a deteriorating eyesore into beautiful, functional, open space for all residents. The plan includes multi-use trails to all of our villages, reforested areas, managed meadows, and a golf amenity, which, ironically, was the very feature sought by those who have repeatedly rejected prior proposals. I do have compassion for the 35 or so residents whose homes are directly adjacent to this property. Many of them are my friends. Their concerns matter and they deserve to be heard. But at the same time, we must thoughtfully consider what will ultimately benefit everyone and support the long-term well-being and future of our community. Believe me when I say there are many other things I'd rather be doing in my retirement, and speaking to you today was not one that I really wanted to do, but I was reminded of a portion of the West Point Cadet Prayer, which resonates: "Strengthen and increase our admiration for honest dealing and clean thinking, encourage us in our endeavor to live above the common level of life, make us choose the harder right than the easier wrong, and never be content with half-truth when whole truth can be won. Endow us with courage that is born of loyalty to all that is noble and worthy, that scorns to compromise with vice and injustice, and knows no fear when truth and right are in jeopardy." Please vote to approve this project and save our community from further decline and community division. I thank you. Clerk: Eleanor Macy. Ms. Macy: I'm Eleanor Macy and I live in the Rosecrest village of West Neck. You're going to hear a lot of talk about what will or might happen if this proposal goes through, but I'd like to focus on what will happen if it doesn't go through. The present dense, unsightly mess that was our golf course harbors poisonous snakes, rats, and other vermin which threaten neighboring residents. This overgrowth presents a serious fire hazard. We had a serious fire which will continue to threaten our community. The obvious failed stormwater removal system will only get worse and will continue to exacerbate the flooding threat to our community. The ponds are interconnected and you can see where the pipes are floating,where it's not working at all. There's total stormwater failure. Some of our neighbors will be affected more than others during the reconstruction period. But in the long run, this proposal is the best outcome we could hope for and will bring many benefits to West Neck and Indian River. Thank you. Clerk: Brian Bowers. Mr. Bowers: Hi, I have to follow that. That was very professional. Short and sweet,my take on it is, if not this plan now, then what? My wife and I have lived in this neighborhood for 10 years now. We have a 9-year-old daughter. We intend to raise her all the way through college,possibly stay in this house forever. And last six years,this golf course has shut down. And as many people will tell you,it's turned into a cesspool. Two,three years ago now,we had a fire that almost caught houses on fire. The fire department saved the day there. But it's not all about the downside. If this doesn't get approved, Mark and his team have done so much work, unlike I've ever seen. So, if they are run out of town, then what? Where do we have another group who's willing to restore this to a golf course without any public funds? And to the point,I'm here for the golf. That's a big part of why I moved here. And it's just, it's really been depressing to, you know, come home and you can't go do anything with that property. Also, you know, excited for what Mark's team brings to the table. I think that a lot of people are talking about the downsides here when we've got some really top tier talent willing to design a pretty top tier golf course. I'm disappointed it can't be 18 holes, to be perfectly honest. But, you know, again, if not this, then what? If we don't fix the property and we continue to sit on it, then I don't really understand what other viable options are being brought to the table. So,thank you so much for the time. Ms. Hippen: Sir,would you state your name for the record,please? Mr. Bowers: My name is Brian Bowers. Clerk: Mari Grindle. Ms. Grindle: I think it is officially evening, so I'll say good evening, Chair,members. My name is Mari Grindle. I appreciate the opportunity to speak in favor of the rezoning request for the former Signature golf course at West Neck. This property has a long history as a golf course,but it also sat largely underutilized in recent years. The proposal before you offer a thoughtful and balanced path forward,one that respects the history while also responding to today's realities. The plan to develop the site into a nine-hole golf course, along with 143 homes is not abandonment of green space, it's a reinvestment in it. Maintaining a golf course, albeit a more sustainable and appropriately scaled one, preserves the character of the area while allowing the property to be economically viable. A smaller course means reduced water use, lower chemical inputs, and less maintenance strain, all while keeping recreational space available for the community. At the same time, the proposed residential development addresses a real need in Virginia Beach. Well-planned housing in an area already supported by infrastructure. This is not sprawl. This is smart, infill-style development on land that has already been disturbed and previously zoned for recreational use. Adding homes here helps ease housing demand without pushing development farther into rural or environmentally sensitive areas. Importantly, this proposal brings long-term benefits to the city. New homes means an expanded tax base that supports schools, public safety, and city services without the high public costs that often comes with newly developed areas. Redevelopment of this site also helps prevent decline, vacancy, and piecemeal uses that could negatively impact surrounding neighborhoods. I also want to acknowledge concerns that neighbors may have. Change is never easy. And it's right to ask about traffic and density and compatibility. From what has been presented, the plan is carefully designed and this rezoning request represents balance. I respectfully urge the Planning Commission to recommend approval of this rezoning. And I thank you for your time and for your service to the city. Clerk: Marcianne Rush. Ms. Rush: Hello everybody. I'm Marcianne Rush. I've lived at West Neck for 16 years and I live on hole number six in Wordsworth, and I'm here to talk to you today and speak for the silent minority or majority, I should say. The old, the sick, the caretakers of spouses and cherished veterans who have been scared into silence by a small handful of bullies known as SOTAR. There are threats and intimidation towards anyone who wants change and is excited about the new plans for the former golf course. They are called out in meetings as traitors or working for the developer if they do not speak. SOTAR leaders took over the community meetings that the developer had to answer questions for the community, planting people throughout each meeting the entire day to disrupt and stop legitimate questions from being asked by the community. Later that same day, there was a West Neck board meeting with a newly elected board, where SOTAR representatives stood up and screamed at the board, get on board with SOTAR or get out. The West Neck board was asked several times to take surveys to determine who was for SOTAR and who wanted change in our community and was refused by the board twice. It seems like they wanted to shape their own narrative,rather than have it challenged by actual data. There are over 900 residents living at West Neck. We are the silent majority,and we're pleading with the Planning Commission to not let the minority rule and leave us in the weeds and constant threat of fire. Thank you. Clerk: Our next speakers are Colleen Craig, Carol Gehrig, Paul Camardella, David Smith, and Mark Dewhurst. Ms. Gehrig: Thank you for your service and thank you for giving us a chance to speak to this issue. I'm in favor of the Preserve development. Mr. Coston: Please speak your name. Please give your name for the record. Ms. Gehrig: Oh, I'm sorry. Carol Gehrig, and I live on Nestle Brook Trail in Indian River Plantation. It's been six years, six years since the golf course closed. When I first moved here in 2014, driving into West Neck on Wilderness Lane was just lovely, beautiful. The roses, the landscaping all was well cared for, and we really enjoyed the clubhouse. It looked great with the white pillars. But now, even though the entrance to West Neck is still lovely because of the West Neck Landscape Committee, they do a beautiful job. As you drive up Wilderness Lane, it begins to look really rugged. It begins to look really bad. Just imagine what your yard would look like if it were neglected for six years. And that's what we have. So, this offer is, I think, the best that we can do. It's not perfect. People aren't happy that it's a 9-hole course instead of an 18-hole course, but it's so much better than what we have now. And what is the alternative? So please consider these ideas when you're making your decision. Some people have complained that, oh, construction will take 10 years. I don't think so. Kingsfield Drive, the neighborhood that's right across West Neck Road from West Neck,went up like mushrooms after a rain. I mean,it's completely,it's amazing how fast that happened. Change can be hard, and this is change. But I think it's the best that we can hope for, and thank you for listening. Clerk: Paul Camardella. Mr. Camardella: My name is Paul Camardella. My wife and I moved into Indian River Plantation in the spring of 2003. At the time,the golf course,though new,was already considered one of the top courses in the area. Through golf, I developed relationships with residents from both West Neck and Indian River. The clubhouse was welcoming, the staff friendly, and the restaurant warm and inviting. Friday afternoon happy hours with live music brought both neighborhoods together, and Sunday brunch and the annual breakfast with Santa made it feel like family. I would like to see that sense of community and quality of life returned to West Neck and Indian River Plantation. That's why I support this proposal. It's not perfect,but it represents a thoughtful and reasonable compromise. I don't criticize neighbors who oppose this plan. Their concerns are valid,and I share some of them. But after years of inaction and a slow decline in our community's quality of life, I believe, excuse me, I believe it's time for a change. I want to ask City Council a simple question. What is the plan if this proposal is voted down? Because the problem doesn't go away. Unmanaged land has already created public safety and health concerns, greater wildlife activity, property damage, and declining views for homes that were once beautifully maintained. Property values, while rising, are not keeping pace with comparable communities. And, perhaps most concerning, there has already been one large wildfire. What happens with the next one? The uncontrolled vegetation,much of it dry, is directly adjacent to homes in both neighborhoods. That is a real risk. This proposal addresses those concerns. Mr.LaClair, along with Mr. and Mrs.Leishman,have put forward a plan that solves a problem the city already has at no cost to taxpayers. Yes,it requires compromise from all parties. I would love to see the land return to a full 18-hole golf course with the amenities I enjoyed for years. Some residents, understandably, don't want to relive the inconvenience of construction and noise. The property owner wants to protect his investment, and the city wants to honor the transition area guidelines. This plan balances those interests, so I respectfully ask that you consider a slight deviation from two transition area design guidelines not met in this proposal. Those guidelines have been waived before, and this solution improves safety and livability without costing taxpayers anything. I believe this compromise moves our community forward, and I thank you for your time and consideration. Mr. Coston: Thank you. Clerk: David Smith. Mr. Smith: Hey,my name is David Smith. I live in Indian River Plantation, and I appreciate the opportunity to speak this afternoon. Well, I previously understood that you guys had received a lot of public comments on this proposal. And I was under the impression it was negative. But I actually heard some comments from y'all that made me think that maybe you actually have received more positive feedback than I was thinking. But I still wanted to share my perspective as someone who strongly supports this proposal and who only realized recently, or thought recently,that support like mine needed to be voiced. I know many people in our community expected this proposal to move forward without issue because it appears reasonable and beneficial. And like myself, again, I did not feel any urgency to participate in the public process. In hindsight,it's understandable that those who feel negatively impacted may have been more motivated to speak up, but that may make opposition seem more widespread than it actually is. What makes this proposal compelling to me is how directly it addresses the quality of life issues we've been living with for years. Without action, the land remains closed, overgrown, and inaccessible. This plan replaces all of that with long-term stability through, at a minimum, a 50-year golf lease. It also restores meaningful open space and addresses real-world problems like safety hazards, pests, and obviously neglect. For neighbors throughout Indian River Plantation and West Neck, and not just those that live along the golf course, this proposal brings back beautifully maintained green space,connected walking paths,and long-term professional stewardship right in the heart of our community. Most importantly, this is a community forward vision, open, welcoming, and shared. My family and I have lived in Indian River Plantation for nearly four years now,and we're raising our four children here. We're thinking long-term and the kind of community we're building, and the decisions that will shape it. I have a great deal of trust in this commission's process. After sitting in this room for,what, like four hours and some change. You guys, actually, it's operated pretty efficiently. I'm impressed. And so because of that,I think that you guys will make the right decision and approve this process. So, I just want to say I respectfully urge you to approve and thank you very much. Any questions for me? Ms. Hippen: We've been doing this since 9 o'clock this morning. They told us we have to hold all our questions to the end. Clerk: Mark Dewhurst. Mr. Dewhurst: Good afternoon. My name is Mark Dewhurst, and my wife and I have lived in Indian River Plantation since August of 2018. I'm here to recommend support for the proposed Preserve at West Neck to the Planning Commission. And I also want to thank you for what you do because today has been quite an educational experience for me. And I'm really impressed with how attentive you are to everything that goes on in our city. A little over a year after my wife and I moved in, Signature Golf Course unexpectedly closed down. And since then, the land, the retention ponds remain neglected and become a hazard. It's been over six years. As I said earlier up above,actually on the seventh year,six years,five months. But who's counting? It's time for a viable, common sense solution,what I call a 90%winning solution. I regularly attend the District Two City Council member Barbara Henley's meetings. In those meetings the past few years I've learned a great deal. Innovation Park, the Silos Project, Ashville Park and Heritage Park, Sherwood Lakes, the history of the development, the transition area and the comprehensive plan. Thank you. Interestingly, for the most part, these projects involve city-owned land versus private land. This proposal is privately owned land and is an infill redevelopment project and has not taken any additional agricultural land to be developed. The Preserve at West Neck will give the city much- needed quality housing, and I might say 55-plus housing, in an area that already has eight villages of 55-plus housing. This proposal brings little or no cost to taxpayers for stormwater management, to neglected ponds. And even now, a traffic light at the entrance of West Neck. The Preserve at West Neck will restore enhanced and neglected green space of the former Signature golf course that will be properly managed by the new golf course and the new home development. No project will ever fully meet the guidelines of the comprehensive plan, but this proposal meets an overwhelming majority of those guidelines and comprehensive plan. In closing, no project is ever perfect or will make everyone 100% satisfied. Leaving the land as is not viable, and everyone loses. In the long run,the proposed Preserve at West Neck is a practical compromise and a winning common sense solution. Thank you very much for your time. Clerk: Our next speakers are Dana Smith, Amy Feldman, Bob Feldman, Salim Raja, and Gundi Kohler. Ms. Smith: Well,I apologize in advance. I feel like there's going to be a lot of repetition with all that you're constantly going to be hearing all day or evening. I'm Dana Smith and good evening. And I am a mom of four and my family plans to be part of this community for many years to come. So, the decisions made here truly matter to me, both as a resident and as a parent raising children here. I'm speaking in support of this proposal because it's meaningful environmental restoration, reforestation, and stormwater improvements it brings to the property and the surrounding areas. I am not only speaking as a neighbor and a parent, but I've had the opportunity to work professionally on the Ohio Creek Watershed project that happened in Norfolk, where I've learned a lot about wetlands,flood mitigation,and watershed-based stormwater planning. The experience taught me how important and thoughtful land and water management really is. Because of that background, I tend to look closely at how projects handle runoff, vegetation, and long-term land care, and this plan shows careful,responsible improvement in each of those areas. For many years,the golf course property has remained private and largely inaccessible to residents, with significant portions sitting inactive. Over time, some of those areas have become overgrown with nuisance vegetation that spreads beyond the property lines. This proposal transforms long- idle land into a professionally maintained, environmentally managed landscape, with preserved wetlands, native reforestation, managed meadows, and thoughtfully scaled nine-hole course as a part of the overall design. Another benefit I find is the creation of the green space, the plan that connects open areas with trails, sidewalks, woodland preservation, vegetated buffers, so the land is not just left alone, but actively designed and maintained in a way the community can enjoy. Stormwater and flood mitigation improvements are also a major benefit. The project adds detention and retention capacity,and incorporates features like vegetated wetland benches that help improve water quality,manage runoff more effectively. Based on my watershed experience, these are exactly the types of measures that help reduce downstream flooding, better handle heavy rainfall. And, importantly, these flood and stormwater improvements would be funded by the project itself and not tax dollars. From a mom's perspective,I see a safer,maintained natural areas with walkable trails, and from a long-term resident's perspective, I see restoration, responsibility, and forward planning. Thank you for your time. Clerk: Amy Feldman. Ms.Feldman: Good afternoon. My name is Amy Feldman. My husband and I moved into Indian River Plantation about three and a half years ago. One of the draws to moving here was that there was the likelihood of the golf course being restored in some fashion. Therefore, I am in favor of the revitalization of the old golf course,which in its current state right now, is a field of weeds and scrub. Transform it into a beautiful, comprehensive, and well-designed plan that includes large areas of green space, a 55 plus housing section, and a nine-hole golf course with a clubhouse, putting greens and golf simulator. We're incredibly fortunate to have pro golfers, pro golfer Mark Leishman and Ian Baker-Finch designing this course, making it a championship quality golf course. Their thoughtful design will allow players of all skill levels to enjoy what will be a top rated course. My family is looking forward to playing golf in our own neighborhood. And since there will be the option for some public play,this golf course is a win-win for our residents and the city of Virginia Beach. Because Indian River Plantation does not have a community center,the clubhouse provides us with so many opportunities to socialize with our IRP and West Neck neighbors. I've heard of the wonderful social events and activities offered at the clubhouse that brought neighbors together for great times. It would be so wonderful to have a clubhouse again that functions as a restaurant and a social venue for our community to enjoy. I believe this plan will be good for everyone. Yes, there will be a few short-term sacrifices in both communities. However,the long-term gains outweigh the small sacrifices. I would love for this project to move forward, and I would appreciate if you would agree. I thank you for all that you do,and thank you for my time. Clerk: Bob Feldman. Mr.Feldman: As you can tell,I am the lesser half. My name is Robert Feldman,3104 Stonewood Drive, Indian River. I'd like to start off by thanking you for your time and saying that you're a very kind and generous group of people and I've been so impressed. I spent a while being a federal employee. I know it's rough to be in a regulatory kind of position. And I really appreciate all the thought and diligence that you all put into your work. I know sometimes it can seem tough and a little thankless, but we do appreciate it, so thank you. What I like about this proposal is that no new development can happen over the next 80 years. By that time, my grandchildren will be past retirement age. During that time,the city will have full control over any modifications to the property. We mitigate the risk of townhouses overflowing our schools, we mitigate the risk of overly dense condominiums that don't age well, backing to our properties. Leaving this property empty is definitely not any kind of a solution. We already had a fire. I can see large, large herds of deer, and they look cute,but they absolutely destroy flower beds,and they leave ticks all over the place. Not really a fan of living in proximity to large herds of deer. This proposal is the only solution I can see. The deal's 100%privately funded,no expense to the public, so my taxes won't go up. The Leishmans and Lear are investing millions of their own money to improve the appearance. They're going to pay for a new traffic light at West Neck Road and Signature Drive. In summary, I believe this is the best solution, and I think it's probably going to be the only solution that doesn't leave the property empty. So, that's all I got to say. Thank you. Clerk: Salim Raja. Mr.Raja: Salim Raja,I live in Indian River Plantation. I've been there for 19 years. I don't play golf. I don't know anyone involved in the golf course or the houses. I just live there and I'd like to go back to my nice, quiet, pretty neighborhood, please. This seems like a great compromise. You have such a turnout here now. We've just been quietly sitting by and letting you guys handle this for so long. But there's rats and there's snakes, and the ponds are stagnant, and there's weird people hanging around in the bushes. And we've got, what is it,vultures and all kinds of stuff. And we feel like we're trapped, our property values stopped going up, we're just stagnated out there and nobody's going to get what they want. But I haven't seen anything close to this to make a compromise. And Audrey,she's not just some investor. She's a neighbor. Her parents live there. It's not like she's going to leave it to just go down the toilet or she'll have to face us, right? But please, it's been going on long enough. My one neighbor spent more than $12,000 in repair from rodent damage. Another one, like $14,000 on the other side. I got a pellet gun and I'm taking out squirrels, okay? I need your help. It's just too long, okay? So,I'm not demanding anything. I don't have a feeling that I should tell someone else what to do with their property, what they're going to do, as long as they're following the rules. And I'm a rule follower. But like Commissioner Byler said, you've got to compromise sometimes. And Commissioner Camp, you said it's okay to compromise a little. We're asking for a 9.9%variance in open space, as far as I can figure from all these details, which I never kept up with. I just know my neighborhood's going to crap. I'm sorry. We used to get together at the clubhouse. People that were too old to drive their car wouldn't cut the corner through the golf course. We'd meet at the clubhouse. It's wonderful. I miss that. Please help us get back to that. I don't have any issue with the bigger things going on. I just want my wife to be happy with our pretty neighborhood again,please. So that's all I have to say. Thank you so much. Clerk: Gundi Kohler. Ms. Kohler: I am Gundi Kohler. I live in IRP, Indian River Plantation. I wanted to thank the Planning Commission members here for their incredible stamina and listening to us. My husband, Manfred,and I have lived in IRP for almost 15 years. Our property borders the former golf course. We purchased our house because of its location on an 18-hole golf course. We had hoped for and supported the restoration of this golf course for years,but we learned that it will not happen. The current owner does not support it. During our first eight years in IRP, we very much enjoyed the beautiful view and the clubhouse restaurant. We enjoyed Sunday brunches and frequent dinners there with our whole family and friends from IRP and West Neck. Our children enjoyed playing golf When the course was sold, it deteriorated to the point of creating not only an unsightly view,but, more important, it became dangerous. High weeds and debris fueled a terrifying fire that reached our fence, burned a large tree right there and some electrical outlets before the fire department came just in time to stop it from actually reaching our house. We could have lost the whole neighborhood. A maintained area will prevent a California-like fire. Mark and Audrey Leishman have a great plan to bring golf back to this area. We fully support this proposal and hope that you will agree with us that a clean, beautiful area is beneficial for all of us. Six years is long enough to drag on. At our age,time is a commodity. Some neighbors in West Neck and IRP have concerns about the inconvenience construction causes. But the same construction equipment is needed for an 18 or a 9-hole golf course. In closing,we feel that this solution is the best compromise and would enhance both neighborhoods. Thank you for your consideration. Clerk: Our next speaker is Dana Bradshaw,followed by Lynn Retano, Tom Scott,Brian Burnett, and Karina Chitty. Mr.Bradshaw: Good afternoon. My name is Dana Bradshaw. This is my wife,Charlene. She's going to help me with some visuals. I appreciate very much your attention to this. My wife and I have been residents of Virginia Beach at Indian River Plantation since March of 2012, and I'm speaking in support of the proposal. I have three brief points to emphasize and elaborate on. The first is the lack of maintenance of the property in question has led to safety hazards that have been already elucidated and detrimental visual appeal. It's an ongoing burden to both local residents and the city. Secondly, this proposal addresses most of the maintenance issues and also adds much-needed affordable over-55 housing without,to my mind,unduly increasing density. Third,the Leishmans are friends and neighbors. We believe them to not only provide the golf expertise but dedicated civic commitment and community goodwill. Personally, the backyard of our home overlooks one of the former golf course tee boxes and a fairway. As a result, we've been front row witnesses to the recent deterioration of the property. My wife is holding up a picture of the brush fire that's been described already. It's just a reminder to all of us. So that's one of the pictures. This is our fence. That's our backyard. So personally, we felt compelled to ask the owner's permission to keep the area behind our home mowed to mitigate the risk and improve our view as well. We wish to avoid, as someone mentioned already, a local example of the Paradise fire in northern California, risking residents' and firefighters' lives. We have extended family and friends who are firefighters. We don't want that. None of us want that. Preserving the stormwater management and neighborhood water features are also integral to what we appreciate about living in Virginia Beach. Many of us in the IRP would like to downsize as we age while still maintaining proximity to our friends and neighbors. And developing this proposal will be a welcome addition to accessible over-55 housing. here's already considerable interaction between ourselves and the West Neck community,and we'd like for that interaction to continue. Mark Leishman offers valuable professional perspective in golf course design and management. His wife,Audrey,is a lifelong Virginia Beach resident. They are internationally, and even though Mark is an internationally known golf professional,he's both unassuming and congenial. They are rooted in our community. Their annual Birdies and Beers Celebrity Golf Classic in support of Audrey's Begin Again Foundation is an important example of their civic commitment. In my opinion, they would be valuable and trustworthy local business partners. For all these considerations,I urge your approval of the proposal. Thank you very much. Clerk: Lynn Retano. Ms. Retano: Good evening, my name is Lynn Retano. I have been living in Indian River Plantation for 26 years. Our three children grew up golfing here and are all still avid golfers. We moved my mom here 12 years ago from Wisconsin, and she lives in West Neck. My husband loved golfing in this community and loved this community and golfing here. He got his hole-in- one at Signature on hole 11. We met so many wonderful people over the years through the golfing community. Many of these friends were there to support and grieve with me nine years ago when my husband passed away from bladder cancer. My husband was,and all three of our children are,dentists. On our youngest's first day of dental school, my husband was diagnosed with cancer, August 2016. And less than seven months later,he was gone. My daughter's friend and dental class in Jimmy's honor bought a magnolia tree and plaque. It is planted to the right of the golf path at hole number one. My five-year-old grandson started golf lessons in the fall. I would love nothing better than to see him and my son golfing here together in the same way that Jimmy, my husband, did with Ryan. My husband would have been heartbroken to see what happened to the course. If he were here today,he would be the one speaking his love and praises for this golf course and community. You have all been very gracious in meeting with us and you have been listening to us for a very long time. Because of that, I'm going to give you the gift of not speaking another long speech. I'm simply going to say that I love my community and it saddens me greatly to see how it is deteriorated. Rebuilding and reopening this golf course is good for everyone. After waiting six years, this is a wonderful solution. Please recommend the approval of this proposal because it restores so many wonderful things that have been lost. Thank you all so much for your time. Mr. Scott: Hi, my name is Tom Scott, and I moved my family here from the Pacific Northwest 22 years ago. I live in Indian River Plantation. I came with two speeches today. I was waiting to read the room to decide which one to give. With Speech one, I was going to tell a little bit of my personal story and why I am so in favor of this amazing proposal, list its virtues, but that has been done so well by everybody who's preceded me. I'm going to give you a gift and spare you the redundancy. Speech two came out of a concern of not having clarity on how you were going to evaluate and do the tough job of evaluating all the soft data you have trying to figure out overall community sentiment. You have emails, you have people, how many people show up, who speaks. And I have three very strong data points that support my assertion that it's the majority of the residents in both communities that support this proposal. And then I heard Commissioner Cuellar, if I heard her right, say, look, we believe the majority are for this proposal. If I misheard, or if any of you don't accept that and would like to see my data, I would be more than happy to share it, in person, on the phone, by email, but I stand by that assertion. So, what am I left with? Well, one thing I do want to say,this is out of my first speech, is that this is one of a kind proposal. We are not going to see another proposal like this again. I've talked to the Leishmans,I've talked to the owners. I am 99%certain they are not going to go through this again. And that doesn't leave us with much. As others have said,I don't think any of us see any other alternative, including further legal moves. And so I kind of view this as a do or die. I believe this is a do or die decision we're making here, that that property will sit and deteriorate for not just years,but probably decades if we don't accept this at this time. The other point I had come from what I observed here. And I really appreciate and respect the questions, especially those that are kind of looking out to making sure we're doing things legally correct, the proffers are done in the right way, or we shouldn't do proffers that we shouldn't. And so I think that's great,but me sitting in the middle of the resident bleachers,I don't necessarily understand all that. What I would say to that is, this proposal is so good,there is so much to gain, it's so much bigger than what there is to lose,that I will hope you would approach this with a mindset of finding a way to make all that work. And not say, yeah, we can't do this. I mean, I'm not saying you're doing this, but, you know, I know you're bound by things, but if you can find a way to make it work. Because the Leishmans and everyone else that you've seen are bending over backwards. Every time I talk to them,there's something new. Well, the residents wanted this, so now we're taking hole 11, and the owner's going to give that, and we're going to turn that into something. And so I hope you will look at it that way. And on that note,I would just like to leave you with this thought. I hope you would employ one of Gaudi's famous,what's it called,well,axiom or something,where he said,never let things that matter most be at the mercy of things that matter least. I hope you'll approach it that way, and I respectfully request that you do what's best for both communities and approve this project. Oh, I don't know if I'm over, I have more time, but if I could do one thing, I've served on public boards and you rarely get acknowledged, and this is likely going to come off as, you know, brown nosing or whatever,but I don't care, I'm going to do it anyway. Because that's not my motivation, and I really would just like to acknowledge you as others have. In a very real way to say, as I've been sitting here, I've heard at least three or four people, maybe more around me, say, wow, this is really an impressive board, these are impressive people. So, I thought you should know that that's what people are saying about you when you're not around. And if I knew a way, I would nominate you all for endurance medals. Clerk: Next speaker is Brian Burnett, who is joining us via Webex. Mr. Burnett: Yes, thank you. I'm Brian Burnett. I live in Indian River Plantation, and I know there's been a lot said so far, so I'll be brief I'd like to thank the Commission for the opportunity to voice my support for this project. My wife and I moved in in 2016, and we loved our beautiful neighborhood. Unfortunately, the golf course closed and became an eyesore. I've attended neighborhood meetings to hear the pros and cons of this project. And I believe something needs to be done, and I believe that this is a great compromise. The 55 and up housing community is much needed in the project,and it brings back golf to our community. So,I just want to say thank you for consideration of this,and we,myself and many of our neighbors in Indian River Plantation strongly support this project. Clerk: Karina Chitty. Ms. Chitty: Hi, my name is Karina Chitty and I live in Rosecrest. Thank you again. I'm not going to repeat all the good stuff that has been told up here, but this is the Preserve. And I'm talking the young generation, 55 to 60. Okay. We're supposed to be an active community. I'm originally from upstate New York. I am 57 years old. My husband's just a little bit older than me. So, I moved here in 1996 and started in the commercial construction roofing industry. And I worked for a vice president that was highly involved in golf tournaments, as you know, construction, and that's how they did their networking. They got together as groups, associations, and I became involved in associations because of his lead. Because of that, I was drug around to a lot of golf courses and a lot of golf tournaments as a young person and got to see most golf courses around here. And 20 years ago,when you drove into Signature, it was beautiful,manicured,premier,everybody wanted to golf here. I do not have to tell you what happened. But my husband bought a condo in Browningstone in 2010. It was beautiful, right on the 16th hole. It was gorgeous. And then he made me go to one of the board meetings, and I was appalled. The HOA board was rude to the residents,the residents were rude, and it was like a rogue board. 2019, or excuse me,2010,okay? It's been going on for a long time. So,then we moved to Rosecrest in the back of the community in 2012. I love it back there. Very peaceful. We used to walk the golf paths illegally when no one was golfing, of course. And it was beautiful,but the past seven years has really been horrendous. It's very,very,very sad in all aspects, including neighbors fighting. I have been to Club Pilates to work out and been lambasted about how I supported a restaurant on the property. Really? I mean,that's how we treat each other, okay? I'm not going to take much longer. We need to evolve. We really need to evolve. And I know you guys are going to work together. They've put a terrific plan together. They've been working with some of the residents. I'm going to say most of the residents. But what I would like to do in the end is say, you guys are going to figure it out. They figured it out. We're going to figure it out. We need to evolve. And what it says on our website and in granite, we're an active community. Just remember that. I support the Preserve. Thank you. Clerk: Our next speaker is Ben Loyola, followed by Mike Brewer, Jim Cox, Gopal Sharma, and Donna Smith. Mr. Loyola: Good afternoon, Chairman,members of the Commission. My name is Ben Loyola. Thank you for the opportunity to speak today. I want to briefly share who I am, what living next to this abandoned property has meant for our community, what this proposal delivers, and why I believe it is the right decision in this unique situation. First, who I am. I was born in Cuba and came to this country as an immigrant. I served this nation for over 30 years in the military, as a naval aviator, and as a retired Navy captain. After the military, I built my business here in Virginia Beach. I met my wife and married here, and I raised our two girls and our two beautiful dogs. My life has been about service. It's central to my core. I serve my country, and I continue to serve our community. I've been chair of the Commonwealth of Virginia Public School Authority, City of Virginia Beach Commissioner for Arts and Humanities, chair of the school board, local school here in the area, and chair of a scholarship. I just believe in giving back. I bought a lot in Indian River Plantation when it was just flatland. In 2005, I broke ground on my home in Indian River Plantation. We completed in 2008. I'm one of the original homeowners. Over the years, I've served on our Indian River Plantation Homeowner Association as president, as an at-large member, as committee chair, and as treasurer. And we're basically managing the 232 homes that the voters entrusted in me to help manage. Our core charter is to maintain Indian River Plantation to high standards. Not just to maintain it, but to high standards. It's a beautiful neighborhood. I've worked really hard to do that. Indian River Plantation is a separate community from the villages at West Neck. We border the former golf course, but are not the same neighborhood. And I want to make one point very clear. My home is next to the fourth hole on the golf course. It's the closest resident home in Indian River Plantation to the proposed housing part of the development. It's in the northwestern corner. If anyone in my neighborhood had reasons to oppose this project, it would be me. And I'm here to share that I'm in full support of this project. Let me explain why. When the golf course began to decline and then ultimately shut down, we didn't lose an amenity. We became subject to lost maintenance and lost stewardship of over more than 200 acres adjoining our neighborhood. Professionally managed greens became unmanaged wilderness. Dense brush overtook former fairways. Weeds,poison ivy became prolific and migrated into our landscape. Rodents increased, wildlife activity increased, including in the streets. I have removed snakes from my pool and yard, have had damage to my home and landscape due to the rodents. Many of us have had to spend money to push back the overgrowth along our fence line and on pest control and repairs that were never necessary when the land was maintained. Those conditions were and are frustrating. And over time,they became something more serious. The most serious issue is safety. On March 7th, 2023, a brush fire ignited on abandoned golf course property directly behind our homes. It triggered a major multi-fire agency response,drawing eight pump trucks,including from Oceana Naval Air Station. Years of unmanaged vegetation had created a continuous fuel load that allowed the fire to spread rapidly across the property and into the trees. I'm not describing an abstract concern;I lived it. As a flame front approached,I was in my backyard with a garden hose, trying to protect my home and my neighbors. As the flame front rapidly approached, it climbed the pine trees and embers were streaming across the sky, further igniting the dry brush. At one point, I was becoming overcome by the smoke, and the flames were now burning inside our backyard. I was saved only because the firefighters finally responded and drenched me with a fire hose, thanks to my wife screaming for help in the front of the yard as I was fighting the fire in our backyard. And our neighbors got damage to their pool, house and their landscape as well. We and my neighbors had damage to our landscape and property, and for days afterwards, the smell of smoke lingered inside our homes and across Indian River Plantation. Then the conversations throughout our neighborhood were not about property values or open space percentages. They were about how close we came to something far worse. Had we had the fire at night, there would have been catastrophic property damage and possible loss of life. That fire confirmed what many of us had been saying for years. Leaving this property idle and overgrown is not a neutral condition. It is an active and escalating risk. Every dry season that remains, the risk returns. And today,without restoration, professional management, nothing is reducing the likelihood of it happening again. This hazardous environment is not what any of us had bought into when we bought our home. And beyond safety, there is also a steadily declining financial impact. This abandoned course sits like an island between two established neighborhoods. This is not farmland being newly opened to development. It is a failed property embedded between existing homes. As an IRP Homeowner Association Board, we have screened calls and fielded repeated inquiries from homeowners and real estate agents asking for updates on the golf course. People buy and sell homes based on stability and predictability, and this abandoned property has negatively affected that stability. For many families, their home is their largest investment, their nest egg. Some residents have delayed selling because of the uncertainty. Some prospective buyers have declined to purchase in our community because of the visible condition and the lack of a viable plan. This has real financial consequences for real families. The issue also important to us is flooding. On the IRP board,we manage our own storm infrastructure. We have our own pump station for our primary center lake there, which we lower prior to any storm hitting Virginia Beach. In the worst case scenario, we had about streets completely filled up with water, and I had water up to the second brick on my mailbox. Deeply concerning. We monitor the infrastructure of all our lakes, and especially the damages from nutria, which is a known hazard to the embankments. And when that caves in and blocks the storm water, that exacerbates the problem. And that's with active management done by our community association,paid by our community association. And we're very proud of the fact that we maintain it to those high standards. Unlike our neighboring property, which affects us because the storm water is interconnected. Nutria, the banks, the overgrowth, and the city of Virginia Beach experienced that firsthand and saw the catastrophic flooding we've had because of clogged stormwater. And we just cannot have that in our backyard because we're being impacted by it. So, what does this proposal change? First, it restores professional land management stewardship. It brings back a championship, nine- hole golf course, practice facilities, and a clubhouse, all led by Mark and Audrey Leishman, who are our neighbors in Indian River Plantation. Mark is a six-time PGA Tour winner. Audrey grew up in this area. This is not an outside corporation. This is family. She lives down the street from us. Putting their name behind our community's future. Like so many of us on the board and volunteers, like you're all yourselves volunteering, trying to make and keep Virginia Beach great, we do the same thing for our community. Second, it transforms open space from something theoretical into something maintained and usable. Today's residents have access only to a few acres of maintained open space in our community. But under this plan,more than 175 acres become maintained and functional as open space and golf course. Walking trails will connect neighborhoods. Stormwater improvements benefit the watershed. Additional ponds enhance drainage. And a needed traffic signal at the entrance, which is to be funded by the developer at nearly one million dollars, will help and improve traffic flow and safety. In short, this proposal does not create risk, it removes it. The residential component includes 143 age-restricted homes, a modest increase of 12%between IRP and West Neck homes,covering less than 9%of the total acreage of the original golf course. The housing makes restoration economically viable. Without it, the land remains unmanaged, and Virginia Beach needs senior housing. We want retirees, including veteran retirees, to stay in our city, and this aligns with that need. I respect the staffs work and concerns raised regarding density and open space guidelines, but guidelines exist to guide decision making, and they must be applied in context. And the context here is a large,failed,privately owned property embedded between two established neighborhoods that has created documented safety concerns and economic impact. As a board member of Indian River Plantation, I speak with neighbors regularly. Support in our community is overwhelming. More than 80 households have submitted letters of support out of the 232 homes. And that's a lot, trying to get people to get involved. In addition, our board conducted a poll of residents to better understand the preferences. 100% of the respondents indicated they wanted a solution to the abandoned property,and 61%ranked restoring the golf course as a preferred outcome. This tells us two things, clearly. Our residents want and desperately need a resolution, and they want a golf course to be part of the resolution. This is not a choice between development and preservation. The land is private and if this proposal fails, nothing changes. On behalf of the majority of our neighbors, on behalf of the Indian River Plantation Board, who have elected me to represent them, I ask for your support. I beg for your support. We need this. Otherwise, we will be held hostage like we have been for six years. Thank you and thank you for your service. Clerk: Mike Brewer. Mr.Brewer: Hi,I'm Mike Brewer. I live in Indian River Plantation and I have for 23 years. My home borders the old golf course. I had to pay a premium for that privilege, a premium over what other people in the neighborhood who weren't bordering the golf course paid. But now, for the last six years, I wonder what happened to that investment. And one of the things I try to do is keep a nice yard. I have a pretty spectacular garden in my backyard. And my neighbors, as well, have kept up their yards as good neighbors do. But right at the very back end of my lot now is nothing but weeds and stray trees that are growing up. And because of that, partly because of that, there was the fire that came through that everybody's talked about. That came right up to my backyard. I was out there in the middle of March, I think it was rather cold, and I'm spraying with a water hose watering down my backyard to prevent the flames from coming into the yard. But I would prefer to have an 18-hole golf course as well, as I know a lot of other people do. And we've had several different proposals over time that just had its own issues. But one thing I've never understood is the owner of the property now, who got it in an auction at a good price, why he wouldn't sell it back as an 18-hole course? Because, imagine he could have gotten a 300% or 400%return on his money after only a couple of years of owning the property. So it almost seems like he's in a spiteful mood to do that. But anyway, lately,he's compromised with the Leishmans and others to put together this proposal, which seems to satisfy most people. The other proposals that have come before this had lots of issues and didn't have a lot of buy-in, but as you can see today, there seems to be a lot of buy-in. So,I would just say that it's a good proposal. I'm surprised at how many people are behind it today. And so I would say it's time to move on, approve it, let us get back to the idyllic world we used to live in. And so I appreciate your time and hopefully you'll vote for the proposal. Thank you. Clerk: Jim Cox. Mr. Cox: Good evening. It's past five, so I'm gonna officially say good evening. My name is Jim Cox, I'm from the villages of West Neck and in favor of the Preserve at West Neck. If development is not approved, here are some concerns. The leaders of SOTAR have pushed a narrative and concerns to our community about 10 years of terror, construction delays, house foundation rumblings, and slow response times by emergency vehicles, with roads blocked by construction equipment. These are all short-term concerns,except for the last one,which probably would not happen. I'm concerned about 10 more years of community stagnation. I'm concerned about West Neck villages being cocooned around private, unusable land. I'm concerned about no usable or visible open space, beautiful vistas and walking trails. I'm very concerned about the continued discord among residents,brought on by highly aggressive SOTAR actions and narratives. I am extremely concerned about West Neck neighbors continuing to have heightened angst,frightened and scared to talk freely for fear of being called a traitor by SOTAR advocates. Though I am speaking here today,there are many silent residents who are afraid to speak up but want this development. And I'm also concerned about flooding as the current standards are not met. Discussions from"No Development" advocates speak out that if the Planning Commission approves this, it will lead to more of the same in the transition area. Absolutely not. Why? The villages of West Neck is an anomaly. It's one of a kind. There are no other developments within the city of Virginia Beach with this dilemma, these constraints and conditions. In fact, because of this, the Planning Commission should seriously consider an exemption to West Neck, recognizing the predicament that West Neck is in. As a note here, almost all, if not all, previously approved developments have exceeded TA and ITA guidelines. West Neck does not even own or control the open space surrounding it, but it is being used against this project. So, if the development proposal does not pass, here's the effect. The villages of West Neck is left with nothing. No golf course, no open space, with private ownership,no control or usage. It will be encased and most likely a fence will be erected around the property. Don't own it, no control over it, no access to it. What kind of open space is this? Sounds like, feels like, and looks like closed space to me. One last thing on open space, a thing was mentioned earlier. If approved, visible and usable open space to West Neck residents increases by 1,000% from 4 to 40. How many times in the earlier course of these meetings today, have we heard about the severe shortage of housing? And I will also add senior housing. This development certainly will have a positive impact improving that shortage. This plan is a win for West Neck. It is a win for Indian River Plantation. It is a win for the city of Virginia Beach. I call upon the Planning Commission's insight and thoughtful reason to approve the West Neck and Indian River development project. It is a terrific compromise and the best solution to a six and a half year old lingering and what seems to be never ending saga, mired in densely populated weeds of open space. The villages of West Neck, Indian River Plantation and the city of Virginia Beach need to move forward. And lastly,I'll just say this,you hear all the positives right now,and then you're going to hear the cons. I hope that you keep in your mind what has all been said in this first hour or so, so that the cons aren't invading your sense of what is right. Thank you. Clerk: Gopal Sharma. Mr. Sharma: My name is Gopal Sharma and I'm a resident of Indian River Plantation for the last 14 years. I live in Virginia Beach for the last 36 years, and I live right off the golf course on Stonebrook Drive, and I'm in support of preserving the golf course improvements. Increased vegetation has numerous effects on the residents, including the wildlife: deer, foxes, vultures, possums, more infestations. One day the deer was impaled right on our fence, so we had to call the Virginia Beach Animal Control Office for help. It was a very traumatic experience. There are multiple occasions where the snakes are looming on the fence. There is a big health and safety concern. I have personally gotten poison ivy just working in the backyard from the overgrowth. We don't feel safe sitting in our backyard. For our peace of mind,we have to install extra lighting and cameras to monitor our backyard. As for the financial impact, the houses are depreciating rather than going up in this market. And we have to get additional fire insurance in case of fire. And we are thinking of adding a fire hydrant in the back of the house. So I would respectfully request the committee to approve this plan, golf course improvement, which is good for the environment and the city, and both the communities. And I'm talking as an environmental engineer. So, from my expertise, if you don't do it, this is going to be a nightmare for the community. And Indian River Plantation, when you people say I live in Indian River Plantation,that's plenty enough. It's like a milestone area of the Virginia Beach city. So, I will request the committee. Thank you. Clerk: Donna Smith. Ms. Smith: You're going to hear something different now. Hi, I'm Donna Smith, and good evening. I have good afternoon written, but it's evening now. I stand before you today, as a resident of Wordsworth Village in the West Neck neighborhood, to express my strong opposition to the proposed rezoning that would add 143 new homes to our established over-55 community. My primary concern is resident safety during and after construction. The critical safety issue is emergency access. Cadence Way is the only road in and out of our neighborhood,and it's not even as wide as a standard residential street. Yet the developer proposes to funnel four new streets directly into it,plus a service road and maintenance yard for heavy equipment storage. If approved,contractors will tear up Cadence Way for months or years to install water,sewer,gas, and electric lines. I ask this commission, what happens when a resident has a heart attack and ambulances cannot get through construction zones? What happens when fire trucks are blocked by torn up pavement and construction equipment? West Neck is an over-55 community. Our residents have higher medical needs and depend on reliable emergency response times. Has the Fire Marshal answered this? Has EMS been consulted about maintaining response times to a senior community during years of construction on our only access road? The density problem. This isn't just about construction. Four new streets converging onto one substandard width road means 143 new homes equals approximately 286 additional cars. Plus, ongoing heavy traffic equipment from the service road and maintenance yard, plus garbage trucks, delivery vehicles, and construction traffic. All funneling through a road that wasn't built to handle even a fraction of this volume. Our residents, many using walkers or wheelchairs, will navigate construction chaos daily to reach medical appointments. How will two emergency vehicles pass each other when the road is torn up? After construction, you cannot force four streets worth of traffic through one narrow road and expect anything other than gridlock and emergency access failures. What we stand to lose. The villages of West Neck residents purchased homes in an over-55 community specifically for a quieter, peaceful environment. The rezoning will destroy irreplaceable wooded areas and open spaces. Once paved over for 143 cookie cutter homes,they're gone forever. Along with the character and safety we chose, we invested here. Conclusion, the answer to this rezoning proposal must be a clear no. This commission has a responsibility to protect residents from unsafe development, especially seniors who depend on reliable emergency access. A neighborhood with one substandard width road cannot safely support 143 new homes, four converging streets, heavy equipment traffic, and years of construction chaos. Mr. Coston: Excuse me, ma'am. Your time is up. We have a three-minute limit. Ms. Smith: You know what? You didn't knock. The other people went way over three minutes. I was looking, and you didn't say anything. You're just saying it to me. Mr. Coston: It has to be from Indian River to get it. Ms. Smith: Yeah, Indian River, by the way, has no construction problems. There's no big equipment going through their neighborhood. It's just West Neck. And especially Wordsworth, with one access road. So,you're cutting me off. I have one more paragraph. Mr. Coston: I tell you what, you give me about half of that paragraph and we'll call it good. Ms. Smith: It's short. The residents of Wordsworth Village do not want 143 houses crammed into our established neighborhood. We want our green spaces preserved and our safety protected. I urge this commission to reject this rezoning proposal outright. Thank you for your time and consideration. Ms. Hippen: Mr. Chair, would you please remind everyone what the time limits are if you represent a homeowners association or a regular person speaking? Mr. Coston: A homeowners association is 10 minutes, and an individual is 3 minutes. And you can tell by the way the clerk is running the clock. If it goes from red back to green, it's because they're giving remarks from a group. And Madam Clerk,before we move forward,I have a request for a five minute break. Clerk: We've been waiting over five hours. We understand that you need a break. But we do have two speakers that need to come up right now because they have an HOA meeting to go to. Could we permit those two speakers? Mr. Coston: You could. Ms. Hippen: Ma'am,we've been here since 9 a.m. Clerk: I know you need breaks, but we did not anticipate this today. So I would just ask for the two speakers that need to leave. Mr. Coston: Okay, we'll bring them on. Clerk: Robert Tice, Linda Jaycox. Thank you very much. Ms.Jaycox: Thank you,I know you need a break. And after four and a half hours,I just rewrote my entire message. I would like to say, good afternoon, I guess it still is. My name is Linda Jaycox. I am a resident of West Neck and a Virginia Beach resident for 58 years. And I think it's important at this point that I tell you that 40 of those years I lived in Pungo. I lived one mile as the crow flies off of Princess Anne Road,which is the old Princess Anne Ridge,which is supposed to be the highest property, I think, in the city. My experience with that is wading in water up to my waist to get from my front door to my mailbox. I'm going to back up just a minute and tell you that. I have listened to stories about flower beds and grass. And the fire thing was there can be controlled burns in areas that need it. I'm sorry that people are deprived of picnics and the kinds of things that I've heard discussed here tonight or today. I will tell you that my background is the Virginia Beach Police Department, and I tell you that because I've been all over the city. I've lived in five different places. I'm not narrow- minded with regard to what's going on in West Neck. I hear that there's no precedent being set. I also hear comments that obviously people aren't thinking past their proverbial front door. This zoning commission, as I understand it, is tasked with making your decisions based on guidelines and rules that the city comprehensive plan and other committees have set forth. A comment that I heard not too long ago was at another committee meeting, and it was the ITA group. And the young lady that made a very strong statement that I have not forgotten is,JBWK bought a piece of property that he has now found out he can't do much with. Now, if you rezone, it helps him out. But my question is, when does a city bail out a guy who made a bad investment? If we were only talking about a golf course, you wouldn't see this opposition that you're seeing here tonight. Because almost everybody I know,with the exception of myself,played golf,enjoyed golf,moved in there because of that golf course. But what they didn't buy into was this additional development. So,I'll get back on track and say,I'm here today to voice objection to the proposed rezoning of the villages of West Neck. This zoning request is inconsistent with the Virginia Beach Comprehensive Plan and exceeds the residential density for this area. While the Planning Commission is afforded discretion in its review of rezoning applications, that discretion is intended to be exercised within the framework of adopted policies and not contradicting it. Approving a rezoning that clearly violates established density guidelines, particularly within an existing age-restricted community, would constitute an improper use of discretionary authority and would undermine the reliance interests of residents who made a long- term housing decision based on the city's adopted plans and zoning standards. If standards are disregarded, it will erode the public trust that citizens of Virginia Beach place in your body to apply the code fairly and consistently. For these reasons, I respectfully urge the Planning Commission to recommend denial of this rezoning application,not fall victim to personal stories of picnics,flowers,and grass. We all enjoy those kinds of things,but that's not what this meeting is about. I thank you for your consideration, for your service to the city of Virginia Beach, and for my opportunity to address this board. Clerk: Robert Tice. Mr. Tice: My name is Robert Tice. Thank you for the opportunity to speak before you. I'm a 17-year resident of the West Neck community. I'm here today to speak on the rezoning of the former Signature golf course property. I recognize that the Leishman's team will likely construct a high quality, attractive nine-hole golf course. I also understand that Harrison Lear's Mr. Chris Pocta stated that the residents cannot rely on density and open space arguments because we do not own the land, and the city's comprehensive plans consist of guidelines rather than binding rules. However, the density and open space comparisons cited to other transition area communities are not equivalent. Those developments were formerly agricultural land, and their open space was intentionally incorporated into their master plans as required by the city, based on lot size and development scale. None of these examples involved open space approaching the 175 acres that exist in West Neck. In our case, the city granted a density exception to the original builder, and the land was zoned P-1 specifically to serve as a community amenity, the golf course. The open space at issue is not incidental. It is a fundamental element of our community design and approval. Residents should not be penalized for not owning the land that was intentionally zoned P-1 by the city for that purpose. The proposal to build 143 homes on P-1 zoned land within a 25-year-old, well-established 55-plus community is unprecedented in Virginia Beach. Approving this rezoning would set a troubling precedent. I support responsible development, but this proposal does not meet that standard. Introducing multiple HOAs within the same community will inevitably create long-term conflicts. Our existing infrastructure is already strained. Our narrow roads often cannot accommodate two passing vehicles when cars are parked along the curb. Adding an estimated 250 to 300 additional vehicles will permanently worsen traffic flow and negatively impact emergency response access. My neighbors and I chose West Neck for its peace, tranquility, and established character. This rezoning would fundamentally alter the environment we were promised and relied upon when choosing to live here. For these reasons, I respectfully urge you to vote no on the Harrison Lear rezoning proposal currently before you. Thank you so much for your service to the city and thank you for letting me speak. Mr. Coston: Thank you. Five minute break. Clerk: Chair Coston, we had an additional speaker in support mixed in with the cards for opposition. Would you like for that person to come speak now or wait till the end? Ms. Coston: That doesn't matter. Clerk: Okay, our next speaker is Fred Giles. If he's still here. Okay, moving on. We have Billy Domingue, Tammy van Dam, Joyce Sharples, and Ken Landfield. Mr. Domingue: Members of the Virginia Beach Planning Commission, good evening and thank you for your patience and your time. Thank you for the opportunity to speak today. My name is Billy Domingue. My wife and I live in West Neck for the past nine years. I'm here today to ask for your consideration against the rezoning of the property that was the Signature golf course. Aside from all the obvious reasons, there's one that you'd have to live in West Neck to see and appreciate, and that's the residents that live there. The neighborhoods are filled with wonderful people from all walks of life, mostly ranging from ages 60, 70, 80 years old. They live in West Neck because it's safe, it's quiet, and it's peaceful. We're able to enjoy simple things like going for a walk,taking a bike ride,walking our dogs. The village hall is also a vital part of everyday life there. It provides a pool,a gym,activities that keep people engaged and socially active. Aside from the golf course, West Neck is doing exactly what it was designed to do. The people that live there are happy and love living there. Let me repeat that. They are happy and they love living there. Aside from that golf course, that was none of our doing. The open-ended proposed addition of 143 homes on the property that was originally designed to be a golf course is going to destroy that quality of life in West Neck for an undetermined amount of time. We would all be at the mercy of concrete dump trucks, earth moving equipment, material delivery trucks, construction crews from sunup to sundown, all week long. Who the hell wants that? The main arteries in and out of West Neck would be clogged with construction traffic. I worked in construction for over 40 years, and,believe me, I understand the need for growth and development. There's a time and a place for everything. This is not it. This project should not be done with such disregard for the quality of life for the people who live in West Neck. When I was young,my parents taught me to respect my elders. I didn't understand it then, but I understand it now. The people in the villages of West Neck could use some respect now. Thank you very much. Clerk: Tammy van Dam. Ms. Dam: Good evening, Chairman, Vice Chair, members of the Planning Commission. My name is Tammy van Dam, as most of you know, and I'm a resident in the villages of West Neck. Remaining SOTAR members in the audience, please stand if you are able. Many have already had to leave for other reasons today. Thank you. The fact that so many seniors waited over five hours to have their voices heard demonstrates the depth, sincerity, and seriousness of our opposition. For the record, SOTAR members are over 900 residents strong out of approximately 1,400 West Neck residents, and I'm happy to provide you the documents to support this if needed. The majority of West Neck oppose rezoning. These are the facts. We respectfully ask you to protect the integrity of West Neck, the integrity of this city's zoning process, by rejecting an application built on neglect rather than compliance. The request relies on manufactured blight at the currently dormant Signature golf course. The property was allowed to fall out of ordinance compliance, and that very decline is now being used to justify rezoning. Enforcement, not entitlement, should guide this decision. West Neck residents should not bear permanent consequences for an out-of-state landowner's failure to maintain property. This same landowner retains the majority of the land, regardless of your decision today, yet has never been available to our community during this public process, despite multiple engagements, as outlined by Mr. Pocta earlier. Approving this application would send a dangerous message that ignoring ordinances is an acceptable pathway to rezoning. If decline created by inaction becomes justification for increased density, then any property in this city could follow the same path. What you decide here tonight does not stay here. It becomes the playbook elsewhere. District 2, the transition area, and its residents, and our city deserve better. Thank you. Clerk: Joyce Sharples. Ms. Sharples: Thank you, Chairman,Vice Chair, and Commission members. My name is Joyce Sharples and I have lived in the Wordsworth condos on the sixth green of the former Signature golf course for eight years. I am a golfer. I am asking you to vote no on the rezoning of the Signature property in the Harrison and Lear proposal. Am I happy with the condition of the golf course and the common landscape as they currently exist? No, I'm not. Do I hate it to the point where I want our neighborhood imploded with 143 new homes and all the construction and the forever change in our community that that will bring? No. As much as I would love to have a playable course in my backyard again, the price our entire community would have to pay is just too much. Wordsworth has one road into our neighborhood. When looking at the proposal Harrison Lear has presented, I can count from the pump station to just on the other side of the maintenance garage, which is about 150 yards, if my measuring tape was correct,has five curb cuts. Five,that's a lot. One is a new construction road that's not currently showing on the plan because, as Mr. Skinner had said, it's not solid yet. But that road is projected to come in from Indian River and run on the back side of the condos in Wordsworth, along Majestic Oaks, Misty Dawn Court, Laughing Creek. All those residents who now face the woods and are enjoying the woods,like many people who are speaking for the project, are going to have a road with construction trucks coming through. And one entrance is to the construction and staging area and the maintenance garage. Three new neighborhood roads,two of which are across from each other. And these new neighborhood roads are located, if you look at the map, on the curve of the road, where there is a limited line of sight. This is very poor planning and poor engineering. The ensuing traffic congestion in this area is just too much, and it's a safety risk to our neighbors. Wordsworth residents tend to be the oldest folks in our neighborhood. Almost daily,we have calls for assistance from the fire department. Each call brings at least two to three vehicles to help us. Our roads are narrow. Now, adding the increasing amount of FedEx, Amazon delivery trucks, along with trash and recycling, these new roads will impact the emergency response time. This is just too much going on in a very small and already congested area. Finally, in the fact that this land has already been accounted for, it was and is the required open space for our existing community of West Neck. That restriction, I believe, runs with the land. It cannot be chipped away by a new owner simply because he wants it so he can line his own pockets. That land is not up for grabs. I thank you. Please observe the zoning as it is now. And boy, do I appreciate your service. You guys are putting in a full day. Thank you. Clerk: Ken Landfield. Mr. Landfield: Almost good evening, commissioners. Thank you. My name is Ken Landfield. I live in the Browningstone condos in West Neck. I am here in opposition to the JBWK and Harrison and Lear plan. Harrison and Lear have claimed that this plan is in compliance with transition area design guidelines, except for density and open space. They actually say in their plan that it's over 90% compliant. In fact, less than 20% of the applicable guidelines are in compliance. Of the 31 guidelines applicable to residential uses,Harrison Lear does not comply with 26,or 84%. Let me highlight and comment on some of the violations. Section 2.4,minimum lot size of 15,000 square feet. In fact, 93% of the lot sizes are 4,000 square feet or less, with 10 of the units being under 10,000 feet. 3.5,architectural features may include large wraparound porches and detached or side-loading garages. In fact, the renderings included in the plan, only 10 have wraparound porches, and all units have front-facing garages. 3.5a, houses should be arranged and streets should not be limited to typical regimented, grid like urban pattern. In fact,this violation is not subjective, with a uniform cookie cutter plan of 4,000 square foot lots with only five-foot side yard setbacks. 5.1 d, land for open space purposes should be protected through the use of a variety of legal instruments. In fact, ownership of the open space will remain with the current owner, JBWK. This is not only a violation,but does not settle the fact that JBWK has been in a litigious nightmare, threatening,harassing,and intimidating West Neck residents since acquiring the property over six years ago. The open space in this plan is to be comprised of the restored nine-hole golf course, the reforested land, and the trail system. Proffer five seems to say the new HOA will maintain the trail system. However,actual ownership is unclear to me. This means the plan expects ownership of approximately 176 acres to remain with JBWK. Make no mistake,this is not the end,but only the beginning. I pray that this commission rejects this ill-conceived plan. Thank you. Clerk: Our next speaker is Michael Woloski, followed by Kathleen Johnson, Linda Anderson, David Cohns, and Ruth Malik. Mr.Woloski: Members of the Planning Commission,I'm Michael Woloski. I live in West Neck. I bring you facts, not emotion. While I acknowledge the saving of the open space offered by the nine-hole golf course,too many failures to meet the transition area design guidelines argue against changing the zoning. In reviewing the proposal, I placed it against the transition area design guidelines and found it inadequate. It is possible that 32 guideline requirements are not met, 16 are not applicable,two are in compliance, and four are unknown. And I think some are downright disingenuous. The first guide, example Guideline 2.3, limited roadway improvements. This proposal will require a new traffic light at the intersection of West Neck Road and Signature Drive, one four-way intersection. One that, during construction, will interfere with the folks in six of the eight villages as they enter and exit the community. Two three-way intersections and the possibility of a major construction entrance to be determined. These are not limited roadway improvements, especially in a 25-year-old established community with over 1,600 residents, 55 and above. These major improvements with their disruption of village traffic, impact on serenity and tranquility during implementation, and impact on commercial and emergency vehicles run counter to the spirit of this guideline. Bottom line, it is 1,600 seniors listening to jackhammers daily for nearly a year. The second, Guideline 5.1.4a, addresses lot size and active open space. I'll only talk to one of them, and that's to maximize views of open space,perhaps the most egregious part of the proposal. It takes the pastoral view of 40 or more existing homes and gives them a view of nearby newly constructed houses. 44 new houses, 31 in Parcel D, 10 in Parcel C, and three in Parcel A,will not have any view of open space. All they'll see are each other or existing homes. That's 31% of the proposed construction. This intrusion does not meet the letter nor the spirit of guidance. In closing, I can go on and on,but in closing,subjecting 1,600 seniors to three to five years or more of construction noise and disruption in their twilight years,while denying 40 or more homeowners of their serenity and tranquility, and then building 44 houses without an open space view, does not justify this rezoning in the transition area. Additionally, I do not believe this city should yield to the threats of continued indifference, as made perfectly clear during Harrison Lear's presentation to the citizens of West Neck on 27 January,to the TA/ITA CAC on 5 February,and now here. I thank you for your time. Obviously, you guys are doing one heck of a job putting up with guys like me. And please, your attention to this matter. Thank you. Clerk: Kathleen Johnson. Ms. Johnson: Thank you all for your long day. It's been a long day for me, too. I'm Kathleen Johnson and I'm an 11-year resident of the villages at West Neck,and I am opposed to the rezoning in my community. And even though I'm a SOTAR member, I am not closed-minded. And I respect those who have a difference of opinion than myself and who are in favor of the golf course. The golf course was in full swing when I purchased my home, and even though I'm not a golfer, I love the green and the neighborhood layout. I love our quiet,the low density, and appreciate the preservation zoning that allowed our homes to exist in conjunction with the golf course. Now, I've been around long enough, 71 years, to know that things change. Rules, or I guess what we want to call guidelines, change when there's a good cause for that to happen. But it is my opinion that there is no good reason for this land that was intentionally zoned as preservation to suddenly change just because the individual who bought the golf course in foreclosure ignored that zoning from day one. He intentionally did not maintain the property as it was intended,figuring that he could make millions more on his investment by selling it as real estate. The current 143 new homes deal with the enticement to some of us of a nine-hole golf course, to me, is just clear evidence that the golf course is salvageable. I ask the Planning Commission to continue to honor both the land and the homeowners who live there by rejecting this proposal and keeping the zoning as it was intended. Some have said, what is the plan, if not the nine-hole golf course? Well, I propose that it's time for the owner to sell the property to a buyer who cares about the land and the people who live there. Thank you very much. Clerk: David Cohns. Mr.Cohns: Good evening. Thank you for the opportunity to speak before you. I share your pain since I've been here since 9 o'clock this morning also, so I appreciate your perseverance. My name is David Cohns. I'm a resident of West Neck and have owned three different homes over the last 20 plus years. As residents, I'm going to take off my script for a minute, maybe just to address what I think of issues that have come up. First of all,we listened to, I don't know,25 or 30 people from Indian River Plantation talk about why they want this. Indian River Plantation has no skin in the game. They're getting a golf course. They're getting everything back. They're not even allowing the trucks and everything. The only way trucks are getting in are coming through our main entrance. So Indian River Plantation hasn't even come to us and said, hey, let's help you out and you can come off Indian River Road. Mr. Skinner has said, and I've listened to about 12 meetings now over the last four years, he's going to get access off Indian River Road. When is that going to happen? If it hasn't happened in four and a half years, how is he going to get that access? We talk about the overgrowth. Whose responsibility is the overgrowth? Not a resident's. It's because the owner, the out-of-state owner, who refuses to comply with regulations and guidelines, not rules, but guidelines,for instance,from 1999,and thinks he can do whatever he wants to do. The overgrowth is his responsibility. He's not maintained anything. Now he's going to have these preserves and all these other things there. What makes you think that anything is going to change, that he will maintain that? I have no idea. He's going to do exactly what he wants to do, which is illustrated by what he's done in the past. We've taken an established neighborhood for 30 years that people have lived in, and now we're going to plop something right smack dab in the middle of it. And as they say, it's going to be three to five years of pure hell for all of us. I would say one other fact, and that is, let me summarize a court filing. Virginia Beach Circuit Court filing of June 27, 2021, and I quote, Paragraph 7, the property has been zoned either as Preservation District P-1 and a Planned Development District PD-H 1 at all times pertinent hereto. This,then it references the city's zoning maps. It continues, the City of Virginia Beach created preservation districts with the intent to protect the atmosphere, lands, water from pollution, impairment, or destruction for the benefit, enjoyment, and general welfare of the public. Then it references the applicable ordinance. In paragraph 9, it states the property has been developed in accordance with applicable land use program. Such development includes,without limitation,construction of a golf course,clubhouse, and restaurant. Paragraph 10, all land use plans associated with the property have required the property to be maintained as a golf course. Indeed, favorable consideration of the properties or surrounding properties rezoning... And I see my red light's going off, so I'll stop,unlike other people that have not stopped. The point is, all we're asking you to do is follow your own guidelines that you've implemented for 30 years. Thank you. Clerk: Ruth Malik. Ms. Malik: I hope everybody can hear me. My name is Ruth Malik, and I will tell you, this has been one long session. Thank you for sitting there, looking so alert. I am a senior citizen. I am probably older than any of you sitting up there, and I'm older than the majority of the people who live in Indian River Plantation. They may be in their 50s, 60s, maybe a little bit into their 70s. Okay? Well, anyhow, I am just saying, I have been a resident of West Neck community for 24 years. I happen to live right next to the golf course. I at one time had a wonderful view. My husband played golf, but this is why I'm here today to speak. I submitted a letter to the council and to the planners of Virginia Beach on February 6th to a website. And there was, actually, I shouldn't say I submitted, there was a letter submitted on February 6th to a website using my name and my identity to tell you all that he or she supported the new idea of H&L. I will tell you right now, I did not send that letter. Because on February 1 st, I submitted a letter to City Council and to the Planning Commission opposing their plans of rezoning. The letter of February 6th included false personal information,including the fact that I am a military,that I had been in military service. My husband was in military service. I just followed along. But behind every successful man, there is what? A more successful woman, right? Okay, upon seeing this on the City Council website, I was very, very upset. My concern is, it's not just personal. If someone can use a resident's name and address and submit a false comment, then what public comments can be trusted? None. Use our heads. Mr. Coston: Excuse me, ma'am. Ms.Malik: I'm not finished yet because I listen to people talk forever. Okay, you got it? Okay, I respectfully ask that this false submission be removed or clearly corrected in the public record and this matter be addressed to prevent this happening to anyone else. And I hope in light of my situation, the commissioners will take into account. There are many of us at West Neck who do not want to have all this crap, can I say,go on. The people,unfortunately, or fortunately for them, in Indian River Plantation will not have all the disruption. And I thank you for listening. Thank you. Mr. Coston: You're welcome. Clerk: Our next speaker is Donna Scott, followed by Dale Murkey,Jack Scott,Ted Sharples,and Tom Luckman. Ms. Scott: Hello, like everybody else, it's not good afternoon, it's good evening. Good evening commissioners. My name is Donna Scott. More than ten years ago, my husband and I purchased a home that backed up to the 17th hole of the Signature golf course within West Neck Villages. At that time, the signature hole of the golf course that it contained a logo and a bridge and was used as the backdrop for wedding photos, family Christmas cards, and other special occasions. The minute we saw it,we loved it. As you know, currently the property is zoned Preservation 1. I am asking that it remain Preservation 1. The attempt to rezone this property is not new to you. The current attempt to rezone includes 143 units and a much smaller footprint, which is dropped inside of a mature community to enjoy the benefits and the infrastructure of our community. 53 of those homes will be crammed into the area directly behind my home, along with a new through street that will traverse houses that lead to 10 on one end and 36 on the other. That street will quickly become a shortcut through the neighborhood for any and all traffic, avoiding the construction and creating additional traffic complications. The developer has said that the backyards of the new development will be 50 feet from our three-foot backyard and will place a public walking trail that will be open around the clock inside of that same 50 feet, which will pass the bedroom and the living room of our home and others that have a like design with the windows to take advantage of the view. Among the loss of our right to quiet enjoyment, we will also lose security, as it will be open for public walkers,bicycles,and e-bikes. We have had pedestrian traffic behind our house before with the golf course, but the people using that path were registered at the golf course and were met at the end of the 18th hole or sooner, if behavior dictated. The developer said in a recent presentation that the road would take one to two years to complete, with the home construction being two to five. That's seven years of disruption. Disruption, dirt, and noise in the 53 feet behind my home. There goes my flowers and my picnic table, the home we chose in retirement. When we bought our homes on the golf course, we all paid premiums to live on the golf course, and we have paid taxes on that same premium, and now we are a part of that compromise. The growth and eyesore that others make reference to are all of the absent owners making. The same owner who has a court case against our community to keep from mowing the property. The developer has said that the owner is again being difficult to work with and will still, at rezoning, own significant amounts of that property. The plan is merely conceptual. His reputation with the city and the West Neck villages speaks for itself. In closing, I would like to thank all of you for your time today and for all of your service. And I ask that you reject this plan to remove the Preservation 1 zoning. Thank you. Good evening. Clerk: Dale Murkey. Mr. Murkey: Good evening. My name is Dale Murkey and I'm asking you to please disapprove the Harrison and Lear rezoning proposal because it will absolutely destroy the quality of life for homeowners in West Neck Villages. This is not about Indian River Plantation, by the way. Some background, about six years ago, the golf course was purchased by an out-of-state owner, a land speculator, who ruined it and is now asking you to change the original regulations and allow him to build 143 homes in the middle of our villages so he can make large profits. From the very beginning,he has demonstrated to be a bad steward of our community and the open spaces. He has never met with homeowners, has refused several valid purchase offers to restore the golf course, and is a bad neighbor. For example, two years ago, in response to a request to cut the rapidly growing thick, seven-foot-high jungle on the fairways because it created such a serious fire hazard, he responded by constructing a continuous eight-foot-high metal wall behind the homes of those making the request. Not a fence, a wall. Plus, he arrogantly continued to not cut the growth, which later fed a dangerous major fire on the golf course. The fire danger, by the way, remains. Something has to be dealt with. You should also be aware that during the recent sales presentations by Harrison Lear,which is kind of the hired gun of the landowner, they have used a rather duplicitous tactic of a group of tactics designed to mislead homeowners and city authorities and gain their support. These sales presentations carefully avoid mentioning the hot-button central issue, which is the destruction of the quality of life for existing homeowners caused by the construction carnage. In these sales pitches,and I've been to all of them,to divert attention,they repeatedly express their fake excitement over a number of unimportant side issues or amenities, such as nature trails and plans to install a new traffic light at the exit to West Neck Road. As an example, expressing excitement,meaning making a note that is a desirable outcome, about a traffic light that is not even presently needed or desired,reveals their deliberate efforts to mislead homeowners. If one carefully thinks about what is being stated, it clearly reveals that building these new homes would increase the number of workers and support vehicle construction, and it'll be necessary to put a traffic light up at West Neck Road. Why would that be an exciting prospect? It is just the opposite. There are many such examples. And finally,the average age in West Neck is in the 70s. About 40% are veterans. There are many widowers and widows who live alone. All decided to invest their hard-earned money to enjoy their final years of life by buying a home to live in a unique residential village, completed and protected by existing zoning laws. Despite their future again being threatened by this greedy land speculator and his developer from outside the city, the homeowners have faith that you will carefully consider their best interests, keep the community as it was designed and completed, and deny this H&L petition. Thanks for your time. Clerk: Jack Scott. Mr. Scott: Good evening. My name is Jack Scott. I'm a West Neck resident. Thank you very much for the opportunity to stand before you and have my voice heard here today. Truthfully, I'd rather not be here at all, but I must make an appeal on behalf of the preservation area that is the core and defines the West Neck neighborhood being reviewed today. I've lived in Virginia Beach for 30 years. 11 years ago,my wife and I were looking for a retirement home after working for 40 plus years. We were eventually drawn to the peaceful, quiet and safe enjoyment of 55 and over community living, and we ultimately purchased a house in West Neck. It's noteworthy to point out that while we were shopping West Neck, we looked at two homes that were identical in builder and design. The first was on the north edge of the neighborhood that was bordered by Victoria Park. The second we looked at faced the Signature golf course. And the moment my wife and I saw the open space and view behind the second home, we looked at each other and said, sold. We loved it at first sight. We had to pay a premium for the open space home, about a 20% increase, a $65,000 actual difference in the two identical homes. As long as we've lived in Virginia Beach, I've heard the city's green line is intended to define a transition area from urban to farmland in Virginia Beach. In a subtle way, that influenced our move to West Neck. We traded nearness to transportation arteries and concentration of services for the quiet enjoyment of living in the country. We believe that the city designated this area to be preserved as an open area for a variety of reasons and is part of the overall comprehensive plan. Five years into our residence, the West Neck golf course property was sold to an out-of-state absentee owner. He's never shown any interest in the welfare of the West Neck neighborhood and has neglected the property for six years. It's grossly overgrown, an eyesore, and dangerous in numerous ways. The condition which the owner created is now proposed to be relieved only if he can squeeze 143 homes into the open space that is the core of our 25-year-old existing neighborhood. There's no regard in this proposal for the existing neighborhood or the city's comprehensive plan. The green line and the transition area, which represented the will of the citizens and the government of Virginia Beach for over 45 years, is under attack. The current preservation zoning of our West Neck area has both governed and defined our development since inception. To close, over 900 West Neck homeowners were promised open space and managed density by city zoning when we were choosing to purchase. Our property values and our quality of life are anchored in this preservation of density and open space. I offer this to you respectfully and ask that you deny this request for rezoning. Thank you. Clerk: Ted Sharples. Mr. Sharples: Good evening, commissioners. Thank you for allowing me to come up. As you contemplate the future of the West Neck community... Mr. Coston: Please state your name for the record. Mr.Sharples: Oh,I'm sorry,I'm Ted Sharples. I live in Wordsworth in West Neck villages,been there since 2007. We, I'll get into this in a little bit. But we paid a premium to buy our house on the golf course, so we were both golfers, or are both golfers, and we'd love to have a golf course. However,as you contemplate the future of the West Neck communities and surrounding areas,I'd like to remind all concerned what was required of the original developer of this land in question. Mr. Fowler was required by the city to open a viable championship golf course, thereby providing required open space to comply with zoning,prior to building housing units in order to prove to the city, as well as to prospective buyers of housing units in West Neck, that this would, in fact, be a golf course community with limits to lot sizes,housing arrangements,and density. The golf course acreage being the required open space to satisfy the city's density requirements. My wife and I saw the value in this promise by paying what we thought was a premium price for a greenside home in a community with city controlled lot sizes and densities. Those density restrictions were important to our decision to buy here and to accept the premium for being on the golf course. And although the golf course has gone away for now, that shouldn't change the parameters under which we bought our home. We trusted the city to maintain the integrity of the established zoning regulations. If the rumors are correct, the current owner of the golf course seems to be holding the city and the West Neck community hostage by indicating that he would never sell the property to a golf course developer. I take issue with that. There seems to be a bit of capitulation recently, however, by offering us half a golf course, but for higher housing density considerations and less open space, and much more auto traffic. We must be mindful that the Signature golf course was, in fact,the open space requirement for the West Neck community. Less than a year ago, the majority of the West Neck community, at least 72%, signed their names to a plea to the city to maintain their pledge to keep the transition area regulations as they currently exist. As I stand here tonight, I speak on behalf of those who signed that plea, over a thousand strong. We fervently hope the city will do the right thing and support the citizens who trust their city leaders not to rezone this area. Harrison and Lear states in their request that the golf course is defunct. The golf course is not defunct. It is a beautiful forest waiting to be returned to a golf course. Thank you for having me. Clerk: Tom Luckman. Mr. Luckman: Mr. Chairman, members of the Planning Commission. My name is Tom Luckman. I reside at West Neck. I have corresponded with a number of you for some time about this matter, and tonight I'd like to talk a little bit about winners and losers. We have some winners by design over in Indian River Plantation, and Ben said it eloquently. He lives right up from me. His house was in danger of fire. We all were. I'm one of the guys that had the fence put up behind their house, an eight-foot fence, so I can see nothing. We're dealing with somebody who is using us, i.e., the city's rules,and now leveraging with some good people in Indian River Plantation to develop half of what we want. The golf course is in the rules. It's there. It was stated. And although the property and the surrounding properties when initially developed would have violated city guidelines regarding housing density,these guidelines were waived and or not enforced because the density, a quote, was supportable due to the unique attributes of the development,including a high-end recreational amenity,the Signature golf course, from the city's attorney. Alright? What we have is a situation where we're all being used. It's them against us. If the nine holes was on the other side of the property,nobody from Indian River Plantation would be supporting it. We've got to understand what's going on here. There are rules that they're trying to manipulate. I think there's a way around it. They want a lease. The Leishmans would be a great thing,Alright, the Leishmans. At their last meeting,Mark said,when asked,you know what about 18 holes? He said, I prefer to do 18 holes. Then Mike Bennett, who's doing it for him, was asked the same question. He said, I prefer 18 holes. The owner, looking out for income from the property, doesn't want to sell the property, he wants income. He can get income by leasing both halves. We know about what that would be because we've seen it at Virginia Beach National and over at Heron Ridge. It's between $750,000 and $660,000 a year. Mike Bennett has a report showing that there is a need for a third high-end golf course in southern Virginia Beach. Don't be fooled. Play by the rules. It's important to us. We live there. Thank you very much. Clerk: Our next speaker is Diana Hicks, followed by Mark Connolly, Kevin Waters, John Perryman, and Paul Spindon. Ms. Hicks: Good evening, my name is Diana Hicks. I'm here representing the Transition Area/ITA Citizens Advisory Committee. Sorry about that. And I want to say hello to all of you. I know it's been a really long day and I appreciate your patience with all of us expressing our point of view and the important things that we all think are happening here tonight and in our city. I would like to step back for a moment to the big picture, and that's the comprehensive plan. That is the document that our committee uses to decide whether an application for a conditional rezoning and change in zoning of land down here is considered. And the decision that the TA/ITA CAC came to, and we sent you a summary note on Friday, we voted that we would recommend denial for this application. In short, our reasons are this: this is preservation zoned land and it was for dedicated open space. The current proposal effectively counts the land twice for density. And there are significant impacts to the people of West Neck, the people who live in the neighborhood that is impacted here. So,I think a really important factor here in your decision making tonight should be, are you deciding based on a solution that's being presented to you for somebody? Are you deciding on things that the rest of all these people who are talking tonight about the comprehensive plan have come to rely on as a guideline for the city? It's very convenient and easy to set that plan aside when it suits somebody's own personal needs. But I think it's important here for you all, who are the planning commissioners and the stewards of our comprehensive plan, to value that very highly when you're making your consideration tonight. We can talk about density and the neighborhoods nearby that do and don't count as possible consideration in what you might do. Some of the precedent-seeking density measures that were put forth by the applicant include neighborhoods that aren't in the transition area or that were rezoned in the 60s and 70s and have no bearing on the decision here tonight. We do have other neighborhoods that are in the area that have been zoned,Victoria Park,R-30,Kingston Estates,R-20,Eagles Nest,R-15,and Indian River Plantation, R-20. Those things should be kept in consideration as they share the same roadways as this neighborhood of West Neck. Some of those early high-density neighborhoods that were zoned back in the 60s and 70s were actually the reason that we ended up having land use management tools and policies put in place in the city:the green line, the creation of the transition area,because of all of the reasons that you all know, and I don't need to articulate for you why we have those policies and procedures. I think that we should be serious about our comprehensive plan. We've just spent the better part of three years coming up with a comprehensive plan, and I don't think it's so easy to set aside. When the applicant was at our committee meeting last week, we tried to really understand what they were projecting forward because there are so many pieces to this pie that you have an application and a modification of proffers that speaks on behalf of and includes voices that aren't present here in the room tonight. One thing we were able to divulge is that there are roughly 62 acres intended to be transferred for rezoning to PD-H2 to Harrison and Lear, and 140 acres maintained by the ownership of JBWK. Listening to all of the people who are in support of this new proposal and this compromise,as they put it, because we can't simply come up with something else or something different, the person who has created all of the problems that they themselves articulated would still be in the ownership position of 140 acres of land. This individual purchased the land knowing what the preservation zoning was on the land and what the intention was for the land. In 1999, when the City Council made density credits and density expansion for an over-55 community. These are not new pieces of information, so that brings us to now. What do we do with this property? And I think it's important to focus on the West Neck neighborhood, not the Indian River Plantation neighborhood. I appreciate that they will benefit greatly by this. They will maintain their R-20 zoning and their open space within their own neighborhood. They will still be golf front properties. They will not experience any of the construction that would take place within the West Neck neighborhood. So, I think that it's easy to say that this sounds like a great compromise when you are the beneficiary of the compromise. And it's tough for us to ignore 936 homeowners that have been in an established neighborhood for over 20, for zoned over 25 years ago,but more than 20 years. I also would like you to consider the precedent that you will be setting. There are consequences to a decision like this. This is, yes, we know,privately owned land, and now, but with the owner that has ownership of the land. But it's also our dedicated open space. So, if we turn our back on preservation zoning, which is part of our ordinance and law, and reconfigure it to be something else, if we ignore designated open space, how does that affect us in other parts of the city? We have other neighborhoods in the city. Heron Ridge has a golf course that's not owned by the homeowners association. Cypress Point is another PD-H2 neighborhood that was configured around a golf course that's privately owned. And so, I think there are bigger ramifications here than just whether or not this would be a nice amenity, more for some people than others. You're being asked to recommend on a conceptual plan that was presented today that includes components that the applicant cannot deliver to you or anybody else in the city because they won't own the land. It was mentioned today that there could be new proffers coming forth,but they're not in this plan. They are not present in the applications today. They are not in the modification of proffers. You're being asked to rezone land that was set aside for preservation open space in a very specific 18-hole golf course in exchange for something that is very different. You're being asked to weigh in on a solution that is for the benefit of an individual who purchased land, knowing what its constraints were. You're being asked to compromise the integrity of our zoning ordinance and say preservation doesn't matter. We can change it to housing when it fits or when it's important for one person or one entity. You're also compromising the integrity of our approved plans that have been in place for decades. Our seniors have been treated in a way that they are describing to you has not been kind. I can't speak for them. I can listen to what they say. I've been listening for years to what this issue is about,just as many of you have. I know it would be convenient to get rid of this problem and make a decision and move on, one that would benefit some more than others. But right now, I'd like to remind you that in Preservation 1, there is no by-right for housing. This is a big change, and yes, change might hurt. But who are we hurting here? A neighborhood that's been in place for decades, at the expense of something that is new and different. And for who? Is that how we're running the city? Do we literally say decades-long neighborhoods, it doesn't matter, we're gonna come infill right here and we're gonna take away tenants of the green line,the transition area and our comprehensive plan? Sure,this is infill. Your new comprehensive plan says to direct that above the green line. It doesn't say go back and get rid of the open space that we planned an entire section of the city around. I respectfully request that you recommend denial of these applications, because not only are they unfair to the neighborhood that exists, but they actually don't deliver what's been presented here tonight. They actually have no ability to enforce a golf course ever. Even the proffers in conversation fall short of providing what the people who are in support of this are saying is the reason for their support. It doesn't exist. So, I don't think that you have the basis to recommend this, but that is my opinion. And I'm going to ask that you seriously consider not just undoing 25 years of zoning and land use, but considering the ramifications and the repercussions of making choices like this when it comes to preservation and open space. Thank you. Clerk: John Perryman. Mr.Perryman: My name is John Perryman. Excuse me. I know zoning fights are a slog, so God bless you guys. My wife and I oppose a zoning change for the preserved land in West Neck. The City Council created the preserved area by allowing the developer to shrink the lots and the city streets around the preserved area. Buyers accepted the smaller lots and streets because the city added the land to the preserved area. The existing zoning laws then support the agreement, or, in my view,the compact between the city, the developer, and the residents. With those considerations, West Neck residential property is already built out. Our shrunken streets are too small. Our main streets don't even have bike lanes. Heck,next door,in Courthouse Estates, they've got divided roads and very nice bike lanes. I and other cyclists and joggers are reminded of the current threat when we ride or jog to the terrific new multipurpose path on West Neck Road. If vehicles approach from opposite directions, I stop. As my wife reminds me often, I married you for better, for worse,but not a hood ornament. I'm not a demographer,but my Ouija board tells me the impact from huge construction vehicles for years,and then traffic vehicle traffic for the requested 143 homes,probably two vehicles per residence, will be staggering. Add the residents'personal services and contractors, lawn and garden people, sprinklers, HVAC, pest control, handyman, home care support, family and friends, etc. The disruption will be awful. Additionally, it's reasonable that construction vehicles and later residential traffic will use our small main streets to get to most of the proposed housing. They are city streets. That's how I drive along the main roads without parked cars, because homes do not face those roads. The buyer bought preserved property. The buyer should use it as such. The proposed development now adds a small half golf course. To paraphrase the Wizard of Oz, I feel like they're pointing at the small golf course and saying, pay no attention to the 143 houses behind the curtain. It did not work for Dorothy and Toto. It doesn't work for us. God bless you guys. Clerk: Our next speaker is Joan Harris,followed by Bill Scholes,Ann Haley,Melissa Drout, and Ted Quinter. Ms. Harris: Good evening. My name is Joan Harris. I'm speaking to you today as a 21-year resident of The Grove in West Neck, who, together with my husband of 61 years, has built a life here. At my age, 83 plus, stability is not a luxury. It is a necessity. Many in this community chose where we live based on what already exists, not on concepts, promises, or drawings that leave more questions than answers. We are now being asked to change our entire way of life based upon plans that are incomplete and, in some cases, impossible to fully understand. The current proposal presents tangible risks, including those to safety, mental and physical health, and emergency access. These concerns become increasingly significant with age. Timely access to care is crucial. Additionally,the maintenance of a peaceful environment is important for mitigating stress-related health impacts. However,the plan submitted by the developer lacks sufficient detail. For instance, there is no clearly defined strategy for accessing the property in question. This omission warrants careful consideration. The drawings presented are not to scale and fail to show actual density, traffic, or impact. Without these essentials, assessing the proposal is guesswork rather than reasonable planning, leaving us to deal with the consequences. I want to be very clear. We are not opposed to progress. However, progress must be grounded in reality, transparency, and full respect for those who already live here. It must protect the most vulnerable among us who cannot simply adapt,relocate, or start over when things go wrong. We are not numbers on a site plan. We are people with routines,health needs,and deep ties to where we live. Do not approve major changes based solely on concepts. Ensure all decisions are backed by complete, accurate, and to scale information to fully assess potential human costs. Thank you for your time. I've been here since 9:00, and thank you for listening. Mr. Coston: Ann Haley. Ms.Haley: Planning Commissioners,thank you for the opportunity to speak to you today. I urge you to recommend to City Council that this application be denied. This is not about development where needed or appropriate. I've taken the last few hours, I think, trying to revise what I had originally written to present to the planning committee. And most of my points have been spoken very eloquently and clearly. So, I will be trying to read some of my notes, to respond to some of what I heard. I will say that I have a great deal of respect for all supporters. That includes the applicant and the team and the Leishmans that are supporters, and also of some of my neighbors who were supportive of this initiative. I've listened carefully, but it has not changed my opinion that this should be denied. One thing that I did note was one speaker said, which I think is quite important, really. A serious question is, what happens if this doesn't go through? And all we know is what we don't know. And I think that's almost enough of a reason to just say halt. There's a lot of confusion and conflict around this situation. What I haven't heard are really the benefits to the 143 development of houses. Now, I understand that there is benefit to the developers and the Leishman team and everyone in support of what the view from Indian River will be. Please consider the view from West Neck. People who have been there,paid a premium cost for this property, and now they will not see a golf course. They will see houses. To them, that's not the view of a golf course. Is the cleanup of this overgrown area really worth the expense and subsequent interruptions that may follow? Maybe there really is another alternative, and maybe that alternative is to find out how to enforce that the property would be maintained by the current owner. I also heard about guidelines and rules. That's been emphasized to us very recently. And I have an interesting thought on that. To me, guidelines implies that there is room for more thoughtful discussion. It's not a rule that you can just check off and say yes or no. It incites a conversation. Yes. Years of disruption during construction. I've heard it's taken too long as a quote that has been frequently said from residents in support of this. Just two more. I just have a really quick one. I also want you to please consider the density. That's also been very well presented. And with every meeting I have attended,or any conversation I've had with residents, it just shows that this must not be approved. Please, please recommend denial to the City council. Clerk: Melissa Drout. Ms. Drout: Good evening commissioners. My name is Melissa Drout and I'm happy to say that I'm one of the last speakers you will hear from today. I'm here today as a resident of Courthouse Estates adjacent to West Neck and as the lead of Responsible Growth VB. You all received about 170 emails in opposition to this application from that website. First, I just want to start by acknowledging something very important. Many of the residents who spoke in support of this project raised legitimate concerns with deterioration, fire risk, aesthetics, and those concerns are valid. You're not going to hear any of the opposition speakers who do not agree that those concerns need to be resolved. But this decision is not about whether the property should improve. Everyone here today agrees that it should. The question is -- this rezoning proposal an appropriate use of this land? We've heard urgency tonight, a feeling that residents are being held hostage by the landowner, their words, not mine, a sense that something must be done. As a neighbor, I understand that deeply. You've heard repeatedly from almost every speaker in support of this application that something is better than nothing. But that urgency cannot supersede standards. And there are serious standards-based concerns already on the record tonight. That this land was previously counted as open space to justify existing density. That the current zoning is preservation, not temporarily, but permanently. And that residents have unresolved questions about flooding, infrastructure and emergency access. Those are not emotional objections, they're planning considerations. The current dilapidated condition of the property did not arise overnight. It's the result of intentional decisions by the landowner over time. That's clear to everyone here, including and especially those who spoke in support of the application. Many of those supporters acknowledge that this proposal is not ideal for their community, but their concerns need to be addressed by the landowner. And I believe that needs to happen outside of this decision. Planning commissioners should not be placed in a position where approval becomes the solution to the decline that was created by the landowner. That's not fair to you. Everyone in this community should respect that. Your role is to evaluate whether this proposal aligns with adopted city plans and guidelines, honors prior housing density assumptions, protects surrounding neighborhoods, and serves the broader public interest. If it satisfies those standards, it should be approved, and if it doesn't, then deterioration alone cannot be the deciding factor. The land use decision you all make today will signal whether preservation zoning means something, or whether it becomes temporary when pressure builds. I urge you to deny this application. I trust that you will make the right decision. I'm truly thankful for your time tonight and the seriousness with which you approach these decisions. Clerk: Our final speaker is Ted Quinter. Mr. Quinter: Mr. Chairman, Madam Vice Chair, who's gone, members of the commission, it would be sneaky to say they saved the best for last. I'm not sure they did. I was pretty happy with what I was prepared to say,and I asked for 10 minutes and was given it. And I had every intention of taking, based on how it began, Mr. Chairman, with taking my 10 minutes and then flipping all my papers over and countering everything I heard. I'm as tired as you are. This is reminiscent of my flying days in Vietnam. Twelve-hour butts. You're strapped in in the morning at 6, and if you're lucky,you got out at 7 in the evening. So,I'll be brief. The people that reside in the villages at West Neck support responsible development,but we support development that honors and protects P-1, Preservation 1. You've heard that a lot, open space. Consider this. One house added to the villages at West Neck increases the density, decreases the open space. Incontrovertible fact. A 143-home basic subdivision, introduced in the middle of a 30-year-old,nearly 30-year-old,55-and-over community,drastically increases density, drastically decreases open space,taking P-1 land, and really significantly changes the character of our community. And a master development was approved in 1999. The developer then was given a density exception. So what? Lots of others in the transition area got a density exception. There's a significant difference in this situation. This density exception was given for a privately owned 175-acre golf course, the owner of which was a really bad businessman and went out of business. And as speakers have said,you know what happened. Got sold to out-of-towner,should have been aware on the P-1, bought it anyway. In that initial action, council zoned, we had 486 acres. My numbers may be slightly off from what we heard this morning at the informal,but I'm going to use mine because that's what I wrote down. Of the 486 acres in the site, 311 were changed from agricultural, with PD-HI and PD-1-12. The golf course,in their infinite wisdom,was changed from agricultural to Preservation 1. I don't think there's a member of the City Planning Commission or the council that can tell me another community in the transition area that has 175 acres of Preservation 1 land in the middle of their community, because there aren't any. They all have open space, and we've heard it commented, they all own it, except for Heron Ridge has got that golf course and they don't own it, and except for Cypress Point's got that golf course and they don't own it. So why should we be punished and held hostage because we don't own the golf course? We think the person deserving punishment is the landowner that hasn't done anything with it. Another significant difference. On the original site, when it was going from agricultural land to what was finally built, it didn't bother us at all. It was a farm. The caterpillars went out. The site construction for homes went in. The golf course got built. All that noise and air pollution and noise pollution and vibration and traffic on then the little West Neck Road didn't bother a soul. Wasn't anybody here. And when Mr.Fowler started building homes,he did it smart, like most do. If this is my site, and I'm going to build the whole site,I'm going to start here and build away from the initial buyer. So they're not putting up with the noise. It was made easier for him because a golf course was in the middle of the community. In this situation, we have a 25-year-old senior community with a golf course property lying dormant in the middle of it. And now we're going to have the same kind of construction. We're going to have caterpillars and bulldozers for site construction. By Mr. Skinner's estimation, 18 to 20 months to get ready to start building homes if this is approved. That's a big difference because it's going to be right in some of my neighbor's backyards. And in my backyard, I have to take that into consideration. Many of those people whose backyards are backyards that they paid a premium for the ability to look at that panoramic view of the golf course. Since the golf course closed in 2019, I've heard comments about real estate values. I'm not buying it. Turnover in West Neck is pretty high because it's a 55 and over. You have to be old to get in there, and you never get younger. So,we have high turnover rate. I live in a condominium with 108 units, 155 residents. We turned over seven units last year in 2025. What do you think the average time on market was? Less than two weeks. People are screaming from places to get here. And it ain't because they like the weeds. We don't like them. And they can see the weeds when they come in and buy. But when they get out of their car,unless it's a fly day, getting ready to go to the ship, it's quiet. They don't hear a lot of noise. And they like it. And so,they still buy it. And I have a couple of realtor friends with whom I checked, and the single-family homes in West Neck are turning over just about as fast. Probably three weeks to a month for them, some a little longer, but on average, way below the days on market for condominiums and single-family homes every place in Virginia Beach, and recently in South Tidewater. The property that used to be a golf course isn't the problem. The problem is the knucklehead from out of state that bought it, doesn't want to do anything with it, in my opinion. He refused three offers,two of which we think were probably profitable. One was a low ball, to be expected. I was going to talk a lot about the owner. I've got six or eight bullets. I'm just going to summarize in view of the time of the day it is. He hasn't done a darn thing to endear himself to us and make us willing to help him do something with his property. I would think if I had that in mind, I would at least go meet some of the people. Nobody's ever met him, except in court over legal things. Now, Harrison Lear was the only developer that would partner with him. He talked to every developer in Virginia Beach, as best we can tell. They knew the history. They didn't want nothing to do with it. To Mr. Skinner's credit,he likes a challenge. I think he saw the challenge. I'm not sure he assessed it as fully and badly as it turned out. They've done a nice job. They have a pretty good plan. The thought process that we listened to in seven or eight meetings with him, and I went to all of them and took pages and pages of notes. The thought processes were good. Old people, smaller lots, but not 50 feet from the neighbors in the back. We think he has a good plan. It's just in the wrong place. I'm going to summarize in four statements a bunch of things I've intended to say. If the rezoning is approved, I contend, and the people from my village contend that we're going to lose our peace and quiet, easily for seven,probably for the better part of 10 years. Because once the site construction is done,we're going to have delivery trucks,we're going to have tradespeople every day, in and out. We're going to have that traffic. And when it's done, we're still going to have the congestion because someone made a comment. 200 days? I think there'll be 300 more cars, 2,500 more trips a day. Our concern is also there's going to be governance issues. In one of the meetings, I approached Mr. Skinner,he has a lot of information. And to his credit, he has a lot of experience. Part of his business is governing, helping govern homeowner associations. But he has a difficult partner in his owner. And we don't have very much confidence in the partner on how those HOA documents are going to turn out. He promised them to us in January, but in reality, he can't give us anything to look at until this gets farther along. But there's going to be governance issues that will happen. They're not proposing really any amenities. We have a village hall. We have a pool. If I buy a$700,000 house from him and I'm in there for six months and it's hot,I want to go swimming. Because we don't allow pools. We have one. An important difference is the city made the property that is a dormant golf course today,Preservation 1. Several of the most recent speakers make that. I want to make that impression on you. Keep the land preserved. We don't want more density. We don't want less open space. Because, as I said, it's quiet with that open space. Nobody comes through it to bother us. Even the ones that had golf course frontage, they don't get golf carts bothering them anymore. The bottom line is that we oppose an increase in housing density and the loss of our open space. And we are adamant about that,because once the open space is gone, it's lost forever. And I'm going to wrap up very quickly, Mr. Chairman. I know I've probably exceeded. My takeaway is it's all about density and open space. Density and open space. Again, density and open space. We don't want it higher for density, and we don't want to lose our open space. It's very important. We're all old people. We don't change very fast. I would respectfully ask you on behalf of my Browningstone residents and the other 850 SOTAR members to deny this request. We think it's in the best interest of the community and of the city. And it's kind of a misnomer. We're not sure that the Preserve at West Neck preserves anything. Thank you for your attention. Thank you for your sore butts and a long day and we trust you'll make the right decision. Mr. Coston: Well, Mr. Pocta, I guess it's time for rebuttal. Mr.Pocta: I'll keep my remarks to 20 minutes. I'm just kidding with you. There's a lot said there. There's quite a bit to rebut. I'll start from the last kind of to the earliest. Increased density, decreased open space, we've talked about that ad nauseum. If this doesn't get approved, there's 4% open space. The guidelines say accessible, usable, visible. That's what defines open space. They're left with 4%. Actually, before I say that, I just want to thank everyone too, for speaking. I don't disagree with folks telling how they feel about it. I mean,there's certain people that feel a certain way,positively about the situation and negatively. And I don't refute or disagree with any of that. And I'm glad they have a forum here where they can share that. I think it's really important. Ms. Hicks, the chair of the ITA committee,mentioned that there were some plans in the 60s and 70s that exceeded the one-to-one unit per acre. I'm not sure what those are, but Sherwood Lakes, Princess Anne Village, Courthouse Estates, those are all in the 90s, 2000s. Princess Anne Village in 2021 at 2.5 units to the acre. There was some talk about winners and losers. It seems to me, if there isn't a solution, this is the solution on the table. If there isn't a solution or a proposal, this is the only one that I've heard tonight, everybody loses. And I know there was a lot of discussion about the property owner,how to get at the property owner, or try to enforce things against him differently, or get back at him. I don't represent the property owner. Mr. Skinner's not the property owner. Ms. Leishman's not the property owner. But what we are proposing, what the applicant is proposing, is the applicant's plan, our proposal. Some folks mentioned about the traffic light. Mr. Skinner, I can guarantee you, is not excited about having to spend a million dollars to put in a traffic light. Nonetheless,he's volunteered and agreed to do it. There was discussion on multi-use trails. I think we discussed this quite a bit earlier on the two sides,but that doesn't reopen without this proposal. Lots of mention on the guidelines and, again, the open space. Several folks even mentioned it who were in opposition. These are not rules. If they were supporters of the transition area guidelines, I might join the club. I think many of us would. Because this, like any other application that's come before, that's deviated from the open space or the density or another guideline, has approached the city. And the city, after weighing the consideration and approving the plan, has recognized what benefits are there here that outweigh the deviation to whatever that guideline is. And that has happened time and time again. And those communities, Sherwood Lakes, Ashville Park, Heritage Park, Princess Anne Village, all the things we've talked about, they wouldn't exist if you strictly complied with them as rules. And then,lastly,I know my time is up,Mr.Coston, I'll respect that,but I just wanted to circle back to that proffer. You know, at the beginning of the process, we recognized that the Leishmans had come forward with this plan and with this agreement with the property owner to lease it,to develop it as a golf course. And that's been discussed ad nauseum with community members, that agreement that they have. We proffered a concept plan that includes a golf course that remains preservation. It's not rezoned to something else. It stays preservation. So that zoning in itself is significant. There remains a use permit on the property for a golf course. But despite all of that, we've talked about it and we've been talking about this for weeks now. If there is something else that could be committed to, that is asked for, is requested, these folks want to do that. So, the proffer that we discussed a moment ago, I know I mentioned at the end that we would kind of go back and think about this a little further. Maybe if there's an additional commitment, even beyond what was suggested. And so what we've come up with, and I think this gets it to, and if not,please let me know,but again,no conditional,I'm sorry,no CO is issued until the land disturbance permit and construction commences. In the event that the golf course ceases operation for a year or the golf course construction ceases for a year, then the property would be subject to that language I talked about, an open space agreement or a conservation easement. And then the third one was that no more than 50% of the COs would be issued until the golf course opens. That way, what's intended is these two tracks to run parallel: golf course development and Mr. Skinner's proposal for the Preserve, working with one another and relying upon one another. We think that adding that additional proffer perhaps kind of keeps in line with the maintenance of those two timelines. And then, lastly,I just wanted to say that there are several people in West Neck who have reached out, I believe over 20, correct me if I'm wrong about that, who would like to buy the houses that we're proposing to build. So, there's a request, not only for folks to move to West Neck, but to move from West Neck to these houses that we're proposing to build. That's far past the time that I had, and I apologize. But if Mr. Skinner has anything else to add, Ms. Leishman,we're here for any questions. Mr. Coston: Okay. Commissioner Hippen. Ms. Hippen: Okay. So, I'm going to say a couple things politely that might hurt some people's feelings. I want to start out with this morning. This morning, we talked about what the density calculation was,why the planning person did it one way,while you did it another way. We talked about in open space,we talked about unused development units coming from other developments. We talked about previous developments influencing the density of this project. Vehicle traffic usage had to be calculated or used to calculate density, and now that formula is not used. And fortunately, all of the discourse in our unofficial meeting was pleasant. I've been on planning commission for a little over two years. I was in the United States Navy and Air Force for over 25 years,retiring as a master chief. And I can tell you that there were some people who did not respect the rules that were stated. Commissioner, our chairman, Mr. Coston, is a very nice man. He's a very nice man. I feel he was disrespected today by a few people. The lack of respect that I saw here is the lack of respect that some neighbors have. And this project has pitted neighbor against neighbor,using age,using retirement. Well, I'm retired, too, and older than you probably think I am. I, too, live in a house that pissed off neighbors when it was built because they used to play in the area that I now live in. The green line. I have heard about the green line for a long time. I have known Councilwoman Henley for a long time, and she was the architect of the green line. And then we had the transition zone come in where developments were approved below the green line, okay? The two that I don't like, I'm going to tell you about the two, are the Silos one and Silos two. Not only are they below the green line,but they're right in line with the runway from Oceana. By the way,noise? I slept underneath the flight deck with the landing gear equipment right at my head. Okay. One gentleman said that he flew in Vietnam. I bet you he can sleep through anything, too. Okay. There has been bad blood with the owner. I have talked to several people. I have gone to a few presentations, and I know that there were spite walls put up. I believe that's what they were called. Am I correct? Because some of the residents pissed the owner off, complaining, okay? Excuse my French, okay? I told you, I'm a retired master chief. That was not a good thing to do. Why did no one force the city to maintain the zoning and keep the vegetation from growing so that you didn't have a fire that threatened your homes? I don't understand, because I'm going to tell you right now, all my neighbors know me, and every one of them knows if they do something wrong. First,I'm coming to you. And if you don't want to listen to me,no,this snitch don't get no stitches, okay? I'm going to report you to whoever needs reporting to, and you're going to fix it. And I think that some of the people that are complaining about some of these things should have trusted in the city organizations that we have to fix. I'm still not sure, okay? I didn't talk while y'all were talking,please. I'm still not sure which way I want to go on this. I'm going to keep listening. I'm still not sure. What I don't like is the nastiness that I saw. And all of you that said, I pray this and I pray that, I hope you go to your church, your synagogue, your wherever, and get yourself a little bit of the spirit and learn how to talk to each other. Because Chairman Coston is a very nice man and he did not deserve to be disrespected. Mr. Coston: Commissioner Plumlee, then Commissioner Mauch. Mr. Plumlee: I have some questions about the golf course. It might be Mrs. Leishman that can answer this. I'm not sure, but you indicated that there is a desire to design this nine-hole golf course. And I've not heard much in the way of the validity of a nine-hole golf course and what value it has in the golfing community. Can you speak to that? Ms. Leishman: Yes. Nine-hole courses have increased in popularity over the last several years. For younger families, a normal round of golf can take five hours, sometimes six. If it's a long round, a slow round, people get there early to warm up. They sometimes like to enjoy the 19th hole and have some beers afterwards. It takes a long time. A nine-hole course can take two hours, two to three max. It's a great way for children to learn how to play the game. Golf is a hard game. It takes a lot of shots to learn. Nine holes is much more manageable. You can see the success of the first nine. Additionally,Mike Bennett had several statistics, which I don't have on hand,about the rise of nine-hole golf courses. Additionally, the demand for golf has increased and the supply of golf courses has decreased over the last several years. I think it's like 35 courses in Virginia have closed and demand just continues to increase. So, in Mike Bennett's opinion, there is no chance that this would not be a successful venture. Mr. Plumlee: And this has a proposed par-3 course and putting and chipping practice green as well going with it? Ms. Leishman: So that was the original intention. After much feedback from golfers within Virginia Beach, that's mainly my husband speaking to all the other golfers, everyone expressed a desire for a driving range. So, it looks like the plan will pivot to shortening some holes to include a driving range. Mr.Plumlee: And how far down the road have you all gotten in creating an elevation of what the plan for the golf course would be and the layout,the area that it would exist? Ms. Leishman: We have not started because if this plan doesn't pass,we don't get to make a golf course. So,we have been focused on doing the community meetings,talking to the residents, and attending things like this evening. Mr. Plumlee: Would the homeowners association be, would they be members of this nine-hole golf course? Ms. Leishman: There will be discounted membership rates for Indian River and West Neck residents,as well as discounted tee times. It will be a semi-private course,which means there will be public tee times. So that means that if a West Neck or Indian River Plantation resident is not a member, they could still play and they would have a reduced tee time. Mr. Plumlee: And so it's my understanding, and I don't mean to be personal, I'm just wanting to understand this, is that you and your husband would be in ownership with this golf course and its operation? Ms. Leishman: It will be us and Mike Bennett. We do have other investors that are interested in it. There's another person who was in this investment group that when we attempted to purchase it to be an 18-hole course, he wants to be in it. There are other local former athletes that are really interested in being a part of this. So, it is more than just us. Mr. Plumlee: Part of what we're being asked to consider is the idea that, if this was to cease in operation for any reason, that the property could be maintained. Because the sense I'm getting is both accessible and maintained,not simply formerly a golf course. And that's part of what I think needs to go into any effort here. You know, there's kind of a fool me once, fool me twice thing happening where people feel like they had a golf course. They move next to it and it's no longer a golf course. And they look into the fine print and it's not there, okay? Ms.Leishman: We were those people as well. We bought to be on the golf course,so I understand the impact that the closure had. I mean, we have been directly affected by it, and that is why we are trying to help. And I know many people don't see it that way, but my genuine intention is to try to find a solution for a problem. Mr. Plumlee: I don't doubt your genuine intention at all. I don't. I think what's important to me is making sure that, since it appears as though what's being traded on in this discussion is the restoration of this golf course,that as that is delivered in solid form,if that is what is recommended, and I'm trying to piece together my mind how that could work, it's very important because I'm sure a lot of lawyers worked in 1999 to come together with the city and to make assurances at that point. And so there are a lot of moving parts and complexities. So understanding what's in your mind is very important to me, to know this,because I think everyone is placing a lot, fairly or unfairly. Ms.Leishman: And that is also why we want to have partners in it. And part of why Mark wants to partner with Ian Baker-Finch, who has golf course design experience. This will be his first golf course that he's ever designed,but he's very excited to do it. And Ian Baker-Finch is also excited. And so we want to provide the legitimacy that everyone wants with this project. Mr. Plumlee: I appreciate that. I do have some questions for Mr. Skinner as well. I try to pull together the consistent themes from both sides and to try to simplify the discussion. Because the human mind gets fractured into too many pieces when you try to focus on too many things. Construction was a consistent theme throughout. And how will you minimize the impact to the current owners in this community with this construction project. Mr. Skinner: To minimize the construction traffic is the question that is a difficult concern to address, frankly. It's very difficult beyond hours of operation and limitations that are already in place with city ordinance to have an impact on that construction traffic. Mr. Plumlee: Would the first part of the construction be the road? Is there a road that's going to separate these homes? Is that fair? Maybe I'm confused. These homes are going to be looking across at other homes, correct? At the current homes? Mr. Skinner: Of the 143 homes, the majority of them would back up to the existing village of Carrollton. Construction essentially will flow in two phases. You have the heavy equipment that will do the significant earthwork and dirt movement. That will be staged at the former maintenance facility of the 18-hole golf course. So,once the large yellow equipment arrives,it won't be moving to and fro within the community. The movements of those pieces of equipment will be isolated to the areas in which they're working until the roads open. But in terms of trades, once homes are being built, there are actually multiple ways of accessing the property. One being off of West Neck Road, two being off of Indian River Road, and then the third being West Neck Parkway to the west. So, the way construction traffic often works is that people choose the path of least resistance, that being the trades. But I cannot make any commitments about controlling construction traffic beyond. Mr. Plumlee: What I'm really talking about is first. You're going to be cutting in infrastructure, you're going to be cutting in roads, you're going to be cutting in lots. You're going to be putting in infrastructure, all the sub infrastructure that has to go in before you start building homes, that's what's going to happen first. Okay, Mr. Skinner: Once that equipment is on site, it won't be traveling on existing roads, such as Cadence Way or Signature Drive. It's delivered on a flatbed, dropped off, and will move around within the project area,but not on existing roads. Mr. Plumlee: Thank you. I have a couple of questions for Mr. Pocta. With regards to these proposed,I guess they're proffers that we're talking about. There is,the owner is signed on to this application, correct? Mr. Pocta: Correct. Mr. Plumlee: And the owner would be responsible for these proffers as directed. That is my understanding. Is that incorrect? Mr. Pocta: No,that's correct. Mr. Plumlee: You mentioned that the course would have to be open before surpassing 50%COs. Was that the... Mr.Pocta: So sort of in the reverse,you can't issue more than 50%of the COs until the course is opened. Mr. Plumlee: You can't exceed 50%until the course is open. Mr. Pocta: Correct. So, it's sort of a phased commitment. And initially, you know, what the Leishmans would do is they would submit a land disturbance plan with a site plan, and that would be reviewed by the city. So,essentially, it's the city's timing,however long the city takes to review and approve that. And then, on top of that, the second commitment was, sorry, I'm trying to go back to what we had here. And then they'd have to commence construction. After that, plus whatever additional due diligence they've got to do. So once they start construction, then the first CO couldn't be issued until that point. And then, should they cease construction of the golf course? You know,we're planning for all these things, you know, if they fail, right? But then also trying to bind them to make sure they succeed. And so it's a difficult, we don't often do this, right? I think we can all kind of acknowledge we don't often do this on a land use application, or rezoning, so it's difficult, it's not as straightforward as it sometimes is on an application like this. So then if they ceased construction for at least a year, or if the golf course had opened and it ceases operations for a year,then it would trigger the obligation for the maintenance plan from the owner, and then the easement or the open space agreement. Mr.Plumlee: Well, I prefer an easement that runs with the land, it binds the owner in perpetuity. Mr. Pocta: So, sure. And I recognize that. I acknowledge that. I think I agree with that. The challenge is that also places an additional burden on the city. So, I've got to recognize you've got the applicants, the property owner. Mr. Plumlee: --within that as well, is that correct? Mr. Pocta: Correct. Mr.Plumlee: So,the maintenance of the trails,the accessibility,the maintenance of proper height, overgrowth or whatever,you know,that's right,taming it. That would be required,and I think Mr. Camp pointed out, Commissioner Camp, that these things expire up to ten years. You get the credits— Mr. Pocta: Not the easement,but the open— Mr. Plumlee: Easement would not. That's why I'm talking about that, and you've discussed that with the owner and that is agreeable. Mr.Pocta: It is. And also to clarify, I don't represent the property owner. I just wanted to clarify that point, represent the applicant. But I have the authority to what I've just told you from the property owner. Mr. Camp: If I may, I'd just like to speak to that one point. I'll yield to Commissioner Mauch and come back on my questions. Mr.Pocta,with regard to the conservation easement concept that you've put forward here today. Did I understand correctly that the proffer would say that the parties would negotiate in good faith to achieve that? Is that what you're proffering? Mr. Pocta: As it sits,yeah. I mean, I'm open to different language. Mr. Camp: You can't commit to it,but you can commit to negotiating in good faith? Mr. Pocta: Correct. Partly because the city's another party to that. Mr.Camp: Actually, it's not. The City of Virginia Beach does not hold conservation easements. So,I'm not quite sure how you would do that. So you're proposing, excuse me,you are proposing an idea that this city doesn't engage in as a potential solution, that a conservation easement,where they exist,is between a property owner and another party. And I'm not going to do the legal work on this for you guys. That idea of doing it with the city or negotiating with the city is illusory because that's not going to happen. They're not going to be the other party to it. Mr.Pocta: I respectfully disagree with you,Mr. Camp. The code section refers to the open space agreement being with the city or the easement. I understand you've referred to it as a conservation easement. I believe technically it would be an open space easement rather than a conservation easement. I know we're kind of, it's a fine point there, but the municipality, I believe the code section says, would be the holder of that easement. Mr. Camp: So, we are mixing some different ideas here, but because this is a massive development involving thousands of homes here, I do want to get it right. This is sort of winging it at the end here. So let's put a finer point on it. If I understand correctly, you have suggested several ways that the property might be protected. One is with the preservation zoning on some of these parcels,which it has now. And by virtue of this application, it shows it is not a protection that is into perpetuity. It's only a protection until such time as somebody comes forward and says, I'd like to change it. You have suggested an open space agreement, which would be a 10-year maximum run, and it suggests that you won't develop any more than you're developing now. That could be put in place now,but the current owner has chosen not to do that. It was in place, as far as I know,from 1999 to 2019,20 years of people relying on that, stating that this would not be developed further. And the city was a party to that, you are correct. That was part of the inducement of making this development work,that the inducement that the city and the original developer entered into,and that these 900 and some homeowners relied upon for 20 some years, was that there would not be anything built back out their back window. So, I think we're talking about one of those as your second idea. The conservation easement, if that's what you said, as I understand it,the City of Virginia Beach does not enter into them as the direct holder. That would take a third-party nonprofit. They are not party to any of this. We can't bind some third-party entity that's not here,and I don't believe that you can come forward and bind them, either. So, I'm just saying that as a planning commissioner, encountering what you've delivered here verbally, sort of at the last minute, I've tried my best to listen and parse through the three types of protection you're describing. And so far, they are not persuasive to me, as I understand them. Mr. Pocta: May I interject? Mr. Camp: Yes, sir. Mr.Pocta: I have to respectfully disagree and also correct you. I did not suggest that it would be a conservation. I believe you brought up because I assumed we were talking about the same thing, so I apologize. But referring to the code section, it says a recorded perpetual easement that's held by a public body. So that's the municipality. And, in fact, the way that this discussion eventually first began was discussions with the city attorney's office. What are some ways that the city could have some additional control? Not that they were suggesting they needed control,but we thought, how could we put some control over this outside of the party or property owner? But have the city, because I know a lot of people want the city to have some additional enforcement mechanisms. Well, this would be that enforcement mechanism to answer Mr. Plumlee's point going beyond 10 years, but providing the same sort of enforcement and preservation. So it's an open space easement that's contemplated by that code section. Mr.Camp: Thank you for the give and take on this. I have no further questions for the application team. Mr. Coston: Commissioner Mauch. Mr.Mauch: Thank you guys for your time. The proffers that you had set forth for the golf course, I just need to take some time to consider that so we can always come back to that. There was a mention of access from Indian River Road. Have you guys worked with staff to try and get some access from Indian River Road? Mr.Skinner: We worked with various subsidiary departments of public works,then with the City Real Estate department. Subsequently,we obtained a copy of the lease and we have contacted the leaseholder,but haven't defined the dimensions or location of the proposed temporary construction easement. That's why I'm uncomfortable to Commissioner Plumlee's question to give a firm commitment on alternative construction access at this point. Mr. Mauch: Okay. So, I'm having a difficult time with the vagueness of proffer number five. Because it talks about rededicating back to the HOA, but it doesn't define, outline, or provide any square footage. There's nothing really there that binds the owner of the property, which is the current owner, to allow access. Although it's understood that you guys have said that he will be providing access,there isn't anything to say that if one day he says we don't want to provide access anymore,that there's assurances that this is going to remain open space. And I take a look at,you know. Maybe parcel A, right? It's retained by the owner, but not a part of the HOA. It doesn't have anything to do with the current development that we're looking at to put there. And we don't have any way to justify that these people can or can't utilize that property for the HOA. Do you see what I'm saying? There's no specifics in order to understand what is actually being granted to the people for access, and there's nothing saying that there's a point in which that can be denied access. And I bring this up specifically because of the back and forth, there's been a lot of bad blood between the ownership and the community, and fault on both sides. I've seen it, but to me, it doesn't demonstrate a willingness to work together. And if something makes him mad, then he may take away the privileges of utilizing that property. So, in proffer number five, it doesn't tell us what can or can't be used. And so there's nothing legally holding anybody to say that the owner of this property that's not being conveyed to Harrison and Lear for the development that they can use it. Mr. Pocta: So, I think I can mostly answer that, and then I think perhaps Mr. Skinner may interject, too. Proffer 5 refers to the open space and land that's zoned PD-HI or PD-H2, so the PD-1-12 zoned land. You have to spell out how that open space is going to be owned and maintained. And so everything that's rezoned to PD-1-12 is no longer going to be owned by the property owner. So, he won't, lack of a better way of saying this, he won't have any control over what does or does not happen to that property. And that's not what I'm concerned about. And the other piece, I think on the elbow, the other part of the elbow, because part of that elbow is zoned PD-H2,I think that other part of that elbow you're talking about,that's going to remain P-1 zoning. And so in discussions with the residents, I think in one of the village hall meetings, it came up, well, those parts of the land, there was a major issue with rezoning more land than is necessary. And so a major value consideration was, you know, is there land that's not going to have houses on it? And the answer to that question is yes. There's some forested wetlands and there's this piece you're talking about. Well, then why rezone that at all? Keep it P-1 preservation. And so, anyways, that's the rationale behind that decision. But then the land use plan, or the conceptual plan, the modification, as far as what's in there, mostly reforestation, but also some trails will be subject to that proffered plan. So, Mr. Skinner wants to add anything to that. Mr.Skinner: Proffer number five states that the open space as depicted on the concept plan, shall be conveyed to the HOA,including the multi-use trail system,which is shown on the concept plan. So the proffer, which is signed by both the applicant and the owner, includes all of the multi-use trails shown,whether it's on the property I'm acquiring or not. And the proffer binds both myself as the applicant and the owner to convey the multi-use trail system improvements to the HOA. Mr. Mauch: Would you mind telling me which page the multi-use trail system is on? Mr. Skinner: In the rezoning package? The best exhibit is the active recreation overlay on page 28. The same trails are also shown on the naturalization and planting overlay, but they're not as easy to observe. So, the best one is really the active recreation overlay. The reforestation and buffer overlay also shows the multi-use trails throughout the properties. There are three concepts included in our submittal,which the proffers bind us to that illustrate the multi-use path. Mr. Mauch: Okay, I really wish we would have had an exhibit for that, since it's clearly spelled out there in the proffers. But I don't see, and it's hard to decipher. I am looking at a very small sheet. Mr. Skinner: Yeah,the active recreation overlay is the best illustrative, the red lines throughout the active recreation overlay represent the multi-use trails. Mr. Mauch: Okay, and so that does go into the preservation area as well? Mr. Skinner: Correct. Mr. Mauch: Which is not owned or in PD-H2. Mr. Skinner: And not going to be conveyed to the applicant. Mr. Mauch: So that at any given time, the ability to cease having people come on that property is still there. Mr. Pocta: I'll defer to the talented attorneys that surround me,but that was not the intention nor how I read proffer number five. Mr. Mauch: Okay. Mr. Pocta: Yeah, I apologize. I think Jonathan corrected me on that point on proffer number five. So that appears to be what that conveys. Mr. Mauch: It does. It does convey. Mr. Pocta: Not the ownership of— Mr. Skinner: But the obligation to complete and convey to the HOA the maintenance of said areas. Mr.Mauch: Alright. Mr. Skinner: Proffer number six, if I may, talks about the completion of the multi-use trails within 12 months of issuance. Proffer number six states the multi-use paths and water quality improvements depicted on the concept plan shall be installed within 12 months. Then, reverting back to proffer number five, in the last sentence,could perhaps be improved,but at its essence,the multi-use trail system, as depicted on the concept plan,will be conveyed to the HOA, which shall be responsible for maintaining said area. Mr. Mauch: Okay, so the trail will be conveyed through somebody else's property and the HOA will be responsible for upkeep,maintenance. And it'll be open and not have the ability to be taken away? Mr. Skinner: Correct. Mr.Mauch: Is that how staff sees it or legal? And while they're thinking about it, the reason... I have signed quite a few leases for properties. And I've always realized, after the fact, that the devil's in the details. And so I want to make sure that the devil's in the details. And that we're not doing something that we think we can do, and later on is taken away. Mr.Skinner: Yeah. And Proffers 5 and 6 address your concerns? But if I'm mistaken,please let me know. Ms. Alcock: So. I think the question is, what is being conveyed? So if there's a maintenance responsibility that's being conveyed to the homeowners association that's located on property that they don't own, is it maintenance? Is it an easement that's being conveyed? What's being? I think there might be a couple different conveyance,some may be in fees,some may just be in easement, but it doesn't explicitly say. Mr. Pocta: Yeah, I mean, I know that the zoning ordinance itself requires,which I think is what gives rise to this proffer, that PD-H2 zoning says that the open space within that zoning that you commit to how that's going to be owned and maintained,whether it's the city,whether it's an HOA or a third party. So. I think that's what that refers to. I'd have to look at that specific section, section 1127. So. I believe that's where it sits. Ms. Alcock: But that's relevant to just PD-H2. So. I think that's what we're trying to clear up. What is happening with the common trails and open space that's P-1 outside of the PD-H2. Mr.Pocta: Yes,I think Jonathan kind of set forth what the expectation,what the plan,what your... Mr. Skinner: The multi-use trail system, as depicted on the concept plan, was my guiding principle, if you will. The intention is for the access and maintenance, and I'm not sure of the easement types, Deputy City Attorney,but I'm open to suggestions. Mr.Pocta: Oh yeah,okay, I see now you're referring to the maintenance obligation, so I'm sorry, Jonathan. So Mr. Skinner is correct. On that last portion of the proffer, I was referring to the ownership conveyance, referring to the PD-H2 zoning, the last sentence of this proffer. It says that the HOA shall be responsible for maintaining all the following area on the property. On the property,the larger property is not just that which is owned PD-H2,the multi-use trail system,that featured signage, and other improvements in the common area of the property as depicted on the overall concept plan. So,yes, maintenance obligation. Yes. Ownership? No. Access? Yes. Mr. Mauch: That's sufficient. Is that how you see it? Mr.Pocta: And if there's a request or a need, I'm glad to look into the need to clarify this so that the intent is carried out. I don't think there's any issue with that. Mr. Mauch: Yeah, I think what I'm trying to get to is I would love to be able to see it clearly stated what is and what isn't. I think it's a little deficient in that and giving maybe a little ambiguity. And I would love to be able to see proffer number five worked on. Because, and even an exhibit that would depict the conveyances, I think that that would be helpful for whatever decision gets made here as a recommendation for council to see as well. Mr. Pocta: Sure, I think we are glad to produce an exhibit that only kind of speaks to maybe this proffer, for example,but I do think the exhibits Mr. Skinner mentioned show where the multi-use trail system is, show it's being conveyed in terms of ownership. And then we just referred to the proffer as to where the maintenance obligation lies, which would include access. But we could, on top of that, include between now and ten days before council an exhibit that maybe just speaks to that proffer, or, if there are others you know, requested as well. Mr. Skinner: And just as a note, the multi-use trail, as shown on the concept plan, is going through three zoning categories in our proposal: P-1, PD-H1 near the existing roundabout, and PD-H2. Mr. Mauch: And the PD-H 1 is also being retained by the current owner? Mr. Skinner: Yes. Mr. Mauch: That's parcel E. Mr. Skinner: Correct. But the multi-use trail passes through parcels A, C, D, and E. Mr. Mauch: And it would be much easier if this entire property was being sold as a lump. Because we have multiple different property owners inside of an area that has a development around it, that has a development inside of it. And I'm just trying to still understand all the nuts and bolts of it, not the nuts and bolts. I've got those pretty much down. It's just making sure and having assurances that the communities that are going to be or not be in here,at least in the proffers, that they're clear, and that it's not that they don't have the ability to do anything. I trust you, Mr. Pocta, and I trust you, Mr. Skinner, to do what you say you're going to do. I think the distrust comes from the current ownership and understanding of the things in the past that have been done, or lack of things that have been done to bring us to this point. And I think that's one of the most difficult things to do is to trust somebody that has shown time and time again that he is not going to be a good neighbor and or he has not been a good neighbor, doesn't mean he won't be. But there's a track record there, and I don't think that personal things should come up, but this gives a track record of the type of person that he is. And I wish he was here to be able to speak to him because then I would understand what his intent of keeping this property would be. And I don't know if you guys have any insight as to what the current property owner wants to do with the property that he's retaining. I think it's pretty pertinent to this application. Mr. Pocta: Well, let's just answer that last question Commissioner Mauch that the proffered concept plan and all the proffers have come along with it, as well as the development and design criteria. I mean, this is probably the most, it's probably the most detailed plan I've ever worked on,in the most complex. And the property owner has had to sign on to all of it as a property owner. And I don't represent the Leishmans in their agreement with the property owner also. But that's my understanding is there's been legal counsel for the Leishmans and legal counsel for the property owner, who have also had to come to terms of an agreement. So, I know there's all these sort of additional ways of kind of binding the property owner,restricting the property owner, et cetera. And I'm not going to speak to property owner's character one way or the other. It's not my place. But we're trying to do all that we can from the applicant standpoint,with our plan,with our proposal. Mr. Mauch: And I think the one thing you stated that, you know, Mr. Skinner has his legal counsel. The Leishmans have their legal counsel, and the property owner has their legal counsel. But everybody that has their own counsel is looking out for their own best interest, which is perfectly fine. That's what you should do. But nobody's looking out for the interest of the surrounding area. And I think that's the reason why these need to be clarified. I think that's kind of our job is to look out for the interest of the citizens and the city. Mr. Pocta: Sure, I don't disagree with that, and I think too. A lot of this plan, much of this plan has come as a result of discussion,collaboration,listening and receiving requests. And then getting the property to agree to some of those requests for those residents, many of whom we heard speaking tonight. Mr. Skinner: So, I would also add the proffer number seven, it was created and imagined with the interest of the surrounding owners. The requirement that we've obligated ourselves to do a reserve study for the elements that are included on the concept plan that will be dedicated to the HOA. And post a performance bond to subsidize any deficit identified in the reserve study. That was the very focus of that proffer was to protect the surrounding residents and ensure that these improvements that are shown on the concept plan will not only be built, which is proffer number six within 12 months of the approval of the E&S and Stormwater Management plan,but will have adequate reserves either through developer subsidy or budgeting in proffer number seven with the HOA. Mr. Coston: Thank you. Commissioner Schoonover. Ms. Schoonover: I had pages of questions,unfortunately, everything has been answered for me. I don't need any questions, all answered. I do have a question for any of the residents who were opposed to this project. There's just one thing I want to hear from you all. And what is your expectations for this land if this project is not done? Because I'm not hearing what I think is an adequate enough answer for me to make a choice. I'm hearing that you all just kind of are fine with it going on the way it is, and I'm hearing death and destruction. So you're welcome to be the one. I just want somebody, or more than one somebody. It's fine with me if there's more than one person. This is a key point for me. Mr. Quinter: Thank you, if I might, unless anybody else would step up here. One of the things I think that we're missing is that, and since you're relatively new, and we've got two new people, this owner,when he came in,he refused a couple applicants. We complained about the buildup of weeds. The city took them to court. And this goes back to Ms. Hippen's question. The city took them to court to maintain it. And he beat the city, okay, because the city had some procedural things. Because on P-1 property,you cannot leave trash there. And that's what almost burned up the 8 to 12 houses when they had the fire. Then we took them to court in our process through the West Neck Community Association. We are three and a half years into that court case. It's being decided right now in the appeals court in Richmond,the Federal court. We went to Virginia Beach District Court. They said they'll hear it. It's just about maintaining the property. Ms.Hippen: Okay,but what do you want done with the property? Mr. Quinter: What we want done with the property is the same thing that the Leishmans want done with it. We want to be able to have somebody like Mark and Audrey come in,lease the land, give a reasonable return to the owner. Ms. Schoonover: Pardon me for one second. This is not the answer to my question. You're having a lot of thoughts about a lot of things that are not what I'm trying to find out. So let me just clarify, because I don't think I asked it correctly. I'm tired. I've got a little cold, so I apologize. So what I'm trying to get at is, I have been told on multiple occasions, this land is going to be secured against you. In other words,you will have zero access to this land. It won't be open space for you to enjoy. You won't be able to set foot on it. Court cases of it being, it might be beautifully maintained behind a gigantic fence for all I know. But from my understanding is, you will have zero access to this property. So if you have zero access to this property,what are your expectations from your standpoint for this neighborhood? Mr. Quinter: The city, when we approached the city, they came back and they said, you know, they recommended. The city attorney recommended to our association that we look at State Code 48-1 and declare the property as a public nuisance. Some homeowners, and I was one of them, tried to get it as a private nuisance, a public nuisance, and set a grand jury to say we can't do that because we've been in litigation since day one. The reason that we're where we are right now is the owner has not put any money into the property. There's no holding cost. They'll wait forever. Ms. Schoonover: I hear what you're saying. Let's say you have no recourse. Let's say this man beautifully maintains it behind whatever secured method, he's going to secure this property. Do you have some expectation that you're going to somehow gain control of this property out of his hands and regain this space as open space for you all in some way? Mr. Quinter: No, we would love him just to lease it for a golf course. Ms. Schoonover: But let's say he won't do that. Mr. Quinter: If he doesn't do that our expectation is that he'll have to maintain the place. If he has to maintain it, it will cost him money. He'll find a way. Ms.Schoonover: But,I mean,let me say,let's pretend he's going to maintain it while it is secured against you. So, you have zero access, because he has no requirement to give you access to this, as far as I can understand. So, let's say it's beautifully maintained, somehow secured against you. Are you okay with the idea that you would completely lose access to this land, even if it's beautifully maintained, behind some sort of method of securing this property? Mr. Quinter: Well, under the current guidelines that he has to live under, that we went to court for, he has to maintain, of course, and of course, our community standards. Our community standards define the type of fences he could put. If he just puts one of those fences around that you can see through,they're small aluminium fences,you know, and we're looking at a nice piece of property forever. It's just not a golf course. That would be alternative two. Alternative one is he makes a return on his investment, which wasn't much, and he leases it to somebody like the Leishmans for 18 holes. Mr. Leishman has said, and the developer for the golf course has said, they'd love to have an 18-hole golf course. Ms.Schoonover: We understand that. And I understand that there's been a full golf course offered before, and that was turned down. But that's off the table. Your only option, from what I understand, is this project or no project. And are you saying that you are fine with no project and completely losing all access and possibly visibility to this land? Mr. Quinter: At this stage, the answer is yes. We don't have any access. Ms. Schoonover: That's kind of what I'm getting at here. Mr.Cohns: It's always been a golf course. We didn't lose anything. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Pardon my outburst. We don't have access. We don't expect to get access. We would like for the weeds to be cut. That's a matter that has to be taken up between the city and whether they choose to go back and try and enforce the zoning code. If the property were maintained in accordance with the city's zoning code. We can't control anything else. That would be my expectation. That's a very low threshold that should be able to be met. I keep hearing about accessibility. I don't view that as an issue for us. If it becomes an 18-hole golf course, it's going to have restricted access like it should, so people can play safely. If it doesn't become an 18-hole golf course and it stays the way it is and the brush is cut and the grass is down and the fire hazard for our neighbors in Indian River goes away,will we like that? We won't like it at all,but we have accepted the fact that it is closed. And we are not in a legal position to do a dang-gone thing about it. And so we're going to be forced to accept it. Now, do we like that? No. But the reality is, we realize that's where we're at, and we can't do anything about it. Ms. Schoonover: That's what I wanted to understand. Mr. Cohns: So, the short answer is, we don't expect anything to happen. We can't make a plan because we don't own it. Mr. Plumlee: This is going to be an endless line. Ms. Smith: Did you feel like your question got the answer? Ms. Schoonover: I think he just answered it unless you had something that was different that you wanted to say. Ms. Smith: It's not different. It's cooperation. And without the majority landowner in our spaces to have a discussion, we can't speculate. We would love to speculate with you. I would love to. But unfortunately, we're not in a position of that. We've never seen the landowner come to the table with our community. And that's the sad truth. Mr. Coston: Commissioner Plumlee? Mr. Plumlee: Well, because the night must come to an end at some point. I'm going to make a motion and then we can beat up the motion for as long as we need to beat up the motion. But there will be a motion, there needs to be something to swing at, right. I'm going to take no pleasure in this motion and I hope none of you will either. I'm going to move to approve this application. However,my recommendation,which is only a recommendation and can just be heard by counsel, comes with some very important elements in it. And if they're not in it, in my view, and I say this to the television cameras, in which maybe there's a council person looking at this moment,it is not my recommendation if it cannot be achieved. Because I know with these last-minute proffers, the applicant is not bound. So here goes. My handwriting, I wish, was better, but the trail system throughout this project, proffer five, it has to be cleaned up. There needs to be an exhibit and it needs to be shown clearly that the HOA is going to maintain it in perpetuity. Let me say it's the HOA that would be created by this subdivision. So these are going to be some expensive houses. We talked about the upfront and the ongoing, and then the if it ceases. And these come with particulars for me. For there to be the very first certificate of occupancy, there have to be sufficient financial assurances submitted for the golf course,its construction,and a fair period of maintenance as determined by the Development Permit Office of this city. There has to be a plan for the golf course, approved by development permits. There must be a 50- year lease received by the city and confirmed by the City Attorney's office. The trails, I'm going to come back to the trails on the golf course. I see that as different than the other remaining trails for the purpose of what I'm talking about. The certificate of occupancy is limited to 50% until such time as the golf course is opened, in accordance with the approved plan of the City Development Permit Office. And so then we talk about probably the most important thing to me, because when there's energy to start something,there's not always the sufficient energy to maintain it. But this might help get things there. If the golf course ceases for a period of one and a half years, all kinds of things can happen in a year and a half, but for one and a half years, there must be, before approval of this rezone, an easement in a form approved by the city attorney in a recordable form, which may be recorded by the city upon its determination of there being a cessation for this period of time. There must be in that same easement and other documentation as required, maintenance required by the owner, by the HOA,and that's why I asked about the HOA being members. They should be members. They should be paying fees, and the maintenance must be sufficiently bonded to the satisfaction of the city's administration. So there's always on the fly. That's my motion. And I'd like to address it if there's a second. Mr. Schoonover: Second. Mr. Plumlee: Well, I said I was not going to make anyone happy. That's what I meant. And sometimes, you know, we have to look around at our opportunities, about what we can want and what we can get. And how often it comes around. It doesn't come around that often. I've been in land business for a long,long time. I'm an attorney. I see these failures. They're constantly in my office. This is an increase on the one-to-one density, but it's not much of an increase in the density that this city has previously approved. There is not sufficient open space currently that is accessible to this community. That is critical. There's not even a current, and I asked this this morning, there is not a current capital improvement project submitted for the vast amount of maintenance that has to be performed for stormwater in this location. There's not even an application for one. So how is it going to be done? We need private development to do it. Our conflicts have to reach a resolution. You know,you've heard me talk up here about attainable housing and affordable housing. This is not affordable housing I'm talking about. But it's housing. One way to break the escalating prices is to add to the stock. It is a chain from top down. And there are not many tools that we have in our toolbox to do it. So, I don't applaud the way this came about, but I've seen many land transactions, and no one looks back at them and says how pretty they were. They're not. So, I just want to share one story about Signature. I'm a terrible golfer, but I've been golfing since I grew up in Kansas. We always played on these cow patty golf courses that were kind of sad, but we loved to play. And I moved to this beautiful paradise of Virginia Beach, you know, 30 years ago, and it's wonderful. I love it. Best, I typically shoot like 110 or something. And I can't be trusted as a teammate for someone. But I shot an 82, a legitimate 82 on that golf course that I loved, okay? Not nine holes. Anyway,this change is harsh,but it's been coming in degrees for a while. We're the planning commission. History is important, and we need to understand trust is important, as Mr. Mauch has put it. That's why I spent the time with these elements, to try to stitch the trust where it's not to be left to chance. But we're a recommending body. There is another body that has to consider this, and I hope they'll listen to all of this presentation. I'm sure they will. And educate themselves on all these points. We have to plan and move forward. Anyway, thank you, Mr. Chair. Mr. Mauch: Could I ask that Tori weigh in? I just want to make sure because proffers are supposed to be given up by the applicant, and I want to make sure that we're not forcing the proffers. That's on their own free will. And realistically, I would have some huge reservations about making a decision on proffers that aren't in our application and really haven't had an opportunity to view. But I'll let her speak. Ms. Eisenberg: I was actually gonna ask for some clarity myself, based on a comment by Commissioner Plumlee. So the way I heard the motion phrased and how I feel like you meant the motion to read may be different. So,as we discussed,proffers have to be voluntary and they have to be submitted to my office 21 days prior to your hearing. So what I heard on your motion was that perhaps you meant to phrase it as a motion for denial for the application that is before you, but to recommend certain proffers that you think would be preferable in the event that City Council chose to approve the application. I don't know if that's what you were meaning to do,but... Mr. Plumlee: It's not. What I'm meaning to do is recommend approval of the application, as I just laid it out, with all of the proffers that I put, which they're not required to do, but this is a recommendation. The council that I'm fully articulating what is currently before me, in terms of what's in writing,is supplemented by what was spoken and what was presented as well. And there was a lot of head nodding and agreement with these proffers as I laid them out. I believe there was agreement. So that's what I meant. Ms. Hippen: Can I ask counsel a question? In the past, we have had, like some of the things that we have approved. See, I can't even talk now. It's getting late. We have, like in District 4, we have put a five-year condition on it. Are we not allowed to put conditions as part of it? How did we do that? Ms. Eisenberg: But those would have been on a conditional use permit, which has unilateral conditions that can be imposed regardless of whether or not the applicant agrees. Mr. Coston: Okay. Commissioner Schoonover has been waiting the longest right now. Ms. Schoonover: That's perfectly fine. You all needed to ask those questions before anything was really done, anyway. I want to start by saying I had no dog in this fight. I had zero thoughts about this space. I had zero thoughts about what my goals might be for it. I completely put myself in the hands of everybody who was willing to talk to me about this. I went out of my way to go to every event that I could and to try to talk to people about this, to make myself as available as humanly possible. That being said, I looked at this decision from four points. One,the basic use of this land,the project in and of itself,what's best for the city,etc. The feelings of the residents, both for and against it. The, for lack of a better term, land war going on in this area between all the various residents and players in this situation. And four, a question that one of the opponents asked me in an email. So, from the standpoint of the project in and of itself, I thought it was a great project. I thought it was a good compromise. I thought it was a great use of this space. 1, you know, everybody would love to do a variety of different things,but we have to deal with it from the standpoint of what is possible,what everybody is willing to do. And from the standpoint of that, this sounds like the only option short of doing literally nothing. I would like to see, if it's possible, the new homeowners association, or sorry, the new homes be connected to the old homeowners association, as opposed to being in a separate. I think it would protect your interests, frankly,but that's just my opinion about that. In terms of the feelings of the people in the neighborhood,I can absolutely understand where you're coming from. It must have been an incredible shock to find out that you had zero control over this property, that what you had hoped would stay there forever was gone. And I absolutely would have shared your views about that. I would be just as upset as you are. From the standpoint of the people who are in favor of this project,I should say. I had people on both sides who were coming to me virtually in tears about this situation. Both sides, tears about how upset that they were and a lot of the bullying that has gone on. I'm sure on both sides if you take everybody, every player into consideration. I myself had some rather unpleasant remarks made to me that I did not appreciate, but I'm a big girl and I can take it. It doesn't bother me. But at some point,you have to make different choices. And I think that this land war that's been going on over there is very unhealthy for everybody. Everybody. And that brings me to the question that I was asked by one of the opponents to this project, and that was, what would I do if my relative lived in this neighborhood? And I will tell you that if it were me and my family, I would want them to have peace and quiet and a happy space. And I think the only way that you are going to get it is with this project. I don't think that there's anything that's going to improve. I think you're going to continue to have hostilities if this land is just simply maintained and you have no access to it. I'm sure that all the legal actions are going to continue. I really don't see any other way forward for you. And based on those four pieces of my thoughts, I am going to vote for this project. Mr. Coston: Commissioner Mauch. Mr. Mauch: Can I get clarification again from legal? Is the motion that is being made a legal motion? Ms.Eisenberg: There can be a motion made for approval,and there can be a motion that includes recommended conditions that they would like to see, which is the motion that is made. So the motion itself, I would say, yes, that's fine. What the point of clarity I was trying to make is we cannot have a motion that is conditioned on additional proffers that are being phrased at the dais. So it can't be an approval if we get this, because then they wouldn't be voluntary. But you could have a motion for approval. You're approving the application that is before you today and also saying,but we would like these added. If it is otherwise,I think it would come forward as a motion for denial. You would deny the application that is before you today, and then part of the motion would include, but in the event that City Council so chooses, or, you know, votes, that this is an appropriate land use decision, that you would like to see certain recommended proffers. I think it could also be done that way. Mr. Mauch: Okay. Thank you. Commissioner Plumlee,you stated that you were going to piss everybody off. I think I'm going to one-up you. I don't think that we have a huge concern with making proffers on the fly. And I don't think that the way it's done,as Tori has explained, is we're able to do it. And I think we need to have proffers that are a part of our consideration before us to consider before sending them to council. And I guess maybe I'll defer to you, Commissioner Plumlee,and Commissioner Schoonover,I believe,was a second,right? To, if you wanted to kind of rescind the motion. Mr. Plumlee: I'm going to call for the vote is what I'm going to do. Mr. Mauch: So I'm still in the middle of my speech, and so I think what needs to be done is a substitute motion. I'm going to make a substitute motion for deferral so that we can understand and see what these proffers are that we're going to be recommending to City Council. Mr. Coston: Before we go down that road. I think I want to know— Mr.Mauch: I would say I still have the floor— Mr. Camp: And I'm waiting to be recognized after he's done with the floor. Mr.Coston: Okay. I thought I heard Commissioner Plumlee say that he saw some heads nodding, that there was some agreement. Mr. Plumlee: Yes,they're still nodding, yes. Mr. Coston: So, let's have them come and say if they agree to these. Mr. Mauch: We're in the middle of the hearing, it's over. Ms. Schoonover: I think we can rely on council to pay attention to what we're saying in this commission. Ms. Hippen: I'm sure we can rely on council to know what we said. And there will be minutes anyway- Ms. Schoonover: To fully grasp what we're saying. Mr. Camp: We have a substitute motion to read in a second. What's going on? Mr. Plumlee: And Toni, as I explained it, it is not a conditioned motion. What it is, is a recommendation in full. Mr. Pocta: Yeah,we were just going back and forth. I mean,the ordinance, it's not written well, in my opinion, but nonetheless, it says, approve, deny, add. But it seems like, and I agree with Attorney Eisenberg,that what could be done,I can't advise the Planning Commission,I can't advise City Council. My reading of it is that you could move to approve. You could add conditions or proffers,but you couldn't say,it seems to me,and I don't--yeah,I'm in a difficult spot,but it seems to me you couldn't say this motion is contingent upon, but I can tell you. But we are, and Mr. Skinner is here to authorize what it is he would be agreeable to, which we would intend to do between now and 10 days before City Council. And just to clarify, too, on the record, et cetera, et cetera,the reason that this is not on the fly, the reason these things are coming up is there are a lot of residents who told us we don't want you to delay or defer these things any longer. How can this be done now? I think this is the way, and in discussions with the city attorney's office, this is the way it can be done now, which is why we're here, not because there's some kind of on the fly proffers or something, so anyways. Ms. Alcock: So, if I may, just to try to overly simplify this, you need to take into account the application that's in front of you tonight. And that is what you are considering. And then you can recommend that. When it goes to council, it would be nice for these proffers to be in place for them to consider. You can't consider those as part of your vote tonight. Mr. Plumlee: I'm advising counsel, and I'm speaking into the television again, that my recommendation is based on all these things. And I've said them. I'm not going beyond my bounds in saying them. And it's going to be up to the applicant to deliver them or not. And counsel to accept them or reject them. Mr. Camp: Mr. Chairman. May I have a point of order? Mr. Coston: Yes, sir. Mr. Camp: As I understand it,we had a motion on the table for a substitute motion. And before we could hear if there was a second, we got into this other discussion. So my understanding is we need to clear that matter in order to then proceed and deal with things before us. So, respectfully, is there a second to the substitute motion or not? Mr. Coston: Is there a second? I didn't hear anybody second. Okay, then we go back to this motion over here then. Mr.Camp: Alright,so if I may be recognized for discussion of the motion on the table. We spent a great deal of time talking about the desirability of re-establishing a golf course. To me,that is at best the secondary issue here. The application is requesting permission to put 143 new homes on existing land that is currently zoned for preservation. That's what's in front of us. Now, abating a nuisance, reestablishing a recreational amenity, those are all fine, secondary things, but we're not voting on those things, as I understand it, as the primary matter before us. I disagree respectfully with my fellow commissioner about this is the only way forward. I don't see it that way. I read over 400 letters. I listened to every speaker tonight. I went back and talked to members of council who were here in 1999 to ask them about what their thinking was when they put this deal together. I've read the legal filings from 1999 forward,the ones that are in place and the ones that were put in place and expired. I feel like I did my homework here. The things that I think matter. And I'm saying this to circle back to the staff recommendation. The staff did their homework,too, and they weighed all of these pieces of evidence short of the testimony we heard tonight, which they didn't have the benefit of And I believe they got it right,that the only reason that the villages of West Neck exist is because the density requirement was shifted from the homes to the golf course. The golf course was the essential factor that enabled the homes to be built in the streets in the fashion they are. In fact, it was quoted to us, I'm not going to read it back,that it stated right in the discussion that, but for that amenity, it never could have been approved in 1999. What this comes down to is you can't eat the same apple twice. We already ate the apple when this thing was approved to the villages of West Neck. To come back later and say that same land can now be used for something else unwinds the deal that was made in the first place. And it unwinds the deal that was maintained with city participation for 20 years, that a thousand homeowners relied upon. Eyes wide open, they understood this is zoned for preservation and the city has entered into an agreement with the statement that it is in the public interest that it stay the way it is. Open space, that's the signed document that we have in the record. And that was there 20 years,when all these people bought their home. That,I think,matters. We talk about trust. We talk about expectations. I heard many people say this is the most important purchase of their life, their home, particularly at this stage of life. It really matters. I don't see us worrying about the golf course piece to the exclusion of the main issue at hand,which is it proper to build 143 houses a few feet out the back window of people who, in good faith and with the city's own participation,were told,you're not going to have anything out that back window but open space? Open space can mean more than a golf course, but that's what they were told. And so I am not convinced by any of these great plans, which are great, that we need to take our eye off the main issue here. To sum this up, I've heard many people say six years is enough, talking about the current state of things. Well, you know, what's too long? Forever. You stick houses out these people's back windows that were never intended to be there because this zoning decision was already made and flew, you have a forever problem. Not a six-year problem. I believe, listening carefully to the people who testified, that there is a path forward to have this declared a public nuisance and to bring about enforcement on that public nuisance as soon as these other matters clear up. The solution is not to build 143 homes, burden some of these people for the failure to go ahead and prosecute the public nuisance that, I believe, has every possibility of being declared. I'll stand on the rest of the record,but I'll just tell you that from my perspective, there are a number of ways forward. I don't believe that we're in the golf course rehabilitation business. I'm glad the private market is, and it's a stellar team that's been put together, and I hope my fellow commissioners, don't take their eye off the question before us that staff has rendered a recommendation on that matters to a thousand homeowners out there. Thank you. Ms. Hippen: My turn. We listened to 45 people today. I just want to tell you, I counted them. 45 people, and that's not all that was signed up. There were three more, four that were against, that showed up today. It is very obvious that this land,because of the court fights that are ongoing, this land is not going to be fixed. This land is not going to be cleared up. It is a public nuisance, but you've obviously got an owner who's got a legal war chest. I appreciate what Commissioner Camp said, that he went back and talked to some of the people who decided on this development when it was started,when it was a golf course. Unfortunately, what happens in our city, and I'm not saying this in a bad way, I'm just stating a fact, is that minds change over time. Minds change over time. If I had snakes and mice and all that stuff, and a fire coming into my house, I would want it cleaned up. What would I do? I am retired. And I told you how long I served, and I've been retired almost that long. And I didn't go in after high school. Told you I'm older than you think. When I bought the house that I'm in, in 1997, I didn't think that they were going to build the four apartment complexes a block and a half away. I didn't know if they were going to extend Lynnhaven Parkway across Volvo. There was a court fight to extend Lynnhaven Parkway the other direction. We need housing. We are in a housing crisis. This is for my age group,over 55. And I think that considering how many projects have been approved in the transition zone, that this one needs to be approved, too. Mr. Coston: Okay,we have a motion on the floor to... Ms.Eisenberg: And before y'all vote,I would just like to clarify the motion for everyone,if that's okay. And I can let Commissioner Plumlee speak to his additions. I'm not going to attempt to clarify on all of those, but just to make sure everyone is clear, because it seemed to me that there was some back and forth and a little bit of confusion. So,I just want to make sure before we take the vote, that everyone is aware that what is happening is that you can recommend approval and you can add additional proffers, but that that recommendation for approval is a recommendation for approval,regardless. So even if those requested proffers do not come, if the applicant does not voluntarily make those additions at least 10 days prior to City council,this body's recommendation would still be that of a recommendation for approval. So,I just want to make sure we're all on the same page. Mr. Plumlee: I understood that. Mr. Coston: As I did also. Commissioner Mauch, you want to say something before we... Mr. Mauch: I do. I think a lot of the onus of the issues that we have are being put on the city. And I think that's an unfair assessment. The onus of the issues that we have are on the property owner for not taking care of his property the way he should. And what we're ending up doing right now,if we choose to approve, is saying that because somebody doesn't take care of their property, now we feel like we need to make a decision that comes to us, which ultimately gives the owner what his desirable outcome was by strong-arming the city, these residents of both neighborhoods. And we're telling City Council that we're recommending that we approve because we don't want to see this unsightliness in people's backyards anymore. Staffs analysis shows that the proposal does not meet the transition area design guidelines targets for either total open space or usable open space. The project falls short on both benchmarks. To the most important things within the transition area guidelines. Reducing open space while adding residential units further moves this site away from the standards that now govern development within the transition area. The transition area exists for a very specific reason. It was intentionally established to create a clear and deliberate buffer between the city's suburban and urban development patterns to the north and the rural area to the south. It represents a promise to our residents that growth in this part of the city would be responsible, limited in intensity, and guided by a framework that prioritizes permanent open space, low impact development and long-term land use stability. The original West Neck development achieved its level of density largely because the golf course functioned as the organized open space feature for the community. That open space system was central to how the development was structured and how its intensity was rationalized. While that approach may have been sufficient to allow the project to move forward at that time, it also effectively exhausted the development capacity of this land. The density that was permitted was inseparable from the presence of a substantial, defining open space amenity. What is being proposed now seeks to retain the benefit of that original density while reducing the very feature that supported it, and then to add additional residential intensity on top of that. This approach does not meet the standards set forth in the planning guidelines. Yes, they are guidelines, but this is egregiously over the guidelines by a multiple of at least two and a half. It represents a material escalation of development pressures on a site that has already absorbed its share. Finally, the transition area was created to provide certainty, certainty for the residents, certainty for the future commissioners, certainty for future councils, and certainty that development pressures would not simply migrate southward over time. Approving a rezoning that adds density beyond what this land has already absorbed, relies on an unenforceable amenity, and lacks clear, binding open space commitments undermines that purpose. For these reasons and a lack of enforceability from what we're taking action on today, insufficient clarity in the proffers, failure to meet the transition area open space and density expectations, and the risk of repeating the same situation we are in today. Because ultimately, what we're doing is taking Signature at West Neck and that West Neck community and doing the exact same thing here, where we have a golf course that's not owned by the HOA. And who knows what happens 15, 20 years, 30 years down the line. We're putting ourselves in the exact same situation that we were in when this project came about. And I think that people really need to understand that. This proposal asks the Commission to rely on intentions rather than obligations for what we see today. And this is what we're voting on. And to disregard adopted guidelines that have a value to the southern portion of the city, that if you don't live there, you truly don't understand what that means to District 2. And by voting yes to approve this project, it clearly shows the lack of understanding of what that does, what this transition area,what this buffer does, and understanding what it does for the people in the southern portion of the city. And I'm not comfortable doing this in the transition area, and for those reasons, I intend to vote for denial for this application. Mr.Plumlee: Mr. Chairman, I respect everyone's opinion. I call for the vote. Mr. Coston: We're ready for the vote. Ms.Schoonover: Just two seconds. I just wanted to clarify because there were a couple comments made that gave a different impression. I'm voting point of procedure. Mr.Mauch: I think the question's been called. Ms. Schoonover: Okay, well, I just want to make sure we all know what we're voting for. I'm voting for a project that is a hybrid of housing. Mr.Mauch: Mr. Chair,the question has been called. Ms. Schoonover: Has it been called? Do we know what we're voting on? I'm voting for half a golf course and half housing. That's what I wanted to clarify. Ms. Hippen: He did. But we need to all be respectful of each other. Mr. Coston: Madam Clerk, could you please? Clerk: The vote is open. Mr. Mauch: Before we vote, could we get clarification on the motion? I just need to hear the motion. Clerk: By a recorded vote of 7 to 3 with one abstention from Vice Chair Byler, Items 2 and 3, Harrison and Lear, Inc.,has been recommended for approval. Mr. Coston: This concludes this meeting. Thank you everyone for showing up. Meeting is adjourned. Vote Tall Commission Member AYE 7 NAY 3 ABS 1 ABSENT 0 Camp X Cromwell X Anderson X B ler Vice Chair X Schoonover X Plumlee X Hi en X Cuellar X Coston Chair X Moorjani X Mauch X Proffers Proffer 1 When the Property is developed, the layout, land uses, recreation and open spaces shall be in substantial conformance with the exhibit entitled, "Conceptual Master Plan, Preserve at West Neck, Virginia Beach, VA," prepared by WPL and found on pages 1 and 2 of the multi-page document entitled "The Preserve at West Neck Development & Design Criteria Land Use Plan," prepared by WPL, VHB, and Harrison and Lear, dated November 3, 2025 and revised on January 5, 2026 which have been exhibited to the City of Virginia Beach City Council and are on file with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning and Community Development (hereinafter the "Concept Plan" and "The Preserve at West Neck Development & Design Criteria Land Use Plan", respectively). The Concept Plan and The Preserve at West Neck Development & Design Criteria Land Use Plan are incorporated herein by this reference. Proffer 2 When the Property is developed, the land uses; layout;trail section; roadway sections with street widths, curb heights; and development criteria to include building elevations, lot dimensions, setbacks, building heights, buffers, and reforestation shall be as set forth in the multi-page document entitled, "The Preserve at West Neck Design & Development Criteria Land Use Plan", prepared by WPL,VHB, and Harrison& Lear,Inc., dated November 3, 2025 and revised on January 5, 2026, and which has been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning and Community Development. The dimensional requirements identified in The Preserve at West Neck Design & Development Criteria Land Use Plan shall be in lieu of all corresponding criteria in the Virginia Beach Zoning Ordinance (the "Zoning Ordinance") applicable to the R-20 Residential District. Proffer 3 When the Property is developed, the number of residential dwelling units thereon shall not exceed one hundred forty-three (143). Proffer 4 When the Property is developed, all residential structures constructed on the Property shall be in substantial conformance with the conceptual architectural exhibit entitled, "Residential Dwelling Precedent Images, The Preserve at West Neck", which has been provided within The Preserve at West Neck Development& Design Criteria Land Use Plan and exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning and Community Development. Exterior building materials shall be of high quality and include the use of cement fiber siding, brick, and asphalt shingle roofing. The use of exterior vinyl siding shall be prohibited on the principal dwellings. Proffer 5 As and when each subdivision plat of the Property is recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia ("Clerk's Office"), the Grantors shall record in the Clerk's Office a Declaration submitting the property shown thereon to restrictive covenants governing the use and occupancy of the Property, including, without limitation, a covenant that imposes a mandatory membership in the Preserve at West Neck Homeowners' Association ("HOA") for each owner of a subdivided residential lot. The open space (as that term is defined in Section 1127 of the CZO) shown on such subdivision plats shall be conveyed to the HOA, which shall be responsible for maintaining all of the following area on the Property: multi-use trail system, entrance feature signage, and other improvements in the common area of the Property as depicted on the Concept Plan. Proffer 6 The multi-use paths and water quality improvements depicted on the Concept Plan shall be installed within twelve (12) months of approval of the Erosion and Sediment Control/Stormwater Management Plan or Construction Plan by the City of Virginia Beach, whichever is approved first. Proffer 7 Prior to the turnover of the HOA from the Grantors to the property owners, as set forth in the Virginia Property Owners Association Act established in Title 55.1 Chapter 18 of the Code of Virginia,the Grantors shall perform a Reserve Study and post a Performance Bond,to the benefit of the HOA, to subsidize any deficit identified in the Reserve Study. Proffer 8 As part of the site plan approval process and subject to the approval of the Department of Public Works / Traffic Engineering Staff ("Traffic Engineering Staff"), the Grantors will design and construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Signature Drive and West Neck Road (the "Traffic Signal"), in accordance with the City of Virginia Beach Public Works Design Standards Manual. The cost of design and construction of the Traffic Signal will be at the Grantors' sole expense; and the Traffic Signal shall be installed and fully operational with the completion of site construction, prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. Proffer 9 The design and building materials of all street lighting shall be complementary to the lighting within the Villages at West Neck and Indian River Plantation. Proffer 10 The design and building materials of all new fencing or fencing which is replaced when the Property is developed shall be complementary to the fencing within the Villages at West Neck and Indian River Plantation. Proffer 11 The design, dimensions, and building materials of any monument-style neighborhood identification sign shall be complementary to the neighborhood identification signs throughout the Villages at West Neck and Indian River Plantation. Proffer 12 The final stormwater management plan submitted to the Development Services Center (DSC) during the site plan review process for the development of the Project shall comply with applicable City Stormwater Management Ordinance(s). Proffer 13 Further conditions may be required by the Grantee during the detailed review of the Conceptual Plan and Review Set and administration of applicable City Codes by all cognizant City agencies and departments to meet all applicable City Code requirements. Proffer 14 Further conditions lawfully imposed by applicable development ordinances may be required by Grantee during detailed site plan and/or resubdivision review and administration of applicable City Codes by all relevant City agencies and departments to meet all applicable City Code Requirements. Proffer 15 All references hereinabove to the PD-H2 Zoning District and to the requirements and regulations applicable thereto refer to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, in force as of the date of approval of this Agreement by City Council, which are by this reference incorporated herein. Proffer 16 Except as expressly superseded and/or modified herein, all Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions as set forth in the "Proffered Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions" dated January 14, 1999, accepted by the Grantee and are recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, in Deed Book 4081, at Page 206, and any amendments or supplements thereto, are ratified, affirmed, and remain binding on the Property. Proffer 17 The above conditions, having been proffered by the Grantors and allowed and accepted by the Grantee as part of the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, shall continue in full force and effect until a subsequent amendment changes the zoning of the Property and specifically repeals such conditions. Such conditions shall continue despite a subsequent amendment to the Zoning Ordinance even if the subsequent amendment is part of a comprehensive implementation of a new or substantially revised Zoning Ordinance until specifically repealed. The conditions, however, may be repealed, amended, or varied by written instrument recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, and executed by the second by the record owner of the Property at the time of recordation of such instrument, provided that said instrument is consented to by the Grantee in writing as evidenced by a certified copy of an ordinance or a resolution adopted by the governing body of the Grantee, after a public hearing before the Grantee which was advertised pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.2-2204 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amendment. Said ordinance or resolution shall be recorded along with said instruments as conclusive evidence of such consent, and if not so recorded, said instrument shall be void. From: David Darden To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,November 17,2025 3:06:43 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. The West Neck community was approved in 1999, There has been no construction since 2005. It was established as a 55 and older neighborhood. Many of the original owners are still residents of the community. therefore they are at least 75 and many are in their 80s. My neighborhood(Browningstone)has an average age of at least 75. I simply believe that me and my neighbors do not deserve to have our quality of life disrupted by five or more years of construction by a developer who is only interested in a profit,not the residents. The noise and traffic will be intolerable not to mention damage to the existing roads and landscape. I and others are hoping the planning department will reject the developers plan. Please feel free to forward this email to the planning commission and city council. Thank You, David Darden From: David Darden To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Preserve at West Neck Objections Date: Monday,November 24,2025 8:59:09 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. In addition to my previous email, I would like to expand my objection to this project as to how it will cause major traffic and safety issues. I served as the fleet manager for a major site developer.That being said most site development sites are in an open area, not in the middle of an established neighborhood and certainly not where the only access is thru the existing neighborhood. The only access to the area to be developed is by using Signature Drive, Legendary Drive and Cadence Way all of which are in the current West Neck Villages complex. These city streets were not designed or built to accommodate the large number of heavy vehicles that will be used to develop the proposed site. In addition all of these streets require 90 degree turns in order to transition from one street to another. Dump trucks can have a Gross Vehicle Weight of 700009 and tractor trailers 80000#. The developer plans to enlarge two retention ponds and create two new ones. The developer also indicated that the spoils from these pond projects will be spread on site. In my experience this will not be the case as most spoils contain a significant amount of unusable material which will to be trucked off site. Regardless,the road building materials, sand, stone, asphalt and concrete will need to be trucked to the site. There will also be another number of heavy trucks making building material deliveries to each home site,normally in excess of ten per home site. There are currently over 900 residences in West Neck and all residents are over 55 years of age. The number of heavy trucks using the above mentioned roads will certainly cause potential safety concerns. Thank you for your time and please feel free to forward to all concerned. David Darden 2673 Browning Drive From: Marchelle L.Coleman To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: FW:Harrison&Lear"s Second Application-Preserve at West Neck Date: Tuesday,December 2,2025 1:22:49 PM From: Robert Tice<rt4DarCa)hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2025 8:10 PM To: Kathy M. Warren<KMWarren(@vbgov.com> Subject: Harrison & Lear's Second Application- Preserve at West Neck CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Ms. Warren, I am emailing you to express my concerns on the new Harrison & Lear's plan for the Preserve at West Neck. It has come to my attention that their application was submitted on November 3, 2025.The fact that Marc and Audrey Leishman have a plan to restore the original front nine of the old Signature Golf Course is irrelevant to the fact that nothing has changed since Harrison and Lear was recommended for denial of in their first attempt to build by your department and Harrison & Lear withdrew his application before it was scheduled to go to the City of Virginia Beach Planning Commission.The new plan still violates the Transition Area Guidelines-the density is worse than his previous application, 143 homes and a majority of lots are 1/6 of an acre. The plan will invade the open space and the preservation area even more as the plan will be condensed since he will not be building on the property where the front nine of the golf course exists. West Neck Community's Storm Water Management will also be a grave concern with this new project. Our infrastructure cannot handle the infill development that is proposed in this plan. The West Neck Community appreciated the efforts of the City's Planning Department during your previous evaluation of Harrison & Lear's first application and their ultimate application withdrawal and we hope that we can get the same results on the second application that they currently have before your department as all the facts are still as they were before. I feel strongly that this plan, if approved, will destroy our West Neck Community's way of life as it exists today and into the future. Robert Tice Former Vice President of the West Neck Community HOA and Concerned Resident of the West Neck Community From: Karen OBrien To: Walter Camp;John Cromwell;Michael Anderson; Kathryn Byler;man Plumlee;Susan B. Hiooen; Holly Cuellar; John H.Coston; Neena Mooriani; Michael C. Mauch Cc: Marchelle L.Coleman;Alexis Bailey;Tom Luckman;Ted Quinter;Tammy Vandame Subject: Formal Opposition to Redevelopment of Signature at West Neck Date: Monday,January 5,2026 1:08:19 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Ms. Karen O'Brien 2661 Browning Drive Virginia Beach,Virginia 23456 757-724-2805 karenobrienberrvC@gmail.com January 4,2026 To:The Honorable Members of the Virginia Beach City Council and Members of the Planning Commission From: Karen O'Brien, Resident,The Villages at West Neck Subject:Opposition to Proposed Rezoning or Redevelopment of the Former Signature at West Neck Golf Course Property Dear Honorable Council Members and Planning Commissioners, I am writing to formally express opposition to any current or future proposals for rezoning or redeveloping the parcels formerly known as the Signature at West Neck Golf Course for additional residential use. I respectfully urge you to uphold the original conditions established in the 1999 development approval,which designated this land through "density bonus agreements"as preservation of open space with the golf course as an integral part of the communities'character and a basis upon which the age restricted residents made a conscious lifestyle choice and financial investment. My primary concern centers on the"density bonus" agreement that enabled our neighborhood's existing density: Key Points: • Density Bonus Utilization:The initial developer received an increased residential density for the surrounding area (2.4 units per acre, rather than the standard 1 unit per acre for the Transition Area)with the explicit understanding that the golf course parcel would remain contiguous, passive open space and served as a community recreational and social amenity with public access.This higher density was fully realized and capitalized upon the sale of residential properties. • Conditions "Run with the Land":These stipulations were not temporary or discretionary;they are codified within the Ptanned Development(PD-H)zoning and recorded in public documents,obligating all subsequent property owners.The current owner acquired the property with full disclosure or should have exercised due diligence regarding these restrictions. • No Additional Density Permitted:The allowable density for this development has already been allocated and constructed. Granting further residential development on the designated open space would amount to double counting the same land, undermining the intent and integrity of the City's Transition Area guidelines, and potentially establishing an unfavorable precedent for future developments. • Villages at West Neck:The original 1999 approval of the West Neck Community was built upon the "Window Principle," using a single fairway returning nine configurations to maximize open space and ensure every home benefited from the Arnold Palmer Golf Course. Homeowners purchased properties at a premium based on golf course views and the assurance of permanent open space that enhanced the communities overall appeal in maintaining the character of the Transition area. • Impact on Existing Homeowners: The Villages at West Neck was specifically developed and marketed as Virginia Beach's first age restricted (55+)community, Residents, including myself, purchased homes—often at a premium—based on assurances from the city regarding the preservation of open space and the golf course as an integral part of the community's character and the basis upon which residents made a conscious lifestyle choice and financial investment.Any redevelopment would adversely affect property values, exacerbate demands on infrastructure(including traffic, stormwater management, and public safety),and alter the fundamental character of our community. • Public Trust: Upholding the original development agreement is vital for maintaining public trust in the City's zoning process and the enforceability of proffers and conditions. Reversing these commitments WILL erode confidence among homeowners in the Transition Area and across Virginia Beach. In conclusion, I respectfully request that the City Council and Planning Commission reject any proposal seeking to change the assigned preservation zoning of the former Signature at West Neck golf course property. Thank you for your attention and thoughtful consideration of this important matter. I urge you to NOT approve any zoning changes in the Villages of West Neck which will increase the density of homes within our age restricted community and in the transition area. Sincerely, Karen O'Brien CC:SOTAR From: Larry Walker To: Marchelle L.Coleman Cc: Barbara Henley:lawalker23456(a amail.com Subject: Harrison and Lear Proposal for Development of Signature Golf Course Land Date: Friday,January 9,2026 10:40:10 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Ms.Coleman, I understand that the Harrison and Lear Company has provided a request for rezoning of the property formally occupied by the Signature Golf Course lying within the Villages at West Neck. This is the second request this company has made in concert with the land owner,David La Clair of JBWK Inc.The first request they made the City Staff reviewed their proposal and recommended DENIAL based upon valid and current Transition Area development criteria.Specifically,Housing Density and Open Space requirements were decisive issues.I have included your Staff ultimate response below(page 9 of 58 of your report): "While Staff acknowledges and commends the applicant for this well-designed proposal,which offers attainable housing for aging residents,improves the site's aesthetics through regular vegetation maintenance,creation of natural meadows and reforestation areas,increases usable recreational open space,and upgrades the stormwater system,Staff finds the proposal to be inconsistent with two key factors,density and open space,as outlined in the Transition Area Design Guidelines.As a result,Staff recommends denial of these requests. Proffers are provided below should the Planning Commission deem this proposal appropriate for redevelopment of the former golf course within the Villages at West Neck." Nothing has changed since the last development proposal was submitted to the City;except that Harrison and Lear proposed building 14 fewer homes(143 homes vice 157 homes).The Land Owner also proposes to allow a separate 9-hole Golf Course to be developed using the"Front 9-Holes"of the former Signature Golf course.This Golf Course development is a separate,distinct issue from the home site development by Harrison and Lear.At an informational meeting held by Harrison and Lear and the proposed developer of the 9-hole Golf Course this past Fall,Jonathan Skinner,the President of Harrison and Lear was asked specifically;if the City were to deny the rezoning and development of these 143 homes would the Land Owner,David La Clair still allow the development of the 9-Hole Golf Course?Mr.Skinner's answer was emphatic....NO. In my opinion;The land owner is only interested in building the homes and is using the Golf Course development as an enticement to the City and those within the Villages at West Neck who are enraptured by the thought of a Golf Course to allow him the Go Ahead for housing development.This should make all residents of the Villages at West Neck and Indian River Plantation wake up and realize the land owners clear objective with this currently proposed development request. I profoundly hope the City Staff see this proposal for what it is and once again recommend DENIAL of the proposal.Obviously,those opposed to the development of 143 homes will have work to do to convince the Planning Commission to recommend DENIAL as well.And then the City Council needs to be convinced this is a bad proposal.But the Staffs recommendation is first and very important in this process. I appreciate your attention, Larry Walker 2500 Calumet Drive Virginia Beach,VA 23456 From: Mark Randoloh To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Opposition to Proposed Rezoning of Signature Golf Course Property Date: Tuesday,January 13,2026 10:30:47 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To the Virginia Beach Planning Commission and the Virginia Beach City Council, I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course at West Neck. In March 2025, the Planning Commission staff recommended the denial of Harrison and Lear's proposal to build 157 homes on the former Signature Golf Course. A key reason for that recommendation was the increase in housing density in the area. The proposal now before Commission asks to build 143 homes, a decrease of less than 10%from last year's proposal. The inclusion of a 9-hole golf course and the backing of Marc Leishman do not alter the fact that housing density and traffic would still increase in West Neck. Indeed, in the neighborhoods affected by the development, such as Carrollton and Browningstone,the density would be greater than under last year's proposal because more development would occur in those areas. In a larger sense, though, the zoning regulations that govern the Transition Area are more than just a set of rules to the residents of West Neck. They represent a promise made by the City to the people who chose to live here, a promise that said: "If you're 55 or older, you can live the rest of your lives here without having to worry about more development. We've zoned the undeveloped property as Preservation and given a conditional use permit for a golf course, and that's it. We're done here. Any further development will happen somewhere else." A decision by the City to change the zoning at Signature would be considered a betrayal of that promise and would undermine the trust that the residents of West Neck have in City officials. I urge the Planning Commission and City Council to deny the rezoning application submitted by Harrison and Lear. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Mark Randolph Stephen A.Wilting,MD 3125 Genius Place Virginia Beach,VA 23456 (757)419-9452 January 12,2026 Dear Ms.Marchell Coleman, On January 9, 2026, I had a phone conversation with a representative from the Virginia Beach Planning Commission who recommended that I send a letter addressed to you. I am writing to formally express my concerns regarding the proposed addition of further housing units to the Villages of West Neck community, which is already at a high density according to current Virginia Beach regulations. My understanding is that the previous density waiver was granted primarily due to the planned inclusion of an Arnold Palmer golf course,considered a valuable economic asset for Virginia Beach. With the removal of the Arnold Palmer golf course,a developer now seeks to increase the housing density beyond existing levels. The initial proposal involved distributing new housing units across the entire former golf course property but encountered significant opposition from residents of both West Neck and Indian River Plantation(IRP). Subsequently,after consultation with a professional golfer residing in IRP, the revised plan features a nine-hole golf course adjacent to IRP,utilizing approximately half of the land slated for development. However,this adjustment reduces the total number of housing units by only 10%, and all additional residences are now concentrated within the Villages of West Neck,further increasing its density while leaving IRP unaffected. Approval of this plan would require a substantial amendment to current density regulations and potentially set a precedent for future developments in other communities. Our concerns regarding the impact on the Villages of West Neck arc as follows: • Construction will take at least three to four years, mainly in central West Neck. Expect more noise,heavy equipment,and traffic. • The proposed development will substantially decrease green space, as all new housing units are planned for the Villages of West Neck. Many residents, including us, value the neighborhood's peacefulness and natural environment,especially as nature haszeclaimed much of the former golf course. • Upon completion of construction, it is anticipated that traffic volume may increase by up to 300 additional vehicles. This projected rise may affect safety conditions, contribute to elevated noise levels,and alter the rural character of the area. Given these concerns,we ask that no additional housing units be approved for the Villages of West Neck. Further development may result in a negative impact on the residents'quality of life. It is recommended that the former golf course land be preserved or that any firture development be conducted equitably. Please forward our concerns to all members of the Planning Commission and the City Council. Thank you in advance for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Stephen A.Willing,MD WestNeck Letter to Marchell Coleman dated January 12,2026 From: nancy canu To: Kathryn Bvler; Holly Cuellar,Walter Camo; Michael Anderson;John Cromwell;Marchelle L.Coleman;Michael C. Mauch;Katherine C.Schoonover;Planning Administration;John H.Coston;Susan B.Higpen; Bryan Plumlee; Neena Mooriani;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Worth Remick;Jennifer V.Rouse;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;City of _Virginia Beach Mayors Office; Rosemary C.Wilson; Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond; Barbara Henley;Joashua F.Schulman;David W.Hutcheson Subject: TRANISTION AREA DEVELOPMENT Date: Monday,January 19,2026 8:18:42 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Once again,the Villages at West Neck are under attack for development. Big money continues to ignore the wishes and needs of our Transition Area community. Many of us are retired teachers, nurses, police, city servants, veterans and general middle class homeowners. We have lost our golf course due to our first developer's greed and now we are threatened once again to lose the peaceful environment of our community. How would any of you feel if the retention take in your subdivision was drained and 143 houses were put on that property? Many of us have lived in the busier parts of this city and money spent on new infrastructure within West Neck will take away from the needs within each of your districts.We paid more for our homes and chose the West Neck Villages to spend our retirement years without the worry of overdevelopment due to the promises of the Preservation and Transition Areas. Keep your promise to us! Any conservation area within the Villages of West Neck will be the next target. Developers will want to continue building long after the initial 143 homes are finished. What is presented by them to the city may be wonderful but after rezoning occurs the builder can alter, add or remove promised items. The 9-hole golf course can be reassigned by the teesee at any time. AND Mr. Leishman will not have to deal with the construction traffic and damage. His property value will increase white the current West Neck Villages will once again lose value. His voice should not be heard as he is on the side of greed. Please preserve our Transition Area. The military needs the safety of our less densely populated areas, especially the fly zone from Oceana to Fentress. If you continue to build we wilt grow closer and closer to threatening our important Agricultural areas. We are called to be good stewards of our environment. Once you sell out our district,we will never be able to recapture the wonderful community we have here. Respectfully, Nancy Canu From: Paul Limauro To: Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen 5,Alcock;Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: West Neck Villages-zoning change Date: Sunday,January 18,2026 10:20:22 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION: I live in the West Neck Villages and I am very worried about the proposed rezoning that you have or will get to review soon. I am sure you are aware the West Neck residents are all senior citizens. We all moved to West Neck Villages because it is a quiet, well kept, community. The thought of 143 houses being built right smack dab in the middle of our community is frightening! Reasons why we are absolutely against this rezoning are: Five or more years of construction. Trucks,plows, noise, dirt& dust all over our quiet beautiful community. When finished what do we gain? About 300 more cars riding through our already narrow streets. A different Home Owners Association. This means that we will have no control or input on any possible problems that may arise pertaining to 143 homes spread over large parts of our community. The current golf course is 203 acres. I am told the development will take up 86 acres. Even taken into consideration the proposed 9-hole golf course there will still be land available. If the zoning and Transition Area Rules are changed what will stop the owner from building more homes on that available land? It seems like the land owner will not sell land, even to Mark Leishman, for the 9-hole golf course. This tells me he must have plans to build more of something on his land in the future. These are just a few of the problems we will have if this project is approved. I am asking the Planning Commission and the City Council to please keep all the zoning and Transition Area Rules in place. Please vote for the hundreds of senior citizens,who are against the proposed development, and not for Harrison& Lear and the land owner. Thank you. Paul Limauro and Linda Limauro 2936 Enchanting Circle West Neck Villages To: Virginia Beach Planning Commission and Virginia Beach City Council Attention; Marchelle L. Coleman - Planning Evaluation Coordinator- Planning Administration Division Re: Harrison and Lear, Inc. - The Preserve at West Neck Date: January 15, 2026 I. Introduction My wife and I are residents of The Villages at West Neck,with our home backing directly onto the former 17th fairway of the original Signature Golf Course.This submission outlines our concerns and recommendations regarding the proposed residential development by Harrison& Lear, Inc., including the recently introduced proposal to re-establish a nine-hole golf course on a portion of the golf course property.The proposed Harrison and Lear housing development will have an impact in varies ways on the entire community of The Villages at West Neck. We ask at this time that this application for rezoning be denied. To be clear, we did not support the original development plan submitted by Harrison and Lear back in early 2025 for a number of reasons nor the current plan that includes the introduction of the proposed nine-hole golf course. This addition, will now force the proposed housing development to become far more dense on the remainder of the old golf course property, particularly to the former 17th fairway. Our major concerns today are based on direct proximity to the proposed development. review of available plans to date and the long-term planning principles under which The Villages at West Neck was originally approved. II. Background and Planning Context The Arnold Palmer Signature Golf Course as pictured in-part on the next page was the foundational element of The Villages at West Neck. The community was approved and constructed with a deliberate balance of: • Recreational open space • Environmental buffers 1 a u ;t; �1+ �" i� E � � ii � ������� !ice ���'�• j t � F� • Adjusted residential density - This balance as pictured above was reviewed and approved by both the City of Virginia Beach Planning Commission and Virginia Beach City Council over 20 years ago. Harrison and Lear's proposal as illustrated in our photo below would represent a significant departure from that original planning framework that was approved by the City of Virginia Beach r s w r -, 3` While the reintroduction of a nine-hole golf course on the front nine has been presented as a mitigating feature, it does not address the primary impacts imposed on existing homeowners, 2 particularly along the former 17th fairway,where residential density has increased and butler areas have been greatly reduced or non-existent. Please note, the current submitted plan titled, BUFFER EXHIBIT(Carrollton)page 17, by Harrison and Lear would want you to believe that in three to five years you would not see anything but maybe the top of a roof in the photo illustration above. In our opinion,their Buffer Exhibit is very mis-leading to the untrained eye. The landscaping suggested in their PARCEL METRICS,page 12,PACEL D, states, "Diverse Mix of Native Hardwood Deciduous Seedlings & Evergreen Seedlings, majority Pine" By general definition, seedling pine or hardwood deciduous seedlings are on the average two to three foot tall with an average diameter of less than 1 inch. The definition is based on most favorable conditions for costal areas like Virginia Beach. To provide a real buffer in the suggested time frame by Harrison and Lear would require much larger trees to be planted including proper placement and care during the early years of growth. III. Impact on Existing Homes Along the 17th Fairway Both the original and revised Harrison & Lear plans place back property lines of new homes approximately 50-80 feet from existing rear property lines along the 17th fairway. This distance does not provide a meaningful buffer and would fundamentally alter: • Established vista views and open space • Tree canopy and wildlife habitat • Privacy and tranquility enjoyed for over 20 years The Harrison and Lear revised development plans now propose more than 52 homes on the former 17th fairway alone, at a density higher than previously submitted concepts. The elimination of mature tree canopy as proposed between the former 17th and 18th fairways compounds these impacts and cannot be mitigated within any reasonable timeframe. 3 IV. Construction and Long-Term Community Impacts The introduction of 143 new homes, more than two decades after community build-out, would impose significant burdens on the existing neighborhoods of The Tillages at West Neck, including: • Extended periods of time measured in months of heavy construction traffic, infrastructure suppliers,home building materials, utility providers and other supporting types of vehicle traffic on our local streets,primarily Signature Drive, Signature Circle, Legendary Drive, and parts of Cadence Way • Permeant long-term traffic increases estimated at 1,500+vehicle trips per day(VPD)over and above existing traffic loads experienced on the same streets mentioned above • Ongoing noise from construction equipment and house construction, uncontrolled dust, air pollution,erosion risks, and permanent loss of established landscaping • Potential adverse effects on marketabilit-N- of older existing homes compared to new h built homes From a planning perspective, the key question remains: What public benefit justifies imposing these substantial impacts on our well established com a nith,, The Vllages at West Neck? V. Deficiencies in Proposed Buffers and Landscaping The Harrison and Lear plan titled"Reforestation & Buffer Overlay for Area D" in our opinion, is misleading in practice as referenced above on page 3. The proposed landscaping and buffer lacks sufficient depth and years of maturity to function as a true buffer between existing and proposed homes. The former 17th fairway itself should serve as the primary buffer,rather than being developed with dense residential lots and minimal landscaping overlays. VI. Request for Field Staking for Transparency To provide clarity for residents,City of Virginia Reach staff,and decision-makers,we respectfully request that the City require Harrison& Lear to clearly mark with 20-25 survey stakes including proper flagging the approximate rear property lines of the proposed lots that back up to the existing lots along the the 17th fairway. 4 This staking request would allow all parties to visually assess the scale and proximity of the proposed development. The detail necessary to provide this type stake-out request has been completed to the scale necessary as part of Harrison& Lear's submitted plans. VII. HOA, Maintenance, and Proffer Concerns A. Contribution Directly to Villages at West Neck HOA The proposed development by Harrison and Lear will benefit directly from the established character,amenities,and access corridors of The Villages at West Neck,yet bears no responsibility for their maintenance. We respectfully request that Harrison& Lear,or the future Preserve at West Neck HOA. provide annual contributions to the Villages at West Neck HOA toward: • Maintenance of the West Neck Road and Signature Drive main marque entrance and structure • Landscaping, lighting, irrigation, walls,fences and common features along shared access corridors including the amenities offered within Signature Circle • Other maintenance and reserve costs not identified above excluding public street maintenance between right of way covered by the of City of Virginia Beach B. Long-Term Maintenance of Proposed Amenities The proposed development utilizing a large portion of the old golf course property as illustrated and offered by Harrison and Lear includes: • Several miles of Multi-use trails • Ponds, stormwater management facilities and other drainage features through-out • Extensive proffered landscape and reforestation areas across a large portion of the former golf course property Long-term maintenance of these amenities as noted will fall on a relatively small Home O►vners Association of 143 members,raising serious concerns in our opinion about f ature financial sustainability once the developer, Harrison and Lear exits. 5 It is our suggestion that the City of Virginia Beach should carefully evaluate within their power. The Preserve at West Neck HOA covenants, reserve requirements, and protlers to ensure long- term maintenance obligations can realistically be met. This evaluation should include and provide some clariij-how the smaller HOA communiti, Kill function in side a much larger HOA. VIII. Summary of Requests We respectfully request that the Virginia Beach Planning Commission and Virginia Beach City Council. I. Require the entire 17th fairway as a development buffer 2. Require field staking to clearly demonstrate proximity of new development to existing homes 3. Evaluate and strengthen realistically HOA funding.reserve requirements. and maintenance obligations for the ne�y proposed development 4. Require fair financial contributions for shared infrastructure and community, features with The Villages at West Neck HOA that will be enjoyed directly by Harrison and Lear's proposed development 5. Carefully consider precedent-setting impacts within District 2 and the Transition Area 6. Clarify how Harrison and Lear's Re-Zoning Application will address the Lease and Split use now offered related to the newly introduced Leishman's Nine Hole Golf Course proposal xv ithin the total acreage and consideration of what could happen if one or the other sub-projects fails 7. In closing,it is our understanding there are similar old golf courses in Virginia compared to The Villages at West Neck that have gone out of business for various reasons and the golf course properties has been allowed to return back to nature or in some cases turned over to local communities for walking and nature trails,etc. Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration of these concerns. R-j ,�CC "� Charles and I3 inie Jackson 2617 Majesty La. 813-215-6900 cell email: cej6812Cwgmail.com 6 From: DALE MERKEY To: Amanda F.Barnes;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office: Michael Berlucchi; Barbara Henley;Worth Remick;Amelia N. Ross-Hammond;Jennifer V.Rouse;Joashua F.Schulman:chtaylorZa yv ov.com;Rosemary C.Wilson: swooten(c�vbgov.com:Planning Administration; Baylee Kotaiarvi;Bryan Plumlee:Holly Cuellar; miClemon(d)vbgov.com;Bob M.Dyer; Bruce Biddle;Tom&Sis Luckman; Ruth Mallek;Russ&Mary Ann Myers; Jeff&Kathy Peters;Diana Ouisenberry Subject: Fw:Special Edition-Planning Commission Hearing Date: Thursday,January 15,2026 5:35:24 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. ----- Forwarded Message----- From: David Konze<davidakonze@gmail.com> To: DALE MERKEY<corvette-2@cox.net> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2026 at 03:17:22 PM EST Subject: Re: Special Edition - Planning Commission Hearing very articulate well done thanks for your support On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 1:39 PM DALE MERKEY<corvette-2@cox.net>wrote: Sharon: Thanks for your serving on our WNCA board. I am one of many that is very much against the most recent H&L petition that would destroy our community and quality of life by building 132 homes. There is not one good thing, none about this and the disruptive 5+ years of construction carnage that will completely upend the peace, safety, quiet and quality of our community. In addition to having successfully defeated the earlier attempt by this "cabal of greed - Leclure (course owner), H&L (developer) and their lawyer McIntyre" their past efforts clearly show they cannot be trusted to do what they say they will do and actually it truly doesn't matter because there are only 2 essential subjects: 1. The existing open space regulations must, must be maintained. Our board must insure there will be a huge homeowner attendance at the upcoming Planning Committee and Council meetings in Bldg. 1 (Courthouse Bldg.) We will need you to alert everyone and urge participation; perhaps speaking at the meetings. Letting everyone know in advance is key; a 1 day notice will not be sufficient. 2. Once we defeat this proposal (again) we must insist that the City Council and the City Legal Dept. working with the fire dept. etc. make the necessary changes to mandate that the course owner cut all the growth on the open spaces. We are now living in extreme danger from the terrible fire hazard the 7 to 8 foot scrub/weed/grass growth creates. This issue is not "rocket science"; just reflect on the recent Palisades fires in CA and the terrible fire that destroyed Lahina on the island of Maui in Hawaii where 108 homeowners/tourists were killed. There would have been many more but some were able to jump into the ocean to escape. A major contributor to that disaster was weed, grass and brush growth plus a 40 knot wind. Also, we have already had one major fire. As you probably know there are 3 things required to have a fire: There must be a combustible material, a temp. that is high enough to ignite the material (cirgarette butt, lightning strike, spark from an outdoor grill left unattended etc.) plus oxygen. If any of these 3 are missing, there is no fire. The fire that has already occured here did not destroy any homes or kill anyone because it happened during the daytime, it was noticed early on and the many fire companies that responded with some effort managed to get it stopped. However there was also another reason. There was no wind! We often get winds here of 20+MPH with higher gusts and I am certain that if we experience one of our periods of no rain (say, a week or 2) and a spark from some source ignites the weed/scrub fuel on our open spaces we will be looking at a terrible disaster with destroyed homes and possible loss of life. The danger is even higher if it happens at night. It is beyond comprehension how and why our city government is allowing this danger to persist. Steps must, Must be taken now to require the growth be cut down and kept down. No thinking person should assume a Palisades or Maui fire cannot happen in West Neck. We have already had 1 fire and were very fortunate it was not worse. Please include this very critical issue in your efforts. Sincerely, Dale Merkey On Tuesday, January 13,2026 at 09:03:45 PM EST, The Villages at West Neck<westnecknotices- gmai1.cornQshared1.ccsend com>wrote: a E fl E January 13, 2026 Special Edition Click HERE o print the flyer below j The Villages at West Neck: 1 2580 Signature Drive f Virginia Beach, VA 2345E US Unsubscribe I Ur)date Profile ( Constant Contact Data Notice onstant 'ontact David A. Konze 3229 Gallahad Drive Virginia Beach, VA 23456 DavidAKonze(g)gmail.com 757-777-5030 From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;Cry of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Concern-West Neck&The Environment Date: Friday,January 23,2026 10:48:37 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am a Virginia Beach resident writing regarding the West Neck J Signature Golf Course property and its role within the city's broader environmental and land use framework. This area has historically contributed to environmental protection, stormwater absorption, and habitat preservation in southern Virginia Beach. Decisions affecting this site have implications beyond a single parcel, influencing how environmentally sensitive land is managed citywide. I encourage you to carefully consider land uses that maintain or enhance environmental functions on this property, including conservation-oriented uses and low-impact activities, while ensuring that more intensive development is directed to areas better suited to support it. Protecting environmentally sensitive land supports flood resilience and long-term sustainability for the entire city. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration. Sincerely, Mark Connelly District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. V Responsible Growth V6. From: Marchelle L.Coleman To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: FW:Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Monday,January 26,2026 8:42:12 AM -----Original Message----- From: Responsible Growth VB<res onsiblegrowthvb(@amail.com> Sent: Sunday,January 25, 2026 8:51 AM To: Planning Commissioners< Ia�gcommissionersPybgov.com>;City Council <CITYCOUNCILPvbgov.com>; City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office<mayorsofficePvbgov.com>; City Manager Citizen Inquiry<CMOfficePvbgov.com>; Kathy M. Warren<KMWarren(@vbgov.com> Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Linda Tawney District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. © Responsible Growth VB. January 26, 2026 Planning & Community Development Attn: Marchelle L. Coleman 2403 Courthouse Drive Virginia Beach VA 23456 Gale & John Perryman 2816 Energy Drive Virginia Beach VA 23456-8313 Dear Ms. Coleman, I oppose the zoning change for the golf course preserved land in the community of West Neck. The Planning Commission record numbers are 2025-PCCC-0178 and 0179. The Virginia Beach City Council specifically zoned the property preserved as a golf course and created the preserved area by allowing the developer to shrink the lots and city streets around the preserved area. Residents purchasing in West Neck accepted the smaller lots and streets because the city added it to the preserved land. The city's zoning laws support the agreement between the city, the developer and residents. With those considerations, West Neck residential property is already built out. Our shrunken streets are too small. Our main streets don't even have bike lanes for residents of our retirement community. Heck, next door Courthouse Estates have full- sized divided roads and very nice bike lanes. I and other bicyclists are reminded of the current threat from no bikes lanes each time we ride our bikes to get to the terrific new multi-purpose path along West Neck Dr. Even Kellum High School distance runners recognize the threat from our small streets, and they run on our concrete sidewalks. As a runner, I know running on concrete is not good for your knees and ankles. However, they understand running on our asphalt streets poses a greater threat. I'm not a demographer, but my Ouija Board tells me the impact from huge construction vehicles for years, and then vehicle traffic for the requested 143 residential property residents, which will probably begin with about 2 vehicles per residence will be staggering. Add the residents' personal services contractors, like lawn and garden, sprinklers, pest control, HVAC, handyman, homecare support, and family and friends visiting, etc., on our small streets, and the disruption by the proposed development will have an awful. Additionally, it's reasonable construction and later residential inspired traffic will use our main streets, i.e., Signature Dr to the traffic circle and then Legendary Dr to Cadence Dr to get to Development C, the lower half of Development D, and the loop section of D touching the new golf course, see attachment yellow highlight. That's how I'd drive - along the main roads without parked cars because homes do not face those roads. The buyer bought preserved property. The buyer should use it as such. The proposed development this time added a small half golf course. To paraphrase the Wizard of OZ, I feel like they are pointing at the small golf course and saying, "pay no attention to the 143 houses behind the curtain." It did not work for Dorothy and Toto, and it doesn't work for us. Sincerely, Attach: As Stated -3 `U tr tTl a O 110iiii Of 111011 If 1111 1 it!its H n tin � �� ��,` �. � ""'� •,. „mod � �,, y _ P _ � p g i' s �x g's �°s �� ge �°a �i �6 agi B� �3� � �• �t 4 � i i•I W From: Elise Turner To: Plannina Commissioners:ash210Ca)comcast.net Subject: west neck Date: Monday,January 26,2026 4:59:59 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor and City Leadership, I am a resident of West Neck, and I am writing to respectfully urge you to oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck golf course. West Neck homeowners purchase their hornes with a clear expectation about density, traffic, environmental buffers, and quality of life. Rezoning this property would fundamentally alter the character of our community and break the trust residents placed in the City when these plans were originally approved. The existing zoning already allows for reasonable use of the property. Increasing density beyond what was promised brings unavoidable consequences—traffic congestion, strain on infrastructure, environmental impacts, and reduced safety for residents, pedestrians. and first responders. A strong majority of West Neck residents have consistently expressed opposition to rezoning. This opposition is not rooted in resistance to changes but in a desire for thoughtful, predictable planning that respects existing neighborhoods. respectfully ask that you listen to the residents who live here and vote no on any rezoning request for West Neck. Thank you for your time and service to our city. Sincerely, Elise Turner Browningstone The Villages of West Neck From: Elise Turner To: Planning Commissioners;ash210Cabcomcast.net;City Council Date: Monday,January 26,2026 5:04:24 PM ___-- rCAU6iTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachmeess you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leadership, am writing to strongly oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck property. Rezoning this Site would undermine long-standing Transition Area rules, in regard to density guidelines and open space as noted in 2016 Comprehensive Plan and send a troubling message to homeowners across Virginia Beach: that previously agreed- upon zoning and development standards can be changed after the fact to benefit developers, regardless of community impact. West Neck residents relied on adopted plans, zoning assurances, and density limits when purchasing their homes. Approving rezoning now would be unfair to homeowners who acted in good faith and would set a precedent that threatens other planned communities throughout the city. Traffic capacity, emergency access, environmental considerations, and infrastructure limits were all factors in the original zoning. Those constraints have not changed - only the developer's desired profit margin has. City leadership has a responsibility to uphold sound planning principles, not rewrite them under pressure. I urge you to deny any rezoning request for West Neck and uphold the rules that protect our neighborhoods. Respectfully, Elise Turner Browningstone The Villages of West Neck From: Elise Turner To: Planning Commissioners;City Council Subject: westneck Date: Monday,January 26,2026 5:07:22 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor and/or City Leadership, live in The Villages of West Neck, and I am asking you to vote NO on any rezoning proposal affecting our community. This is not an abstract planning issue for us—it directly affects how we live every day. Increased density will mean more traffic on roads that are already strained, longer emergency response times, and reduced safety for families, seniors, and pedestrians. Many of us chose West Neck because it offered a balance of nature, open space, and carefully planned development. Rezoning the golf course property would permanently disrupt that balance and diminish the quality of life we were promised. Residents have attended meetings, written letters, and spoken out repeatedly, the message has been clear and consistent: we do not support rezoning. Please respect the voices of the people who live here and will bear the consequences of this decision long after the developers are gone. urge you to stand with residents and protect the integrity of West Neck by rejecting rezoning. Sincerely, Elise Turner Browningstone The Villages of West Neck From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Tuesday,January 27,2026 7:25:08 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Joan Simon District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannino Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manaaer Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,January 27,2026 7:26:36 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, David Smith District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. G Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,January 27,2026 8:58:20 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Neil Palmer District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. �D Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,January 27,2026 10:25:43 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Linda Gronemann District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry; Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,January 27,2026 10:49:07 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Judith Bura District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M• Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,January 27,2026 12:31:53 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, David Van Petten District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. ©Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannino Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Tuesday,January 27,2026 2:41:06 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. This lands open space and densities requirements were fully realized with the completion of the existing residential units. Converting preserved open space into new housing on land already counted would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Karen O'Brien District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,January 27,2026 2:51:29 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Elise Turner Sincerely, Elise Turner District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry;Kathy M, Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning Due to Public Safety and Emergency Access Risks Date: Tuesday,January 27,2026 3:16:56 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am concerned about the public safety implications of the proposed rezoning at the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck, and I respectfully ask you to vote NO. West Neck is a 55+ community with frequent emergency medical needs. Roads, access points, and response capacity were planned based on preserved open space and existing density assumptions. Increasing density by removing that open space risks compromising emergency access and response times. Public safety impacts should not be accepted retroactively. Please vote NO and uphold the original preservation zoning. Thank you. Sincerely, Karen O'Brien District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. ,rD Responsible Growth VB. From: Steve Elv To: Bryan Plumlee:Hunter Morrison;sedwards(alvbcom.gov:Marchelle L.Coleman;City of Virainia Beach Mayors Office:David W.Hutcheson:Barbara Henley:mberluccMvbgov.com:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond:Rosemary C. Wmison Worth Remick:Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green:Stacy Cummings Jr.;ishulman(&vbgov.com;Jennifer V.Rouse Subject: Preserve at West Neck Proposal Date: Tuesday,January 27,2026 3:59:36 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments 1 unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. January 27, 2026 Dear City Leadership: I am writing to strongly oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck property. Rezoning this site would undermine long-standing Transition Area rules, in regards to density guidelines and open space as noted in the 2026 Comprehensive Plan, and send a troubling message to homeowners across Virginia Beach: that previously agreed-upon zoning and development standards can be changed after the fact to benefit developers, regardless of community impact. West Neck residents relied on adopted plans, zoning assurances, and density limits when purchasing their homes. Approving rezoning now would be unfair to homeowners who acted in good faith and would set a precedent that threatens other planned communities throughout the city. Traffic capacity, emergency access, environmental considerations, and infrastructure limits were all factors in the original zoning. Those constraints have not changed--only the developer's desired profit margin has. City leadership has a responsibility to uphold sound planning principles, not rewrite them under pressure. I urge you to deny any rezoning requests for West Neck and uphold the rules that protect our neighborhoods. Respectfully, J. Steven Ely Wordsworth Village The Villages of West Neck From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,January 27,2026 7:46:41 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Alfred Jacocks District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement fool. O Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,January 27,2026 10:15:22 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, My name is Melissa Draudt and I live in Courthouse Estates, adjacent to the West Neck community. I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Also, West Neck is a 55+ community with frequent emergency medical needs. Roads, access points, and response capacity were planned based on preserved open space and existing density assumptions. Increasing housing density, and the construction traffic that goes along with it, risks compromising emergency access and response times. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Vote NO on rezoning West Neck and Signature Golf Course. Thank you. Sincerely, Melissa Draudt District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. C7 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning Due to Public Safety,Emergency Access Risks and Infill Redevelopment Date: Tuesday,January 27,2026 10:43:17 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am concerned about the public safety implications of the proposed rezoning at the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck, and I respectfully ask you to vote NO. West Neck is a 55+ community with frequent emergency medical needs. Roads, access points, and response capacity were planned based on preserved open space and existing density assumptions. Harrison and Lear is planning infill redevelopment in the first 55 and over community in Viriginia Beach and it would be the first of its kind in the transition area. The West Neck Community is a mature master developed community that should not have an additional 143 homes placed inside our established community. Increasing density by removing that open space risks compromising emergency access and response times. Public safety impacts should not be accepted retroactively. Please vote NO and uphold the original preservation zoning. Thank you. Sincerely, Robert Tice District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry; Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Wednesday,January 28,2026 7:16:53 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Terry Stevens District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Growth VB. From: Stephen Willing To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Villages of West Neck redevelopment Date: Wednesday,January 28,2026 10:59:42 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good morning Ms. Coleman I am writing to express my concerns about adding more houses to the already over developed Villages of West Neck community. As you are aware we already exceed the density for our area according to current Virginia Beach regulations. It is my understanding that a density waiver was only allowed since the addition of an Arnold Palmer golf course would be a great addition to the City of Virginia Beach. Now we no longer have the Arnold Palmer golf course and a developer wants to increase the density even more. His first plan was to distribute the additional housing over the entire golf course property,however not only was this met with resistance from the West Neck and Indian River Plantation residents, but also turned down by the Virginia Beach planning commission. He then met with a professional golfer that lives in Indian River Plantation (IRP), and the new plan is to put a 9 hole golf course along the land that is adjacent to Indian River Plantation. To my eye, it looks like the 9 hole golf course is about 1/2 of the land being proposed for development. This new plan only decreases the total housing units by 10%, but ALL of the new housing will be in the Villages of West Neck and none in IRP, increasing the housing density to even higher levels,but only in the Villages of West Neck. This second proposal is worse than the one that was already voted against by the planning commission! Therefore, for this to be approved by the City of Virginia Beach, density(and maybe additional)regulations will have to be enormously changed. This would not only affect West Neck but could also be a precedent for other developers and could affect other communities. If you allow this plan to go through,how will it affect the Villages of West Neck? 1. The number of years of construction is debatable but a reasonable minimum is 4-5 years. The majority of the proposed construction is in the center of West Neck, not on an edge. There will be a lot of noise, heavy equipment, decreased air quality and high construction traffic for years. 2. Greatly increased density with loss of green space. As stated above, all of the housing units will be in the Villages of West Neck. We are a community of older people,who enjoy our beautiful neighborhood with its rural feel. That is the reason we moved here. The prior golf course land has been taken over by nature and has actually made our neighborhood more beautiful and peaceful. Also please remember, once you develop green space, it is gone forever. 3. Increased traffic, even after construction is finished- as many as an additional 300 cars on the roads in our neighborhood. This will increase the noise and decrease the safety and rural feel of our neighborhood. My wife and I request that you deny any zoning changes and deny any additional housing in the Villages of West Neck. To approve it would greatly diminish our quality of life. We moved here for the open green space,please do not take that away from us. We are fine with leaving the old golf course for nature to reclaim or for ALL the land used to repair the prior 18 hole golf course as it was when we moved here. Please forward this to all the members of the planning commission and the City Council. Thank you. Stephen and Sophia Willing Residents of The Grove, Villages of West Neck From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Wednesday,January 28,2026 10:12:02 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Jackie McCormack District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth Via To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density and Infll Development Precedent. Date: Wednesday,January 28,2026 11:30:56 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes, which will be infill development, would push density beyond what was originally justified. Our current roads are used by not only West Neck residents but also by Courthouse Estates and Indian River Residents as a cut through to West Neck Road. Adding an additional neighborhood of 143 homes whose entrance and exit will also be the same existing roadways will put a significant strain on our infrastructure. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Kathy Tice District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. From: Christopher Cronan To: Planning Commissioners; Planning Administration;bio319s2020,&amai1.com Subject: Protect West Neck from Overdevelopment Date: Wednesday,January 28,2026 12:11:59 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Members of the Virginia Beach Planning Commission: You will soon be facing a very important land use decision focused on the proposal by Harrison and Lear to develop over 140 house units on the back nine golf course acreage in an existing Transition Area neighborhood at West Neck Community. This decision will have major adverse implications for residents in the development zone, but it will also have consequences for all Virginia Beach taxpayers and will set a precedent for the future balance between land development versus conservation in Virginia Beach. I urge members of the Planning Commission to review the points listed below and to use them to support a decision to reject the rezoning and development proposal. Reasons to reject the plan are as follows. (a) The proposed plan is not in compliance with density, open space, and land use policies. The proposed development will create a housing density that is far beyond allowable limits in the Transition Area and will nullify the open space set aside condition approved by the city in 1999 that required maintenance of the Arnold Palmer Signature Golf Course as a permanent open space amenity to offset the excess density in West Neck. Any addition of new housing at the expense of golf course acreage in the P-1 Preservation Zone will grossly exceed allowable housing density, will undermine the intended low-impact and low-density character of the area, and will fragment and eliminate designated open space, thus setting a dangerous precedent for the future of land zoned as P-1 Preservation. (b) If this ill-conceived H&L development plan is approved, the decision will erode long-standing Town Council commitments to stable, dependable zoning regulations in Virginia Beach. As indicated in ARTICLE 3— PRESERVATION DISTRICT: Sec. 301, zoning regulations explicitly prohibit residential uses on land zoned as P-1 Preservation. Approval of rezoning for this project will establish a harmful precedent, making it easier for other developers to circumvent P-1 zoning protections across the land base in Virginia Beach. (c) The proposed H&L development plan will have severe and irreversible impacts on the quality of life for retirees and veterans living in West Neck Community. Residents of West Neck Community, especially those bordering the new housing, will be penalized in the following ways: their peaceful neighborhood will experience chronic road congestion and noise associated with construction equipment; residents will lose views and wildlife habitat when the golf course open space is bulldozed and converted to new housing; air quality will be impacted with construction dust which will adversely affect residents with asthma and breathing issues; water ponding and backyard flooding will increase in this area of poorly drained soils as development expands impervious surfaces associated with new roadways and roofs; and property values will be adversely affected for homes abutting the new construction, both during the construction phase and afterwards with the loss of valuable viewsheds bordering open space and wildlife habitat (that would be transformed to fences and houses by the developer). In closing, as you consider your vote on the H&L rezoning and development proposal, please note that there is an important foundational precedent to be honored on this matter - the City of Virginia Beach approved the original West Neck site plan on May 11, 1999 based on an agreement that the golf course would serve as a permanent undeveloped recreational and open space buffer. While you may argue that development is inevitable and necessary, it should occur where and when it is justifiable and meets the public interest. This proposal to transform a protected open space parcel in West Neck into a massive housing development is ill-advised and is counter to the best interests of the City of Virginia Beach and its residents. Sincerely, Christopher Cronan, 2673 Majesty Lane, Virginia Beach, VA 23456 From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguirv; Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Wednesday,January 28,2026 2:19:44 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. J Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, William Obrien District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: vaoetersigCglgmail.com To: Planning Commissioners Subject: REQUEST FOR YOUR NO VOTE ON ANY REZONING REQUEST FOR THE SIGNATURE AT WEST NECK PROPERTY Date: Wednesday,January 28,2026 2:36:35 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Members of the Virginia Beach Planning Commission, My name is Jeffrey R. Peters and have lived adjacent to the former Signature at West Neck property since its opening in 2001. 1 am writing to strongly oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck property complex. Rezoning this site would undermine the long-standing Transition Area rules, in regards to density and open space guidelines as noted in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan which I fully support, and send a troubling message to homeowners across Virginia Beach that previously agreed- upon zoning and development standards and guidelines can be changed after the fact to the benefit of developers, regardless of community desires and impact to existing residents. West Neck residents relied on adopted plans, zoning assurances, and density limits when purchasing their homes as planned and constructed by the original developer. Approving rezoning now would be extremely unfair to homeowners who acted in good faith and would set a precedent that threatens other planned communities throughout the city. Traffic capacity, critical emergency responder's access and response times, environmental considerations, and infrastructure limits were all factors of the original zoning decision-making. Those constraints have not changed, only a new developer's desire to increase their profit margin by proposing to add the maximum number of new construction residences possible, regardless of their impact on existing property owners. Many of us chose West Neck because it offered a balance of nature, residential density, and open space across a carefully, thoughtfully planned development. Rezoning the golf course property would permanently disrupt that existing balance and diminish the quality of life we hoped our futures would hold. A strong majority of West Neck residents have consistently expressed opposition to this or any request for rezoning. This opposition is not rooted in resistance to change, but in the desire for thoughtful, predictable planning/zoning that respects existing neighborhoods. respectfully ask that you listen to the residents who live here and vote no on any rezoning request for the Signature at West Neck property. Thank you for your time and service to our city. Sincerely, Jeffrey R. Peters LCDR US Navy, Retired 3144 Gallahad Drive Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Arthur Parke Village The Villages of West Neck (757) 573-3666 vapeterjp@gmail.com January 26, 2026 Planning & Community Development Attn: Marchelle L. Coleman 2403 Courthouse Drive Virginia Beach VA 23456 Gale & John Perryman 2816 Energy Drive Virginia Beach VA 23456-8313 Dear Ms. Coleman, We oppose the zoning change for the golf course preserved land in the community of West Neck. The Planning Commission record numbers are 2025-PCCC-0178 and 0179. The Virginia Beach City Council specifically zoned the property preserved as a golf course and created the preserved area by allowing the developer to shrink the lots and city streets around the preserved area. Residents purchasing in West Neck accepted the smaller lots and streets because the city added it to the preserved land. The city's zoning laws support the agreement between the city, the developer and residents. With those considerations, West Neck residential property is already built out. Our shrunken streets are too small. Our main streets don't even have bike lanes for residents of our retirement community. Heck, next door Courthouse Estates have full- sized divided roads and very nice bike lanes. I and other bicyclists are reminded of the current threat from no bikes lanes each time we ride our bikes to get to the terrific new multi-purpose path along West Neck Dr. Even Kellum High School distance runners recognize the threat from our small streets, and they run on our concrete sidewalks. As a runner, I know running on concrete is not good for your knees and ankles. However, they understand running on our asphalt streets poses a greater threat. I'm not a demographer, but my Ouija Board tells me the impact from huge construction vehicles for years, and then vehicle traffic for the requested 143 residential property residents, which will probably begin with about 2 vehicles per residence will be staggering. Add the residents' personal services contractors, like lawn and garden, sprinklers, pest control, HVAC, handyman, homecare support, and family and friends visiting, etc., on our small streets, and the disruption by the proposed development will have an awful. Additionally, it's reasonable construction and later residential inspired traffic will use our main streets, i.e., Signature Dr to the traffic circle and then Legendary Dr to Cadence Dr to get to Development C, the lower half of Development D, and the loop section of D touching the new golf course, see attachment yellow highlight. That's how I'd drive - along the main roads without parked cars because homes do not face those roads. The buyer bought preserved property. The buyer should use it as such. The proposed development this time added a small half golf course. To paraphrase the Wizard of QZ, I feel like they are pointing at the small golf course and saying, "pay no attention to the 143 houses behind the curtain." It did not work for Dorothy and Toto, and it doesn't work for us. Sincerely, Attach: As Stated ems" a LL tTj �' �` �E �° as �� PS p$�E g'c a5 ` �1 � •fit i •j7 i i � � � a P- i. do y■ o• 3. a a Z= e p& F _r �G 8 �Filisi : a $ •' gg gg • 3 a w From: Resaonsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Wednesday,January 28,2026 3:31:54 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Helen Preti District 8 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. v Responsible Growth VB. From: dh.wessner To: City of Virainia Beach Mayors Office;Barbara Henley;City Manager Citizen InQuiry;Mark Stiles;Amanda F. Barnes; Lyndon S.Remias;Walter Camo;icromwell(dybaov.com; m.anders(a)vboov.com; Kathryn Bvler; kschoonover(@vbaov.com;Bryan Plumlee;Susan B. Hiooen; Holly Cuellar;John H.Coston; nmorianiCalybaov.com; Michael C. Mauch;Hunter Morrison;Seth L.Edwards;Marchelle L.Coleman;David W. Hutcheson; Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond; Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick;Cal"Cash" Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;ishulman(cDvbQov.com;Jennifer V.Rouse Subject: Opposition to Rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck Golf Course Date: Thursday,January 29,2026 9:21:20 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor Dyer and City Leadership, I am a resident of West Neck,and more specifically a property owner along the 17th Fairway directly impacted by proposed rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck golf course writing to respectfully urge you to strongly oppose any rezoning therein. West Neck homeowners purchase their homes with a clear expectation about density,traffic, environmental buffers, and quality of life that were assured within both the long-standing Transition Area rules and the density guidelines and open space as noted in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan. Rezoning this property would fundamentally alter the character of our community and break the trust residents have placed in the City when these plans were originally approved. Approving rezoning in this case could set a dangerous precedent for the loss of other green spaces throughout the Transition Area and extends beyond just a District 2 impact. The existing zoning already allows for reasonable use of the property and the expectations of the residents that have chosen to make our homes here. Increasing density beyond what was promised brings unavoidable consequences-traffic congestion, strain on infrastructure, environmental impacts, significant disruption of tranquility,and reduced safety for residents, pedestrians and first responders. As a retired Marine Officer,the choice to live in Virginia Beach and specifically West Neck was based on the character of the community and trust placed in the city. A strong majority of West Neck residents have consistently expressed opposition to rezoning.This opposition is not rooted in resistance to change, but in a desire for thoughtful, predictable planning that respects existing neighborhoods. I respectfully ask that you listen to the residents who live here and vote NO on any rezoning request and protect the integrity of West Neck. Thank you for your time,consideration,and service to our city. Sincerely, David Wessner LTCOL, USMC (Retired) Carrollton Village The Villages of West Neck From: David Konze To: Neena Mooriani;JCROWELCa)vbaov.com;Katherine C.Schoonover:Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Fwd:WEST NECK ZONING Date: Thursday,January 29,2026 1:30:35 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. ----------Forwarded message--------- From: David Konze<davidakonze&gmai1_com> Date: Thu,Jan 29, 2026 at 1:20 PM Subject: WEST NECK ZONING To: <WCAMP vbgov.com>,<JCROMWELL.(g.vbgov om>, <M.ANDERSnvbgov_com>, <KBY R ybgov_com>,<K HOONO Rnvbgov_com>, <BPL JM . . .nvbgov.com>, <5HIPPEN44vbgov.com>, <HCUELLAR(@vbgov_com>,<JHCOSTONUvbgov_com>, <NMORJANIQvbgov_com>, <MCMAUCH(cr�.vbgov.com>, <MAYORSOFFICEQvbgov_com>, <DHUTCHESONQvbgov.com>, <BHENLEY(awbgov_com>, <MBERLUCCavbgov_com>, <AROSSHAMMOND(wbgov_com>, <RCWILSON2vbgov_com>, <WREMICK(j.vbgov.com>, <CJACKSONGRFENnvbgov_com>, <ST , MMIN Qvbgov_com>,<JSHULMAN(cwbgov_com>, <.TVRO[TS (@vbgov om>, <CMOFFICE(W.vbgov_com> I AM A RESIDENT OF WEST NECK FOR THE LAST 17 YEARS AND SPECIFICALLY A PROPERTY OWNER IN ARTHUR PARK DIRECTLY AFFECTED BY THE HARRISON/LEAR PROPOSAL. I AM RESPECTFULLY URGING YOU TO STRONGLY OPPOSE ANY REZONING THEREIN. AS A FORMER COMBAT VIETNAM VETERAN, I ALONG WITH 40% OF MY ARTHUR PARK NEIGHBORS ARE RETIRED VETERANS WHO ARE NOT FROM VIRGINIA,BUT CHOSE TO RETIRE HERE BECAUSE OF THE CITY AND IMPORTANTLY THE ATTRIBUTES OF THE WEST NECK DEVELOPMENT. OUR DECISION WAS BASED ON THE CHARACTER OF THE COMMUNITY AND THE TRUST PLACE IN THE CITY. WE HAVE CONSISTENTLY EXPRESSED OPPOSITION TO REZONING. THIS OPPOSITION IS NOT ROOTED IN RESISTANCE TO CHANGE , BUT A DESIRE FOR THOUGHTFUL, PREDICTABLE PLANNING THAT FOLLOWS CITY GUIDELINES IMPLEMENTED THIRTY YEARS AGO THAT RESPECTS EXISTING NEIGHBORHOODS. THE LONG- STANDING TRANSITION AREA RULES AND DENSITY GUIDELINES AND OPEN SPACE AS NOTED IN THE 2016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HAVE SERVED TO CONTINUED DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY IN A RESPONSIBLE MANNER. REZONING WOULD FUNDAMENTALLY ALTER THE CHARACTER OU OUR COMMUNITY AND BREAK THE TRUST THAT RESIDENTS HAVE PLACE IN THE CITY WHEN THESE PLANS WERE ORIGINALLY APPROVED. David A.Konze 3229 Gallahad Drive Virginia Beach, VA 23456 DavidAKonzea email.com 757-777-5030 David A.Konze 3229 Gallahad Drive Virginia Beach,VA 23456 DavidAKonzeQgrnail_com 757-777-5030 From: red 101244 To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: West Neck Rezoning Date: Thursday,January 29,2026 3:52:48 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. January 29, 2029 I am a resident of West Neck, and I am writing to respectfully urge you to oppose any rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course at West Neck. I have been a resident of West Neck for 23 years. Rezoning the community will have a profound change to our neighborhood character. It will permanently disrupt the balance and diminish the quality of life we were promised. The increased density from this Project will lead to significant traffic congestion, strain on local services, environmental impacts and reduce the safety of residents. Many residents of West Neck are now older citizens. To have our lives disrupted by developing the Signature Golf Course is unfair to us in our twilight years. I respectfully urge you to oppose any rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course. Sincerely, Mary Patricia Piccola 2629 Wonderland Court Village of Carrollton Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad From: Sandra Williams To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Opposed To Rezoning of former Signature at West Neck Property Date: Thursday,January 29,2026 3:57:01 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >I am writing to oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck Property >Rezoning this site would undermine and betray long-standing Transition Area principles,in regard to density guidelines and open space as recorded in Virginia Beach 2016 Comprehensive Plan. This would send a troubling message of betrayal to homeowners across Virginia Beach:that previously established zoning and development standards can be changed to benefit developers,regardless of community impact. >West Neck residents purchased their properties secure in Virginia Beach's adopted plans,zoning assurances and density limits.Approving rezoning now would be betrayal to West Neck property owners and other planned Virginia Beach communities. >City Leadership has a responsibility to uphold our city's established sound planning principles.I urge you to deny any rezoning request for West Neck. >Respectfully, >Sandy Williams >Arthur Parke >The Villages of West Neck From: Kate Johnson To: City Council;Planning Commissioners Subject: Re-Zoning West Neck Date: Friday,January 30,2026 10:02:58 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor and/or City Leadership, I live in The Villages of West Neck, and I am asking you to vote no on any rezoning proposal affecting our community. This is not an abstract planning issue for us—it directly affects how we live every day. Increased density will mean more traffic on roads that are already strained, longer emergency response times, and reduced safety for families, seniors, and pedestrians. Many of us chose West Neck because it offered a balance of nature, open space, and carefully planned development. Rezoning the golf course property would permanently disrupt that balance and diminish the quality of life we were promised. Residents have attended meetings, written letters, and spoken out repeatedly. The message has been clear and consistent: we do not support rezoning. Please respect the voices of the people who live here and will bear the consequences of this decision long after the developers are gone. I urge you to stand with residents and protect the integrity of West Neck by rejecting rezoning. Sincerely, Kathleen Johnson 3145 Egyptian Lane The Villages of West Neck Blue Lake Village From: Mike Wisloski To: Planning Administration Subject: Harrison and Lear Proposal for the Villages at West Neck Date: Friday,January 30,2026 10:59:30 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Ladies and Gentlemen of the Planning Commission, I believe that approximately 25 years ago,this commission did its due diligence and made the correct decision on the Villages at West Neck. Density and open space were examined and found to fit the Comprehensive Plan for the city after debate on the proposed Signature Golf Course. Now comes a proposal to alter that decision, by magically building more homes and increasing open space.The logic isn't there. I could go on and on, but I find everything I want to say in Ms. O'Brian's letter to you under separate cover. Homeowners and residents of the West Neck community, walking away from the January 27, 2025 Harrison and Lear presentation, we felt like they'd pulled a gas light over our eyes, insisting we saw rainbows when all we could perceive was a storm. We continue to express firm opposition to any application or proposal to develop additional "residential units" on the CONTEMPORANEOUSLY property formerly known as the Signature at West Neck golf course. The integrity of our neighborhood relies on the preservation of this land as open space, as originally intended and legally established. The homes in the Villages at West Neck were specifically designed, marketed, and sold with the "windows principle and design intent" Over 500 homeowners purchased their properties at a premium based on the explicit promise to the city of permanent, unobstructed CONTEMPORANEOUSLY golf course views. This design intent created a de facto contractual reliance that should not be unilaterally voided for the benefit of a new developer. The legal principle of Equitable Servitude dictates that these restrictions "run with the land." Even if the current ownership acquired the property through a note sale or following the original developer's exit, they did so with constructive notice of the community's character. The physical layout of the neighborhood—with homes oriented toward the green space— serves as a visible, binding notification that this land is encumbered by the rights of the existing homeowners. A change in ownership does not grant a "clean slate" to disregard the equitable rights established during the common plan of development. The golf course was marketed as the "signature" amenity of this age-restricted community. Plat maps, brochures, even "Golf Themed" street names. For many residents, particularly the high percentage of veterans and retirees, this open space was the primary inducement to purchase. The original 1999 development approval for West Neck relied on the CONTEMPORANEOUSLY golf course acreage to meet the Transition Area Design Guidelines. This land was already "counted" as the required open space to justify the existing residential density. To build more homes on this same land would be a "bait-and- switch" that violates the Virginia Beach Comprehensive Plan and undermines density protections for the entire Southern Rivers Watershed. If this project moves forward, current owners may have valid grounds to appeal their real estate tax assessments based on the significant loss of market value for"obstruction of an open space view" The resulting decrease in property values would negatively impact the city's tax base and the financial security of longtime residents. The Planning Department has previously recommended denial of similar proposals by the current owner because they failed to align with density and open space requirements. Respectively Submitted, Michael Wisloski 3120 Gallahad Drive, Virginia Beach From: Billy Domanaue To: City Council:Planning Commissioners Subject: Signature golf course rezoning Date: Friday,January 30,2026 1:16:59 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. , . Fw. W. a .� . " .� c s t ,i t - Sent from my iPhone From: Bob and Mary Lynn Hanks To: Planning Commissioners Cc: ashiOCaacomcast.net Subject: Fw:West Neck Zoning Proposal Date: Friday,January 30,2026 2:53:40 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Planning Commission Members: I am writing to ask you to disapprove the Harrison and Lear zoning proposal affecting the Villages at West Neck. You are now being asked to change zoning to financially benefit an out-of- town developer, to the detriment of the quality of life of the West Neck I community, and its hundreds of senior citizens, a majority of whom are veterans, and many of whom purchased in West Neck because of access to a golf course and open space, and now, with closure of the golf course, favor the retention and maintenance of the open space over any type of development. Created as a planned development, some 25 years ago, the Villages at West Neck was the first every 55+ community in Virginia Beach. The Community of homes was built with a centerpiece of an Arnold Palmer Signature Golf Course. That golf course property, some 6 years ago, was taken as collateral security for non-golf course debt, and was then purchased, and is now held, by an out-of-state owner/land speculator, who has ruined it. Now, the story is like the classic story of the guy who murdered his parents and then pled for mercy, in court, saying that he was an orphan. The speculator is now coming to you saying, approve my development because there is no other choice for the golf course I ruined. The owner has proven to be a bad steward and a bad neighbor, has failed to maintain the golf course, has erected spite fences, has refused offers of purchase for it to be returned to a golf course, has never met with residents, and now, asks you to reward that conduct by changing the zoning so that he can make larger profits. And now, he sends in his developer, riding on his white horse, to save us. The story should never have gotten this far. The golf course was purchased as a golf course, keep it as a golf course. Consider the best interests of your Virginia Beach military retirees, senior citizens and keep the community as it was designed. Don't create a new community within a community. Both will suffer great damage and the character of the Villages at West Neck will be lost. The choice is yours. Balance the interests of the land speculator/developer and the residents. Who do you favor ... a greedy out-off-state land speculator and out-of-town developer, or, your Virginia Beach retired military senior citizen residents? I hope that you will choose wisely. Thank you. Very truly yours, Robert Hanks 2795 Browning Drive Virginia Beach, VA 23456 (757) 797-3758 From: D P rfano To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City Manager Citizen Inquiry Subject: West Neck/Harrison Lear Rezoning of Signature at West Neck Date: Friday,January 30,2026 8:02:28 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am a resident of West Neck since 2002; and I am urging you to vote NO on the rezoning of Signature at West Neck golf course. Their plan is to embed a community in a shot-gun pattern of 157 single family homes as a single HOA; requiring 6 new access roads and enlarging retention ponds for drainage. There will also be an increase in vehicle traffic that will affect the safety for dog walkers, seniors, pedestrians and affect the response times for emergency services There is only one entrance/exit to West Neck Road and it is heavily travelled primarily to see doctors, buy food, general shopping, mail deliveries and miscellaneous services. Therefore road safety is of concern. Especially in the areas where the new proposed roads intersect with the existing roads and feed into the circle. Of additional concern is the increase in density and lose of open space per the existing guild-lines. We are being threatened by parties whose only true interest in West Neck is pure profit. While we must bear with the construction noises and activities for 5 years (their estimate). Keep the existing zoning guild lines. Do not change them. VOTE NO to the rezoning request. Thank you, D. Porfano Majesty Ln From: Joyce Sharoles To: Plannina Commissioners Subject: West Neck Rezoning Date: Saturday,January 31,2026 9:53:51 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commissioners, I am a resident of West Neck,and I am writing to respectfully urge you to oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck golf course. West Neck homeowners purchase their homes with a clear expectation about density,traffic, environmental buffers, and quality of life. Rezoning this property would fundamentally alter the character of our community and break the trust residents placed in the City when these plans were originally approved. The existing zoning already allows for reasonable use of the property. Increasing density beyond what was promised brings unavoidable consequences—traffic congestion,strain on infrastructure, environmental impacts,and reduced safety for residents,pedestrians,and first responders. A strong majority of West Neck residents have consistently expressed opposition to rezoning.This opposition is not rooted in resistance to change,but in a desire for thoughtful,predictable planning that respects existing neighborhoods. I respectfully ask that you listen to the residents who live here and vote no on any rezoning request for West Neck. Thank you for your time and service to our city. Sincerely, Joyce Sharples 757-323-0667 jsharplesl@,Iive.com 3547 Winding Trail Circle Wordsworth Village The Villages of West Neck From: 7hd To: Mannino Commissioners Subject: West Neck Rezoning Date: Saturday,January 31,2026 10:09:36 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leadership, I am writing to strongly oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck property. Rezoning this site would undermine long-standing Transition Area rules,in regards to density guidelines and open space as noted in 2016 Comprehensive Plan,and sends a troubling message to homeowners across Virginia Beach: that previously agreed-upon zoning and development standards can be changed after the fact to benefit developers,regardless of community impact. West Neck residents relied on adopted plans,zoning assurances,and density limits when purchasing their homes.Approving rezoning now would be unfair to homeowners who acted in good faith and would set a precedent that threatens other planned communities throughout the city. Traffic capacity,emergency access,environmental considerations,and infrastructure limits were all factors in the original zoning. Those constraints have not changed-only the developer's desired profit margin has. City leadership has a responsibility to uphold sound planning principles,not rewrite them under pressure. I urge you to deny any rezoning request for West Neck and uphold the rules that protect our neighborhoods. Respectfully, Ted Sharples 3547 UWinding Trail Circle Wordsworth Village The Villages of West Neck Sent from my iPad From: HENRY MANN To: planning Commissioners;City Council;City Manager Citizen Ingulrv;KWarren(atvbgov.com Subject: NO TO REZONING Date: Saturday,January 31,2026 11:26:56 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor and City Leadership 01/31/2026 1 have lived in The Wordsworth Village of West Neck for 20+ years. I am writing to strongly oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck property. I am also asking you to vote NO on any rezoning proposal affecting our community. This is not an abstract planning issue for us; it directly affects our everyday life. Increased density will mean more traffic which is already strained, longer emergency response time, and reduced safety for our families, seniors and pedestrians. Many of us chose Wordsworth Village because it offered a balance of nature, open space, and carefully planned development. Rezoning the golf course would disrupt that balance and diminish the quality of life we were promised and total destruction of our open space as we know them. A strong majority of Wordsworth Village residents have consistently expressed opposition to rezoning. This opposition is not rooted in resistance to change, but in a desire for thoughtful, predictable planning that respect existing neighborhoods and their infrastructure. I respectfully ask that you listen to the residents who live here and vote NO on any rezoning request for West Neck. Sincerely, Henry M Mann The Wordsworth Village of West Neck From: devl In peach na agl.cgm To: City Council;City Manager Citizen Inquiry; Planning Commissioners Subject: The Villages at West Neck Date: Saturday,January 31,2026 11:51:14 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor and City Leadership, I am a resident of West Neck, and I am writing to respectfully urge you to oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck golf course. West Neck homeowners purchase their homes with a clear expectation about density, traffic, environmental buffers, and quality of life. Rezoning this property would fundamentally alter the character of our community and break the trust residents placed in the City when these plans were originally approved. The existing zoning already allows for reasonable use of the property. Increasing density beyond what was promised brings unavoidable consequences—traffic congestion, strain on infrastructure, environmental impacts, and reduced safety for residents, pedestrians. and first responders. A strong majority of West Neck residents have consistently expressed opposition to rezoning. This opposition is not rooted in resistance to changes but in a desire for thoughtful, predictable planning that respects existing neighborhoods. I respectfully ask that you listen to the residents who live here and vote no on any rezoning request for West Neck. Thank you for your time and service to our city. Sincerely, Cheryl Devlin Browningstone The Villages of West Neck From: Carol Konze To: Plannino Commissioners Subject: Zoning Issue at West Neck Date: Saturday,January 31,2026 6:09:13 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Ladies& Gentlemen, I have been a resident in the various West Neck Communities Since 2002 - 24 Years and a resident of Virginia Beach since 1968 - 58 years. I vehemently oppose the change in zoning that would affect the quality of our neighborhood(s). VOTE NO on rezoning! Sincerely, C. A. Konze 3229 Gallahad Drive Virginia Beach,VA 23456 From: Kathleen Lam To: Planning Commissioners Subject: Vote NO to rezone West Neck Village in the Transition Area!! Date: Saturday,January 31,2026 3:12:10 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commissioners, I live in West Neck Village and have been deeply upset by the latest proposal for extreme overdevelopment by the owner of the former golf course to vastly exceed the density limits of the Transition area here through a disastrous plan called 'The Preserve at West Neck'. This is his latest attempt to test the resolve of the community by again requesting that the original 1999 protections of P1 Preservation zoning be demolished. I live on Majesty Lane adjacent to the parcel he proposes construction of 143 houses on what was once the 17th fairway at Signature Meadows. I would like to share my thoughts about his plan to partner with local Indian River Plantation residents Marc and Audrey Leishman to rejuvenate the front nine holes of the former golf course while destroying the peaceful tranquility enjoyed by the 900 residents of this community. This change to the zoning in the Preservation Zone violates the Green Line and will exponentially enrich him at West Neck Villages' expense. It's an enormous price we would pay in the form of obliterated view plains, polluted air from pond dredging, years of extreme dust, greatly increased traffic, construction noise, vehicular congestion on our narrow roads, drastically disrupted drainage channels, displaced bird and wildlife populations, increased HOA fees, and substantially reduced property values due to high density and loss of golf course proximity. Please understand- we are all retired and invested in property that was intended to be golf course adjacent, not construction zone immersed. We deserve that, for now and for the next decade that this plan would take to complete. These are the reasons the TA/ITA Citizens Advisory Committee and the Planning Committee recommended denial of a similar horrible self-serving proposal by JBWK in March 2025. Here we are again in the same place, and I respectfully plead with you NOT to support this similar proposal of destruction! Thank you, Kathleen Lam 2669 Majesty Lane Virginia Beach, VA pat Satamy,awvy 3l,]p2e.:N:taM ____._. _. ....... _.... ..._._- ....�..._. .__._.__._____—.� ..._.. .......... ............ _._..__._. LAU110N:TAs tdipnkedfiom aeaitle dthe Oh'dWOrtla Beam.Oo nw c46 Gnfa or Open ettaMmems uNea -...... - - --.. i I.._._ ___�_....__ YOO r.00graa�mefnbay.INbW U1.mnMansah. Plan g Commissim Members, H,u g Leer n suMratlatg a plan to Maki 10]Qwelrmgs m the Uatselal area(TA),on V1e Old SW.-Go1f Dolase ha'es 10-1g Tlas plan vMafes me ongawl aorMSlpns eatablianed in tna IM davetppmem epomval.which daalgnatad thb bad mrough danairy boll,agreemoMs M preservation of open 6pac.wM the goe epurx.a an Intagral part of the rommunma'eh.rectar and a ball,upon—h the age reaVlcted raldents megaa eOnWc s gfearyle choice and fiM lal Imenment me inrtbl developer received an increases raiOenllel density for me aun0uneingara 12..units per acre,remer men me rtens.re 1 untt per acre M the TrensidOn Areal wiM me ..plicn urMeratarMingthatthagolfcourse parcelwould ramaln cOmlpN,.Me open specs and served a,a com l"recrmtbn.l.MaOdtl.menirywith M+N.c a,mis h1O.1 denairy we,fully raUi and cepitahx upon tarsal.of residential properties.These.VWbaona were not tamporeryor diacretgiwy,they ere catlifiedwimin tM%antKd Devebpment(p H)xolting arM recorded In NMI documents,Odigating all aubsepuent raoperry owner:.The currant ovmer a QlN me property whh full dlacb,ura or ahoub han eaerN due diligence regarding maaa rmniction, I pufcfiaa.d my hom 8Pf"lum(on—t2l--0aad on 0a1rencea"1N,city ragardbg me plaenatbn of opal a pace and me sM cNrIa.,an ImegrN part of ma commumtyacharacterand mapee1.uponwhkhraimm,madeaconaciouaIda.tyfe.lp —financialImea 1ArryredevelopmentwouMeewrxly In—propertyvelum, eaecemata damanda On—at—la(IneW0ing a,.-,,torn water management and public 68fety),and eltel me tundamamel cheracbr of our commundy. I implore you not approve H&US Ml to bulb 1d dwellings in me TA, Lary.M . Wat Ned W.ga Beaidem,Y ginla Beach,VA From: Bruce Biddle To: Planning Administration Subject: Transition Area Non-Development with over1000 signed SOTAR votes/members Date: Saturday,January 31,2026 9:04:49 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Planning Commission Members, SOTAR (Supporters of the Transition Area) has over 1000 signed members supporting the non-development of the Transition Area (TA). That's close to 95% of the residents in the TA, if you don't count the residents that support SOTAR but are either too old, too lazy or just don't understand the impact of future development in the TA . I live on hole #2 of the old West Neck Signature Golf Course, purchased my home with the assurances from City Council that the golf course would be preserved as open space (This was not a temporary or discretionary when implemented in 1999 as PD-H zone) and recorded in public records obligating the City to not develop the land by a very aggressive/well financed/bully developer named Harrison & Lear. The Developer/Harrison & Lear is submitting a plan to build 143 dwellings in the transition area, on the old Signature Golf Course holes 10-18. This plan violates the original conditions established in the 1999 development approval, which designated this land through density bonus agreements as preservation of open space with the golf course as an integral part of the communities' character. The Leishman's, a very influential golf family don't understand the implications of such a plan. The Leishman's suggest,with the developer's aggressive encouragement,that they would build a 9 hole course on holes 1-9 or next to IRP/Indian River Plantation (where the Leishman's live) and allow the developer to develop in the West Neck Villages Community or holes 10-18 which would only impact our community(eg: building new homes within 50 ft of West Neck Villages homes). This not only violates the City Council PD-H zoning assurances from 1999 but would severely impact West Neck Villages directly. As you're aware the initial developer received an increased residential density for the surrounding area (2.4 units per acre, rather than the standard 1 unit per acre for the Transition Area)with the explicit understanding that the golf course parcel would remain contiguous, passive open space and served as a community recreational and social amenity with public access.This higher density was fully realized and capitalized upon the sale of residential properties. I urge you to vote no to a very aggressive, well funded, bully'ish developer and vote no to developing the transition area. Bruce Biddle West Neck Village Resident,Virginia Beach, VA From: Robert Tice To: Planning Commissioners Subject: Harrison and Lear"s Rezoning Proposal for the West Neck Community Date: Sunday,February 1,2026 2:13:30 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commissioners, Please see the letter below: Dear Planning Commissioners, I attended the Harrison and Lear presentation at the Wave Church on January 27th for their plans for our West Neck community. I know the Leishman's team will build a beautiful and high quality 9-hole golf course. I also understand that the Harrison and Lear's lawyer, Chris Pocta,Wolcott Rivers Gates, P.C., so eloquently stated that we could not use the density and open space defense as we do not own the land, and I know these are just guidelines and not rules for the city to follow.The communities that he referenced in the Transition Area that he used, as examples of communities that owned their open space, were previously all agricultural land. Open space in these communities is part of the master plan and required per the city based on the size of the lots, but I dare say they are 175 acres as our open space is. The open space that we are referring to in our community is land the city provided the builder with a density exception and land was zoned P1 for the amenity which was the golf course. The open space we are talking about is 175 acres, and the city should not punish us for not owning the land as it is zoned P1 for the amenity. This does not excuse the fact that the plan that Harrison and Lear are proposing to build 143 homes, infill development, in a 25-year-old well-established 55+community. No other community in Virginia Beach has infill development on previous P1 zoned land. This plan will set a precedent. I do not disagree with responsible development, but this is not responsible. There will be two HOAs in the same community that will have to coexist.This will cause major issues between the two communities going forward in regard to the West Neck Community's amenities. Our infrastructure will be seriously affected as our community roads are hard to navigate now when someone parks on the curb as two cars cannot pass, one car always must wait, and their proposal will add 250 to 300 additional cars on our streets forever. This will affect emergency services as well. We moved to the West Neck Community for the peace and tranquility that this community offered. PLEASE VOTE NO ON THE REZONING PROPOSAL BEFORE YOU! Best Regards, Robert L.Tice, Emerson Spring Village, 2709 Steinbeck Court February 1, 2026 Joseph& Helen Genco 2824 Still Breeze Court Wordsworth Village Virginia Beach,VA. 23456 Planning Commissioner c/o Department of Planning and Community Development City of Virginia Beach 2875 Sabre Street Virginia Beach,Va 23452 Dear Planning Commissioner: Opposition to Rezoning and Density Increase.I am writing to express my opposition to the ill-conceived,Harrison and Lear,Inc.proposal to rezone the Signature Golf Course; thus, raising the housing density and permitting years of construction and disruption to a mature community inhibited primarily by senior citizens. Rezoning Will Change Irrevocably the Character of Our Mature Community. Once the character of West Neck is changed, it will be lost forever. I I am an 86-year-old retired University Professor while my wife of 58 years, Helen, is a retired Home Health Administrator. We moved into the West Neck over-55 community in 2018 as our retirement home because it was a mature, well-planned community,with a unique, spacious environment,a golf course and amenities for senior citizens. Years of Construction and Disruption in a Mature Neighborhood. West Neck is currently a wonderful, low-density community for older individuals and senior citizens. The lives of hundreds of senior citizens will be disrupted for years by construction if the proposed rezoning is approved. The ill-conceived Harrison and Lear proposal will mean years of construction in an already mature community, leading to high volumes of construction traffic, longer emergency response time and reduced safety for our families, especially senior citizens. H&L Deliberately Allowed the Golf Course to Go to Seed. H&L and the property owner, JBWK LLC,have engaged in dilatory and deceptive behavior by deliberately letting the golf course go to seed, despite numerous offers to maintain the integrity of the golf course. For what purpose; so they can proceed with their ill-conceived proposal for financial gain Please Vote No on Rezoning. I respectfully request that you kindly listen to the residents who live here and vote NO on any rezoning request for West Neck by H&L. Respectfully Submitted Joseph M. Genco 207-944-9231 From: Joseph Genco To: Planning Administration Subject: Re:Opposition Letter to Harrison and Lear Proposal Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 12:26:32 PM Attachments: imaoe001.Dno CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Please Don't Approve H&L Proposal for Rezoning West Neck Dear Katherine Schoonover I can see no overriding reason to approve the rezoning proposal of the Signature Golf Course in West Neck. I am of the opinion that this ill-conceived proposal is driven solely by financial gain for a Florida real estate speculator(JBWK LLC)and a local developer. (1) Once the unique character of West Neck is lost, it will be lost forever. West Neck will become just another high-density residential development. (2) Approval of this proposal to raise the housing density will mean years of construction and disruption to Wordsworth Village, a mature neighborhood inhabited primarily by senior citizens in the twilight of their lives. (3) H&L and the property owner have engaged in dilatory and deceptive behavior by deliberately letting the golf course go to seed, solely for financial gain and spite while disregarding the wishes of the residents. (4)Clearly, leaving the Golf course property as an undevoted green zone is far superior to the alternative of misguided over-development for financial gain of a few. Joseph M. Genco 2824 Still Breeze Court Wordworth Village(West Neck) Virginia Beach,VA. 12345 On Mon,Feb 2, 2026 at 12:45 PM Planning Administration<P1anAdmn(�,)vbgov.com>wrote: Thank you for your email. This letter will be provided in the packages to Planning Commission and City Council ahead of their votes. Thanks, PLANNING&COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning Administration Division O:(757)385-4621 1 pl na-_admnnvbgov_com https:// tannina.ViriziniaBeach.aov 2403 Courthouse Drive Municipal Center, Building 3 Virginia Beach,VA 23456 a CITY OF VIRGINIA % BEACH From:Joseph Genco<img19390gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, February 1, 2026 4:02 PM To: Planning Commissioners< lap nningcommissionersCcDvbgov.com> Subject:Opposition Letter to Harrison and Lear Proposal CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commissioner: My wife and I are both retired, senior citizens in our 80ties living in Wordsworth Village of West Neck, Virginia Beach. Attached please find our letter in opposition to the rezoning change proposed by Harrison and Lear, Inc. for the Signature Golf Course. I have included our letter as both a Word Document and as a PDF file. We would appreciate it greatly if you would take a few minutes to read our letter; which explains our rationale for opposition to this ill-advised rezoning and density increase for our beautiful West Neck Community. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Respectfully submitted Joseph M. Genco Wordsworth Village 207-944-9231 From: Helen To: Planning Commissioners Subject: For Your Review and Consideration Date: Sunday,February 1,2026 4:08:06 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thank you for your service to the city of Virginia Beach. Representing a diverse group of people can be a rewarding, but sometimes a thankless and exhausting job. I have been a resident of the West Neck 55+ Community since November 2018. lam asking to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. I have one overriding concern: The proposed plan for development of the former golf course, if approved, will take place in an existing community. This, if approved, will have significant, often yet to be identified impacts on all concerned. Questions that come to mind: • What will the impact be on our lives and services? o Take for example the sewage system. We live in a low lying, flood prone, drainage adverse area such as VB. o Who will evaluate that? o Who pays for the corrective action, if corrective action is required? o Who enforces the corrective action (courts take time and are expense prone)? • How will damage to the common areas of West Neck be dealt with? o Who evaluates damage and who pays for repair? o How is enforcement dealt with? • Certain common areas will be affected longterm, e.g. Legendary Drive and Cadence Way. These streets will be used to gain access to the proposed housing development. o Now the West Neck HOA does the upkeep to the trees and grass (maybe more, I did not check). They are city streets. ■ Who pays and how will enforcement be dealt with? • If you or a member of your family lived in West Neck, how would vote? Thank you for your consideration of my concerns. Helen Genco 207-944-1231 gbJ2004(cbgmail.com 1824 Still Breeze Ct., 23456 From: DALE MERKEY To: Planning Commissioners;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Barbara Henley; Rosemary C.Wilson;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Mark Stiles;Amanda F. Barnes: Lyndon S. Remias; David W.Hutcheson; Michael C. Mauch;Marchelle L.Coleman; Kathryn Bvler;dhhorsley6lyboov.com;Susan B.Hiooen;Baylee Kotaiarvi Cc: Konze Dave And Carol Subject: Request To Maintain Existing Open Space/Density Regulations For West Neck(WN) Date: Sunday,February 1,2026 7:59:00 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. As a WN homeowner for over 25 years I have witnessed the changes in our age 55 and over unique community. Once villages were initially completed homes were purchased and repurchased (as original owners passed on) and the exceptional life style of this distinctive community began to coalesce and improve for all. As seniors WN provides peacefullness, safety and quiet so important in our final years. This changed when the golf course closed, was bought by the current owner who allowed it to become ruined. He then initiated various duplicitous strategic efforts containing superfluous tactics in collaboration with a developer, Harrison and Lear to gain approval and promote the construction of at least 134 more homes over a period of 5 to 8+ years in the center of the community. If this were permitted it would violate the original, important and still existing open space/density regulations and completely destroy the sensitive high quality of life so critical to the seniors who own existing homes. The WN 55 age restriction doesn't accurately define the composition of our community. Over 40% are veterans, the average age is in the 70's and there are many widows and widowers who live alone. At these age brackets while some are still active walking,swimming, cycling etc. many must deal with limiting medical constraints. Most have lived in multiple locations moving forward with their military service, corporate careers etc. This last home purchase to enjoy the security, peacefullness, quiet and safety in WN is for most their final home ownership decision. The current golf course owner has allowed the course to be ruined and even built 8' "spite fences" directly behind homes when owners expressed concerns about the high, thick unsightly weeds and plant growth becoming a serious fire hazard; a concern that became a reality later with a large dangerous brush fire about 2 years ago. Protecting the existing open spaces by all measures is extremely important. Returning it to a renewed 18 hole golf course or at the very least maintaining the open spaces and eliminating the serious fire hazard should be considered. In fact, 2 separate attempts to buy the course from the current owner and restore it were steadfastly refused. The amounts offered were more than twice what he paid for it. Now, homeowners again must deal with the stress of yet another attempt by the course owner to build homes in the middle of the community without any regard for existing owners. It is important to note that this is also a morale decision. It is not just about radical, greed-based, disastrous land grab attempts. It is also about understanding the profound reasons for our request to stop any additional WN development/home construction because it represents the will of the WN tax paying homeowners. The decision rests with you. We sincerely hope and trust you will carefully consider in good faith our request. Sincerely, Dale Merkey From: Edward Mathews To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City Manager Citizen Inquiry Subject: West Neck rezoning Date: Sunday,February 1,2026 9:13:03 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To City Leadership I am writing this to express my opposition to any rezoning of the Signature at West Neck property. Rezoning of this site would undermine long-standing Transition area rules,in regards to density guidelines and open space as noted in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan,and send a troubling message to homeowners across Virginia Beach,that previously agreed-upon zoning and development standards can be changed after the fact for the benefit of developers,regardless of community impact. West Neck residents relied on adopted plans,zoning assurances,and density limits when purchasing their homes. Approving rezoning now would be unfair to homeowners,who acted in good faith,and would set a precedent that threatens other planned communities throughout the city. Traffic capacity,emergency access,environmental considerations,and infrastructure limits were all factors in the original zoning.Those constraints have not changed.Only the developer's desired profit margin has. City leadership has a responsibility to uphold sound planning principles,not rewrite them under pressure.I urge you to deny any rezoning request for West Neck and uphold the rules that protect our neighborhoods. Thank You Edward and Donna Mathews Browningstone The Villages of West Neck Sent from my iPad Mrs. Ruth I Mallek 3244 GALLAHAD DRIVE Virginia Beach, Va. 23456 February 1 , 2026 PLANNING COMMISSIONER'S @ VB GOV.COM CITY COUNCIL MEMBER'S @VB GOV.COM CM OFFICE @ VB GOV.COM To whom this may concern : AS A TWENTY THREE YEAR RESIDENT OF ARTHUR PARK ,LOCATED AT THE ONCE WEST NECK SIGNATURE GOLF COURSE, I WISH TO ADDRESS MY CONCERNS ABOUT THE FUTURE OF WHAT WAS ONCE A FANTASTIC DEVELOPMENT FOR THOSE FIFTY-FIVE AND OLDER. MANY OF US LOOKED FORWARD TO LIVING IN THIS AREA AND ENJOYING OUR LIVES WHEN WE BOUGHT INTO THIS DEVELOPMENT. WE TRUSTED OUR PURCHASE . THESE PAST EIGHT YEARS HAVE BEEN VERY TAXING ON ALL OF US AS WE HAVE SEEN THE SECURITY WE FELT, SLOWLY BE ERODED BY A DEVELOPER WHO WANTED TO REMOVE THE GOLF COURSE AND BUILD MORE HOMES IN AN AREA THAT WAS ONCE GRANDFATHERED AS A GOLF COURSE FOR WEST NECK AREA. FIRST THE GOLF COURSE AND THEN HOMES ! MILLIONS OF DOLLARS HAVE BEEN SPENT ON THIS DEVELOPMENT... PURCHASING THE LAND, SURVEYING THE AREA, PURCHASING THE RIGHTS TO THE ARNOLD PALMER GOLF COURSE PLANS, ROADS AND SEWER LINES, BUILDING OF HOMES, ETC. THIS LAND WAS FIRST ZONED FOR THE GOLF COUSE AND THEN HOMES WERE ADDED TO FULFILL THE PROJECT OF HAVING A NUMBER ONE GOLF COURSE IN VIRGINIA BEACH WITH LOVELY HOMES. THIS COURSE CERTAINLY ADDED TO THE TAX BASE OF VB. WHO WOULD NOT WANT TO PLAY ON AN' ARNOLD PALMER `GOLF COURSE ? FOR YEARS THE GOLF COURSE, THE AMENITIES OF THE RESTAURANT AND THE BAR... A DELIGHTUL SITUATION FOR THOSE GETTING UP IN YEARS WHO ENJOYED LIFE AT WEST NECK. THEN D IASTER STRUCK ! UNFORTUNATELY, MR. DICKY FOSTER ,THE DEVELOPER ,FELL ON HARD TIMES AND IN 2018 OR THERE ABOUTS, HE WAS IN A FINANCIAL BIND. SIGNATURE AT WEST NECK WAS PUT UP FOR AUCTION. THIS SITUATION HURT EVERYONE AND NOT ONLY MR. FOSTER. UNFORTUNATELY, AN OUT OF STATE BUYER PURCHASED THE 14 ACRES WHICH WAS THE GOLF COURSE. HIS INTENTIONS WERE TO BUILD 154 HOMES ON THE LAND AND TOTALLY DO AWAY WITH THE AMENITIES WHICH WE HAD ALL PURCHASED. WE, THE RESIDENTS OF WEST NECK HAVE BEEN FIGHTING HIS DESIRES WHICH WOULD RUIN OUR SERENITY AND DESTROYING OUR END OF LIFE PLANS TO PLAYI GOLF AND ENJOYING LIFE AT OUR SPECIAL HAVEN. DURING THE YEARS THIS DEVELOPER HAS BEEN IN CONTROL ,THERE HAVE BEEN ISSUES. SEVERAL HOME OWNERS COMPLAINED CONCERNING THE MANNER IN WHICH THE NEW OWNER WAS KEEPING THE GOLF COURSE. WEEDS AS HIGH AND HIGHER THAN SIX FEET TALL WERE FILLING THE FREEWAYS ALONG WITH THE DEBRIS FROM DEAD TREES. INSTEAD OF BEING A " GOOD NEIGHBOR,"HE CONTACTED HIS ATTORNEY AND 8 X 8 FOOT CORRUGATED METAL FENCES WERE ERECTED ALONG THE PROPERTY LINES OF EACH HOME OWNER... TOTALLY BLOCKING HIS VIEW. WE NOTICED THAT SMALL WHITE PIECES OF PAPER WERE PUT IN HOLDERS ON PROPERTIES ADJACENT TO HIS PROPERTY. WERE THESE SILENT THREATS THAT IF YOU COMPLAINED, YOU TOO WOULD BE SUBJECT TO 8 X 8 CORRUGATED METAL FENCES ??? FINALLY, THE CITY WAS INVOLVED AFTER A FIRE BROKE OUT AND THE OUT OF STATE OWNER WAS FORCED TO DO SOME GROWTH MAINTENANCE AROUND WHAT WAS ONCE A GOLF COURSE. THERE AE MANY HUGE PINE TREES DROPPING BRANCHES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY AS I SPEAK. PRESENTLY WE HAVE BEEN PRESENTED WITH A NEW PLAN... THE DEVELOPER WANTS TO PRESERVE THE FIRST 9 HOLES FOR A 9 HOLE GOLF COURSE AND THE REMAINING 9 HOLES WOULD BE FOR 143 NEW HOMES, ETC. WHAT ARE THE GUARANTEEES TO THE OWNERS ON THE FIRST 9 HOLES THAT THIS IDEA WOULD NEVER CHAANGE AND WITHIN A FEW YEARS THE 9 HOLES WILL HAVE HOMES OR CONDO'SUILT ON THAT AREA ??? ONCE AGAIN THIS OFFER WILL DEFINATELY CAUSE ISSUES WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. NEW ROADS, CONJESTION FOR SEVERAL YEARS. TORN UP PROPERTIES AND MANY INCONVIENCES. THERE IS TALK THAT THE AREA FOR THE 143 HOMES WOULD BE 55 AND OLDER, BUT THE HOA'S WOULD BE DIFFERENT . THIS AREA IS IN A FLOOD ZONE . DURING THE RAINS AND FLOODING OF 2016 IN THIS AREA, MY TWO YEAR OLD CAR WAS DESTROYED. WATER HAD DESTROYED THE ELECTRICAL COMPOTENTS AND AFTER DRIVING A BIT, MY CAR DIED. A COSTLY DEAL FOR ME. LET ME ASK THIS OF EACH ONE OF YOU ON CITY COUNCIL AND OUR PLANNING COMMISSION OF VIRGINIA BEACH.... IF EACH OF YOU WERE FACED WITH THIS DILEMMA ,WOULD YOU FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS AS HOME OWNERS TO PROTECT YOUR INVESTMENT? I CAN GUARANTEE YOU WOULD E ON OUR SIDE. . 1 . YOU BOUGHT YOUR HOME KNOWING THAT A GOLF COURSE WAS PART OF A GRANDFATHERED DEAL FOR THE COMMUNITY. TO HAVE THIS DEAL SUDDENLY DESTROYED DOES NOT SET WELL WITH HOMEOWNERS . WHAT AREA IN VIRGINA BEACH IS NEXT ? WE , AS A COMMUNITY, ASK THAT YOU PUT YOURSELF IN OUR SHOES AND KEEP WEST NECK AS IT ONCE WAS. I'M SURE MANY OF YOU ENJOYED THE COURSE AND WERE PROUD OF WHAT WE HAD. WE ARE YOUR NEIGHBORS AND FRIENDS AND WE NEED YOUR SUPPORT IN KEEPING YOUR WORD TO PROTECT THIS AREA. SINCERELY, RUTH I MALLEK MRS. GEORGE A MALLEK PS. AS RETIRED MILITARY WITH 30 YEARS IN SERVICE AND A ONE TIME BUSINESSMAN IN VIRGINIA BEACH, THIS AREA MET THE NEEDS OF AN AVID GOLFER... THERE ARE MANY STILL AROUND WHO LOVED THIS COURSE. From: richard damond To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City Manager Citizen Inquiry Subject: Please vote No to West Neck rezoning Date: Monday,February 2,2026 9:44:56 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City leadership, I 1 have been a resident of West Neck Villages for 20 years. Rezoning the adjacent golf course property, the former Signature at West Neck is disruptive and financially damaging to the residents of West Neck. We do not need any more competition for senior housing immediately adjacent to our own homes. 6 This could make selling our properties difficult. Homes placed on the former 17th fairway would be in the backyards of current residents who had purchased their property knowing there was either open space or a golf course behind their backyards, not another house with the noise and crowding and traffic that comes with it. Rezoning increases density which is beyond what was originally planned. Please honor my request and those of many residents who live in West Neck and vote no on any rezoning. Thank you very much for your time and service to our city. i Sincerely, Richard Damond, Veteran US Army 2891 Rose Garden Way Wordsworth Village, The Villages of West Neck From: gary yonke To: Planning Commissioners Subject: Rezoning of West Neck Signature Golf Course Date: Monday,February 2,2026 11:23:47 AM Attachments: letter to MayorCity Leadershio.oaoes CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Barbara and I respectfully urge you to stand with the residents and protect the integrity of the West Neck community by rejecting rezoning. We have lived in Arthur Parke, in the Villages of West Neck, for over 23 wonderful years,and we are asking you to vote NO on any rezoning proposal affecting our community.Attached is our letter regarding the rezoning action. Thank you for your time and service to our city. Sincerely, Gary&Barbara Yonke Dear Mayor and City Leaders, I am writing to strongly oppose any rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course at the West Neck Villages. Rezoning this site would undermine long standing Transition Area rules in regards to density guidelines and open space requirements as noted in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan, and send a troubling message to homeowners across Virginia Beach: that previously agreed upon zoning and development standards can be changed after the fact to benefit developers, regardless of community impact. We West Neck residents relied on adopted plans, zoning assurances, and density limits when purchasing our homes! Approving rezoning now would be unfair to us homeowners who acted in good faith and would set a precedent that threatens other planned communities throughout the city we care about. Traffic and infrastructure capacities, emergency access, and environmental issues, were all factors in the original zoning and those constraints have not changed, but the developers desire for higher profits has changed. I ask and hope that you, as city leaders, will uphold the responsibility for sound planning principles and not change those principles under pressure from profit driven developers. I respectfully urge you to deny any rezoning request for West neck and uphold the rules that protect our neighborhoods. Sincerely, Mark & Sheree Scott Wordsworth in the Villages of West Neck From: Gretchen Allen To: City Council Cc: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: West Neck/Signature Rezoning Date: Saturday,January 31,2026 11:37:01 AM CAUTION This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor and City Leadership, We in the West Neck Community are once again facing threats of development from Harrison Lear regarding the development of the former Signature Golf Course. First of all, let me, CATEGORICALLY STATE THAT I AM 1. OPPOSED TO ANY CHANGES TO THE DENSITY IN THE TRANSITION AREA. 2. OPPOSED TO ANY P1 ZONING CHANGES. 3. 1 am not opposed to the proposed plans regarding the golf course, just the additional housing. There are many other reasons this is a bad idea for the West Neck Community however, I will not waste your time enumerating them. Suffice it to say that the items listed above should be enough to end this proposed development. Please hold to the agreement that was made in 1999. Best Regards, Gretchen Allen alacarteevents4u@cox.net Carrollton Village The Villages at West Neck From: allallen To: Planning Commissioners Cc: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: West Neck/Signature rezoning Date: Saturday,January 31,2026 11:37:26 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. City Leadership, We in the West Neck Community are once again facing threats of development from Harrison Lear regarding the development of the former Signature Golf Course. First of all, let me, CATEGORICALLY STATE THAT I AM 1. OPPOSED TO ANY CHANGES TO THE DENSITY IN THE TRANSITION AREA. 2. OPPOSED TO ANY P1 ZONING CHANGES, ANYWHERE IN THE CITY. 3. 1 am not opposed to the proposed plans regarding the golf course, just the additional housing. There are many other reasons this is a bad idea for the West Neck Community; however, I will not waste your time enumerating them. Suffice it to say that the items listed above should be enough to end this proposed development. Please hold to the agreement that was made in 1999. Best Regards, Thomas Allen allallen@cox.net Carrollton Village The Villages at West Neck From: Robert Franklin To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: West Neck Zoning Date: Saturday,January 31,2026 1:31:22 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Marchelle L. Coleman, My name is Robert"Rex"Franklin,a life long resident of Virginia Beach.I am an Army Veteran and currently a Volunteer EMT for the CityOf Virginia Beach at station 5,Courthouse. I am writing to strongly oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck property. Rezoning this site would undermine long-standing transition Area rules,in regards to density guidelines and open space as noted in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan,and send a troubling message to homeowners across Virginia Beach:that previously agreed-upon zoning and development standards can be changed after the fact to benefit developers,regardless of community impact. West Neck residents relied on adapted plans,zoning assurances,and density limits when purchasing our homes.Approving rezoning now would be unfair to homeowners who acted in good faith and would set a precedent that threatens other planned communities throughout the city. Traffic capacity,emergency access,environmental considerations,and infrastructure limits were all factors in the original zoning.Those constraints have not changed,only the Developers desired profit margin has. City leadership has the responsibility to uphold sound planning principles,not rewrite them under pressure from developers. I urge you to deny,now,and in the future,any rezoning request for West Neck and uphold the rules that protect our neighborhoods. Respectfully, Robert"Rex"Franklin 2716 Longworth Court West Neck Villages-Emerson Spring Virginia Beach,VA 23456 From: PAULA RODDENSERRY To: icromwellCowboov.com;m.anders(&vbcov.com;Kathryn Byler;kschoonover(o)vbaov.com;Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hiooen;Holly Cuellar;ihcostenCalvbgov.com;nmorianiCabvboov.com;Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L.Coleman; dhutchenson(@vbaov.com;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Worth Remick;Cal "Cash"Jackson-Green;ishulman(a)vbaov.com;Jennifer V.Rouse:City Manager Citizen Inquiry Subject: Please vote No to West Neck rezoning Date: Sunday,February 1,2026 11:09:21 AM CAUTIO :This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City leadership, I have been a resident of West Neck villages for nearly 15 years. Rezoning the adjacent golf course property, the former signature at West Neck is unfair and financially damaging to the residents of West Neck. We do not need any more competition for senior housing immediately adjacent to our own homes. This could make selling our properties difficult. Homes placed on the former 17th fairway would be in the backyards of current residents who had purchased their property knowing there was either open space or golf course behind their backyards, not another home. Rezoning increases density which is beyond what was originally planned. Please honor my request and those of many residents who live in West Neck and vote no on any rezoning. Thank you very much for your time and service to our city. Sincerely, Paula Roddenberry, 3403 Laughing Creek Court Wordsworth The Villages of West Neck plrodden@aol.com (757) 651-5667 February 1, 2026 Joseph& Helen Genco 2824 Still Breeze Court Wordsworth Village Virginia Beach,VA. 23456 Planning Commissioner c/o Department of Planning and Community Development City of Virginia Beach 2875 Sabre Street Virginia Beach,Va 23452 Dear Planning Commissioner: Opposition to Rezoning and Density Increase.I am writing to express my opposition to the ill-conceived,Harrison and Lear,Inc.proposal to rezone the Signature Golf Course; thus, raising the housing density and permitting years of construction and disruption to a mature community inhibited primarily by senior citizens. Rezoning Will Change Irrevocably the Character of Our Mature Community. Once the character of West Neck is changed, it will be lost forever. I I am an 86-year-old retired University Professor while my wife of 58 years, Helen, is a retired Home Health Administrator. We moved into the West Neck over-55 community in 2018 as our retirement home because it was a mature, well-planned community,with a unique, spacious environment,a golf course and amenities for senior citizens. Years of Construction and Disruption in a Mature Neighborhood. West Neck is currently a wonderful, low-density community for older individuals and senior citizens. The lives of hundreds of senior citizens will be disrupted for years by construction if the proposed rezoning is approved. The ill-conceived Harrison and Lear proposal will mean years of construction in an already mature community, leading to high volumes of construction traffic, longer emergency response time and reduced safety for our families, especially senior citizens. H&L Deliberately Allowed the Golf Course to Go to Seed. H&L and the property owner, JBWK LLC,have engaged in dilatory and deceptive behavior by deliberately letting the golf course go to seed, despite numerous offers to maintain the integrity of the golf course. For what purpose; so they can proceed with their ill-conceived proposal for financial gain Please Vote No on Rezoning.I respectfully request that you kindly listen to the residents who live here and vote NO on any rezoning request for West Neck by H&L. Respectfully Submitted Joseph M. Genco 207-944-9231 From: Shim Gordon To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: West Neck Rezoning Date: Monday,February 2,2026 8:03:54 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leadership, I am writing to strongly oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck property. Rezoning this site would undermine long standing Transition Area rules,in regards to density guidelines and open space as noted in 2016 Comprehensive Plan,and send a troubling message to homeowners across Virginia Beach: that previously agreed-upon zoning and development standards can be changed after the fact to benefit developers,regardless of community impact. West Neck residents relied on adopted plans,zoning assurances and density limits when purchasing their homes. Approving rezoning now would be unfair to homeowners who acted in good faith and would set a precedent that threatens other planned communities throughout the city. Traffic capacity,emergency access,environmental considerations,and infrastructure limits were all factors in the original zoning. Those constraints have not changed—only the developer's desired profit margin has. City leadership has a responsibility to uphold sound planning principles,not rewrite them under pressure. I urge you to DENY any rezoning request for West Neck and uphold the rules that protect our neighborhoods and lands. Our Virginia Beach!H Respectfully, Shim Gordon Carrollton Village The Villages of West Neck From: Jac To: Kathy M.Warren Cc: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Strongly opposed to West Neck Rezoning Date: Monday,February 2,2026 10:46:05 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Virginia Beach City Office of Planning and Community Development Director Warren: am a resident of the West Neck neighborhood in strong opposition to the current proposal before you from the developer Harrison and Lear to build 143 homes on the previous Signature golf course property. I am a 30-year Virginia Beach resident that has been watching with alarm for the past 10 years how southern wind flooding is increasingly affecting our daily affairs in this area. Look at Muddy Creek Road any day the wind is from the south or whenever there is hard rain how Indian River Road is impassable from West Neck Road to Princes Anne. There is considerable change taking place! Closer to home, from my West Neck residence I have included two pictures, one is the view out my front during the "Matthew" storm, the second is my back yard the summer of 2025 following a thunderstorm. The latter is the most water that's gathered in my yard due to a one-day storm since I moved here ten years ago. I have more of these types of pictures if they would benefit you. The West Neck area as I understand is zoned a "preservation area" with the intent to mitigate the environmental challenges the entire city faces. The proposition to build more houses in this preservation area of the city is counter intuitive to what's happening currently and is a clear vision of the challenges water and environment management faces. The golf course space currently absorbs rainwater. If it is paved over with concrete, asphalt, and roofing this shift to impervious surfaces creates redirected water runoff and lost soil absorption, which can lead to new flooding risks for our existing properties. Additionally, we were promised open space and managed density by city zoning when we chose to purchase here. Our property values and our quality of life are anchored in the preservation of this open space, as well as sound environmental management. The Planning Department has previously recommended denial of similar proposals by the current owner because they failed to align with density and open space requirements. For the residents of West Neck and the city overall we urge you to recommend Against The Rezoning of the West Neck Preservation area. Respectfully Jack Scott 2629 Majesty Lane 23456 n mow, i` �jr K 'SY� t a ,I a, s ,4 T , e ,., „ a .. �. «,=,.dux-'�. �.�.`• . � - s=� _ x n e r } �� 4 e From: devlin peach Calaol.com To: Planning Commissioners City Council;City Manager Citizen Inquiry Subject: Rezoning at the Villages of West Neck Date: Monday,February 2,2026 1:13:26 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor and City Leadership, I am a resident of West Neck, and I am writing to respectfully urge you to oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck golf course. West Neck homeowners purchased their homes with a clear expectation about density, traffic, environmental buffers, and quality of life. Rezoning this property would fundamentally alter the character of our community and break the trust residents placed in the City when these plans were originally approved. The existing zoning already allows for reasonable use of the property. Increasing density beyond what was promised brings unavoidable consequences - traffic congestion, strain on infrastructure, environmental impacts, and reduced safety for residents, pedestrians, and first responders. A strong majority of West Neck residents have consistently expressed opposition to rezoning. This opposition is not rooted in resistance to change, but in a desire for thoughtful, predictable planning that respects existing neighborhoods. I respectfully ask that you listen to the residents who live here and vote no on any rezoning request for West Neck. Thank you for your time and service to our city. Sincerely, Pete Devlin Browningstone The Villages of West Neck From: R Milne To: kwarren(alvbaov.com;Hunter Morrison:Seth L.Edwards:Marchelle L.Coleman;Walter Camp; icromwell(a)ybaoy.=m.anders@)ybaov.cgM Kathryn Bvler;kschoonoyeKalybaoy.com:Bryan Plumlee:Susan B.Hiooen;Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:nmoriani(@ybaov.com:Michael C.Mauch Cc: senatorcraio(asenate.virainia.aov:delbkniaht(obhouse.virainia.aov Subject: Subj:Regarding Proposed Rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck Property Virginia Beach,VA Date: Monday,February 2,2026 10:09:54 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Ray Milne III 2805 Energy Drive Virginia Beach,VA 23456 (rc3sammi(@yahoo.com) The Honorable Planning Commission Members Virginia Beach City Council,Virginia Beach,VA 23456 1 am writing as a concerned resident of the Villages of West Neck, Virginia Beach, VA asking you to vote no on the current rezoning proposal affecting our community. Developing a new community from scratch on a parcel of raw land totally within the confines of an already well-established surrounding community will no doubt bring forth challenges. To my knowledge,while there are variations of local infill developments, I can't recall a Large Infill Development scenario like this and the accompanying restraints and both daily and long term issues it will create for the current residents and our city over the roughly three to six year build-out. And, on a personal note, as a thirty-year military veteran and one of the current homeowners who purchased a home with a significant premium up-charge and who is in very close proximity to the new proposed homes,this is definitely not what we envisioned when we purchased our "Virginia Beach Retirement House". This is not an abstract planning issue for us, it will directly affect how we live every single day. Current residents purchased their homes with a clear expectation about density, traffic, environmental buffers, and quality of life. A change in that quality of life will mean more traffic on roads and sidewalks that are already noticeably strained and reducing safety for families, seniors and pedestrians, increased light pollution, conflicting HOA/Deed restrictions, and decreased privacy. Approving this rezoning would simply be unfair. Please do not misunderstand, I am for and behind responsible development, as proposed,this is not such. If this zoning change is approved,there is nothing stopping the currently interested developer (or any other)from simply dropping significant numbers of houses right smack in the middle of our current development.... no one, I dare say including yourself, would accept that with open arms. I appreciate your consideration and am open to follow-on interaction at your convenience. Respectfully, RCM III From: )ON TORREY JR. To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Opposition to Rezoning/CUP for 1756 S.Rosemont Rd(2025-PCCC-00052/00053)—Impact to Brigands Way Date: Monday,February 2,2026 3:53:49 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission, I'm writing to formally OPPOSE the requested Conditional Rezoning from Conditional 0-1 (Office)to Conditional B-2(Community Business District)and the associated Conditional Use Permit for a mini-warehouse/self-storage facility at 1756 S. Rosemont Road(Accela Records: 2025-PCCC-00052 and 2025-PCCC-00053). I understand this includes a proposed three- story self-storage building. This proposal directly impacts the established residential community behind the site, Brigands Quay,and would introduce an incompatible use at an intensity and scale that harms neighborhood character and quality of life. Key concerns: • Traffic and safety(major concern): S. Rosemont Road is already heavily traveled throughout most of the day, and this project would add frequent short trips and larger vehicles (moving trucks,trailers, and deliveries), leading to slow turns in and out of the site. That combination increases the likelihood of backups, sudden braking, and conflicts with oncoming traffic. The location is also too close to the Dam Neck Road intersection for an additional signal or major traffic control change to make sense, which would likely push congestion and safety risks onto an already busy stretch of road. • Stormwater/runoff(major concern): Increased impervious surface area can worsen runoff and drainage impacts. Adjacent homeowners should not bear increased stormwater burdens as a result of a private rezoning request. • Loss of existing tree line/buffering: The current tree canopy provides essential screening between the site and Brigands Quay. Removing or degrading this tree line will permanently reduce privacy, increase noise and light intrusion, and erode the natural character residents rely on. • Aesthetics and massing: A three-story self-storage structure is visually dominant and typically presents large blank walls. Even with fagade treatments, it will be out of scale adjacent to a residential neighborhood and will degrade corridor and neighborhood aesthetics. •Noise, lighting, and operational impacts: Security lighting, gates/alarms, dumpster service, and extended access hours can create persistent nuisances, especially for homes immediately behind the site. For these reasons, I respectfully request that the Planning Commission recommend DENIAL of the rezoning and CUP. If the Commission is inclined to support this request despite these concerns, please require strong, enforceable conditions to protect Brigands Quay and nearby properties, including: •A traffic review addressing truck access,turning,stacking, and entrance design • Stormwater controls emphasizing on-site retention and infiltration,with protection of adjacent homes • Dark-sky-compliant lightingwith zero spillover onto residential property; no wall packs facing the neighborhood • Maximum preservation of the existing tree line with a wide, continuous, undisturbed vegetated buffer • Dense evergreen screening and/or a berm where disturbance is unavoidable, installed before vertical construction • Reduced height and massing and increased setbacks along the residential edge • Clear limits on access and operating hours,with restrictions on early and late move-in and move-out activity • No outdoor storage;strict controls on dumpster placement and pickup hours Please include this email in the official record for 2025-PCCC-00052 and 2025-PCCC-00053. Respectfully, Jon Torrey Jr., MBA, USN(Ret.) 1720 Brigands Way Virginia Beach,VA 23453 904-860-8910 jontorreyjr@outlook.com From: City Manager Citizen Inauiry To: Planning Administration Subject: FW:VB Golf Courses Date: Monday,February 2,2026 2:19:51 PM Attachments: image001.pno Good afternoon, Below is a concern from The Patrick's regarding the rezoning of West Neck. Thankyou City Manager Office City Halt,Building 1,Suite 2017 2401 Courthouse Drive Virginia Beach,VA 23456 Ci1Y OF VIRGINIA BEACH From: Rosemary C. Wilson<RCWilson@vbgov.com> Sent: Sunday, February 1, 2026 12:42 PM To:The Patricks<sue.tim@verizon.net>; planningcommission@vbgov.om; City Council <CITYCOUNCIL@vbgov.com>; City Manager Citizen Inquiry<CMOffice@vbgov.com> Subject: Re: VB Golf Courses Dear Mr.And Mrs. Patrick, We cannot reopen West Neck Golf Course. It is owned by the private sector and not by the city. It is quite unfortunate with what has happened there. However again it is private ownership. They will be asking the Council for a rezoning, and there are lots of steps for that request. It will be coming to the Planning commission in February. The planning staff will also be making a recommendation. There will be ample opportunity to hear from the public. Thank you for taking the time to write and voice your concerns. We take all if this very seriously. With kindest regards, Rosemary Wilson Get Outlook for iOS From:The Patricks <sue.tim(@verizon.net> Sent: Saturday,January 31, 2026 1:52:01 PM To:planningcom mission(@vb ov.om <planningcommission(@vbgov.om>; City Council <CITYCOUNCIU@vbgov.com>; City Manager Citizen Inquiry<CMOfficePvbgov.com> Subject:VB Golf Courses CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Obviously the members of our local government and developers that are proposing the closure of the golf course at West Neck are not interested in what citizens want, but only in the money that will be put in city and personal pockets. One of the few things that Virginia Beach has not done to ruin the public offerings is to have golf courses. That is a positive draw almost year round, not just summers. However, drawing people to the assets of Virginia Beach brings tourists and the housing industry. It is far too often that those who govern have self-interests before citizens interests. If it were the opposite, more interest would be in bringing in visitors and newcomers. The ocean front gets the first nod, but not everyone feels safe there and seek other venues which you should be promoting. Keeping golf courses open provides exercise and people meeting other people. That is a personal side that draws visitors and new tax payers who come to retire here. Decisions to keep golf courses open is an investment and should not be at the whim of a small group of people only focused on more housing/taxes. Let's fill our housing that is available and use golf courses as a means of enticing people. Are the course in Virginia Beach advertised on appropriate media? Empty houses and foreclosures are not the answer. We are a military family who have moved over 20 times, and we are not Navy! We looked for a place to call home to spend time with family-, therefore, we first bought a beach house at Sandbridge. Then we bult a home here as Virginia Beach provided golf for us and a safe environment for my wife and family. West Neck was just beginning. Since then it has grown and provided the amenities that drew us here. We often went there to join friends for dinner and to play golf and as well as socialize. We have seen it at its best and now seen it vanishing from what it was. Guidelines (keep the 1993 guidelines)were established and yet were slowly ignored. City leaders did not support home owners nor help the vision that was initially offered. It is sad to see what greedy people can do to others. The golf course needs to be reopened and advertise the assets. Open the golf course at West Neck or is Heron Ridge next on your list too...? We suggest that you rethink your objectives. Tim and Susan Patrick From: City Manaaer Citizen Inauiry To: Planning Administration Subject: FW:West Neck Rezoning Date: Monday,February 2,2026 2:36:12 PM Attachments: imaae001.Dna Hello, FYSA Thank you City Manager Office City Hall,Building 1,Suite 2017 2401 Courthouse Drive Virginia Beach,VA 23456 CITY OF N VIRGINIA -- BEACH From:Joyce Sharples<jsharplesl@live.com> Sent:Sunday, February 1, 2026 10:19 AM To:City Manager Citizen Inquiry<CM Office @vbgov.corn> Subject:West Neck Rezoning CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. From:Joyce Sharples<isharples1(alive.com> Date:January 31,2026 at 10:15:39 AM EST Subject:West Neck Rezoning Dear City Leadership, I am writing to strongly oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck property. Rezoning this site would undermine long-standing Transition Area rules,in regards to density guidelines and open space as noted in 2016 Comprehensive Plan, and sends a troubling message to homeowners across Virginia Beach: that previously agreed-upon zoning and development standards can be changed after the fact to benefit developers, regardless of community impact. West Neck residents relied on adopted plans,zoning assurances,and density limits when purchasing their homes.Approving rezoning now would be unfair to homeowners who acted in good faith and would set a precedent that threatens other planned communities throughout the city. Traffic capacity,emergency access,environmental considerations,and infrastructure limits were all factors in the original zoning.Those constraints have not changed—only the developer's desired profit margin has. City leadership has a responsibility to uphold sound planning principles,not rewrite them under pressure.I urge you to deny any rezoning request for West Neck and uphold the rules that protect our neighborhoods. Respectfully, Joyce Sharples 3547 Winding Trail Circle 757-323-0667 Wordsworth Village The Villages of West Neck From: City Manaaer Citizen Inouiry To: Plannina Administration Subject: FW:West Neck Rezoning Date: Monday,February 2,2026 2:36:12 PM Attachments: imaae001.ono Hello, FYSA Thank you City Manager Office City Hall,Building 1,Suite 2017 2401 Courthouse Drive Virginia Beach,VA 23456 CITY OF "x VIRGINIA BEACH From:Joyce Sharples<jsharples1@live.com> Sent:Sunday, February 1, 2026 10:19 AM To:City Manager Citizen Inquiry<CM Office @vbgov.corn> Subject:West Neck Rezoning CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. From:Joyce Sharpies<*sharpies1(c)live.com> Date:January 31,2026 at 10:15:39 AM EST Subject:West Neck Rezoning Dear City Leadership, I am writing to strongly oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck property. Rezoning this site would undermine long-standing Transition Area rules,in regards to density guidelines and open space as noted in 2016 Comprehensive Plan, and sends a troubling message to homeowners across Virginia Beach: that previously agreed-upon zoning and development standards can be changed after the fact to benefit developers, regardless of community impact. West Neck residents relied on adopted plans,zoning assurances,and density limits when purchasing their homes.Approving rezoning now would be unfair to homeowners who acted in good faith and would set a precedent that threatens other planned communities throughout the city. Traffic capacity,emergency access,environmental considerations,and infrastructure limits were all factors in the original zoning.Those constraints have not changed—only the developer's desired profit margin has. City leadership has a responsibility to uphold sound planning principles,not rewrite them under pressure.I urge you to deny any rezoning request for West Neck and uphold the rules that protect our neighborhoods. Respectfully, Joyce Sharples 3547 Winding Trail Circle 757-323-0667 Wordsworth Village The Villages of West Neck From: City Manager Citizen Inquiry To: Planning Administration Subject: FW: PLEASE do not support rezoning West Neck Village in the Transition Area!! Date: Monday,February 2,2026 2:41:14 PM Attachments: image001.ong Good afternoon, We received the below concern from Kathleen Lam regarding the West Neck rezoning. Thankyou City Manager Office City Hatl,Building 1,Suite 2017 2401 Courthouse Drive Virginia Beach,VA 23456 0TY OF VIRGINIA BEACH From: Kathleen Lam<kathleenm lam @yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2026 3:50 PM To: City Manager Citizen Inquiry<CMOffice@vbgov.com> Subject: PLEASE do not support rezoning West Neck Village in the Transition Area!! CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mr. Duhaney, I live in West Neck Village and have been deeply upset by the latest proposal for extreme overdevelopment by the owner of the former golf course to vastly exceed the density limits of the Transition area here through a disastrous plan called 'The Preserve at West Neck'. This is his latest attempt to test the resolve of the community by again requesting that the original 1999 protections of P1 Preservation zoning be demolished. I live on Majesty Lane adjacent to the parcel he proposes construction of 143 houses on what was once the 17th fairway at Signature Meadows. I would like to share my thoughts about his plan to partner with local Indian River Plantation residents Marc and Audrey Leishman to rejuvenate the front nine holes of the former golf course while destroying the peaceful tranquility enjoyed by the 900 residents of this community. This change to the zoning in the Preservation Zone violates the Green Line and will exponentially enrich him at West Neck Villages' expense. It's an enormous price we would pay in the form of obliterated view plains, polluted air from pond dredging, years of extreme dust, greatly increased traffic, construction noise, vehicular congestion on our narrow roads, drastically disrupted drainage channels, displaced bird and wildlife populations, increased HOA fees, and substantially reduced property values due to high density and loss of golf course proximity. Please understand- we are all retired and invested in property that was intended to be golf course adjacent, not construction zone immersed. We deserve that, for now and for the next decade that this plan would take to complete. These are the reasons the TA/ITA Citizens Advisory Committee and the Planning Committee recommended denial of a similar horrible self-serving proposal by JBWK in March 2025. Here we are again in the same place, and I respectfully plead with you NOT to support this similar proposal of destruction! Thank you, Kathleen Lam 2669 Majesty Lane Virginia Beach, VA Dear Planning Commissioners, I have lived in Virginia Beach since 1977, and moved to the Villages of West Neck in 2016. 1 am asking you to vote no on any rezoning proposal which will affect our community. My husband David and I chose West Neck because it offered a balance of nature, open sp and well-planned development. We desired a peaceful,yet active, community to enjoy o retirement years. Rezoning the golf course property would permanently disrupt that balance°, and greatly diminish the quality of the life we were promised, and completely deny us the right the peaceful and quiet enjoyment of our home, which we worked many years to achieve. .- We, along with many of our neighbors, have attended meetings,written letters, and spoken out repeatedly. The message has been consistently clear; we do not support rezoning. Please- respect the voices of the citizens who live here and will bear the consequences of your decisi n" long after the developers are gone. I urge you to stand with your fellow Virginia Beach residents and neighbors and protect the integrity of the Villages of West Neck, as well as preserving the beauty of our belove Virginia Beach by rejecting rezoning. Sincerely, Nancy Crane �Village of of Carrollton Villages of West Neck pear Mayor and City Leadership, to respectfully urge you I am a resident of West Neck, and 1 am writing to oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck golf course. ar West Neck homeowners purchase tric, environmental homes wi buffe seand quality of expectation about density, life. Rezoning this property would fundamentally alter the character o our community and break the trust residents placed in the City when these plans were originally approved. The existing zoning already allows for reasonable use of the property. Increasing density beyond what was promised brings unavoidable consequences---traffic congestion, strain on infrastructure,environmental impacts, and reduced safety for residents, pedestrians, and first responders. A strong majority of West Neck residents have consistently expressed opposition to rezoning. This opposition is not rooted in resistance to change, but in a desire for thoughtful, predictable planning that respects existing neighborhoods. I respectfully ask that you listen to the residents who live here and vote no on any rezoning request for West Neck. Thank you for your time and service to our city. Sincerely, I ADD YOUR VILLAGE E The Villages of West NeckZ From: Steve Taylor To: City Council;Planning Commissioners Subject: West Neck Properties Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 7:51:17 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leadership, I am writing to strongly oppose any rezoning of the former Signature Golf course at West Neck Villages. Rezoning this site would undermine long-standing Transition Area rules, in regard to density guidelines and open space as noted in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan,and sending a troubling message to homeowners across Virginia Beach to wit: that previously agreed-upon zoning and development standards can be changed after-the-fact to benefit developers , regardless of community impact. West Neck residents relied on adopted Plans, zoning assurances, and density limits as approved by City Council in 1999 when deciding to purchase their homes. Allowing rezoning now would set a negative precedent that threatens other planned communities throughout the city. Traffic capacity, emergency access, environmental considerations, and infrastructure limit were all factors in the original zoning. Those constraints have not changed. Only former golf course owners and prospective developers will be compensated on the backs of existing owners with no real regard for their impacts. City leadership has a duty to uphold sound planning principles, and not rewrite them under pressure. I urge you to DENY any rezoning request for West Neck and uphold the rules that protect our neighborhoods. Respectfully, Stephen Taylor Blue Lake Village of West Neck From: Steve Taylor To: City Council; Planning Commissioners Subject: West Neck properties Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 8:02:32 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor and City Leadership, I am a resident of West Neck, a d I am wr in tQ res ��tfully r e o to oppose any rezoning of tie former ig�iature aft West I�elc o course. West N ck h menvYners urchhase their homes ith a clear exp ct etion n�out gensit , t affic, n ironment I If Fri nd quality off e e o n this ro . r� woue(dundamena ter t�i thehar ter of ou com�riu i nd break the trust re� dents pe(aced in �i when Qse plans Were on inall a roved. Y p g Y pp The existi zoning ahead loows for e sonable use of the pro ert . � reasIn dense �e d w is was promised brings U voic�ab�e consequence —tra c con estionp, strpin on inTradstructure, envir nmen a�. impacts, aid re uce sa ety for rest ents, pedestrians, an first responders. A stron a. .ty. f West Neck resS-W�aents havelonlisconsistentl ex r ss�edmo osi ion to rezone .:Th s o pose nott.r od in r ssanc t��han e, but.in a c� siror tiotfu , redicae(e pp canning that resp�cts existing neigi borhoo�. p retspectfullly ask that.you listen t thewresiftcn�s who live here and vo e no on any rezoning requestor est . Thank you for your time and service to our city. Sincerely, Stephen Taylor Blue Lake Village @ The Villages of West Neck Dear Mayor and/or City Leadership, I live in The Villages of West Neck, and I am asking you to vote no on any rezoning proposal affecting our community. This is not an abstract planning issue for us—it directly affects how we live every day. Increased density will mean more traffic on roads that are already strained, longer emergency response times, and reduced safety for families, seniors, and pedestrians. Many of us chose West Neck because it offered a balance of nature, open space, and carefully planned development. Rezoning the golf course property would permanently disrupt that balance and diminish the quality of life we were promised. Residents have attended meetings, written letters, and spoken out repeatedly. The message has been clear and consistent: we do not support rezoning. Please respect the voices of the people who live here and will bear the consequences of this decision long after the developers are gone. I urge you to stand with residents and protect the integrity of West Neck by rejecting rezoning. Sincerely, Donald Jellig Blue Lake, West Neck Dear Planning Commissioners, My name is Cindy Walters-Calloway, and my spouse is Annie Walters-Calloway.We live at 2700 Sonnet Lane, in the Browningstone division of West Neck Villages. We purchased our condo in October 2025. Annie is a retired educator, and I am a retired military veteran. I also, in full disclosure, am employed by the City of Virginia Beach and my comments (our comments) are wholly personal and not representative of any city position,thought, or consideration. We purchased our current home as our retirement home and refuge. It is a 55 and older community. It is a peaceful sanctuary. When we first began looking,we found West Neck Villages to be tranquil, friendly, and perfectly situated and appointed. We knew and appreciated that the golf course did not exist and that the current density of housing in our community was perfect. The rezoning and subsequent increased development of our community at West Neck Villages would have a negative impact on the density, peaceful enjoyment, expected living conditions, and value of our home. The traffic congestion during and after construction would be intolerable and the community amenities would be overburdened for years to come. None of the developers' plans fits into the expectations or desires of the residents. These continuous attempts to over develop and tax the energy and concerns of an older population in the"work, play, and live for a lifetime"community—is abhorrently deaf to the needs and desires of a large swath of your senior population,whose lifetime now falls to retirement and peaceful enjoyment. We adamantly OPPOSE the rezoning of our community and this development We plead with you to VOTE DISAPPROVAL for this project's request for rezoning Thank you for your continued service to the city. Respectfully submitted, Cindy&Annie Walters-Calloway 2700 Sonnet Lane From: Donna Scott To: Marchelle L.Coleman; Kathy M.Warren Subject: Vote NO to West Neck Rezoning Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 2:43:23 PM CAUTIONI:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. TO: VB City Office of Planning and Community Development Director Warren I write to ask you to vote NO on the rezoning request made by developers Harrison & Lear (H&L) to rezone and build homes on the dormant Signature Golf Course that is located within the Villages at West Neck Community. The area at stake is presently zoned Preservation 1. As you well know, this area was part of the agreement to build West Neck Village and provide green space for ONLY our community. These stipulations were not temporary or discretionary; they were codified within the Planned Development (PD-H) zoning and recorded in public documents, obligating all subsequent property owners. The current owner acquired the property with full disclosure or should have exercised due diligence regarding these restrictions In comes H&L who intends to build 143 homes on a portion of that area. 54 of those homes are designated to be 53 feet from the edge of our home (or 50 ft as H&L plans from our property line) and include a multiuse path that will be inside that same distance. The attempt to develop this property is not new to you. Harrison and Lear 2025 proposal was opposed by the Virginia Beach Planning Department, which cited that the change did not align with the existing land-use recommendations and the proposal was withdrawn. This is the same piece of property but in a much smaller footprint. This time with the promise of less density and stormwater management. First the density issue, the current attempt is including 143 units in a smaller footprint. With 53 of those homes to be crammed into an area on former hole 17 along with a new through street that traverses 17 and leads to another 10 homes on one end and 36 on the other end. Also that street will quickly become a shortcut through the neighborhood for any and all traffic through West Neck Village. Does that sound like it's less dense to you??? No, it is placing another community inside of our community so that they can enjoy the benefits of what our community members have paid for and disrupt our lives for years to come. The President of H&L has said that road planning and construction for this area will be 1-2 years while home construction will begin after the road is complete and last 2-5 years. That's 7 years of disruption 50 feet from property lines. Further, the addition of more pavement and more concrete slabs will add to a stormwater problem that we are currently facing in our neighborhood and specifically in the area in which they plan to build thus creating more water issues for us and water for people buying the package that H&L is selling. This time they are offering a "conservation area" that will belong to the same absentee owner that is presently trying his best to not tend to what he owns through court proceedings and defiance. Will that change? I doubt it. Property value...when we bought our homes on the golf course we all paid premiums to live on the golf course. Our homes were designed to accentuate the views of the golf course, not another neighborhood and into the kitchens of those residences. Now the proposed nine hole golf course...there are plenty of nine hole courses around. No one makes anyone play 18 on any of the existing golf courses. The addition of this amenity (which will have to be paid for by the new homeowners through membership) since Harrison and Lear offers no amenities to these homes. This addition to the proposal is merely to mute the voices of Indian River Plantation. In closing, I ask that you maintain the Preservation (P-1) zoning for this area of the TA/ITA portion of our city by VOTING NO to this request for rezoning. Thank you for your time and consideration of this letter. Donna Scott 2629 Majesty Lane Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Donna Scott 757/285-7405 From: Timothy Soraoue To: City Manaaer Citizen Inauirv;ash2100comcast.mm Cc: Planning Commissioners:City Council Subject: West Neck Rezoning Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 12:39:59 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor and City Leadership, I am a resident of West Neck, and I am writing to respectfully urge you to oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck golf course. West Neck homeowners purchase their homes with a clear expectation about density, traffic, environmental buffers, and quality of life. Rezoning this property would fundamentally alter the character of our community and break the trust residents placed in the City when these plans were originally approved. The existing zoning already allows for reasonable use of the property. Increasing density beyond what was promised brings unavoidable consequences—traffic congestion, strain on infrastructure, environmental impacts, and reduced safety for residents, pedestrians, and first responders. A strong majority of West Neck residents have consistently expressed opposition to rezoning. This opposition is not rooted in resistance to change, but in a desire for thoughtful, predictable planning that respects existing neighborhoods. I respectfully ask that you listen to the residents who live here and vote no on any rezoning request for West Neck. Thank you for your time and service to our city. Sincerely, Tim Sprague, CAPT, USN. RET. The Villages of West Neck From: Timothy Soraoue To: City Council:Plannina Commissioners:O y Manaaer Citizen Inquiry:ash210(@comcast.com Subject: West Neck Rezoning Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 12:48:45 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leadership, I am writing to strongly oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck property. Rezoning this site would undermine long-standing Transition Area rules, in regards to density guidelines and open space as noted in 2016 Comprehensive Plan, and send a troubling message to homeowners across Virginia Beach: that previously agreed-upon zoning and development standards can be changed after the fact to benefit developers, regardless of community impact. West Neck residents relied on adopted plans, zoning assurances, and density limits when purchasing their homes. Approving rezoning now would be unfair to homeowners who acted in good faith and would set a precedent that threatens other planned communities throughout the city. Traffic capacity, emergency access, environmental considerations, and infrastructure limits were all factors in the original zoning. Those constraints have not changed—only the developer's desired profit margin has. City leadership has a responsibility to uphold sound planning principles, not rewrite them under pressure. I urge you to deny any rezoning request for West Neck and uphold the rules that protect our neighborhoods. Respectfully, Arthur Park The Villages of West Neck From: Timothy Soracue To: City Council:Planning Commissioners;City Manager Citizen Inauiry:ash210(abcomcast.com Subject: West Neck Rezoning Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 12:52:22 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor and/or City Leadership, I live in The Villages of West Neck, and I am asking you to vote no on any rezoning proposal affecting our community. This is not an abstract planning issue for us—it directly affects how we live every day. Increased density will mean more traffic on roads that are already strained, longer emergency response times, and reduced safety for families, seniors, and pedestrians. Many of us chose West Neck because it offered a balance of nature, open space, and carefully planned development. Rezoning the golf course property would permanently disrupt that balance and diminish the quality of life we were promised. Residents have attended meetings, written letters, and spoken out repeatedly. The message has been clear and consistent: we do not support rezoning. Please respect the voices of the people who live here and will bear the consequences of this decision long after the developers are gone. I urge you to stand with residents and protect the integrity of West Neck by rejecting rezoning. Sincerely, <!--[if!supportLineBreakNewLine]--> <!--[endif]--> Arthur Park The Villages of West Neck From: Timothy Soraque To: ash210(a)comcast.com; planning Commissioners;City Manager Citizen InQuiry Subject: Request To Maintain Existing Open Space/Density Regulations For West Neck(WN) Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 12:10:53 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. As a WN homeowner for over 25 years I have witnessed the changes in our age 55 and over unique community. Once villages were initially completed homes were purchased and repurchased (as original owners passed on) and the exceptional life style of this distinctive community began to coalesce and improve for all. As seniors WN provides peacefullness, safety and quiet so important in our final years. This changed when the golf course closed, was bought by the current owner who allowed it to become ruined. He then initiated various duplicitous strategic efforts containing superfluous tactics in collaboration with a developer, Harrison and Lear to gain approval and promote the construction of at least 134 more homes over a period of 5 to 8+ years in the center of the community. If this were permitted it would violate the original, important and still existing open space/density regulations and completely destroy the sensitive high quality of life so critical to the seniors who own existing homes. The WN 55 age restriction doesn't accurately define the composition of our community. Over 40% are veterans, the average age is in the 70's and there are many widows and widowers who live alone. At these age brackets while some are still active walking,swimming, cycling etc. many must deal with limiting medical constraints. Most have lived in multiple locations moving forward with their military service, corporate careers etc. This last home purchase to enjoy the security, peacefullness, quiet and safety in WN is for most their final home ownership decision. The current golf course owner has allowed the course to be ruined and even built 8' "spite fences" directly behind homes when owners expressed concerns about the high, thick unsightly weeds and plant growth becoming a serious fire hazard; a concern that became a reality later with a large dangerous brush fire about 2 years ago. Protecting the existing open spaces by all measures is extremely important. Returning it to a renewed 18 hole golf course or at the very least maintaining the open spaces and eliminating the serious fire hazard should be considered. In fact, 2 separate attempts to buy the course from the current owner and restore it were steadfastly refused. The amounts offered were more than twice what he paid for it. Now, homeowners again must deal with the stress of yet another attempt by the course owner to build homes in the middle of the community without any regard for existing owners. It is important to note that this is also a morale decision. It is not just about radical, greed-based, disastrous land grab attempts. It is also about understanding the profound reasons for our request to stop any additional WN development/home construction because it represents the will of the WN tax paying homeowners. The decision rests with you. We sincerely hope and trust you will carefully consider in good faith our request. Sincerely, Tim Sprague, CAPT, USN, RET. From: Joseph Genco To: Hunter Morrison:Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Please Don"t Approve H&L Proposal for Rezoning West Neck Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 1:56:00 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mr. Cromwell, Chair Planning Commission I can see no overriding reason to approve the rezoning proposal of the Signature Golf Course in West Neck. I am of the opinion that this ill-conceived proposal is driven solely by financial gain for a Florida real estate speculator(JBWK LLC)and a local developer. (1) Once the unique character of West Neck is lost, it will be lost forever. West Neck will become just another high-density residential development. (2) Approval of this proposal to raise the housing density will mean years of construction and disruption to Wordsworth Village, a mature neighborhood inhabited primarily by senior citizens in the twilight of their lives. (3) H&L and the property owner have engaged in dilatory and deceptive behavior by deliberately letting the golf course go to seed, solely for financial gain and spite while disregarding the wishes of the residents. (4) Clearly, leaving the Golf course property as an undevoted green zone is far superior to the alternative of misguided over-development for financial gain of a few. Respectfully Submitted Joseph M. Genco 2824 Still Breeze Court Wordsworth Village(West Neck) Virginia Beach,VA. 12345 From: Connie Milne To: Marchelle L.Coleman;kwarren(a)vbgov.com; Hunter Morrison;Seth L.Edwards;Walter Camo; icromwell(a)vbaov.com:m.anders(ayboov.com;Kathryn Bvler, kschoonover(olvboov.com;Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hipoen; Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston; nmorianiCalvboov.com;Michael C.Mauch Cc: Connie Milne Subject: Rezoning Proposal-Signature at West Neck Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 11:14:40 AM CAUTION;This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am writing in regard to the proposed rezoning related to the planned development within the Signature at West Neck property. I am one of the few homeowners most impacted by the proposed development of homes. Ten years ago we purchased a gorgeous golf course lot with a beautiful view. Since the closure of the course we continue to enjoy the view of nature,wildlife, and beautiful sunrises.Today our home has one of the highest property values in the community. While it would be wonderful to, once again, have access to a golf course and clubhouse close to our community, the development of more homes within our existing community simply is not a viable option. There are so many associated issues with adding more homes inside of our community from the primary issue of overcrowding/density to community property management, separate HOAs, construction, infrastructure, traffic, preservation of natural spaces, etc. I am asking you to please help us preserve our beautiful community and VOTE NO to the rezoning. I personally have spoken to Harrison and Lear and requested some relief from having homes placed 50' from my property line. These concerns have been disregarded. There seems to be no desire to compromise or discuss how to make the situation more reasonable for the existing homeowners. The only goal is to achieve the profit for the land owner. In addition, there is absolutely no commitment regarding the quality of the homes, the price range, the HOA guidelines, the"reforestation", etc. The concepts continue to change from moment to moment. I served on the Steering Committee for Harrison & Lear for over a year. I have heard the proposed plans since the beginning. The plans continue to evolve and we still truly have no idea what the final product would be. It is all vague concepts and no firm commitments. City representatives need to look carefully at the proposed development plan and, at a minimum, reject the plan to crowd current homeowners and negatively impact our property values. With the proposed plan Indian River Plantation receives ALL of the benefits while the aesthetics of the Villages at West Neck are forever destroyed. This imbalance is unnecessary and unacceptable. We love the beauty and quiet of southern Virginia Beach. It is such a unique and attractive component of this City. Please help us preserve that beauty for everyone and VOTE NO to rezoning. Thank you, Connie Milne 703-728-8757 2805 Energy Drive From: Paul Vincelette To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Rezoning of the Signature at West Neck golf course Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 10:30:58 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments I unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission Members My wife and I are 21 year residents of West Neck in the Wordsworth community. I am writing to respectfully urge you to oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck golf course. West Neck home owners purchased their homes with a clear expectation about density, traffic, environmental buffers, and quality of life. Rezoning this property would fundamentally alter the character of our community and break the trust residents placed in the city when these plans were originally approved. We are both 80 years old and along with about 40% of the current residents will not see this project completed. We certainly do not desire to spend the rest of our lives in a construction zone. PLEASE listen to the residents who live here and vote no on any rezoning request for West Neck. Thank you so much for your consideration. Paul Vincelette Commander USN Ret Delta Airlines Pilot Ret From: Tammy Vandame To: City Council Cc: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Opposition to Rezoning of Former Signature Golf Course—West Neck Community Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 10:10:D4 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mayor Dyer,Members of City Council and Planning Commissioners, My name is Tammy Van Dame,and I am a resident of the West Neck community.I am writing to clearly oppose the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course to allow 143 homes within an established neighborhood. This proposal represents a David-and-Goliath imbalance.On one side are residents who relied on existing zoning and invested their lives and savings accordingly.On the other are a landowner retaining majority control of the open space and well-funded developers with the resources to press forward despite overwhelming community opposition. This opposition is not anti-development.It is about scale,trust,and impact.The proposed density is outside of the established guidelines of the Transition Area. The open space density was already counted to develop West Neck. If rezoning were to take place,critical concerns—traffic,infrastructure,drainage,and environmental effects— remain unresolved.Recent presentations,while polished,are conceptual and nonbinding,offering no enforceable protection to residents once rezoning is granted. Nothing material has changed:the risks fall entirely on the community,while the benefits flow upward.When public input is repeatedly solicited but not meaningfully reflected,it creates the perception that decisions are driven by financial power rather than sound planning. Rezoning is a permanent decision with irreversible consequences and sets a dangerous precedent.I respectfully urge you to deny this request and uphold the purpose of zoning—to protect existing communities from incompatible development. Respectfully, Tammy Van Dame West Neck Resident Virginia Beach Sent from my iPhone From: allallen To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: West Neck/Signature rezoning Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 5:28:08 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leadership I live in The Villages of West Neck and am writing to you to vote no on any rezoning proposal affecting our community. This is not an abstract planning issue for us — it directly affects how we live every day. Increased density will mean more traffic on roads that are already strained, longer emergency response times, and reduced safety for families, seniors, and pedestrians. Many of us chose West Neck because it offered a balance of nature, open space, and carefully planned development for Seniors. Rezoning the golf course property would permanently disrupt that balance and diminish the quality of life we were promised. Residents have attended meetings, written letters and spoken out repeatedly. The message has been clear and consistent: we do not support rezoning. Please respect the voices of the people who live here and will bear the consequences of this decision. I urge you to stand with residents and protect the integrity of West Neck by rejecting rezoning. Sincerely, Thomas Allen allallen@cox.net Carrollton Village The Villages of West Neck From: allallen To: City Council Cc: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: West Neck/Signature rezoning Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 5:25:17 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor and City Leadership, We in the West Neck Community are once again facing threats of development from Harrison Lear regarding the development of the former Signature Golf Course. First of all, let me, CATEGORICALLY STATE THAT I AM 1. OPPOSED TO ANY CHANGES TO THE DENSITY IN THE TRANSITION AREA. 2. OPPOSED TO ANY P1 ZONING CHANGES, ANYWHERE IN THE CITY. 3. 1 am not opposed to the proposed plans regarding the golf course, just the additional housing. There are many other reasons this is a bad idea for the West Neck Community however, I will not waste your time enumerating them. Suffice it to say that the items listed above should be enough to end this proposed development. Please hold to the agreement that was made in 1999. Best Regards, Thomas Allen allallen@cox.net Carrollton Village The Villages at West Neck From: Lynn Blank To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Rezoning of 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 5:22:38 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Rose Miller 3001 Egyptian Lane Virginia Beach, VA 23456 228-731-5147 February 3, 2026 Virginia Beach Planning Commission 2403 Courthouse Drive Virginia Beach, VA 23456 RE: FORMAL OPPOSITION to Rezoning Request for -(3100 Arnold Palmer Drive in West Neck, VB, VA) Dear Commissioners, As a long-term resident at 3001 Egyptian Lane, VB, VA, I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed rezoning and redevelopment of the shuttered golf course. When I purchased my home, I did so based on the established low-density layout and green space of this community. This proposal to squeeze 143 dwellings onto the property is a drastic departure from the current land use and will fundamentally alter the quality of life for all adjacent neighbors. My primary concerns include: Property Values: Transitioning from an open golf course view to a high-density housing development will negatively impact the resale value and appeal of my home. Privacy: The proximity of 143 new units will eliminate the privacy and quiet we currently enjoy as adjacent owners. I enjoy sitting on my deck looking at the water, its peaceful. I have done that for years and now you want to take that away from me. Utility Capacity: I am concerned whether our existing sewage, water, and electrical infrastructure can handle the sudden addition of over 100 new households without frequent service interruptions. I urge the Commission to prioritize the interests of the current tax-paying residents who will be most affected by this change. Please vote NO on this request to amend the previous approval. Please disregard the first email sent. I do not want another proposal submitted, my vote is NO to rezoning. Thank you for your time and for considering the impact on our community. Sincerely, Rose Miller From: Nancy Aiello To: Walter Camp;icromwell(ftbooy.com:m.anders(ftbpoy.com:Kathryn Bvler.kschoonover(ftbaoy.com:Ean Plumlee Susan B.Hippen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:nmoriani(alvboov.com;Michael C.Mauch:Hun Morrison;Seth L.Edwards:Marchelle L.Coleman Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 5:06:26 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Cominision Members, We are residents of West Neck, and are writing to respectfully urge you to oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck golf course. West Neck homeowners purchase their homes with a clear expectation about density,traffic, environmental buffers, and quality of life. Rezoning this property would fundamentally alter the character of our community and break the trust residents placed in the city when these plans were originally approved. The existing zoning already allows for reasonable use of the property. Increasing density beyond what was promised brings unavoidable consequences such as congestion, strain on infrastructure, environmental impacts, and reduced safety for residents,pedestrians, and first responders. A strong majority of West Neck residents have consistently expressed opposition to rezoning. This opposition is not rooted in resistance to change,but in a desire for thoughtful,predictable planning that respects existing neighborhoods. We respectfully ask that you listen to the residents who live here and vote NO on any rezoning request for West Neck. Thank you for your time and service to our city. Nancy J. Ajello & Thomas A. Mattson, Jr. 2823 Rose Garden Way Wordsworth Village at West Neck From: Ted Ouinter To: Kathy M.Warren; Hunter Morrison; Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Opposition to Rezoning Signature at West Neck Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 9:43:57 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Planning Director Warren and Staff Members, I am a retired Marine, I've been a resident of the Browningstone Village Condominium at West Neck for the past 17 years, and I am writing to respectfully urge you to recommend DISAPPROVAL of the Harrison & Lear Application for Conditional Rezoning of any portion of the dormant Signature at West Neck golf course. The West Neck master development, like most Transition Area developments, for various and different reasons, was approved with higher than the recommended one home per acre density. The approval of this 12articular master development, however, was conditioned upon the opening of an Arnold Palmer Signature golf course, which the city council at the time coveted for public use. Council liked the golf course idea so well they zoned it P-1 to preserve and protect it as passive open space. This is a significant difference between the Villages at West Neck and all other developments in the TA. I view City Council's 1999 P-1 zoning decision as a covenant between the city and the residents of the Villages to preserve and maintain that passive open space amenity. You know the history of the change of ownership of the Signature golf course in 2019 to an out of state land speculator. The new owner has partnered with out-of-town developer Harrison & Lear to attempt to change the zoning of 3 golf course parcels from P-1 to PDH-2 for more housing. Residents would prefer the golf course to be open with the panoramic views for which many paid extra lot premiums, but we have duly accepted that it is closed. However, the unsightly overgrowth still provides us peace and quiet. The addition of a 143-home subdivision into the middle of our community will not only drastically change the density, it will very drastically change the entire character of our community, and it will destroy our peace and quiet. Once our P-1 passive open space is gone, it's lost forever! In what other VB or TA community have we allowed a 143-home subdivision to be plopped in the middle of a mature, thriving 936 home neighborhood? A strong super majority (66%+) of West Neck residents have consistently expressed opposition to this rezoning. This opposition is not rooted in resistance to change or progress, but in a desire for thoughtful, predictable planning that respects existing neighborhoods and our peace and quiet. We support responsible development in the Transition Area that honors and protects open space - this Harrison & Lear proposal does not do that. I respectfully request that you listen to the majority of the residents who live here and recommend DISAPPROVAL of any rezoning request for the Signature at West Neck golf course. Thank you for your attention, for your support of Villages at West Neck residents on this issue, and for your service to our city. Semper Fi, Ted Quinter LtCol USMC, Ret President, Browningstone Condominium "America is not governed by the majority,it is governed by the majority whoparticioateV' Thomas Jefferson February 5, 2026 Subject: An Appeal to the City of Virginia Beach Dear Planning Commission Members, My name is Michael Downtain and my wife, Evelyn, and I are members of the SOTAR Group at West Neck {Supporters of Transition Area Rules}. We want to thank you for the recent correspondence you sent, providing us with an opportunity to share with your Planning Commission members our thoughts about the latest application from Harrison and Lear to rezone the property to redevelop the existing defunct golf course with 143 single-family style dwellings and 9-hole golf course. We are appealing to your members to consider disapproving of Harrison and Lear's latest zoning request. We are opposed to any increase in density to our community. My wife and I moved to the West Neck at Signature in its early stages in 2002. We looked at several other areas in Virginia Beach before choosing West Neck. Our deciding factors were, of course, the 55+community, a quality built custom house surrounded by beautiful landscaping,Arnold Palmer Signature golf course, clubhouse, and other amenities. We especially wanted tranquility and peace in our later years and to live out our lives here. We never anticipated that the owner of Baymark Construction would go bankrupt and sell the golf course. It was the main attraction, and my home is situated across from what used to be the ninth fairway and green across Wilderness Lane. After its closure, we didn't expect to be caught up in years of legal disputes about its future. We had always hoped that someone would purchase the property and restore it to its original condition. So, when we learned that wasn't going to happen, we were deeply disappointed. However, we continued to believe that the City of Virginia Beach remained committed to the Transition Area Rules and preserving open space within the 'Green Zone.' Harrison and Lear's latest proposal still requires the development of 143 homes on some of the golf course property which is still unacceptable to us and once again raises the issue of population density in the "Green Zone". If their request is approved it will mean for our community a daily nuisance generated by trucks containing heavy loads of dirt, concrete, and large logs from cut-down trees rumbling through our repaved streets. Moreover,the noise from trucks hauling heavy debris for land clearing will be accompanied by the constant sounds of bulldozers, chainsaws, and other heavy machinery, creating a disturbing disruption to the area. Once the land is cleared, the relentless noise from hammers, power saws, and construction equipment—potentially over the span of several years—will further erode the peace and tranquility that originally drew us to this neighborhood. As an afterthought, if the zoning request is approved and 143 new homes are developed, the impact on our community will extend far beyond the noise and heavy truck traffic during construction. Once the homes are completed, we can expect a significant increase in traffic volume in the area which could lead to serious traffic congestion and safety concerns. The vast majority of residents in West Neck strongly opposed the initial Harrison and Lear Plan. We respectfully urge the City of Virginia Beach to reject the current zoning request. Warmest Regards, Michael and Evelyn Downtain 3208 Gallahad Drive West Neck,Arthur Parke From: ioklein56(@amail.com To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: NO,TO REZONING OF SIGNATURE GOLF COURSE Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 7:28:42 PM ------------- CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leadership, re I am writing to strongly oppose any rezoning of the former Sig natu at West Neck property. Rezoning this site would undermine long-standing Transition Area rules, in regards to density guidelines and open space as noted In 2016 Comprehensive Plan, and send a troubling message to homeowners across Virginia Beach: that previously agreed-upon to zoning and development standards can be changed after the fact benefit developers, regardless of community impact. West Neck residents relied on adopted plans, zoning assurances' and density limits when purchasing their homes. Approving rezoning now would be unfair to homeowners who acted in good faith and would sot a precedent that threatens other planned communities throughout the city. Traffic capacity, emergency access, environmental considerations, and infrastructure limits were all factors in the original zoning. Those constraints have not changed--only the developer's desired profit margin has. City leadership has a responsibility to uphold sound planning principles, not rewrite them under pressure. I urge you to deny any rezoning request for West Neck and uphold the rules that protect our neighborhoods. Respectfully, r � ADC} YOUR VILLAGE pages of West Neck Virginia Beach 2/3, 2026 1 am writing to strongly oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck property. Rezoning this site would undermine long-standing Transition Area rules, in regards to density guidelines and open space as noted in 2016 Comprehensive Plan and send a troubling message to homeowners across Virginia Beach: that previously agreed-upon zoning and development standards can be changed after the fact to benefit developers, regardless of community impact. West Neck residents relied on adopted plans, zoning assurances, and density limits when purchasing their homes. Approving rezoning now would set a precedent that threatens other planned communities throughout the city. Traffic capacity, emergency access, environmental considerations, and infrastructure limits were all factors in the original zoning. Those constraints have not changed-only the developer's desired profit margin has. City leadership has a responsibility to uphold sound planning principles, not rewrite them under pressure. I urge you to deny any rezoning request for West Neck and uphold the rules that protect our neighborhoods. Respectfully, Agneta S. White Carrollton Village of West Neck Virginia Beach. VA 23456 Virginia Beach 2/3, 2026 I live in the Village of West Neck, and I am asking you to vote no on any rezoning proposal affecting our community. This is not ab abstract planning issue for us- it directly affects how we live every day. Increased density will mean more traffic on roads that are already strained, longer emergency response times, and reduced safety for families, seniors, and pedestrians. Many of us chose West Neck because it offered a balance of nature, open space, and carefully planned development. Rezoning the golf course property would permanently disrupt that balance and diminish the quality of life we were promised. Residents have attended meetings, written letters, and spoken out repeatedly. The message has been clear and consistent: we do not support rezoning. Please respect the voices of the people who live here and will bear the consequences of this decision long after the developers are gone. I urge you to stand with residents and protect the integrity of West Neck by rejecting rezoning. Sincerely, Agneta S. White Carrollton Village of West Neck Virginia Beach VA23456 From: ash210Calcomcast.net To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City Manager Citizen Inquiry Subject: ADHERENCE TO TRANSITIONAL GUIDELINES Date: Monday,February 2,2026 10:28:54 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor Dyer, City Council Members, TA/ITA COC, and Planning Commissioners, Most residents in The Community of West Neck are strongly OPPOSED to the rezoning and development of the property known as the former Arnold Palmer Signature Golf Course. That can be verified by signatures that are available. Volumes of letters, long conversations, and arguments have gone on for years about this issue. After reading, listening, and attending meetings, and as a resident of Virginia Beach and The Community of West Neck, I stand with the guidelines of the Transitional Area and SOTAR: PLEASE DO NOT RECOMMEND OR VOTE TO REZONE THIS AREA. The reasons have been documented in every letter in favor of opposing this development. They address environmental concerns and years of disruptions with construction trucks, traffic issues and more. Personal feelings about the idea that The Community of West Neck was built according to density restrictions are not moot. Now there are mentions that the Transitional Area restrictions were guidelines, not rules. That may be the most important argument to deny development. Residents purchased homes with the understanding that this was area was open space. My support is to those who believe that the Transitional Area should be respected and want to adhere to the promise that this land would be RESERVED for open space. The plan for "The Preserve" is NOT preserving this property in ANY way. This is not about opposing housing developments in the right area or for the renewal of a golf course that attracted golfers. It is about trust in our local leaders to uphold the open space that was agreed upon. Had there not been such a stipulation, our 55+ Community could not have been built. Again, density was dependent on open space. The applicant has made the case for another golf course that is based on the approval to build 143 homes that will eliminate the unsightly course. The Owner insists that the construction of the homes is a requirement for a lease to provide a 9- Hole golf course. That lease is defined as being able to be reassigned. The Owner has refused or ignored offers from buyers who wanted to purchase and restore Signature. Harrison and Lear have modified their Conceptual Plan several times. The first one did not include a golf course and had multiple amenities to appeal to retirees interested in Senior Activities. It was even discussed that West Neck residents would be entitled to participate_ There is no question why all of this is confusing to an established community who first purchased their retirement home on golf course. To repeat again - the emphasis is DENSITY and quality of life. • The fact that properties were purchased at a premium to be on the golf course is valid. Obviously, no one had any idea that future housing might happen. I doubt anyone ever thought there could even be a discussion about anything other than a golf course. • A CONCEPTUAL PLAN means that this is a plan and is not final. Modifications may be required for any number of reasons. Will any changes be communicated if rezoning is approved? Will the residents adjacent to the property be ensured that the new houses will not be less than 50 feet away from their own property line and that there will be even less privacy than designed in this plan? • Do we really think that this will inspire serious golfers to vacation in Virginia Beach? I think they might visit or play if they are here, but what impact might that have on traffic? Will there be adequate parking space? This suggests even more interruptions. • The Preserve is being designed for a piece of land that is in the middle of an existing housing development. We have already experienced the development of "light industrial" nearby. That is another matter, but it feels like we may be faced with even more development. • We trust our elected officials to stand by their constituents and carefully study all aspects of changing past decisions and agreements. This development is not because of a housing shortage or unplanned It does not BENEFIT our city and residents. It benefits the seller, the buyer, and the investor leasing the golf area. The idea that this may be a precedent is serious. It certainly does not consider our Military residents in West Neck who chose to stay or move here, or the residents who are opposed to this entire plan. It poses an opportunity for further development in the future. Agriculture may even be threatened in the future. It also does not address potential time delays for EMT vehicles, especially during construction which will take years. There is only one entrance/exit to the largest condominium village in The Community of West Neck. These alone are significant points. Thank you for the long read, and your careful consideration. Your efforts are appreciated in keeping our city strong, safe, and honorable. Respectfully and sincerely, Anne S. Haley ash210 a2comcast.net 2968 Elegance Lane Virginia Beach 23456 908-917-1563 From: William Wolstenholme To: Planning Commissioners Subject: Former Signature golf course Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 2:02:42 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. My name is William Wolstenholme. I am a retiree. an army veteran and a resident of West Neck. I am writing to strongly oppose the rezoning of the former Signature golf course at West Neck. Rezoning this site would undermine longstanding Transition Area rules regarding density guidelines and open space as noted in the 2016 Comprehensive Plan as well as send a message to homeowners in Virginia Beach that previously agreed upon zoning and development standards can be changed after the fact to benefit developers, regardless of community impact. City leadership has a responsibility to uphold sound planning principles, not rewrite them under pressure. So, I urge you to deny the rezoning request for West Neck and uphold the rules that protect our neighborhoods, Respectfully. William Wolstenholme Browningstone Village The Villages of West Neck From: City Manaaer Citizen Inauiry To: Plannina Administration Subject: FW:Opposition to Rezoning of Former Signature Golf Course at WestNeck Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 3:50:56 PM Good afternoon, Below is a concern from citizen about the rezoning of West Neck Golf course. City Manager Office City Hall,Building 1,Suite 2017 2401 Courthouse Drive Virginia Beach,VA 23456 -----Original Message----- From:joekuhnl7@icloud.com<joekuhnl7@icloud.com> Sent:Tuesday,February 3,2026 3:37 PM To:City Council<CITYCOUNCIL@vbgov.com>;City Manager Citizen Inquiry<CMOffice@vbgov.com> Cc:ash210@comcast.com Subject:Opposition to Rezoning of Fortner Signature Golf Course at WestNeck CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >Dear City Council members and CMoffice,As a citizen of City of >Virginia Beach and a former home owner of West Neck,I strongly oppose >the rezoning of the subject property. >We sold our property at 3184 Gallahad Drive when the owner constructed >an unsightly metal fence directly eight yards behind our home because we criticized his failure to control the weed and tree growth so close to our home. >It is unfortunate that a single person from out of state purchased the land with the sole intention of building over one hundred houses with complete disregard of current home owners. >I strongly urge you to deny a rezoning of this land. >Sincerely, >Joseph L Kuhn >Captain,U.S.Navy(Ret.) From: Gail To: Planning Commissioners Cc: ash210Ca)comcast.net Subject: Harrison&Lea Rezoning Application Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 7:33:16 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Members of Planning Commission, We have lived in the Villages at West Neck,2756 Browning Dr., for three years in August,2026. Both of us are retired. We like the peaceful, largely green environment at West Neck. With the Harrison &Lea Rezoning Proposal,we foresee a significant, permanent decrease in this living environment by: 1. increase in buildings/houses, 2. increase in vehicle traffic, 3. increase in noise. We are strongly asking that you OPPOSE rezoning and VOTE for DIASAPROVE!!! Thank you for your understanding and support of our community ! Greatly appreciate your volunteer service to Virginia Beach!! Mark and Gail Bailey From: Deborah Dise To: Plannino Commissioners Subject: Harrison&Lear rezoning application Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 9:44:17 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission, I live in the Browningstone Village at West Neck. My husband and I have lived here for 8 years. Love the views, opportunity to safely walk throughout entire West Neck neighborhood,and the great neighbors I've met over the years. I served in the Air Force from 1981-1985 and retired as a teacher with Virginia Beach City Public Schools in 2018. I am greatly opposed to the rezoning and proposed development at West Neck. Traffic on the main streets of Legendary and Cadence is already very busy. Not only do we already have a lot of traffic from our own residents, we daily get residents of Courthouse Estates and Indian River Plantation driving through our neighborhood to get to their homes. The increased traffic from the new proposed homes would make traffic unbearable. I am not just talking about residents cars,but delivery trucks going through West Neck. This doesn't even take into consideration the noise,dust/dirt while the proposed new neighborhoods are being developed. I strongly ask you to oppose rezoning and vote for disapproval. There are many other areas in the city where new neighborhoods could be developed without going against current transition area rules. I would ask that you encourage Harrison and Lear to look for such property elsewhere while maintaining current transition area rules. Cordially, Mrs.Deborah Dise 2720 Sonnet Lane From: Laura Beckwith To: Plannina Commissioners Subject: Harrison&Lear Rezoning Application Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 6:10:39 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Members of the Planning Commission, This email is regarding the upcoming Harrison&Lear Rezoning application. I am earnestly asking you to ggnose all rezoning of this area and vote for Disannroyal of this ggplication. I live in Browningstone village,part of the West Neck Community. I moved here in 2017 to be close to family and I chose this place to live because it has a very rural and open landscape. The tree-covered walkways are surrounded by trees and ponds it is a joy to take a healthy walk daily-to watch squirrels run around and ducks swimming, and listen to birds singing. The housing is spread out and not dense so there is very little traffic. When I am out walking I often chat with other residents out walking, many with a dog. It is a very friendly and safe environment in which to live my senior years. The Harrison&Lear proposal will destroy that. The proposed houses will turn a quiet tree- lined street into a line of houses and driveways and destroy any views of the pond and wildlife there. The traffic will increase by several hundred cars including service vehicles. The construction itself will create several years of noise, dirt and dust,blocked roadways and contractor equipment and noise. The environmental impacts will be devastating. There is no plan that addresses the failing ponds and runoff water from storms. The green space and trees which now exist help keep the environment healthy. That loss will be castastrophic and is against the recommendations of any Nature conservancy program. PLEASE VOTE. TO MA PER 0VF. OF THIS APP .I ATTON Thank you for your work, Laura Beckwith laurasutherland.2016@gmail.com 774-364-2801 (cell) 757-689-2144 From: Carol Wisloski To: Plannino Administration Subject: Harrison and Lear Proposal Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 12:12:49 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Ladies and Gentlemen of the Planning Commission, My husband and I retired to Virginia Beach in 2019.We found the ideal house adjacent to the 2nd hole on the Signature Golf Course. I remember the real estate agent mentioning something about the course being here forever. Now almost 7 years later, I see the current owner plans to build homes on part of the course. Luckily it won't be behind our home. But what of our neighbors in Carrolton, Browningstone, and The Grove?They had the same expectations when they bought.Alt the residents of the Villages of West Neck as seniors, especially our veterans,deserve the peace and quiet expected in a retirement community. Now,we possibly face years of increased traffic,construction activity and noise,and total disruption of our lives. My husband is active in defending the Transition Area and constantly points out the continued assault on it. One of his pet peeves is that this city spent hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars on the Comprehensive Plan. He claims the original draft set a course to a future of continued growth in several key areas. Light and heavy industry centered around the Oceana airfield, revitalization of areas north of the Green Line, and a continued concern for land preservation south of the Green Line. Now with Little regard for the city's future and its wellbeing comes developers with plans contrary to the tenets of the Comprehensive Plan. He is not anti-growth, he sees opportunity north of the Green Line well defined in the Comprehensive Plan. Look at this proposal,see the disruption of our lives and its failure to meet the spirit of the Comprehensive Plan and the Transition Area Guidelines.The placing of 143 houses into a well-established,25-year-old,over 55 community does not serve the interest of the residents of West Neck,our city,and the future. Thank you for your attention to this letter and for your service to our city, Carol Wisloski 3120 Gallahad Drive, Arthur Parke,The Villages at West Neck From: Terry Beralund To: Planning Commissioners Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 8:13:27 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. My name is Terry Berglund. I've lived in the Browningstone community since 2008. Prior to my retirement in 2015, I worked for the Naval Inspector General as an Environmental Engineer for 25 years. I attended Virginia Military Institute and Old Dominion University. In 1973, I started my environmental career at the Virginia State Air Pollution Control Board (VAPCB). I served 2 years at the VAPCB before moving to the Virginia Water Control Board. I was Vice President of the Browningstone Board of Directors (BOD) for 7 years, the Browningstone Voting Member and alternate Voting Member for the West Neck BOD and, and I'm also a member of the City's Stormwater Appeals Board. I welcome Leishman's initiative and support the new golf course configuration, but I remain adamantly opposed to development on the "open space." As President Trump once said, "There are good people on both sides" ... of this issue." On one side are the good people who purchased their homes in West Neck adjacent to former Signature Golf Course because it was a beautiful, safe, quiet, tranquil community in the rural southeastern part of the city, away from the dynamic, bustling, business-oriented suburbs and transportation corridors favored by younger, active families. On the other side are good people who are seeking to profit from constructing as many homes as possible on the former Signature Golf Course. Their challenge is to garner enough support on Virginia Beach City Council to change the current zoning classification, which prohibits residential construction, to a new classification that would allow the owners to initiate development of the former golf course property. Their efforts to date have ranged from condescension and spite, intimidation and litigation, to sowing the seeds of misinformation and confusion in an attempt "divide and conquer" the West Neck community. Despite having viable offers from third parties to revive the former Arnold Palmer Signature Golf Course, the property owners had vowed "NEVER to allow the return of a golf course to the property." They must have been shocked by the magnitude of the public opposition to the previous rezoning request because they withdrew that request and are now proposing a new project that includes a 9-hole golf course in exchange for developing only half of the property. While the owners are portraying this as a reasonable compromise, the real issue was never the golf course but rather was about developing property that was dedicated to open space. It opens the door for unwanted, unnecessary disruptive development that will continue for years and require the expenditure of tax dollars for infrastructure improvements, and continual preventive maintenance. And the mere fact that the owners are acquiescing to the demands for a golf course at this late date to "sweeten the pot," indicates the level of desperation they have reached. They understand that without a change in zoning the undeveloped property has very little value to them. That is why I believe that any quid pro quo relative to this "compromise" or willingness "to engage" will signal to the potential developers that we are amenable to future construction. I believe it is in our best self-interest, armed with scientific watershed data, backed by sound Best Management Practices, to continue to resist the rezoning request. Terry Berglund Browning Drive Va Beach, VA 23456 From: Al Dalv To: Planning Commissioners:Barbara Henley;Katherine C.Schoonover Subject: Open Space/Density Regulations For West Neck Villages Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 12:50:49 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am writing this to strongly express my wish to keep the existing regulations concerning the existing open space/ density regulations for The West Neck Villages. I have lived in West Neck since 2012,and fmd it very beautiful-almost resort like. This community provides peacefulness,safety and quiet to a senior population. If I understand it right,the smaller lots were allowed because of the green space that the golf course provided. I don't understand how building approximately 130 new homes in our community could be allowed. This whole process over the last 5-8 years has been very unsettling,especially seeing how the people were ticketed for trespassing,"spite fences"were erected because people complained about the condition of the property and one could even feel that they were being bullied into giving in to developers! To me it has become a moral issue as well. In addition,if regulations get changed here,what other developments could encroach on our precious open spaces/woods etc. Again,I humbly request a denial to change the OpenSpace/Density regulations for the West Neck Villages. Sincerely Albert M Daly 2937 Charisma Court Virginia Beach,Virginia 23456 4197795323 Sent from my Whone From: Larry Walker To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: Igwalker23456(@amai1.com Subject: Planning Commission Meeting on February filth 2026 Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 2:43:30 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Ladies and Gentlemen, The proposal from Harrison and Lear Corporation regarding their rezoning and housing development request involving the former Signature Golf Course is a completely separate issue than the intended development of a 9- Hole Golf Course on that same privately held property. I am writing to ensure your consideration and discussions regarding this H&L proposal is kept in the proper context. The last time(about 8 months ago)H&L submitted a proposal for this development and the City Staff rightfully recommended DENIAL of their request for the reasons of Housing Density and Open Space within the Transition Area.H&L then withdrew their request.Again,the City Staffrightfully considered the existing Virginia Beach Comprehensive Plan when they determined this project would exceed Transition Area Development Guidelines. So what changed from the initial H&L submission and the one you all will be considering on the 1 lth of Feb? H&L on behalf of JBWK LLC has resubmitted their request for 143 homes vice their original requested number of 157 homes with an added enticement of a 9-Hole Golf Course to be developed by a separate and independent group of investors. H&L and the current land owner(JBWK LLC)want to construct 143 homes on the former Golf Course and that is their primary objective.When Jonathan Skinner(President of H&L)was asked if the Land Owner were denied this request for rezoning and Housing development, would he still allow the development of the 9-Hole GC,Mr. Skinner's answer was an emphatic NO. So,that should tell all that the Land Owner is using the 9-Hole Golf Course as an inducement(or ruse)to get the City to approve his rezoning and housing development request. The City of Virginia Beach has had its Comprehensive Plan in place for many years now and is currently working a draft for an updated plan.The City Residents when asked for input have by a large number indicated they wish to see the GREEN LINE and thus the TRANSITION AREA kept for the purposes both were designated in the first place.The Comprehensive Plan outlines the development guidelines for the area south of the GREEN LINE and within the TRANSITION AREA. My question to you as the Planning Commission is;if we are to violate the development guidelines contained within the Comprehensive Plan,then why has the City put so much effort into updating the Plan and why not just get rid of it?The answer should be that it provides a Guide to the development of our City and lays out the type of City we all want to live in,going into the future.So,let's abide by the Comprehensive Plan when making a decision on the proposal being submitted by Harrison and Lear.I hope you will recommend DENIAL for this proposal when you submit your recommendation to the City Council. Truth in Lending; I am a resident of Indian River Plantation.I have no qualms with the idea of a 9-Hole Golf Course developed on the former Signature GC property as the land is already zoned for that type development and it would be a good benefit for all the surrounding neighborhoods and City residents as a whole.I am against the development of additional homes on the former GC land. -every acre of land within the Signature GC and the varied Villages at West Neck was considered by the City when Dickie Foster originally proposed the West Neck Villages and Golf Course...the H&L project would utilize land acreage already computed for housing numbers within West Neck Villages...thus use the same land area twice. How can anyone think this is the correct thing to do. -the H&L proposal goes against the development guidelines laid out within the Comprehensive Plan,Housing Density should still be a major issue. Thank you,I hope your decision reflects what is best for the continued development of our City. Larry Walker 2500 Calumet Drive Virginia Beach,VA 23456 (757)407-1332 From: Maaaie Biondo To: Maaaie Biondo Cc: Planning Commissioners;City Council•City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguirv: t y M.Warren Subject: Re:Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 11:18:22 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Vote no on rezoning of Signature Golf Course and West Neck Project. ----------Forwarded message--------- From: Responsible Growth VB<res op nsiblegrowthvb gmail_com> Date: Wed, Feb 4, 2026, 10:54 AM Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent To: <PlanningCo missionersnvbgov_com>, <CityCouncil vbgov_com>, <mayorsoffice vbgov_com>, <CMOfficeaXbgov_com>, <kmwarren vbgov_com> Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Maggie Buindo District 9 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. C)Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Friday,February 6,2026 10:34:12 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Judith Ebert District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. `7 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannino Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry; Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Friday,February 6,2026 10:25:24 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Arlene Ridge District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry: Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Friday,February 6,2026 10:24:55 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Susan Kiely District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. v Responsible Growth VS. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council:City of Virainia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inauirv:Kathy M.Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 2:14:20 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land- use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space.Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, mark gellsch District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 2:40:45 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, James Dowdy District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 2:12:08 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. J Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, jean garnett District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguirv;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 2:09:41 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Sherry Dowdy District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. C;Responsible Grov,#h VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguirv;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 2:09:20 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, ed anderson District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 1:43:51 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe, Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, lawrence remaklus District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry: Kathya M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 2:42:09 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, joan Harris District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 3:17:22 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, forest smith District 8 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. c Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office:City Manaaer Citizen Inauirv;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 3:15:30 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, herb pettway District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. c0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguirv;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 3:13:01 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, cheryl pettway District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguirv;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning Due to Public Safety and Emergency Access Risks Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 3:47:20 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am concerned about the public safety implications of the proposed rezoning at the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck, and I respectfully ask you to vote NO. West Neck is a 55+ community with frequent emergency medical needs. Roads, access points, and response capacity were planned based on preserved open space and existing density assumptions. Increasing density by removing that open space risks compromising emergency access and response times. Public safety impacts should not be accepted retroactively. Please vote NO and uphold the original preservation zoning. Thank you. Sincerely, Donetta Kihle District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. L Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inauiry Kathy Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 3:50:45 PM F UTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless u recognize the:sender and know the content is safe. .. Dear City Leaders, I am writinJ to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Kathy Spencer District 9 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. C`Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:Cry Council:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office:City Manager Citizen Inguiry:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent,Public Safety and Emergency Access Issues,and Environmental Protection. Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 4:03:45 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified and permits crowding of existing home sites where expansive natural views currently exist. These are our long term retirement homes! Please, no noise, construction, or crowding in our quiet cohesive community. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you, Connie Milne Sincerely, Connie Milne District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguirv:KathyM. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 7:31:43 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Oliver gaskey District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 11:18:58 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Nora Lynch District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. G Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 9:31:19 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Jan Tucker District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannino Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 8:45:25 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Mary F. Hildreth District 8 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. G Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VS To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Viroinia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 11:20:16 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Jack Lynch District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners:City Council;City of Viroinia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 10:07:38 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Bonnie Firman District 8 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. c)Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry; KathyM Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 9:01:00 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Bruce Carter District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inauiry: Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 6:21:05 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Faye Hannah District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 4 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 8:58:44 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Melony Mack District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. Oc Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 10:05:11 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Kim Lanier District 5 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. Cc)Responsible Growth VS. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 9:50:20 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Robert Golding District 5 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. C Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry; Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Taxpayers Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 10:00:36 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am asking you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck due to the long-term costs it may place on taxpayers. Additional housing density in this area could require new or expanded roads, drainage, utilities, and emergency services that were not anticipated under the original plan. When growth does not fully pay for its impacts, those costs are ultimately borne by taxpayers citywide. Please vote NO and apply planning standards consistently to protect residents from avoidable infrastructure costs. Thank you. Sincerely, NANCY TASE District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry Kathy Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 9:45:25 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Todd Albala District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. Q Responsible Growth VB. From: Resoonsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 9:42:49 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, David Wessner District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. C�Responsible Groxth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 9:40:27 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Alan Bearmore District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Growth VB_ From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 12:11:33 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, JANNALANDSPERGER District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. ��Responsible Gro,,,Ah VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannino Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen InQuiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 12:10:36 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, MATTHEW konze District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 12:09:38 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, david konze District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O�?Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 12:08:38 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Nancy O'Brien District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. t-Responsible Grovrth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannino Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 12:07:58 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Thomas Walsh District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannino Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 12:01:33 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Nancy Ajello District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Grm lh VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 11:53:26 AM LCAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless ecognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Gretchen Allen District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Piannina Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 2:11:28 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Marilyn Sincerely, Marilyn Voigt District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. C7 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry; Kathy . Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 1:53:01 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Ronald Voigt District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office City Manager Citizen Inguiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 2:54:26 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Ken Faulkner District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. Cf.1 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inpuiry:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 3:26:13 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Raymond and Elaine Moore District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. D Responsible Growth VS. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 12:22:36 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, WILLIAM CASANOVA District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. C Responsible Growth VB_ From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry; Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 12:21:31 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless] you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor and City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck that is being considered due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. We live in the Villages at West Neck and any rezoning of the parcels for residential development will alter the way we (my wife and 1) and the other senior residents that live here can live and can rest in peace and quiet. We bought herein as it was always intended as a finite residential community, and yes, while there was a golf course surrounding the villages, it needs to remain as a preservation area. The community's existing housing density was approved in 1999 with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved as open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. And once it were to be rezoned, we would lose that open space FOREVER. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent in the City of Virginia Beach that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Sylvio T. Canu Resident- Carrollton Village Sincerely, Sylvio Canu District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. J Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy . Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 12:20:40 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Mike LeMoine District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 12:19:29 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. j Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Laura Boyle District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Grovvth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners:City Council:Cry of Virainia Beach Mayors Office:City Manaaer Citizen Inauiry:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 10:16:03 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. I live in West Neck Village and have been deeply upset by the latest proposal for extreme overdevelopment by the owner of the former golf course to vastly exceed the density limits of the Transition area here through a disastrous plan called 'The Preserve at West Neck'. This is his latest attempt to test the resolve of the community by again requesting that the original 1999 protections of P1 Preservation zoning be trampled. I live on Majesty Lane adjacent to the parcel he proposes constructing 143 houses on what was once the 17th fairway at Signature Meadows. I would like to share my thoughts about his plan to partner with local Indian River Plantation residents Marc and Audrey Leishman to rejuvenate the front nine holes of the former golf course while destroying the peaceful tranquility enjoyed by the 900 residents of this community. This change to the zoning in the Preservation Zone violates the Green Line and will exponentially enrich him at West Neck Villages' expense. It's an enormous price we would pay in the form of obliterated view plains, polluted air from pond dredging, years of extreme dust, greatly increased traffic, construction noise, vehicular congestion on our narrow roads, drastically disrupted drainage channels, displaced bird and wildlife populations, increased HOA fees, and substantially reduced property values due to high density and loss of golf course proximity. Please understand-we are all retired and invested in property that was intended to be golf course adjacent, not construction zone immersed. We deserve that, for now and for the next decade that this plan would take to complete. These are the reasons the TA/ITA Citizens Advisory Committee and the Planning Committee recommended denial to a similar horrible self-serving proposal by JBWK in March 2025. Here we are again in the same place, and I respectfully plead with you NOT to support this very similar destruction of land! Sincerely, Kathleen Lam District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry; Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 12:25:28 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Carol Berger District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. I_?Responsible Growth VB. From: Resoonsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Taxpayers Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:49:03 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am asking you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck due to the long-term costs it may place on taxpayers. Additional housing density in this area could require new or expanded roads, drainage, utilities, and emergency services that were not anticipated under the original plan. When growth does not fully pay for its impacts,those costs are ultimately borne by taxpayers citywide. Please vote NO and apply planning standards consistently to protect residents from avoidable infrastructure costs. Thank you. Sincerely, Melrene Shim Gordon District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virainia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Taxpayers Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:45:40 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am asking you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck due to the long-term costs it may place on taxpayers. Additional housing density in this area could require new or expanded roads, drainage, utilities, and emergency services that were not anticipated under the original plan. When growth does not fully pay for its impacts, those costs are ultimately borne by taxpayers citywide. Please vote NO and apply planning standards consistently to protect residents from avoidable infrastructure costs. Thank you. Sincerely, Danielle Barth District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. ©Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inouirv:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Taxpayers Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 6:35:24 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am asking you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck due to the long-term costs it may place on taxpayers. Additional housing density in this area could require new or expanded roads, drainage, utilities, and emergency services that were not anticipated under the original plan. When growth does not fully pay for its impacts, those costs are ultimately borne by taxpayers citywide. Please vote NO and apply planning standards consistently to protect residents from avoidable infrastructure costs. Thank you. Sincerely, Danielle Barth District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. C Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office:City Manager Citizen Inquiry Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning Due to Public Safety and Emergency Access Risks Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:52:43 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am concerned about the public safety implications of the proposed rezoning at the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck, and I respectfully ask you to vote NO. West Neck is a 55+ community with frequent emergency medical needs. Roads, access points, and response capacity were planned based on preserved open space and existing density assumptions. Increasing density by removing that open space risks compromising emergency access and response times. Public safety impacts should not be accepted retroactively. Please vote NO and uphold the original preservation zoning. Thank you. Sincerely, Raymond and Elaine Moore District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannino Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry; Kathy M• Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning Due to Public Safety and Emergency Access Risks Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:23:45 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am concerned about the public safety implications of the proposed rezoning at the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck, and I respectfully ask you to vote NO. West Neck is a 55+ community with frequent emergency medical needs. Roads, access points, and response capacity were planned based on preserved open space and existing density assumptions. Increasing density by removing that open space risks compromising emergency access and response times. Public safety impacts should not be accepted retroactively. Please vote NO and uphold the original preservation zoning. Thank you. Sincerely, PAULA RODDENBERRY District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. C�)Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office:City Manager Citizen Inauiry Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning Due to Public safety and Emergency Access Risks Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 5:53:30 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am concerned about the public safety implications of the proposed rezoning at the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck, and I respectfully ask you to vote NO. West Neck is a 55+ community with frequent emergency medical needs. Roads, access points, and response capacity were planned based on preserved open space and existing density assumptions. Increasing density by removing that open space risks compromising emergency access and response times. Public safety impacts should not be accepted retroactively. Please vote NO and uphold the original preservation zoning. Thank you. Sincerely, Ken Landfield District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. >Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning Due to Public Safety and Emergency Access Risks Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 5:52:49 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am concerned about the public safety implications of the proposed rezoning at the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck, and I respectfully ask you to vote NO. West Neck is a 55+ community with frequent emergency medical needs. Roads, access points, and response capacity were planned based on preserved open space and existing density assumptions. Increasing density by removing that open space risks compromising emergency access and response times. Public safety impacts should not be accepted retroactively. Please vote NO and uphold the original preservation zoning. Thank you. Sincerely, Mayris M Cerwonka District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. t Responsible Growth,VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:53:28 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, LOLET ARALAR District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. Oc Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguirv; Kathy . Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:51:41 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. WSA Sincerely, William Ainsley District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. Og Responsible Grovvth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry:Kathy . Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:51:19 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, GARY ANDERSON District 9 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. d Responsible Growth VB. From: Resoonsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:50:36 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Linda Taylor District 4 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:49:53 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Ashley Gordon District 8 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:46:22 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Gale Perryman District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:35:09 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, George Przymuzala District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry; Kathy Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:34:28 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Kenneth York District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inouirv;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:33:52 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Ruth York District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. C Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:32:12 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Richard Chongoushian District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry; Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:31:41 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Carl Niemann District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathya M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:30:20 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, James Bohrer District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry; Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:29:39 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Diana Quisenberry District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Resoonsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy . Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:27:41 PM CAUTION;This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, James Watt District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry; Kathy Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:25:34 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Joyce Sharples District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguirv;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:25:11 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, rodger pike District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. G Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:22:11 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, floyd anderson District 9 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:21:06 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Edward Thomas District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. OO Responsible Growth VB. From: Resoonsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 9:18:56 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Calvin Thames District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth V8. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inauirv;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 9:13:32 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Michael Wisloski District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office City Manager Citizen Inauirv:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 9:13:32 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Michael Wisloski District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. G Responsible Growth VB. From: Resoonsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry; Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 9:12:57 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Marcia Myers Sincerely, Marcia Myers District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 9:11:20 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, barbara carey District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. ®Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguirv;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 9:10:46 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, jim carey District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. c Responsible Growth VB. From: Resoonsibie Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 8:56:49 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Gary Alexander West Neck Resident Sincerely, Gary Alexander District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguirv:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 8:56:25 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Thomas Allen District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguirv;KathyM. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 8:52:39 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Neil Palmer District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office City Manager Citizen Inguiry Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 8:03:57 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push development beyond what was originally justified. Placing a 143-home subdivision in the middle of a thriving, mature, and established neighborhood would drastically change its character and planning framework. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas and established communities citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Jocelyn Banda District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 5:59:04 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, bill mclaughlin District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 5:55:32 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, janice mclaughlin District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inouirv:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 5:53:54 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Kurt Werth District 8 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. C3 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 5:21:31 PM CAUTION;This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I have lived in Virginia Beach all my life. I currently live in courthouse estates. I have for the past 20 plus year. I have watched VB grow to what it is today. It concerns me how quickly our open space is being used for neighborhoods. I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push development beyond what was originally justified. Placing a 143-home subdivision in the middle of a thriving, mature, and established neighborhood would drastically change its character and planning framework. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas and established communities citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Kelly Sincerely, Kelly Limbach District 2 From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office:City Manager Citizen Inauirv:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 4:19:00 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Anne Haley District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. G Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February S,2026 4:10:38 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, reiny pierson District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. Responsible GroMh VB. From: Resoonsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry; Kathy . Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 4:09:29 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, lisa firth District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. C�Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguirv:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 4:08:19 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Mary LeMoine District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 3:07:45 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push development beyond what was originally justified. Placing a 143-home subdivision in the middle of a thriving, mature, and established neighborhood would drastically change its character and planning framework. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas and established communities citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, FAYE BARKLEY District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 3:06:13 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push development beyond what was originally justified. Placing a 143-home subdivision in the middle of a thriving, mature, and established neighborhood would drastically change its character and planning framework. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas and established communities citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, CURTIS WOOLARD District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 3:05:09 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push development beyond what was originally justified. Placing a 143-home subdivision in the middle of a thriving, mature, and established neighborhood would drastically change its character and planning framework. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas and established communities citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, KAREN THOMAS District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 3:01:36 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push development beyond what was originally justified. Placing a 143-home subdivision in the middle of a thriving, mature, and established neighborhood would drastically change its character and planning framework. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas and established communities citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, TIM SPRAGUE District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 2:33:20 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless i you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, roni farrell District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. C Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virainia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 2:32:31 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Michael Melatti District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planninc Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office:City Manager Citizen Inguiry:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 2:26:26 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, JOESCHADEL District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. G Responsible Growth VB. From: _Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inouirv:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 2:24:30 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, ASTRID GROW District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 2:23:57 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Joan Harris District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. G Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inauiry Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 2:23:27 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Ted Sharples District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inauiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 2:21:53 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Billy Domangue District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. G Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office:City Manager Citizen Inauiry Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 2:11:23 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push development beyond what was originally justified. Placing a 143-home subdivision in the middle of a thriving, mature, and established neighborhood would drastically change its character and planning framework. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas and established communities citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, joe kuhn District 6 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Friday,February 6,2026 1:22:36 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Courtney Parham District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. C7 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VS To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:48:12 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Elmira F Estes District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. (U Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 11:26:08 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Valerie Moore District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. ��Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council:CCU of Virginia Beach Mayors Office City Manager Citizen Inquiry Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 9:14:11 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Stephen Willing District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. C)Responsible Growth V6. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office:City Manager Citizen Inquiry; Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Thursday,February S,2026 8:48:29 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Dale Harris District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 5:54:57 PM CAUTION;This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Robert Stury District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. tc Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguirv:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 4:08:50 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Elizabeth Dudley District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry; Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 2;49:14 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless YOU recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Linda Jacocks District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. @ Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 2:28:43 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Larry Kuebler District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. (D Responsible Growth VB, From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguirv:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 1:44:02 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Edward Murphy District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. G Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners:City Council;City of Virainia Beach Mayors Office:City Manaaer Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 1:43:02 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Patrice Murphy District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. U Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry; Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 1:10:24 PM CAUTION;This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. This proposed rezoning is a clear effort by a developer to make a profit at the expense of property owners that have invested in a beautiful quiet residential neighborhood. There are number of investors that have expressed an interested in purchasing the rights to the original, wonderful 18-hole course but their efforts have been ignored by developers wishing to trash the property for a quick profit. A 9-hole Put-Put course will do nothing to enhance West Neck. The land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, James Enoch Jones District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office:City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Friday,February 6,2026 9:10:34 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. To support our request to vote No can be put in just a few words. We choose the Villages at West Neck to live the remainder of our life for what it offered and to enjoy the open vista that is provided. Now we look at the possibility that houses along the 17th fairway will be built some 50 to 75 feet from our property. No amount of proposed landscaping will substitute what we have now. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Charles and Bonnie Jackson Sincerely, Charlie Jackson District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;Cir_r of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Taxpayers Date: Friday,February 6,2026 10:22:46 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am asking you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck due to the long-term costs it may place on taxpayers. Additional housing density in this area could require new or expanded roads, drainage, utilities, and emergency services that were not anticipated under the original plan. When growth does not fully pay for its impacts, those costs are ultimately borne by taxpayers citywide. Please vote NO and apply planning standards consistently to protect residents from avoidable infrastructure costs. Thank you. Sincerely, Eric Gordon District 8 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry: Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning Due to Public Safety and Emergency Access Risks Date: Friday,February 6,2026 10:23:52 AM CAUTION;This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am concerned about the public safety implications of the proposed rezoning at the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck, and I respectfully ask you to vote NO. West Neck is a 55+ community with frequent emergency medical needs. Roads, access points, and response capacity were planned based on preserved open space and existing density assumptions. Increasing density by removing that open space risks compromising emergency access and response times. Public safety impacts should not be accepted retroactively. Please vote NO and uphold the original preservation zoning. Thank you. Sincerely, Robert Tice District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry; Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Friday,February 6,2026 10:47:02 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Patricia Buckley District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. G Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry; Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Friday,February 6,2026 10:38:45 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Erin Buckley District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. C Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners;City Council:City of Virainia Beach Mayors Office:City Manaaer Citizen Inauirv:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Friday,February 6,2026 10:38:31 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I respectfully urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. • From a planning perspective, rezoning land that has long been designated and relied upon as preserved open space raises important concerns about consistency, predictability, and public trust in the City's land use framework. Preservation zoning exists to withstand development pressure.Altering it here sets a precedent that may undermine citizen trust in similar designations citywide. •The preserved open space at West Neck was integral to how the surrounding neighborhood's density was originally calculated and approved. Previously similar proposals for that land have also been rejected by city staff based on density impacts. Reallocating the land now for 143 additional homes would materially change the development pattern that residents and planners alike understood and accepted. This shift in position would also raise concerns about the integrity of the City's density and capacity analyses. • In addition,the proposal raises day-to-day technical concerns related to stormwater management and flooding. The Transition Area's soil conditions are already known to be challenging. Introducing 143 new homes would increase impervious surface and runoff in this particularly sensitive area. Resulting mitigation and long term maintenance costs ultimately would ultimately fall to the City and taxpayers, adding to an already complex and expensive infrastructure burden. While I am not a resident of the West Neck community, I have lived in Southern Virginia Beach for nearly 40 years and have followed local planning efforts closely. I have spent considerable time reviewing drafts of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and am encouraged by its emphasis on resilience, compatibility, and thoughtful growth. In that context, recent development trends in the Transition Area—including this proposal—appear misaligned with the Plan's stated direction. I urge you not to allow West Neck to become a case in point. Thank you for considering this request and for your service to guide development decisions that balance today's pressures with the City's long term planning goals. Ann Lester Sincerely, Ann Lester District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. ID Responsible Growth V6. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguirv:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Friday,February 6,2026 10:38:04 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Troy Glenn District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inouirv; Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Friday,February 6,2026 10:36:26 AM CAUTION;This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Dale Harris District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Resoonsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Friday,February 6,2026 10:35:09 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Robert Kolin District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: _Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguirv:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Friday,February 6,2026 10:33:49 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless j you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Douglas Ross District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannino Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Friday,February 6,2026 10:30:34 AM CAUTION;This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, Catherine Crisher District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners;City Council;City of Virainia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Friday,February 6,2026 10:22:10 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, JUDY GELLASCH District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inpuiry:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Prevent a Dangerous Density Precedent Date: Friday,February 6,2026 10:21:21 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. Sincerely, MARK GELLASCN District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. 0 Responsible Growth VB. From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inquiry;Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Vote NO on West Neck Rezoning to Protect Preserved Open Space Date: Friday,February 6,2026 10:50:17 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am writing to ask you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning of the former Signature Golf Course in West Neck. I am a new resident to Virginia Beach, but I am very impressed by the care and dedication the City has taken to initiate and preserve the Transition Area. This proposal seems to strike at its very heart. This land was designated as preservation open space when the community was originally approved. That open space was intentionally preserved to protect environmental resources and to balance the overall intensity of development. Converting preserved open space into new housing would undermine long-standing conservation commitments and weaken trust in preservation zoning citywide. Please uphold the original preservation zoning and protect land that was meant to remain undeveloped. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, ARDEN CALVERT District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. From: Steven Denaler To: Plannina Commissioners Subject: REZONING AT WEST NECK VILLAGES Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 2:21:06 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leadership, My wife and I grew up in Virginia Beach area and moved away to attend college and Graduate School. We lived in Fairfax Virginia for 30+years, raised 2 kids,retired, and moved back to The Beach to be with friends and family. We moved to the Villages at West Neck for it's established neighborhood design an elegance. Being south of the Greenline was supposed to be a place that would ensure a low development growth area, where we could enjoy the amenities; low density of structures; and the open space provided by the Signature course. We had enough of the density issues found in Northern Virginia. West Neck homeowners purchased their homes with a clear expectation of what their neighborhood looked like,with a clear understanding regarding density, traffic, environmental buffers, and quality of life. Approving rezoning in the middle of our established neighborhood would be unfair to homeowners. City Leadership has a responsibility to uphold sound planning principles. We urge you to deny any rezoning request for West Neck and uphold the rules that protect our neighborhoods. Steven Dengler Browningstone Village Steven Dengler From: LINDA GRONEMANN To: Plannina Commissioners Subject: Rezoning of West Neck Signature Golf course Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 7:45:30 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am a resident of West Neck and i am writing to respectfully urge you to oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck golf course. West Neck homeowners purchased their homes with a clear expectation about density, traffic, environmental buffers, and quality of life. Rezoning this property would alter the character of our community and break the trust residents placed in the city when these plans were originally approved. I am asking you to vote no on any rezoning proposal affecting our community. Rezoning directly affects how we live every day. Increased density will mean more traffic on roads that are already strained, longer emergency response times and reduced safety for families, seniors, and pedestrians. I am opposed to the rezoning plan that Harrison Lear is proposing. I have attended all of the meetings presented recently regarding the rezoning and their building plan. There are many residents in West Neck and Indian River Plantation who are against this rezoning. I urge you to vote no to this rezoning. Linda Gronemann Browningstone Resident The Villages of West Neck Sent from Yahoo Mail for Whone From: Linda Anderson To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: Linda Anderson Subject: Rezoning of West Neck Village Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 9:45:58 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission, My husband and I moved from Sandbridge to West Neck 8 years ago because it was a nice, quiet retirement area with many amenities. The area is already densely packed, and it is inconceivable that any additional homes or condos could be placed here. The folks who moved here did so either to play golf or just enjoy a quiet retirement. Who could have expected that the golf course would be eventually sold to folks that are anxious to build even more homes here?Put yourselves in the position of a homeowner who bought property solely to be located along a golf course, and never realizing that homes could eventually take over the view, and serenity that propelled them to move here to begin with. The infrastructure of this area is fragile, and there is always a continuous flow of traffic as it is NOW. Any added housing of ANY kind would impede travel within our corridors, and never was it conceivable that any developer could come in and destroy what was intended to be here from the onset of the initial planning of this village. When you choose to live in a 55 and older RETIREMENT village,you realize that this is generally your last move. I beg you to understand that any additional housing would upend what was INITIALLY planned for this community, and the noise level alone would be a problem for many residents. I am imploring you to please NOT consider any change in rezoning to West Neck Village. We seniors pay our taxes too, and deserve to have our few remaining years of life unencumbered by builder greed. Thank you, and I hope that you will use your hearts, and infrastructure data when making your decision! Sincerely, Linda Anderson From: Julie Olszewski To: Plannino Commissioners Subject: Rezoning of West Neck Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 5:32:37 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thank you for taking time to read this and consider the feelings of the residents of Browning Drive and West Neck. I have lived here for 11 years after downsizing to this peaceful, safe setting looking out over water and the golf course. I am a widow, also a retired Military dependent. I know we no longer look at the golf course but now the trees have grown up it is a beautiful setting. I live in the 3rd block of Browning facing the water, all of my many windows face the direction where Harrison and Lear plan on putting in houses. My view which was premium will now be someones fence/backyard/back windows which breaks my heart. Not only will my view be taken, which will devalue my property, my peace will be shattered for years while they dig,bang, drill etc...all day long!! There will be dust, dirt,noise and critters that live in trees that they will knocked down. Our roads will be blocked by trucks coming and going....will Harrison and Lear use our entrance and our roads that we pay dues every month for. I totally OPPOSE this rezoning and any development. Please vote for a disapproval! We are a lovely quiet peaceful community of tax paying seniors who deserve quite and peace and not to live on a building site so someone who cares nothing about us can make money. Please vote for disapproval of the rezoning. I am grateful for your time and support Sincerely Julie Olszewski 2675 Briwning Drive VB. Yahoo Mail: Search- Organize onque From: Rita Kino To: Planning Commissioners Subject: Rezoning signature Golf Course Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 3:08:52 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >Good afternoon Commissioners, >I would like to express my strong opposition to the rezoning of the Signature Golf Course at West Neck Village and request your disapproval of it. > Similar to many other residents of West Neck Village, we retired to Virginia Beach to live our golden years enjoying the serenity and open space provided by the Transition Area density guidelines. Sticking a new 143 "not affordable"house development in the middle of an established community is not what we envisioned. Dirt, noise,habitat disruption and preservation land reduction for the next 5-8 years to satisfy developer greed is unacceptable. Please protect the open space and the density requirements of the Transition Area by voting NO on this application. If your parents or other loved ones lived here, I know what you're recommendation would be. Thank you for your service to Virginia Beach. Best Regards, Rita King Browningstone West Neck Villages From: Mark Connelly To: Plannina Commissioners Subject: Rezoning Signature Golf Course Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 2:36:26 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >Good afternoon Commissioners, >I would like to express my strong opposition to the rezoning of the Signature Golf Course at West Neck Village and request your disapproval of it. > Similar to many other residents of West Neck Village,we retired to Virginia Beach to live our golden years enjoying the serenity and open space provided by the Transition Area density guidelines. Sticking a new 143 "not affordable"house development in the middle of an established community is not what we envisioned. Dirt, noise, habitat disruption and preservation land reduction for the next 5-8 years to satisfy developer greed is unacceptable. Please protect the open space and the density requirements of the Transition Area by voting NO on this application. If your parents or other loved ones lived here, I know what you're recommendation would be. Thank you for your service to Virginia Beach. Best Regards, Mark Connelly Browningstone West Neck Villages From: Mark Connelly To: Plannina Commissioners Subject: Rezoning Signature Golf Course Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 10:40:45 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Sent from my iPad >Good morning Commissioners, >I would like to express my strong opposition to the rezoning of the Signature Golf Course at West Neck Village and request your disapproval of it. > We retired to Virginia Beach 3 years ago and after a 10 month home search,chose West Neck Village due to the serenity and protection provided by the Transition Area Guidelines.After attending the Harrison and Lear/Leishman presentations,aside from a semi public 9 hole golf course,there was no new information to warrant approval from the previously denied/withdrawn applications.Please protect the open space and the density requirements of the Transition Area by voting NO on this application. >Thank you for your service. >Regards, >Rita King >2689 Browning Dr >Virginia Beach,VA 23456 >603-305-8030 From: Judy Bura To: Planning Commissioners Subject: Rezoning Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 12:30:52 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Commissioners: Weeks before I retired,my coworkers were discussing where the ideal place to live would be; and, lucky me, I hit the jackpot, a condo on a golf course(The Signature at West Neck.) For the fourteen years we have lived here,my husband and I loved the tranquility of the rolling greens and although disappointed when the golf course closed we also loved beautiful natural wilderness. What we won't like is the noise of construction or the destruction of natural habitats and displacement of the animals who made the area their homes. The"green line"was first conceived to maintain charm and character of Virginia Beach. It was the right choice then and it is the best choice now. Please do not change the zoning or permit the proposed development. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Judith Bura Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS From: Kenneth Landfield To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: Walter Camp;icromwellCnlvboov.com;m.andersnavbgov.com;Kathryn Bvler;kschoonover(d)vbaov.com;Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hippen;Holly Cuellar;John H.Coston;nmorianiCalvbgov.com; Michael C.Mauch Subject: Save West Neck's Quality of Life Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 9:23:22 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Transition Area Design Guidelines Harrison&Lear have repeatedly stated that over 90%their plan is in compliance with the Transition Area Design Guidelines. In fact, less than 20%of the applicable Guidelines are in compliance. First off, 25 of the 56 Guidelines refer to non-residential development and are therefore not even applicable. Of the remaining 31 applicable Guidelines,H&L does not comply with 26, or 84%. Let me highlight ten of the most egregious examples of what the H&L plan is lacking: 2.1 Development should be creative and of high quality. 2.2 Uses should be limited to low-impact, low-density residential... 2.4a Minimum lot sizes of 15,000 square feet are preferred. 3.1 Design should be with nature using low-impact development techniques and creative design... and optimize site amenities. 3.5 Architectural features may include large, wraparound porches...and detached or side- loading garages. 3.5a1 Houses should be arranged and streets should be aligned in ways that create or adapt to the natural setting and are not limited to a typical regimented grid-like urban pattern. 3.6 For residential development, parcel consolidation is encouraged to enable larger development sites that can be designed creatively. 5.1c The maintenance responsibility for each facility should be established prior to construction. 5.1d Land for open space purposes should be protected through the use of a variety of legal instruments, such as deed restrictions, transfer to a stewardship agency (e.g. foundations or conservation groups) or through some other appropriate means. 5.3b Secondary Trails - (defined as) Public asphalt trails located on property owned by HOA or other neighborhood ownership entities within a development. A public easement will be required to be dedicated to the City. The easement agreement states that maintenance of secondary trails is the responsibility of the HOA or other neighborhood ownership entity. Please vote against the proposed rezoning of the former Signature golf course land. Thanks you. Ken Landfield 2745 Browning Drive Virginia Beach, VA. 23456 From: Donna Scott To: Plannino Commissioners Subject: Say No To West Neck Rezoning Request Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 10:02:20 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. TO: Virginia Beach Planning Commissioners I write to ask you to vote NO on the rezoning request made by developers Harrison & Lear (H&L) to rezone and build homes on the dormant Signature Golf Course that is located within the Villages at West Neck community. The area at stake is presently zoned Preservation 1. As you well know, this area was part of the agreement to build West Neck Village and provide green space for ONLY our community. These stipulations were not temporary or discretionary; they were codified within the Planned Development (PD-H) zoning and recorded in public documents, obligating all subsequent property owners. The current owner acquired the property with full disclosure or should have exercised due diligence regarding these restrictions. In comes H&L who intends to build 143 homes on a portion of that area. 54 of those homes are designated to be 53 feet from the edge of our home (or 50 ft as H&L plans from our property line) and include a multi use path that will be inside that same distance. It is my understanding that you plan to walk the property re: the proposal this week. I'd respectfully ask that you pay particular attention to our home at 2629 Majesty and the adjoining home and note the proximity to the development plans of Harrison and Lear. The attempt to develop this property is not new to you. Harrison and Lear 2025 proposal was opposed by the Virginia Beach Planning Department, which cited that the change did not align with the existing land-use recommendations and the proposal was withdrawn. This is the same piece of property but in a much smaller footprint. This time with the promise of less density and stormwater management. First the density issue, the current attempt is including 143 units in a smaller footprint. With 53 of those homes to be crammed into an area on former hole 17 along with a new through street that traverses 17 and leads to another 10 homes on one end and 36 on the other end. Also that street will quickly become a shortcut through the neighborhood for any and all traffic through West Neck Village. Does that sound like it's less dense to you??? No, it is placing another community inside of our community so that they can enjoy the benefits of what our community members have paid for and disrupt our lives for years to come. The President of H&L has said that road planning and construction for this area will be 1-2 years while home construction will begin after the road is complete and last 2-5 years. That's 7 years of disruption 50 feet from property lines. Further, the addition of more pavement and more concrete slabs will add to a storm water problem that we are currently facing in our neighborhood and specifically in the area in which they plan to build thus creating more water issues for us and water for people buying the package that H&L is selling. This time they are offering a "conservation area" that will belong to the same absentee owner that is presently trying his best to not tend to what he owns through court proceedings and defiance. Will that change? I doubt it. Property value...when we bought our homes on the golf course we all paid premiums to live on the golf course. Our homes were designed to accentuate the views of the golf course, not another neighborhood and into the kitchens of those residences. In closing, I ask that you maintain the Preservation (P-1) zoning for this area of the TA/ITA portion of our city by VOTING NO to this request for rezoning. Thank you for your time and consideration of this letter. Donna Scott 2629 Majesty Lane Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Donna Scott 757/285-7405 From: Sherry Walker To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: Annie Haley Subject: Signature at West Neck Property Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 7:06:30 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To whom it may concern, I am one of the original homeowners at the Signature at West Neck villages. I have lived in my home adjacent to the golf course property for over 20 years enjoying the lakeside and golf course view along with a variety of waterfowl and wildlife that visit the lakes on the property. The proposed development by Harrison and Lear is of great concern to me. We have dense housing in this community and the roads connecting the villages are heavily travelled. How will the addition of 140+ homes affect traffic in the community? Access management is a big concern due to limited entry and exit points to the community. One entrance off Indian River Rd, one thru Courthouse Estates and the main entrance via West Neck Road which is now in competition with the new housing development across the road and traffic to and from Kellam High School. The lakes on the golf course are fed by storm drains. There have been times in the past when we have had a very wet fall followed by a Nor'easter or passing hurricane and the lakes cannot hold all the rainfall. The water has backed up into the roads in the community. How will the addition of 140+ homes affect the drainage? Will we have flooding in our neighborhood like others do in Virginia Beach? Construction and utility vehicles will add even more traffic moving on the narrow roads and traffic circle. Add to this this inconveniences the noise and dirt and disruption to our daily lives this large project will create for several years. What about the long-term management of the amenities, including the 9-hole golf course, that are being promised? Who will pay for that? Much of this neighborhood is age 55 and up with people living on retire ment/fixed incomes. Raising our dues to pay for additional amenities was not in the plan when we purchased homes here. I sincerely hope the city managers will consider all aspects of this proposal and how will affect not just The Signature at West Neck villages but other areas beyond the supposed green line. Please do not open the door to even more development in the remaining rural and farming areas of the city. We need buffers and green space. Sherry Walker 3000 Egyptian Lane Virginia Beach, VA 23456 From: Lee Dise To: Plannina Commissioners Subject: Subject:Harrison&Lear Rezoning Application for West Neck Date: Friday,February 6,2026 12:33:40 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission: I am writing to you as a resident of West Neck' s Browningstone condo development to express my opposition to the proposed rezoning of the West Neck community. The West Neck community was built around a golf course to make the development as attractive to homebuyers as possible. When we bought our condo here, eight years ago, I couldn' t have asked for a more beautiful and livable community. Not long afterward, unfortunately, the golf course went bankrupt. However, the word around here is that offers were made by other golf course developers that could have revitalized our own golf course. From my perspective, that would be the ideal -- and I 'd hazard a guess that most of the other residents ' perspectives are congruent with mine. I think the proposed development, seeking to cram 143 new residences into one of the former fairways, would be at odds with the aesthetics that were built into the original design, in terms of crowding, and in terms of straining the existing infrastructure. The residents would need to endure the sounds and the dust and grit of new construction for years, which is something that current residents never bargained for when we bought into our West Neck homes . We bought our homes confident that the City of Virginia Beach had planned this area as a golfing community which would serve for years to maintain our property values . Aesthetic value is not just a luxury. It ' s insurance in a sense, because people want to live in nice homes and nice communities . Construction noises and overcrowding will pose some threat, possibly very serious threat, to home values . I 've been following Zillow's estimates of our own condo' s value. It ' s discouraging. Appreciation was quite rapid during our earlier years in West Neck, but since then has ground to a halt. It's easy to see why. The former golf course is now choked with great thickets of ugly weeds . Public demand for a vista of weeds is never going to be a selling point. When we bought into West Neck, we bargained neither for weed fields nor an overcrowded neighborhood. I think the City is obligated to help protect the home values for which the buyers bargained. Many of those buyers paid thousands of extra dollars for a view of the golf course. The weeds and the growing sense of uncertainty about the future of the neighborhoods detract from homeowners ' equity. This situation devalues the investments in our homes, and the problem compounds with every year of uncertainty. It' s the worst kind of tax. I ask that the planning commission remember and honor the bargain that they struck with West Neck homebuyers, and say no to the proposed new home development plan. Sincerely, Lee Dise 2720 Sonnet Lane Virginia Beach, VA 23456 From: Sheila Wilson To: Plannina Commissioners Subject: The Harrison&Lears Rezoning Application Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 10:15:53 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am a 13-year resident of Browningstone Village at West Neck and I am writing to ask you to please Vote for Disapproval of The Harrison & Lears Rezoning ARRUcafion. I am retired and I moved into this most beautiful and tranquil West Neck community in June 2012. Like most of my neighbors, I anticipate living out my final years here in West Neck. A great many of us here, my neighbors and friends, are in our 70s, 80s, and 90s. The prospect of having to face living through five to seven years (possibly 10 with unanticipated delays), with ongoing daily construction disruptions, noise, congestion, traffic and the increased density within the community shatters any possibility of a peaceful existence. Many of us, unfortunately, may not have five-plus years and it would be a great disservice to us if we had to face whatever time we have left with the anticipated disruptions that will occur if this proposed development is allowed to move forward. This is not a comforting prospect and would be extremely disruptive and harmful to many of us, mentally and physically. Please consider the impact, and despair this type of situation would have on one of your own older family members and then consider us and Vote for Disapproval of The Harrison& Lears Rezoning Application, Pleasell! Thank you for your kind consideration, for your support and for your service to this community and The City of Virginia Beach. Sincerely, Sheila A. Wilson Resident, Browningstone From: Pamela Comevne To: Plannino Commissioners Subject: Vote no on rezoning West Neck Date: Friday,February 6,2026 11:40:45 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Leadership, I live in West Neck in Wordsworth. I am writing to ask you to vote no on rezoning the land on the former Signature golf course. I am concerned that changing the zoning will forever change the quiet, safe, and peaceful community I chose to live in. Living in Wordsworth with the only way in and out on Cadence makes me very worried about the added traffic and construction. The only way out of Wordsworth is on Cadence. I am asking you to vote no on rezoning. Sincerely, Pam Comeyne Wordsworth The Villages of West Neck From: Responsible Growth VB To: Planning Commissioners:City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;City Manager Citizen Inguiry:Kathy M. Warren Subject: Vote no on West Neck rezoning application by property owners JBWK LLC&WHITE CLOVER LLC. Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 2:48:55 PM CAUTION;This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leaders, I am a resident of West Neck(Browningstone)and I am writing to urge you to vote NO on the proposed rezoning at West Neck due to its broader implications for land-use planning across Virginia Beach. The community's existing housing density was approved with the understanding that the golf course land would remain preserved open space. Removing that open space to add new homes would push density beyond what was originally justified. Please note that the golf course was used to justify the current density in the West Neck community. In addition, rezoning this site would also undermine the longstanding Transition Area rules. Allowing preserved land to be rezoned after the fact sets a dangerous precedent that threatens preservation areas citywide. Lastly, the residents of West Neck are all senior citizens and to subject us to this project is totally out of line as it relates to our health and well-being. Please vote NO and uphold long-standing planning commitments. Thank you. David Darden Sincerely, David Darden District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth From: NICK ROSS To: City Council;Planning Commissioners Subject: Vote NO to rezoning Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 1:44:48 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor and City Leadership, I am a resident of West Neck, and I am writing to respectfully urge you to oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck golf course. West Neck homeowners purchased their homes with a clear expectation about density, traffic, environmental buffers, and quality of life. Rezoning this property would fundamentally alter the character of our community and break the trust residents placed in the City when these plans were originally approved. The existing zoning already allows for reasonable use of the property. Increasing density beyond what was promised brings unavoidable consequences -- traffic congestion, strain on infrastructure, environmental impacts, and reduced safety for residents, pedestrians, and first responders. A strong majority of West Neck residents have consistently expressed opposition to rezoning. This opposition is not rooted in resistance to change but in a desire for thoughtful, predictable planning that respects existing neighborhoods. I respectfully ask that you listen to the residents who live her and vote NO on any rezoning request for West Neck. Thank for your time and service to our city. Sincerely Linda A Ross Nicholas J Ross Wordsworth Village The Villages of West Neck From: Bill Taylor To: City Council;Planning Commissioners Subject: West Neck Community Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 2:52:02 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor and/or City Leadership, live in The Villages of West Neck, and I am asking you to vote no on any rezoning proposal affecting our community. This is not an abstract planning issue for us—it directly affects how we live every day. Increased density will mean more traffic on roads that are already strained, longer emergency response times, and reduced safety for families, seniors, and pedestrians. Many of us chose West Neck because it offered a balance of nature, open space, and carefully planned development. Rezoning the golf course property would permanently disrupt that balance and diminish the quality of life we were promised. Residents have attended meetings, written letters, and spoken out repeatedly. The message has been clear and consistent: we do not support rezoning. Please respect the voices of the people who live here and will bear the consequences of this decision long after the developers are gone. I urge you to stand with residents and protect the integrity of West Neck by rejecting rezoning. Respectfully William Taylor Blue Lake Village From: Dave Browne To: City Council:Planning Commissioners Subject: West Neck Rezoning Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 10:38:23 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor and City Leadership, I live in the Villages of West Neck and I am asking you to vote NO on any rezoning proposal affecting our community. This is not an abstract planning issue for us; it directly affects how we live every day. Increased density will mean more traffic on roads that are already strained, longer emergency response times, and reduced safety for families, senior citizens, and pedestrians. Many of use chose West Neck because it offered a balance of nature, open space, and carefully planned development. Rezoning the golf course property would permanently disrupt that balance and quality of life we were promised . Residents have attended meetings,written letters, and spoken out repeatedly. The message has been consistent and clear :: we do not support rezoning. Please respect the voices of the people who live here and will bear the consequences long after Harrison and Lear are gone. The idea of a 9-hole course is both ludicrous and minor league. I urge you to stand with residents and protect the integrity of West Neck by voting NO on rezoning. Respectfully, Dave Browne of The Villages of West Neck From: Jackson Browne To: City Council; Planning Commissioners Subject: West Neck rezoning Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 1:58:28 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor and City Leadership, I am a resident of West Neck, and I am writing to respectfully urge you to oppose any rezoning of the former Signature at West Neck golf course. West Neck homeowners purchase their homes with a clear expectation about density, traffic, environmental buffers, and quality of life. Rezoning this property would fundamentally alter the character of our community and break the trust residents placed in the City when these plans were originally approved. The existing zoning alreadyallows for reasonable use of the property. Increasing density beyondwhat was promised brings unavoidable consequences—traffc congestion, strain on infrastructure, environmental impacts, and reduced safety for residents, pedestrians, and first responders. A strong majority of West Neck residents have consistently expressed opposition to rezoning. This opposition is not rooted in resistance to change, but in a desire for thoughtful, predictable planning that respects existing neighborhoods. I respectfully ask that you listen to the residents who live here and vote no on any rezoning request for West Neck. Thank you for your time and service to our city. Sincerely, Jackson Davis Blue Lake Village The Villages of West Neck From: allallen To: Planning Commissioners Cc: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: West Neck/Signature rezoning Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 5:28:08 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Leadership I live in The Villages of West Neck and am writing to you to vote no on any rezoning proposal affecting our community. This is not an abstract planning issue for us — it directly affects how we live every day. Increased density will mean more traffic on roads that are already strained, longer emergency response times, and reduced safety for families, seniors, and pedestrians. Many of us chose West Neck because it offered a balance of nature, open space, and carefully planned development for Seniors. Rezoning the golf course property would permanently disrupt that balance and diminish the quality of life we were promised. Residents have attended meetings, written letters and spoken out repeatedly. The message has been clear and consistent: we do not support rezoning. Please respect the voices of the people who live here and will bear the consequences of this decision. I urge you to stand with residents and protect the integrity of West Neck by rejecting rezoning. Sincerely, Thomas Allen allallen@cox.net Carrollton Village The Villages of West Neck From: Gretchen Allen To: Planning Commissioners Cc: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: West Neck/Signature Rezoning Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 5:19:31 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia y g nia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe Dear City Leadership I live in The Villages of West Neck and am writing to you to vote no on any rezoning proposal affecting our community. This is not an abstract planning issue for us — it directly affects how we live every day. Increased density will mean more traffic on roads that are already strained, longer emergency response times, and reduced safety for families, seniors, and pedestrians. Many of us chose West Neck because it offered a balance of nature, open space, and carefully planned development for Seniors. Rezoning the golf course property would permanently disrupt that balance and diminish the quality of life we were promised. Residents have attended meetings, written letters and spoken out repeatedly. The message has been clear and consistent: we do not support rezoning. Please respect the voices of the people who live here and will bear the consequences of this decision. I urge you to stand with residents and protect the integrity of West Neck by rejecting rezoning. Sincerely, Gretchen Allen alacarteevents4u@cox.net Carrollton Village The Villages of West Neck From: MARCI RUSH To: City Council;Marchelle L.Coleman;Holly Cuellar;John Cromwell; Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt; Kaitlen S. Alcock Subject: Preserve at West Neck formerly Signature Golf Course Date: Monday,November 17,2025 2:48:24 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. My name is Marci Rush and I live in the Villages of West Neck (Wordsworth) for the last 15 years. I am writing to express my support of the proposal by Harrison and Lear for the former Signature Golf Course at West Neck Golf Course. Sincerely, Marci Rush 2857 Rose Garden Way, VB, VA. 23456 From: Amy Heldman To: Marchelle L.Coleman;Holly Cuellar:John Cromwell:Kathy M.Warren:CbrookholCa ybgov.oM Kaitlen S.Alcock; Cirvcouncil(alvbaov.com Subject: IRP-West Neck Golf Leishman/Lear Project Date: Sunday,November 16,2025 12:28:56 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good afternoon, I am a resident of Indian River Plantation and I am writing to you to show my full support in moving forward with the Leishman/Lear proposal for reinstating a golf course and single- family neighborhood where the previous Arnold Palmer golf course was in the Indian River Plantation and West Neck neighborhoods. This plan is a win-win situation for our neighborhoods and the city of Virginia Beach by providing an additional senior living development And a par three course and regulation nine hole course. I encourage you to vote yes with the plans for this project. Sincerely, Amy and Robert Fieldman 3104 Stonewood Dr From: Ira Starlino To: City Council;Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Fw:Support for the Harrison Lear/Leishman Golf Course Plan Date: Wednesday,November 12,2025 10:05:46 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To whom it may concern: My name is Ira Carroll Starling. My wife and live in Wordsworth Village in West Neck. We are writing to express our support of the Harrison and Lear proposal for the former Signature at West Neck golf course. ICS -�-�-��--�- `..�, '-�-'-,��,`''..� ram--' �. ��,� � ��--�.�-�--2 tea-- r--�--, r-,�,�.,�-� � �,$-- '�_, � --tea-- �-�c� ��� .sue 6/ -l/ From: MARCI RUSH To: City Council;Holly Cuellar; Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: The Preserve Golf Course Plans Date: Sunday,December 14,2025 8:04:18 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am a 15 year home owner who lives on hole number six of the former Signature Golf Course. I am in favor of the new plans that the Leishman Family are part of, rather than continue to live with weeds in my face and fear of fire. Sotar started out as a reasonable way to try and bring back Signature but has turned over the years into a threatening, bullying small group of people calling out people as traitors or employees of the developer in open board meetings if they do not agree with them. These elderly owners are truly afraid of this group, its heartbreaking to watch them sit in silence afraid to speak. Please don't make your decision on the outspoken Sotar but the safety and beauty of West Neck and what the silenced community wants. Sincerely, Marci Rush 2857 Rose Garden Way From: Marie Grindle To: Walter Camp;John Cromwell;Michael Anderson; Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover;Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hiooen; Holly Cuellar;John H.Coston; Neena Moodani; Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L.Coleman;Kathy M. Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt; Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Proposed Nine Hole Golf Course at Indian River Plantation Date: Saturday,January 10,2026 12:49:38 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments € unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To Members of The Virginia Beach Planning Commission„ I am writing in support of the proposed nine hole golf course and par three course with limited housing development on the remainder of the property now owned by Harrison and Lear. My husband and I are residents of West Neck and we are both golfers. We miss having a golf course so conveniently close. A 9 hole course would be perfect as we get older. Please consider approving the proposal being presented to the Council and the Planning Commission. Respectfully, CHuck and Marie brindle 2973 Enchanting Circle From: Amy Fieldman To: Walter Camp;John Cromwell;Michael Anderson;Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover;man Plumlee;Susan B.Hippen;Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani;Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L.Coleman:Kathy M. Warren:Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Golf Course-Indian River Plantation Date: Saturday,January 10,2026 7:29:18 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Planning Committee Members, My name is Amy Fieldman. I am the owner of 3104 Stonewood Dr in Indian River Plantation. I am writing in support of the application by Harrison&Lear, Inc. for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive, formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Amy Fieldman 3104 Stonewood Dr Virginia Beach, Virginia 23456 Email: abfieldman2003agmail.com From: Judi Dewhurst To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Beducchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth $emit;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp:John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Byler;Katherine C.Schoonover: Bryan Plumlee:Susan B.Hippen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Moopani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: The Preserve at West Neck Proposal Date: Monday,January 12,2026 5:59:57 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Ms.Coleman, I am a resident of Indian River Plantation writing in support of the application by Harrison&Lear,Inc.for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive. I believe this proposal benefits the community and represents a thoughtful use of the property. It brings back a very viable solution to the Signature Golf Course situation that has now entered the 7th year of deterioration.This proposal brings in four things: 1.Restore a golf course. 2.More housing for VA Beach. 3.More dedicated green space 4.Increased tax revenue for the city. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Mark and Judi Dewhurst 2788 Nestlebrook Trail From: tscott.6(dkox.net To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp;John Cromwell; Michael Anderson;Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hppen;Holly Cuellar;John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani;Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L. Coleman;Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt; Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Signature Golf Course Proposal Date: Monday,January 12,2026 7:25:39 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council members, Planning Commission members,and staff, 1 am writing to express my support for the new Signature at West Neck development plan. My wife and I have been Indian River Plantation (IRP) residents for 22 years and live on the golf course. Until I retired (last year), I was an executive for local companies, including Lillian Vernon,Spiegel, Dollar Tree, and STIHL. I'm sure you must factor many things into your decision on this matter, many of which I am probably not aware of. I'm going to share what I think is a unique perspective on some considerations. I say my perspective is unique because: • 1 was a member of the IRP HOA,two-person golf course committee and was therefore involved in things at the ground level. • 1 quit that group in order to assemble a team to make a proposal to owner David LaClair to partner with us to bring back an 18-hole course.That team included the Leishman's. 0 1 am one of only a handful of people who have spoken to David LaClair(recently)to get his perspective. Based on my experience, I share with you the following observations and assertions. Summary Assertions • West Neck leader's actions scuttled a decent opportunity to restore an 18-hole course. • Their wholly antagonistic approach to the owner from the very beginning backed him into a corner, and he will never agree to a course bordering West Neck Property. • IRP residents should not pay the price for their misguided actions. • Most IRP residents are in favor of the new proposal based on three sample surveys I conducted (details below). • A 9-hole course and development is a far better option than guaranteeing the property will stay as is for decades. • A few current and former HOA leaders'strong personal opinions do not represent most residents. • Density and construction considerations are less significant than having to live with the property as is for decades. DETAILS West Neck Leaders Actions I believe it was likely we could have restored an 18-hole course,were it not for the actions of a few West Neck leaders and residents.They took an uninformed, miscalculated,and frankly, stupid approach, and never adjusted course. • LaClair said he was open to restoring the course in the beginning. He was even mowing the lawn when he didn't have to make restoration easier. • He says he became resistant and defensive because of the way West Neck residents treated him. From his point of view: o They never approached him to discuss his position or options. o They were immediately antagonistic. ■ At the outset, 19 residents began a coordinated email campaign, sending LaClair daily emails threatening lawsuits. ■ He said he would put up fences so they wouldn't have grounds for a lawsuit if they didn't stop. ■ 15 or 16 stopped;those that didn't got a fence after another warning. o They sued him multiple times and lost. • They helped persuade the city to sue. • They were party to multiple "bad press"events. o A West Neck leader went to the press after the fire and told them the City advised him that he could try to convene a grand jury to declare the property a nuisance. • LaClair was told West Neck leaders were intent on making his life so miserable that he would have no choice but to sell the property or restore the 18-hole course. LaClair's Actions • LaClair could have been more empathetic about the impact his actions were having on all the IRP and West Neck residents and overlooked the actions of a few West Neck leaders orfound a better wayto deal with them. He is no saint in this matter. • He appeared to be dealing in good faith with the group I was part of until the fire/press event.We may never have come to terms, but it seemed highly possible that we would, and at that point in time, he was open to an 18-hole course. • Upon learning a West Neck leader went to the city and press, LaClair,through his attorney told us that even though we had been great to work with, he was ending his involvement because Mr. Luckman's latest actions were the"straw that broke the camel's back",and that"Tom Luckman would never get a golf course." Key Assertions—Golf Course • Some West Neck residents are upset that IRP will get a course and they won't. I say that is a condition of their own making,or at least the making of their leaders that the others will have to live with. • IRP residents should not be disadvantaged because of the reckless and misguided actions of West Neck leaders. • IRP leadership and residents did nothing to antagonize LaClair and only came up with solutions to work with him. • The course restoration group I mentioned was doing all it could to give the residents of both communities the benefit of a course.After seeing everything West Neck leaders did to scuttle those efforts, I have no sympathy for them not getting a course. Key Assertions—IRP Response • A few former and current HOA board members have publicly stated their position against the new proposal. • 1 assert that even though they are vocal,their views are personal and don't represent the overall wishes of the community.Several IRP residents have told me they are concerned about their views being misrepresented because of the board status of this small group. 0 A previous survey,with a high response rate, showed over 95%of respondents wanted an 18-hole course instead of a 9-hole course.There was a lot of influence begging that response,and it was taken before becoming convinced that 9-holes is the best LaClair will do. • 1 wanted 18 holes and signed the petition, but after talking to LaClair and considering his commitments, I am fully convinced he will leave the property as it is and will never build an 18-hole course. It will sit as is for decades. Given that option, I am now all for the 9- hole proposal. • 1 have taken 3 informal polls of residents. My polls comprised asking everyone to at the same time (to avoid groupthink)to hold up fingers from 0 to 5,where 0 meant totally against the new proposal and 5 meant totally for it. I did my best to ask objectively without begging the question. Here are the results. o A pickleball group of about 25 people: Estimated response average—4.75;almost all 5's and nothing below 4. • A resident dinner group of about 25 people: Estimated response average—4.5; almost all 5's and nothing below 4. • Approximately 10 of my direct neighbors:All are in favor. I didn't do 0-5 because I spoke with them individually. • Even though that survey was not totally scientific, it was a decent sample size, and I believe it represents the view of the majority of IRP residents. • My experience in data science suggests that people against something are far more likely to write emails than people who are for it. I hope you factor that into your considerations. I recognize there are additional issues about density and construction. I think those issues are less significant than the prospect of both communities living with the property in its current condition for at least the next two decades. Please vote to approve the new proposal. Sincerely, Tom Scott 757-323-4677 3161 Stonewood Drive From: Kimberly Burnette To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Harrison&Lear,Inc. Date: Tuesday,January 13,2026 11:16:34 AM Attachments: email draft ootions.dooc CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. January 13. 2026 Ms. Marchelle Coleman Planning Evaluation Coordinator City of Virginia Beach mcoleman@vbgov.com Ms. Coleman, My name is Kimberly Burnette, and I live at 2608 Willowlawn Way in Indian River Plantation. I am familiar with the application submitted by Harrison & Lear, Inc. regarding the property at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive. I am writing to share my support for this request. I see this proposal as a positive step that brings renewed purpose to the property while respecting nearby neighborhoods. Thank you for considering resident input. Kind regards Kimberly Burnette kimberlyburnette@live.com Sent from my Whone From: Zhuo r Jie To: Marchelle L.Coleman;David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley:Michael Beducchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond; Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick:Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green:Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua P.Schulman; Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office:Walter Camp:John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn DykG Katherine C.Schoonover;Bryan Plumlee:Susan B.Hippen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani; Michael C.Mauch:Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Preserve at West Neck Date: Tuesday,January 13,2026 8:09:16 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Ms. Coleman, My name is Yijie Dooley. I am the owner of the property located at 2621 Willowlawn Way in Indian River Plantation. I am writing in support of the application by Harrison&Lear, Inc. for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive, formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I see this proposal as a positive step that brings renewed purpose to the property while respecting nearby neighborhoods. Thank you for considering resident input. Sincerely, Yijie Dooley 2621 Willowlawn Way, Indian River Plantation zvi 199 gmail_com From: Robert Fieldman To: Marchelle L.Coleman:Holly Cuellar:John Cromwell:Kathy M.Warren:CbrookhoK@Ybaoy.m=Kaitlen 5.Alcock: CIrycounCllna ybaoy.com Subject: IRP-West Neck Golf Leishman/Lear Project Date: Wednesday,January 14,2026 3:46:54 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good afternoon, I am a resident of Indian River Plantation and I am writing to you to show my full support in moving forward with the Leishman/Lear proposal for reinstating a golf course and single- family neighborhood where the previous Arnold Palmer golf course was in the Indian River Plantation and West Neck neighborhoods. This plan is a win-win situation for our neighborhoods and the City of Virginia Beach by providing an additional senior living development And a par three course and regulation nine hole course. I encourage you to vote yes with the plans for this project. Sincerely, Amy and Robert Fieldman 3104 Stonewood Dr January 19, 2026 Ms. Marchelle Coleman Planning Evaluation Coordinator City of Virginia Beach mcoleman@vbgov.com Dear Ms. Coleman, My husband and I have been residents of the Villages at West Neck for the past three years. I am writing in support of the application by Harrison and Lear, Inc. for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive. I am familiar with the application and have attended presentations by Jonathan Skinner as well as Audrey and Marc Leislunann.The most recent proposal represents a thoughtful and welcome compromise that will benefit West Neck, Indian River Plantation, and the surrounding community. hnportantly,the proposal will restore golf to the area, which was the original goal of many residents who opposed earlier plans. In addition, the development will revitalize a long-standing eyesore that residents have endured for the past six years. The project offers a positive path forward that balances development with community interests. The additional homes will provide increased revenue for the city, while the enhanced landscaping and open areas will create a beautiful environment for residents to walk,bike, and enjoy the community we are fortunate to call home. Thank you for your time and consideration, and for your support of this application. Sincerely, 94,,� •6l Susan B. Cox 2948 Elegance Lane Virginia Beach,VA 23456 cinchome55@gniail.com From: Michael Sabourin To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Preserve at West Neck Date: Sunday,January 25,2026 4:33:07 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Ms. Coleman, I am an owner/resident at Browningstone Village Condominiums at West Neck and I support the project Preserve at West Neck with the restoration of nine holes of golf of the former Signature course. I have reviewed the proposal in detail. I fully understand that there will be some short term inconveniences that come with the construction phase of this project. I am willing to bear with that in order to enjoy the final outcome that will have a positive impact by restoring much of the lost luster of West Neck. My support is firmly based on the restoration of golf to West Neck and the commitment by Harrison and Lear to cleanup the atrocious overgrowth on the remaining undeveloped portions of the former Signature course. If the city of Virginia Beach is as confident as I am that the Leishman's will follow through with their portions of the project and the developers meet all of the planning requirements, then let's move forward and make the necessary approvals. Please forward this to all of our city staff and government involved in the application approval process. R/ Michael T Sabourin 2764 Browning Drive Browningstone Village Condominiums From: Anaela Osbv To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Beducchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick:Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office:Walter Camp:John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Byler;Katherine C.Schoonover: Bryan Plumlee:Susan B.Hiooen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 11:19:38 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. January 26,2026 Dear Members of the Planning Commission,City Council,and Staff, My name is Angela Osby.I live in Courthouse Estates,near the property at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive. I am writing to express my support for the proposed project submitted by Harrison and Lear.The land has sat unused for years,and I believe this plan brings a responsible and productive useto the site while benefiting nearby neighborhoods. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Angela Osby 757-282-1608 Courthouse Estates From: Gagan"s Gmail To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley; Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick;Cal"Cash'Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp;John Cromwell:Michael Anderson;Kathryn Bvler,Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hippen;Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L. Coleman;Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 12:22:32 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Gagan Grewal.I live at2701 Nestlebrook trail in Indian River Plantation. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I want to see the property maintained and golf restored to our area. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Gagan Grewal Address 2701 Nestlebrook trail Email gagangrewa11975@gmail.com Sent from my iPhone From: Fern Bass To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick:Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr. Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Cam;;John Cromwell;Michael Anderson;Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B. Hi;;en;Holly Cuellar;John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch; Marchelle L. Coleman Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt; Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 12:29:16 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Fern Bass.I live at 2596 Nestlebrook Trail in Indian River Plantation. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I want to see the property maintained and golf restored to our area. Thank you for your time and consideration. Fern Bass 2596 Nestlebrook Trail Virginia Beach,Va.23456 Winmets@cox.net Sent from my iPhone From: ASHLEY L CHILDERS To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remgck;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummins Jr,;Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camo:John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee:Susan B.Hiooen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 12:34:24 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission, City Council Members, and Staff, My name is Ashley Childers. I live at 2053 Quincy Way in Ashville Park. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive, formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities. I would like to see the property maintained and golf restored in our area again Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Ashley Childers Get Outlook for iOS Disclaimer: This electronic message and its contents and attachments contain information from Sentara Health and is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error,please notify us immediately and destroy the original message and all copies. From: heather stclair To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;icy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp:John Cromwell; Michael Anderson;Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover,- Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hippen:Holly Cuellar.John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch; Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 12:37:53 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Heather StClair.I live at_2857 Camarillo Lane_in Virginia Beach. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I would like to see the property maintained and golf restored in our area again Thank you for your time and consideration, Heather StClair Swell Real Estate Co. 757.416.4587 From: Anitha Gowda To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth RemiLk,Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulm=Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp;John Cromwell; Michael Anderson;Kathryn Byler; Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hippen;Holly Cuellar.John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch; Marchelle L. Coleman;Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 12:40:32 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Anitha Gowda .I live at in Indian River Plantation. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I want to see the property maintained and golf restored to our area. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Anitha gowda 2536 Greystone Street Virginia Beach VA 23456 Address Email anithashantraj@yahoo.com Anitha Gowda From: Jayne Luna To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond; Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp;John Cromwell:Michael Anderson;Kathryn Bvler,Katherine C.Schoonover, Bryan Plumlee;Susan B. Hiooen;Holly Cuellar John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani;Michael C.Mauch; Marchelle L. Coleman;Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 12:42:56 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Jayne Luna .I live at_2205 Lynx DR in Virginia Beach. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I would like to see the property maintained and golf restored in our area again Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Jayne Luna 2205 Lynx DR Jayneluna@verizon.net Sent from my iPhone From: CYNTHIA M GONZALEZ To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond; Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse; City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camo;John Cromwell;Michael Anderson; Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B. Hiooen;Holly Cuellar;John H.Coston; Neena Mooriani;Michael C.Mauch; Marchelle L. Coleman; Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt; Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 12:43:56 PM CAUTION;This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Cynthia Gonzalez. I live at 2612 Nestlebrook Trail in Indian River Plantation. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities. I want to see the property maintained and golf restored to our area. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Cynthia M. Gonzalez, D.O. Medical Director for Sentara PACE W 757.252.7800 1 F 757.390.4351 Chat with me in Teams Sentara, Disclaimer: This electronic message and its contents and attachments contain information from Sentara Health and is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us immediately and destroy the original message and all copies. From: Seema To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick;Cal"Cash'Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camo;John Cromwell:Michael Anderson;Kathryn Byler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hiooen;Holly Cuellar John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch; Marchelle L. Coleman;Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Cc: Joshua Miranda Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 12:49:32 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Seema Chawla Miranda and live at 2625 Willowlawn Way in Indian River Plantation. I and my husband Josh are writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I want to see the property maintained and golf restored to our area. The reason we moved to this neighborhood in 2020 was because of the golf course and it was a major disappointment when it stopped operating. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Seema&Josh Miranda 2625 Willowlawn way Virginia Beach VA 23456 Seema9779@gmail.com Joshua.miranda@gmail.com Sent from my iPhone From: Heather Courtriaht To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth $emjcck Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office:Walter Camp:John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover: Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hippen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman;Kathy M.Warren:Carrie L.Bookholt Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 12:53:42 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission, City Council Members, and Staff, My name is Heather Courtright. I live at 2629 Willowlawn Way in Indian River Plantation. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive, formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities. I want to see the property maintained and golf restored to our area. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely Heather Courtright 2629 Willowlawn Way, Virginia Beach,VA 23456 HEC 122310(a GMAIL._COM From: Charles Youna To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick:Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp John Cromwell:Michael Anderson;Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B. Hippen;Holly Cuellar;John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch; Marchelle L. Coleman;Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 1:22:58 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Charles Young and I live at 2037 Channing Ln in Ashville Park.I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I would like to see the property maintained and golf restored in our area again Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Charles Young 2037 Charming Ln Virginia Beach,VA 23456 bamachuck27@yahoo.com Sent from my iPhone From: Debra Pence To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Beducchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick:Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp;John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hippen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 1:34:25 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. January_26_,2026 Dear Members of the Planning Commission,City Council,and Staff, My name is_Debra_Pence .I live in Courthouse Estates near the property at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive. I am writing to express my support for the proposed project submitted by Harrison and Lear.The land has sat unused for years,and I believe this plan brings a responsible and productive useto the site while benefiting nearby neighborhoods. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, _Debra Pence Courthouse Estates Email Sent from my iPhone From: Rhonda Mixer To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp:John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hippen:Holly Cuellar;John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani;Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L. Coleman;Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 1:41:01 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Rhonda Mixer.I live at 2501 Calumet Drive in Indian River Plantation. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I have fond memories of the old golf course and would love for my family to be able to enjoy the space again. Sincerely, Rhonda Mixer Rhonda Mixer 2501 Calumet Drive,VB VA 23456 rhondamixer@gmail.com Sent from my iPhone From: Clay Stephens To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Beducchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond:Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummins Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virainia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp:John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover: Bryan Plumlee:Susan B.Hippen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 1:41:59 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Clayton Stephens.I live at 2704 Sonnet Lane in the West Neck Villages. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I want to see the property maintained and golf restored to our area. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Clayton Stephens 2704 Sonnet Lane clay471@grnail.com Sent from my iPad From: Joseph Diferdinando To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camo:John Cromwell: Michael Anderson;Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hiooen;Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L. Coleman;Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 1:43:08 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Joseph Diferdinando.I live at 2049 Channing lane in Ashville Park.I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I would like to see the property maintained and golf restored in our area again Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Joseph Diferdinando 2049 Channing lane Virginia Beach Virginia 23456 Jd684099@gmail.com Sent from my iPhone From: Brittany Howe To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camo;John Cromwell;Michael Anderson;Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hiooen;Holly Cuellar.John H.Coston;Neena Moorjani;Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 1:43:10 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. January 26,2026 Dear Members of the Planning Commission,City Council,and Staff, My name is Brittany Howe.I five in Ocean Lakes but work in Indian River Plantation,near the property at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive. I am writing to express my support for the proposed project submitted by Harrison and Lear.The land has sat unused for years,and I believe this plan brings a responsible and productive useto the site while benefiting nearby neighborhoods. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Brittany Howe Email:bhowe32189@gmail.com Sent from my iPhone From: Brad Ginn To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond:Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth $c7jgk;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Wafter Camp;John Cromwell;Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hippen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman;Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 1:46:52 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission, City Council Members, and Staff, My name is Brad Ginn. I live at 2053 Grandon Loop Road in Ashville Park. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive, formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities. I would like to see the property maintained and golf restored in our area again Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Brad Ginn 2053 Grandon Loop Rd, Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Email : mrbradginn(a gm� ail com From: Billy To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr,;Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp;John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hippen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren:Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 1:49:00 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission, City Council Members, and Staff, My name is William `Billy' Ennis. I live at 2080 Grandon Loop Road in Ashville Park. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive, formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities. I would like to see the property maintained and golf restored in our area again. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Billy Ennis 2080 Grandon Loop Rd,VB 23456 ennis.bil y79 gmail.com From: Ryan Canter To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Beducchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond:Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp;John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover: Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hippen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman Kathy M.Warren:Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 1:51:46 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission, City Council Members, and Staff, My name is Ryan Canter. I live at 2929 Weston Loop in Ashville Park. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive, formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities. I would like to see the property maintained and golf restored in our area again Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Ryan W Canter 2929 Weston Loop. Virginia Beach,VA 23456 Ryan.Canter@Oceandrywall.com Ryan Canter I Field Superintendent I Ocean Drywall,Inc. 104 Aragona Boulevard Suite 100 1 Virginia Beach, VA 1 23462 1 Office: 757.493.8916 eFax: 757,493,89211 Mobile: 757.803.3712 1 Ryan.Canter@ocean ,rwall.com www.oceandr«uall.com I facebook ( linkedin From: Brandon Pace To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp;John Cromwell; Michael Anderson;Kathryn Bvler,Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hippen;Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston;Neena Moo 'a�ni:Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L. Coleman;Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 1:55:53 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Brandon Pace.I live at 2040 Channing Lane in Ashville Park.I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive, formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I would like to see the property maintained and golf restored in our area again Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Brandon Pace 2040 Charming Lane Bpace@rockebnail.com From: Brent Cowan To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Beducchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond:Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick:Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camo;John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee:Susan B.Hiooen;Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 1:57:03 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is_brent Cowan .I live at_2101 saw mill ct in Virginia Beach. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I would like to see the property maintained and golf restored in our area again Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, _brent Cowan Address Email Brentcowan@heirloomvb.com Sincerely, Brent Cowan Sent from my iPhone,please forgive terseness&typos... From: Josh Viohl To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr,;Joashua F.Schulman,Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camo;John Cromwell:Michael Anderson;Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee:Susan B.Hiooen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaiden S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 2:01:33 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Joshua Viohl.I live at 629 Pelham PL,in Virginia Beach.I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive, formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I would like to see the property maintained and golf restored in our area again Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Joshua Viohl 629 Pelham P1,Va Beach,VA.23452 Jviohl@gmail.com Sent from my iPhone From: Pete Ellard To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley:Michael Berlucchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond:Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick; Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camo;John Cromwell;Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover:Bryan Plumlee;Susan B. i n;Holly Cuellar;John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L.Coleman;Kathy M.Warren:Carrie l.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 2:04:45 PM Attachments: tl- 2r ci 6fa798 d- al-45a0-a8cc- 4 39 d 9O.Dng oicture2 64222b4a-Od64-4348-89c7-579dl414aa20.ona insta 15f46e7a-313f-4leb-b755-b2f245378441.ona twitter 8ed7c897-33a8-4b3d-a927-dc8f7bc8ll7a.12ng linkedin 4425e86f-Saab-45ff-a322-12139c72ea86.Dna youtube 403433b0-4e01-46aa-8317-253a77c4f022.ona CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is pete Ella d .I live at 2516 peaceful lane,23456 in Virginia Beach. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I would like to see the property maintained and golf restored in our area again Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Pete Ellard Address Email t1c Pete Ellard Vice President,Digital the�Ukef15CO171 2800 Shirlington Road,9th Floor t f t R y Arlington,VA 22206 tel:703.845.8484 ext.4080 cell:757.749.2717 --,\ ti^AwthOukenscomnawcom From: Matthew Tonelson To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camo:John Cromwell:Michael Anderson;Kathryn Byler;Katherine C.Schoonover: Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hiooen;Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookho(t:Kaiden S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 2:10:18 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Matt Tonelson .I live at_2829 Weston Loop in Ashville Park.I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I would like to see the property maintained and golf restored in our area again Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Matt Tonelson Address Email Sent from my iPhone From: Mary Ennis To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remic Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office:Walter Camp;John Cromwell:Michael Anderson;Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover: Bryan Plumlee:Susan B.Hippen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coem n•Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 2:26:27 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Catherine Ennis.I live at 2080 Grandon Loop in Ashville Park.I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I would like to see the property maintained and golf restored in our area again Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Catherine Ennis Mary.ennis@vbschools.com Sent from my iPhone From: Tony Gower Jr To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp;John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee:Susan B.Hippen;Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L. Coleman Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitien S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 2:29:47 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Tony Gower Jr.I live at 2897 Weston Loop in Ashville Park.I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive, formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I would like to see the property maintained and golf restored in our area again Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Tony Gower Jr 2897 Weston Loop,Va Beach Tgowerjr@gmail.com January 26, 2026 Ms. Marchelle Coleman Planning Evaluation Coordinator City of Virginia Beach mcolenlanEvvbgov.com Ref: 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive Ms. Coleman, My name is Bill Chitty. I am a resident of the Rosecrest neighborhood in the Villages of West Neck and have lived here for 14 years. I am writing to show my support of the application by Harrison & Lear, Inc. for the renovation of a nine-hole golf course and the development of a new senior living neighborhood. I believe these changes will be a plus for the Villages of West Neck and make the neighborhood as beautiful as it was before the golf course closed. Please consider voting to allow this development to happen for the betterment of Va. Beach. Sincerely, W. E. Chitty II 2940 Elegance Lane wechitty@gmail.com January 27,2026 To: Planning Commissioners Ref: West Neck Preserve My name is Bill Chitty, and I am the owner of the property located at the Rosecrest Neighborhood in the Villages of West Neck. I am writing in support of the application by Harrison & Lear,Inc. for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive, formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, W. E Chitty II 2940 Elegance Lane wechitty@gmail.com From: Brian Wilson To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley; Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp;John Cromwell;Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover: Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hippen:Holly Cuellar John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L. Coleman;Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 3:21:50 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Brian Wilson.I live at 2837 Weston Loop in Ashville Park.I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive, formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I would like to see the property maintained and golf restored in our area again Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Brian Wilson 2837 Weston Loop,Virginia Beach,VA 23456 brwilso23@gmail.com Sent from my iPhone From: Damon Bowers To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond:Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr,;Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office:Walter Camp;John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee:5mc&aJL1hW=Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 4:55:31 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission, City Council Members, and Staff, My name is Damon Bowers . I live at 2217Kirkby Lane_in Virginia Beach. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive, formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities. I would like to see the property maintained and golf restored in our area again Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Damon Bowers 2217 Kirkby Ln,Virginia Beach, VA 23456 bowers.damon4Ugmail.com From: Robert Bradshaw To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp:John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler:Katherine C.Schoonover: Bryan Plumlee:Susan B.Hippen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 5:05:11 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission, City Council Members, and Staff,My name is Robert Bradshaw . I live at 2628 Willowlawn Way in Indian River Plantation. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive, formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities. I want to see the property maintained and golf restored to our area. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, rdbradshaw76@cox.net Address Email From: Lyn Reitano To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick:Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office:Walter Camp;John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Byler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee:Susan B.Hippen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani;Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 10:16:58 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is_Lyn Reitano .I live at 2509 Calumet Drive in Indian River Plantation. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I want to see the property maintained and golf restored to our area. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Lyn Reitano Address.2509 Calumet Drive Va Beach,VA 23456 Email. Lynreitano@gmail.com From: Carol Gehria To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond; Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp;John Cromwell; Michael Anderson;Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover,- Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hippen;Holly Cuellar;John H.Coston; Neena Mooriani;Michael C.Mauch; Marchelle L. Coleman;Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L. Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Tuesday,January 27,2026 4:29:59 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Carol Gehrig_.I live at 2576 Nestlebrook Trail in Indian River Plantation. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I want to see the property maintained and golf restored to our area. Thank you for your service, Carol Gehrig Address:2576 Nestlebrook Trail Email:carolgehrig@hotmail.com Sent from my iPad From: Korinna Chitty To: Marchelle L.Coleman;Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock:David W.Hutcheson:1Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond:Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick:Cal"Cash"Jackson- Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office: Walter Camo;John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover;Bryan Plumlee:Sin B.Hiooen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch Subject: Preserve at West Neck Date: Tuesday,January 27,2026 7:05:22 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. All: It is my pleasure to write this email, in support of The Preserve Development in the West Neck Villages, Virginia Beach. The Preserve is a fabulous solution to the defunct golf course of years past. All renditions, ideas and presentations introduce a beautiful plan for the residents to enjoy for years to come. Harrison& Lear has really set out to work in partnership with the homeowners of West Neck Villages. The owner abandoned Signature Golf Course at West Neck 7 years ago this fall. It was an abrupt physical closure, and our THEN APPOINTED HOA fought like "sticks in the mud" from the very beginning;no collaboration effort was ever put forth. We now have a new board with a NEW FRAME OF MIND! Harrison& Lear has teamed up diligently with the owner, and has presented various concepts; repurposing landscapes that boost biodiversity and build natural sceneries inclusive of a 9-hole golf course. I cannot explain to you how exciting it is to envision the end result; once again fully enjoying our surrounding environment. In conclusion, I fully support the efforts of The Preserve Development. We as a community, need to move forward with sensibility, feasibility, and appreciation. Thank you, Korinna L. Chitty Resident of Rosecrest, West Neck Villages From: TIMOTHY KEATING To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond:Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman,Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp:John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Byler,Katherine C.Schoonover: Bryan Plumlee:Susan B.Hipoen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren:Carrie L.Bookholt:KaMen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 6:28:20 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission, City Council Members, and Staff, My name is TIMOTHY J. KEATING. I live at 3172 STONEWOOD DRIVE in Indian River Plantation. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive, formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities. I want to see the property maintained and golf restored to our area. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, /s/Timothy J. Keating 3172 Stonewood Drive tjkeating@me.com All the Best. Tim Timothy J. Keating Admiral USN(Ret) C 202-615-5148 From: TIMOTHY KMNG To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office:Walter Camp:John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover: Bryan Plumlee:Susan B.Hippen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren:Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Monday,January 26,2026 6:30:45 PM CAUTIORl:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission, City Council Members, and Staff, My name is Wandalee Keating. I live at 3172 Stonewood Drive in Indian River Plantation. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive, formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities. I want to see the property maintained and golf restored to our area. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, /s/Wandalee Keating 3172 Stonewood Drive Wandaleekeating@hotmall.com From: Jan Scott To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp;John Cromwell;Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hiooen;Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch; Marchelle L. Coleman Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Tuesday,January 27,2026 1:05:46 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is_Jan Scott .I live at 3161 Stonewood Dr. in Indian River Plantation. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I want to see the property maintained and golf restored to our area. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Jan Scott 3161 Stonewood Dr. Virginia Beach.23456 jscott.6(a)cox.net Sent from my iPad From: Cheryl Farino To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara3 Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond; Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cumming;Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp;John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Byler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hiooen;Holly Cuellar;John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L. Coleman;Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L. Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Tuesday,January 27,2026 8:59:28 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Edmund Farino I live at 2605 Nestlebrook Trail in Indian River Plantation. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I want to see the property maintained and golf restored to our area. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Edmund Farino 2605 Nestlebrook Trail, Virginia Beach,VA 23456 Farinoce@aol.com Sent from my iPhone From: Tany Hassell To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Support for the Proposed Preserve at West Neck Date: Wednesday,January 28,2026 3:37:38 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am in support for the proposed Preserve at West Neck. I am tired of looking at the unkept property. Thank you. Sincerely, Tany Hassell From: Adam Wells To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick:Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virainia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp;John Cromwell Michael Anderson;Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; cyan Plumlee;Susan B.Hippen;Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L. Coleman Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Thursday,January 29,2026 8:28:29 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Adam Wells.I live at 507 20 1/2 St.,in Virginia Beach. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I would like to see the property maintained and golf restored in our area again Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Adam Wells 507 20 1/2 street Virginia Beach,VA 23451 Jadamwells@,gmail.com Sent from my iPhonc From: larryscheible To: Planning Commissioners Subject: West Neck Rezoning ICO Signature Golf Course Date: Wednesday,January 28,2026 7:11:01 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Greetings: I attended a meeting Monday afternoon hosted by Mr. Ted Quinter. It was a very, very negative meeting expressing Mr. Quinter's opinion regarding the redevelopment of the old Signature Golf Course. I suspect you will get a ton of emails recommending disapproval of the rezoning. I am in support of the rezoning and the redevelopment of the old course site. I live on what used to be the 16th fairway and I for one am very tired of looking at overgrown property. Mr. Quinter thinks that we, West Neck, have a significant amount of say so regarding what the owner does with this property, Really, in my view we have NOTHING to do with it. Let the folks who bought it do what they presented to us with 1 9 hole course and a practice facility. I support the rezoning and redevelopment!! Sincerely, Larry Scheible 2717 Browning Drive Virginia Beach, VA 23456 From: Devan Maloney To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Beducchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office:Walter Camp:John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover: Bryan Plumlee:Susan B.Hippen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Thursday,January 29,2026 5:13:32 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission, City Council Members, and Staff, My name is Devan Maloney. I live at 1972 Grandon Loop Road, Virginia Beach VA 23456, in Ashville Park. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive, formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities. I would like to see the property maintained and golf restored in our area again Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Devan Maloney Dmaloney816 =ail_com From: Marisa Ferrera To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Re ;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr,;Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp;John Cromwell;Michael Anderson:Kathryn Byler;Katherine C.Schoonover: Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Higpen;Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani;Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L. Coleman;Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Thursday,January 29,2026 8:46:37 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Marisa Hofmann.I live at 2856 Camarillo Lane in Asheville Park. I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I would like to see the property maintained and golf restored in our area again Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Marisa Hofmann Ashville Park Resident marisa 116@yaboo.com Sent from my iPhone From: Chris Cadena To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond; Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.•Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp;John Cromwell•Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hippen;Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch; Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support of West Neck Rezoning Development and Golf Course Plan Date: Sunday,February 1,2026 4:39:42 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission,City Council Members,and Staff, My name is Chris Cadena .I live at_924 Corrente lane in Lagomar.1 am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive,formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I believe the proposed plan represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities.I would like to see the property maintained and golf restored in our area again Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Chris.cadena@securitas.com Address Email Sent from my Whone From: Larry zito To: Hunter Morrison;Seth L.Edwards; Marchelle L.Coleman;icromwe11(Zbvbaov.com Subject: Approve The Preserve at West Neck Date: Sunday,February 1,2026 5:56:15 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. As a resident of the Emerson Springs Village at West Neck I would like to support the re-zoning required to approve The Preserve at West Neck.The nine hole golf course and open space will be a big improvement in the current over-grown condition. Lawrence Zito 2721 Blake st.Virginia Beach From: Suzy Feldman To: Walter Camo;John Cromwell; Michael Anderson; Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover;Bryan Plumlee;Susan Q.Hi en; Holly Cuellar;John H.Coston; Neena Moonani;Michael C.Mauch; Marchelle L.Coleman; Kathy M. Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt; Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Proposed Preserve at West Neck project Date: Monday,February 2,2026 8:01:05 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission Members, I live in the Villages at West Neck and have for 21 years. After attending many meetings...in support of and against... I am writing in support of the application submitted by Harrison and Lear for conditional rezoning and modification of proffers at 3100 Arnold Palmer Drive, formerly known as The Signature at West Neck. I have reviewed the proposed plan and believe it represents a responsible use of the property and serves the interests of the surrounding communities. I want to see the property maintained and golf restored to our area. Thank you for your time and consideration. And thank you for your service to our community, which I understand is a volunteer position...we appreciate your time! Sincerely, Suzanne Feldman 2816 Gentle Fawn Court From: iohnshumatel(o)icloud.com To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp:John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover: Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hippen:Holly Cuellar.John H.Coston:nmoorian(@vb.com;Michael C.Mauch Marchelle L.Coleman;Kathy M.Warren:Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Support The Preserve at West Neck:A Path Forward for Us All Date: Monday,February 2,2026 5:04:57 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Our community needs a resolution. I'm writing to express my strong support for the rezoning and approval of The Preserve at West Neck project on the former Signature Golf Course property. This thoughtful proposal would restore a 9-hole semi-public golf course while adding 143 homes for residents 55+on what is primarily the unused driving range. Since the golf course closed, the West Neck community has been mired in conflict over this property's future. A vocal minority—including three former HOA board presidents—has organized opposition to any development or compromise whatsoever. While their voices have been persistent and loud,they do not represent the broader community sentiment. Key Facts: • The new homes would be built entirely on the former golf course property, which is separate from the West Neck community • Density for individual West Neck homeowners remains completely unchanged • The golf course would be restored to a 9-hole course and made accessible to the public For six years,we've heard nothing but"no" from the West Neck HOA,which has refused any dialogue with the property owner beyond litigation. This obstruction and defiance has served no one. It's time for a different approach. This infill project offers genuine benefits: • it revitalizes our neighborhood • expands available housing stock • restores recreational amenities • does not reduce agricultural use in District 2 • expands a viable tax base for future city needs • and contributes positively to Virginia Beach as a whole Rather than continuing to fear change,we should embrace a reasonable compromise that moves our community forward. I urge you to approve the rezoning and support The Preserve at West Neck. It's time to move past the status quo and say yes to progress. John Shumate The Villages at West Neck Homeowner 2949 Elegance Lane Virginia Beach,VA 23456 757-831-2294 January 26,2026 Ms, Marchelle Coleman Planning Commission Evaluation Coordinator City of Virginia Beach Dear Ms. Coleman I am a resident of the Villages at West Neck. I am writing you to state my full support of the Preserve at West Neck development and 9-hole golf course on the old Signature Golf Course property being proposed by Harrison and Lear, Inc. This recent proposal represents a great compromise benefiting West Neck,Indian River Plantation and the surrounding community. And key to many Village of West Neck residents, this proposal restores a golf venue to the community/area, a priority for many residents. Also, this is a win for our community, Indian River, and the City of Virginia Beach. While the enhanced landscaping,open areas and walking paths benefit us, the city benefits from an increase in much needed affordable housing,corresponding revenue and virtually no impact on area schools. Thank you for your time and consideration, I highly encourage you to support,and to vote yes for the proposed development project by Harrison and Lear on the old Signature Golf Course property. Sincerely, James Cox 2948 Elegance Lane Virginia Beach, VA 23456 757-777-2048 jcox53@veri7on.net CC: All Virginia Beach Planning Commissioners From: Janet Blohm To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp;John Cromwell:Michael Anderson;Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hippen;Holly Cuellar;John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L. Coleman;Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Why the Preserve at West Neck Makes Sense Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 2:37:02 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Commissioners and Council Members, The old golf course at the Preserve at West Neck has been neglected for years,ever since it closed down.I'm really looking forward to having it restored and open to the community again,especially with professional golfer Marc Leishman leading the project.A well-maintained course right here in our neighborhood would be such a welcome addition.It's exciting to see this abandoned property finally getting the attention it deserves. Best regards, Janet Blohm West Neck From: Janet Blohm To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office•Walter Camp;John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hippen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: West Neck:A Plan That Aligns with Our Goals Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 2:39:46 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good morning, I've lived in West Neck for over 6 years,and I'm encouraged by the Preserve at West Neck project.The old golf course has been overgrown and closed for too long,and I'm ready to see this property put to good use again. If this plan is approved,we'll finally have a long-term solution that restores golf,creates new trails and open space, and improves stormwater management.This is a pragmatic,realistic approach that ends the uncertainty we've faced for years.Compared to the alternative of the property just sitting vacant and deteriorating,this is clearly the better path forward.I hope the Planning Commission and City Council will give this project their full support. Regards, James Blohm West Neck From: Geraldine McDonald To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camo;John Cromwell;Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hiooen;}lolly Cuellar;John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman;Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Cc: Jerry McDonald;Geraldine McDonald Subject: Local Support for the Preserve at West Neck Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 3:30:05 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council and Planning Commission, As a long-time Indian River Plantation resident,Pm looking forward to the Preserve at West Neck project. It will transform the old Signature at West Neck golf course property that has been closed and neglected for far too long into a premier golfing destination not just for West Neck and Indian River Plantation residents,but for all Virginia Beach residents and visitors. It's exciting to see Marc Leishman,a professional golfer who is an Indian River Plantation resident,leading this effort to recreate the golf experience on the property. Having a well-maintained golf course in our community again would be a huge improvement over the current state of the property sitting empty and being a potential safety hazard to adjacent property owners in the West Neck and Indian River Plantation communities. Just as important,this plan creates new walking trails and green space via reforestation that will replace some of the overgrown holes of the old golf course property that current adjacent property owners primarily in certain West Neck villages see every day. Right now,that property is completely closed off to current West Neck and Indian River Plantation residents by the current owner,but the Preserve at West Neck project would make it accessible and usable for residents again. Finally,the planned drainage improvements are a crucial part of the overall proposed project which should significantly improve stonnwater management in this area.Without question,this is a major benefit that will benefit all property owners in the West Neck villages. I believe the planned 143 single family homes,though increasing the housing density of West Neck minimally,will protect and enhance the character of the West Neck neighborhood,with natural buffers and complementary architecture. The new homes will be for 55+residents only in keeping with the rest of the West Neck villages. These new homes will provide additional property tax revenues to the city and have no impact on schools. In summary,this is a win-win project that brings back the golf course,improves the environment,and enhances not only the West Neck and Indian River Plantation communities but all of Virginia Beach. Thank you, Jerry McDonald 2524 Greystone Street Virginia Beach,VA.23456 Indian River Plantation From: Geraldine McDonald To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office:Walter Camp;John Cromwell: Michael Anderson;Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hiopen;Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch; Marchelle L. Coleman Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: An IRP Neighbor Supporting the West Neck Project Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 10:53:17 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council and Planning Commission, I've have been a resident of the Indian River Plantation community for over 25 years. Since the Signature at West Neck golf course closed in September of 2019 the land has become an eyesore and a safety hazard. There was a fire on that land and if it had not been contained by the fire department's quick response it could have engulfed neighbors'homes and worse.I am very supportive of the"The Preserve at West Neck"project which is an opportunity to bring this property back to life.The planned project for"The Preserve at West Neck"offers a real solution which includes not just golf but open space and hiking trails to enjoy.I strongly support this project being approved and implemented. Thank you, Geraldine McDonald 2524 Greystone Street Indian River Plantation From: Luke McGhee To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond:Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick:Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office:Walter Camp:John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover: Bryan Plumlee:Susan B.Hippen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren:Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Adding My Voice for West Neck Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 8:11:04 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Council Members and Planning Commission, As a resident of West Neck, living at 2648 Willowlawn Way, I'm excited about the prospect of the Preserve at West Neck project. For years, the old golf course has been closed off and neglected, an eyesore in our otherwise beautiful neighborhood. The thought of it being restored and reopened to the public is incredibly appealing. I'm especially thrilled that Marc Leishman, a professional golfer who lives nearby, is leading this effort. Having a well-maintained,public golf course in our community would be a wonderful asset. It would provide a space for us to come together, enjoy the outdoors, and maintain an active lifestyle. After being closed for so long, I'm looking forward to having this amenity back. Sincerely, Cindy McGhee 2648 Willowlawn Way West Neck From: Colleen Craig To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond; Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office:Walter Camp;John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hiopen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L. Coleman Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt; Kaiden S.Alcock Subject: Community Support for Preserve at West Neck Date: Tuesday,February 3,2026 5:09:45 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good morning, I'm optimistic about the Preserve at West Neck project.As a longtime resident living right near the old golf course, Pm excited that Marc Leishman is leading the effort to restore the course.Having a well-maintained public golf option in our neighborhood would be wonderful.For years,the abandoned property has been an eyesore-it'll be great to see the land cleaned up and landscaped instead. Regards, Judy Smith 2972 Elegance Lane West Neck Colleen Craig 757-816-0376-Cell From: Steve Smith To: Walter Camp;John Cromwell;Michael Anderson; Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover;Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hipoen; Holly Cuellar;John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L.Coleman; Kathy M. Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: The Preserve at West Neck Date: Wednesday,February 4,2026 9:09:44 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe __-- _ —__..__.-- __ ..-____. __ Good morning Commissioners, My name is Steve Smith, and our family(wife Heather and daughters Katy(17)and Kamryn (13)) live in Indian River Plantation at 2508 Calumet Drive. We moved here in 2020 from Wisconsin and absolutely love it here. Collectively,you are evaluating whether to allow a portion of the former Signature golf course to come back to life,so I was hoping to share our family's perspective. We are enthusiastically in favor of the course returning to its former glory. Our daughter is a golfer and plays with a couple other IRP 13 year olds in local tournaments. As more and younger families make IRP their home,a renewed golf course and accompanying amenities will suit the community well. Additionally,the plan involves adding—140 homes. From our perspective,the traffic right now is light,so a 15%increase will not be noticed. We are looking forward to an improved and thriving community as a result of this golf course returning. Thank you for your support. The Smiths (Steve, Heather, Katy, Kamryn) From: Christy Huaeback To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp;John Cromwell; Michael Anderson;Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Pluml=Susan B.Hippen;Holly Cuellar;John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch; Marchelle L. Coleman;Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: From IRP:Support for the Preserve at West Neck Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 8:54:48 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Regarding the Preserve at West Neck proposal,I'm firmly behind this project.The old golf course has been going to waste for years,and I m excited that Marc Leishman is leading an effort to bring it back.Having a well-maintained public course would be a huge asset for our neighborhood.Plus,the plan preserves most of the land as open space with new trails-a big improvement over the overgrown,closed-off property we have now.This is a chance to finally address the drainage issues that have caused problems in our area.I hope you'll support this plan to revitalize the site. Thank you, Christiana Hugeback 2528 Nestlebrook Trail Indian River Plantation Sent from my Whone From: ELEANOR MASSIE To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp;John Cromwell Michael Anderson:Kathryn Byler;Katherine C.Schoonover: Bryan Plumlee:Susan B.Himen;Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani;Michael C.Mauch; Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Community Support for Preserve at West Neck Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 10:41:42 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Council Members and Planning Commission, I've lived in West Neck for over 20 years,and I'm optimistic about the Preserve at West Neck project.The abandoned golf course has become an eyesore,with overgrown weeds and brush affecting the entire neighborhood. This plan would replace the neglect with maintained landscaping,which would be a huge improvement for our property values. Additionally,the project includes important stormwater improvements that could help reduce the flooding issues we've been dealing with for years.Addressing the longstanding drainage problems is a major reason I support this. Respectfully, Eleanor Massie West Neck From: rob oadaet To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp:)ohn Cromwell'Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler,Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hiooen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston; Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren:Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaiden S.Alcock Subject: The Preserve at West Neck-A Win for Virginia Beach Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 1:41:01 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Pm writing about the proposed Preserve at West Neck project,and I wanted to express my support.As a resident at 2716 Nestlebrook Trail,Pm excited about the opportunity to finally access and enjoy the open space of the old golf course.For years,it's just been sitting there,wasted potential.This plan would create walking trails and green space that everyone in the community can use.That's what I care most about-restoring this land for our neighborhood to actually experience and appreciate. Thank you, Robert Padgett 2716 Nestlebrook Trail West Neck Sent from my iPhone From: Susan Cox To: Walter Camp;John Cromwell;Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler:Katherine C.Schoonover;Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.ftpen;Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L.Coleman:Kathy M. Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Save our neighborhood-Support The Preserve at West Neck Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 1:53:25 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Commissioner, I have been a resident of The Villages at West Neck for three years, and I am writing to express my strong support for the rezoning and approval of The Preserve at West Neck on the former Signature Golf Course property. The most recent proposal represents a thoughtful and welcome compromise that will benefit The Villages at West Neck, Indian River Plantation, and the surrounding community. Importantly, it restores golf to the area—an outcome that was the original goal for many residents who opposed earlier redevelopment plans. Our community needs resolution. Since the golf course closed, The Villages at West Neck has been embroiled in conflict over this property's future. A vocal minority—including three former HOA board presidents—has dragged the community through years of division; repeated lawsuits, internal disputes, and the misrepresentation of facts. Community communication channels were used to advance a single viewpoint, without meaningful efforts to solicit or reflect the broader opinions of residents. During this same period, the property owner, Harrison and Lear, along with Marc and Audrey Leishman, made multiple attempts to engage in dialogue and explore compromises. Those efforts were consistently declined, and residents were never made aware of these attempts or given an opportunity to participate. I respectfully urge you to approve The Preserve at West Neck proposal. It offers a path forward, restores beauty and functionality to land that has become an eyesore, and provides a long-overdue solution that benefits the entire community. Thank you for saving our beautiful community. Warm regards, Susan Cox 2948 Elegance Lane Virginia Beach,VA 23456 cinchome550)gmail.com Even though there are more than goo SOTAR members, it is important to note that SOTAR communications to the community reflected only one perspective and did not include information about proposed compromises. Subsequently, many of these residents have changed their minds, and now support this proposal. From: Nicole Piette To: Barbara Henley;David W.Hutcheson;Michael Berlucchi;Kathryn Bvler; Katherine C.Schoonover;Bryan Plumlee; Susan B. Hiooen;Holly Cuellar;John H.Coston; Neena Mooriani;Michael C. Mauch; Marchelle L.Coleman;Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt; Kaitlen S.Alcock Cc: Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F. Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camg:John Cromwell;Michael Anderson;theoroiectoreserve25()vgmaiLcom Subject: Support for more housing in West Neck Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 2:04:38 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I have been a realtor in Virginia Beach for 13 years, and one of the most consistent concerns I hear from clients is the lack of housing options designed for our aging population—specifically, the shortage of 55+communities and homes with primary bedrooms on the first floor.This issue has only become more pressing as the population of Virginia Beach continues to grow older. Virginia Beach has a large and increasing number of residents who want to age in place, remain close to family,and stay active in the community they have called home for decades. Unfortunately,there are very limited housing options that meet their changing needs. Many older buyers are not necessarily looking to downsize into condos or assisted living; instead, they want thoughtfully designed homes that offer accessibility,safety,and long-term comfort —features such as first-floor primary suites, minimal stairs,and low-maintenance living. Time and time again, I hear from clients—and even close friends—who would prefer to stay in Virginia Beach but feel they have no choice but to look elsewhere.either in nearby cities like Chesapeake, or nearby states like North Carolina,offer a wider variety of 55+communities and age-friendly housing options.These areas are actively attracting our residents by providing what Virginia Beach currently lacks: homes that accommodate aging while still offering quality of life,community amenities, and affordability. This trend is concerning because it means Virginia Beach is losing long-time residents who want to remain here but simply cannot find suitable housing. Expanding the availability of 55+ communities and homes with first-floor primary bedrooms would not only serve our aging population but also strengthen the local housing market,support community continuity,and help keep families close together. Addressing this housing gap is not just about meeting demand—it's about planning responsibly for the future of Virginia Beach. By encouraging development that reflects the needs of our changing demographics,we can ensure that residents are able to stay in the city they love throughout every stage of life. For this reason I support the Harrison and Lear rezoning application. Nicole Piette Nicole Piette REALTOR& Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices RW Towne Realty M: (757)288-8824 0: (757)422-2200 A� E: nicole.piette@rwtowne.com 600 22nd Street, Suite 101, Virginia Beach, VA 23451 W: nicolepietterealtor.com 02023 BHH Affiliates, LLC.An independently owned and operated franchisee of BHH Affiliates, LLC. Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices and the Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices symbol are registered service marks of Columbia Insurance Company, a Berkshire Hathaway affiliate. Equal Housing Opportunity. From: Nancy Oliver To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick:Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp;John Cromwell: Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hiopen;Holly Cuellar John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman Kathy M.Marren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: Benefits of the Preserve at West Neck Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 5:44:01 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Members of the Planning Commission and City Council, I live at 2681 Nestlebrook Trl.,and I am emailing to express my support of the Preserve at West Neck project.As a resident who lives near the abandoned golf course,Pm excited to see this run-down property finally get the attention it needs. For years,the overgrown and neglected course has been an eyesore in our neighborhood.Replacing it with a well- maintained golf course,trails,and thoughtfully designed homes will be a vast improvement.I'm especially glad to hear that professional golfer Marc Leishman is leading this effort-his involvement will surely result in a high- quality course open to the public. This plan also provides important protections for existing homeowners like myself.The substantial natural buffers and lack of new cut-through streets will help preserve the character of our community.I believe the Preserve at West Neck is the right solution for this property. Thank you, Nancy Oliver 2681 Nestlebrook TH. Indian River Plantation Sent from my iPhone From: Korinna Chitty To: Marchelle L.Coleman:Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock:David W.Hutcheson:Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond:Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick:Sal"Cash"Jackson- Green:Stacy Cumminas Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office: Walter Camp;John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover:Bryan Plumlee;&M B.Hiocen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch Subject: Preserve @ West Neck Support Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 10:03:04 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. All: It is my pleasure to write this email, in support of The Preserve Development in the West Neck Villages, Virginia Beach. We, as a community,need to move forward for the younger generation here at West Neck. Harrison& Lear has designed a galvanized solution to the defunct golf course here. They have embraced suggestions, ideas and visions from the current residents favoring change at The West Neck Villages. Repurposing landscapes that boost biodiversity and building natural sceneries - inclusive of a 9-hole golf course! They are melding what was,with what should be; acquiescing to Virginia Beach Codes. The up and coming "youthful residents" (55 - 60 year olds)are moving to The West Neck Villages. They're either refired or almost at retirement. We desire change. We long for beautiful surroundings. The current opposers are in the 70's, 80's and 90's. Holding back the needed change. Holding on to the past; never to see the future/end result. In conclusion, I fully support the efforts of The Preserve Development. Please let the younger generation thrive here,upholding a bright future while preserving some of the past. Thank you, Korinna L. Chitty Resident of Rosecrest, West Neck Villages From: Jeanne Kurash To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr,;Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virainia Beach Mayors Office:Walter Camp:John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Byler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee:Susan B.Hippen:Holly Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani;Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L. Coleman:KathyM.Warren;Carrie L.Bookhott:Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: A Good Plan for West Neck Date: Friday,February 6,2026 9:09:15 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good afternoon,For years, the old golf course on the West Neck property has been overgrown and closed off to the community. It's exciting to see that Marc Leishman, a professional golfer who lives nearby, is leading the effort to restore the course and open it up for public use. Having a well-maintained golf course in our neighborhood would be a wonderful addition. The new senior housing is also a welcome change. Virginia Beach needs more housing options for residents 55 and older who want to age in place. Since the homes are age- restricted,there won't be any impact on our local schools. If this project is approved,we'll finally see this neglected property come back to life. But if nothing happens, it will just remain closed off and forgotten. As a resident at 2853 Rose Garden Way, I'm ready for the positive changes the Preserve at West Neck will bring to our community. Best regards,Jean Kurash 2853 Rose Garden Way West Neck From: Brian Bowers To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Hence;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse:City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp; Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover; Bryan Plumlee;Susan B.Hipoen; Holly Cuellar;John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani;Michael C.Mauch; Marchelle L.Coleman;Kathy M.Warren; Carrie L.Bookholt- Kaitlen S.Alcock Cc: narae0011cOvahoo.com Subject: IRP resident writing you about The Signature Golf course and the Leishman"s proposal-WE SUPPORT Date: Friday,February 6,2026 1:11:58 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, My wife and I would like to express our support for the proposed 9-hole golf performance center and new senior living development. It was a pleasure to meet Ms. Cueller and Ms. Moorjania today; my apologies for having to leave a quickly after speaking. Our main opinion is that we wish to have some golf returned to the property and to tie up the land preventing alternate uses down the road. We believe those opposing the project because it's "not 18 holes" and "housing density" are short-sighted. Additional Thoughts: • The current property owner owns the land "fair and square" and has the means to continue to sit on it out of spite. Unless the city is going to declare eminent domain and take it, I don't see any other path forward. • This has allowed the existing property to fall into disrepair which is unsightly, but has also created a vermin/rodent issue we didn't previously have in IRP and there was the fire a couple years back that was very close to catching homes along Nestlebrook. VBFD saved the day. • I am a golfer and bought this house here in IRP partially because of the Signature. Because of the extended closure, we ended up joining Princess Anne Country Club at pretty substantial expense. • Unfortunately, the City doesn't appear the have the appetite to own/run golf courses and become a "golfing vacation destination" as evidenced by the current situation at VB National. • End of the day we pay a lot of taxes and I would like to keep West Neck, IRP, and Courthouse Estates the way they are now. A golf performance center with additional senior living prevents multi-family housing in the event the green line is not moved. Thank you, Brian Bowers 757-719-4588 From: Joseph Takach To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Community Support for Preserve at West Neck Date: Friday,February 6,2026 3:15:31 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Regarding the West Neck proposal,I'm supportive of the Preserve at West Neck project.From my home on 2904 enchanting circle,I've watched the old golf course become more and more of a wasted potential over the years.It's been neglected and overgrown ever since it closed,and its been an eyesore for the whole neighborhood I'm excited that Marc Leishman,a professional golfer who lives nearby,is leading the effort to reopen the golf course.Having a well-maintained,public course in our community would be such a wonderful amenity.The fact that it will be accessible to all residents is a huge plus.Plus,replacing the abandoned property with quality landscaping and homes will do wonders for our property values and the overall look of the area.As long as the new construction is thoughtfully designed to complement the existing neighborhood,I'm fully supportive of this plan. Sincerely, Joseph Takach 2904 enchanting circle West Neck Sent from my iPhone From: William Welsted To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Benefits of the Preserve at West Neck Date: Friday,February 6,2026 1:48:22 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council Members and Planning Commissioners, As someone who has lived in West Neck for over 20 years, I'm thrilled to see the Preserve at West Neck project moving forward. This plan is exactly what our community needs. The closed and neglected golf course has been a missed opportunity for far too long. I'm excited that Marc Leishman, a respected pro golfer, is leading the effort to restore it. Having a well-maintained public course again would be a huge asset, giving residents like myself a place to play and enjoy the outdoors. Just as importantly,this project will finally open up the property for everyone to use. The current situation,with the course sitting empty and inaccessible, is a shame. I'm looking forward to the new walking trails and green spaces that will be created- it's going to dramatically improve the look and feel of the neighborhood. As a long-term resident, I am not aware of any viable alternative. We have watched for 6 1/2 years now as the property continues to worsen with no end in sight. I have never seen another plan...I have heard rumors that"a group" is willing to buy the course and rebuild,but never any meeting(s)to discuss the details...never!!! Mr. Skinner and his group have been very open about their project, group meetings, open discussions,plan revisions and more meetings. The opportunity to have a 9-hole course with additional housing seems to be a winner for most. No project will have 100% support,but this MAY be the best deal we ever get...plus we rid ourselves of the current owner who apparently is not the easiest to deal with. If we fail to act it may be 5, 10, or 15 years before he even considers another offer. I also look at the demographics of the community-over 55. Most of the original buyers (unfortunately including me) are at an age where 9 holes is about enough. We have 7 18 -hole courses within 10 miles(not including military courses)of our community and those who want more can do that. As I write this,I personally see the advantage of the nine holes as a practice spot and perhaps an 18-hole round occasionally at one of the other courses. I hope you'll approve this plan. It's a win-win that will breathe new life into a property that has been neglected for far too long.As a veteran who served our country, I'm proud to support a project that will enhance our community. Sincerely, William Welsted 2821 Loveliness Court West Neck Get Outlook for iOS From: Suzy Feldman To: Planning Commissioners Cc: Marshall Feldman Subject: From Marshall Feldman West Neck Resident Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 10:52:13 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Subject: Reclaiming the WOW Feeling at The Villages at West Neck Dear Planning Commission Members.- Over the years, when we told people we lived in The Villages at West Neck, their response was "WOW!" It was the first 55+ community in Virginia Beach. Many folks already knew about, or played on, the Signature Golf Course. Some people had toured the model single-family homes and condominiums or later purchased resales. Together the homes, the setting, and the golf course created a community that truly stood out, ergo, the WOW feeling. Then the dark years came. (Seven years and counting.) The Signature Golf Course closed. The property reverted to nature. Community squabbles, missed opportunities, and lawsuits followed. Sadly, not all conducive to a WOW feeling. Now The Preserve proposal is before you. Age-specific single homes specifically designed for the 55+ population. A 9-hole golf course. Community-wide walking trails. And a bonus. A traffic light at Signature Drive and West Neck Road. An immeasurable traffic safety signal for a senior community and the surrounding area. This proposal does more than redevelop dormant land. It restores purpose, safety, and vitality to a community that has waited years for progress. It brings back that original WOW feeling. Now it's the city's chance for our community to reclaim that WOW feeling. I respectfully urge you to support Harrison & Lear's application for The Preserve. Thank you for your service and stewardship to our city. Cordially, Marshall Feldman 21 Year Resident, Wordsworth Village The Villages at West Neck 2816 Gentle Fawn Court Virginia Beach, Virginia 23456 From: Kathy Van Mullekom To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: In support of the Preserve at West Neck Date: Friday,February 6,2026 2:05:25 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, I've lived in West Neck for over a decade, and I'm fully behind this Preserve at West Neck project. For years,the old golf course has just been sitting there, closed and neglected. If nothing happens, it'll keep deteriorating. This plan finally offers a real,permanent solution- restoring golf and creating new trails and open space. The long-term lease means the golf course isn't going anywhere. It's exactly what this area needs. Respectfully, Ken Van Mullekom West Neck Kathy Hogan Van Mullekom ... in Hampton Roads Virginia along the scenic Chesapeake Bay Facebook a)Kathy Hogan Van Mullekom FacebookCa Zip Codes 23456123457 Virginia Beach From: Debra Shumate To: Planning Commissioners Subject: Please Approve The Preserve at West Neck Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 9:06:43 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission, I am a resident of West Neck Villages and am in favor of The Preserve project as currently proposed.Please approve this development as I believe it is a fair compromise for all concerned and will bring benefit to our community and the Indian River Plantation community. As you are aware,certain members of our community have ginned up a false narrative for their own purposes amongst some of our residents and neighboring developments,and they are in active opposition to anything other than restoring the original 18-hole golf course.However,many of these individuals do not have to live here and have only a minor interest in the outcome-if any.As the current property owner has categorically stated that he does not intend to sell as a golf course due to the inability to make a sufficient profit,and our community of 55 and older residents would certainly not be able to afford to buy,restore,and maintain it if he did,we have to be reasonable people And find a reasonable solution.I believe we have one here.Yes,there will be noise and inconvenience.The alternative is additional years of weeds,strife,and lawsuits. On a personal note,I moved to Virginia Beach and this community from Northern Virginia in 2016.The in-fighting and personal attacks over these past several years,along with the expensive lawsuits(which I was NOT in favor of), have made living here extremely unpleasant and caused no small amount of regret over my decision to purchase a home in this area. The residents in this community deserve a resolution and I sincerely hope that our city government will take leadership at this point and make a decision that will move us forward on resolving this issue. Please approve The Preserve development Sincerely, Debra Shumate 2949 Elegance Ln West Neck Villages From: Rachel Hardy-Virainia Beach Resident To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Rachel Hardy Supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Friday,February 6,2026 12:54:41 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Rachel Hardy, a Virginia Beach resident living at 3129 Sacramento Drive, writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. Hi, Even though I don't live right next to this project, I'm looking forward to the Preserve at West Neck plan. Living close by, myself and my husband regularly for walks and bike rides around the area. The old golf course has been closed off and neglected for years - it's an eyesore. I'm glad to see Marc Leishman is leading the effort to restore the course and open it back up to the community. This plan will also bring much-needed stormwater improvements and new senior housing. It aligns perfectly with the city's Comprehensive Plan goals. Respectfully, Rachel Hardy 3129 Sacramento Drive Courthouse Estates I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Rachel Hardy 3129 Sacramento Drive Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email: rwalters@varush.com Sincerely, Rachel Hardy This message was sent on behalf of the above Virginia Beach resident through WNPreserve.com. The resident authorized this communication and can be reached directly using the contact information above. Questions about this platform? Contact info@wnpreserve.com From: Responsible Growth VB To: Plannina Commissioners;City Council;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office:City Manager Citizen Inquiry Kathy M. Warren Subject: Resident Input-Reclaiming the WOW Feeling at The Villages at West Neck Date: Friday,February 6,2026 10:48:13 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Planners and City Council Members: Over the years, when we told people we lived in The Villages at West Neck, their response was "WOW!" It was the first 55+ community in Virginia Beach. Many folks already knew about, or played on, the Signature Golf Course. Some people had toured the model single-family homes and condominiums or later purchased resales. Together the homes, the setting, and the golf course created a community that truly stood out, ergo, the WOW feeling. Then the dark years came. (Seven years and counting.) The Signature Golf Course closed. The property reverted to nature. Community squabbles, missed opportunities, and lawsuits followed. Sadly, not all conducive to a WOW feeling. Now The Preserve proposal is before you. Age-specific single homes specifically designed for the 55+ population. A 9-hole golf course. Community-wide walking trails. And a bonus. A traffic light at Signature Drive and West Neck Road. An immeasurable traffic safety signal for a senior community and the surrounding area. This proposal does more than redevelop dormant land. It restores purpose, safety, and vitality to a community that has waited years for progress. It brings back that original WOW feeling. Now it's the city's chance for our community to reclaim that WOW feeling. I respectfully urge you to support Harrison & Lear's application for The Preserve. Thank you for your service and stewardship to our city. Cordially, Marshall Feldman 21 Year Resident, Wordsworth Village The Villages at West Neck 2816 Gentle Fawn Court Virginia Beach, Virginia 23456 Sincerely, Marshall Feldman District 2 This message was submitted by a Virginia Beach resident using the Responsible Growth VB civic engagement tool. O Responsible Growth VB. From: Jerry MacCaulev To: Plannina Commissioners Subject: Support for H&L Preserve at West Neck proposal. Date: Thursday,February 5,2026 4:06:06 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good afternoon, As residents of West Neck(Wordsworth) since 2018,we have witnessed the deterioration of our ponds and green spaces firsthand. We have followed these issues closely, often having to navigate misinformation from various sources claiming to represent the majority of our residents. We believe the current proposal in partnership with the Leishmans is a well-designed project. This development would provide Virginia Beach with a high-quality "Active Adult Community" comparable to those found in other coastal areas. We appreciate the time and consideration the Board has committed to this matter and respectfully request your support for the project moving forward. Best regards, Jerry& Patti MacCauley From: Kathleen Reinhart To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Public Hearing February 11,2026 re:Villages of West Neck Date: Friday,February 6,2026 3:48:57 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Ms. Coleman: I am writing to endorse my approval of the proposed Preserve at West Neck. It's my opinion that this project will certainly enhance the community, as it currently exists. I worry about the accumulating brush,which presents a fire hazard, and feel this new addition to the current communities will benefit all of us,by increasing our property values. I have an appointment on Wednesday at 11:00, so will likely be unable to attend this presentation. Will you kindly make my voice heard in my absence? Thank you sincerely, Kathleen Reinhart Wordsworth Village From: Kathleen Reinhart To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Public Hearing February 11,2026 re:Villages of West Neck Date: Friday,February 6,2026 3:48:57 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Ms. Coleman: I am writing to endorse my approval of the proposed Preserve at West Neck. It's my opinion that this project will certainly enhance the community, as it currently exists. I worry about the accumulating brush, which presents a fire hazard, and feel this new addition to the current communities will benefit all of us,by increasing our property values. I have an appointment on Wednesday at 11:00, so will likely be unable to attend this presentation. Will you kindly make my voice heard in my absence? Thank you sincerely, Kathleen Reinhart Wordsworth Village From: Heather Courtricht To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi:Amelia N.Ross-Hammond:Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.:Joashua F.Schulman:Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp:John Cromwell:Michael Anderson:Kathryn Byler;Katherine C.Schoonover: Bryan Plumlee:Susan B.Hippen:Holty Cuellar:John H.Coston:Neena Mooriani:Michael C.Mauch:Marchelle L. Coleman:Kathy M.Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt:Kaitien S.Alcock Subject: Support for West Neck Rezoning Date: Saturday,February 7,2026 5:55:36 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission and City Council, My name is Heather Courtright, and I live in Indian River Plantation near the former Signature Golf Course property. I wanted to share why this project matters to me on a personal level. Living next to an abandoned property has been unsettling. The land has not been maintained for years, and there is no consistent security presence. As a single mom with a teenage daughter at home,this has become a real safety concern for our family. Last year I came across a raccoon on the property that looked rabid that chased me down the street. I have seen many other wild creatures coming from the unkept golf course. That was frightening enough,but it is not the only incident that has made me uneasy. I am aware of two different times when homeless men were found staying on the property. Another unsettling memory my daughter and I share a few years back,the police were called searching for a mentally troubled man that had taken all his clothes off and used the unmanatained golf course to hide. Experiences like this change how safe you feel in your own neighborhood. I want to see this property cared for again. An active golf course with regular maintenance, lighting, and people present would make a big difference for those of us who live nearby. Restoring the land to a maintained and supervised space would help families like mine feel secure again. Thank you for taking the time to read my perspective as a neighbor and parent. Thank you, Heather Courtright 2629 Willowlawn Way From: Marshall Feldman To: Walter Camp;John Cromwell; Michael Anderson;Kathryn Bvler;Katherine C.Schoonover;Bryan Plumlee;Susan B. Hippen; Holly Cuellar;John H.Coston; Neena Mooriani: Michael C.Mauch; Marchelle L.Coleman;Kathy M. Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt; Kaitlen S.Alcock Subject: The Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 8:01:20 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. The WOW Feeling: A Traffic Light at Signature Drive and West Neck Road Dear Planning Commissioners/ Motor vehicle traffic without a dedicated traffic light at an intersection may work for younger drivers, but it creates real safety challenges for older adults. The Villages at West Neck is a 55+ active adult community. The average age in a 55+ active adult community is 76. As we age, reaction time slows and vision becomes more sensitive to glare. Turning our head or judging distance becomes harder. When intersections lack clear signals or right-of- way markings, seniors are forced to make rapid, high-stakes decisions in exactly the situations where aging makes them most difficult. The Preserve application, a 55+ community, the developer Harrison and Lear includes a traffic signal at the intersection of Signature Drive/Tin Barn Way and West Neck Road, A traffic light helps protect communities designed for older residents like The Villages at West Neck. As a senior citizen, I enthusiastically welcome the traffic light. It promotes safety and predictability. Truly a WOW feeling that improves the quality of life for West Neck residents and the family neighborhoods of Kingston Estates and Eagles Nest. That's a compelling "WOW" reason for your approval of The Preserve application. Thank you. Cordially, Marshall Feldman 21 Year Resident Wordsworth Village The Villages at West Neck From: iohnshu mate 1(caicloud.corn To: David W.Hutcheson;Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson:Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camp;John Cromwell; Michael Anderson;Kathryn Byler;Bryan Plumlee;Susan B. Hiooen; Holly Cuellar,John H.Coston;Neena Mooriani: Michael C.Mauch; Marchelle L.Coleman;Kathy M. Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt; Kaitlen S.Alcock; Katherine C.Schoonover Subject: Comments supportive of"The Preserves" Date: Monday,February 9,2026 9:34:22 AM CAUTION;This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. There has been considerable discussion within the Villages at West Neck regarding claims that certain promises were made and must now be upheld. In particular, some contend that the West Neck Villages zoning approved in 1999 represented a"promise"that the city is obligated to maintain unchanged in perpetuity. It is important to recognize, however,that at the time these alleged promises were made,there was not a single resident living in West Neck. It was a zoning decision, not a promise. Zoning can be changed. Furthermore, emotional appeals based on promises to veterans are misplaced.Veterans reside on both sides of this issue within the Villages at West Neck and Indian River Plantation. As such,those opposing the development cannot claim moral high ground on that basis. Veterans are an integral part of Virginia Beach and are represented in every community. I believe the proposed development represents our final opportunity to reach a reasonable compromise for the former golf course property.The Preserve proposal seeks to restore golf to the community while also addressing the need for additional housing options for residents aged 55 and over. I also believe the property owner is sincere in stating that this is the last opportunity to advance a viable solution.While bad faith has been demonstrated on both sides over the years (the owner and the West Neck community),the property does not belong to the West Neck HOA. The owner retains the right to develop the property(or not),subject to zoning requirements and city approvals. This matter must be resolved. Six years of delay is more than enough,and I am concerned about what another six years or more of inaction may bring if this project is not approved. The status quo is unacceptable and residents are looking for the Commission and Council to look beyond the vocal and angry detractors and find a way to a "yes" in this infill project. strongly urge your support for this initiative as I do, despite its acknowledged density and open-space shortcomings. These are shortcomings we can all live with. John Shumate 2949 Elegance Lane Virginia Beach VA 23456 757-831-2294 Villages of West Neck Resident February 9, 2026 To: Virginia Beach City Council and Planning Commission Members, Please consider this letter to be our statement in support of the proposed "The Preserve at West Neck" development project. It is our understanding that this is for the area that is part of the West Neck and Indian River Plantation community, and adjacent property of the former "The Signature at West Neck" golf course. This letter is in support of the proposal as presented in the "The Preserve at West Neck" Informational Meeting Power Point dated January 27tn We have reviewed the presentation, and had our questions addressed to our satisfaction through additional communication with Jonathan Skinner. We understand and respect that some of the current residents of West Neck and Indian River Plantation are opposed to the proposed development, but also know many who, like us, are in support. We would much rather have the attractive and usable golf course and recreational areas proposed than continue to have the property in its current state that we believe constitutes an eye-sore, fire hazard and fiscal dead weight. In regards to the additional proposed homes, it is our understanding that Virginia Beach has an increasing need for more quality homes for residents in the 55+ demographic. We believe that the proposed homes will provide an attractive and affordable option without impacting the quality of life offered to current residents through the existing amenities. In summary, we believe that the proposed development would be good for West Neck, Indian River Plantation and the overall Virginia Beach community. Sincerely, Glenn and Alison Goldberg 2921 Elegance Lane Virginia Beach, VA 23456 goldberg.glenn@gmail.com Dear planning Commission and City Council Members, My spouse and I live in West Neck and look out toward the former Signature Golf Course property every day.Since the course closed,the land has become overgrown with weeds and brush.During dry summer months,the fire risk worries us. We miss seeing the open green space.It was one of the reasons we chose this neighborhood. We support bringing back the golf course,even with the addition of homes,because this finally offers a solution for the property. We are also excited about the possibility of walking trails.We love when our grandkids visit, and having safe places to walk together in the neighborhood would mean a lot to us. We worry about what will happen to the property if this proposal does not pass.Doing nothing does not feel like an option anymore. Sincerely, S h"rlee�l 17LLt QO'�� ,d,.l azj Address: oL`3'FF�1 R'Ot)e. vas �3Ll--' 1, { t } t Dear Members of the Planning Commission and City Council, As West Neck residents,we have watched the former Signature Golf Course property sit i unused for far too long,As we get older,playing 18 holes is not easy anymore.A 9-hole course feels liket something hmg we could still enjoy. We are encouraged by the proposal to bring golf back in a way that fits how people play today.The smaller course and limited development seem like a thoughtful plan for the property. We would love to see the land maintained again so our grandkids can grow up seeing the same beautiful views that once made this neighborhood so special. We hope this plan moves forward. Respectfully, Address: U. 4. & Dear City Leaders, We are West Neck residents writing in support of restoring the former Signature Golf Course property.Since the course closed,the land has become overgrown and unmanaged. We have noticed more wildlife coming out of the tall grass and brush and into nearby yards. Snakes,rodents,and other critters are showing up more often than they used to. A maintained golf course would bring care back to the land.We are also excited about the clubhouse returning.We miss being able to have dinner there with friends and gather in the community. This proposal feels like a practical way to move forward.We are concerned about what will happen if it does not pass. Respectfully, Address. ._ Michael B. Newbill 2653 Majesty Lane•Virginia Beach,VA 23456-8279•757 453-6985•newbillm@cox.net February 9, 2026 Virginia Beach Planning Commissioners and Planning Director Warren Via Email to: Marchelle Coleman Planning Evaluation Coordinator City of Virginia Beach mcolemanc@vbgov.com Re: My Enthusiastic Support for Harrison and Lear, Inc., Preserve at West Neck, Request for Modification of Proffers and Conditional Rezoning Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commissioners and Planning Director Warren: I am writing to express my enthusiastic support for Harrison and Lear's application for a zoning change for the former Signature at West Neck Golf Course property. My home at 2653 Majesty Lane backs up to the 17th Fairway—an area designated for some of the most intensive redevelopment under the proposal, with new residential property lines potentially within 50 feet of my own. I am therefore directly affected by this project and have followed its evolution closely. I concur with the staff review, which "commends the applicant for this well-designed proposal," and I acknowledge the noted concerns regarding density and open-space guidelines within the Transition Area. Even so, as I stated in my October 2024 letter supporting the then-proposed redevelopment of this land, it is time to embrace a new vision for our community. I continue to advocate for revising the one-unit-per-acre density standard. A more flexible approach—one that reflects the existing density in the developed portions of the Villages of West Neck (excluding the former golf course)—would enable a cohesive, walkable, and vibrant neighborhood. This type of development is especially appealing to residents aged 55 and older, who value community connection, convenience, and the ability to age in place within a supportive environment. Thank you for considering my perspective as you deliberate. I trust you will recognize the long- term benefits of the proposal and approve the zoning modification needed to bring this thoughtful redevelopment to life. Sincerely, ; /,,j0,C id Ltr to PC and Planning Director 9 FEB 2026 re Preserve at West Neck From: iohnshumatel(d)cloud.com To: David W.Hutcheson; Barbara Henley;Michael Berlucchi;Amelia N.Ross-Hammond;Rosemary C.Wilson;Worth Remick;Cal"Cash"Jackson-Green;Stacy Cummings Jr.;Joashua F.Schulman;Jennifer V.Rouse;City of Virginia Beach Mayors Office;Walter Camo;John Cromwell; Michael Anderson;Kathryn Bvler;Bryan Plumlee;Susan B. Hioaen; Holly Cuellar;John H.Coston; Neena Mooriani; Michael C.Mauch;Marchelle L.Coleman;Kathy M. Warren;Carrie L.Bookholt;Kaitlen S.Alcock; Katherine C.Schoonover Subject: Is SOTAR going away? Date: Tuesday,February 10,2026 8:49:57 AM CAUTION;This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Civility should be a basic expectation in public discourse—whether before this Commission, City Council, or within communities like the Villages at West Neck. Unfortunately, civility in West Neck has been lacking in recent years. SOTAR has taken an aggressive approach that has undermined good-faith efforts to reach a reasonable, compromised solution for the former Signature Golf Course.They forced their way into leadership positions, controlled the narrative,silenced dissent,and even undermined and delayed a state-required communication tool to limit opposing viewpoints. While SOTAR may appear well-behaved at upcoming public meetings,their leadership continues to promote a false narrative about community support and future development in the Transition Area.They have turned guidelines into rigid rules,framed this issue as a moral battle, personally attacked supporters of the plan,and intimidated residents from speaking openly. You have seen them walking the halls of City Hall and have taken their phone calls. The Planning Commission has already seen evidence of their behavior last week through organized protests intended to intimidate. Although SOTAR's influence may be diminishing,they wilt not accept approval of this project and will likely continue harassment and threats of litigation against the City, developers, landowners, and even our own HOA. SOTAR is a vocal minority. Most residents want to move beyond division and toward a solution to restore the tranquility of our community. Please do not be swayed by their intimidation,their lanyards, and their nametags. Stand up to SOTAR. Make the decision that is right for the community and the City. Support The Preserves. John Shumate 2949 Elegance Lane Virginia Beach VA 23456 757-831-2294 Villages of West Neck Resident From: James Cox PRO Project Approval for Preserve at WN Villages of West Neck Resident To: All Planning Commissioners Project Approval Considerations and Data CONSIDERATIONS Development is not approved: Concerns The leaders SOTAR have our community concerned about 10 years of terror and construction noise, house foundations trembling and response time by emergency vehicles slowed because roads will be blocked by construction equipment. --I am concerned about 10 more years of community stagnation --I am concerned about the West Neck Villages remaining cocooned around private unusable, undeveloped land, --I am concerned about NO usable and/or visible open space, or beautiful vistas, walking trails --I am very concerned about continued dissension among residents brought on by highly aggressive SOTAR actions and narrative. --I am extremely concerned about West Neck neighbors and residents continuing to have heightened angst, frightened and scared to talk freely for fear of being called a traitor by SOTAR advocates. -- I am not afraid to speak up, but trust me, there are many silent residents who are afraid, many who want this development, many who have switched from no to a yes. Much discussion coming from no-development advocates speaks out and leans on that if the commission and council approve this proposal, it will lead to more of the same in the Transition area. no, No, and absolutely NO! No, WHY? (this is important) The Villages West Neck is an anomaly. One of a kind. There is No other development in the City of VB under these constraints, conditions and dilemma. If fact, because of this, the Planning Commission and City Council should seriously assess and consider a guideline easement allowance over full compliance of the Comprehensive Plan and TA/ITA guidelines during the decision process, recognizing this predicament And a note here, almost, if not all, previous development projects have exceeded TA/ITA guidelines. West Neck does not even own or control the open space surrounding it, but it is considered/being used against the project. As well, the scope of this project should be more than just density/common space, as the Planning Commission Staff's recommendation used, in its decision not recommending approval. These should not be the full weight for their disapproval. Otherwise, reading the Planning Commission Staff report, everything about the development proposal is glowing. Development proposal does not pass: Effect The Villages West Neck is left with nothing and possibly worse. Golf course gone Open space gone. With private owner, WN will be encased, not only by dense undergrowth, but possibly an unsightly fence erected surrounding the property. If the vision of this proposal cannot be seen, the Open Space must be a forest that cannot be seen through, to realize and understand this is a win for West Neck, a win for Indian River Plantation, and a win for the City of Virginia Beach. I express my full support and endorsement. I call on and appeal to the Planning Commission vote Yes, to approve this West Neck and Indian River development project. It is a terrific compromise and the best solution for a 61/2 year old lingering and what seems to be a never-ending saga. DATA WN Open Space less than 4%of total acreage (400+ acres) W/out development less than 4% (old Signature GC property private (and) And will not be assessable, open or groomed in anyway With development MORE than 40 % - actual visible/usable open space That is 1000%more open space 934 = WN resident Lots, 40 = WN Residents directly affected by new homes built _ <5% of total West Neck homes 26 homes in Carrolton Village, 4 homes in The Grove Village 5 condominium units( appx 10 residents) in Brookingstone Village (A lake will be between and separate the two areas) I know the Planning Commission has been involved in and spent untold hours and effort over the past several years on this development project. It is greatly appreciated. Thank you for your consideration. James Cox 2948 Elegance Ln Virginia Beacb,VA 23456 757-777-2048 Jcox53@verizon.net From: idpca To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: A Constituent"s Support for Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 8:09:43 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good morning,As a veteran who served our country, I'm thrilled to see a plan that finally brings the old West Neck golf course back to life. For years, this deteriorating property has been an eyesore and a wasted resource for our community. The Preserve at West Neck project would not only restore the golf course, but also create walking trails, open green spaces, and much-needed stormwater improvements. This comprehensive solution is exactly what our neighborhood needs. Respectfully, Laurence Apel From: Maureen Kellv To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: A Neighbor"s Perspective on Preserve at West Neck Date: Tuesday,February 10,2026 11:31:52 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To Virginia Beach City Council and Planning Commission, I'm glad to see the Preserve at West Neck project moving forward.Right now,the old golf course sits unused and overgrown.This plan would transform it into walking trails,green space,and quality senior housing-a huge improvement for our neighborhood.Most of the land stays as open space,which is what I care about most.I support this plan. Respectfully, Maureen Kelly 2905 Elegance Ln West Neck Sent from my iPhone From: Patricia Dillard To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: A Resident"s Support for Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 10:20:25 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, I've lived at 2661 Nestlebrook trail in the Indian River Plantation neighborhood for over 10 years,and I'm excited to support the Preserve at West Neck project.As someone who has watched the old golf course sit abandoned and overgrown for far too long,I'm thrilled to see a plan that will finally bring it back to life. Having a well-maintained golf course again will be a game-changer for our community.Marc Leishman,the professional golfer who lives nearby,is leading this effort,and I can't wait for the course to be open to the public with tee times available to everyone.It will be wonderful to have that amenity back after all these years. Just as importantly,this plan preserves so much open space that we'll all be able to enjoy.Instead of a closed-off, neglected property,there will be walking trails,natural areas,and green space for the whole neighborhood.It's exactly the kind of community asset we've been missing. I fully support the Preserve at West Neck and hope the Planning Commission and City Council will approve this project.It's time to transform this eyesore into something we can all be proud of. Regards, Patricia Dillard 2661 Nestlebrook trail Indian River Plantation Sent from my Whone From: Cyndi t To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Adding My Voice for West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 3:18:51 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. The golf course has been closed and abandoned for years,and it's exciting to see Marc Leishman leading this effort to bring it back.Having a well-maintained course again would be wonderful for our neighborhood.The property has become an overgrown eyesore,and this plan would replace the neglect with beautiful landscaping.The new homes will have substantial natural buffers,and the architecture will complement what's already here.I'm glad to see this project moving forward. Respectfully, Cyndi Torosky Tommaso 2520 Nestlebrook Trail Indian River Plantation Sent from my iPhone From: Marcie Waldron To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Adding My Voice for West Neck Date: Saturday,February 7,2026 8:24:58 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, From my home on 2880 Einstein Dr,I've watched the old golf course sit abandoned and overgrown for years.It's been an eyesore and a wasted opportunity.That's why I'm so excited about the Preserve at West Neck project. Bringing back the golf course is a game-changer.Pm thrilled that a local professional like Marc Leishman is leading this effort.Having a well-maintained course open to the public will be a huge asset for our community.And the plan preserves most of the land as open space with walking trails everyone can enjoy.It's a far better use of this property than the neglect we've seen.The stormwater improvements are also critical,as flooding has been an ongoing issue. After initially having some doubts,I'm now fully on board because this plan finally offers a permanent,sustainable solution for the site.I hope youll approve this project and end the years of uncertainty. Thank you, marcie waldron 2880 Einstein Dr West Neck Sent from my iPhone From: Jonathan Jones To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Adding My Voice for West Neck Date: Saturday,February 7,2026 10:05:03 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good afternoon, As a resident at Willowlawn Way in the Indian River Plantation neighborhood,I'm hopeful about the Preserve at West Neck project.The abandoned golf course has been going to waste for years,and I'm excited that Marc Leishman is leading an effort to bring it back. Having a well-maintained golf course that's open to the public would be a wonderful addition to our community. The flooding and drainage issues in this area have also been ongoing problems,so I'm glad the plan includes significant stormwater improvements that could help reduce flooding for surrounding neighborhoods. Additionally,the new homes will have substantial natural buffers,and the architecture will complement the existing homes.Most residents like myself won't even be near the new construction.Overall,I believe this project will protect and enhance our community. Best regards, Jonathan Jones Willowlawn Way Indian River Plantation From: Rob Clyburn To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: An IRP Neighbor Supporting the West Neck Project Date: Monday,February 9,2026 3:53:03 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. The Preserve at West Neck is exactly what our neighborhood needs.The new homes will have substantial natural buffers to protect us,and there won't be any new cut-through streets.Most importantly,it finally addresses the long- standing safety risk from the abandoned golf course bordering our community.A fast-moving brush fire in March 2023 was a serious wake-up call.Restoring active management and maintenance is crucial for lowering the fire hazard.After years of uncertainty,this plan delivers the positive change we've been waiting for. Respectfully, Rob Clybum 2524 Calumet Dr Indian River Plantation Rob Clybum From: Kathi Hite To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: An IRP Neighbor Supporting the West Neck Project Date: Monday,February 9,2026 2:12:32 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Honorable Members of the Planning Commission and City Council, I'm ready for the old golf course to come back to life!As a resident of Indian River Plantation,I've watched that abandoned property sit unused for far too long.It's been an eyesore in our community,with overgrown weeds and brush making it look neglected.I'm excited that professional golfer Marc Leishman is leading the effort to restore the course and open it up for public play.Having a well-maintained golf course in our neighborhood again would be wonderful.Plus,the new homes and landscaping will be a big improvement over the current state of the property.I hope you'll support this plan to revitalize this area. Thank you, Kathi Hite 2776 Nestlebrook Trail Indian River Plantation Sent from my iPhone From: Susan Scheible To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Benefits of the Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 7:13:14 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, As a resident living on 2717 Browning Drive in the West Neck neighborhood, I am optimistic about the Preserve at West Neck project. For years, the abandoned golf course has been an eyesore,with overgrown weeds and brush. I'm excited that this plan will finally restore the course and create accessible green space for our community to enjoy. The golf course has been closed for over six years, and it will be wonderful to have a well-maintained facility open to the public again. This is a great solution that addresses the problems we've been living with for too long. Best regards, Susan Scheible 2717 Browning Drive West Neck From: Joseph Takach To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Community Support for Preserve at West Neck Date: Friday,February 6,2026 3:15:55 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Regarding the West Neck proposal,I'm supportive of the Preserve at West Neck project.From my home on 2904 enchanting circle,I've watched the old golf course become more and more of a wasted potential over the years.It's been neglected and overgrown ever since it closed,and it's been an eyesore for the whole neighborhood. I'm excited that Marc Leishman,a professional golfer who lives nearby,is leading the effort to reopen the golf course.Having a well-maintained,public course in our community would be such a wonderful amenity.The fact that it will be accessible to all residents is a huge plus.Plus,replacing the abandoned property with quality landscaping and homes will do wonders for our property values and the overall look of the area.As long as the new construction is thoughtfully designed to complement the existing neighborhood,I'm fully supportive of this plan. Sincerely, Joseph Takach 2904 enchanting circle West Neck Sent from my iPhone From: Kelsey Reagan To: Plannina Commissioners;City Council Subject: Firefighter support of West Neck Rezoning Date: Tuesday,February 10,2026 10:53:31 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission and City Council Members, I serve as a Virginia Beach firefighter and was part of the response to the brush fire on the former Signature Golf Course property in 2023.That incident grew into an 8 alarm fire and burned close to 20 acres.Fires like that spread quickly when land sits unmanaged with heavy brush and dry vegetation. From a public safety standpoint,open and maintained land reduces risk.A maintained golf course with regular landscaping,irrigation,and visibility creates a much safer environment than an overgrown property.During the 2023 fire,access to certain areas of the property was difficult because of vegetation and lack of clear pathways.That slows response time and increases danger for firefighters and nearby homes. I support the plan to restore the property with a 9 hole golf course and responsible development.Bringing maintenance,irrigation,and regular activity back to the land will reduce the chance of another large brush fire and improve safety for the surrounding neighborhoods. Thank you for your time and for considering the safety impact of restoring this property. Sincerely, Sent from my iPhone From: EL To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: From IRP:Support for the Preserve at West Neck Date: Tuesday,February 10,2026 11:43:17 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. As a resident of Indian River Plantation, I'm looking forward to the Preserve at West Neck project restoring the long-neglected golf course. For years, this property has been an embarrassment-overgrown and closed off from the community. Marc Leishman's plan to revive the course and create walking trails is exactly what we need. Maintaining this green space will be a huge improvement over its current state. As a veteran who served our country, I'm ready to see this property finally turned around. Respectfully, Richard Witwer 2521 Calumet Drive Indian River Plantation From: lames T.Dowdy To: Plannino Commissioners Cc: Gtv Council Subject: From IRP:Support for the Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 9:41:31 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council and Planning Commission, As someone who has lived in Indian River Plantation for years,I'm excited about the prospect of The Preserve at West Neck project.Having the old golf course restored and open to the public would be a tremendous benefit for our community. The abandoned property has been an eyesore for far too long,with overgrown weeds and brush.Replacing this neglected land with a well-maintained golf course and landscaping would do wonders for the appearance of our neighborhood.And the planned stormwater improvements could finally address the ongoing drainage issues we've faced. Most importantly,the risk of fire is a real concern,as we saw firsthand in March 2023 when a fast-moving brush fire broke out on the abandoned course.Returning this property to active management and maintenance is crucial for improving public safety. After years of uncertainty,I'm fully supportive of this plan.As a veteran who served our country,I believe The Preserve at West Neck represents a sensible compromise that delivers the amenities and improvements our community needs.I urge you to approve this project. Best regards, James Dowdy 2536 Nestlebrook Trail Indian River Plantation Sent from my iPhone From: itakachvbCalamail.com To: Plannina Administration Subject: I support the Preserve at Great Neck Date: Tuesday,February 10,2026 11:47:38 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Joseph Takach 2904 Enchanting Circle Virginia Beach,VA 23456 From: Marion Rosenow To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: In Favor of West Neck Restoration Date: Monday,February 9,2026 7:45:17 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Members of the Planning Commission and City Council, I'm really glad to see the proposal for The Preserve at West Neck,as it would finally address the long-standing issue of the abandoned golf course in our neighborhood.For years,that property has become an overgrown eyesore,with weeds and brush taking over.It's been such an unpleasant sight for all of us who live nearby. The plan to restore the golf course and bring it back into use is exactly what we need.Having a well-maintained course open to the public will be a wonderful addition to our community.And replacing the current neglect with proper landscaping and buffers will greatly improve the appearance of the whole area.I'm confident this will be a positive change that enhances our property values as well. Best regards, Marion Rosenow 2811 Rose Garden Way West Neck Sent from my iPhone From: Catherine Cruz To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: In Support of the Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 2:32:40 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. The Preserve at West Neck is exactly what our community needs.For over six years,the old golf course has sat closed and neglected,an eyesore that's become a real problem for neighbors like me.As a veteran who served our country,I'm tired of the uncertainty and want to see this property finally turned around. The Preserve plan is a comprehensive solution that addresses the issues we've been dealing with-the overgrowth, the drainage problems,the uncertainty about what's next.This isn't a temporary fix,but a long-term plan backed by a real golf course operator.If we don't act now,this property will just continue to deteriorate with no end in sight. I fully support the Preserve at West Neck and hope the Planning Commission and City Council will approve it.Our community has waited long enough-it's time to move forward with a real plan that delivers what we've been asking for. Thank you, Euclid and Catherine Cruz 2604 Nestlebrook Tr Indian River Plantation From: Jason Bryan To: Plannino Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Indian River Plantation Perspective on West Neck Date: Sunday,February 8,2026 12:46:19 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commission and Council Members, As a veteran who served our country,Pm thrilled to see the Preserve at West Neck project moving forward. Restoring the long-abandoned(Legendary Arnold Palmer designed golf course)and creating new walking trails and green space would be a game-changer for our community. For years,that property has been an eyesore-overgrown and inaccessible.But this plan,led by local golf pro Marc Leishman,finally offers a comprehensive solution.Ifs a dream come true to have a well-maintained course open to the public again. Equally exciting is the preservation of open space.Too much of that land has sat unused for far too long.This plan strikes the perfect balance,revitalizing the golf course while safeguarding natural areas for all of us to enjoy. I couldn't be more excited to support this project.As a long-time resident of Indian River Plantation,I urge you to approve the Preserve at West Neck.Our community has waited long enough-it's time to move this forward. Respectfully, Jason Bryan 2605 Willowlawn Way Indian River Plantation Sent from my iPhone From: Kevin Jones To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Indian River Plantation Perspective on West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 4:50:59 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good morning, As a veteran who served our country,I am welcoming the opportunity to restore the abandoned West Neck golf course through the Preserve at West Neck project.For years,this wasted potential has been a source of frustration, not just for me,but for the entire Indian River Plantation community. The return of a well-maintained golf course would be a tremendous asset,providing public access and a hub for recreation.Moreover,the plan's focus on stormwater improvements is crucial,as flooding has long been a persistent issue in our area.Addressing this problem head-on is a game-changer. Most importantly,the Preserve at West Neck addresses the fire risk posed by the neglected golf course.The recent brush fire was a stark reminder of the danger,and this project's proactive land management is essential to making our neighborhood safer. After years of uncertainty,I am fully supportive of this plan.It delivers the solutions we've been seeking,and I urge the Planning Commission and City Council to approve the Preserve at West Neck. Regards, Kevin Jones 3101 Stonewood Drive Indian River Plantation Sent from my iPhone From: Ken Mills To: Plannino Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Indian River Plantation Perspective on West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 1:30:10 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Members of the City Council and Planning Commission, As a resident of the Indian River Plantation neighborhood,I'm welcoming the Preserve at West Neck project.The old golf course has been going to waste for over six years,and it's exciting to see plans to bring it back.Having a well-maintained course that's open to the public,along with new walking trails and green space,would be a wonderful asset for our community.This plan addresses the eyesore we've been dealing with and provides a real, permanent solution.I'm fully on board and hope you'll approve this project_ Regards, Ken Mills Sent from my iPhone From: Brian Talicuran To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Indian River Plantation Perspective on West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 7:33:30 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, As a veteran who served our country,I'm hoping for the Preserve at West Neck project to move forward.The abandoned golf course has become an eyesore,and I'm excited at the prospect of Marc Leishman leading the effort to restore it.Having a well-maintained public course would be wonderful for our community.Additionally,the plan's focus on open space and improved drainage are exactly what our neighborhood needs. Sincerely, Brian Talicuran 2772 Nestlebrook Trail Indian River Plantation Sent from my iPhone From: Ryder.Jeff To: PlanMna Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Indian River Plantation Resident in Support of West Neck Date: Tuesday,February 10,2026 9:55:10 AM Attachments: imaoe001.Dna imaae002.Dno imaae003.Dna imaae004.Dno CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good afternoon, I live in Indian River Plantation, and I'm writing to express my full support for The Preserve at West Neck project. As a long-time resident of this community, I've seen the old golf course deteriorate into an overgrown eyesore over the past six years.The property has just been sitting there, unused and neglected, and it's starting to affect the look and feel of our entire neighborhood. That's why I'm so glad to see this new plan to transform the site.The fact that it will preserve so much open space-with walking trails, a restored golf course, and natural areas-is a huge selling point for me. Right now,the land is completely off-limits, but this will finally give residents like myself a chance to enjoy the outdoors.And the stormwater improvements are another major benefit,as flooding has been an ongoing issue in our area. Overall, I believe this is the best path forward for the property. It cleans up the blight, creates new amenities, and protects the character of our community.After some initial hesitation, I'm now fully behind this project, and I hope the Planning Commission and City Council will approve it.This is the solution we've been waiting for. Furthermore,as I learn more about what was initially reviewed and approved for west neck and IRP, the proposed plan aligns very well with the intent of the "guidelines."The change in density and associated calculations are minimally different from what was initially approved (2.79 proposed vs. 2.52 originally approved).When you compare that minimal difference to the great benefit that this proposal will bring to city of Virginia Beach, I am in full support of this proposal. Best regards, Jeffrey Hyder 2753 Nestlebrook Trl Indian River Plantation Jeffrey M. Hyder,AIA, LEED AP President cdJ Moseley 0 757.368.2800 ( M 757.503.0431 E jhyder@moseleydesigns.com Connect with us MoseleyDesigns.com (Din (®) �-f) Please Note: Our domain has recently changed to @moseleydesigns.com From: Tina Watson To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Indian River Plantation Resident in Support of West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 2:41:58 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I'm writing about the proposed Preserve at West Neck project.As a resident of Indian River Plantation,I'm thrilled to see a plan that would finally restore the long-abandoned golf course. For years,this property has become an overgrown,deteriorating eyesore that negatively impacts our entire neighborhood.Bringing back the golf course,with public tee times,would be a game-changer.And the stormwater improvements could even help address longstanding drainage issues. This is a comprehensive solution that preserves open space,adds trails,and includes only age-restricted housing with substantial buffers.After so much uncertainty,I'm fully behind this project and urge the Planning Commission and City Council to approve it. Respectfully, Emily C Watson 2533 Greystone St Indian River Plantation From: Nicole Pinnock To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: IRP Resident Supporting the Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 9:45:47 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commissioners and City Council Members, I've lived in Indian River Plantation for almost 4 years,and I'm thrilled to see the Preserve at West Neck project moving forward.As a veteran who served our country,I'm especially excited about the plan to restore the long- abandoned golf course. For years,that property has sat closed off and neglected,an eyesore in our otherwise beautiful neighborhood.The idea of having a well-maintained golf course open to the public,with walking trails and green spaces we can all enjoy,is incredibly appealing.Marc Leishman,the professional golfer who lives here,is leading this effort,and I think it's wonderful to have someone with such deep ties to the community spearheading the project. Beyond the golf course,this plan would also address longstanding drainage issues in our area and create important buffers to protect our existing homes.After so many years of uncertainty,I'm eager to see this property transformed from an abandoned liability into an asset for the whole community. I wholeheartedly support the Preserve at West Neck and hope you'll approve this project.It's exactly the kind of thoughtful,comprehensive solution our neighborhood has been waiting for. Best regards, Nicole Burch 2784 Nestlebrook Trl Indian River Plantation Sent from my iPhone From: Michael Pritchard To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: IRP Resident Supporting the Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 9:27:44 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, I've been keeping an eye on the old golf course property near my home in Indian River Plantation,and I'm really hoping for the Preserve at West Neck project to move forward.That course has been abandoned for years,and it's just a missed opportunity for our community.I'm excited that local pro golfer Marc Leishman is involved-having a well-maintained public course again would be fantastic.This plan seems like a great way to revitalize that space. Sincerely, Michael Pritchard 2548 Nestlebrook trail Indian River Plantation Sent from my iPhone From: Pam Mills To: Plannino Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: IRP Resident Supporting the Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 1:27:24 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commissioners and City Council Members, As a resident of Indian River Plantation,I live very close to the former West Neck/Signature golf course.For years, I've watched this property deteriorate into an overgrown,neglected eyesore.The thick brush,weeds,and unmaintained vegetation have created the perfect habitat for a growing rodent and wildlife population that has become a nuisance for our neighborhood. That's why I'm so pleased that the Preserve at West Neck plan will finally restore this property and address these problems.By replacing the dense overgrowth with well-maintained golf fairways,landscaping,and open space,the Preserve will eliminate the cover that has attracted so many unwanted animals.Ongoing professional management will ensure this doesn't become an issue again. After years of uncertainty,I'm excited that this comprehensive solution is on the table.The Preserve delivers what our community has been asking for-a revitalized golf course,new public trails,and thoughtful residential development with substantial buffers.This may be our last,best chance to turn this property around,and I fully support it. Thank you, Pam Mills Sent from my iPhone From: Sherry Kachur To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Local Support for the Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 9:31:17 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. The golf course has sat closed and abandoned for far too long.I'm welcoming the plan to restore it under the leadership of Marc Leishman,a local pro who's invested in our community.Replacing the current eyesore with a well-maintained course that's open to the public would be a huge improvement.Plus,the drainage upgrades could finally help address the flooding issues we've dealt with for years.After so much uncertainty,I'm glad to see a real, permanent solution for this property. Thank you, Sherry Dowdy 2536 Nestlebrook Trl Indian River Plantation From: Maxine Tate-Virginia Beach Resident To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Maxine Tate Supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 10:09:17 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Maxine Tate, a Virginia Beach resident living at 1385 Marseilles Court, writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I'm writing about the Preserve at West Neck proposal, and I wanted to share my support for this project. Even though I don't live right next to the site, I used to live in Rosecrest, I believe this plan aligns well with Virginia Beach's long-term vision and would benefit the entire community. One of the biggest draws for me is that this will finally bring the old golf course back to life. It's been closed and neglected for over six years, and it's exciting to see a local golf pro like Marc Leishman get involved to restore and reopen it. Having a high-quality public course again would be a huge asset. Just as importantly, this plan would convert the abandoned property into meaningful open space that residents can actually use. Right now, it's all fenced off-this will create walking trails, natural areas, and other green amenities that the whole neighborhood can enjoy. That's a much better outcome than just letting the land sit there unused. Beyond the golf and open space, the project's stormwater improvements are a big plus. Flooding and drainage have been ongoing issues in this part of the city, and the new ponds and drainage features could help reduce those problems. Addressing regional flooding challenges is exactly the kind of forward-thinking approach the Comprehensive Plan calls for. Ultimately, this is the kind of infill development that implements Virginia Beach's vision for the future. It protects rural lands from sprawl by growing inward, delivers private investment for public benefits, and provides much-needed senior housing options. For all these reasons, I hope you'll support the Preserve at West Neck. Best regards, Maxine Tate 1385 Marseilles Court Atlantic Shores I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Maxine Taw 1385 Marseilles Court Virginia Beach, VA 23454 Council District 8 Email: maxitl331@cox.net Sincerely, Maxine Taw This message was sent on behalf of the above Virginia Beach resident through WNPreserve.com. The resident authorized this communication and can be reached directly using the contact information above. Questions about this platform? Contact info@wnpreserve.com From: Jeff Hyder To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Re:Preserve at West Neck Proposal Date: Tuesday,February 10,2026 10:41:03 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. From my home on 2753 Nestlebrook Trl,I'm writing to express my support for the Preserve at West Neck project. As a resident who lives near the old golf course,I've been frustrated watching this property sit neglected for years. The overgrown weeds and deteriorating conditions have become an embarrassment for the whole neighborhood. This plan finally offers a real solution.By restoring the golf course and adding walking trails and natural areas,it would transform the property from an eyesore into a community asset that everyone can enjoy.And the substantial stormwater improvements could even help reduce flooding issues that have plagued our area.While I was initially skeptical,the thoughtful buffers and quality architecture have convinced me this is the best path forward.After years of uncertainty,it's time to move this project ahead and put this property to good use. Respectfully, Wendy Hyder 2753 Nestlebrook Trl Indian River Plantation Sent from my iPhone From: Colleen Craia To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Re:Preserve at West Neck Proposal Date: Sunday,February 8,2026 5:07:38 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Honorable Members of the Planning Commission and City Council, For years,the old golf course in our community has been an embarrassment-closed off and neglected,with no public access or enjoyment.I'm glad to see the Preserve at West Neck plan finally offers a real,permanent solution that benefits our entire neighborhood. Most importantly,this plan restores the land as usable open space,with walking trails and natural areas that residents can actually access and enjoy.It's a vast improvement over the current situation where it's just sitting there unused.And the new homes will have substantial buffers,so most of us won't even notice any changes.After over six years of uncertainty,this plan provides the long-term protection and revitalization our community deserves. Regards, Phil Craig From: Katy To: Plannino Commissioners Cc: City Council:1Z Kathy Subject: Reasons to Support Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 3:43:12 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council and Planning Commission, As a nearby resident,I'm excited to see the Preserve at West Neck project moving forward.The old golf course has been abandoned for years,and it's a missed opportunity not to bring it back.Having Marc Leishman,a local professional golfer,leading this project is a huge plus-it will ensure the course is well-maintained and open to the community. A revitalized golf course would be a wonderful asset for our neighborhood.It would provide a beautiful green space for everyone to enjoy,not just homeowners.I'm hopeful this plan can breathe new life into an area that has been neglected for far too long. Thank you, Kathryn Fuleihan 2704 Nestlebrook Trail Indian River Plantation Sandra Griffin From: Deborah Sroufe To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: Cate Council Subject: Regarding the Preserve at West Neck Plan Date: Saturday,February 7,2026 1:19:16 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Council Members and Planning Commission, As a long-time resident of the West Neck neighborhood,I'm looking forward to the Preserve at West Neck project fmally bringing the golf course back to life.The course has sat abandoned and overgrown for far too long,and it will be wonderful to have a well-maintained green space in our community again. I'm also excited about the plan's focus on stormwater improvements.Flooding has been an ongoing issue in our area, and the new drainage ponds and infrastructure could make a real difference in reducing water problems for surrounding homes.Addressing these long-standing drainage challenges is a big priority for me. Respectfully, Deborah Sroufe 3437 Robins Nest Arch West Neck Sent from my iPad From: Cynthia Caldwell To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Speaking Up for West Neck Date: Tuesday,February 10,2026 11:46:56 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Honorable Members of the Planning Commission and City Council, For years,the old golf course property has been a wasted opportunity.It's sat closed and neglected,deteriorating without any plan in place.The Preserve at West Neck finally offers a real,permanent solution-restoring the golf course through a long-term lease and creating new trails and open space for the community.This isn't a temporary fix,but a lasting improvement that will transform an eyesore into a valuable community asset.I'm glad to see this project moving forward and hope you'll support it. Thank you, Cynthia Caldwell 3057 Cadence Way West Neck From: Rhonda To: Plannino Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Speaking Up for West Neck Date: Saturday,February 7,2026 8:33:40 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. The old golf course has been closed and neglected for over six years, and it's been an eyesore in our neighborhood. I'm pleased that Marc Leishman is leading the effort to restore the course and open it up for public use. This plan would also address the persistent drainage issues we've been dealing with and replace the overgrown,blighted property with well-maintained landscaping. As a resident at 2928 Einstein Dr, I fully support The Preserve at West Neck and hope the city will approve this comprehensive solution. Respectfully, rhonda polfus-herrod 2928 Einstein Dr West Neck "Kind words can be short and easy to speak,but their echoes are truly endless." -Mother Teresa From: Dan Campbell To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Speaking Up for West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 1:48:19 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. The old golf course has been sitting unused for years, and it's been an eyesore for the entire neighborhood. From my home on 2597 Nestlebrook Trail, I can see the overgrown weeds and neglected property, and it's really brought down the look of the area. I'm encouraged by the Preserve at West Neck project because it would finally clean up this mess and replace it with a well-maintained, landscaped community. As a veteran who served our country, I'm glad to see a plan that offers a permanent solution to this abandoned property. Having a golf course and trails open to the public would be a great asset, and I believe it would help improve our property values too. It's time to put this neglected land to good use, and I hope the Planning Commission and City Council will approve this project. Best regards, Danny Campbell 2597 Nestlebrook Trail Indian River Plantation From: Erin Jones To: Planning Commissioners Cc: Cry Council Subject: Speaking Up for West Neck Date: Saturday,February 7,2026 9:59:39 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good morning, I'm writing to express my support for the Preserve at West Neck project.As a resident who lives on Willowlawn Way,just a stone's throw from the old golf course,I'm excited to see this property brought back to life. It's been over six years since the golf course was abandoned,and the land has remained private and inaccessible to the community.I'm thrilled that Marc Leishman,a professional golfer who lives in the area,is leading the effort to restore the course.Having a well-maintained public golf course in our neighborhood would be a wonderful asset.I look forward to being able to use the course and enjoy the outdoor space once again. Thank you, Erin Jones 2601 Willowlawn Way West Neck From: larryscheible To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council;VB BCCaa NETORG19975582.onmicrosoft.com Subject: Standing with the Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 5:01:59 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. From my home on 2717 Browning Drive, I'm glad to see the Preserve at West Neck project moving forward. As a veteran who served our country, I know the importance of having a strong, united community. This plan will protect our neighborhood by providing substantial natural buffers and no new cut-through streets. For over six years, the old golf course has sat abandoned and neglected. The property has become an eyesore, causing drainage issues and uncertainty about the future. The Preserve at West Neck finally offers a real, permanent solution - restoring the golf course, adding trails and open space, and including only age-restricted housing. I'm 100% behind this plan. After years of back-and-forth debate, it's time to get this property turned around. The Preserve delivers what we've been asking for, and I urge the Planning Commission and City Council to approve it. Best regards, Lawrence Scheible 2717 Browning Drive West Neck From: Amy Erbskom To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: pity Council Subject: Standing with the Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 3:38:28 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council and Planning Commissioners,For years, the old golf course in my neighborhood has been a neglected eyesore. As someone who lives right near the property, I'm thrilled to see a real plan to finally revive it. The Preserve at West Neck project is exactly what we need. The course has been closed for over six years,with the land sitting unused and overgrown. It's been a constant source of frustration, dragging down the look and feel of the whole area. But this plan from Marc Leishman would change all that. Restoring the course and opening it up to the public would be a huge win- not to mention all the new walking trails and preserved green space. And the stormwater improvements could even help reduce flooding in the surrounding neighborhoods. This is the right solution at the right time. After years of uncertainty, it's time to approve The Preserve and get this property turned around. I fully support this plan and hope you will too. Sincerely, Amy Erbskorn Indian River Plantation Amy Erbskom Phone: 757-636-1933 E-mail: aerbskomQgmail_com From: Richard Greeder To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Supporting the Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 2:23:05 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Members of the City Council and Planning Commission, Even though I don't live right next to this project,I'm looking forward to the Preserve at West Neck.As someone who has dealt with flooding issues in my neighborhood for years,the stormwater improvements this plan includes are a big plus.The new ponds and drainage features could really help reduce the water problems that have impacted our whole area. Plus,with so many seniors in Virginia Beach,the 143 new homes designed for residents 55 and older will be a welcome addition.We need more housing options that allow our older neighbors to age in place comfortably.Since it's age-restricted,there won't even be any impact on local school capacity. This project aligns perfectly with the city's Comprehensive Plan goals around stormwater management,transition area development,and meeting the growing demand for senior housing.It's a smart way to responsibly develop this land without sprawling outward.I hope you'll support it. Sincerely, Richard Greeder Christopher farms Sent from my iPhone From: H.T.Pohlman To: Plannina Commissioners Subject: The Preserve at West Neck Date: Tuesday,February 10,2026 1:32:54 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express our strong support for the proposed Preserve at West Neck. As residents of West Neck for over 15 years,we believe the situation regarding the former Signature Golf Course has remained unresolved for too long. After attending several presentations on the repurposing of the site, we feel the proposal submitted by Harrison& Lear and the Leishmans represents the best possible outcome for the community. We are disappointed by the approach taken by the SOTAR group and their lack of a clear, constructive alternative. We believe the current proposal is a far more viable solution for our neighborhood. Please give a favorable response to the request to build The Preserve. We truly believe it will be an asset to both West Neck and Virginia Beach. Sincerely, H. T. Pohlman Carol Pohlman Virus-free.www.avg.com From: Cheryl Buaelski To: Planning Administration Subject: The Preserve Date: Monday,February 9,2026 5:20:30 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Please vote to support the development known as the Preserve. From: Gail Conley To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: The Right Plan for West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 6:03:32 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Planning Commissioners and City Council Members, As a resident of West Neck who lives near the old golf course property,I'm optimistic about the Preserve at West Neck project.This abandoned property has been an eyesore for years,with overgrown weeds and brush affecting our neighborhood's appearance.Replacing it with well-maintained landscaping and age-restricted homes with substantial natural buffers is exactly what we need. Having served in the military,I know the importance of creating strong,secure communities.This plan protects our existing neighborhood while providing new housing options for seniors.It's a comprehensive solution that addresses the issues we've dealt with for too long. After years of uncertainty,I'm ready for this property to be turned around.The Preserve at West Neck is the right plan at the right time,and I fully support its approval. Thank you, Gail Conley,Commander,USN(Retired) 2980 Elegance Lane West Neck Sent from my iPhone From: Maureen Kellv To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Urging Support for Preserve at West Neck Date: Tuesday,February 10,2026 11:33:04 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good afternoon, As a veteran who served our country,I am supportive of the Preserve at West Neck project.Right now,the old golf course is just sitting there,closed off and inaccessible to residents.This plan would create walking trails and green space that the whole community could enjoy. Most of the land would remain as open space,which is a huge improvement over the current situation where it's been an eyesore for years.Replacing the neglect with well-maintained landscaping would help keep our neighborhood looking its best. The new homes are designed to complement the existing architecture and have substantial natural buffers,so they won't impact the character of the area.And the 55+age restriction means there's no added burden on local schools. After years of uncertainty,this plan finally offers a real,permanent solution for the property.I hope you will consider approving it. Respectfully, Lee Kelly 2905 Elegance Ln West Neck Sent from my iPhone From: LAURA STAYLOR To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Urging Support for Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 8:29:05 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Commissioners and Council Members, As a resident at 2803 Rose Garden Way in the West Neck neighborhood,I'm excited about the Preserve at West Neck project and hope you'll approve it.For years,the old golf course has sat abandoned and overgrown,becoming an eyesore.It's been frustrating watching this property go to waste,with no progress or plan in sight. That's why I'm so supportive of the Preserve proposal.Restoring the golf course under the leadership of local pro Marc Leishman would be a game-changer for our community.Having a well-maintained course open to the public again would be wonderful.And replacing the neglected property with thoughtfully designed homes for 55+ residents,along with new trails and open space,is exactly what we need. This plan finally offers a real,permanent solution after years of uncertainty.I'm confident it will improve our neighborhood's appearance,property values,and overall quality of life.Please support the Preserve at West Neck- it's exactly the positive change we've been hoping for. Respectfully, Laura Sorrell 2803 Rose Garden Way West Neck Sent from my iPhone From: Michele Bryan To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Urging Support for Preserve at West Neck Date: Sunday,February 8,2026 8:57:35 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. The old golf course has been sitting unused for over 6 years,and it's exciting to see a real plan to bring it back.As a resident of Indian River Plantation,I'm thrilled that Marc Leishman is leading this effort to restore the course and open it up for the whole community.Having a well-maintained golf course right here in the neighborhood would be wonderful. But the best part is that this plan preserves so much open space-the golf course,walking trails,and natural areas. Right now that land is completely off-limits,but The Preserve at West Neck would let us all enjoy it again.This is a huge improvement over the current situation where it's just overgrown and neglected. After years of uncertainty,I'm ready for something positive to happen with this property.The Preserve delivers the solution we've been waiting for-it brings back the golf course,preserves open space,and includes only age- restricted housing.This may be our last chance to turn this around,and I fully support moving forward with this plan. Regards, Michele Bryan Indian River Plantation Sent from my iPhone From: LAURA STAYLOR To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Urging Support for Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 8:32:03 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Commissioners and Council Members, As a resident at 2803 Rose Garden Way in the West Neck neighborhood,I'm excited about the Preserve at West Neck project and hope you'll approve it.For years,the old golf course has sat abandoned and overgrown,becoming an eyesore.It's been frustrating watching this property go to waste,with no progress or plan in sight. That's why Pm so supportive of the Preserve proposal.Restoring the golf course under the leadership of local pro Marc Leishman would be a game-changer for our community.Having a well-maintained course open to the public again would be wonderful.And replacing the neglected property with thoughtfully designed homes for 55+ residents,along with new trails and open space,is exactly what we need. This plan finally offers a real,permanent solution after years of uncertainty.I'm confident it will improve our neighborhood's appearance,property values,and overall quality of life.Please support the Preserve at West Neck- it's exactly the positive change we've been hoping for. Respectfully, Dr M Ronald Sorrell 2803 Rose Garden Way West Neck Sent from my iPhone From: James Cox To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Urging Support for Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 11:49:59 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. City Council and Planning Team, I live locally in Virginia Beach and am writing to express my support for the proposed redevelopment of the former West Neck golf course. Like many in the area, I've watched the property sit overgrown and underutilized for years, and this proposal represents a thoughtful opportunity to restore it as a true community asset. The combination of a revived golf course and clubhouse, nature walk areas, and overall beautification would transform a neglected space into one that promotes activity, connection, and serenity for residents and visitors alike. I am also mindful of the concerns raised by homeowners whose properties back up to the former course and whose views may be affected, and I believe those concerns deserve respect. At the same time, within a neighborhood of more than 900 homes, the proposed housing would directly affect a relatively small number—approximately 50 residences, or less than five percent of the community. An additional benefit worth noting is the potential relocation of the First Tee YMCA program to the proposed 9-hole course if Virginia Beach National were ever rezoned or sold. This would be a tremendous opportunity for grandchildren in the West Neck community and for youth across Virginia Beach, reinforcing the project's value not just as redevelopment,but as a long-term investment in recreation, mentorship, and community well-being. Very Respectfully, Jim Cox,Jr. Jim Cox,Jr. coxjc05@gmail.com 757.630.2192 From: Jason McDonald To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Virginia Beach Resident Supporting West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 5:07:47 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Regarding the West Neck proposal, I'm ready for the Preserve at West Neck project. The old golf course has been an embarrassment for too long -it's time to bring back the course and clean up this neglected property. As a neighbor, I'm excited for the improvements this plan will deliver. Regards, Jason McDonald Indian River Plantation From: Brett Bell To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Development Aligns with Comprehensive Plan Date: Monday,February 9,2026 12:08:46 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Regarding the West Neck proposal, As residents of Indian River Plantation,we're excited to see the Preserve at West Neck project move forward. For years, the abandoned golf course has been an eyesore,with overgrown weeds and brush making the area look neglected. This plan would finally transform it into a well-maintained public golf course, open to the entire community. Having a beautiful, professionally-operated course right in our neighborhood would be a tremendous asset. Additionally, the plan includes important stormwater improvements that could help reduce flooding in our area. Drainage has been an ongoing issue, so this infrastructure investment is greatly needed. As a veteran who served our country, I'm pleased to see this project preserving open space and natural buffers to protect our community. The new homes are thoughtfully designed to complement the existing neighborhood. This feels like the best path forward for the future of this property. We support the Preserve at West Neck and urge the Planning Commission and City Council to approve it. Best regards, Brett& Rachel Bell 2525 Nestlebrook Trl Indian River Plantation From: Alan Young-West Neck Resident To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident Alan Young Supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 9:04:00 AM CAUTION!:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless 1 you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. JI Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Alan Young, a West Neck resident living at 2885 Einstein Drive, writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. Dear Planning Commission Members and Council, I've lived at 2885 Einstein Drive in West Neck since 2014, and I'm writing to express my support for the Preserve at West Neck project. This property has sat closed and neglected for far too long, and this plan finally offers a real, permanent solution. The long-term lease for the golf course means it won't just be a temporary fix. Thank you, Alan Young 2885 Einstein Drive West Neck I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Alan Young 2885 Einstein Drive Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email: lilvabeach@gmail.com Sincerely, Alan Young This message was sent on behalf of the above Virginia Beach resident through WNPreserve.com. The resident authorized this communication and can be reached directly using the contact information above. Questions about this platform? Contact info@wnpreserve.com From: Arthur Brooks-West Neck Resident To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident Arthur Brooks supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Tuesday,February 10,2026 12:26:42 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Arthur Brooks, a West Neck resident living at 2792 Nestlebrook Trl, writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. Good afternoon, As a long-time resident of Indian River Plantation, I'm writing to express my strong support for the Preserve at West Neck project. For years, the former West Neck golf course has sat abandoned and overgrown, creating an eyesore and safety hazard for our community. I'm thrilled to see Marc Leishman, a professional golfer who lives nearby, leading the effort to restore this property. Reopening the golf course would be a game-changer for our neighborhood. The public tee times and well-maintained fairways and greens would be a dream come true, providing a wonderful community amenity that has been sorely missed. Just as importantly, the plan includes significant stormwater improvements that could help reduce the persistent flooding issues we've faced. In addition, the new homes will have ample natural buffers, ensuring they blend seamlessly into the existing neighborhood. And the high-quality architecture will complement the surrounding area, with no cheap materials like vinyl siding. After years of uncertainty, this plan finally offers a permanent, thoughtful solution for the property. I couldn't be more excited to see it move forward. As a concerned citizen, I urge the Planning Commission and City Council to approve this project. Best regards, Arthur Brooks 2792 Nestlebrook Trl Indian River Plantation I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Arthur Brooks 2792 Nestlebrook Trl Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email: cgacoc@aol.com Sincerely, Arthur Brooks This message was sent on behalf of the above Virginia Beach resident through WNPreserve.com. The resident authorized this communication and can be reached directly using the contact information above. Questions about this platform?Contact info@wnpreserve.com From: Bernard Kurash-West Neck Resident To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident Bernard Kurash Supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 1:00:00 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Bernard Kurash, a West Neck resident living at 2853 Rose Garden Way, writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. The abandoned golf course on West Neck has been an eyesore for years. From my home on 2853 Rose Garden Way, I've watched as the property has become overgrown with weeds and brush, dragging down the look of our entire neighborhood. This new plan to turn it into a 55+ community with a restored golf course and public trails is exactly what we need. It will finally clean up that neglected mess and replace it with a well-kept, attractive property. After some initial concerns, I've come to fully support this project. The open space and stormwater improvements make a lot of sense, and I'm glad there's a long-term solution in place instead of the uncertainty we've had for over six years. This is the best path forward for our community. Thank you, Bernard Kurash 2853 Rose Garden Way West Neck I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Bernard Kurash 2853 Rose Garden Way Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email: jpkurash@yahoo.com Sincerely, Bernard Kurash This message was sent on behalf of the above Virginia Beach resident through WNPreserve.com. The resident authorized this communication and can be reached directly using the contact information above. Questions about this platform? Contact info@wnpreserve.com From: Colleen Craig-West Neck Resident To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident Colleen Craig Supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Tuesday,February 10,2026 8:28:57 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Colleen Craig, a West Neck resident living at 2972 Elegance Lane, writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. I've lived in West Neck for 15 years and am optimistic about the Preserve at West Neck plan. The old golf course has been closed off for too long, becoming an eyesore in our community. This proposal would finally put the property to good use - restoring golf and creating new green spaces for everyone to enjoy. Letting this land sit neglected any longer just doesn't make sense. I'm glad to see a plan that would clean up the area and provide some certainty after all these years of uncertainty. Regards, Colleen Craig West Neck I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Colleen Craig 2972 Elegance Lane Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email- craig523@cox.net Sincerely, Colleen Craig This message was sent on behalf of the above Virginia Beach resident through WNPreserve.com. The resident authorized this communication and can be reached directly using the contact information above. Questions about this platform?Contact info@wnpreserve.com From: Colleen Gard-West Neck Resident To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident Colleen Gard Supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Saturday,February 7,2026 3:39:14 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless 1 you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Colleen Gard, a West Neck resident living at 2972 Elegance Lane, writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. I've lived in West Neck for years, right near the old golf course property. I'm optimistic about the Preserve at West Neck project bringing that eyesore of an abandoned course back to life. For too long it's just sat there overgrown and neglected. Getting a world- class golfer like Marc Leishman to lead the redevelopment is exciting - it means we'll finally have a high-quality, community-accessible course again. And preserving most of the land as open space with trails will be a huge improvement over the current situation where it's all fenced off. This plan tackles the problems we've dealt with for years. Thank you, Colleen Gard West Neck I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Colleen Gard 2972 Elegance Lane Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email: gard4@cox.net Sincerely, Colleen Gard This message was sent on behalf of the above Virginia Beach resident through WNPreserve.com. The resident authorized this communication and can be reached directly using the contact information above. Questions about this platform? Contact info@wnpreserve.com From: Dan Hugeback-West Neck Resident To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident Dan Hugeback Supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 9:07:34 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Dan Hugeback, a West Neck resident living at 2528 Nestlebrook Trail, writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. Dear City Council and Planning Commission, From my home on 2528 Nestlebrook Trail in Indian River Plantation, I've watched the old golf course property become a wasted potential for far too long. It's been an eyesore for years, overgrown with weeds and brush, and I'm ready for that to change. That's why I'm excited about the Preserve at West Neck project. Bringing back the golf course under the leadership of local pro Marc Leishman would be wonderful for our community. Having a well-maintained course open to the public again would be a huge improvement. And replacing the neglected, blighted land with thoughtful landscaping and homes for 55+ residents is exactly what this area needs. I'm confident the new development will complement the existing neighborhood and even boost our property values. It's a win-win that I fully support. In fact, my wife and I very seriously considering "downsizing" our current residence and buying in the new development!!! Regards, Dan Hugeback 2528 Nestlebrook Trail Indian River Plantation I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Dan Hugeback 2528 Nestlebrook Trail Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email: danhugeback@gmail.com Sincerely, Dan Hugeback This message was sent on behalf of the above Virginia Beach resident through WNPreserve.com. The resident authorized this communication and can be reached directly using the contact information above. Questions about this platform? Contact info@wnpreserve.com From: Elvira Delantar-West Neck Resident To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident Elvira Delantar Supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Tuesday,February 10,2026 1:55:51 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Elvira Delantar , a West Neck resident living at 2521 Greystone street Virginia bch, writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. I'm glad to see the plan to bring back the old golf course at West Neck. It's been sitting unused for years, and I'm excited that Marc Leishman is leading this effort to restore it for the community. Having a well-maintained course open to the public would be wonderful for our neighborhood. Regards, Elvira Delantar 2521 Greystone street Virginia bch West Neck I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Elvira Delantar 2521 Greystone street Virginia bch Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email: ezdelantar@yahoo.com Sincerely, Elvira Delantar This message was sent on behalf of the above Virginia Beach resident through WNPreserve.com. The resident authorized this communication and can be reached directly using the contact information above. From: Paul Spinden-West Neck Resident To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident Francisco Paras Supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Saturday,February 7,2D26 6:57:59 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Paul Spinden, a West Neck resident living at 2833 Einstein Drive, writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. I am a resident of West Neck Village in Virginia Beach and am writing to formally express my support for the proposed rezoning and redevelopment of the former West Neck golf course. The golf course has been closed for an extended period and the property is currently unused and overgrown. I support the plan to develop a nine-hole golf course along with additional residential homes. This proposal represents a constructive and practical use of the land and would bring positive improvement to the area. I believe this plan is a reasonable and balanced compromise that benefits the surrounding community, enhances property values, and respects the property owner's right to responsibly develop the property. I support this proposal and do not support alternative development plans. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully, Paul Spinden 2833 Einstein Drive West Neck 724-554-8102 1 urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Paul Spinden 2833 Einstein Drive Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email: spindy0196@gmail.com Sincerely, Paul Spinden This message was sent on behalf of the above Virginia Beach resident through WNPreserve.com. The resident authorized this communication and can be reached directly using the contact information above. Questions about this platform?Contact info@wnpreserve.com From: Hee Yoon-West Neck Resident To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident Hee Yoon Supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 10:34:40 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Hee Yoon, a West Neck resident living at 2797 Nestlebrook Trail , writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. The old golf course has been a run-down eyesore for years. I'm pleased that Marc Leishman's plan would restore it to a well-maintained public course that our whole community can enjoy. The new trails and open spaces would be a huge improvement over the neglected property we have now. Sincerely, Hee Yoon 2797 Nestlebrook Trail Indian River Plantation I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Hee Yoon 2797 Nestlebrook Trail Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email: hee.w.yoon@gmail.com Sincerely, Hee Yoon This message was sent on behalf of the above Virginia Beach resident through WNPreserve.com. The resident authorized this communication and can be reached directly using the contact information above. From: Helen Hills-West Neck Resident To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident Helen Hills Supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Tuesday,February 10,2026 8:06:24 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Helen Hills, a West Neck resident living at 2516 Greystone Street, writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. The old golf course has been a wasted potential for far too long. I'm glad to see Marc Leishman and the Preserve at West Neck team bringing it back to life. Having a well- maintained public course in our neighborhood would be a huge asset. It's exciting to have a professional golfer like Marc leading this project and ensuring the course is accessible to the community. If this goes through, we'll finally get to enjoy an amenity that's been closed off for years. But if nothing changes, the property will stay private and neglected. I hope the Planning Commission and City Council will approve this plan. Respectfully, Helen Hills 2516 Greystone Street Indian River Plantation I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Helen Hills 2516 Greystone Street Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email: dbleh5@yahoo.com Sincerely, Helen Hills From: Jae cesar Ledezma-West Neck Resident To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident Jae cesar Ledezma supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Tuesday,February 10,2026 12:24:34 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Jae cesar Ledezma, a West Neck resident living at 2744 Nestlebrook Trail, writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. Good morning, As a long-time resident of Indian River Plantation, I live at 2744 Nestlebrook Trail and have been optimistic about the Preserve at West Neck project from the start. For years, the old golf course has just been sitting there, closed and abandoned. It's exciting to see professional golfer Marc Leishman leading the effort to bring it back to life. Having a well-maintained golf course open to the public will be a wonderful addition to our neighborhood. I look forward to having the option to play right in our community again, instead of having to drive elsewhere. This project isn't just about golf, though - the plans also include trails and open green space that everyone can enjoy. It's the kind of investment that will truly enhance the quality of life for residents like myself. I'm glad to see the city considering this proposal and hope you'll support it. Regards, Jae cesar Ledezma 2744 Nestlebrook Trail Indian River Plantation I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Jae cesar Ledezma 2744 Nestlebrook Trail Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email: jp72mex@gmail.com Sincerely, Jae cesar Ledezma This message was sent on behalf of the above Virginia Beach resident through WNPreserve.com. The resident authorized this communication and can be reached directly using the contact information above. Questions about this platform? Contact info@wnpreserve.com From: )oAnn Moran-West Neck Resident To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident JoAnn Moran Supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Saturday,February 7,2026 7:14:03 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am JoAnn Moran, a West Neck resident living at 3177 Stonewood Drive, writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. Dear Members of the Planning Commission and City Council, I'm glad to see the proposal to restore the old golf course at West Neck. For far too long, this property has sat abandoned and deteriorating. As a resident of the Indian River Plantation neighborhood, I'm excited at the prospect of having a well-maintained golf course back in our community. Marc Leishman, a local pro golfer, is leading this project, and I think that's a great sign. Not only will the course be open to the public, but it will also provide a wonderful amenity for our 55+ community. After all, the old course has been closed for over 6 years - it will be fantastic to have it back and accessible again. We are tried of looking at the 6' weeds and dealing with the snakes, mice etc coming off the abandoned land that hasn't been touched in 5-6 years!! Regards, JoAnn Moran 3177 Stonewood Drive Indian River Plantation I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at.- JoAnn Moran 3177 Stonewood Drive Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email: joannmoran@aol.com Sincerely, JoAnn Moran This message was sent on behalf of the above Virginia Beach resident through WNPreserve.com. The resident authorized this communication and can be reached directly using the contact information above. Questions about this platform? Contact info@wnpreserve.com From: Kathi Hite-West Neck Resident To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident Kathi Hite Supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 10:36:38 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Kathi Hite, a West Neck resident living at 2776 Nestlebrook Trail, writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. Dear Honorable Members of the Planning Commission and City Council, I'm ready for the old golf course to come back to life! As a resident of Indian River Plantation, I've watched that abandoned property sit unused for far too long. It's been an eyesore in our community, with overgrown weeds and brush making it look neglected. I'm excited that professional golfer Marc Leishman is leading the effort to restore the course and open it up for public play. Having a well-maintained golf course in our neighborhood again would be wonderful. Plus, the new homes and landscaping will be a big improvement over the current state of the property. I hope you'll support this plan to revitalize this area. Thank you, Kathi Hite 2776 Nestlebrook Trail Indian River Plantation I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Kathi Hite 2776 Nestlebrook Trail Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email: redleg89@me.com Sincerely, Kathi Hite From: Linda Hewitt-West Neck Resident To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident Linda Hewitt Supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Sunday,February 8,2026 8:40:47 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Linda Hewitt, a West Neck resident living at Winding Trail Circle, writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. Dear Honorable Members of the Planning Commission and City Council, I've lived in the West Neck neighborhood on Winding Trail Circle for 4 years, and I'm excited to voice my support for the Preserve at West Neck project. The old golf course has been sitting unused for far too long, and I can't wait to see it restored. As someone who lives right near the property, the overgrown and neglected land has been an eyesore for years. This plan would finally clean it up and turn it into a true asset for the community. Beyond that, the stormwater improvements included in the project are desperately needed. Flooding has been an ongoing issue, and I'm hopeful this could help alleviate some of the drainage problems we've faced. After all this time of uncertainty, it's exciting to have a real, long-term solution for the site. Sincerely, Linda Hewitt Winding Trail Circle West Neck I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Linda Hewitt Winding Trail Circle Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email- Ishewitt54@gmail.com Sincerely, Linda Hewitt From: Mary Cupper-West Neck Resident To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident Mary Cupper Supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Sunday,February 8,2026 1:59:01 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Mary Cupper, a West Neck resident living at 2806 Loveliness Court , writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. Dear Members of City Council and the Planning Commission, As a resident who lives at 2806 Loveliness Court in the West Neck neighborhood, I am pleased that the Preserve at West Neck project is being considered. For years, the old golf course has sat closed off and neglected, becoming an eyesore for our community. This new plan would finally transform that missed opportunity into an asset we can all enjoy. What excites me most is the focus on open space and restoring access to the land. Rather than remaining a private, overgrown property, the majority will become walking trails, a new golf course, and natural areas that residents can use. I look forward to having green space right in our neighborhood that we can actually access and appreciate. Additionally, the high-quality landscaping and architecture will be a vast improvement over the current neglected state of the property. I'm confident this plan will enhance our property values and the overall appearance of the West Neck area. Respectfully, Mary Cupper 2806 Loveliness Court West Neck I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Mary Cupper 2806 Loveliness Court Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email: macupper@cox.net From: Michael Scanlan-West Neck Resident To: Plannino Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident Michael Scanlan Supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 7:49:12 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Michael Scanlan, a West Neck resident living at 2932 Einstein dr, writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. As a resident at 2932 Einstein dr, I fully support the Preserve at West Neck project. Flooding and drainage have been ongoing problems in our area, but this plan includes significant stormwater improvements that could help reduce flooding in our neighborhood. It's been incredibly frustrating watching the old golf course sit closed and neglected for over six years. This project finally offers a real, permanent solution that will restore the property and provide long-term benefits. While I had some concerns at first, the details around the buffers, open space, and managed landscapes have convinced me this is the best path forward. As a veteran who served our country, I'm especially worried about the fire risk from the abandoned course. The Preserve's active land management will make conditions much safer for all of us. I'm ready to see this happen and put an end to years of uncertainty. Respectfully, Michael Scanlan 2932 Einstein dr West Neck I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Michael Scanlan 2932 Einstein dr Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email: miscanlan@cox.net Sincerely, Michael Scanlan From: Nicole Bowers-West Neck Resident To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident Nicole Bowers Supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 8:36:08 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Nicole Bowers, a West Neck resident, writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. Dear Virginia Beach Commissioners and Council Members, I'm supportive of the Preserve at West Neck project because it will bring back the abandoned golf course that's been closed for years. As a resident of Indian River Plantation, I'm excited that Marc Leishman is leading this effort to restore the course and make it open to the public again. Having a well-maintained golf course right in our neighborhood would be wonderful. Thank you, Nicole Bowers I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Nicole Bowers Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email: nargeOO1@yahoo.com Sincerely, Nicole Bowers This message was sent on behalf of the above Virginia Beach resident through WNPreserve.com. The resident authorized this communication and can be reached directly using the contact information above. Questions about this platform? Contact info@wnpreserve.com From: Pamela Beaton-West Neck Resident To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident Pamela Beaton Supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 4:53:00 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Pamela Beaton, a West Neck resident living at 3024 Cadence Way, writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. To the Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, As a resident living at 3024 Cadence Way in West Neck, I'm writing to express my full support for The Preserve at West Neck project. This property has been closed off and neglected for over six years, and it's time we finally move forward with a solution. My neighborhood has had to deal with the consequences of this abandoned golf course for far too long - overgrowth, drainage issues, and the general decline in the area. We've been stuck in an endless cycle of debate and inaction, and I'm ready for something positive to happen. The Preserve plan addresses the problems we've been facing and delivers the improvements we've been asking for. It restores the golf course, preserves open space, adds trails, and includes only age-restricted housing with substantial buffers. This may be our last realistic chance to turn this property around before it continues to sit and deteriorate. I'm 100% on board and I urge you to approve this project. Respectfully, Pamela Beaton 3024 Cadence Way West Neck I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Pamela Beaton 3024 Cadence Way Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email: ptphschmidt@cox.net Sincerely, Pamela Beaton This message was sent on behalf of the above Virginia Beach resident through WNPreserve.com. The resident authorized this communication and can be reached directly using the contact information above. Questions about this platform? Contact info@wnpreserve.com From: Paul Campbell-West Neck Resident To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident Paul Campbell supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 10:03:13 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Paul Campbell, a West Neck resident living at 2533 Greystone St, writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. To the Planning Commission and Council, I've lived in Indian River Plantation for over 11 years, and I'm encouraged by the plan for The Preserve at West Neck. The abandoned golf course has been neglected for too long, and I'm excited that it will finally be restored and opened up to the community. Improving the drainage issues in this area is also a big priority for me. This is a smart solution that addresses many of the problems we've been dealing with - I'm fully on board. Best regards, Paul Campbell 2533 Greystone St Indian River Plantation urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Paul Campbell 2533 Greystone St Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email: 3dawgnight@cox.net Sincerely, Paul Campbell From: Sandra Hudson-West Neck Resident To: Plannino Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident Sandra Hudson Supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 7:33:22 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Sandra Hudson, a West Neck resident writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. Dear City Council Members and Planning Commissioners, I've lived in the West Neck neighborhood for over 15 years, and I'm excited about the Preserve at West Neck project. After the golf course was abandoned years ago, I'm ready for it to come back to life. It will be wonderful to have a well-maintained course open to the public again, especially with Marc Leishman's involvement. But what I'm most excited about is the plan to preserve so much of the land as open space. Right now, the old course is closed off, and residents can't even use it. This new plan will create walking trails and natural areas that the whole community can enjoy. Keeping most of the land as green space is a huge improvement over the current situation. Respectfully, Sandra Hudson I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Sandra Hudson Council District 2 Email- sandra.hudson12@yahoo.com Sincerely, Sandra Hudson This message was sent on behalf of the above Virginia Beach resident through WNPreserve.com. The resident authorized this communication and can be reached directly using the contact information above. From: Shameer Grewal-West Neck Resident To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident Shameer Grewal Supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Saturday,February 7,2026 9:43:16 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Shameer Grewal, a West Neck resident living at 2701 Nestlebrook Trail, writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. The property has been closed and neglected for years - it's time for something to change. This plan puts the land to good use instead of letting it sit idle. It creates open space and trails that residents can actually enjoy. As a resident at 2701 Nestlebrook Trail, I welcome this sensible, realistic solution that benefits our community. Regards, Shameer Grewal 2701 Nestlebrook Trail Indian River Plantation I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Shameer Grewal 2701 Nestlebrook Trail Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email: shameerg30@gmail.com Sincerely, Shameer Grewal This message was sent on behalf of the above Virginia Beach resident through WNPreserve.com. The resident authorized this communication and can be reached directly using the contact information above. Questions about this platform? Contact info@wnpreserve.com From: Shirlev&Deb Shrover-West Neck Resident To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck Resident Shirley&Deb Shroyer Supports The Preserve at West Neck Date: Monday,February 9,2026 5:25:21 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Virginia Beach Planning Commission and City Council, I am Shirley&Deb Shroyer, a West Neck resident writing to express my support for The Preserve at West Neck development project. The old golf course has been an embarrassment for too long. This plan puts the land to good use by restoring golf and creating new open space and trails for the community to enjoy. As a veteran who served our country, I'm optimistic about this sensible solution that will benefit everyone. Regards, Shirley&Deb Shroyer Indian River Plantation I urge you to approve this project that will benefit our community. You can reach me directly at: Shirley&Deb Shroyer Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Council District 2 Email: sshroyer2@gmail.com Sincerely, Shirley&Deb Shroyer This message was sent on behalf of the above Virginia Beach resident through WNPreserve.com. The resident authorized this communication and can be reached directly using the contact information above. Questions about this platform? Contact info@wnpreserve.com From: Jean Burnett To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: West Neck:A Plan That Aligns with Our Goals Date: Tuesday,February 10,2026 11:27:02 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, As a veteran who served our country,I'm welcoming the opportunity to restore the old golf course in our community.For far too long,this property has just been sitting there,closed off and neglected.It's exciting to see Marc Leishman,a local professional golfer,leading the charge to bring the course back to life.Having a well- maintained golf course that's open to the public would be a wonderful addition to our neighborhood. Beyond the golf,I'm also pleased to see the plan includes new homes designed for residents 55 and older.With an aging population,Virginia Beach needs more housing options that allow seniors to comfortably age in place.And since these are age-restricted homes,there won't be any impact on our local schools. Honestly,I was a bit skeptical at fast,but after learning more about the details,I've come to strongly support this project.The open space,the buffers,and the stormwater improvements all make a lot of sense.This is the best path forward to breathe new life into a property that has languished for far too long. Respectfully, Jean Burnett 3000 Cadence Way West Neck From: Bruce Walters To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: Cmty Council Subject: Why the Preserve at West Neck Makes Sense Date: Monday,February 9,2026 10:12:14 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council and Planning Commission, From my home on 2693 Nestlebrook Tr,I'm ready for the abandoned West Neck golf course to finally be brought back to life.Marc Leishman's plan to restore the golf course and create walking trails and open space is exactly what our neighborhood needs.For years,that property has sat unused,and it's time to turn it into an asset we can all enjoy again.The stormwater improvements and landscaping will be a huge upgrade from the current overgrown eyesore.I fully support The Preserve at West Neck-let's get this done. Best regards, Bruce Walters 2693 Nestlebrook Tr Indian River Plantation Bruce Walters From: JOE PERROTTA To: Plannina Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Why the West Neck Project Deserves Approval Date: Tuesday,February 10,2026 5:47:17 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Regarding the West Neck proposal,I've lived in this neighborhood for over 5 years and I'm hoping for the Preserve at West Neck to move forward.As a veteran who served our country,I care deeply about the appearance of our community.The abandoned golf course has become an embarrassment-overgrown with weeds and completely neglected. This new plan would transform that eyesore into a well-maintained,landscaped community.The natural buffers and thoughtful architecture will protect our existing homes,and I'm glad the developers worked to avoid cut-through streets.Overall,it's a vast improvement that will boost our property values and make the whole area look cared for. I'm excited to see this long-neglected site finally get the attention it deserves. Best regards, Joe Perrotta 2732 Longworth Court West Neck Sent from my iPhone From: Lonnie Bush To: Planning Commissioners Cc: City Council Subject: Why the West Neck Project Deserves Approval Date: Saturday,February 7,2026 10:34:11 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. The golf course has been abandoned for years,and it's exciting to see Marc Leishman leading the effort to restore it. As a veteran who served our country,I'm glad to see the course will be open to the community with public tee times. Having a well-maintained course again would be wonderful for the neighborhood. Best regards, Lonnie Bush 2544 Nestlebrook Trail West Neck Lonnie Bush Real Estate*Licensed in Hampton Roads,VA * 770 Lynnhaven Pkwy Ste 120,Virginia Beach VA 23452*(757)217-0900 IMPORTANT WIRE FRAUD NOTICE*:*Never trust wiring instructions sent via email.Cyber criminals are hacking email accounts and sending emails with fake wiring instructions.These emails are convincing and sophisticated. Always independently confirm wiring instructions in person or via telephone call to a trusted and verified phone number.Never wire money without double-checking that the wiring instructions are correct. THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK DEVELOPMENT &DESIGN CRITERIA LAND USE PLAN ��==f 41.0vhh. NOVEMBER 3,2025 rev.January 5,2026;February 27,2026 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.................CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN(COLOR) 2.................CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN(B&W) 3.................PROJECT COMPOSITE EXHIBIT 4.................LOT LINES&ZONING OVERLAY 5.................DENSITY SUMMARY 6.................DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA&PARKING SUMMARY 7.................RESIDENTIAL DWELLING PRECEDENT IMAGES 9.................ROADWAY OVERLAY&TYPICAL SECTION 10...............ACTIVE RECREATION OVERLAY I I...............NATURALIZATION&PLANTING OVERLAY 12...............REFORESTATION&BUFFER OVERLAY 13...............MANAGED MEADOW CONCEPTUAL PALETTE 14...............REFORESTATION TYPOLOGY VIGNETTES 17...............BUFFER EXHIBITS 19...............TYPICAL 5'CONCRETE SIDEWALK EXHIBIT 20...............COMMUNITY BRANDING SIGNAGE CONCEPTS 21...............ILLUSTRATIVE RENDERING OVERLAY 22...............HYDROLOGY OVERLAY •LEGEND 1 EXISTING STORMNNTER POND 2 ENHANCED STORMWATER POND �~aR>tiw fix'. nq lava I9 PROPOSED STORMWATERPOND IxaalYaa qan. 4. PROPCSEO LUXURY SINGLE FAMILY HOMES 6. PROPOSED REfORECTATION I F OINBxM 9 acx- �6 PROPOSED RESTORED GOLF COURSE �' �i1 nLTw onao..11P.x. 7. PROPOSED OUTDOOR PRACTICE FACILITY ,B PROPOSED INDOOR PRACTICE FACILITY 9 PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY HONES .n rw eacrr,y..ta^a,mxro�me an eea 10.RESTORED GOLF CART PATH y a.l o xes apar:aa a a.,, :. Im tr oY s rxt „ek+=mM we x^a ae Aso na•re a z-�a� 72 EXISTING PARKING LOT TO REMAIN ,y parape mr an aacr�o�r zes an<n<ar pampa Panmp aP.ca. tI PROPfiSEO MLII TI-t15E TRAS.SVSTFM ,S 1 113 NATIVE I POLLINATOR MANAGED FLOWERING MEADOW la a r r x�Axc il/aex+A�I ]a.EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN 16.EXISTING WETLANDS TO REMAIN TIE.EXISTINGFOR[5TKANOPYTORlSNAIN ` i �17.EXISTING CLUBHOUSE TO REMAIN fL � � w 0 v e t air . l , tt M F a 4 t ? ♦� CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK 1 •- 'L. "fr'� r O w' CD : , , „� �;, ��" �- � •' �%, o � "� ,'t ate,` ,,t� �� "�f r 00 400 41 Y4 t ' �• tip. s:rr o r��eu c..cuunONS._ oo-Hr PV—Pimo- no-w i vn � �— TM�a ceurw) msx) u.w tM., rolsx)rexsx> r O°%) ox) (e6 Tx). Al w orgy w) A, (o%) (3n) (nn) ri sr> !! J OWG°e Izaa ub 00° aze ^' u r!C roox) f°S%) rsosx) (°Ox) (oox) oU ) r�ex rb Poo eve ra..x)a ) r.nu <... ) roox) rw-wx> p se`�L m „- �yz p, oao oao 00o rvs 1 , oouw se. .a a..ow roox> rn ox) rs ex) roox) pm) r— 0w 142 ssr ooe n>t w.nu roox) psx> rsox) nnu <sssx) "'� i �or.rvum wr nn om son rx sxss (1sx) (szax) (2.x) rss.ex)rso ox)ra.s.x) PROJECT COMPOSITE EXHIBIT THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK 3 I \yYgill ib f Pi I o, u !Ib lON 3S'! M.YS !fN ! 5 S12C 0 1 g LOT LINES&ZONING OVERLAY THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK 4 Density Summary Development Potential Of West Neck Property Per 1999 Staff Report: 1,082 units Units Approved In 1999 For West Neck: 974 units Units Actually Built In West Neck: 936 units Remaining Development Potential of West Neck Properly per 1999 Staff Report: 146 units (1,082 units-936 units) Units Proposed in The Preserve at West Neck: 143 units Density Approved In 1999 By City Council For West Neck: 2.52 ula (974 units/38620 developable acres) Density Of Actual Units Built In West Neck+Proposed Units In The Preserve at West Neck: 2 79]1. (936 units+143 units 1 38620 developable acres) DENSITY SUMMARY THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK 5 Development&Design Criteria Land Use Plan Total Number of Residential Dwelling Units: Parking Summary The number of single-family dwellings shall not exceed 143. Residential unit Type. Single-Famiy Dwelling Proposed Single Family Dwellings Required Ott-Street Spaces 143 Dwelling Units x 2 Soaves oar Unit Minimum Lot Area 4,000 SF 286 Required Spaces Lot Area outside of Water,Marsh,Wetlands 4,000 SF Provided Off-Street Spaces: 286 Driveway(g'x 18'min.) Minimum Lot Width 50 feet 286 Garage 572 Total Off-Street Spaces Minimum Front Yard Setback from a public right-of-way 20 feet Off-Street Parking Requirement for each single-family dwelling unit shall be a Except as provided in Section 502(a)Subsection(6.1)of minimum of 2 parking spaces on the driveway,each no less than 18 feet by 9 feet, the Zoning Ordinance,Minimum Side Yard Setback for a total of 286 spaces.Each single-family dwelling unit shall also have a 2-car except when adjacent to a street 5 feet garage for an additional 286 off-street garage parking spaces. Minimum Side Yard Setback-Accessory Structures no larger than a 150 square foot footprint with a height to On-Street parking provided on 1 side of all public right-of-way eave of no higher than 8 feet 5 feet Minimum Side Yard Setback adjacent to a street 15 feet Minimum Side Yard Setback-Adjacent to a public right- of-way 15 Feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback except for Accessory Structures 10 feet Except As Provided In Section 502(a)Subsection(6.1) of the Zoning Ordinance,Minimum Rear Yard Setback for Accessory Structures 3 feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback-Accessory Structures no larger than a 150 square foot footprint with a height to eave of no higher than 8 feet 3 fee Minimum Setback On Through Lots For Accessory Structures that are physically located to the rear of the Principal Structure 3 fee Maximum Lot Coverage In Percent 60 Maximum Buildinq Height 45 feet Mechanical Equipment Generators,&Chimneys Setback In Side&Rear Yards 1 3 fee DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA&PARKING SUMMARY THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK 6 j � f 3.:/��z •0�O d i� / � / Ll �S � ,PS 000 SOi N 011 IpR ��� / •ior uzw -'*�) (o ox) OP 3•) ,r,.%) P.1) ron.) oNOxam Oli ,�\ (IOV) (00%) f39•) (ae%3 (DOY) (339x) PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD OVERLAY THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK wwww ®� RESIDENTIAL DWELLING PRECEDENT IMAGES THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK 8 I \ \ t J � PUBLIC ROAD ® PRIVATE ROAD yr J �5 i I TWO-WAY,50'R.O.W.TYPICAL SECTION n ' i NOTE TYPICAL.SEMON APPLIES TO All.PROPOSED ROADWAYS.BOTH PUBLIC h PRIVATE .7�/.. ROADWAY OVERLAY&TYPICAL SECTION THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK 9 ,'. «< �,} - 0'7 t y 6 z + , r lol5� / # -�5 ►UM N[TOMM" GLQRATIOMS- x h «k �� 091 r80 < M ) �p igiv ACTIVE RECREATION OVERLAY THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK 10 I � t � > i i ` '` wucnwnucY•aaati.,]oM..... , ml.) (ua%) M., 'v'M tw.wi) �- tow O ww rox> < +o <sanu ro%> / 11 21(]eY) (oox) (S.TI) ( /( of RYi R o.- xSIB (on) (So.S%) (I'll ( )=a ,) i 4`v' sax 16z ) Yw on ]].0 00o aw .:e MOM) (]a%) (00%) (712Y) NATURALIZATION&PLANTING OVERLAY THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK 11 �� V�� �J l�'�� 1}}} � Av �ARC81Rf�ICf�GLCYLATIONf TA 3b ]S roBI�..J 1 /�N ), Q.1 (OW (1-1 REFORESTATION&BUFFER OVERLAY THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK 12 LANCELEAFCOREOPSIS MISTFLOWER COREOPSIS LANCEOLATA EUPATORIM COELESTINUM o'"., i LITTLE BLUESTEM NEW ENGLAND ASTER VIRGINIA WILD RYE SCHIZACHYRIUM S. ASTER NOVAE•ANGLLA.E ELYMUS VIRGINICUS NARROW MOUNTAIN MINT BLACKEYED SUSAN PYCNANTHEMUM T. RUDBECKLA HIRTA MANAGED MEADOW COMPOSITION INCLUDES GRASSES,GRASS-LIKE SPECIES,HERBACEOUS PERENNIALS& HERBACEOUS FLOWERING SPECIES.PLANTS SHOWN ABOVE ARE CONCEPTUAL&TYPICAL OF REGIONAL MEADOW COMPOSITIONS;FINAL PALETTE.TO BE DEVELOPED&DEFINED DURING SITE PLAN DOCUMENTATION PHASE. MANAGED MEADOW CONCEPTUAL PALETTE THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK 13 ;i y��s_Y• # •";�y x Yet��74+; xl � ,` :.9� �ft 'c_ _ xt; j.t �r� 4 u � • tf • fl. • tl , • � �r ANke 4 4� WWN, TIT Z t7T Y - yy os- d `"Snc� �`# row.,3 x' �.'!►� .�.r '�" � .l i �;F �:r 1 .a -- ' :}Jt''�• � � .Jii�e. -T}�� 4¢' ^� •sue p I"� ti v y. AIR OF FOCUS 'y 16/ F'arcri VIEW Y. '} PLAN VIEW a •. ( Ma. 11RRR CONTEXT MAP ELEVATION(I-3 YEARS) 50'MIN.'TYPICAL BUFFER SECTION ..'. }v (AREA W) y...r� �'``r.•ads ,S.�;- x_ EVERGREEN FOREST UNDERSTORYSHRUB& TURF WALKING LAYER PERENNIAL LAYER LAYER PATH LBVATION(5+YEARS) BUFFER EXHIBIT(CARROLLTON NEIGHBORHOOD) THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK 17 A dii; ; c N! aAREA OF FOC.LS,. K tt 3 �'IMfRWJN Eve - ONTEXT MAP ELEVATION(1-3 YEARS) - n� 50'MIN.TYPICAL BUFFER SECTION (AREA"Bn) 'ELLVATION(5+)EARS) BUFFER EXHIBIT(THE GROVE NEIGHBORHOOD) THE PRESERVE'AT WEST NECK 18 t r �p � •,4 Y -�•# � +'�^:: �p',"fir^_ n � . i Y- 5 �y zx Al { 5'CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK,TYP. THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK 19 CONCEPT A Tom THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK COMMUNITY BRANDING SIGNAGE CONCEPTS THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK 20 q ; d E 8 ILLUSTRATIVE RENDERING OVERLAY THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK 21 I I , It I j 1/! PPRANDLOCATIONSWILLBE CATION OF THE SMRMWATER NG PLAN REVIEW r `�..�� � ,t� � ^^• � yj"ay, MIK6I�TMCi ICALC1MilOM�'•••, •`V,• 1` e 6 OTAL \\, ,� / ,f .o«E1-o asI roaI rnsu m.oxl co.ax� nz.aw ow 1. ow lass ow 3— °^o'er" >eo u. na> o0o aa.w r>III—) II, axe nsor� Ia cx� cw-wx> HYDROLOGY OVERLAY THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK 22 k- 1 ;� o Y D IS THE PRESERVE AT WEST NECK NEW X HOLE WOLF COURSE ( �. PROPOSED OWNER:NEW NOR,LEASED TO GOLF COURSE OPERATOR ISEE PROFFFRXlbI ® COMMUNRY MFA W/PUWCACCESSMSEMENT PROPC`%DOWNER:NMWA(SEEPROFFERXI3) PO-Hz PROPERTY IMA�NTEnANCE eUILDINGI T PROPOSED OWNER:NEW HOA,LEASED TO GOLF COURSE OPERATOR ISEE PROFFER X161 �1 / o REFORESTED MEA W/EASEMENT PROFOSfO OWNER NEW HOA SEE PROFFER X13 PROPOSED EASEMENTS:PUBLIC ACCESS&CONSEAVATION V' `n,," ExlmnG werunos / D PROPOSED OWNER:NEW ROYAL CO.—ARD/RUBNOUSE/PROPOSEDINOOORPRACTKEFACIUTY/PARKING L—J LEASED TO ROYAI COURTYARD/CLUBNWSE OPERATOR/GOLF COURSE OPERATOR ❑ PRIVATEO NEMI PRIVATE OWNERSHIP OPEN SPACE EXHIBIT yyFF PRESERVE AT WEST NECK ^T T T ---�.. VIRGINIA BEACH,VIRGINIA WPLI LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 7