Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
5-5-2026 FORMAL SESSION AGENDA
City of ���G�NIA BEAc� ,• �, Virginia Beach "COMMUNITY FOR A LIFETIMP U yo r` 9FS 5 e� �F BUR NAS��N City Council Members Mayor Robert M. "Bobby" Dyer bdyer@VBgov.com 1 757-385-4581 Vice Mayor Rosemary Wilson, District 5 Cal "Cash" Jackson-Green, District 7 rcwilson@VBgov.com 1 757-422-0733 ciacksongreen@VBgov.com 1 757-629-8792 Michael F. Berlucchi, District 3 Robert W. "Worth" Remick, District 6 mberlucc@VBgov.com 1 757-407-5105 wremick@VBgov.com 1 757-840-5855 Stacy Cummings, District 8 Dr. Amelia N. Ross-Hammond, District 4 stcummings@VBgov.com 1 757-629-8691 arosshammond@VBgov.com 1 757-840-0735 Barbara M. Henley, District 2 Jennifer Rouse, District 10 bhenlev@VBgov.com 1 757-426-7501 ivrouse@VBgov.com 1757-840-1821 David Hutcheson, District 1 Joashua F. "Joash" Schulman, District 9 dhutcheson@VBgov.com 1 757-651-7641 ischulman@VBgov.com 1 757-840-1291 Email all City Council members at CityCouncil@VBgov.com City Council Appointees Patrick A. Duhaney City Manager Amanda Barnes City Clerk Mark D. Stiles City Attorney Sue Cunningham City Real Estate Assessor Lyndon S. Remias City Auditor City Hall, Building 1 2401 Courthouse Drive Virginia Beach, VA 23456 Phone: 757-385-4303 1 Fax: 757-385-5669 City Council Agenda May 5, 2026 Mayor Robert M. "Bobby" Dyer Presiding I. CITY COUNCIL'S RECONCILIATION -CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM- A. FY 2026-27 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN (BUDGET) 2:00 P.M. Operating and Capital Budgets II. CITY COUNCIUS BRIEFING A. TOURISM MARKETING CAMPAIGN 2:45 P.M. Amanda Jarratt, Deputy City Manager III. CITY COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 3:15 P.M. IV. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION/INITIATIVES/COMMENTS 3:30 P.M. V. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REVIEW 3:45 P.M. VI. INFORMAL SESSION - CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM- A. CALL TO ORDER 4:00 P.M. B. CITY COUNCIL ROLL CALL C. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION VII. FORMAL SESSION -CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER- A. CALL TO ORDER -Mayor Robert M. "Bobby" Dyer 6:00 P.M. B. INVOCATION C. MOMENT OF SILENCE D. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA E. ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL F. CERTIFICATION OF CLOSED SESSION G. MINUTES 1. INFORMAL AND FORMAL SESSIONS —April 21, 2026 H. MAYOR'S PRESENTATION 1. RESOLUTION IN MEMORIAM -Barry D. Knight Family of Mr. Knight accepting I. FORMAL SESSION AGENDA 1. CONSENT AGENDA J. ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS 1. Ordinance to AUTHORIZE the acquisition of an Agriculture Land Preservation (ARP) easement from J. Louis Parsons,Jr. (138.36+/-Acres), and the issuance by the City of its contract obligations in the maximum principal amount of$1,007,261 and TRANSFER funds to purchase U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2. Ordinance to DECLARE City-owned property at 1372 Laskin Road to be in the EXCESS of the City needs and AUTHORIZE the City Manager to enter into an Agreement for the sale of the property to Foreman Services, LLC re construct a single-family residential dwelling 3. Resolution to RENAME the Owl Creek Boat Ramp as"The Barry D. Knight Owl Creek Boat Ramp" (Requested by City Council) 4. Ordinance to AMEND City Code Section 18-108 re temporary or transient businesses (Requested by Vice Mayor Wilson and Councilmembers Berlucchi, Remick, Ross-Hammond, and Schulman) 5. Resolution to AUTHORIZE the distribution of a preliminary official statement and other actions re issuance of Water and Sewer Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series of 2026 6. Resolution to AUTHORIZE Thirteenth Supplement Master Water and Sewer Bond Resolution of February 11, 1992, and AUTHORIZE the sale of up $120-Million Refunding Bonds, Series of 2026 7. Ordinance to ESTABLISH Capital Project#100753, "Town Center Hotel Pipe Replacement," and to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE $434,958.12 funds to Capital Project #100753, and AUTHORIZE the City Manager to take action re relocation of the Town Center Hotel Pipe 8. Ordinance to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE $10,072.03 from the Department of Historic Resources (DHR) to the FY2025-26 Planning and Community Development Operating Budget re update up to five (5) National Registrar of Historic Places nominations 9. Ordinance to APPROPRIATE$1-Million from the fund balance of the Tourism Advertising Program Special Revenue Fund to the FY2025-26 Convention and Visitors Bureau Operating Budget re advertising and marketing efforts 10. Ordinance to TRANSFER$3.1-Million and $1,446,655 as Pay-As-You-Go funding from the FY2025- 26 Public Works Operating Budget and $1.3-Million from Capital Project #100010, "42nd Street Pump Station Outfalls," to Capital Project #100287 "Oceanfront Stormwater Facilities Maintenance" K. PLANNING 1. SHAKILAH VERNER for a Conditional Change in Zoning from R-7.5 Residential to Conditional A-18 Apartment District re develop a multi-family development and a Variance to Section 4.4 (b) of the Subdivision Regulations re lot width and street frontage at 4916 Euclid Road DISTRICT 4 (Deferred from March 17, 2026) RECOMMENDATION: STAFF - DENIAL PLANNING COMMISSION —APPROVAL APPLICANT REQUESTS WITHDRAWAL L. APPOINTMENTS • ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE • ARTS AND HUMANITIES COMMISSION • BAYFRONT ADVISORY COMMISSION • BEACHES AND WATERWAYS ADVISORY COMMISSION • CLEAN COMMUNITY COMMISSION • COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION GRANT REVIEW & ALLOCATION COMMITTEE • DEFERRED COMPENSATION BOARD • DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY • FLOOD PREVENTION BOND REFERENDUM OVERSIGHT BOARD • GREEN RIBBON COMMITTEE • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION • HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION • INDEPENDENT CITIZEN REVIEW BOARD • OLD BEACH DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE • OPEN SPACE ADVISORY COMMITTEE • PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION • PROCESS IMPROVEMENT STEERING COMMITTEE • PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD • RESORT ADVISORY COMMISSION • SOCIAL SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD • TIDEWATER COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD • TIDEWATER YOUTH SERVICES COMMISSION • TRANSITION AREA/INTERFACILITY TRAFFIC AREA CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE • VIRGINIA BEACH TOWING ADVISORY BOARD M. UNFINISHED BUSINESS N. NEW BUSINESS 0. ADJOURNMENT OPEN DIALOGUE For non-agenda items, each speaker will be allowed three minutes. If you are physically disabled or visually impaired and need assistance at this meeting, please call the City Clerk's Office at 757-385-4303. The full Agenda with all backup documents can be viewed in the eDocs Document Archive under: Current Session. If you would like to receive an email with a list of the agenda items for future City Council meetings, please submit your request to TChelius@vbgov.com or call 757-385-4303. AGENDA ITEMS Citizens who wish to speak can sign up either in-person or virtually via WebEx. Anyone wishing to participate virtually, must follow the two-step process provided below: 1. Register for the WebEx Meeting. 2. Register with the City Clerk's Office by calling 757-385-4303 prior to 5:00 p.m. on May 5, 2026. I. CITY COUNCIL'S RECONCILIATION -CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM- A. FY 2026-27 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN (BUDGET) 2:00 P.M. Operating and Capital Budgets II. CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFING A. TOURISM MARKETING CAMPAIGN 2:45 P.M. Amanda Jarratt, Deputy City Manager III. CITY COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS 3:15 P.M. IV. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION/INITIATIVES/COMMENTS 3:30 P.M. V. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REVIEW 3:45 P.M. VI. INFORMAL SESSION - CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM- A. CALL TO ORDER 4:00 P.M. B. CITY COUNCIL ROLL CALL C. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION VII. FORMAL SESSION -CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER- A. CALL TO ORDER -Mayor Robert M. "Bobby" Dyer 6:00 P.M. B. INVOCATION C. MOMENT OF SILENCE D. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA E. ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL F. CERTIFICATION OF CLOSED SESSION G. MINUTES 1. INFORMAL AND FORMAL SESSIONS—April 21, 2026 H. MAYOR'S PRESENTATION 1. RESOLUTION IN MEMORIAM -Barry D. Knight Family of Mr. Knight accepting I. FORMAL SESSION AGENDA 1. CONSENT AGENDA J. ORDINANCES/RESOLUTIONS 1. Ordinance to AUTHORIZE the acquisition of an Agriculture Land Preservation (ARP) easement from J. Louis Parsons,Jr. (138.36+/-Acres), and the issuance by the City of its contract obligations in the maximum principal amount of$1,007,261 and TRANSFER funds to purchase U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2. Ordinance to DECLARE City-owned property at 1372 Laskin Road to be in the EXCESS of the City needs and AUTHORIZE the City Manager to enter into an Agreement for the sale of the property to Foreman Services, LLC re construct a single-family residential dwelling 3. Resolution to RENAME the Owl Creek Boat Ramp as "The Barry D. Knight Owl Creek Boat Ramp" (Requested by City Council) 4. Ordinance to AMEND City Code Section 18-108 re temporary or transient businesses (Requested by Vice Mayor Wilson and Councilmembers Berlucchi, Remick, Ross-Hammond, and Schulman) 5. Resolution to AUTHORIZE the distribution of a preliminary official statement and other actions re issuance of Water and Sewer Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series of 2026 6. Resolution to AUTHORIZE Thirteenth Supplement Master Water and Sewer Bond Resolution of February 11, 1992, and AUTHORIZE the sale of up $120-Million Refunding Bonds, Series of 2026 7. Ordinance to ESTABLISH Capital Project#100753, "Town Center Hotel Pipe Replacement," and to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE $434,958.12 funds to Capital Project #100753, and AUTHORIZE the City Manager to take action re relocation of the Town Center Hotel Pipe 8. Ordinance to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE $10,072.03 from the Department of Historic Resources (DHR) to the FY2025-26 Planning and Community Development Operating Budget re update up to five (5) National Registrar of Historic Places nominations 9. Ordinance to APPROPRIATE$1-Million from the fund balance of the Tourism Advertising Program Special Revenue Fund to the FY2025-26 Convention and Visitors Bureau Operating Budget re advertising and marketing efforts 10. Ordinance to TRANSFER$3.1-Million and $1,446,655 as Pay-As-You-Go funding from the FY2025- 26 Public Works Operating Budget and $1.3-Million from Capital Project #100010, 1142nd Street Pump Station Outfalls," to Capital Project #100287 "Oceanfront Stormwater Facilities Maintenance" CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH AGENDA ITEM ITEM: An Ordinance Authorizing 1) the Acquisition of an Agricultural Land Preservation Easement from J. Louis Parsons, Jr. (138.36+/- Acres); 2) the Issuance by the City of its Contract Obligations in the Maximum Principal Amount of $1,007,261; and 3) Transfer of Funds to Purchase U.S. Treasury STRIPS PUBLIC HEARING DATE: April 21, 2026 MEETING DATE: May 5, 2026 ■ Background: In May 1995, the Agricultural Lands Preservation Ordinance (the "Ordinance") was adopted by the City Council for the purpose of promoting and encouraging the preservation of farmland in the rural southern portion of the City. Under the Agricultural Reserve Program established by the Ordinance, the City purchases the development rights of eligible parcels of land, leaving the fee simple ownership of the land unchanged. These purchases are embodied by perpetual agricultural land preservation easements pursuant to which only agricultural uses, as defined in the Ordinance, are allowed on the land. The subject property has been appraised by an independent appraiser retained by the City. The appraiser has determined the fair market value of the property, based upon four (4) comparable sales. From the fair market value, the value of the development rights has been determined by subtracting $1,800 per acre, which has previously been established as the farm value (i.e. value of the land restricted to agricultural uses) for land throughout the southern rural area of the City. The resulting amount is the value of the development rights of the property. All offers by the City to purchase the development rights of property are expressly made contingent upon the absence of any title defects or other conditions which, in the opinion of the City Attorney, may adversely affect the City, s interests, and other standard contingencies. ■ Considerations: The subject property, which consists of two (2) parcels having approximately 138.36 acres outside of marshland and swampland, is owned by J. Louis Parsons, Jr. The parcels are located at 5853 Blackwater Road (GPINs: 1398-14-6236 and 1388-93-9546) and are shown on the attached Location Map. Under current development regulations, there is a total development potential of fifteen (15) single- family dwelling building sites, of which one (1) building site is being reserved for future development. The proposed purchase price, as stated in the ordinance, is $1,007,261. This price is the equivalent of approximately $7,280 per acre. The terms of the proposed acquisition are that the City would pay only interest for a period of 25 years, with the principal amount being due and payable 25 years from the date of closing. The interest rate to be paid by the City will be the greater of 4.927% per annum or the per annum rate which is equal to the yield on U.S. Treasury STRIPS purchased by the City to fund its principal obligation under the Installment Purchase Agreement, not to exceed 6.927% without the further approval of the City Council. The ordinance authorizes the transfer of the amount needed to purchase the U.S. Treasury STRIPS from the Agriculture Reserve Program Special Revenue Fund to the General Debt Fund. Matching funds through the Virginia Department of Forestry may be available for reimbursement of a portion of this purchase. The proposed terms and conditions of the purchase of the development rights pursuant to the Installment Purchase Agreement, including the purchase price and manner of payment, are fair and reasonable and in furtherance of the purposes of the Ordinance. ■ Public Information: Notice of Public Hearing has been advertised twice by publication in a newspaper having general circulation in the City, with the first notice appearing no more than twenty-eight days before the hearing and the second notice appearing no less than seven days before the hearing (April 5, 2026 and April 12, 2026). The Public Hearing will be held on April 21, 2026. Public notice will also be provided via the normal City Council agenda process. ■ Alternatives: The City Council may decline to purchase the development rights to the property. ■ Recommendations: Adoption of the ordinance and acquisition of the development rights, assuming all contingencies are met. ■ Attachments: Ordinance Summary of Terms of Installment Purchase Agreement Location Map Disclosure Statement Form Recommended Action: Adoption / Submitting Department/Agency: Agriculture Department ` City Manager: 1 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING 1) THE ACQUISITION 2 OF AN AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION 3 EASEMENT FROM J. LOUIS PARSONS, JR. (138.36+/- 4 ACRES); 2) THE ISSUANCE BY THE CITY OF ITS 5 CONTRACT OBLIGATIONS IN THE MAXIMUM 6 PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $1,007,261; AND 3) 7 TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO PURCHASE U.S. 8 TREASURY STRIPS 9 10 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Agricultural Lands Preservation Ordinance (the 11 "Ordinance"), Appendix J of the Code of the City of Virginia Beach, there has been 12 presented to the City Council a request for approval of an Installment Purchase Agreement 13 (the form and standard provisions of which have been previously approved by the City 14 Council, a summary of terms of which is hereto attached, and a copy of which is on file in 15 the City Attorney's Office)for the acquisition of the Development Rights (as defined in the 16 Installment Purchase Agreement) on certain property located in the City and more fully 17 described in Exhibit B of the Installment Purchase Agreement for a purchase price of 18 $1,007,261; and 19 20 WHEREAS, the aforesaid Development Rights shall be acquired through the 21 acquisition of a perpetual agricultural land preservation easement, as defined in, and in 22 compliance with, the requirements of the Ordinance; and 23 24 WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed terms and conditions of the 25 purchase as evidenced by the Installment Purchase Agreement. 26 27 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 28 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: 29 30 1. The City Council hereby determines and finds that the proposed terms and 31 conditions of the purchase of the Development Rights pursuant to the Installment Purchase 32 Agreement, including the purchase price and manner of payment, are fair and reasonable 33 and in furtherance of the purposes of the Ordinance, and the City Manager or his designee 34 is hereby authorized to approve, upon or before the execution and delivery of the 35 Installment Purchase Agreement, the rate of interest to accrue on the unpaid principal 36 balance of the purchase price set forth hereinabove as the greater of 4.927% per annum or 37 the per annum rate which is equal to the yield on United States Treasury STRIPS 38 purchased by the City to fund such unpaid principal balance; provided, however, that such 39 rate of interest shall not exceed 6.927% unless the approval of the City Council by 40 resolution duly adopted is first obtained. 41 42 2. The City Council hereby further determines that funding is available for the 43 acquisition of the Development Rights pursuant to the Installment Purchase Agreement on 44 the terms and conditions set forth therein. 45 3. The City Council hereby expressly approves the Installment Purchase 46 Agreement and, subject to the determination of the City Attorney that there are no defects 47 in title to the property or other restrictions or encumbrances thereon which may, in the 48 opinion of the City Attorney, adversely affect the City's interests, authorizes the City 49 Manager or his designee to execute and deliver the Installment Purchase Agreement in 50 substantially the same form and substance as approved hereby with such minor 51 modifications, insertions, completions or omissions which do not materially alter the 52 purchase price or manner of payment, as the City Manager or his designee shall approve. 53 The City Council further directs the City Clerk to affix the seal of the City to, and attest 54 same on, the Installment Purchase Agreement. The City Council expressly authorizes the 55 incurrence of the indebtedness represented by the issuance and delivery of the Installment 56 Purchase Agreement. 57 58 4. The City Council hereby elects to issue the indebtedness under the Charter of 59 the City rather than pursuant to the Public Finance Act of 1991 and hereby constitutes the 60 indebtedness a contractual obligation bearing the full faith and credit of the City. 61 62 5. The City Council hereby authorizes the transfer of $281,285.00 from the 63 Agricultural Reserve Program Special Revenue Fund to the General Debt Fund, and the 64 City Manager is empowered to transfer sufficient additional funds or return funds not 65 required from the Agricultural Reserve Program Special Revenue Fund notwithstanding the 66 dollar limits provided by the Annual Appropriation Ordinance,to purchase the United States 67 Treasury STRIPS as described in the Installment Purchase Agreement. 68 69 Adoption requires an affirmative vote of majority of all members of the City Council. 70 71 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on this day of 72 12026. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: e&y-2— Agriculture Department Budget and Management Services CERTIFIED AS TO AVAILABILITY APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: OF FUNDS: Director of rinance City Attorney's Office CA17049 \\vbgov.com\dfs 1\applications\citylaw\cycom32\wpdocs\d014\p052\01032161.doc R-1 April 7, 2026 2 AGRICULTURAL RESERVE PROGRAM INSTALLMENT PURCHASE AGREEMENT NO. 2026-180 SUMMARY OF TERMS SELLER: J. Louis Parsons,Jr. PROPERTY: 5853 Blackwater Road(GPINs: 1388-93-9546 and 1398-14-6236) PURCHASE PRICE: $1,007,261 EASEMENT AREA: 138.36 acres, more or less DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL: Fifteen(15) single-family building sites(1 reserved by Seller for future development) DURATION: Perpetual INTEREST RATE: Equal to yield on U.S. Treasury STRIPS acquired by City to fund purchase price,but not less than 4.927%(actual rate to be determined when STRIPS are purchased prior to execution of Installment Purchase Agreement("IPA")). Rate may not exceed 6.927%without approval of City Council. TERMS: Interest only, twice per year for 25 years,with payment of principal due 25 years from IPA date. RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER: IPA ownership may not be transferred(except for Estate Settlement Transfer) for one(1)year following execution and delivery of the IPA. I Louis Parsons Property — Aerial Map 5853 BLackwater Road GPIN #'s : 1398 -14- 6236 & 77 x } L :Ir w AS � •r `R� �� ''� �^ ..:tea* �� ..t—w .x t•. CITY OF Disclosure _ 1 BEACH The disclosures contained in this form are necessary to inform public officials who may vote on the application as to whether they have a conflict of interest under Virginia law. Completion and submission of this form is required for all applications that pertain to City real estate matters or to the development and/or use of property in the City of Virginia Beach requiring action by the City Council, boards, commissions, or other bodies. SECTION APPLICANT ■ ■ 1 APPLICANT INFORMATION Applicant Name: ,1 as listed on application �1/ , �Z G CQ i T E/,`021 c A/ Is Applicant also the Owner of the subject property? YesVN00 If no, Property Owner must complete SECTION 2:PROPERTY OWNER DISCLOSURE(page 3). Does Applicant have a Representative? Yeso NoeC If yes,name Representative: Is Applicant a corporation,partnership,firm,business,trust or unincorporated business? YesoNoa' If yes, list the names of all officers, directors, members, or trustees below AND businesses that have a parent-subsidiary'or affiliated business entity'relationship with the applicant. (Attach list if necessary.) Does the subject property have a proposed or pending purchaser? Yes No If yes, name proposed or pending purchaser: KNOWN INTEREST BY PUBLIC OFFICIAL OR EMPLOYEE Does an official or employee of the City of Virginia Beach have an Interest In t�ubject land or any proposed development contingent on the subject public action? Yeso No if yes,name the official or employee, and describe the nature of their interest. APPLICANT SERVICES DISCLOSURE READ: The Applicant must certify whether the following services are being provided in connection to the subject application or any business operating or to be operated on the property. The name of the entity and/or individual providing such services must be identified. (Attach list if necessary.) SERVICE YES NO SERVICE PROVIDER (Name entity and/or individual) Financing(mortgage, deeds of trust, 0 cross-collateralization,etc.) Beal Estate Broker/Agent/Realtor 0 Disclosure Statement I rev. M a y-2024 page 1 of 3 I lSECTION 1: APPLICANT DISCLOSURE contimed SERVICE YES NO SERVICE PROVIDER r (Name entity and/or individual) Accounting/Tax Return Preparation v Architect/Designer/Landscape O Architect/Land Planner Construction Contractor 0 Engineer/Surveyor/Agent 0 Gr Legal Services o T-& APPLICANT CERTIFICATION READ:/certify that all information contained in this Form is complete, true, and accurate. l understand that, upon receipt of notification that the application has been scheduled for public hearing, I am responsible for updating the information provided herein three weeks prior to the meeting of Planning Commission, City Council, VBDA, CBPA, Wetlands Board or any public body or committee in connection with this application. Applicant Name(Print) Applicant Signature Date z "Parent-subsidiary relationship"means "a relationship that exists when one corporation directly or indirectly owns shares possessing more than 50 percent of the voting power of another corporation,"See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, VA. Code§2.2-3101. 2"Affiliated business entity relationship"means"a relationship, other than parent-subsidiary relationship, that exists when(i)one business entity has a controlling ownership interest in the other business entity, (li) a controlling owner in one entity is also a controlling owner in the other entity, or(ili)there is shared management or control between the business entities.Factors that should be considered in determining the existence of an affiliated business entity relationship include that the same person or substantially the some person own or manage the two entities; there are common or commingled funds or assets; the business entities share the use of the some offices or employees or otherwise share activities, resources or personnel on a regular basis;or there is otherwise a close working relationship between the entitles."See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, Va. Code§2.2-3101. FOR CITY USE ONLY: No changes as of(date); i i i Staff Name (Print) Staff Signature Date Disclosure Statement rev. May-2024 page 2 of 3 y CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH AGENDA ITEM ITEM: An Ordinance Declaring the Property Located at 1372 Laskin Road to be in Excess of the City's Needs and Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into an Agreement for the Sale of the Property to Foreman Services, LLC PUBLIC HEARING: April 21, 2026 MEETING DATE: May 5, 2026 ■ Background: The City of Virginia Beach (the "City") acquired property located at 1372 Laskin Road (GPIN: 2417-29-0438) (the "Property") in 2002 for the Laskin Road, Phase 1 Project (VDOT) (CIP 100239), which has since been completed. The Property consists of approximately 33,390 sq. ft. (0.77 acres), is zoned R-20 and is located in District 6. On July 14, 2025, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP #PW-25-03) open for 90 days to identify a private party to develop the Property for residential use consistent with the surrounding neighborhood. After a review committee evaluated the 3 responsive proposals, staff recommends that Foreman Services, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company ("Foreman") acquire the Property and construct a single-family residential dwelling. ■ Considerations: Foreman has agreed to pay $310,500.00 for the Property and must commence construction no later than June 1, 2028. Additional terms and conditions are set forth in the Summary of Terms attached to the Ordinance as Exhibit A. The Property was acquired using transportation funds as part of state or federally funded road project. All sale proceeds are required to be put into a transportation CIP. ■ Public Information: As required by Section 15.2-1800, a public hearing will be advertised in The Virginian-Pilot on April 12, 2026, and held on April 21, 2026. Public information will also be provided through the normal City Council agenda process. ■ Alternatives: Deny the request or add conditions as desired by Council. ■ Recommendations: Approval. ■ Attachments: Ordinance, Summary of Terms, Location Map, Disclosure Statement Recommended Action: Approval Submitting Department/Agency: Public Works/Real Estate City Manager: �N,9 I AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THE PROPERTY LOCATED 2 AT 1372 LASKIN ROAD TO BE IN EXCESS OF THE 3 CITY'S NEEDS AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER 4 TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT FOR THE SALE OF 5 THE PROPERTY TO FOREMAN SERVICES, LLC 6 7 WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach (the "City") acquired property located at 8 1372 Laskin Road (GPIN: 2417-29-0438) (the "Property") for the Laskin Road Phase 1 9 Project (the "Project"); 10 11 WHEREAS, the City issued a Request for Proposals to identify a private party to 12 develop the Property for residential use consistent with the surrounding neighborhood; 13 14 WHEREAS, after review of the proposals submitted, staff recommended that the 15 Property be sold to Foreman Services, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company 16 ("Foreman") for the purpose of constructing a single-family residential dwelling; 17 18 WHEREAS, Foreman desires to purchase the Property on the terms and 19 conditions set forth on the Summary of Terms, attached hereto as Exhibit A; and 20 21 WHEREAS, the Project is complete and City Council is of the opinion that the 22 Property is in excess of the needs of the City. 23 24 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 25 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: 26 27 That the Property is hereby declared to be in excess of the needs of the City of 28 Virginia Beach and that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute any 29 documents necessary to convey the Property to Foreman Services, LLC, a Virginia 30 limited liability company, in accordance with the Summary of Terms, attached hereto as 31 Exhibit A, and such other terms, conditions or modifications as may be acceptable to 32 the City Manager and in a form deemed satisfactory by the City Attorney. 33 34 This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its adoption. 35 36 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, on the day 37 of 2026. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: 14 ub is Wor / Real Estate at- Atti6it�( ' CA17150 ' \\vbgov.com\dfs 1\applications\citylaw\cycom32\wpdocs\d001\p049\01121279.doc R-1 4/9/26 EXHIBIT A SUMMARY OF TERMS SALE OF EXCESS CITY PROPERTY Seller: City of Virginia Beach ("City") Buyer: Foreman Services, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company ("Foreman") Property: 1372 Laskin Road (GPIN: 2417-29-0438) /Approx. 33,390 sq. ft. Sale Price: $310,500 Deposit: $10,000 Due Diligence: Sixty (60) days after execution of Agreement of Sale Settlement: Forty-five (45) days after the Due Diligence Period or Site Plan Approval, whichever first occurs. If Settlement has not occurred before 12/31/31, the City may terminate the Agreement of Sale and neither party will have any further obligations or liability to the other. Other Terms and Conditions: • Foreman shall have access to the Property during the Due Diligence Period to perform evaluations and inspections. • The Property shall be conveyed "As-Is", free and clear of all claims or demands of Seller or persons claiming through Seller. • The Property shall be developed with one single-family dwelling and for no other purpose. • City will reserve any public maintenance, drainage and/or utility easements needed. • Foreman shall comply with all applicable building and zoning laws, ordinances and regulations of all government authorities. • City and Foreman shall each pay their own closing costs, attorney fees and lender fees (if applicable). • If construction has not commenced by June 1, 2028, or is not completed within twenty-four (24) months of commencement, the City has the right to reacquire the Property for the Sale Price, less the Deposit. r' , Z UD CPRo�� r. Z 0 I:ASKIN '^ LOCATION MAP Legend rn EXCESS CITY PROPERTY nPROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH 2417-29-0438 GPIN: 2417-29-0438 CITY PROPERTY Q 0 100 200 Feet Prepared by JCS\P W Eng\Eng.Support Services Bureau 1 2/1 2120 24 XICADD\ProjectsWc FilesWGENDA MAPS\City Property\2417-29-0438\2417-29-0438.aprx CITY O Disclosure VB VIRGINIA Statement BEACH The disclosures contained in this form are necessary to inform public officials who may vote on the application as to whether they have a conflict of interest under Virginia law. Completion and submission of this form is required for all applications that pertain to City real estate matters or to the development and/or use of property in the City of Virginia Beach requiring action by the City Council, boards, commissions, or other bodies. SECTIONDISCLOSURE APPLICANT INFORMATION Applicant Name: as listed on application 5 '07-a ,, r-00 Do U-3,g�,Qs LL d. Is Applicant also the Owner of the subject property? Yeso NoAz If no, Property Owner must complete SECTION 2: PROPERTY OWNER DISCLOSURE(page 3). Does Applicant have a Representative? Yeso Nog If yes, name Representative: Is Applicant a corporation, partnership,firm, business,trust or unincorporated business? YesONo1 If yes, list the names of all officers, directors, members, or trustees below AND businesses that have a parent-subsidiary I or affiliated business entity 1 relationship with the applicant. (Attach list if necessary.) Does the subject property have a proposed or pending purchaser? Yes No If yes, name proposed or pending purchaser: KNOWN INTEREST BY PUBLIC OFFICIAL OR EMPLOYEE Does an official or employee of the City of Virginia Beach have an interest in the subject land or any proposed development contingent on the subject public action? Yeso NofD If yes, name the official or employee, and describe the nature of their interest. APPLICANT SERVICES DISCLOSURE READ: The Applicant must certify whether the following services are being provided in connection to the subject application or any business operating or to be operated on the property. The name of the entity and/or individual providing such services must be identified. (Attach list if necessary.) SERVICE YES NO SERVICE PROVIDER (Name entity and/or individual) Financing (mortgage, deeds of trust, (D cross-collateralization, etc.) Real Estate Broker/Agent/Realtor Disclosure Statement I rev. M a y-2024 page 1 of 3 SECTION • • - • SERVICE YES NO SERVICE PROVIDER (Name entity and/or individual) Accounting/Tax Return Preparation o Architect/Designer/Landscape O Architect/Land Planner Yy Construction Contractor Engineer/Surveyor/Agent 0 Legal Services APPLICANT CERTIFICATION READ:I certify that all information contained in this Form is complete, true, and accurate. I understand that, upon receipt of notification that the application has been scheduled for public hearing, I am responsible for updating the information provided herein three weeks prior to the meeting of Planning Commission, City Council, VBDA, CBPA, Wetlands Board or any public body or committee in connection with this application. Applicant Name (Print) Applicant Signature Date 1 "Parent-subsidiary relationship"means "a relationship that exists when one corporation directly or indirectly owns shares possessing more than 50 percent of the voting power of another corporation."See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, VA. Code§2.2-3101. 2 "Affiliated business entity relationship"means "a relationship, other than parent-subsidiary relationship, that exists when(i) one business entity has a controlling ownership interest in the other business entity, (ii) a controlling owner in one entity is also a controlling owner in the other entity, or(iii) there is shared management or control between the business entities. Factors that should be considered in determining the existence of an affiliated business entity relationship include that the some person or substantially the some person own or manage the two entities; there are common or commingled funds or assets; the business entities share the use of the same offices or employees or otherwise share activities, resources or personnel on a regular basis; or there is otherwise a close working relationship between the entities."See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, Va. Code§2.2-3101. FOR CITY USE ONLY: No changes as of(date): Staff Name (Print) Staff Signature Date Disclosure Statement I rev. M a y-2024 page 2 of 3 f 04` 4 , CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH AGENDA ITEM ITEM: A Resolution Renaming the Owl Creek Boat Ramp as "The Barry D. Knight Owl Creek Boat Ramp" MEETING DATE: May 5, 2026 ■ Background: The Honorable Barry D. Knight was a respected farmer and the epitome of a citizen legislator who served the residents of Virginia Beach as a member of the Virginia House of Delegates for 17 years. Raised in the former Princess Anne County and a graduate of Kempsville High School, he worked tirelessly from a young age to achieve his dream of opening a farm and established Barry D. Knight Farms, which produced up to 25,000 hogs annually before his retirement in 2016. He earned widespread respect within the agriculture community, receiving numerous awards including Virginia Young Farmer of the Year, the Clean Water Farm Award, and the Virginia Beach Man of the Year in Agriculture award. He also held leadership roles, including president of the Tidewater Pork Producers and chair of the Virginia Beach Planning Commission. Elected to the Virginia House of Delegates in 2009, Knight represented districts covering parts of Virginia Beach and Chesapeake. As Chair of the House Appropriations Committee, he developed deep expertise in state budgeting and worked on legislation aimed at improving the lives of Virginians, particularly in the Hampton Roads region. Among his achievements was securing nearly $4 million in funding for improvements to the Owl Creek Boat Ramp, enhancing public access to local waterways. The Owl Creek Boat Ramp is located at 717 General Booth Boulevard. Honoring former Delegate Barry D. Knight by renaming the Owl Creek Boat Ramp would be a fitting reminder to the City's residents and visitors of the many years of service he provided to the City. ■ Considerations: The attached resolution renames the Owl Creek Boat Ramp in honor of Barry D. Knight. ■ Public Information: Normal Council agenda process. ■ Attachment: Resolution Requested by the City Council REQUESTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL 1 A RESOLUTION RENAMING THE OWL CREEK 2 BOAT RAMP AS "THE BARRY D. KNIGHT OWL 3 CREEK BOAT RAMP" 4 5 WHEREAS, the Honorable Barry D. Knight was a respected farmer and the 6 epitome of a citizen legislator who served the residents of Virginia Beach as a member of 7 the Virginia House of Delegates for 17 years; 8 9 WHEREAS, Barry Knight grew up in the former Princess Anne County and 10 graduated from Kempsville High School, and as a young adult, he worked on a neighbor's 11 farm and spent his winters working as a long-haul truck driver to raise funds to fulfill his 12 lifelong dream of buying his own farm, ultimately establishing Barry D. Knight Farms in 13 Virginia Beach, which produced as many as 25,000 finished hogs every year until his 14 retirement in 2016; 15 16 WHEREAS, he was highly admired by his peers in the agricultural sector, receiving 17 the American Farm Bureau's Virginia Young Farmer of the Year award, the Clean Water 18 Farm Award, and the Virginia Beach Man of the Year in Agriculture award, among other 19 accolades, and he served as president of Tidewater Pork Producers and as chair of the 20 Virginia Beach Planning Commission; 21 22 WHEREAS, he was first elected to the Virginia House of Delegates in 2009, 23 representing the residents of the 81st District, which included parts of Virginia Beach and 24 Chesapeake, and more recently, he represented the 98t" District, which covers 25 southeastern Virginia Beach; 26 27 WHEREAS, as Chair of the House Appropriations Committee, he developed a 28 keen understanding of the Commonwealth's finances and the budgeting process, and as 29 a delegate, he introduced and supported a wide range of legislation to benefit all 30 Virginians and strengthen the Hampton Roads Region, often characterizing his work as 31 proudly representing his friends and neighbors; 32 33 WHEREAS, Barry Knight's advocacy for the residents of Virginia Beach included 34 securing almost $4 million in state funding to improve the City's Owl Creek Boat Ramp, a 35 free boat launch that enables residents and visitors to access Rudee Inlet and the Atlantic 36 Ocean; 37 38 WHEREAS, Barry Knight passed away on February 19, 2026, and is greatly 39 missed by his wife of 42 years, Paula; his sons, Hunter, Kyle, and Forrest, and their 40 families; and numerous friends and colleagues on both sides of the legislative aisle; 41 42 WHEREAS, honoring the memory of Barry D. Knight by renaming the Owl Creek 43 Boat Ramp would be a fitting reminder to the City's residents and visitors of the many 44 years of service he provided to our City. 45 46 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 47 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA: 48 49 1. That the Owl Creek Boat Ramp, located at 717 General Booth Boulevard, is 50 hereby renamed as "The Barry D. Knight Owl Creek Boat Ramp." 51 52 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to take all steps necessary to revise 53 the signage for the facility and all other references to the facility to include its 54 new name. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, this day of 2026. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: City Attorney's Office CA17221 R-2 April 28, 2026 zsi CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH AGENDA ITEM ITEM: An Ordinance to Amend City Code Section 18-108 Pertaining to Temporary or Transient Businesses MEETING DATE: May 5, 2026 ■ Background: In 2001, the City created a sub-classification for purposes of business license called a "community event license." By defining this sub-classification as a distinct category, the City decreased the regulatory burden on public events staged for the enjoyment of the citizens of Virginia Beach. The original proposal for community events was to have an umbrella license for the event that costs $10 per vendor or merchant table with a minimum of $50 and a maximum of $500. Notwithstanding this allowance, the City Council has further reduced the umbrella license to no cost on two occasions. Once for nonprofit churches or other religious bodies (9/16/2014) and again for nonprofit teacher associations (12/13/2016). Recently, the City has been asked to extend this allowance to nonprofit rescue squads by the Council of Virginia Beach Volunteer Rescue Squads, Inc. ■ Considerations: The attached ordinance adds nonprofit rescue squads to the groups that may obtain a community event license at no cost. The annual revenue impact of the proposed ordinance is expected to be around $1,000. ■ Public Information: Public information will be provided through the normal Council agenda process. ■ Attachments: Ordinance Requested by Vice Mayor Wilson, and Councilmembers Berlucchi, Remick, Ross- Hammond, and Schulman REQUESTED BY VICE MAYOR WILSON, AND COUNCILMEMBERS BERLUCCHI, REMICK, ROSS-HAMMOND, AND SCHULMAN 1 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CITY CODE 2 SECTION 18-108 PERTAINING TO TEMPORARY 3 OR TRANSIENT BUSINESSES 4 5 Section Amended: § 18-108 6 7 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, 8 VIRGINIA THAT- 9 10 That Section 18-108 of the City Code is hereby amended and reordained to read 11 as follows: 12 13 Sec. 18-108. - Temporary or transient businesses. 14 15 (a)Except as provided in subsection (b) of this chapter, every person who engages 16 in, or transacts any temporary or transient business in the city for the sale of any 17 goods, wares, merchandise or services and who, for the purpose of carrying on such 18 business, hires, leases, uses or occupies any building or structure, motor vehicle, 19 tent, car, boat or public room, or any part thereof, including rooms in hotels, lodging 20 houses or houses of private entertainment, or in any street, alley or other public place, 21 for the exhibition of or sale of such goods, wares, merchandise or services, shall pay 22 for such privilege a tax of $500.00. Any such person conducting business in the city 23 for thirty (30) consecutive days or more shall obtain the license and pay the tax or fee 24 required by sections 18.5 and 18-5.2 of this chapter. The license required by this 25 section shall not be transferable. 26 27 (b)(1)The sale of goods, wares, merchandise and services in the city by merchants 28 and vendors at a community event or an event conducted by a nonprofit charitable 29 organization is hereby recognized as a distinct activity. Any organization conducting 30 such an event may obtain an umbrella license from the commissioner of the revenue 31 that will satisfy the business license requirement for business transacted by all 32 registered merchants and vendors at the event. For any other business conducted in 33 the city by any such merchant or vendor, the appropriate license required by this 34 chapter must be obtained. 35 36 (2)The cost of the umbrella license described in subsection (b)(1) shall be $10.00 per 37 merchant or vendor; provided, however, that regardless of the number of merchants 38 and vendors, the cost of such license shall not be less than $50.00 nor more than 39 $500.00. 40 41 (3)Notwithstanding subsection (b)(2) a community event sponsored by a nonprofit 42 church or other religious body, a nonprofit rescue squad, or a nonprofit parent-teacher 43 association may obtain an umbrella license described in subsection (b)(1) for no cost 44 provided: (i) the nonprofit church or other religious body, a nonprofit rescue squad, or a 45 nonprofit parent-teacher association makes proper application to the commissioner of 46 the revenue; (ii) the duration of the community event is limited to one calendar day; and 47 (iii) such umbrella license is only applicable to merchants or vendors and is not 48 applicable to other activities such as the sale of prepared food or alcohol. 49 50 . . . . Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the day of 2026. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: J City At orney's Office CA17216 R-3 April 29, 2026 N1ABF�y� F Z) s, fi y p°. CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH AGENDA ITEM ITEMS: (1) Resolution of the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, Authorizing the Distribution of a Preliminary Official Statement and Other Actions in Connection with the Issuance by the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, of its Water and Sewer System Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series of 2026 (2) Thirteenth Supplemental Resolution Supplementing and Amending Resolution Adopted February 11, 1992, Entitled "Master Water and Sewer Revenue Bond Resolution Providing for the Issuance from Time to Time of One or More Series of Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds of the City of Virginia Beach," as Previously Supplemented and Amended, to Provide for the Issuance and Sale of up to $120,000,000 in Aggregate Principal Amount of its Water and Sewer System Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series of 2026, and Providing for the Form, Details and Payment Thereof and the Financing of the Cost of Improvements to the City's Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities MEETING DATE: May 5, 2026 ■ Background: In accordance with the City's Capital Improvement Program, the City Council periodically authorizes the issuance of water and sewer revenue bonds to finance certain capital improvements for the water and sewer system. The Department of Finance, in conjunction with the Department of Public Utilities, has identified the need for such action. The bond proceeds from the "new money" Series A would reimburse prior capital expenditures and project list is attached. In addition to the "new money" issue, the Department of Finance and the City's financial advisor recommend that the City include a "current refunding" series to refund the $27.4 million currently outstanding Series 2013A bonds to reduce future debt service costs. The refunding bonds would only be issued if the minimum net present value debt service savings of 3.0% threshold was met. Per the industry's best practice, the final maturity date of the refunded bonds would not be extended. ■ Considerations: The City's bond counsel, Butler Snow, prepared the enclosed resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of the 2026 Series of water and sewer revenue bonds. The resolution provides for the distribution of the Preliminary Official Statement along with other necessary actions. The second resolution amends the Master Water and Sewer Revenue Bond Resolution to provide for the 2026 series of bonds and to allow the interest and principal payments on each Series of Bonds and Parity Obligations to be paid on their due date, rather than accrued by fractional monthly payments to the Fiscal Agent throughout the year. The City's consulting engineers, Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc., have prepared a Financial Feasibility Report on the water and sewer system and have concluded that the existing water and sewer rates and charges are sufficient to support the debt service costs on the 2026 bonds. Both series of bonds will be sold electronically by competitive bid on May 27. The true interest cost for the combined series will not exceed 5.50% per year. The final maturities will be no later than the year 2050 for the "new money" bonds and 2038 for the refunding bonds and sold at a price not less than 100% of the aggregate principal amount. The sale results of the bond issue will be reported to City Council shortly after pricing. ■ Public Information: Public information will be handled through the normal Council agenda process. In addition, the resolution authorizes the distribution of the Preliminary Official Statement for marketing purposes. A Notice of Sale will be posted on the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board's (MSRB) Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) site. ■ Attachments: Resolutions (2); Project List Recommended Action: Approval Submitting Department/Agency: Department of Finance City Manager: RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA, AUTHORIZING THE DISTRIBUTION OF A PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND OTHER ACTIONS IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE BY THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,VIRGINIA, OF ITS WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM REVENUE AND REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES OF 2026 WHEREAS, the Council (the "Council") of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia (the "City") has adopted on the date hereof a Thirteenth Supplemental Resolution (the "Thirteenth Supplemental Resolution")supplementing and amending the City's Master Water and Sewer Bond Resolution originally adopted on February 11, 1992, as previously supplemented and amended (the"Bond Resolution"),pursuant to which the City authorized the issuance of up to$122,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of its Water and Sewer System Revenue and Refunding Bonds, including its (a) Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series of 2026A, in a maximum principal amount of$92,000,000 (the "Series 2026A Bonds"), and (b) Water and Sewer System Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series of 2026B, in a maximum principal amount of$30,000,000 (the "Series 2026B Bonds"and, collectively with the Series 2026A Bonds, the"Bonds"); and WHEREAS, in connection with the adoption by the Council of the Thirteenth Supplemental Resolution,there have been presented to or otherwise made available to this meeting drafts of the following documents: (a) Notice of Sale to be dated on or about May 20,2026(the"Notice of Sale"),relating to the advertisement of the public offering of the Bonds; (b) Preliminary Official Statement to be dated on or about May 20, 2026, relating to the public offering of the Bonds,including,as an Appendix,a Financial Feasibility Study prepared by Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc., dated March 3, 2026 (collectively, the "Preliminary Official Statement"); and (c) Continuing Disclosure Agreement to be dated on or about June 17, 2026,pursuant to which the City will agree to undertake continuing disclosure obligations pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12, as amended(the "Rule"), for the benefit of the holders of the Bonds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,VIRGINIA: 1. The City Manager, in collaboration with Davenport & Company LLC, the City's financial advisor (the "Financial Advisor"), is authorized and directed to take all proper steps to advertise the Bonds for sale substantially in accordance with the form of Notice of Sale, which is approved,provided that the City Manager, in collaboration with the Financial Advisor,may make such changes in the Notice of Sale not inconsistent with this Resolution as he may consider to be in the best interest of the City, including,without limitation, such changes as may be necessary to prepare and distribute at the option of the City Manager separate Notices of Sale for the refunding and new money series of the Bonds. 2. The City authorizes the distribution of the Preliminary Official Statement in form deemed"near final"as of its date,within the meaning of the Rule,to prospective purchasers of the Bonds,with such completions, omissions, insertions and changes as may be approved by the City Manager. Such distribution shall constitute conclusive evidence of the approval of the City Manager as to any such completions, omissions, insertions and changes and that the City has deemed the Preliminary Official Statement to be near final as of its date. 3. The City Manager,in collaboration with the Financial Advisor,is hereby authorized and directed to approve such completions, omissions, insertions and other changes to the Preliminary Official Statement necessary to reflect the terms of the sale of the Bonds and the details thereof appropriate to complete it as an official statement in final form (the"Official Statement') and to execute and deliver the Official Statement to the purchasers of the Bonds. Execution of the Official Statement by the City Manager shall constitute conclusive evidence of his approval of any such completions, omissions, insertions and changes and that the Official Statement has been deemed final by the City as of its date within the meaning of the Rule. 4. The City Manager is authorized to remove the fiscal agent, registrar and paying agent for the bonds outstanding under the Bond Resolution, and to appoint a new fiscal agent, registrar and paying agent, or trustee with such functions, for such bonds and the Bonds. 5. The Mayor,the City Manager and such officer or officers of the City as either may designate, any of whom may act, are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Continuing Disclosure Agreement, the form of which is approved, with such completions, omissions, insertions and changes that are not inconsistent with this Resolution. 6. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute, deliver and file all certificates and documents and to take all such further action as they may consider necessary or desirable in connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds, including without limitation (a) execution and delivery of a certificate setting forth the expected use and investment of the proceeds of the Bonds to show that such expected use and investment will not violate the provisions of Section 148 of Code,and the regulations thereunder, applicable to"arbitrage bonds," (b)making any elections that such officers deem desirable under the Code, including, without limitation, under any provision requiring rebate to the United States of"arbitrage profits" earned on investment of proceeds of the Bonds or any provision permitting treatment of the Bonds as a "multipurpose issue," and (c) filing Internal Revenue Service Form 8038-G. The foregoing shall be subject to the advice, approval and direction of bond counsel. 7. To ensure compliance with federal tax law after the Series 2026 Bonds are issued, the City Manager,Director of Finance and other officers of the City are authorized and directed to apply such Post-Issuance Compliance Policies and Procedures as may be adopted by the Council from time to time to monitor the use of the proceeds of the Bonds,including the use of the projects financed with such proceeds, and to monitor compliance with arbitrage yield restriction and rebate requirements. 8. The Director of Finance is authorized to direct the City Treasurer to utilize the State Non-Arbitrage Program of the Commonwealth of Virginia ("SNAP") in connection with the investment of proceeds of the Series 2026A Bonds,if the City Manager and the Director of Finance determine that the utilization of SNAP is in the best interest of the City. The City Council acknowledges that the Treasury Board of the Commonwealth of Virginia is not, and shall not be, in any way liable to the City in connection with SNAP,except as otherwise provided in the SNAP Contract. 9. Any authorization herein to execute a document shall include authorization to deliver it to the other parties thereto. 10. All other actions of the officers of the City that are in conformity with the purposes and intent of this Resolution and in furtherance of the issuance and sale of the Bonds,and the plan of financing and refinancing related thereto,are hereby approved and ratified. 11. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,Virginia,on the th day of May, 2026. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SU - CIENCY: Finance Department City Attorney's Office CA17211 R-1 April 24, 2026 2026A Water & Sewer System Revenue Bonds Project List Expenditures - Reimbursement Project Project Name Potential Issue Amount 100196 GREAT NECK WATER TANK REPLACEMENT 7,908,351.81 100230 LAKE GASTON RAW WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM 2,493,627.61 100238 LANDSTOWN YARD IMPROVEMENTS PHASE IV - WATER 1,918,691.12 100303 PEMBROKE MEADOWS NEIGHBORHOOD WATER REHAB 7,863,706.71 100327 PUMP STATION PROGRAM - PHASE VI 21,093,322.14 100342 ROYAL PALM ARCH SANITARY SEWER REHAB 3,945,155.77 100361 SANITARY SEWER REVITALIZATION PROGRAM III 11,136,139.42 100371 SEWER PUMP REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENTS 2,427,545.46 100387 SHORE DRIVE WATER LINE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE III 2,347,793.20 100470 WATER LINE EXT, REPLACE, REHAB PROGRAM II 3,308,118.09 100479 WATER TRANSMISSION SYSTEM UPGRADE PRG - PHASE II 3,156,734.33 100518 ROYAL PALM ARCH WATER SYSTEM REHAB 2,383,276.40 100519 SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN REHABILITATION - PHASE 1 11,288,064.94 100525 LANDSTOWN YARD IMPROVEMENTS PHASE IV - SEWER 1,989,750.74 100612 GREEN GARDEN WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 6,698,197.04 89,958,474.78 WA 4�h4ol � CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH AGENDA ITEM ITEMS: (1) Resolution of the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, Authorizing the Distribution of a Preliminary Official Statement and Other Actions in Connection with the Issuance by the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, of its Water and Sewer System Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series of 2026 (2) Thirteenth Supplemental Resolution Supplementing and Amending Resolution Adopted February 11, 1992, Entitled "Master Water and Sewer Revenue Bond Resolution Providing for the Issuance from Time to Time of One or More Series of Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds of the City of Virginia Beach," as Previously Supplemented and Amended, to Provide for the Issuance and Sale of up to $120,000,000 in Aggregate Principal Amount of its Water and Sewer System Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series of 2026, and Providing for the Form, Details and Payment Thereof and the Financing of the Cost of Improvements to the City's Water and Sanitary Sewer Facilities MEETING DATE: May 5, 2026 ■ Background: In accordance with the City's Capital Improvement Program, the City Council periodically authorizes the issuance of water and sewer revenue bonds to finance certain capital improvements for the water and sewer system. The Department of Finance, in conjunction with the Department of Public Utilities, has identified the need for such action. The bond proceeds from the "new money" Series A would reimburse prior capital expenditures and project list is attached. In addition to the "new money" issue, the Department of Finance and the City's financial advisor recommend that the City include a "current refunding" series to refund the $27.4 million currently outstanding Series 2013A bonds to reduce future debt service costs. The refunding bonds would only be issued if the minimum net present value debt service savings of 3.0% threshold was met. Per the industry's best practice, the final maturity date of the refunded bonds would not be extended. ■ Considerations: The City's bond counsel, Butler Snow, prepared the enclosed resolution authorizing the issuance and sale of the 2026 Series of water and sewer revenue bonds. The resolution provides for the distribution of the Preliminary Official Statement along with other necessary actions. The second resolution amends the Master Water and Sewer Revenue Bond Resolution to provide for the 2026 series of bonds and to allow the interest and principal payments on each Series of Bonds and Parity Obligations to be paid on their due date, rather than accrued by fractional monthly payments to the Fiscal Agent throughout the year. The City's consulting engineers, Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc., have prepared a Financial Feasibility Report on the water and sewer system and have concluded that the existing water and sewer rates and charges are sufficient to support the debt service costs on the 2026 bonds. Both series of bonds will be sold electronically by competitive bid on May 27. The true interest cost for the combined series will not exceed 5.50% per year. The final maturities will be no later than the year 2050 for the "new money" bonds and 2038 for the refunding bonds and sold at a price not less than 100% of the aggregate principal amount. The sale results of the bond issue will be reported to City Council shortly after pricing. ■ Public Information: Public information will be handled through the normal Council agenda process. In addition, the resolution authorizes the distribution of the Preliminary Official Statement for marketing purposes. A Notice of Sale will be posted on the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board's (MSRB) Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) site. ■ Attachments: Resolutions (2); Project List Recommended Action: Approval Submitting Department/Agency: Department of Finance City Manager: CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA THIRTEENTH SUPPLEMENTAL RESOLUTION SUPPLEMENTING AND AMENDING RESOLUTION ADOPTED FEBRUARY 11, 1992, ENTITLED "MASTER WATER AND SEWER REVENUE BOND RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE FROM TIME TO TIME OF ONE OR MORE SERIES OF WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH," AS PREVIOUSLY SUPPLEMENTED AND AMENDED, TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF UP TO $122,000,000 IN AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF ITS WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM REVENUE AND REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES OF 2026, AND PROVIDING FOR THE FORM, DETAILS AND PAYMENT THEREOF AND THE FINANCING OF THE COST OF IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CITY'S WATER AND SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES ADOPTED ON MAY 2026 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ARTICLE I THIRTEENTH SUPPLEMENTAL RESOLUTION 2 Section 13.101 Thirteenth Supplemental Resolution............................................................2 Section 13.102 Meaning of Terms; Definitions....................................................................2 Section 13.103 Reference to Articles and Sections..............................................................3 ARTICLE II 2026 Project 3 Section 13.201 Authorization of 2026 Project......................................................................3 ARTICLE III ISSUANCE AND SALE OF SERIES 2026 BONDS 3 Section 13.301 Issuance and Sale of Series 2026 Bonds......................................................3 Section 13.302 Details of Series 2026 Bonds.......................................................................3 Section 13.303 Book Entry System......................................................................................4 Section13.304 Registrar.......................................................................................................5 Section 13.305 Form of Series 2026 Bonds..........................................................................5 Section 13.306 Security for Series 2026 Bonds....................................................................5 Section 13.307 Application of Proceeds...............................................................................5 ARTICLE IV REDEMPTION OF SERIES 2026 BONDS 6 Section 13.401 Optional Redemption Provisions.................................................................6 Section13.402 [Reserved]....................................................................................................6 Section 13.403 Selection of Series 2026 Bonds for Redemption.........................................6 Section 13.404 Notice of Redemption..................................................................................7 ARTICLE V FEDERAL TAX PROVISIONS 7 Section 13.501 Limitation of Use of Proceeds. ....................................................................7 Section 13.502 Rebate Requirement.....................................................................................8 Section 13.503 Calculation and Payment of Rebate Amount...............................................8 ARTICLE VI AMENDMENTS TO MASTER RESOLUTION 9 Section 13.601 Effective Date of Amendments....................................................................9 Section 13.602 Amendments................................................................................................9 ARTICLE VII MISCELLANEOUS 10 Section 13.701 Limitation of Rights...................................................................................10 Section 13.702 SNAP Investment.......................................................................................10 Section13.703 Severability................................................................................................10 Section 13.704 Effective Date. ...........................................................................................10 Appendix A- Form of the Series 2026A Bonds......................................................................... A-1 Appendix B - Form of the Series 2026B Bonds..........................................................................B-1 (i) THIRTEENTH SUPPLEMENTAL RESOLUTION SUPPLEMENTING AND AMENDING RESOLUTION ADOPTED FEBRUARY 11, 1992, ENTITLED "MASTER WATER AND SEWER REVENUE BOND RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE FROM TIME TO TIME OF ONE OR MORE SERIES OF WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH," AS PREVIOUSLY SUPPLEMENTED AND AMENDED, TO PROVIDE FOR THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF UP TO $122,000,000 IN AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF ITS WATER AND SEWER SYSTEM REVENUE AND REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES OF 2026, AND PROVIDING FOR THE FORM, DETAILS AND PAYMENT THEREOF AND THE FINANCING OF THE COST OF IMPROVEMENTS TO THE CITY'S WATER AND SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES WHEREAS, the Council (the "Council") of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia (the "City"), adopted a resolution on February 11, 1992 (the "Master Resolution"), providing for the issuance from time to time of water and sewer revenue bonds to finance the cost of improvements and extensions to its water and sanitary sewer system; and WHEREAS, the Council has been advised that it would be advantageous for the City to issue its (a) Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series of 2026A, in a maximum principal amount of$92,000,000 (the "Series 2026A Bonds"), to finance the costs of the 2026 Project (as hereinafter defined) and to pay costs of issuance and fund debt service reserves, and (b) Water and Sewer System Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series of 2026B, in a maximum principal amount of$30,000,000 (the "Series 2026B Bonds" and, collectively with the Series 2026A Bonds, the "Series 2026 Bonds"), to obtain debt service savings by refunding all or a portion of the City's Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series of 2013 (the"Refunded Bonds"); WHEREAS, the Council has previously adopted ordinances authorizing the City's issuance of water and sewer system revenue bonds in principal amounts sufficient to permit the issuance of the Series 2026A Bonds; WHEREAS, based upon the premises described above, the Council has determined that it is desirable and in the best interests of the City to undertake the issuance of the Series 2026 Bonds for the purposes set forth above; and WHEREAS, the City is not in default under the Master Resolution or in payment of the principal of or interest on the Outstanding Bonds (as defined in the Master Resolution). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,VIRGINIA: ARTICLE I THIRTEENTH SUPPLEMENTAL RESOLUTION Section 13.101 Thirteenth Supplemental Resolution. This Thirteenth Supplemental Resolution is adopted pursuant to and in accordance with Section 1101(g) of the Master Resolution. All covenants, conditions and agreements of the Master Resolution shall apply with equal force and effect to each series of the Series 2026 Bonds and to the holders thereof, except as otherwise provided herein. Section 13.102 Meaning of Terms; Definitions. All capitalized terms used herein and not defined either in this Section or elsewhere in this Thirteenth Supplemental Resolution (including the recitals hereto), shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Master Resolution. The following terms shall have the following meanings in this Thirteenth Supplemental Resolution. "2026 Project" shall have the meaning set forth in Article II. "DTC" shall mean The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, a securities depository, as holder of the Series 2026 Bonds, or its successors or assigns in such capacity. "Rebate Amount" shall mean the excess of (a) the future value of all nonpurpose receipts with respect to the Series 2026 Bonds over (b) the future value of all nonpurpose payments with respect to the Series 2026 Bonds, in each case calculated under Section 12.503 pursuant to the requirements of Section 148 of the Code, or such other amount of arbitrage required to be rebated to the United States of America under Section 148 of the Code. "Rebate Amount Certificate" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 12.503. "Refunded Bonds" shall mean all or a portion of the City's Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series of 2013. "Registrar" shall mean U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, or its successors or assigns under this Resolution, or any replacement Registrar which may be appointed by the City. "Series 2026 Bonds" shall mean, collectively, the Series 2026A Bonds and the Series 2026B Bonds. "Series 2026A Bonds" shall mean the City's Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series of 2026A, in the amounts to be issued in accordance with the provisions of Article III. "Series 2026B Bonds" shall mean the City's Water and Sewer System Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series of 2026B, in the amounts to be issued in accordance with the provisions of Article III. 2 "Thirteenth Supplemental Resolution" shall mean this Thirteenth Supplemental Resolution,which supplements the Master Resolution. Section 13.103 Reference to Articles and Sections Unless otherwise indicated, all references herein to particular articles or sections are references to articles or sections of this Thirteenth Supplemental Resolution. ARTICLE II 2026 Project Section 13.201 Authorization of 2026 Project. The Council has authorized certain acquisitions, improvements, extensions, additions and replacements to the System (as defined in the Master Resolution) as part of the approved capital improvement program of the City, and further authorizes the 2026 Project, which shall include the payment of the Costs of any such projects, or reimbursements of the same for which the Council has adopted official intent resolutions,together with costs of issuance and the funding of debt service reserves (collectively,the"2026 Project"). ARTICLE III ISSUANCE AND SALE OF SERIES 2026 BONDS Section 13.301 Issuance and Sale of Series 2026 Bonds. The City hereby authorizes the issuance of water and sewer system revenue bonds in an aggregate principal amount up to $122,000,000, or such lesser amount determined by the City Manager, consisting of (a) Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series of 2026A (the "Series 2026A Bonds"), in the principal amount of up to $92,000,000, the proceeds of which shall be used to pay the Cost of the 2026 Project; and, if elected by the City Manager, (b) Water and Sewer System Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series of 2026B (the "Series 2026B Bonds"), in the principal amount of up to $30,000,000, the proceeds of which shall be used to refund such of the Refunded Bonds as shall be selected by the City Manager as hereinafter provided. All such Series 2026 Bonds shall constitute Bonds, as defined in the Master Resolution. Section 13.302 Details of Series 2026 Bonds. (a) Subject to the provisions of paragraph (e) below, the Series 2026A Bonds shall be designated as the "Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series of 2026A," shall be numbered RA-1 upward, shall be dated, shall be in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $92,000,000, shall bear interest at rates, payable semiannually on such dates and shall mature in installments on such dates and in years and amounts, all as determined by the City Manager to be in the best interest of the City. (b) Subject to the provisions of paragraph(e) below, the Series 2026B Bonds shall be designated as the "Water and Sewer System Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series of 2026B," shall 3 be numbered RB-1 upward, shall be dated, shall be in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $30,000,000, shall bear interest at rates, payable semiannually on such dates and shall mature in installments on such dates and in years and amounts, all as determined by the City Manager to be in the best interest of the City. (c) Principal of the Series 2026 Bonds and the premium, if any, thereon shall be payable to the holders upon the surrender of such Bonds at the principal corporate trust office of the Registrar. Interest on the Series 2026 Bonds shall be payable by check or draft mailed to the holders as of the 15th day of the month prior to each interest payment date, at their addresses as they appear on the registration books kept by the Registrar. (d) Except as otherwise provided herein, the Series 2026 Bonds shall be payable, executed, authenticated, registrable, exchangeable and secured, all as set forth in the Master Resolution. (e) The Series 2026 Bonds shall be sold by competitive bid, and the City Manager shall receive bids for the Series 2026 Bonds and award each series of the Series 2026 Bonds to the bidder providing the lowest "true" or "Canadian" interest cost for such series, subject to the following limitations. Each series of the Series 2026 Bonds shall, and it is confirmed that they will, (a)have true interest cost not exceeding 5.50%per annum (taking into account any original issue discount or premium), calculated independently for each series, (b)be sold at a net price of not less than 100% of the aggregate principal amount thereof, and (c) mature no later than October 1, 2052. Section 13.303 Book Entry System. Initially, one Series 2026 Bond certificate for each maturity will be issued to DTC, which is designated as the securities depository for the Series 2026 Bonds, or its nominee, and immobilized in its custody. Beneficial owners of the Series 2026 Bonds will not receive physical delivery of the Series 2026 Bonds. So long as DTC is acting as securities depository for the Series 2026 Bonds, a book entry system shall be employed, evidencing ownership of the Series 2026 Bonds in principal amounts of $5,000 or multiples thereof, with transfers of beneficial ownership effected on the records of DTC and its participants pursuant to rules and procedures established by DTC and its participants. Interest on the Series 2026 Bonds shall be payable in clearinghouse funds to DTC or its nominee as registered owner of the Series 2026 Bonds. Principal, premium, if any, and interest shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America by the Registrar. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of DTC shall be the responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by participants of DTC will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of beneficial owners. The City and the Registrar shall not be responsible or liable for maintaining, supervising or reviewing the records maintained by DTC, its participants or persons acting through such participants. In the event that(a) DTC determines not to continue to act as securities depository for the Series 2026 Bonds by giving notice to the City and the Registrar discharging its responsibilities 4 hereunder, (b) the Registrar or the City determines that DTC is incapable of discharging its duties or that continuation with DTC as securities depository is not in the best interest of the City, or (c) the Registrar or the City determines that continuation of the book entry system of evidencing ownership and transfer of ownership of the Series of 2026 Bonds is not in the best interest of the City or the beneficial owners of the Series 2026 Bonds, the Registrar and the City shall discontinue the book entry system with DTC. If the Registrar or the City fails to identify another qualified securities depository to replace DTC, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver replacement bonds in the form of fully registered certificates to the beneficial owners or to the DTC participants on behalf of beneficial owners, substantially in the form as set forth in Appendix A or Appendix B, as applicable, with such variations, omissions or insertions as are necessary or desirable in the delivery of replacement certificates in printed form. The Series 2026 Bonds would then be registrable and exchangeable as set forth in Section 204 of the Master Resolution. So long as DTC is the securities depository for the Series 2026 Bonds (a) it shall be the registered owner of the Series 2026 Bonds, (b) transfers of ownership and exchanges shall be effected on the records of DTC and its participants pursuant to rules and procedures established by DTC and its participants, and (c) references in this Thirteenth Supplemental Resolution to holders of the Series 2026 Bonds shall mean DTC or its nominee and shall not mean the beneficial owners of the Series 2026 Bonds. Section 13.304 Registrar. The selection of U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as paying agent and bond registrar for the Series 2026 Bonds is approved. Section 13.305 Form of Series 2026 Bonds. (a) The Series 2026A Bonds shall be in substantially the form set forth in Appendix A with such variations, omissions and insertions as may be necessary to set forth the details thereof pursuant to Article II of the Master Resolution and Article III hereof. (b) The Series 2026B Bonds shall be in substantially the form set forth in Appendix B with such variations, omissions and insertions as may be necessary to set forth the details thereof pursuant to Article II of the Master Resolution and Article III hereof. Section 13.306 Security for Series 2026 Bonds. The Series 2026 Bonds shall be issued pursuant to the Master Resolution and this Thirteenth Supplemental Resolution and shall be equally and ratably secured under and to the extent provided in the Master Resolution with the Prior Parity Bonds, any Bonds that may be issued under the Master Resolution, any Parity Double Barrel Bonds that may be issued and any Parity Debt Service Components that may be incurred, without preference, priority or distinction of any obligations over any other obligations. Section 13.307 Application of Proceeds. The proceeds of the Series 2026 Bonds shall be applied as follows: 5 (a) The proceeds of the Series 2026A Bonds (after netting any original issue premium or discount and deducting the applicable underwriting discount) shall be applied as follows: (i) If other City funds are not utilized for such purpose, the amount of Series 2026 Bond proceeds necessary, together with amounts on deposit in the Debt Service Reserve Fund, to equal the total Debt Service Reserve Requirement for all Series of Bonds, shall be paid to the Fiscal Agent and deposited into the Debt Service Reserve Fund; and (ii) The balance of the proceeds shall be retained by the City and deposited in a General Account in the Construction Fund to be used to pay the Cost of the 2026 Project and to pay expenses incident to issuing the Series 2026 Bonds. (b) The proceeds of the Series 2026B Bonds (after netting any original issue premium or discount and deducting the applicable underwriting discount) shall be applied to pay the principal of and accrued interest on the Refunded Bonds, as applicable, on their optional redemption date by depositing the same with [ ], as escrow agent under a defeasance escrow agreement between the City and such escrow agent. ARTICLE IV REDEMPTION OF SERIES 2026 BONDS Section 13.401 Optional Redemption Provisions. The Series 2026 Bonds may be subject to redemption prior to maturity at the option of the City on or after dates, if any, determined and agreed upon by the City Manager, in whole or in part at any time at redemption prices equal to no greater than 100% of the principal amount of the Series 2026 Bonds,together with any accrued interest to the redemption date. Section 13.402 Mandatory Redemption. The Series 2026 Bonds may be subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption prior to maturity in years and amounts, upon payment of 100% of the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the redemption date, as may be determined by the City Manager. Section 13.403 Selection of Series 2026 Bonds for Redemption. If less than all of the Series 2026 Bonds of a Series are called for redemption, the Series 2026 Bonds of a Series to be redeemed shall be selected in such manner as the City Manager or the chief financial officer of the City may determine to be in the best interest of the City. If less than all of the Series 2026 Bonds of a particular maturity are called for redemption, the Series 2026 Bonds to be redeemed shall be selected by DTC or any successor securities depository pursuant to its rules and procedures or, if the book entry system is discontinued, shall be selected by the Registrar by lot in such manner as the Registrar at its discretion may determine. 6 The portion of any Series 2026 Bond to be redeemed shall be in the principal amount of $5,000 or some multiple thereof. In selecting Series 2026 Bonds for redemption, each Series 2026 Bond shall be considered as representing that number of Series 2026 Bonds which is obtained by dividing the principal amount of such Series 2026 Bond by $5,000. If a portion of a Series 2026 Bond shall be called for redemption, a new Series 2026 Bond in principal amount equal to the unredeemed portion thereof shall be issued to the registered owner upon the surrender thereof. Section 13.404 Notice of Redemption. (a) The Registrar shall send notice of the call for redemption identifying the Series 2026 Bonds or portions thereof to be redeemed, not less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior to the redemption date, (1) by facsimile or electronic transmission, registered or certified mail or overnight express delivery, to the holder of each Series 2026 Bond to be redeemed at his address as it appears on the registration books kept by the Registrar, (2)by facsimile or electronic transmission, registered or certified mail or overnight express delivery, to all organizations registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as securities depositories, and(3)to the Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) system (established by the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board) or any other nationally recognized municipal securities information repository designated as such by the Securities and Exchange Commission. (b) In the case of an optional redemption, the notice may state that (1) it is conditioned upon the deposit of moneys, in an amount equal to the amount necessary to effect the redemption, with an escrow agent no later than the redemption date or (2) the City retains the right to rescind such notice on or prior to the scheduled redemption date (in either case, a "Conditional Redemption"), and such notice and optional redemption shall be of no effect if such moneys are not so deposited or if the notice is rescinded as described herein. Any Conditional Redemption may be rescinded at any time prior to the redemption date, and the Registrar shall give prompt notice of such rescission to the affected Series 2026 Bondholders. Any Series 2026 Bonds subject to Conditional Redemption where redemption has been rescinded shall remain Outstanding, and the rescission shall not constitute an Event of Default. Further, in the case of a Conditional Redemption, the failure of the City to make funds available on or before the redemption date shall not constitute an Event of Default, and the Registrar shall give immediate notice to all organizations registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as securities depositories or the affected Series 2026 Bondholders that the redemption did not occur and that the Series 2026 Bonds called for redemption and not so paid remain outstanding. ARTICLE V FEDERAL TAX PROVISIONS Section 13.501 Limitation of Use of Proceeds. The City covenants with the holders of the Series 2026 Bonds as follows: (a) The City shall not take or omit to take any action or make any investment or use of the proceeds of any Series 2026 Bonds (including failure to spend the same with due 7 diligence) the taking or omission of which would cause the Series 2026 Bonds of any Series to be"arbitrage bonds"within the meaning of Section 148 of the Code, including without limitation participating in any issue of obligations that would cause the Series 2026 Bonds of any Series to be part of an "issue" of obligations that are arbitrage bonds, within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.148-10 or successor regulation, or otherwise cause interest on the Series 2026 Bonds of any Series to be includable in the gross income of the registered owners under existing law. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the City shall comply with any provision of law that may require the City at any time to rebate to the United States of America any part of the earnings derived from the investment of gross proceeds of the Series 2026 Bonds. (b) The City shall not permit the proceeds of the Series 2026 Bonds or the facilities to be financed with such proceeds to be used in any manner that would result in either (1) 5% or more of such proceeds or the facilities being financed with such proceeds being considered as having been used in any trade or business carried on by any person other than a governmental unit as provided in Section 141(b) of the Code, (2) 5% or more of such proceeds or the facilities being financed with such proceeds being used with respect to any "output facility" (other than a facility for the furnishing of water) within the meaning of Section 141(b)(4) of the Code, or (3) 5% or more of such proceeds being considered as having been used directly or indirectly to make or finance loans to any person other than a governmental unit, as provided in Section 141(c) of the Code. (c) The City shall not take any other action that would adversely affect, and shall take all action within its power necessary to maintain, the exclusion of interest on all Series 2026 Bonds from gross income for federal income taxation purposes; provided, however, that if the City receives an opinion of Bond Counsel that compliance with any such covenant is not required to prevent the interest on the Series 2026 Bonds from being includable in the gross income of the registered owners thereof under existing law, the City need not comply with such restriction. Section 13.502 Rebate Requirement. The City shall determine and pay, from any legally available source, the Rebate Amount, if any, to the United States of America, as and when due, in accordance with the "rebate requirement" described in Section 148(f) of the Code and retain records of all such determinations until six years after payment in full of the Series 2026 Bonds. Section 13.503 Calculation and Payment of Rebate Amount. (a) The City selects October 1 as the end of the bond year with respect to the Series 2026 Bonds pursuant to Treasury Regulation Section 1.148-1. (b) Within 30 days after the initial installment computation date, the last day of the fifth bond year, unless such date is changed by the City prior to the date that any amount with respect to the Series 2026 Bonds is paid or required to be paid to the United States of America as required by Section 148 of the Code, and at least once every five years thereafter, the City shall cause the Rebate Amount to be computed. Prior to any payment of the Rebate Amount to the United States of America as required by Section 148 of the Code, such computation(the "Rebate 8 Amount Certificate") setting forth such Rebate Amount shall be prepared or approved by (1) a person with experience in matters of governmental accounting for Federal income tax purposes or(2)a bona fide arbitrage rebate calculation reporting service. (c) Not later than 60 days after the initial installment computation date, the City shall pay to the United States of America at least 90% of the Rebate Amount as set forth in the Rebate Amount Certificate prepared with respect to such installment computation date. At least once on or before 60 days after the installment computation date that is the fifth anniversary of the initial installment computation date and on or before 60 days every fifth anniversary date thereafter until final payment in full of the Series 2026 Bonds, the City shall pay to the United States of America not less than the amount, if any, by which 90% of the Rebate Amount set forth in the most recent Rebate Amount Certificate exceeds the aggregate of all such payments theretofore made to the United States of America pursuant to this Section. On or before 60 days after final payment in full of the Series 2026 Bonds, the City shall pay to the United States of America the amount, if any, by which 100% of the Rebate Amount set forth in the Rebate Amount Certificate with respect to the date of final payment in full of the Series 2026 Bonds exceeds the aggregate of all payments theretofore made pursuant to this Section. All such payments shall be made by the City from any legally available source. (d) Notwithstanding any provision of this Article to the contrary, no such calculation or payment shall be made if the City receives an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that (1) such payment is not required under the Code in order to prevent the Series 2026 Bonds from becoming "arbitrage bonds" within the meaning of Section 148 of the Code or (2) such payment should be calculated and paid on some alternative basis under the Code, and the City complies with such alternative basis. ARTICLE VI AMENDMENTS TO MASTER RESOLUTION Section 13.601 Effective Date of Amendments. The amendments provided in this Article shall be effective as of the date hereof. They do not require consent of any of the Bondholders. Section 13.602 Amendments. The following definition in Section 101 of the Master Resolution is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: "Fiscal Agent" shall mean U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, or its successors or assigns under this Resolution, or any replacement Fiscal Agent which may be appointed by the City. 9 ARTICLE VII MISCELLANEOUS Section 13.701 Limitation of Rights. With the exception of the rights herein expressly conferred, nothing expressed or ►mentioned in or to be implied from this Thirteenth Supplemental Resolution is intended or shall be construed to give any person other than the parties hereto and the holders of the Series 2026 Bonds any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim under or in respect to this Thirteenth Supplemental Resolution or any covenant, condition or agreement herein contained, this Thirteenth Supplemental Resolution and all of the covenants, conditions and agreements hereof being intended to be and being for the sole and exclusive benefit of the holders of the Series 2026 Bonds as herein provided. Section 13.702 SNAP Investment. The Council has received and reviewed the Information Statement (the "Information Statement") describing the State Non-Arbitrage Program of the Commonwealth of Virginia ("SNAP") and the Contract Creating the State Non-Arbitrage Program Pool I (the "Contract"). The Council acknowledges the Treasury Board of the Commonwealth of Virginia is not, and shall not be, in any way liable to the City in connection with SNAP, except as otherwise provided in the Contract. Section 13.703 Sever•ability. If any provision of this Thirteenth Supplemental Resolution shall be held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction,such holding shall not invalidate any other provision hereof. Section 13.704 Effective Date. This Thirteenth Supplemental Resolution shall take effect immediately. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: Finance Department C' y t orney's Office CA17217 R-1 April 24, 2026 A-10 APPENDIX A FORM OF SERIES 2026A BONDS Unless this certificate is presented by an authorized representative of The Depository Trust Company, a New York corporation ("DTC"), to the issuer or its agent for registration of transfer, exchange, or payment, and any certificate is registered in the name of Cede & Co., or in such other name as is requested by an authorized representative of DTC (and any payment is made to Cede & Co. or to such other entity as is requested by an authorized representative of DTC), ANY TRANSFER, PLEDGE, OR OTHER USE HEREOF FOR VALUE OR OTHERWISE BY OR TO ANY PERSON IS WRONGFUL inasmuch as the registered owner hereof, Cede & Co., has an interest herein. REGISTERED REGISTERED RA- $ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH Water and Sewer System Revenue Bond, Series of 2026A INTEREST RATE MATURITY DATE DATED DATE CUSIP 1-11,20_ June [_], 2026 [ ] REGISTERED OWNER: CEDE & CO. PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: DOLLARS The City of Virginia Beach, Virginia (the "City"), for value received, hereby promises to pay upon surrender hereof at the designated corporate trust office of [ 1 (the "Registrar"), or its successor, solely from the source and as hereinafter provided, to the registered owner hereof, or registered assigns or legal representative, the principal sum stated above on the maturity date stated above, subject to prior redemption as hereinafter provided, and to pay, solely from such source, interest hereon semiannually on each r 1 and 1, beginning 1, 202J, at the annual rate stated above, calculated on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months. Interest is payable (a) from the Dated Date, if this Bond is authenticated prior to [ 1, 202J, or (b) otherwise from the [ 1 or 1] that is, or immediately precedes, the date on which this Bond is authenticated (unless payment of interest hereon is in default, in which case this Bond shall bear interest from the date to which interest has been paid). Interest is payable by check or draft mailed to the registered owner hereof at his address as it appears on the [15th] day of the month preceding each interest payment date on A-1 registration books kept by the Registrar. Principal, premium, if any, and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States of America. Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, this Bond is subject to a book entry system maintained by The Depository Trust Company ("DTC") and the payment of principal and interest, the providing of notices and other matters will be made as described in the City's Blanket Letter of Representations to DTC. This Bond is one of an issue of$[ Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series of 2026A (the "Bonds"), of like date and tenor, except as to number, denomination, rate of interest, privilege of redemption and maturity, authorized and issued pursuant to ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Council including a resolution adopted on February 11, 1992, as previously supplemented and as supplemented and amended by a resolution adopted on May 5, 2026 (collectively, the "Resolution"), and the Constitution and statutes of the Commonwealth of Virginia, including the City Charter and the Public Finance Act of 1991, to provide funds, together with other available funds, to pay the cost of the acquisition and construction of improvements and extensions to the City's water and sanitary sewer system (the "System"), as more fully described in the Resolution. The Bonds and the premium, if any, and the interest thereon are limited obligations of the City and are payable solely from the revenues to be derived from the ownership or operation of the System, as the same may from time to time exist, except to the extent payable from the proceeds of the Bonds, the income, if any, derived from the investment thereof, certain reserves, income from investments pursuant to the Resolution or proceeds of insurance, which revenues and other moneys have been pledged as described in the Resolution to secure payment thereof. The Bonds, the premium, if any, and the interest thereon are payable solely from the revenues pledged thereto in the Resolution, and nothing herein or in the Resolution shall be deemed to create or constitute an indebtedness of or a pledge of the faith and credit of the Commonwealth of Virginia or of any county, city, town or other political subdivision of the Commonwealth, including the City. The Bonds are issued under and are equally and ratably secured on a parity with the unpaid balance of the City's (i) $44,845,000 Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series of 2013, (ii) $89,425,000 Water and Sewer System Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series of 2016, and (iii) $96,710,000 Water and Sewer System Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series of 2020 (collectively, the "Parity Bonds"), to the extent set forth in the Resolution. Reference is hereby made to the Resolution and all amendments and supplements thereto for a description of the provisions, among others, with respect to the nature and extent of the security, the rights, duties and obligations of the City, the rights of the holders of the Bonds and the terms upon which the Bonds are issued and secured. Additional bonds ranking equally with the Bonds and the Parity Bonds may be issued on the terms provided in the Resolution. The Bonds maturing on and after [ 1, 20_], are subject to redemption beginning [ 1, 20_], in whole or in part at any time, at the option of the City, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of Bonds to be redeemed plus interest accrued and unpaid to the redemption date. A-2 Bonds maturing on [ 1, 20_], are required to be redeemed prior to maturity, in part, on f I] in the years and amounts below: Year Amount Year Amount If less than all the Bonds are called for redemption, the maturities of the Bonds to be redeemed shall be selected in such manner as the City Manager or the chief financial officer of the City may determine to be in the best interest of the City. If less than all of the Bonds of any maturity are called for redemption, the Bonds to be redeemed shall be selected by DTC or any successor securities depository pursuant to its rules and procedures or, if the book entry system is discontinued, shall be selected by the Registrar by lot in such manner as the Registrar in its discretion may determine. In either case, (a) the portion of any Bond to be redeemed shall be in the principal amount of$5,000 or some integral multiple thereof and (b) in selecting Bonds for redemption, each portion of $5,000 principal amount shall be counted as one bond for this purpose. If a portion of a Bond is called for redemption, a new Bond in principal amount equal to the unredeemed portion thereof will be issued to the registered owner upon the surrender hereof. The Registrar will cause notice of the call for redemption identifying the Bonds or portions thereof to be redeemed, not less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior to the redemption date, (1)by facsimile or electronic transmission, registered or certified mail or overnight express delivery, to the holder of each Bond to be redeemed at his address as it appears on the registration books kept by the Registrar, (2)by facsimile or electronic transmission, registered or certified mail or overnight express delivery, to all organizations registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as securities depositories, and (3)to the Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) system (established by the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board) or any other nationally recognized municipal securities information repository designated as such by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Provided funds for their redemption are on deposit at the place of payment on the redemption date, all Bonds or portions thereof so called for redemption shall cease to bear interest on such date, shall no longer be secured as set forth in the Resolution and shall not be deemed to be outstanding under the provisions of the Resolution. The registered owner of this Bond shall have no right to enforce the provisions of the Resolution or to institute action to enforce the covenants therein or to take any action with respect to any Event of Default under the Resolution or to institute, appear in or defend any suit or other proceedings with respect thereto, except as provided in the Resolution. Modifications or alterations of the Resolution, or of any supplement thereto, may be made only to the extent and in the circumstances permitted by the Resolution. The Registrar shall treat the registered owner as the person exclusively entitled to payment of principal, premium, if any, and interest and the exercise of all other rights and powers of the owner, except that interest payments shall be made to the person shown as owner on the [15th] day of the month preceding each interest payment date. A-3 All acts, conditions and things required to happen, exist or be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond have happened, exist and have been performed. This Bond shall not be valid or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Registrar shall have executed the Certificate of Authentication appearing hereon and inserted the date of authentication hereon. A-4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, has caused this Bond to be signed by the manual signature of its Mayor, to be countersigned by the manual signature of its Clerk, its seal to be impressed hereon, and this Bond to be dated the Dated Date. COUNTERSIGNED: (SEAL) Clerk, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia Mayor, City of Virginia Beach,Virginia A-5 9 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION Date Authenticated: June [_j, 2026 This Bond is one of the Bonds described in the within-mentioned Resolution. 1 1, Registrar By Authorized Signature A-6 ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby sell(s), assign(s) and transfer(s) unto (please print or typewrite name and address including zip code of Transferee) PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF TRANSFEREE the within-mentioned Bond and all rights thereunder, hereby irrevocably constituting and appointing Attorney, to transfer said Bond on the books kept for the registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: Signature Guaranteed NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed (Signature of Registered Owner) by an Eligible Guarantor Institution such as a Commercial Bank, Trust Company, NOTICE: The signature above must Securities Broker/Dealer, Credit Union correspond with the name of the or Savings Association who is a member registered owner as it appears on the of a medallion program approved by The front of this bond in every particular, Securities Transfer Association, Inc. without alteration or enlargement or any change whatsoever. A-7 APPENDIX B FORM OF SERIES 2026B BONDS Unless this certificate is presented by an authorized representative of The Depository Trust Company, a New York corporation ("DTC"), to the issuer or its agent for registration of transfer, exchange, or payment, and any certificate is registered in the name of Cede & Co., or in such other name as is requested by an authorized representative of DTC (and any payment is made to Cede & Co. or to such other entity as is requested by an authorized representative of DTC), ANY TRANSFER, PLEDGE, OR OTHER USE HEREOF FOR VALUE OR OTHERWISE BY OR TO ANY PERSON IS WRONGFUL inasmuch as the registered owner hereof, Cede & Co., has an interest herein. REGISTERED REGISTERED RB- $ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH Water and Sewer System Revenue Refunding Bond, Series of 2026B INTEREST RATE MATURITY DATE DATED DATE CUSIP [ 1], 20_ June L_J, 2026 [ ] REGISTERED OWNER: CEDE & CO. PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: DOLLARS The City of Virginia Beach, Virginia (the "City"), for value received, hereby promises to pay upon surrender hereof at the designated corporate trust office of[ I (the "Registrar"), or its successor, solely from the source and as hereinafter provided, to the registered owner hereof, or registered assigns or legal representative, the principal sum stated above on the maturity date stated above, subject to prior redemption as hereinafter provided, and to pay, solely from such source, interest hereon semiannually on each �— 1 and 1, beginning 1, 202J, at the annual rate stated above, calculated on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months. Interest is payable (a) from the Dated Date, if this Bond is authenticated prior to [ 1, 202J or (b) otherwise from the [ 1 or 1] that is, or immediately precedes, the date on which this Bond is authenticated (unless payment of interest hereon is in default, in which case this Bond shall bear interest from the date to which interest has been paid). Interest is payable by check or draft mailed to the registered owner hereof at his address as it appears on the [15th] day of the month preceding each interest payment date on B-1 registration books kept by the Registrar. Principal, premium, if any, and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States of America. Notwithstanding any other provision hereof, this Bond is subject to a book entry system maintained by The Depository Trust Company ("DTC") and the payment of principal and interest, the providing of notices and other matters will be made as described in the City's Blanket Letter of Representations to DTC. This Bond is one of an issue of $[ Water and Sewer System Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series of 2026B (the "Bonds"), of like date and tenor, except as to number, denomination, rate of interest, privilege of redemption and maturity, authorized and issued pursuant to ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Council including a resolution adopted on February 11, 1992, as previously supplemented and as supplemented and amended by a resolution adopted on May 5, 2026 (collectively, the "Resolution"), and the Constitution and statutes of the Commonwealth of Virginia, including the City Charter and the Public Finance Act of 1991, to provide funds, together with other available funds, to pay the cost of refunding certain prior bonds, as more fully described in the Resolution. The Bonds and the premium, if any, and the interest thereon are limited obligations of the City and are payable solely from the revenues to be derived from the ownership or operation of the System, as the same may from time to time exist, except to the extent payable from the proceeds of the Bonds, the income, if any, derived from the investment thereof, certain reserves, income from investments pursuant to the Resolution or proceeds of insurance, which revenues and other moneys have been pledged as described in the Resolution to secure payment thereof. The Bonds, the premium, if any, and the interest thereon are payable solely from the revenues pledged thereto in the Resolution, and nothing herein or in the Resolution shall be deemed to create or constitute an indebtedness of or a pledge of the faith and credit of the Commonwealth of Virginia or of any county, city, town or other political subdivision of the Commonwealth, including the City. The Bonds are issued under and are equally and ratably secured on a parity with the unpaid balance of the City's (i) $44,845,000 Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series of 2013, (ii) $89,425,000 Water and Sewer System Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series of 2016, and (iii) $96,710,000 Water and Sewer System Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series of 2020 (collectively, the "Parity Bonds"), to the extent set forth in the Resolution. Reference is hereby made to the Resolution and all amendments and supplements thereto for a description of the provisions, among others, with respect to the nature and extent of the security, the rights, duties and obligations of the City, the rights of the holders of the Bonds and the terms upon which the Bonds are issued and secured. Additional bonds ranking equally with the Bonds and the Parity Bonds may be issued on the terms provided in the Resolution. The Bonds maturing on and after [ 1, 20 1, are subject to redemption beginning [ 1, 20_], in whole or in part at any time, at the option of the City, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of Bonds to be redeemed plus interest accrued and unpaid to the redemption date. B-2 Bonds maturing on [ 1, 20_], are required to be redeemed prior to maturity, in part, on [ 1] in the years and amounts below: Year Amount Year Amount If less than all the Bonds are called for redemption, the maturities of the Bonds to be redeemed shall be selected in such manner as the City Manager or the chief financial officer of the City may determine to be in the best interest of the City. If less than all of the Bonds of any maturity are called for redemption, the Bonds to be redeemed shall be selected by DTC or any successor securities depository pursuant to its rules and procedures or, if the book entry system is discontinued, shall be selected by the Registrar by lot in such manner as the Registrar in its discretion may determine. In either case, (a) the portion of any Bond to be redeemed shall be in the principal amount of$5,000 or some integral multiple thereof and (b) in selecting Bonds for redemption, each portion of $5,000 principal amount shall be counted as one bond for this purpose. If a portion of a Bond is called for redemption, a new Bond in principal amount equal to the unredeemed portion thereof will be issued to the registered owner upon the surrender hereof. The Registrar will cause notice of the call for redemption identifying the Bonds or portions thereof to be redeemed, not less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior to the redemption date, (1)by facsimile or electronic transmission, registered or certified mail or overnight express delivery, to the holder of each Bond to be redeemed at his address as it appears on the registration books kept by the Registrar, (2)by facsimile or electronic transmission, registered or certified mail or overnight express delivery, to all organizations registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as securities depositories, and (3)to the Electronic Municipal Market Access (EMMA) system (established by the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board) or any other nationally recognized municipal securities information repository designated as such by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Provided funds for their redemption are on deposit at the place of payment on the redemption date, all Bonds or portions thereof so called for redemption shall cease to bear interest on such date, shall no longer be secured as set forth in the Resolution and shall not be deemed to be outstanding under the provisions of the Resolution. The registered owner of this Bond shall have no right to enforce the provisions of the Resolution or to institute action to enforce the covenants therein or to take any action with respect to any Event of Default under the Resolution or to institute, appear in or defend any suit or other proceedings with respect thereto, except as provided in the Resolution. Modifications or alterations of the Resolution, or of any supplement thereto, may be made only to the extent and in the circumstances permitted by the Resolution. The Registrar shall treat the registered owner as the person exclusively entitled to payment of principal, premium, if any, and interest and the exercise of all other rights and powers of the owner, except that interest payments shall be made to the person shown as owner on the [15th] day of the month preceding each interest payment date. B-3 All acts, conditions and things required to happen, exist or be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond have happened, exist and have been performed. This Bond shall not be valid or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution until the Registrar shall have executed the Certificate of Authentication appearing hereon and inserted the date of authentication hereon. B-4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, has caused this Bond to be signed by the manual signature of its Mayor, to be countersigned by the manual signature of its Clerk, its seal to be impressed hereon, and this Bond to be dated the Dated Date. COUNTERSIGNED: (SEAL) Clerk, City of Virginia Beach, Virginia Mayor, City of Virginia Beach,Virginia B-5 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION Date Authenticated: June U, 2026 This Bond is one of the Bonds described in the within-mentioned Resolution. 1 1,Registrar By Authorized Signature B-6 ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby sell(s), assign(s) and transfer(s) unto (please print or typewrite name and address including zip code of Transferee) PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF TRANSFEREE the within-mentioned Bond and all rights thereunder, hereby irrevocably constituting and appointing Attorney,to transfer said Bond on the books kept for the registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: Signature Guaranteed NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed (Signature of Registered Owner) by an Eligible Guarantor Institution such as a Commercial Bank, Trust Company, NOTICE: The signature above must Securities Broker/Dealer, Credit Union correspond with the name of the or Savings Association who is a member registered owner as it appears on the of a medallion program approved by The front of this bond in every particular, Securities Transfer Association, Inc. without alteration or enlargement or any change whatsoever. B-7 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH AGENDA ITEM ITEM: An Ordinance to (1) Establish Capital Project 100753, "Town Center Hotel Pipe Replacement," (2) Accept and Appropriate Funds to Capital Project 100753, and (3) Authorize the City Manager to Take Actions Related to the Relocation of the Town Center Hotel Pipe MEETING DATE: May 5, 2026 ■ Background: Construction is currently in progress on a new Hampton Inn hotel in Town Center on the corner of Market Street and Columbus Street. The existing water and sewer service lines run under the site, which would pose a risk to guests if a line were to burst. To ensure the safety of the site and accommodate the hotel's needs, the City will relocate the pipes at the site. Work provided by the Department of Public Utilities will include an offset of water and sewer service lines, re-connection to existing utility infrastructure, and the installation of a new fire hydrant. The developer will be responsible for any additional plumbing, including connections to the meter and into the building. If approved, once the agreement between the City and developer is finalized, the work will take roughly 30 days to complete. ■ Considerations: This project will be fully funded through developer contributions. None of these funds are coming from ratepayers or the General Fund. If the cost of the project exceeds the current estimate, the difference will be paid for by the developer through a true up at the end of the project. If the service lines are not relocated, they will not be at the minimum required depth and may be at risk of excess wear and damage. The parties' respective obligations for this project will be documented via an amendment to an existing development agreement. ■ Recommendations: Adopt the attached ordinance. ■ Public Information: Normal City Council agenda process. ■ Attachments: Ordinance, Exhibit A: CIP Detail Sheet, Exhibit B: Summary of Terms Recommended Action: Approval Submitting Department/Agency: Public Utilities City Manager: 1 AN ORDINANCE TO (1) ESTABLISH CAPITAL PROJECT 2 100753, "TOWN CENTER HOTEL PIPE REPLACEMENT," 3 (2) ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE FUNDS TO CAPITAL 4 PROJECT 100753, AND (3) AUTHORIZE THE CITY 5 MANAGER TO TAKE ACTIONS RELATED TO THE 6 RELOCATION OF THE TOWN CENTER HOTEL PIPE 7 8 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, 9 VIRGINIA, THAT: 10 11 1) Capital Project 100753, "Town Center Hotel Pipe Replacement," is hereby 12 established in the FY2025-2026 Capital Improvement Program with a project 13 page attached hereto as "Exhibit A" and incorporated herein. 14 15 2) $434,958.12 is hereby accepted as a developer contribution and appropriated 16 to Capital Project 100753. 17 18 3) The City Manager or his designee is hereby is hereby authorized to execute 19 any and all documents necessary for the implementation of the Capital Project 20 as contemplated herein, so long as the documents are substantially in 21 accordance with the terms set forth on the Summary of Terms, attached hereto 22 as "Exhibit B", and incorporated herein, and such other terms, conditions or 23 modifications as may be acceptable to the City Manager and in a form deemed 24 satisfactory by the City Attorney. Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the day of , 2026. Requires an affirmative vote by a majority of all members of the City Council. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: -D - udget and Managemen Services - y Attorney's Office CA17218 R-1 April 27, 2026 Exhibit A City of Virginia Beach FY 2027 thru FY 2032 Capital Improvement Program Project:100753 Title:Town Center Hotel Pipe Replacement Status:Proposed Category:Sewer Utility Department:PUBLIC UTILITIES Ranking:0 Project Type Project Location Project Type: District: Programmed Funding Programmed Appropriated Budgeted Non-Appropriated Programmed CIP Funding Future Funding To Date FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 Funding 434,958 434,958 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ScopeDescription and This project provides funding for the relocation of a waterline in Town Center,construction of water and sewer service lines to service the Hampton Inn,and installation of a new fire hydrant,as part of a development agreement. Purpose Construction o a new Hampton Inn in Town enter is set to i?Mn in summer 2026.An existing water iine runs imme late y a jacent to t e ui ing,w is may pose a risk to the structural integrity of the building were the line to catastrophically rupture in the future.To ensure the safety of the site,the existing waterline will be offset. History and Current Status This project was added to the FY 2025-26 CIP by City Council in May 2026. Operating Project Map Schedule of Activities VIRGINIA BEACH BLVD Project Activities From-To Amount Construction 05/26-09/26 434,958 Total Budgetary Cost Estimate: 434,958 m BANK STMeans of Financing Q C a z W 9 V MAIN5T Funding Subclass Amount u a _ Local Funding 0 z COMMERCE sT a u Developer Contribution 434,958 w z 5 Total Funding: 434,958 COLUMBUS Sr . • 100753 0 V t°... m -NINADR dCARAPACE OR 2 g Z � a T,y C'*A 4.a. y0y. U CIP EXHIBIT B SUMMARY OF TERMS UTILITY RELOCATION TOWN CENTER HOTEL DEVELOPER: TC Hotel, LLC. SCOPE OF PROJECT: City to undertake relocation of waterline, installation of hydrant and associated utility work related to the development of a hotel at 4571 Columbus Street, Virginia Beach. CONSTRUCTION COSTS: Estimated to be $434,958.12. Developer to prepay this amount to City within five (5) days of execution of agreement. City to hold funds and apply against costs as incurred. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS: City to utilize existing annual service contracts to complete project with Developer responsible for all costs incurred by the City, including any and all overruns. Should funds remain after completion of the project, those funds to be returned to Developer. CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH AGENDA ITEM ITEM: An Ordinance to Accept and Appropriate Grant Funds from the Virginia Department of Historic Resources and to Authorize a Grant Match MEETING DATE: May 5, 2026 ■ Background: The Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR), the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), administers the U.S. Department of the Interior's (DOI) Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) in cooperation with the National Park Service (NPS). Under this program, the DOI specifies that at least ten (10) percent of Virginia's annual HPF program award be designated as pass-through funding to Certified Local Governments (CLG) each year. The Department of Planning prepared and submitted a CLG grant application in April 2024 to update five National Register of Historic Places, originally listed in the 1970 and 1980s. Initial notification of the award from DHR was received on June 4, 2024, to notify the City of Virginia Beach that a subgrant award in the amount of$22,500 was awarded. A match of$25,000 from the City of Virginia Beach as required. A formal letter of the grant award followed in August 2024. City Council initially accepted and appropriated these funds in September 2024. The City of Virginia Beach initially provided 52% of total project cost in grant matching funds to have a greater chance of receiving funding. DHR has notified the City that additional grant funding associated with the grant cycle has become available. Due to the City providing matching funds above the 30% threshold, DHR has offered to provide an additional $10,072.03 in grant funds to reduce the City's match amount to $14,927.97. The total project funding will still be $47,500 with a City grant match percentage of 31%. Matching funds were authorized from the operating budget of the Department of Planning. ■ Public Information: Normal Council Agenda process. ■ Attachments: Ordinance Recommended Action: Approval Submitting Department/Agency: Planning and Community Development City Manager: Y 1 AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE GRANT 2 FUNDS FROM THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HISTORIC 3 RESOURCES 4 5 WHEREAS, in April 2024, the Department of Planning prepared and submitted a 6 Certified Local Governments grant application, and 7 8 WHEREAS, a letter was received from the Department of Historic Resources in 9 August 2024 to notify the City of Virginia Beach of a grant award in the amount of$22,500, 10 and 11 12 WHEREAS, City Council accepted and appropriated the grant in September 2024 in 13 the amount of$22,500 with matching funds of$25,000, 14 15 WHEREAS, the updated grant terms received from the Department of Historic 16 Resources in March 2026, increase the grant award to $32,572,.03 and reduces the 17 matching amount to $14,927.97. 18 NOW BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, 19 VIRGINIA, THAT: 20 $10,072.03 is hereby accepted from the Department of Historic Resources and 21 appropriated, with revenue increased accordingly, to the FY 2025-26 Operating Budget of 22 the Department of Planning, to update up to five National Registrar of Historic Places 23 nominations. Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the day of — 2026. Requires an affirmative vote by a majority of all of the members of the City Council. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: Budget and Management Services City Attorney's Office CAI 7213 R-1 April 21, 2026 1A 1' yG CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH AGENDA ITEM ITEM: An Ordinance to Appropriate $1,000,000 from the Fund Balance of the Tourism Advertising Program Special Revenue Fund to the FY 2025-26 Operating Budget of the Convention and Visitors Bureau for Advertising and Marketing Efforts MEETING DATE: May 5, 2026 ■ Background: In August, 1995, the City Council of Virginia Beach established the Tourism Advertising Program (TAP) Special Revenue Fund with the intent to utilize the TAP Fund for the City's travel and tourism advertising programs outside the local market. This fund collects revenues dedicated from one percent of the percentage- based portion of the transient occupancy tax, one-half percent of the meals tax, and a flat transient occupancy tax of one dollar per night. The Council has continued its support by appropriating these revenues to the TAP Fund in the Operating Budget for the City's advertising and marketing programs to promote and increase tourism, conventions and amateur sports competition visitation to the City. These programs include the operation and maintenance of the Visitor Information Centers and additional regional and national advertising for the City with increased emphasis on marketing through a variety of electronic media. The Convention and Visitors Bureau has identified a marketing opportunity to enhance the upcoming tourism season. The SURGE Campaign will utilize an influx of immediate funds to be used through marketing efforts in the drive and fly markets, including but not limited to Washington DC, NY, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and Charlotte. These funds will be spread across digital media placements, Online Travel Agencies platforms, and software platforms. The goal is to drive additional visitation to Virgina Beach over the next 1-6 months. ■ Considerations: The total cost for the campaign is $1,000,000. The funding source for this appropriation is the fund balance of the Tourism Advertising Program Fund. ■ Public Information: Normal Council Agenda process. ■ Recommendations: Approve the attached ordinance. ■ Attachments: Ordinance Recommended Action: Approval Submitting Department/Agency: Convention and Visitors Bureau City Manager: 1 AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $1,000,000 FROM 2 THE FUND BALANCE OF THE TOURISM ADVERTISING 3 PROGRAM SPECIAL REVENUE FUND TO THE FY 2025-26 4 OPERATING BUDGET OF THE CONVENTION AND 5 VISITORS BUREAU FOR ADVERTISING AND MARKETING 6 EFFORTS 7 8 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, 9 VIRGINIA, THAT: 10 11 $1,000,000 is hereby appropriated from the fund balance of the Tourism 12 Advertising Program Special Revenue Fund, with specific fund reserve revenue 13 increased accordingly, to the FY 2025-26 Operating Budget of the Convention and 14 Visitors Bureau for advertising and marketing efforts. Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the day of 2026. Requires an affirmative vote by a majority of all the members of City Council. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: Budget and 4naem&ent4e�rv�ices orney's Office CA17219 R-1 April 28, 2026 a •.1iyy.,,,...�J CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH AGENDA ITEM ITEM: An Ordinance to Transfer Funding from Public Works Operating Budget and Capital Project #100010, "42nd Street Pump Station Outfalls," to Capital Project #100287, "Oceanfront Stormwater Facilities Maintenance" MEETING DATE: May 5, 2026 ■ Background: Over the weekend of January 24, 2026, a water service line break caused flooding and damage to the underground control room at the 42nd Street stormwater pump station at the Oceanfront. Crews have been actively working to clean, repair, and restore the facility. Temporary pumps and equipment are currently in use to manage stormwater levels while permanent systems are brought back online. Some temporary hoses and pumps remain on the beach to allow stormwater to be pumped to the ocean, which is consistent with how the oceanfront drainage system is designed to function. As work at the pump station continues, these temporary pumps will be removed once the existing pump operations are restored. While damage assessment and repair planning are still underway, the current estimated total cost is approximately$7 million. The City's Risk Management staff is working closely with insurance providers to complete the claim; however, due to policy limitations, only $1 million is available to offset the cost. Public Works has reviewed various funding sources to cover the remaining cost of the damage and has identified end-of-year available funds within its operating and personnel accounts in the Stormwater Lockbox and Stormwater Utility Fund. The department anticipates that these funds, along with remaining unspent funds from Capital Project #100010, "42nd Street Pump Station Outfalls,"will support the repair of the pump station. To facilitate purchases and repair contracts, a transfer of $5.8 million is requested from the following funding sources: Funding Source Amount General Fund — Stormwater Lockbox - Personnel Accounts $1,500,000 General Fund — Stormwater Lockbox - Operating Accounts $1,600,000 Stormwater Utility Fund — Reserve for Contingencies $1,446,655 CI — Project 100010 "42nd Street Pump Station Outfalls" $1,300,000 Total: $5,846,655 ■ Considerations: Transferring the funds will support the timely purchase of equipment and the procurement of repair contracts. This action will also avoid reliance on costly rental units. This transfer is not expected to negatively impact the current FY 2025-26 Public Works Operating Budget. ■ Public Information: Normal City Council agenda process. ■ Attachments: Ordinance; Capital Project Detail Pages (2) Recommended Action: Approval Submitting Department/Agency: Public Works City Manager: 1 1 AN ORDINANCE TO TRANSFER FUNDING FROM THE 2 PUBLIC WORKS OPERATING BUDGET AND CAPITAL 3 PROJECT #100010, "42ND STREET PUMP STATION 4 OUTFALLS," TO CAPITAL PROJECT #100287, 5 "OCEANFRONT STORMWATER FACILITIES 6 MAINTENANCE" 7 8 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, 9 VIRGINIA THAT: 10 11 1) $3,100,000 is hereby transferred as pay-as-you-go funding from the FY 2025-26 12 Operating Budget of the Department of Public Works (General Fund) to the Capital 13 Project#100287, "Oceanfront Stormwater Facilities Maintenance." 14 15 2) $1,446,655 is hereby transferred as pay-as-you-go funding from the FY 2025-26 16 Operating Budget of the Public Works Department (Stormwater Utility Fund) to 17 Capital Project#100287, "Oceanfront Stormwater Facilities Maintenance." 18 19 3) $1,300,000 is hereby transferred within the FY 2025-26 Capital Improvement 20 Program from Project #100010, "42nd Street Pump Station Outfalls," to Project 21 #100287, "Oceanfront Stormwater Facilities Maintenance." Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the day of , 2026. APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: Budget and Management Services y ttorney's Office CAI 7214 R-1 April 23, 2026 City of Virginia Beach FY 2026 thru FY 2031 Capital Improvement Program Project:100287 Title:Oceanfront Stormwater Facilities Maintenance Status:Approved Category:Stormwater Department:PUBLIC WORKS Ranking:0 Project Type Project Location Project Type:Rehabilitation/Replacement District:6 Programmed Funding Programmed Appropriated Budgeted Non-Appropriated Programmed CIP Funding Future Funding To Date FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 Funding 31,530,740 14,630,740 4,650,000 4,650,000 2,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 0 Description This project will provide for the inspection,design,major maintenance rehabilitation,renovation,and repairs for the stormwater system infrastructure constructed as part of the beach erosion control and hurricane protection maintenance and provide acquisition of necessary easements and rights-of-entry to the extent funding is available.This will include all work associated with the 16th Street,42nd Street,61st Street,and 79th Street pump stations and associated ocean outfalls.Additionally,it will include the associated seawall cap/boardwalk and main stormwater trunk line connecting the collection system to the pump stations. Purpose Pert e Co e o'Feuera Regu ations,Section 208.10 a 6)Ttrie Project Agreement,ana t e app ica a portions o tne-0—p—erationand Maintenance Manua s,t e City of Virginia Beach is required to submit maintenance reports to the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers(USACOE)documenting the yearly maintenance performed for the Virginia Beach Erosion Control and Hurricane Protection Project.The USACOE performs an annual inspection of the pump stations and boardwalk in conjunction with the review of the City maintenance and repair documentation.. History and Current Status This project first appeared in the FY 2011-12 CIP.This ongoing project will address needs to maintain the infrastructure of the flood protection project constructed jointly by the USACE and the City of Virginia Beach.Additional funding was added beginning in FY 2016-17 to help meet the City's obligation to maintain the oceanfront storm water facilities to the standards of the US Army Corps of Engineers.In FY 2020-21$1 million in appropriations to date were transferred from this project to CIP 100405 SW Infrastructure Rehabilitation. Operating Budget Impacts Project Map Schedule of Activities Project Activities From-To Amount Construction 07/13-06/31 31,530,740 Total Budgetary Cost Estimate: 31,530,740 Means of Financing Funding Subclass Amount Local Funding 31,530,740 ,�tKst Total Funding: 31,530,740 tetK St ! 10028/ 5t t�Rp 21NV 5t jyg yy i A 1 f 9 1 otN st � FY 2025-26 TO FY 2030-31 300 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Virginia Beach FY 2026 thru FY 2031 Capital Improvement Program Project:100010 Title:42nd Street Pump Station Outfalls Status:Approved Category:Stormwater Department:PUBLIC WORKS Ranking:0 Project Type Project Location Project Type:Rehabilitation/Replacement District:6 Programmed Funding Programmed Appropriated Budgeted Non-Appropriated Programmed CIP Funding Future Funding To Date FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 Funding 4,476,522 4,476,522 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Description and Scope This project involves slip-lining four 48-inch reinforced concrete(RCP)outfall,pipes with 42-inch high density polyethylene plastic(HDPE),for the 42nd street stormwater pump station. Purpose Every t ree years,tile U.S.Army Corp oY Engineers conriucts annua inspections o Virginia Beac hurricane protection system an inspections ot-fn—e-507177nat discharge into the Atlantic Ocean from the Ocean Front Stormwater pump stations.Based on the inspection completed for the Quad 42nd street outfall pipes, Outfall number three,South Middle pipe,the exposed aggregate material has significantly deteriorated.The outfall pipe is currently only operated during emergencies,routine pump start maintenance,and during significant weather events.An estimate and analysis was completed in June of 2017 to evaluate the alternatives.Based on the analysis,it is recommended to slip-line all four outfall pipes. History and Current Status This project first appeared in the FY 2019-20 CIP.Construction bid was awarded in October 2024 and construction will follow soon after. Operating Budget Impacts Project Map Schedule of Activities Project Activities From-To Amount 1.TN 4T ! A Design 07/19-10/24 200,000 Construction 10/24-07/25 4,276,522 e P n = C0LGN`10R 7 Total Budgetary Cost Estimate: 4,476,522 FundingMeans of Financing Subclass Amount mount BSTN ST Local Funding 4,476,522 Total Funding: 4,476,522 s2R0 NAtf 8� OSRO ST • 100010 CAV4LlCR Oq �_ i2N0 NAtf ST X:,_ Og R'. 30 Fj Op � O ►� FY 2025-26 TO FY 2030-31 280 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM K. PLANNING 1. SHAKILAH VERNER for a Conditional Change in Zoning from R-7.5 Residential to Conditional A-18 Apartment District re develop a multi-family development and a Variance to Section 4.4 (b) of the Subdivision Regulations re lot width and street frontage at 4916 Euclid Road DISTRICT 4 (Deferred from March 17, 2026) RECOMMENDATION: STAFF - DENIAL PLANNING COMMISSION —APPROVAL APPLICANT REQUESTS WITHDRAWAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING A Public Hearing of the Virginia Beach City Council will be held on Tuesday,May 5,2026 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber at City Hall,Building 1,2^d Floor at 2401 Courthouse Drive,Virginia Beach,VA 23456. Members of the public will be able to observe the City Council meeting through livestreaming on https://virginiabeach.gov, broadcast on VBTV,and via WebEx.Citizens who wish to speak can sign up to speak either in- person at the Council Chamber or virtually via WebEx by completing the two-step process below. All interested parties are invited to observe. If you wish to make comments virtually during the public hearing,please follow the two-step process provided below: 1. Register with the City Clerk's Office by calling 757-385-4303 prior to 5:00 p.m.on May 5, 2026. 2. Download WebEx and view the meeting at: httr)s://vbeov.webex.com/`weblmnk/wisterlr7 993c723f1593ce6766bddf841dc66bd The following requests are scheduled to be heard: Shakilah Verner(Applicant&Owner)Conditional Rezoning(R-7.5 Residential to Conditional A-18 Apartment District) & Subdivision Variance (Section 4.4(b) of the Subdivision Regulations) Address:4916 Euclid Road GPIN: 1.477136034 City Council: District 4 (Ross-Hammond) Copies of the proposed plans, ordinances, amendments and/or resolutions are on file and may be examined by appointment in the Planning Department at 2403 Courthouse Drive,Municipal Center,Building 3,Virginia Beach,VA 23456 or online at https://virginiabeach.gov/pc. For Information call 757-3854621. If you require a reasonable accommodation for this meeting due to a disability,please call the City Clerk's Office at 757-385-4303.If you are hearing impaired,you can contact Virginia Relay at 711 for TOD service. The meeting will be broadcast on cable TV,https://virginiabeach.gov and Facebook Live. Please check our website at https://clerk.virginiabeach.gov/city-council for the most updated meeting information. All interested parties are invited to participate. Amanda Barnes,MMC City Clerk PILOT-APRIL 21,2026&APRIL 28,2026-1 TIME EACH \ <4 O a / ON\�S� i" RI . j R7.5 ti Site Shakilah Verner Q Zoning 4916 Euclid Road ' (� Property Polygons S Feet 0 15 30 60 90 120 Map created by Planning Department on 2/26/2026 ✓GNU B� . till {c�y ysi CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH AGENDA ITEM ITEM: SHAKILAH VERNER[Applicant& Property Owner] Conditional Rezoning (R- 7.5 Residential District to Conditional A-18 Apartment District) & Subdivision Variance (Section 4.4(b) of the Subdivision Regulations) for the property located at 4916 Euclid Road (GPIN 1477136034). COUNCIL DISTRICT 4 (Ross-Hammond) MEETING DATE: May 5, 2026 (Deferred from March 17, 2026 CC Hearing) ■ Background: The applicant proposes to rezone a 7,744-square-foot parcel on Euclid Road in the Pocahontas Village neighborhood, within the Central Village District of the Pembroke Strategic Growth Area, from R-7.5 Residential to Conditional A-18 Apartment District. The request would allow development of a three-unit, three- story multi-family building at a density of 16.87 units per acre, with a maximum height of 35 feet, consistent with the maximum height permitted in the A-18 Apartment District. A Subdivision Variance is also requested to address deficiencies in lot width and street frontage. The conceptual site plan shows one building with three units, each featuring a one- car garage and two additional off-street parking spaces, exceeding the required minimum of two spaces per unit. Proposed exterior materials include brick veneer, premium vinyl siding, PVC trim, and a metal roof. A ten-foot-wide Category IV landscape buffer and a six-foot-tall earthtone privacy fence are provided adjacent to neighboring residential properties, with detailed landscaping to be finalized during site plan review. No signage is proposed. Because the A-18 District requires a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet and maximum lot coverage of 50 percent, the applicant is requesting two deviations to allow a minimum lot area of 7,744 square feet and maximum lot coverage of 66 percent through Section 107(i) of the Zoning Ordinance. The proposal also includes right-of-way improvements, including a five-foot sidewalk, a six-foot public multi-purpose trail easement, and an 11-foot right-of-way dedication. ■ Considerations: Staff recommends denial of the request to conditionally rezone the 7,744-square- foot parcel to the A-18 Apartment District for a three-unit multifamily development, finding it incompatible with the surrounding single-family neighborhood and inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Although the property is located within the Pembroke Strategic Growth Area's Central Village District, where long-term Shakilah Verner Page 2 of 4 plans envision a more urban, mixed-use environment, the Central Density Study does not identify this specific parcel for redevelopment or increased density. Additionally, the conceptual layout does not meet the Comprehensive Plan's urban design guidance, which recommends buildings be oriented closer to the street with parking located behind, due to the site's limited size. Staff finds that introducing a three-story, higher-density multifamily building into an established neighborhood of predominantly one-story single-family homes would represent a significant shift in scale and intensity. The proposal is viewed as incompatible with the area's existing development pattern and could adversely affect neighborhood cohesion, visual character, privacy, green space, and overall aesthetics. The applicant seeks deviations from A-18 dimensional standards, including a substantial reduction in required minimum lot area (20,000 square feet required versus 7,744 square feet proposed), an increase in maximum lot coverage (50% permitted versus 66% proposed), and variances for lot width and street frontage deficiencies (100 lot width and 80-feet of frontage required versus 77.44 feet for both lot width and street frontage proposed). Staff finds these deviations excessive given the constrained lot and surrounding low-density context, and inconsistent with the intent of the district regulations and Subdivision Ordinance variance criteria. While staff acknowledges the applicant's efforts to address technical requirements, including improved vehicular access, required parking, buffering and landscaping, and pedestrian accommodations, these measures do not outweigh concerns regarding land use compatibility and density. While Staff is recommending denial of the requests, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposal at the February hearing. Further details pertaining to the application, as well as Staff's evaluation, are provided in the attached Staff Report. There were 2 speakers present at the public hearing stating concerns related to incompatibility with surrounding neighborhood, increase traffic and congestion, and decrease in property values. 26 letters of opposition and 2 letters of support were received. ■ Recommendation: On February 11, 2026, the Planning Commission passed a motion to recommend approval of this request by a vote of 8 to 3. CONDITIONAL REZONING (PROFFERS) Proffer 1 Upon development, the Property shall adhere to the site layout, parking configuration, building design, setbacks, dimensions, sidewalk, and landscaping as generally shown and described in the exhibit titled "Conceptual Site Plan for Shakilah Verner Page 3 of 4 4916 Euclid Road," dated December 18, 2025 prepared by CECS (the "Concept Plan"). This Concept Plan has been presented to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning and Community Development, incorporated herein by reference. Proffer 2 When the Property is developed, it will have no more than three (3) 3-Story residential units in one (1) single building, with each unit containing a minimum of 2,091 square feet of enclosed living area. The residential units labeled 1 through 3 as depicted on the Concept Plan shall have front-entry one (1) car garages and driveways. Each unit shall utilize quality architectural features, design elements, and exterior building materials substantially as depicted and described on the four (4) building renderings for 4916 Euclid Road dated 12/16/2025, which have been incorporated by reference into this proffer. Proffer 3 In lieu of the 50% maximum lot coverage and the 20,000 sq ft minimum lot area in the A-18 zoning classification for multi-family dwellings pursuant to Section 602(d) of the Zoning Ordinance, (66%) lot coverage and 7,744 sq ft minimum lot area will be permitted to allow improvements depicted on the Concept Plan. Proffer 4 Further conditions lawfully imposed by applicable development ordinances may be required by the Grantee during detailed site plan and/or subdivision review and administration of applicable City Codes by all cognizant City agencies and departments to meet all applicable City Code requirements. SUBDIVISION VARIANCE (CONDITION) 1. The applicant/owner shall submit a subdivision plat to the City of Virginia Beach, subject to the review and approval of the Department of Planning & Community Development prior to the recordation, which shall be in substantial conformance to the submitted exhibit entitled "Conceptual Site Plan for 4916 Euclid Road," dated December 18, 2025 prepared by CECS (the "Concept Plan")", a copy of which has been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file with the Department of Planning & Community Development. ■ Attachments: Staff Report and Disclosure Statements Location Map Proffer Agreement Minutes of Planning Commission Hearing Letter(s) of Support (2) Letter(s) of Opposition (26) Shakilah Verner Page 4 of 4 Recommended Action: Staff recommends Denial. Planning Commission recommends Approval. r`-\ Submitting Department/Agency: Planning Department City Manager: Agenda Applicant ••- Owner: Planning Commission Public -• • • CouncilCity iistrict: District 4 (Ross-Hammond Project Details Requests Subdivision Variance (Section 4.4(b) of the Subdivision Regulations) iOUTHERN BLYD .. Conditional Rezoning (R-7.5 Residential District to MANDANRD Conditional A-18 Apartment District) - SQ�ytP ° CONESTOGA RD Staff Recommendation `", Denial st C Staff Planner °<4y c NPaapDP�s 0 0 � Marchelle Coleman taE tiv e A�Ko°, Location E` = crR�KFO°r 9 P w 4916 Euclid Road GPIN aF� 1477136034 A Site Size 7,744 square feet F z AICUZ Less than 65 dB DNL Watershed Chesapeake Bay Existing Land Use and Zoning District Vacant Lot/ R-7.5 Residential Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning Districts North Single-family dwelling/R-7.5 Residential South A 3, Euclid Road Mobile Home Park, single-family dwellings/A-12 Apartment, R-7.5 Residential East Single-family dwelling/ R-7.5 Residential West Single-family dwelling/R-7.5 Residential Shakilah Verner Agenda Items 5 & 6 page 1 of 19 Background SummaryofProposal • The applicant is requesting to rezone a 7,744 square foot parcel from R-7.5 Residential to Conditional A-18 Apartment District to develop a three-unit multi-family development with a resulting density of 16.87 units per acre. The applicant is also requesting a Subdivision Variance to the lot width and street line frontage requirements for the A-18 Apartment District • The 7,744-square-foot parcel fronting Euclid Road is currently vacant, situated within the Pocahontas Village neighborhood, and lies in the Central Village District of the Pembroke Strategic Growth Area (SGA). A single-family dwelling previously occupied the site but was demolished in 2019. • As shown on the submitted conceptual site plan, the proposal depicts one multi-family building, including three units. Each unit will be three stories, with a maximum building height of 35 feet, which is within the maximum 35-foot height permitted in the A-18 Apartment District. • As required by Section 603 of the Zoning Ordinance, a ten-foot-wide Category IV landscape buffer is provided adjacent to all property lines abutting the residential district zoned properties to the north, east, and west. As depicted on the building renderings, a six-foot tall earthtone privacy fence is proposed.The proposed landscaping appears to meet the standards of the Zoning Ordinance; however, a more detailed review of all screening and planting requirements will occur during final site plan review. • The proffered building renderings depict dwellings with exterior building materials consisting of brick veneer, premium vinyl siding, PVC trim, and a metal roof. • The Zoning Ordinance establishes a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet and a maximum lot coverage of 50%for multi-family dwellings in the A-18 Apartment District. As depicted on the conceptual site plan, a lot area of 7,744 square feet and a lot coverage of 66% is proposed. As part of this proffered Conditional Rezoning request, the applicant is requesting deviations to the lot area and lot coverage requirements through the provisions of Section 107(i) of the Zoning Ordinance. • Right-of-way improvements are proposed as shown on the proffered conceptual site plan, including a five- foot-wide sidewalk and a six-foot-wide public multi-purpose trail easement. To accommodate the protected bike lanes recommended along Euclid Road in the Active Transportation Plan, the Department of Parks & Recreation requested an eight-foot-wide right-of-way dedication to accommodate future needs. The current proposal includes an 11-foot-wide right-of-way dedication, exceeding the request from Parks & Recreation. • No signage is proposed as part of this development. • Each of the three units will have a one-car garage and two off-street parking spaces, for a total of three parking spaces per unit. Per Section 203(12) of the Zoning Ordinance, the development requires a minimum of two spaces per dwelling unit, which is provided on site. Shakilah Verner Agenda Items 5 & 6 page 2 of 19 • A Subdivision Variance is requested for the deficiency in lot width and street line frontage. ProposedRequired Minimum Proposed Lot Width Lot Width (feet) (feet) Frontage (feet) 4916 Euclid Road 100 77.44 80 77.44 Zoning History No Zoning History to Report �R7�5 o.3 0 o f OR AI2 G R7.5 Application Types CUP: Conditional Use Permit MDP: Modification of Proffers SVR:Subdivision Variance REZ. Rezoning NON: Nonconforming Use LUP: Land Use Plan CRZ: Conditional Rezoning STC:Street Closure STR:Short Term Rental MDC:Modification of FVR: Floodplain Variance Conditions ALT. Alternative Compliance Evaluation - • • • Staff finds the request to conditionally rezone the 7,744-square-foot parcel to Conditional A-18 Apartment District for the development of a three-unit multifamily building to be incompatible with the character of the surrounding single-family neighborhood and inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan's vision for the property; therefore, staff cannot support the request as proposed. As stated previously, the subject property is located within the Pembroke Strategic Growth Area (SGA) and the Central Village District. The long-term vision for this area calls for an eclectic, mid-to low-rise commercial and urban-residential environment, including live-work units, lofts, rowhouse residential buildings, smaller-scale mixed-use commercial development, and a sports arena.This vision supports a more urban, mixed-use Shakilah Verner Agenda Items 5 & 6 page 3 of 19 context. While the proposed three-unit multifamily building is generally consistent with the overall vision of the Comprehensive Plan for the area, the proposed Central Density Study (Pembroke SGA plan, p. 34) does not identify this specific property for redevelopment or increased density and recommends no changes at this location. The Special Area Development Guidelines for Urban Areas (2016 Comprehensive Plan, Reference Handbook, p. B-1) recommend that buildings be oriented closer to the street with parking located behind the structure. As shown on the conceptual site plan, the limited size of the site prevents compliance with these design recommendations, resulting in a site layout that is incompatible with the design recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan. Furthermore, the subject parcel is situated within an established single-family residential neighborhood and surrounded by an established pattern of low-density, single-family residential development. In Staff's assessment, the introduction of a higher-density apartment use on this site would constitute a substantial departure from the existing neighborhood character. The increased scale, intensity, and multi-unit building proposed on the parcel is not compatible with the development pattern in this area and would create noticeable conflicts in massing, visual character, and the intended use of the land in this area. Such a shift in intensity could undermine the neighborhood's cohesion, diminish its established residential character, and allow development patterns that conflict with the area's existing low-density residential character. As indicated earlier, the applicant is requesting deviations from the minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet and the maximum 50% lot coverage requirements for multi-family dwellings in the A-18 Apartment District. As part of the proffered conditional rezoning request, the applicant seeks to develop a 7, 744 square foot lot and an increase in lot coverage to 66%.These requests are made in accordance with Section 107(i) of the Zoning Ordinance, which allows the City Council to approve deviations from dimensional standards, such as lot area and lot coverage, when good cause is shown, and there is no significant detrimental impact on surrounding properties. Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds the requested lot area deficiency and increase in lot coverage difficult to support. The subject property is a small, 7,744-square-foot lot located within a neighborhood predominantly composed of one-story single-family homes, where multi-family dwellings require a minimum 20,000 square feet of lot area. Lot coverage for single-family dwellings in the current R-7.5 Residential district is 35%. Increasing the lot coverage to 66%would result in a significant reduction of green space and rear yard area, a larger building footprint, and increased impervious surface, which would be inconsistent with the existing neighborhood character and could create adverse effects related to privacy, an increase in noise and activity, and the diminishing of the neighborhood aesthetics. Given the scale of the site and the surrounding low-density development, Staff believes the proposed lot area deficiency and increased lot coverage is excessive and not compatible with the area, and therefore is not supportive of these deviation requests. Section 9.3 of the Subdivision Regulations states: No variance shall be authorized by the Council unless it finds that: A. Strict application of the ordinance would produce undue hardship. B. The authorization of the variance will not be of substantial detriment to adjacent property, and the character of the neighborhood will not be adversely affected. \Shakilah Verner Agenda Items 5 & 6 page 4 of 19 C. The problem involved is not of so general or recurring a nature as to make reasonably practicable the formulation of general regulations to be adopted as an amendment to the ordinance. D. The hardship is created by the physical character of the property, including dimensions and topography, or by other extraordinary situation or condition of such property, or by the use or development of property immediately adjacent thereto. Personal or self-inflicted hardship shall not be considered as grounds for the issuance of a variance. E. The hardship is created by the requirements of the zoning district in which the property is located at the time the variance is authorized whenever such variance pertains to provisions of the Zoning Ordinance incorporated by reference in this ordinance. Similarly to the deviation requests for minimum lot area and minimum lot coverage, the applicant is requesting deviations from the lot width and street line frontage requirements applicable to properties within the A-18 Apartment District.These requests are due in part to the limited size of the lot.The A-18 Apartment District requires a minimum lot width of 100 feet and a minimum street line frontage of 80 feet for multi-family dwellings. The subject property is deficient by 22.56 feet in lot width and 2.56 feet in street line frontage. Staff finds that the requested variances are inconsistent with the established character of the area and would further intensify development on a constrained lot in a manner that does not align with the intent of the district regulations; therefore, staff does not support the request. Although the proposal includes requests for deviations from both the lot area, lot width and street line frontage, and the maximum lot coverage requirement, the applicant has worked collaboratively with staff to address vehicular access, parking, landscaping, and pedestrian connectivity.Through multiple plan revisions, the proposal now incorporates a commercial entrance in accordance with the Public Works Design Standards Manual, provides landscape buffering along the north, east, and west property lines adjacent to residential uses, and meets the on-site parking requirements for each unit. In addition, the plan includes a five-foot-wide sidewalk and a six-foot-wide public multi-purpose trail easement to accommodate a future protected bikeway consistent with the City's Active Transportation Plan. Collectively, these elements demonstrate the applicant's efforts to meet applicable development standards for the proposed use. The proffered conceptual site plan has been reviewed by the Fire Marshal's Office, and no concerns raised with the proposed layout or circulation. Further review will be conducted during the final site plan review process. Information provided by the Virginia Beach City Public School Staff indicates that the proposed development is within the threshold for increases in student population. Only the elementary school data indicates a student population above capacity. The overcapacity is within the acceptable utilization range of less than 10%of optimum capacity. Based on this analysis, the proposed redevelopment is not expected to adversely affect current student enrollment, as only one additional student would be anticipated with this request. This site is located in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed; therefore, a preliminary stormwater analysis is not required prior to this item being reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council. An in-depth review of the stormwater management strategy will occur during the site plan review process to ensure that the project complies with all stormwater regulations and that no negative flooding impacts will occur upstream and downstream as a result of this development. � Shakilah Verner Agenda Items 5 &6 page 5 of 19 While Staff acknowledges and commends the applicant for seeking to provide additional housing within the City of Virginia Beach, Staff believes the proposed development is not compatible with the existing character of the surrounding single-family neighborhood, which predominantly consists of one-story homes.The request to rezone from R-7.5 Residential to A-18 Apartment to accommodate three multi-family units in a three-story building represents a significant increase in density that, in Staff's assessment, is inconsistent with the scale and character envisioned for this area.The Central Village District, as outlined in the Pembroke SGA Master Plan, anticipates a mix of mid-to low-rise commercial and urban-residential uses, including live-work, loft, and rowhouse buildings; however, the proposed Central Density Study indicates no changes to this property. Given the proposed density, change in use, and incompatibility with the surrounding neighborhood, staff recommends denial of these requests. Should the Planning Commission find this proposal appropriate for redevelopment, the proffers submitted by the applicant are provided below for consideration. Proffers The following are proffers submitted by the applicant as part of a Conditional Zoning Agreement (CZA). The applicant, consistent with Section 107(h) of the City Zoning Ordinance, has voluntarily submitted these proffers in an attempt to "offset identified problems to the extent that the proposed rezoning is acceptable," (§107(h)(1)). Should this application be approved,the proffers will be recorded at the Circuit Court and serve as conditions restricting the use of the property as proposed with this change of zoning. Proffer 1 Upon development, the Property shall adhere to the site layout, parking configuration, building design, setbacks, dimensions, sidewalk, and landscaping as generally shown and described in the exhibit titled "Conceptual Site Plan for 4916 Euclid Road," dated December 18, 2025 prepared by CECS (the "Concept Plan"). This Concept Plan has been presented to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning and Community Development, incorporated herein by reference. Proffer When the Property is developed, it will have no more than three (3) 3-Story residential units in one(1) single building, with each unit containing a minimum of 2,091 square feet of enclosed living area.The residential units labeled 1 through 3 as depicted on the Concept Plan shall have front-entry one (1) car garages and driveways. Each unit shall utilize quality architectural features, design elements, and exterior building materials substantially as depicted and described on the four(4) building renderings for 4916 Euclid Road dated 12/16/2025, which have been incorporated by reference into this proffer. Proffer 3 In lieu of the 50% maximum lot coverage and the 20,000 sq ft minimum lot area in the A-18 zoning classification for multi-family dwellings pursuant to Section 602(d) of the Zoning Ordinance, (66%) lot coverage and 7,744 sq ft minimum lot area will be permitted to allow improvements depicted on the Concept Plan. Shakilah Verner Agenda Items 5 & 6 page 6 of 19 Proffer 4 Further conditions lawfully imposed by applicable development ordinances may be required by the Grantee during detailed site plan and/or subdivision review and administration of applicable City Codes by all cognizant City agencies and departments to meet all applicable City Code requirements. Staff Comments: Staff has reviewed the Proffers listed above and finds them acceptable. The City Attorney's Office has reviewed the agreement and found it to be legally sufficient and in acceptable legal form. Recommended Conditions for 1. The applicant/owner shall submit a subdivision plat to the City of Virginia Beach, subject to the review and approval of the Department of Planning & Community Development prior to the recordation, which shall be in substantial conformance to the submitted exhibit entitled "Conceptual Site Plan for 4916 Euclid Road," dated December 18, 2025 prepared by CECS (the "Concept Plan")", a copy of which has been exhibited to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file with the Department of Planning & Community Development. Further conditions may be required during the administration of applicable City Ordinances and Standards. Any site plan submitted with this application may require revision during detailed site plan review to meet all applicable City Codes and Standards. All applicable permits required by the City Code, including those administered by the Department of Planning/Development Services Center and Department of Planning/ Permits and Inspections Division, and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, are required before any approvals allowed by this application are valid. The applicant is encouraged to contact and work with the Crime Prevention Office within the Police Department for crime prevention techniques and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) concepts and strategies as they pertain to this site. Comprehensive The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property as being located within the Pembroke Strategic Growth Area in the Central Village District, which the Comprehensive Plan designates as one of the eight urban areas in the City that is envisioned to accommodate future growth and adopt a more urban style in the City. The vision of the Central Village District is "an eclectic, mid to low-rise commercial and urban-residential area. This district will include live-work, loft, and rowhouse residential buildings as well as smaller-scale mixed-use commercial buildings and a sports arena" (p. 34, Pembroke SGA Master Plan). The design policies and principles encourage the following: Buildings to be located close to the pedestrian street with off- street parking behind or beside buildings. (p. B-1), Wherever possible,join parking areas to create an internal circulation network. Minimize or eliminate curb cuts by sharing vehicular access with adjacent properties and or utilizing alleys for access." (p. B-1), Parking areas should not dominate the frontage of streets. Off-street parking areas should be located behind buildings or in the interior of a block whenever possible. Shared parking is strongly encouraged between adjacent or vertically mixed uses whose peak Shakilah Verner Agenda Items 5 & 6 page 7 of 19 demand is offset from each other." (p. B-1), Fences are recommended only where complementary to the building design. Discourage the use of stockade or chain link fence where visible from any public street. Design sensitive to the surrounding built and natural conditions. Adjacent buildings should relate in similarity of scale, height, and configuration. (p. B-3) ResourcesNatural & Cultural • The site is located in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. There are no known historic or cultural resources that will be affected by this project. Impacts/TransportationTraffic TrafiSc Counts 5treet'Iam it serttt� = e Cptenerated 'rfic an Existing Land Use (vacant lot) —0 ADT Euclid Road 4,400 ADTl 12,500 ADT 1(LOS a "D") Existing Land Use Z-10 ADT Proposed Land Use 3—20 ADT 1 Average Daily Trips 2As defined by a 3As defined by a three 4LOS= Level of 7,774 square foot unit multi-family Service single-family lot dwelling Master Transportation Plan(MTP)and Capita/Improvement Program(CIP) Euclid Road, in the vicinity of this application, is considered a two-lane undivided minor urban arterial. It is not included on the MTP. Active Transportation Plan The Active Transportation Plan calls for a protected Bike Lane along Euclid Road. While this facility would be difficult to install in segments, one lot at a time, Parks & Recreation recommends an 8-foot-wide right-of-way dedication to provide adequate width to accommodate the bike lane in the future, as well as existing sidewalks to be improved to satisfy the minimum 5-foot wide standard. ImpactsPublic Utility Water There is an existing 10-inch city water main along Euclid Road. The site must connect to city water. Sewer There is an existing eight-inch city sanitary sewer gravity main along Euclid Road.The site currently connects to city sewer. \ ShakilahvVerner Agenda Items 5 & 6 page 8 of 19 School • , School Current Enrollment Capacity Generation' Change' Point O'View Elementary 684 students 635 students 1 student 1 student Larkspur Middle 1,473 students 1,329 students 0 students 0 students Kempsville High 2,002 students 2,029 students 0 students 0 students 1 "Generation" represents the number of students the development will add to the school. 2 "Change" represents the difference between the number of potential or actual students generated under the existing zoning and the number generated under the proposed zoning. The number can be positive (additional students) or negative (fewer students). Public • • Planning Commission • The applicant has undertaken extensive public outreach efforts related to the proposed project. In September 2025, the applicant visited the community church located off Euclid Road on two separate Wednesdays and met with several parishioners, as well as the pastor, to discuss the proposal. On August 30, 2025, the applicant personally hand-delivered informational letters describing the project and received support from the adjacent property owners on both sides of the site. Additionally, in September 2025, the applicant personally spoke with a neighbor across the street from the subject property; although she did not submit a formal letter, she expressed her support for new development and wished the applicant well. By the end of October 2025, the applicant received written letters of support from adjacent neighbors across the street. The applicant has also met with two City Council Members, one of which is the district representative for this area. • Two letters of support and 20 letters of opposition have been received by Staff noting concerns related to incompatibility with existing single-family neighborhood, increased traffic, decrease in property values, and parking impacts. • As required by the Zoning Ordinance,the public notice sign(s) was placed on the property on January 12, 2026. • As required by State Code, this item was advertised in the Virginian-Pilot on Wednesdays,January 28, 2026 and February 4, 2026. • As required by City Code, the adjacent property owners were notified regarding the request and the date of the Planning Commission public hearing on January 26, 2026. • This Staff report, as well as all reports for this Planning Commission's meeting, was posted on the Commission's webpage of virginiabeach.gov/pc on February 5, 2026. Shakilah Verner Agenda Items 5 & 6 page 9 of 19 City Council • As required by City Code, this item was advertised in the Virginian-Pilot on Tuesdays, March 3, 2026 and March 10, 2026. • As required by City Code,the adjacent property owners were notified regarding both the request and the date of the City Council's public hearing on March 2, 2026. • The City Clerk's Office posted the materials associated with the application on the City Council website of https://clerk.virginiabeach.gov/city-council on March 13, 2026. Shakilah Verner Agenda Items 5 & 6 page 10 of 19 hI LOT IS BLOCK I �' • GPIN: N77-t3-6191 PERRY S.& x x' CAROL P.REDIGERg, z 15 4 REVOCABLE TRUST ` . .y ' ,_ ■ Lr,. INST.1200300128133 LOT A-D(CEFT 25E'BCI ZONE.,R-75 GPIN. '477{'`-50Y LOT 12 SRWAH VERNER BLOCK! NST.#2025C3C,1315 GP1N' 1477-13-7055 ta'woscw[ kEUME VAN LIERF Fli5 9 � x v+ 10W A-18 OR..3955 PG.2117 .t F;KS ZONE.,R-7.5RJS 39'26'00"E 77.44' '.. ' t. R= yICNTY Wp FENCE FENCE lGYP1'loov �.•. • 0.7' qa• Bp IDS '. OVER o OVER _ you vo r. O 3 V _ 0 �'ar`acws T PROPOSED S'SOLID - 0 - PRIVACY FENCE UN JN s JNI EXISTING 3'CHAIN LINK FENCE TO BE REMOVED ss LOT 3&' LOT 5 2.56'OF LOT 4 FENCE °o BLOCK I BLOCK 1 0.5' '^ a GPW,-1477-11-69M 6Y'dN' 1477-1J-5170 OVER a — ro n ivo F.OWRY RICHARD A WELLER v°t RLST1 202206007406 NLST1101200039029 00 ,n 7011f.•R-75 ZONE R-7.5 14912 14920 .: E-L LANDSCAPE 3871 TO THE CIL OF NARPAGANSETT DRNE z ' s'IOtlSCAPE --EXISTING DRNEWAY TO BE REMOVED iLXIS NO R/'k >R�i} c -� +r c 71GSTM!,R/'M u�cscr+c s-.+,Eou �-rc w�rmr �J 8 "wr {'S5 D ,.;- a/+'SAM SEWiff LINE caa wm MAN EUCMD ROAD ssFQc.o. CD s7s'tw-m m, (50' RIW) 7 Ln PROPOSED 6'PUBUC a Q S MJ_TI-PURPOSE Co O) TRAIL EASEMENT rD (D SU w °® vBTNJi1 Ln 0 Ln IS go D N LD m � Proposed Building Renderings F= m c oC ca � as � � w tO c cc LL1 r U I � Q t7A 73 L!7 ar 17 E -� } K Shakilah Verner Agenda Items 5 & 6 page 12 of 19 Proposed Building Renderings tl im AM a ` w F y Shakilah Verner Agenda Items 5 & 6 page 13 of 19 Proposed Building Renderings r N : ��� ��;;°�a..,ac; •.�'` r +�3ih l^.�a aye,..ed'� �. �. a c�3 a as w v J i Shakilah Verner Agenda Items 5 & 6 page 14 of 19 Proposed Building Renderings ROM v�. # s i s: e � $` W LU a` �w Shakilah Verner Agenda Items 5 & 6 page 15 of 19 Site Photos ,yy f 'tea ,. ✓ -m�3S . x 4 t5 y v.Nm � S j k° 5 Y�' q+.+,,• .yam"^ $• �. n Disclosure DisclosureCITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH Statement The disclosures contained in this form are necessary to inform public officials who may vote on the application as to whether they have a conflict of interest under Virginia law. Completion and submission of this form is required for all applications that pertain to City real estate matters or to the development and/or use of property in the City of Virginia Beach requiring action by the City Council,boards, commissions, or other bodies. SECTION 1: APPLICANT . . , DISCLOSURE APPLICANT INFORMATION Applicant Name: as listed on application Shakilah Verner Is Applicant also the Owner of the subject property? Yes@ Noo If no,Property Owner must complete SECTION 2:PROPERTY OWNER DISCLOSURE(page 3). Does Applicant have a Representative?YesC)No@ If yes,name Representative: Is Applicant a corporation,partnership,firm,business,trust or unincorporated business? YesQNo@ If yes,list the names of all officers,directors,members,or trustees below AND businesses that have a parent-subsidiary i or affiliated business entity z relationship with the applicant. (Attach list if necessary.) Does the subject property have a proposed or pending purchaser? YesU No • If yes,name proposed or pending purchaser: KNOWN INTEREST BY PUBLIC OFFICIAL OR EMPLOYEE Does an official or employee of the City of Virginia Beach have an interest in the subject land or any proposed development contingent on the subject public action? Yeso No@ If yes,name the official or employee,and describe the nature of their interest. APPLICANT SERVICES DISCLOSURE READ:The Applicant must certify whether the following services are being provided in connection to the subject application or any business operating or to be operated on the property. The name of the entity and/or individual providing such services must be identified.(Attach list if necessary.) SERVICE YES NO SERVICE PROVIDER Name entity and or individual Financing(mortgage,deeds of trust, Q cross-collateralization,etc.) Real Estate Broker/Agent/Realtor. 4 @ Disclosure Statement I rev. May-2024 w page 1 of 3 Shakilah Verner Agenda Items 5 & 6 page 17 of 19 Disclosure SECTIONAPPLICANT DISCLOSURE -. SERVICE YES NO SERVICE PROVIDER Name entity and/or individual Accounting/Tax Return Preparation 0 E) Architect/Designer/Landscape Q Q Brian Meekins Architect/Land Planner Construction Contractor G) I Q Adelina Escamilla,Don Weeks Engineer/Surveyor/Agent Q Q Issam Baraki/CECS Legal Services Q C) GradyAPalmer,WilliamsMuRen APPLICANT CERTIFICATION READ:I certify that all information contained in this Form is complete,true,and accurate.I understand that upon receipt of notification that the application has been scheduled for public hearing,I am responsible for updating the information provided herein three weeks prior to the meeting of Planning Commission, City Council,VBDA,CBPA, Wetlands Board or any public body or committee in connection with this application. Shakilah Verner �Xa�4/a44lt" 0 8/1 1120 25 Applicant Name(Print) Applicant Signature Date 1"Parent-subsidiary relationship"means"a relationship that exists when one corporation directly or indirectly owns shares possessing more than 50 percent of the voting power of another corporation."See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act,VA.Code§2.2-3101. 2'Affiliated business entity relationship"means"a relationship,other than parent-subsidiary relationship, that exists when(i)one business entity has a controlling ownership interest in the other business entity,(ii) a controlling owner in one entity is also a controlling owner in the other entity,or(iii)there is shared management or control between the business entities.Factors that should be considered in determining the existence of an affiliated business entity relationship include that the some person or substantially the same person own or manage the two entities;there are common or commingled funds or assets;the business entities share the use of the some offices or employees or otherwise share activities,resources or personnel on a regular basis;or there is otherwise a close working relationship between the entities. See State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act,Va. Code§2.2-3101. FOR CITY USE ONLY: No changes as of(date): 4/23/2026 ����v 4 Marchelle L. Coleman /23/2026 Staff Name(Print) Staff Signature Date Disclosure Statement I rev. May-2024 page 2 of 3 Shakilah Verner Agenda Items 5 & 6 page 18 of 19 • Upon receiving a recommendation from Planning Commission, this request will be scheduled for a City Council public hearing. Staff will inform the applicant and/or their representative of the date of the hearing in the upcoming days. • Following City Council's decision, the applicant will receive a decision letter from Staff. • Once the conditions of approval are in place and/or completed, the applicant must contact the Zoning Division of the Planning Department to obtain verification that the conditions have been met. Contact the Zoning Division at 757-385-8074. • If the request requires land disturbance and/or a subdivision of property, please contact the Development Services Center (DSC) to discuss next steps for site plan/plat review. Contact the DSC at 757-385-4621 or the Development Liaison Team at 757-385-5692. • Please note that further conditions may be required during the administration of applicable City Ordinances and Standards. Any site plan submitted with this application may require revision during detailed site plan review to meet all applicable City Codes and Standards. All applicable permits required by the City Code, including those administered by the Department of Planning/ Development Services Center and Department of Planning/ Permits and Inspections Division, and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, are required before any approvals allowed by this application are valid. • The applicant is encouraged to contact and work with the Crime Prevention Office within the Police Department for crime prevention techniques and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) concepts and strategies as they pertain to this site. Shakilah Verner Agenda Items 5 & 6 page 19 of 19 Prepared by and return to: Grady A.Palmer.(VSB 4 45730) Williams Mullen 222 Central Park,Ave.Suite 1700 Virginia Beach,VA 23462 Shakilah Verner, a Virginia Beach resident TO (PROFFERED COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, AND CONDITIONS) CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,a municipal corporation of the Commonwealth of Virginia GP1N: 14771360340000 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT("Agreement") is made as of the day ofke&m by and between SHAKILAH VERNER, (together with its successors and/or assigns, the "Grantor"), to be indexed as grantor, and the CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, a municipal corporation of the Commonwealth of Virginia (the "Grantee"; together with the Owner, collectively,the"Parties"),to be indexed as grantee. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Grantor is the current owner of that certain parcel located in the City of Virginia Beach,Virginia identified by GPIN No. 14771360340000,as more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference(the "Property"); WHEREAS, the Grantor has initiated a conditional amendment to the Zoning Map of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, by petition addressed to the Grantee, so as to change the classification of the Property from R 7.5 Residential District to A-18 Apartment District; WHEREAS, the Grantor has voluntarily proffered, in writing, in advance of and prior to the public hearing before the Grantee,the following conditions and restrictions which shall restrict and govern the physical development, operation and use of the Property, to be incorporated as a part of the previously adopted amendment to the Zoning Map; WHEREAS, said conditions having been proffered by the Grantor and allowed and accepted by the Grantee as part of the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, such conditions shall continue in full force and effect until a subsequent amendment changes the zoning on the Property covered by such conditions; provided, however, that such conditions shall continue despite a I subsequent amendment if the subsequent amendment is part of the comprehensive implementation of a new or substantially revised zoning ordinance, unless, notwithstanding the foregoing, these conditions are amended or varied by written instrument recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia and executed by the record owner of the subject Property at the time of recordation of such instrument; provided, further, that said instrument is consented to by the Grantee in writing as evidenced by a certified copy of the ordinance or resolution adopted by the governing body of the Grantee, after a public hearing before the Grantee advertised pursuant to the provisions of the Code of Virginia, Section 15.2-2204, which said ordinance or resolution shall be recorded along with said instrument as conclusive evidence of such consent. NOW THEREFORE, the Grantor, for itself, its successors, assigns, grantees, and other successors in title or interest, voluntarily and without any requirement by or exaction from the Grantee or its governing body and without any element of compulsion of quid pro quo for zoning, rezoning, site plan, building permit or subdivision approval, hereby makes the following declaration of conditions and restrictions which shall restrict and govern the physical development, operation and use of the Property and hereby covenants and agrees that these proffers(collectively, the "Proffers") shall constitute covenants running with the said Property, which shall be binding upon the Property and upon all parties and persons claiming under or through the Grantor,its heirs, personal representatives, assigns,grantees and other successors in interest or title, namely: 1. Upon development, the Property shall adhere to the site layout, parking configuration, building design,setbacks,dimensions,sidewalk,and landscaping as generally shown and described in the exhibit titled "Conceptual Site Plan for 4916 Euclid Road," dated December 18, 2025 prepared by CECS (the "Concept Plan"). This Concept Plan has been presented to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning and Community Development, incorporated herein by reference. 2. When the Property is developed, it will have no more than three(3) 3-Story residential units in one(l) single building, with each unit containing a minimum of 2,091 square feet 2 of enclosed living area. The residential units labeled 1 through 3 as depicted on the Concept Plan shall have front-entry one (1)car garages and driveways. Each unit shall utilize quality architectural features, design elements, and exterior building materials substantially as depicted and described on the four(4) building renderings for 4916 Euclid Road dated 12/16/2025, which have been incorporated by reference into this proffer. 3. In lieu of the 50%maximum lot coverage and the 20,000 sq ft minimum lot area in the A-18 zoning classification for multi-family dwellings pursuant to Section 602(d) of the Zoning Ordinance, (66%) lot coverage and 7,744 sq ft minimum lot area will be permitted to allow improvements depicted on the Concept Plan. 4. Further conditions lawfully imposed by applicable development ordinances may be required by the Grantee during detailed site plan and/or subdivision review and administration of applicable City Codes by all cognizant City agencies and departments to meet all applicable City Code requirements. All references hereinabove to zoning districts and to regulations applicable thereto, refer to the City Zoning Ordinance of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia ("CZO"), in force as of the date the conditional zoning amendment is approved by the Grantee. The Grantor covenants and agrees that(1)the'Zoning Administrator of the City of Virginia Beach,Virginia shall be vested with all necessary authority on behalf of the governing body of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia to administer and enforce the foregoing conditions, including (i) the ordering in writing of the remedying of any noncompliance with such conditions, and (ii) the bringing of legal action or suit to erasure compliance with such conditions, including mandatory or prohibitory injunction, abatement, damages or other appropriate action, suit or proceedings; (2) the failure to meet all conditions shall constitute cause to deny the issuance of any of the required building or occupancy permits as may be appropriate; (3) if aggrieved by any decision of the Zoning Administrator made pursuant to the provisions of the City Code, (lie CZO or this Agreement,the Grantor shall petition the governing body for the review thereof prior to instituting proceedings in court; and(4) the Zoning Map shall show by an appropriate symbol on the map the existence of conditions attaching to the zoning of the subject Property on the map and that the 3 ordinance and the conditions may be made readily available and accessible for public inspection in the office of the Zoning Administrator and in the Department of Planning and that they shall be recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia and indexed in the naive of the Grantor and Grantee. This Agreement constitutes the full and entire agreement between the Parties with regard to the subject matter hereof and supersedes any other prior promises,representations or warranties (oral or otherwise)made by any person. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have authorized and duty executed and delivered this Agreement as of the date first above written. GRANTOR: Shakilah Verner By: COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,to wit: The foregoing Agreement was acknowledged before me in the jurisdiction aforesaid this 10 day ofJCf'ws "t ,2025, by Shakilah Verner. My commission expires: bjove v tr Notary Registration No.: MARIA C.WSIUi AM — Conwnwion No;2426617,..?� NOTARY PVBLIC-c�urbisNu,1y Notary Public SAN 60. CbUNT'�` Commission Expires*ve(ntier.tSr202$ 4 Exhibit A ALL THAT certain lot, piece or parcel of land,situate in the City of Virginia Beach,State of Virginia, being known, numbered, and designated as Lot Four(4), in Block One(1), as shown on the plat of Pocahontas Village,which plat is duly recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia in Map Book 48, at Page 7, save and except the northwesterly 2.56 Feet thereof which was conveyed by deed recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 728,at page 468. 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of San Diego } On Jecem Qr 10t1 2,�5' before me, Maria C. Patsiouras, Notary Public (insert name and title of the officer) personally appeared11 'l�� who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s)on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. N"LA c.PATSiou�s WITNESS my hand and official seal. Commission No.24266'17 � NOTARY PU®li •6�L1FORNtA'y SAN 0(EG G UNTV. Comr+�ss on Expras N4Ye,?1tie�29r2028 Signature GTE ea Virginia Beach Planning Commission February 11, 2026 City Council Chambers Formal Hearing, 12:00 P.M. Public Meeting Items #5 & 6 Shakilah Verner Recommendation: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Discussion Mr. Coston: Thank you. If you had an application that was on the consent agenda,your request will now be scheduled for an upcoming city council meeting. Staff will contact you about the date. For those applicants on the consent agenda,thank you for your participation,and you may remain in the meeting either virtually or in person, but you are free to leave. The next order of business is our regular agenda. Madam Clerk, we are ready for the first item. Clerk: Our first items are five and six, Shakilah Verner. Mr. Coston: Please state your name for the record. Ms. Verner: Shakilah Verner. Good afternoon, Chairman, Madam Vice Chair, and honorable members of the Planning Commission. I am here regarding my Conditional rRezoning for District 4. Before I speak about the zoning,I'd like to briefly share who I am. I am a military veteran who served on active duty, where I rose through the ranks and earned the trust of both my junior and senior sailors alike. I take responsibility and trust seriously, and the goal is to earn your trust, as I did in the military. And to earn the trust of the neighbors and the community members who will live beside this development. With your support,I hope to create a vibrant and strong residential structure,one that demonstrates how a redeveloped lot can embrace positive change and set a standard for future infill development. Public input and the city's vision for the comprehensive plan did not happen overnight. Since May of 2023, there has been over two years of public input, dialogue with residents, and engagement with community leaders. Through that process,the direction was clear,built above the green line. That direction mirrors the city's own planning work,which is the draft 2040 Comprehensive plan. The comprehensive plan has been shaped through a multi-year, multi-phase public engagement process that has included more than 80 stakeholder meetings, multiple speak up VB surveys, 10 focus groups, nine open houses, and seven Planning commission workshops. Throughout that process, residents ask for inward growth, upward density, strategic growth areas, and strong connectivity, especially north of the Green Line. The city's own Comprehensive Planning Administrator, Mr. Hank Morrison stated, resident and stakeholder input on their vision for Virginia Beach's future has been crucial in drafting the plan. This further demonstrates the public outreach and the collaborative effort that was used to define the goals for redevelopment of District 4. For it to be more compact, walkable, connected, while increasing density upwards to meet today's housing needs. Additionally, conditional rezoning is the better option for this proposal, because it's important to consider the alternative. By right, I could build a two-story, 35-foot tall, single-family home with more lot coverage than many of the older 1,200-square-foot homes built in that area in the 60s. That home would not include easements for a bike trail, a multi-use trail, or a new five-foot sidewalk. -It would contribute to urban sprawl and go against the comprehensive Plan's vision, which discourages single-family home development. On page 154. It would not advance strategic growth area goals of District 4. It would not meaningfully increase mixed-use housing options. It would be self-serving and not. Give back to the community. I will argue that we can do better. By building three units on this parcel,we are demonstrating a balanced approach to SGA 4's goals, while increasing density upwards by approximately 66%. This proposal offers a real and practical expression of the city's long-term intent for the Central Business District expansion, low to mid- rise, diverse housing types, affordable across all income levels, human-scale density upwards that support the housing demand, has multimodal transportation options, supports attainability, and assists in tax stability. There's a shortage of attainable home ownership opportunities for residents who earn too much to qualify for subsidized rental products, but too little to enter a traditional single-family for-sale market. This project helps fulfill a real and recognized gap. To illustrate that reality, I would respectfully reference a letter I received from Ms. Sharon Shoff, housing development manager for housing and neighborhood Preservation, who wrote, I don't think you will have any problem selling. There is such a dearth of affordable home ownership opportunities and attainable homes. When you get closer, please let me know what the sales prices are. We are hoping to have a down payment and closing cost assistance available for next year for home buyers. And it would be helpful to provide some inventory of housing units qualified buyers may be able to afford with our assistance. I would add to that there are many reports that local city workers to include teachers, nurses, janitorial workers, etc. are unable to find affordable, attainable houses within the city, making it difficult to retain those workers. Clearly,creating housing is a multi-pronged approach. I understand that one development won't solve the housing gap, however, it will undoubtedly be a contribution to what's needed now. Regarding compatibility, and from my research, compatibility cannot be reduced solely to height and scale. Compatibility means that two uses or development can coexist harmoniously, side by side, without conflict or disruption. It does not mean that they must be architectural identical. I have provided to the planning staff several communities in which similar developments currently exist throughout the city of Virginia Beach. Where the scale is higher and lower, yet they have coexisted for years, harmoniously and without affecting public safety and welfare. Keeping in mind,this site is near the entrance of Pocahontas Village,where diverse residential and commercial uses already exist in the immediate vicinity. The city has approved Grand Lake Apartments, another commercial project just one and a half miles away from this development. So, from a broader planning standpoint, this area is transitioning, not from residential to commercial, but from single purpose to multi-purpose. We don't get any more land,we only get more people. Seniors are living longer, we must evolve. Lastly, I would like to share that my team and I approach this proposal as a serious and thoughtful redevelopment. That team includes the highly respected civil engineer, Mr. Asam Baraki, architect and structural engineer, Mr. Brian Meekins, Land Use Attorney, Mr. Grady Palmer, a real estate attorney, and a survey team. Together,we examine the property in detail and work diligently on a proposal that is revitalizing, accessible, functional, more energy efficient, and contributes to a better quality of life and attainable for several families. I hope the information I have provided here today further demonstrates how the proposal aligns with public input, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, SGA IV goals, attainability needs, and responsible in field development. I respectfully ask for your support. So,we can continue growing upward and inward, above the green line, and in a way that advances the goals of our neighborhoods and our city. Thank you for your time, your services to the citizens of Virginia Beach, and for your thoughtful consideration. I appreciate it. Thank you. Mr. Coston: Thank you. Please stay there for a moment. Are there any questions from any of the commissioners? Mr. Plumlee: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Ms.Verner,with regards to this development, you've had a number of encounters with the residents to talk over your plan. Can you explain that to us? Ms. Verner: So,yes, sir. Ultimately,when we began making arrangements and plans, I reached out to adjacent neighbors to the left and right, across the street, and I also visited the local church where Pastor Jay is there, and they welcomed me to engage with the parishioners there. Throughout those conversations,I had a couple people provide letters of support,which was given the planning staff. And then I had several couple neighbors who felt that. You know, this is just something that they don't want here,you know, it's change, is change isn't easy for anyone. And as a result, you know, they reached out to other neighbors and said, hey, you know, let's get together to oppose this project. After that occurred,I spoke to more neighbors. And at the end of the day,you know,their concern and opposition wasn't rooted, in fact. There were things like, you know, this may reduce my property value, is going to increase traffic. You know,other developers will want to come and do the same thing. So what I intended to do,and what I tried to do,was to acknowledge their concerns, because, again, I do understand changes are challenging, and at the same time, refute, you know, their opposition. The reality is, is that this is a single development. So,in my mind, I explained to them how it's not going to change,you know,their property values at this point. Property values are individualized until the community is redeveloped more as a whole or a particular area. So, I tried to explain that. Additionally, when they mentioned, you know, our taxes will go up, you know, I explained that, since 2021, City Council has voted to reduce taxes on property, going from $1.01. This was in 2021. In 2022 through 2024, taxes on property were reduced to $0.99 per$100. And as of 25 and 26,the tax rate on property values are 97 cents. And I haven't seen anything recently where council is looking to change that as far as taxes are concerned. So again, you know, I did have those discussions additionally regarding the parking and as far as the street traffic. I explained that actually, if you look at the plan that the civil engineers came up with and architectural engineers,I will argue that this plan is safer for parking, ingress, and egress more than any other home in the area. The reality is that you can actually pull in and turn around, and pull out onto a 35 mile per hour street,vice bagging out directly into a 35 mile per hour street. So,when they had the parking concerns,again,those were things that I certainly wanted to address. And back to the original statement, again, some of them has just changed. You know, we just don't want this here. It's new. We want, you know, what we've always been used to. So, sir, I did try to address their concerns. Mr. Plumlee: Thank you. Ms. Verner: Yes, sir. Mr. Coston: Commissioner Cromwell. Mr. Cromwell: Could you go over again? Your statement that you said something about the single-family residences were not recommended on page 154? Ms. Verner: Yes, sir. That is exactly what I said. Correct. Would you like for me to read that entire section? Mr. Cromwell: Is that in the zoning ordinances or what document are you referring to? Ms. Verner: In the comprehensive plan. Would you like for me to give you? I think I have it in the back. Mr.Cromwell: Quick synopsis,I mean,what's it? Is it in reference to all single-family dwellings or in your area specifically/ Ms.Verner: Particularly in SGA 4. That's a great question,particularly in SGA 4, in the Central Business District of the comprehensive plan. That is correct for that growth area, where density should be increased upward with the mixed use of developments. Since they want the mixed use of developments per the Comprehensive Plan SGA 4, that is the reason why single-family infield development is discouraged. Mr. Cromwell: Thank you. Ms. Verner: Yes, sir. Mr. Coston: No other questions? You may be seated. Madam Clerk, do we have any speakers for this item? Clerk: Yes,we have two speakers for this item. Edward Abete, followed by Justin James. Mr. Coston: Please state your name for the record. Mr. Abete: I'm Edward Abete. I live at 4924 Euclid Road. It's two lots down from the owner. I wish I had her gift for Gab, and right now I am nervous. Ms. Hippen: Can you speak up,please? Mr.Abete: Is that better? Ms. Hippen: Yes. Mr. Abete: Okay. So, I'm Edward Abate, and I live at 4924 Euclid Road, two lots down from the owner that just spoke. I wish I had her gift of Gab. I'm opposed to the variances that are being asked, and there are two of them. I was wondering if the electrical impact has been studied for adding these three apartments. Also, if there is a sewage impact, if that's been studied. Back in December, we had a medical issue at our house and it clogged our sewage system. That's how bad we were using it. So, I'm wondering if these three apartments, or whatever they're called are going to go individually into the city sewer system. Or if they are going to join together before they actually go into the sewer system. If one of those, if that main line gets clogged, all three apartments are going to suffer there. So I just want to make sure that that is being addressed. The parking issue where they showed. The front view of the apartment. They put it up there. It does show two cars per unit. The house,or the lot to the left of me,has three cars on there. We've got one because we're retired. The house to the right of me, which is between us and the lot in question, has five cars on it. The way they were showing it on the picture, they're showing two cars per unit, that's not realistic. Most everybody's going to have at least three cars. That means you're going to smack at least one of those cars behind one of the other two. That's going to make it hard. You cannot park on the street on our block, the only parking allowed on the street is one block over. This whole neighborhood is set for single-family dwelling, and they're trying to put three families in one lot. The placard,there was two placards that were put on there,there was a second one that was put on later. So the first one is asking for a variance to build a three-story triplex. Again,the whole neighborhood is single-family dwelling. The second placard asks for a deviation or a variance,because the lot is not a normal size. It is smaller than allowed. Mr. Coston: Your time has expired. We have three minutes. Just stand there for a minute. Do any of the commissioners have any questions? Thank you,you may be seated. Clerk: Our final speaker is Justin James. Mr.James: How y'all doing today? Mr. Coston: Alright,please state your name for the record. Mr. James: Justin James. I live at 4905 Euclid Road. I went around door-to-door, and about 9 out of 10 houses opposed this petition. Would y'all like to see that? Ms. Alcock: If you want to,bring it over here. Mr. James: I didn't have time to walk around because I work 78 hours a week. I lived there 15 years. I have no opposition to her building a normal house there, but most people in our neighborhood are elderly or whatever. So,what else do I want to say? Basically,I do contracting for a living and anything three stories is really hard to maintenance. With the lot being as small as it is, you have to put a ladder in someone else's yard just to work on it. And there's a lot of traffic on our road and it's a beautiful neighborhood that's, you know,just little houses. I have a bigger house,but,and just like I said,I out of 34 doors,or out of 40 doors I knocked on,34 opposed it. So, if I had time and got to go around the whole neighborhood,probably would have been,you know,a huge number. And everybody works,so a lot of people wanted to come,but they couldn't. So, I'm here on a lot of people's behalf. Mr. Coston: Thank you. Mr.James: That's about it. Mr. Coston: Are there any questions? Mr.James: Thank you for your time, sir. Mr. Coston: Okay,you may be seated. Mr. James: Thank you. Mr. Coston: Chair would like to open the floor for discussion or motion. Excuse me. Where did the applicant go? Ms. Verner: Yes, sir. Mr. Coston: You may rebut. Ms. Verner: Thanks for mentioning it. I spoke to Mr. Ed. In fact, we had a great conversation when I met him in the area. He's actually one of the residents that we had, again, great conversation. A couple of his concerns, sewer concern. As far as the homes, we've already worked with the city and planning. Each home will have their own water-sewer connection, and they will be connected to stormwater individually. There were no concerns that came up regarding any backups or anything like that. Additionally, parking, he did mention about the neighbor next to him having three vehicles, another neighbor having five vehicles. We have provided with a garage and also two outdoor parking spaces. So, each home will have three spaces for parking. And again, safety, I will argue that it is will be safer the way the parking plan is set up as of now. He also mentioned three families on one lot. So,this the feasibility of that, and again, I think it's just being informed again back to the SGA 4 and the comprehensive plan, the feasibility of the three families on one lot, is we able to do that based on the density upwards. So if we were building horizontally, then I could understand his concern. But we are building up so it allows us to safely and structurally sound build three stories going upwards. And additionally for the whole neighborhood, he mentioned as being a single-family dwelling primarily, I would actually agree with that assessment,however,this particular area where the lot is at is very diverse. Again, we have a mobile home lot, which is within 50 feet. We have two-story ranches, which don't look similar when we talk about scale and height to other homes in the area. We have another single family with an extension that is two stories. Mrs. Maureen and her family, they're great people, but they decided to do something different, and that's okay. So,this particular area, and within 300 feet of the property that we're proposing this development,there's also a parking lot and other industrial areas. So when we speak to just a single-family dwelling area, that's not exactly true when we consider this lot, this property, and the location. Additionally, we had the other gentleman, I think he stepped out. I've never spoken with him before,but I appreciate his input. Again, I've engaged with many of the residents. So,I'm happy when they come up and address things so I can address their concerns. He mentioned single- family concerns, single-family community. That was one of his concerns. And then smaller homes. So, what I would say to that is, you know, a lot of those homes are smaller. They were built in the 1960s. And since I've had a lot of public engagement, I will share that. One of the neighbors directly next door had a husband that was ill, and he passed away. And the challenge is that before he passed away,he wasn't feeling well. He was unable to navigate the kitchen because the area was too narrow. So, we've been able to come up with building standards that allows people to have more adaptability, flexibility, accessibility, where we can make doorways wider, we can make homes more energy efficient, more insulated. There's even another scenario, and this pain, the neighbor, like she was, you could see, you know,just the pain she felt of not being able to assist her husband. Again,I shared with some of the neighbors how we can create ramps. That is an aging --there are a lot of older senior citizens in that area. We can build ramps to help them. You know,there are some who have window air conditioning units. We can give them a mini split. So again, it can't, it really comes down to an education factor. Like,well,we're doing this. We want to do this with this property, but you can do it too. And we can help you live better and have better quality of life. So, is that something they're interested in doing? That's fine. But again, we just want to educate them on this specific project of what's going on with this specifically. Mr. Coston: Thank you. Thank you. Are there any questions for our applicant? You may be seated. Then we'll open the floor for a motion or discussion. Ms. Byler: Thank you, Chair Coston. So this is in District 4, the district that I represent. I'm very familiar with the road, and I've spent a lot of time working on the new comprehensive plan, As have my fellow commissioners, and many of you have been involved also. And I will say that we do try to compromise. We try to retain the character of established neighborhoods, but then we're also trying to move forward into the future. And, in particular Town Center, Cleveland Street,Euclid Road are part of a transition area. We all know that attainable housing is a real issue in Virginia Beach,especially,in my opinion,I can't back this up,but I feel it's especially a problem in Town Center, because to have affordable housing in an area where you could walk, bike, or Comfortably get to work at Town Center is going to be a real issue. The prices of the homes over there. If this project, if this application was in the middle of this neighborhood in Arrowhead, I would feel 100% differently. But it is not in the middle. It is the very outskirt. It is not on a residential road. It's not on a 25 mile an hour road. It's on Euclid, which is highly trafficked by a lot of vehicles, and not just people going to and from their homes. It's 35 miles an hour and you've got shopping centers along there. Most of them are,I don't mean any disrespect,but they're aging shopping centers and they're going to need to be transitioned into something that's better use for the land planning of Virginia Beach. So, to take an empty lot and put homes for three new families at reasonable, attainable prices, to me is a good thing. If we don't approve this and she does a by-right build, we could lose all of the things that she's already offered. She's met and exceeded everything the city staff has asked in terms of the multi-use path out front and the fencing and everything else. So, for those reasons and others, I support the application and I make a motion that we approve it. Ms. Hippen: Second. I would like to speak on that. Okay. So, in the informal session, I asked the question, what was the difference between this property and the next property we're going to talk about? Because essentially what it is, is there are two places where they're putting, as we called them in Philly, row homes. Okay. Right now, this property is bringing the city, not very much in the way of revenue. I was told that the difference between the two properties was that this one had some deficiencies in the standards that were required. Specifically, it's deficient 22 feet in lot width and two and a half feet in street line frontage. The existing character of the neighborhood, I would like to agree with Commissioner Byler that where this is in that development is different if it were in the middle of the development. Because as I stood on the front of the property facing the street,I looked and I saw the trailer park. I looked and I saw commercial places, and homes that did not look alike. They were a single family, but they didn't all look alike. There were single-story homes, ranches. There were two-story homes and so on, and so forth. So, with that, looking at it that way, looking at the fact that we do need attainable housing, and this SGA recommends the Row Home style, I support this. Mr. Coston: Any other comments? Commissioner Camp? Mr. Camp: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I want to commend the applicant for the litany of things that have been cited, both in the staff report and verbally here. And in addition to that, I want to commend the applicant for understanding both the spirit of the Comprehensive plan,the SGA plan. As well as specific citations. Thank you for the homework you did on this,to try to say that your application fits into this vision for our city. I also want to commend you as an individual. Many people hire council to come and present contentious and challenging proposals. You've stood here yourself and done this with advisors on your team, but to me,that is no small thing for a private individual. To come up,master these technical details, speak to them,field the questions that you don't necessarily know are coming. Same thing with the city staff. I have heard from staff on a number of departments about the way you interacted with them and attempting to accommodate their concerns. You are a most unusual, in a good way, applicant. And thank you for coming to this commission so prepared and having done your homework. Now, all of that said,I do want to explain my vote. I've said many times that I look at certain key issues on these applications, and in this particular case,the amount of a small lot that your proposal will be covering with pavement and with the homes, the normal standard for this type is 35% of the lot. Your project asks us to waive that and cover 66%of the lot. That's not a small deviation. In many occasions, I've looked at these and said,well, it's close, or there's a reason for it. There's a lake next to it, or some other doggone thing. In this case, I can't find one of those reasons that would allow me to go from 35% coverage to 66%. I'm mindful of our stormwater problems. I'm mindful of the need for families and kids, the kind of people you want to attack to your homes,to have a yard to play in. And so,for that reason, I'm unable to vote for this particular application. But I didn't want to just push the button today and say no without saying all of the other things. And I really want to encourage you to take the idea for this home and put it on a slightly bigger lot somewhere else in our city. We need the kind of thing you're proposing. It just doesn't fit in this square. So please don't waste your investment in all this. Find that property and put it on it and do it again and again. Thank you very much. Mr. Coston: Mr. Mauch. Mr. Mauch: Just looking to get a little bit of clarification. I know she had referenced the comprehensive plan and how it fits in, and staff is recommending that it does not fit in. I was just looking to get that clarification for the page that she had cited and how that was incorporated within the staff report. Mr. Coston: So, you want her to come back? Mr.Mauch: No, I was looking for clarification from staff. Ms. Alcock: Okay. So, I was trying to look and find the specific reference in terms of the page 154. I was not able to find that,so happy to get that from her, if necessary. In terms of what staff, our comprehensive planning staff has looked at with the Pembroke SGA plan, which is still adopted by reference in the COMP plan, the central density study, that is a part of that plan. Specific to the site does not recommend any increase in density or changes from the current pattern of development. So,while the larger recommendations for the SGA would call for an increase in density specific to this site,you do not have those same recommendations. Mr. Mauch: Okay. And then I know that affordability has been mentioned, and I may have missed it, but I didn't know what the affordability factor was based off of, or how the this is actually affordable housing. This is my real question. So if anybody up here has that, or if staff was provided with that, I'd like that information. I know that it was projected as or portrayed as affordable housing. Ms. Royster: At this time, we do not know what the sales price would be, so it'd be hard to determine that. Mr. Mauch: Okay,thank you. Mr. Coston: But at this point,you can't sell them individually anyways,right? Ms. Royster: Yeah, I think it's so individual. Yes,they could be condoed and sold. Mr. Coston: So, you would have to rezone the property,right? Ms. Royster: That's the ask. Ms. Royster: Yes. Commissioner Plumlee. Mr.Plumlee: Thank you very much,Mr.Chair.,I think this is a very well thought out application in an area that has been shifting and not fully reaching, well, let's say it's exceeded. I've been driving down that road for 26 years, and this community has been what it is for that time. And I understand the pride that folks have with that neighborhood. It's tremendous to be able to have a place that you've resided for that length of time. But we have not just a housing problem. We have a housing crisis of ginormous proportions that we cannot deal with. In my district, District 6,we've had a tremendous number of these types of units. I'm not talking about a few. I'm talking about dozens, upon dozens of them. And I will tell you, the property owners that were holding onto their land up to that point in time were paid very well in order to change to another use. It did not decrease the value of their homes to see new units constructed adjacent to them. It did not damage. I won't identify the person, but I was just talking to a city employee today that works here every day and cannot afford to live in our city. Lives with their family. So,their family is subsidizing the ability of this person to work for you. That's astounding. That is an astounding problem. And I'm not saying these three units are going to solve it. We have to break its back, somehow. This isn't the appropriate SGA. It is appropriate, in my view with the COMP plan. And I appreciate those who disagree with me, but I'm going to support it. Mr. Coston: Any further discussion? Commissioner Anderson. Mr.Anderson: Thank you. I've said this several times, 37 years ago, I bought my first house in Pocahontas Village. It was a great neighborhood. Loved the neighbors. The single-family houses, of course, as Commissioner Plumlee says, I traveled Euclid Road. I was on the opposite side of the neighborhood. Loved it. My only issue is the height, even though it does fall within the 35 feet height. It's not going to change my view, but I am worried about the height of the property. You know how tall they are going to be versus the single family around there. With that said,the other parts of the application outweigh the height, especially since it does meet the requirement. So, I will be in favor. Mr. Coston: Are we ready for the vote? Clerk: The vote is open. By a recorded vote of 8 to 3, items 5 and 6, Shakilah Verner, have been recommended for approval. Vote Tall Commission Member AYE 8 NAY 3 ABS 0 ABSENT 0 Camp X Cromwell X Anderson X B ler Vice Chair X Schoonover X Plumlee X Hi en X Cuellar X Coston Chair X Moorjani X Mauch Ix Proffers Proffer 1 Upon development, the Property shall adhere to the site layout, parking configuration, building design, setbacks, dimensions, sidewalk, and landscaping as generally shown and described in the exhibit titled "Conceptual Site Plan for 4916 Euclid Road," dated December 18, 2025 prepared by CECS (the "Concept Plan"). This Concept Plan has been presented to the Virginia Beach City Council and is on file with the Virginia Beach Department of Planning and Community Development, incorporated herein by reference. Proffer 2 When the Property is developed, it will have no more than three (3) 3-Story residential units in one(1) single building, with each unit containing a minimum of 2,091 square feet of enclosed living area. The residential units labeled 1 through 3 as depicted on the Concept Plan shall have front-entry one (1) car garages and driveways. Each unit shall utilize quality architectural features, design elements, and exterior building materials substantially as depicted and described on the four (4) building renderings for 4916 Euclid Road dated 12/16/2025, which have been incorporated by reference into this proffer. Proffer 3 In lieu of the 50% maximum lot coverage and the 20,000 sq ft minimum lot area in the A-18 zoning classification for multi-family dwellings pursuant to Section 602(d) of the Zoning Ordinance, (66%) lot coverage and 7,744 sq ft minimum lot area will be permitted to allow improvements depicted on the Concept Plan. Proffer 4 Further conditions lawfully imposed by applicable development ordinances may be required by the Grantee during detailed site plan and/or subdivision review and administration of applicable City Codes by all cognizant City agencies and departments to meet all applicable City Code requirements. OCTOBER 29, 2025 RICHARD A.WELLER AND HELEN D.WELLER 4920 ECULID ROAD VIRGINIA BEACH,VIRGINIA 23462 PHONE: (757)288-0767 PHONE: (757)589-9922 To Whom It May Concern, My name is Richard Weller, and I am a resident who lives directly adjacent to the site of the proposed new residential development. I am writing to express my strong support for this project and the positive improvements it will bring to our community. Over the past several years, our district has seen increasing interest in thoughtful growth, revitalization, and responsible residential expansion.This proposed development represents an exciting opportunityto enhance propertyvalues, beautifythe neighborhood, and provide modern, desirable housing options. The plans presented show attention to design, landscaping, safety, and overall community benefit. As someone who lives immediately next to the project site, I have a direct and vested interest in ensuring that our neighborhood continues to improve. I am currently in discussions with the developer regarding a potential sale of my property,which would allow for further coordinated planning and additional enhancements to the surrounding area. I believe this collaborative approach will help ensure that future development remains consistent,well-designed, and beneficial to existing residents. It is rare to find developers who are willing to engage openly with neighbors and invest in Long-term improvements.The developer's willingness to communicate, plan, and incorporate feedback has been sincere and appreciated. For these reasons, and many others, I fully support the approval and advancement of this project. Thank you for your time and consideration. I respectfully urge the reviewing board to approve this development so that our neighborhood may continue moving in a positive direction. Sincerely, Richard A.Weller Adjacent Property Owner Seneka and Subah Kotigalla October 20, 2025 4117 Euclid Road Virginia Beach, VA 23462 Email: skotigala@grnail-com To Whom it May Concern: We are writing as residents of Pocohontas Village to express our strong support for the proposed residential development planned for 4916 Euclid Road. As neighbors who directly face the property, we believe this project will be aesthetically pleasing and will bring significant benefits to our area, Our city and community have a growing demand for quality housing, and this development represents a thoughtful response to a neededl,overhaul. The proposed homes are designed to meet the needs of current residents and will introduce new opportunities for families, professionals, and retirees to join and contribute to our local community. Beyond providing needed housing for our area, the project promises to enhance the overall environment by improving the current landscape, adding larger pedestrian walkways, creating more functional and modern housing, and by providing a close commute to the upcoming Virginia Beach Trail that intersects with Euclid Road. Developments like this encourage responsible growth and help maintain the vitality and diversity of our area. We appreciate the developer's commitment to quality design and community engagement, and we are confident this project will make a positive and lasting contribution to our city and the local area. We respectfully encourage the Planning Commission and City Council to approve the 4916 Euclid Road Development, Thank you for your consideration, Sincerely, Seneka and Subah Ko"1'9a From: Becky To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Opposition to Proposed Triple Family Residence Property Development at 4916 Euclid Road,Virginia Beach Date: Tuesday,September 30,2025 4:59:03 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Department of Zoning and Permits, am writing regarding the application to construct a 3,000 sq.ft.triple-family residence on the property at 4916 Euclid Road in Virginia Beach. I respectfully would like to express my opposition to this proposal.This neighborhood is an older,well-established residential area located near Town Center and surrounded by commercial buildings.The proposed three- family residence does not align with the existing character or structure of the neighborhood.A development of this scale on such a small lot would be out of place and diminish the residential appeal of the area. In addition,a triple-family residence at 4916 Euclid Road would bring increased traffic and congestion to a street and community that are not designed for this level of density.The lot size is insufficient to support a three-family residence without creating strain on neighboring properties and local infrastructure. For these reasons, I believe the project would be an eyesore and a disruption to the neighborhood's balance and character. I strongly urge the department to consider these concerns and vote against this application. Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration. Respectfully, Becky Abete 4924 EUCLID RD VIRGINIA BEACH VA 23462 E-Mail: happyface23me@verizon.net From: Carol Murray To: Marchelle L.Coleman Cc: Pat n Perry Rediaer Subject: 4916 Euclid Road,Pocahontas Village Date: Monday,October 6,2025 12:05:36 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Ms.Coleman, I am writing to ask you to please disapprove the proposed building of a triplex residential building at 4916 Euclid Road.My elderly parents have lived at 4917 Klamath Road,which is the lot directly adjacent to the back of this property,since 1963.They raised a family of 3 children in this quiet,family-oriented neighborhood,and still enjoy living there.I welcome anyone wanting to rebuild on the subject lot in compliance with the existing single-family zoning restrictions.For years,my parents endured having a deteriorating abandoned house and overgrown lot right behind their home.They were very pleased to see the dilapidated home demolished and the lot cleaned up,but much their dismay,they learned about the buyer's plans to build a large triplex on the tiny lot. This planned triplex is incompatible with the Pocahontas Village concept.It will look out of place and could pose a traffic safety threat to the highly traveled narrow 2-lane Euclid Road. If this change is allowed,it could set a precedent and open the door for an avalanche of rezoning requests,which will quickly change the character of Pocahontas Village. Cheaply built apartment buildings are already popping up all over Virginia Beach and will quickly become eyesores if not well-maintained.We should strive to preserve the integrity and nostalgia of one of the oldest communities in our city. Thank you for your consideration. Carol R.Murray(mobile 757-515-9179) Daughter of Mr.and Mrs.Perry Rediger,4917 Klamath Road From: Chris Tanana To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: 4916 Euclid rd Date: Saturday,October 18,2025 1:39:15 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Wanted to voice my rejection to the planned construction of I believe is a 3tier structure on this property. I'm concerned of increased traffic;parking and property value. We need to uphold our zoning laws. Traffic is constant on Euclid rd. Having allowed Best Buy to move in years ago made it ten times worse! There's always congestion especially around the holidays. This proposed structure would make things worse.And I'm sure it would definitely be an eyesore. Thank you for your time in this matter. Sincerely Christine Tanana From: Danielle Mcauire To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Concerns about rezoning 4916 Euclid Road Date: Wednesday,October 1,2025 5:18:33 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am writing to express my concern regarding the proposed rezoning of 4916 Euclid Road into a multi-structure family residence. To my knowledge, no one in our neighborhood was notified of this rezoning application, which is deeply troubling given the potential impact on our community. Such a lack of communication undermines transparency and denies residents the opportunity to engage in decisions that directly affect our community I would like Clarification on why nearby residents were not informed of this proposal. Additionally, I would appreciate information on when the public meeting at City Hall will be held regarding this rezoning, What steps residents may take to formally oppose this request. As a member of this community who values the integrity and stability of our neighborhood, I am opposed to rezoning of 4916 Euclid Road. Please let me know how I and my neighbors can participate in this process and ensure our voices are heard. Please provide information on how we may organize a formal protest against this proposal and what avenues are available to appeal or challenge it. Thank you for your time and attention to this important matter Sincerely, Danielle McGuire 129 Yaqui street From: Darren Murdock To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: 9916 Date: Wednesday,October 1,2025 2:38:31 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Building a multifamily dwellig is a mistake build it in your neighbor hood From: David Smith To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: 4916 Euclid Road Date: Monday,November 17,2025 12:54:07 PM �CAUTIONU:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments less yo recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am opposed to the rezoning of 4916 Euclid Road in the Pocahontas Village neighborhood. Thanks David W Smith 484 Cronin Road Virginia Beach, Virginia 23452 From: eabeteCabverizon.net To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Opposition to Proposed Triple Family Residence Property Development at 4916 Euclid Road,Virginia Beach Date: Wednesday,September 24,2025 11:38:52 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Department of Zoning and Permits, am writing regarding the application to construct a 3,000 sq.ft.triple-family residence on the property at 4916 Euclid Road in Virginia Beach. I respectfully would like to express my opposition to this proposal.This neighborhood is an older,well-established residential area located near Town Center and surrounded by commercial buildings.The proposed three- family residence does not align with the existing character or structure of the neighborhood.A development of this scale on such a small lot would be out of place and diminish the residential appeal of the area. In addition,a triple-family residence at 4916 Euclid Road would bring increased traffic and congestion to a street and community that are not designed for this level of density.The lot size is insufficient to support a three-family residence without creating strain on neighboring properties and local infrastructure. For these reasons, I believe the project would be an eyesore and a disruption to the neighborhood's balance and character. strongly urge the department to consider these concerns and vote against this application. Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration. Respectfully, Edward Abete III 4924 EUCLID RD VIRGINIA BEACH VA 23462 Phone: 757-383-3945 E-Mail: ea bete(@verizon.net From: Eric Paul To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Pending rezoning of 4916 Euclid Road Date: Saturday,October 11,2025 10:04:38 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I live at 137 Yaqui Street and I strongly oppose the pending rezoning request.The lot in question was barely large enough to support the single family home that used to occupy the lot.Due to lack of on-street parking on the section of Euclid Road that lies in front of the vacant lot,there would be a great deal of difficulty handling all the vehicles that would come with a multifamily residence.I feel that this number of vehicles would be very impactful on the traffic flow on Euclid Road which can be very busy at various times during the workdays. Thanks Eric Paul 137 Yaqui Street From: Frank C To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: 4916 Euclid Road Date: Tuesday,November 4,2025 2:18:19 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Marchelle, Thank you for the hard work you all are doing on the Planning Evaluation Coordination of these projects. I would like to register my personal complaint about the redistricting of this single family home lot, at 4916 Euclid Road, to a triplex. I'm against this action. Thank you, Frank Camarillo, VB resident From: iain klimsza To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Opposition top triple family resident development @ 4916 Euclid Rd.23462 Date: Tuesday,September 30,2025 8:59:36 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. We are against this rezoning Multi family apartments would detrimental to this single family community I have lived here since 1985 and have seen young families move in&remodel there homes. This doesn't contribute to a neighborhood were people want to live and raise a family. Sincerely, lain Klimsza Yahoo Mail: Seach, Organize. Conquer From: 3 Emo To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: 4916 Euclid Rd Date: Monday,September 15,2025 1:31:22 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I'm writing this email due to concern about a recent zoning change request for the above listed property, from a single family residence to a multi-family residential structure, consisting of 3000 square feet, 3 family residence. I am requesting this change be denied. This structure will be nothing like the majority of the ranch style homes in our quaint little neighborhood. We have 2 story homes as well, but all are aesthetically cohesive with the ranch style homes, which, mostly are approximately 1200 square feet in size. This new construction will definitely stand out and detract from the beauty and integrity of our neighborhood and homes. I was informed by the owner of the property that the building she is proposing is too large to face the street, so it will be built sideways to accommodate the small lot of 7400 square feet(almost half of the lot size), clearly a huge building in comparison to the neighborhood structures already in existence. On a personal level, I live next to this lot, and this huge building will block the breezes I enjoy, and, since the old growth trees will be removed per the owner, my late afternoon shade will also be affected. I strongly urge that the single family zoning remain in place. Thank you for your time. Janet Emory From: Jeff Cartwright To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Fwd: Rezoning for Multifamily homes in Pocahontas Village. Date: Sunday,November 9,2025 1:49:40 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Please keep me informed of what happens with this Thanks. ----------Forwarded message ---------- From: Teaford Webber<teafordwebber(a�gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, October 22,2025 Subject: Rezoning for Multifamily homes in Pocahontas Village. To:jeffacartwright��gmail.com Mr. and Mrs. Jeffrey A. Cartwright 4904 Euclid Road Virginia Beach. VA 23462 (Jeffacartwright a amail.com] [10/22/20251 To the Virginia Beach City Council and Planning Commission Attn: Marchelle L. Coleman,Planning Evaluation Coordinator Department of Planning& Community Development. Proposed Zoning changes to Pocahontas Village Neighborhood: We are writing as homeowners at 4904 Euclid Road in Pocahontas Village to express our firm opposition to the proposed rezoning of our neighborhood from Single-Family Residential(R- 7.5)to Multifamily Residential (R-10 or higher). Our Pocahontas Village community has long been a peaceful, family-oriented neighborhood where homeowners take pride in maintaining their properties and building strong relationships with one another.Allowing multifamily development would fundamentally change the character and quality of life that make this area special. Our primary concerns are as follows: Traffic and Parking Strain: Euclid Road and adjacent streets are already narrow and frequently congested; multifamily housing would intensify this issue and increase safety risks. Infrastructure Overload: Local schools, utilities, and emergency services are not designed to accommodate higher-density living in this area. Property Value Impact: Rezoning could decrease property values and negatively affect long- time homeowners who have invested deeply in this community. Loss of Neighborhood Character: Pocahontas Village's quiet, single-family charm would be replaced by higher density, increased noise, and less stability. We support responsible growth for the City of Virginia Beach, but this proposal does not fit the established infrastructure or the community vision of Pocahontas Village. We respectfully urge the City Council and Planning Commission to preserve the current single-family zoning that protects the integrity of our neighborhood. Thank you for your time and for considering the concerns of your homeowners who care deeply about this community. Sincerely, Mr. and Mrs. Jeffrey A. Cartwright 4904 Euclid Road Virginia Beach, VA 23462 From: ikdakoenig(a)aol.com To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Re:4916 Euclid Road,VaBch Date: Monday,September 15,2025 2:58:45 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. It has come to my attention that a developer would like to build a triplex at 4916 Euclid Road in my neighborhood, Pocahontas Village. Please consider turning down their application. This is an older neighborhood located near Town Center. Many homes that sell in this neighborhood are"flipped"and returned to market in a much better shape that increases the home values in the entire neighborhood. By building a triplex here, the home values would start to deteriorate and other developers would snatch at the opportunity to tear down houses and build homes that do not fit the character of the neighborhood. Before you know it, this area near Town Center would drop in value and increase in crime in an area of the city that is attempting to draw more upscale clientele. There are already numerous apartments and condos in this area; we need to retain a neighborhood of single-family homes as well. Please say"No!" Kathy Koenig 117 Onondaga Road From: Julianne Cariola To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: 4916 Euclid Rd Date: Monday,September 22,2025 2:09:23 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good afternoon, I am the current resident of 4904 Blackfoot circle in Virginia Beach in the neighborhood adjacent to 4916 Euclid Rd.It has come to my attention that the current empty lot is being requested to be zoned for a multi family home.I object adamantly to this as a small growing family living in this quaint and tight knit community.Having only lived here for 5 years this community is truly a hidden gem of Town Center with all the neighbors knowing each other and supporting each other.I believe communities like this must be protected to allow for more single family homes to continue to create and maintain the community support needed for young families to thrive.Allowing this lot to be utilized as a multi family home will open the door for money driven developers to take away affordable single family homes from young and growing families like mine.Thank you for listening to my concerns,I know that my neighbors would agree. Sincerely Kameron and Julianne Walters From: Linda Bell To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Rezoning Date: Wednesday,October 1,2025 2:48:36 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. "I'm writing to express concern about potential zoning changing. This is a single family neighborhood, not multi. Rezoning would be a mistake. Respectfully, Linda Bell Sent from my iPhone From: Mckenna Bushell To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Rezoning Date: Tuesday,September 30,2025 9:59:53 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. _1! I am a homeowner and strongly oppose the rezoning of 4916 Euclid Road. This development is incompatible with the single-family character of our neighborhood. I am concerned about the impact on traffic,parking, safety, and my property value. Please deny this rezoning application and uphold our current zoning laws. So your children can have a safe neighborhood to play and grow up in. Let's stand together to ensure responsible development that preserves the value and character of our community. From: Ricardo Lugo To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Opposition to refining Date: Tuesday,October 14,2025 7:23:59 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach.Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mr Coleman I am a homeowner at Pocahontas Village I am strongly opposed to the rezoning of 4916 Euclid Road for the construction of a triplex. Respectfully Ricardo Lugo Sent from my Whone From: Stephanie S Scott To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: No to zoning variance please on 4916 Euclid Road,VB,VA 23462 Date: Tuesday,September 23,2025 2:26:35 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Short and sweet, 4916 Euclid Road, VB, VA 23462 Thoughtfully considered by me, living at 4928 Euclid Road, VB, VA 23462 photo Stephanie S Scott [ ] Tesla of Self Mastery Heroic Certified Coach Mobile 757.477.1538 Email HealinaHeartCafe(d)amail.com Website SteohSScott.com Extension httos:Hlinktr.ee/ssscott757REALTOR Create your own email signature From: Theresa Will To: Marcheile L.Coleman Subject: Zoning change Date: Monday,September 22,2025 4:16:28 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello. I would like to voice my disagreement with a zoning change that would allow a 3 family structure on the lot at 4916 Euclid Rd. If we are to preserve our neighborhood the zoning change cannot be allowed. I believe that the zoning change would open a can of worms that would turn our neighborhood into a developers dream. Our single family dwellings create a quaint, old fashioned neighborhood that I believe should remain as it is. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Theresa Will 4912 theresawi119574gmaii.com 757-376-1038 From: Marchelle L.Coleman To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: FW:4916 Euclid Road Date: Friday,November 21,2025 9:32:12 AM From: Raquel Ricci<4raquelricci(@9mail.com> Sent: Wednesday,August 27, 2025 8:06 PM To: Planning Board of Zoning Appeals<BZAPvbgov.com> Subject:4916 Euclid Road CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. i Subject: Opposition to Proposed Triple Family Residence Property Development at 4916 Euclid Road, Virginia Beach Dear Department of Zoning and Permits, I am writing regarding the application to construct a 3,000 sq. ft.triple family residence on the property at 4916 Euclid Road in Virginia Beach.As both a REALTORO who works throughout this community and a concerned resident, I would like to respectfully express my opposition to this proposal. This neighborhood is an older,well-established residential area located near Town Center and surrounded by commercial buildings. The proposed three-family residence does not align with the existing character or structure of the neighborhood.A development of this scale on such a small lot would stand out inappropriately and diminish the residential appeal of the area. In addition,a triple family residence at 4916 Euclid Road would bring increased traffic and congestion to a street and community that were not designed for this level of density. The lot size is simply insufficient to support a three-family residence without creating strain on neighboring properties and local infrastructure. For these reasons, I believe the project would be an eyesore and a disruption to the balance and character of the neighborhood. I strongly urge the department to consider these concerns and vote against this application. Thank you for your time and thoughtful consideration. Respectfully, Raquel Ricci, REALTOR° Concerned Resident of Virginia Beach/Pocahontas Village Raquel Ricci, PEAL.TOR© ABR,SRS,MRP,CSP,GRI,RESA CSA, PSA, AHWD,SRES Luxury Collection Specialist Circle of Excellence Licensed REALTOR in Virginia & North Carolina Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices RW Towne Realty 1215 Volvo ParkwaX Chesapeake,VA 23320 Office 757-549-2000 Cell 757-679-2456 www.rauueLricci.com i What's Your Home Worth? Get three automated Estimates- Instantly No cost, and no obligation http://bhhstowne.findbuyers.com/RaquelRicci I i ? Disclaimer: i IMPORTANT WIRE FRAUD NOTICE: Never trust wiring instructions sent via email.Cyber criminals are hacking email accounts and sending emails with fake wiring instructions.These emails are convincing and sophisticated.Always independently confirm wiring instructions in person or via telephone call to a trusted and verified phone number.Never wire money without double-checking that the wiring instructions are correct. 02025 BHH Affiliates,LLC.An independently owned and operated franchisee of BHH Affiliates,LLC. Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices and the Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices symbol are registered service marks of HomeServices of America,Inc.®Equal Housing Opportunity.Information not verified or guaranteed.If your home is currently listed with a Broker,this is not intended as a solicitation. From: Shelly Rankin To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Rezoning 4916 Euclid Road Date: Saturday,January 10,2026 6:41:02 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good evening,Members of the Planning Commission. My name is Shelly Rankin, and I live in the neighborhood near 4916 Euclid Road. I am here on behalf of many residents who respectfully request that you deny the rezoning request to change this property to A-18 Apartment zoning for a three-unit multifamily development. Our neighborhood has been established since the 1960s and is made up almost entirely of single-family ranch-style homes. Many of us have lived here 25 years or more, and we chose this area specifically because of its stable, low-density residential character. Approving this rezoning would be incompatible with the surrounding homes and would fundamentally change the character of our neighborhood. It introduces higher density in the middle of a long-standing single-family area and raises concerns about traffic,parking, noise, and property values. We are also concerned about the precedent this would set.Allowing multifamily zoning here could open the door to additional requests, gradually eroding the integrity of our neighborhood. We respectfully ask that you preserve the existing zoning,protect the character of our community, and deny this rezoning request. Thank you for your time and consideration. Shelly Rankin From: Shane Vassar To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Proposed rezoning of 4916 Euclid Rd Date: Monday,January 12,2026 11:26:58 PM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Sir or Madam: I am a resident of Pocahontas Village, and I am absolutely and strongly opposed to the rezoning of the property at 4916 Euclid Rd from single family residential to multifamily apartment residential. If this rezoning is allowed,then it will ruin our neighborhood. My property already borders a noisy industrial park. Having the possibility of a next door neighbor build a three story apartment in the future is out of the question. Shane W. Vassar From: Jeneen Mchuah To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: Property located at 4916 Euclid Rd 23462 Date: Wednesday,January 14,2026 10:50:52 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Members of the Virginia Beach Zoning Commission, I am writing to formally express my opposition to the proposed multifamily development planned for the vacant parcel located at 4916 Euclid Rd, Virginia Beach, Va 23462, which is within my neighborhood (Pocahontas Village). I am a longtime resident of this community and have a strong interest in preserving the established character, safety, and livability of our area. Our neighborhood has long been designated and developed as single-family residential. The homes, infrastructure, and community layout were designed with that intent in mind. Introducing a multifamily or apartment-style development into this setting is inconsistent with the existing zoning character and would represent a significant departure from the surrounding land use. This proposed development raises several concerns, including but not limited to increased traffic congestion, parking strain, noise, and potential impacts on public services and infrastructure that were not designed to accommodate higher-density housing. Additionally, a multifamily property would alter the overall character and cohesion of the neighborhood, potentially affecting property values and residents' quality of life. The vacant parcel in question has always been understood by residents to be part of a single- family residential environment. Allowing a higher-density development in this location sets a precedent that undermines the integrity of zoning decisions and the expectations of homeowners who invested in this community based on its current designation. respectfully urge the Zoning Commission to consider the long-term impacts of this proposal and to uphold the established zoning intent by denying approval for this multifamily development. Maintaining consistent land use planning is essential to protecting neighborhoods like ours and ensuring thoughtful, sustainable growth for Virginia Beach. Thank you for your time and consideration. I appreciate the opportunity to provide input on this matter. Respectfully yours, Jeneen R. McHugh 128 Yaqui St. Virginia Beach, Va 23462 (757)763-9733 Sent from my Whone From: Beverly Boyce To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: 4916 Euclid Rd. Date: Monday,January 19,2026 9:48:10 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am Beverly boy so I live at 4905 Conestoga Road Virginia Beach Virginia 23462 I oppose having approval to put three family homes in this neighborhood I've been here since 1963 this is a very quiet nice neighborhood we don't want it destroyed with a whole bunch of triple Apartments thank you From: Jeffery Boyce To: Marchelle L.Coleman Subject: 4916 Euclid Rd. Date: Monday,January 19,2026 7:52:25 AM CAUTION:This email originated from outside of the City of Virginia Beach. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. We lived in Pocahontas Village since 1963. What a beautiful neighborhood! If this multi- family is built, will be the beginning of the end for our modest neighborhood! Please don't approve this! Thank You, Jeffery Boyce L. APPOINTMENTS • ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE • ARTS AND HUMANITIES COMMISSION • BAYFRONT ADVISORY COMMISSION • BEACHES AND WATERWAYS ADVISORY COMMISSION • CLEAN COMMUNITY COMMISSION • COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION GRANT REVIEW &ALLOCATION COMMITTEE • DEFERRED COMPENSATION BOARD • DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY • FLOOD PREVENTION BOND REFERENDUM OVERSIGHT BOARD • GREEN RIBBON COMMITTEE • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION • HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION • INDEPENDENT CITIZEN REVIEW BOARD • OLD BEACH DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE • OPEN SPACE ADVISORY COMMITTEE • PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION • PROCESS IMPROVEMENT STEERING COMMITTEE • PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD • RESORT ADVISORY COMMISSION • SOCIAL SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD • TIDEWATER COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD • TIDEWATER YOUTH SERVICES COMMISSION • TRANSITION AREA/INTERFACILITY TRAFFIC AREA CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE • VIRGINIA BEACH TOWING ADVISORY BOARD M. UNFINISHED BUSINESS N. NEW BUSINESS 0. ADJOURNMENT OPEN DIALOGUE For non-agenda items, each speaker will be allowed three minutes. If you are physically disabled or visually impaired and need assistance at this meeting, please call the City Clerk's Office at 757-385-4303. The full Agenda with all backup documents can be viewed in the eDocs Document Archive under: Current Session. If you would like to receive an email with a list of the agenda items for future City Council meetings, please submit your request to TChelius@vbgov.com or call 757-385-4303. AGENDA ITEMS Citizens who wish to speak can sign up either in-person or virtually via WebEx. Anyone wishing to participate virtually, must follow the two-step process provided below: 1. Register for the WebEx Meeting. 2. Register with the City Clerk's Office by calling 757-385-4303 prior to 5:00 p.m. on May 5, 2026. J CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH A R SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTIONS C O K S B H S S E C U O - S DATE:04/21/2026 PAGE: I R U T N H C L M H C - R A H W U M E H G E M R U I C I D N E R M M O L L C N Y L S E I O U M S AGENDA H G E E O E C N S A O ITEM# SUBJECT MOTION VOTE I S R Y N N K D E N N 1. CITY COUNCIL'S BRIEFING A. Virginia Beach Coastal Stormwater Risk L.J.Hansen—Director— Management Study Update Public Works If. CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS A. DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET PRESENTATIONS PLANNING Kathy Warren,Director PUBLIC WORKS L.J.Hansen,Director ROADWAYS CIP L.J.Hansen,Director BUILDING CIP L.J.Hansen,Director III—VI CERTIFICATION OF CLOSED SESSION CERTIFIED 1 1-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y A-F. G. MINUTES 1. INFORMAL and FORMAL SESSIONS 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y April 7,2026 2• SPECIAL FORMAL SESSIONS 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y April 14,2026 APPROVED 3 SPECIAL FORMAL SESSIONS 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y April 15,2026 4. SPECIAL FORMAL SESSIONS 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y April 16,2026 H. MAYOR'S PRESENTATIONS 1. RESOLUTION—Autism Acceptance Month Tyler Williamson,Chief Executive Officer— Families of Autistic Children of Tidewater (FACT) Cameron Malone,HERO Internship— Families of Autistic Children of Tidewater (FACT) 2. RESOLUTION—Month of the Military Child Laura Baxter,Executive Director—Armed Services YMCA of Hampton Roads 3. RESOLUTION—Birthplace of American Cuisine Day Patrick Evans-Hylton,Food Journalist& Food Historian Debbie Lou Hague,VBRA President and Restauranteur Martha Davenport,VBRA Executive Director .1 CITY OF VIRGINM BEACH A R SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTIONS C O K S B H S S E C U O - S DATE:04/21/2026 PAGE: 2 R U T N H C L M H C - R A H W U M E H G E M R U I C I D N E R M M O L L C N Y L S E I O U M S AGENDA H G E E O E C N S A O ITEM# SUBJECT MOTION VOTE I S R Y N N K D E N N I. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. PROPOSED REAL PROPERTY TAX 8 SPEAKERS INCREASE 2. ACQUISITION OF AGRICULTURAL NO SPEAKERS LAND PRESERVATION(ARP) EASEMENT Installment Purchase Agreement for 138.36 acres at 5853 Blackwater Road 3. DECLARATION AND SALE OF EXCESS NO SPEAKERS CITY PROPERTY 1372 Laskin Road to Foreman Services,LLC K.I. Ordinance to GRANT twenty(20)Franchise ADOPTED,BY 1 1-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y v Y Y Y Y Agreements in the Resort Area: CONSENT a. SEDA, Inc., re sidewalk cafe at 200 21' Street#103 b. Calabrese Management Group, Inc., re sidewalk cafes at 200 21"Street#105 c. Moliar Liquid Assets 2,LLC,re sidewalk cafe at 202 22°d Street d. Kouri, LLC, re sidewalk cafe at 706 Atlantic Avenue e. Inga Mit, Inc., re sidewalk cafe at 812 Atlantic Avenue f. Planet Pizza,Inc.,re sidewalk cafe at 812 Atlantic Avenue g. Kiraly, LLC, re sidewalk caf6 at 1102 Atlantic Avenue h. ANSHI, Inc., re sidewalk cafd at 1516 Atlantic Avenue i. K&M, Inc., re sidewalk cafd at 1718 Atlantic Avenue#103 j. Happymeals,LLC,re sidewalk cafe at 1814 Atlantic Avenue k. VB's Raw Bar, Inc., re sidewalk cafe at 2014 Atlantic Avenue I. EEE LLC,re sidewalk cafe at 2200 Atlantic Avenue m. Virginia George Co,Inc.,re sidewalk cafe at 2410 Atlantic Avenue n. Grill Virginia Beach,LLC,re sidewalk cafd at 405 19'Street,Suite 115 o. Mi Vida Virginia Beach,LLC,re sidewalk cafd at 332 20'Street,Suite 120 p. Las Palmas Boardwalk Corporation re boardwalk cafd at 1601 Atlantic Avenue q. Beachside,LC,re boardwalk cafd at 2607 Atlantic Avenue r. 3001 Atlantic,LLC,re boardwalk cafd at 3001 Atlantic Avenue s. 3315 Atlantic, LLC, re boardwalk cafd at 3315 Atlantic Avenue t. Harrison Virginia Beach North,SPE,LLC, re boardwalk cafd at 3900 Atlantic Avenue .1 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH A R SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTIONS C O K S B H S S E C U O S DATE:04/21/2026 PAGE: 3 R U T N H C L M H C - R A H W U M E H G E M R U I C I D N E R M M O L L C N Y L S E I O U M S AGENDA H G E E O E C N S A O ITEM# SUBJECT MOTION VOTE I S R Y N N K D E N _NJI K.2. Ordinance to AUTHORIZE the acquisition of ADOPTED,BY 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y property in fee simple and the acquisition of CONSENT temporary and permanent easements,either by agreement or condemnation re Lakeview Drive Channel Improvements Project,CIP 100405 and 100662 K.3. Ordinance to AUTHORIZE the acquisition of ADOPTED,BY 1 I-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y property in fee simple and the acquisition of CONSENT temporary and permanent easements,either by agreement or condemnation re Rosemont Road and South Plaza Trail Intersection Improvements Project,CH'100423.022 K.4. Resolution to DESIGNATE"Driving East"by ADOPTED,BY 1 1-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Celeste Kellogg as the Official Song of the City CONSENT of Virginia Beach(Requested by Mayor Dyer and Vice Mayor Wilson) K.5. Resolution to ESTABLISH a"Virginia Beach DEFERRED 10-1 Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Sports District' and AUTHORIZE the City INDEFINITELY,BY Manager to take actions in support(Requested CONSENT by Mayor Dyer and Council Members Henley, Jackson-Green, Remick and Schulman) Deferred from February 17,2026 K.6. Resolution to REFER to the Planning ADOPTED,BY 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Commission the proposed Amendments to the CONSENT City Zoning Ordinance (CZO) AMEND the Official Zoning Map re reduce the Oceanfront Resort Short Term Rental Overlay District; AMEND Section 2303 of the City Zoning Ordinance(CZO)re Parking Requirements; and AMEND Section 241.2 ofthe City Zoning Ordinance (CZO) re Short Term Rentals (Requested by Vice Mayor Wilson and Council Members Remick,Schulman and Henley) K.7. Ordinance to ADOPT the 2026 Housing ADOPTED,BY 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Choice Voucher Annual Agency Plan and CONSENT Administrative Plan and AUTHORIZE the City Manager to EXECUTE and SUBMIT plans to the U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD) K.8. Ordinance to CONVERT four(4)long-term ADOPTED,BY 1 1-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y vacant part-time positions equivalent to 3.2 CONSENT FTE to three(3)full-time positions within the FY 2025-26 Police Department Operating Budget re Camera Operator positions K.9 Ordinance to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE ADOPTED,BY 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y $30,248 from the Virginia Crisis Intervention CONSENT Team Coalition to the FY 2025-26 Human Services Operating Budget re support the Crisis Intervention Team(CIT) J CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH A R SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTIONS C O K S B H S S E C U O - S DATE:04/21/2026 PAGE: 4 R U T N H C L M H C - R A H W U M E H G E M R U I C I D N E R M M O L L C N Y L S E I O U M S AGENDA H G E E O E C N S A O ITEM# SUBJECT MOTION VOTE I S R Y N N K D E N _NJI K.10. Ordinance to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE ADOPTED,BY 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y $26,477.75 from each of the following Cities: CONSENT Portsmouth, Suffolk and Norfolk to the FY 2025-26 Human Services Operating Budget re Regional Recovery High School K.11. Ordinance to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE ADOPTED,BY 1 1-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y $21,436.25 and $643.09 from the Federal CONSENT Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)to the FY 2025-26 Fire Department Operating Budget for the mobilization of Virginia Task Force 2 re the Washington flooding deployment K.12. Ordinance to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE ADOPTED,BY 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y $18,669.51 and $560.09 from the Federal CONSENT Emergency Management Agency(FEMA)to the FY 2025-26 Fire Department Operating Budget for the administration and mobilization of Virginia Task Force 2 re Invest 94L South Carolina deployment K.13. Ordinance to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE ADOPTED,BY 1 1-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y $2,500 from the Office of the Attorney General CONSENT to the FY 2025-26 Sheriffs Office Operating Budget re efforts to reduce crimes against seniors L.1. VA OPC LAND LLC/NORTHAMPTON APPROVED/ 1 1-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y DEVELOPMENT,LLC for a Modification MODIFIED/ of Proffers to a Conditional Change of Zoning PROFFERED,BY re develop the Veterans Administration CONSENT outpatient treatment facility at a parcel directly West of 5866 Northampton Boulevard DISTRICT 4 L.2. NORTHAMPTONDEVELOPMENT,LLC APPROVED/ 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y for a Modification of Proffers to a Conditional MODIFIED/ Change of Zoning re development of a PROFFERED,BY shopping center at a parcel directly West of CONSENT 5866 Northampton Boulevard District 4 1-3. JEFF BERKOWITZ/ PAUL S BROWN APPROVED/ 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y FAMILY LLC for a Rezoning from AG-2 CONDITIONED/AS Agricultural District & B-2 Community AMENDED,BY Business District toI-1 Light Industrial District CONSENT & Conditional Use Permit re bulk storage yard at Northwest corner of London Bridge Road&Hornet Drive District 5 LA. 5644 PARLIAMENT DRIVE, LLC for APPROVED AS 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Conditional Change of Zoning from R-40 PROFFERED/ Residential District to Conditional B-2 CONDITIONED,BY Community Business District)&Conditional CONSENT Use Permit re indoor recreational facility at a portion of 5620 Parliament Drive District I .I CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH A R SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTIONS C O K S B H S S E C U O S DATE:04/21/2026 PAGE: 5 R U T N H C L M H C R A H W U M E H G E M R U I C I D N E R M M O L L C N Y L S E I O U M S AGENDA H G E E O E C N S A O ITEM# SUBJECT MOTION VOTE I S R Y N N K D E E_j N L.5. SOUTH ROSEMONT STORAGE,LLC/ APPROVED AS 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y MONARCH PROPERTIES, INC. for a PROFFERED/ Conditional Change of Zoning from CONDITIONED Conditional 0-1 Office District to Conditional B-2 Community Business District & Conditional Use Permit re mini-warehouse at 1756 South Rosemont Road District 10 L.6. ANN SAGLE / ANN E & PHILIP R APPROVED/ I1-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y SAGLE for a Conditional Use Permit re CONDITIONED,BY home-based wildlife rehabilitation facility at CONSENT 1212 Candlewood Drive District 1 L.7. THE RUNNYMEDE CORPORATION / APPROVED/ 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y WITCHDUCK ONE ASSOCIATES,LLC CONDITIONED,BY F/K/A WITCHDUCK ONE CONSENT PARTNERSHIP & THE RUNNYMEDE CORPORATION for a Conditional Use Permit re multi-family dwellings at 5101 Cleveland Street,129 North Witchduck Road, 5121 Cleveland Street,5163 Cleveland Street & parcels Southwest and Southeast of 5121 Cleveland Street District 4 1,.8. OUTER BANKS BEACH BUGGIES,LLC APPROVED/ 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y PROPERTY/SEASHELL ASSOCIATES, CONDITIONED,BY LLC for a Conditional Use Permit re motor CONSENT vehicle sales&rental at 4417 Shore Drive, Unit B District 9 L.9. 21"STREET PROPERTIES,LLC/LILLY APPROVED/ 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y II LLC,LILLY INC,CRAB BOSS LLC for CONDITIONED,BY an Special Exception for Alternative CONSENT Compliance re nine (9)-story mixed-use building with a loft and dwelling units on the ground floor at the Southwest comer of Pacific Avenue&22"d Street;2106&2108 Pacific Avenue, 15-foot by 200-foot strip North of 2106 Pacific Avenue,302,304,306, &308 22'Street District 6 L.10. Ordinance to REMOVE GPIN DEFERRED I1-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 24140508440000 and a portion of GPIN INDEFINITELY,BY 24140549120000 from the Nimmo Church CONSENT Historic and Cultural District and AMEND the Official Zoning Map re eliminate the Nimmo Church Historic and Cultural District L.11. Ordinance to ADOPT the Virginia Beach APPROVED 8-3 Y Y Y N Y N Y Y N Y Y Comprehensive Plan-imagineVB2040 which will supersede the Virginia Beach Comprehensive Plan 2016 L.12. Ordinance to AMEND the CZO Sections APPROVED 1 l-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 239.05,283,405,500,1500,1501,1502, 1507,1520,1521,1524,1526,1804,1810, 2106,2211,and 2401 re reflect the imagineVB2040,Comprehensive Plan _ J CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH A R SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTIONS C O K S B H S S E C U O S DATE:04/21/2026 PAGE: 6 R U T N H C L M H C R A H W U M E H G E M R U I C I D N E R M M O L L C N Y L S E I O U M S AGENDA H G E E O E C N S A O ITEM# SUBJECT MOTION VOTE I S R Y N N K D E N N L.13. Ordinance to AMEND City Code Section APPROVED 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 16-43 re reflect the imagineVB2040 Comprehensive Plan L.14. Ordinance to ADD City Zoning Ordinance APPROVED,BY 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y (CZO)Section 208.1 re the regulation of CONSENT roll off containers M. APPOINTMENTS RESCHEDULED B Y C O N S E N S U S COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION GRANT REVIEW&ALLOCATION COMMITTEE DEFERRED COMPENSATION BOARD INDEPENDENT CITIZEN REVIEW BOARD PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION VIRGINIA BEACH TOWING ADVISORY BOARD BAYFRONT ADVISORY COMMISSION Appointed: 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y John Crouse Unexpired thru 6/30/2026 +3 Year Term 7/1/2026—6/30/2029 BEACHES AND WATERWAYS Appointed: 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ADVISORY COMMISSION Lyn Henry— Representing District 3 Unexpired thru 7/31/2026 +3 Year Term 8/1/2026—7/31/2029 COMMUNITY CRIMINAL JUSTICE Appointed: 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y BOARD Dr.Donald Robertson —Representing Local Educator Unexpired thru 3/31/2030 COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD Reappointed: 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Brianna Dempsey 3 Year Term 6/1/2026—5/31/2029 INDEPENDENT CITIZEN REVIEW Appointed: 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y BOARD Fay Silverman MINORITY BUSINESS COUNCIL Reappointed: 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Rhonda Alexander Jaketa Clark- Thompson Tara Jones 2 Year Term 6/1/2026—5/31/2028 J CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH A R SUMMARY OF COUNCIL ACTIONS C O K S B H S S E C U O - S DATE:04/21/2026 PAGE: 7 R U T N H C L M H C R A H W U M E H G E M R U I C I D N E R M M O L L C N Y L S E I O U M S AGENDA H G E E O E C N S A O ITEM# SUBJECT MOTION VOTE I S R Y N N K D E N N PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD Appointed: 11-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Matthew Adolph Unexpired thru 8/31/2026 +4 Year Term 9/1/2026—8/31/2030 SENIOR SERVICES OF SOUTHEASTERN Reappointed: 1 1-0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y VIRGINIA Barbara Booker- Williams 3 Year Term 6/1/2026—5/31/2029 N. UNFINISHED BUSINESS O. NEW BUSINESS P. ADJOURNMENT 9 03 P.M.