HomeMy WebLinkAboutJUNE 19, 1989
Cit@ C:)f @ir-wiraiel
"WORLD'S LARGEST RESORT Crff"
CITY COLJNCIL
MAYOR M@EM E OW@@W,
VICE -- .-@Rl
-@Rl
]..l A, -U., B@--
-RO- @El@.O.@, .@
M HENUY, P.@@
10.1 --ill,
I-CY . @@R. A, L-,
J.., , -Y, ,- --@
Wll- . -OMS, JR,
281 CITY HALL BUILDING
MUNICIPAL CENTER
A-1 V --, J.,, li@, CITY COUNCIL AGENDA VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA 234m-@2
1 D@ I.SOI, A,- (804) 427-4303
RUTH HO@ES $MffH, C.Cl-, @i,,
June 19, 1989
ITEM 1. WETLANDS TOUR 9:00 AM
ITEM 11. CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS - Conference Room - 11:00 AM
A. CONSTITUTION DRIVE
C. Oral Lambert, Jr., Director, Public Works
B. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
William Macali, Assistant City Attorney
C. JUDICIAL CENTER
Giles G. Dodd, Assistant City Manager for Administration
ITEM 111. COUNCIL CONFERENCE SESSION - Conference Room - 12:45 PM
A. CITY COUNCIL CONCERNS
ITEM IV. INFORMAL SESSION - Conference Room - 1:15 PM
A. CALL TO ORDER - Vice Mayor Robert E. Fentress, Presiding
B. ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL
C. MOTION TO RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION
ITEM V. FORMAL SESSION - Council Chamber - 2:00 PM
A. INVOCATION: Reverend Jim Snow
Pastor, Scott Memorial United Methodist Church
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
C. ELECTRONIC ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL
D. MINUTES
1. INFORMAL & FORMAL SESSIONS - June 12, 1989
E. PUBLIC HEARING
FY 1989-90 SCHOOL BUDGET
Proposed Increase
F. PUBLIC HEARING
DEVELOPMENT FEES Ordinances for Authorization
G. RESOLUTIOWORDINANCES
1. Resolution approving the issuance of Industrial Development Revenue
Bonds:
HERMES ABRASIVES, LTD. $1,800,000
2. Ordinance REENACTING the Development Fee Ordinances passed by City
Councl I on May 15, 1989, in confor-mity with the provisions of
Section 15.1-29.14 of the Code of Virginia.
3. Ordinance to TRANSFER $13,867 frorn the FY 1989-90 Reserve for
Contingencies to the Office of Environmental Management for a
Natural Areas Inventory.
4. Ordinance to TRANSFER $50,440 from reserve for contingencies to the
Economic Development FY 1989-90 Operating Budget for the
establishment of an Economlc Development Project Coordinator
position.
5. Ordinances, upon FIRST READING, to APPROPRIATE:
a. $1,642,000 tor the FY 1989-90 School Textbook Rental Fund
Budget.
b. $8,363,985 for City of Virginia Beach School Programs funded by
Special Categorical Grants for school year 1989-90.
c. $11,502,501 for the FY 1989-90 School Cafeteria Enterprise Fund
Budget.
d. $334,450 for the FY 1989-90 School Athletic Enterprise Fund
Budget.
H. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered in the
ordinary course of business by City Council and will be enacted by
one motion in the form listed. If an Item is rernoved frorn the Consent
Agenda, it wi I I be di scussed and voted upon separately.
1. Ordinance to AMEND and REORDAIN Section 6-121 of the Code of the
City of Virglnia Beach, Virginia, re reckless boating.
2. Ordinance to AMEND and REORDAIN Section 7-11 of the Code of the
City of Virginia Beach, Virglnia, re restrictions on renting
Mopeds.
3. Ordinance to AMEND and REORDAIN Section 23-42 of the Code of the
City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, re the concealing, destroying, et
cetera of City RGcords.
4. Annual Ambulance Per-mit Renewal for area private, municipal and
non-profit organizations, pursuant to Section 10.5-2 of the Code of
the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia:
a. Norfolk General Cardiac Diagnostic Unit
b. Chlldren's Hospital of the King's Daughters
c. Norfolk Paramedical Rescue Services
d. Nightingale Air Arnbulance
e. City of Chesapeake Fire/EMS
f. Central Virginia Arnbulance Service
g. Tidewater Ambulance Service
h. Medical Transport, Inc.
5. Ordinance, upon FIRST READING, to APPROPRIATE $1,447,484 to the
Department of Public Utilitles due to an Increase In the rate of
water purchased frorn the City of Norfolk.
6. Ordinance, upon FIRST READING, to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE $8,196
Grant frorn the Virginia Department of Housing and Community
Development for an Emergency Home Repair Program.
7. Ordinance, upon FIRST READING, to APPROPRIATE $167,500 of funds in
the School Site Acquisition Fund; and, TRANSFER the funds to the
project account for the future construction of Ocean Lakes High
School.
8. Ordinance to TRANSFER $1,590,000 between categories in the FY
1988-89 School Operating Fund to cover unanticipated expenditures
and to Increase estimated revenues by $280,000 in the textbook
rental fund as a result of these transfers.
9. Ordinance to TRANSFER $110,000 to Project #2-079 International
Parkway Improvements to cover Sidewalk Construction Expenses.
10. Ordinance to TRANSFER $550 from the General Fund's Reserve for
contingencies to the Police Chief's Division for reimbursement of
legal expenses Incurred by a City Empfoyse In the performance of
his duty.
11. COST PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT:
HOLLAND WOODS (CIP 5-306) Water $26,369.00
(CIP 6-316) Sewer $ 71483.00
12. Ordinance declaring property (3561 Shawn Court) excess and
authorizlng the City Manager to dispose of same.
Deferred January 30, 1989
13. BINGO/RAFFLE PERMITS
FIRST COLONIAL BAND BOOSTERS Bingo
HUMANA HOSPITAL BAYSIDE AUXILIARY Raffle
SONS OF ITALY (ROMA LODGE) Raffle
VIRGINIA BEACH SPCA Raffle
14. CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY
BEACH LIMOUSINE SERVICES, INC.
15. Ordinance authorizing tax refunds In the amount of $1,499.27.
1. APPOINTMENTS
FRANCIS LAND HOUSE BOARD OF GOVERNORS
SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD
SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION
TIDEWATER COMMUNITY COLLEGE BOARD
TIDEVIATER REGIONAL GROUP HOME COMMISSION
J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
K. NEW BUSINESS
1. Interim Financial Statements for the period of July 1, 1988,
through April 30, 1989.
L. ADJOURWENT
cmd
6/15/89
M I N U T E S
VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Virginia Beach, Virginia
June 19, 1989
The CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS to the VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL was called to
order by Vice Mayor Robert E. Fentress in the Conference Room, City Hall on
Monday, June 19, 1989. at 11:00 A.M.
Council Members Present:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Reba S. McClanan, John
D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker and William D. Sessoms
Council Members Absent:
Barbara M. Henley (ENTERED: 11:58 A.M.)
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf (U.S. CONFERENCE OF MAYORS, Charleston
South Carolina)
John L. Perry (ENTERED: 1:30 P.@l. conferring with
wife's physician)
- 2 -
C I T Y M A N A G E R 'S B R I E F I N G
CONSTITUTION DRIVE
11:00 A.M.
ITF14 # 31377
C. Oral Lambert, Director of Public Works, advised the Constitution Drive
Alignment first appeared on the MASTER STREET AND HIGHWAY PLAN in 1982. At that
time, it was conceived of as a straight forward extension of Edwin Drive
directly over Route 44 tying in on the Pembroke side. In 1985, City Council
ADOPTED a Resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation
establish the Constitution Drive Project as a VDOT funded project and it
appeared in the 1984-88 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. Numerous meetings have
been held on the Constitution Drive Project, with much interface between VDOT
and City Staff. A FORM@AL PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING was held by the Virginia
Department of Transportation on September 1, 1989, where the Public was
introduced to the various alignments under consideration. In January, 1989, the
official Alignment Public Hearing was held for the Constitution Drive Project.
Four alignments were presented to the public of which the graphics are
available:
Alignment I Curved across the lake and went to the west side of
Edwin Drive.
Alignment 1A More direct alignment, directly across the lake and
stayed primarily on the east side of Edwin Drive.
Aligrunent 2 - Went of f at a narrower point across the Lake and again
paralleled behind Edwin Drive through this office complex.
Alignment 3 - Studied to determine the feasibility of keeping all
portions of Constitution Drive totally off of the Park Site.
Alignment 4 - Combination of features of Alignment I and IA. This
alignment essentially took the curve associated with Alignment 1 and
shifted it across the Mount Trashmore Lake at a narrow point, span
the existing parking facility at Mount Trashmore Lake and build a
bridge so the parking area could continue to be utilized underneath
the bridge.
Concurrent with the process of studying the alignments was the Pembroke Area
Transportation Analysis conducted by Frederick R. Harris. Prior to the PUBLIC
HF-ARING on January 25, 1989, two things occurred. One was based on the Pembroke
Area Transportation Analysis, it was determined to attain the desired level of
service, a grade separated interchange was required at South Independence
Boulevard and Ilolland Road and a grade separated interchange was required at
Bonney Road. Frederick R. Harris suggested a fifth alignment (Alignment 4).
A copy of the transcript of the PUBLIC HEARING will be made available. All of
the information has been reviewed by the Virginia Department of Transportation
and they have recommended Aligriment 4 as the selected alignment for the
Constitution Drive Project. VDOT has requested City Council ADOPT a Resolution
agreeing with that alignment and allowing them to proceed with the next step,
the design of the project. Once this Resolution is ADOPTED, it would be taken
by VDOT staff to the Transportation Board for action as a recommended alignment
and the State would then be authorized to proceed with design. This would also
enable the City, under certain circumstances, to consider advance right-of-way
acquisition while it is under design.
June 19 1989
- 3 -
C I T Y M A N A G E R 'S B R I E F I N G
CONSTITUTION DRIVE
ITEM # 31377 (Continued)
C. Oral Lambert, Jr., cited the letter of C. A. Nash, Jr. , District Engineer,
"This alignment meets the needs of the Transportation System, provides the
local communities with as much buffer zone as possible, does the least amount
of damage to the commercial and industrial properties and provides an
aesthetically pleasing alignment which will minimize disruption to the
facilities of Lake Trashmore.
C. Oral Lambert further quoted Staff's analysis: "The importance of the visual
impact of the project is a major design element and has weighed evenly on the
selection of the recommended final alignment. In fact, contributing
significantly to the selection of the recommended alignment is the
visualization that a moderately curved structure across a narrow area of the
Lake will be more attractive and will have less of a negative impact on the
Park and Recreational activities then would an alignment cutting directly
across the Lake at one of its widest points."
The concern expressed by the public during the Public Hearing can be
generalized in two major areas of concern: (1) The alignment shall be kept as
far away as feasible from the residents of their community. (2) The potential
negative impact to the project on Mount Trashmore.
The alignments are very limited due to the density of the area. The Staff
recognized if Alignment 4 was selected, more must be accomplished than
traditionally with bridge projects to blend more with the Mount Trashmore Park.
VDOT has embraced that concept and has commissioned work in the way of
exploring different concepts. These have been depicted by a rendering. A bridge
has been superimposed over Mount Trashmore which might have a brick facade, a
thin line bridge, a low level bridge that is high enough to allow
transportation at the roadways to get under the bridge and high enough over the
park to allow recreational use under the bridge. This particular rendering is
not intended to represent what the bridge will resemble, just the State's
willingness. The State has indicated their willingness to engage the services
of a bridge architect to suggest design features to blend with Mount Trashmore
Park. This project is estimated to cost over $40-MILLION.
Louis Grimm, Consultant with Frederick R. Harris, reiterated the impact of the
Constitution Drive Project and provided statistics. With the utilization of a
graphic, Louis Grimm, illustrated an estimate of the daily two-directional
traffic volumes crossing Route 44 with four (4) possible crossing points:
Witchduck Road, Independence Boulevard, Constitution Drive and Rosemont Road.
With the Constitutional Drive Flyover in place, there would be approximately
27,000 vehicles on a two-way daily basis. Considering the four arterial
streets, the total volume across the line would be approximately 184,000 two-
way vehicle trips per day.
If the Constitution Drive Flyover were not created, there would not be a
significant change in the total volume (183,800) of traffic across Route 44.
There would be the same demand, just shifted to different streets. The largest
portion of the traffic with a desire to use Constitution Drive would shift over
to use the Independence Boulevard Corridor. Approximately 94,000 vehicles a day
along Independence Boulevard, even assuming if this were upgraded to an 8-lane
arterial is much more traffic then a road like that can comfortably carry. The
volume projected to be there at approximately 70,500 vehicles a day, assuming
Constitution Drive is in place, is approximately where the volume of traffic
should be held for an eight-lane surface arterial street.
Part of the Consultant's recommendation was to effectively cut out from the
arterial street system, the section of Independence Boulevard from Jeanne
Street, north to Constitution, maintain this as a two-lane residential
collector street and redirect the major flow of traffic up Constitution when it
crosses Virignia Beach Boulevard, swing it to the left along the Jeanne Street
corridor and then blend it back into Independence at the Jeanne
Street/Independence Intersection. Thus, keeping as much traffic as possible out
of the residential neighborhood.
June 19, 1989
- 4 -
C I T Y M A N A C E R 'S B R I E F I N G
CONSTITUTION DRIVE
ITEM # 31377 (Continued)
Bob Morris advised during the Public Hearing of January 1989, there was no
consideration at this particular point of any type of facade or different
treatment of the structure. Estimates have been obtained of that possible cost,
if this were selected to be added to this proposal. Estimates have also been
obtained for a ramp letting the traffic off of the bridge onto Independence.
With the addition of these items, Bob Morris, Virginia Department of
Transportation, reiterated the following estimates:
Alternative 1 $39.2-MILLION
Alternative 1A $40.2-MILLION
Alternative 2 $37.8-MILLION
Alternative 3 $50.8-MILLION
Alternative 4 $40.6-MILLION
(The aforementioned also include
an interchange at Bonney)
PUBLIC COMMENT and Resolution recommending Aligriment 4 Constitution Drive (CIP
2-007) shall be SCHEDULED for the City Council Meeting of June 26, 1989.
Councilman Moss requested information relative the $52-MILLION cost as it
relates to the economic tax base.
June 19, 1989
- 5 -
C I T Y M A N A C E R 'S B R I E F I N G
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
ITEM # 31378
12:00 NOON
William Macali, Assistant City Attorney, distributed a copy of the proposed
Certificate of Occupancy Ordinance. This Ordinance is in final form with the
exception of a definition clarification of ,owner". There have been further
meetings with representatives of the Council of Civic Organizations, the
Tidewater Builders Association, the Tidewater Multi-Family Council, the Board
of Realtors and the Chamber of Commerce.
In any area of the City designated as a Special Emphasis Area, property cannot
be vacated and reoccupied by new tenants until a Certificate of Occupancy has
been issued. The requirement for a Certificate to be issue has not changed. The
property must comply with all applicable housing codes.
A subsection has been inserted requiring the City Manager to review the
designation of a Special Emphasis Area on an annual basis. A provision has
been inserted requiring the City Manager to set forth, in writing, reasons for
designating an area as a Special Emphasis Area. This designation would be based
on criteria established by the proposed Ordinance.
An owner will call the city requesting inspection of the property. There will
be no fee for an initial inspection. If the initial inspection reveals
certain violations exist and a reinspection is requested and the violations
have not been corrected, a fee of $25.00 will be charged. If the violations
have been rectified at the time of reinspection, there will be no fee.
In a situation where the property may not completely comply with all the Code
requirements, there are certain circumstances where a temporary Certificate of
Occupancy can be issued. This allows the property to be occupied, but also
requires the owner during the period of occupancy and within a certain
designated time to make all the repairs bringing the property up to code. A
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy is issued if the required repairs can
reasonably be accomplished within a period of 60 days, performed safely and
without undue convenience to the occupants of the property and the condition of
the property itself does not constitute a health or safety hazard. If the
property requires more than 60 days for repair or repairs are such to render
same inhabitable, or the defects are dangerous conditions, the Certificate of
Occupancy will not be issued. Property which constitutes a health or safety
hazard should not be occupied. Any person aggrieved of any determination or
decision of the director made pursuant to this section shall have the right to
appeal such determination or decision within twenty (20) days to the Board of
Building Code Appeals. Notice of such appeal shall be in writing, shall
specify the grounds of appeal, and shall be mailed or delivered to the
director. All proceedings before the Board shall be in accordance with the
provisions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code.
A Certificate of Exemption shall be issued if, and only if, all of the
following criteria have been met:
The dwelling units to which the Certificate of Exemption applies are
contained in a unified multiple-family dwelling development having no
less than twenty (20) units, in which development a property manager or
property management entity performs, or causes to be performed, regular
maintenance of the property
Written application for a Certificate of Exemption has been made to the
Director of flousing and neighborhood preservation by the management or
owner of such development
The management or owner has allowed the inspection by city housing
inspectors of not less than fifty per cent (50%) of the vacant dwelling
units, with a minimum of one (1) and a maximum of ten (10) units,
contained in such development. If no units are vacant, such
inspection shall be performed upon a unit chosen by the inspector, but
shall be subject to the consent of the occupant.
June 19, 1989
6
C I T Y M A N A G E R 'S B R I E F I N G
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
ITEM # 31378 (Continued)
No material and substantial violations of any applicable ordinance,
regulation or standard pertaining to a condition of housing exist
within any of the units so inspected, or the interior of any building
or upon the exterior of the property of the development.
BY CONSENSUS, City Council will SCHEDULE the Certificate of Occupancy Ordinance
for the City Council Meetin-. of July 3, 1989.
June 19, 1989
- 7 -
C I T Y M A N A G E R 'S B R I E F I N G
JUDICIAL CENTER
12:40 P.M.
ITEM # 31379
Giles Dodd, Assistant City Manager for Administration, advised the Judicial
Center was approved in the present CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM at a total cost
of $31.9-MILLION. The expansion of the heating plant and the pump station was
not included in this amount.
Judicial Center $31.9-MILLION
Heating Plant Expansion $ 3.2-MILLION
Pump Station $ 275,000
$34,767,000 TOTAL COST
The following resources/revenues were determined to be available to help fund
debt service and other costs related to the project:
Pre-paid fines
Rentals from State Offices
Available Local Funds
Interest on surpluses
Juvenile Probation administrative cost savings
Juvenile Probation rental cost savings
Giles Dodd described the Four Scenarios of Construction:
SCENARIO I (Phased Option)
Financing of construction costs
From COP Issue $32,661,571
From available local
resources 4,860,502 $37,522,073
COP issue
(Comprises two COP issues - $34,750,000
$6,725,000 in February 1990
and $28,025,00 in September
1991.)
Net debt service $58,099,293
COP maturities $ 6,725,000 issue FYs 1991-2010
$28,025,000 issue FYs 1992-2012
The J & DR building, pump station and a portion of the central plant would
begin November 1989 and finish December 1990. The remainder of the project
would begin July 1991 and finish June 1993.
June 19, 1989
- 8 -
C I T Y M A N A G E R 'S B R I E F I N C
JUDICIAL CENTER
ITEM # 31379 (Continued)
SCENARIO II (Accelerated Option)
Financing of construction costs
From COP issue $29,967,000
From available local resources 4,800,000 $34,767,000
COP issue (issued February 1990) $32,285,000
Net debt service $53,744,396
COP maturities FYs 1991-2010
Construction of the entire Judicial Center would begin September 1989 an
finish August 1991.
SCENARIO III (Delayed Option)
Financing of construction costs
From COP issue $33,042,443
From available local
resources 4,860,502 $37,902,945
COP issue (issued September 1991) $35,010,000
Net debt service $58,595,238
COP maturities FYs 1992-2012
Preliminary sitework, roadwork and the pump station would begin September
1989 and finish May 1990. The judicial center and central plant would
begin 1991 and finish June 1993.
SCENARIO IV (Continue as now)
Construction would be postponed indefinitely. The City would be faced with
the perennial acquisition of modular units.
June 19, 1989
- 9 -
C ON C E R N S OF T HE C IT Y MANA GE R
ITEM # 31380
The City Manager distributed a copy of a video relative the Virginia Beach
tourist industry. This video was shown on Channel 12 in Richmond.
ITFII # 31381
The City Manager referenced the WETLANDS TOUR and advised in order to provide
all an ample opportunity to attend, another time could be SCHEDULED on Monday,
June 26, 1989, from 2:30 P.M. to 4:30 P.@l. This particular time might be more
convenient.
June 19, 1989
- 10 -
ITEM # 31382
The INFORMAL SESSION of the VTRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL was called to order by
Vice Mayor Robert E. Fentress in the Conference Room, City Hall Building, on
Monday, June 19, 1989, at 1:18 P.M.
Council Members Present:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker and
William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Absen
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf (U.S. CONFERENCE OF MAYORS, Charleston,
South Carolina)
John L. Perry (ENTERED: 1:30 P.M. conferring with
wife's physician)
- 11 -
ITEM # 31383
Vice @layor Robert E. Fentress entertained a motion to permit City Council to
conduct its EXECUTIVE SESSION, pursuant to Section 2.1-344, Code of
Virginia, as amended, for the following purposes:
1. PERSONNEL MATTERS: Discussion or consideration of employment, assignment,
appointment, promotion, performance, demotion, salaries, disciplining or
resignation of public officers, appointees or employees.
2. PUBLICLY HELD PROPERTY: Discussion or consideration of the condition,
acquisition or use of real property for public purpose, or of the
disposition of publicly held property, or of plans for the future of an
institution which could effect the value of property owned or desirable
for ownership by such institution.
Upon motion by Councilman Heischober, seconded by Councilwoman Henley,
City Council voted to proceed into EXECUTIVE SESSION.
Voting: 9-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker and
William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf and John L. Perry*
"Councilman Perry entered 1:30 P.M.
June 19 1989
- 12 -
F 0 R M A L S E S S I 0 N
VIRGINIA BEACII CITY COUNCIL
June 19, 1989
2:00 P.M.
Vice Mayor Robert E. Fentress called to order the FORMAL SESSION of the
VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL in the Council Chambers, City Hall Building, on
Monday, June 19, 1989, at 2:00 P.M.
Council Members Present:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf (Representing the City at the U.S.
Conference of Mayors in Charleston,
South Carolina)
TNVOCATION: Reverend Jim Snow
Scott Memorial United Methodist Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
June 19 1989
- 13 -
Item V-D. 1.
MINUTES ITEIM # 31384
Upon motion by Councilwoman McClanan, seconded by Councilman Heischober, City
Council APPROVED the MINUTES of the INFORMAL AND FORMAL SESSIONS of June 12,
1989, AS AMENDED.
ITEM # 31363, Page 15
ORDINANCE UPON APPLICATION OF PERRY H. WOOD FOR A
CONDITIONAL USE PEPMIT FOR A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
IN THE AG-1 AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT R06891227
Condition No. 2 shall be AMENDED as follows:
2. The City is not responsible for any public
services on this property including but not
limited - - - 1-4-4-g to road work, sewer or
garbage collection.
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council @lembers Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
June 19, 1989
- 14 -
Item V-E. 1.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM # 31385
Vice Mayor Robert E. Fentress DECLARED a PUBLIC HEARING:
FY 1989 - 90 SCHOOL BUDGET
Proposed Increase
The following registered to speak:
Colonel Robert Engesser, 5290 Vestry Drive, Phone: 499-3157
There being no further speakers, Vice Mayor Fentress CLOSED the PUBLIC HEARING.
June 19 1989
- 15 -
Item V-F. 1.
PUBLIC HEARING ITFd4 # 31386
Vice Mayor Robert E. Fentress DECLARED a PUBLIC HEARING:
DEVELOPWM FEES
Ordinances for Authorization
There being no speakers, Vice Mayor Fentress CLOSED the PUBLIC HEARING.
- 16 -
Item V-G. 1.
RESOLUTIONS/ORDINANCES ITEM # 31387
Upon motion by Councilman Sessoms, seconded by Councilwoman Parker, City
Council ADOPTED:
Resolution approving the issuance of Industrial
Development Revenue Bonds:
HERMES ABRASIVES, LTD. $1,800,000
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:,
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
June 19, 1989
SUMMARY SHEET
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BOND
1. PROJECT NAME:
2. LOCATION:
3. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
4. AMOUNT OF BOND ISSUE:
5. PRINCIPALS:
Hermes Abrasives, Ltd.
524 Viking Drive
_Virginia Beach, VA 23~52
.Purchase of equipment for the
manufacture of coated abrasives and
...the conversion of coated a~ras~va~
into belts and discs.
$1,800,000 /
Hermes Abrasives~ Inc.
Norddeutsche Schleifmittel - Industrie
Christiansen & Co. (Gmbh & Co.)
6. ZONING CLASSIFICATION:
Presgnt zoning
classification of the
Property
b. I~ rezoning proposed?
c. If so, to what zoning
classification?
Yes
N/A
No X
A meeting of the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
Virginia, was held in the Council Chambers, in the Adminis-
tration Building, on the 19 day of June 1989.
On motion by Councilman Sessoms
and seconded by Councilwoman Parker the follow-
ing Resolution was adopted.
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS FOR HERMES ABRASIVES,
LTD.
WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach Development Authori-
ty (the Issuer), has considered the application and plan of
financing of Hermes Abrasives, Ltd. (the Company) for the
issuance of the Issuer's industrial development revenue bonds
in an amount not to exceed $1,800,000 (the Bonds) to assist
in the financing of the Company's acquisition of equipment
(the Equipment) for the manufacture of coated abrasives and
the conversion of coated abrasives into belts and discs to be
used in its manufacturing facility (the Facility) located at
524 Viking Drive in the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, and
owned by the Company, and has held a public hearing thereon
on June 13 , 1989; and
WHEREAS, the Issuer has recomrnended that the City
Council (the Council) of City of Virginia Beach, Virqinia
(the City), approve the issuance of the Bonds to comply with
Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code), and Section 15.1-1378.1 of the Code of
Virginia of 1950, as amended, and has authorized the City
Manager to submit an application to the Virginia Department
of Housing and Community Development requesting an allocation
of $1,800,000 pursuant to Title 15.1, Chapter 33.2 of the
Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended (the Virginia Code),
with respect to the issuance of the Bonds;
WHEREAS, a copy of the Issuer's resolution approving the
issuance of the Bonds, subject to terms to be agreed upon, a
reasonably detailed summary of the comments expressed at the
public hearing with respect to the Bonds and a statement in
the form prescribed by Section 15.1-1378.2 of the Code of
Virqinia of 1950, as amended, have been filed with the Clerk
of the Council;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
1. The recitals made in the preamble to this Resolution
are herebv adopted as a part of this Resolution.
2. The Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia,
approves the issuance of the Bonds by the City of Virginia
Beach Development Authority to assist in the financing of the
Equipment for the benefit of the Company, to the extent of
and as required by the Code.
3. The approval of the issuance of the Bonds, as
required by the Code and Section 15.1-1378.1, does not
constitute an endorsement of the Bonds or the
creditworthiness of the Company, but, pursuant to Chapter
643, Virginia Acts of Assembly of 1964, as amended, the Bonds
shall provide that neither the City nor the Issuer shall be
obligated to pay the Bonds or the interest thereon or other
costs incident thereto except from the revenues and moneys
pledged therefor, and neither the faith or credit nor the
taxing power of the Commonwealth, the City, or the Issuer
shall be pledged thereto.
4. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed
to submit an application to the Virginia Department of
Housing and Community Development requesting an allocation of
$1,800,000 pursuant to the Virginia Code.
2
5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon
its adoption.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
Virginia, on June 19, 1989 1 1989.
3
City Council Of Virginia Beach, V' . .
Municipal Center irginia
Virginia Beach, Virginia
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
FOR PROPOSED INDIJSTRIAL REVENIJE BOND FINANCING
April 13, 1989
Hermes Abrasives, Inc.
Manufacturing Equipinent
1. Maximum amount of financing souglit $1,800,000
2. Estimatod taxable value, of tlle faci.lity's
real property to be constructed in tlie
municipality $ -0-
3. EstimEtted real propcrty tax per @,car
using present tax rates " -0-
4. Estimated personal property tax per
year using present tax ratos $ 10,200
5. Estimated merchaiits' capitai t@ix
(business license tax) per year using
l@resent tax rates $ -0-
6. Estimated dollar value per year of
goods and services tliat will be
purchased locally $ -0-
7. Estimated number of regular employees
on year round basis 45
8. Average alinual salary per employee $ 18,700
The information contaiiied in this statement is based
solely on facts and estimates provided by the Applicant, and
the Authority has made no independent investigation with
respect thereto.
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH
DEVELOPMENT AUTI[ORI
By
I
ECONOMIC IMPACT
FOR
BOND ALLOCATION REVIEW
I
I
Economic Impact Statement
1 - Amount of investment $ 1 800 000
2. Amount of industrial revenue bond
financing sought $ 1 800 000
3. Estimated taxable value of the
facility's real property to be
constructed in the City of
Virginia Beach $
4. Estimated real property tax per
year using present tax rate $
5. Estimated personal property tax $ 10 200
6. Economic impact statement
demonstrating the overall
return to the City:
A. Number of new jobs 45
B. Payroll generated $ 750 000 Av. Wage $ 8.00 per hour
C. Number of jobs retained 306
D. Payroll retained $5,500,000- Av. Wage $ 8.64 per hour
E. Estimate of the value of goods and services
purchased within the qeographic boundary of
Virginia Beach by type (inventory, machinery,
professional services, insurance, motor vehicles,
etc.):
Type Value
Office and plant supplies $ 75,000
Landscape maintenance $ 4,000
Insurance $150,000
Utilities $300,000
$
F. Estimated building permit fee
and other municipal fees NIA $
2
G. Estimated construction payroll $
Estimated value of construction
material to be purchased within
the City of Virginia Beach $
Estimated nuniber of
construction jobs
Any other items of which the
applicant feels the Authority
should be made aware of in
evaluating the project Hermes Abrasives, Ltd. is currently
constructing an addition t
Also,
Facility using internal funds. he
7. Is the site currently zoned for the use of being
proposed for industrial revenue bond financing?
Yes x No
8. Has a bond purchase agreement/commitment been accepted
by the applicant? (attach a copy) Yes No x
9. Will the bond financing close within 90 days from the
date of adoption of the inducement resolution?
Yes x No
10. Location of project (attach location map)
ikin Drive
Virpinia Beach, Virginia 23452
11. Explanation of alternative financing that has been
reviewed for project Bank loan
I hereby certify that the information stated in the
above Economic Impact Statement is ccurate and true in all
respects.
3
-4
Subsc rn to before me this /illi day of
, @&4.
i @ @l/-
.1
@ilu / /@ ae(I
.ta@y Pbiic
My Commission Expires: @l q (C-l) J 14, l' 121 9 )-
JECT
TION',
EANA
PROJECT N@IE: nerines Abrasives, Ltcl.
PROJECT ADDRESS: 524 Viking Drive
Virgiiiia Beacil, VA 23,152
TYPE OF PROJECT: Manufacturing Equipment
- 17 -
Item V-G.2.
RESOLUTIONS/ORDINANCES ITEM # 31388
Upon motion by Councilman Heischober, seconded by Councilman Sessoms, City
Couiicil ADOPTED:
Ordinance REENACTING the Development Fee Ordinances
approved by City Council on May 15, 1989, in
conformity with the provisions of Section 15.1-
29.14 of the Code of Virginia.
AND, ADOPTED (adjustments to ordinances originally enacted on May 15, 1989):
Ordinance to amend and reordain Section 1403(c) of
the City Zoning Ordinance, of the City of Virginia
Beach, Virginia, pertaining to applications for
permits for wetlands."
'@sets a maximum fee for wetlands applications at
$1,000 for residential and $2,500 for non-
residential applications.
Ordinance to amend and reordain Section 8-32, 8-33,
and 8-34 of the Code of the City of Virginia Beach,
Virginia, pertaining to permit fees for plumbing
permits, mechanical and gas permits and electrical
permits."ll
**deletion of a septic tank permit fee of $25.00.
Voting: 8-2
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, John
D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker* and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
Reba S. McClanan and John L. Perry"ll
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
"Verbal Aye
**Verbal Nay
APPROVED AS To CONTENTS
APPPOVED AS TO LEGAL
ORDINANCE REENACTING THE
ELOPMENT FEE ORDINANCES PASSED BY
TY COUNCIL ON MAY 15, 1989 IN
FORMITY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF
5 SECTION 15.1-29.14 OF THE CODE OF
6 VIRGINIA
7 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach (the
8 Council) passed certain ordinances on May 15, 1989 (hereinafter
9 the May 15 ordinances), which increased various development fees,
10 which ordinances are attached hereto and incorporated herein by
11 reference;
12 WHEREAS, it was necessary that the May 15 ordinances be
13 effective immediately so as to comply with budgetary requirements
14 of State law;
15 WHEREAS, while it was necessary for the May 15 ordinances to
16 be effective immediately, the May 15 ordinances need to be
17 reenacted after advertisement and a public hearing as required by
18 Section 15.1-29.14 of the Code of Virginia;
19 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
20 OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA, AS FOLLOWS:
21 The provisions of Section 15.1-29.14 of the State Code with
22 respect to advertisement and a public hearing having been complied
23 with, the May 15 ordinances are hereby approved, ratified and
24 reenacted.
25 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
26 Virginia, on the 19th day of June 1989.
27 KJC/dhh
28 06/14/89
29 CA-89-3328
30 \ordin\noncode\devfees.ord
APP,IIOVFI)
ORJ)-80 -1 86
1 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN
2 SECTIONS 33-71 AND 33-72, OP T[iE
3 CODE OF TIIE CITY OF VIRGINIA SEACH,
4 VIRGINIA, PERTAINING TO PERMIT,
5 INSPECTION AND GUARANTEE FEES
6
7 BE IT ORDAINED BY TIIE COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF VIRGINIA
8 BEACH, VIRGINIA:
9 That Sections 33-71 and 33-72 of the Code of the City
10 of Virginia Beach is hereby ametided and reordained to read as
11 follows:
12
13
14 Section 33-71. Schedule.
15
16 Minimum permit, inspection and guarantee fees for work
17 for which a permit is required by this article Shall be required
18 or not required in accordance with the following schedule:
19
20 Perntit and inspection minimum guarantee
21 Type of project fee fee
22 A. ENTRANCES:
23 1. Private777777777
24 (including teinporary
25 entrances, private
26 service roads, and
27
28 ditches ....... $1700$10.00 None.
29 2. Conunercial-.-.777-.
30
31 related to site plan
32
33 roads, tram roads,
34 coinmercial service
35 roads, and
36
37
38 construction $5700$25.00 Depos i t in accordance
39 with estimated cost.
40
41
42
43 p(5rary-privtite-ent-
44 -$5vOO e@@ - -i7ft C@@C
45 with-estim8ted-coat7
46 --4@ Service-road57777-. -$1700 Bt@i-L- - -i7n - -&C C@@ce
47 with-estimated-co5t7
48 --57 -$ITOO De@@--i7n--arec@@ce
49 with-estimnted-cost7
50 B. STRUCTURES:
51 1. Steps, sidewalks.. $1700$25.00 $25.00
52 2. Poles, unless
53 authorized by
54 frarichise or
55 certificate of
56 convenience and
57 necessity ...... $ 0.25 eacti witli Deposit in accordance
58 $5700$25.00 witli estimated cost.
59 min i Ill Ll Ill
60 3. Guys and/or
61 atichors, unless
62 authorized by
63 fraric[iise or
64 certificate of
65 convenience and
66 necessity ....... $ 0.25 each witli Deposit in accordance
67 $5700$25.00 witli esliiiiated cost.
68 mi ni niuni
69 4. Wire crossitigs,
70 including guy
71 wires, unless
72 autliorized by
73 frariciiise or
74 cerlificate of
75 corivenience and
76 necessity ..... $ 0.25 eacti witli Deposit in accordance
2
77 $5700$25.00 witli estimated cost.
78 iiliuiii
79 5. UiidergrOLind
80 i.i)stallatioiis,
81 unless authorized
82 by franchise or
83 certificate of
84 convc-iiiencc, and
85 riecessity ...... AcLual COSL ($5700 Deposit iii accordance
86 $25.00 iniiiirntiiii) with estitnated cost.
87 6. SLructures
88 (including
89 any of the
90 foregoing)
91 authorized by
92 franchise or
93 certificate of
94 convenience aj)d
95 necessity ..... None Noiie.
96 C. SPECIAL:
97 I-. Tree triinmiiig,
98 cutting or
99 spraying-.7-.-.-.
100 unless authorized
101
102 certificate of
103 convenience and
104 $5700$25.00 $25.00
105 (iniiiiinuni)
106 -27 Tret-trirhming-
107 and-cutting
108 atthorited-by
109 frmnchime-or
110
ill e(3nvemience-tind
112 neces@ity777-.7 None Home-.
3
113 D. MISCELLANEOUS:
114 All others ..... Actual cost Deposit in accordance
115 with estimated cost.
116
117 Section 33-72. Amount of inspection fees.
118 Except as to the iniiiiinum fees set forth in section 33-71,
119 inspection fees under tiiis article shall be the-@@- --of
120 maki:ng charged at the rate of forty dollars ($40.00) per hour.
121 Inspections made shall be those inspections necessary to assure
122 that the work is done in a.proper and orderly manlier.
123
124 An emergency is hereby declared, and this ordinance shall be
125 effective upon adoption.
1 26
127 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
1 28 Virginia, on the lird day of 1989.
129
130 KJC/epirt
131 0 3/1 0/89
1 3 2 03/15/89
1 3 3 0 5/0 3/89
134 CA-03206
135 \ordin\proposed\33-071ETC.pro
4
APPrZOVED lf,
tA 0 RD-S" I SC, 4
o roR
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN
2 SECTION 8-31 OF TIIE CODE OF THE
3 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACII, VIRGINIA,
4 PERTAINING TO BUILDING PERMITS AND
5 BUILDING PERMIT FEES.
6
7 BE IT ORDAINED BY TIIE COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY Or VIRGINIA
8 BEACII, VIRGINIA:
9 That Section 8-31 of the Code of the City of Virginia
10 Beach is hereby amended and reordained to read as follo,,:
11
12
13 Section 8-31. Perinit fees - Building perniits.
14
15 (a) It shall be unlawful for any person to construct,
16 enlarge, alter, repair or demolish a any building or structure
17
18 reeju-Iti+,&d, by as defined in the Ulliform Statewide
19 Building Code, without first obtaining the- @ a building
20 permit therefor7 and paying the periiiit fees as-hereby-e!stabli:shed
21 and set ottt fortli in this section7
22
23 bui:4:ding-code.
24 (b) The miniinuiti fee for aiiy building perniit shall be
25 ten fifteen dollars F$IOTOOI .($15.00).
26 (c) For the construction of any building or addition
27 thereto where the floor area is increased and f o r th,
28 installation or erection of any industrialized building uiiit, the
29 fee shall be based on the floor area to be constructed, as
30 computed from exterior building diniensions at each floor, as
31 follows:
32 fll--Re5identialt
33 -f
34 up--t@- a-nd--i7n@@i7@--t@-thousand
35
36
37
38 b7 Fc)t--bwo--bhc)usand--(-270 0 01-@quare
39
40 t. h
4 1 f --be--@ie--hu@ted--twenty
42
4 3 t: hc)u!iand - -!3qtt ti r e- @et--pi u!S
4 4 f i ve- @ol-Ittr@ - -T@-- hu nd red
4 5
4 6 CT For - -E- @L- - -Hiou,@ltd- --0 GO-) -- tsq till re
47 f rte-- hu-rid-r-c-d-- L h@&nd
48 f L-he -- fet-
49 !5 h@ldr-e d---3@L y
50 dol -l-a-r@ - t he- -f-i7rnt
51 f
52
53 ee+--br--f-rtC@i7oM
54 thereoft
55 d7 1007000t
56
57
58
59
60
61
62 thereOE7-WithOUt-liMit7
63
64
65
66
67 be-- s
68
69 thereof-.
70 b7
71
72
73
74 dolltirm-f$140700)-for-the-fir5t-two
75 t: H(5ti!st% nd - -(-2-,-UOD-)- -!iq uti r e- -p4: U!i
2
7 6 mi x--del $6-. Ot)J--pt!r- -htt ndre c3
77
78 C7- Por--@rt - sqta tire
79 feet:--up---te--artd
80
81
82 dollarm-f$6207001-EC)r-the-firmt-ten
83
84
85
86 d 257000t
87
88 nd--i: h-r-c@- ned
89 3eventy-dollarm-f$17370700t-fOr-the
90 fir5t-twenty-five-thodsand-f2570001
91 N tl'd@@- - -f@&& t! - -P I 'd S- r 5
92 f $47OOt-p@--fit
93
94
95 ti 7
96 @n(I-@@-t:hottstind
97 f 1-iOOO) -
98 be--
99 htind-r-@-t5tltitAr-&--feet--or--f-r-&c@ion
100 thereofv
101 b Po-r--c) n t!- -L-hou 5c nd- - (1- TO 0 0 -2tqtta r e
102 f e@-- up-- t@ - ti ti@- 4@Tl@-ti@i7rtg - -f-i7v e
103 t hou@m md- 5qua r e t he
104 f- @a-l- I --b e-- ts@rt t y- - m
105 f
106
107 t)Ol--r)er--httmdred
108
109 For --f-i-v& - -5-,-O"- - squet r e
110 fe et- -ttv - -t@ --t"yd- - -i tiCAdd4@- t we n t! y
ill t hou!5a nd- -(-2 -1
3
11 2 fee--@h dii--be--L-h r ee--hun dr ed-- be n
11 3 f @--,c he --f-i7r.4 L-
11 4 f ive -@iotrjfmid--@STO
11 5 Ii @--per
11 6 htitid-r@-tstlu@-r@-f
117 ther&of7
118 dT P(5r-twenty-the3umdnd-f2O7OOOt-mcluart
1.19
120
121 fo
122 f -2,0-,
123 -meluare
1 2 4 f
125 limiL7
126 f4l--A.5sembly-
1 27 d Por - @l@-httnd @d - eet:
1 28 ti p-@@ - ti nd--i7rrel-@i7tM- t:h(ntt sand
1 29 t 1 7 0 0 0 1 - -@- e -!ihd I 1.
1 30 b e- - ts@rt --do 3-.@Y --re r
1 31
1 3 2 there(5E7
1 3 3 bT
1 3 4
1 3 5
1 36
1 37
138 f -l-,@O
139
1 4 0
141 Pdr --@i7Ve Ild-- l@, @iH--mcluti re
1 4 2 fee t: - @- t @ -dnd - -E @ f t:et-m
143 t hou fi a md- i -5-,-0 001- hc
1 4 4
1 4 5 d o-l-iti-I t- he--f-i7 r@ t:
14G f i7VL 5 7 0 0 0 f ee L-
1 4 7 -pe r
4
ld8 h timd-r@- 5,1-utt-r@-feet--or --f-r.ZtCL-iofi
1 4 9
1 5 0
151 @q tid r e- -feet- shd II
1 5 2
1 5 3
1 5 4 h o tt 3 a m 8 - u m
1 5 5 o u 1- I-a n h u n d r e d
156 or
1 57
158 f5t--StortigeT
1 5 9 -EeeL
1 6 0
1 6 1
162 be-four-doildrm-t$47001-r)er-hundred
163
1 6 4 b7
165
166
167
168 f$807001-for-the-fir!5t-two-thoumand
169
170
1 7 1
172 C Po@--f@@ee m ti--
173
1 7 4 be - -f-t)u r- -hu ndre d- -:3 evem
175
176
177 I)101--per - -@nd red
1 7 8 MC1 Ut' r e- -or- - -f -r ti@4 @l- - the r eof 7
179 with(5ut-limit7
180 t6l--indtistrittIT
181 tt7 Por-@@ -ht+/-md @d -I
,eet!
182 u @ng - L ho ti!5a nd
183 f
5
184
185
186 b7 Pot-- bwo--L h(nd 58 nd- - @R 70 0 0
187 f ee+-- u@ - t@ -n-nd- - -i t+i-ng --F@ve
188 th ouma nd - t he
189 4ru-tid-r@ -dol3:art3
190 -f-o r - - + -1@ - -f- i7 r 7s@- - @-w o
191 t: h c tt!s a n d - -(-@-0 *@ -!3 cl tt a r e - --plus
192 o ti r - @ o 1- l-,It r:i - -@. O-O-)- - T)@- - h u n d r e d
193
1 9 4 POT - -f-i7ve - re
195 f e e L - 0-f - t,of@,- -t-@ -b t - L w 0
196 h d n d r ed- - bw e n t y - -d 0 1- let r m - - (-@ 2.2 0,7 0 0 1/2
197 for-the-Eirmt-five-thou@and-f576Oot
198 cl til"@ -
199
200
201
202 ti For-@-itttnd -feet
203 up- -t@ -er@ - -f-ive-- t! housa nd
204
205 be-four-dolitir6-f$47001-per-hundred
206 f'Llut, re- fee t! -0 r - E rtic t ic n- t he ree3f 7
207 POr--[-i7Ve 5q ua r e
208 f C,@- - @ - -i-rt n
209 t ht)U!Itl nd --(-l o-, -OD t: h c
210 bt- -@ - -iithid t@ -dt>l la r m
211 0 0 --f@r- - @h e-- f e
212 thou!ia -ficl ua -pi tt!i
213 th r ee 3 7 0 0 -Y --p@ -hu ndred
214
215 C P(5 r r e
216 f & et- -0 r,- hm-1-1- -be
217 h u-n-d r --&o 4 -1@r- 5
218 O@)- --E-o f -E- i7 r -s-t- - -t@ n
219 t hc3u ma nd- -"&)- @al@ -@t- -pi u 5
6
2 2 0 $-2-. f)01--per - -itttnd red
2 21 mq uti -r e- -f-tte L-- -f-t thereof 7
2 2 2 wit! ho tit-I ittii t-
2 2 3
224 e of Si.ze iti Base Additional
225 Bkiildiiig Periiiit ,c a (, PeeL Pee Rate Per
226 100 Sq Pt
227
228
229 (1) Residential 100- 2,000 - $6.00
230 2,000- 5,000 $120 5.00
231 5,000-100,000 270 4.00
232 100,000+ 4,070 3.00
2 3 3
234 @2 usiness/ 100- 2,000 - $7.00
235 iiiercantile -2,000- 10,000 $140 6.00
236 10,000- 25,000 620 5.00
237 25,0004- 1,370 4.00
238
239 (3) Institutions 100- 1,000 - $7.00
240 1,000- 5,00n 70 6.00
241 5,000- 20,000 310 5.00
242 20,000+ 1,060 4.00
243
244 00- 1,000 - $7.00
245 1,000- 5,000 $70 6.00
246 s 5,000- 15,000 310 5.00
247 15,000+ 810 4.00
248
249 L51 ra e 00- 2,000 - $4.00
250 2,000- 15,000 $80 3.00
251 15,000+ 470 2.00
252
253 (6) Iiidtistrial 100- 2,000 - $5.00
254 2,000- .-5,000 $100 4.00
255 5,000i 220 3.00
7
2 56
2 57 ( 7 liazardotis storagc@ I 0,0 - 5, 00 0 $ 4 . 0 0
258 or occupaiicy -5,000- 10,000 $200 3.00
259 1.0,0004 350 2.00
2 6 0
2 6 1 (8) Resideiitial 0- 1 , 0 0 0 - $ 4 0 0
262 accessory I,,OOOI $40 2.00
263
264
265 (9) l-'ariii buildii gs 0- 2 , 0 0 0 $ 3 . 0 0
266 2,000t $60 2.00
2 6 7 ra r iii buildiiigs i 1) s L i- i i c L i i i- e s stiall be S Li b j e c t to the
268 requireinents o f t h i secl ioti ; 1) r o v i d e d , tiowever, t I i a t farm
2 6 9 bliildiiiqs aiid structlires riot ti@,ed f(Dr re,@idential Purposes shall
27 0 not be sub-iect to the teclliiical r(-,qti i reiiieill-s of tile Virqil)ia
2 7 1 Unilot-iii Statewide lltiildinq Co-de.
272
273 fat(IO) Alteratic)ris, repairs, privat:e piers, btilkheads, pools,
214 elevators, cc)iiiniercial illterior fillisti, iiiiscellaneous structures:
2/5 a. For a valtialion of lesr, tlian oiie hutidred
276 dollars ($100.00), no fee sliall, be required,
277 uiiless aii inspL'cLioil is necessary, in whicl)
278 case Lliere sliall be a t:tn fifteerl dollar
279 f$107001 fee.
280 b. Tlie niiiiiiiiuiii fee shall be Len fifteen dollars
281 f$10700@ ($15.001.
282 C. For a valuatioil iip Lo five LIIOLlsatid dollars
283 ($5,000-00), tlie Eee stiall 1) L, teil dollars
284 ($10.00) per thotisatid or fractioil tilereof.
285 d. Por a valt'alioil tip Lo aiid iiiciudi.i)g tweilly
286 thousaiid dol,lars ($20,000.00), tile fee shall
2 8 7 L)e fifly doll,ars ($50.oo) for tile Eirst five
288 ttiousai)d d o I I a r s ($5,000.00) plus fivl
2 8 9 dollars $ 5 . 0 0 ) f o r eacti addi.tional 'Diie
29 0 ttiousarid dc)llars ($1,000.00) or f ractioii
291 LliereoE.
8
2 9 2 e For a valuation up I:o and incl.udifig one
2 9 3 liuiidred tilOLIsaild dollars ($100,000.00), the
294 fee sliall be oiie hundred Lwenty-fivL dollars
295 ($125.00) for tlie f i r s t twenty thousand
29 6 dollars ($20,000.00) plus four dollars
2 97 ( $ 4 . 0 0 ) f o r eacli additional thousand or
298 Eractioti thereof.
299 f. Por a valuation over one liuiidred tliotisaiid
300 dollars ($100,000.00) Llie Eec@ stiall be four
301 liundred forty-five dollars ($445.00) for the
3 0 2 f i r s t one liuiidred tliousand d o 1 1 a r s
3 0 3 ($100,000.00) pl.us ttiree dollars ($3.00) for
3 0 4 eacli addilioi)al tliotisatid or fraclioti thereof,
305 wittiout liiliiti.
306 f9f - - - Re@ g
307 re!sidentidi-bui+dingm@
308
309
310 raelciom
ill thereof -
312 b l@o r -on(+/- - t: hoti!iti rid- 17 0 0 0 @cltjti r f-e e L -or -ttior e 7
313 t! he - -Ee@ -iltti 1-1- --b@ - f o -@-4 0-.-0 0 EC5 r
3 1 4 t:h t! -@@ t,- -c)ne- --L-tiotr-itiiid- - 1 7 0 0 0 j @e t
315 ti nd -dc5l I ti r O-)- pe r - -liLHid t@ - tiqutt r e
316 ft!e t -or- f rtic @ ion - t: he r ec f -i -w i t! iic)LI t - I i mi t
317 fiOI-Ftftrm-build+n(ImT
318 tl7 270001
319
320
321 thereoE7
322 b7
3 2 3
3 2 4
3 2 5
326
327 (11) Moving of buildings or structures:
9
3 2 8
3 2 9 1(5ctit! ion -to- -ttritA4@-- -1
3 3 0 or --I ti
331 recluire --i t--t-@-bf---movcd ee
332 shmll-bc-fift!Y-doilmr!i-f$5070o)-.
3 3 3 b7 Por - -IN,3v i- ng - -of- -ti - -C) rye-@@-P -g ti r ng e - @ -el
334 one -5t:or y--tiCC@@t@ -IYLI i-I d i-nej- I i7vi ng
3 3 5 quti r the- -f-@et - -f -i-f -t@-do l la r 5
336 f$50700t-.
337 C Por- -L-htt -ai@ - bu-i-Id-i-r@-f7rntft--one
338 l oca tion - -iTl- -t-@ -c L-Y -,t@ -eitiot-ilt-@ in
3 3 9
340
3dl
342 d Po r - -t-t@--mov irtg - bui -ld i ng- t- he
3 4 3 e i c y--f-r@irt --n- - -locb+ -i OTI- -Ott L-M i d@ - t-0
3 4 4 a not: he r -ou t: m iti +he- -e i t y-, fee
3,15 m h@1-1-- - b@- @,ro -- h-u-ird r @-- -L-i- f -t-p - -d-o
346 f$2507001-.
347 d Po-r- - t h@ - -&n-p - -@i7l-d i n 9--f-rom--a
3 4 8 1 -@i7L-h @n - -L-he! -@ i: L-y - -L-0 - -a- - n
349
350 hundred-fifty-dc)llttrt5-f$25070017
351 Ev Po rom--tl
352
353
354
3 5 5 f 11-t!hr@ugh- (-20)
356 L-'or Llie iiiovin - ail btiildiiig or strLICture
3 5 7 illto, O(IL of, tllt-OLlgh or %4iLliin tlie city, tl)e
358 fee sliall be calctilated in accordaiice with
359 sectiori B-31(cl(l).
360 (12) DeinoliLioi)s:
361 a 7 1,0 r L ii e d eiiio 1 i L i o ii of a ii y r @-i-d &rt L- i ti -1
362 ti e @ s--@-y- - bAi@ -t@- - @ - - g a r ti tj r,- Ii u i I d i ii g or
10
3 6 3 strticture, the fee stiall be five twelity-five
364 dollars f$S-.00y ($25.00).
365 b P(n r -t@attti-I y- j- --t-+@ - f ee
366 :5ht2li-be-ten-c3olitirm-1 $1070017
367 C7
368 fee-mhttll-bc-twenty-dc)llbrm-t$2070017
369
370
371 dc)llars-t$25-.0017
372 fl-4t.(I.3). Signs:
373 a. Fees for LI)e erectioii, paiiiliiig, placing,
374 replacing, repai , liaiiging or relianging of
375 siglis no-t--@ t-ite-r-w i tS@ -tS-t@@i7 f---
376 !iection stiall I,)e based oi) Llie Lotal surface
377 area of tc)tttl all sign faces, and stiall be as
378 follows:
379 ----------
380 25-to-,49- ----------
381 ---------
-J82 ----------
3 8 3 -100-to- ----------
384 -300- tsqutire- f @ct- tifid- ---------
385 ---- 8700
386 (1) Siii(lle
3 8 7 4-32 squar-e f@eel ........... $ 4 0 0 0
388 33-75 sqLlare_fee.L ........... $ 6 0 0 0
389 76-150 square fe(-,t ......... $100.00
390 (2 ble fa@-@ns
391 4-32 square feet .......... $ 80.00
392 33-75 sguare feet .......... $1,00.00
393 76-150 sqtiare feet .......... $120.00
3 9 4 b The- -f ee- t he
395 ro(5-f--of
396
397 e.b- The fee for a periitil for tlie repair of a
11
3 9 8 billboard sliall be ten-@17 -f$107001/2 in
399 accordance witti sectiorl B-31(c)( o@ .
400 C. Fees for tlie erection, paiiltiiig, placifig,
401 repl.acin liaiigiiig elian ir)g of
4 0 2 teniporary @igiis sliall Y)e in all alliount equal
4 0 3 to otie-half (112) of tlie fee chargeable for
4 0 4 peritianenl sigiis of lik-e size.
405 ti5t(14) Penalty: If aiiy coristructioii, alteratioii, repair, or
406 other work reqlliring a periiiit iiiider Lhis article is coiiiiiienced
407 before said periiiit is sectired aiid fee paid for saine, a pelialty of
408 fifty dollars ($50.00) stiall [)e addcd to Llie Eee due. Payntent oE
409 sucli petially sliall noL in atiy way i-elieve ttie violator of any
410 criininal prosectitiozi.
411
4 1 2 churche5-@-+m-i-ld-i n@--Ltm@d r
4 1 3
414 occdpttnCY7
4 1 5 f 1-71 ( 1 5 ) Teii Ls Tents and ollier teiiiporary slructures periiiil fee
416 shall be Eifteeii dollars ($15.00).
417 fiBt(16) Reinspection fee: Tliere shall be a iiiiiiiiiiutii of ten
418 dol-leiTm--(-FjIO704)-) twetily-fi.ve do.l,lars ($25.00) additiojial fee
419 cliarged for eacti reinspection.
4 2 0 ti9f(17)- Appeal: 'I'he fee for subiiiiLLiiig ati appeal to ttle board
4 2 1 of buildiiig codl appeals sliall be Lweiity-five dollars ($25.00).
422 Such fee shall be paid by Lile appellailt.
423 f2Ot(18) ReconiiecL or cliange of use: 'I'liere sliall be a iiiinimum
424 fee of twenty dollars ($20.00) for each itispection.
425 (19) AI)plication for septic tank soil evaluation:
4 2 6 The fee sha e of
4 2 7 ve
4 2 8 perinit sliall beiSS Lled willi no addilional Eee.
429
12
4 30
4 3 1 AdopLed by Llie Couiicil o[ Llie City of Virginia Beacil,
4 3 2 Virginia, on the day o[ 1989.
4 3 3
434 KJC/WMM/epin
435 07/23/87
4 3 6 08/10/87
4 3 7 08/17/87
438 03/09/89
4 3 9 03/15/89
440 04/05/89
441 CA-02363
442 \ordin\proposed\08-031.pro
13
AppROVED AS TO CONN"T
1 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN
2 SECTION 21-205 OF TIIE CODE OF THE
3 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACII, VIRGINIA,
4 PFRTAINING TO SPECIAL PERMITS FOR
5 OVERSIZE AND OVERWEIGIIT VEIIICLES
6 CENERALLY
7
8 BE IT ORDAINED BY TIIE COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF VIRGINIA
9 BEACH, VIRGINIA:
10 That Section 21-205 of the Code of the City of Virginia
11 Beach is hereby amended and reordained to read as follows:
12
13
14 Section 21-205. Special permits for oversize and overweight
15 vehicles generally.
16
17 (a) The city manager may, in his discretioll, upon
18 application in writing accompanied by a fee of twenty-five
19 ($25.00) dollars to cover the cost of processing the application,
20 except for the perntits referenced below, aild good cause beijlg
21 shown therefor, issue a special permit in writing authorizing the
22 applicant to operate or move a veliicle upon the highways of the
23 city of a size or weight exceeding the inaxim@ufn specified in this
24 article. Except as otherwise specifically provided, every such
25 permit may designate the route to be traversed and contain any
26 other restrictioiis or conditions deemed necessary by the city
27 manager.
28 (b) Special permits to operate or move a vehicle upon
29 the highways of the city of a weight exceeding the maximum
30 specified in this article shall be granted without cost wliere the
31 vehicle is hauling or carrying containerized cargo in a sealed,
32 seagoing container bound to or froin a Virginia seaport and has
33 been or will be transported by niarine shipinent, provided the
34 single axle weight does not exceed twenty thousand (20,000)
35 pounds, the tandem axle weight does not exceed thirty-four
36 thousand (34,000) pounds and the gross weight does not exceed
37 seventy-eight thousand (78,000) pounds, and provided the contents
38 of sucli seagoing container are not changed froill the tinle it is
39 loaded by the coiisignor or his agents to the tiine it is delivered
40 to the consignee or his agents. Cargo itioving in vehicles
41 conforming to specifications sliown in this subsection but
4 2 exceediiig axle aiid gross weiglit Iiiriitatiotis shown in this
43 subseclion shall be coiisidered irreducible ai)d eligible for
44 perinits under regulalioris of ttie state liigliway aiid transportation
45 coiiiiiiissioli. 'I'lie reqtiireiiiciil of Lti!L; pat'agrzipli that Lile colitztiiler
46 be bound to or frorii a Virginia seaport need not be riiet if the
47 cargo in tiie coiilaiiier (i) is destined for a seaport outside
48 Virginia atid (ii) coiisisls wliolly of EIrtil products growil in that
49 part of Virginia separated from ttie larger part of the
50 conimonwealth by Llie Chesapeake Bay.
51 (c) The city nianager upon application in writiilg iiiade
52 by tlie owner or operator oE three-axle veiiicles used exclusively
53 for the iiiixing of coticrete in transit or at a project site or for
54 transporting necessary cortiponents in a coiiipartutelitalized vellicle
55 to produce coricrete iinniediately upon arrival at the project site,
56 aiid haviiig a gross weiglit not exceediiig sixty tilousand (60,000)
57 pouiids, a sitigle axle weiglit not exceeding twenty thousand
58 (20,000) polinds, aiid a tandeni axle weight not exceeding forty
59 thousatid (40,000) pout)ds, sliall issue to such owi)er or operator,
60 wittiotit cost, a periiiit iii writii)g aut)iorizirig tlie operat-ion of
such veliicles upon tlie llighways of the City. No such permit
62 shall be issued aLltl)Oriziiig the operation of the vehicles
63 enuiiierated iii Lliis subseclioi) for a distailce of iiiore ttlan twenty-
64 five (25) iniles froin a balciiing plar)t; llowever, the said permit
65 shall noL desigiiale the route to be Lraversed nor contain
66 restr!clions or coiidilions iiot applicable to other vehicles in
67 their geiieral use of Llie higli@4ays.
68 (d) Ttie city titaiiager, upon applicalion ill wriling inade
69 by the owner or operator of ttiree-axle passenger buses,
70 consisling of two (2) sectioii,, joined togetlier by all articulated
71 joinl witil the trailer beiiig equipped witil a mechallically steered
72 rear axle, aiid liaviiig a gross weiglit tiot exceeding sixty thousaild
73 (60,000) pounds, a sitigle axle weiglit not exceeding twenty-five
74 Lliousaiid (25,000) liotifids and a widlli iiot Lo exceed one hiindred
75 Lwo (102) iiicties, stiall issue Lo sucli owiier or operator, williout
76 cost, a periiiit iii writing aLIttiorizitig the operation of sucil
77 vehicles upon tlie Iiighways.
2
78 (e) No permit issued under this section providing for
79 a single axle weight iii excess of twenty thousand (20,000) pounds
80 or for a tandeni axle weight in excess of thirty-four thousand
81 (34,000) pounds shall be issued to include travel on the federal
82 interstate system of highways.
83 (f) Each vehicle, when loaded according to the
84 provisions of a permit issued under tliis section, shall be
85 operated at a reduced speed. Tlie reduced speed limit shall be
86 ten (10) miles per hour slower than the legal speed limit in
87 fifty-five (55), forty-five (45) and thirty-five (35) miles per
88 hour speed limit zones.
89 (g) Every permit issued under this section shall be
90 carried in the vehicle to which it refers and shall be open to
91 inspection by any officer and it shall be a misdenieanor for any
92 person to violate any of the terms or conditions of such special
93 perinit.
94
95 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
96 Virginia, on the day of 1989.
97
98 KJC/epm
99 03/09/89
100 CA-03203
101 \ordin\proposed\21-205.pro
102
103
3
APPnOVEF.) AS TO COrli-t-@l-r,
A 0 RD-89-I 870
CIIY
I AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN
2 SECTION 33-113, OF TIIE CODE OF THE
3 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACII, VIRGINIA,
4 PERTAINING T 0 APPLICATION
5 PROCESSING FEE FOR ENCROACHMENTS
6
7 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF VIRGINIA
8 BEACII, VIRGINIA:
9 That Section 33-113 of the Code of the City of Virginia
10 Beach is hereby amended and reordained to read as follows:
11
12
13 Section 33-113. Application; processing fee.
14
15 Applications for encroachments into public streets and
16 other public ways, places or property shall be made to the
17 department public wor-ks. A fee of one hundred fifty dollars
18 f$100@00t .00 shall be paid to the city for the processing
19 of an application for an encroachment into any public street or
20 other public way, place or property. The director of public
21 works or his authorized representative shall not accept any
22 application unless such fee be paid at the time the application
23 is filed. The department of public works is hereby authorized
24 and directed to prepare and adopt a procedure for the processing
25 of such applications and the reporting to city council of any
26 detrimental effect which a requested encroachment may have on the
27 public health, safety, welfare or interest.
28 City council may deny or grant permission to encroach
29 subject to such terms and conditions as city council may, in its
30 discretion, deem proper. Notwithstanding any other provision of
31 law, city council shall deny any encroachment request it
32 determines, in its discretion, to be detrintental to the public
33 health, safety, welfare or interest.
34 Permission by city council granted hereunder to any
35 person to construct and maintain an encroachment into any public
36 street or other public way, place or property shall not relieve
37 such person or encroachment of coiiiplying witli all otlier
38 applicable laws, regulations and requirements.
39
40
41 Adopted by ttie Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
42 Virginia, on the day of 1 1989.
43
44 KJC/epm
45 03/10/89
46 CA-03207
47 \ordin\proposed\33-113.pro
2
APPROVED AS TO COIlTr@4-r,
Af)ii@ i-) i',, :0 @:01,'@A 0 RD-(S@)-l 867
c
1 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN
2 SECTION 3-24 OF TIIE CODE OF TIIE
3 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACII, VIRGINIA,
4 PERTAINING TO FEES FOR PERMITS FOR
5 SIGNS AND OTIIER ADVERTISING
6 DEVICES
7
8 BE IT ORDAINED BY TIIE COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF VIRGINIA
9 BEACII, VIRGINIA:
10 That Section 3-24 of the Code of the City of Virginia
11 Beacli is hereby amended and reordained to read as follows:
12
13
14 Section 3-24. ree.
15
16 Each application for a permit under this article shall
17 be accompanied by a perinit fee of t,enty-
18 three dollars ($23.00).
19
20 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
21 Virginia, on the day of
1989.
22
23 KJC/epm
24 03/09/89
25 CA-03204
26 \ordin\proposed\03-024.pro
27
28
MEt4T
,AppRO,VEI) AS To LEG@ 0 R 1) - 8 9 8 7 1
y AND FORM
E TO AMEND AND REORDAIN SECTIONS
D 221(b), OF THE CITY ZONING
3 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,
4 VIRGINIA, PERTAINING TO AMENDMENTS AND
5 PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS AND GENERAL STANDARDS
6 FOR CONDITIONAL USES
7
8 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
9 VIRGINIA BEACII, VIRGINIA:
10 That Sections 107(g) and 221(b) of the City Zoning
11 Ordinance of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, are hereby
12 amended and reordained to read as follows:
13
14 Section 107. Amendments.
15 ....
16 (g) Fee. A petition of any property owner to amend,
17 supplemenl or change the regulations, district boundaries, or
18 classification of property shall be accompanied by a--fee
19 htndred-fi-f-ty-@-l@-s--(
20 of @-@-pr itT@ --- Howevet-,--any
21 petition-
22 amendm,"-t--to--&rr-
23 i-07fht- -1- - b e - @ @-by-@-f -dollars
24 f$5GO7OOt7 a fee in the amount of five hundred fifty dollars
25 ($550.00) plus ten dollars ($10.00) per acre for each acre or
26 part thereof over one hundred (100) acres.
27 ....
28
29 Section 221. Procedural requirements and general standards for
30 conditional uses.
31
32 ....
33 (b) Fees. The application shall be accompanied by a-fee-of
34 one-
35 the
36 following fees to cover the costs of processing the application
37 and publication of the notice of public hearing:
38 Six hundred dollars ($600.00) for all applications
39 except:
4 0 (1) Those either submitted by a non-proeit
41 organization or an applicatioll for a home
42 occupation under SS 234 of tile city zoniiig
43 ordinance. The fee for these applications
44 shall be one hundred twenty-Eive dollars
45 ($125.00); or
46 (2) Those submitted to allow a single-family
47 dwelling in AG-1 zoning. The fee for these
48 applications shall be fifty dollars ($50.00).
49
50 ....
51
52 An emergency is hereby declared, and this ordinance shall be
53 effective upon adoption.
54
55 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
56 Virginia, on the day of 1989.
57
58 KJC/epm
59 03/10/89
60 05/02/89
61 05/15/89
62 CA-3208
63 \ordin\proposed\45-106etc.alt
2
All)'ROVEI) AS TO CONTENTS
SIGNAVURE
0 RD-89-I 872
DEPARTMENT
APPROVED AS TO LEGALI
1 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN SECTIONI
2 8.1, AND 8.3 OF TIIE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCESU.ICIENCY AND FORM
3 TIIE CITY OF VIRGINLA BEACII, VIRGINIA,
4 PERTAINING TO PLAT F-'EES AND SUL3DI
5 VARIANCE FEES
6
7 BE IT ORDAINED BY TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF
8 VIRGINIA BEACII, VIRGINIA:
9 That Sections 8.1 aiid 8.3 of tlie Subdivisioii Ordiiiance
10 of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, is hereby anielided and
11 reordained to read as follows:
12 Section 8.1. Plat fees.
13 At: - -t-hc- @!7me- -prel-i:mi:nar ry- pl at-5- -a@ -pr-eaen@ j- - a - -f@ @f-- t: en
14
15 thir+y-f-i@-dollaT-s--f of--original
16 inal
17 subd-iv-is-i@-plat5-,
18 minimum-fee-of-ten-dollar3-t$iO7OOl-per-plat7--Such-fees-shall-be
19 payable-to-the-treasurer-of-the-city7
20 (a) At the time preliminary subdivision plats are
21 submitted, tlie following fees shal.1 be diie and payabl.e froin tile
22 effective date of this orditiance:
23 1) Resi.dential two (2) lot plals - two huiidred dollars
24 ($200.00).
25 2) Residential tliree (3) to (5) five lot plal-s - five
26 hundred dollars ($500.00) plils oiie litindred dollarf, ($100.00)
27 per lot.
28 3) Resideiitial six (6) or more ].ot plats - seven
29 huiidred dollars ($700.00) plus live dol.l.ars ($5.00) per lot
30 after tlie first five (5) I.ots.
31 4) Noii-resideriti.al plals - sevei) Iiiiiidred dollars
32 ($700.00) pltis thi.rt-y dollars ($30.00) per lot.
33 (b) At tlie tiine coi)sl@rtictioii plans are subinit:Led for
34 residential stibdivisioiis of six or more lot pl.ats or for ally noll-
35 residential stibdivisioiis, the following fees sliall be due aj)d
36 payable from tlie e[fecli.ve date of Lliis ordiiiance:
37 one hundred fiftv dc)ll;i,, t@i5O.OO) plus
38
39 linear feet of roadway.
40 @c At tiie tinic final subdi.visioii plats are StibniiLted., the
41 followinq fees shall be due and payable froul the effective date
42 of tliis ordinance:
43 1) Residential six (6) or niore lot I)lats - LtIree
44 hundred fifty dollars $350.00) Plus live dollars
45 first five (5) lots,
46 2) Non-residential p]-ats - tllree huildred f i f t v
47 tliirty doll.a
48 lot.
49 (d) ine duritiq stibdivision review,
50 submits a revised plan or poltioii tllereof, or makes a cliallqe to
51 at the reQLlest OE the Cit
52 Beach, such revision sliall be accotnpaiii.ed by a fee of olle hundred
53 doll per sheet tliat i.s revised or clianqed.
54 (e) If a subdivisioii pi.at does iiot: creat:e a qreater iluinber
55 Of lots, such olat when subniilted shall be Icconil:,aiiied by the
56 following fees:
57 1) Residential plat - fifty dolla
58 2) Non-residentia wo hiindred do]-lars
59 ($200.00).
60 ( f ) When a plat is submit-t(,Cl eiicompassiiig l,atid within a
61 community development tarqet area, iio plat fee sliall be due from
62 ProPerty owners who ritiilify as low atid moderate iiicojiie as
63 determined by the secretary of liotisiiiq and tirbati developmeiit or
64 by the Virainia lioll.-ina Developnietit Authority liiider one (1) or
65 more of tlleir rental assistaj)ce or lioiiieowiier iflorlqaqe proqrallis.
66 Throtigh agreenieiit with Llie ci.Ly, waiver of plal fees inay also be
67 provided to builderr, whn are buildiii(i uiider Llie aforementioned
68 proqrams for low azid ninciprale incoiiie fainilies.
69 (9) All. fees slia.11 be pavable to t@lie city t@reasurer.
70
71
2
72 Section 8.3. Subdivision variance fees.
73 An y- -appen-l- @- @ -rar-i-ance - shall - be- @on@@ -of
74 seventy-five-dollars-f$75@OOf-to-cover-the-co3t-of-publication-of
75 notice-of-public-hearing-and-proce35ing7
76 Any appeal for a variaiice shal.]. be acconipaiiied by the
77 following fees to cover the costs oE processiiig the a22eal and
78 publication of the notice of ptlbl,i.c he
79 From tlie effective date of this orditiatice, L-hree
80 hundred eighty five dollars ($385.00).
81
82 An emergency is liereby declared aiid this ordinance shall be
83 effective upon adoption.
84
85 Adopted by the Council of tlic CiLy of Virgiiiia Beach,
86 Virginia, on the day of 1989.
87
88 KJC/epm
89 03/10/89
90 03/15/89
91 05/02/89
92 05/12/89
93 CA-3209
94 \ordin\proposed\47-008-letc.alt
'"_':'PR~'VED AS TO CONTENTS
SIGNAIURE
AP?ROVED AS TO LEGAL
· -c U,:FJCIENC Y AN~ORM
~ '/'} . URDINANCE ~O AMEND AND REORDAIN SEC'
~11[ A~,Pk~ - ~ obnUll, VIRGINIA,
~ -'1'O ~ PROCEDURE ~ .... , '
APPROVAL ~- u~ ~ 11 g DEVELOPMENT PLAN
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2-7
]8
~9
~0
1
2
3
4
5
6
?
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
That Section 3.2 A.2 of the Site Plan Qrdinance of the
City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, is hereby amended and
reordained to read as follows:
Section 3.2. Procedure for site development plan approval:
A.1. The developer shall cause to be prepared a site
development plan with other material as set forth in
sections 4 and 5.
All
A~-~he-~q~me--tq~c~-m~e-devetopmen~-~pi~n-_i_~_p~ememt. edr_a
~ee--°~-{wen~y--de~r~-~${O~,OOJ--pe~-~5%~_deve~opmene
p~an-mha~-be-pa~d-~o-cover-~he-cos~-O~-exam~na~on_mnd
Pr°cemm~n~v--Such-fee-sha~-be-payab~e-~o_~he_treamurer
of-the-~y~ At the time the site deyelo~}pn~ plan Js
presented, the following fees shall be due and p~able{
~ Residential site plan for two (2) or moro
residences - six hundred dollars ($600.00) .~lus twenty
doliars ($20.00) per unit after the first five (5)
residential units.
~) Non-residential site plan - eight hundred dollars
J_$800.00) plus sixty dollars ($60.00} ~er acre.
~) Duplex site plan four hundred dollars ($400.00)~
d_J There shall be no site ~lan
a site plan encompassing only
dwelling unit.
review fee char_g_ed fo______~r
one (1) single familz
e_~ There shall be no resubmission fee for a~
~].an resubmitted within sixt~60) da~s of the date of
completion of the prior review.
fees shall be ppyable to the city treasurer.
After the site development plan, related materials and
fees have been submitted, it shall be reviewed and
38 processed by the cily agent and other affecled cily
39 agencies for coiiforiiiity to this ordinaiice ajid other
40 applicable regulations. Tlie cily agcjil shall acL upon
41 the site developmeiit plaii aiid related material as
42 submitted by the developer, or as niodified by the site
43 development review process, witliin twenty (20) working
44 days, uiiless extensive modificatioii to Lhe plail or
45 extenuating circumslaiices require addilioi)al time, and
46 if approved, shall certify its approval and state the
47 conditions of such approval, if any, or if disapproved,
48 shall indicate its disapproval alid the reasolis
49 therefor.
50 ....
51
52 An emergency is hereby declared, and this ordiiiaiice
53 shall be effective upon adoptioil.
54
55 Adopted by the Couiicil of tlie CiLy of Virginia Beach,
56 Virginia, on the day of igag.
57
58 KJC/epm
59 03/10/89
60 03/15/89
61 05/02/89
62 05/12/89
63 CA-3212
64 \ordiii\proposed\46-003-2.alt
0 RD-89-1 876)@r
AN ORDINANCE URGING THE WETLANDS
2 BOARD TO INCREASE THE PROCESSING
3 FEE THAT IT CURRENTLY CHARGES UNDER
4 SECTION 1603 OF THE CITY ZONING
5 ORDINANCE TO AN AMOUNT EQUAL To THE
6 WETLANDS PERMIT FEE SET BY CITY
7 COUNCIL IN SECTION 1403 OF THE CITY
8 ZONING ORDINANCE
9 WHEREAS, the City Council has embarked on a
10 comprehensive review of all development-related fees that the
11 City charges for services rendered in processing development
12 applications;
13 WHEREAS, the City has determined that the fees
14 currentiy assessed by the Wetlands Board, pursuant to SS 1603 of
15 the City Zoning Ordinance does not recover an appropriate amount
16 of the City's costs in processing applications submitted under
17 the Coastal Primary Sand Dune Zoning Ordinance;
18 WHEREAS, the City's enabling legislation 62.1-
19 13.25 SS4) specifically grants the Wetlands Board, and not the
20 City Council, the power to establish a processing fee for review
21 of the applications submitted under the Coastal Primary Sand Dune
22 Zoning ordinance;
23 WHEREAS, the City has determined that, if the Wetlands
24 Board were to impose the same fees that the City has imposed in
25 SS 1403 of the City Zoning ordinance, an appropriate amount of the
26 city's costs in processing applications submitted under the
27 Coastal Primary Sand Dune Zoning Ordinance would be recovered;
28 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE
29 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
30 The Wetlands Board is hereby requested to increase the
31 fee that it currently charges under 1603 of the City Zoning
32 Ordinance to an amount equal to the fee charged by the City for
33 wetlands permits under SS 1403 of the City Zoning Ordinance.
34 An emergency is hereby declared, and this ordinance
35 shall be effective upon adoption.
36 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
37 Virginia, on the /@ day of 1989.
38 KJC/dhh
39 05/02/89
40 CA-89-3298
41 \Ordin\Noncode\wetbdfee.ord
2
,, J
Ai)PROVED AS TO CGI'lly 'l-f@
SIG14ATURE
DEPARTt,@ENT
'APPROVED AS TO 0 RD-89-1 "@-'@6
SUFFICIENCY ANI)
-ORDTRXIQCE AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE
CITY@OV,N@y AN
2 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TO INCREASE FEES
3 FOR CERTAIN INSPECTIONS
4 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.2 of the Subdivision
5 Ordinance and Section 7A.1 of the Site Plan Ordinance, permit and
6 inspection fees not specified within the City Code are to be
7 based on cost, as determined by the agency involved;
8 WHEREAS, the current inspection fees charged by the
9 City for subdivisions are 1% of the estimated construction costs
10 for Public Works inspection and fees charged by the City for site
11 plans are $16.50 per hour for Public Works inspections;
12 1 WHEREAS, a report prepared by City staff demonstrates
13 that these current fees do not recover actual costs expended by
14 the City in providing these services;
15 WHEREAS, the City has the power to impose inspection
16 fees to recover all its costs expended in providing these
17 services, but chooses to recover a lesser amount at this time:
18 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
19 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
20 The Department of Public Works is hereby authorized
21 and directed to increase its fee for inspections pursuant to
22 Section 8.2 of the Subdivision Ordinance from 1% of the estimated
23 construction costs to 1.5% of the estimated construction costs
24 and pursuant to Section 7A.1 of the Site Plan Ordinance from
25 $16.50 per hour to $40.00 per hour.
26 An emergency is hereby declared, and this ordinance
27 shall be effective upon adoption.
28 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
29 Virginia, on the day of 1989.
30 KJC/dhh
31 03/15/89
32 05/02/89
3 3 05/12/89
3 4 05/15/89
35 CA-89-3211
36 \ordin\noncode\inspfee.ord
o coN-@, 1.5
APPpOVED AS T
DIIAIITI
APPRC-14ED A's TO 1-c@GAL
SUFFICIENCY ANID Fl-R@'A
ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN
CTION 1403(c) OF THE CITY ZONING
3 ORDINANCE, OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
4 BEACH, VIRGINIA, PERTAINING TO
5 APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS FOR
6 WETLANDS
7 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
8 BEACH, VIRGINIA:
9 That Section 1403(c) of the City Zoning Ordinance, of the
10 City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, is hereby amended and reordained
11 to read as follows:
12 Section 1403. Applications for permits.
13 (a) Any person who desires to use or develop any wetland
14 within this city, other than for those activities specified in
15 section 1402 above, shall first file an application for a permit
16 with the wetlands board directly or through the Commission.
17 (b) An application shall include the following: The name
18 and address of the applicant; a detailed description of the
19 proposed activity and a map, drawn to an appropriate and uniform
20 scale, showing the area of wetland directly affected, with the
21 location of the proposed work thereon, indicating the area of
22 existing and proposed fill and excavation, especially the
23 location, width, depth and length of any proposed channel and the
24 disposal area; all existing and proposed structures; sewage
25 collection an treatment facilities, utility installations,
26 roadways, and other related appurtenances or facilities, including
27 those on adjacent uplands, and the type of equipment to be used
28 and the means of equipment access to the activity site; the names
29 and addresses of owners of record of adjacent land and known
30 claimants of water rights in or adjacent to the wetland of whom
31 the applicant has notice; an estimate of cost; the primary purpose
32 of the project; any secondary purposes of the project, including
33 further projects; the public benefit to be derived from the
34 proposed project; a complete description measures to be taken
35 during and after the alteration to reduce detrimental offsite
36 effects; the completion date of the proposed work, project, or
37 structure and such additional materials and documentation as the
38 wetlands board may deem necessary.
39 (c) A nonrefundable processing fee to cover the cost of
40 processing the application, set: by the appl:ieable geverning bedy
41 with dtie regard f-er t!he et-viees te be L-endered, ine3:ttding the
42 time, slt!3:3: and adntinistrater's expense invelved, shall aeeempany
43 eaeh app3:iea . shall be charged in the amount of seven tenths
44 of one percent (.7%) of the total construction value of the permit
45 item for commercial applications with a minimum fee of two hundred
46 dollars ($200.00) and a maximum fee of two-thousand five hundred
47 dollars ($2,500.00) and one quarter of one percent (.25%) of the
48 total construction value of the permit item for residential
49 applications with a minimum fee of one hundred dollars ($100.00)
50 and a maximum fee of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00).
51 These fees shall apply to original applications, re-
52 applications and requests for variance approval after the fact.
53 An emergency is hereby declared, and this ordinance
54 shall be effective upon adoption.
55 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
56 Virginia, on the 19 day of June 1989.
57 KJC/epm
58 03/10/89
59 05/01/89
60 05/02/89
61 06/14/89
62 CA-3216
63 \ordin\adopted\45-1403et.pro
2
1 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN
2 SECTIONS 8-32, 8-33, AND 8-34 OF THE
3 CODE OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,
4 VIRGINIA, PERTAINING TO PERMIT FEES
5 FOR PLUMBING PERMITS, MECHANICAL AND
6 GAS PERMITS AND ELECTRICAL PERMITS
7 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
8 BEACH, VIRGINIA:
9 That sections 8-32 8-33, and 8-34 of the Code of the
10 City of Virginia Beach is hereby amended and reordained to read as
11 follows:
12 Section 8-32. Same - Plumbing permits.
13 (a) The fee for a permit for plumbing work, as required
14 by the building code, shall be @ fifteen dollars ($19.09)
15 ($15.00) and, in addition thereto, the following:
16 (1) Each plumbing fixture, floor drain
17 or tap: Four dollars ($4.00).
18 (2) Each house sewer connection: Ten
19 dollars ($10.00).
20 (3) Each house water connection: Ten
21 dollars ($10.00).
22 (4) Haeh septle tan't er dr-ainf-ield-,
23 Twenty five dellafg ($25.0-0).
24 (@4) On-site sanitary sewer collector
25 lines, per building: Fifty dollars
26 ($50.00).
27 (fy5) On-site portable potable water
28 distribution lines, per building:
29 Fifty dollars ($50.00).
30 (b) The fees prescribed in this section shall be in
31 addition to the sewer and water connection fees and charges
32 provided for in chapters 28 and 37 of this Code.
33 Section 8-33. Same - Mechanical and gas permits.
34 The minimum fee for any mechanical or gas permit required
35 by the building code shall be @ fifteen dollars ($10.99)
36 ($15.00) with the exception that the fee for the installation of
37 gas outlets for a gas piping system shall be @ fifteen dollars
38 ($10.00) ($15.00), plus two dollars ($2.00) for each additional
39 outlet over two (2). For the installation or replacement of
40 mechanical systems or equipment, the fee shall be at the rate of
41 four dollars ($4.00) per one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) of the
42 current value of all service, labor, materials and equipment.
43 Section 8-34. Same - Electrical permits.
44 (a) The fee for a permit for electrical work, as
45 required by the building code, shall be as specified in this
46 section.
47 (b) There shall be charged a minimum fee of @ fifteen
48 dollars ($19.90) ($15.00) for each permit issued.
49 (c) For a permit issued for a temporary service, such
50 as a trailer, house meter or meter loop added to an existing
51 service, net to exceed one httndred (100) antper",- the fee shall be
52 teft fifteen dollars ($10.09) ($15.00). Eer such a pertnit for
53 these temper-., ever one hundred (100) antperes, the
54 shall be fifteen dollars ($15.09).
55 (d). For a permit for any special condition, such as and
56 including buildings moved, swimming pools, carnivals, services
57 relocated but not increased and the like, the fee shall be a
58 minimum of t," fifteen dollars ($!0.00) ($15.00). The fee for a
59 permit for prefabricated buildings for out-of-city use shall be
60 twenty dollars ($20.00).
61 (e) For a permit issued for original construction, the
62 following fees include all equipment outlets only if specifically
63 listed on the application and installed by the permit holder before
64 the final inspection, such fees being based on the maximum current
65 carrying capacity of each set or subset of service conductors
66 installed, to the nearest fifty (50) amperes:
67 (1) Single phase: Fifteen dollars
68 ($15.00) per fifty (50) amperes.
2
69 (2) Three (3) phase: Twenty dollars
70 ($20.00) per fifty (50) amperes for
71 the first one thousand (1,000)
72 amperes and ten dollars ($10.00) per
73 ampere in excess of one thousand
74 (1,000) amperes.
75 When services are increased or phases added, the fee shall be one-
76 half the rate above, plus the added equipment fee. For fee
77 purposes, the service-panel nameplate amperage rating shall be
78 used.
79 (f) The following fees shall apply in regard to a
80 permit with reference to wiring or equipment connected to an
81 existing service. For each piece of equipment connected and for
82 each circuit or feeder installed, extended, relocated or repaired,
83 the fee shall be:
84 Amperes Conductor Size Fee
85 0-- 30 #14, 12, 10 $ 3.00 each
86 31-- 60 #8, 6 $ 4.00 each
87 61--100 #4, 3, 2 $ 5.00 each
88 101--200 #11 o, 00, 000 $10.00 each
89 Over 200 Over 000 $15.00 each
90 (g) On any electrical work commenced before an
91 electrical permit has been issued and the requisite fee paid
92 therefor, a civil penalty of twenty five fifty dollars ($25.00)
93 ($50.00) per unit shall be added to the fee due. Payment of such
94 penalty shall not in any way relieve the violator from such
95 penalties as may be imposed by the courts.
96 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
97 Virginia, on the 19 day of June 1989.
98 KJC/epm I@ 10
99 03/09/89
100 03/15/89
101 06/14/89
102 CA-03205
103 \ordin\proposed\08-032etc.pro
3
- 18 -
Item V-G. 3.
RESOLUTTONS/ORDINANCES ITEM # 31389
Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Councilwoman Parker, City Council
ADOPTED:
Ordinance to TRANSFER $13,867 from the FY 1989-90
Reserve for Contingencies to the Office of
Environmental Management for a Natural Areas
Inventory.
The City Manager will respond to Councilwoman McClanan's concern if this
information could be integrated with the City's mapping program and thus not be
confronted by significant additional cost.
Councilman Moss expressed concern relative deriving the funds from the Reserve
for Contingencies.
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
June 19, 1989
1 AN ORDINANCE TO TRANSFER $13,867 FROM THE FY 1989-90
2 RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES TO THE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL
3 MANAGEMENT FOR A NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY
4 WHEREAS, the Department of Conservation and Historic Resources
5 (DCHR) has proposed to do a study of the natural areas and resources which are
6 existent within the boundaries of the city;
7 WHEREAS, due to the high concentration of rare species and unique
8 natural areas located in the city, as well as, the rapid urbanization and
9 development, the city was ranked by the DCHR, as their first priority within
10 the state;
11 WHERFAS, this study with three clearly defined parts, is estimated
12 to take two and one half years to complete at a total cost of $83,716 as follows:
13 First Year - data collection $ 13,867
14 Second Year - field inventory 54,624
15 Third Year - analyze and report 15,225
16 716
17 WHEREAS, the city will issue a contract containing a "non-
18 appropriation clause', which will allow tbe city to appropriate each segment of
19 the contract on a yearly basis.
20 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COIJNCIL OF THE CITY OF
21 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
22 That funds in the amount of $13,867 be transferred from the FY 1989-
23 90 General Fund Reserve for Contingencies to the Office of Environmental
24 Management for the purpose of contracting for a Natural Areas Inventory;
25 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED,
26 That the City Manager is authorized to enter into a contract for the
27 study of natural areas within the city boundaries.
28 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia,
29 on the 19 day of June , 1989.
- 19 -
Item V-G.4.
RESOLUTIONS/ORDINANCES ITEM # 31390
Upon motion by Councilman Sessoms, seconded by Councilman Heischober, City
Council ADOPTED:
Ordinance to TRANSFER $50,440 from reserve for
contingencies to the Economic Development FY 1989-
90 Operating Budget for the establishment of an
Economic Development Project Coordinator position.
Councilman Moss requested the funding source not be from the Reserve for
Contingencies and the City Mianager be directed to secure these funds from
existing appropriations. Councilman Moss requested a Memorandum of
Understanding be issued to clarify to all affected parties the relationship of
this position.
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, NaDcy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
June 19, 1989
1 AN ORDINANCE TO TRANSFEP, $50,440 FROM RESERVE
2 FOR CONTINGENCIES TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
3 OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE ESTABLIS@ OF AN
4 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMF.NT PRWECT COORDINATOR POSITION
5
6 WHEREAS, the primary goal of the Economic Development Department is to
7 create an economic envirorunent conducive to investment that will increase the
8 city's tax base and increase employment opportunities for our citizens;
9 WHEREAS, one of the responsibilities of this department is to provide staff
10 support to the Development Authority;
11 WHEREAS, the Development Authority is involved in extensive projects
12 important to the economic development of the city including the existing commer-
13 cial/industrial parks, the proposed Corporate Landing business park, and a
14 possible resort industry development;
15 WHEREAS, this position would expeditiously coordinate the work of profes-
16 sionals and consultants contracted by the Virginia Beach Development Authority,
17 city agencies, and private developers in the purchase and development of Author-
18 ity property;
19 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
20 BEACH, VIRGINIA:
21 That $50,440 be transferred from the FY 1989-90 Operating Budget Reserve for
22 Contingencies to the Economic Development Operating Budget for the establishment
23 of the Economic Development Project Coordinator position.
24 This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its adoption.
25 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the
26 19 day of June 1 1989.
- 20 -
Item V-G.5 a/b/c/d
RESOLUTION/ORDINANCES ITEM # 31391
Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Councilwoman tlenley, City Council
APPROVED upon FIRST READING:
$1,642,000 for the FY 1989-90 School Textbook
Rental Fund Budget.
$8,363,985 for City of Virginia Beach School
Programs funded by Special Categorical Grants for
school year 1989-90.
$11,502,501 for the FY 1989-90 School Cafeteria
Enterprise Fund Budget.
$334,450 for the FY 1989-90 School Athletic
Enterprise Fund Budget.
Councilwoman Henley expressed concern relative equity for other academic
pursuits (debate, band) rather than just an Athletic Enterprise Fund.
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
FentresSS, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
The City Clerk referenced Councilman Moss's letter of March 30, 1989, which
pursuant to Section 2.1-639.14E of the Code of Virginia, Ann., DECLARED
although his wife is a teacher with the Virginia Beach School System, he is
able to review, make recommendations and approve or deny a budget regarding the
School Board fairly, objectively and in the best public interest. (Said letter
is hereby made a part of the proceedings.)
June 19, 1989
joifN D. moss 4021 GLEN ROAD
COUNCILMAN VIRGINIA BEACII. VinGINIA 23452
KEMPSVILLE BOROUGH (004) 498-0310
March 30, 1988
Mrs. Ruth Hodges Smith, CMC
City. Clerk
Municipal Center
Virginia Beach, VA 23456
Re: School Board Budgct
Dear Mrs. Smith:
Pursuant to Section 2.1-639.14E of tlic Code of Virginia,
Ann., I make the following declaration:
1. As a member of the City Council of the City of Virginia
Beach, I have a duty and responsibility to tlic citizcns of
Virginia Beach to review, make recommendations and approve or
deny the School Board budget, and I intend to carry out said
duties as fairly and faithfully as I can; and
2. Pursuant to the State Conflict of Interests Act prior to
taking any action on the School Board budget, I am disclosing
that my wife is a teacher in tlic Virginia Beacli school systcln;
and
3. My wifc, as a tcacher in a profession, nccupat@-on and
group along with 5everal hundred other tcachers, could possibly
be affected by City Council's votc on thc School Board bu@-get;
and
4. I ain able to review, make reconimendations and approve or
deny a budgct regarding the School Board fairly, objectively and
in the public interest even though my wife, is one of many
teachers within the school systein.
Accordingly, I respcctfully requcst that you record this
declaration in the official records of thc City Council. Tliank
you for your assistance and coopcration in this inatter.
Ve'ry t@uly yours,
@ 6))-
n f@ Moss
ncilmember
JDM/CJS/awi
cc: Paul A. Sciortino, Coinmonwealth Attorney
1 AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS OF
2 $1,642,000 FOR THE FY 1989-90 SCHOOL
3 TEXTBOOK RENTAL FUND BUDGET
4 WHEREAS, the Attorney General of Virginia has opined that School
5 Board expenditures of funds generated by the rental of textbooks require an
6 appropriation of the local governing body;
7 WHEREAS, the Virginia Beach School Board has a textbook rental
8 plan whereby rental income is deposited in a textbook rental fund and
9 purchases of textbooks and other related expenses are paid from this fund;
10 WHEREAS, the School Board has submitted a Textbook Rental Fund
11 budget for FY 1989-90 in order to comply with the Attorney General's
12 opinion;
13 WHEREAS, the Textbook Rental budget approved by the School Board
14 included total revenues of $1,642,000 and total disbursements of
15 $1,642,000 for fiscal year 1989-90.
16 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
17 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
18 That funds in the amount of $1,642,000 be appropriated for a
19 School Textbook Rental Fund budget in the manner approved by the School
20 Board.
21 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED:
22 That this appropriation be financed by Estimated Revenues of
23 $1,642,000 in the School Textbook Rental Fund.
24 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED:
25 That funds in the amount of $130,000 in the FY 1989-90 School
26 Operating Fund are transferred to the Textbook Rental Fund.
27 This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its adoption.
28 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia
29 on the day of 1989.
30 FIRST READING: Jiine 19, 1989
31 SECOND READING:
PWC WP1/ORD117
1 AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS OF
2 $8,363,985 FOR CITY OF VIRCINIA BEACH
3 SCHOOL PROGRAMS FUNDED BY SPECIAL
4 CATEGORICAL GRANTS FOR SCHOOL YEAR 1989-90
5 WHERFAS, the Virginia Beach School Board has been notified that
6 it will receive funds of $8,363,985 through special state and federal
7 categorical grants for the school year 1989-90;
8 WHERFAS, these funds were not included in the FY 1989-90 School
9 Operating Budget approved by City Council;
10 WHEREAS, the School Board approved this funding and requests
11 that City Council appropriate these funds;
12 WHEREAS, it is desirable and necessary for the City Council to
13 appropriate these funds prior to the incurrence of the expenditure.
14 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
15 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
16 That funds in the amount of $8,363,985 be appropriated for
17 school purposes for FY 1989-90.
18 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that this appropriation be financed by
19 $8,363,985 estimated revenue from the Federal Goverriment;
20 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that this appropriation is authorized
21 subject to the expenditures being incurred with no local match.
22 This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its adoption.
23 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia
24 on the day of 1989.
June 19, 1989
25 FIRST READING:
26 SECOND READING:
PWC WP1/ORD116
1 AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE @DS OF
2 $11,502,501 FOR THE FY 1989-90 SCHOOL
3 CAFETERIA ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGET
4 WHEREAS, the Attorney General of Virginia has opined that School
5 Board expenditures of funds generated by the sale of cafeteria meals re-
6 quire an appropriation of the local governing body;
7 WHEREAS, the Virginia Beach School Board has a cafeteria meal
8 program whereby meal income is deposited in a cafeteria enterprise fund
9 and purchases of food and other related expenses are paid from this fund;
10 WHEREAS, the School Board has submitted a Cafeteria Enterprise
11 Fund budget for FY 1989-90 in order to comply with the Attorney General's
12 opinion;
13 WHEREAS, the Cafeteria Enterprise Fund budget approved by the
14 School Board included total revenues of $11,502,501 and total disburse-
15 ments of $11,502,501 for fiscal year 1989-90.
16 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
17 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
18 That funds in the amount of $11,502,501 be appropriated for a
19 School Cafeteria Enterprise Fund budget in the manner approved by the
20 School Board.
21 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED:
22 That this appropriation be financed by Estimated Revenues of $11,502,501
23 in the School Cafeteria Enterprise Fund.
24 This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its adoption.
25 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia
26 on the day of 1989.
27 FIRST READING: June 19, 1989
28 SECOND READING:
PWC WP1/ORD250
I AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS OF
2 $334,450 FOR THE FY 1989-90 SCHOOL
3 ATHLETIC ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGET
4 WHEREAS, the School Board expenditures of funds generated by the
5 sale of admissions to high school football games, basketball games, gym-
6 nastics meets, and wrestling matches require an appropriation of the local
7 governing body;
8 WHEREAS, the Virginia Beach School Board has an athletic program
9 whereby admissions income is deposited in an athletic enterprise fund and
10 disbursements from this account are used to purchase athletic equipment
11 and uniforms, to pay officials, and to provide miscellaneous supplies;
12 WHEREAS, the School Board has submitted a budget for the
13 Athletic Enterprise Fund for FY 1989-90;
14 WHEREAS, the Athletic Enterprise Fund budget approved by the
15 School Board included total revenues of $334,450 and total disbursements
16 of $334,450 for fiscal year 1989-90.
17 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
18 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
19 That funds in the amount of $334,450 be appropriated for a
20 School Athletic Enterprise Fund budget in the manner approved by the
21 School Board.
22 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED:
23 That this appropriation be financed by Estimated Revenues of
24 $334,450 in the School Athletic Enterprise Fund.
25 This ordinance shall be effective from the dale of its adoption.
26 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia
27 on the day of 1989.
28 FIRST READING: Juen 19, 1989
29 SECOND RFADINC:
PWC WPI/ORD119
- 21 -
Item V-H.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 31392
Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Councilwoman Henley, City Council
APPROVED in ONE MOTION Ttems 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 of
the CONSENT AGENDA.
Items V-H.8 and 9 were voted upon separately.
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Reba
S. McClanan", John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Abstaining:
"Councilwoman Reba S. McClanan VERBALLY ABSTAINED on
Item V-G.7 and V-G.13 (b). Councilwoman McClanan
believed her husband, Delegate Glen McClanan was
involved in the closing of this piece of property.
Councilwoman McClanan is a Member of the Board of
Humana liospital Bayside Auxiliary.
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
une
- 22 -
Item V-H.I.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 31393
Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Councilwoman Henley, City Council
ADOPTED:
Ordinance to AMEND and REORDAIN Section 6-121 of
the Code of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia,
re reckless boating.
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and Williapi D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council @'lembers Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
June 19, 1989
APPROVED AS
SIGNATURE
I
DEPARTMENT
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
1 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN
2 SECTION 6-121 OF THE CODE OF THE
3 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA,
4 PERTAINING TO RECKLESS BOATING
5
6 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
7 BEACH, VIRGINIA:
8 That Section 6-121 the Code of the City of Virginia
9 Beach is hereby amended and reordained to read as follows:
10
11
12 Section 6-121. Reckless boating, skiing, etc.
13
14 (a) It shall be unlawful and a Class 1 misdemeanor for
15 any person to operate any motor boat or other vessel, or to
16 manipulate any water skis, surfboard or other similar device, or
17 engage in spearfishing while skindiving or scuba diving on or in
18 any of the waters in the city, in a reckless or negligent manner
19 so as to endanger or be likely to endanger the life, limb or
20 property of any person.
21 (b) Notwithstanding the foregoing provision of this
22 article, upon the trial of any person charged with a violation
23 thereof where the degree of culpability is slight, the court in
24 its discretion may find the accused not guilty of reckless
25 boating, skiing, surfboarding or spearfishing but guilty of
26 improper boating, skiing, surfboarding or spearfishing and impose
27 a fine not exceeding fifty dollars ($50.00).
28 fbt(c) It shall be unlawful for any person to operate
29 or manipulate any motor boat, tow rope or other device by which
30 the direction or location of water skis, surfboards and other
31 similar devices may be affected or controlled in such a way as to
32 cause the water skis, surfboards or other similar devices, or any
33 person thereon, to collide with any object or person. A
34 violation of this subsection shall be punished by a fine of not
35 more than fifty dollars ($50.00).
36 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
37 Virginia, on the lgh day of 1989.
38
39 WEB/epm
40 08/09/88
41 05/05/89
42 05/10/89
43 CA-02877
44 \ordin\proposed\06-121.pro
45
2
- 23 -
Item V-H.2.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 31394
Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Councilwoman Henley, City Council
ADOPTED:
Ordinance to AMEND and REORDAIN Section 7-11 of the
Code of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, re
restrictions on renting Mopeds.
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Nlembers Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
June 19, 1989
APPROVED AS TO CONTENTS
SIGNATURE
DEPARTMENT
APPROVED As TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY AND FOPM
ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN
CTION 7-11 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY
VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA,
ERTAINING TO RESTRICTIONS ON
NTING MOPEDS
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
BEACH, VIRGINIA:
That Section 7-11 of the Code of the City of Virginia
Beach is hereby amended and reordained to read as follows:
Section 7-11. Restrictions on renting mopeds.
It shall be unlawful for an owner, manager, operator or
employee of a moped rental business to:
(1) Lease or rent a moped to any person under sixteen
(16) years of age.
(2) Lease or rent, or offer to lease or rent, a moped
which produces speeds in excess of thirty (30)
miles per hour on a level surface.
(3) Require or accept as security or surety any
Operators' license, military identification card or
other permit or pass issued by any state or federal
agency.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
Virginia, on the Igth day of Junp 1989.
WEB/epm
05/05/89
CA-03312
\ordin\proposed\07-Oll.pro
- 24 -
Item V-H.3.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 31395
Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Councilwoman Henley, City Council
ADOPTED:
Ordinance to AMEND and REORDATN Section 23-42 of
the Code of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia,
re the concealing, destroying, et cetera of City
Records.
Major Payne advised Councilman Moss this Ordinance only pertained to law
enforcement investigative records
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. flenley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
@P@ A'J' T@-i CO@@TENTS
,)'-PARTMENT
,6,1@@r,,-@VED AS TO LEGAL
SUI-FICIENCY AND FOPM
N ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN
ECTION 23-42 OF THE CODE OF THE
3 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA,
4 PERTAINING TO CONCEALING,
5 DESTROYING, ETC., CITY RECORDS
6
7 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,
8 VIRGINIA:
9 That Section 23-42 of the Code of the City of Virginia Beach
10 is hereby amended and reordained to read as follows:
11
12
13 Section 23-42. Concealing, destroying, etc., city records.
14
15 (a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes,
16 alters, mutilates, obliterates or destroys, or attempts to do so
17 or with intent to do so takes and carries away, any record,
18 proceeding, map, book, paper, document or other thing filed or
19 deposited in any public office of the city or with any public
20 officer of the city shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.
21 (b) Whoever, having the custody of any record, proceeding,
22 map, book, document, paper or other thing belonging to the city,
23 willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, alters, mutilates,
24 obliterates, falsifies or destroys the same, or permits another to
25 do so, shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor and, in addition,
26 shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any
27 office with the city.
28 (c) Whoever having, or having had access in an official
29 capacity to any official record or report pertaining to any
30 criminal investigation, including written documents, computer data
31 and/or photographically recorded materials, who uses or knowingly
32 permits another to use such record or report or portion thereof
33 for any purpose not consistent with the exemptions permitted in
34 Section 2.1-342 of the Code of Virginia or other provision of
35 state law or city ordinance, shall be guilty of a Class 2
36 misdemeanor.
37 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
38 Virginia, on the 19th day of June , 1989.
39
40 WEB/epm
41 05/05/89
42 06/14/89
43 CA-03311
44 \ordin\proposed\23-042.pro
2
- 25 -
Item V-H.4.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 31396
Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Councilwoman Henley, City Council
APPROVED:
Annual Ambulance Permit Renewal for area private,
municipal and non-profit organizations, pursuant to
Section 10.5-2 of the Code of the City of Virginia
Beach, Virginia:
Norfolk General Cardiac Diagnostic Unit
Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters
Norfolk Paramedical Rescue Services
Nightingale Air Ambulance
City of Chesapeake Fire/EMS
Central Virginia Ambulance Service
Tidewater Ambulance Service
Medical Transport, Inc.
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. lienley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
June 19, 1989
- 26 -
Item V-H.5.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 31397
Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Councilwoman Henley, City Council
APPROVED upon FIRST READING:
Ordinance to APPROPRIATE $1,447,484 to the
Department of Public Utilities due to an increase
in the rate of water purchased from the City of
Norfolk.
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara ill. Henley, Reba
S. l@IcClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
June 19, 1989
1 AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS OF $1,447,484
2 TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES DUE TO AN INCREASE
3 IN THE RATE OF WATER PURCHASED FROM THE CITY OF NORFOLK
4 WHEREAS, due to an increase in the rate of water purchased from the City of
5 Norfolk, on June 5, 1989, the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach amended
6 the City Code increasing the water rate charged to customers from $2.18 to $2.32
7 per thousand gallons effective as of July 1, 1989;
8 WHEREAS, the revised rate will result in an operating budget increase of
9 $1,447,484 for the purchase of water;
10 WHEREAS, the increase in appropriations will be offset by a like increase in
11 estimated revenues from the sale of water to customers;
12 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
13 BEACH, VIRGINIA:
14 That funds in the amount of $1,447,484 are hereby appropriated to the
15 Department of Public Utilities for an increase in the rate of water purchased
16 from the City of Norfolk.
17 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED:
18 That the increase in appropriations be offset by a like increase in es-
19 timated revenues from the sale of water.
20 This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its adoption.
21 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the
22 day of , 1989.
23 First Reading: June 19, 1989
24 Second Reading: APPROVED AS TO CONTENTS
SIGNATbRE
DEPARTMENT
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY AND FORM
- 27 -
Item V-H.6.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 31398
Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Councilwoman Henley, City Council
APPROVED upon FIRST READING:
Ordinance to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE $8,196 Grant
from the Virginia Department of Housing and
Community Development for an Emergency Home Repair
Program.
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara r@. Heilley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
June 19, 1989
ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE $8,196 FROM THE
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
FOR AN EMERGENCY HOME REPAIR PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Commonwealth of Virginia has established the
Virginia Housing Partnership Fund to encourage the improvement of
housing opportunities for low-income Virginians; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Housing and Community
Development has authorized grants under this program to
localities to provide emergency home repairs to eligible
citizens; and
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Housing and Community
Development has informed the City that $8,196 has been awarded to
the City for such emergency repairs;
NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCFL OF THE CITY OF
VIRGINIA BEACH that a grant of $8,196 from the Virginia
Department of Housing and Community Development for emergency
home repairs is accepted and appropriated to the City of Virginia
Reach's Department of Housing and Community Development.
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED THAT the City Manager is authorized
to execute a grant agreement with the Virginia Department of
Housing and Community Development accepting such funds.
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED THAT the City of Virginia Beach will
comply with all requirements of this program as set forth by the
Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development.
Adopted by the Council of tbe City of Virginia Beach on the
day of 1989.
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: APPROVED AS TO FORM
37
A"
Maryinn@l. Ustick, Director City Attorney
Department of Housing and
Community Development
First REading: June 19, 1989
- 28 -
Item V-H.7.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 31399
Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Councilwoman lienley, City Council
APPROVED upon FIRST READING:
Ordinance to APPROPRIATE $167,500 of funds in the
School Site Acquisition Fund; and, TRANSFER the
funds to the project account for the future
construction of Ocean Lakes High School.
Voting: 9-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Ileischober, Barbara M. Henley, John
D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L. Perry and William
D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Abstaining:
"Councilwoman Reba S. McClanan VERBALLY ABSTAINED on
Item V-G.7 and V-G.13 (b). Councilwoman McClanan
believed her husband, Delegate Glen McClanan, was
involved in the closing of this piece of property.
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
The City Clerk referenced Councilman Moss's letter of March 30, 1989, which
pursuant to Section 2.1-639.14E of the Code of Virginia, Ann., DECLARED
although his wife is a teacher with the Virginia Beach School System, he is
able to review, make recommendations and approve or deny a budget regarding the
School Board fairly, objectively and in the public interest. (Said letter is
hereby made a part of the proceedings.)
1 AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $167,500 OF FUNDS
2 IN THE SCHOOL SITE ACQUISITION FUND AND TRANSFER
3 THE FUNDS TO THE PROJECT ACCOUNT FOR THE FUTURE
4 CONSTRUCTION OF OCEAN LAKES HIGH SCHOOL
5 WHEREAS, agreements have been executed between two property owners and
6 the city of Virginia Beach for the acquisition of 6.127 acres of land to be used
7 for the future construction of Ocean Lakes High School;
8 WHEREAS, R. G. Moore Co. has agreed to pay for the acquisition and has
9 deposited with the city the necessary amount of $167,500 for the purchase of the
10 land;
11 WHEREAS, it is necessary to appropriate the receipt in the School Site
12 Acquisition Fund and, subsequently, to transfer the like amount to the capital
13 project fund to properly account for the land acquisition.
14 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
15 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
16 That funds in the amount of $167,500 are hereby appropriated to the
17 School Site Acquisition Fund for the purchase of land for the future construction
18 of Ocean Lakes High School.
19 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED:
20 That funds in the amount of $167,500 are hereby transferred to Project
21 1-010 Ocean Lakes High School to properly account for the land acquisition.
22 This ordinance shall be in effect from the date of its adoption.
23 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the
24 day of 1989. 10 co@@
25 First Reading: June 19, 1989
26 Second Reading:
DE,
OPROV,
- 29 -
Item V-H.8.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 31400
Dr. Fred G. Benham, Assistant Superintendent for Financial Services, advised
the amounts in the Transfer directly related to Courthouse Elementary School
involve between $65,000 and $70,000 whicli would entail furniture and equipment
(primarily computers utilized by the School Planning Center). Other funds
related to the Butler Building at the Center for Effective Learning.
Upon motion by Councilwoman Henley, seconded by Councilinan Sessoms, City
Council ADOPTED:
Ordinance to TRANSFER $1,590,000 between categories
in the FY 1988-89 School Operating Fund to cover
unanticipated expenditures and to increase
estimated revenues by $280,000 in the textbook
rental fund as a result of these transfers.
Councilman Moss advised schools are consistently being taken out of production
and valuable property is never surplused to bring in funds to build faciliies
in other locations where land is less expensive. Councilman Moss did not
believe the report justified the decision being implemented. Councilman Moss
requested a full explanation relative the utilization of Courthouse Elementary
School by the School Board.
Voting: 7-3
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, John
L. Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
Reba S. McClanan, John D. Moss and Nancy K. Parker
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
The City Clerk referenced Councilman Moss's letter of March 30, 1989, which
pursuant to Section 2.1-639.14E of the Code of Virginia, Ann., DECLARED
although his wife is a teacher with the Virginia Beach School System, he is
able to review, make recommendations and approve or deny a budget regarding the
School Board fairly, objectively and in the public interest. (Said letter is
hereby made a part of the proceedings.)
1 AN ORDINANCE TO TRANSFER FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT
2 OF $1,590,000 BETWEEN CATEGORIES IN THE FY 1988-89
3 SCHOOL OPERATING FUND TO COVER UNANTICIPATED EXPENDITURES
4 AND TO INCREASE ESTIMATED REVENUES BY $280,000 IN THE
5 TEXTBOOK RENTAL FUND AS A RESULT OF THE TRANSFERS
6 WHEREAS, for fiscal year 1988-89 Council appropriated funds to the
7 School Board by major category as is permitted by statute;
8 WHEREAS, during the year, several costs were incurred that have caused
9 the unanticipated expenditure of funds from certain categories resulting in a
10 total of $1,590,000 of excess expenditures over appropriations;
11 WHEREAS, funds are available in other categories and line items to
12 compensate for the unanticipated costs.
13 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
14 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
15 That funds in the amount of $1,590,000 are hereby transferred between
16 categories in the School Operating Fund as shown below to match appropriations
17 and expenditures for major categories:
18 School Operating Fund
19 Transfer from:
20 50010 - Instruction $ 1,370,000
21 50023 - Pupil Transportation 100,000
22 50081 - Summer School 50,000
23 50082 - General Adult Education 40,000
24 50083 - Other Educational Programs 30,000
25 Total Transfer From $ 1590 000
26 Transfer to:
27 50021 - Administration $ 200,000
28 50022 - Attendance and Health 100,000
29 50090 - Capital Outlay 1,010,000
30 90000 - Transfer to Textbook Rental Fund 280,000
31 Total Transfer To $1 590 000
32 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED:
33 That the appropriations in the Textbook Rental Fund be increased by
34 $280,000 to be offset by a like increase in estimated revenues as a result of a
35 transfer from the Scbool Operating Fund.
36 This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its adoption.
37 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the
38 19 day of June 1989.
- 30 -
Item V-H.9
CONSENT AGENDA TTFIA # 31401
C. Oral Lambert, Jr., Director of Public Works, responded to City Council
concerns.
Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Councilman Perry, City Council
ADOPTED:
Ordinance to TRANSFER $110,000 to Project #2-079
International Parkway Improvements to cover
Sidewall( Construction Expenses.
Voting; 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
1 AN ORDINANCE TO TRANSFER FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $110,000
2 TO PROJECT # 2-079 INTERNATIONAL PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS
3 TO COVER SIDEWAIY, CONSTRUCTION EXPENSES
4 WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach desires to improve the City's
5 transportation system through the construction and maintenance of highways and
6 arterials throughout the City;
7 WHEREAS, project # 2-079 International Parkway Improvements has been
8 created to fund the construction of intersection and roadway improvements on
9 International Parkway between Lynnhaven Parkway and London Bridge Road;
10 WHEREAS, a greater amount of office space development versus industrial
11 space development has occurred in the Oceana West Industrial Park and a
12 concurrent need for sidewalks along International Parkway has arisen;
13 WHEREAS, the additional cost of constructing sidewalks along
14 International Parkway is $110,000 and the coordination of sidewalk
15 construction with on-going improvements on International Parkway wlll minimize
16 construction activity along International Parkway;
17 WHEREAS, additional funding may be provided from the transfer of
18 appropriations from project # 2-836 Haygood Road since the project is
19 substantially complete and has excess appropriations.
20 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
21 BEACH, VIRGINIA:
22 That funds in the amount of $110,000 are hereby transferred from project
23 2-836 Haygood Road to project # 2-079 International Parkway Improvements for
24 sidewalk construction.
25
26 This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its adoption.
27 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the
28 19 day of June , 1989.
- 31 -
Item V-H. 10
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 31402
Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Councilwoman Henley, City Council
ADOPTED:
Ordinance to TRANSFER $550 from the General Fund's
Reserve for contingencies to the Police Chief's
Division for reimbursement of legal expenses
incurred by a City Employee in the performance of
his duty.
Voting: 10-0
Council @lembers Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
June 19 1989
APPROVED AS TO CONTENTS
S16WAfbitE
6EPARTMENT
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
D FORM AN ORDINANCE TO TRANSFER FUNDS OF
$550.00 FROM THE GENERAL FUND'S
RESERVE FOR CONTINGENCIES TO THE
RNEY POLICE CHIEF'S DIVISION FOR
4 REIMBURSEMENT OF LEGAL EXPENSES
5 INCURRED BY A CITY EMPLOYEE IN
6 THE PERFORMANCE OF HIS DUTY
7
8 WHEREAS, a Virginia Beach animal control officer was charged
9 with assault while performing assigned duties; and
10 WHEREAS, the General District Court dismissed the case; and
11 WHEREAS, the officer is seeking reimbursement from the City
12 for his legal fees in accordance with SS 15.1-131.6, Va. Code
13 Ann.; and
14 WHEREAS, City Council considers this request reasonable and
15 proper,
16 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
17 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
18 That funds of $550.00 be transferred from the General Fund's
19 Reserve for Contingencies to the Police Chief's Division for
20 legal fees involving the above incident.
21 This Ordinance shall become effective upon the date of its
22 adoption.
23 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
24 Virginia, on this 19 day of June 1989.
25 DGA
26 legfees.ord
27 5/23/89
28
- 32 -
Item V-H.11
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 31403
Upon motion by Councilman Baurl, seconded by Councilwoman Henley, City Council
APPROVED:
COST PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT:
HOLLAND WOODS (CIP 5-306) Water $26,369.00
(CIP 6-316) Sewer $ 7,483.00
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
June 19 1989
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY AND @O@
Cl ATIO'll M ORDINANCE TO AUTHORIZE AND DIRECT
THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE COST
PARTICIPATION AGREEMENTS
WHEREAS, Holland Woods Associates is desirous of
developing land located in the Princess Anne Borough in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the city ordinances,
and
WHEREAS, the city desires to enter into cost
participation agreements requesting the developer to engage in
construction greater in scope than is necessary for the project
in order to provide water and sewer services to customers outside
the project limits, and
WHEREAS, the city's share of costs is estimated at
$ 2 6 , 3 6 9for water improvements, and $7 , 483 for sewer
improvements with such costs to be charged to project #5-306
Water Request and Agreement Projects and #6-316 Various Sewer
Projects, respectively, and
WHEREAS, such construction at this time will provide
for future needs and prevent the city from having to incur
additional operating and maintenance costs at a later date.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH that the City Manager is hereby authorized
and directed to execute cost participation agreements with
Holland Woods Associates for construction of water and sewer
facilities. Said proposed agreements are hereby attached and
approved.
This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its
adoption.
Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach,
Virginia on the -19 day of June 1 1989.
- 33 -
Item V-H.12
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 31404
Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Councilwoman Henley, City Council
ADOPT'ED:
Ordinance declaring excess property at 3561 Shawn
Court and authorizing the City Manager to dispose
of same.
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
1 AN ORDINANCE DECLARING
2 CERTAIN PROPERTY EXCESS
3 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
4 MANAGER TO DISPOSE OF
5 SAME
6
7 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
8 BEACH, VIRGINIA:
9 WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach acquired ownership
10 of the following described property by deed recorded in Deed Book
11 2649, at page 1033; and
12 WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the
13 following described property is in excess of the needs of the
14 City of Virginia Beach.
15 NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the Council of the
16 City of Virginia Beach, Virginia;
17 1. That the following described property is hereby
18 declared to be in excess of the needs of the City of Virginia
19 Beach and that the City Manager is authorized to convey said
20 property in the manner he deems in the best interests of the City
21 of Virginia Beach reserving therein any and all easements
22 pertaining thereto, and further that such property to be declared
23 in excess of the needs of the City is more particularly described
24 as follows:
25 All that certain lot, tract or
26 parcel of land together with
27 improvements thereon belonging,
28 lying, situated and being in the
29 City of Virginia Beach, Virginia
30 and designated and described as:
31 "LOT 1 IN BLOCK All as shown on that
32 certain plat entitled:
33 "RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCKS
34 A,B,C,O,M,L,J AND K AND PORTIONS OF
35 GREENBELTS -M-1-Al AND -M-1-BI AS
36 SHOWN ON PLAT OF GREEN RUN P.U.D.
37 SUBDIVISION SECTION M-1 (M.B. 110,
38 P.34) PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH---
39 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA." Said
40 plat has been recorded in the
41 Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court
42 in the City of Virginia Beach,
43 Virginia in Map Book 120, at Page
44 19 to which reference is made for a
45 more particular description.
46
47 It being a part of the same
48 property conveyed to the City of
49 Virginia Beach, Virginia, by deed
50 of Frank E. P. Klages, Jr., et ux,
51 dated May 14, 1987 and recorded in
52 the Clerk's Office of the Circuit
53 Court of the City of Virginia
54 Beach, Virginia, in Deed Book 2649,
55 at page 1033.
56
57 2. This ordinance shall be effective from the date of
58 its adoption.
59 Adopted by the Council of the City of Virginia Beach on
60 the 19 day of June 1989.
61
62
63
64 JAR/ih
65 CA-3089
66 01/11/89
67 (encroach\shawn.ord)
A three-fourths (3/4) vote of Council is required for adoption.
[APPROVED AS TO CONTENTS
2
........ . .
ui
in
........ ......
.... ..... .
.1161
lily
re,
-----------
0
69 37i
(P
SHAWN CT
I I I!:. ily I
SITE
69 21%
om
3561 SHA WN COURT
Scale 1"=100'
Date 11/8/88
SEI
2, @Wl CR -;7
C-)I
WIDE; SIDEWI LK
@36.44
00),
5
PROPERTY OF
MARTIN WILLIAMS
UJ
nT
I p@
IZED
FOR CANAL IR
C*4
0.
L)
z
cn
- 34 -
Item V-H. 13
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 31405
Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Councilwoman Henley, City Council
APPROVED:
BINGO/RAFFLE PERMITS
FIRST COLONIAL BAND BOOSTERS Bingo
HUMANA HOSPITAL BAYSIDE AUXILIARY Rafflell
SONS OF ITALY (RO@IA LODGE) Raffle
VIRGINIA BEACH SPCA Raffle
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara @l. Henley, Reba
S. McClanani@, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council iviembers Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
*Councilwoman McClanan VERBALLY ABSTAINED on the Raffle for Humana Hospital
Bayside as she is a member of the Board of Humana Hospital Bayside Auxiliary.
June 19, 1989
- 35 -
Item V-H. 14
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 31406
Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Councilwoman Henley, City Council
APPROVED:
CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY
BEACH LIMOUSINE SERVICES, INC.
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
June 19 1989
- 36 -
Ttem V-H.15
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 31407
Upon motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Councilwoman Henley, City Council
ADOPTED:
Ordinance authorizing Tax Refunds in the amount of
$1,499.27 upon application of certain persons and
upon certification of the City Treasurer for
payment.
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara @l. Henley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
RM NO. C.A. 7 6/6/89 EMC
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING TAX FTEFUNDS
UPON APPLICATION OF CERTAIN PERSONS
AND UPON CERTIFICATION OF THE TREASURER
FOR PAYMENT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA:
That the following applications for tax refunds upon certification of the Treasurer are hereby approved:
NAME Tax Type Ticket Exonera- Date Penalty I nt. Total
Year of Tax Number tion No. Paid
Newman Homes Inc 88 RE(1/2) 79347-1 12/2/87 34.91
NewTnan Homes Inc 88 RE(2/2) 79347-1 6/5/88 34.91
Ameribanc Savings Banc 89 RE(1/2) 13583-2 11/20/88 4.58
Investors Savings Bank 88 RE(2/2) 122986-5 6/1/88 200.04
The Runnymede Corp 89 RE(1/2) 96518-7 11/29/88 91.50
City Federal Savings Bank 89 RE(1/2) 27280-0 12/5/88 22.88
Robert J & Linda Schwechten 89 RE(1/2) 99661-6 12/5/88 9.45
Sovran Mortgage Corp 88 RE(1/2) 53537-6 12/5/87 37.87
Sovran Mortgage Corp 88 RE(2/2) 53537-6 6/5/88 37.87
Sovran Mortgage Corp 87 RE(1/2) 51528-2 12/1/86 39.07
Sovran Mortgage Corp 87 RE(2/2) 51528-2 6/5/87 39.07
Sovran Mortgage Corp 86 RE(1/2) 49157-5 12/5/85 49.90
Sovran Mortgage Corp 86 RE(2/2) 49157-5 6/5/86 49.90
Monds Rentals 88 RE(1/2) 72844-4 6/5/88 241.95
Monds Rentals 88 RE(2/2) 72844-4 6/5/88 208.29
Cenland Assoc Ltd Partnership 89 RE(1/2) 18992-6 11/23/88 22.88
First Union Mortgage Corp 89 RE(1/2) 9351-0 11/30/88 78.01
Witchduck Fuel Oil & Burner 89 RE(1/2) 122192-4 5/9/89 106.31
William E & Mary Woodhouse 89 RE(1/2) 122810-6 12/5/88 24.40
Colonial Mortgage Co 89 RE(1/2) 49664-8 11/21/88 77.78
Colonial Mortgage Co 88 RE(1/2) 48047-9 12/5/87 43.85
Colonial Mortgage Co 88 RE(2/2) 48047-9 5/16/88 43.85
Total 1,499.27
This ordinance shall be effective from date of adoption.
The above abatement(s) totaling c to paymo
$1,499.27 were approved by
the Council of the City of Virginia
Beach on the 19day of junq, 1989
7o ph( Atk@@so@
p Zed as to form:
Ruth Hodges Smith
City Clerk
Kevii nterim City Attorney
- 37 -
Item V-I. I
APPOINTMENTS ITENI # 31408
BY CONSENSUS, City Council RESCffEDULED the following APPOINTMENTS:
FRANCIS LAND HOUSE BOARD OF GOVERNORS
SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION
TIDEWATER REGIONAL GROUP HOME COMMISSION
June 19, 1989
- 38 -
Item V-I. 2
APPOINTMENTS ITEM # 31409
Upon NOMINATION by Councilman Balko, City Council REAPPOINTED:
SOCIAL SERVICES BOARD
Howard M. Williams
(4-year term from 7/1/89 - 6/30/93)
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
June 19 1989
- 39 -
Item V-I.3
APPOINTMENTS TTEM # 31410
Upon NO@IINATION by Councilwoman Henley, City Council REAPPOINTED:
TIDEWATER COMMMITY COLLEGE BOARD
Barbara M. Cromwell
(4-year term: 7/1/89 -6/30/93)
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
June 19, 1989
- 40 -
Item V-J. 1.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS ITEM # 31411
Councilman Moss referenced the meeting of the "TURN OF THE CENTURY STRATEGIC
PLANNING COMMITTEE" on Tuesday, June 27, 1989, 7:00 P.M. at the Central
Library.
Councilman Moss advised that during the third meeting on Tuesday, June 13,
1989, at Old Donation School for the Talented and Gifted, much discussion
entailed the subject of excellence and "children at risk". Councilman Moss
relayed the concerns of Councilman Sessoms.
The "TURN OF THE CENTURY STRATEGIC PLANNING COMITREE" agreed to extend their
time line to September. The Chamber of Commerce is investigating polling all
1200 members in a survey.
- 41 -
Item V-K. 1.
NEW BUSINESS ITEM # 31412
Giles Dodd, Assistant City Manager for Administration, responded to City
Council concerns relative the Interim Financial Statements for the period of
July 1, 1989, through April 30, 1989.
June 19 1989
- 42 -
Item V-K. 2.
NEW BUSINESS TTEM # 31413
Vice Mayor Fentress referenced the VIRGINIA FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
effective July 1, 1989. Section 2.1-34.1 of the Code of Virginia requires a
certification by the governing body that such Executive Session was conducted
in conformity with Virginia Law.
A BRIEFING shall be SCHEDULED for the City Council Meeting of June 26, 1989.
- 43 -
Item IV-L.I.
RECESS INTO ITEM # 31414
EXECUTIVE SESSION
In accordance with Section 2. 1-344, Code of Virginia as amended, and upon
motion by Councilman Baum, seconded by Councilman Ileischober, City Council
RECESSED into EXECUTIVE SESSION for discussion of Personnel Matters (3:32
P.M.), after which to adjourn.
1. PERSONNEL MATTERS: Discussion or consideration of employment, assignment,
appointment, promotion, performance, demotion, salaries, disciplining or
resignation of public officers, appointees or employees.
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
Albert W. Balko, John A. Baum, Vice Mayor Robert E.
Fentress, Harold Heischober, Barbara M. Henley, Reba
S. McClanan, John D. Moss, Nancy K. Parker, John L.
Perry and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
June 19, 1989
- 44 -
Item IV-L.2.
ADJOURNMENT ITEI@L # 31415
Upon motion by Councilman Baum and BY ACCLAMATION, City Council ADJOURNED the
Meeting at 3:45 P.M.
B@,,e,-ly O@
Chief Deputy City Clerk Vice Mayor
uth lod . Sith, CMC
City Clerk
Mayor
City of Virginia Beach
Virginia