HomeMy WebLinkAboutMARCH 24, 1992 MINUTES
-@. I -
"WORLD'S LARGEST RESORT CITY"
CITY COUNCIL
MAYOR MEYE@ E. OBEMM@, Al-U@,
VICE -YOR RO.ERT @@ FEWU-, VIli@i@ @l-c@
JOHN A VM, -1@
j@. W. B-IER. JR.. 11,@@@.-@
R-ERT @. @LYBU-, X,@@ll
HARO@ PIEI@HOBE@, A.-@@,
W.S R. 10a. @@@
@AUL 1. @TEIGNE. 1-
U. S MX@N@, @-, A.-
N-CY X PAMER, Al-@,@,
@l-M D. J...
2@, IM HA@ BUIWI-
f-a K@ S@RE. Cil, UNICIPIL @EWER
U@UE L. D-Y. C,,, Al.@@ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA IIRGINIA EICH, VIR@INI@ 231.
R@H HOME@ -ITH, C-@ I -E. -,l Cl@h @21 @3.
MARCH 24, 1992
ITEM 1. CITY MANAGERIS BRIEFINGS - Council Chamber 3:00 PM
A. WATER DESALINIZATION
Clarence 0. Warnstaff, Director, Public Utilities
B. 1992 SPRING/SUMMER TOURISM ADVERTISING PROGRAM
James B. Ricketts, Director, Convention and Visitor Development
C. ATLANTIC AVENUE CIRCULATION COMMITTEE REPORT
John W. Herzke, Traffic Engineer
ITEM 11. INFORMAL SESSION - Council Chamber 5:00 PM
A. CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
B. ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL
C. RECESS TO EXECUTIVE SESSION
ITEM ill. FORMAL SESSION - Council Chamber 6:00 PM
A. CALL TO ORDER - Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf
B. INVOCATION: Reverend John B. Morris
Nimmo United Methodist Church
C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
D. ELECTRONIC ROLL CALL OF CITY COUNCIL
E. CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE SESSION
F. MINUTES
1. INFORMAL & FORMAL SESSION - March 10, 1992
G. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered in the
ordinary course of business by City Council and will be enacted by
one motion in the form listed. If an item is removed from the Consent
Agenda, it will be discussed and voted upon separately.
Ordinance to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE $15,000 Grant from the Virginia
Department of Motor Vehicles to the Department of Public Works re
regional training In Traffic Engineering.
2e
Ordinance to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE $300,519 Federal Child Care and
Development Block Grant to Department of Social Services re
expansion and Improvement of child day care services for income
eligible families.
Ordinance to APPROPRIATE $263,637 to FY 1991-1992 Sheriff's
Department Budget re lease purchase of 23 vehicles; and, increase
estimated revenues as proceeds from sale of lease purchase.
Ordinance to APPROPRIATE and TRANSFER $100,000 from E-911 Fund
Balance to Public Safety Communications' capital project (3-008) to
supplement funds re replacement of Computer-Aided Dispatch System
(CADS).
Ordinance to APPROPRIATE $60,887 from DEA Shared Proceeds Seized
Property Program to FY 1991-1992 Police Department Operating Budget
re additional equipment and training; and, the total appropriation
be offset by $60,887 increase in estimated revenues from the
Federal Government.
Ordinance to APPROPRIATE $9,600 in additional revenue from
Overweight Vehicle Fees to FY 1991-1992 Department of Permits and
Inspections' Operating Budget re purchase of necessary weighing
equlpment for the program; and, the total appropriation be offset
by $9,600 increase in estimated revenues.
Ordinance appointing viewers in the petition of Holloman-Brown
Funeral Home, Bayside Chapel, Inc., for the closure of a portion of
Princess Anne Road near Nimmo Church (Princess Anne Borough).
e
Resolutions requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation to
reclassify, correct the inventory and accept additional streets for
urban maintenance payments:
28.71 lane miles of urban street corrections with a reduction
of $158,049 in revenue; and, 39.46 lane miles of arterial
streets with a reduction of $369,977 in revenue
b. 82.07 lane miles of urban streets with $451,795 additional
revenue; and, 87.79 lane miles of arterial streets with
$823,119 additional revenue
c. Reclassify 31.84 lane miles from urban to arterial streets with
$123,253 additional revenue
Request of the Department of Parks and Recreation for an
alternative to the standard park reservatlon required by
Section 4.5(a) of the Subdivision Ordinance re Mill Dam Forest
Subdivision.
10. Request for WAIVERS to the Master Street and Highway Plan's
CONTROLLED ACCESS (PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH:
a. Curb cut for residence at 505 General Booth Boulevard.
b. Access road to Dam Neck Water Tank at Red Wing Park
(CIP 5-004).
H. PUBLIC HEARING
1. PLANNING BY CONSENT
a. Applications of JOHNNIE R. and PAGE B. HARTLEY for Changes of
Zoning District Classification (PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH):
From AG-1 Aqricultural District to R-10 Residential District
600 fet South of Seaboard Koaa beginning at a
more or less East of Bernadotte Street, containing 15 acres
more or less;
AND,
From AG-2 Agricultural District to R-10 Residential District on
the South side of Seaboard Road Deginning at a point 950 feet
more or less East of Bernadotte Street, containing 15 acres
more or less.
Referred to Planning Commission: April 9, 1991
Deferred: October 22, 1991
Recommendation: APPROVAL
(Applicant requests Withdrawal)
b. Ordinances to AMEND and REORDAIN Sections 111, 401 and 1001
and ADDING Section 233.2 of the City Zoning Ordinance re
firewood preparation facilities.
Recommendation: APPROVAL
c. Resolution, in accordance with Section 102(b)(3) of the City
Zoning Ordinance, re computerization of Phase 111, to replace
certain zoning maps without changing the official designation
(bearing Grid Numbers B 11-24 through R 11-24).
Recommendation: APPROVAL
2. PLANNING - RECONSIDERATION
a. RECONSIDERATION OF CONDITION Number 3 in the February 25, 1992,
Approved Application of TIDEWATER GOLF CENTER for a Conditional
Use Permit for a recreational facility of an outdoor nature.
(golf driving ranqe) on the South side ot Z)nipps Corner Road,
1311 feet more r@less West of Holland Road, containing 16.06
acres (PRINCESS ANNE BOROUGH).
Scheduled for Reconsideration: March 3, 1992
3. PLANNING
a . Ordinance to AMEND and REORDAIN the Code of the City of
Virginia Beach, Virginia, by ADDING Appendix,G to be known as
The Southern Watersheds Management Ordinance.
AND,
Ordinance to AMEND the Comprehensive Plan of the City of
Virginia Beach, Virginia, re water quality and related land use
planning policies affecting Southern Watersheds Management Area
and Transition Area Ill.
Rescheduled: February 25, 1992
Recommendation: APPROVAL
b. Application of MINWER H. SUBEH for a of Zonin DistTriicti
Classification from 1-1 Light ial District to
B-2 Community L3usiness District on the Last side OT
South Military Highway, 1070.57 feet North of Alexandria Avenue
(728 South Mi litary H*ighway) containing 39,988 square feet
(KEMPSVILLE BOROUGH).
Recommendation: APPROVAL
c. Application ot W. R. STEPHENSON, agent for S. T. YATES, for a
Variance to Section 4.4(d) of the Subdivision Ordinance which
requires ali lots created by subdivision have frontage on a
public street (5177 Shell Road), containing 3.2 acres
(BAYSIDE BOROUGH).
Recommendation: APPROVAL
d. Application of HERB CULPEPPER for a Conditi onal Use Permit for
sin_qle family homes in the Agricul ural Distr'lct on the East
sid e of in dian (;reek Road, 1430 feet South of Blackwater Road,
containing 63.6 acres (BLACKWATER BOROUGH).
Recommendation: APPROVAL
e. Ordinance to AMEND and REORDAIN Article 15, Section 1501 of the
City Zoning Ordinance re recreational and amusement facilities
of an outdoor nature in the RT-1 Resort Tourist District.
Recommendation: APPROVAL
f. Application of BUNGEE THRILLS, INC. for a Conditional Use
Permit for a recreational and amusement facilitv of an
outdoor nature tbungee jumping) on -rne west side o
Atlantic Avenue, South ot Third Street, containing 1.6 acres
(LYNNHAVEN BOROUGH).
Recommendation: APPROVAL
1. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Request from Kempsville Greens Civic League to authorize a
six-month delay for the removal of the temporary netting on the
13th Hole of the Kempsville Greens Golt Course.
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. COUNCIL-SPONSORED IYFMS:
a. Resolution directing the Planning Commission study proposed
amendment to Section 501 of the City Zoning Ordinance re
child care and child care education centers.
(Sponsored by Councilman James W. Brazier, Jr.)
b. Resolution directing the Planning Commission study proposed
amendment to Section 801 of the City Zoning Ordinance re
Use Regulations in the 0-1 and 0-2 Office Districts.
(Sponsored by Councilman James W. Brazier, Jr.)
K. ADJOURNMENT
SCHEDULE
FY 1992-1993 OPERATING BUDGET
City Council Chamber
TUESDAY, MARCH 31, 1992 2:00 PM
**SPECIAL FORMAL SESSION**
PRESENTATION
TUESDAY, APRIL 7, 1992 10:00 AM
WORKSHOP
TUESDAY, APRIL 14, 1992 10:00 AM
WORKSHOP
THURSDAY, APRIL 16, 1992 7:00 PM
**SPECIAL FORMAL SESSION**
PUBLIC HEARING
Green Run High School Auditorium
TUESDAY, APRIL 28, 1992 (Time to be determined)
WORKSHOP
THURSDAY, APRIL 30, 1992 7:00 PM
**SPECIAL FORMAL SESSION**
PUBLIC HEARING
Princess Anne High School Auditorium
THURSDAY, MAY 7, 1992 10:00 AM
RECONCILIATION WORKSHOP
TUESDAY, MAY 12, 1992 2:00 PM
APPROPRIATION ORDINANCES
COUNCIL SESSIONS CANCELLED
MAY 5, 1992
CITY COUNCIL ELECTION DAY
3/19/92 gs
M I N U T E S
VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
Virginia Beach, Virginia
March 24, 1992
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf called to order the VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL for
the CITY MANAGER'S BRIEFINGS in the Council Chamber, City Hall Building, on
March 24, 1992, at 3:00 P.M.
Council Members Present:
John A. Baum, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert W. Clyburn,
Vice Mayor Robert E. Fentress, Harold Heischober, Louis
R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, Reba S. McClanan, Mayor
Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy K. Parker and William D.
Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Absent:
None
- 2 -
C I T Y M A N A G E R ' S B R I E F I N C S
WATER DESALINATION
3:00 P.M.
ITEM # 35438
Clarence 0. Warnstaff, Director - Public Utilities, advised the State of North
Carolina determined in September 1991, the Lake Gaston project is inconsistent
with its Coastal Zone Management Program under its Federal Coastal Zone
Management Act. This determination has been appealed to the U.S. Secretary of
Commerce. The State of North Carolina claims seawater desalting along with
continued purchase of water from the City of Norfolk is a viable and cost-
effective alternative to Lake Gaston. Mr. Warnstaff advised this was incorrect.
North Carolina recently retained a company to conduct a study to compare
sea,water desalting with Lake Gaston. This study is referred to as THE LEITNER
STUDY. This study contains many erroneous assumptions and does not present a
factual cost. Thomas M. Leahy, III, Water Resource Engineer, completed an
exhaustive analysis of the Leitner Study and the cost associated with
desalting. Mr. Leahy identifies the cost associated with the Lake Gaston
Project (SEGMENT ONE) as being $174-MILLION. $18-MILLION for engineering,
right-of-way and other project costs has already been expended. Segment one
includes the pump station at Lake Gaston and the first 76 miles of the
pipeline. Segment Two of the Gaston Pipeline, which includes a booster pump
station and eight miles of pipeline, can be considered an optional portion of
the pipeline as Segment Two is not needed to introduce the Lake Gaston water
into the Norfolk water system. The Leitner Study assumes that Virginia Beach's
financial liability for the Lake Gaston project would be $219-MILLION. The
Leitner study disregarded the fact that Chesapeake will pay one-sixth of the
project cost. In the preparation of this year's Capital Improvement Program,
the process of fine tuning the estimated cost will be continued for
construction of the pipeline.
Mr. Leahy distributed "A TECHNICAL RESPONSE TO THE JANUARY 1992 LEITNER STUDY"
and "DESALINATION FOR URBAN WATER SUPPLY", which are hereby made a part of the
record. Mr. Leahy advised Leitner and Associates is not the only engineering
firm which North Carolina contacted with respect to evaluating the City's cost
estimates for seawater desalting. Before it engaged Leitner and Associates,
North Carolina contacted the Orlando, Florida offices of Black and Veatch
Engineers to solicit their advice concerning the reasonableness of the City's
desalting cost estimates. Black and Veatch responded that the City's costs
estimates were reasonable, and in fact, about 10% lower than those determined
by Black and Veatch. After being advised that the City's desalting cost
estimates were reasonable, North Carolina terminated its discussions with
Black and Veatch and subsequently commissioned the Leitner study. Leitner and
Associates is a two person firm located in Wisconsin. The two employees are
Gordon Leitner, an engineer with prior desalting experience, and his daughter
Wendy Leitner, who is not an engineer and has no specific desalting experience.
Neither have any significant experience in the municipal water supply industry.
The results of the Leitner Study are greatly dependent upon a number of
assumptions with respect to the Lake Gaston project and the City's water supply
relationship with Norfolk. Virtually all of the assumptions are seriously
flawed and result in overstating the cost of the Lake Gaston project and
understanding the costs of seawater desalting.
ERRORS IN THE LEITNER STUDY
Overstated the City's liability with respect to the Lake
Gaston Project. The City's remaining financial liability is
$130-MILLION not $219-MILLION.
Overstated the City's liability with respect to Norfolk water
treatment as $88-MILLION. All of the capital improvements
necessary to wheel and treat the City's entire share of the
Lake Gaston project will be $1.35 per 1000 gallons.
Understated the demand and capacity of the project.
5-24 MCD vs. 55-60 MGD
Fixed costs, capital intensive
Understated City's Demand
Ignored Chesapeake's need
Overstated Norfolk's supply
Assumed the City had total rights to emergency
wells.
- 3 -
C I T Y M A N A G E R ' S B R I E F I N C
WATER DESALINATION
ITEM # 35438 (Continued)
The Leitner study understated the capital costs of the project and estimated
that the unit capital cost of constructing seawater desalting plants would be
only $3.30 per gallon of capacity. Santa Barbara, California, built a temporary
plant, half of which is sitting out in the open and the other half is in
trailers. Because the plant is located next to their existing waste water
treatment facility, there was virtually no off-site infrastructure. The plant
was able to piggy-back onto existing infrastructure. Tbe cost of the Santa
Barbara plant was $5.00 per gallon of capacity. Based on experience in Santa
Barbara and engineering studies conducted for Marin County, Monterey and
Virginia Beach, the unit capital cost of seawater desalting plants, exclusive
of off-site infrastructure, ranges from $5.00 to $7.00 per gallon of capacity
(50% to 100% higher than the Leitner study). The Leitner study understated
operation and maintenance costs and assumed desalting plants last for forty
(40) years. The most optimistic assumption that can be made with respect to the
useful life of desalting facilities is that about half of the facilities (i.e.
permanent buildings and treated water process equipment) can be designed to
have the same life as conventional treatment facilities (over 40 years) and
that the other half (i.e., the desalting equipment) will have to be replaced in
20 years. The Leitner study understated the need and capacity of the desalting
plant. The Leitner study assumed that Norfolk would continue to provide
Virginia Beach with a 30 mgd supply at the current water rate and that the City
could access an 11 mgd supply from the emergency wells through the year 2030.
These assumptions are wrong and resulted in the understating of both the amount
for desalting capacity which would have to be built and the amount of seawater
which would have to be desalted. Norfolk has clearly indicated that the 30 mgd
limit is an upper limit, not a lower limit. Norfolk has made it very clear that
it will provide Virginia Beach only surplus water and that if the yield of its
water system is reduced, for whatever reason, the reductions will come from the
allocations to its extra-jurisdictional customers. The assumption that Norfolk
will continue to furnish surplus water at a rate of $1.06 per 1000 gallons is
also wrong. Norfolk has indicated the cost of its surplus water will be $1.95
per 1000 gallons initially and higher in the future.
Mr. Leahy referred to the two types of costs associated with a Desalting Plant
and Off-Site Infrastructure:
Desalting Plant
Pretreatment
Reverse Osmosis Process
Post-Treatment
Storage and Pumping
Building and on-site facilities
Off-Site Infrastructure
Seawater Intake and Pipeline
On-shore Pumping Station
Waste Brine Outfall and Pipeline
Electrical Transmission and Supply
Distribution and Transmission System
Improvements.
The City of Santa Barbara, California's temporary seawater desalting facility
can provide a maximum of 6.7 mgd. The seawater intake used an abandoned
wastewater discharge line. The waste brine went into Santa Barbara's outfall
for their existing waste water treatment plant. The City of Virginia Beach
could not build a Santa Barbara like facility. There are approximately 50
inches of rainfall annually vs approximately 10 inches annually in Santa
Barbara; therefore a lot of process equipment could not be placed outside. It
must be housed. Virginia Beach also has extended freezing periods and
hurricanes. This would necessitate the building of more permanent structures.
- 4 -
C I T Y M A N A G E R ' S B R I E F I N G
WATER DESALINATION
ITEM # 35438 (Continued)
SUMMARY OF UNIT CAPITAL COST FACTORS
FOR
SEAWATER DESALTING FACILITIES
Seawater Off-Site Total
Desalting Infrastructure $/Gallon
Plant $/Gallon
$/Gallon
SANTA BARBARA 5.00 N/A N/A
VIRGINIA BEACH 5.60 4.10 9.70
MONTEREY 5.55 4.23 9.78
MARIN 6.84 4.16 11.00
LEITNER STUDY 3.30 1.00 4.30
SUMKARY OF DESALTING COSTS
IN DOLLARS PER 1000 GALLONS (PUF = 90 to 100%)
Capital Fixed Variable
Recovery 0 & m 0 & m Total
MONTEREY 3.05 0.84 1.43 5.32
VIRGINIA BEACH 3.01 0.79 1.81 5.61
MARIN 3.44 0.90 1.46 5.80
SANTA BARBARA 3.30 0.73 1.91 5.94
CUWA* 3.07 0.61 2.45 6.13
AVERAGE 3.17 0.77 1.81 5.76
*California Urban Water Agencies
SUMt4ARY OF WATER COSTS
F'OR SF-AWATER DESALTING
AVERAGE COST ($/1000 GALLONS)
BASED UPON YEAR BASED UPON MAXIMUM
AVERAGE DEMANDS DAY DEKANDS
(PUF = 90 to 100%) (PUF = 67%)
JURISDICrION:
MONTEREY 5.32 6.68
VIRGINIA BEACH 5.61 6.92
SANTA BARBARA 5.94 7.96
MARIN 5.80 7.32
CUWA 6.13 7.98
AVERAGE 5.76 7.37
LEITNER STUDY 4.90
- 5 -
C I T Y M A N A G E R ' S B R I E F I N G
WATER DESALINATION
ITEM # 35438 (Continued)
COST OF SEAWATER DESALTING
AVERAGE INITIAL FINAL AVERAGE AVERAGE
NORFOLK SURPLUS WATER COST WATER COST WATER COST ANNUAL
COST (1995) COST (2030) $/KGAL EXPEND-
$/KGAL $/KGAL ITURE
MILL/YR
25 MGD 4.50 4.09 4.47 77.102
20 MGD 5.10 4.31 4.99 88.848
15 MGD 6.15 4.71 5.50 94.304
LAKE GASTON 2.45 1.57 1.96 33.277
PROJECT
Mr. Leahy advised his conclusions. The total costs of bulk treated water from
the Lake Gaston Project, including all costs from the City of Norfolk, will
average approximately $2.00 per 1000 gallons. Total expenditures for bulk
treated water would average approximately $33-MILLION per year. Seawater
desalting would average anywhere from $4.50 to $5.50 per 1,000 gallons at $77
to $94-MILLION per year depending upon Norfolk's surplus. The whole water
budget excluding the sewer charges is only about $30-MILLION a year. This would
require substantial rate increases. The City would be dependent upon Norfolk
surplus. This would also impact Chesapeake and the other jurisdictions in the
region.
Mr. Leahy referenced discussions with Santa Barbara as to the cost of desalting
regarding their water rates. Prior to the desalting plant, the cost for them to
produce bulk treated water was $1.36 per 1,000 gallons, and they were charging
their customers $1.46 to $2.11 per 1,000 gallons depending upon volume used.
Now, the cost of them producing bulk treated water is $4.95 per 1,000 gallons
and they have raised their water rates to a three tier rate: $2.47 per 1,000
for the first 3,000 gallons; thereafter, it is $4.95 per 1,000 gallons for the
next 6,000 gallons per month and $8.69 per 1,000 gallons after that. Therefore,
this has had some substantial rate impacts.
Marin County has decided not to build the desalting plant, because they found
it to be too expensive. Marin County's per capita household income is $70,000 a
year with the median price of housing being $300,000. Santa Barbara, with
virtually the same financial statistics, are going to shut their plant down the
day it finishes its performance test, because the cost of operating the plant
is really causing their water rates to increase. Santa Barbara has voted to
build a pipeline, which is similar in scope, length and diameter to the Lake
Gaston Pipline, to hook up to the California State Water Project. More
jurisdictions in California have opted out of desalting once they have received
the cost than have opted for it. Monterey has long term plans to build a
reservoir and solve their problems. Mr. Leahy advised they were not aware of
anyone who was going to permanently solve their problems with desalting.
Mr. Leahy advised, regarding a desalting plant, permits would be required to
run the lines out into the ocean, permits to withdraw the water and permits to
dump the brine out of the ocean. The State Health Department still considers
desalting with reverse osmosis "experimental technology" and under no
circumstances will they allow a plant to be built without first going through
pilot studies. The City estimates this would entail twelve to eighteen months
and possibly two years in a pilot testing and permitting process followed by
eighteen months to two years to construct a temporary facility. There is no
reverse osmosis facility in the world which utilizes 60-MILLION gallons a day.
The majority are very small facilities in the 2 to 6-MILLION gallons per day
size. Santa Barbara's facility is 6.7-MILLION gallons per day. Key West had a
3-MILLION gallon per day facility which was turned off, as soon as a pipeline
from the Mainland was established. When the facility was turned off, water
rates dropped $4.00 per 1,000 gallons.
- 6 -
C I T Y M A N A G E R ' S B R I E F I N C
WATER DESALINATION
ITEM # 35438 (Continued)
Mr. Leahy advised the City would not be able to provide the redundancy in a
desalting plant traditionally provided with the water treatment plant.
Santa Barbara is the largest seawater desalting plant with 6.7-MILLION gallons
per day. There are numerous brackish water desalting plants with one in Florida
being the largest, around 15-MILLION gallons per day. The desalting plants
operating in the Carribbean are usually much smaller approximately I-MILLION
gallons per day.
Mr. Leahy advised there are desalting plants in Saudi Arabia that are fairly
successful. However, these are found where there is no other solution and as
one must have water, then $6.00 or $7.00 per 1,000 gallons sounds reasonable.
The question is do we want to spend upwards of $50 to $100-MILLION for a
temporary plant. Councilman Baum advised the energy in Saudi Arabia was very
inexpensive.
A report to City Council shall be provided next week regarding the statistics
involving the February and March water conservation.
Mr. Warnstaff advised the figures contained in the City's report regarding
water desalination were estimates provided by other Engineering firms, which
have absolutely no ties to the City of Virginia Beach.
- 7 -
C I T Y M A N A G E R ' S B R I E F I N G
1992 SPRING/SUMMER TOURISM ADVERTISING PROGRAM
4:15 P.M.
ITEM # 35439
James B. Ricketts, Director - Convention and Visitor Development, distributed
information relative the City of Virginia Beach Spring/Summer Campaign 1992.
Mr. Ricketts advised according to the Travel Data Center figures, the tourism
industry in Virginia Beach is in excess of $500-MILLION. The total tax revenue
generated to the City from the tourist spending is $20-MILLION. There is an
additional $20-MILLION generated to the State of Virginia and another $10-
MILLION generated in the form of real estate taxes and personal property.
21,000 permanent and part time jobs are involved in the tourism industry.
TOURISM MEDIA ADVERTISING 1991 RESULTS
600,000 visitors
$5.3-MILLION in net tax revenue
161% net rate of return
Hotel Occupancy for 1991 increased 5%. Room Nights Booked, City-wide increased
4%.
ANTICIPAT'ED ISSUES F'OR 1992
Continued softness in the economy
Pressure to add value for the tourist dollar
Aggressive hotel marketing, e.g., price cuts
Flat national hotel occupancy predicted
Continued aggressive competition for tourism and
conventions
Palmer Farley, Barker Campbell & Farley reiterated the 1992 MARKETING
OBJECrIVES:
Produce a 60% annual occupancy
Maintain/expand 81% summer occupancy
Improve the quality of the visitor
Expand the shoulder season
Extend the stay beyond 4.7 nights
Mr. Farley advised the 1992 Boardwalk Study reflected five key issues in the
Visitor Profile. Families with Children are almost 50%. 70% of the visitors
are married with 60% having an average household income in excess of $40,000.
The majority of visitors are aged 25-44. Approximately 75% of the visitors plan
within a 60-day time period. About 56% plan within thirty-days.
F'OCUS GROUP RESULTS
Prefer ads providing free information
Like short, direct copy
Very positive response to Vacation Planner
Changed perceptions
Impressed by variety of activities
Would influence a visit to Virginia Beach
- 8 -
C I T Y M A N A G E R ' S B R I E F I N G
1992 SPRING/SUMMER TOURISM ADVERTISING PROGRAM
ITEM # 35439 (Continued)
Pete Leddy, Account Supervisor, Barker Campbell & Farley, advised the various
strategies:
1992 STRATEGIES
Position Virginia Beach a superior value
Feature Vacation Guide and 1-800-VA BEACH
Increase conversions with Guide
Use events to attract visitors/extend stay
Maximize ROI by focusing on major
spending markets with most new visitors
Attract more Canadian visitors
Mr. Leddy advised a value has been assigned to various markets based on two
attributes: (1) How much they contribute to the total spending in Virginia
Beach and (2) How many new visitors come from their markets. Markets that
contribute close to 71% of the total dollars spent at the Beach will be the
focus of the media plan.
CREATIVE STRATEGY
Continue to showcase "Good. Clean. Fun."
position launched in 1991
CREATIVE ELEMENTS
Newspaper
Magazine
Busch Gardens Co-op Television
Per Inquiry Television
Events Radio
Mr. Leddy displayed the 1992 Newspaper Ad: "The Time of Your Life Comes with
Free Instructions", the French equivalent and the four-color magazine version.
The sixty, thirty-second and Busch Gardens Television spots were shown to City
Council, as well as an example of the radio advertising. The brochure: Virginia
Beach is Good/Clean/Fun was distributed and is hereby made a part of the
record. Information, which remains the same, was contained in the core book
with inserts in the back cover, which can be updated on an annual basis for a
less costly investment.
Stephen K. Lonning, Vice President, Media Director - Barker Campbell & Farley,
reviewed the Media Strategies. Advertising will be in the March through June
period with a concentration in April and May.
SPENDING RECOMMENDATION
"A" markets
Heaviest advertising
Continuous newspaper
Events radio in close-in markets
Television in further-out markets
"B" markets
Heavy advertising
Nearly continuous newspaper
Television
- 9 -
C I T Y M A N A G E R ' S B R I E F I N G
1992 SPRING/SUMMER TOURISM ADVERTISING PROGRAM
ITEM # 35439 (Continued)
SPENDING RECOMMENDATION
(Continued)
"C" markets
Moderate advertising weight
Newspaper every other week
"D" markets
Light advertising weight
Four newspaper insertions
MEDIA PLAN
Newspaper is primary medium
53 newspapers
372 insertions
15.75" ad size (3 cl x 5.25")
Mr. Lonning displayed a slide @eflecting the Newspaper Schedule.
ADDITIONAL MEDIA
Spot television in A and B markets
Busch co-op in Pittsburgh, Harrisburg,
Scranton/Wilkes Barre
Per inquiry in New York, Washington, D.C.
Philadelphia plus National Cable.
Magazine for inquiries and additional reach
1/3 page, four-color
Radio in close-in markets to support events
Sixty second spot.
Mr. Lonning displayed the Television, Magazine Schedule and Events Schedule for
Spot Radio and Newspaper.
Ron Kuhlman, Director Sales and Marketing - Convention and Visitor Development,
advised New Market Development:
TOURISM
Develop city-wide tour package program
Expand golf package program
Expand Canadian marketing program
Develop one new overseas market (UK)
Position for 1993 season
CONVENTION
Implement automated convention sales management
system
Expand local and regional sports marketing role
Establish a network with convention
professionals
VISITOR INF'ORMATION CENTER
Expand customer services
Expand new and existing revenue sources
Increase leadership role for state and region
Increase support for advertising campaign
A multi-language flyer is available on the area and will be updated within the
next year. Essentially, 51% additional budget for advertising is being expended
in Canada.
- 10 -
C IT Y MANA GE R ' S B R I E F IN G
ATLANTIC AVENUE CIRCULATION COMITTEE REPORT
4:47 P.M.
ITEM # 35440
John Herzke, Traffic Engineer, advised the City staff has reviewed the Avenue
Circulation Committee Report. Mr. Herzke and Captain W. W. Baker, 2nd Precinct
- Virginia Beach Police Department, represented the City Staff on this
Committee. Dr. Hager is commended for his excellent stewardship in guiding this
committee through the very difficult task of developing recommendations for
this report. This report has been endorsed by the Resort Area Advisory
Commission, the Virginia Beach Chapter of the Virginia Restaurant Association,
the Hotel/Motel Association, the Resort Retailers Association and the Resort
Leadership Council. The Atlantic Avenue Circulation Committee was initially
formed by the Resort Area Advisory Commission in concert with the Virginia
Beach Hotel/Motel Association, and they previously presented a major report to
City Council in January of 1987. The findings of that report were reviewed and
adopted by City Council on January 5, 1987. That report contained significant
long term and short term recommendations for the traffic circulation patterns
in the oceanfront area. There were major elements of that earlier report which
included that Atlantic Avenue would be constructed as a four lane undivided
roadway with wider sidewalks and streetscape improvements with the
reconstruction and enhancement of Atlantic Avenue. Another recommendation was
that Pacific Avenue should be improved to provide left turn lanes at major
intersections and also remove parallel parking along this roadway. As Atlantic
Avenue is improved, the numbered side streets were to be converted from one-
way to two-way traffic flow. The elimination of stub streets was recommended
and Norfolk Avenue is to be upgraded to enhance its importance as a major
east-west access point to the oceanfront area. There was the recommendation of
the "Super Blocks Demonstration Project" in the area of 20th Street to 25th
Street along Atlantic Avenue including 21st Street and 22nd Street west to
Pacific Avenue for improvement. This became the impetus for the first phase of
the Atlantic Avenue Revitalization Project. There were some long range
transportation improvements, which included the one-waying of Arctic and Baltic
Avenues as one-way paired roadways and recommended also enhancing the 31st
Street/Laskin Road corridor, developing 3OLh and 31st Street as one-way paired
roadways, widening and improving Birdneck Road and the development of a
Visitors Information Center at the east end of the Toll Road near the Pavilion.
Many of the short range, as well as some of the long range, recommendations
have come to fruition. The improvements along Atlantic Avenue have been
continuing each year, with full improvements to-date between 15th and 25th
Streets. The section between 10th and 15th Streets will be finished this
Spring.
In the Spring of 1991, the Atlantic Avenue Circulation Committee provided
additional recommendations to City Council in regard to the proposed cross
section of Atlantic Avenue north of 25th Street. The Committee recommended to
City Council that a three-lane cross section should be constructed instead of
the previously established four-lane section, in order to provide wider
sidewalks in this area. On April 23, 1991, City Council approved the change to
the proposed cross section for Atlantic Avenue, which was for a three lane
section, with one lane in each direction and a reversible center left turning
lane.
For the first few meetings of this Committee, there was considerable attention
focused on traffic. Mr. Herzke pointed out to the members that most of their
concerns were actually behavioral issues.
Mr. Herzke advised there were seven major recommendations with four items for
additional consideration. Six of these involved the Police Department.
- 11 -
C I T Y M A N A G E R ' S B R I E F I N G
ATLANTIC AVENUE CIRCULATION COMITTEE REPORT
ITEM # 35440 (Continued)
Chief Charles Wall advised the recommendations involving the Police Department:
Increased Police 17 frozen positions have been "unfrozen". 38
positions from other precincts and police
agencies shall be assigned for full-time
Summer oceanfront enforcement efforts, along
with 15 officers from the second precinct.
The Police Department is currently
investigating the ability to permanently
electronically monitor some of the
Beachfront. Presently, there are television
cameras which the Police take on the street.
Personnel will be supplemented by Shore
Patrol and Sheriff's Deputies for processing
and transportation of incarcerated persons.
Enforcement The Police will be targeting juvenile
curfews, disorderly conduct and drinking
violations as key enforcement areas. The
Police Department has developed an
operations plan for the coming Summer
season, which reflects a sensitivity to the
need for reasonable and adequate compliance
with existing ordinances. Over the last four
weeks, approximately 75 to 80 juveniles have
been picked up and taken to their parents or
juvenile services. In the Beach's trouble
spots, there have been 54 arrests, 93
misdemeanor summons and 90 traffic
violations, so the City is now is the
process of trying to utilize enforcement as
well as voluntary compliance. Monthly
meetings with the Military have been
instituted concerning problems.
Cruising Ordinance Preliminary findings indicate this
legislation may be legally feasible,
however, it is not economically practical
and enforcement would be extremely
difficult, if not impossible. It is
estimated that enforcement would require a
minimum of at least six additional police
officers per work shift.
Police Manned
Intersections There are twenty-two auxiliary police
officers in the new academy and, for the
first time, will be certified State Officers
who will be able to move in as full-time
police officers. The police will continue to
take an active role in the manned control of
critical intersections in the Oceanfront
area during periods of severe traffic
congestion.
Synchronization of
Traffic Signals Personnel from the Traffic Engineering
Division are presently working with the
Police Department to further enhance the
coordination of the traffic signal timing in
conjunction with the efforts of the police
to manage the traffic congestion in this
area.
- 12 -
C I T Y M A N A G E R ' S B R I E F I N G
ATLANTIC AVENUE CIRCULATION COMITTEE REPORT
ITEM # 35440 (Continued)
Traffic Diversion The police have used traffic diversion in
the past, and they plan to utilize this
technique as one of their options for
traffic control also this year.
Blocking One Lane
on Atlantic Ave. Staff is agreeable to utilizing and
implementing this concept (between 15th and
25th Streets, on the west side of Atlantic
Avenue). Portable barricades, with
appropriate signs will be pre-positioned on
the street corners and whenever the police
decide to implement this lane closure, they
will move these items into the westernmost
lane of Atlantic Avenue. This will be as an
,ton needed basis".
Mr. Herzke advised the following Considerations:
(1) Exercise awareness not to cause actions taken that
would negatively impact the residential community.
City staff has been meeting regularly with area
residents, business representatives and concerned
parties in the Oceanfront area since the end of
last Summer.
(2) Develop a comprehensive traffic circulation plan.
The staff agrees there is a need to periodically
assess and revise the traffic circulation plan as
conditions evolve or change.
(3) Provide left turn lanes on Atlantic Avenue south of
25th Street.
The two inside lanes of Atlantic Avenue presently
provide the dual functions for left and through
movements of traffic. Prior left turning
restrictions from Atlantic Avenue onto these
numbered side streets are being deleted on an as
needed basis and where it is deemed appropriate.
(4) Plan for developing off-street parking that would
prove suitable and easy access to the oceanfront,
while not impacting residential community areas.
The City Staff agrees this needs to be evaluated
and included, as necessary, in the Capital
Improvement Program.
1 3
ITEM # 35441
The INFORMAL SESSION of the VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL was called to order by
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf in the Counci I Chambers, City Hal I Bui Iding, on
Tuesday, March 24, 1992, at 5:18 P.M.
Council Members Present:
John A. Baum, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert W.
Clyburn, Vice Mayor Robert E. Fentress, Harold
Heischober, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, Reba S.
McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy K. Parker
and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Absent:
None
- 14
F 0 R M A L S E S S I 0 N
VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL
March 24, 1992
6:00 P.M.
Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf ca I I ed to order the FORMAL SESS I ON of the VIRGINIA
BEACH C I TY COUNC I L I n the Cou nc i I Chambers, C i ty Ha I I Bu i I d i ng, on Tuesday,
March 24, 1992, at 6:00 P.M.
Council Members Present:
John A. Baum, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert W.
Clyburn, Vice Mayor Robert E. Fentress, Harold
Heischober, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, Reba S.
McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndort, Nancy K. Parker
and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Absent:
None
INVOCATION: Reverend John B. Morris
Nimmo United Methodist Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- 15 -
Item III-E.l.
CERTIFICATION OF
EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEM # 35442
I
Certification was not necessarylas no EXECUTIVE SESSION was held.
- 16 -
Item III-F.I.
MINUTES ITEM # 35443
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Fentress, seconded by Councilman Clyburn, City
Council APPROVED the Minutes of the INFORMAL AND F'ORMAL SESSIONS of March 10,
1992:
Councilman Baum clarified the reason for the 50-
foot buffer adjacent to areas retained for
agricultural use to be made up of two parts (low
grasses and shrubs for the first 25 feet and the
second 25 feet would be made up primarily of larger
trees).
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert W.
Clyburn, Vice Mayor Robert E. Fentress, Harold
Heischober, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, Reba S.
McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf and Nancy K.
Parker
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Abstaining:
William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Absent:
None
Councilman Sessoms was not in attendance during the City Council Session of
March 10, 1992.
- 17 -
Item 11 1-G.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 35444
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Fentress, seconded by Counci Iman Sessoms, City
Counci I APPROVED in ONE MOTION Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 a.b.c., 9 and 10 of
the CONSENT AGENDA.
Item 7 was voted upon separately.
Voting: 11-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert W.
Clyburn, Vice Mayor Robert E. Fentress, Harold
Heischober, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, Reba S.
McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndort, Nancy K. Parker
and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
None
- 18 -
Item 111-G.1
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 35445
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Fentress, seconded by Counci Iman Sessoms, City
Council ADOPTED:
Ordinance to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE $15,000 Grant
from the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles to
the Department of Public Works re regional training
In Traffic Engineering.
Voting: 11-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert W.
Clyburn, Vice Mayor Robert E. Fentress, Harold
Heischober, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, Reba S.
McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy K. Parker
and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
None
AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE A GRANT IN THE
AMOUNT OF $15,000 FROM THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
MOTOR VEHICLES TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO BE
USED FOR REGIONAL TRAINING IN TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
WHEREAS, the State Department of Motor Vehicles has
awarded $15,000 in Highway Safety Funds, to the Virginia Beach
Traf f ic Engineering Division, for the purpose of providing regional
training in traffic engineering, and
WHEREAS, this training will extend the knowledge of
traffic engineering in Hampton Roads and improve the quality of
traffic flow and address safety issues within the region, and
WHEREAS, this funding is a one time grant requiring no
city match.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA, that a grant in the amount of
$15,000 be accepted from the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles
and appropriated to the Department of Public Works for the purpose
of providing regional traffic engineering training to the Traffic
Engineering personnel in Hampton Roads region.
BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that estimated revenues be
increased by the amount of the grant.
This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its
adoption.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia
Beach, Virginia on 25 day of March 1992.
APPROVED TO CO@
WALTER 0. k@ER, JR,
HFFI(;E OF BUDGET AND E.VALUATION
- 19 -
Item 111-G.2.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 35446
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Fentress, seconded by Counci lman Sessoms, City
Council ADOPTED:
Ordinance to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE $ 300, 5 1 9
Federal Chi ld Care and Development Block Grant to
Department of Social Services re expansion and
Improvement of child day care services for Income
eligible families.
Voting: 11-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert W.
Clyburn, Vice Mayor Robert E. Fentress, Harold
Heischober, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, Reba S.
McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy K. Parker
and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
None
I AN ORDINANCE TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE A FEDERAL
2 GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $300,519 TO THE DEPARTMENT
3 OF SOCIAL SERVICES FOR THE EXPANSION AND IMPROVEMENT
4 OF CHILD DAY CARE SERVICES FOR INCOME ELIGIBLE FAMILIES
5 WHEREAS, the Department of Social Services is responsible for administering
6 child day care services for income eligible residents;
7 WHEREAS, the 101st Congress passed the Child Care and Development Block
8 Grant which provides additional funding for the expansion and improvement of
9 child day care services for income eligible families;
10 WHEREAS, the grant will become a part of the Department of Social Services
11 annual budget with no local match required;
12 WHEREAS, the grant will increase the departmental position total by 1 FTE.
13 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
14 BEACH, VIRGINIA that the Child Care and Development Block Grant in the amount
15 of $300,519 be accepted and appropriated and 1 FTE be established, contingent
16 upon the grant's continuation, in the Department of Social Services FY 91-92
17 Operating Budget to provide additional funding for the expansion and improvement
18 of child day care services for income eligible residents.
19 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that appropriations be offset by a $300,519 increase
20 in estimated revenue.
21 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, this
22 25 day of March , 1992.
23 This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its adoption.
APPROVED AS TO CO
WALTER 0. KIMEMER, JR.
OFFICE OF BUDGET AND EVALUATION
- 20 -
Item 111-G.3.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 35447
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Fentress, seconded by Counci Iman Sessoms, City
Council ADOPTED:
Ordinance to APPROPRIATE $263,637 to FY 1991-1992
Sheriff's Department Budget re lease purchase of 23
vehicles; and, increase estimated revenues as
proceeds from sale of lease purchase.
Voting: 11-0
Councli Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert W.
Clyburn, Vice Mayor Robert E. Fentress, Harold
Heischober, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, Reba S.
McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy K. Parker
and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
None
AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $263,637 TO THE FY 1991-92
SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT BUDGET AND INCREASE ZSTIMATIED
REVENUES FOR PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF LEASE PURCHASE
I WHEREAS, funding was provided in the FY 1991-92 Operating Budget Lease/Rent
2 of Equipment for the Sheriff's Department to lease 23 vehicles for the Civil
3 Processing Unit, base on the estimated annual savings of $10,000 over paying a
4 milage charge to the civil processors for use of their personnel car;
5 WHEREAS, the City can lease purchase the vehicles, over a four (4) year
6 period, for a cost of $263,637 plus interest paymentb;
7 WHEREAS, maintenance costs for the vehicles are included in the semi-annual
8 paymentb within the four year period.
9 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA
10 BEACH, VIRGINIA, that funds in the amount of $263,637 be appropriated to the FY
11 1991-92 Operating Budget of the Sheriff's Department for the lease purchase of 23
12 vehicles;
13 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that the appropriation be OffBet by an increase in
14 estimated revenues as proceeds from lease purchase;
15 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that the Increase in debt service costs for these
16 vehicles shall be offset by an annual reduction in lease/rent of equipment costs in
17 the Sheriff's operating Budget for the next four (4) fiscal years.
18 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on this
19 day March 25 1992.
APPROVED AS TO CONTEN r
- 21 -
Item 111-G.4-
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 35448
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Fentress, seconded by Counci iman Sessoms, City
Council ADOPTED:
Ordinance to APPROPRIATE and TRANSFER $100,000 from
E-911 Fund Balance to Publ ic Safety Cornmunicatlons'
capital project (3-00 8) to supplement funds re
replacement of Computer-Aided Dispatch System
(CADS).
Voting: 11-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert W.
Clyburn, Vice Mayor Robert E. Fentress, Harold
Heischober, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, Reba S.
McCianan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndort, Nancy K. Parker
and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
None
AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIXTE AND TRANSFER @100,000 TO THE
COMPUTER AIDED DISPATCH CAPITAL PROJECT (#3-008) SYSTEM
FROM THE E911 FUND TO SUPPLEMENT FUNDS FOR THE ACQUISITION
OF A REPLACEMENT COMPUTER ASSISTED DISPATCHING SYSTEM (CADS)
1 WHEREAS, the Public Safety Communications Center's utilizes a
2 computer aided dispatching system (CADS) to assist in the dispatching of Police,
3 Fire, and Emergency Medical Services to citizens calling the E911 SyBtem;
4 WHEREAS, the current CADS system is scheduled for replacement in the
5 approved Capital Improvement Program (Project #3-008 Computer Aided DiBpatch
6 System) at an estimated price of $1,200,000;
7 WHEREAS, the Computer Assist Dispatch Re@iew Conimittee has received
8 bids on the SyBtem and through negotiations with the low bidder gotten the total
9 price to within $1,300,000;
10 WHEREAS, there are sufficient funds in the E911 Fund Balance to
11 provide the $100,000 needed to fully fund this replacement.
12 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
13 VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA, that $100,000 be appropriated and transferred from the
14 Fund Balance of the E911 Fund to the Computer Aided Dispatch system Capital
15 Project (#3-008) for the purpose of supplementing the funding for replacement
16 of the Computer Aided Dispatch System (CADS).
17 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia
18 on this day March 25, 1992.
APPROVED TO C@
WALTER 0. KP-AEMER, JR.
OFFICE OF BUDGET AND EVALUATION
- 22 -
Item 111-G.5.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 35449
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Fentress, seconded by Counci Iman Sessoms, City
Council ADOPTED:
Ordinance to APPROPRIATE $60,887 trom DEA Shared
Proceeds Seized Property Program to FY 1991-1992
Police Department Operating Budget re additional
equipment and training; and, the total
appropriation be offset by $60,887 increase in
estimated revenues from the Federal Government.
Votlng: 11-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert W.
Clyburn, Vice Mayor Robert E. Fentress, Harold
Heischober, Louis R. Jones, Paul J. Lanteigne, Reba S.
McClanan, Mayor Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy K. Parker
and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Votlng Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
None
AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $60,887 TO THE FY 1991-92
POLICE DEPARTMENT BUDGET FROM THE DEA SHARED PROCEEDS
SEIZED PROPERTY PROGRAM FOR ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT AND TRAINING
1 WHEREAS, the Federal Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) allows
2 localities to share in proceeds from assets which have been seized as a result of
3 narcotics investigations activities, and use these proceeds for law enforcement
4 enhancementb;
5 WHEREAS, the City of Virginia Beach Police Department'B narcotics enforcement
6 efforts can be strengthened with additional computer support for the development of the
7 CRIMES system and other computer based systems. It will also be aided by acquisition of
8 equipment to support the employees of the Special Investigative Division as well as
9 additional training. The estimated cost of this equipment and training is $60,887;
10 WHEREAS, there are sufficient funds available from the DEA Shared Proceeds Seized
11 Property program to addreBB these needs.
12 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,
13 VIRGINIA, that $60,887 be appropriated from the DEA Shared Proceeds Seized Property
14 program to the FY 1991-92 Operating Budget of the Police Department for additional
15 computer support, equipment, and training in order to enhance the investigation and
16 enforcement activities of the department.
17 BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED, that these appropriations be offset by a corresponding
18 increase in Estimated Revenues from the Federal Government.
19 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia on this day
March 25,
20 1992.
- 23 -
item ill-G.6.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 35450
Upon motion by Vice Mayor Fentress, seconded by Councilman Sessoms, CitY
Council ADOPTED:
Ordinance to APPROPRIATE $9,600 in additional
revenue from overweight Vehicle Fees to FY 1991-
1992 Department of Permits and inspections,
operating Budget re porchase of necessary weighing
equipment for the program; and, the total
appropriation be offset by $9,600 increase In
estimated revenues.
Voting: 11-0
Council Member$ Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, James W- Brazler, Jr., Robert W.
Clyburn, Vice Mayor Robert E. Fentress, Harold
Heischober Louis R. Jones, PaUl J. Lanteigne, Reba S.
McClanan, @ayor Meyera E. Oberndort, Nanry K. Parker
and William D. Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Absent:
None
1
2 AN ORDINANCE TO APPROPRIATE $9,600 IN ADDITIONAL REVENUE
3 FROM OVERWEIGHT VEHICLE FEES
4
5
6 WHEREAS, the City Council, desiring to implement a more aggressive truck
7 weighing program, set up this re @ noibility within the Department of Permits and
8 Inspection beginning in FY 1991-1992,
9
10 WHEREAS, this program waB begun with weighing equipment borrowed from the
11 Commonwealth of Virginia on a month to month babis, rendering the future of the
12 program dependent on continued loan of such equipment,
13
14 WHEREAS, the program has proven highly SUCCesBfUl in identifying and
15 assessing feeb on overweight vehicleb, producing realized revenues for the first
16 seven months of operation $19,754 in excess of anticipated revenue for that period,
17
18 WHEREAS, the program Btaff have Btrongly reconimended that a portion of this
19 excess be directed to purchase the necessary weighing equipment to ensure the
20 future of the program,
21
22 NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,
23 VIRGINIA, that $9,600 in additional realized revenue from overweight Vehicle Fees
24 be appropriated within the FY 1991-1992 Operating Budget for purchase of necessary
25 weighing equilxnent for the program, and that estimated revenue from overweight
26 Vehicle Fees be increased by $9,600.
27
28 This ordinance shall be effective from the date of its adoption.
29
30 Adopted by the council of the city of Virginia Beach, Virginia on the 25
31 day of March, 1992.
32
33
34
APPROVED c@
WALTER C. K@ER, JR.
OFFICE OF BUDGET AND EVALUATION
- 24 -
Item III-G.7.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM # 35451
Attorney Bill Cox, represented the applicant, and advised this closure will
make the property line face the street.
Lou Pace, 1908 Hunts Neck Court, Phone: 468-0925, requested information
concerning the value to the taxpayer.
Upon motion by Councilman Heischober, seconded by Councilman Sessoms, City
Council ADOPTED:
Ordinance appointing viewers in the petition of
Holloman-Brown Funeral Home, Bayside Chapel, Inc.,
for the closure of a portion of Princess Anne Road
near Nimmo Church (Princess Anne Borough).
The Viewers are:
David Grochmal Director of General Services
Robert J. Scott Director of Planning
Ralph Smith Director of Public Works
Voting: 10-0
Council Members Voting Aye:
John A. Baum, James W. Brazier, Jr., Robert W.
Clyburn, Vice Mayor Robert E. Fentress, Harold
Heischober, Paul J. Lanteigne, Reba S. McClanan, Mayor
Meyera E. Oberndorf, Nancy K. Parker and William D.
Sessoms, Jr.
Council Members Voting Nay:
None
Council Members Abstaining:
Louis R. Jones*
Council Members Absent:
None
*Councilman Jones ABSTAINED and DISCLOSED pursuant to Section 2.1-639.14(E) of
the Code of Virginia, he is President of Holloman-Brown Funeral Home, Bayside
Chapel, Inc., and receives an annual salary in excess of $10,000 from
Holloman-Brown Funeral Home, Bayside Chapel, Inc. Councilman Jones has an
ownership interest in the corporation which exceeds 3% of its total equity and
that assumes liability on behalf of the corporation which exceeds 3% of its
asset value. The City Attorney has advised this personal interest meets the
criteria of a personal interest in the transaction under the Conflict of
Interests Act. Councilman Jones's letter of March 23, 1992, is hereby made a
part of the record.
ORDINANCE APPOINTING VIEWERS
WHEREAS, HOLLOMON BROWN FUNERAL HOME, BAYSIDE CHAPEL,
INC., a Virginia Corporation, has given due and proper notice,
in accordance with the statutes for such cases made and provided
that it will on the 24th day of march, 1992, apply to the City
Council of the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, for the
appointment of Viewers to view the below-described property and
report in writing to the Council whether, in the opinion of said
Viewers, any, and if any, what inconvenience would result from
the discontinuance of the hereinafter described portion of that
certain street of variable width, and has filed such application
with the said Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ORDAINED by the Council of the
City of Virginia Beach, Virginia:
THAT RALPH SMITH, DAVID GROCHMAL and ROBERT SCOTT are
hereby appointed to view the below-described property and report
in writing to the Council, as soon as possible, whether in their
opinion, any, and if any, what inconvenience would result in the
discontinuing and vacating of a portion of that certain street
of variable width located in the City of Virginia Beach,
Virginia, and more particularly described as follows:
PRINCESS ANNE ROAD beginning at a point located
in the northern right of way line of Princess
Anne Road, said point being 439.97' east of
General Booth Boulevard; thence along a curve
to the left, having a radius of 885.001, a
delta of 02@ 131 13", an arc of 34.291, a
tangent distance of 17.151, a chord distance of
34.291 and a chord bearing of N 831 201 43" E
to a pin; thence along a curve to the left,
having a radius of 285.001, a delta of 191 291
43" , an arc of 96. 971 , a tangent distance of
48.961, a chord distance of 96.511 and a chord
bearing of N 72* 291 15" E to a pin; thence S
22- 21- 29- E, 30.10' (non-radial) to a point;
thence S 64* 22' 27" W, 0.771 to a point;
thence S 261 391 04" E, 33.031 to a point;
thence S 88* 04' 02" W, 43.08' to a point;
thence S 420 221 20" E, 12.351 (non-radial) to
a point in the northern right of way line of
Princess Anne Road; thence west along the
northern right of way line of Princess Anne
Road, along a curve to the right, having a
radius of 40.671, a delta of 161 271 51", an
arc of 11.691 and a tangent distance of 5.881
to a point; thence continuing along said right
of way, N 721 261 22" W, 110.59' to the point
of beginning; said parcel of land containing
4564 square feet or 0.105 acre, more or less.